Effect of Different Sensitization Events on HLA Alloimmunization in Kidney Transplantation Candidates

Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies among live related renal transplant recipients: A retrospective observational study from a tertiary healthcare Center in India

AIM

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies is crucial for pre-transplant histocompatibility testing, donor selection, and graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spectrum of anti-HLA antibodies among live related renal transplant recipients from one of the largest transplant centers in north India.

METHODS

In this study, retrospective data of transplant workup done in past four years were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 Version 9.2.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). All samples received for pre-transplant work-up if showed positive screening results underwent Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay. Antibodies identified on L-SAB were evaluated for their specificity and the strength of their mean florescence intensity (MFI).

RESULTS

A total of 1250 renal transplant samples were included for analysis. Out of these, 458 (36.64 %) samples were found positive in screening tests algorithm. All 458 samples were further analyzed for both class I and class II HLA antibodies by Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay. In this study, we observed that anti-A*24:01, anti-B*15:01 and anti-C*07*01 were the three most prevalent anti-HLA antibodies identified against HLA-class I antigens. However, anti-DRB1*11:01, anti-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*03:01 and anti-DPA1*02:01-DPB1*17:01 were the most common anti-HLA antibodies identified against HLA-class II antigen. Furthermore, our study found a significant association between anti-HLA class I antibody and the history of pregnancy. However, in re-transplant cases, we observed the presence of antibodies both against HLA class I and II antigens.

CONCLUSION

For a transplant center, it is of utmost importance to have comprehensive knowledge about the prevalence of HLA antibodies, their MFI, and their association with various sensitization events. This study may immensely help transplant communities in selecting appropriate prospective organ donors, planning desensitization regimes, managing recipients' care and predicting transplant outcomes in live related renal transplantation.

A retrospective observational study to estimate the risk of HLA alloimmunization with blood transfusion: Can the risk be reduced by leucodepletion?

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, our aim was to find the effect of leucodepleted (LD) blood transfusions on the formation of anti-HLA-antibodies when compared to non-leucodepleted (non-LD) transfusions using Luminex-based method.

METHODS

In this study, Luminex single antigen bead assay (L-SAB) and HLA typing were performed on 310 patients. Test positivity rates (as MFI - Mean florescence intensity) were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.

RESULTS

Of the 310 patients included in the study, 58.06% (180) patients were male and 41.93% (130) were female. The average age of the patients was 42.86 (±12.37) years. In this study, test positivity rates were significantly lower in the patients who received LD RBC units than in those who received non-LD RBC units (28.43% = 29 of 102 Vs 55.22% = 74 of 134, p < 0.05). In our study, transfusion combined with a history of pregnancy had higher number of significant HLA antibodies compared to cases where transfusion was the only sensitization event (81.81% = 18/22 Vs 39.71% = 85/214, p < 0.05). In addition, anti-HLA-antibodies-MFI were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in non-LD patients compared to LD patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received LD RBC units had a significantly lower rate of transfusion-associated alloimmunization compared to those who received non-LD RBC units. Multiparous women had a high risk for transfusion-related alloimmunization compared to both nulliparous women and male patient. Furthermore, class I-anti-HLA-antibodies (HLA-B and HLA-A + B) were significantly associated with pregnancy sensitization and/or blood transfusion as a single sensitization.

Complement Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies and the Survival of Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is one of the most important challenges in the context of renal transplantation, because the binding of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) to the kidney graft triggers the activation of the complement, which in turn leads to loss of transplant. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the association between complement-fixing dnDSA antibodies and graft loss as well as the possible association between non-complement-fixing antibodies and transplanted organ survival in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Our study included a cohort of 245 transplant patients over a 5-year period at Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (HUVN) in Granada, Spain.

RESULTS

dnDSA was observed in 26 patients. Of these patients, 17 had non-complement-fixing dnDSA and 9 had complement-fixing dnDSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a significant association between the frequency of rejection and renal graft loss and the presence of C1q-binding dnDSA. Our results show the importance of the individualization of dnDSA, classifying them according to their ability to activate the complement, and suggest that the detection of complement-binding capacity by dnDSA could be used as a prognostic marker to predict AMR outcome and graft survival in kidney transplant patients who develop dnDSA.

COVID-19 infection and vaccination rarely impact HLA antibody profile in waitlisted renal transplant Candidates- a multicenter cohort

Although rare, infection and vaccination can result in antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We analyzed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on HLA antibodies in waitlisted renal transplant candidates. Specificities were collected and adjudicated if the calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) changed after exposure. Of 409 patients, 285 (69.7 %) had an initial cPRA of 0 %, and 56 (13.7 %) had an initial cPRA > 80 %. The cPRA changed in 26 patients (6.4 %), 16 (3.9 %) increased, and 10 (2.4 %) decreased. Based on cPRA adjudication, cPRA differences generally resulted from a small number of specificities with subtle fluctuations around the borderline of the participating centers' cutoff for unacceptable antigen listing. All five COVID recovered patients with an increased cPRA were female (p = 0.02). In summary, exposure to this virus or vaccine does not increase HLA antibody specificities and their MFI in approximately 99 % of cases and 97 % of sensitized patients. These results have implications for virtual crossmatching at the time of organ offer after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, and these events of unclear clinical significance should not influence vaccination programs.

The detrimental effect of donor-specific antibodies is irrespective of its level in highly-immunized living donor kidney transplant recipients: A case-control series

Background

The impact of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in (highly-) immunized living donor kidney transplant recipients is reported differentially in various patient cohorts.

Methods

We have performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients in our center between 2010-2019. Recipients who underwent plasmafiltration for a positive CDC-crossmatch were excluded. For each DSA+ recipient (DSA+), one immunized recipient without DSA (pPRA+) and two non-immunized recipients (pPRA-) were included. Patient and graft survival were analyzed and a subgroup analysis of DSA+ recipients was performed.

Results

For 63 DSA+ recipients, 63 PRA+ and 126 PRA- recipients were included. 26 (41%) had class I, 24 (38%) class II and 13 (21%) combined HLA class I and II DSA. Death-censored graft survival was inferior in DSA+ recipients compared to pPRA+ (HR 2.38 [95% CI 1.00-5.70]) as well as to pPRA- (HR 3.91 [1.86-8.22]). In multivariate analysis, DSA remained of negative influence on death-censored graft survival. Flowcytometric crossmatch, MFI value, HLA class and origin of DSA were not of significant impact.

Conclusion

In our cohort of (highly-) immunized recipients, pretransplant DSA led to inferior death-censored graft survival. There were no "safe" DSA characteristics since only DSA per se impacted death-censored graft survival.

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BACKGROUND

Patients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.

METHODS

HLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) & Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.

RESULTS

In this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 86.95% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% & 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I & II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I & II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I & II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I & II MFI 5598.82, 5436.12; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I & II MFI 8580.12, 7556.08; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I & HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.

How to Deal With Kidney Retransplantation-Second, Third, Fourth, and Beyond

Kidney transplantation is the best health option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Ideally, a kidney transplant would last for the lifetime of each recipient. However, depending on the age of the recipient and details of the kidney transplant, there may be a need for a second, third, fourth, or even more kidney transplants. In this overview, the outcome of multiple kidney transplants for an individual is presented. Key issues include surgical approach and immunologic concerns. Included in the surgical approach is an analysis of transplant nephrectomy, with indications, timing, and immunologic impact. Allograft thrombosis, whether related to donor or recipient factors merits investigation to prevent it from happening again. Other posttransplant events such as rejection, viral illness (polyomavirus hominis type I), recurrent disease (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease may lead to the need for retransplantation. The pediatric recipient is especially likely to need a subsequent kidney transplant. Finally, noncompliance/nonadherence can affect both adults and children. Innovative approaches may reduce the need for retransplantation in the future.

Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Transplantation

Sex and gender often are used interchangeably, but are two distinct entities, with sex being the biological attribute and gender including the social, psychological, and cultural aspects of one's identity. Kidney transplantation has been proven to be the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease, improving both quality of life and life-expectancy for most patients. However, gender disparities in access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation remain despite the plethora of evidence showing the advantages of kidney transplantation to our patients. Data have shown that women are less likely to be waitlisted for a kidney transplant and to receive a deceased donor or a living donor kidney. On the other hand, women are more likely than men to become living kidney donors. Although some state the latter is the result of the female gender to nurture and care for loved ones, others believe this observation is because women often are incompatible with their spouse or child because pregnancy is a strong sensitizing event, which stems from the biological rather than the social differences between the sexes. Influence of sex and gender is not limited to access to kidney transplantation, but rather exist in other areas of transplant medicine, such as the difference observed in transplant outcomes between the sexes, variability in immunosuppression metabolism, and even in more contemporary areas such as recent data showing sex-based differences in outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease-2019, with males having an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and death.

Gender disparities in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transplantation is the life-saving therapy for patients suffering from end-organ failure, and as such, equitable access to transplantation (ATT) is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, gender/sex-based disparities exist, and despite the transplant community's awareness of this injustice, gender/sex-based disparities have persisted for more than two decades. Importantly, no legislation or allocation policy has addressed inequity in ATT that women disproportionately face. In fact, introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation system in 2002 widened the gender disparity gap and it continues to be in effect today. Moreover, women suffering from kidney disease are consistently less likely to be referred for transplant evaluation and subsequently less likely to achieve a kidney transplant, yet they comprise the majority of living kidney donors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acknowledging gender/sex-based disparities in ATT is the first step toward interventions aimed at mitigating this long-standing injustice in healthcare.

SUMMARY

This article provides a background of end-stage liver and kidney disease in women, summarizes the existing literature describing the issue of gender disparity in ATT, and identifies potential areas of intervention and future investigation.

Single antigen testing to reduce early antibody-mediated rejection risk in female recipients of a spousal donor kidney

Female recipients of a spousal donor kidney transplant are at greater risk of donor-specific pre-immunization, which may increase the risk of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). We assessed the incidence of early ABMR (within two weeks after transplantation), risk factors for ABMR and graft function in 352 complement-dependent cytotoxicity test-negative LURD transplant recipients, transplanted between 1997 and 2014 at the Leiden University Medical Center in The Netherlands. Risk factors for immunization were retrieved from the health records. As methods to screen for preformed donor-specific antibodies (pDSA) have developed through time, we retrospectively screened those with ABMR for pDSA using pooled-antigen bead (PAB) and single-antigen bead (SAB) assays. The cumulative incidence of rejection in the first six months after transplantation was 18% (TCMR 15%; early ABMR 3%). Early ABMR resulted in inferior graft survival and was more common in women who received a kidney from their spouse (10%) than in other women (2%) and men (<1%). The SAB assay retrospectively identified pDSA in seven of nine cases of early ABMR (78%), while the PAB detected pDSA in only three cases (33%). Seeing that early ABMR occurred in 10% of women who received a kidney from their spouse, a SAB assay should be included in the pre-transplant assessment of this group of women, regardless of the result of the PAB assay.

Characteristics and Sensitization Risk Factors in Kidney Transplant Wait List Candidates: Panel Reactive Antibodies Status Is Crucial for Successful Kidney Allocation Systems in Turkey

OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Because of the insufficient supply of donor organs for transplant, the number of patients on the transplant wait list is increasing. We analyzed demographic and clinical factors including sensitization status of patients on the kidney transplant wait list in our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients on the kidney transplant wait list at Ankara University School of Medicine by July 2018 were evaluated. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment characteristics, and immunologic properties were collected.

RESULTS

The study included 528 kidney transplant candidates whose mean time on the deceased donor organ wait list was 57 ± 47 months. Enlisted patients were aged 53 ± 13 years, and 95% of them were on dialysis. Dialysis vintage was longer and percentage of patients who had anti-HLA antibodies was higher in women than men (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively). Levels for median fluorescence intensity were higher in women compared with men (class I, P < .001; and class II, P = .011). Transfusion (P < .001), pregnancy (P = .001), transplant (P < .001), longer dialysis vintage (P = .021), and longer time on wait list (P = .001) were associated with anti-HLA antibody positivity. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a history of transplant and blood transfusion were independent risk factors of a positive panel reactive antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

In our kidney transplant candidates on the wait list, sensitization by transplant has a significant impact on development of anti-HLA antibodies. Updates of the organ allocation system to consider sensitized candidates and strategies to expand the deceased donor organ pool and donation rates are needed to increase the rate of deceased donor kidney transplant in Turkey.

Mitigating Racial and Sex Disparities in Access to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Impact of the Nation's Longest Single-center Kidney Chain

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we sought to assess likelihood of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) within a single-center kidney transplant waitlist, by race and sex, after implementation of an incompatible program.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Disparities in access to LDKT exist among minority women and may be partially explained by antigen sensitization secondary to prior pregnancies, transplants, or blood transfusions, creating difficulty finding compatible matches. To address these and other obstacles, an incompatible LDKT program, incorporating desensitization and kidney paired donation, was created at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed among our kidney transplant waitlist candidates (n = 8895). Multivariable Cox regression was utilized, comparing likelihood of LDKT before (era 1: 01/2007-01/2013) and after (era 2: 01/2013-11/2018) implementation of the incompatible program. Candidates were stratified by race [white vs minority (nonwhite)], sex, and breadth of sensitization.

RESULTS

Program implementation resulted in the nation's longest single-center kidney chain, and likelihood of LDKT increased by 70% for whites [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-1.99] and more than 100% for minorities (aHR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.60-2.62). Improvement in access to LDKT was greatest among sensitized minority women [calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 11%-49%: aHR 4.79; 95% CI, 2.27-10.11; cPRA 50%-100%: aHR 4.09; 95% CI, 1.89-8.82].

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an incompatible program, and the resulting nation's longest single-center kidney chain, mitigated disparities in access to LDKT among minorities, specifically sensitized women. Extrapolation of this success on a national level may further serve these vulnerable populations.

HLA in transplantation

The human major histocompatibility complex is a family of genes that encodes HLAs, which have a crucial role in defence against foreign pathogens and immune surveillance of tumours. In the context of transplantation, HLA molecules are polymorphic antigens that comprise an immunodominant alloreactive trigger for the immune response, resulting in rejection. Remarkable advances in knowledge and technology in the field of immunogenetics have considerably enhanced the safety of transplantation. However, access to transplantation among individuals who have become sensitized as a result of previous exposure to alloantigens is reduced proportional to the breadth of their sensitization. New approaches for crossing the HLA barrier in transplantation using plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and kidney paired donation have been made possible by the relative ease with which even low levels of anti-HLA antibodies can now be detected and tracked. The development of novel protocols for the induction of tolerance and new approaches to immunomodulation was also facilitated by advances in HLA technology. Here, we review the progress made in understanding HLAs that has enabled organ transplantation to become a life-saving endeavour that is accessible even for sensitized patients. We also discuss novel approaches to desensitization, immunomodulation and tolerance induction that have the potential to further improve transplantation access and outcomes.

Evaluation of Living Kidney Donor and Recipient Candidates: The Experience of Our Center

PURPOSE

We evaluated potential kidney living donors and recipients for donation in our transplant center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Candidates to be kidney living donors and kidney transplant recipients (KTxR) were retrospectively evaluated. All candidates were informed and assessed by transplant coordinator and nephrologists. All data were obtained from archive records.

RESULTS

The mean ages of 194 kidney living donors and 182 KTxR were 45.7 ± 13.1 and 37.7 ± 14.6 years, respectively. Percentages of female candidates were 55.2% and 34.1% among kidney living donors and KTxR respectively. The kidney living donor candidates were the patients' mothers (27.3%), spouses (24.2%), siblings (21.6%), fathers (12.4%), and sons or daughters (6.2%) of KTxRs and others (8.2%). The numbers of donors with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m² and > 35kg/m² were 56 (28.9%) and 17 (8.8%) respectively. Due to withdrawal from donation (21.2%) and renal problems (15.3%), 85/194 (43.8%) kidney living donors were excluded. Of the remaining 51/182 (28%) KTxR candidates, 26/182 (14.2%) were unsuitable because their panel-reactive antibody (PRA) > 20%. Sixty-six KTxR were performed in our center. Nine donor candidates were rejected due to obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m²).

CONCLUSION

Most of our kidney living donors were mothers, housewives, and uneducated persons. Due to high percentages of suitability among candidates of KTxRs and kidney living donors as 72% and 56% may be an advantage for living kidney donation. However, PRA positivity in the recipients drew attention as a major barrier. The high incidence of obesity among the donor candidates suggests that societies must be more sensitive about this issue.

Transfusion of leukoreduced blood products and risk of antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major barrier to the long-term function of renal allografts. White blood cells, which may be present in red blood cell (RBC) units, and platelets (PLTs) express HLA antigens that may increase the risk of AMR by inducing or increasing humoral sensitization to HLA.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of HLA-incompatible (HLAi) renal transplant recipients between 2004 and 2015 was conducted. Data on apheresis PLT and leukoreduced RBC transfusions within 4 weeks of transplantation, demographic information, and biopsy-proven AMR were collected from medical records and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Patients were evaluated until they showed evidence of AMR or until 1 year posttransplant, whichever came first. Multivariable analysis with Cox modeling was performed.

RESULTS

Of 244 individuals, 182 (74.6%) received RBCs and 20 (8.2%) of those also received PLTs. During the first year posttransplant, 97 (39.8%) had AMR. RBC-alone or RBC and PLT transfusions were not associated with increased risk of AMR after adjustment for panel-reactive antibody, years on dialysis, HLA antibody strength, and number of therapeutic plasma exchange treatments (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.59-1.69; and adjHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.28-1.68, respectively). For each 1-unit increase in RBC transfusions, there was no association with AMR (adjHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85-1.05). Only HLA antibody strength before transplantation was associated with AMR (adjHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.10-4.52; cytotoxic crossmatch compared to crossmatch negative but detectable donor-specific HLA antibodies).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive an HLAi transplant who are transfused with leukoreduced RBCs or PLTs in the peritransplant period are at no higher risk of AMR than nontransfused patients.

Inferior long-term allograft and patient outcomes among recipients of offspring living donor kidneys

While offspring-to-parent living donor kidney transplantations may represent an ideal donor-recipient combination to optimize long-term transplantation outcomes, the sex-specific long-term success of these transplantations remains unclear. We hypothesize that allograft and recipient survivals in offspring-to-parent living donor kidney transplantation differ between men and women due to donor-specific alloimmunization during pregnancy. We retrospectively analyzed long-term allograft and patient survival among men and women who received an offspring living donor kidney compared with those who received other haplotype-matched living donor kidneys. Based on multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 2001 to 2015, we found that both men and women who received offspring living donor kidneys had significantly increased mortality compared with recipients who received nonoffspring living donor kidneys. While male recipients of any living donor kidney had greater risk of mortality and allograft failure than female recipients, there was no significant difference in all-cause allograft failure or mortality in male versus female recipients of offspring living donor kidney transplantations. Our analysis demonstrated no significant interaction between recipient sex and donor offspring status. We conclude that nonoffspring living donors should be considered whenever feasible for both men and women with multiple donor options.

Detection of major histocompatibility complex molecules in processed allogeneic bone blocks for use in alveolar ridge reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Because processed allogenic bone blocks contain remnants of cells and other organic material, the present study examined the putative presence of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules in protein extracts derived from processed allogeneic bone blocks.

STUDY DESIGN

Protein content and the immunogenic potential of 3 different processed allografts (Osteograft, DIZG, Berlin, Germany; Caput femoris, DIZG, Berlin, Germany; Human Spongiosa, Charité Tissue Bank, Berlin, Germany) were assessed by protein extraction and analysis of the presence of MHC class 1 and 2 molecules prior to grafting. MHC concentration was measured by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Protein content in the allograft materials varied between 0.87 and 1.61 µg protein/mg. In the allograft Human Spongiosa, no MHC was detected, whereas in the allogeneic bone blocks Osteograft and Caput femoris MHC 1 (0.04-0.037 ng/mg graft material) and in Osteograft MHC class 2 molecules were detectable.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that despite thorough processing, a potential antigenicity of allografts is not eliminated. MHC molecules in allografts may sensitize the immune system.

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome

The consolidation of single antigen beads (SAB-panIgG) assay in the detection of preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has improved transplantation success. However, its high sensitivity has limited the allograft allocation for sensitized patients, increasing their waiting time. A modification of the standard SAB-panIgG assay allows the detection of that subset of antibodies capable of binding C1q (SAB-C1q assay). However, the clinical usefulness of SAB-C1q assay for determining the unacceptable mismatches is under discussion. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) according to the C1q-binding ability on allograft outcome, examining 389 single-kidney transplanted patients from deceased donors. Recipients with preformed C1q-binding DSA showed the lowest allograft survival up to 7 years (40.7%) compared to patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA (73.4%; p = 0.001) and without DSA (79.1%; p < 0.001). Allograft survival rate was similar between patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA and patients without preformed DSA (p = 0.403). Interestingly, among the high-mean fluorescence intensity DSA (≥10,000) population (n = 46), those patients whose DSA were further capable of binding C1q showed a poorer allograft outcome (38.4 vs. 68.9%; p = 0.041). Moreover, in our multivariate predictive model for assessing the risk of allograft loss, the presence of C1q-binding DSA (HR 4.012; CI 95% 2.326–6.919; p < 0.001) but not of non-C1q-binding DSA (HR 1.389; CI 95% 0.784–2.461; p = 0.260) remained an independent predictor after stratifying the DSA population according to the C1q-binding ability and adjusting the model for other pre-transplantation predictive factors including donor age, cold-ischemia time, and HLA-DR mismatches. In conclusion, the unacceptable mismatch definition according to the SAB-C1q assay would improve the risk stratification of allograft loss and increase the limited allograft allocation of highly sensitized patients, shortening their waiting time.

Genetic predictors of long-term graft function in kidney and pancreas transplant patients

Kidney and pancreas transplantation have helped transform the lives of people with end-stage renal failure and individuals with type 1 diabetes who have poor glycaemic control/severe secondary complications, respectively. Despite an improvement in immunosuppressive regimes, operative techniques and decreased initial rejection rates, there has been little improvement in long-term graft survival rates over the past decade. Whilst limited progress has been made in establishing clinical markers of graft function, several genetic markers of long-term graft function have been identified. These genetic markers have the potential to (i) assist in selecting marginal donor organs for transplantation, (ii) provide better understanding of the mechanisms behind graft loss enabling identification of new, or repurposing, current treatments to extend graft function and (iii) provide a window of opportunity to identify and treat individuals before graft failure has occurred. This review will discuss the different genetic variants screened for a role in predicting transplant longevity, examine their findings and limitations and introduce where the future of genetic research within the transplantation field lies.

Effect of Single Sensitization Event on Human Leukocyte Antigen Alloimmunization in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Human leukocyte antigen alloimmunization is caused by exposure to HLA antigens through transfusion, pregnancy, or transplant. Our study objective was to present the rate of positivity of anti-HLA antibody considering the effects of a single sensitization event in kidney transplant candidates at our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study reviewed 606 kidney transplant candidates. Patient sera were analyzed using Luminex xMAP technology. Panel reactive antibody positivity rates and antibody strengths in patients were analyzed according to a single sensitization event.

RESULTS

Our findings showed 246 patients (40.6%) with a panel reactive antibody > 0, of which 97 (39.4%) were sensitized from a single event, 119 (48.4%) were sensitized by multiple events, and 30 (12.2%) had no known sensitizing event. Considering patients sensitized by a single event with a panel reactive antibody > 0, we found that 25.8% had received transplant only, 49.5% had previous pregnancy only, and 24.7% had received transfusion only. The strength of antibodies was significantly higher in patients with previous transplant procedures than in those with transfusion for HLA-A (P < .01), HLA-B (P < .05), HLA-C (P < .05), HLA-DR (P < .001), HLA-DQ (P < .05), and HLA-DP (P < .05). Similarly, we observed significantly higher median fluorescence intensity values for HLA-A, -DR, -DQ, and -DP loci in patients with a previous transplant procedure versus pregnancy. The strength of antibodies against HLA-DR was significantly higher in patients with a previous pregnancy compared with those with transfusion (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents the profile of HLA alloimmunization in kidney transplant candidates. In particular, transplant procedures appear to have a greater immunologic impact, followed by pregnancy and transfusion. Our data confirm and are in accordance with those of several studies in which the sensitization events were associated with higher prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies.

Peritransplant Soluble CD30 as a Risk Factor for Slow Kidney Allograft Function, Early Acute Rejection, Worse Long-Term Allograft Function, and Patients' Survival

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine whether serum soluble CD30 (sCD30) could identify recipients at high risk for unfavorable early and late kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Serum sCD30 was measured on the day of kidney transplantation and on the 4th day posttransplant. We assessed the value of these measurements in predicting delayed graft function, slow graft function (SGF), acute rejection (AR), pyelonephritis, decline of allograft function after 6 months, and graft and patient survival during 5 years of follow-up in 45 recipients.

RESULTS

We found the association between low pretransplant serum levels of sCD30 and SGF. The absence of significant decrease of sCD30 on the 4th day posttransplant was characteristic for SGF, early AR (the 8th day-6 months), late AR (>6 months), and early pyelonephritis (the 8th day-2 months). Lower pretransplant and posttransplant sCD30 predicted worse allograft function at 6 months and 2 years, respectively. Higher pretransplant sCD30 was associated with higher frequency of early AR, and worse patients' survival, but only in the recipients of deceased-donor graft. Pretransplant sCD30 also allowed to differentiate patients with early pyelonephritis and early AR.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritransplant sCD30 is useful in identifying patients at risk for unfavorable early and late transplant outcomes.

Association Between HLA Antibodies and Different Sensitization Events in Renal Transplant Candidates

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allo-immunization is caused by various events such as blood transfusions, pregnancies, or organ transplantations, which can lead to sensitization. In this retrospective study, we evaluated different sensitization models and their effects on panel-reactive antibody (PRA) profiles of renal transplantation candidates.

METHODS

Anti-HLA class I/II antibody screening tests were performed in 906 renal transplantation candidates with the use of a microbead-based assay (Luminex).

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-seven (32.8%) of the patients were determined as positive in terms of PRA, and 609 (67.2%) were negative. Sensitized and non-sensitized patients were compared separately in terms of each sensitization type. The anti-HLA class I, II, and I+II positivity rates in patients sensitized only by blood transfusion were 13.1%, 6.3%, and 14.1%, the rates with pregnancy sensitization were 35.5%, 29%, and 45.2%, and rates with previous transplantation sensitization were 15.6%, 34.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. Prevalence of PRA positivity was significantly higher in patients with previous pregnancy than with transplantation and transfusion (odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 0.441-2.281; P = .031). The risk of developing HLA class I antibodies was higher in pregnancies (P < .001), and the risk of developing anti-HLA class II antibodies was higher in patients who had undergone a previous transplantation (P < .001). The rate of developing HLA-B antibodies in patients sensitized by pregnancy were significantly higher compared with sensitization after transfusion (P = .015), as was the rate of developing HLA-DQ antibodies in patients sensitized by previous transplantation compared with sensitization through pregnancy (P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who are waiting for kidney transplantation, sensitization by pregnancy and transplantation have a significant impact on development of HLA class I and class II antibodies.

Pregnancy-Induced Sensitization Promotes Sex Disparity in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

The presence of sex disparity in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) remains controversial. To determine if women fall behind men in LDKT evaluation, we performed an intention to treat study of 2587 candidates listed for kidney transplant at a single transplant center over 7 years. We found that women and men kidney transplant candidates engaged an equivalent type and number of prospective living donors. However, sex-specific differences in sensitization history and histocompatibility reduced the rate of LDKT for women by 30%. Pregnancy-induced incompatibility with spouse donors was limiting given that spouses were among the individuals most likely to complete donation. Notably, participation in a kidney paired exchange program eliminated sex-based differences in LDKT. Collectively, these data suggest that pregnancy is a formidable biologic barrier for women and contributes uniquely to sex disparity in LDKT. Targeted efforts to improve transplant center participation in paired kidney exchanges may increase sex equity in LDKT.

Impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies against HLA class I on kidney graft outcomes: Comparative analysis of exclusively anti-Cw vs anti-A and/or -B antibodies

AIM

To analyze the clinical impact of preformed antiHLA-Cw vs antiHLA-A and/or -B donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective study, comparing 12 patients transplanted with DSA exclusively antiHLA-Cw with 23 patients with preformed DSA antiHLA-A and/or B.

RESULTS

One year after transplantation there were no differences in terms of acute rejection between the two groups (3 and 6 cases, respectively in the DSA-Cw and the DSA-A-B groups; P = 1). At one year, eGFR was not significantly different between groups (median 59 mL/min in DSA-Cw group, compared to median 51 mL/min in DSA-A-B group, P = 0.192). Moreover, kidney graft survival was similar between groups at 5-years (100% in DSA-Cw group vs 91% in DSA-A-B group, P = 0.528). The sole independent predictor of antibody mediated rejection (AMR) incidence was DSA strength (HR = 1.07 per 1000 increase in MFI, P = 0.034). AMR was associated with shortened graft survival at 5-years, with 75% and 100% grafts surviving in patients with or without AMR, respectively (Log-rank P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that DSA-Cw are associated with an identical risk of AMR and impact on graft function in comparison with “classical” class I DSA.

HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation - A Balancing Act

HLA matching provides numerous benefits in organ transplantation including better graft function, fewer rejection episodes, longer graft survival, and the possibility of reduced immunosuppression. Mismatches are attended by more frequent rejection episodes that require increased immunosuppression that, in turn, can increase the risk of infection and malignancy. HLA mismatches also incur the risk of sensitization, which can reduce the opportunity and increase waiting time for a subsequent transplant. However, other factors such as donor age, donor type, and immunosuppression protocol, can affect the benefit derived from matching. Furthermore, finding a well-matched donor may not be possible for all patients and usually prolongs waiting time. Strategies to optimize transplantation for patients without a well-matched donor should take into account the immunologic barrier represented by different mismatches: what are the least immunogenic mismatches considering the patient’s HLA phenotype; should repeated mismatches be avoided; is the patient sensitized to HLA and, if so, what are the strengths of the patient’s antibodies? This information can then be used to define the HLA type of an immunologically optimal donor and the probability of such a donor occurring. A probability that is considered to be too low may require expanding the donor population through paired donation or modifying what is acceptable, which may require employing treatment to overcome immunologic barriers such as increased immunosuppression or desensitization. Thus, transplantation must strike a balance between the risk associated with waiting for the optimal donor and the risk associated with a less than optimal donor.