Immune status assessment in adult lung transplant candidates

Differences in toll-like receptor ligand-induced cytokine concentrations before and after solid organ transplantation: A prospective, observational cohort study in a clinical setting

Reliable methods to assess immune function after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are needed to guide dosing of immunosuppression. We hypothesized that toll-like receptor ligand-induced cytokine concentrations would decrease post-transplantation due to the use of immunosuppressive medication. Furthermore, we hypothesized that induced cytokine concentrations pre-transplantation would be higher in recipients with episodes of acute rejection post-transplantation due to underlying immunological dispositions. We aimed to investigate toll-like receptor ligand-induced cytokine concentrations by TruCulture©, a standardized immunoassay, in SOT recipients before and 3 months after SOT and explored associations with methylprednisolone-treated acute rejections. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study including 123 participants (67 liver, 32 kidney and 24 lung transplant recipients). Whole blood was stimulated for 22 h with: (A) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), (B) Resiquimod, (C) Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C) and (D) a blank control. Cytokine concentrations (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-17A, IFN-α and IFN-γ) were measured by Luminex. 30 participants developed methylprednisolone-treated acute rejection at a median of 9 days (IQR 5-17) post-SOT. We found that all induced cytokine concentrations decreased post-SOT except from LPS-induced and Poly I:C-induced IL-10. The induced cytokine concentration pre-transplantation did not differ in recipients with or without acute rejection. In conclusion, the induced cytokine concentrations decreased for all stimuli post-SOT, except the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Importantly, recipients developing early acute rejection did not differ in induced cytokine concentrations pre-SOT. Thus, the use of a standardized assay in SOT is feasible in a clinical setting and may provide important information on the immune function post-SOT.

Vaccination and their importance for lung transplant recipients in a COVID-19 world

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplant patients are immunocompromised because of the medication they receive to prevent rejection, and as a consequence are susceptible to (respiratory) infections. Adequate vaccination strategies, including COVID-19 vaccination, are therefore needed to minimize infection risks.

AREAS COVERED

The international vaccination guidelines for lung transplant patients are reviewed, including the data on immunogenicity and effectivity of the vaccines. The impact on response to vaccination of the various categories of immunosuppressive drugs, used in the posttransplant period, on response to vaccination is described. A number of immunosuppressive and/or anti-inflammatory drugs also is used for controlling the immunopathology of severe COVID-19. Current available COVID-19 vaccines, both mRNA or adenovirus based are recommended for lung transplant patients.

EXPERT OPINION

In order to improve survival and quality of life, infections of lung transplant patients should be prevented by vaccination. When possible, vaccination should start already during the pre-transplantation period when the patient is on the waiting list. Booster vaccinations should be given post-transplantation, but only when immunosuppression has been tapered. Vaccine design based on mRNA technology could allow the design of an array of vaccines against other respiratory viruses, offering a better protection for lung transplant patients.

Pneumococcal immunity and PCV13 vaccine response in SOT-candidates and recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) candidates and recipients are highly vulnerable to invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD). Data on which to base optimal immunization recommendations for this population is scant. The national distribution of IPD serotypes led the Swiss Health Authorities to recommend in 2014 one dose of pneumococcal-13-valent-conjugate-vaccine (PCV13), without any subsequent dose of the 23-valent-polysaccharide-pneumococcal-vaccine (PPV23).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of pneumococcal immunity using a multiplex binding assay, to assess seroprotection rates against a selection of seven PCV13- and seven PPV23-serotypes in SOT-candidates and recipients evaluated and/or transplanted in 2014/2015 in the University Hospitals of Geneva. Seroprotection was defined as serotype-specific antibody concentration greater than 0.5 mg/l and overall seroprotection when this was achieved for ≥ 6/7 serotypes.

RESULTS

Pre-vaccination and at time of transplant sera were available for 35/43 (81%), and 43/43 (100%) SOT-candidates respectively. At listing, 17/35 (49%) SOT-candidates were seroprotected against PCV13 and 21/35 (60%) against PPV23 serotypes. Following one systematic dose of PCV13 at listing, 35/43 (81%) SOT-recipients were seroprotected at day of transplant against PCV13-serotypes and 34/43 (79%) against PPV23 serotypes, compared to 21/41 (51%) and 28/41 (68%) respectively in the controls transplanted in 2013, before the systematic PCV13-vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic vaccination with PCV13 of all SOT candidates without additional PPV23 is a good strategy as it confers seroprotection against a wide range of pneumococcal serotypes. Indeed, one of five PCV13-vaccinated SOT-candidates was nevertheless not seroprotected at time of transplant, reflecting their partial immune competence, and indicating the need for additional dose of pneumococcal vaccines before transplant.

Serologic screening and infectious diseases consultation in renal transplant candidates for measles, mumps, rubella and varicella

Background. Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk for developing complications of vaccine-preventable diseases. They benefit from a comprehensive pre-transplant evaluation when they might safely receive live vaccines. The primary aim of our study was to investigate the number of renal transplant recipients who were evaluated for serologic status against measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), and varicella. Secondarily, we investigated if pre-transplant Infectious Diseases consultation (IDC) improved vaccination rates.Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 282 kidney-alone and kidney-plus adult transplant recipients who were born in or after 1957. Patients were evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Florida Transplant Center between January 2015 and December 2017. Serologic status evaluation and vaccination rates were compared in two groups created based on IDC and no ID consultation (NIDC).Results. 235 (83%) of a total 282 patients received an IDC pre-transplantation. Varicella IgG levels were screened in all 235 IDC candidates. Among the IDC patients, mumps, measles and rubella IgG serologies were performed in 7 (3%), 143 (61%) and 144 (61%), respectively. Among 44 patients seronegative for any of MMR, 24 (55%) were vaccinated. Ten (66%) of 15 varicella seronegative patients were vaccinated. Zostavax was not given to 18% of IDC patients. Zostavax and MMR were administered more frequently in the IDC group compared to NIDC (p < .001 and p = 0.0016, respectively).Conclusion. Although the majority of patients had IDC, the screening rate for MMR serologies was lower than varicella. A protocol-driven serologic screening similar to the one for VZV is required for MMR. Pre-transplant IDC increases vaccination rates.

The Role of Systems Vaccinology in Understanding the Immune Defects to Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk for many infections, whether viral, bacterial, or fungal, due to immunosuppressive therapy to prevent organ rejection. The same immune defects that render transplanted patients susceptible to infection dampen their immune response to vaccination. Therefore, it is vital to identify immune defects to vaccination in transplant recipients and methods to obviate them. These methods can include alternative vaccine composition, dosage, adjuvants, route of administration, timing, and re-vaccination strategies. Systems biology is a relatively new field of study, which utilizes high throughput means to better understand biological systems and predict outcomes. Systems biology approaches have been used to help obtain a global picture of immune responses to infections and vaccination (i.e. systems vaccinology), but little work has been done to use systems biology to improve vaccine efficacy in immunocompromised patients, particularly SOTRs, thus far. Systems vaccinology approaches may hold key insights to vaccination in this vulnerable population.

Pneumococcal vaccination in lung transplant patients

Introduction: This review analyzes the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccinations in lung transplant patients before and after transplantation.Areas covered: This review addresses the risk for respiratory infections, in particular pneumococcal infections, in lung transplantation patients in the context of immunodeficiency and immunosuppressive medication. Vaccination is recommended to counteract the increased risk of pneumococcal infection, and the relevant guidelines are discussed in this review. The design of specific vaccination schedules is required because of the impaired antibody response in specific patient categories.Expert opinion: Lung transplantation candidates should be vaccinated with pneumococcal vaccines prior to transplantation. Currently, the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine offers the broadest coverage, but the antibody response should be monitored. New generation pneumococcal conjugate vaccines with equally broad serotype coverage could be used in the future. During the post-transplantation period, the immune status of the patients should be monitored regularly, and vaccination should be repeated when indicated.

Serologic screening and infectious disease consultation (IDC): Indicated in heart, lung, liver (HLL) solid organ transplants (SOT) for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are a special group of patients who require comprehensive evaluation for preventable infectious diseases before transplantation. The main aim of our study was to investigate the number of heart, lung, and liver (HLL) transplant recipients who were evaluated for their immune status against measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), and varicella (VZV). As a secondary aim, we investigated whether pre-transplant infectious disease consultation (IDC) improves vaccination rates.

METHODS

This study was an institution-based retrospective analysis of HLL transplant recipients born in or after 1957 and evaluated at Mayo Clinic, FL Transplant Center between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2017. Data collection was obtained from electronic medical records. The vaccination rates were compared by univariate analysis based on IDC and no ID consultation (NIDC).

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven (77%) of a total 242 patients received an IDC pre-transplantation. Varicella IgG levels were screened in all 187 IDC candidates. Among the 187 IDC patients, mumps, measles, and rubella IgG serologies were performed in 9 (5%), 21 (11%), and 51 (27%), respectively. Among all 242 patients, vaccines given included 2 (0.8%) MMR, 10 (4.1%) varicella and 85 (35.12%) Zostavax. Univariate analysis revealed that Zostavax was given to 76 (40.6%) pre-transplant IDC patients and only in 9 (16.7%) NIDC patients (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relatively high IDC rate, patients' screened numbers for MMR IgG levels were low. Results pointed out the need for MMR protocol-driven serologic screening as well as for VZV and IDC prior to transplantation to increase vaccination rates.

Usefulness of a systematic approach at listing for vaccine prevention in solid organ transplant candidates

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates may not be immune against potentially vaccine-preventable diseases because of insufficient immunizations and/or limited vaccine responses. We evaluated the impact on vaccine immunity at transplant of a systematic vaccinology workup at listing that included (1) pneumococcal with and without influenza immunization, (2) serology-based vaccine recommendations against measles, varicella, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis A virus, and tetanus, and (3) the documentation of vaccines and serology tests in a national electronic immunization registry (www.myvaccines.ch). Among 219 SOT candidates assessed between January 2014 and November 2015, 54 patients were transplanted during the study. Between listing and transplant, catch-up immunizations increased the patients' immunity from 70% to 87% (hepatitis A virus, P = .008), from 22% to 41% (hepatitis B virus, P = .008), from 77% to 91% (tetanus, P = .03), and from 78% to 98% (Streptococcus pneumoniae, P = .002). Their immunity at transplant was significantly higher against S. pneumoniae (P = .006) and slightly higher against hepatitis A virus (P = .07), but not against hepatitis B virus, than that of 65 SOT recipients transplanted in 2013. This demonstrates the value of a systematic multimodal serology-based approach of immunizations of SOT candidates at listing and the need for optimized strategies to increase their hepatitis B virus vaccine responses.

Long-term Follow-up of Humoral Immune Status in Adult Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients have an increased risk for infections in the posttransplant period due to immunosuppressive therapy. Protection against infections can be achieved through vaccination, but the optimal vaccination schedule in lung transplant recipients is unknown. Data on long-term immunological follow up and vaccination responses after lung transplantation are scarce.

METHODS

Here we present long-term immunological follow up of a cohort of 55 lung transplant recipients. This includes detailed antibody responses after 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (23vPPV).

RESULTS

All patients were vaccinated with 23vPPV before transplantation. Median follow-up after transplantation was 6.6 years (379 patient-years). After transplantation, there is a significant decrease of all immunoglobulins, IgG subclasses and pneumococcal polysaccharide antibodies. After the first year posttransplantation, there is a gradual increase of all immunoglobulins and IgG subclasses, but values were always significantly lower than in the pretransplant period. After a median of 4.4 years posttransplantation, patients were revaccinated with 23vPPV. The pneumococcal polysaccharide antibody response was impaired in 87% of patients (ie, antibody titer above cutoff and twofold increase between pre and postvaccination values for <70% of serotypes).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that impairment of humoral immunity was most outspoken in the first year after lung transplantation. Immunoglobulin levels remain decreased several years after transplantation and the response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was significantly lower posttransplantation compared to the pretransplantation response. However, most patients did show a partial response to vaccination. Based on our results, revaccination with pneumococcal vaccines after transplantation should be considered 1 year after transplantation.