Perspectives and experiences of kidney transplant recipients with graft failure: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Supportive care in transplantation: A patient-centered care model to better support kidney transplant candidates and recipients

Kidney transplantation (KT), although the best treatment option for eligible patients, entails maintaining and adhering to a life-long treatment regimen of medications, lifestyle changes, self-care, and appointments. Many patients experience uncertain outcome trajectories increasing their vulnerability and symptom burden and generating complex care needs. Even when transplants are successful, for some patients the adjustment to life post-transplant can be challenging and psychological difficulties, economic challenges and social isolation have been reported. About 50% of patients lose their transplant within 10 years and must return to dialysis or pursue another transplant or conservative care. This paper documents the complicated journey patients undertake before and after KT and outlines some initiatives aimed at improving patient-centered care in transplantation. A more cohesive approach to care that borrows its philosophical approach from the established field of supportive oncology may improve patient experiences and outcomes. We propose the "supportive care in transplantation" care model to operationalize a patient-centered approach in transplantation. This model can build on other ongoing initiatives of other scholars and researchers and can help advance patient-centered care through the entire care continuum of kidney transplant recipients and candidates. Multi-dimensionality, multi-disciplinarity and evidence-based approaches are proposed as other key tenets of this care model. We conclude by proposing the potential advantages of this approach to patients and healthcare systems.

Preferences in treating polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: A discrete choice experiment with patients, caregivers, and clinicians

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in kidney transplant recipients are heterogeneous among clinicians. We aimed to identify the treatment preferences of key stakeholders for BKPyV infection and measure the trade-offs between treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Adult kidney transplant recipients, caregivers, and clinicians were eligible to participate in a discrete choice experiment between February 2021 and June 2022. The five treatment-related attributes were achieving viral clearance and optimal graft function, as well as reducing the risk of graft loss, acute rejection, and complications. Results were analyzed using multinomial logistic models.

RESULTS

In total, 109 participants (57 kidney transplant recipients, 10 caregivers, and 42 health professionals) were included. The most important attribute was the risk of graft loss, followed by side effects and acute rejection. As the risk of graft loss increased, all participants were less inclined to accept an assigned treatment strategy. For instance, if graft loss risk was increased from 1% to 50%, the probability of uptake of a treatment strategy for BKPyV infection was reduced from 87% to 3%.

CONCLUSION

Graft loss is the predominant concern for patients, caregivers, and health professionals when deciding on the treatment for BKPyV infection, and should be included in intervention trials of BKPyV infection.

Outcomes of kidney replacement therapies after kidney transplant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Following kidney transplant failure, patients generally have three kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options: peritoneal dialysis (PD), haemodialysis (HD), or pre-emptive kidney re-transplantation. This review aims to explore KRT options after kidney transplant failure and compare clinical outcomes.

METHOD

This review included studies from five databases: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO [CRD42024514346]. Causes of kidney transplant failure were explored. Survival and re-transplantation rates among three groups after kidney transplant failure were compared: patients starting PD (TX-PD group), patients starting HD (TX-HD group), and patients re-transplanted without bridging dialysis (TX-TX group). Causes of death were also explored. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the CASP checklist and the meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Of 6405 articles, eight articles were included in the systematic review. Chronic damage was identified as the primary cause of kidney transplant failure. The TX-TX group had a lower mortality rate than the TX-HD group and TX-PD group, though this difference was only statistically significant in comparison to the TX-HD group (OR: 2.57; 95 % CI:1.58, 4.17; I2 = 79 %; P = 0.0001). Additionally, the TX-PD group had a significantly lower mortality rate (OR: 0.83; 95 % CI:0.76, 0.90; I2 = 88 %; P < 0.0001) and higher re-transplantation rate (OR: 1.56; 95 % CI:1.41, 1.73; I2 = 0 %; P < 0.00001) compared to the TX-HD group. Cardiovascular disease, infection, and cancer were the leading causes of death.

CONCLUSION

The TX-TX group had better survival than the TX-HD group. Survival and re-transplantation rates were higher in the TX-PD group than the TX-HD group. However, age and comorbidities may impact survival and re-transplantation rates between the TX-PD and TX-HD groups, which should be explored further.

Losing Much More Than a Transplant: A Qualitative Study of Kidney Transplant Recipients' Experiences of Graft Failure

Introduction

Kidney transplant recipients with graft failure are a growing cohort of patients who experience high morbidity and mortality. Limited evidence guides their care delivery and patient perspective to improve care processes is lacking. We conducted an in-depth exploration of how individuals experience graft failure, and the specific research question was: "What impact does the loss of an allograft have on their lives?"

Methods

We adopted an interpretive descriptive methodological design. Semistructured in-depth narrative interviews were conducted with adult recipients who had a history of ≥1 graft failure. Data were collected until data saturation was achieved and analyzed using an inductive and thematic approach.

Results

Our study included 23 participants from 6 provinces of Canada. The majority were on dialysis and not waitlisted for retransplantation (60.9%). Our thematic analysis identified that the lives of participants were impacted by a range of tangible and experiential losses that go beyond the loss of the transplant itself. The themes identified include loss of control, loss of coherence, loss of certainty, loss of hope, loss of quality of life, and loss of the transplant team. Although many perceived that graft failure was inevitable, the majority were unprepared. The confusion about eligibility for retransplantation appears to contribute to these experiences.

Conclusion

Individuals with graft failure experience complex mental and emotional challenges which may contribute to poor outcomes. The number of patients with graft failure globally is increasing and our findings can help guide practices aimed at supporting and guiding them toward self-management and adaptive coping.

An Environmental Scan of Canadian Kidney Transplant Programs for the Management of Patients With Graft Failure: A Research Letter

Background

Kidney transplant recipients with graft failure (KTR-GF) and those with a failing graft are an increasingly prevalent group of patients. Their clinical management is complex, and outcomes are worse than transplant naïve patients on dialysis. In 2023, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organization reported findings from a controversies conference and identified several clinical practice priorities for KTR-GF.

Objective

As an exercise in needs assessment, we aimed to collate and summarize current practices in adult Canadian kidney transplant programs around these KDIGO-identified clinical practice priorities.

Design

Environmental scan followed by content analysis.

Setting

Canadian adult kidney transplant programs.

Measurements

We categorized the themes of our content analysis around 7 clinical practice priorities: (1) determining prognosis and kidney failure trajectory; (2) immunosuppression management; (3) management of medical complications; (4) preparing for return to dialysis; (5) evaluation and listing for re-transplantation; (6) management of psychological effects; and (7) transition to supportive care.

Methods

We solicited documents that identified each program's current care practices for KTR-GF or patients with a failing graft, including policies, procedures, pathways, and protocols. A content analysis of documents and informal correspondence (email or telephone conversations) was done to extract information surrounding the 7 practice priorities.

Results

Of the 18 programs contacted, 12 transplant programs participated in this study and a document from a provincial organization (where 2 non-responding programs are located) was procured and included in this analysis. Overall, practice gaps and discrepancies were noted. Many participants highlighted the lack of evidence or consensus to guide the management of KTR-GF as the key reason. Immunosuppression management was the most frequently addressed priority. Six programs and the provincial document recommended a nuanced approach to immunosuppressant management based on clinical factors and re-transplant candidacy. Two programs used the Kidney Failure Risk Equation and eGFR to determine referral trajectories and prepare patients for return to dialysis. Exact processes outlining medical management during the transition were not found except for nephrectomy indications and in 1 program that has a specific transition clinic for KTR-GF. All programs have a formal or informal policy that KTR-GF should be assessed for re-transplantation. Referrals for psychological support and transition to supportive care were made on a case-by-case basis.

Limitations

Our environmental scan was at risk of non-response bias and restricted to transplant programs. Kidney clinics and dialysis units may have relevant policies and procedures that were not examined.

Conclusion

The findings from our environmental scan suggest gaps in care and potential areas for quality improvement, including a lack of multidisciplinary care, structured dialysis preparation and psychological support. There is also a need to prioritize research that generates evidence to guide the management of KTR-GF and contributes to the aim of developing clinical practice guidelines.

Pretransplant Malnutrition, Particularly With Muscle Depletion Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Kidney transplant centers lack consistent diagnostic malnutrition tools. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society of Parenteral Nutrition Adult Malnutrition Criteria (AMC) is the widely accepted and utilized tool by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs) to diagnose malnutrition.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of prekidney transplant malnutrition based on Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society of Parenteral Nutrition AMC, as well as the individual components of the AMC, on posttransplant outcomes including length of stay, delayed graft function (DGF), early readmission, cardiovascular events, acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and death. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association of malnutrition or its components with outcomes of interest.

Results

A total of 367 recipients were included, of whom 36 (10%) were malnourished (23 moderately and 13 severely) at pretransplant evaluation. In adjusted models, pretransplant malnutrition was significantly associated with increased risk for early readmission (adjusted odds ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-7.21; P = 0.03) and with DGF (adjusted odds ratio 8.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-64.6; P = 0.04). Muscle depletion was also associated with an increased risk for readmission and with DGF. Fat depletion and reduced functionality in the adjusted model were only associated with increased risk for readmission.

Conclusions

Malnutrition could be an important consideration for selecting kidney transplant recipients because it was associated with poor clinical outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach with the involvement of RDNs to outline a nutrition intervention plan may help mitigate some of the poor outcomes.

Age Disparities in Access to First and Repeat Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that older patients are less frequently placed on the waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) than their younger counterparts. The trends and magnitude of this age disparity in access to first KT and repeat KT (re-KT) remain unclear.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System, we identified 2 496 743 adult transplant-naive dialysis patients and 110 338 adult recipients with graft failure between 1995 and 2018. We characterized the secular trends of age disparities and used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the chances of listing and receiving first KT versus re-KT by age (18-64 y versus ≥65 y).

RESULTS

Older transplant-naive dialysis patients were less likely to be listed (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.18) and receive first KT (aHR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.89) compared with their younger counterparts. Additionally, older patients with graft failure had a lower chance of being listed (aHR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41) and receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81). The magnitude of the age disparity in being listed for first KT was greater than that for re-KT ( Pinteraction  < 0.001), and there were no differences in the age disparities in receiving first KT or re-KT ( Pinteraction  = 0.13). Between 1995 and 2018, the age disparity in listing for first KT reduced significantly ( P  < 0.001), but the age disparities in re-KT remained the same ( P  = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Age disparities exist in access to both first KT and re-KT; however, some of this disparity is attenuated among older adults with graft failure. As the proportion of older patients with graft failure rises, a better understanding of factors that preclude their candidacy and identification of appropriate older patients are needed.

The Heterogeneity of Symptom Burden and Fear of Progression Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Latent Class Analysis

Purpose

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may experience symptoms that increase their fear of progression (FoP), but a dearth of research examines the issue from a patient-centered perspective. Our study aimed to first determine the category of symptom burden, then to explore the differences in characteristics of patients in different subgroups, and finally to analyze the impact of symptom subgroup on FoP.

Patients and Methods

Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics, Symptom Experience Scale, and Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form were used. Latent class analysis was used to group KTRs according to the occurrence of symptoms. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyze the predictors of different subgroups. The differences in FoP among symptom burden subgroups were analyzed by hierarchical multiple regression.

Results

Three subgroups were identified, designated all-high (20.5%), moderate (39.9%), and all-low (39.6%) according to their symptom occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression showed that gender, post-transplant time, per capita monthly income, and hyperuricemia were the factors that distinguished and predicted the all-high subgroup (P < 0.05). Hierarchical multiple regression showed that symptom burden had a significant effect on FoP (class1 vs class3: β = 0.327, P < 0.001; class2 vs class3: β = 0.104, P = 0.046), explaining the 8.0% variance of FoP (ΔR2 = 0.080).

Conclusion

KTRs generally experience moderate or low symptom burden, and symptom burden is an influencing factor in FoP. Identifying the traits of KTRs with high symptom burden can help clinicians develop targeted management strategies and ease FoP of KTRs.