Addressing urologic health disparities in sexual and gender minority communities through patient-centered outcomes research

Lack of Informed and Affirming Healthcare for Sexual Minority Men: A Call for Patient-Centered Care

BACKGROUND

Sexual minority men (SMM) face severe health inequities alongside negative experiences that drive avoidance of medical care. Understanding how SMM experience healthcare is paramount to improving this population's health. Patient-centered care, which emphasizes mutual respect and collaboration between patients and providers, may alleviate the disparaging effects of the homophobia that SMM face in healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how SMM perceive their experiences with healthcare providers and how care can most effectively meet their needs.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on healthcare experiences, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and HIV-related beliefs were conducted between July and November 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included a sample of 43 young adult SMM (ages 25-27), representing diverse socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic backgrounds, in New York City.

APPROACH

Researchers utilized a multiphase, systematic coding method to identify salient themes in the interview transcripts.

KEY RESULTS

Analyses revealed three main themes: (1) SMM perceived that their clinicians often lack adequate skills and knowledge required to provide care that considers participants' identities and behaviors; (2) SMM desired patient-centered care as a way to regain agency and actively participate in making decisions about their health; and (3) SMM felt that patient-centered care was more common with providers who were LGBTQ-affirming, including many who felt that this was especially true for LGBTQ-identified providers.

CONCLUSIONS

SMM expressed a clear and strong desire for patient-centered approaches to care, often informed by experiences with healthcare providers who were unable to adequately meet their needs. However, widespread adoption of patient-centered care will require improving education and training for clinicians, with a focus on LGBTQ-specific clinical care and cultural humility. Through centering patients' preferences and experiences in the construction of care, patient-centered care can reduce health inequities among SMM and empower healthcare utilization in a population burdened by historic and ongoing stigmatization.

The Role of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Principles in Enhancing the Quality of Urologic Resident Education and Advancing Gender Diverse Care

This article will review the history of trans and gender diverse individuals in the medical field and suggest relevant content and methods to include in a diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum. The hope is that the inclusion of these methods will help combat the barriers in place to receiving equitable and fair urologic care.

Perceived Barriers Among Underrepresented and Historically Marginalized Medical Students Pursuing a Career in Urology

OBJECTIVE

To assess perceived barriers to pursuing urology among medical students and to determine if marginalized groups identified greater challenges to entry.

METHODS

The Deans of all New York medical schools were asked to disseminate a survey to their students. The survey collected demographic information to identify underrepresented minorities, students of low socioeconomic background, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals. Students were asked to rate various survey items on a five-point Likert scale to determine which factors were perceived as barriers to applying to urology residency. Student t tests and ANOVA were used to compare mean Likert ratings between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 256 students responded to the survey from 47% of medical institutions. Underrepresented minorities students cited lack of evident diversity within the field as a more significant barrier than counterparts (3.2 vs 2.7, P= .025). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual students perceived the lack of evident diversity within urology (3.1 vs 2.65, P = .01), exclusivity of the field (3.73 vs 3.29, P = .04), and fear that residency programs would have negative perceptions of them as students (3.0 vs 2.1, P < .0001) as substantial obstacles compared to peers. Students with childhood household incomes less than $40,000 cited socioeconomic concerns as a higher barrier compared to students with household incomes greater than $40,000 (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Underrepresented and historically marginalized students perceive more significant barriers to pursuing urology than their peers. Urology training programs must continue to foster an inclusive environment to recruit prospective students from already marginalized groups.