1
|
Fan J, Xu S, Liu Y, Ma X, Cao J, Fan C, Bao S. Influenza vaccination rates among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating influencing factors. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1295464. [PMID: 38026311 PMCID: PMC10657874 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1295464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Healthcare workers risk of exposure to the influenza virus in their work, is a high-risk group for flu infections. Thus WHO recommends prioritizing flu vaccination for them-an approach adopted by >40 countries and/or regions worldwide. Methods Cross-sectional studies on influenza vaccination rates among healthcare workers were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and CBM databases from inception to February 26, 2023. Influenza vaccination rates and relevant data for multiple logistic regression analysis, such as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), were extracted. Results A total of 92 studies comprising 125 vaccination data points from 26 countries were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall vaccination rate among healthcare workers was 41.7%. Further analysis indicated that the vaccination rate was 46.9% or 35.6% in low income or high income countries. Vaccination rates in the Americas, the Middle East, Oceania, Europe, Asia, and Africa were 67.1, 51.3, 48.7, 42.5, 28.5, and 6.5%, respectively. Influencing factors were age, length of service, education, department, occupation, awareness of the risk of influenza, and/or vaccines. Conclusion The global influenza vaccination rate among healthcare workers is low, and comprehensive measures are needed to promote influenza vaccination among this population. Systematic review registration www.inplysy.com, identifier: 202350051.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingchun Fan
- Center for Laboratory and Simulation Training, School of Public Health, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shijie Xu
- School of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yijun Liu
- Social and Historical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Xiaoting Ma
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Juan Cao
- Department of Public Health, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chunling Fan
- Department of Pharmacy, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Gansu Provincial Academic Institute for Medical Research, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shisan Bao
- Center for Laboratory and Simulation Training, School of Public Health, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
López-Zambrano MA, Pita CC, Escribano MF, Galán Meléndez IM, Cebrián MG, Arroyo JJG, Huerta C, Cuadrado LM, Ruiperez CM, Núñez C, Zapata AP, de la Pinta MLR, Uriz MAS, Conejo ISA, Gomila CM, Carbajo MDL, Gómez AS. Factors associated to influenza vaccination among hospital's healthcare workers in the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain 2021-2022. Vaccine 2023; 41:6719-6726. [PMID: 37806803 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Influenza vaccination (IV) aims primarily to protect high-risk groups against severe influenza-associated disease and death. It is recommended in Spain for high-risk groups, including Healthcare workers (HCWs). However, vaccination uptake has been consistently below desirable levels. The objective of this study were to evaluate influenza vaccination coverage using data from the regional vaccination registry, during 2021-2022 season, among HCWs in public hospitals in Autonomous Community of Madrid (CAM) and to explore factors associated with influenza vaccination. We conducted a cross-sectional study using administrative data retrieved from the Regional Department of Health data repositories. A multilevel logistic regression model was designed to estimate Level 1 (individual) and Level 2 (contextual) variables that are associated with HCẂs vaccination. The study population was HCWs from 25 public hospitals in CAM who were active during the period of the influenza 2021-2022 vaccination campaign. The global influenza vaccination coverage (IVC) was 52.1 %. All study Level 1 variables were significantly associated with vaccine uptake. Greater IVC is associated with individual characteristics: female (OR1.14; 95 %CI 1.09-1.19), older age 59-69 years old (OR1.72; 95 %CI 1.60-1.84), born in Spain, medical staff, more than one high-risk condition (OR1.24; 95 %CI 1.10-1.40; respectively) and vaccinated in two previous campaigns (OR25.64; 95 %CI 24.27-27.09). IVC was highest among HCWs celiac disease (65.5 %) followed by diabetes mellitus (65.1 %) and chronic inflammatory disease (64.3 %). The hospital where the study subject worked also showed an effect on the vaccination uptake, although Level 2 variable (hospital complexity) was not positively associated. IVC in HCWs remains suboptimal. These findings may prove useful to tailor strategies to reach specific groups. It is recommended to delve into the identification of factors associated with the HCWs workplace that may have a positive impact on IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Alejandra López-Zambrano
- Subdirección General de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
| | - Covadonga Caso Pita
- Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Isabel Mª Galán Meléndez
- Servicio de Prevención y Salud Laboral, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Manuela García Cebrián
- Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Carmen Huerta
- Servicio de Prevención Riesgos Laborales, Hospital Universitario de Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Luis Mazón Cuadrado
- Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Carmen Muñoz Ruiperez
- Servicio de Medicina del Trabajo y Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Concha Núñez
- Servicio de Prevención Riesgos Laborales, Hospital U. La Paz-Carlos III-Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Aurora Pérez Zapata
- Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales - Salud Laboral, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Mª Angeles Sánchez Uriz
- Servicio de Prevención Mancomunado de Grupo, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Mª Dolores Lasheras Carbajo
- Subdirección General de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
| | - Amaya Sánchez Gómez
- Subdirección General de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallant AJ, Harding A, Johnson C, Steenbeek A, Curran JA. Identifying H1N1 and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among health care providers: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2023; 21:913-951. [PMID: 36917102 PMCID: PMC10173945 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-22-00112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to describe and map the evidence on COVID-19 and H1N1 vaccine hesitancy or refusal by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in North America, the United Kingdom and the European Union, and Australia. INTRODUCTION Since 2009, we have experienced two pandemics: H1N1 "swine flu" and COVID-19. While severity and transmissibility of these viruses varied, vaccination has been a critical component of bringing both pandemics under control. However, uptake of these vaccines has been affected by vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The vaccination behaviors of health care providers, including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, are of particular interest as they have been priority populations to receive both H1N1 and COVID-19 vaccinations. Their vaccination views could affect the vaccination decisions of their patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies were eligible for inclusion if they identified reasons for COVID-19 or H1N1 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among physicians, nurses, or pharmacists from the included countries. Published and unpublished literature were eligible for inclusion. Previous reviews were excluded; however, the reference lists of relevant reviews were searched to identify additional studies for inclusion. METHODS A search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Premier databases was conducted April 28, 2021, to identify English-language literature published from 2009 to 2021. Gray literature and citation screening were also conducted to identify additional relevant literature. Titles, abstracts, and eligible full-text articles were reviewed in duplicate by 2 trained reviewers. Data were extracted in duplicate using a structured extraction tool developed for the review. Conflicts were resolved through discussion or with a third team member. Data were synthesized using narrative and tabular summaries. RESULTS In total, 83 articles were included in the review. Studies were conducted primarily across the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The majority of articles (n=70) used cross-sectional designs to examine knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of H1N1 (n=61) or COVID-19 (n=22) vaccines. Physicians, medical students, nurses, and nursing students were common participants in the studies; however, only 8 studies included pharmacists in their sample. Across health care settings, most studies were conducted in urban, academic teaching hospitals, with 1 study conducted in a rural hospital setting. Concerns about vaccine safety, vaccine side effects, and perceived low risk of contracting H1N1 or COVID-19 were the most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy or refusal across both vaccines. CONCLUSIONS With increased interest and attention on vaccines in recent years, intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic, more research that examines vaccine hesitancy or refusal across different health care settings and health care providers is warranted. Future work should aim to utilize more qualitative and mixed methods research designs to capture the personal perspectives of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and consider collecting data beyond the common urban and academic health care settings identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Janet A. Curran
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kairiza T, Kembo G, Chigusiwa L. Herding behavior in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural Zimbabwe: The moderating role of health information under heterogeneous household risk perceptions. Soc Sci Med 2023; 323:115854. [PMID: 36947991 PMCID: PMC10022463 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy poses a global health threat by potentially delaying the attainment of herd immunity to attenuate infection and transmission. Most governments across the world are engrossed with formulating strategies to surmount conservative group behavior such as vaccine hesitancy typical under risky and uncertain situations such as in the case of COVID-19. This paper examines herding behavior in vaccine hesitancy with a special focus on the moderating role of household access to health information from village health workers under different risk perceptions. We use the 2021 Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee cross-section household national survey consisting of 13, 583 valid observations. Our major findings indicate that herding behavior plays a role in rural households' hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccine inoculation. Furthermore, whilst access to health information from village health workers reduces herding behavior in vaccine hesitancy, it does so more when the household perceives itself to be at high risk of contracting COVID-19. Analysing herding behavior in vaccine hesitancy can help policymakers develop more targeted vaccination strategies, such as promoting access to health information through channels like village health workers, especially for households at high risk of contracting COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terrence Kairiza
- Department of Economics, Bindura University of Science Education, P. Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
| | - George Kembo
- Food and Nutrition Council of Zimbabwe, 1574 Alpes Road, Hatcliffe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
| | - Lloyd Chigusiwa
- Department of Economics, Bindura University of Science Education, P. Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frings D, Wills J, Sykes S, Wood KV, Albery IP. Multiple Group Membership, Optimistic Bias, and Infection Risk in the Context of Emerging Infectious Diseases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Abstract. Background: Understanding psychosocial factors which impact responses to emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) is vital in managing epidemics and pandemics. Two under-researched areas in this field are the interactive roles of optimistic bias (underestimation of the likelihood of negative events occurring to the self, relative to others) and group membership (a factor observed to be psychologically protective, but infection risk enhancing). Aims: The current study aimed to test the relationships between optimistic bias and membership of multiple groups upon EID-related emotional and psychological responses and behavioral intentions. Methods: Participants from the UK and US ( N = 360) rated how they would evaluate and respond to a fictitious EID immediately before the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns in a correlational study. Results: Negative relationships were observed between optimistic bias and perceived infection vulnerability, infection prevention strategies, and perceived EID severity. Multiple group membership correlated negatively with germ avoidance, but positively with emotional responses such as disgust and increased perceived vulnerability to infection – factors linked to avoiding infection. Multiple group memberships and optimistic bias were unrelated. Limitations: The study focussed on a fictitious disease and relies on cross-sectional data and behavioral intentions. Conclusions: These findings build upon the small evidence base on the role of optimistic bias in EID management and suggest that multiple group membership is unlikely to increase optimistic bias. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings for EID management are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Frings
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Jane Wills
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Susie Sykes
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Kerry V. Wood
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Ian P. Albery
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kocańda K, Zarębska-Michaluk D. Obligation Is Not a Compulsion-The Quality of the Law and the Effectiveness and Safety of Vaccination against COVID-19. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14003. [PMID: 36360882 PMCID: PMC9657154 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In December 2021, the Minister of Health in Poland announced via Twitter that vaccination was not compulsory. Such a message from a public authority, who was to a significant extent responsible for organising the process of preventing and combating the infections caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, appeared to have a negative impact on the public perception of the role of vaccination in combating this disease. The impossibility of directly enforcing vaccination, in the sense that there is no legal basis for its compulsory administration, should not weaken the sense of obligation towards a socially necessary attitude of vaccination as a means of protecting the population against the disease; this should be promoted by public authorities. An auxiliary role in shaping this type of message should be played by the law of appropriate quality, regulating the rules related to vaccination in a way that encourages citizens' trust in the state and the law.
Collapse
|
7
|
Impact of Social Media, Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) on the Intention to Stay at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14127192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Considering how communities perceive the threat and risks of COVID-19, it is essential to examine how emotional regulation stimulated through intrinsic and extrinsic incentive mechanisms via social media can reinforce ‘Stay at home’ intentions. The conceptual framework was developed using the elements of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). A self-reported questionnaire was used to measure individuals’ intention to stay at home during the pandemic based on the perceived locus of causality as a part of self-determination theory. The empirical research was conducted on a sample of 306 USA respondents. The study results indicate that both components of the EPPM—efficacy and threat—positively affect ‘stay at home’ intentions. Moreover, a positive effect of efficacy on threats was found, as was a moderating effect of threats on the relationship between efficacy and the intention to stay at home. Meanwhile, the influence of social media exposure on threats and behavioral intentions was not significant. People are likely to stay at home as a preventive measure during COVID-19 if there is enough threats and efficacy. However, the abundance of information and opinions in social media can lead to a decreased perceived threat and might disrupt the acceptance of preventive actions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Souza FDO, Werneck GL, Pinho PDS, Teixeira JRB, Lua I, Araújo TMD. [Influenza vaccine hesitancy among health workers, Bahia State, Brazil]. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2022; 38:e00098521. [PMID: 35107509 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00098521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization acknowledges vaccine hesitancy as one of the ten most serious global health threats. The study investigated the association between confidence, convenience, and complacency and influenza vaccine hesitancy among male and female health workers. The study included 453 workers in primary and medium-complexity health services in a medium-sized city in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Vaccine-hesitant individuals were defined as those who had not received an influenza vaccine in 2019. Structural equation models were used to assess interrelations between target predictive variables and vaccine hesitancy. One-fourth of the workers (25.4%) hesitated to be vaccinated for influenza. Lower confidence (standardized coefficient - SC = 0.261; p = 0.044) and higher complacency (SC = 0.256; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. Convenience was not associated with vaccine hesitancy. Workers not involved in patient care, workers in medium-complexity services, and male workers reported less receptiveness from the health professional administering the vaccines. Fear of needles was associated with both lower confidence and greater vaccine hesitancy. History of vaccine reactions was not associated directly with vaccine hesitancy, but it was associated with greater complacency, that is, less perception of risk from vaccine-preventable diseases. Since annual influenza vaccination is recommended, influenza vaccine hesitancy can increase the burden of this disease in the population. The data back the hypothesis that factors related to confidence and complacency produce harms in this vaccine´s acceptance and should be considered in the development of strategies and actions for greater adherence to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda de Oliveira Souza
- Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Feira de Santana, Brasil.,Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Iracema Lua
- Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hall CM, Northam H, Webster A, Strickland K. Determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination hesitancy among healthcare personnel: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 31:2112-2124. [PMID: 34716635 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore the determinants of and behaviour change models for seasonal influenza vaccination compliance among healthcare personnel. BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel may be better understood by exploring determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy. DESIGN Integrative literature review. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Six thousand and forty-eight articles were screened. Seventy-eight met inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of included articles, a narrative synthesis was conducted utilising a conceptual matrix to identify thematic categories. RESULTS Six thematic categories were identified as influencing HCP SIV compliance: 'perceived vulnerability', 'trust', 'past behaviour', 'professional duty', 'access and convenience' and 'knowledge and experience'. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was the most commonly utilised health behaviour change model within the seasonal influenza vaccination context. Few studies have examined seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance and uptake within the Australian HCP context, particularly involving community care and aged care. CONCLUSIONS Factors that appear to relate to influenza vaccination compliance among HCP can be grouped according to several thematic categories, and they also appear influential in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. In particular, an emerging focus on 'trust' or the more emotive considerations of decision-making around health-protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic. Efforts to influence these domains to increase compliance, however, are likely to be impeded by a lack of a well-developed and tested behaviour change model. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Healthcare personnel (HCP) face high levels of occupational exposure to seasonal influenza every year. An emerging focus on 'trust' and the more emotive considerations of decision-making around health-protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Hall
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Holly Northam
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Adrian Webster
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Health Systems Group, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Karen Strickland
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, AUT, Auckland, New Zealand.,Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saro-Buendía M, Marrero-Sánchez Á, García-Ruiz de Morales D, Chiara-Graciani G, Coderch-Carretero J, Pérez-Jacoiste Asín MA, Silva JT, Fernández-Ruiz M, Arrazola P, Aguado JM, López-Medrano F. Implementation of a program to improve influenza vaccination rates among medical students: a comparative study involving two university affiliated hospitals. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:3662-3669. [PMID: 34129422 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1920269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Influenza vaccination rates among medical students (MSs) are below the standards recommended in hospitals where influenza vaccination is not mandatory. We carried out a comparative study in two Spanish university hospitals to reassert this fact and evaluated the impact on vaccination rates of a specific program aimed at promoting influenza vaccination among MSs.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed describing influenza vaccination rates and motivations for vaccination during the 2017/18 campaign among MSs in two hospitals affiliated to the same university. We subsequently performed a community-based intervention study during the 2018/19 campaign evaluating the impact of a strategy for promoting influenza vaccination, comparing the hospital where the intervention took place (hospital A) with the one where it did not take place (hospital B).Results: During de 2017/18 campaign the overall influenza vaccination rate was 44.8%, with no differences between hospitals A and B (difference: 3.9%; 95% CI: -4.36-12.16; p-value = .4). During the 2018/19 campaign, vaccination rate increased to 76.4% in hospital A, with significant differences compared with the previous campaign in the same hospital (29.8%; OR 5.00; 95% CI: 3.14-8.3; p-value = .0001) and with that observed in hospital B in the same campaign (21.1%; 95% CI: 13.38-28.82; p-value <.001).Conclusions: Influenza vaccination rates among MSs in two Spanish university affiliated hospitals were below the recommended standards. A new reproducible strategy for promoting influenza vaccination with a specific approach toward MSs achieved a significant improvement in vaccination rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Saro-Buendía
- School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, University Hospital, "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Marrero-Sánchez
- School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, University Hospital, "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Jaime Coderch-Carretero
- School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañón", Madrid, Spain
| | - María Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Tiago Silva
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Fernández-Ruiz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Arrazola
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University Hospital "12 de Octubre" Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Aguado
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco López-Medrano
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang J, Feng Y, Hou Z, Lu Y, Chen H, Ouyang L, Wang N, Fu H, Wang S, Kan X, Liao Y, Lu G, Mao J, Lin J, Wu M. Willingness to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among healthcare workers in public institutions of Zhejiang Province, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2926-2933. [PMID: 33848217 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1909328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to investigate healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Zhejiang and to discover the related influential factors. The survey was conducted in six regions of Zhejiang Province, China, and 13 hospitals and 12 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were incorporated into the survey research. Participants were healthcare workers and a total of 3726 questionnaires were collected online, of which 3634 (97.53%) were analyzed. The relationships between the factors and the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19 were computed as odds ratios (ORs) by means of multi-factor non-conditional logistic regression analysis. Of the 3634 participants, 2874 (79.09%) HCWs expressed their willingness to get vaccinated if the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine becomes available. Respondents who were younger than 50 years (OR = 1.502, 95% CI: 1.047-2.154), those who believed that they were somewhat likely (OR = 1.658, 95% CI: 1.297-2.120) or likely (OR = 1.893, 95% CI: 1.334-2.684) to get infected by SARS-COV-2 and those with a positive attitude toward the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were more willing to get vaccinated. Furthermore, compared to doctors, nurses were more reluctant to get vaccinated. In addition, it was found that higher the education level, lower the willingness to get vaccinated. This study revealed that HCWs in Zhejiang Province had a high willingness to get vaccinated. Awareness about the vaccine's effectiveness and safety and the disease severity should be promoted among HCWs over 50 years of age and nurses to increase the willingness to get vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yaling Feng
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Lanxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinhua, China
| | - Zhigang Hou
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, China
| | - Yuzhong Lu
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Lishui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lishui, China
| | - Huihong Chen
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Shanmen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China
| | - Le Ouyang
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Changxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huzhou, China
| | - Nini Wang
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Bingjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haiping Fu
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Tongxiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, China
| | - Shuangqing Wang
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, China
| | - Xuwei Kan
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Anji Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huzhou, China
| | - Yan Liao
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Shensi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhoushan, China
| | - Guofei Lu
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Haining Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, China
| | - Jilai Mao
- Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, China
| | - Junfen Lin
- Department of Public Health Surveillance and Advisory, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengna Wu
- Department of Public Health Surveillance and Advisory, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Determinants of Vaccination Uptake in Risk Populations: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8030480. [PMID: 32867126 PMCID: PMC7563537 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8030480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination uptake has decreased globally in recent years, with a subsequent rise of vaccine-preventable diseases. Travellers, immunocompromised patients (ICP), and healthcare workers (HCW) are groups at increased risk for (severe) infectious diseases due to their behaviour, health, or occupation, respectively. While targeted vaccination guidelines are available, vaccination uptake seems low. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview of determinants-based on the integrated change model-predicting vaccination uptake in these groups. In travellers, low perceived risk of infection and low awareness of vaccination recommendations contributed to low uptake. Additionally, ICP were often unaware of the recommended vaccinations. A physician's recommendation is strongly correlated with higher uptake. Furthermore, ICP appeared to be mainly concerned about the risks of vaccination and fear of deterioration of their underlying disease. For HCW, perceived risk of (the severity of) infection for themselves and for their patients together with perceived benefits of vaccination contribute most to their vaccination behaviour. As the determinants that affect uptake are numerous and diverse, we argue that future studies and interventions should be based on multifactorial health behaviour models, especially for travellers and ICP as only a limited number of such studies is available yet.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen TTM, Lafond KE, Nguyen TX, Tran PD, Nguyen HM, Ha VTC, Do TT, Ha NT, Seward JF, McFarland JW. Acceptability of seasonal influenza vaccines among health care workers in Vietnam in 2017. Vaccine 2020; 38:2045-2050. [PMID: 32001072 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A demonstration project in Vietnam provided 11,000 doses of human seasonal influenza vaccine free of charge to healthcare workers (HCWs) in 4 provinces of Vietnam. Through this project, we conducted an acceptability survey to identify the main reasons that individuals chose to be vaccinated or not to inform and improve future immunization activities. METHODS We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional survey from May to August 2017 among HCWs at 13 selected health facilities. We employed logistic regression to determine the association between demographic and professional factors, and the decision to receive seasonal influenza vaccine. We performed post-hoc pairwise comparisons among reasons for and against vaccination using Chi square and Fisher's exact tests (for cell sizes <5). RESULTS A total of 1,450 HCWs participated in the survey, with a higher proportion of females than males (74% versus 26%). The median age of the participating HCWs was 35 years (median range 25.8-44.2). Among those surveyed, 700 (48%) HCWs were vaccinated against seasonal influenza during the first half of 2017. Younger HCWs under 30 and 30-39 years old were less likely to get vaccinated against seasonal influenza than HCWs ≥50 years old (OR = 0.5; 95%CI 0.4-0.8 and OR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.4-0.8 respectively). Nurses and other employees were more likely to get seasonal influenza vaccination than physicians (OR = 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.4 and OR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2-3.2 respectively). The most common reason for accepting vaccination was fear of getting influenza (66%) and the most common reason for not getting vaccinated was concern about vaccine side effects (23%). CONCLUSION Acceptability of seasonal influenza vaccines in this setting varied among HCWs by age group and job category. Interventions to increase acceptance of vaccine among HCWs in this setting where influenza vaccine is being introduced free for the first time should include targeted risk communication on vaccine safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thoa Thi Minh Nguyen
- Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
| | - Kathryn E Lafond
- Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tung Xuan Nguyen
- General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Phu Dac Tran
- General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Hang Minh Nguyen
- General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Van Thi Cam Ha
- General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Thu Thi Do
- General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Nga Thu Ha
- Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | | | - Jeffrey W McFarland
- Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Persistent genetic variation within populations presents an evolutionary problem, as natural selection and genetic drift tend to erode genetic diversity. Models of balancing selection were developed to account for the maintenance of genetic variation observed in natural populations. Negative frequency-dependent selection is a powerful type of balancing selection that maintains many natural polymorphisms, but it is also commonly misinterpreted. This review aims to clarify the processes underlying negative frequency-dependent selection, describe classes of polymorphisms that can and cannot result from these processes, and discuss the empirical data needed to accurately identify processes that generate or maintain diversity in nature. Finally, the importance of accurately describing the processes affecting genetic diversity within populations as it relates to research progress is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin Brisson
- Biology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fernández-Villa T, Molina AJ, Torner N, Castilla J, Astray J, García-Gutiérrez S, Mayoral JM, Tamames S, Domínguez Á, Martín V. Factors associated with acceptance of pandemic flu vaccine by healthcare professionals in Spain, 2009-2010. Res Nurs Health 2017; 40:435-443. [PMID: 28805243 DOI: 10.1002/nur.21815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus reached pandemic level in Spain in 2009, prompting a national vaccination campaign. To avoid transmission to patients, healthcare professionals' vaccination against pandemic influenza is crucial. The main objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with the failure by healthcare professionals to accept the pandemic vaccination in 2009. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of healthcare professionals in seven of Spain's autonomous regions. A questionnaire was used to collect information about personal and professional details, the respondents' flu vaccination status in the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 seasons (seasonal and pandemic vaccines), and their knowledge and attitudes. A total of 1,661 professionals completed the survey. In the 2009-2010 season, 38.2% had both the seasonal and the pandemic vaccine, 22.1% had had only the seasonal, and 4.7% only the pandemic vaccine. The strongest predictor of not receiving the pandemic vaccine was not having had seasonal vaccinations in that year or the previous year. Those who had not received the pandemic vaccine were more often female; nurses; under 45; denied contact with at-risk groups; and had negative beliefs about the vaccine effectiveness and little concern for getting the disease, being infected at work, or passing it on to patients. It would be prudent to direct preventive campaigns not only at individuals at risk of catching flu but also at health professionals with a negative view of flu vaccine, with a particular focus on nurses, who have a key role in recommending flu vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Fernández-Villa
- Grupo de Investigación en Interacción Gen - Ambiente y Salud (GIIGAS), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Antonio J Molina
- Grupo de Investigación en Interacción Gen - Ambiente y Salud (GIIGAS), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Nuria Torner
- Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Castilla
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jenaro Astray
- Área de Epidemiología, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Sonia Tamames
- Dirección General de Salud Pública, Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Junta de Castilla y León, León, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Martín
- Grupo de Investigación en Interacción Gen - Ambiente y Salud (GIIGAS), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de León, León, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Karafillakis E, Larson HJ. The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations. Vaccine 2017; 35:4840-4850. [PMID: 28760616 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The success of vaccination strategies depends in part on population perceptions of benefits and risks of vaccines and related confidence in vaccination. Better knowledge of public concerns about vaccines and what is driving them is needed to inform vaccination strategies and communications. This literature reviewer examined studies on vaccine and vaccination risk perceptions and concerns across European populations. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between 2004 and 2014 in Europe. A descriptive analysis was performed. FINDINGS A total of 145 articles were selected, most of which were conducted in the UK, the Netherlands and France and studied seasonal influenza, HPV and pandemic influenza vaccination. Across all countries and vaccines, the primary area of concern was vaccine safety, followed by perceptions of low likelihood of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), perceived low severity of VPDs, beliefs that vaccines do not work, and overall lack of information. Concerns were found to be vaccine-, country- and population-specific. CONCLUSION In addition to identifying concerns about vaccination in Europe, this study confirmed the notion that individuals have many safety concerns about vaccination and often believe that the risks of vaccination outweigh their benefits. More research needs to be conducted to explore the impact of different types of communication strategies, which would frame the benefits of vaccination as well as risks of not vaccinating. Strategies to better inform public perceptions of vaccines should include the provision of unbiased, comprehensive information tailored to population information needs, and delivered using multiple and new communication technologies such as social media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Karafillakis
- Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi J Larson
- Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmid P, Rauber D, Betsch C, Lidolt G, Denker ML. Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior - A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 - 2016. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0170550. [PMID: 28125629 PMCID: PMC5268454 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 720] [Impact Index Per Article: 102.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccine hesitancy is a significant threat to global efforts to reduce the burden of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Potential barriers of influenza vaccination need to be identified to inform interventions to raise awareness, influenza vaccine acceptance and uptake. OBJECTIVE This review aims to (1) identify relevant studies and extract individual barriers of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination for risk groups and the general public; and (2) map knowledge gaps in understanding influenza vaccine hesitancy to derive directions for further research and inform interventions in this area. METHODS Thirteen databases covering the areas of Medicine, Bioscience, Psychology, Sociology and Public Health were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between the years 2005 and 2016. Following the PRISMA approach, 470 articles were selected and analyzed for significant barriers to influenza vaccine uptake or intention. The barriers for different risk groups and flu types were clustered according to a conceptual framework based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and discussed using the 4C model of reasons for non-vaccination. RESULTS Most studies were conducted in the American and European region. Health care personnel (HCP) and the general public were the most studied populations, while parental decisions for children at high risk were under-represented. This study also identifies understudied concepts. A lack of confidence, inconvenience, calculation and complacency were identified to different extents as barriers to influenza vaccine uptake in risk groups. CONCLUSION Many different psychological, contextual, sociodemographic and physical barriers that are specific to certain risk groups were identified. While most sociodemographic and physical variables may be significantly related to influenza vaccine hesitancy, they cannot be used to explain its emergence or intensity. Psychological determinants were meaningfully related to uptake and should therefore be measured in a valid and comparable way. A compendium of measurements for future use is suggested as supporting information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schmid
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Department of Media and Communication Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Dorothee Rauber
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Department of Media and Communication Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Cornelia Betsch
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Department of Media and Communication Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Gianni Lidolt
- Department of Media and Communication Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Marie-Luisa Denker
- Department of Media and Communication Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paula SID, Paula GID, Cunegundes KSA, Moraes-Pinto MID. ADHERENCE TO INFLUENZA VACCINATION AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS DURING AND AFTER INFLUENZA A (H1N1) PANDEMIC. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2016; 58:82. [PMID: 27828623 PMCID: PMC5096636 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201658082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the adherence to influenza vaccination among medical students in 2010 and 2011. From August to December 2011, a questionnaire was used to record the influenza vaccination in 2010 and 2011, reasons for acceptance of the influenza vaccine and knowledge of healthcare workers about the influenza vaccine recommendation. One hundred and forty-four students from the 2ndto the 6th years of the medical school were interviewed. A great adherence to pandemic influenza vaccine was noted in 2010, (91% of the students), with "self-protection" being the most common reason cited for vaccination. Other determinants for the vaccination during pandemic were "convenient access to vaccine" and "encouragement by peers and teachers in workplaces and at the university". However, there was a great decay in the acceptance to vaccine in the next influenza season (2011). Only 42% of the students received the vaccine. They claimed "lack of time" and "have forgotten to take the vaccine" as the main reasons. The "knowledge on the recommendation of influenza vaccine to healthcare workers" increased when the students come to attend the last year of the medical school, but that was an insufficient motivator for vaccination. Strategies to increase vaccination should be based on the abovementioned aspects for the adoption of effective measures in both, pandemic and seasonal periods.
Collapse
|
19
|
de Waure C, Quaranta G, Ianuale C, Panatto D, Amicizia D, Apprato L, Campanella P, Colotto M, De Meo C, Di Nardo F, Frisicale EM, La Milia DI, Rizzitelli E, Aquilani S, Briata MP, Frumento V, Marensi L, Spadea A, Turello V, Gasparini R, Ricciardi W. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of the Italian population towards Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and HPV diseases and vaccinations: A cross-sectional multicentre study. Public Health 2016; 141:136-142. [PMID: 27931989 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study addressed knowledge of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis and human papillomavirus (HPV), and attitudes and behaviours towards vaccines against them. STUDY DESIGN This is a cross-sectional, multicentre study. METHODS Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 530 adults who accessed four Departments of Prevention of the Italian National Health Service in 2013. RESULTS Less than 50% of people gave the right answer to all the questions concerning the three diseases, but 96.2%, 94% and 92.7% agreed with the importance of vaccination against N. meningitidis, S. pneumoniae and HPV, respectively, and 58.4% expressed own willingness to have their children vaccinated with N. meningitidis B vaccine. The attitude towards vaccination was more positive in women for N. meningitidis and in people having children for HPV. Furthermore, individuals giving correct answers to all knowledge items were more in favour of both HPV and S. pneumoniae vaccination. A total of 68.8%, 82.6% and 84.5% of respondents vaccinated their own children against N. meningitidis C, S. pneumoniae and HPV, respectively. About 50% of the respondents reported paediatricians' or other health professionals' recommendations as the main reason for vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Vaccinations may be promoted through actions aimed at increasing citizens' knowledge. Health professionals should be educated to actively provide information on vaccinations in a clear, comprehensive and effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C de Waure
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
| | - G Quaranta
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - C Ianuale
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - D Panatto
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
| | - D Amicizia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
| | - L Apprato
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
| | - P Campanella
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - M Colotto
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - C De Meo
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - F Di Nardo
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - E M Frisicale
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - D I La Milia
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - E Rizzitelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
| | - S Aquilani
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione ASL Viterbo, Italy
| | - M P Briata
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione S.C. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica ASL2 savonese, Italy
| | - V Frumento
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione S.C. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica ASL2 savonese, Italy
| | - L Marensi
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione S.C. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica ASL3 genovese, Italy
| | - A Spadea
- UOS Medicina Preventiva Età Evolutiva IV Distretto, ASL RMA, Italy
| | - V Turello
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione S.C. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica ASL3 genovese, Italy
| | - R Gasparini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
| | - W Ricciardi
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scatigna M, Fabiani L, Micolucci G, Santilli F, Mormile P, Giuliani AR. Attitudinal variables and a possible mediating mechanism for vaccination practice in health care workers of a local hospital in L'Aquila (Italy). Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 13:198-205. [PMID: 27624736 PMCID: PMC5287314 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1225638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Active immunization is an important concern for health care workers (HCWs) susceptible subjects and potential sources of infection for patients. However, the vaccine coverage for vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) is below recommended standards. The aims of the study were to estimate the hospitals' HCWs' susceptibility and vaccination coverage rates for VPDs and to analyze the role of HCWs' attitudes and knowledge as determinants of the immunization practices. A cross-sectional study enrolled 334 HCWs (physicians, nurses, others) at local hospital in L'Aquila (Italy). By means of an anonymous questionnaire, self-report data about history of disease and active vaccination for seasonal influenza, chickenpox, measles-mumps-rubella and hepatitis B were collected, as well as attitudes and knowledge about vaccination in HCWs. The employees showed high levels of susceptibility and insufficient vaccination coverage rates, particularly for influenza. Specific trends were detected for different VPDs across age strata and professional categories, not always consistent with literature. Overall, the level of knowledge about recommended vaccination for HCWs was low, in all categories. The active immunization status against influenza was found the most clearly associated with difference levels in 3 psychometric variables: personal responsibility, beliefs on usefulness and beliefs on risk of vaccination. A mediation mechanism was analyzed between these constructs, and an interesting indirect effect was highlighted for beliefs that could enhance the advantage of increased responsibility for HCWs. Further effort in research is needed to evaluate the black-box of longitudinal intervention studies (education, environmental changes, policies), to improve HCWs immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Scatigna
- a Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences - University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy
| | - Leila Fabiani
- a Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences - University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy
| | - Giovanna Micolucci
- b Local Health Office (ASL 1) of L'Aquila - Abruzzo Region , L'Aquila , Italy
| | - Flavio Santilli
- a Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences - University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy
| | - Pasquale Mormile
- a Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences - University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy
| | - Anna Rita Giuliani
- a Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences - University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Halcomb E, Hickman L. Attitudes and immunisation practices of Australian general practice nurses. Contemp Nurse 2016; 52:440-446. [DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1216754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
22
|
Carlsen B, Glenton C. The swine flu vaccine, public attitudes, and researcher interpretations: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:203. [PMID: 27338141 PMCID: PMC4919843 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1466-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During pandemics, health authorities may be uncertain about the spread and severity of the disease and the effectiveness and safety of available interventions. This was the case during the swine flu (H1N1) pandemic of 2009-2010, and governments were forced to make decisions despite these uncertainties. While many countries chose to implement wide scale vaccination programmes, few accomplished their vaccination goals. Many research studies aiming to explore barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake have been conducted in the aftermath of the pandemic, including several qualitative studies. AIMS 1. To explore public attitudes to the swine flu vaccine in different countries through a review of qualitative primary studies. 2. To describe and discuss the implications drawn by the primary study authors. METHODS Systematic review of qualitative research studies, using a broadly comparative cross case-study approach. Study quality was appraised using an adaptation of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) quality assessment tool. RESULTS The review indicates that the public had varying opinions about disease risk and prevalence and had concerns about vaccine safety. Most primary study authors concluded that participants were uninformed, and that more information about the disease and the vaccine would have led to an increase in vaccine uptake. We find these conclusions problematic. We suggest instead that people's questions and concerns were legitimate given the uncertainties of the situation at the time and the fact that the authorities did not have the necessary information to convince the public. Our quality assessment of the included studies points to a lack of reflexivity and a lack of information about study context. We suggest that these study weaknesses are tied to primary study authors' lack of acknowledgement of the uncertainties surrounding the disease and the vaccine. CONCLUSION While primary study authors suggest that authorities could increase vaccine uptake through increased information, we suggest instead that health authorities should be more transparent in their information and decision-making processes in future pandemic situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Glenton
- />Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 7004, St. Olavs plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Emerging infectious disease (EID) communication during the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak: literature review (2009-2013) of the methodology used for EID communication analysis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2015; 9:199-206. [PMID: 25882126 DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2014.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This year alone has seen outbreaks of epidemics such as Ebola, Chikungunya, and many other emerging infectious diseases (EIDs). We must look to the responses of recent outbreaks to help guide our strategies in current and future outbreaks or we risk repeating the same mistakes. The objective of this paper was to conduct a systematic literature review of the methodology used by studies that examined EID communication during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic outbreak through different communication channels or by analyzing contents and strategies. METHODS This was a systematic review of the literature (n=61) studying risk communication strategies of H1N1 influenza, published between 2009 and 2013, and retrieved from searches of computerized databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts by use of specific search criteria. Searches were followed by review, categorization, and mixed qualitative and quantitative content analysis. RESULTS Of 41 articles that used quantitative methods, most used surveys (n=35); some employed content analyses (n=4) and controlled trials (n=2). The 16 articles that employed qualitative methods relied on content analyses (n=10), semi-structured interviews (n=2) and focus groups (n=4). Four more articles used mixed-methods or nonstandard methods. Seven different topic categories were found: risk perception and effects on behaviors, framing the risk in the media, public concerns, trust, optimistic bias, uncertainty, and evaluating risk communication. CONCLUSIONS Up until 2013, studies tended to be descriptive and quantitative rather than discursive and qualitative and to focus on the role of the media as representing information and not as a medium for actual communication with the public. Several studies from 2012, and increasingly more in 2013, addressed issues of discourse and framing and the complexity of risk communication with the public. Formative evaluations that use recommendations from past research when designing communication campaigns from the first stages of crises are recommended. Research should employ diverse triangulation processes based on representatives from different stakeholders. Further studies should address the potential offered by social media to create dialogue with individuals and the public at large.
Collapse
|
24
|
Boiron K, Sarazin M, Debin M, Raude J, Rossignol L, Guerrisi C, Odinkemelu D, Hanslik T, Colizza V, Blanchon T. Opinion about seasonal influenza vaccination among the general population 3 years after the A(H1N1)pdm2009 influenza pandemic. Vaccine 2015; 33:6849-54. [PMID: 26322844 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the opinions of the French general population about seasonal influenza vaccination three years after the A(H1N1)pdm 09 pandemic and identify factors associated with a neutral or negative opinion about this vaccination. STUDY DESIGN The study was conducted using data collected from 5374 participants during the 2012/2013 season of the GrippeNet.fr study. The opinion about seasonal influenza vaccination was studied on three levels ("positive", "negative" or "neutral"). The link between the participant's characteristics and their opinion regarding the seasonal influenza vaccination were studied using a multinomial logistic regression with categorical variables. The "positive" opinion was used as the reference for identifying individuals being at risk of having a "neutral" or a "negative" opinion. RESULTS Among the participants, 39% reported having a positive opinion about seasonal influenza vaccine, 39% a neutral opinion, and 22% a negative opinion. Factors associated with a neutral or negative opinion were young age, low educational level, lack of contact with sick or elderly individuals, lack of treatment for a chronic disease and taking a homeopathic preventive treatment. CONCLUSIONS These results show that an important part of the French population does not have a positive opinion about influenza vaccination in France. Furthermore, it allows outlining the profiles of particularly reluctant individuals who could be targeted by informative campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Boiron
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Marianne Sarazin
- INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; Département d'information médicale, Centre Hospitalier, Firminy, France
| | - Marion Debin
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Jocelyn Raude
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France
| | - Louise Rossignol
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Caroline Guerrisi
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Didi Odinkemelu
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Hanslik
- INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; APHP, Service de médecine interne, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France; UFR des sciences de la santé Simone-Veil, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78280 Versailles, France
| | - Vittoria Colizza
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Thierry Blanchon
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, F-75012 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Giannattasio A, Mariano M, Romano R, Chiatto F, Liguoro I, Borgia G, Guarino A, Lo Vecchio A. Sustained low influenza vaccination in health care workers after H1N1 pandemic: a cross sectional study in an Italian health care setting for at-risk patients. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:329. [PMID: 26265328 PMCID: PMC4533948 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1090-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite consistent recommendations by all Public Health Authorities in support of annual influenza vaccination for at-risk categories, there is still a low uptake of influenza vaccine in these groups including health care workers (HCWs). Aim of this observational two-phase study was to estimate the immunization rates for influenza in four subsequent seasons and for pandemic H1N1 influenza in HCWs of a University Hospital, and to investigate its distribution pattern and the main determinants of immunization. Phase 1 data collection was performed in 2009–2010, during the peak of H1N1 pandemic. Phase 2 data collection, aimed to investigate seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in the three seasons after pandemic, was performed in 2012–2013. Methods The overall H1N1 vaccination rate was derived by the Hospital immunization registry. In 2010, the personnel of three Departments (Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics and Gynecology/Obstetrics) completed a survey on influenza. A second-phase analysis was performed in 2012 to investigate influenza vaccination coverage in three consecutive seasons. Results The first-phase survey showed a low coverage for influenza in all categories (17 %), with the lowest rate in nurses (8.1 %). A total of 37 % of health care workers received H1N1 vaccine, with the highest rate among physicians and the lowest in nurses. H1N1 vaccination was closely related to the Department, being higher in the Department of Infectious Diseases (53.7 %) and Pediatrics (42.4 %) than in Gynecology/Obstetrics (8.3 %). The second-phase survey showed the lowest rate of influenza vaccination in 2012/13 season. The main reasons for not being vaccinated were “Unsure of the efficacy of vaccine” and “Feel not at-risk of getting influenza or its complications”. Despite recommendations, influenza vaccine uptake remains poor. Conclusion Immunization is largely perceived as a personal protection rather than a measure needed to prevent disease spreading to at-risk patients. Compulsory vaccination against influenza should be considered as a possible strategy, at least in health institutions where at-risk patients are admitted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1090-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonietta Giannattasio
- Medicine and Health Sciences Department, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy. .,Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, Naples, 80100, Italy.
| | - Miriam Mariano
- Medicine and Health Sciences Department, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Roberto Romano
- Medicine and Health Sciences Department, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Fabrizia Chiatto
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, Naples, 80100, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Liguoro
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, Naples, 80100, Italy.
| | - Guglielmo Borgia
- Clinical Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Alfredo Guarino
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, Naples, 80100, Italy.
| | - Andrea Lo Vecchio
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, Naples, 80100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Domínguez A, Godoy P, Castilla J, María Mayoral J, Soldevila N, Torner N, Toledo D, Astray J, Tamames S, García-Gutiérrez S, González-Candelas F, Martín V, Díaz J. Knowledge of and attitudes to influenza in unvaccinated primary care physicians and nurses. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 10:2378-86. [PMID: 25424945 PMCID: PMC4896788 DOI: 10.4161/hv.29142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary healthcare workers, especially nurses, are exposed to the vast majority of patients with influenza and play an important role in vaccinating patients. Healthcare workers’ misconceptions about influenza and influenza vaccination have been reported as possible factors associated with lack of vaccination. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of unvaccinated physicians and unvaccinated nurses in the 2011–2012 influenza season. We performed an anonymous web survey of Spanish primary healthcare workers in 2012. Information was collected on vaccination and knowledge of and attitudes to the influenza vaccine. Multivariate analysis was performed using unconditional logistic regression. We included 461 unvaccinated physicians and 402 unvaccinated nurses. Compared with unvaccinated nurses, unvaccinated physicians had more frequently received seasonal influenza vaccination in the preceding seasons (aOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.11–2.25), and more frequently believed that vaccination of high risk individuals is effective in reducing complications (aOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.30–4.95) and that influenza can be a serious illness (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.17–2.32). In contrast, unvaccinated physicians were less concerned about infecting patients (aOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40–0.96). Unvaccinated nurses had more misconceptions than physicians about influenza and the influenza vaccine and more doubts about the severity of annual influenza epidemics in patients with high risk conditions and the prevention of complications by means of the influenza vaccination. For unvaccinated physicians, strategies to improve vaccination coverage should stress the importance of physicians as a possible source of infection of their patients. The effectiveness of influenza vaccination of high risk persons should be emphasized in nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Domínguez
- a Departament de Salut Pública; Universitat de Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Amour S, Djhehiche K, Zamora A, Bergeret A, Vanhems P. Perception of the A/H1N1 influenza pandemic and acceptance of influenza vaccination by Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 staff: A descriptive study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 11:727-31. [PMID: 25715115 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1008887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed the perception and attitudes of university staff, including medical school and other science specialties, toward the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic and influenza vaccination program. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 4,529 university personnel on October 19-20, 2009. Seven hundred (15%) employees participated in the study. Only 18% were willing to be vaccinated, men more than women (29% versus 9%, P < 0.001), and professors/researchers more than administrative/technical staff (30% vs. 6%, P < 0.001). Intention to be vaccinated was insufficient. Additional efforts are needed to improve information dissemination among university staff. Medical university personnel should receive more information to increase vaccine coverage and protect them as well as patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sélilah Amour
- a Observatoire de la Santé des Personnels de Lyon 1; Université de Lyon; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 ; Lyon , France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Antón-Ladislao A, García-Gutiérrez S, Soldevila N, González-Candelas F, Godoy P, Castilla J, Mayoral JM, Astray J, Martín V, Tamames S, Toledo D, Aguirre U, Domínguez A. Visualizing knowledge and attitude factors related to influenza vaccination of physicians. Vaccine 2014; 33:885-91. [PMID: 25529290 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 10/24/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize groups of primary healthcare physicians according to sociodemographic data, years of professional experience and knowledge of and attitudes to influenza, and to evaluate differences between groups with respect to influenza vaccination in the 2011-2012 season. METHODS We carried out an anonymous web survey of Spanish primary healthcare physicians in 2012. Information on vaccination, and knowledge of and attitudes to influenza was collected. Multiple correspondence analysis and cluster analysis were used to define groups of physicians. RESULTS We included 835 physicians and identified three types. Type B were physicians with low professional experience of influenza. Types A and C were physicians with high professional experience with influenza, type A also had a high awareness of influenza and seasonal vaccination. Types A and C were older and more often male than type B (p<0.0001). Knowledge of influenza was greatest in type A and lowest in type B. Awareness of influenza was greatest in type A and lowest in type C. In type A, 71.0% of physicians were vaccinated in the 2011-2012 season, compared with 48.1% and 33.6% from types B and C, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Additional efforts should be made to increase interest and concerns about preventing the transmission of influenza in physicians who do not believe influenza is a severe disease and are not concerned about its transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Antón-Ladislao
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo (Osakidetza), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Susana García-Gutiérrez
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo (Osakidetza), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Núria Soldevila
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Fernando González-Candelas
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Unidad Mixta Genómica y Salud FISABIO-Salud Pública, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pere Godoy
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Castilla
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Jenaro Astray
- Área de Epidemiología, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicente Martín
- Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Sonia Tamames
- Dirección General de Salud Pública, Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Junta de Castilla y León, León, Spain
| | - Diana Toledo
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Departament de Salut Pública, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Urko Aguirre
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo (Osakidetza), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Angela Domínguez
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Departament de Salut Pública, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of hospital health-care workers regarding influenza A/H1N1: a cross sectional survey. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:208. [PMID: 24739890 PMCID: PMC4021506 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the knowledge, the attitudes, and the behaviour towards influenza A/H1N1 and the vaccination among health-care workers (HCWs). METHODS A sample of HCWs was selected from a random sample of non-teaching public hospitals, located in the cities of Naples and Avellino (Italy), received a self-administered anonymous questionnaire including questions about socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge on modes of transmission and preventative measures, attitudes and behaviour relating to influenza A/H1N1. RESULTS Only 36.1% correctly knew the main modes of transmission, and that HCWs are a risk category and this level of knowledge was significantly higher in HCWs having received information through scientific journals. A higher perceived risk of contracting influenza A/H1N1 has been observed in the HCWs more knowledgeable, in those considering influenza A/H1N1 a serious disease, and in those working in surgical wards. Only 16.7% have received the influenza A/H1N1 vaccination and HCWs with more fear of contracting influenza A/H1N1, those considering vaccine more useful and less dangerous were more likely to receive vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Education and communication strategies for improving the level of knowledge and for the immunization uptake regarding influenza A/H1N1 HCWs are strongly needed.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bellia C, Setbon M, Zylberman P, Flahault A. Healthcare worker compliance with seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2014; 7 Suppl 2:97-104. [PMID: 24034493 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) can be an important source of transmission of influenza to patients and family members, and their well-being is fundamental to the maintenance of healthcare services during influenza outbreaks and pandemics. Unfortunately, studies have shown consistently low levels of compliance with influenza vaccination among HCWs, a finding that became particularly pronounced during recent pandemic vaccination campaigns. Among the variables associated with vaccine acceptance in this group are demographic factors, fears and concerns over vaccine safety and efficacy, perceptions of risk and personal vulnerability, past vaccination behaviours and experience with influenza illness, as well as certain situational and organisational constructs. We report the findings of a review of the literature on these factors and highlight some important challenges in interpreting the data. In particular, we point out the need for longitudinal study designs, as well as focused research and interventions that are adapted to the most resistant HCW groups. Multi-pronged strategies are an important step forward in ensuring that future influenza vaccination campaigns, whether directed at seasonal or pandemic strains, will be successful in ensuring broad coverage among HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Bellia
- Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sante Publique (EHESP), Paris, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Costantino C, Mazzucco W, Azzolini E, Baldini C, Bergomi M, Biafiore AD, Bianco M, Borsari L, Cacciari P, Cadeddu C, Camia P, Carluccio E, Conti A, De Waure C, Di Gregori V, Fabiani L, Fallico R, Filisetti B, Flacco ME, Franco E, Furnari R, Galis V, Gallea MR, Gallone MF, Gallone S, Gelatti U, Gilardi F, Giuliani AR, Grillo OC, Lanati N, Mascaretti S, Mattei A, Micò R, Morciano L, Nante N, Napoli G, Nobile CG, Palladino R, Parisi S, Passaro M, Pelissero G, Quarto M, Ricciardi W, Romano G, Rustico E, Saponari A, Schioppa FS, Signorelli C, Siliquini R, Trabacchi V, Triassi M, Varetta A, Ziglio A, Zoccali A, Vitale F, Amodio E. Influenza vaccination coverage among medical residents: an Italian multicenter survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2014; 10:1204-10. [PMID: 24603089 DOI: 10.4161/hv.28081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although influenza vaccination is recognized to be safe and effective, recent studies have confirmed that immunization coverage among health care workers remain generally low, especially among medical residents (MRs). Aim of the present multicenter study was to investigate attitudes and determinants associated with acceptance of influenza vaccination among Italian MRs. A survey was performed in 2012 on MRs attending post-graduate schools of 18 Italian Universities. Each participant was interviewed via an anonymous, self-administered, web-based questionnaire including questions on attitudes regarding influenza vaccination. A total of 2506 MRs were recruited in the survey and 299 (11.9%) of these stated they had accepted influenza vaccination in 2011-2012 season. Vaccinated MRs were older (P = 0.006), working in clinical settings (P = 0.048), and vaccinated in the 2 previous seasons (P<0.001 in both seasons). Moreover, MRs who had recommended influenza vaccination to their patients were significantly more compliant with influenza vaccination uptake in 2011-2012 season (P<0.001). "To avoid spreading influenza among patients" was recognized as the main reason for accepting vaccination by less than 15% of vaccinated MRs. Italian MRs seem to have a very low compliance with influenza vaccination and they seem to accept influenza vaccination as a habit that is unrelated to professional and ethical responsibility. Otherwise, residents who refuse vaccination in the previous seasons usually maintain their behaviors. Promoting correct attitudes and good practice in order to improve the influenza immunization rates of MRs could represent a decisive goal for increasing immunization coverage among health care workers of the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Costantino
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Walter Mazzucco
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Elena Azzolini
- Department of Public Health; University of Siena; Siena, Italy
| | - Cesare Baldini
- Department of Medicine and Public Health; University of Verona; Verona, Italy
| | - Margherita Bergomi
- Department of Public Health Sciences; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena, Italy
| | | | - Manuela Bianco
- Department of Public Health and Microbiology; University of Torino; Torino, Italy
| | - Lucia Borsari
- Department of Public Health Sciences; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena, Italy
| | - Paolo Cacciari
- Department of Medicine and Public Health; University of Bologna; Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Cadeddu
- Department of Public Health; University of Sacred Heart of Roma; Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Camia
- Department of Public Health; University of Parma; Parma, Italy
| | - Eugenia Carluccio
- Department of Public Health Sciences; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Conti
- Department of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health; University of Messina; Messina, Italy
| | - Chiara De Waure
- Department of Public Health; University of Sacred Heart of Roma; Rome, Italy
| | | | - Leila Fabiani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health; University of L'Aquila; L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberto Fallico
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health G.F. Ingrassia; University of Catania; Catania, Italy
| | - Barbara Filisetti
- Institute of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Public Health; University of Brescia; Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria E Flacco
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging; University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti; Chieti, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Franco
- Department of Public Health; University of Rome Tor Vergata; Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Furnari
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health G.F. Ingrassia; University of Catania; Catania, Italy
| | - Veronica Galis
- Department of Public Health and Microbiology; University of Torino; Torino, Italy
| | - Maria R Gallea
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health G.F. Ingrassia; University of Catania; Catania, Italy
| | - Maria F Gallone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences; University of Bari Aldo Moro; Bari, Italy
| | - Serena Gallone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences; University of Bari Aldo Moro; Bari, Italy
| | - Umberto Gelatti
- Institute of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Public Health; University of Brescia; Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Gilardi
- Department of Public Health; University of Rome Tor Vergata; Rome, Italy
| | - Anna R Giuliani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health; University of L'Aquila; L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Orazio C Grillo
- Department of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health; University of Messina; Messina, Italy
| | - Niccolò Lanati
- Department of Public Health, Neuroscience, Experimental and Legal Medicine; University of Pavia; Pavia, Lombardi, Italy
| | - Silvia Mascaretti
- Institute of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Public Health; University of Brescia; Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonella Mattei
- Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health; University of L'Aquila; L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Rocco Micò
- Department of Health Sciences; University of Catanzaro Magna Græcia; Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Laura Morciano
- Department of Public Health; University of Rome Tor Vergata; Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Nante
- Department of Public Health; University of Siena; Siena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Napoli
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | | | - Raffaele Palladino
- Department of Public Health; University Hospital Federico II of Naples; Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Parisi
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Maria Passaro
- Department of Public Health; University Hospital Federico II of Naples; Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pelissero
- Department of Public Health, Neuroscience, Experimental and Legal Medicine; University of Pavia; Pavia, Lombardi, Italy
| | - Michele Quarto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences; University of Bari Aldo Moro; Bari, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Department of Public Health; University of Sacred Heart of Roma; Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Romano
- Department of Medicine and Public Health; University of Verona; Verona, Italy
| | - Ennio Rustico
- Department of Medicine and Public Health; University of Bologna; Bologna, Italy
| | - Anita Saponari
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging; University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti; Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco S Schioppa
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging; University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti; Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Siliquini
- Department of Public Health and Microbiology; University of Torino; Torino, Italy
| | | | - Maria Triassi
- Department of Public Health; University Hospital Federico II of Naples; Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Varetta
- Department of Public Health, Neuroscience, Experimental and Legal Medicine; University of Pavia; Pavia, Lombardi, Italy
| | - Andrea Ziglio
- Department of Medicine and Public Health; University of Verona; Verona, Italy
| | - Angela Zoccali
- Department of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health; University of Messina; Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Vitale
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Emanuele Amodio
- Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care G. D'Alessandro; University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barnett DJ, Thompson CB, Semon NL, Errett NA, Harrison KL, Anderson MK, Ferrell JL, Freiheit JM, Hudson R, McKee M, Mejia-Echeverry A, Spitzer J, Balicer RD, Links JM, Storey JD. EPPM and willingness to respond: the role of risk and efficacy communication in strengthening public health emergency response systems. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2014; 29:598-609. [PMID: 23799806 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.785474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
This study examines the attitudinal impact of an Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM)-based training curriculum on local public health department (LHD) workers' willingness to respond to representative public health emergency scenarios. Data are from 71 U.S. LHDs in urban and rural settings across nine states. The study explores changes in response willingness and EPPM threat and efficacy appraisals between randomly assigned control versus intervention health departments, at baseline and 1 week post curriculum, through an EPPM-based survey/resurvey design. Levels of response willingness and emergency response-related attitudes/beliefs are measured. Analyses focus on two scenario categories that have appeared on a U.S. government list of scenarios of significant concern: a weather-related emergency and a radiological "dirty" bomb event (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2007). The greatest impact from the training intervention on response willingness was observed among LHD workers who had low levels of EPPM-related threat and efficacy perceptions at baseline. Self-efficacy and response efficacy and response willingness increased in intervention LHDs for both scenarios, with greater response willingness increases observed for the radiological "dirty" bomb terrorism scenario. Findings indicate the importance of building efficacy versus enhancing threat perceptions as a path toward greater response willingness, and suggest the potential applicability of such curricular interventions for boosting emergency response willingness among other cadres of health providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Barnett
- a Johns Hopkins Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
López-Medrano F, Fariñas MC, Payeras A, Pachón J. Antiviral treatment and vaccination for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus: lessons learned from the pandemic. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2013; 30 Suppl 4:49-53. [PMID: 23116793 DOI: 10.1016/s0213-005x(12)70105-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The influenza pandemic that was declared by the World Health Organization in June 2009 created a new scenario for the use of influenza antivirals and vaccination. The new strain, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, was resistant to amantadine and rimantadine, and the most frequently used antiviral was oseltamivir. Randomized studies were not performed comparing neuraminidase inhibitors with placebo. Nevertheless, experience from prospective and retrospective cohorts indicated that these drugs were useful for improving the prognosis of patients admitted to hospitals, especially for those with more severe disease. Treatment with oseltamivir was associated with a reduction in days of fever, length of hospital stay, use of mechanical ventilation and mortality. Treatment was more effective if it was begun within the first 48 h after the onset of symptoms, but it was also useful if begun later. A safe and effective vaccine to prevent disease from this new influenza strain was available in developed countries soon after the pandemic began; thus, the rate of adverse effects was comparable to that of seasonal influenza vaccines. The main barrier to its use was the concern of target populations about its necessity and safety. Therefore, the challenges for future pandemics will be to increase the population coverage of the vaccine in developed countries and to make it affordable for developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco López-Medrano
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Domínguez A, Godoy P, Castilla J, Soldevila N, Toledo D, Astray J, Mayoral JM, Tamames S, García-Gutiérrez S, González-Candelas F, Martín V, Díaz J, Torner N. Knowledge of and attitudes to influenza vaccination in healthy primary healthcare workers in Spain, 2011-2012. PLoS One 2013; 8:e81200. [PMID: 24260560 PMCID: PMC3832596 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for healthcare workers, but many do not follow the recommendation. The objective of this study was to investigate the factors associated with seasonal influenza vaccination in the 2011–2012 season. We carried out an anonymous web survey of Spanish primary healthcare workers in 2012. Information on vaccination, and knowledge and attitudes about the influenza vaccine was collected. Workers with medical conditions that contraindicated vaccination and those with high risk conditions were excluded. Multivariate analysis was performed using unconditional logistic regression. We included 1,749 workers. The overall vaccination coverage was 50.7% and was higher in workers aged ≥ 55 years (55.7%), males (57.4%) and paediatricians (63.1%). Factors associated with vaccination were concern about infection at work (aOR 4.93; 95% CI 3.72–6.53), considering that vaccination of heathcare workers is important (aOR 2.62; 95%CI 1.83–3.75) and that vaccination is effective in preventing influenza and its complications (aOR 2.40; 95% CI 1.56–3.67). No association was found between vaccination and knowledge of influenza or the vaccine characteristics. Educational programs should aim to remove the misconceptions and attitudes that limit compliance with recommendations about influenza vaccination in primary healthcare workers rather than only increasing knowledge about influenza and the characteristics of the vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Domínguez
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Pere Godoy
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Castilla
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Núria Soldevila
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diana Toledo
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jenaro Astray
- Área de Epidemiología, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Tamames
- Dirección General de Salud Pública, Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Junta de Castilla y León, León, Spain
| | | | | | - Vicente Martín
- Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - José Díaz
- Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Nuria Torner
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Caballero P, Tuells J, Duro-Torrijos JL, Nolasco A. Acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers in 2010 Alicante (Spain), perceived seriousness and sources of information. Prev Med 2013; 57:725-8. [PMID: 23973756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers (ECWs) from Alicante province (Spain) in January 2010. Evaluate the correlation with attitudes, beliefs, professional advice and information broadcasted by media. METHOD In this cross-sectional study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 742 ECWs to assess their attitudes towards vaccination against the pandemic influenza strain. A multivariable regression model was made to adjust the Odds Ratios (ORs). RESULTS Some ECWs reported having been vaccinated with seasonal vaccine, 21.5% (95%IC 18.6-24.9); only 15.4% (95%IC 12.8-18.4) with the pandemic one. ECWs vaccinated regularly against seasonal flu (OR 5.1; 95%IC 2.9-9.1), those who considered pandemic influenza as a severe or more serious disease than seasonal flu (OR 3.8; 95%IC 2.1-6.7) and those who never had doubts about vaccine safety (OR 3.7; 95%IC2.1-6.7) had a better acceptance of pandemic vaccine. Finally, 78.7% (95%IC 75.1-81.4) had doubts about pandemic vaccine's effectiveness. CONCLUSION The vast amount of information provided by the media did not seem to be decisive to prevent doubts or to improve the acceptability of the vaccine in ECWs. Professional advice should be the focus of interest in future influenza vaccination campaigns. These results should be taken into account by health authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Caballero
- Cátedra de Vacunología "Balmis" UA-CSISP, Universidad de Alicante, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Trends in influenza vaccine coverage among primary healthcare workers in Spain, 2008-2011. Prev Med 2013; 57:206-11. [PMID: 23732251 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Revised: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate trends in seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) in Spain between 2008 and 2011. METHODS We made an anonymous web survey of PHCWs in 2012. Information on attitudes towards and knowledge of influenza vaccine, and immunization in previous seasons was collected. Self-reported vaccination coverage and factors related to vaccination continuity were analysed. RESULTS Of 5433 workers contacted, 2625 (48.3%) responded to the survey: 47.0% were general practitioners, 10.3% paediatricians and 42.7% nurses. Their reported vaccination rates from seasons 2008-2009 to 2011-2012 decreased over time: 58.4%, 57.4%, 53.2% and 49.3% (linear trend, p < 0.001). Among workers vaccinated in any previous season, 70.2% were vaccinated again in 2011-2012, compared with 5.2% among those not previously vaccinated (p < 0.001). Continuity of vaccination increased with age and with the worker or cohabitant having a major chronic condition. Vaccination was higher in workers who recognized vaccination as effective and those worried about being infected or infecting patients. CONCLUSION Influenza vaccination coverage in PHCWs has declined, especially after the pandemic. Intensive interventions are needed to change this trend. Knowledge of vaccination should be reinforced by stressing the effectiveness of the vaccine and the risks of influenza for workers and patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Njuguna H, Ahmed J, Oria PA, Arunga G, Williamson J, Kosgey A, Muthoka P, Mott JA, Breiman RF, Katz MA. Uptake and effectiveness of monovalent influenza A (H1N1) pandemic 2009 vaccine among healthcare personnel in Kenya, 2010. Vaccine 2013; 31:4662-7. [PMID: 23859843 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Revised: 06/07/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During April-June 2010, the Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation distributed free monovalent influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines to health care personnel (HCP) and other vulnerable groups. We conducted a prospective, cohort study among HCP to characterize influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine uptake, and to assess influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine effectiveness. METHODS We enrolled HCP from 5 hospitals and followed them for 6 months. At enrollment, we asked HCP if they had received the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine and their reasons for their decision. We administered weekly questionnaires to participants about respiratory symptoms suffered during the previous week. Participants who had acute respiratory illness were asked to contact our surveillance clinician, and nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens were collected and later tested for influenza by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by comparing the incidence of acute respiratory illness, absenteeism from work due to respiratory illness and laboratory-confirmed influenza among vaccinated and unvaccinated HCP. RESULTS We enrolled 3803 HCP from the five hospitals; 64% received influenza vaccine. Vaccinated HCP were more likely to develop acute respiratory illness (ARI) and more likely to report missed days of work due to respiratory illness compared to non-vaccinated HCP (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.50, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.33-1.70) and (aIRR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.41-2.88), respectively. Of 531 samples collected from vaccinated and non-vaccinated HCP, 30 were influenza A and 3 were influenza B. Two influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 subtypes were isolated; one from vaccinated and the other from non-vaccinated HCP. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS A majority of Kenyan HCP surveyed reported receiving the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine. Because of low circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the study period, vaccine effectiveness could not be determined. The findings of increased ARI events and missed days of work among vaccinated HCP were likely confounded by vaccine-seeking behavioral factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Njuguna
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Kenya (CDC-K), Nairobi, Kenya.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Aziz NA, Muhamad S, Manaf MRA, Hamid MZA. Factors Influencing H1N1 Vaccination Among Primary Health Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Prev Med 2013; 4:664-70. [PMID: 23930184 PMCID: PMC3733034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2012] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary health care workers (PHCW) are the front-liners in any infectious disease outbreaks. The recent outbreak of H1N1 influenza demonstrated that uptake of H1N1 vaccination remained low amongst PCHW despite its proven effectiveness. This trend is worrying as PHCW are the first point of contact in any emerging outbreak of future influenza epidemic. To investigate factors influencing willingness of H1N1 vaccination amongst PHCW. METHODS A cross-sectional survey using self-reported questionnaire assessing perception and practice towards H1N1 Influenza A vaccination. A score of 34/50 was used as a cut-off score that divide good and poor perception. Logistic regression analysis used to explore the association between acceptance to be vaccinated and chosen variables. RESULTS The mean age was 33.91 (SD: 8.20) with mean year of service of 9.23 (SD: 8.0). Acceptance of H1N1 vaccination was 86.3%. A total of 85.9% perceived the vaccination can prevent serious disease. Willingness to be vaccinated influenced by perception at risk of having illness (OR: 10.182, CI: 1.64-63.23, P 0.013) and need for vaccination (OR: 11.35, CI: 4.67-27.56, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS PCHW were generally willing to be vaccinated should H1N1 Influenza epidemic emerges in the future. However, acceptance of vaccination was influenced by factors of benefit to prevent illness and reduction of spread of the illness. Fear of side-effects remained a barrier toward acceptance which should be taken into account in planning of preparation for future wave of outbreak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Azah Aziz
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, UKM Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia,Correspondence to: Prof. Dr Noor Azah Aziz, Department of Family Medicine, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. E-mail:
| | - Shanaz Muhamad
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, UKM Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Rizak Abd Manaf
- Department of Community Medicine, Medical Faculty, UKM Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Zaini Abd Hamid
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barnett DJ, Errett NA, Rutkow L. A Threat- and Efficacy-Based Framework to Understand Confidence in Vaccines among the Public Health Workforce. Vaccines (Basel) 2013; 1:77-87. [PMID: 26343959 PMCID: PMC4515584 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines1020077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2013] [Revised: 03/09/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) is an established threat- and efficacy-based behavioral framework for understanding health behaviors in the face of uncertain risk. A growing body of research has applied this model to understand these behaviors among the public health workforce. In this manuscript, we aim to explore the application of this framework to the public health workforce, with a novel focus on their confidence in vaccines and perceptions of vaccine injury compensation mechanisms. We characterize specific connections between EPPM’s threat and efficacy dimensions and relevant vaccine policy frameworks and highlight how these connections can usefully inform training interventions for public health workers to enhance their confidence in these vaccine policy measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Barnett
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room E7036, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Nicole A Errett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 513, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Lainie Rutkow
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 513, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cihan FG, Durmaz FG, Odabas D, Baydemir C, Fatma K. Attitudes toward and factors affecting influenza vaccination among physicians and nurses of a tertiary-care hospital in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey. Postgrad Med 2013; 124:117-23. [PMID: 23322145 DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2012.11.2602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Similar to most international health care organizations, the Turkish Ministry of Health strongly recommends influenza vaccination for health care professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the vaccination rates and attitudes of physicians and nurses during the 2011 to 2012 seasonal influenza vaccination at a tertiary-care hospital of the Turkish Ministry of Health. METHODS This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study participants were physicians and nurses working at the Konya Training and Research Hospital, located in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey. Self-reported (anonymous) questionnaires were given to 192 physicians and 411 nurses (N = 603) who agreed to participate between November 1 and 30, 2011. Frequencies, percentages, chi-square tests, and logistic regression tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Women comprised 64.1% (n = 387) of the participants, and 63% (n = 380) of participants had been working for ≥ 5 years. The seasonal influenza vaccination rate for all participants during the 2011 to 2012 season was 16.7% (n = 101). Although 9.5% (n = 57) of the study group had a chronic disease, 71.9% (n = 41) did not receive influenza vaccination (P < 0.05). Additionally, 40.8% (n = 240) reported ≥ 2 cases of influenza annually, and 82.9% (n = 204) had not been vaccinated. For 12.9% (n = 78) of participants, influenza caused absenteeism from work. Approximately 45% (n = 271) of participants had never been vaccinated, 27% (n = 163) were vaccinated in 2010, and 21.2% (n = 128) planned on being vaccinated in 2012. Among the vaccinated group, 56.4% (n = 57) experienced no side effects, 29.7% (n = 30) experienced local side effects, and 22.8% (n = 23) developed influenza-like syndrome. CONCLUSION Similar to other studies in the literature, vaccination rates were not at the desired level. According to our Hospital Infection Committee reports, vaccination rates at our hospital were lower compared with vaccination rates of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. The underlying causes of health care professionals abstaining from influenza vaccination should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Goksin Cihan
- Family Medicine Department, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
López-Medrano F, Cordero E, Gavaldá J, Cruzado JM, Marcos MÁ, Pérez-Romero P, Sabé N, Gómez-Bravo MÁ, Delgado JF, Cabral E, Carratalá J. Management of influenza infection in solid-organ transplant recipients: consensus statement of the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2013; 31:526.e1-526.e20. [PMID: 23528341 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at greater risk than the general population for complications and mortality from influenza infection. METHODS Researchers and clinicians with experience in SOT infections have developed this consensus document in collaboration with several Spanish scientific societies and study networks related to transplant management. We conducted a systematic review to assess the management and prevention of influenza infection in SOT recipients. Evidence levels based on the available literature are given for each recommendation. This article was written in accordance with international recommendations on consensus statements and the recommendations of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). RESULTS Recommendations are provided on the procurement of organs from donors with suspected or confirmed influenza infection. We highlight the importance of the possibility of influenza infection in any SOT recipient presenting upper or lower respiratory symptoms, including pneumonia. The importance of early antiviral treatment of SOT recipients with suspected or confirmed influenza infection and the necessity of annual influenza vaccination are emphasized. The microbiological techniques for diagnosis of influenza infection are reviewed. Guidelines for the use of antiviral prophylaxis in inpatients and outpatients are provided. Recommendations for household contacts of SOT recipients with influenza infection and health care workers in close contact with transplant patients are also included. Finally antiviral dose adjustment guidelines are presented for cases of impaired renal function and for pediatric populations. CONCLUSIONS The latest scientific information available regarding influenza infection in the context of SOT is incorporated into this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco López-Medrano
- Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica 12 de Octubre (i+12), Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ashbaugh AR, Herbert CF, Saimon E, Azoulay N, Olivera-Figueroa L, Brunet A. The decision to vaccinate or not during the H1N1 pandemic: selecting the lesser of two evils? PLoS One 2013; 8:e58852. [PMID: 23505565 PMCID: PMC3591380 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2012] [Accepted: 02/08/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the release of the H1N1 vaccine, there was much controversy surrounding its use despite strong encouragements to be vaccinated in the media. Though studies have examined factors influencing people's decision to be vaccinated, few have focused on how general beliefs about the world or where an individual gathers information might influence that decision. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS A cross-sectional web-based survey (N = 817) was conducted during the H1N1 outbreak after the vaccine was available. Variables examined included sociodemographic information, health related behaviours, specific beliefs concerning the H1N1 virus and its vaccine, as well as general beliefs, such as fear of contamination, intolerance of uncertainty, emotional states, coping behaviour, and the source of information concerning the virus. Three converging statistical methods were used to examine the associations - analysis of variance, logistic regression, and recursive partition modelling. The most consistent and strongest association was that negative beliefs about the H1N1 vaccine (e.g. fear of its side effects) was related to the decision not to be vaccinated, whereas beliefs about the dangers of the H1N1 virus was related to the decision to be vaccinated. Most notably, having very strong negative beliefs about the vaccine was a more powerful predictor than even strong beliefs about the dangers of the H1N1 virus. Furthermore, obtaining information from the Internet, as compared to more traditional sources of information (e.g., TV, newspapers) was related to the decision not to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE These results are consistent with the Health Belief Model. Importantly they suggest that during future pandemics public health officials should not only discuss the dangers of the pandemic but also (i) take additional steps to reassure the public about the safety of vaccines and (ii) monitor the information disseminated over the Internet rather than strictly relying on the more traditional mass media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea R Ashbaugh
- Research Center of the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mitchell R, Roth V, Gravel D, Astrakianakis G, Bryce E, Forgie S, Johnston L, Taylor G, Vearncombe M. Are health care workers protected? An observational study of selection and removal of personal protective equipment in Canadian acute care hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41:240-4. [PMID: 23073484 PMCID: PMC7132671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2012] [Revised: 04/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/19/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by health care workers (HCWs) is vital in preventing the spread of infection and has implications for HCW safety. METHODS An observational study was performed in 11 hospitals participating in the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program between January 7 and March 30, 2011. Using a standardized data collection tool, observers recorded HCWs selecting and removing PPE and performing hand hygiene on entry into the rooms of febrile respiratory illness patients. RESULTS The majority of HCWs put on gloves (88%, n = 390), gown (83%, n = 368), and mask (88%, n = 386). Only 37% (n = 163) were observed to have put on eye protection. Working in a pediatric unit was significantly associated with not wearing eye protection (7%), gown (70%), gloves (77%), or mask (79%). Half of the observed HCWs (54%, n = 206) removed their PPE in the correct sequence. Twenty-six percent performed hand hygiene after removing their gloves, 46% after removing their gown, and 57% after removing their mask and/or eye protection. CONCLUSION Overall adherence with appropriate PPE use in health care settings involving febrile respiratory illness patients was modest, particularly on pediatric units. Interventions to improve PPE use should be targeted toward the use of recommended precautions (eg, eye protection), HCWs working in pediatric units, the correct sequence of PPE removal, and performing hand hygiene.
Collapse
|
44
|
Domínguez Á. ¿Qué nos enseñan los brotes de enfermedades inmunoprevenibles? GACETA SANITARIA 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
45
|
|
46
|
Estudio de actitudes y conocimientos sobre la vacunación antigripal en personal sanitario de atención primaria. Temporada 2011-2012. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vacun.2013.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
47
|
Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Vaccine amongst Essential Service Providers: A Cross Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2012; 1:17-33. [PMID: 26343848 PMCID: PMC4552200 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines1010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Revised: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 12/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although mentioned in the UK pandemic plan, essential service providers were not among the priority groups. They may be important targets of future influenza pandemic vaccination campaigns. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 380 employees from West Midlands police headquarters and 15 operational command units in the West Midlands Area during December 2009–February 2010 to identify factors affecting intention to accept the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine. One hundred and ninety nine (52.4%) employees completed the questionnaire. 39.7% were willing to accept the vaccine. The most common reasons for intention to accept were worry about catching Swine Flu (n = 42, 53.2%) and about infecting others (n = 40, 50.6%). The most common reason for declination was worry about side effects (n = 45, 57.0%). The most important factor predicting vaccine uptake was previous receipt of seasonal vaccine (OR 7.9 (95% CI 3.4, 18.5)). Employees aged <40 years, males, current smokers, and those who perceived a greater threat and severity of swine flu were also more likely to agree to the vaccine. The findings of this study could be used to improve future pandemic immunization strategies. Targeted education programs should be used to address misconceptions; the single most important factor which might lead to a large improvement in uptake is to allay concern about side effects.
Collapse
|
48
|
Valour F, Bénet T, Chidiac C. Pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza vaccination in Lyon University Hospitals, France: perception and attitudes of hospital workers. Vaccine 2012; 31:592-5. [PMID: 23219437 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2011] [Revised: 11/18/2012] [Accepted: 11/25/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Health-care authorities encouraged A(H1N1)2009 influenza vaccination for all hospital workers because of their high risk of contracting and transmitting the virus. Six months after the vaccination campaign began, an electronic anonymous questionnaire was completed by 1630 among 14,000 hospital workers (11.6%). Vaccination rate was 54.3%. Independent predictors for vaccination acceptance were advanced age (OR=1.61-2.19), being a physician (OR=5.07), working in gynaecology-obstetrics or podiatry (OR=1.62), and having been informed about vaccination (OR=2.78). The main reasons for getting vaccinated were to avoid flu for relatives (82.4%), themselves (65.8%) and patients (57.1%). Arguments against vaccination were lack of sufficient studies of the vaccine (75.7%) and the perception of A(H1N1)2009 influenza as a benign disease (51.5%). Vaccination coverage would be insufficient to keep the health-care system operating at maximum capacity during a severe pandemic disease, and to avoid nosocomial transmission of influenza. These results suggest a better-targeted vaccination campaign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Valour
- Infectious Diseases Department, Lyon University Hospitals, Lyon, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Factors Affecting Medical Students' Uptake of the 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine. INFLUENZA RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2012; 2012:753164. [PMID: 23251794 PMCID: PMC3515892 DOI: 10.1155/2012/753164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2012] [Accepted: 07/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background. Pandemic influenza vaccination rate amongst healthcare workers in England 2009/2010 was suboptimal (40.3%). Targeting medical students before they enter the healthcare workforce is an attractive future option. This study assessed the H1N1 vaccine uptake rate amongst medical students and factors that influenced this. Methods. Anonymised, self-administered questionnaire at a medical school. Results. The uptake rate amongst 126 medical students offered the vaccine was 49.2% and intended uptake amongst 77 students was 63.6%. Amongst those offered the vaccine, the strongest barriers to acceptance were fear of side effects (67.9%), lack of vaccine information (50.9%), lack of perceived risk (45.3%), and inconvenience (35.8%). Having a chronic illness (OR 3.4 (95% CI 1.2-10.2)), 4th/5th year of study (OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.3-7.1)), and correct H1N1 knowledge (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1-6.0)) were positively associated with uptake. Non-white ethnicity was an independent negative predictor of uptake (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.8)). Students who accepted the H1N1 vaccine were three times more likely (OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-7.7)) to accept future seasonal influenza vaccination. Conclusion. Efforts to increase uptake should focus on routine introduction of influenza vaccine and creating a culture of uptake during medical school years, evidence-based education on vaccination, and improving vaccine delivery.
Collapse
|
50
|
Mamma M, Spandidos DA. Economic evaluation of the vaccination program against seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza among customs officers in Greece. Health Policy 2012. [PMID: 23195436 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health policies from many countries recommend influenza vaccination of "high-priority" professional groups, including customs officers. Our aim was to estimate the economic impact of the vaccination program against influenza among customs officers in Greece during the 2009/2010 period. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a decision analytical computational simulation model including dynamic transmission elements that estimated the economic impact of various scenarios with different attack rates, symptomatic percentages and vaccination participation among customs officers. We also assessed in real-time the economic impact of the national 2009/2010 campaign against seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza. RESULTS Implementing a seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza vaccination program among customs officers in Greece with a participation rate of 30%, influenza vaccination was not cost-saving in any of the studied influenza scenarios. When the participation rate reached 100%, the program was cost-saving, when the influenza attack rate was 30% and the symptomatic rate 65%. The real-time estimated mean net cost-benefit value in 2009/2010 period was -7.3 euros/custom officer. CONCLUSIONS With different clinical scenarios, providing a vaccination program against seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza can incur a substantial net benefit for customs offices. However, the size of the benefit strongly depends upon the attack rate of influenza, the symptomatic rate as well as the participation rate of the customs officers in the program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Mamma
- Department of Virology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|