1
|
Olson-Chen C, Swamy GK, Gonik B, Forsyth K, Heininger U, Hozbor D, von König CHW, Chitkara AJ, Top KA, Muloiwa R, van der Schyff M, Tan TQ. The current state of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world, with recommendations for improved care: Consensus statements from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:860-869. [PMID: 38251722 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Gonik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Forsyth
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Amar J Chitkara
- Department of Pediatrics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Malikah van der Schyff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Constantiaberg Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Choi WS, Song JY, Kwon KT, Lee HJ, Choo EJ, Baek J, Chin B, Kim WJ, Lee MS, Park WB, Han SH, Choi JY, Yeom JS, Lee JS, Choi HJ, Choi YH, Lee DG, Choi JH, Cheong HJ. Recommendations for Adult Immunization by the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, 2023: Minor Revisions to the 3rd Edition. Infect Chemother 2024; 56:188-203. [PMID: 38960738 PMCID: PMC11224039 DOI: 10.3947/ic.2023.0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases has been regularly developing guidelines for adult immunization since 2007. In 2023, the guidelines for the following seven vaccines were revised: influenza, herpes zoster, pneumococcal, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap), human papillomavirus (HPV), meningococcal, and rabies vaccines. For the influenza vaccine, a recommendation for enhanced vaccines for the elderly was added. For the herpes zoster vaccine, a recommendation for the recombinant zoster vaccine was added. For the pneumococcal vaccine, the current status of the 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 20-valent PCV was described. For the Tdap vaccine, the possibility of using Tdap instead of tetanus-diphtheria vaccine was described. For the HPV vaccine, the expansion of the eligible age for vaccination was described. For the meningococcal vaccine, a recommendation for the meningococcal B vaccine was added. For the rabies vaccine, the number of pre-exposure prophylaxis doses was changed. This manuscript documents the summary and rationale of the revisions for the seven vaccines. For the vaccines not mentioned in this manuscript, the recommendations in the 3rd edition of the Vaccinations for Adults textbook shall remain in effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Suk Choi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Song
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Tae Kwon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyo-Jin Lee
- Division of infectious diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ju Choo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Jihyeon Baek
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - BumSik Chin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Joo Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Suk Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan Beom Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Han
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Yong Choi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Sup Yeom
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Soo Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hee-Jung Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Woman's University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hwa Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Dong-Gun Lee
- Division of infectious diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Hyun Choi
- Division of infectious diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Cheong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Weerdt L, Thiriard A, Leuridan E, Marchant A, Maertens K. Immunogenicity at delivery after Tdap vaccination in successive pregnancies. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1360201. [PMID: 38464513 PMCID: PMC10920275 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1360201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is recommended to be administered in every pregnancy. Although the safety of this strategy has been confirmed, the immunogenicity of Tdap vaccination in two successive pregnancies has not yet been described. This study investigated Tdap-specific immunity levels and transplacental transfer in two successive pregnancies after repeated Tdap-vaccination. Methods Women enrolled in prior studies on Tdap vaccination during pregnancy were invited to participate in a follow-up study if they became pregnant again. Women who received a Tdap vaccine in both pregnancies were considered for this analysis. Tdap-specific total IgG and IgG subclasses were measured with a multiplex immunoassay. Results In total, 27 participants with a mean interval between deliveries of 2.4 years were included in the analysis. In maternal serum, Tdap-specific total IgG levels were comparable at both deliveries whereas in cord serum, all Tdap-specific total IgG antibody levels were reduced at the second compared to the first delivery. This was largely reflected in the IgG1 levels in maternal and cord serum. Transplacental transfer ratios of total IgG and IgG1 were also mostly reduced in the second compared to the first pregnancy. Conclusion This study reports for the first time Tdap-specific total IgG and IgG subclass levels and transfer ratios after repeated Tdap vaccination in successive pregnancies. We found reduced transfer of most Tdap-specific IgG and IgG1 antibodies in the successive pregnancy. As pertussis-specific antibodies wane quickly, Tdap vaccination in each pregnancy remains beneficial. However, more research is needed to understand the impact of closely spaced booster doses during pregnancy on early infant protection against pertussis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise De Weerdt
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anaïs Thiriard
- European Plotkin Institute for Vaccinology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- European Plotkin Institute for Vaccinology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaudhary N, Newby AN, Whitehead KA. Non-Viral RNA Delivery During Pregnancy: Opportunities and Challenges. SMALL (WEINHEIM AN DER BERGSTRASSE, GERMANY) 2023:e2306134. [PMID: 38145340 PMCID: PMC11196389 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202306134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
During pregnancy, the risk of maternal and fetal adversities increases due to physiological changes, genetic predispositions, environmental factors, and infections. Unfortunately, treatment options are severely limited because many essential interventions are unsafe, inaccessible, or lacking in sufficient scientific data to support their use. One potential solution to this challenge may lie in emerging RNA therapeutics for gene therapy, protein replacement, maternal vaccination, fetal gene editing, and other prenatal treatment applications. In this review, the current landscape of RNA platforms and non-viral RNA delivery technologies that are under active development for administration during pregnancy is explored. Advancements of pregnancy-specific RNA drugs against SARS-CoV-2, Zika, influenza, preeclampsia, and for in-utero gene editing are discussed. Finally, this study highlights bottlenecks that are impeding translation efforts of RNA therapies, including the lack of accurate cell-based and animal models of human pregnancy and concerns related to toxicity and immunogenicity during pregnancy. Overcoming these challenges will facilitate the rapid development of this new class of pregnancy-safe drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namit Chaudhary
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Alexandra N. Newby
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Kathryn A. Whitehead
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clark LR, Johnson DR. Safety and Clinical Benefits of Adacel ® and Adacel ®-Polio Vaccination in Pregnancy: A Structured Literature Review. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:1955-2003. [PMID: 37653123 PMCID: PMC10505126 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00847-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination in pregnancy using a tetanus toxoid, reduced dose diphtheria toxoid, and reduced dose acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is important for prevention of severe pertussis disease in young infants. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to search for original research studies evaluating the vaccine effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of Adacel®/Adacel-Polio® used during pregnancy to prevent pertussis disease in young infants. Medical databases used included EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Chemical Abstracts, with search terms related to pregnancy, vaccines/immunization, safety, pertussis, effectiveness/efficacy, and immune response; other potentially eligible reports were included where applicable. Search results were restricted to literature published from 1 January 1995 to 26 July 2021. A total of 2021 articles and 4 other reports were identified for primary review. A total of 49 publications qualified for inclusion after primary and secondary reviews. Effectiveness studies of Adacel or Adacel-Polio given in pregnancy consistently showed high levels of protection from pertussis disease in the newborn (vaccine effectiveness: 91-93%). In immunogenicity studies, the response in pregnant women was consistent with that of non-pregnant women. Infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio in pregnancy had higher anti-pertussis antibody levels at birth and at 2 months of age compared to infants born to women vaccinated with comparator vaccines, placebo, or those not vaccinated during pregnancy. There was evidence of a slightly decreased response to primary pertussis vaccination in infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio, but this was not thought to be clinically significant. In safety studies, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination was well tolerated by pregnant woman and not associated with pregnancy, postpartum, or neonatal complications. In conclusion, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination in pregnancy is highly effective in protecting young infants from pertussis disease, with a favorable safety profile for both pregnant women and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana R Clark
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA.
| | - David R Johnson
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taton M, Willems F, Widomski C, Martin C, Jiang Y, Renard K, Cogan A, Necsoi C, Ackerman ME, Marchant A, Dauby N. Impact of pregnancy on polyfunctional IgG and memory B cell responses to Tdap immunization. Vaccine 2023; 41:4009-4018. [PMID: 37244810 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal pertussis immunization using Tdap vaccine is recommended in many countries to protect newborns from severe post-natal infection. Immunological changes during pregnancy may influence the response to vaccines. The quality of IgG and memory B cell responses to Tdap immunization in pregnant women has not yet been described. METHODS The impact of pregnancy on the response to Tdap vaccination was assessed by comparing humoral immune responses in 42 pregnant and 39 non-pregnant women. The levels of serum pertussis antigens and tetanus toxoid-specific IgG, IgG subclasses, IgG Fc-mediated effector functions, as well as memory B cell frequencies were assessed before and at several time points after vaccination. RESULTS Tdap immunization induced similar levels of pertussis and tetanus-specific IgG and IgG subclasses in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Pregnant women produced IgG promoting complement deposition, and neutrophils and macrophages phagocytosis at levels comparable to non-pregnant women. They were also able to expand pertussis and tetanus-specific memory B cells at similar frequencies as non-pregnant women, suggesting equivalent "boostability". Higher levels of vaccine-specific IgG, IgG subclasses, and IgG Fc-mediated effector functions were detected in cord blood as compared to maternal blood, indicating efficient transport across the placenta. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that pregnancy does not affect the quality of effector IgG and memory B cell responses to Tdap immunization and that polyfunctional IgG are efficiently transferred across the placenta. REGISTRY'S URL AND THE TRIAL'S REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT03519373).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Taton
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fabienne Willems
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Cyprien Widomski
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Charlotte Martin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, Brussels 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Yiwei Jiang
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Katty Renard
- Clinical Research Unit, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, Brussels 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Alexandra Cogan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, Brussels 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Coca Necsoi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, Brussels 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Margaret E Ackerman
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Rope Ferry Rd. 1, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Thayer Dr. 15, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Dauby
- Institute for Medical Immunology and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Lennik Rd. 808, Anderlecht 1070, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Haute 322, Brussels 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prabhu M, Yang YJ, Johnston CD, Murphy EA, Ketas TJ, Diaz-Tapia R, Jurkiewicz M, Racine-Brzostek S, Mohammed I, Sukhu AC, Singh S, Forlenza K, Iyer S, Yee J, Eng D, Marks K, Zhao Z, Klasse PJ, Permar S, Moore JP, Riley LE. Longitudinal antibody response kinetics following SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccination in pregnant and nonpregnant persons. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100796. [PMID: 36334723 PMCID: PMC9626404 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For some vaccine-preventable diseases, the immunologic response to vaccination is altered by a pregnant state. The effect of pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize the peak and longitudinal anti-S immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin A responses to messenger RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant persons and compare them with those in nonpregnant, reproductive-aged persons. STUDY DESIGN We conducted 2 parallel prospective cohort studies among pregnant and nonpregnant persons who received SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccinations. Blood was collected at the time of first and second vaccine doses, 2 weeks post second dosage, and with serial longitudinal follow-up up to 41.7 weeks post vaccination initiation. Anti-S immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin A were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We excluded those with previous evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by history or presence of antinucleocapsid antibodies. In addition, for this study, we did not include individuals who received a third or booster vaccine dosage during the study period. We also excluded pregnant persons who were not fully vaccinated (14 days post receipt of the second vaccine dosage) by time of delivery and nonpregnant persons who became pregnant through the course of the study. We studied the effect of gestational age at vaccination on the anti-S response using Spearman correlation. We compared the peak anti-S antibody responses between pregnant and nonpregnant persons using a Mann-Whitney U test. We visualized and studied the longitudinal anti-S antibody response using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing, Mann-Whitney U test, and mixed analysis of variance test. RESULTS Data from 53 pregnant and 21 nonpregnant persons were included in this analysis. The median (interquartile range) age of the pregnant and nonpregnant participants was 35.0 (33.3-37.8) years and 36.0 (33.0-41.0) years, respectively. Six (11.3%) participants initiated vaccination in the first trimester, 23 (43.3%) in the second trimester, and 24 (45.3%) in the third trimester, with a median gestational age at delivery of 39.6 (39.0-40.0) weeks. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time from vaccine initiation to the last blood sample collected was 25.9 (11.9) weeks and 28.9 (12.9) weeks in the pregnant and nonpregnant cohort, respectively. Among pregnant persons, anti-S immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin M responses were not associated with gestational age at vaccine initiation (all P>.05). The anti-S immunoglobulin G response at 2 weeks post second dosage was not statistically different between pregnant and nonpregnant persons (P>.05). However, the anti-S immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin A responses at 2 weeks post second dosage were significantly higher in nonpregnant persons (P<.001 for both). The anti-S immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M levels 6 to 8 months after vaccine initiation fell to comparable proportions of the peak 2 weeks post second dosage antibody levels between pregnant and nonpregnant persons (immunoglobulin G P=.77; immunoglobulin M P=.51). In contrast, immunoglobulin A levels 6 to 8 months after vaccine initiation fell to statistically significantly higher proportions of peak 2 weeks post second dosage antibody levels in pregnant compared with nonpregnant persons (P=.002). Maternal anti-S immunoglobulin G levels were strongly correlated with umbilical cord anti-S immunoglobulin G levels (R=0.8, P<.001). CONCLUSION The anti-S immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin G response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy is independent of gestational age of vaccine initiation. Maintenance of the immunoglobulin G response is comparable between pregnant and nonpregnant persons. The differential peak response of immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin A and the differential decline of anti-S immunoglobulin A between pregnant and nonpregnant persons requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malavika Prabhu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Prabhu, Mr Mohammed, and Dr Riley)
| | - Yawei J Yang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Yang, Murphy, Racine-Brzostek, and Zhao); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao).
| | - Carrie D Johnston
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Johnston and Marks)
| | - Elisabeth A Murphy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Yang, Murphy, Racine-Brzostek, and Zhao)
| | - Thomas J Ketas
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Messrs Ketas and Diaz-Tapia and Drs Klasse and Moore)
| | - Randy Diaz-Tapia
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Messrs Ketas and Diaz-Tapia and Drs Klasse and Moore)
| | - Magdalena Jurkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Jurkiewicz)
| | - Sabrina Racine-Brzostek
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Yang, Murphy, Racine-Brzostek, and Zhao); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao)
| | - Iman Mohammed
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Prabhu, Mr Mohammed, and Dr Riley)
| | - Ashley C Sukhu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao)
| | - Sunidhi Singh
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Ms Singh, Dr Forlenza, and Ms Iyer)
| | - Kimberly Forlenza
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Ms Singh, Dr Forlenza, and Ms Iyer)
| | - Sonali Iyer
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Ms Singh, Dr Forlenza, and Ms Iyer)
| | - Jim Yee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao)
| | - Dorothy Eng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao)
| | - Kristen Marks
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Johnston and Marks)
| | - Zhen Zhao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Drs Yang, Murphy, Racine-Brzostek, and Zhao); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Yang and Racine-Brzostek, Ms Sukhu, Mr Yee, Ms Eng, and Dr Zhao)
| | - Per Johan Klasse
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Messrs Ketas and Diaz-Tapia and Drs Klasse and Moore)
| | - Sallie Permar
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Permar)
| | - John P Moore
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Messrs Ketas and Diaz-Tapia and Drs Klasse and Moore)
| | - Laura E Riley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Prabhu, Mr Mohammed, and Dr Riley)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Immink MM, Kemmeren JM, Broeders L, Bekker MN, de Melker HE, Sanders EAM, van der Maas NAT. Reactogenicity and safety of second trimester maternal tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccination in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2023; 41:1074-1080. [PMID: 36604217 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is offered to all pregnant women during their second trimester in the Netherlands since December 2019. We assessed second trimester Tdap vaccination reactogenicity and compared with third trimester data from a similar study. For safety assessment, adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared with national data from 2018, before Tdap vaccine-introduction. METHODS Pregnant women were included between August 2019-December 2021 and received Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24w gestational age (GA). Participants completed a questionnaire on solicited local reactions and systemic adverse events (AEs) within one week after vaccination. Results were compared with historical data on reactogenicity from women vaccinated between 30 and 33w GA (n = 58). Regarding safety-related outcomes, each participant was matched to four unvaccinated pregnant women from the Dutch Perinatal Registry, based on living area, parity and age. RESULTS Among 723 participants who completed the questionnaire, 488 (67.5 %) experienced ≥ 1 local reaction with pain at the injection site as most reported reaction (62.3 %), and 460 (63.6 %) experienced ≥ 1 systemic AE with stiffness in muscles/joints (38.9 %), fatigue (28.9 %), headache (14.5 %) and common cold-like symptoms (11.0 %) most frequently reported. 4 women (0.6 %) reported fever (≥38.0˚C). Symptoms were considered mild and transient within days. No difference in AEs were found between vaccination at 20-24w versus 30-33w GA. 723 participants were matched to 2,424 unvaccinated pregnant women with no increased rates of premature labor, small-for-gestational-age, or other adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Second trimester maternal Tdap vaccination appears safe and well-tolerated. Comparison between second versus third trimester vaccination yielded no reactogenicity concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanet M Kemmeren
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Broeders
- The Dutch Perinatal Registry, Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maertens K, Orije MRP, Huoi C, Boisnard F, Lyabis O. Immunogenicity of a liquid hexavalent DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine after primary and booster vaccination of term and preterm infants born to women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy. Vaccine 2023; 41:795-804. [PMID: 36528443 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination during pregnancy with tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (aP) (Tdap) antigens is important for early protection of newborn infants against pertussis, particularly for preterm infants. This study evaluated the effect of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on the immunogenicity of a diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), aP, inactivated poliovirus (IPV), hepatitis B (HB), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP ∼ T) vaccine in term and preterm populations. METHODS A prospective, observational study (NCT02511327) recruited women and their infants based on delivery (term or preterm) and vaccination status (vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine [Boostrix™, GlaxoSmithKline] during pregnancy or not vaccinated in the last 5 years). All infants received licensed DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T (Hexyon™, Sanofi) (8, 12, 16 week primary series and booster at 13 months of age [preterm infants] or 15 months of age [term infants]). Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays. Data were pooled into term (N = 127) and preterm infants (N = 105), and infants of women who received a Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (N = 199) or not (N = 33). RESULTS Before primary vaccination, antibody levels were higher for term than preterm infants for anti-D, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP, and similar for anti-HBs and anti-T. At this time, infants of Tdap-vaccinated women had higher anti-D, anti-T, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP antibody levels than infants of Tdap-unvaccinated women; anti-HBs and anti-polio antibody levels were similar in both groups. Post-primary, pre-booster, and post-booster, there were only small differences in seroprotection rates (anti-D, anti-T, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-HBs, anti-PRP) and seroconversion rates (anti-PT, anti-FHA), except for anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥ 0.15 µg/mL post-primary vaccination (higher for term [98.31 % and 90.91 %, respectively] versus preterm infants [89.80 % and 79.41 %, respectively]). CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T vaccine for primary and booster vaccination in term and preterm born infants and in infants born to Tdap-vaccinated or Tdap-unvaccinated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - M R P Orije
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shamoun R, Agosta P, Nabati S, Brannan GD, Haglin K, Thomas M. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Rate of Influenza Vaccination in a Predominately African American Pregnant Population. Cureus 2022; 14:e30666. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
11
|
Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022; 22:1553-1564. [PMID: 35964614 PMCID: PMC9371587 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00426-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Pregnant individuals have been receiving COVID-19 vaccines following pre-authorisation clinical trials in non-pregnant people. This study aimed to determine the frequency and nature of significant health events among pregnant females after COVID-19 vaccination, compared with unvaccinated pregnant controls and vaccinated non-pregnant individuals. Methods We did an observational cohort study, set in seven Canadian provinces and territories including Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Alberta, Nova Scotia, Yukon, and Prince Edward Island. Eligibility criteria for vaccinated individuals were a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine within the previous 7 days; an active email address and telephone number; ability to communicate in English or French; and residence in the aforementioned provinces or territories. Study participants were pregnant and non-pregnant females aged 15–49 years. Individuals were able to participate as controls if they were unvaccinated and fulfilled the other criteria. Data were collected primarily by self-reported survey after both vaccine doses, with telephone follow-up for those reporting any medically attended event. Participants reported significant health events (new or worsening of a health event sufficient to cause work or school absenteeism, medical consultation, or prevent daily activities) occurring within 7 days of vaccination or within the past 7 days for unvaccinated individuals. We employed multivariable logistic regression to examine significant health events associated with mRNA vaccines, adjusting for age group, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and trimester, as appropriate. Findings As of Nov 4, 2021, 191 360 women aged 15–49 years with known pregnancy status had completed the first vaccine dose survey and 94 937 had completed the second dose survey. 180 388 received one dose and 94 262 received a second dose of an mRNA vaccine, with 5597 pregnant participants receiving dose one and 3108 receiving dose two, and 174 765 non-pregnant participants receiving dose one and 91 131 receiving dose two. Of 6179 included unvaccinated control participants, 339 were pregnant and 5840 were not pregnant. Overall, 226 (4·0%) of 5597 vaccinated pregnant females reported a significant health event after dose one of an mRNA vaccine, and 227 (7·3%) of 3108 after dose two, compared with 11 (3·2%) of 339 pregnant unvaccinated females. Pregnant vaccinated females had an increased odds of a significant health event within 7 days of the vaccine after dose two of mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·4 [95% CI 2·4–8·3]) compared with pregnant unvaccinated controls within the past 7 days, but not after dose one of mRNA-1273 or any dose of BNT162b2. Pregnant vaccinated females had decreased odds of a significant health event compared with non-pregnant vaccinated females after both dose one (aOR 0·63 [95% CI 0·55–0·72]) and dose two (aOR 0·62 [0·54–0·71]) of any mRNA vaccination. There were no significant differences in any analyses when restricted to events which led to medical attention. Interpretation COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have a good safety profile in pregnancy. These data can be used to appropriately inform pregnant people regarding reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, and should be considered alongside effectiveness and immunogenicity data to make appropriate recommendations about best use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Collapse
|
12
|
Atyeo CG, Shook LL, Brigida S, De Guzman RM, Demidkin S, Muir C, Akinwunmi B, Baez AM, Sheehan ML, McSweeney E, Burns MD, Nayak R, Kumar MK, Patel CD, Fialkowski A, Cvrk D, Goldfarb IT, Yonker LM, Fasano A, Balazs AB, Elovitz MA, Gray KJ, Alter G, Edlow AG. Maternal immune response and placental antibody transfer after COVID-19 vaccination across trimester and platforms. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3571. [PMID: 35764643 PMCID: PMC9239994 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31169-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of three COVID-19 vaccines in the United States provides an unprecedented opportunity to examine how vaccine platforms and timing of vaccination in pregnancy impact maternal and neonatal immunity. Here, we characterize the antibody profile after Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccination in 158 pregnant individuals and evaluate transplacental antibody transfer by profiling maternal and umbilical cord blood in 175 maternal-neonatal dyads. These analyses reveal lower vaccine-induced functions and Fc receptor-binding after Ad26.COV2.S compared to mRNA vaccination and subtle advantages in titer and function with mRNA-1273 versus BN162b2. mRNA vaccines have higher titers and functions against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. First and third trimester vaccination results in enhanced maternal antibody-dependent NK-cell activation, cellular and neutrophil phagocytosis, and complement deposition relative to second trimester. Higher transplacental transfer ratios following first and second trimester vaccination may reflect placental compensation for waning maternal titers. These results provide novel insight into the impact of platform and trimester of vaccination on maternal humoral immune response and transplacental antibody transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline G Atyeo
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- PhD Program in Virology, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lydia L Shook
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Brigida
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rose M De Guzman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stepan Demidkin
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cordelia Muir
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Babatunde Akinwunmi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arantxa Medina Baez
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Erin McSweeney
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madeleine D Burns
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruhi Nayak
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maya K Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chinmay D Patel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison Fialkowski
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dana Cvrk
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ilona T Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lael M Yonker
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alessio Fasano
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Michal A Elovitz
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Gray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Galit Alter
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Andrea G Edlow
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jennewein MF, Kosikova M, Noelette FJ, Radvak P, Boudreau CM, Campbell JD, Chen WH, Xie H, Alter G, Pasetti MF. Functional and structural modifications of influenza antibodies during pregnancy. iScience 2022; 25:104088. [PMID: 35402869 PMCID: PMC8991102 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy represents a unique tolerogenic immune state which may alter susceptibility to infection and vaccine response. Here, we characterized humoral immunity to seasonal influenza vaccine strains in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Although serological responses to influenza remained largely intact during late pregnancy, distinct modifications were observed. Pregnant women had reduced hemagglutinin subtype-1 (H1)- IgG, IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3, hemagglutination inhibition, and group 1 and 2 stem IgG titers. Intriguingly, H1-specific avidity and FcγR1 binding increased, and influenza antibodies had distinct Fc and Fab glycans characterized by increased di-galactosylation and di-sialylation. H1-specific Fc-functionality (i.e. monocyte phagocytosis and complement deposition) was moderately reduced in pregnancy. Multivariate antibody analysis revealed two distinct populations (pregnant vs. non-pregnant) segregated by H1 FcγR1 binding, H1-IgG levels, and Fab and Fc glycosylation. Our results demonstrated a structural and functional modulation of influenza humoral immunity during pregnancy that was antigen-specific and consistent with reduced inflammation and efficient placental transport Pregnancy resulted in structural and functional modulation of influenza antibodies. Antibodies had differential binding capacity, Fc/Fab glycosylation, and function. Antibody glycans directed toward low inflammation and efficient placental transfer. Multivariate analysis of immune markers segregated pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Kosikova
- Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | | | - Peter Radvak
- Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | | | - James D Campbell
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Wilbur H Chen
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Hang Xie
- Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Galit Alter
- The Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Marcela F Pasetti
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shook LL, Fallah PN, Silberman JN, Edlow AG. COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:735394. [PMID: 34604115 PMCID: PMC8481914 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the urgent need to develop vaccine strategies optimized for pregnant people and their newborns, as both populations are at risk of developing severe disease. Although not included in COVID-19 vaccine development trials, pregnant people have had access to these vaccines since their initial release in the US and abroad. The rapid development and distribution of novel COVID-19 vaccines to people at risk, including those who are pregnant and lactating, presents an unprecedented opportunity to further our understanding of vaccine-induced immunity in these populations. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature to date on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation and highlight opportunities for investigation that may inform future maternal vaccine development and implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L. Shook
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Parisa N. Fallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jason N. Silberman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea G. Edlow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peer V, Muhsen K, Betser M, Green MS. Antibody Response to Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women-The Role of Sex Hormones. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9060637. [PMID: 34200795 PMCID: PMC8230440 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9060637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pertussis containing vaccine is recommended for pregnant women to protect neonates prior to being fully immunized against the disease. The immune response during pregnancy may be impacted by changes in the hormonal status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune response to pertussis immunization in pregnancy and to assess the role of sex hormones. In a cross-sectional study, blood samples were drawn from 174 pregnant and 74 non-pregnant women 45-60 days following immunization. Anti-pertussis toxin (Anti-PT) IgG antibody levels, estrogen, and progestogen concentrations were compared between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between serum antibody and sex hormone concentrations in each group, controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-PT IgG antibody was significantly higher in non-pregnant women compared with pregnant women (median of 2.09 and 1.86, interquartile range = 2.36-1.8 and 2.11-1.16 respectively, p < 0.0001). Among pregnant women, the anti-PT IgG antibody GMC was negatively associated with both progesterone (odds ratio = 0.300, 95% CI = 0.116, 0.772, p = 0.013) and estrogen (odds ratio = 0.071, 95% CI = 0.017, 0.292, p < 0.0001), after controlling for age, BMI, and smoking. Pregnancy was associated with lower anti-PT IgG antibody levels (odds ratio = 0.413, 95% CI = -0.190, 0.899, p = 0.026). This appears to be at least partially explained by the higher levels of hormones during pregnancy. These findings demonstrate the important role of sex hormones in the response to pertussis vaccine during pregnancy and can help to evaluate the optimum vaccination schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Peer
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy 199, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel;
- Correspondence:
| | - Khitam Muhsen
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel;
| | - Moshe Betser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (Formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), Zerifin 70300, Israel;
| | - Manfred S Green
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy 199, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
ERRATA CORRIGE. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2021; 62:E249-E260. [PMID: 34322644 PMCID: PMC8283635 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.1.1832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
[This corrects the article on p. E530-E541 in vol. 61, PMID: 33628957.].
Collapse
|
17
|
Röbl-Mathieu M, Kunstein A, Liese J, Mertens T, Wojcinski M. Vaccination in Pregnancy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:262-268. [PMID: 34114547 PMCID: PMC8287076 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination during pregnancy can protect both the expecting mother and the unborn and newborn child from infectious diseases. METHODS This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search on the immunological particularities of infectious diseases affecting pregnant women, unborn children, and neonates, with particular attention to the guidelines of the German Standing Committee on Vaccinations (Ständige Impfkommission, STIKO) and the pertinent guidelines. RESULTS Vaccination during pregnancy protects the expecting mother from a severe course of a number of different infectious diseases. Vaccination with inactivated vaccines against influenza, tetanus, and pertussis is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Women who are pregnant or of child-bearing age should be immunized against tetanus according to the STIKO recommendations. All pregnant women from the second trimester onward should receive an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine. The immunity acquired after vaccination with an acellular pertussis vaccine is present only for a limited time. In a cohort study involving 72,781 pregnant women, pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was found to yield 91% protection against pertussis for their subsequently born children in the first three months of life. Further types of vaccine can also be given during pregnancy if indicated. Additional reasonable measures to protect the health of mother and child include the vaccination of other persons in close contact as well as the closure of relevant vaccination gaps among young adults, particularly women of child-bearing age. Treating physicians play a crucial role in encouraging vaccine acceptance by their patients. CONCLUSION Maternal immunization is a safe and effective strategy for giving neo - nates passive immune protection against life-threatening infections by the vertical transmission of maternal antibodies until they are able to build up their own adaptive immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Röbl-Mathieu
- Gynecologist's office, Munich; Member of STIKOGynecologist's office, MunichDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital WürzburgInstitute of Virology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm; Member of STIKOWorking Group Vaccination in Pregnancy, German Professional Association of Gynecologists, Munich
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Racial Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization and Infant Small for Gestational Age Among Active Duty US Military Women. Matern Child Health J 2021; 24:885-893. [PMID: 32356127 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-02941-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine racial disparities in prenatal care (PNC) utilization and infant small for gestational age (SGA) among active duty US military women, a population with equal access to health care and known socioeconomic status. METHODS Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program data identified active duty women with singleton live births from January 2003 through August 2015. Administrative claims data were used to define PNC utilization and infant SGA, and log-binomial regression models estimated associations with race/ethnicity. To examine whether associations between maternal race/ethnicity and infant SGA were subject to effect measure modification, respective analyses were stratified by demographic and health characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 12.2% of non-Hispanic White women initiated PNC after the first trimester, compared with 14.8% of American Indian/Alaska Native, 15.1% of Asian/Pacific Islander, 14.2% of non-Hispanic Black, and 13.0% of Hispanic women. Infant SGA prevalence was 2.4% and 1.6% among non-Hispanic Black and White women, respectively (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.40-1.64). This disparity persisted across stratified analyses, particularly among non-Hispanic Black versus White women with a preeclampsia or hypertension diagnosis in pregnancy (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.67-2.29) and those aged 35 + years at infant birth (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.56-2.67). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE In multiple assessments of PNC utilization and infant SGA, non-Hispanic Black military women had consistently worse outcomes than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. This suggests that equal access to health care does not eliminate racial disparities in outcomes or utilization; additional research is needed to elucidate the underlying etiology of these disparities.
Collapse
|
19
|
SQUERI RAFFAELE, GENOVESE CRISTINA. Immunogenicity and antibody persistence of diphteria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination in adolescents and adults: a systematic review of the literature showed different responses to the available vaccines. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2021; 61:E530-E541. [PMID: 33628957 PMCID: PMC7888403 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.4.1832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In industrialized countries, the routine use of Bordetella pertussis vaccines has shifted the burden of Bordetella pertussis disease from children to infants, adolescents and adults, leading to the necessity for booster doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prepared a review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) with the aims of: a) describing the immunogenicity of the main available vaccines for adolescents and adults; b) describing antibody persistence after immunization with the main vaccines available in childhood and adults and, also, possible co-administration; and c) identifying the gold standard for adolescent and adult immunizations. RESULTS We identified 6906 records. After removing duplicate records, we included 12 RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial) (people aged 11-73): 7 of these studies had only 1 control group, 4 had 2 control groups and 1 had 5 control groups; moreover, of the 12 studies included, only 2 regarded co-administration, while all concerned immunogenicity. Nine of the 12 studies had a Jadad score above 3 points, and 10 out of 12 met the criteria of Cochrane Back Review Group Criteria List for Methodological Quality Assessment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION We found a limited number of good-quality RCTs investigating our object. The 5-component vaccines, although containing a lower dose of antigen, proved more effective than the 1-component vaccine. Evidence supports the use of 5-component vaccines for booster sessions in adolescence and adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RAFFAELE SQUERI
- Correspondence: Raffaele Squeri, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images (BIOMORF), University of Messina, piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy - E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Immink MM, Koole S, Bekker MN, Groenendaal F, Kemmeren JM, de Melker HE, van der Maas NAT. Background incidence rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Netherlands: Data of 2006-2018. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:274-280. [PMID: 33259996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternal vaccination is an effective and safe intervention to protect newborns against infectious diseases shortly after birth. We assessed background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes before the implementation of a maternal pertussis immunisation programme in the Netherlands, to put into perspective the safety concerns about such outcomes following immunisation. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cross-sectional study, annual numbers of pregnancy outcomes derived from the Dutch Perinatal Registry were used to calculate incidence rates per 10,000 in the 2006-2018 period. Births of ≥500 g birth weight and ≥24 + 0 w gestational age were included. Trends with moving-average-lines over the past 3 years were plotted, with 95 % confidence interval. RESULTS From 2006 through 2018, yearly numbers of pregnancies ranged between 158,868-175,710. Numbers of newborns ranged between 161,307-178,874, of whom 160,838-178,177 were live-born. Most outcomes were stable over time. Between 2006-2011, occurrence of labour induction increased by 68 %, and postpartum hemorrhage increased by 25 %. Both stabilised from 2011 onwards. Perinatal mortality up to day 7 or 28 postpartum decreased by 38 % and 37 %, respectively. Occurrence of low Apgar score among preterm infants born before 37 + 0 w gestational age and among term infants increased by 19 % and 27 %, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study on background incidences showed notable increases over time in occurrence of labour induction, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score, while showing a considerable decrease in overall perinatal mortality. These findings should be considered when interpreting data on adverse events occurring since the maternal pertussis immunisation programme was implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne Koole
- The Dutch Perinatal Registry, Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanet M Kemmeren
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fortuna L, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Soonthornworasiri N, Spiegel J, Wijagkanalan W, Mansouri S, van den Biggelaar AHJ, Pham HT. Enhanced post-licensure safety surveillance of a new recombinant acellular pertussis vaccine licensed as a monovalent (aP, Pertagen®) and tetanus, reduced-dose diphtheria combination (TdaP, Boostagen®) vaccine for immunization of adolescents and adults in Thailand. Vaccine 2020; 38:8194-8199. [PMID: 33176935 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
A new generation of recombinant acellular pertussis vaccine containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin (PTgen) was licensed as a monovalent pertussis vaccine (aPgen; Pertagen®) and in combination with tetanus and reduced-dose diphtheria (TdaPgen; Boostagen®) for active immunization in individuals aged 11 years and older in Thailand in 2016. We here report post-marketing safety data on the use of the vaccines in individuals in the community obtained through active pharmacovigilance surveillance including pregnant women participating in a prospective observational study. Between May 2017 and February 2020 for TdaPgen and between June 2018 and February 2020 for aPgen, participating health care providers vaccinated and collected safety data for 11,429 exposed adolescents and adults. This included 1778 pregnant women. The incidence rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) was 11.5 per 1000 of vaccinated individuals (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 9.7-13.6). AEFIs mostly concerned local pain at the injection site and muscle pain, and symptoms were mild and mostly resolved within a few days with no complications. The incidence rate of AEFIs in women vaccinated during pregnancy was 1.1 per 1000 (95% CI 0.3-4.1). Of 833 pregnant women vaccinated with recombinant aPgen or TdaPgen, 91.4% (95% CI 89.3-93.3) had uncomplicated pregnancies and 98.7% (95% CI 97.7-99.4) of the 855 babies delivered by these women were born healthy, which exceeds rates generally reported in Thailand. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported during the surveillance period. In conclusion, active pharmacovigilance confirms that the recombinant pertussis vaccines aPgen (Pertagen) and TdaPgen (Boostagen) are safe in adolescents and adults, including pregnant women vaccinated in the second or third trimester of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Librada Fortuna
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri
- Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Jane Spiegel
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Wassana Wijagkanalan
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Souad Mansouri
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | | | - Hong Thai Pham
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pasetti MF, Ackerman ME, Hoen AG, Alter G, Tsang JS, Marchant A. Maternal determinants of infant immunity: Implications for effective immunization and maternal-child health. Vaccine 2020; 38:4491-4494. [PMID: 32111530 PMCID: PMC9946685 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela F. Pasetti
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Annie G. Hoen
- Ragon Institute of MGH, Harvard, and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - John S. Tsang
- Systems Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Laboratory of Immune System Biology and Center for Human Immunology, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beran J, Leroux-Roels G, Van Damme P, de Hoon J, Vandermeulen C, Al-Ibrahim M, Johnson C, Peterson J, Baker S, Seidl C, Dreisbach A, Karsten A, Corsaro B, Henry O, Lattanzi M, Bebia Z. Safety and immunogenicity of fully liquid and lyophilized formulations of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy non-pregnant women: Results from a randomized comparative phase II trial. Vaccine 2020; 38:3227-3234. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
24
|
Vygen-Bonnet S, Hellenbrand W, Garbe E, von Kries R, Bogdan C, Heininger U, Röbl-Mathieu M, Harder T. Safety and effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:136. [PMID: 32054444 PMCID: PMC7020352 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4824-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Infants < 3 months of age are at highest risk for developing severe complications after pertussis. The majority of pregnant women has low concentrations of pertussis-specific antibodies and thus newborns are insufficiently protected by maternally transferred antibodies. Acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was recently implemented in various countries. Here, we assessed the evidence for safety and effectiveness of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1st 2010 to January 10th 2019. We assessed risk of bias (ROB) using the Cochrane ROB tool and ROBINS-I. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. Results We identified 1273 articles and included 22 studies (14 for safety; 8 for effectiveness), comprising 1.4 million pregnant women in safety studies and 855,546 mother-infant-pairs in effectiveness studies. No significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated women and their infants were observed for safety outcomes with the exception of fever and chorioamnionitis. Compared to no vaccination, three studies showed a significantly increased relative risk for the presence of the ICD-9 code for chorioamnionitis in electronic patient data after pertussis vaccination. However, no study reported an increased risk for clinical sequelae of chorioamnionitis after vaccination during pregnancy, such as preterm birth or neonatal intensive care unit admission. Vaccine effectiveness against pertussis in infants of immunized mothers ranged from 69 to 91% for pertussis prevention, from 91 to 94% for prevention of hospitalization and was 95% for prevention of death due to pertussis. Risk of bias was serious to critical for safety outcomes and moderate to serious for effectiveness outcomes. GRADE evidence quality was moderate to very low, depending on outcome. Conclusion Although an increased risk for a diagnosis of fever and chorioamnionitis was detected in pregnant women after pertussis vaccination, there was no association with a higher frequency of clinically relevant sequelae. Vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infant pertussis, hospitalization and death is high. Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has an overall positive benefit-risk ratio. In view of the overall quality of available evidence ongoing surveillance of chorioamnionitis and its potential sequelae is recommended when pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is implemented. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42018087814, CRD42018090357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vygen-Bonnet
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Wiebke Hellenbrand
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Edeltraut Garbe
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger von Kries
- Institute of Social Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Bogdan
- Institut für klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Medical Immunology Campus Erlangen, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- University of Basel Children's Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marianne Röbl-Mathieu
- Working Group on Immunization of the federal state of Bavaria (LAGI), Munich, Germany.,Private practice for gynecology/obstetrics, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Harder
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Havers FP, Moro PL, Hunter P, Hariri S, Bernstein H. Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2019. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2020; 69:77-83. [PMID: 31971933 PMCID: PMC7367039 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6903a5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Since 2005, a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and adults (1,2). After receipt of Tdap, booster doses of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine are recommended every 10 years or when indicated for wound management. During the October 2019 meeting of ACIP, the organization updated its recommendations to allow use of either Td or Tdap where previously only Td was recommended. These situations include decennial Td booster doses, tetanus prophylaxis when indicated for wound management in persons who had previously received Tdap, and for multiple doses in the catch-up immunization schedule for persons aged ≥7 years with incomplete or unknown vaccination history. Allowing either Tdap or Td to be used in situations where Td only was previously recommended increases provider point-of-care flexibility. This report updates ACIP recommendations and guidance regarding the use of Tdap vaccines (3).
Collapse
|
26
|
Immunobiological aspects of vaccines in pregnancy: Maternal perspective. MATERNAL IMMUNIZATION 2020. [PMCID: PMC7149477 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814582-1.00003-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Immunization during pregnancy is an efficient strategy to protect both the mother and the newborn infant against infectious pathogens. Pregnant women have an increased susceptibility to severe infections caused by some pathogens, but the mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Pregnancy is associated with dynamic changes in maternal immune system that are critical for tolerance of the fetus. These changes could also play an important role in shaping maternal immune components that are transferred to the newborn infant following natural infection or vaccination to prevent infectious diseases in early life. As the momentum for maternal immunization is growing, there is a need to increase our understanding of the immunobiology of maternal immunization in order to better prevent infectious diseases in the pregnant women and the young infant.
Collapse
|
27
|
D'Heilly C, Switzer C, Macina D. Safety of Maternal Immunization Against Pertussis: A Systematic Review. Infect Dis Ther 2019; 8:543-568. [PMID: 31531826 PMCID: PMC6856234 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-019-00265-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The WHO recommends vaccination of all children against pertussis. However, newborn infants remain vulnerable to infection. Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has been introduced in several countries to protect newborns via transplacental transfer of maternal pertussis antibodies to the infant. We reviewed the impact of maternal pertussis vaccination on the health of pregnant women, the developing fetus, and health of the newborn. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ProQuest, and Science Direct to identify studies that assessed the safety of maternal pertussis vaccination. Twenty-seven English language publications published between January 1995 and December 2018 were included in this review. Pregnant women receiving pertussis vaccines did not have increased rates of systemic or local reactions. There were no safety concerns with repeat vaccination with other tetanus-containing vaccines or their concomitant administration with influenza vaccines. Maternal pertussis vaccination did not adversely affect pregnancy, birth or neonatal outcomes. This review confirms the safety of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. FUNDING: Sanofi Pasteur. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Denis Macina
- Sanofi Pasteur, Vaccines Epidemiology and Modeling, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Switzer C, D'Heilly C, Macina D. Immunological and Clinical Benefits of Maternal Immunization Against Pertussis: A Systematic Review. Infect Dis Ther 2019; 8:499-541. [PMID: 31535327 PMCID: PMC6856250 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-019-00264-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are vulnerable to pertussis infection particularly before initiation of pertussis vaccination. Maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has been introduced in a number of countries in order to confer on young infants indirect protection from the disease through transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. We reviewed the evidence on the immunogenicity and efficacy of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ProQuest, and Science Direct was undertaken to identify studies published between January 1995 and December 2018. This review was not specific to any particular pertussis vaccine but included applicable data on available pertussis vaccines administered to pregnant women. The search identified 40 publications for inclusion in this review. Vaccination during pregnancy elicited robust maternal immune responses against all vaccine antigens and resulted in high placental transfer of pertussis antibodies to the infant that persisted well beyond delivery. Vaccination during the second or early third trimesters was considered ideal for antibody quantity and functionality. Although blunting of immune responses to some antigens in the primary immunization series was documented in neonates born to women vaccinated during pregnancy, there was no apparent adverse effect on vaccine efficacy. Multiple studies conducted in diverse settings have confirmed the effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in preventing pertussis in infants prior to receipt of their first primary vaccine dose and beyond. These findings collectively underscore the value of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in protecting vulnerable infants too young to be vaccinated.Funding Sanofi Pasteur.Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Denis Macina
- Sanofi Pasteur, Vaccines Epidemiology and Modeling, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|