1
|
El-Gendy N, Bertha CM, Abd El-Shafy M, Gaglani DK, Babiskin A, Bielski E, Boc S, Dhapare S, Fang L, Feibus K, Kaviratna A, Li BV, Luke MC, Ma T, Newman B, Spagnola M, Walenga RL, Zhao L. Scientific and regulatory activities initiated by the U.S. food and drug administration to foster approvals of generic dry powder inhalers: Quality perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 189:114519. [PMID: 36038083 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Regulatory science for generic dry powder inhalation products worldwide has evolved over the last decade. The revised draft guidance Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) Products - Quality Considerations [1] (Revision 1, April 2018) that FDA issued summarizes product considerations and potential critical quality attributes (CQAs). This guidance emphasizes the need to apply the principles of quality by design (QbD) and elements of pharmaceutical development discussed in the International Conference for Harmonisation of (ICH) guidelines. Research studies related to quality were used to support guidance recommendations, which preceded the first approval of a generic DPI product in the U.S. This review outlines scientific and regulatory hurdles that need to be surmounted to successfully bring a generic DPI to the market. The goal of this review focuses on relevant issues and various challenges pertaining to CMC topics of the generic DPI quality attributes. Furthermore, this review provides recommendations to abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) applicants to expedite generic approvals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nashwa El-Gendy
- Division of Immediate and Modified Release Drug Products III, Office of Lifecycle Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Craig M Bertha
- Division of New Drug Products II, Office of New Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mohammed Abd El-Shafy
- Division of Immediate and Modified Release Drug Products III, Office of Lifecycle Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Dhaval K Gaglani
- Division of Immediate and Modified Release Drug Products III, Office of Lifecycle Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Babiskin
- Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Bielski
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Susan Boc
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sneha Dhapare
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Lanyan Fang
- Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Katharine Feibus
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Anubhav Kaviratna
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Bing V Li
- Office of Bioequivalence, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Markham C Luke
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Tian Ma
- Division of Bioequivalence I, Office of Bioequivalence, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Bryan Newman
- Division of Therapeutic Performance I, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Michael Spagnola
- Division of Clinical Safety and Surveillance, Office of Safety and Clinical Evaluation, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Ross L Walenga
- Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
| | - Liang Zhao
- Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruzycki CA, Tavernini S, Martin AR, Finlay WH. Characterization of dry powder inhaler performance through experimental methods. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 189:114518. [PMID: 36058349 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Experimental methods provide means for the quality control of existing DPIs and for exploring the influence of formulation and device parameters well in advance of clinical trials for novel devices and formulations. In this review, we examine the state of the art of in vitro testing of DPIs, with a focus primarily on the development of accurate in vitro-in vivo correlations. Aspects of compendial testing are discussed, followed by the influence of flow profiles on DPI performance, the characterization of extrathoracic deposition using mouth-throat geometries, and the characterization of regional thoracic deposition. Additional experimental methods that can inform the timing of bolus delivery, the influence of environmental conditions, and the development of electrostatic charge on aerosolized DPI powders are reviewed. We conclude with perspectives on current in vitro methods and identify potential areas for future investigation, including the estimation of variability in deposition, better characterization of existing compendial methods, optimization of formulation and device design to bypass extrathoracic deposition, and the use of novel tracheobronchial filters that aim to provide more clinically relevant measures of performance directly from in vitro testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor A Ruzycki
- Lovelace Biomedical, 2425 Ridgecrest Drive SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA.
| | - Scott Tavernini
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada
| | - Andrew R Martin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada
| | - Warren H Finlay
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stegemann S, Faulhammer E, Pinto JT, Paudel A. Focusing on powder processing in dry powder inhalation product development, manufacturing and performance. Int J Pharm 2022; 614:121445. [PMID: 34998921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Dry powder inhalers (DPI) are well established products for the delivery of actives via the pulmonary route. Various DPI products are marketed or developed for the treatment of local lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or cystic fibrosis as well as systemic diseases targeted through inhaled delivery (i.e. Diabetes Mellitus). One of the key prerequisites of DPI formulations is that the aerodynamic size of the drug particles needs to be below 5 µm to enter deeply into the respiratory tract. These inherently cohesive inhalable size particles are either formulated as adhesive mixture with coarse carrier particles like lactose called carrier-based DPI or are formulated as free-flowing carrier-free particles (e.g. soft agglomerates, large hollow particles). In either case, it is common practice that drug and/or excipient particles of DPI formulations are obtained by processing API and API/excipients. The DPI manufacturing process heavily involves several particle and powder technologies such as micronization of the API, dry blending, powder filling and other particle engineering processes such as spray drying, crystallization etc. In this context, it is essential to thoroughly understand the impact of powder/particle properties and processing on the quality and performance of the DPI formulations. This will enable prediction of the processability of the DPI formulations and controlling the manufacturing process so that meticulously designed formulations are able to be finally developed as the finished DPI dosage form. This article is intended to provide a concise account of various aspects of DPI powder processing, including the process understanding and material properties that are important to achieve the desired DPI product quality. Various endeavors of model informed formulation/process design and development for DPI powder and PAT enabled process monitoring and control are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Stegemann
- Institute of Process and Particle Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Eva Faulhammer
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Joana T Pinto
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Amrit Paudel
- Institute of Process and Particle Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria; Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rudén J, Frenning G, Bramer T, Thalberg K, Alderborn G. On the relationship between blend state and dispersibility of adhesive mixtures containing active pharmaceutical ingredients. Int J Pharm X 2021; 3:100069. [PMID: 33409485 PMCID: PMC7773864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2020.100069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The objectives of this investigation were to study the evolution in blend state of adhesive mixtures containing the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) salbutamol, budesonide and AZD5423 and to study the relationship between blend state and dispersibility of the mixtures, as assessed by the fine particle fraction (FPF). A series of adhesive mixtures of varied fines concentration were prepared for each API using the same type of carrier. Based on visual examination and powder mechanics, blend states were identified and summarized as blend state maps for each API. The dispersibility of the mixtures was studied using a Fast Screening Impactor (FSI) equipped with a ScreenHaler. The evolution in blend state differed between the APIs in terms of the width of the blend states. The structure of the adhesion layer also differed between the APIs, from relatively uniform to a heterogeneous layer with small agglomerates dispersed on the carrier surface. All three APIs expressed a similar type of bended relationship between FPF and fines concentration. However, the initial rate of increase and the fines concentration of the plateau differed between the APIs. The adhesive mixtures of all APIs followed the three main states in terms of structural evolution and the overall shape of the FPF-fines concentration profiles could be explained by the evolution in blend state. It is proposed that the structure of the adhesion layer is an important factor explaining the differences in blend state - blend dispersibility relationships between the APIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Rudén
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and the Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 580, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
- Corresponding author.
| | - Göran Frenning
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and the Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 580, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tobias Bramer
- Inhalation Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kyrre Thalberg
- Inhalation Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Emmace Consulting AB, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden
| | - Göran Alderborn
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and the Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 580, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun Y, Cui Z, Sun Y, Qin L, Zhang X, Liu Q, Shen X, Yu D, Mao S. Exploring the potential influence of drug charge on downstream deposition behaviour of DPI powders. Int J Pharm 2020; 588:119798. [PMID: 32828976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Dry powder inhaler (DPI) development is limited by the time- and labor-consuming in vitro lung deposition test. It's highly desirable to find an easy tool for DPI formulation screening. Dynamic powder rheological properties seem to present many advantages, however, the adoptability needs to be verified. Drug charge is an important parameter especially for DPI formulation design but how it affects the process of pulmonary drug delivery is unavailable. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore the influence of drug charge on DPI powders, further testing the potentials of powder properties for downstream deposition behavior prediction. Taking five differently charged drugs as model, influence of drug charge on uniformity, rheological and aerodynamic properties of the mixtures were investigated systemically. It was found that mometasone furoate with near neutral charge presented better content homogeneity, while significantly decreased recovery was noted for charged drugs, such as positively charged drug (salbutamol sulphate and indacaterol maleate) mixtures and negatively charged drug (budesonide and fluticasone propionate) mixtures. Moreover, drug charge also influenced flowability and cohesion of their admixture with lactose. As for the downstream deposition, neutral drugs presented higher fine particle fraction (FPF), followed by positively charged drugs and negatively charged drugs. Good correlations between basic flowability energy, aeration energy, Permeability and FPF were established irrespective of different drugs. Principal component analysis results suggested flowability had a greater influence on FPF when mixtures were less cohesive. In conclusion, this study demonstrated drug charge can influence physicochemical, rheological and aerodynamic properties of the admixture, and DPIs' dynamic properties could be used as potential tools to predict downstream deposition with good accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Sun
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Zhixiang Cui
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Yujiao Sun
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Lu Qin
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Qiaoyu Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Xin Shen
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Duo Yu
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Shirui Mao
- School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.
| |
Collapse
|