1
|
Nakamura K, Kigure K, Nishimura T, Yamashita S. Questionnaire survey on cervical cancer screening and HPV awareness among patients at a local cancer center in Japan. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:402. [PMID: 39014425 PMCID: PMC11251239 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03256-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is increasing in Japan. Although human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cancer screening are crucial in preventing cancer-related mortality, the cervical cancer screening rate in Japan was only approximately 43.6% in 2022. This study aimed to conduct an epidemiological analysis of cervical cancer by collecting data from individual patients. METHODS A questionnaire survey was administered to patients who visited our hospital between January 2017 and July 2023 owing to abnormal cervical cytological findings or a cancer diagnosis. Patients answered questions regarding their history of cervical cancer screening as well as their knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer. RESULTS During the study period, 471 patients participated in the survey, with 35 declining to participate. Patients with Stage 1b1-4b primarily sought medical attention due to self-reported symptoms (P < 0.001); however, they were less likely to have undergone cervical cancer screening (P < 0.001). Additionally, older patients were less likely to be aware of the association of HPV with cervical and other cancers. Notably, 28 of the 129 patients with stage 1b1-4b cancer underwent cervical cancer screening within 2 years. The tumor location within the endocervical canal emerged as a significant factor contributing to the difficulty for an accurate diagnosis of precancerous or cervical cancer during cervical screening. Furthermore, non- squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology was another possible factor. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest the need to widely disseminate information regarding the significance of cancer screening to increase cancer screening rates. Moreover, establishing strategies for improving the accuracy of detecting lesions during screening for non-SCC and endocervical canal tumors is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Nakamura
- Department of Gynecology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1 Takabayashi-nishi, Ota, Japan.
| | - Keiko Kigure
- Department of Gynecology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1 Takabayashi-nishi, Ota, Japan
| | - Toshio Nishimura
- Department of Gynecology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1 Takabayashi-nishi, Ota, Japan
| | - Soichi Yamashita
- Department of Gynecology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1 Takabayashi-nishi, Ota, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rabia RA, Alfayumi-Zeadna S, Hendel T, Kagan I. Barriers to Adopting Healthy Lifestyle and Health Promotion among Ethnic Minority Bedouin Women in Southern Israel: A Qualitative Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-02022-z. [PMID: 38809466 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02022-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A healthy lifestyle is a crucial step in disease prevention and management, as well as a significant predictor of health promotion. Yet, despite an increase in chronic morbidity among Bedouin women in southern Israel, little research has been conducted on their health behaviors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle and health promotion among ethnic minority Bedouin women in southern Israel. METHODS This qualitative study was based on data collected through focus groups during June and July 2021. Participants included 44 Bedouin women aged 18-55. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were thematically analyzed and coded using the ecological model. RESULTS We found multiple barriers at various levels that prevent Bedouin women from adopting a healthy lifestyle and health promotion. At the individual level, such factors included the impact of financial limitations on healthful nutrition, as well as a lack of awareness or knowledge regarding healthy lifestyle and health promotion. At the organizational level, barriers include a lack of clinics, accessibility, and availability of health services and cultural incompatibility of the health services. At the community level, impediments to a healthy lifestyle include inaccessibility to sports facilities and suppression of physical activity. At the public policy level, participants, especially those living in unrecognized villages, described difficult living conditions related to environmental and social neglect as affecting their health status and ability to maintain a healthy lifestyle. CONCLUSION Study findings emphasize the need for policymaking and a systemic approach to address health disparities and ensure equal health promotion for the Bedouin population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmiya Abu Rabia
- Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, 78211, Ashkelon, Israel
- Clalit Health Services, Southern Region, 84417, Be'er-Sheva, Israel
| | - Samira Alfayumi-Zeadna
- Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, 78211, Ashkelon, Israel.
| | - Tova Hendel
- Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, 78211, Ashkelon, Israel
| | - Ilya Kagan
- Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, 78211, Ashkelon, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ares-Blanco S, López-Rodríguez JA, Polentinos-Castro E, Del Cura-González I. Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:165. [PMID: 38750446 PMCID: PMC11094967 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02400-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing cardiovascular and cancer screenings in target populations can reduce mortality. Visiting a General Practitioner (GP) once a year is related to an increased likelihood of preventive care. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of visiting a GP in the last year on the delivery of preventive services based on sex and household income. METHODS Cross-sectional study using data collected from the European Health Interview Survey 2013-2015 of individuals aged 40-74 years from 29 European countries. The variables included: sociodemographic factors (age, sex, and household income (HHI) quintiles [HHI 1: lowest income, HHI 5: more affluent]), lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and preventive care services (cardiometabolic, influenza vaccination, and cancer screening). Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and multilevel models (level 1: citizen, level 2: country) were performed. RESULTS 242,212 subjects were included, 53.7% were female. The proportion of subjects who received any cardiometabolic screening (92.4%) was greater than cancer screening (colorectal cancer: 44.1%, gynaecologic cancer: 40.0%) and influenza vaccination. Individuals who visited a GP in the last year were more prone to receive preventive care services (cardiometabolic screening: adjusted OR (aOR): 7.78, 95% CI: 7.43-8.15; colorectal screening aOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95; mammography aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.69-1.83 and Pap smear test: aOR: 1.89, 95% CI:1.85-1.94). Among those who visited a GP in the last year, the highest ratios of cardiometabolic screening and cancer screening benefited those who were more affluent. Women underwent more blood pressure measurements than men regardless of the HHI. Men were more likely to undergo influenza vaccination than women regardless of the HHI. The highest differences between countries were observed for influenza vaccination, with a median odds ratio (MOR) of 6.36 (under 65 years with comorbidities) and 4.30 (over 65 years with comorbidities), followed by colorectal cancer screening with an MOR of 2.26. CONCLUSIONS Greater adherence to preventive services was linked to individuals who had visited a GP at least once in the past year. Disparities were evident among those with lower household incomes who visited a GP. The most significant variability among countries was observed in influenza vaccination and colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ares-Blanco
- Federica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.
- Medical Specialties and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Juan A López-Rodríguez
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- General Ricardos Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Polentinos-Castro
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Del Cura-González
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Unit, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion Networks (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Specialties and Public Health Department, School of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos, University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
- Aging Research Center, Karolinksa Instituted, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jansen L, Schwettmann L, Behr C, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Justenhoven C, Kajüter H, Manz K, Peters F, Pritzkuleit R, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A, Sirri E, Tetzlaff F, Voigtländer S, Arndt V. Trends in cancer incidence by socioeconomic deprivation in Germany in 2007 to 2018: An ecological registry-based study. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:1784-1796. [PMID: 37539757 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Age-standardized cancer incidence has decreased over the last years for many cancer sites in developed countries. Whether these trends led to narrowing or widening socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence is unknown. Using cancer registry data covering 48 million inhabitants in Germany, the ecological association between age-standardized total and site specific (colorectal, lung, prostate and breast) cancer incidence in 2007 to 2018 and a deprivation index on district level (aggregated to quintiles) was investigated. Incidence in the most and least deprived districts were compared using Poisson models. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) and differences in AAPCs between deprivation quintiles were assessed using Joinpoint regression analyses. Age-standardized incidence decreased strongly between 2007 and 2018 for total cancer and all cancer sites (except female lung cancer), irrespective of the level of deprivation. However, differences in the magnitude of trends across deprivation quintiles resulted in increasing inequalities over time for total cancer, colorectal and lung cancer. For total cancer, the incidence rate ratio between the most and least deprived quintile increased from 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.12) to 1.23 (1.12-1.32) in men and from 1.07 (1.01-1.13) to 1.20 (1.14-1.26) in women. Largest inequalities were observed for lung cancer with 82% (men) and 88% (women) higher incidence in the most vs the least deprived regions in 2018. The observed increase in inequalities in cancer incidence is in alignment with trends in inequalities in risk factor prevalence and partly utilization of screening. Intervention programs targeted at socioeconomically deprived and urban regions are highly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Jansen
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Schwettmann
- Division for Health Economics, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Behr
- Cancer Registry Rheinland-Palatinate gGmbH, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology: BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Kirsi Manz
- Cancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Ron Pritzkuleit
- Institute for Cancer Epidemiology, University Lübeck, Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Eunice Sirri
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Lower Saxony, Registerstelle, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Tetzlaff
- Division of Social Determinants of Health, Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Voigtländer
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Des Marais AC, Brewer NT, Knight S, Smith JS. Patient perspectives on cervical cancer screening interventions among underscreened women. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277791. [PMID: 36454891 PMCID: PMC9714890 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is highly preventable with regular screening, yet over 4,000 women die from it annually in the United States. Over half of new cervical cancer cases in the U.S. are attributable to insufficient screening. METHODS Participants were 23 low-income, uninsured or Medicaid-insured women in North Carolina who were overdue for cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Semi-structured interviews examined perspectives on barriers to cervical cancer screening and on interventions to reduce these barriers. We also elicited feedback on three proposed evidence-based interventions: one-on-one education, coupons to reduce out-of-pocket costs, and self-collection of samples for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the primary cause of cervical cancer. RESULTS Reported barriers included high cost, inconvenient clinic hours, lack of provider recommendation, poor transportation, difficulty finding a provider, fear of pain, and low perceived need. Participants suggested interventions including reducing cost, improving convenience through community-based screening or extended clinic hours, strengthening provider recommendations, and providing one-on-one counseling and education outreach. HPV self-collection was most frequently selected as the "most helpful" of 3 proposed interventions (n = 11), followed by reducing out-of-pocket costs (n = 7) and one-on-one education (n = 5). CONCLUSION Cost was the most reported barrier to cervical cancer screening, although women experience multiple simultaneous barriers. Novel interventions such as HPV self-collection promise to reduce some, but not all, barriers to primary screening. Interventions that work on reducing multiple barriers, including obstacles to receiving follow-up care, may be most effective to prevent cervical cancer among these high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C. Des Marais
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Noel T. Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Suzanne Knight
- Cabarrus Health Alliance, Kannapolis, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jennifer S. Smith
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Makadzange EE, Peeters A, Joore MA, Kimman ML. The effectiveness of health education interventions on cervical cancer prevention in Africa: A systematic review. Prev Med 2022; 164:107219. [PMID: 36007752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Low levels of knowledge and awareness on cervical cancer play a role in limiting cervical cancer prevention uptake. This systematic review aimed to identify effective educational interventions to increase cervical cancer awareness, knowledge, and subsequently screening or vaccination uptake in African women. A literature search was conducted in Medline and EMBASE databases. We examined original, peer-reviewed English literature published between 2005 and 2020. Nineteen studies examining health education interventions' impact on awareness, knowledge, and screening or vaccination uptake in African women were included. Ten studies were controlled trials, nine performed pre- and post-measurements in one group. Most studies were published between 2015 and 2020 (86%), many were from Nigeria (47%). Studies were mostly set up in communities and schools. The most frequently used intervention was lectures, alone or combined with videos and practical demonstrations. Sixteen studies evaluated knowledge or awareness, and all showed a statistically significant improvement following the intervention. Of the ten studies that evaluated screening uptake, either as the single outcome or combined with knowledge or awareness, six found a significant rise in screening uptake after intervention. Educational interventions increased knowledge and awareness in African women, some boosted uptake of cervical cancer screening, especially when using peer health educators and culturally tailored methods. Innovative approaches such as self-collected HPV testing and mHealth also demonstrated a potential to increase uptake of screening. More research is needed to identify and analyse barriers to screening uptake, which can still be present even after a successful educational intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evidence Eve Makadzange
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Merel L Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bongaerts THG, Büchner FL, Crone MR, van Exel J, Guicherit OR, Numans ME, Nierkens V. Perspectives on cancer screening participation in a highly urbanized region: a Q-methodology study in The Hague, the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1925. [PMID: 36243684 PMCID: PMC9571478 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14312-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Netherlands hosts, as many other European countries, three population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs). The overall uptake among these CSPs is high, but has decreased over recent years. Especially in highly urbanized regions the uptake rates tend to fall below the minimal effective rate of 70% set by the World Health Organization. Understanding the reasons underlying the decision of citizens to partake in a CPS are essential in order to optimize the current screening participation rates. The aim of this study was to explore the various perspectives concerning cancer screening among inhabitants of The Hague, a highly urbanized region of the Netherlands. METHODS A Q-methodology study was conducted to provide insight in the prevailing perspectives on partaking in CSPs. All respondents were inhabitants of the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. In an online application they ranked a set of 31 statements, based on the current available literature and clustered by the Integrated Change model, into a 9-column forced ranking grid according to level of agreement, followed by a short survey. Respondents were asked to participate in a subsequent interview to explain their ranking. By-person factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives, which were interpreted using data from the rankings and interviews. RESULTS Three distinct perspectives were identified: 1). "Positive about participation", 2). "Thoughtful about participation", and 3). "Fear drives participation". These perspectives provide insight into how potential respondents, living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands, decide upon partaking in CSPs. CONCLUSIONS Since CSPs will only be effective when participation rates are sufficiently high, it is essential to have insight into the different perspectives among potential respondents concerning partaking in a CSP. This study adds new insights concerning these perspectives and suggests several ideas for future optimization of the CSPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H G Bongaerts
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands. .,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Frederike L Büchner
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Matty R Crone
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Onno R Guicherit
- University Cancer Center Leiden - The Hague, at Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Nierkens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Quintal C, Antunes M. Mirror, mirror on the wall, when are inequalities higher, after all? Analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening in 30 European countries. Soc Sci Med 2022; 312:115371. [PMID: 36137367 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Screening for breast and cervical cancer is strongly related with a reduction in cancer mortality but previous evidence has found socioeconomic inequalities in screening. Using up-to-date data from the second wave of the European Health Interview Survey (2013-2015), this study aims to analyse income-related inequalities in mammography screening and Pap smear test in 30 European countries. We propose a framework that combines age group and screening interval, identifying situations of due-, under-, and over-screening. Coverage rates, standard and generalised concentration indices are calculated. Overall, pro-rich inequalities in screening persist though there are varied combinations of prevalence of screening attendance and relative inequality across countries. Bulgaria and particularly Romania stand out with low coverage and high inequality. Some Baltic and Mediterranean countries also present less favourable figures on both accounts. In general, there are not marked differences between mammography and Pap smear test, for the recommended situation ('Due-screening'). 'Extreme under-screening' is concentrated among lower income quintiles in basically all countries analysed, for both screenings. These women, who never screened, are at risk of entering the group of 'Lost opportunity', once they reach the upper-limit age of the target group. At the same time, there are signals of 'Over-screening', within target group, due to screening more frequently than recommended. In several countries, 'Over-screening' seems to be concentrated among richer women. This is not only a waste of resources, but it can also cause harms. The inequalities found in 'Extreme under-screening' and 'Over-screening' raise concerns on whether women are making informed choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlota Quintal
- University of Coimbra, CeBER, Faculty of Economics, Portugal; CEISUC, Portugal.
| | - Micaela Antunes
- University of Coimbra, CeBER, Faculty of Economics, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim J, Dove MS, Dang JHT. Sociodemographic factors associated with HPV awareness/knowledge and cervical cancer screening behaviors among caregivers in the U.S. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:335. [PMID: 35941594 PMCID: PMC9358833 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family caregivers may be at a higher risk for several chronic diseases, including cancer. Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death among women. Despite family caregivers' vulnerability, the status of their HPV awareness, knowledge, and preventive health behaviors, including cervical cancer screening, has been understudied. Thus, this study aimed to examine the sociodemographic factors associated with HPV awareness and knowledge and adherence to the cervical cancer screening guidelines among caregivers in the U.S. METHODS Nationally representative cross-sectional survey data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, 2017-2020). Female caregivers aged 21-65 were included (N = 1190). Weighted multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with HPV awareness (heard of HPV), knowledge (HPV can cause cervical cancer), and adherence to the United States Preventive Service Task Force 2018 cervical cancer screening guidelines by sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, education, household income, marital status,) and the intensity of caregiving. RESULTS An estimated 79% of female caregivers were aware of HPV and 84% adhered to the cervical cancer screening guidelines. Caregivers who were older than 50 (OR = 3.62, 1.91-6.85, adherence of aged 21-50 vs. 51-65), Hispanics of race/ethnicity compared with Black/African Americans (OR = 3.14, 1.31-7.52, adherence of Black/African Americans vs. Hispanics), with a high school education or less (OR = 2.34, 1.14-4.82, adherence of Some college or more vs. High school education or less), and with intense caregiving duty (spending 35 h/week or more on caregiving) compared with light-duty (OR = 2.34, 1.10-5.00, adherence of 5-14 h vs. 35 h or more, weekly) had poor adherence to the cervical cancer screening guidelines. Caregivers who were older, racial minorities (Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, Multiple races), and less educated showed lower HPV awareness (Heard of HPV) than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS There are caregiving populations whose HPV awareness and cervical cancer screening adherence are low. To improve their awareness and knowledge of HPV and support their cervical cancer screening behaviors, we need to consider interventions that target those specific populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyeong Kim
- Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.
| | - Melanie S. Dove
- grid.27860.3b0000 0004 1936 9684Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Julie H. T. Dang
- grid.27860.3b0000 0004 1936 9684Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Audiger C, Bovagnet T, Bardes J, Abihsera G, Nicolet J, Deghaye M, Bochaton A, Menvielle G. Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France). Int J Public Health 2022; 67:1604562. [PMID: 35859669 PMCID: PMC9289096 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to examine social inequalities in participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS) in a metropolitan area by implementing a pilot organised screening programme. The pilot programme consisted of sending invitations to women who did not perform a pap smear within the past 3 years, managing interventions to reach vulnerable women, training healthcare professionals, and organising follow-ups of abnormal pap smears. Methods: We studied participation in CCS between January 2014 and December 2016 among 241,257 women aged 25-63 years old. To assess relative inequalities, Odds Ratios were computed using multilevel logistic regression. To assess absolute inequalities, the CCS coverage and the rate difference were calculated. Inequalities were computed by age and neighbourhood characteristics (social deprivation and proportion of single women). Results: Disparities in participation in CCS were observed by age and social deprivation. For overall screening compared to opportunistic screening, disparities by age were larger (OR25-35_vs._55-64 = 2.13 [2.08-2.19] compared to 2.02 [1.96-2.07]), but disparities by social deprivation were decreased (OR10%_most_vs._10%_least_deprived = 2.09 [1.90-2.30] compared to 2.22 [2.02-2.44]). Conclusion: Disparities in CCS participation remain despite the organised programme. To reduce these inequalities, free screening should be proposed and evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Audiger
- Le Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers-CRCDC, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France
| | - Thomas Bovagnet
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France
| | - Julia Bardes
- Le Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers-CRCDC, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Abihsera
- Le Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers-CRCDC, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Nicolet
- Le Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers-CRCDC, Paris, France
| | - Michel Deghaye
- Le Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers-CRCDC, Paris, France
| | - Audrey Bochaton
- Université Paris Nanterre, UMR CNRS 7533 LADYSS, Nanterre, France
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Malekzadeh E, Nourizadeh R, Farshbaf-Khalili A, Mehrabi E, Hakimi S. The effect of decision-aid-based counseling on cervical cancer screening behavior among women: An interventional study. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2022; 11:205. [PMID: 36003249 PMCID: PMC9393954 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_714_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing appropriate and regular screening can effectively reduce cervical cancer and mortality rate, however, the available evidence suggests that women's participation in cervical cancer screening remains low in middle- and low-income countries, and that it is necessary to identify appropriate intervention methods to change behavior. The present study was designed to determine the effect of decision-aid-based counseling on cervical cancer screening behavior among women. MATERIALS AND METHODS This trial study was conducted on 154 women with no history of Pap smear during the past 3 years and refers to Tabriz health care centers. The participants were assigned to the intervention (decision aid based counseling) and control (routine health education) groups through randomized block design with block sizes of 4 and 6 and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The data were collected using the sociodemographic and fertility characteristics, stages of change checklist, and shared decision-making (SDM) and decisional conflict (DC) questionnaire before and 6 months after the intervention by interview and then, analyzed by SPSS24 software. The independent t-test, ANCOVA tests were used. RESULTS A significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of changing the stages of cervical cancer screening behavior 6 months after the intervention. As after the intervention, the frequency of individuals entered the preparation or action stage was more than the control group (P = 0.001). The mean score of SDM in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group after intervention ([45.49 ± 1.18] vs. [27.56 ± 1.18] [Mean Difference (MD): 17.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.59-21.25; P < 0.001]). The mean score of DC in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group after intervention ([29.16 ± 1.09] vs. [34.14 ± 1.09] [MD: -4.97; 95% CI: 1.09-8.04; P < 0.002]). CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that evidence-based information communicated between clients and clinicians has very important role in clients' health-related behavior. It is recommended, health care providers apply decision-aid-based counseling for promoting the cervical cancer screening behavior among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elnaz Malekzadeh
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Esmat Mehrabi
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Sevil Hakimi
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barrera Ferro D, Bayer S, Brailsford S, Smith H. Improving intervention design to promote cervical cancer screening among hard-to-reach women: assessing beliefs and predicting individual attendance probabilities in Bogotá, Colombia. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:212. [PMID: 35672816 PMCID: PMC9172610 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01800-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite being a preventable disease, cervical cancer continues to be a public health concern, affecting mainly lower and middle-income countries. Therefore, in Bogotá a home-visit based program was instituted to increase screening uptake. However, around 40% of the visited women fail to attend their Pap smear test appointments. Using this program as a case study, this paper presents a methodology that combines machine learning methods, using routinely collected administrative data, with Champion’s Health Belief Model to assess women’s beliefs about cervical cancer screening. The aim is to improve the cost-effectiveness of behavioural interventions aiming to increase attendance for screening. The results presented here relate specifically to the case study, but the methodology is generic and can be applied in all low-income settings.
Methods This is a cross-sectional study using two different datasets from the same population and a sequential modelling approach. To assess beliefs, we used a 37-item questionnaire to measure the constructs of the CHBM towards cervical cancer screening. Data were collected through a face-to-face survey (N = 1699). We examined instrument reliability using Cronbach’s coefficient and performed a principal component analysis to assess construct validity. Then, Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests were conducted to analyse differences on the HBM scores, among patients with different poverty levels. Next, we used data retrieved from administrative health records (N = 23,370) to fit a LASSO regression model to predict individual no-show probabilities. Finally, we used the results of the CHBM in the LASSO model to improve its accuracy. Results Nine components were identified accounting for 57.7% of the variability of our data. Lower income patients were found to have a lower Health motivation score (p-value < 0.001), a higher Severity score (p-value < 0.001) and a higher Barriers score (p-value < 0.001). Additionally, patients between 25 and 30 years old and with higher poverty levels are less likely to attend their appointments (O.R 0.93 (CI: 0.83–0.98) and 0.74 (CI: 0.66–0.85), respectively). We also found a relationship between the CHBM scores and the patient attendance probability. Average AUROC score for our prediction model is 0.9.
Conclusion In the case of Bogotá, our results highlight the need to develop education campaigns to address misconceptions about the disease mortality and treatment (aiming at decreasing perceived severity), particularly among younger patients living in extreme poverty. Additionally, it is important to conduct an economic evaluation of screening options to strengthen the cervical cancer screening program (to reduce perceived barriers). More widely, our prediction approach has the potential to improve the cost-effectiveness of behavioural interventions to increase attendance for screening in developing countries where funding is limited.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01800-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Barrera Ferro
- Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. .,Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Steffen Bayer
- Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sally Brailsford
- Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Honora Smith
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jolidon V, De Prez V, Bracke P, Bell A, Burton-Jeangros C, Cullati S. Revisiting the Effects of Organized Mammography Programs on Inequalities in Breast Screening Uptake: A Multilevel Analysis of Nationwide Data From 1997 to 2017. Front Public Health 2022; 10:812776. [PMID: 35198524 PMCID: PMC8858931 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.812776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study revisits the effects of mammography screening programs on inequalities in breast screening uptake in Switzerland. The progressive introduction of regional mammography programs by 12 out of the 26 Swiss cantons (regions) since 1999 offers an opportunity to perform an ecological quasi-experimental study. We examine absolute income and marital status inequalities in mammography uptake, and whether the cantons' implementation of mammography programs moderate these inequalities, as previous research has devoted little attention to this. We use five waves of the Swiss Health Interview Survey covering the 1997-2017 period and comprising data on 14,267 women aged 50-70. Both up-to-date and ever-screening outcomes are analyzed with multilevel models which assess the mammography programs' within-canton effect. Findings show that higher income women and married women (compared to unmarried women) had significantly higher mammography uptake probabilities. Mammography programs did not moderate absolute income differences in up-to-date screening; however, they were associated with smaller absolute income differences in ever-screening uptake. Mammography programs related to higher screening uptake for married women, more than for unmarried women. In conclusion, we showed absolute income inequalities in mammography uptake which were not revealed by previous studies using relative inequality measures. Mammography programs may have contributed to reducing income inequalities in ever-screening, yet this was not observed for up-to-date screening. This study has implication for preventive health interventions-e.g., cancer screening promotion should pay attention to women's marital status since screening programs may widen the screening gap between married and unmarried women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew Bell
- Sheffield Methods Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bozhar H, McKee M, Spadea T, Veerus P, Heinävaara S, Anttila A, Senore C, Zielonke N, de Kok I, van Ravesteyn N, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Koning H, Heijnsdijk E. Socio-economic Inequality of Utilization of Cancer Testing in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prev Med Rep 2022; 26:101733. [PMID: 35198362 PMCID: PMC8850331 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
There are currently screening programmes for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer in many European countries. However, the uptake of cancer screening in general may vary within and between countries. The aim of this study is to assess the inequalities in testing utilization by socio-economic status and whether the amount of inequality varies across European regions. We conducted an analysis based on cross-sectional data from the second wave of the European Health Interview Survey from 2013 to 2015. We analysed the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer testing by socio-economic position (household income, educational level and employment status), socio-demographic factors, self-perceived health and smoking behaviour, by using multinomial logistic models, and inequality measurement based on the Slope index of inequality (SII) and Relative index of inequality (RII). The results show that the utilization of mammography (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (95%CI):0.50–0.61), cervical smear tests (OR = 0.60, 95%CI:0.56–0.65) and colorectal testing (OR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.78–0.86) was overall less likely among individuals within a low household income compared to a high household income. Also, individuals with a non-EU country of birth, low educational level and being unemployed (or retired) were overall less likely to be tested. The income-based inequality in breast (SII = 0.191;RII = 1.260) and colorectal testing utilization (SII = 0.161;RII = 1.487) was the greatest in Southern Europe. For cervical smears, this inequality was greatest in Eastern Europe (SII = 0.122;RII = 1.195). We concluded that there is considerable inequality in the use of cancer tests in Europe, with inequalities associated with household income, educational level, employment status, and country of birth.
Collapse
|
15
|
Heidemann DL, Adhami A, Nair A, Haftka-George A, Zaidan M, Seshadri V, Tang A, Willens DE. Using a Frontline Staff Intervention to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Clinic. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2608-2614. [PMID: 33987788 PMCID: PMC8390589 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is the third most common malignancy affecting women. Screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) tests effectively identifies precancerous lesions and early-stage cervical cancer. While the nationwide rate of cervical cancer screening (CCS) is 84%, our urban general internal medicine (GIM) clinic population had a CCS rate of 70% in 2016. OBJECTIVE To improve our clinic's CCS rate to match or exceed the national average within 18 months by identifying barriers and testing solutions. DESIGN A quality improvement project led by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers. PARTICIPANTS Our GIM clinic includes 16 attending physicians, 116 resident physicians, and 20 medical assistants (MAs) with an insured and underserved patient population. INTERVENTION Phase 1 lasted 9 months and implemented CCS patient outreach, patient financial incentives, and clinic staff education. Phase 2 lasted 9 months and involved a workflow change in which MAs identified candidates for CCS during patient check-in. Feedback spanned the entire study period. MAIN MEASURES Our primary outcome was the number of Pap tests completed per month during the 2 study phases. Our secondary outcome was the clinic population's CCS rate for all eligible clinic patients. KEY RESULTS After interventions, the average number of monthly Pap tests increased from 35 to 56 in phase 1 and to 75 in phase 2. Of 385 patients contacted in phase 1, 283 scheduled a Pap test and 115 (41%) completed it. Compared to baseline, both interventions improved cervical cancer screening (phase 1 relative risk, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.64-2.10; P < 0.001; phase 2 relative risk, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.40-3.02; P < 0.001). Our clinic's CCS rate improved from 70% to 75% after the 18-month intervention. CONCLUSIONS The rate of CCS increased by 5% after a systematic 2-phase organizational intervention that empowered MAs to remind, identify, and prepare candidates during check-in for CCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle L Heidemann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Angie Adhami
- Department of Primary Care, Dedicated Senior Medical Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - Anupama Nair
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alexis Haftka-George
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mariam Zaidan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Vaidehi Seshadri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Amy Tang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David E Willens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Change in mammography screening attendance after removing the out-of-pocket fee: a population-based study in Sweden (2014-2018). Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:1257-1268. [PMID: 34322823 PMCID: PMC8492563 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01476-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the change in mammography screening attendance in Sweden—overall and in sociodemographic groups at risk of low attendance—after removal of the out-of-pocket fee in 2016. Methods Individual-level data on all screening invitations and attendance between 2014 and 2018 were linked to sociodemographic data from Statistics Sweden. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for attendance by time period and sociodemographic factor were computed using mixed logistic regression to account for repeated measures within women. The study sample included 1.4 million women, aged 40–75, who had a mammography screening appointment in 2014–2015 and/or 2017–2018 in 14 of Sweden’s 21 health care regions. Results Overall screening attendance was 83.8% in 2014–2015 and 84.1% in 2017–2018 (+ 0.3 percentage points, 95% CI 0.2–0.4). The greatest increase in attendance was observed in non-Nordic women with the lowest income, where attendance rose from 62.9 to 65.8% (+ 2.9 points, 95% CI 2.3–3.6), and among women with four or more risk factors for low attendance, where attendance rose from 59.2 to 62.0% (+ 2.8 points, 95% CI 2.2–3.4). Conclusion Screening attendance did not undergo any important increase after implementing free screening, although attendance among some sociodemographic groups increased by almost three percentage points after the policy change.
Collapse
|
17
|
Shimoda A, Saito Y, Ooe C, Kondo N. Income-based inequality in nationwide general health checkup participation in Japan. Public Health 2021; 195:112-117. [PMID: 34087670 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Japan, it is mandatory for employers to provide general health checkup opportunities to employees. Although many companies have subsidized checkups for employees' dependent family members, their participation is low. We assessed income-based inequality in the participation of employees' dependents in the general health checkup. STUDY DESIGN This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. Annual participation rate in general health checkup and various factors including income, age, and sex were collected and analyzed to examine the income-based inequality of participation rate in general health checkup. METHODS The data for the present study were sourced from the Fukuoka Branch of the Japan Health Insurance Association, a large medical insurer in Japan. We extracted data of 196,057 dependents aged 40-74 years. We conducted a multiple logistic regression analysis using participation from April 2015 to March 2016 as dependent variable and income category ranging from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) between April and June 2015 as independent variable (adjusted for sex and age). We computed slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) based on income category. RESULTS Higher the income, the more likely were dependents to participate in the general health checkup. SII for the participation rate of general health checkup ranged between -0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07 to 0.03) and 0.06 (0.03-0.09) for men; 0.03 (0.01-0.06) and 0.10 (0.09-0.11) for women. RII for the participation rate of general health checkup ranged between -0.19 (95% CI: -0.66 to 0.29) and 0.88 (0.15-1.61) for men; 0.22 (0.05-0.39) and 0.68 (0.60-0.76) for women. The highest inequality existed for men in their 50s and 60s and women in their 50s; the lowest inequality was among men and women aged 70-74 years. CONCLUSION There was income-based inequality in participation in the general health checkup among dependents (family members) of the insured persons. The degree of inequality differed with age group. It cannot be explained solely by financial barrier among low-income group, rather it may reflect Japanese unique context in medical insurance system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Shimoda
- Department of Health Education and Health Sociology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Y Saito
- Department of Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - C Ooe
- Planning and Administration Group, Fukuoka Branch of Japan Health Insurance Association, Hakata Mitsui Building, Gofukucho 10-1, Hakata-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - N Kondo
- Department of Health Education and Health Sociology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bourmaud A, Chauvin F. Which communication strategies can improve interventions aimed at tackling social inequalities in organized cancer screening in France? Glob Health Promot 2021; 28:89-92. [PMID: 33843345 PMCID: PMC7897540 DOI: 10.1177/1757975921989505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Interventions to increase participation in cancer screening programs have been developed and evaluated by our research team. The results observed provide an opportunity to consider which methods of communication should be encouraged to improve those interventions. The objective of this commentary is to recommend communication strategies which should be adopted to efficiently reach and support disadvantaged individuals to engage in cancer screening, as a healthy behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelie Bourmaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Universitary Hospital Robert Debré, Université de Paris, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm) ECEVE 1123, Paris, France
| | - Franck Chauvin
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm) CIC 1408, High Council for Public Health, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pankakoski M, Heinävaara S, Anttila A, Sarkeala T. Differences in cervical test coverage by age, socioeconomic status, ethnic origin and municipality type - A nationwide register-based study. Prev Med 2020; 139:106219. [PMID: 32693176 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
An invitational organized cervical cancer screening together with widely spread opportunistic testing has coexisted for decades in Finland. The aim of this study was to examine the coverage of cervical tests by age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and municipality type within and outside the organized screening program. We had a cohort of women of whom 1,2 million were in the target age range of screening and residing in Finland in 2010-2014. Data on Pap and/or HPV -tests within and outside the screening program were collected from the Mass Screening Registry, the pathology laboratories and the health insurance reimbursement registry and five-year population coverages of tests were reported. The total test coverage was 86.0%; 95% CI, (85.8-86.1), and was notably lower for those with an unknown socioeconomic status and pensioners (68.8%; 95% CI, (67.9-69.6) and 77.1%; 95% CI, (76.5-77.6), respectively) compared to upper-level employers (89.8%; 95% CI, (89.5-90.2)). Coverage was also lower for non-native speaking women (72.4%; 95% CI, (71.8-73.0)) compared to native speakers (86.9%; 95% CI, (86.7-87.0)) and for women living in urban municipalities (85.5%; 95% CI, (85.3-85.7)) compared to semi-urban (87.4%; 95% CI, (87.0-87.8)). Although overall coverage was high, tests within and outside the program seemed to concentrate on women with presumably good access to health services. Tests outside the program were especially common among young women who are at a low risk of invasive cervical cancer. Efforts should be made to reduce excessive opportunistic testing and to increase attendance at the program among hard-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiju Pankakoski
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014, Finland.
| | - Sirpa Heinävaara
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014, Finland
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tytti Sarkeala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
National organization of uterine cervical cancer screening and social inequality in France. Eur J Cancer Prev 2020; 29:458-465. [PMID: 32740172 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Some of the inequality in uterine cervical cancer (UCC) screening uptake are due to the socioeconomic deprivation of women. A national organized screening programme has proven to be effective in increasing the uptake, but may increase socioeconomic inequality. Therefore, we compared inequality in uptake of UCC screening between two French departments, one of which is experimenting an organized screening programme. We used reimbursement data from the main French health insurance scheme to compare screening rates in the municipalities of the two departments over a three-year period. The experimental department had higher screening rates, but the increase in deprivation in municipalities had a greater effect on the decrease in participation in this department. Moreover, while screening rates were higher in urban areas, the negative effect of deprivation on participation was greater in rural areas. Although these departments were compared at the same time under different conditions, socioeconomic inequality between them may have been greater before the experimentation started. However, screening may have led to an increase in socioeconomic inequality between women screened. Special attention must be paid to changes in socioeconomic and geographic inequality in the uptake of UCC screening when the programme is rolled out nationally.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lott BE, Trejo MJ, Baum C, McClelland DJ, Adsul P, Madhivanan P, Carvajal S, Ernst K, Ehiri J. Interventions to increase uptake of cervical screening in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review using the integrated behavioral model. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:654. [PMID: 32393218 PMCID: PMC7216595 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08777-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) experiences disproportionate burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality due in part to low uptake of cervical screening, a strategy for prevention and down-staging of cervical cancer. This scoping review identifies studies of interventions to increase uptake of cervical screening among women in the region and uses the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) to describe how interventions might work. METHODS A systematic search of literature was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL databases through May 2019. Screening and data charting were performed by two independent reviewers. Intervention studies measuring changes to uptake in screening among women in SSA were included, with no restriction to intervention type, study setting or date, or participant characteristics. Intervention type and implementation strategies were described using behavioral constructs from the IBM. RESULTS Of the 3704 citations the search produced, 19 studies were selected for inclusion. Most studies were published between 2014 and 2019 (78.9%) and were set in Nigeria (47.4%) and South Africa (26.3%). Studies most often assessed screening with Pap smears (31.6%) and measured uptake as ever screened (42.1%) or screened during the study period (36.8%). Education-based interventions were most common (57.9%) and the IBM construct of knowledge/skills to perform screening was targeted most frequently (68.4%). Willingness to screen was high, before and after intervention. Screening coverage ranged from 1.7 to 99.2% post-intervention, with six studies (31.6%) reporting a significant improvement in screening that achieved ≥60% coverage. CONCLUSIONS Educational interventions were largely ineffective, except those that utilized peer or community health educators and mHealth implementation strategies. Two economic incentivization interventions were moderately effective, by acting on participants' instrumental attitudes, but resulted in screening coverage less than 20%. Innovative service delivery, including community-based self-sampling, acted on environmental constraints, striving to make services more available, accessible, and appropriate to women, and were the most effective. This review demonstrates that intent to perform screening may not be the major determinant of screening behavior, suggesting other theoretical frameworks may be needed to more fully understand uptake of cervical screening in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly for health systems change interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanne E Lott
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
| | - Mario J Trejo
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Christina Baum
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - D Jean McClelland
- Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave Ward 6, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- School of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, MSC08 4720, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA
| | - Purnima Madhivanan
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.,College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.,Public Health Research Institute of India, 89/B, 2nd Cross, 2nd Main, Yadavgiri, Mysore, 560021, India
| | - Scott Carvajal
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Kacey Ernst
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - John Ehiri
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nagendiram A, Bidgood R, Banks J, Heal C. Knowledge and perspectives of the new National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative interview study of North Queensland women-'I could be that one percent'. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034483. [PMID: 32156766 PMCID: PMC7064076 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate women's understanding and attitudes towards the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) and to explore methods to improve screening participation. DESIGN Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted through convenience and snowball sampling. Thematic analysis occurred using the interpretivist framework. SETTING A private general practice in North Queensland. PARTICIPANTS Women between the ages of 18 and 74 who attended the general practice were eligible to participate. Fourteen women between 20 and 58 years old were interviewed. RESULTS Participants were concerned that the new NCSP would miss cancer due to longer screening intervals and reliance on primary human papilloma virus (HPV) testing. They believed that young women are at increased risk of cervical cancer, due to perceived HPV vaccine ineffectiveness and parent objection to vaccination. Most participants were not agreeable to self-sampling and preferred their doctor to perform screening. Personal and practitioner beliefs influenced a woman's screening participation. Personal factors include being healthy for themselves and their family, previous abnormal smears and family history of cancer. Emphasis was placed on feeling 'comfortable' with their practitioner which included patient rapport and gender preference. Proposed methods to improve cervical screening included education programmes, advertising campaigns, general practitioner interventions and improving accessibility. CONCLUSIONS It is apparent that women are hesitant about the new NCSP. However, when provided with additional information they were more amenable to the changes. This highlights the need to improve awareness of cervical screening and the new NCSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Nagendiram
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Jennifer Banks
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| | - Clare Heal
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Background: Although cervical cancer is highly preventable through regular screenings using Pap smear or human papillomavirus–deoxyribonucleic acid tests, cervical cancer remains a prevalent women's health issue across the world. Therefore, encouraging women to screen for cervical cancer is very important for the early detection of cervical cancer. Purpose: The purposes of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three interventions that are typically used to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening during home visits and (2) determine the participation rate in cervical cancer screenings after invitation, the health promotion perceptions, and the cervical cancer and screening-related knowledge of women. The three interventions noted in Purpose 1 were one-on-one training accompanied by an educational brochure, providing the educational brochure only, and giving an invitation without any relevant information. Methods: This interventional study was conducted on women who were between the ages of 30 and 65 years in three Turkish provinces (Ankara, Malatya, and Trabzon). Five hundred twenty home visits were made, and 356 women who did not have a Pap smear test within the previous year were invited for cervical cancer screening. Women were randomized into one of three intervention groups, and the participants in each group were invited to attend a national cervical cancer screening program and to undergo a cervical cancer screening using the related intervention type. Results: The results showed that the interventions used during home visits and knowledge were effective in encouraging women to participate in cervical cancer screening. It was determined that the participants who had received one-on-one training accompanied by an educational brochure had a higher cervical cancer screening rate than their peers who were offered a brochure only or a verbal invitation only. Conclusions: Invitations to screenings that are made by providing training accompanied with a brochure were found to be effective in increasing the participation of women in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
|
24
|
A Theory-Based and Culturally Aligned Training Program on Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention for South Asian Community Health Workers: A Feasibility Study. Cancer Nurs 2020; 42:E20-E30. [PMID: 28945633 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening uptake among South Asian ethnic minorities is reported to be relatively low. An outreach program, led by community health workers (CHWs), may increase the minority group's awareness of the importance of cancer screening. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a theory-based, culturally sensitive program to train South Asian women in Hong Kong as CHWs. METHODS A CHW training program, guided by the Empowerment Model and the Health Belief Model, was developed and implemented. Its feasibility was evaluated through the recruitment of South Asian women to the program and their satisfaction with it. Its effectiveness was assessed by a test of knowledge, the participants' self-efficacy and competence, and their readiness to work as CHWs. RESULTS Five South Asian women were recruited to the training program. Outcomes included increased participants' knowledge of cancer and improved self-efficacy and competence in working as CHWs. All participants were highly satisfied with the program, although the addition of practical sessions in the South Asian community was suggested as a further improvement. CONCLUSION It seems to be feasible to train South Asian CHWs to deliver interventions to promote their peers' awareness of breast and cervical cancer prevention, although challenges exist in recruitment of trainees. More hands-on practical opportunities as CHWs would likely increase their effectiveness. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The theoretical framework of our CHW training program and the incorporated cultural components could be useful for the development of future programs for training South Asian CHWs in delivering interventions on cancer prevention.
Collapse
|
25
|
[How can we improve cervical cancer screening: What can we learn from mistakes?]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:322-327. [PMID: 32061377 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening is considered one of the most significant public health interventions that can reduce not only the incidence, but also the mortality of the disease. One of the most important factors for screening effectiveness is coverage defined as the number of women tested within a recommended interval. In the first years of the cervical screening, the participation rate in National Screening Program in Romania was 14.2% with slight difference in different region of the country. In the northeastern part of the country, in the first four years of the program, the rate was 16.9% with an alarmingly continuous decrease. Thus, increasing the rate of uptake of cervical screening is essential. The policy-makers should take new measures to increase women's participation in this screening program. The objective of this paper was to review situation of the screening program and to identify gaps and needs in the system and to bring or suggest solution.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bongaerts TH, Büchner FL, Middelkoop BJ, Guicherit OR, Numans ME. Determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes: A systematic review. J Med Screen 2019; 27:121-129. [PMID: 31801039 PMCID: PMC7491249 DOI: 10.1177/0969141319887996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective The Netherlands host three population-based cancer screening programmes: for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. For screening programmes to be effective, high participation rates are essential, but participation in the Netherlands’ programmes is starting to fall below the minimal effective rate. We aimed to produce a systematic overview of the current known determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes. Methods A literature search was conducted in the electronic databases Academic Search Premier, Cochrane Library, Embase, EMCare, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and also in grey literature, including all articles published before February 2018. The I-Change model was used to categorize the identified determinants of cancer screening attendance. Results In total, 19/1232 identified studies and 6 grey literature reports were included. Fifteen studies reported on predisposing factors. Characteristics such as social economic status, country of birth, and residency were most often reported, and correlate with cancer screening attendance. Thirteen studies addressed information factors. Factors on awareness, motivation, ability, and barriers were less often studied. Conclusion Current studies tend to describe the general characteristics of (non-)attendance and (non-)attenders, but rarely provide in depth information on other factors of (non-)participation. The I-Change model proved to be a useful tool in mapping current knowledge on cancer screening attendance and revealed knowledge gaps regarding determinants of (non-)participation in the screening programmes. More research is needed to fully understand determinants of participation, in order to influence and optimize attendance rates over the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hg Bongaerts
- Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike L Büchner
- Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Barend Jc Middelkoop
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Municipal Health Service Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Onno R Guicherit
- University Cancer Center Leiden, The Hague at Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kriaucioniene V, Petkeviciene J. Predictors and Trend in Attendance for Breast Cancer Screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16224535. [PMID: 31744058 PMCID: PMC6887946 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In Lithuania, a Nationwide Breast Cancer (BC) Screening Program was launched in 2005, offering mammography for women aged 50 to 69 years, every other year. This study aimed to determine the trend in the attendance for mammography screening during 2006–2014 and to identify the factors that are predictive for participation in it. The study sample consisted of 1941 women aged 50–64 years, who participated in five cross-sectional biennial postal surveys of Lithuanian Health Behavior Monitoring, carried out in independent national random samples. The attendance for screening was identified if women reported having had a mammogram within the last two years. The proportion of women attending the screening was continuously increasing from 20.0% in 2006 up to 65.8% in 2014. The attendance for BC screening was associated with the participation in cervical cancer screening. A higher level of education, living in a city, frequent contact with a doctor, and healthy behaviors (fresh-vegetable consumption, physical activity, and absence of alcohol abuse) were associated with higher participation rates in BC screening. To increase BC screening uptake and to reduce inequalities in attendance, new strategies of organized BC screening program using systematic personal invitations are required in Lithuania.
Collapse
|
28
|
Agide FD, Garmaroudi G, Sadeghi R, Shakibazadeh E, Yaseri M, Koricha ZB, Tigabu BM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake. Eur J Public Health 2019; 28:1156-1162. [PMID: 30346504 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake. Methods Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for all published eligible research articles in the past 12 years (as of January 2005-2017). A total of 17 research articles were included. The interventions were classified as 'individual level', 'community level' and 'cultural sensitive educations' which contains various interventions in their content as compared with usual care. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists and rated by each researcher independently and the average score was given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060405. Results The review dovetailed 17 studies. Ten studies (58.82%) were conducted in the United States, three in Iran (17.65%) and one each in Malaysia, China, Cameroon and Nigeria (23.53%). Almost all levels of the interventions boosted the screening uptake and the Pap test. However, the individual level health education interventions were prioritized in many of the studies. Conclusion The review indicated that health education interventions have immense contributions in boosting the screening uptake. However, the effectiveness varies with study setting, populations and the way of delivery. Therefore, the limited quality of the studies indicated that further research is required to develop a simple and effective intervention to boost cervical cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feleke Doyore Agide
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia
| | - Gholamreza Garmaroudi
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Roya Sadeghi
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Shakibazadeh
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zewdie Birhanu Koricha
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Bereket Molla Tigabu
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gianino MM, Lenzi J, Bonaudo M, Fantini MP, Siliquini R, Ricciardi W, Damiani G. Organized screening programmes for breast and cervical cancer in 17 EU countries: trajectories of attendance rates. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:1236. [PMID: 30400786 PMCID: PMC6220470 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6155-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to analyse participation trajectories in organised breast and cervical cancer screening programmes and the association between socioeconomic variables and participation. METHODS A pooled, cross-sectional, time series analysis was used to evaluate secondary data from 17 European countries in 2004-2014. RESULTS The results show that the mammographic screening trend decreases after an initial increase (coefficient for the linear term = 0.40; p = 0.210; 95% CI = - 0.25, 1.06; coefficient for the quadratic term = - 0.07; p = 0.027; 95% CI = - 0.14, - 0.01), while the cervical screening trend is essentially stable (coefficient for the linear term = 0.39, p = 0.312, 95% CI = - 0.42, 1.20; coefficient for the quadratic term = 0.02, p = 0.689, 95% CI = - 0.07, 0.10). There is a significant difference among the country-specific slopes for breast and cervical cancer screening (SD = 16.7, p < 0.001; SD = 14.4, p < 0.001, respectively). No association is found between participation rate and educational level, income, type of employment, unemployment and preventive expenditure. However, participation in cervical cancer screening is significantly associated with a higher proportion of younger women (≤ 49 years) and a higher Gini index (that is, higher income inequality). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion three messages: organized cancer screening programmes may reduce the socioeconomic inequalities in younger people's use of preventive services over time; socioeconomic variables are not related to participation rates; these rates do not reach a level of stability in several countries. Therefore, without effective recruitment strategies and tailored organizations, screening participation may not achieve additional gains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Michela Gianino
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Bonaudo
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Fantini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Siliquini
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCSS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCSS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lima GM, Matti A, Vara G, Dondi G, Naselli N, De Crescenzo EM, Morganti AG, Perrone AM, De Iaco P, Nanni C, Fanti S. Prognostic value of posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and predictors of metabolic response to therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation therapy: an analysis of intensity- and volume-based PET parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:2139-2146. [PMID: 30069578 PMCID: PMC6182406 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4077-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic value of posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). The secondary aim was to assess the possible role of intensity-based and volume-based PET parameters including SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG, and clinical parameters including age, pathology, FIGO stage and nodal involvement as factors predicting response to treatment. METHODS This retrospective study included 82 patients affected by LACC treated with CCRT. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT both before and after treatment. The posttreatment PET/CT scans were used to classify patients as complete metabolic responders (CMR) or non-complete metabolic responders (N-CMR) according to the EORTC criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS) between the CMR and N-CMR groups. Student's t test, Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression were used to investigate the possible value of PET and clinical parameters as predictors of metabolic response to therapy. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly significant difference in OS between the CMR and N-CMR groups (log-rank test p < 0.0001). Significant independent predictors of response to therapy were MTV (p = 0.019, odds ratio = 1.015, 95% CI = 1.002-1.028, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.110), TLG (p = 0.045, odds ratio = 1.001, 95% CI = 1.000-1.002, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.081) and nodal involvement (p = 0.088, odds ratio = 2.361, 95% CI = 0.879-6.343, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.051). CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET/CT-based response assessment using the EORTC criteria reliably predicts OS in LACC patients treated with CCRT. In our cohort of patients, pretreatment MTV and TLG and nodal involvement were predictors of response to therapy. MTV was the best predictor of response. However, its additional risk value seems to be low (MTV odds ratio = 1.015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Maria Lima
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Antonella Matti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulio Vara
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Dondi
- Oncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Naselli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Oncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Oncologic Gynecology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Petrelli A, Giorgi Rossi P, Francovich L, Giordani B, Di Napoli A, Zappa M, Mirisola C, Gargiulo L. Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021653. [PMID: 30232106 PMCID: PMC6150150 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Italian National Health Service instituted cervical and breast cancer screening programmes in 1999; the local health authorities have a mandate to implement these screening programmes by inviting all women aged 25-64 years for a Pap test every 3 years (or for an Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) test every 5 years) and women aged 50-69 years for a mammography every 2 years. However, the implementation of screening programmes throughout the country is still incomplete. This study aims to: (1) describe cervical and breast cancer screening uptake and (2) evaluate geographical and individual socioeconomic difference in screening uptake. METHODS Data both from the Italian National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) conducted by the National Institute of Statistics in 2012-2013 and from the Italian National Centre for Screening Monitoring (INCSM) were used. The NHIS interviewed a national representative random sample of 32 831 women aged 25-64 years and of 16 459 women aged 50-69 years. Logistic multilevel models were used to estimate the effect of socioeconomic variables and behavioural factors (level 1) on screening uptake. Data on screening invitation coverage at the regional level, taken from INCSM, were used as ecological (level 2) covariates. RESULTS Total 3-year Pap test and 2-year mammography uptake were 62.1% and 56.4%, respectively; screening programmes accounted for 1/3 and 1/2 of total test uptake, respectively. Strong geographical differences were observed. Uptake was associated with high educational levels, healthy behaviours, being a former smoker and being Italian versus foreign national. Differences in uptake between Italian regions were mostly explained by the invitation coverage to screening programmes. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of both screening programmes in Italy is still under acceptable levels. Screening programme implementation has the potential to reduce the health inequalities gap between regions but only if uptake increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Petrelli
- Epidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lisa Francovich
- Direzione centrale delle statistiche socio-demografiche e ambientale, National Institute of Statistics (Istat), Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Barbara Giordani
- Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority TO3, Grugliasco, Piemonte, Italy
| | - Anteo Di Napoli
- Epidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Institute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPO), Italian National Screening Monitoring Centre, Florence, Italy
| | - Concetta Mirisola
- Epidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy
| | - Lidia Gargiulo
- Direzione centrale delle statistiche socio-demografiche e ambientale, National Institute of Statistics (Istat), Rome, Lazio, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Thomson K, Hillier-Brown F, Todd A, McNamara C, Huijts T, Bambra C. The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:869. [PMID: 30005611 PMCID: PMC6044092 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5677-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socio-economic inequalities are associated with unequal exposure to social, economic and environmental risk factors, which in turn contribute to health inequalities. Understanding the impact of specific public health policy interventions will help to establish causality in terms of the effects on health inequalities. METHODS Systematic review methodology was used to identify systematic reviews from high-income countries that describe the health equity effects of upstream public health interventions. Twenty databases were searched from their start date until May 2017. The quality of the included articles was determined using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR). RESULTS Twenty-nine systematic reviews were identified reporting 150 unique relevant primary studies. The reviews summarised evidence of all types of primary and secondary prevention policies (fiscal, regulation, education, preventative treatment and screening) across seven public health domains (tobacco, alcohol, food and nutrition, reproductive health services, the control of infectious diseases, the environment and workplace regulations). There were no systematic reviews of interventions targeting mental health. Results were mixed across the public health domains; some policy interventions were shown to reduce health inequalities (e.g. food subsidy programmes, immunisations), others have no effect and some interventions appear to increase inequalities (e.g. 20 mph and low emission zones). The quality of the included reviews (and their primary studies) were generally poor and clear gaps in the evidence base have been highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The review does tentatively suggest interventions that policy makers might use to reduce health inequalities, although whether the programmes are transferable between high-income countries remains unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016025283.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Thomson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
- Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frances Hillier-Brown
- Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University, 32 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN UK
| | - Adam Todd
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
- Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK
| | - Courtney McNamara
- Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Building 9, Level 5, 7491 Dragvoll, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tim Huijts
- Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht University, Tongersestraat 53, 6211 LM Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Clare Bambra
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
- Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Relecom A, Arzel B, Perneger T. Effect of an organised screening program on socioeconomic inequalities in mammography practice, knowledge and attitudes. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17:95. [PMID: 29970090 PMCID: PMC6031106 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0811-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer stands as the leading cause of cancer related mortality in women worldwide. Mammography screening has the potential to improve prognosis by reducing stage at diagnosis. Socioeconomic inequalities in mammography cancer screening have been widely reported. The influence of organised programs on socioeconomic disparities regarding mammography screening is to date unclear. We aimed to investigate the impact of an organised regional screening program on socioeconomic inequalities in terms of the uptake, knowledge and attitudes towards mammography screening. METHODS Data were obtained from two cross-sectional surveys of women 50 to 69 years old conducted in 1998 and 2012, before and after the implementation of an organised breast cancer screening program in Geneva, Switzerland. Socioeconomic status was measured by monthly household income and education level. Logistic and linear regression multivariable models were used to investigate the evolution of socioeconomic gradients between 1998 and 2012 in terms of uptake, knowledge and attitudes towards mammography screening. RESULTS In 1998, before the implementation of an organised screening program, 44% of women from the lowest education category reported mammography practice conforming to recommendations versus 63% of the more educated participants. This socioeconomic gradient was no longer present in 2012 where reported mammography practice at guideline-recommended frequency were 83 and 82% in the lowest and highest education level categories respectively (change in education gradient over time, p = 0.018). The difference in mammography practice in agreement with recommendations between the lowest and the highest income category went from 27 percentage points in 1998 to 14 percentage points in 2012 (change in income gradient over time, p = 0.10). The socioeconomic gradient in negative attitudes towards mammography screening persisted in 2012 but was reduced compared to 1998. We did not observe a reduction in the socioeconomic disparities in knowledge regarding mammography screening over this period. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that mammography screening programs may lessen socioeconomic inequities in mammography practice. Such programs should feature adapted communication tools to reach women of lower socioeconomic status to attempt to further reduce socioeconomic gradients in mammography screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Relecom
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Geneva University Hospitals, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Oncology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - B. Arzel
- Geneva Foundation for Breast Cancer Screening, Boulevard de la Cluse 43, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T. Perneger
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Geneva University Hospitals, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Grigore M, Popovici R, Pristavu A, Grigore AM, Matei M, Gafitanu D. Perception and use of Pap smear screening among rural and urban women in Romania. Eur J Public Health 2018; 27:1084-1088. [PMID: 29020396 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2012 the National Screening Program for all women between 25 and 64 years of age was launched in Romania. Public awareness is an important factor in the success of a screening program. For this reason, we intended to assess the perception and the level of awareness of Romanian women regarding the Pap test in the prevention of cervical cancer. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 454 women from rural and urban areas. For our study, we used a questionnaire covering general characteristics, awareness, knowledge and practices regarding cervical cancer and Pap smear. Results 431 participants (95%) had heard of cervical cancer and Pap smear but only 71.8% knew the exact role of it. Bivariate analysis showed that knowledge about the importance of the Pap smear, early detection and treatment of early-stage cervical cancer was reduced among women with low socio-economic status, mainly living in rural area. The most frequent reasons for avoiding Pap smear screening were: lack of money, embarrassment or fear of gynaecological consultation and pain, the feeling that they don't need it, misconceptions about cervical cancer, fatalistic attitude, perceived low susceptibility to cervical cancer. Conclusions Because the uptake and the success of cervical cancer screening are determined by women's knowledge and awareness of Pap smear, it is critical to improve these perceptions in the near future especially in rural area characterized by a low socio-economic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Grigore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania, Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Cuza-Voda", Iasi, Romania
| | - Razvan Popovici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania, Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Cuza-Voda", Iasi, Romania
| | - Anda Pristavu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania, Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Cuza-Voda", Iasi, Romania
| | - Ana Maria Grigore
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania
| | - Mioara Matei
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania
| | - Dumitru Gafitanu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Romania, Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Elena Doamna", Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rees I, Jones D, Chen H, Macleod U. Interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: A systematic review. Prev Med 2018; 111:323-335. [PMID: 29203349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Screening can reduce both the incidence and mortality of the disease but is often not utilized by lower socioeconomic groups. A systematic review, including studies of interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening uptake, up to 2006, found targeted interventions could be effective. A formal update has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups. A systematic computerized literature search was undertaken in June 2016 for relevant papers published since 2006. Data was extracted on study participants, setting, intervention and control using a predefined extraction tool and a full quality assessment was undertaken using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This update yielded 16 studies of mixed quality, in addition to the 13 studies from the original review. The interventions were categorized into local interventions including HPV self-testing, lay health advisors, inreach, outreach and mixed, and strategies enhancing attendance within an organized program. This review has found two large, randomized controlled trials for the use of HPV self-testing to increase cervical screening uptake. Both reviews have found varying success using lay health advisors, with the majority of included papers reporting a statistically significant increase in screening uptake. HPV self-testing can improve uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups. This is a relatively new method of cervical screening that was not included in the earlier review. The findings of this updated review largely support that of the 2006 review for the use of lay health advisors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imogen Rees
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, University of Hull, Supportive Care, Early Diagnosis and Advanced Disease (SEDA) Research Group, United Kingdom.
| | - Daniel Jones
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, University of Hull, Supportive Care, Early Diagnosis and Advanced Disease (SEDA) Research Group, United Kingdom
| | - Hong Chen
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, University of Hull, Supportive Care, Early Diagnosis and Advanced Disease (SEDA) Research Group, United Kingdom
| | - Una Macleod
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, University of Hull, Supportive Care, Early Diagnosis and Advanced Disease (SEDA) Research Group, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gyulai A, Nagy A, Pataki V, Tonté D, Ádány R, Vokó Z. General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:67. [PMID: 29778099 PMCID: PMC5960501 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0755-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is a preventable disease. Unfortunately, its mortality is high in Hungary: 9.2 deaths /100000 women/year in 2015. The Hungarian organized, nationwide cervical screening program was launched in 2003, but it could improve the coverage rate of cervical cancer screening only by a few percentage points. The vast majority of women still uses opportunistic screening and the organized screening program had little impact on participation by women who never or rarely consult their gynecologists. We assessed whether involving general practitioners in the cervical cancer screening process would increase participation. METHODS The study consisted of two parts: 1. A questionnaire-based health survey was conducted using a representative sample of women aged 25 to 65 years from 11 Hungarian counties, in which we studied where women obtained information about cervical cancer screening. 2. Additionally, a model program and its evaluation were implemented in the practices of general practitioners in one of the 11 counties (Zala county). In this program, general practitioners were informed of their patients' participation in the cervical cancer screening program, and they motivated those who refused the invitation. RESULTS Questionnaire-based health survey: A total of 74% (95% confidence interval (CI): 70-77%) of the target population had a screening examination within the previous 3 years. The majority (58, 95% CI: 54-62%) of the target population did not ask for information about cervical cancer screening at all. Only 21% (95% CI: 17-26%) consulted their general practitioners about cancer screening. Evaluation of the model program: the general practitioners effectively motivated 24 out of 88 women (27, 95% CI: 18-38%) who initially refused to participate in the screening program. CONCLUSION The majority of Hungarian women are not informed about cervical cancer screening beyond the invitation letter. General practitioners could play a more important role in mobilizing the population to utilize preventive services. The involvement of general practitioners in the organization of the cervical cancer screening program could increase the participation of those women who generally refuse the services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anikó Gyulai
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Debrecen, Sóstói u. 2-4, Nyíregyháza, H-4400 Hungary
| | - Attila Nagy
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai út 26, Debrecen, H-4028 Hungary
| | - Vera Pataki
- GlaxoSmithKline Hungary Ltd., Csörsz u. 43, Budapest, H-1124 Hungary
| | - Dóra Tonté
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai út 26, Debrecen, H-4028 Hungary
| | - Róza Ádány
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai út 26, Debrecen, H-4028 Hungary
| | - Zoltán Vokó
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai út 26, Debrecen, H-4028 Hungary
- Department of Health Policy & Health Economics, Institute of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/a, Budapest, H-1117 Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Saei Ghare Naz M, Kariman N, Ebadi A, Ozgoli G, Ghasemi V, Rashidi Fakari F. Educational Interventions for Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior of Women: A Systematic Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:875-884. [PMID: 29693331 PMCID: PMC6031778 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.4.875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide; early detection can play a key role in reducing the associated morbidity. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the effects of educational interventions on cervical cancer screening (CCS) behavior of women. Methods: In this review the Cochrane library, Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus and search engine of Google scholar were searched for all interventional studies (trails, pre- and post-test or quasi-experimental) published in 2000-2017 for a systematic review, The search was based on the following keywords: cervix cancer, uterine cervical neoplasms, screening, prevention and control, Papanicolaou Test, pap test, pap smear, education, intervention, systematic review. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, a qualitative analysis was performed. Results: Thirty seven articles with 15,658 female participants in different parts of world were included in the review. About three quarters of the articles covered behavior change interventions. About one fourth of the articles were based on health education methods. The heath belief model is the most popular used framework for cervical cancer screening interventions. The results of our study showed that different health education methods (such as calls, mailed postcards, mother/daughter education. consultation sessions, picture books, videos, PowerPoint slides, small group discussions, educational brochures, radio broadcast education, lecture presentations, tailored counseling and a fact sheet, Self-learning package, face-to- face interviews and etc) are effective in modifying cervical cancer screening behavior of women. Conclusions: Our results showed that the different interventions and health behavior change frameworks provide an effective base for cervical cancer prevention. Heath providers can chose educational methods based on the particular client situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz
- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. gozgoli@sbmu. ac.ir
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Primary Health Care and Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates in Brazil: A Longitudinal Ecological Study. J Ambul Care Manage 2018; 40 Suppl 2 Supplement, The Brazilian National Program for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ):S24-S34. [PMID: 28252500 PMCID: PMC5338880 DOI: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Cervical cancer is a common neoplasm that is responsible for nearly 230 000 deaths annually in Brazil. Despite this burden, cervical cancer is considered preventable with appropriate care. We conducted a longitudinal ecological study from 2002 to 2012 to examine the relationship between the delivery of preventive primary care and cervical cancer mortality rates in Brazil. Brazilian states and the federal district were the unit of analysis (N = 27). Results suggest that primary health care has contributed to reducing cervical cancer mortality rates in Brazil; however, the full potential of preventive care has yet to be realized.
Collapse
|
39
|
Participants, Physicians or Programmes: Participants' educational level and initiative in cancer screening. Health Policy 2018; 122:422-430. [PMID: 29454541 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
This study is an in-depth examination of at whose initiative (participant, physician or screening programme) individuals participate in cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening across the EU-28. Special attention is paid to (1) the association with educational attainment and (2) the country's cancer screening strategy (organised, pilot/regional or opportunistic) for each type of cancer screened. Data were obtained from Eurobarometer 66.2 'Health in the European Union' (2006). Final samples consisted of 10,186; 5443 and 9851 individuals for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed. Surprisingly, even in countries with organised screening programmes, participation in screenings for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer was most likely to be initiated by the general practitioner (GP) or the participant. In general, GPs were found to play a crucial role in making referrals to screenings, regardless of the country's screening strategy. The results also revealed differences between educational groups with regard to their incentive to participate in cervical and breast cancer screening and, to a lesser extent, in colorectal cancer screening. People with high education are more likely to participate in cancer screening at their own initiative, while people with less education are more likely to participate at the initiative of a physician or a screening programme. Albeit, the results varied according to type of cancer screening and national screening strategy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Hugosson J, Godtman RA, Carlsson SV, Aus G, Grenabo Bergdahl A, Lodding P, Pihl CG, Stranne J, Holmberg E, Lilja H. Eighteen-year follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: effect of sociodemographic variables on participation, prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Scand J Urol 2017; 52:27-37. [PMID: 29254399 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1411392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined whether previously reported results, indicating that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening can reduce prostate cancer (PC) mortality regardless of sociodemographic inequality, could be corroborated in an 18 year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 1994, 20,000 men aged 50-64 years were randomized from the Göteborg population register to PSA screening or control (1:1) (study ID: ISRCTN54449243). Men in the screening group (n = 9950) were invited for biennial PSA testing up to the median age of 69 years. Prostate biopsy was recommended for men with PSA ≥2.5 ng/ml. Last follow-up was on 31 December 2012. RESULTS In the screening group, 77% (7647/9950) attended at least once. After 18 years, 1396 men in the screening group and 962 controls had been diagnosed with PC [hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.64]. Cumulative PC mortality was 0.98% (95% CI 0.78-1.22%) in the screening group versus 1.50% (95% CI 1.26-1.79%) in controls, an absolute reduction of 0.52% (95% CI 0.17-0.87%). The rate ratio (RR) for PC death was 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87). To prevent one death from PC, the number needed to invite was 231 and the number needed to diagnose was 10. Systematic PSA screening demonstrated greater benefit in PC mortality for men who started screening at age 55-59 years (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.78) and men with low education (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.78). CONCLUSIONS These data corroborate previous findings that systematic PSA screening reduces PC mortality and suggest that systematic screening may reduce sociodemographic inequality in PC mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Hugosson
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.,b Department of Surgery (Urology Service) , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , NY , USA.,c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , NY , USA
| | - Gunnar Aus
- d Department of Urology , Carlanderska Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Anna Grenabo Bergdahl
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Pär Lodding
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Carl-Gustaf Pihl
- e Department of Pathology, Institute of Biomedicine , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Johan Stranne
- a Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Erik Holmberg
- f Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Hans Lilja
- b Department of Surgery (Urology Service) , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , NY , USA.,g Department of Laboratory Medicine , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , NY , USA.,h Department of Medicine (Genitourinary Oncology Service) , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , NY , USA.,i Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.,j Department of Translational Medicine , Lund University, Skåne University Hospital , Malmö , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bobridge A, Price K, Gill TK, Taylor AW. Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer. Front Oncol 2017; 7:308. [PMID: 29322029 PMCID: PMC5733549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participation in established cancer screening programs remains variable. Therefore, a renewed focus on how to increase screening uptake, including addressing structural barriers such as time, travel, and cost is needed. One approach could be the provision of combined cancer screening, where multiple screening tests are provided at the same time and location (essentially a ‘One Stop’ screening shop). This cohort study explored both cancer screening behavior and the acceptability of a combined screening approach. Methods Participants of the North Western Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), South Australia were invited to participate in a questionnaire about cancer screening behaviors and the acceptability of a proposed ‘One Stop’ cancer screening shop. Data were collected from 10th August 2015 to 18th January 2016, weighted for selection probability, age, and sex and analyzed using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results 1,562 people, 52% female (mean age 54.1 years ± 15.2) participated. Reported screening participation was low, the highest being for Pap Smear (34.4%). Common reasons for screening participation were preventing sickness (56.1%, CI 53.2–59.0%), maintaining health (51%, CI 48–53.9%), and free program provision (30.9%, CI 28.2–33.6%). Females were less likely to state that screening is not beneficial [OR 0.37 (CI 0.21–0.66), p < 0.001] and to cite sickness prevention [OR 2.10 (CI 1.46–3.00), p < 0.001] and free program [OR 1.75 (CI 1.22–2.51), p < 0.003] as reasons for screening participation. Of those who did not participate, 34.6% (CI 30.3–39.1%) stated that there was nothing that discouraged them from participation, with 55- to 64-year olds [OR 0.24 (CI 0.07–0.74), p < 0.04] being less likely to cite this reason. 21% (CI 17.2–24.8%) thought they did not need screening, while a smaller proportion stated not having time (6.9%, CI 4.9–9.7%) and the costs associated with screening (5.2%, CI 3.5–7.7%). The majority of participants (85.3%, CI 81.9–88.2%) supported multiple screening being offered at the same time and location. Conclusion Identified screening behaviors in this study are similar to those reported in the literature. The high support for the concept of combined cancer screening demonstrates that this type of approach is acceptable to potential end users and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kay Price
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Osborne LA, Whittall CM, Emanuel R, Emery S, Reed P. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Brief Telephone Support Intervention on Initial Attendance at Physiotherapy Group Sessions for Pelvic Floor Problems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98:2247-2252. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
43
|
Salem MR, Amin TT, Alhulaybi AA, Althafar AS, Abdelhai RA. Perceived Risk of Cervical Cancer and Barriers to Screening among Secondary School Female Teachers in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:969-979. [PMID: 28545195 PMCID: PMC5494247 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.4.969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: No previous studies had addressed the perceived risk of cervical cancer (CC) and its influence on screening practices and perceived barriers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 506 randomly selected Saudi female secondary school teachers in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia to assess their level of knowledge about risk factors and signs of CC in relation to perceived risk and to characterize CC screening compliance using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: Of the included female Saudi teachers, 65.4% and 63.4% were considered less-knowledgeable about CC risk factors and early signs and symptoms respectively. Only 17.2% reported being previously examined for CC. The majority of participants perceived themselves to be at an average or below average risk of CC. Residing in urban areas was the strongest predictor of CC screening (Odds ratio ‘OR’= 3.39; 95% confidence intervals ‘CI= 1.76-6.46; P=0.001). Awareness of risk factors was significantly associated with higher awareness of signs of CC (OR 2.5; 95% CI=, P=0.001). Exploratory factor analysis showed that personal fears (of screening being embarrassing) was the major factor that hindered CC screening with a high loading eigenvalue of 4.392, explaining 30.8% of the barriers toward utilization, followed by health care related factors. Conclusion: Secondary school teachers in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia showed low perceived risk, poor awareness about risk factors, signs and symptoms of CC and limited uptake of screening practices. This underlines the need for education programs on CC targeting this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Rashad Salem
- Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Trapero-Bertran M, Acera Pérez A, de Sanjosé S, Manresa Domínguez JM, Rodríguez Capriles D, Rodriguez Martinez A, Bonet Simó JM, Sanchez Sanchez N, Hidalgo Valls P, Díaz Sanchis M. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in Spain: the CRIVERVA study. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:194. [PMID: 28196467 PMCID: PMC5309977 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study is to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of three different interventions to promote the uptake of screening for cervical cancer in general practice in the county of Valles Occidental, Barcelona, Spain. METHODS Women aged from 30 to 70 years (n = 15,965) were asked to attend a general practice to be screened. They were randomly allocated to one of four groups: no intervention group (NIG); one group where women received an invitation letter to participate in the screening (IG1); one group where women received an invitation letter and informative leaflet (IG2); and one group where women received an invitation letter, an informative leaflet and a phone call reminder (IG3). Clinical effectiveness was measured as the percentage increase in screening coverage. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of the public health system with a time horizon of three to five years - the duration of the randomised controlled clinical trial. In addition, a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results are presented according to different age groups. RESULTS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the most cost-effective intervention, IG1, compared with opportunistic screening was € 2.78 per 1% increase in the screening coverage. The age interval with the worst results in terms of efficiency was women aged < 40 years. CONCLUSIONS In a population like Catalonia, with around 2 million women aged 30 to 70 years and assuming that 40% of these women were not attending general practice to be screened for cervical cancer, the implementation of an intervention to increase screening coverage which consists of sending a letter would cost on average less than € 490 for every 1000 women. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01373723 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Trapero-Bertran
- Economy and Business Organisation Department, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Research in Economics and Health (CRES), University Pompeu Fabra, c/Immaculada 22, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amelia Acera Pérez
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) SAP Cerdanyola-Ripollet, Institut Catala de la Salut, Ripollet, Barcelona, Spain
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Nord, IDIAP Jordi Gol. Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de Recerca GRASSIR reconegut per la Generalitat de Catalunya SGR 2014-2016, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme (CERP), Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Manresa Domínguez
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Nord, IDIAP Jordi Gol. Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Infermeria, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diego Rodríguez Capriles
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) SAP Cerdanyola-Ripollet, Institut Catala de la Salut, Ripollet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Rodriguez Martinez
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) SAP Cerdanyola-Ripollet, Institut Catala de la Salut, Ripollet, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Norman Sanchez Sanchez
- Sistemes d’Informació Sanitària, SAP Vallés Occidental, Institut Catala de la Salut, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Hidalgo Valls
- SAP Vallés Occidental, Institut Català de la Salut, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Díaz Sanchis
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme (CERP), Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In a primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening program, we compared the 6-month follow-up among colposcopy and noncolposcopy-based management strategies for screen-positive women. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women aged 30 to 49 years were screened with HPV DNA tests using both self-collection and provider collection of samples. Women testing positive received either (1) colposcopy management (CM) consisting of colposcopy and management per local guidelines or (2) screen-and-treat (ST) management using visual inspection with acetic acid to determine cryotherapy eligibility, with eligible women undergoing immediate cryotherapy. One thousand women were recruited in each cohort. Of these, 368 (18.4%) of 2000 women were recruited using a more intensive outreach strategy. Demographics, HPV positivity, and treatment compliance were compared across recruitment and management strategies. RESULTS More women in the ST cohort received treatment within 6 months compared with those in the CM cohort (117/119 [98.3%] vs 64/93 [68.8%]; p < .001). Women recruited through more intensive outreach were more likely to be HPV positive, lived in urban areas, were more educated, and had higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners and fewer children. CONCLUSIONS Women in the CM arm were less likely to complete care than women in the ST arm. Targeted outreach to underscreened women successfully identified women with higher prevalence of HPV and possibly higher disease burden.
Collapse
|
46
|
Duffy SW, Myles JP, Maroni R, Mohammad A. Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services. J Med Screen 2016; 24:127-145. [PMID: 27754937 PMCID: PMC5542134 DOI: 10.1177/0969141316664757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective Screening participation is spread differently across populations, according to factors such as ethnicity or socioeconomic status. We here review the current evidence on effects of interventions to improve cancer screening participation, focussing in particular on effects in underserved populations. Methods We selected studies to review based on their characteristics: focussing on population screening programmes, showing a quantitative estimate of the effect of the intervention, and published since 1990. To determine eligibility for our purposes, we first reviewed titles, then abstracts, and finally the full paper. We started with a narrow search and expanded this until the search yielded eligible papers on title review which were less than 1% of the total. We classified the eligible studies by intervention type and by the cancer for which they screened, while looking to identify effects in any inequality dimension. Results The 68 papers included in our review reported on 71 intervention studies. Of the interventions, 58 had significant positive effects on increasing participation, with increase rates of the order of 2%–20% (in absolute terms). Conclusions Across different countries and health systems, a number of interventions were found more consistently to improve participation in cancer screening, including in underserved populations: pre-screening reminders, general practitioner endorsement, more personalized reminders for non-participants, and more acceptable screening tests in bowel and cervical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan P Myles
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Roberta Maroni
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Abeera Mohammad
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Williams JH, Carter SM. An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates. BMC Med Ethics 2016; 17:56. [PMID: 27716156 PMCID: PMC5053126 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0143-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens disadvantaged women. Organised cervical screening aims to make cancer prevention available to all women in a population, yet screening uptake and cancer incidence and mortality are strongly correlated with socioeconomic status (SES). Reaching underscreened populations is a stated priority in many screening programs, usually with an emphasis on something like 'equity'. Equity is a poorly defined and understood concept. We aimed to explain experts' perspectives on how cervical screening programs might justifiably respond to 'the underscreened'. METHODS This paper reports on a grounded theory study of cervical screening experts involved in program organisation. Participants were 23 experts from several countries and a range of backgrounds: gynecology; epidemiology; public health; pathology; general practice; policy making. Data were gathered via semi-structured interview and concepts developed through transcript coding and memo writing. RESULTS Most experts expressed an intuitive commitment to reducing systematic differences in screening participation or cancer outcomes. They took three different implicit positions, however, on what made organised programs justifiable with respect to underscreened populations. These were: 1) accepting that population screening is likely to miss certain disenfranchised groups for practical and cultural reasons, and focusing on maximising mainstream reach; 2) identifying and removing barriers to screening; and 3) providing parallel tailored screening services that attended to different cultural needs. Positions tended to fall along country of practice lines. CONCLUSIONS Experts emphasised the provision of opportunity for underscreened populations to take up screening. A focus on opportunity appeared to rely on tacit premises not supported by evidence: that provision of meaningful opportunity leads to increased uptake, and that increased uptake of an initial screening test by disadvantaged populations would decrease cervical cancer incidence and mortality. There was little attention to anything other than the point of testing, or the difficulties disadvantaged women can have in accessing follow up care. The different approaches to 'improving equity' taken by participants are differently justified, and differently justifiable, but none attend directly to the broader conditions of disadvantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane H. Williams
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine (VELiM), K25, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Stacy M. Carter
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine (VELiM), K25, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Presence, characteristics and equity of access to breast cancer screening programmes in 27 European countries in 2010 and 2014. Results from an international survey. Prev Med 2016; 91:250-263. [PMID: 27527575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The European Union Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening suggests the implementation of organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on mammography every other year for women aged 50 to 69years, ensuring equal access to screening, taking into account potential needs for targeting particular socioeconomic groups. A European survey on coverage and participation, and key organisational and policy characteristics of the programmes, targeting years 2010 and 2014, was undertaken in 2014. Overall, 27 countries contributed to this survey, 26 of the 28 European Union member states (92.9%) plus Norway. In 2014, 25 countries reported an ongoing population-based programme, one country reported a pilot programme and another was planning a pilot. In eight countries, the target age range was broader than that proposed by the Council Recommendation, and in three countries the full range was not covered. Fifteen countries reported not reaching some vulnerable populations, such as immigrants, prisoners and people without health insurance, while 22 reported that participation was periodically monitored by socioeconomic variables (e.g. age and territory). Organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on routine mammograms are in place in most EU member states. However, there are still differences in the way screening programmes are implemented, and participation by vulnerable populations should be encouraged.
Collapse
|
49
|
Wittenberg E, Bharel M, Bridges JFP, Ward Z, Weinreb L. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Understand Patient Priorities: A Case Example of Papanicolaou Tests for Homeless Women. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14:359-64. [PMID: 27401425 PMCID: PMC4940467 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a survey method for assessing individuals' priorities. It identifies the extremes-best and worst items, most and least important factors, biggest and smallest influences-among sets. In this article, we demonstrate an application of BWS in a primary care setting to illustrate its use in identifying patient priorities for services. METHODS We conducted a BWS survey in 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts, to assess the relative importance of 10 previously identified attributes of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing services among women experiencing homelessness. Women were asked to evaluate 11 sets of 5 attributes of Pap services, and identify which attribute among each set would have the biggest and smallest influence on promoting uptake. We show how frequency analysis can be used to analyze results. RESULTS In all, 165 women participated, a response rate of 72%. We identified the most and least salient influences on encouraging Pap screening based on their frequency of report among our sample, with possible standardized scores ranging from+1.0 (biggest influence) to -1.0 (smallest influence). Most important was the availability of support for issues beyond health (+0.39), while least important was the availability of accommodations for personal hygiene (-0.27). CONCLUSIONS BWS quantifies patient priorities in a manner that is transparent and accessible. It is easily comprehendible by patients and relatively easy to administer. Our application illustrates its use in a vulnerable population, showing that factors beyond those typically provided in health care settings are highly important to women in seeking Pap screening. This approach can be applied to other health care services where prioritization is helpful to guide decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Monica Bharel
- The Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; currently: Department of Public Health, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John F P Bridges
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zachary Ward
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Weinreb
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gyulai A, Nagy A, Pataki V, Tonté D, Ádány R, Vokó Z. Survey of Participation in Organised Cervical Cancer-Screening Programme in Hungary. Cent Eur J Public Health 2016; 23:360-4. [PMID: 26841151 DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a4068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM Cervical cancer mortality is high in Hungary, with more than 400 deaths per annum. In 2003, a national cervical cancer screening programme was launched to provide screening services for women who otherwise would not use services themselves. The aim of this survey was to study the socioeconomic and lifestyle factors related to participation in the organised cervical cancer screening programme. METHODS A questionnaire-based health survey was conducted using a representative sample of women from 25-65 years of age in 11 Hungarian counties. A logistic regression analysis was used to study the association between participation in the screening programme and socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. RESULTS 74% (95% CI: 70-77%) of the target population underwent a screening examination within the previous three years. Only 15% (95% CI: 5-35%) of the women, who received an invitation letter and took part in the organised screening programme, had never been previously examined by gynaecologist. The participation rates decreased significantly (p<0.05) for those subjects aged >44 years, retired, participants with low income, living in small settlements, and reported to be heavy smokers. CONCLUSION Although the overall proportion of Hungary's population that undergoes regular screening for cervical cancer is not low, the organised national cancer screening programme was ineffective in engaging women not regularly visiting their gynaecologist for examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anikó Gyulai
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Attila Nagy
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Dóra Tonté
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Róza Ádány
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Vokó
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|