Colorectal cancer screening among Hispanics in the United States: Disparities, modalities, predictors, and regional variation

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnoses in the COVID Era: A Study of the VA Health System

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused disruptions in cancer screening and diagnosis, including colorectal cancer. Given disparities in cancer and COVID-19 faced by historically disadvantaged minorities, we examined changes in disparities in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis in the COVID era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a cohort study using the Veterans' Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS) from 2018 through 2021, we quantified colonoscopies, fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), and new diagnoses of colorectal cancer (CRC) by month from 1 March 2018 to 31 December 2021. We compared the pre-COVID (before 1 March 2020) to the COVID (1 March 2020 and after) era. We graphed temporal trends by age, sex, race, ethnicity, rural-urban, and socioeconomic status (SES). Logistic regression was used to evaluate temporal trends after adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were about 900,000 colonoscopies, 1.4 million FOBTs, and > 30,000 new diagnoses of CRC. Colonoscopies and new CRC decreased dramatically during the early COVID era to < 10% and < 60% of pre-COVID rates, respectively. Although we identified a modest increase in disparities of colonoscopy use among Black and Latino patients in the early COVID era, these increased disparities did not persist in adjusted analysis. We did not identify changes in disparities in FOBT use or new CRC diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify increased disparities in CRC screening or diagnoses by age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic region, or SES in the VAHCS. These results indicate a potential strength of the VAHCS and require further study in additional cancers and healthcare systems.

Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Health Fair Attendees in Utah

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake remains suboptimal despite the importance and effectiveness of various testing options. The purpose of our study was to identify barriers and facilitators to CRC screening in a community-based sample in Salt Lake County, Utah to inform future efforts to develop effective interventions to increase CRC screening.

METHODS

This study enrolled adults eligible for CRC screening at 6 community health events. Participants completed targeted questionnaires based on whether they had discussed screening with a provider and whether they had received screening. We identified participant-reported barriers to CRC screening using descriptive analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify participant characteristics associated with receipt of screening.

RESULTS

Of the 117 participants who completed the questionnaires, 43.6% were 50 to 60 years old, 36.8% identified as white, and 51.3% identified as non-Hispanic. The most common barrier to colonoscopy was the need for extensive bowel preparation (30.8%). For stool tests, common barriers included handling stool (20.5%) and not understanding how to do the test (20.5%). For virtual colonoscopy, barriers included the need for extensive bowel preparation (21.4%) and cost (21.4%). Most participants (67.5%) believed that they should know about all CRC screening options available, and their importance. The majority of participants (68.4%) preferred to learn about CRC screening from their doctor or healthcare provider. Younger age was associated with non-screening.

CONCLUSION

We observed that study participants faced procedural barriers to complete CRC screening and preferred to learn about CRC screening options through their providers. Younger age groups were less likely to receive screening within our study sample. Future, targeted interventions to increase CRC screening should focus on increasing the awareness of the importance of CRC screening and educating patients on the various screening options available and their benefits, especially as they pertain to less invasive tests and targeting younger individuals.

Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Testing in Hispanic Communities: Key Learnings from Virtual Boot Camp Translation

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the US. Screening by fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a strategy to lower CRC rates. Unfortunately, only half of patients with an abnormal FIT result complete the follow-up colonoscopy, an essential component of screening. We used virtual Boot Camp Translation (BCT), to elicit input from partners to develop messaging/materials to motivate patients to complete a follow-up colonoscopy. Participants were Hispanic, ages 50 to 75 years, and Spanish-speaking. All materials were developed in English and Spanish. The first meeting included expert presentations that addressed colorectal health. The two follow-up sessions obtained feedback on messaging/materials developed based on themes from the first meeting. Ten participants attended the first meeting and eight attended the follow-up sessions. The two key barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal FIT noted by participants were (a) lack of colonoscopy awareness and (b) fear of the colonoscopy procedure. We learned that participants valued simple messaging to increase knowledge and alleviate concerns, patient-friendly outreach materials, and increased access to health information. Using virtual BCT, we included participant feedback to design culturally relevant health messages to promote follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal testing among Hispanic patients served by community clinics.

Effect of a Theory-Based Narrative Video on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention, Knowledge, and Psychosocial Variables Among a Predominantly Hispanic Population

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third leading cause of cancer death in the USA. Latinx adults are overrepresented in late-stage CRC diagnosis as CRC screening utilization remains low among Latinx-identifying individuals. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a theory-based narrative video following a culturally appropriate storyline on CRC screening intention, knowledge, and psychosocial variables along the U.S.-Mexico border. We designed and analyzed a non-randomized pre-posttest evaluation of a narrative, culturally tailored video embedded within a community program. The study is set in the U.S.-Mexico border community. Outreach provided a link or QR code to access the survey. In all, 458 participants started the survey, and 304 completed the survey. Participants were recruited through flyers distributed throughout various community events by the program's community health workers and via social media. The intervention evaluated changes in participant's knowledge, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, self-efficacy, and perceived benefits and intention to screen. Participants were a mean age of 39 and identified mainly as female (72.7%) and Hispanic/Latinx (88.49%). After viewing the narrative video, participants had significantly improved perceived susceptibility, self-efficacy, and benefits, while perceived barriers and sense of fatalism significantly decreased. Paradoxically, this was associated with a significant decrease in knowledge scores. Results from this intervention suggest that a theory-based narrative video following a culturally appropriate storyline effectively improves psychosocial variables and intention to carry out CRC screening in a predominantly Hispanic border population.

Risk Factors for Suboptimal Colon Cancer Diagnosis and Management at a Safety-Net Hospital System

INTRODUCTION

Colon cancer (CC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Quality measures have been introduced by the American Gastroenterological Association and Commission on Cancer for optimal management of CC. In this study, we sought to identify factors that may hinder the timely diagnosis and treatment of CC at a safety-net hospital system.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed for patients aged ≥18 y diagnosed with CC from 2018 to 2021. Primary outcomes were time from positive fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy, time from diagnosis to surgery, and time from diagnosis to adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary end points were demographic characteristics associated with suboptimal outcomes in any of the above measures.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic CC. The majority were Hispanic and non-English-speaking. 74.1% of patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test received a colonoscopy within 180 d. 59.6% of nonemergent cases received surgery within 60 d of diagnosis. 77% of those eligible received adjuvant chemotherapy within 120 d of diagnosis. No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with delay in colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy. Most frequent cause of delay in surgery (38.0%) was optimization of comorbidities. Most frequent cause of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (71.4%) was delay in surgery itself.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with experiencing delays in diagnostic colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates at Federally Qualified Health Centers From 2014 to 2022: Incomplete Recovery From COVID-19 and Worsening Disparities

INTRODUCTION

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) provide preventive health services such as colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to low-income and underinsured individuals. Overall CRC screening participation in the United States declined during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovered by 2021; however, trends in underresourced settings are unknown.

METHODS

Using Uniform Data System data from 2014 to 2022, we assessed trends in FQHC CRC screening rates nationally, in California, and in Los Angeles County and determined clinic-level factors associated with recent screening rate changes. For each FQHC, we calculated the screening rate change from 2019 to 2020, 2020 to 2021, and 2020 to 2022. We used mixed-effects linear regression to determine clinic-level characteristics associated with each screening rate change.

RESULTS

Across all FQHC (n = 1,281), 7,016,181 patients were eligible for CRC screening in 2022. Across the United States and in California, median screening rates increased from 2014 to 2019, severely declined in 2020, and failed to return to prepandemic levels by 2022. Both nationally and in California, CRC screening declined most dramatically from 2019 to 2020 in FQHC serving majority Hispanic/Latino patients or a high proportion of patients experiencing homelessness. From 2020 to 2022, screening rates did not recover completely in US FQHC, with disproportionate recovery among FQHC serving majority non-Hispanic Black patients.

DISCUSSION

CRC screening rates at FQHC did not return to prepandemic levels by 2022, and recovery varied by FQHC patient characteristics. Tailored interventions addressing low and decreasing CRC screening rates in FQHC are urgently needed to mitigate worsening CRC disparities.

Identification of Priorities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among US Hispanic/Latino Populations

Objectives. To identify nationwide census tract‒level areas where improving colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake via targeted local preventive intervention may benefit Hispanic or Latino/a (H/L) groups defined by region or country of origin. Methods. Using 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PLACES and American Community Survey data, we applied geographically weighted regression and Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot procedures to identify CRC screening priority zones for H/L groups in the United States. Priority zones can be conceptualized as census tracts with strong inverse associations between percentage of a particular H/L group in the population and CRC screening rate, after adjusting for socioeconomic deprivation and lack of insurance. Results. We identified 6519, 3477, 3522, 1069, and 1424 census tract CRC screening priority zones for H/L communities of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Central/South American, Dominican, and Cuban heritage, respectively. Priority zones for H/L groups had strong spatial heterogeneity, and overlap of geographic patterns among H/L groups varied by region. Conclusions. Our findings and interactive web map may serve as a translational tool for public health authorities, policymakers, clinicians, and other stakeholders to target investment and interventions to increase guideline-concordant CRC screening uptake benefitting specific H/L communities in the United States. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S6):S515-S524. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307733) [Formula: see text].

Predictors of stool deoxyribonucleic acid test use in the United States: Implications for outreach to under-resourced populations

OBJECTIVE

Although colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is a public health priority, uptake is suboptimal in under-resourced groups. Noninvasive modalities, including stool deoxyribonucleic acid (sDNA) testing, may mitigate economic, geographic, cultural, or impairment-related barriers to CRCS. We assessed use of sDNA testing and other CRCS modalities in U.S. residents, comparing subgroups defined by several social determinants of health (SDOH).

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of community-dwelling respondents aged 50-75 years self-reported use of CRCS modalities in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey. Statistical analyses assessed up-to-date screening status and choice of modality in the recommended screening interval.

RESULTS

Of 179,833 sampled respondents, 60.8% reported colonoscopy, 5.7% sDNA testing, 5.5% another modality. The rate of up-to-date screening was 72.0% overall and negatively associated with Hispanic ethnicity (63.6%), lower educational and annual income levels (e.g.,

CONCLUSIONS

Under-resourced persons were more likely than better-resourced persons to access sDNA testing, possibly offsetting screening barriers in some groups. Findings suggest opportunities to increase CRCS with heightened communication about sDNA testing to those who may experience difficulty accessing other modalities.

Collapse

Key Words

• Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
• Cancer screening
• Colonoscopy
• Colorectal cancer
• Colorectal cancer screening
• Health disparities
• Social determinants of health
• Stool deoxyribonucleic acid

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Female
• Aged
• United States
• Feces/chemistry
• Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
• Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data
• Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
• DNA/analysis
• Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data
• Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data
• Social Determinants of Health

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Kathleen A Fairman Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale Campus, 19555 North 59(th) Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308, United States of America.
Sarah T Lira Veterinary Pharmacy Resident, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, At the time the research was conducted, Dr. Lira was a PharmD student at the Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale Campus., 1008 West Hazelwood Drive, Urbana, IL 61802, United States of America.

Collapse

Colorectal cancer outcomes among Hispanic/Latino patients in the United States: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review will identify the patterns of survival, treatment, and recurrence among Hispanic and/or Latino/a/x (H/L) patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) living in the United States (US) and Puerto Rico. Additionally, population- and individual-level determinants of cancer outcomes among H/L CRC patients will be mapped to highlight under-reported/under-investigated research areas.

INTRODUCTION

CRC is the third most common cancer excluding skin cancers in the US. Unlike non-Hispanic White populations, cancer is the number one cause of death in H/L populations and currently represents 21% of total deaths. Despite this, a lack of consensus exists on CRC outcomes for H/L patients. Most research on H/L individuals has examined incidence and screening of CRC, with fewer studies focusing on cancer outcomes.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All epidemiological study designs and systematic reviews will be considered. The review will only include peer-reviewed studies that report on survival, treatment, and/or recurrence patterns for H/L patients with CRC residing in the US and Puerto Rico.

METHODS

A 3-step search with a 2-stage study selection process will be followed, as recommended by JBI and Arksey and O'Malley. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus. A data extraction tool will be designed based on JBI recommendations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) will be used, with the results presented in a PRISMA diagram. Publications in English from database inception to the present will be considered.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/y6qf5.

The association of cancer-preventive lifestyle with colonoscopy screening use in border Hispanic adults along the Texas-Mexico border

PURPOSE

The relationship between engaging in two domains of cancer-preventive behaviors, lifestyle behaviors and colonoscopy screening, is unknown in Hispanic adults. Accordingly, the study examined the association between lifestyle and colonoscopy screening in Hispanic adults along the Texas-Mexico border, where there is suboptimal colorectal cancer prevention.

METHODS

Lifestyle behavior adherence and compliance with colonoscopy screening schedules were assessed using 2013-2023 data from the Cameron County Hispanic Cohorta population-based sample of Hispanic adults living along the Texas-Mexico border. The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund scoring system characterized healthy lifestyle engagement. Multivariable logistic regression quantified the association between lifestyle behaviors and colonoscopy screening.

RESULTS

Among 914 Hispanic adults, there was a mean adherence score of 2.5 out of 7 for recommended behaviors. Only 33.0% (95% CI 25.64-41.39%) were up-to-date with colonoscopy. Complete adherence to fruit and vegetable (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] 5.2, 95% CI 1.68-16.30; p = 0.004), fiber (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.06-4.37; p = 0.04), and ultra-processed foods (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.30-6.21; p = 0.01) consumption recommendations were associated with up-to-date colonoscopy screening. Having insurance versus being uninsured (AOR 10.8, 95% CI 3.83-30.62; p < 0.001) and having local medical care versus in Mexico (AOR 7.0, 95% CI 2.26-21.43; p < 0.001) were associated with up-to-date colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to dietary lifestyle recommendations was associated with being up-to-date with colonoscopy screenings. Those with poor dietary behavior are at risk for low-colonoscopy use. Improving lifestyle behaviors may complement colonoscopy promotion interventions. Healthcare accessibility influences up-to-date colonoscopy prevalence. Our findings can inform cancer prevention strategies for the Hispanic population.

Delays in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Latino Patients: The Role of Immigrant Healthcare in Stemming the Rising Global Incidence of Colorectal Cancer

The significant global burden of colorectal cancer accentuates disparities in access to preventive healthcare in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as well as large sections of underserved populations within high-income countries. The barriers to colorectal cancer screening in economically transitioning Latin America are multiple. At the same time, immigration from these countries to the USA continues to increase. This case highlights the delays in diagnosis experienced by a recent immigrant from a country with no established colorectal cancer screening program, to an immigrant population in the USA with similar poor screening coverage. We discuss common challenges faced by Latinos in their home countries and the USA, as well as strategies that could be implemented to improve screening coverage in US immigrant populations.

Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC-related mortality among young adults (< 50 years) has been on the rise. The American Cancer Society (ACS) reduced the CRC screening age to 45 in 2018. Few studies have examined the barriers to CRC screening among young adults.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted using data from 7,505 adults aged 45-75 years who completed the 2018 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. We examined the sociodemographic characteristics associated with CRC screening overall and by age group using separate multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

76% of eligible adults had received screening for CRC. Increasing age, Black racial group [OR 1.45; 95% CI (1.07, 1.97)], having some college experience, a college degree or higher [OR 1.69; 95% CI (1.24, 2.29)], health insurance coverage [OR 4.48; 95% CI (2.96, 6.76)], primary care provider access [OR 2.48; 95% CI (1.91, 3.22)] and presence of a comorbid illness [OR 1.39; 95% CI (1.12, 1.73)] were independent predictors of CRC screening. Current smokers were less likely to undergo CRC screening [OR 0.59; 95% CI (0.40, 0.87)]. Among adults aged 50-64 years, being of Hispanic origin [OR 0.60; 95% CI (0.39, 0.92)] was associated with a lower likelihood of CRC screening.

CONCLUSION

CRC screening rates among adults 45-49 years are low but are increasing steadily. Odds of CRC screening among Blacks is high which is encouraging while the odds among current smokers is low and concerning given their increased risk of developing CRC.

Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies

Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.

Perceived economic pressure and colorectal cancer-related perceptions among U.S. males (aged 45-75)

PURPOSE

To examine whether a greater perception of economic pressure would be associated with more-negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers, and lower subjective norms regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening among males aged 45-75 years.

METHODS

We recruited 492 self-identified males aged 45-75 years living in the United States. We operationalized perceived economic pressure as a latent factor with three subscales: can't make ends meet, unmet material needs, and financial cutbacks. Our dependent variables were attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening, perceived barriers to completing a CRC screening exam, and subjective norms regarding CRC screening (e.g., how others value CRC screening). We tested a hypothesized model using structural equation modeling with maximum-likelihood estimation, adjusting for covariates, and made post-hoc modifications to improve model fit.

RESULTS

Greater perceived economic pressure was associated with more-negative attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.37,0.57) and with greater perceived barriers to CRC screening (β = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.34), but was not significantly associated with subjective norms (β = 0.07, 95% CI: - 0.05, 0.19). Perceived economic pressure was an indirect pathway by which lower-income and younger age were associated with more-negative attitudes and greater perceived barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is one of the first to show that, among males, perceived economic pressure is associated with two social-cognitive mechanisms (i.e., negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers) that are known to influence CRC screening intent and, ultimately, CRC screening completion. Future research on this topic should employ longitudinal study designs.

Outcomes of a Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Modified for a Diverse and Urban Community

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) colorectal programs have been shown to improve the length of stay (LOS) without increasing hospital resource utilization at academic centers worldwide. A multidisciplinary ERAS protocol that includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management guidelines was recently implemented at our urban, racially diverse, and academically affiliated community hospital. A delivery option was provided to reduce barriers to care. Given our unique patient population, the objective of our study was to determine if improvements in outcomes were reproducible in our hospital.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing elective colectomy at New York-Presbyterian Queens Hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patient outcomes were compared between surgeries performed under standard practice (all colectomies prior to April 2017) and those performed after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Demographic and perioperative data were abstracted from a prospectively derived database used to submit data to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Additional data were obtained from chart review.

RESULTS

Six hundred five elective colectomies were performed by 12 surgeons (range 1-228 cases) during the study period. Of these, 22 were performed open (41% followed ERAS), 467 were performed laparoscopically (57% followed ERAS), and 116 were performed robotically (74% followed ERAS). The average patient age was 64 y. Of which, 55% were male; 34% were Asian, 27% were non-Hispanic Caucasian, 27% were Hispanic, and 11% were Black or African American (all P-values > 0.05 for ERAS versus non-ERAS). Average duration of procedure was longer in the ERAS group (262 min versus 243 min, P = 0.04), although when stratified by procedure type, this relationship held true only for laparoscopic procedures. Hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (4.3 versus 5.4 d, P < 0.001) and this relationship held true for procedures performed both laparoscopically (4.2 versus 5.3 d, P = 0.01) and robotically (4.1 versus 5.1 d, P = 0.04). Of the ERAS group, patients who opted for delivery of ERAS components (n = 205) had the shortest LOS when compared to patients who picked up components (n = 91) or opted out of ERAS (n = 309) (4.1 versus 4.4 versus 5.2 d, P = 0.003). No significant differences were found for 30-d mortality, 30-d readmission, wound infection, or other postoperative complications (all P-values > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ERAS protocol in an urban, diverse, academically affiliated community hospital is associated with reductions in LOS for colectomies performed both laparoscopically and robotically. Facilitating ERAS compliance with a delivery option was also associated with improvements in hospital LOS. Preoperative nutrition supplementation was not associated with outcomes. No differences in mortality, readmission rates, or rates of postoperative complications were found.

Developing patient-refined colorectal cancer screening materials: application of a virtual community engagement approach

INTRODUCTION

In partnership with a federally qualified health center (FQHC), an adapted virtual version of boot camp translation (BCT) was used to elicit input from Spanish-speaking Latino patients and staff to develop messaging and patient education materials for follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal testing. We describe how we adapted an existing in-person BCT process to be delivered virtually and present evaluations from participants on the virtual format.

METHODS

Three virtual BCT sessions were facilitated by bilingual staff and conducted via Zoom. These sessions included introductions and discussions on colorectal cancer (CRC), CRC screening, and gathered feedback from participants on draft materials. Ten adults were recruited from the FQHC. A research team member from the FQHC served as the point of contact (POC) for all participants and offered Zoom introductory sessions and/or technology support before and during the sessions. Following the third session, participants were invited to complete an evaluation form about their virtual BCT experience. Using a 5-point Likert Scale (where 5 = strongly agree), questions focused on session utility, group comfort level, session pacing, and overall sense of accomplishment.

RESULTS

Average scores ranged from 4.3 to 5.0 indicating strong support towards the virtual BCT sessions. Additionally, our study emphasized the importance of a POC to provide technical support to participants throughout the process. Using this approach, we successfully incorporated feedback from participants to design culturally relevant materials to promote follow-up colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

We recommend ongoing public health emphasis on the use of virtual platforms for community engaged work.

Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening

Increases in colorectal cancer screening are linked to the declining incidence of the disease over the past three decades. These favorable trends, however, are not observed in marginalized racial and ethnic populations with disproportionately lower rates of screening, higher disease incidence, and increased mortality despite advances in health technology and policy. This review describes the differences in screening uptake and test selection amongst racial and ethnic groups, discusses known obstacles and facilitators that impact screening, and highlights existing frameworks developed to achieve health equity in colorectal cancer screening.

Recruitment Challenges of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Dissemination Study

BACKGROUND

Dissemination strategies to reach underserved and minority populations to promote screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) are key to reducing disparities. We conducted a study to examine a tailored messaging approach to navigate individuals from communities (i.e., lower income, less access to care, and underscreened) to clinics to receive CRC screening. We encountered several political, demographic, and secular trend issues that required reconsideration and redesign of implementation strategies.

OBJECTIVES

Through study implementation from 2012 to 2017, changes in medical reimbursement and immigration policies-at the state level and later at the national level-affected healthcare delivery systems that had initially committed to supporting the study and our recruitment methods. Although our selected zip codes and sites had previously yielded high rates of CRC screening nonadherence, within a few years, these sites showed substantially higher screening adherence rates-yielding limited numbers of eligible participants. In addition, state immigration policy trends created mistrust and fear, leading to lower participation rates than anticipated. This report documents and provides valuable insights on how we and the community network developed creative strategies to overcome these challenges.

METHODS

New relationships with community partners were extended to tap advisory board input to meet the challenges. Criteria for clinic participation widened from originally selected Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to various nonprofit, hybrid, and privately insured reimbursement types. Recruitment site options were creatively redefined to reach community participants where they live, work, and receive services.

RESULTS

Strategies that engage community members in identifying alternative healthcare delivery structures and that link recruitment efforts to community-based service organizations were found to be critical to recapturing community trust in the face of unfavorable political environments. Widening the type of clinic partners from FQHCs to stand-alone nonprofits and private clinics and identifying unusual types of recruitment sites provided alternative solutions for successful study implementation.

DISCUSSION

In prevention-based studies that face unplanned system and political barriers to recruitment, embedding the study in the community may aid in reestablishing trust levels to improve engagement and recruitment of clinic partners and eligible participants.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities Among Race: A Zip Code Level Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can prevent disease by early identification. Existing disparities in CRC screening have been associated with factors including race, socioeconomic status, insurance, and even geography. Our study takes a deeper look into how social determinants related to zip code tabulation areas affect CRC screenings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of CRC screenings by race at a zip code level, evaluating for impactful social determinant factors such as the social deprivation index (SDI). We used publicly available data from CDC 500 Cities Project (2016-2019), PLACES Project (2020), and the American Community Survey (2019). We conducted multivariate and confirmatory factor analyses among race, income, health insurance, check-up visits, and SDI.

RESULTS

Increasing the tertile of SDI was associated with a higher likelihood of being Black or Hispanic, as well as decreased median household income (P < .01). Lower rates of regular checkup visits were found in the third tertile of SDI (P < .01). The multivariate analysis showed that being Black, Hispanic, lower income, being uninsured, lack of regular check-ups, and increased SDI were related to decreased CRC screening. In the confirmatory factor analysis, we found that SDI and access to insurance were the variables most related to decreased CRC screening.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal the top 2 factors that impact a locality's CRC screening rates are the social deprivation index and access to health care. This data may help implement interventions targeting social barriers to further promote CRC screenings within disadvantaged communities and decrease overall mortality via early screening.

Economic Pressure and Intention to Complete Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Among U.S. Men

Although men's lives can be saved by colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, its utilization remains below national averages among men from low-income households. However, income has not been consistently linked to men's CRC screening intent. This study tested the hypothesis that men who perceive more economic pressure would have lower CRC screening intent. Cross-sectional data were collected via an online survey in February 2022. Men (aged 45-75 years) living in the U.S. (N = 499) reported their CRC screening intent (outcome) and their perception of their economic circumstances (predictors). Adjusted binary and ordinal logistic analyses were conducted. All analyses were conducted in March 2022. Men who perceived greater difficulty paying bills or affording the type of clothing or medical care they needed (i.e., economic strain) were less likely to have CRC screening intent (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.93). This association was no longer significant when prior screening behavior was accounted for (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.10). Contrary to our hypothesis, men who reported more financial cutbacks were more likely to report wanting to be screened for CRC within the next year (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11). This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that men's perceptions of their economic circumstances play a role in their intent to complete early-detection screening for CRC. Future research should consider men's perceptions of their economic situation in addition to their annual income when aiming to close the gap between intent and CRC screening uptake.

Spanish-Speaking Status: A Protective Factor in Colorectal Cancer Presentation at a Safety-Net Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Lower screening rates and poorer outcomes for colorectal cancer have been associated with Hispanic ethnicity and Spanish-speaking status, respectively.

METHODS

We reviewed sequential colorectal cancer patients evaluated by the surgical service at a safety-net hospital (SNH) (2016-2019). Insurance type, stage, cancer type, surgery class (elective/urgent), initial surgeon contact setting (outpatient clinic/inpatient consult), operation (resection/diversion), and follow-up were compared by patient-reported primary spoken language.

RESULTS

Of 157 patients, 85 (54.1%) were men, 91 (58.0%) had colon cancer, 67 (42.7%) primarily spoke Spanish, and late stage (III or IV) presentations occurred in 83 (52.9%) patients. The median age was 58 y, cancer resection was completed in 48 (30.6%) patients, and 51 (32.5%) patients were initially seen as inpatient consults. On univariate analysis, Spanish-speaking status was significantly associated with female sex, Medicaid insurance, being seen as an outpatient consult, and undergoing elective and resection surgery. On multivariable logistic regression, Spanish-speaking patients had higher odds of having Medicaid insurance (AOR 2.28, P = 0.019), receiving a resection (AOR 3.96, P = 0.006), and undergoing an elective surgery (AOR 3.24, P = 0.025). Spanish-speaking patients also had lower odds of undergoing an initial inpatient consult (AOR 0.34, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Spanish-speaking status was associated with a lower likelihood of emergent presentation and need for palliative surgery among SNH colorectal cancer patients. Further research is needed to determine if culturally competent infrastructure in the SNH setting translates into Spanish-speaking status as a potentially protective factor.

Association Between Body Mass Index and Cancer Screening Adherence Among Latinas in the United States and Puerto Rico

Background

Research on the role of body size on cancer screening is mixed with few studies among Latinas in the United States. We evaluated the association between body size and cancer screening adherence among Latinas living in Puerto Rico and the rest of the United States.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using 2012-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data among Latinas 50-64 years of age (n = 16,410). Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening (guideline adherent: yes/no), height and weight were self-reported. Prevalence ratios (PRs) derived from Poisson models were estimated for each cancer screening utilization for Puerto Rico versus rest of the United States by body mass index (BMI) category.

Results

Nearly a quarter of women lacked adherence with breast and cervical cancer screening and 43.6% were nonadherent to colorectal cancer screening. Latinas with BMI ≥40.0 kg/m² in both groups were more likely to lack adherence to cervical cancer screening than women with BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m². For those with BMI ≥40.0 kg/m², Latinas in Puerto Rico were more likely to lack adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations than Latinas living in the rest of the United States (adjusted PR: 1.38; 95% confidence interval = 1.12-1.70).

Conclusions

The role of body size in cancer screening utilization among Latinas differs in women living in Puerto Rico versus in the rest of the United States and varies by cancer type. Understanding Latinas' experience can inform culturally adapted interventions to promote cancer screening.

Decreasing colorectal cancer screening disparities: A culturally tailored patient navigation program for Hispanic patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Hispanic patients. Screening colonoscopy has been shown to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, utilization among Hispanic patients and other minority groups is low. The objective of this study was to evaluate colonoscopy utilization among Hispanic patients with a culturally tailored patient navigation program (CTPNP) in place.

METHODS

A CTPNP was designed to meet the needs of the authors' Hispanic patient population and their health care system characteristics. A CTPNP protocol was created, and a Spanish-speaking navigator/coordinator was hired. Enrolled patients received a Spanish-language introductory letter, an initial phone call for patient education, and follow-up calls to ensure that all potential barriers to colonoscopy were overcome. Colonoscopy completion (CC), colonoscopy cancellation (CN), and colonoscopy no-show (NS) rates were recorded and compared with historical rates in Rhode Island.

RESULTS

Over a 28-month period, 773 patients were referred to the CTPNP, and 698 (53% female and 47% male) were enrolled in the program. The overall CC rate was 85% (n = 592) with no difference between males and females. The CN rate was 9% (n = 62), and the NS rate was 6% (n = 44). The most common reasons for CN and NS were cost and an inability to contact the patient after referral. Within the CC group, 43% (n = 254) of patients underwent polypectomy, and 1.3% (n = 8) required colectomy. Ninety percent (n = 530) of the CC group reported that they would not have completed colonoscopy without the CTPNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a CTPNP is an effective intervention to improve the CC rate and eliminate the historical gender gap in utilization among Hispanic patients.

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Yield in a Mailed Outreach Program in a Safety-Net Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Screening with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) reduces colorectal cancer mortality; however, screening remains low in underserved populations. Mailed outreach, including an invitation letter, FIT, and test instructions, is an evidence-based strategy to improve screening.

AIMS

To examine screening completion and yield in a mailed outreach program in a safety-net healthcare system.

METHODS

We identified and mailed outreach invitations to patients due for screening in a large safety-net system between September 1, 2018, and August 31, 2019. We examined: (1) screening completion, the proportion of patients completing FIT or screening colonoscopy within 6 months of the mailed invitation; and (2) timely diagnostic colonoscopy, the proportion of patients completing colonoscopy within 6 months of positive FIT.

RESULTS

We mailed 14,879 invitations to 13,190 patients. Nearly half (n = 6098, 46.2%) of patients completed screening: 4,896 (80.3%) completed FIT through mailed outreach; 1,114 (18.3%) FIT through usual care; and 88 (1.4%) screening colonoscopy through usual care. Of patients with a positive FIT (n = 289), 50.5% completed diagnostic colonoscopy within 6 months, 10.7% within 6-12 months, and 4.8% after 12 months. A total of 8 cancers and 83 advanced adenomas were detected in the 191 patients completing diagnostic colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

After implementing and scaling up mailed outreach in a safety-net system, about half of patients completed screening, and the majority did so through mailed outreach. However, many patients failed to complete diagnostic colonoscopy after positive FIT. Results highlight the importance of adapting mailed outreach programs to local contexts and constraints of healthcare systems, in order to support efforts to improve CRC screening in underserved populations.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Quality Improvement Initiative Using a Bilingual Patient Navigator, Mobile Technology, and Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Engage Hispanic Adults

BACKGROUND

Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are an effective screening method to detect and prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) when done in appropriate intervals. The use of bilingual patient navigators (PNs) and secure short message service (SMS) has been demonstrated to increase CRC screening rates among Hispanic adults.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this quality improvement project is to increase CRC screening rates among Hispanic adults in a family clinic by 25% in the post-project implementation period using an unlicensed bilingual PN, secure SMS, and at-home FITs.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was used. Spanish-translated educational videos were delivered using SMS, and instructional screening guidance was provided via telephone in Spanish by the PN. Participants were surveyed to determine satisfaction with the support received from the PN.

FINDINGS

Findings showed a 35% increase in the clinic's FIT rates. Findings also showed that having a PN's support influenced the decision to complete FIT as compared to the use of secure SMS.

Colorectal cancer screening in Uruguay: current assessment and roadmap for the future

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and is expected to remain a public health concern for years to come. Within Latin America, Uruguay has the highest colorectal cancer rates. Heeding past calls to action, in this article we provide a critical assessment of colorectal cancer needs and opportunities in Uruguay with a focus on developing a roadmap for future action. First, we provide an overview of risk factors, screening procedures and guidelines, and screening rates. Next, we provide an overview of psychosocial factors that influence colorectal cancer screening, with the goal of providing guidance for future behavioral health promotion initiatives in Uruguay. In this effort, we present four conceptual models that may be used for interventions: the ecological systems theory, informed decision-making, the health beliefs model, and the health literacy model. Subsequently, we propose using an integrated model based on the ecological systems theory and health literacy model to develop national, local, and community-based interventions to increase screening rates and lower the colorectal cancer burden in Uruguay. We close the paper with a summary and implications section, including recommendations for future research programs focused on the assessment of factors that influence screening.

Adaptation of a Mailed-FIT Kit and Patient Navigation Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Among Spanish-Speaking Hispanic/Latino Patients

BACKGROUND

Hispanic/Latino populations experience significant barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. ProCRCScreen is a multicomponent CRC screening program that can help primary care clinics improve CRC screening rates, but it needs adaptation to better meet the health care needs of Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino populations.

METHODS

We conducted four focus groups with 22 Spanish-speaking Latino patients and used inductive qualitative content analysis to identify potential program adaptations.

RESULTS

We identified lack of social support for CRC screening and confusion about completing stool-based testing as important barriers to CRC screening. Participants recommended increased specificity of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) instructions to increase the likelihood of successful test completion, especially for first-time screening. They also endorsed patient navigation for support in completing CRC screening.

DISCUSSION

We adapted the informational materials and workflows for the ProCRCScreen program. Future research to test the adapted program is needed.

Colorectal Cancer: In the Pursuit of Health Equity

Colorectal cancer mortality has decreased considerably following the adoption of national screening programs, yet, within at-risk subgroups, there continue to be measurable differences in clinical outcomes from variations in screening, receipt of chemotherapy, radiation or surgery, access to clinical trials, research participation, and survivorship. These disparities are well-described and some have worsened over time. Disparities identified have included race and ethnicity, age (specifically young adults), socioeconomic status, insurance access, geography, and environmental exposures. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, colorectal cancer care has necessarily shifted dramatically, with broad, immediate uptake of telemedicine, transition to oral medications when feasible, and considerations for sequence of treatment. However, it has additionally marginalized patients with colorectal cancer with historically disparate cancer-specific outcomes; among them, uninsured, low-income, immigrant, and ethnic-minority patients-all of whom are more likely to become infected, be hospitalized, and die of either COVID-19 or colorectal cancer. Herein, we outline measurable disparities, review implemented solutions, and define strategies toward ensuring that all have a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as possible.