Tricyclic antidepressant and methylphenidate treatment of attention deficit disorder in children

Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

BACKGROUND

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed and treated psychiatric disorders in childhood. Typically, children and adolescents with ADHD find it difficult to pay attention and they are hyperactive and impulsive. Methylphenidate is the psychostimulant most often prescribed, but the evidence on benefits and harms is uncertain. This is an update of our comprehensive systematic review on benefits and harms published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with ADHD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trials registers up to March 2022. In addition, we checked reference lists and requested published and unpublished data from manufacturers of methylphenidate.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention in children and adolescents aged 18 years and younger with a diagnosis of ADHD. The search was not limited by publication year or language, but trial inclusion required that 75% or more of participants had a normal intellectual quotient (IQ > 70). We assessed two primary outcomes, ADHD symptoms and serious adverse events, and three secondary outcomes, adverse events considered non-serious, general behaviour, and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment for each trial. Six review authors including two review authors from the original publication participated in the update in 2022. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Data from parallel-group trials and first-period data from cross-over trials formed the basis of our primary analyses. We undertook separate analyses using end-of-last period data from cross-over trials. We used Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA) to control for type I (5%) and type II (20%) errors, and we assessed and downgraded evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 212 trials (16,302 participants randomised); 55 parallel-group trials (8104 participants randomised), and 156 cross-over trials (8033 participants randomised) as well as one trial with a parallel phase (114 participants randomised) and a cross-over phase (165 participants randomised). The mean age of participants was 9.8 years ranging from 3 to 18 years (two trials from 3 to 21 years). The male-female ratio was 3:1. Most trials were carried out in high-income countries, and 86/212 included trials (41%) were funded or partly funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Methylphenidate treatment duration ranged from 1 to 425 days, with a mean duration of 28.8 days. Trials compared methylphenidate with placebo (200 trials) and with no intervention (12 trials). Only 165/212 trials included usable data on one or more outcomes from 14,271 participants. Of the 212 trials, we assessed 191 at high risk of bias and 21 at low risk of bias. If, however, deblinding of methylphenidate due to typical adverse events is considered, then all 212 trials were at high risk of bias.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.88 to -0.61; I² = 38%; 21 trials; 1728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to a mean difference (MD) of -10.58 (95% CI -12.58 to -8.72) on the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; range 0 to 72 points). The minimal clinically relevant difference is considered to be a change of 6.6 points on the ADHD-RS. Methylphenidate may not affect serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.67; I² = 0%; 26 trials, 3673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 0.91 (CI 0.31 to 2.68).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

methylphenidate may cause more adverse events considered non-serious versus placebo or no intervention (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37; I² = 72%; 35 trials 5342 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 1.22 (CI 1.08 to 1.43). Methylphenidate may improve teacher-rated general behaviour versus placebo (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.33; I² = 68%; 7 trials 792 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but may not affect quality of life (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.83; I² = 81%; 4 trials, 608 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The majority of our conclusions from the 2015 version of this review still apply. Our updated meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate versus placebo or no-intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms and general behaviour in children and adolescents with ADHD. There may be no effects on serious adverse events and quality of life. Methylphenidate may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events considered non-serious, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite. However, the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes is very low and therefore the true magnitude of effects remain unclear. Due to the frequency of non-serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate, the blinding of participants and outcome assessors is particularly challenging. To accommodate this challenge, an active placebo should be sought and utilised. It may be difficult to find such a drug, but identifying a substance that could mimic the easily recognised adverse effects of methylphenidate would avert the unblinding that detrimentally affects current randomised trials. Future systematic reviews should investigate the subgroups of patients with ADHD that may benefit most and least from methylphenidate. This could be done with individual participant data to investigate predictors and modifiers like age, comorbidity, and ADHD subtypes.

Cardiovascular Effects of Drugs Used to Treat Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Part 1: Epidemiology, Pharmacology, and Impact on Hemodynamics and Ventricular Repolarization

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a clinical syndrome characterized by persistent inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. It is most commonly encountered in children and adolescents but may persist into adulthood. A variety of psychostimulant and nonpsychostimulant medications have proven to be successful in reducing inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity in those with ADHD. Psychostimulants used to treat ADHD include methylphenidate and related drugs and various amphetamine preparations. Non-psychostimulant medications used to treat ADHD include atomoxetine and two alpha-2 adrenergic agonists: guanfacine extended-release and clonidine extended-release. The psychostimulants and atomoxetine have been shown, on average, to increase heart rate by 3-10 beats/min, systolic blood pressure by 3-8 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure by 2-14 mm Hg. These drugs may also delay ventricular repolarization. The alpha-2 adrenergic agonists may reduce heart rate and blood pressure. For these reasons, there is concern about the safety of psychostimulant and nonpsychostimulant medications in patients with ADHD. In part 1 of this review, we discuss the epidemiology and natural history of ADHD, describe the pharmacology of drugs used to treat ADHD, and discuss in detail studies assessing the effects of ADHD drugs on blood pressure, heart or pulse rate, and electrocardiographic indices of ventricular repolarization.

Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis

The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind randomized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. A systematic review was conducted by two independent reviewers in ten electronic databases (PROSPERO register CRD42016043239). Methodological quality of included studies was evaluated according to the Jadad scale. Network meta-analyses were performed including double-blinded head-to-head trials comparing active allopathic drugs in patients (0-18 years old) diagnosed with ADHD. The results of efficacy and safety of atomoxetine (ATX), bupropion, buspirone (BSP), dexamphetamine, edivoxetine (EDX), guanfacine (GXR), lisdexamfetamine (LDX), methylphenidate (MPH), mixed amphetamine salts, modafinil, pindolol (PDL), reboxetine (RBX), selegiline, and venlafaxine were analyzed using ADDIS software v.1.16.5. Forty-eight trials were identified (n = 4169 participants), of which 12 were used for efficacy analysis and 33 for safety analysis. On the CGI-I scale, the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR. For the safety outcomes, according to drug ranks, LDX was more likely to cause sleep disorders (39%) as well as loss of appetite (65%) and behavior problems such as irritability (60%). BSP (71%) and EDX (44%) caused less appetite decrease. For behavioral effects, PDL was considered safest (50%). For any adverse events, RBX (89%) was the safest alternative. The lack of head-to-head trials properly reporting outcomes of interest limited some comparisons. Network meta-analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD, especially for safety issues, and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions. A core outcome set for ADHD should be designed to guide the conduction and report of clinical trials.

ADHD medications and cardiovascular adverse events in children and adolescents: cross-national comparison of risk communication in drug labeling

PURPOSE

Regulators approve written medical information for healthcare professionals and consumers, but the consistency of these sources has not been studied. We investigated the consistency of information regarding four cardiovascular risks of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications approved in four countries.

METHODS

Professional and consumer product labeling for five ADHD medications approved in Australia, Canada, the UK, and the USA were obtained in March/April 2016. Language describing the relationship between medication and elevated blood pressure and/or heart rate, myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden death was extracted verbatim and classified into one of four categories based on the described relationship between medication and adverse event: "confirmed," "unconfirmed," "mixed," and "not mentioned." We judged the consistency of messages delivered to healthcare professionals and consumers as either "consistent" or "inconsistent."

RESULTS

We obtained 20 healthcare professional labels and 20 corresponding consumer labels for the five ADHD medications registered in all four countries. Not all professional and consumer labeling contained language regarding all four adverse events. Of the 80 theoretically evaluable drug-risk pairs, 38 (48%) were not evaluable because of absence of mention of the adverse event in the consumer label. For the remaining 42, the potential causal relationship was expressed consistently in professional and consumer labeling in 25 (60%) cases. The cardiovascular risk profile was not described consistently across all four countries for any of the five drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Product labeling provides healthcare professionals and consumers with inconsistent messages regarding the potential causal relationship between stimulant use and specific cardiovascular risks in children and adolescents. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common of the childhood psychiatric disorders, with a prevalence rate of up to 20%, and is probably genetically transmitted. ADHD is characterized by impulsive behavior, hyperactivity, and decreased attention span. It is often extremely disruptive to the afflicted individuals social interactions and school performance. Therapeutic approaches to ADHD should be multimodal, including medications, family, and educational therapies. The pathophysiology of ADHD is not yet fully understood. Catecholoamines are believed to play a significant role with serotonin in an adjunctive role. Pathophysiological theories are supported by useful drug therapies that are known to affect dopamine and norepinephrine metabolism. Stimulants remain the drugs of choice, with methylphenidate most commonly used. Dextroamphetamine and pemoline are also effective. The rational use of these drugs is discussed. Antidepressants are second-line drug therapies; their usefulness is most apparent in patients who have high levels of anxiety and/or depression. Other potentially useful medications, including clonidine and the antipsychotics, are discussed. Adult populations can also express ADHD; treatment is similar to that used in children. Overall, ADHD is an important illness with significant morbidity. Pharmacotherapy is highly effective for its treatment and forms the cornerstone of therapy. This review of ADHD seeks to promote a greater understanding of this disorder and its appropriate drug therapy.

Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

BACKGROUND

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed and treated psychiatric disorders in childhood. Typically, children with ADHD find it difficult to pay attention, they are hyperactive and impulsive.Methylphenidate is the drug most often prescribed to treat children and adolescents with ADHD but, despite its widespread use, this is the first comprehensive systematic review of its benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with ADHD.

SEARCH METHODS

In February 2015 we searched six databases (CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Conference Proceedings Citations Index), and two trials registers. We checked for additional trials in the reference lists of relevant reviews and included trials. We contacted the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture methylphenidate to request published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention in children and adolescents aged 18 years and younger with a diagnosis of ADHD. At least 75% of participants needed to have an intellectual quotient of at least 70 (i.e. normal intellectual functioning). Outcomes assessed included ADHD symptoms, serious adverse events, non-serious adverse events, general behaviour and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Seventeen review authors participated in data extraction and risk of bias assessment, and two review authors independently performed all tasks. We used standard methodological procedures expected within Cochrane. Data from parallel-group trials and first period data from cross-over trials formed the basis of our primary analyses; separate analyses were undertaken using post-cross-over data from cross-over trials. We used Trial Sequential Analyses to control for type I (5%) and type II (20%) errors, and we assessed and downgraded evidence according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for high risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness, heterogeneity and publication bias.

MAIN RESULTS

The studies.We included 38 parallel-group trials (5111 participants randomised) and 147 cross-over trials (7134 participants randomised). Participants included individuals of both sexes, at a boys-to-girls ratio of 5:1, and participants' ages ranged from 3 to 18 years across most studies (in two studies ages ranged from 3 to 21 years). The average age across all studies was 9.7 years. Most participants were from high-income countries.The duration of methylphenidate treatment ranged from 1 to 425 days, with an average duration of 75 days. Methylphenidate was compared to placebo (175 trials) or no intervention (10 trials). Risk of Bias.All 185 trials were assessed to be at high risk of bias. Primary outcomes. Methylphenidate may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.90 to -0.64; 19 trials, 1698 participants; very low-quality evidence). This corresponds to a mean difference (MD) of -9.6 points (95% CI -13.75 to -6.38) on the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; range 0 to 72 points; DuPaul 1991a). A change of 6.6 points on the ADHD-RS is considered clinically to represent the minimal relevant difference. There was no evidence that methylphenidate was associated with an increase in serious (e.g. life threatening) adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.22; 9 trials, 1532 participants; very low-quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted intervention effect was RR 0.91 (CI 0.02 to 33.2).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Among those prescribed methylphenidate, 526 per 1000 (range 448 to 615) experienced non-serious adverse events, compared with 408 per 1000 in the control group. This equates to a 29% increase in the overall risk of any non-serious adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.51; 21 trials, 3132 participants; very low-quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted intervention effect was RR 1.29 (CI 1.06 to 1.56). The most common non-serious adverse events were sleep problems and decreased appetite. Children in the methylphenidate group were at 60% greater risk for trouble sleeping/sleep problems (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.23; 13 trials, 2416 participants), and 266% greater risk for decreased appetite (RR 3.66, 95% CI 2.56 to 5.23; 16 trials, 2962 participants) than children in the control group.Teacher-rated general behaviour seemed to improve with methylphenidate (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.71; 5 trials, 668 participants; very low-quality evidence).A change of seven points on the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ; range 0 to 100 points; Landgraf 1998) has been deemed a minimal clinically relevant difference. The change reported in a meta-analysis of three trials corresponds to a MD of 8.0 points (95% CI 5.49 to 10.46) on the CHQ, which suggests that methylphenidate may improve parent-reported quality of life (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.80; 3 trials, 514 participants; very low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate may improve teacher-reported ADHD symptoms, teacher-reported general behaviour, and parent-reported quality of life among children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD. However, the low quality of the underpinning evidence means that we cannot be certain of the magnitude of the effects. Within the short follow-up periods typical of the included trials, there is some evidence that methylphenidate is associated with increased risk of non-serious adverse events, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite, but no evidence that it increases risk of serious adverse events.Better designed trials are needed to assess the benefits of methylphenidate. Given the frequency of non-serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate, the particular difficulties for blinding of participants and outcome assessors point to the advantage of large, 'nocebo tablet' controlled trials. These use a placebo-like substance that causes adverse events in the control arm that are comparable to those associated with methylphenidate. However, for ethical reasons, such trials should first be conducted with adults, who can give their informed consent.Future trials should publish depersonalised individual participant data and report all outcomes, including adverse events. This will enable researchers conducting systematic reviews to assess differences between intervention effects according to age, sex, comorbidity, type of ADHD and dose. Finally, the findings highlight the urgent need for large RCTs of non-pharmacological treatments.

Tricyclic antidepressants for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder of childhood onset, which may persist into adulthood. ADHD has a significant impact on a child's daily life, affecting relationships and academic performance. Its core symptoms include developmentally inappropriate levels of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsive behaviour. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are sometimes used as second line of treatment in the reduction of ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents with ADHD. However, their efficacy is not yet known.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of TCAs in the reduction of ADHD symptoms within the broad categories of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattentiveness in young people aged 6 to 18 years with established diagnoses of ADHD.

SEARCH METHODS

On 26 September 2013, we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, seven other databases, and two trials registers. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted manufacturers and known experts in the field to determine if there were any ongoing trials or unpublished studies available.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including both parallel group and cross-over study designs, of any dose of TCA compared with placebo or active medication in children or adolescents with ADHD, including those with comorbid conditions. 

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Working in pairs, three review authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed trial quality. We calculated the standardised mean differences (SMD) for continuous data, the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both. We conducted the meta-analyses using a random-effects model throughout. We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the risk of bias of each included trial and the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the body evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six RCTs with a total of 216 participants. Five of the six trials compared desipramine with placebo; the remaining trial compared nortriptyline with placebo. One trial compared desipramine with clonidine and placebo, and another compared two TCAs (desipramine and clomipramine) with methylphenidate and placebo. Of the six trials, one RCT primarily assessed the efficacy of TCA in children with ADHD and comorbid tic or Tourette disorder, and another one trial was in children with comorbid tic disorder. RCTs that met our inclusion criteria varied both in design and quality, and none were free of bias. The quality of the evidence was low to very low according to our GRADE assessments.TCA outperformed placebo regarding the proportions of patients achieving a predefined improvement of core ADHD symptom severity (OR 18.50, 95% CI 6.29 to 54.39, 3 trials, 125 participants, low quality evidence). In particular, there was evidence that desipramine improved the core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents as assessed by parents (SMD -1.42, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.85, 2 trials, 99 participants, low quality evidence), teachers (SMD -0.97, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.28, 2 trials, 89 participants, low quality evidence), and clinicians (OR 26.41, 95% CI 7.41 to 94.18, 2 trials, 103 participants, low quality evidence). Nortriptryline was also efficacious in improving the core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents as assessed by clinicians (OR 7.88, 95% CI 1.10 to 56.12). Desipramine and placebo were similar on "all-cause treatment discontinuation" (RD -0.10, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.04, 3 trials, 134 participants, very low quality evidence). Desipramine appeared more efficacious than clonidine in reducing ADHD symptoms as rated by parents (SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.40 to -0.40, 1 trial, 68 participants, very low quality evidence) in participants with ADHD and comorbid tics or Tourette syndrome.Although this Cochrane Review did not identify serious adverse effects in patients taking TCAs, it did identify mild increases in diastolic blood pressure and pulse rates. Also, patients treated with desipramine had significantly higher rates of appetite suppression compared to placebo whilst nortriptyline resulted in weight gain. Other reported adverse effects included headache, confusion, sedation, tiredness, blurred vision, diaphoresis, dry mouth, abdominal discomfort, constipation, and urinary retention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most evidence on TCAs relates to desipramine. Findings suggest that, in the short term, desipramine improves the core symptoms of ADHD, but its effect on the cardiovascular system remains an important clinical concern. Thus, evidence supporting the clinical use of desipramine for the treatment of children with ADHD is low.

Psychopharmacological interventions

Currently stimulants and atomoxetine are the most established treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); more than 170 controlled studies with more than 9000 subjects have documented their efficacy in 50% to 70% of subjects. Although the stimulant medications tend to show a dose-related improvement in ADHD symptoms, atomoxetine is generally dosed based on weight. The literature clearly documents that stimulants improve not only abnormal behaviors of ADHD but also self-esteem, cognition, and social and family functioning. However, efficacy varies with age and psychiatric comorbidities. Although most of the existing studies are brief, an increasing number of long-term studies have documented persistent response up to 1 and 2 years. Recent studies are extending the knowledge of treatment to younger and older subjects, women, and ethnic minorities. Cognitive and cognitive/behaviorally based psychotherapies combined with medication may play a role in treating behavioral and organizational issues and comorbid psychopathology.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric patients with epilepsy: review of pharmacological treatment

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with epilepsy is a common source of impairment. Based on review of Medline indexed articles, meeting abstracts, and data requested from drug manufacturers, a summary of evidence that might guide treatment and research is presented. Methylphenidate (MPH) has shown high response rates and no increase in seizures in small trials. However, low baseline seizure rates, small numbers of subjects, and short observation periods limit the power of these studies to detect increases in seizure risk. Although longer-term effects of MPH and its effects in children with frequent seizures need to be studied, the evidence available at this time best supports use of MPH for the treatment of ADHD not amenable to changes in antiepileptic drugs or improvements in seizure control. This treatment should be part of a biopsychosocial approach. Other agents show promise. Preclinical, retrospective and open-label studies on amphetamines and atomoxetine support undertaking randomized controlled studies of these agents in patients with ADHD plus epilepsy. In contrast, additional data on guanfacine and modafinil should be gathered before undertaking randomized controlled studies with these agents.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE

With this study we assessed the efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of guanfacine compared with placebo for the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dosage escalation study, patients aged 6 to 17 years were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups of guanfacine extended release (2, 3, or 4 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measurement was the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV total score. Secondary measurements included Clinical Global Impression of Improvement, Parent's Global Assessment, Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form, and Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form.

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 86) or guanfacine extended release 2 mg (n = 87), 3 mg (n = 86), or 4 mg (n = 86) treatment groups. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to the end point in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV total scores were significant in all groups of children taking guanfacine extended release: -16.18 in the 2-mg group, -16.43 in the 3-mg group, and -18.87 in the 4-mg group, compared with -8.48 in the placebo group. All groups of children taking guanfacine extended release showed significant improvement on hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness subscales of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement, Parent's Global Assessment, Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form, and Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form assessments compared with placebo. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, somnolence, fatigue, upper abdominal pain, and sedation. Small to modest changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, and electrocardiogram parameters were observed but were not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

Guanfacine extended release met the primary and secondary efficacy end points. It was well tolerated and effective compared with placebo.

Comparison of psychosocial correlates in primary school age children with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder- combined type, with and without dysthymic disorder

In this study, standardized assessments of maternal psychopathology, family functioning and marital adjustment were compared between 115 medication naïve, clinically referred primary school age children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder combined type (ADHD-CT) alone and 29 children with comorbid dysthymic disorder (DD) and ADHD-CT. The mothers of children with ADHD-CT and DD reported higher rates of anxiety and depression than those of children with ADHD-CT alone. These results reinforce the need for early recognition of comorbid DD when working with children with ADHD-CT. Increased rates of maternal anxiety and depression in children with ADHD-CT and DD may contribute to the children's symptoms, require specific psychological and/or medication treatments and careful ongoing monitoring of these specific treatments.

Non-stimulant medications in the treatment of ADHD

BACKGROUND

Stimulants are the first-line medication in the psychopharmacological treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, 10 to 30% of all children and adults with ADHD either do not respond to or do not tolerate treatment with stimulants.

OBJECTIVE

To describe alternative treatment approaches with various non-stimulant agents, especially atomoxetine.

METHOD

General review of empirically based literature concerning efficacy and safety of the substances.

RESULTS

A large and still increasing body of data supports the usefulness of atomoxetine, a once daily dosing, and new selective noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor, with few side effects. Atomoxetine has been licensed in the US for use in ADHD across the lifespan, and is currently under consideration in Europe. Other non-stimulant substances, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, which are used to treat ADHD, are also reviewed. TCAs have been well studied and shown to be efficacious in the treatment of ADHD, but are limited by side effects. The number of studies documenting the efficacy of alpha-2-adrenergic agonists is still limited. Some experimental studies support a potential role of cholinergic drugs such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil) as well as novel nicotinic analogues (ABT-418).

CONCLUSION

Non-stimulant agents have been shown to be effective in treatment of ADHD. Especially, atomoxetine seems promising and newline drugs are in development.

Which anxiety disorders may differentiate attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type with dysthymic disorder from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type alone?

OBJECTIVE

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type (ADHD-CT), dysthymic disorder, and anxiety disorders frequently co-occur in primary school age children, although there have been no published data describing their association. We investigated the association of anxiety, defined from a parent or child perspective, with primary school-age children with ADHD-CT with and without dysthymic disorder.

METHOD

One hundred and forty-six medication naïve children with ADHD-CT were studied. Two groups with and without dysthymic disorder were formed to compare parent and child reports of anxiety, using categorical and continuous measures of anxiety, using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Separation anxiety disorder and social phobia were associated with primary school-age children with ADHD-CT and dysthymic disorder, compared to children with ADHD-CT without dysthymic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition of dysthymic disorder and anxiety disorders and their management in primary school-age children with ADHD-CT is generally poorly understood. The identification and elucidation of composite anxiety and depressive phenomena that may be systematically investigated through longitudinal studies of epidemiologically derived samples is needed in this particular group of children.

Non-stimulant treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

A variety of compounds with a common noradrenergic/dopaminergic activity have shown documented anti-Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) activity. There is a substantial body of literature documenting the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants on ADHD in over 1,000 subjects. There is an equally large database on the efficacy of the specific norepinephrlne reuptake inhibitor, atomoxetine, of greater than 2,000 Individuals. In addition, the atypical antidepressant buproplon also has been documented to be effective in the treatment of ADHD in controlled clinical trials. Despite wide use, the scientific base supporting the efficacy of alpha-2, noradrenergic agonists is somewhat limited. Several lines of evidence provide preliminary support for the potential benefits of cholinergic cognitive enhandng drugs, such as anticholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil) as well as novel nicotinic analogues (ABT-418). Despite these promising results, more research is needed on alternative pharmacological treatments for the treatment of ADHD.

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and methylphenidate. A review of height/weight, cardiovascular, and somatic complaint side effects

Three classes (height/weight, cardiovascular, and somatic complaints) of treatment emergent symptoms (side effects) associated with methylphenidate (MPH) therapy for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are reviewed. The more easily quantifiable side effects (e.g., blood pressure [BP], heart rate [HR], height/weight) are mostly transient, dose-dependent, easily rectified with dosage adjustments, and considered minor from a clinical perspective considering the breadth and level of improvement in behavior and cognitive functioning observed in most children. Previously reported somatic complaints associated with psychostimulant therapy may reflect symptoms occurring prior to initiation of treatment and require additional study.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and methylphenidate: a dose-response analysis and parent-child comparison of somatic complaints

The authors examined parent and child ratings of somatic complaints in 65 children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) who received four doses (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg) of methylphenidate (MPH) in the context of a double-blind, placebo controlled, within-subject (crossover) experimental design. Results indicated that parent and child ratings of somatic complaints decreased in a linear fashion from baseline levels as a function of increasing MPH dose and showed minimal variation across MPH conditions. Statistical comparisons of specific somatic complaints indicated minimal agreement between parents and children in contrast to the nearly identical parent-child dose-response curves. The paradoxical findings of fewer somatic complaints associated with MPH, importance of obtaining children's perceptions of MPH treatment, and implications for measuring somatic complaints are discussed.

Antidepressant treatment in children and adolescents: bridging the gap between efficacy and effectiveness

This review of antidepressant treatments in children and adolescents emphasizes the gap between efficacy data derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the limited effectiveness data from community-based practices. Part one is a brief review of data from randomized, double-blind clinical trials to assess the evidence base for the major approved indications for antidepressants in youths. Part two reviews information gaps in the evidence from RCTs. Part three discusses nonexperimental evidence of the use of antidepressants, including surveys of prescription sales, physician surveys, and population-based data. Part four presents a comprehensive model for assessing the use of antidepressants in youths in the community. The model aims to answer a range of public health-oriented questions and is intended to improve treating physicians' and clinical care providers' ability to manage medications for optimal patient benefit. Suggestions are made for engaging health service providers, health insurers, academicians, advocates, and the government in building the necessary infrastructure to make effectiveness as vital as efficacy to the model of drug therapy evaluation.

Non-stimulant treatments for ADHD

We reviewed the literature of medication trials in ADHD to evaluate the scope of the available non-stimulant treatments. A variety of compounds with a common noradrenergic/ dopaminergic activity have shown documented anti-ADHD activity. There is a substantial body of literature documenting the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants on ADHD in over 1,000 subjects. In addition, the atypical antidepressant bupropion and the novel noradrenergic specific antidepressant tomoxetine have also been documented to be effective in the treatment of ADHD in controlled clinical trials. Despite wide use, the scientific base supporting the efficacy of alpha-2, noradrenergic agonists continues to be limited. Several lines of evidence provide preliminary support for the potential benefits of cholinergic cognitive enhancing drugs in such as anticholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil) as well as novel nicotinic analogues (ABT-418). Despite these promising results, more research is needed on alternative pharmacologic treatments for the treatment of ADHD.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a noradrenergic disorder

This review revisits the thesis that a dysregulation of the central noradrenergic networks may underlie the pathophysiology of ADHD. We review the pertinent neurobiological and pharmacological literature on ADHD. The noradrenergic system has been intimately associated with the modulation of higher cortical functions including attention, alertness, vigilance and executive function. Noradrenergic activation is known to profoundly affect the performance of attention, especially the maintenance of arousal, a cognitive function known to be deficient in ADHD. Data from family, adoption, twin, and segregation analysis strongly support a genetic hypothesis for this disorder. Although molecular genetic studies of ADHD are relatively new and far from definitive, several replicated reports have found associations between ADHD with DAT and D4 receptor genes. Brain imaging studies fit well with the idea that dysfunction in fronto-subcortical pathways occurs in ADHD with its underlying dysregulation of noradrenergic function. A wealth of pharmacological data (within and without the stimulant literature) provides strong evidence for selective clinical activity in ADHD for drugs with noradrenergic and dopaminergic pharmacological profiles. Available research provides compelling theoretic, basic biologic and clinical support for the notion that ADHD is a brain disorder of likely genetic etiology with etiologic and pathophysiologic heterogeneity. Neurobiological and pharmacological data provide compelling support for a noradrenergic hypothesis of ADHD and suggest that drugs with noradrenergic activity may play an important role in the therapeutics of this disorder.

Absence of effect of stimulants on the phamacokinetics of desipramine in children

We conducted a retrospective chart review to examine the pharmacokinetic interaction between desipramine and the stimulants methylphenidate and dexedrine using routinely monitored desipramine serum concentrations in children receiving desipramine either alone or with a stimulant. Subjects were 142 children and adolescents (age 6-17 yrs; 113 taking desipramine, 29 taking desipramine-stimulants) in whom 401 dose- and weight-normalized serum concentrations were evaluated (333 desipramine, 68 desipramine-stimulants). Desipramine pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for both groups, including mean weight-corrected dose (3.66+/-1.36 mg/kg, desipramine; 3.66+/-1.09 mg/kg, desipramine-stimulants; p=0.97), weight- and dose-normalized serum concentrations (47.26+/-39.26 [microg/L]/[mg/kg], desipramine, 39.02+/-19.92 [microg/L]/[mg/kg], desipramine-stimulants; p=0.09), and clearance (0.690+/-0.913 [L/kg]/hr, desipramine; 0.613+/-0.514 [L/kg]/hr, desipramine-stimulants; p=0.499). When stratified by age, gender, and type of stimulant, no difference was detected (p>0.05) between groups. Our findings indicate the absence of a clinically significant interaction between desipramine and stimulants.

Critical review of tricyclic antidepressant use in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To provide a critical review of the role of tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) medications in children and adolescents.

METHOD

Multiple resources including a Medline search (1966-1998) were used.

RESULTS

There were few double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of TCAs, and even fewer with positive results. Also, potentially serious cardiovascular side effects have been described.

CONCLUSIONS

The future therapeutic role of TCAs for children and adolescents needs to be seriously weighed against lethality of overdose, the unresolved issue of possible sudden unexplained death, and the availability of safer and easier to monitor medications. Ongoing future research on heart rate variability and epidemiology of psychotropic medication-related deaths will address developmental aspects of TCA use.

Desipramine clearance in children and adolescents: absence of effect of development and gender

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of development and gender on the pharmacokinetics of desipramine (DMI) in the pediatric population.

METHOD

DMI pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from 407 routinely drawn, dose- and weight-normalized serum concentrations in 173 youths receiving DMI (90 children, 83 adolescents; 29 were female, 144 were male).

RESULTS

Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for the entire population included dose (3.78 +/- 1.51 mg/kg), weight- and dose-normalized serum concentration (45.41 +/- 47.39 [micrograms/L]/[mg/kg]), and DMI clearance (0.68 +/- 1.51 [L/kg]/hr). No between-group differences for children and adolescents were detected in dose (child, adolescent) (3.73 +/- 1.40 mg/kg, 3.83 +/- 1.68 mg/kg), weight- and dose-normalized serum concentrations (44.52 +/- 39.6 [micrograms/L]/[mg/kg], 46.34 +/- 34.89 [micrograms/L]/[mg/kg]; p = .62), and clearance (0.680 +/- 0.890 [L/kg]/hr, 0.695 +/- 1.05 [L/kg]/hr; p = .103). No between-group gender differences were detected in dose (male, female) (3.83 +/- 1.55 mg, 3.39 +/- 1.84 mg), weight- and dose-normalized serum concentrations (45.15 +/- 37.76 [micrograms/L]/[mg/kg], 47.14 +/- 34.96 [micrograms/L]/mg/kg]; p = .720), and clearance (0.699 +/- 0.89 [L/kg]/hr, 0.606 +/- 0.535 [L/kg]/hr; p = .390).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that age and gender do not significantly influence DMI clearance or dose-normalized serum concentrations in the pediatric population.

Sleep disturbances in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparative study with healthy siblings

The sleep profiles of 13 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who were treated with a fixed dose of methylphenidate for at least 1 month were compared with those of 16 healthy siblings. Sleep disturbances were assessed according to a structured sleep questionnaire, and the severity of ADHD was evaluated via the Conners Parents Teachers Rating Scale. The results indicated that significantly more children with ADHD demonstrated single or multiple sleep disturbances as well as higher rates of specific sleep disorders, such as initial and middle insomnia, compared with their siblings. No correlation was found between the severity of ADHD and disturbed sleep. Sleep duration and satisfaction with sleep were similar in the two groups. These findings raise important questions regarding the association between ADHD and disturbed sleep.

The use of tricyclic antidepressants in children and adolescents

For children and adolescents, TCAs have proven efficacy in the treatment of enuresis, OCD, and ADHD, with less compelling evidence in anxiety and tic disorders and as-yet unproven efficacy in major depression. The TCAs continue to be a valuable second-line treatment in the previously mentioned conditions. Given the possible adverse effects caused by these medications and the individual variability in plasma levels, effective, responsible use of these medications includes careful monitoring by the prescribing clinician.

Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

These practice parameters review the literature on children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There are three types of ADHD: predominantly inattentive, predominantly hyperactive-impulsive, and combined. Together, they occur in as many as 10% of boys and 5% of girls of elementary school age. Prevalence declines with age, although up to 65% of hyperactive children are still symptomatic as adults. Frequency in adults is estimated to be 2% to 7%. Assessment includes clinical interviews and standardized rating scales from parents and teachers. Testing of intelligence and academic achievement usually are required. Comorbidity is common. The cornerstones of treatment are support and education of parents, appropriate school placement, and pharmacology. The primary medications are psychostimulants, but antidepressants and alpha-adrenergic agonists are used in special circumstances. Other treatments such as behavior modification, school consultation, family therapy, and group therapy address remaining symptoms.

Comorbidity in ADHD: implications for research, practice, and DSM-V

OBJECTIVE

Since the introduction of DSM-III/III-R, clinicians and investigators have shown increasing interest in the study of conditions comorbid with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Better understanding ADHD comorbidity patterns is needed to guide treatment, research and future classification approaches.

METHOD

The ADHD literature from the past 15 years was reviewed to (1) explore the most prevalent patterns of ADHD comorbidity; (2) examine the correlates and longitudinal predictors of comorbidity; and (3) determine the extent to which comorbid patterns convey unique information concerning ADHD etiology, treatment and outcomes. To identify potential new syndromes, the authors examined comorbid patterns based on eight validational criteria.

RESULTS

The largest available body of literature concerned the comorbidity with ADHD and conduct disorder/aggression, with a substantially smaller amount of data concerning other comorbid conditions. In many areas the literature was sparse, and pertinent questions concerning comorbidity patterns remain unexplored. Nonetheless available data warrant the delineation of two new subclassifications of ADHD: (1) ADHD aggressive subtype, and (2) ADHD, anxious subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional studies of the frequency of comorbidity and associated factors are greatly needed to include studies of differential effects of treatment of children with various comorbid ADHD disorders, as well as of ADHD children who differ on etiological factors.

A naturalistic assessment of protriptyline for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential benefit of the tricyclic antidepressant, protriptyline, in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHOD

All clinic patients in an outpatient pediatric psychopharmacology unit treated with protriptyline for ADHD were monitored for response to treatment. Thirteen subjects (11 male, 2 female) were treated naturalistically with protriptyline for ADHD and were administered the ADHD Symptom Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) at baseline and while taking medication. All patients had failed to respond to at least one previous medication trial, and 46% had psychiatric comorbidity.

RESULTS

Patients received an average protriptyline dose of 17 mg (range 5 to 30 mg) for 11.5 +/- 6.8 weeks. Of the 11 patients who continued to take protriptyline for at least 4 weeks, there was a modest reduction in the ADHD symptom checklist (p < .004) and the CGI-S (p = .032). However, using a predefined criteria of response, only 45% of patients were considered positive responders. Adverse effects were prominent, with 46% of patients reporting clinically significant problems and 38% of patients discontinuing treatment because of intolerable side effects.

CONCLUSION

These findings do not support the clinical utility of protriptyline in the routine management of complex cases of ADHD in children and adolescents. However, the usefulness in noncomorbid, medication-naive ADHD individuals remains unclear.

Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder across the life cycle

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the scope of the available therapeutic armamentarium in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHOD

The literature of medication trials in ADHD was systematically reviewed, with attention to issues of psychiatric comorbidity, age, gender, and ethnic background.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five controlled studies of 5,768 children, adolescents, and adults have documented the efficacy of stimulants in an estimated 70% of subjects. The literature clearly documents that stimulants not only improve abnormal behaviors of ADHD, but also self-esteem, cognition, and social and family function. However, response varied in different age groups and with certain comorbid conditions. In addition, there is an impressive body of literature documenting the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants on ADHD in more than 1,000 subjects. Studies of alternative antidepressants, antipsychotics, antihypertensives, and other compounds were also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The available literature indicates the important role of psychopharmacological agents in the reduction of the core symptoms of ADHD and associated impairments. More research is needed on alternative pharmacological treatments and to further evaluate established therapeutics beyond school-age Caucasian boys. In addition, more research is needed on the efficacy of treatment for comorbid ADHD, use of combined medications, and the combination of medication and psychosocial treatment.

ECG changes in pediatric patients on tricyclic antidepressants, desipramine, and imipramine

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is an altered pattern of cardiac electrical activity in children treated with tricyclic antidepressants, desipramine, or imipramine, which may predispose these patients to sudden death.

METHODS

All patients in a child psychiatry practice from 1989 to 1993 in Calgary, Alberta, treated with desipramine or imipramine with both pre- and post-treatment electrocardiograms (ECGs) were included in the study (n = 21; ages 8 to 17 years). Thirty-six blinded post-treatment ECGs were analysed for interval measurement and compared to the pretreatment ECGs.

RESULTS

Drug dosages ranged from 25 mg to 125 mg per day and treatment duration ranged from 1 to 49 months. Seven of 21 patients were concurrently receiving an antipsychotic medication (pericyazine). The maximal increase in PR, and QRS, and QT interval changes were 40 msec and 70 msec, respectively, with most patients demonstrating no significant changes in the ECG intervals. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate (QTc). No significant arrhythmias or tachycardias were observed. ECG interval changes were not related to drug dosage, age, treatment duration or plasma levels.

CONCLUSIONS

No consistent pattern of ECG interval changes including the QTc interval was observed in children on desipramine and imipramine.

Predictors of clonidine response in Tourette syndrome: implications and inferences

Clonidine is an alpha-adrenergic agonist which may alleviate emerging symptoms in Tourette syndrome, an observation that has fueled speculation regarding involvement of stress-sensitive central noradrenergic systems in this disorder. We conducted a retrospective study of 53 juvenile patients with Tourette syndrome to assess predictors of short-term behavioral and tic response to oral clonidine and to examine the relationship, if any, among pretreatment blood pressure, tic severity, and clonidine response. When adverse effects were considered, older subjects experienced a better therapeutic response to clonidine, independent of dose. Improvement in symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was associated with a longer duration of vocal tics before treatment. Baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure was directly correlated with measures of tic severity but not with tic response to clonidine. The findings (1) provide indirect support for involvement of central noradrenergic systems in tic expression; (2) suggest that emergence of a tic-related neurophysiologic dysfunction may be necessary for optimal behavioral response to clonidine in Tourette syndrome; and (3) provide broad guidelines for the clinician considering clonidine therapy for pediatric patients with Tourette syndrome, particularly those with comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Side effects of methylphenidate and desipramine alone and in combination in children

OBJECTIVE

To investigate side effects of methylphenidate and desipramine alone and in combination in hospitalized children with symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression.

METHOD

A double-blind placebo controlled crossover design was used to investigate each medication alone and in combination. Side effect ratings and EKGs were done weekly. Pulse and blood pressure were monitored daily.

RESULTS

Nausea, dry mouth, and tremor were present in at least twice as many children on combined methylphenidate and desipramine compared with any other condition. Nausea/vomiting, headaches, other aches, refusal of food, and feeling "tired" were significantly more frequent during the combined methylphenidate plus desipramine condition when compared with either methylphenidate alone or with baseline. Significantly higher ventricular heart rate was found on combined methylphenidate plus desipramine compared with desipramine alone, methylphenidate alone, and baseline. Prolonged PR interval and significantly higher heart rate occurred during desipramine alone compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

During the several-month duration of the study, there were more frequent side effects during combined methylphenidate plus desipramine treatment than with either medication alone. Clinically, side effects present during combined medication appeared to be similar to and no more serious than those associated with desipramine alone.

Electrocardiographic effects of desipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine in children, adolescents, and adults treated with desipramine

OBJECTIVE

To assess the developmental effects of desipramine (DMI) treatment on the electrocardiogram (ECG), we investigated serum concentrations of DMI ([DMI]), and its major active metabolite 2-hydroxydesipramine ([OHDMI]) and ECG parameters.

METHODS

ECGs and [DMI] and [OHDMI] were analyzed from 50 children, 39 adolescents, and 30 adult psychiatric patients receiving DMI.

RESULTS

There were modest overall correlations between [DMI], [OHDMI], or [OHDMI+DMI], and the PR and QRS intervals when data from all 119 subjects were pooled. Within the pediatric age groups there were no significant associations between serum drug levels and heart rate or conduction intervals; and in all subjects with ECG abnormalities, there were some findings of higher [DMI], [OHDMI], and [OHDMI+DMI].

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that only modest associations of [DMI] and [OHDMI] with ECG conduction intervals were found, and are not likely to be clinically significant in any of the age groups studied. Compared with adults, children and adolescents do not appear to be at increased risks for ECG changes related to DMI treatment or to circulating concentrations of [DMI] or [OHDMI].

Antidepressant treatments in children and adolescents: II. Anxiety, physical, and behavioral disorders

Part II of this review critically evaluates antidepressants' (AD) efficacy in children and adolescents with anxiety, physical, and behavioral disorders as well as AD's side-effect spectrum. AD are administered increasingly to youths with specific anxiety syndromes phenomenologically paralleling those in adults which are responsive to AD (e.g., panic, obsessive-compulsive disorders). While several trials have not substantiated earlier theoretical considerations suggesting their usefulness in separation anxiety, their recent success in ameliorating obsessive-compulsive symptoms is encouraging. Systematic drug treatment studies however are limited because of the common overlap of anxiety syndromes with each other and other prominent psychiatric disturbances. More consistent benefits with AD are seen in the physical (e.g., enuresis, bulimia nervosa) and behavioral disorders (e.g., attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder). The wide-ranging benefits of AD in nonaffective disorders suggest AD are more appropriately viewed as broad spectrum pharmacotherapeutics.

Nortriptyline in the treatment of ADHD: a chart review of 58 cases

OBJECTIVE

The potential benefit of the tricyclic antidepressant medication, nortriptyline (NT), in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was evaluated.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted from a computerized data base of all clinic patients in an outpatient pediatric psychopharmacology unit treated with NT for ADHD. The records of the 58 subjects identified (37 children and 21 adolescents) were reviewed for overall response, dose, serum levels, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven percent of the identified subjects had failed to respond to an average of four previous medication trials, 84% had at least one comorbid diagnosis with ADHD, and 47% were receiving at least one concurrent medication. NT doses ranged from 0.4 to 4.5 mg/kg (X +/- SD = 2.0 +/- 1.0 mg/kg) and subjects received NT from 0.4 to 57.9 months (11.9 +/- 14.0 months). Overall, 76% of subjects were considered to have a moderate to marked improvement by an independent rater, which was corroborated by their clinicians. There was no association between response and age, rate of comorbidity, number of previous medication trials, or concurrent pharmacotherapy (all p NS). Although there were no overall differences in serum NT levels between responders and nonresponders, significantly more patients within the suggested therapeutic range in adults of 50 to 150 ng/ml were classified as "markedly improved" than those outside this range (68% versus 35%, p < 0.03). Mild adverse effects were reported in 20 subjects (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that NT may be an effective well-tolerated agent for ADHD children and adolescents. Additional controlled investigations utilizing NT for ADHD should be undertaken.

Desipramine treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and tic disorder or Tourette's syndrome

OBJECTIVE

As many as 50% of patients with Tourette's syndrome (TS) also meet diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Since antipsychotics are of limited value in controlling the symptoms of ADHD and stimulants can exacerbate tics, alternative treatments are directly needed. The purpose of this study was the examination of the efficacy of desipramine (DMI) in the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic tic disorder (CTD; TS or chronic motor tics) + attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHOD

All pediatric patients with the diagnosis of CTD that were treated with DMI were ascertained from retrospective systematic chart reviews of a psychopharmacology clinic and a neurology service specialized in movement disorders.

RESULTS

Of the 33 identified patients, 30 had comorbid CTD + ADHD and three had CTD alone. In all, 82% had significant improvement in CTD symptomatology and 80% significantly improved ADHD symptoms without major adverse effects over an average follow-up period of 16 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the conclusions from this retrospective report can be seen as preliminary only until replicated in a controlled investigation, the magnitude and persistence of the response is encouraging and suggest a therapeutic role for DMI in the treatment of CTD + ADHD patients.

A retrospective study of serum levels and electrocardiographic effects of nortriptyline in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively evaluated a large pediatric population treated with nortriptyline (NT) in an outpatient psychopharmacology clinic to assess pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic (EKG) effects.

METHODS

A systematic search revealed 82 children and adolescents treated naturalistically with NT. All patients with available EKGs and serum NT levels were included in the series with the exception of those receiving concomitant antipsychotic agents. Forty-three percent of subjects were receiving medications in addition to NT.

RESULTS

Patients received an average (+/- SE) NT dose of 2.0 +/- 0.1 mg/kg yielding mean serum NT levels of 105.5 +/- 7.4 ng/mL. There was a linear relationship of NT dose (mg/kg) to serum NT levels (r = 0.50, p < 0.0001). NT treatment resulted in small increases in heart rate, and PR, QRS, and QTc intervals (all ps < 0.01), of similar magnitude in children and adolescents. Individuals with the highest baseline EKG indices had the least amount of change in those indices with NT treatment. There were only a few statistically significant associations between NT dose or serum NT levels and EKG parameters. NT treatment was significantly associated with the onset of asymptomatic sinus tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats per minute), and prolongation of the EKG QRS (> 100 msec) and QTc (> 440 msec) intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest: (1) NT has a predictable dose to level relationship, (2) the effect of NT on the EKG in this age group is mild and similar to that reported with other tricyclic antidepressants, and (3) there are few age-specific differences in NT-induced EKG changes.

Methylphenidate and desipramine in hospitalized children: I. Separate and combined effects on cognitive function

OBJECTIVE

The separate and combined effects of methylphenidate and desipramine on cognitive function were investigated in 16 psychiatrically hospitalized children with primary, secondary, and mixed features of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and mood disorder.

METHOD

A double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover design was used to investigate drug effects on vigilance, short-term memory, visual problem solving, and higher-order learning.

RESULTS

Methylphenidate alone improved vigilance, both drugs positively affected short-term memory and visual problem solving, and combined drugs affected learning of higher-order relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Separate and combined drug effects are related to the specific cognitive domain assessed and have implications for neurotransmitter models of action.

A double-blind placebo controlled study of desipramine in the treatment of ADD: III. Lack of impact of comorbidity and family history factors on clinical response

A 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of desipramine (DMI) in daily doses averaging 4 to 5 mg/kg for the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) was further analyzed. Investigators examined whether comorbidity of ADDH with conduct disorder, major depression, an anxiety disorder, or a family history of ADDH predicted response to DMI treatment. There was a highly significant effect of treatment with DMI in outcome assessments, but responses to DMI were indistinguishable in ADDH patients with and without a comorbid disorder or familial ADDH. Cases of "pure" ADDH (lacking comorbidity with depression, anxiety, or conduct disorder and having a positive family history of ADDH) showed a trend toward lesser placebo responses and a corresponding greater DMI-placebo difference. These findings suggest that (1) DMI is effective in simple, noncomorbid cases, (2) DMI is not selective for comorbid cases, but (3) a response to DMI can be obtained even in complex cases of ADDH with associated comorbidity.

Nortriptyline treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and tic disorder or Tourette's syndrome

Although as many as 50% of patients with Tourette's syndrome (TS) also meet diagnostic criteria for Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), until recently little attention has been paid to ADHD symptoms in the assessment of therapeutic outcome of TS or patients with chronic motor tics (CMT). Because antipsychotics are of limited value in controlling the symptoms of ADHD and stimulants can exacerbate tics, alternative treatments for patients with chronic tic disorder (CTD) (TS or CMT) plus ADHD (CTD+ADHD) patients are direly needed. We examined the efficacy of the tricyclic antidepressant nortriptyline in the treatment of pediatric patients with CTD+ADHD ascertained from systematic chart reviews of all subjects with this diagnosis treated with nortriptyline. Of the 12 identified patients, 67% had significant improvement in CTD symptomatology and 92% significantly improved ADHD symptoms without major adverse effects over an average follow-up period of 19 months. Although the conclusions from this retrospective report can be only seen as preliminary until replicated in a controlled investigation, the magnitude and persistence of the response is encouraging and suggest a therapeutic role for nortriptyline in the treatment of CTD+ADHD patients.

Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: clinical and related issues in pharmacological treatment

Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents are receiving more attention from clinicians and researchers. Psychopharmacological approaches to controlling symptoms of anxiety are possible as part of a multi-model treatment approach. This paper provides an overview of some recent findings in child and adolescent anxiety disorders that may influence treatment decisions. It also reviews studies of the use of benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in treating children and adolescents who suffer from anxiety disorders, and suggests methods of integrating pharmacological treatment with other modalities in these disorders.

Developmental changes in serum concentrations of desipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine during treatment with desipramine

Steady-state serum concentrations of desipramine (DMI) and its metabolite, 2-hydroxydesipramine (OHDMI), were measured in 40 children, 36 adolescents, and 27 adult psychiatric patients. The authors predicted that younger patients would show more efficient elimination of DMI, with greater amounts of OHDMI. OHDMI averaged 52% lower than DMI. DMI per weight-corrected dose (ng/mL: mg/kg) rose significantly with maturation, from 50 in children and 56 in adolescents to 91 in adults. Contrary to expectation, OHDMI per DMI dose also rose with age, from 17 in children and 20 in adolescents to 26 in adults. It was concluded that: (1) similar mg/kg doses of DMI result in lower DMI and OHDMI in children; (2) children metabolize both DMI and OHDMI more rapidly than adults; and (3) children do not have high circulating concentrations of OHDMI.

Growth deficits in children treated with desipramine: a controlled study

Using multiple assessment methods, growth deficits in weight and height were examined in a clinical sample of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder treated chronically (mean 14 months) with desipramine (DMI) and two comparison samples of children treated chronically with methylphenidate (MPH) and a not-treated group. Although there were statistically significant weight deficits in children treated with both DMI and MPH compared with normal controls, only those treated with MPH sustained height deficits that attained statistical significance. It appears that DMI may be an appropriate alternative for patients with stimulant-associated severe suppression of growth in height.

Chronic low-dose MPTP in nonhuman primates: a possible model for attention deficit disorder

Schneider and Kovelowski (1990) showed that chronic low-dose N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) administration to monkeys caused cognitive dysfunction without significant motor impairment on tasks thought to be related to the caudate-frontal axis. The cognitive difficulties were similar to those seen in monkeys with frontal lesions, normal young monkeys, and normal young children. The caudate-frontal dysfunction is consistent with the cognitive difficulties that are thought to exist in children with attention deficit disorder (ADD). The caudate-frontal dysfunction is also consistent with the distribution of decreased cerebral blood flow and, presumably, decreased metabolism that has recently been found in children with ADD. In monkeys given chronic low-dose MPTP, pilot neurochemical studies have suggested abnormalities in dopamine and norepinephrine metabolism, the two neurotransmitters most frequently linked with ADD. We suggest that chronic low-dose MPTP induced cognitive dysfunction in primates may not only be a model for the cognitive disturbances that accompany Parkinson's disease but may also aid in understanding the cognitive dysfunction seen in children with ADD.

Quantitative EEG correlates of crack cocaine dependence

Evidence for a distinctive syndrome of neuroadaptation in cocaine dependence has accumulated from behavioral, neurophysiological, and preclinical and clinical pharmacological studies. The authors report on the results of a preliminary investigation of the quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) correlates of severe DSM-III-R crack cocaine dependence in seven patients abstinent from cocaine for 1 to 68 days. The major QEEG finding was increased absolute and relative alpha power. Increased alpha power has also been reported in multiple previous studies of depressed patients. This series of crack-dependent patients showed significant depressive morbidity; four patients attempted suicide subsequent to initiating their use of crack and the group mean (+/- SD) Beck Depression Scale score was 18.9 (+/- 6.5). These results complement other studies that support the concept of neuroadaptation to chronic cocaine exposure. Prospective studies correlating QEEG measures with subsequent response to pharmacological interventions for cocaine dependence should be considered.