Frequency of aspirin resistance in patients with congestive heart failure treated with antecedent aspirin

Aspirin non-response in pregnant women at increased risk of pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVES

Low dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for women at increased risk of preeclampsia (PE), however it is not always effective. The study sought to determine the prevalence of non-response to LDA and to ascertain the effect of increasing aspirin dose in non-responders.

STUDY DESIGN

Single centre, cohort study of 166 women at increased risk of PE was conducted in a large maternity unit in the UK between 2013 and 2016. All women were prescribed 75 mg of aspirin and invited to attend study visits at 18-24 weeks' and 32-36 weeks' gestation. Non-response was defined as a serum thromboxane B2 (TXB₂) ≤10 ng/mL. Aspirin dose was increased to 150 mg if a bedside VerifyNow test suggested non-response (test value ≥ 550 arachidonic acid reactive units [ARU]) at 18-24 weeks. Adherence was assessed by self-report.

RESULTS

Based on serum TXB₂, response rates were 85.3 % at 18-24 weeks and 79.3 % at 32-36 weeks' gestation. Compared to serum TXB₂, the VerifyNow test demonstrated moderate test performance (AUC 0.79 95 % CI 0.71-0.88, p < 0.0001) to detect non-response. High prevalence of non-adherence (6/10) was evident in persistent non-response group. Dose change from 75 to 150 mg of aspirin in adherent participants improved response (VerifyNow: 598 [95 % CI 550-665] ARU at 18-24 weeks on 75 mg aspirin, 509 [95 % CI 350-667] at 32-36 weeks on 150 mg of aspirin, [p < 0.0001]).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-response to LDA is common in pregnancy but appears to be largely attributable to non-adherence. Dose change could be useful to improve response to LDA in this cohort.

Older adults with frailty syndrome present an altered platelet function and an increased level of circulating oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction biomarker GDF-15

INTRODUCTION

The elderly population is increasing worldwide and in Chile, it is expected to grow rapidly. The World Health Organization (WHO) ICOPE guideline (Integrated Care for Older People) emphasizes the importance of frailty diagnosis to prevent dependence. Frailty in older adults is considered an indicator of vulnerability and poor health outcomes, of multifactorial etiology. Our objective was to investigate the association of activation of coagulation and increased risk of thrombosis with frailty in people older than 64 years. A prevalent-case control study was designed with 28 frail older and 27 robust older adults (non-frail, control group) older than 64 years. Frailty was defined by Fried's Phenotype, Platelet aggregation and activation plasma levels of Thromboxane B2 (TXB2), 8-isoprostane and Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) were determined.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, frail older adults, had a) higher percentage of platelet aggregation induction with ADP 4 μM (82.85% (3.35) and 73.41% (3.26), p-value = 0.024) and subaggregant dose of ADP (30.83% (7.47) and 13.25% (3.21), p-value = 0.002); b) higher platelet activation: P-selectin exposure (18.23% (4.41) and 6.96% (1.08), p-value = 0.011), and activated GPIIβ-IIIα (21.51% (3.41) and 8.26% (1.18), p-value = 0.001), at the baseline level and against a subaggregant dose ADP: P-selectin exposure (46.93% (5.95) and 13.41% (3.35), p-value = 0.002) and activated GPIIβ-IIIα (43.29% (6.04) and 26.71% (4.92), p-value = 0.024); c) higher plasma levels of TXB2 (201.8 ng/mL (59.53-236.3) and 45.77 ng/mL (25.14-98.26), p-value<0.0001), d) elevated plasma levels of 8-isoprostane (70.94 pg/mL, IQ: 65.89-99,96 and 56.24 pg/mL, IQ: 42.18-74.81, p-value = 0.001), and e) higher plasma GDF-15 levels (2,379 pg/mL, IQ: 1,845-4,121and 1367 pg/mL, IQ: 1190-1747, p-value = 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Older adults with frailty syndrome have an upregulated platelet activity that may contribute to an increased risk of thrombosis and aspirin resistance. The elevated oxidative stress and increases of GDF-15 levels might be related to altered platelet responsiveness in frail patients.

CONCLUSION

The determination of biomarkers of platelet dysfunction, oxidative stress and cell senescence/mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to frailty diagnosis, and approaches aimed at regulating platelet function in frail older adults could contribute to its prevention and treatment.

The dilemma of aspirin resistance in obese patients

Aspirin resistance (AR) commonly refers to the concept of reduced aspirin efficacy in preventing cardiovascular disease and platelet inhibition. Obesity increases the risk of heart disease three- to four-fold and has been associated with AR. Aspirin is used as a tool for both primary and secondary prevention, but recent studies suggest that its lack of efficacy for primary prevention is partly attributable to obesity. Several mechanisms have been described that contribute to AR in obese patients using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. AR may be attenuated through weight loss, alternative dosing regimens, and different drug formulations. With the global rise of obesity, it is imperative to find preventive therapies that adequately address atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in this population.

Aspirin Resistance and Stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet drug in both primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases. A proportion of patients may have stroke recurrence while they are on treatment with aspirin, giving rise to term aspirin resistance or aspirin failure. Studies have suggested that such recurrence could partly be attributed to biochemical aspirin resistance, with an estimated prevalence ranging between 5% and 65% among patients with ischemic stroke in the published studies. Common methods to evaluate laboratory aspirin resistance include light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow-Aspirin assay, serum thromboxane B2, and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2. Aspirin resistance is multifactorial in origin and involves diverse environmental and genetic factors, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms, miRNAs, drug interactions, and co-morbid risk factors. The current review overviews the concept of aspirin resistance, its evaluation and relationship with stroke recurrence, its outcome, and its implications on stroke management in the future.

[Prevalence of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) - low response in vascular surgery]

BACKGROUND

Research has revealed that a decreased antiplatelet effect (low response [LR]/high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HPR]) of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. There are extensive ASA low response (ALR) and clopidogrel low response (CLR) prevalence data in the literature, but there are only a few studies concerning vascular surgical patients. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and risk factors of ALR and CLR in vascular surgical patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined n = 154 patients with an antiplatelet long-term therapy, who were treated due to peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD) and/or arteria carotis interna stenosis (CVD). To detect an ALR or CLR, we examined full blood probes with impedance aggregometry (ChronoLog® Aggregometer model 590). Risk factors were examined by acquisition of concomitant disease, severity of vascular disease, laboratory test results and medication.

RESULTS

We found a prevalence of 19.3 % in the ALR group and of 21.1 % in the CLR group. Risk factors for ALR were an increased platelet and leucocyte count and co-medication with pantoprazole. We found no significant risk factors for a decreased antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel treatment.

CONCLUSION

The investigated prevalence for ALR and CLR are in the range of other studies, particularly based on cardiological patients. More investigations are needed to gain a better evaluation of the risk factors for HPR and to develop an effective antiplatelet therapy regime to prevent cardiovascular complications.

rs5911 and rs3842788 Genetic Polymorphism, Blood Stasis Syndrome, and Plasma TXB2 and hs-CRP Levels Are Associated with Aspirin Resistance in Chinese Chronic Stable Angina Patients

The identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to aspirin resistance (AR) is of great significance for the explanation why some individuals demonstrate an incomplete response to aspirin and for optimizing the antiplatelet therapy strategy. The study was designed to investigate the possible associated genetic markers and clinical factors of AR for Chinese patients with chronic stable angina after PCI and to analyze the association between TXA2, PGI2, hs-CRP level, AR, and gene polymorphisms. Totally 207 chronic stable angina patients who received 100 mg maintenance dose daily of aspirin for more than 7 days were enrolled. The inhibition of platelets was assessed using light transmittance aggregometry. TXB2, 6-keto-PGF1α, and hs-CRP were measured by radioimmunoassay. Genotyping was performed using Taqman probe technique (rs5787 and rs5911) and gene sequencing technology (rs3842788). By using binary logistic regression analysis, the impact of clinical and genetic determinants on AR was evaluated. The prevalence of AR and aspirin semiresistance (ASR) was 3.86% and 20.76%, respectively, in Chinese chronic stable angina patients. rs5911 A/C and C/C versus A/A genotype (OR = 5.546, 95% CI = 1.812–11.404), rs3842788 A/G versus G/G genotype (OR = 8.358, 95% CI = 2.470–28.286), and blood stasis syndrome (BSS, OR = 10.220, 95% CI = 4.242–24.621) were associated with AR, but rs5787 variants were all homozygous of G/G genotype. Plasma TXB2 and hs-CRP increased significantly in AR and ASR group, while 6-keto-PGF1α showed no difference, and TXB2 level was significantly higher in carriers of the rs3842788 A/G genotype. According to our results, rs5911 and rs3842788 are proved to be specific genetic markers of AR in Chinese chronic stable angina patients for the first time, and BSS was also proved to be a remarkable determinant for AR. The AR and ASR patients were with increased plasma TXB2 and hs-CRP levels, and the TXB2 level was influenced by the variation of rs3842788 genotype.

A brief review on the mechanisms of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is the most widely prescribed drug for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, a large number of patients continue to experience thromboembolic events despite aspirin therapy, a phenomenon referred to as aspirin resistance or treatment failure. Aspirin resistance is often observed along with a high incidence of unstable plaque, cardiovascular events and cerebrovascular accident. Studies have shown that aspirin reduces the production of TXA2, but not totally inhibits the activation of platelets. In this review, we analyze current and past research on aspirin resistance, presenting important summaries of results regarding the potential contributive roles of single nucleotide polymorphisms, inflammation, metabolic syndrome and miRNAs. The aim of this article is to provide a brief review on aspirin resistance and platelet function, which will provide important insights into the research of aspirin resistance.

Clinical Significance of Laboratory-determined Aspirin Poor Responsiveness After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AIMS

The objective of the present substudy was to examine whether aspirin poor/high responsiveness (APR/AHR) is associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious bleeding after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS

We analyzed 961 consecutive ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction patients who underwent PPCI between February 2008 and June 2011. Multiplate analyser (Dynabite, Munich, Germany) was used for the assessment of platelet reactivity. APR/AHR were defined as the upper/lower quintiles of ASPI values, determined 24 h after aspirin loading. APR patients were tailored using 300 mg maintenance dose for 30 days. The co-primary end points at 30 days were: MACE (death, non-fatal infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization and ischemic stroke) and serious bleeding according to the BARC classification.

RESULTS

One hundred and 90 patients were classified as APR, and 193 patients as AHR. At admission, compared with aspirin sensitive patients (ASP), patients with APR had more frequently diabetes, anterior infarction and heart failure, while AHR patients had reduced values of creatine kinase, leukocytes, heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Compared with ASP, the rates of 30-day primary end points did not differ neither in APR group including tailored patients (MACE, adjusted OR 1.02, 95%CI 0.47-2.17; serious bleeding, adjusted OR 1.92, 95%CI 0.79-4.63), nor in patients with AHR (MACE, adjusted OR 1.58, 95%CI 0.71-5.51; serious bleeding, adjusted OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.22-2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of APR patients were suitable for tailoring. Neither APR including tailored patients nor AHR were associated with adverse 30-day efficacy or safety clinical outcomes.

Effect of Frailty and Age on Platelet Aggregation and Response to Aspirin in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is associated with changes in inflammation, coagulation, and possibly platelet function. Aspirin is still prescribed for stroke prevention in older patients with atrial fibrillation, although not recommended by current guidelines. In frail older people, it is unclear whether platelet aggregability and response to aspirin are altered. This study aims to investigate the effects of frailty and chronological age on platelet aggregability and on responses to aspirin in older patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Inpatients with atrial fibrillation aged ≥65 years were recruited from a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Frailty was determined using the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. Platelet aggregation studies were performed using whole blood impedance aggregometry.

RESULTS

Data from 115 participants were analyzed (mean age 85 ± 6 years, 41% female, 52% frail). Spearman correlation coefficients found no significant associations of platelet aggregation with chronological age or with frailty score. Comparison between frail and non-frail groups showed that there was no impact of frailty status on aggregation assays amongst participants who were not taking any antiplatelet drugs. Amongst participants taking aspirin, the frail had higher adjusted arachidonic acid agonist (ASPI) test measures (AU per platelet) than the non-frail (0.11 ± 0.11 vs. 0.05 ± 0.04; p = 0.04), suggesting that in frail participants, platelet aggregation is less responsive to aspirin than in non-frail.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no effect of chronological age or frailty status on platelet aggregation amongst older patients with atrial fibrillation in this pilot study. However, frailty could be associated with reduced aspirin responsiveness among older patients with atrial fibrillation.

Acetylsalicylic acid resistance risk factors in patients with myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Despite its commonly recognized benefits in the cardiovascular disease setting, an issue of resistance to this drug has lately emerged. The aim of this research was assessment of the phenomenon of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) resistance and its risk factors in patients treated for myocardial infarction.

METHODS

This study is a post-hoc analysis of a previous prospective study with approximately 200 patients treated for myocardial infarction with a coated formulation of ASA. The population was divided into two subgroups according to the response to ASA. ASA responsiveness was assessed using the arachidonic acid-dependent platelet aggregation (ASPI-test). The measurements were performed using the technique of impedance aggregometry.

RESULTS

The prevalence of aspirin resistance among the study population was 6.2%. All analyzed aggregometric parameters (including ASPI-test, adenosine diphosphate dependent platelet aggregation - ADP-test, bleeding time measurement) showed significant differences between both subgroups. ASA resistant patients had higher concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), leukocytes (WBC) and platelets (PLT) but lower concentrations of hemoglobin (HGB). The temporal point analysis for both subgroups showed aspirin resistance incidence peak in patients at 9 months after myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of aspirin resistance in our study population is comparable with rates reported in literature among patients with cardiovascular diseases. There is a possible relation between aspirin resistance and clopidogrel resistance. Presence did not affect the incidence of the clinical end-points.

Aspirin resistance in patients with type II diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients exhibit platelet hyperreactivity, which renders them resistant to antithrombotic treatments. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of aspirin resistance in diabetic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 93 diabetic and 37 non-diabetic participants were included into the study. Aspirin resistance was measured with a whole-blood desktop platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) with an epinephrine agonist.

RESULTS

Altogether 41.9% patients with DM were aspirin non-responders. Aspirin resistance was observed in 43.2% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.89). Presence of diabetes mellitus had no effect on aspirin response (RR 0.95 (95% CI 0.44-2.05), p = 0.89) in the whole study population. Hypercholesterolemia was the only predictor of aspirin resistance in multivariate analysis in diabetic patients (RR 3.09 (95% CI 1.17-8.16), p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of aspirin resistance is comparable in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Hypercholesterolemia is the only independent predictor of aspirin resistance in diabetic patients.

Antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the leading cause of disability in the developed world. Atherothrombosis is the underlying condition that results in events leading to ischemic stroke and vascular death. Antiplatelet therapy is commonly used for both acute stroke and in secondary prevention. Numerous trials and meta-analyses have left little doubt that antiplatelet therapy effectively reduces stroke risk in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Current antiplatelet agents include acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, ticlopidine and extended release dipyridamole with low doses of acetylsalicyclic acid (aspirin). The optimum doses of antiplatelet drugs depend upon several variables, such as genetic and environmental factors, so that clinical and laboratory response for dosage varies for each patient. Recently, the correlation between the laboratory-measurable effect of antiplatelet agents and the clinical effectiveness on the mortality of ischemic stroke and cardiovascular patients has been documented. Due to the side effect of bleeding with different antithrombotic drugs, their future employment will be determined in combination with low dosages of each component. Laboratory-controlled, tailored drug therapy will be needed for long-lasting secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.

Prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in diabetic patients treated with aspirin

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have shown that ≤ 100 mg aspirin daily is not effective for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetes; however, clinical and pharmacologic evidence suggests these patients need >100 mg for adequate antiplatelet activity. Although high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) could explain the lack of benefit, prevalence of HTPR in diabetes is not known. This systematic review examined the relationship between daily aspirin dose and prevalence of HTPR in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched until May 2013 using database-appropriate terms for aspirin, resistance, and diabetes. Studies were included if prevalence of HTPR was reported according to daily dose and diabetes status. Patients were stratified by daily aspirin dose and the weighted mean prevalence across studies was calculated. Where appropriate, pooled relative risks (RR) were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Data were available from 31 studies that enrolled 2147 diabetic patients. Overall, prevalence of HTPR was 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.2%-28.5%) in diabetic patients and 15.8% (95% CI, 11.4%-20.3%) in nondiabetic patients (pooled RR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.71; I(2) 56%). Prevalence appeared to be dose related, with 398 (23.6%) of 1689 diabetic patients using ≤ 100 mg daily having HTPR compared with 64 (12.3%) of 518 diabetic patients using 101-325 mg daily (pooled RR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.72; I(2) 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although these observations should be verified in a clinical trial, the possibility that 1 in 4 patients have HTPR with doses commonly used in diabetes could have significant implications on overall effectiveness of aspirin.

[Antiplatelet therapy: resistance to traditional antiaggregation drugs and role of new antiplatelet agents]

Platelet aggregation plays a key role in the development of major cardiovascular events (MACE) related to atherothrombosis. Since the appearance of coronary stenting, the importance of measuring and modulating platelet activity has considerably increased in the scientific literature during the last decade. Double antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel administrated to stent carriers has widely demonstrated its efficacy in the prevention of MACE compared with aspirin alone. These benefits are also present when a conservatory approach is chosen for acute coronary syndrome management. However, there are an important number of patients who develop MACE despite optimal dual antiplatelet therapy, most likely related to an incomplete platelet activity inhibition. Many studies suggest an important inter-individual variability in the response to the drugs, maybe related, at least in part, to the use of different assessment techniques of platelet aggregation. Other authors suggest an incomplete platelet inhibition as a possible explanation for the presence of MACE in patients under optimal antiplatelet therapy. Resistance to usual drugs has become a clinically relevant issue that requires an individual approach where new antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, could play an important role as stated in current consensus documents.

Clinical consequences of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an overview

The aim of this review is to introduce the concept of personalized medicine in secondary stroke prevention with antiplatelet medication. In the last years, many studies have been conducted regarding aspirin resistance and genotyping of clopidogrel metabolism. A review of the currently published data on this issue emphasizes the importance of focusing on the individualizing approach in antiplatelet therapy to achieve maximal therapeutic beneficial effect. However, many authors suggest that, before new information from ongoing trials become available, good clinical practice should dictate the use of low dose of aspirin that was shown to be effective in the prevention of stroke and death in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease, because higher doses do not have significantly better efficacy than lower doses in secondary stroke prevention, but lower-dose aspirin is associated with less side effects. On the other hand, many factors are associated with clopidogrel resistance, and recent genetic studies showed that the CYP2C19*2 genotype (loss-of-function allele) is related to poor metabolism of clopidogrel, but larger studies are needed to definitively confirm or rule out the clinical significance of this genetic effect. The aim of personalized approach in secondary stroke prevention is to take the most appropriate medicine in the right dose in accordance with the clinical condition of the patient and associated risk factors.

HeartWare left ventricular assist device thrombosis in aspirin non-responder

Patient characteristics that increase the risk of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device thrombosis have not been well established. We report a case of HeartWare thrombosis in a patient with aspirin hyporesponsiveness, and discuss the role of platelet function testing in preventing this severe complication. There is a need for clinical trials determining optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients supported with left ventricular assist devices, and consensus regarding modification of antiplatelet therapy after device thrombosis.

Aspirin resistance in patients undergoing hemodialysis and effect of hemodialysis on aspirin resistance

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of aspirin resistance (AR) in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and to assess the effect of HD on the results of the Multiplate test. A total of 54 patients undergoing HD were included in this study. Blood samples were taken just before and after the HD session. To determine AR, we used Multiplate test. Platelet aggregation values of the study population were 363.01 ± 225.69 aggregation unit (AU) × minutes before and 375.33 ± 254.05 AU × minutes after the HD (P = .597). There was strong correlation between the values before and after HD (R = .755, P < .0001). The AR status was changed in 9 (16.6%) patients after HD. Agreement of AR status before and after HD was substantial (κ coefficient = .667, P < .0001). The prevalence of AR in patients undergoing HD seems higher than in most of the studied populations, and this study has shown that the AR statuses of a significant number of patients undergoing HD change after an HD session.

Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin resistance and all that jazz!

Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and stroke. Aspirin used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs has been shown to offer significant benefit to patients at high risk of vascular events. Resistance to the action of aspirin may decrease this benefit. Aspirin resistance has been defined by clinical and/or laboratory criteria; however, detection by laboratory methods prior to experiencing a clinical event will likely provide the greatest opportunity for intervention. Numerous laboratory methods with different cutoff points have been used to evaluate the resistance. Noncompliance with aspirin treatment has also confounded studies. A single assay is currently insufficient to establish resistance. Combinations of results to confirm compliance and platelet inhibition may identify "at-risk" individuals who truly have aspirin resistance. The most effective strategy for managing patients with aspirin resistance is unknown; however, studies are currently underway to address this issue.

Aspirin resistance: current status and role of tailored therapy

Aspirin is integral in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. Given the high clinical importance of aspirin in the management of coronary artery disease, much attention has been directed towards the concept of "aspirin resistance." Unfortunately, the term aspirin resistance is ill-defined in the literature, leading to a large variance in the reported prevalence of this phenomenon. In this review, the current understanding of aspirin resistance is discussed. Commonly used functional and diagnostic tests of platelet function, including their strengths and weakness, are reviewed. We next discuss several proposed mechanisms of aspirin resistance and special high-risk groups at risk for aspirin treatment failure. We then discuss optimal dosing and diagnostic strategies for those populations at risk for aspirin resistance with a focus on tailored aspirin therapy for high-risk groups. Finally, future topics of interest in the field of aspirin resistance are considered.

Aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of thrombosis: expectations and limitations

Platelets play a very important role in the pathogenesis of acute vascular events leading to thrombosis of the coronary and cerebral arteries. Blockage of these arteries leading to regional ischemia of heart and brain tissues precipitate heart attacks and stroke. Acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin) has been the drug of choice for over half a century for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of thrombotic events. In spite of its extensive use as an antiplatelet drug for the prevention of vascular thrombosis, there is considerable concern about the degree of protection it offers, to patients under aspirin therapy. In this paper, we explain the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, discuss the limitations of aspirin therapy, and suggest methods to monitor "at-risk" individuals. Ability to monitor and determine at risk patients will provide opportunities for the clinicians to customize antiplatelet therapies.

The clinical significance of aspirin resistance in patients with chest pain

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data in the literature about the clinical significance of aspirin resistance.

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of biochemical aspirin resistance in patients on aspirin therapy who were admitted to the emergency clinic with chest pain. We also aimed to evaluate the relation between acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and aspirin resistance.

METHODS

A total of 338 patients were included in the study. Platelet reactivity was measured with the PFA-100 system (Dade Behring Inc, Deerfield, IL). Aspirin resistance determined by the PFA-100 was defined as a normal collagen and/or epinephrine closure time despite aspirin treatment (<165 s).

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable angina pectoris (SAP), unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and rule out ACS. Aspirin resistance was found in 81 (24%) patients in all groups. Patients with ACS had significantly more aspirin resistance than patients with rule out ACS or patients with SAP (P < .001). In the SAP group, 31 (19.6%) patients; in the UA/NSTEMI group, 19 (35.8%) patients; in the STEMI group, 14 (50%) patients; and in the rule out ACS group, 17 (17.2%) patients had aspirin resistance (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, cardiac biomarker elevation on admission to emergency department and platelet count appeared as independent factors predictive of aspirin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that incidence of aspirin resistance was significantly higher in patients who were finally diagnosed as ACS, especially in aspirin-taking patients admitted to the emergency clinic with STEMI.

Aspirin resistance: Fact or fiction? A point of view

Aspirin is a wonder drug that has been used for well over 100 years for its analgesic and antipyretic effects. For the past three decades, it has increasingly been used for the prevention of primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Lately, it has been suggested that a significant number of individuals taking aspirin have become resistant to this drug. The phenomenon of "aspirin resistance" is based on the observation of clinical events in some patients taking aspirin, and/or a diminished platelet aggregation inhibitory response to aspirin therapy. Unfortunately, laboratory assays used to monitor the efficacy of aspirin are far from accurate and the results are not reproducible. Furthermore, results of different platelet function tests are often not congruent. In addition, platelet aggregation studies show marked inter-individual and intra-individual variability. Patients with coronary heart disease take many drugs that interfere with the effect of aspirin on platelet aggregation. Besides inhibiting formation of thromboxane A(2) from arachidonic acid, aspirin has a host of platelet-independent effects that complement its platelet inhibitory effects. Laboratory assays designed to measure platelet function do not take into account these pleiotropic effects of aspirin. In our view, use of the term "aspirin resistance" based on inadequate knowledge of imperfect laboratory tests does a disservice to physicians and patients.

Aspirin Resistance in healthy drug-naive men versus women (from the Heredity and Phenotype Intervention Heart Study)

This study was designed to determine the factors that contribute to interindividual variation in the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. We measured platelet response to aspirin in 745 (400 men and 345 women) drug-naive asymptomatic subjects of the Heredity and Phenotype Intervention (HAPI) Heart Study. Whole blood platelet aggregometry was performed to assess response to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, and collagen at baseline and after 14 days of aspirin 81 mg/day. There was wide interindividual variation in platelet aggregation in response to aspirin, with no clear biological threshold to define aspirin resistance. Variation in platelet function before and after aspirin was heritable. Women exhibited greater platelet aggregability in response to adenosine diphosphate and collagen at baseline and after aspirin administration. The degree to which aspirin inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation was also significantly less in women compared with men (mean +/- SD percent inhibition of collagen-induced [1 microg/ml] platelet aggregation 49.9 +/- 30.9 vs 57.5 +/- 42.5 in women and men, respectively, p = 0.005). Using a cutoff <70% inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation, 21% of the total population demonstrated aspirin resistance, which occurred in 30% of women and 16% of men (p = 0.0002). Aspirin-resistant subjects were older, had significantly higher total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, lower hematocrit, and higher platelet count compared with aspirin-sensitive subjects. In conclusion, in this study group, platelet function is heritable. There is wide interindividual variation in platelet response to aspirin as defined by whole blood platelet aggregometry, with women having lower mean percent inhibition of platelet aggregation and greater prevalence of aspirin resistance than men.

Aspirin resistance: an update

Aspirin resistance (AR) still lacks a universally accepted definition, but it may be discussed as either a laboratory phenomenon or a clinical presentation. Laboratory resistance is mainly defined as abnormal platelet response to aspirin, whereas the clinical manifestation is the failure of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events. Although there is evidence of an association, it appears that a laboratory abnormality in platelet function is not the only risk factor for the clinical manifestation of AR. Therapies for primary and secondary prevention of AR still need to be elucidated, but there are some data to suggest that in an acute episode of aspirin failure because of AR, different therapeutic interventions need to be considered.

Prospective, observational study of antiplatelet and coagulation biomarkers as predictors of thromboembolic events after implantation of ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Long-term success in ventricular assist device (VAD) recipients is limited by thromboembolic events, the prediction of which remains elusive. We evaluated the predictive value of aspirin hyporesponsiveness and markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients scheduled to undergo VAD implantation between June 2004 and March 2006. Once before surgery, daily during hospitalization, and weekly after discharge we assessed platelet function, measured prothrombin activation fragment 1.2 (F1.2) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) concentrations, and evaluated aspirin hyporesponsiveness by whole-blood aggregometry and thromboelastography. All patients received 325 mg oral aspirin daily from at least 7 days before VAD implantation. Follow-up continued until heart transplantation, death or closure of the database.

RESULTS

We included 26 patients (median follow-up 315 days, range 9-833 days). In eight (31%) patients, 14 thromboembolic events occurred at a median of 42 (interquartile range 26-131) days. Only six (43%) events based on whole-blood aggregometry and one (7%) based on thromboelastography coincided with aspirin hyporesponsiveness. Within-patient variability was high for both tests (59% and 567%, respectively). Compared with levels before surgery, PAI-1 concentrations were raised for up to 45 days (P <0.0001) and those of F1.2 for up to 3 days (P = 0.0001) after VAD implantation. PAI-1 and F1.2 levels did not rise significantly further before thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin hyporesponsiveness was not associated with raised risk of future clinical thromboembolic events after VAD implantation. Impaired fibrinolysis, demonstrated by raised PAI-1 concentrations, might, however, indicate a predisposition to such events early after surgery.

Carotid endarterectomy performed in the morning is associated with increased cerebral microembolization

OBJECTIVES

Platelet function exhibits circadian variation with highest levels of activity in the morning and plays a central role in arterial thrombotic events, including thrombotic stroke following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Prior to the platelet-rich thrombus occluding the carotid artery, multiple embolic signals are detected in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. We hypothesized that patients undergoing CEA early in the day may be at an increased stroke risk and this would manifest as an increased postoperative embolic count.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on 235 patients undergoing primary CEA. Accurate start and finish times were recorded in addition to the number of postoperative emboli detected in the first three hours after CEA using transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring.

RESULTS

For operations finishing before midday, there was a 3.6-fold increase in the number of emboli detected relative to afternoon finishes (53.2 vs 14.8, P = .002) with similar results for starts before 10:30 AM (48.1 vs 14.7, P =.002). There was also a significant correlation between start time and emboli count (P = .02). Of the 55 patients with no postoperative emboli, only 19 had a morning start (relative risk 0.63, P = .011). Patients were 6.9 times more likely to require treatment with Dextran-40 to prevent progression onto a thrombotic stroke if their CEA finished before midday (P = .008).

CONCLUSION

There is a significantly increased rate of postoperative embolization for operations begun earlier in the day. Carotid endarterectomies performed in the afternoon may be at less risk of developing postoperative thrombotic stroke.

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article about currently available antiplatelet drugs is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, reversible cyclooxygenase inhibitors, thienopyridines, and integrin alphaIIbbeta3 receptor antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are thoroughly discussed, with a mechanistic overview of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations; however, it does highlight important practical aspects related to antiplatelet therapy, including the optimal dose of aspirin, the variable balance of benefits and hazards in different clinical settings, and the issue of interindividual variability in response to antiplatelet drugs.

The role of aspirin in cardiovascular prevention: implications of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is well recognized as an effective antiplatelet drug for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk of cardiovascular events. However, most patients receiving long-term aspirin therapy still remain at substantial risk of thrombotic events due to insufficient inhibition of platelets, specifically via the thromboxane A2 pathway. Although the exact prevalence is unknown, estimates suggest that between 5.5% and 60% of patients using this drug may exhibit a degree of "aspirin resistance," depending upon the definition used and parameters measured. To date, only a limited number of clinical studies have convincingly investigated the importance of aspirin resistance. Of these, few are of a sufficient scale, well designed, and prospective, with aspirin used at standard doses. Also, most studies do not sufficiently address the issue of noncompliance to aspirin as a frequent, yet easily preventable cause of resistance to this antiplatelet drug. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of aspirin resistance, discussing its definition, prevalence, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Moreover, the clinical implications of aspirin resistance are explored in various cardiovascular disease states, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, and other similar disorders where platelet reactivity is enhanced.

Pharmacogenomics of platelet responsiveness to aspirin

Aspirin is the most widely used drug in the world for cardiovascular protection. Aspirin's ability to suppress platelet function varies widely among individuals and lesser suppression of platelet function is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Platelet response to aspirin is a complex phenotype involving multiple genes and molecular pathways. Aspirin response phenotypes can be categorized as directly or indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) activity, with phenotypic variation indirectly related to COX-1 being much more prominent. Recent data indicate that variability in platelet response to aspirin is genetically determined, but the specific gene variants that contribute to phenotypic variation are not known. An understanding of the relationship between genotype, aspirin response phenotype and clinical outcome will help to bring about a personalized approach to antiplatelet therapy that maximizes antithrombotic benefit whilst minimizing bleeding risk for individual patients.

Prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin in patients treated for secondary stroke prophylaxis and in patients with recurrent ischemic events

To determine the prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin treatment for secondary stroke prophylaxis, the authors studied consecutive patients during a 29-month period. Information regarding their ischemic events, risk factors, and medications was collected. Platelet aggregation in response to collagen and arachidonic acid was used to determine platelet responsiveness to aspirin. A total of 653 patients were evaluated. Of these, 129 patients (20%) were determined to be nonresponsive to aspirin based on continued platelet aggregation in response to collagen, arachidonic acid, or both. A total of 87 (13%) of the 653 patients were clinical aspirin failures (ie, presented with new focal cerebral ischemic symptoms while taking aspirin). Of the patients with new cerebral ischemic symptoms, 57 (66%) were determined to be platelet nonresponsive to aspirin. The odds ratio for platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin in patients who suffered a recurrent ischemic event while taking aspirin was 14.25 (95% confidence interval: 8.5-23.7; P < .5). Continued platelet aggregation despite aspirin treatment occurred in 20% of ambulatory patients treated for secondary stroke prophylaxis. The prevalence of nonresponsiveness to aspirin was statistically higher in those patients who suffered recurrent cerebral ischemia while taking aspirin (P < .5) compared with patients who remained without new ischemic symptoms.

Variable responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among patients with acute coronary syndrome as assessed by platelet function tests

Unresponsiveness to clopidogrel or aspirin has been reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet aggregometry (PA) and the Impact-R [Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer (CPA) technology, measuring whole blood platelet adhesion under flow conditions] were compared in detecting laboratory unresponsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among ACS patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples were evaluated in 404 patients by PA using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) and whole blood samples by the Impact-R ADP- and AA-response tests. The first cohort (n=114) was assayed by PA on days 1 and 4 of the onset of ACS. A patient with relative decrease of </=10% in ADP-induced maximal platelet aggregation after clopidogrel treatment was defined as laboratory non-responding (NR) patient to clopidogrel. This relative value correlated well with an absolute value of ADP-induced aggregation >/=70%. A patient with an absolute value of AA-induced maximal aggregation >/=60% was defined as laboratory NR patient to aspirin. The second cohort (n=290) was tested on day 4 by both systems and results analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. The following cut-off values of the Impact-R surface coverage were obtained: </=2.8% and </=3.4% for clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients, respectively. The incidence of NR patients to clopidogrel and aspirin, according to the two methods was 27% and 22%, respectively. Impact-R compared to PA in detecting clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients revealed: 79% and 82% agreement, 71% and 73% sensitivity, 83% and 86% specificity, respectively. In conclusion, the Impact-R and PA results demonstrated high degree of similarity.

Comparison of cationic propyl gallate and adenosine diphosphate for the measurement of aspirin effectivity with optical aggregometry

To compare the newer inductor of platelet aggregation cationic propyl gallate (CPG) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) for the examination of aspirin (ASA) effectivity with optical aggregometry. In total,116 patients were prospectively enrolled with a stable cardiovascular disease, taking ASA 100 mg/day for >or=1 month. The control group consisted of 62 healthy volunteers. A platelet aggregation was investigated by optical aggregometry (aggregometer LASER 4x; BIO ART, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium). CPG and ADP were added as aggregating agents. The measured parameters were CPG-slope (%/min) and ADP max (%). Using the CPG-slope values from the control group, the CPG-slope cut-off value was determined to define a laboratory ASA-noneffectively treated patient. The values from control group followed a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). We calculated the cut-off value using the 1-tailed 95% confidence interval. The CPG-slope cut-off value was 79 %/min for an ASA-effectively treated patient. We marked the patients as laboratory ASA-noneffective treated when the CPG-slope was >79%/min. In the same way we defined the cut-off value for ADP-max. We identified the aspirin treatment as ineffective when the value of ADP-max was >62%. The values of CPG-slope and ADP-max were in close correlation in the group of patients treated with aspirin with a highly significant correlation index (r=0.671, P<0.001). By CPG-induced optical aggregation, 33,6% were ASA-noneffectively treated patients. When using both inductors, the proportion of ASA-noneffectively treated patients was 25%. Using both tests, 72.4% of patients were equally divided. ASA-noneffectively treated patients were commonly more obese (46.2%), had hypertension (94.9%) and hypercholesterolemia (73.7%), and were less commonly treated with statins (30.8%) than the aspirin effectively treated patients (42%, 88.2%, 59.2%, and 42.1%, respectively). The detected differences were not statistically significant. Cationic propyl gallate is an optimal inductor for optical aggregometry to monitor laboratory effectiveness of aspirin therapy in routine clinical pratice. The determined high prevalence of laboratory aspirin ineffectiveness highlights the clinical importance of the problem. This study brings attention to the importance of controlling cardiovascular risk factors.

Residual platelet reactivity is associated with clinical and laboratory characteristics in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy

A residual platelet reactivity (RPR) on antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) has been reported to be associated with adverse clinical events by some Authors. However, scarce data are present on the clinical parameters associated with this phenomenon. No study, at our knowledge, was designed with the specific aim to examine the relationship between clinical characteristics and RPR. We sought to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with RPR in patients with IHD undergoing coronary revascularization on dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy. We included in the study 868 patients undergoing a coronary angiography: 386 with acute coronary syndromes undergoing a primary coronary revascularization and 482 IHD patients scheduled to undergo an elective coronary angiography. We measured platelet function by both platelet aggregation with two agonists [0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid (AA); 2 and 10 microM adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)] and a point-of-care assay (PFA-100) on venous blood samples collected within 24 h from the end of the procedure. In patients with acute coronary syndromes and elective PCI diabetes is independently associated with RPR [group A: OR=2.9 (1.5-5.7) by 10 microM ADP, OR=5.3 (1.1-27.8) by PFA-100; group B: OR=4.0 (1.6-10.0) by 10 microM ADP]; reduced left ventricular systolic function [OR=3.7 (2.2-6.5) by AA-PA, OR=2.7 (1.6-4.6) by PFA-100], chronic use of aspirin [OR=0.2 (0.1-0.4) by AA-PA, OR=0.3 (0.2-0.5) by PFA-100] and loading dose of clopidogrel [OR=0.2 (0.06-0.5) by 10 microM ADP] were independent variables significantly associated with RPR in patients undergoing elective PCI. In addition, inflammatory status was found to be significantly associated with RPR in both groups of patients. These results provide indications for the selection of patients for whom the evaluation of platelet reactivity could be useful.

Screening for aspirin resistance in stable coronary artery patients by three different tests

BACKGROUND

Aspirin (ASA) failure to inhibit in vitro platelet function had been termed ASA resistance. The prevalence of this phenomenon as measured with different platelet function tests varies widely among studies.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we propose to determine the prevalence of ASA non-responsiveness in stable coronary artery patients using three different tests.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-one patients with a stable coronary artery disease and receiving secondary ASA prophylaxis (250 mg/day) were tested. For each patient the ASA-induced platelet inhibition was determined using three different tests: Ivy Bleeding time (BT), collagen/epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT; PFA-100, Dade-Behring) and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (uTxB2) excretion level. The agreement between these tests was evaluated by kappa statistics test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of biological ASA resistance was 15.7% (n=30), 20.4% (n=39) and 24.6% (n=47) by BT, PFA-100 and UTxB2, respectively. Only fourteen patients (7.3%) were non-responders for two tests: 6 (3.1%) BT/ PFA-100; 1 (0.5%) BT/UTxB2; 7 (3.7%) PFA-100/UTxB2). A poor agreement was found between these three methods and only 3 patients were resistant with all the tests (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

The lack of agreement supposed that different types of aspirin resistance exist. Thus, combination of two tests or more could be a primary solution for a better identification of ASA resistant patients. This hypothesis must be confirmed by a large-scale randomized study with clinically well-defined endpoints.

Prevalence of persistent platelet reactivity despite use of aspirin: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The absolute risk of recurrences among patients using aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events remains high. Persistent platelet reactivity despite aspirin therapy might explain this in part. Reported prevalences of this so-called aspirin resistance vary widely, between 0% and 57%.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to systematically review all available evidence on prevalence of aspirin resistance and to study determinants of reported prevalence.

METHODS

Using a predefined search strategy, we searched electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. To be included in our analysis, articles had to contain a laboratory definition of aspirin resistance, use aspirin as secondary prevention, and report associated prevalence.

RESULTS

We included 34 full-text articles and 8 meeting abstracts. The mean prevalence of aspirin resistance was 24% (95% CI 20%-28%). After adjustment for differences in definition, used dosage, and population, a statistically significant higher prevalence was found in studies with aspirin dosage < or =100 mg compared with > or =300 mg (36% [95% CI 28%-43%] vs 19% [95% CI 11%-26%], P < .0001). Studies measuring platelet aggregation using light aggregometry with arachidonic acid as an agonist had a pooled unadjusted prevalence of 6% (95% CI 0%-12%). In studies using point-of-care platelet function-analyzing devices, the unadjusted prevalence was significantly higher, at 26% (95% CI 21%-31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalences widely differ between studies reporting on aspirin resistance. Both aspirin dosage and the method of defining aspirin resistance strongly influence estimated prevalence, which explains found heterogeneity among studies. On average, it appears that about 1 in 4 individuals may express biochemically defined aspirin resistance.

Acetylsalicylic acid is compounding to antiplatelet effect of C-reactive protein

The contribution of inflammatory process to the modulation of platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) remains obscure. In our study, we examined the in vitro effect of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the ASA-mediated inhibition of collagen-stimulated platelet reactivity. Influence of CRP on platelet responsiveness to ASA was analysed using classical turbidimetric aggregation and flow cytometry. When acting alone, both C-reactive protein and ASA inhibited collagen-dependent platelet aggregation and reduced the expressions of two platelet surface membrane activation markers: P-selectin and activated GPIIbIIIa complex. Compared to the effects observed for ASA alone, the simultaneous action of both agents lead to further reductions in platelet aggregation (by 56.7+/-1.0% vs. 14.9+/-0.6%, p<0.0001) and lowered the expressions of platelet surface membrane P-selectin (by 72.1+/-5.3% vs. 65.0+/-6.0%, p<0.01) and activated GPIIbIIIa (by 67.0+/-5.6% vs. 47.7+/-8.3%, p<0.01). In general, our findings showed for the first time the augmenting effect of native C-reactive protein in the antiplatelet action of acetylsalicylic acid. Thus, we conclude that the effectiveness of aspirin therapy may strongly depend upon the presence of native CRP in circulation.

Aspirin resistance, an emerging, often overlooked, factor in the management of patients with coronary artery disease

Aspirin is the most widely used medication in patients with cardiovascular disease. It has had a greater effect on patients with cardiovascular disease than any other drug. With the importance of aspirin now known for decades, it is recently becoming clearer that some patients do not derive as great a benefit from this "wonder drug" secondary to their resistance to its effects. Aspirin resistance, its prevalence, its identification, and how to overcome or avert it with other medications then becomes a central topic of discussion as important, if not more so, than the importance of aspirin itself as a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. This review explores the current understanding of the mechanism of aspirin resistance with regard to its prevalence and the magnitude of its clinical significance. It also examines the therapeutic implications of a diagnosis of aspirin resistance.

Aspirin resistance measured by cationic propyl gallate platelet aggregometry and recurrent cardiovascular events during 4 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Aspirin resistance appears to be an important prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease, yet there is no standardized method to measure it and limited data on its correlation to clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In a prospective study we followed 103 patients (mean age 64 years) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST segment elevation who were treated with 100 mg of aspirin (ASA) daily. Optical platelet aggregometry using cationic propyl gallate (CPG) as an inductor was measured at ACS onset and after 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. ASA responsiveness was defined both by the slope of the aggregation curve (<53%/min) and by spontaneous aggregation (<5%). The primary outcomes were the recurrence of ACS or stroke.

RESULTS

Patients with ACS exhibited a greater prevalence of ASA resistance (55%) than healthy volunteers (4%; p<0.01). ASA resistance occurred more often in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertriacylglycerolemia, and decreased HDL levels, and in smokers (p<0.05). A single assessment of platelet aggregometry was sufficient to identify ASA-resistant patients. During the 4-year follow-up, the patients with ASA resistance had an 88% incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events versus 46% for the patients without ASA resistance (p<0.01). In the subgroup with recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events, significantly more patients were ASA-resistant than in the subgroup without recurrent CV events (72% vs. 8%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

ASA resistance measured by CPG-induced platelet aggregometry is more common among patients with ACS and some metabolic risk factors, and ASA-resistant patients have a significantly higher recurrence of cardiovascular events.