The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: a trial of cholesterol reduction in Scottish men

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women

Ischemic heart disease is the primary cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in both men and women. Strategies targeting traditional modifiable risk factors are essential - including hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus - particularly for atherosclerosis, but additionally for stroke, heart failure and some arrhythmias. However, challenges related to education, screening and equitable access to effective preventative therapies persist, and are particularly problematic for women around the globe and those from lower socioeconomic groups. The association of female-specific risk factors (e.g. premature menopause, gestational hypertension, small for gestational age births) with CVD provides a potential window for targeted prevention strategies. However, further evidence for specific effective screening and interventions is urgently required. In addition to population-level factors involved in increasing the risk of suffering a CVD event, efforts are leveraging the enormous potential of blood-based 'omics', improved imaging biomarkers and increasingly complex bioinformatic analytic approaches to strive toward more personalized early disease detection and personalized preventative therapies. These novel tactics may be particularly relevant for women in whom traditional risk factors perform poorly. Here we discuss established and emerging approaches for improving risk assessment, early disease detection and effective preventative strategies to reduce the mammoth burden of CVD in women.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people with coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014, which included 50 studies (45,285 participants).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD not requiring dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 4 October 2023. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. An updated search will be undertaken every three months.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on death, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 90 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous benefits and harms with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 studies (50,725 randomised participants); of these, 53 studies (42,752 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 2 to 64.8 months), the median dosage of statin was equivalent to 20 mg/day of simvastatin, and participants had a median eGFR of 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. Ten studies (7973 participants) compared two different statin regimens. We were able to meta-analyse 43 studies (41,273 participants). Most studies had limited reporting and hence exhibited unclear risk of bias in most domains. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statins prevent major cardiovascular events (14 studies, 36,156 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79; I2 = 39%; high certainty evidence), death (13 studies, 34,978 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96; I² = 53%; high certainty evidence), cardiovascular death (8 studies, 19,112 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87; I² = 0%; high certainty evidence) and myocardial infarction (10 studies, 9475 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). There were too few events to determine if statins made a difference in hospitalisation due to heart failure. Statins probably make little or no difference to stroke (7 studies, 9115 participants: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.08; I² = 39%; moderate certainty evidence) and kidney failure (3 studies, 6704 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Potential harms from statins were limited by a lack of systematic reporting. Statins compared to placebo may have little or no effect on elevated liver enzymes (7 studies, 7991 participants: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60; I² = 37%; low certainty evidence), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). However, few studies reported rhabdomyolysis or elevated creatinine kinase; hence, we are unable to determine the effect due to very low certainty evidence. Statins reduce the risk of death, major cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction in people with CKD who did not have cardiovascular disease at baseline (primary prevention). There was insufficient data to determine the benefits and harms of the type of statin therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins reduce death and major cardiovascular events by about 20% and probably make no difference to stroke or kidney failure in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. However, due to limited reporting, the effect of statins on elevated creatinine kinase or rhabdomyolysis is unclear. Statins have an important role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and death in people who have CKD and do not require dialysis. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. We will search for new evidence every three months and update the review when we identify relevant new evidence. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Doctors' Drugs and the Dangers of Dental Decay

Many "anti-something" medications, which are prescribed by medical doctors for older patients, often for dubious reasons, result in a serious reduction in the quantity and quality of saliva. That drug-induced xerostomia can produce dangerous dental decay, particularly in already compromised dentitions.This article suggests that doctors should undertake a personalised "benefits, risks, alternatives, nothing" (BRAN) analysis including an assessment of the possible dental decay risks, especially before prescribing combinations of "anti-" drugs for marginal conditions.Doctors should consider carefully if alternative approaches are feasible which could produce acceptable outcomes without incurring those serious dental decay risks. Alternative approaches may include patients altering their diet and lifestyle to include more physical exercise for controlling conditions such as marginal hypertension, for example, or perhaps prescribing counselling/talking therapies for depression or anxiety.If various "anti-" drugs really do have to be prescribed, this article describes cheap, pragmatic, and effective ways of mitigating the risks of already compromised dentitions developing new decay.

Undertreatment or Overtreatment With Statins: Where Are We?

Statins, in addition to healthy lifestyle interventions, are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy. Other low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering drugs include ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and PCSK9 inhibitors. As new evidence emerges from new clinical trials, therapeutic goals change, leading to renewed clinical guidelines. Nowadays, LDL goals are getting lower, leading to the "lower is better" paradigm in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) management. Several observational studies have shown that LDL-C control in real life is suboptimal in both primary and secondary preventions. It is critical to enhance the adherence to guideline recommendations through shared decision-making between clinicians and patients, with patient engagement in selecting interventions based on individual values, preferences, and associated conditions and comorbidities. This narrative review summarizes the evidence regarding the benefits of lipid-lowering drugs in reducing cardiovascular events, the pleiotropic effect of statins, real-world data on overtreatment and undertreatment of lipid-lowering therapies, and the changing LDL-C in targets in the clinical guidelines of dyslipidemias over the years.

Risk of dementia in patients with periodontitis and related protective factors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of dementia in patients with periodontitis and its associated factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database, we identified 56,018 patients aged ≥50 years with newly diagnosed periodontitis in 2000-2008. A cohort of 56,018 adults without periodontitis was selected for comparison, with matching by age and sex. Both cohorts were followed from 2000 to the end of 2013, and incident dementia was identified during the follow-up period. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of dementia associated with periodontitis were calculated in the multivariate regressions.

RESULTS

Periodontitis was associated with dementia risk (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.67-1.93), and the association between periodontitis and dementia risk was significant in men, women, and people aged more than 60 years. Among patients with periodontitis, the use of statins (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.87), metformin (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62), and influenza vaccination (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61-0.74) were associated with a reduced risk of dementia, while diabetes, mental disorders, and stroke were major significant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodontitis was a risk factor for dementia, while the use of statins and metformin may reduce the risk of dementia.

Infográficos para decisão compartilhada no uso de estatinas em paciente de alto risco cardiovascular

Objetivos: Elaborar infográficos para decisão compartilhada sobre o benefício e risco do uso de estatinas como prevenção primária em pacientes com alto risco cardiovascular. Métodos: A partir do “the NNT”, que analisou o uso de estatinas para prevenção primária em pessoas de baixo risco cardiovascular a partir de meta-análises do US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) e da Cochrane, buscou-se definir o balanço de risco e benefício dessa terapia na prevenção primária de pessoas com alto risco. Como o USPSTF e a Cochrane tinham 10 estudos primários diferentes incluídos em suas análises e populações com risco cardiovascular variável, foi realizada uma busca adicional por revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises publicadas desde a data da revisão Cochrane (dezembro de 2012) até outubro de 2017. Buscou-se no Medline via PubMed, na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, na Cochrane e no NHS Evidence por estudos de pessoas com risco cardiovascular estimado em 10 anos de mais de 10% com mais um fator de risco ou com mais de 20%, sem história de doença cardiovascular prévia, que comparassem o uso de estatina com placebo ou nenhum tratamento. Os desfechos deveriam ser a redução de doenças cardio e cerebrovasculares, da mortalidade cardiovascular ou geral e a ocorrência de eventos adversos. Resultados: Foram encontrados 225 estudos entre meta-análises e revisões sistemáticas elaboradas desde dezembro de 2012 até outubro de 2017. Foram excluídos 224 estudos por motivos diversos. Selecionou-se para elaboração do infográfico de benefícios o Statins for primary prevention, 2012, com população de 100% de diabéticos sem eventos cardiovasculares prévios com redução de risco absoluto (RRA) quanto a AVC fatal de 0,78 pontos percentuais/NNT 128 e Doenças Cardio/Cerebrovasculares RRA 2,6 pontos percentuais/NNT 39, cardiovascular. Quanto à redução de mortalidade geral (RR 0,79; IC95% 0,58-1,08) e revascularização (RR 0,74; IC 95% 0,55-1,00) não foi encontrada diferença estatística significante. Devido às limitações encontradas nas revisões sistemáticas avaliadas, não foi possível compilar dados, no formato de infográfico, sobre a incidência de diabetes e abandono de terapia. Assim, para elaboração da parte referente a danos, foi selecionado o ECR Aspen, com população de diabéticos de alto risco para desenvolvimento de eventos cardiovasculares, sem eventos prévios, quanto à mialgia com aumento do risco absoluto (ARA) de 1,43 pontos percentuais/NND 70 (RR 1,91; IC95% 1,03-3,53). Conclusão: Foi elaborado infográfico, com e sem uso de estatina, para desfechos cardiocerebrovasculares não fatais, AVC fatal, necessidade de revascularização, mortalidade geral e para ocorrência adversa de sintomas musculares. Esse instrumento pode ser utilizado na Atenção Primária durante o encontro clínico visando à tomada de decisão compartilhada, facilitando a compreensão dos riscos e benefícios do uso de estatina em pacientes de alto risco cardiovascular (RCV 10% com pelo menos um fator de risco adicional ou > 20 % em 10 anos), diabéticos, nos quais a prescrição de estatina seja cogitada.

Statins for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, may be potentially preventable with statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review benefits and harms of statins for prevention of CVD to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE (from 1946), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from 1991), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from 2005) to June 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials of statins vs placebo, fixed-dose vs titrated statins, and higher- vs lower-intensity statins in adults without prior cardiovascular events.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

One investigator abstracted data, a second checked data for accuracy, and 2 investigators independently assessed study quality using predefined criteria. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause mortality, CVD-related morbidity or mortality, and harms.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials (n = 71 344 participants [range, 95-17 802]; mean age, 51-66 years) compared statins vs placebo or no statin. Statin therapy was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.93]; I2 = 0%; absolute risk difference [ARD], -0.40% [95% CI, -0.64% to -0.17%]), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88]; I2 = 54%; ARD, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.75% to -0.11%]), stroke (RR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.82]; I2 = 0; ARD, -0.38% [95% CI, -0.53% to -0.23%]), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.71]; I2 = 0%; ARD, -0.81% [95% CI, -1.19 to -0.43%]), and composite cardiovascular outcomes (RR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.78]; I2 = 36%; ARD, -1.39% [95% CI, -1.79 to -0.99%]). Relative benefits appeared consistent in demographic and clinical subgroups, including populations without marked hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol level <200 mg/dL); absolute benefits were higher in subgroups at higher baseline risk. Statins were not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04]), myalgias (RR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16]), or liver-related harms (RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.35]). In pooled analysis, statins were not associated with increased risk of diabetes (RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.20]), although statistical heterogeneity was present (I2 = 52%), and 1 trial found high-intensity statins associated with increased risk (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.49]). No trial directly compared titrated vs fixed-dose statins, and there were no clear differences based on statin intensity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In adults at increased CVD risk but without prior CVD events, statin therapy was associated with reduced risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and CVD events, with greater absolute benefits in patients at greater baseline risk.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), for whom the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people who have existing coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review published in 2009, and includes evidence from 27 new studies (25,068 participants) in addition to the 26 studies (20,324 participants) assessed previously; and excludes three previously included studies (107 participants). This updated review includes 50 studies (45,285 participants); of these 38 (37,274 participants) were meta-analysed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits (such as reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, MI and stroke; and slow progression of CKD to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)) and harms (muscle and liver dysfunction, withdrawal, and cancer) of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD who were not on dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 5 June 2012 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD not on dialysis were the focus of our literature searches.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipids, creatinine clearance and proteinuria) and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (major cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or non-fatal stroke, ESKD, elevated liver enzymes, rhabdomyolysis, cancer and withdrawal rates) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 50 studies (45,285 participants): 47 studies (39,820 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment and three studies (5547 participants) compared two different statin regimens in adults with CKD who were not yet on dialysis. We were able to meta-analyse 38 studies (37,274 participants).The risk of bias in the included studies was high. Seven studies comparing statins with placebo or no treatment had lower risk of bias overall; and were conducted according to published protocols, outcomes were adjudicated by a committee, specified outcomes were reported, and analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat methods. In placebo or no treatment controlled studies, adverse events were reported in 32 studies (68%) and systematically evaluated in 16 studies (34%).Compared with placebo, statin therapy consistently prevented major cardiovascular events (13 studies, 36,033 participants; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79), all-cause mortality (10 studies, 28,276 participants; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91), cardiovascular death (7 studies, 19,059 participants; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87) and MI (8 studies, 9018 participants; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.72). Statins had uncertain effects on stroke (5 studies, 8658 participants; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.12).Potential harms from statin therapy were limited by lack of systematic reporting and were uncertain in analyses that had few events: elevated creatine kinase (7 studies, 4514 participants; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.48), liver function abnormalities (7 studies, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 130).Statins had uncertain effects on progression of CKD. Data for relative effects of intensive cholesterol lowering in people with early stages of kidney disease were sparse. Statins clearly reduced risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and MI in people with CKD who did not have CVD at baseline (primary prevention).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins consistently lower death and major cardiovascular events by 20% in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Statin-related effects on stroke and kidney function were found to be uncertain and adverse effects of treatment are incompletely understood. Statins have an important role in primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in people who have CKD.

Atorvastatin reduces malondialdehyde concentrations in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that there is an increase in oxidative stress in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Statins are considered to have a pleiotropic effect other than their lipid-lowering effect. These effects may be mediated in part by reducing oxidative stress.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of atorvastatin on serum malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations as a marker of oxidative stress in patients with PCOS. Forty medication-naïve patients with PCOS were randomized to either atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo for 3 months. A 3-month extension study for both groups of patients was undertaken with metformin 1500 mg daily after completing initial 3 months of atorvastatin or placebo.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease of MDA concentrations with atorvastatin [mean (sem)] [0.29 (0.04) vs. 0.25 (0.02) μmol/liter; P < 0.01] compared with placebo [0.28 (0.02) vs. 0.29 (0.12) μmol/liter; P = 0.52]. Three months treatment with metformin resulted in further reduction of MDA levels with atorvastatin compared with baseline [0.25 (0.02) baseline vs. 0.23 (0.03) μmol/liter for atorvastatin treated; P = 0.02]. There was also a significant correlation between the reduction in MDA with a reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), an increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD; r = -0.68, P = 0.02), and a reduction in testosterone levels (r = 0.63, P = 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed Δ25OHD, ΔC-reactive protein, and Δtestosterone were independent predictors of changes in MDA after atorvastatin treatment. No correlation was observed between the reductions in serum MDA concentrations with changes in the lipid parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve weeks of atorvastatin led to a significant reduction in oxidative stress as determined by MDA concentrations among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome that was independently predicted by changes in testosterone, 25OHD, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Statin utilization according to indication and age: a Danish cohort study on changing prescribing and purchasing behaviour

OBJECTIVE

Introduced to reduce mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), statins are now recommended for a range of other conditions, including asymptomatic individuals without cardiovascular disease or diabetes. The aim was to describe trends in Danish statin utilization according to indication and age during 1996-2009, and to analyse changing prescribing and purchasing behaviour during time intervals (driver periods) a priori defined by potential influential factors.

METHODS

A nationwide cohort (N=4,998,580) was followed in Danish individual-level registries. Based on a hierarchy of register markers of indications for statin prescribing, we analysed incidence and prevalence of use by age and indication (age ≥ 40). Applying Poisson regression, we calculated Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) of statin treatment for the last year of each driver period, applying the first year as reference.

RESULTS

Treatment prevalence increased from 7/1000 to 187/1000, representing a shift towards lower-level indications and increased relatively more in individuals aged 75+. While treatment prevalence in MI-patients reached 780/1000, asymptomatic individuals represented 50% of incident statin-users in 2009. A marked increase in incidence of statin use occurred during 1999-2003 (IRR=3.05) across all indications, followed by a more moderate rise during 2003-2006 (IRR=1.29) and 2006-2008 (IRR=1.15) - most marked increases in asymptomatic individuals. A sudden decrease was observed in 2009 (IRR=0.82) for all indications and ages.

CONCLUSION

While patent expiry and lower prices most likely boosted the general increase in statin utilization, the gradually altered indication and age pattern seems to be driven by guidelines, influencing both reimbursement rules and general healthcare policies. A media debate on statin side effects may have modified the general attitudes.

Rosuvastatin: a review of the pharmacology and clinical effectiveness in cardiovascular disease

Rosuvastatin is a new generation HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which exhibits some unique pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties. It has low extrahepatic tissue penetration, low potential for CYP3A4 interactions and substantial LDL-C lowering capacity and therefore has distinct advantages. We conducted a Medline literature search to identify rosuvastatin papers published in English. In this review, we outline the pharmacology of rosuvastatin, highlighting its efficacy and safety. We also review the major clinical trials with reference to primary and secondary prevention, familial hypercholesterolaemia and comparison with other statins. Finally we address its place in clinical practice.

Cholesterol-lowering strategies reduce vascular LRP1 overexpression induced by hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND

Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP1) plays a key role on vascular functionality and is upregulated by hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. To investigate the effect of cholesterol-lowering interventions on vascular LRP1 over expression and whether simvastatin influences LRP1 expression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Male New Zealand rabbits were recruited into various groups, one group was fed a normal chow diet for 28 days (control group, n = 6), other group (n = 24) was fed a hypercholesterolemic diet (HC), six rabbits were euthanized at day 28 to test the capacity of HC diet to induce early atherosclerosis and the rest at day 60 (n = 18) after receiving either HC diet (HC group, n = 6), HC diet with simvastatin (2·5 mg/kg.day) (HC+simv group, n = 6), or a normal chow diet (NC group, n = 6) for the last 32 days.

RESULTS

High-cholesterol diet raised vascular LRP1 concomitantly with increased lipid, VSMC and macrophage content in the arterial intima. Simvastatin and return to normocholesterolemic diet significantly reduced systemic cholesterol levels and vascular lipid content. Interestingly, these interventions also downregulate LRP1 overexpression in the vascular wall although to a different extent (HC+simv: 75 ± 3·6%vs NC: 50 ± 3·5% versus, P = 0·002). Immunohistochemistry studies showed that LRP1 diminushion was associated to a reduction in the number of intimal VSMC in HC+simv.group. Simvastatin per se did not exert any significant effect on LRP1 expression in rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells (rSMC).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that cholesterol-lowering interventions exerted down regulatory effects on vascular LRP1 over expression induced by hypercholesterolemia and that simvastatin did not influence LRP1 expression beyond its cholesterol-lowering effects.

Atorvastatin increases 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that many women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) insufficient. Both statin treatment and vitamin D supplementation have been shown to improve biochemical hyperandrogenemia, insulin resistance, and markers of inflammation in patients with PCOS, raising the possibility that some of the statin effects are mediated through vitamin D.

METHODS

We conducted this randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study to assess the effect of atorvastatin on serum 25OHD concentrations in patients with PCOS. Forty medication-naive patients with PCOS were randomized to either atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo for 3 months. After completing the initial 3 months of atorvastatin or placebo, both groups of patients participated in a 3-month extension study with metformin 1500 mg daily. We measured changes in 25OHD concentrations by use of tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) baseline 25OHD concentrations were comparable between the 2 groups [45.9 (2.4) vs 44.8 (1.8) nmol/L; P = 0.7]. There was a significant increase in 25OHD concentrations with atorvastatin [45.9 (2.4) vs 60.8 (3.5) nmol/L] compared with placebo [44.8 (1.8) vs 41.8 (3.2) nmol/L; P = 0.02]. Three-month treatment with metformin maintained the improvement of 25OHD with atorvastatin compared to baseline [45.9 (2.4) vs 61.8 (3.5), P ≤ 0.01). There were no significant changes in 25OHD concentrations in the placebo group after 12 weeks of metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, 12 weeks of atorvastatin led to a clinically significant rise in 25OHD concentrations. This may represent a beneficial pleiotropic effect of statins on 25OHD concentrations.

Atorvastatin enhances humoral immune responses but does not alter renal injury in experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis

AIM

Statins are widely used for their cholesterol-lowering effects and for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Evidence indicates that these drugs also have immunomodulatory and other non-lipid lowering effects, with studies suggesting benefit in some animal models of immune (particularly T helper (Th)1)-mediated inflammatory disease and their corresponding human disease counterparts. We sought to evaluate the immunomodulatory effects and therapeutic potential of atorvastatin in experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis, a Th1-predominant animal model of glomerulonephritis.

METHODS

Autologous phase, anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by intravenous injection of sheep anti-mouse glomerular basement membrane globulin. Mice were administered atorvastatin (10 or 100 mg/kg) or control (phosphate-buffered saline) daily by oral gavage. Immune responses and renal injury were assessed after 21 days.

RESULTS

Compared with control-treated mice, treatment with atorvastatin did not alter renal injury (serum creatinine, proteinuria, glomerular crescent formation) or glomerular leukocytic infiltration (CD4(+) T cells or macrophages). Atorvastatin resulted in a dose-related increase in circulating serum antibody to the disease-inducing antigen but no differences in antigen-stimulated splenocyte production of Th1/Th2 cytokines. At the higher dose, atorvastatin also led to a significant reduction in apoptosis of splenic CD4(+) T lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that statins modulate humoral responses and alter splenic CD4(+) T cell apoptosis. However, atorvastatin does not lead to significant changes in T helper cell polarization or renal injury in experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis.

Benefit of statins in daily practice? A six-year retrospective observational study

This observational retrospective study analysed the association of adherence to statins with the achievement of a target total cholesterol level (CL, <200mg/dl), and any association of adherence with the time to first hospital admission for coronary event in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, in one Italian Local Health Authority between 1998 and 2003. The study population consisted of 3516 patients who were prescribed statins and for whom full cholesterol results were available. After three months of treatment, there were significant reductions in CL (p<0.001) in the three treatment groups stratified by adherence (good adherents -24%, poor adherents -22%, and nonadherents -14%). Patients more likely to achieve the target CL were older, male and more adherent to the statins. The risk of first hospitalization was associated positively with increased age and male gender. Patients with co-treatments were more likely to be hospitalized. Surprisingly, better adherence to statin treatment increased the risk of hospitalization.

Statins in endothelial signaling and activation

The beneficial effects of statins, the most widely prescribed class of drugs in the world, are now recognized to extend well beyond their lipid-lowering properties. Through a combination of both distinct and interdependent effects on endothelial cell (EC) Rho GTPase regulation, NAPDH oxidase activity, NO bioavailability, and differential gene expression, statins confer significant protection of the vasculature. Abundant in vitro data, in addition to myriad reports relying on a range of animal models, now firmly support the idea that these drugs may serve as novel and effective therapeutic agents in a variety of disease states characterized by vascular dysfunction.

Simvastatin reduces myocardial infarct size via increased nitric oxide production in normocholesterolemic rabbits

OBJECTIVE

Statins have been reported to be protective against myocardial infarction (MI). Moreover, statin drugs upregulate nitric oxide (NO) in coronary artery independent of lipid-lowering effects. However their precise mechanism for MI-protection is unclear. We investigated the effect of lipophilic statin administration in a normocholesterolemic rabbit MI model.

METHODS

Nω-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME, 10 mg/kg) or vehicle alone was intravenously administered 20 min before inducing ischemia, followed by intravenous administration of simvastatin (5 mg/kg) or saline 10 min before ischemia. Rabbits then underwent 30 min of coronary occlusion followed by 48 h of reperfusion. The at-risk and infarct areas were calculated as a percentage of the total left ventricular slice area.

RESULTS

Determination of infarct size revealed that pre-ischemic treatment with simvastatin reduced infarct size (30.5 ± 4%) in comparison to controls (45.0 ± 3%) (P < 0.05). This infarct size-reducing effect of simvastatin could be completely abrogated by pretreatment with L-NAME (42.0 ± 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-ischemic treatment with simvastatin reduces MI size via NO production. Simvastatin could be a useful drug for coronary artery disease patients without dyslipidemia as it has direct protective effects.

Statin therapy in the treatment of Alzheimer disease: what is the rationale?

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that is manifested by cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and diffuse structural abnormalities in the brain. Its prevalence is predicted to rise 4-fold in the next 50 years. AD is characterized pathologically by deposition of extracellular beta-amyloid and accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles. Neuronal death and specific neurotransmitter deficits also are part of the pathologic picture. Strategies to delay symptom progression have focused on addressing the neurotransmitter deficits. Strategies to delay the onset or biologic progression of AD largely have targeted the plaques formed by the deposition of beta-amyloid. AD and cardiovascular disease share common risk factors, notably hypercholesterolemia, and occur together more often than expected by chance. Therapy with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) is the first-line treatment option for hypercholesterolemia, and observational studies have suggested that the risk of AD is reduced in patients who receive statin therapy in midlife. This reduction in risk of AD observed with statin therapy may be due to statins reducing beta-amyloid formation and deposition or to their known anti-inflammatory effects. Two randomized double-blind statin trials in patients with AD to assess the potential for statins to slow disease progression are currently under way. If successful, statin AD primary prevention trials may be developed.

Benefits of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is expected to increase dramatically over the next decade. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at a much greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than are nondiabetic individuals. Consequently, the treatment of CVD risk factors is a healthcare priority in this patient population. Dyslipidemia is a major cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in patients with type 2 diabetes, and it is characterized by elevated triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and a preponderance of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Subgroup analyses of clinical trial data suggest that treatment of the entire range of lipid abnormalities may reduce CV risk in this patient population. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are the best therapy for LDL cholesterol reduction. A number of statin trials have shown significant CV risk reduction through LDL cholesterol lowering in subgroups of patients with diabetes. The recently published Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), a placebo-controlled trial conducted solely in patients with type 2 diabetes, terminated 2 years earlier than its anticipated length owing to the significant reduction in number of CV events observed in patients randomized to receive low-dose atorvastatin versus placebo. These results suggest that low-dose statin therapy with atorvastatin results in significant reduction of CV events in patients with type 2 diabetes without prior CVD or high LDL cholesterol levels. Based on this evidence, patients with type 2 diabetes may be candidates for statin therapy regardless of LDL cholesterol level and in the absence of a previous CV event.

Statins and fibrates for preventing melanoma

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment for advanced melanoma is lacking. While no drug therapy currently exists for prevention of melanoma, in vitro, case-control, and animal model evidence suggest that lipid-lowering medications, commonly taken for high cholesterol, might prevent melanoma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of statin or fibrate lipid-lowering medications on melanoma outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (February 2003), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (to March 2003), EMBASE (to September 2003), CANCERLIT (to October 2002), Web of Science (to May 2003), and reference lists of articles. We approached study investigators and pharmaceutical companies for additional information (published or unpublished studies).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials involving random allocation of study participants, where experimental groups used statins or fibrates and participants were enrolled for at least four years of therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors screened 109 abstracts of articles with titles of possible relevance. We then thoroughly examined the full text of 72 potentially relevant articles. We requested unpublished melanoma outcomes data from the corresponding author of each qualifying trial.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 16 qualifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (seven statin, nine fibrate). Thirteen of these trials (involving 62,197 participants) provided data on incident melanomas (six statin, seven fibrate). A total of 66 melanomas were reported in groups receiving the experimental drug and 86 in groups receiving placebo or other control therapies. For statin trials this translated to an odds ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.44) and for fibrate trials an odds ratio of 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.82). Subgroup analyses failed to show statistically significant differences in melanoma outcomes by gender, melanoma occurrence after two years of participation in trial, stage or histology, or trial funding. Subgroup analysis by type of fibrate or statin also failed to show statistically significant differences, except for the statin subgroup analysis which showed reduced melanoma incidence for lovastatin, based on one trial only (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.99).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The melanoma outcomes data collected in this review of RCTs of statins and fibrates does not exclude the possibility that these drugs prevent melanoma. There was a 10% and 42% reduction for participants on statins and fibrates, respectively, however these results were not statistically significant. Until further evidence is established, limiting exposure to ultraviolet radiation remains the most effective way to reduce the risk of melanoma.

Statins in hypercholesterolaemia: a dose-specific meta-analysis of lipid changes in randomised, double blind trials

Background

Statins alter lipid concentrations. This systematic review determined the efficacy of particular statins, in terms of their ability to alter cholesterol.

Review methods

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, references lists of reports, and reviews were searched (September 2001) for randomised, double blind trials of statins for cholesterol in trials of 12 weeks or longer. Mean change in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides was calculated using pooled data for particular statins, and for particular doses of a statin. Pre-planned sensitivity analyses were used to determine the effects of initial concentration of total cholesterol, study duration, the effects of major trials, and effects in placebo versus active controlled trials. Information was not collected on adverse events.

Results

Different statins at a range of doses reduced total cholesterol by 17–35% and LDL-cholesterol by 24–49% from baseline. Lower doses of statins generally produced less cholesterol lowering, though for most statins in trials of 12 weeks or longer there was at best only a weak relationship between dose and cholesterol reduction. Duration of treatment and baseline total cholesterol concentration did not alter the amount of the benefit attained.

Conclusions

Statins are effective medicines and confer benefit to patients in terms of primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Reductions in total cholesterol of 25% or more and LDL cholesterol of more than 30% were recorded for fixed doses of simvastatin 40 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, and rosuvastatin 5 mg and 10 mg.

Antiarrhythmic effects of omega-3 fatty acids: from epidemiology to bedside

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are emerging as a safe and effective means to reduce sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. This review summarizes the epidemiological background for the use of omega-3 fatty acids with this indication, clinical trials performed so far, and experimental data supporting their antiarrhythmic efficacy.

Hepatotoxicity of hypolipidemic drugs

Dyslipidemic conditions and their cardiovascular related complications are common. Effective primary and secondary prevention strategies include therapies to lower LDL and total cholesterol and to increase HDL. Further, it seems that there is a need for therapeutic reduction in triglycerides as it emerges as an independent risk factor for CVD. Many clinical trials have been designed to evaluate pharmacologic compounds in the treatment of the dyslipidemias and they seem to have shown a safe profile, both in the experiment phases and in post-marketing observation studies. Nevertheless, sporadic reports of hepatotoxicity with statins and niacin still arise (Table 2). Although routine hepatic biochemical test monitoring is recommended, the cost-effectiveness is questionable because often these reactions are idiosyncratic and may not be identified by this routine screening. The risk/benefit ratio is in favor of using these medications in individuals at risk. There is no evidence to suggest intrinsic hepatotoxic activity as such. Drugs that lower triglycerides such as fibrates, have been observed to improve hepatic biochemical tests, although in small series. This leads to speculation whether treatment with fibrates would be beneficial for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition that is emerging as one of enormous magnitude.

Behavioral medicine in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease

Cardiac behavioral medicine is the application of behavioral and psychosocial principles to the prevention and treatment of heart disease. Most biomedical cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., high blood lipids, high blood pressure, diabetes) require behavioral and medical interventions. Other risks, including obesity, high-fat eating pattern, smoking, and inactivity, clearly require lifestyle change. Behavioral medicine screening and intervention have been applied to psychosocial risk factors such as depression, hostility, and social isolation. Appropriate assessment of risk factors is essential because research has demonstrated successful prevention of heart disease and reduction of morbidity and mortality in patients with existing disease. Behavioral interventions have been beneficial in improving cardiac outcomes by enhancing compliance with medication taking and dietary/exercise recommendations. Future needs include the study of psychosocial factors in women and ethnic minorities with heart disease and the integration of behavioral medicine with newer medical technologies designed to detect subclinical biomarkers of heart disease.

Fenofibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a review of the data as they relate to the new suprabioavailable tablet formulation

BACKGROUND

The fibric acid derivative fenofibrate is indicated as an adjunct to dietary modification in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia, Fredrickson classification) to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein (apo) B, and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A. It is also indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (types IV and V hyperlipidemia). Initially approved in the United States in a micronized capsule formulation, fenofibrate is now available in a new "suprabioavailable" tablet formulation that has increased bioavailability, achieving equivalent plasma concentrations at lower doses. The 67- and 200-mg micronized capsules can be considered equivalent to the 54- and 160-mg suprabioavailable tablets, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties, clinical usefulness, and safety profile of fenofibrate in the management of dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Recent studies, abstracts, reviews, and consensus statements published in the English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2002), and PharmaProjects (1990-January 2002) using the search terms fenofibrate, fibrates, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate is well absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma levels attained in 6 to 8 hours. The absolute bioavailability of fenofibrate cannot be determined due to its being virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection; however, after oral administration of a single dose of radiolabeled fenofibrate, approximately 60% of the dose appeared in urine, primarily as fenofibric acid and its glucuronated conjugate, and approximately 25% was excreted in the feces. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.89 L/kg in healthy volunteers, and protein binding is approximately 99% in healthy and hyperlipidemic patients. Neither fenofibrate nor fenofibric acid appears to undergo significant oxidative metabolism in vivo. Fenofibric acid has a half-life of 20 hours. Fenofibrate is effective in lowering TG levels and increasing HDL-C levels. Its LDL-C-lowering effect is greater than that of gemfibrozil. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates, including gastrointestinal symptoms, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, myositis, and rash. Fenofibrate therapy has been associated with increases in serum aminotransferase levels, and clinical monitoring of these markers of liver function should be performed regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate is effective in reducing levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C, and increasing levels of HDL-C in patients with dyslipidemias. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Its use is accompanied by a low incidence of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities. Fenofibrate protects against coronary heart disease not only through its effects on lipid parameters but also by producing alterations in LDL structure and, possibly, alterations in the various hemostatic parameters. Its uricosuric property may prove to be a useful adjunctive attribute.

The effect of probucol on atherosclerosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic-hyperlipidemic APA hamsters in different stages of atherosclerosis

We investigated the effect of probucol (PB) on atherosclerosis in streptozotocin (SZ)-induced diabetic-hyperlipidemic APA hamsters in three different stages, the early, middle and late stages of atherosclerosis. Male APA hamsters were injected intraperitoneally with SZ or vehicle alone (citrate buffer; CB) as a control at the age of 8 weeks. At 6 weeks after injection (WAI) of SZ or CB (the early stage), 14 WAI (the middle stage) and 26 WAI (the late stage), animals were assigned to PB treated- or non-treated groups (CBPB, SZPB, CB, SZ). After 8 weeks of PB administration with diet, the aorta was taken from each animal for assessment of atheromatous lesions and blood samples were subjected to serum biochemical analysis and the measurement of blood lipid peroxide (LPO). In the middle stage, PB treatment significantly decreased serum total cholesterol level, slightly decreased LPO, and also tended to reduce the lesion area, although no statistical difference was seen. There was no marked effect of PB treatment in the early and late stages. These findings suggest that single use of PB has little effect on atherosclerosis of a hyperglycemia-hyperlipidemia animal model.

Pharmacology of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), including rosuvastatin and pitavastatin

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world, with hypercholesterolemia as the major risk factor. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors represent the most efficient drugsfor the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. They lower plasma cholesterol due to the inhibition of endogenous cholesterol synthesis in the liverand subsequent increased expression of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, resulting in an up-regulated catabolic rate for plasma LDL. The beneficial effect of statins on the incidence of CHD was clearly demonstrated in several large-scale clinical trials. Currently, five statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) are available, and two novel compounds (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin) are undergoing clinical investigation. To point out potential mechanisms leading to increased toxicity and to compare the novel statins with the established ones, this article summarizes their pharmacological data since the prevalence of adverse events can be explained at least in part by their pharmacokinetic differences.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, hyperlipidaemia, and atherosclerosis

Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor in the development of atherosclerosis, and lipid lowering is achieved clinically using fibrate drugs and statins. Fibrate drugs are ligands for the fatty acid receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, and the lipid-lowering effects of this class of drugs are mediated by the control of lipid metabolism, as directed by PPARalpha. PPARalpha ligands also mediate potentially protective changes in the expression of several proteins that are not involved in lipid metabolism, but are implicated in the pathogenesis of heart disease. Clinical studies with bezafibrate and gemfibrozil support the hypothesis that these drugs may have a significant protective effect against cardiovascular disease. The thiazolidinedione group of insulin-sensitising drugs are PPARgamma ligands, and these have beneficial effects on serum lipids in diabetic patients and have also been shown to inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models. However, their efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular-associated mortality has yet to be determined. Recent studies have found that PPARdelta is also a regulator of serum lipids. However, there are currently no drugs in clinical use that selectively activate this receptor. It is clear that all three forms of PPARs have mechanistically different modes of lipid lowering and that drugs currently available have not been optimised on the basis of PPAR biology. A new generation of rationally designed PPAR ligands may provide substantially improved drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Clinical profile and long-term prognosis of women < or = 50 years of age referred for coronary angiography for evaluation of chest pain

A significant lack of information exists regarding risk factors, preventive strategies, diagnostic testing, and treatment of women with coronary artery disease (CAD), especially in the young age group. We studied the clinical profile, angiographic results, and long-term follow-up of 135 women aged < or =50 years referred for coronary angiography because of chest pain. The most prominent risk factor was hyperlipidemia (60%), followed by a family history of coronary disease (44%), systemic hypertension (40%), cigarette smoking (31%), postmenopausal state (23%), and diabetes mellitus (21%). Angiographically significant CAD was demonstrated in 79 of 135 patients (58%), most of whom (61%) had 1-vessel CAD. Women with compared to those without significant CAD had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (71% vs 45%; p = 0.002) and of the post-menopausal state (30% vs 16%; p = 0.028). There was no difference in the incidence of positive noninvasive evaluation (ergometry or thallium scan) before catheterization between women with or without significant coronary lesions. At a follow-up period of 2 to 7 years, 3 women had acute myocardial infarction, all of whom demonstrated coronary lesions on prior angiography. No difference was found regarding the recurrence of chest pain on follow-up between women with or without significant CAD. Mortality and congestive heart failure were observed more frequently in women with CAD (6% vs 0%; p = 0.0516 and 12% vs 2%; p = 0.047, respectively).

Efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors for prevention of stroke

OBJECTIVE

To determine if 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in preventing fatal and nonfatal strokes in patients at increased risk of coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical trials were identified by a computerized search of MEDLINE (1983 to June 1996), by an assessment of the bibliographies of published studies, meta-analyses and reviews, and by contacting pharmaceutical companies that manufacture statins. Trials were included in the analysis if their patients were randomly allocated to a statin or placebo group, and reported data on stroke events. Thirteen of 28 clinical trials were selected for review. Data were extracted for details of study design, patient characteristics, interventions, duration of therapy, cholesterol measurements, and the number of fatal and nonfatal stroke events in each arm of therapy. Missing data on stroke events were obtained by contacting the investigators of the clinical trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 19,921 randomized patients, the rate of total stroke in the placebo group was 2.38% (90% nonfatal and 10% fatal). In contrast, patients who received statins had a 1.67% stroke rate. Using an exact stratified analysis, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for total stroke was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57, 0.86; p =.0005). The pooled OR for nonfatal stroke was 0.64 (95% CI 0.51, 0.79; p =.00001), and the pooled OR for fatal stroke was 1.25 (95% CI 0.71, 2.24; p =.4973). In separate analyses, reductions in total and nonfatal stroke risk were found to be significant only for trials of secondary coronary disease prevention. Regression analysis showed no statistical association between the magnitude of cholesterol reduction and the relative risk for any stroke outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence clearly shows that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors reduce the morbidity associated with strokes in patients at increased risk of cardiac events. Data from 13 placebo-controlled trials suggest that on average one stroke is prevented for every 143 patients treated with statins over a 4-year period.

High risk strategies for atherosclerosis

Calculating a person's chances of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) is not simple, as many risk factors interact in a complex fashion. Thus many markers, though significant in univariate comparisons, are no longer so when multivariate analysis is performed. Those factors contributing independently to risk can be identified only in prospective investigations such as the Münster Heart (PROCAM) or the Framingham studies. In the Münster Heart study, follow-up of middle-aged men for eight years identified the following nine independent risk variables: age, smoking history, personal history of angina pectoris, family history of myocardial infarction, systolic blood pressure, raised plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), low plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol, raised fasting plasma triglyceride and presence of diabetes mellitus. These have been used to generate an algorithm for prediction of first coronary events which is available in interactive fashion on the internet'. Large trials have shown that lowering LDL-C reduces the risk of CHD, and diminishes CHD morbidity and mortality in persons without prior evidence of coronary atherosclerosis (primary prevention). This is even more the case in patients with such evidence (secondary prevention). It appears that lowering of LDL-C also reduces all-cause mortality in secondary prevention.

Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research

The efficacy of cardiovascular risk-reduction programs has been established. However, the extent to which risk-reduction interventions are effective may depend on adherence. Non-compliance, or non-adherence, may occur with any of the recommended or prescribed regimens and may vary across the treatment course. Compliance problems, whether occurring early or late in the treatment course, are clinically significant, as adherence is one mediator of the clinical outcome. This article, which is based on a review of the empirical literature of the past 20 years, addresses compliance across four regimens of cardiovascular risk reduction: pharmacological therapy, exercise, nutrition, and smoking cessation. The criteria for inclusion of a study in this review were: (a) focus on cardiovascular disease risk reduction; (b) report of a quantitative measure of compliance behavior; and (c) use of a randomized controlled design. Forty-six studies meeting these criteria were identified. A variety of self-report, objective, and electronic measurement methods were used across these studies. The interventions employed diverse combinations of cognitive, educational, and behavioral strategies to improve compliance in an array of settings. The strategies demonstrated to be successful in improving compliance included behavioral skill training, self-monitoring, telephone/mail contact, self-efficacy enhancement, and external cognitive aids. A series of tables summarize the intervention strategies, compliance measures, and findings, as well as the interventions demonstrated to be successful. This review reflects the progress made over two decades in compliance measurement and research and, further, advances made in the application of behavioral strategies to the promotion of cardiovascular risk reduction.

Lipid lowering in patients with coronary artery disease: low density lipoprotein cholesterol and beyond

Now that the importance of LDL-C and its reduction are well established in the prevention of atherosclerotic vascular complications, we are moving to a new era in which physicians must pay more attention to factors beyond LDL-C lowering. More emphasis should be put on TRL and remnant lipoproteins as well as other contributors to the cardiovascular risk burden, such as thrombotic risk factors and impaired fibrinolysis. This should be carried out within the standard framework of a global approach to risk factor management in CAD patients.

Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease

Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which lowers plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis. Pravastatin produces consistent dose-dependent reductions in both total and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Favourable changes in other parameters such as total triglyceride and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels are generally modest. Combination therapy with other antihyperlipidaemic agents such as cholestyramine further enhances the efficacy of pravastatin in patients with severe dyslipidaemias. Available data suggest that pravastatin is effective in elderly patients and in patients with hypercholesterolaemia secondary to diabetes mellitus or renal disease. The benefit of cholesterol-lowering in terms of patient outcomes is currently an area of considerable interest. Recently completed regression studies (PLAC I, PLAC II, KAPS and REGRESS) show that pravastatin slows progression of atherosclerosis and lowers the incidence of coronary events in patients with mild to moderately severe hypercholesterolaemia and known coronary heart disease. Large scale primary (WOSCOPS) and secondary (CARE) prevention studies, moreover, demonstrate that pravastatin has beneficial effects on coronary morbidity and mortality. In WOSCOPS, all-cause mortality was reduced by 22%. Pravastatin is generally well tolerated by most patients (including the elderly), as evidenced by data from studies of up to 5 years in duration. As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, myopathy occurs rarely (< 0.1% of patients treated with pravastatin): approximately 1 to 2% of patients may present with raised serum levels of hepatic transaminases. Thus, with its favourable effects on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality and total mortality, pravastatin should be considered a first-line agent in patients with elevated cholesterol levels, multiple risk factors or coronary heart disease who are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity.

Extending the benefit of lipid-regulating therapy to primary prevention

In recent years, a number of published secondary prevention trials have further strengthened the rationale for aggressive lipid-regulating therapy in patients with established coronary artery disease. However, the role of lipid-regulating therapy in primary prevention is less well characterized. Several large primary prevention trials, using a variety of interventions, are ongoing in different populations. These include the Air Force Coronary/Texas Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, the Women's Health Initiative, and the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. These investigations will extend the results of earlier primary prevention trials and further characterize the rationale for intervention.