Evidence for increased dopaminergic inhibition of secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormone in hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary microadenoma

Distinct dopaminergic personality patterns in patients with prolactinomas: a comparison with nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma patients and age- and gender-matched controls

INTRODUCTION

Personality patterns such as extraversion and novelty seeking have been associated with an altered dopaminergic activity in healthy subjects. Patients with prolactinomas have been described as exhibiting an altered dopaminergic tone and are often treated with dopamine agonists. Little is known about the personality traits of this patient group. Hence, we aimed at examining whether patients with prolactinomas exhibit modified personality patterns compared to patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and healthy controls.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 86 patients with prolactinomas and 58 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) were compared with 172 mentally healthy age- and gender-matched controls. To assess personality traits, standardized personality questionnaires (Eysenck personality questionnaire-EPQ-RK and Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire devised by Cloninger-TPQ) were administered.

RESULTS

Patients with either prolactinomas or NFPA showed a distinct personality profile compared to the normal population, characterized by increased neuroticism and they also answered in a socially desirable mode. On harm-avoidant total and subscales, they presented with a higher fear of uncertainty and also increased fatigability and asthenia. The prolactinoma patients, when contrasted with the 'clinical' control group of patients with NFPA and after post hoc tests for multiple comparisons following the Bonferroni-Holm procedure showed significantly reduced extraversion (p = 0.044) and increased shyness with strangers (p = 0.044), tending to be more neurotic and present lower scores in the novelty seeking subscale impulsiveness.

CONCLUSION

This is, to our knowledge, the first study providing new evidence of an altered personality profile of prolactinoma patients which might affect the patient-doctor relationship, treatment and patient's quality of life.

Prolactin suppresses GnRH but not TSH secretion

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In animal models, prolactin increases tuberoinfundibular dopamine turnover, which has been demonstrated to suppress both hypothalamic GnRH and pituitary TSH secretion. To test the hypothesis that prolactin suppresses GnRH and TSH secretion in women, as preliminary evidence that a short-feedback dopamine loop also operates in the human, the effect of hyperprolactinemia on GnRH and TSH secretion was examined.

METHODS

Subjects (n=6) underwent blood sampling every 10 min in the follicular phase of a control cycle and during a 12-hour recombinant human prolactin (r-hPRL) infusion preceded by 7 days of twice-daily subcutaneous r-hPRL injections. LH and TSH pulse patterns and menstrual cycle parameters were measured.

RESULTS

During the 7 days of r-hPRL administration, baseline prolactin increased from 16.0+/-3.0 to 101.6+/-11.6 microg/l, with a further increase to 253.7+/-27.7 microg/l during the 12-hour infusion. LH pulse frequency decreased (8.7+/-1.0 to 6.0+/-1.0 pulses/12 h; p<0.05) with r-hPRL administration, but there were no changes in LH pulse amplitude or mean LH levels. There were also no changes in TSH pulse frequency, mean or peak TSH. The decreased LH pulse frequency did not affect estradiol, inhibin A or B concentrations, or menstrual cycle length.

CONCLUSION

These studies demonstrate that hyperprolactinemia suppresses pulsatile LH secretion but not TSH secretion and suggest that GnRH secretion is sensitive to hyperprolactinemia, but that TSH secretion is not. These data further suggest that the degree of GnRH disruption after 7 days of hyperprolactinemia is insufficient to disrupt menstrual cyclicity.

Effect of human prolactin administration on gonadotropin and thyrotropin secretion in normal men

To test the hypothesis that PRL is able to feedback negatively on its own secretion (short-loop feedback) in humans via augmentation of the turnover of tuberoinfundibular dopamine (TIDA), the effects of the administration of purified hPRL on endogenous LH, FSH and TSH were assessed. Purified hPRL, given in an i.v. loading dose of 90 micrograms followed by a continuous infusion of 1.39 micrograms/min to 4 normal male volunteers resulted in a tripling of PRL levels (10.5 +/- 1.9 micrograms/L increasing to 30.9 +/- 3.6 micrograms/L) at the end of 90 min. There were no changes in LH, FSH or TSH levels, however, during or following the infusion. Purified hPRL was also given in 1 and 8 micrograms/kg doses IM to 5 normal male volunteers. Although PRL levels did not rise significantly with the 1 microgram/kg dose, levels almost doubled with the 8 micrograms/kg dose (9.5 +/- 2.2 micrograms/L increasing to 17.4 +/- 1.5 micrograms/L). Again, LH, FSH and TSH levels did not change significantly over the three hour period of sampling with either dose. In conclusion, in this study we found that a 2-3 fold increase of circulating PRL levels maintained for 1.5-3 h exerted no apparent effects on the secretion of endogenous LH, FSH and TSH. This study provides direct evidence against the existence of a short-loop feedback occurring via TIDA activation in humans over this time interval but does not rule out the possibility that such feedback may occur with more prolonged states of hyperprolactinemia or via other mechanisms or the possibility of an effect on the hypothalamic pulse generator.

The influence of diabetes mellitus on thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in untreated acromegalic patients

Impairment of thyrotropin (TSH) response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) has been documented in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). In acromegalic patients, however, there have been no data regarding TSH secretion studied taking the existence of DM into consideration. Therefore, we investigated the TSH response to TRH [expressed as TSH increment (delta TSH)] in 14 untreated acromegalic patients, who did not show the suprasellar extension of adenoma, divided into two groups on the basis of either presence or absence of uncontrolled DM, and in 28 normal subjects. The mean max delta TSH was significantly reduced (p less than 0.02) in acromegalic patients despite similar mean serum T4 and free T4 index (FT4l) levels. Furthermore, the mean basal and max delta TSH in 7 patients with DM (FBS, 120-300 mg/dl; HbA1, 8.8-15.2%) were significantly lower than those in 7 patients without DM (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.02, respectively) despite similar the mean serum T3, T4, FT4l, growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) levels and sellar volume. In 4 patients with DM the TSH response to TRH 6-8 weeks after insulin therapy, when their HbA1 levels were normal, increased compared to that before insulin therapy. The mean max delta TSH after selective adenomectomy in 8 patients (3 in DM group and 5 in non-DM group), whose fasting basal GH fell to less than 5 ng/ml, was almost identical to that in normal subjects. In conclusion, the present study suggests that the abnormality in TSH secretion in acromegalic patients may be increased by the existence of uncontrolled DM.

Thyroid function in patients with hyperprolactinaemia: relationship to dopaminergic inhibition of TSH release

It has been reported recently that patients with hyperprolactinaemia may develop hypothyroidism as a consequence of the increased inhibition of TSH release by dopamine which occurs in the majority of such patients. In this study we have evaluated thyroid function in a large number of hyperprolactinaemic patients in order to delineate more precisely the relationship between thyroid status, free thyroid hormone levels and the control of TSH release by dopamine. Biochemical euthyroidism was present in the majority of the hyperprolactinaemic patients. Our data indicate that the increased dopaminergic inhibition of TSH release does not lead to hypothyroidism. Instead, the slightly elevated basal TSH levels and TSH responses to TRH (within the normal range) may reflect the operation of a compensatory mechanism to maintain euthyroidism in the face of te increased inhibition of TSH release by hypothalamic dopamine.

The preoperative and postoperative investigation of TSH and prolactin release in the management of patients with hyperprolactinaemia due to prolactinomas and nonfunctional pituitary tumours: relationship to adenoma size at surgery

We report here our results of the pre- and post-operative assessment of prolactin and TSH status in 41 hyperprolactinaemic patients who underwent pituitary surgery over a 5 year period. Preoperatively in patients with prolactinomas (n = 33) the TSH response to domperidone decreased with increasing adenoma size. When the data are expressed on a group mean basis the exaggerated TSH response to domperidone in preoperative prolactinoma patients was reduced significantly in patients rendered normoprolactinaemic by surgery but persisted in those who remained hyperprolactinaemic. Similarly the reduced preoperative PRL responses to domperidone and TRH were significantly increased by successful surgery. In contrast patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia (n = 6) due to larger lesions which were not prolactinomas all showed reduced or absent TSH responses to domperidone. The PRL responses to domperidone and TRH were reduced or absent both in patients with prolactinomas and in those with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia. All patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia showed a delayed pattern of TSH response to TRH with 60 min values being greater than 20 min ones. In contrast a normal pattern of TSH response to TRH was observed in all patients with hyperprolactinaemia due to prolactinomas. Postoperatively TSH and PRL responses were largely unchanged in patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia regardless of whether normoprolactinaemia was restored by surgery. In conclusion a reduced or absent PRL response to TRH or domperidone is not diagnostic of the presence of a prolactinoma since it occurs in hyperprolactinaemic patients with prolactinomas or stalk-compression. In contrast, the TSH response to acute dopamine antagonism is exaggerated in most patients with small prolactinomas but not in those with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia and we have found this to be helpful diagnostically since the presence of an exaggerated TSH response to dopamine antagonism is evidence against the presence of stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia. The observation of a delayed TSH response to TRH in a hyperprolactinaemic patient should alert the clinician to the possibility of stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia due to a large lesion which may not be a prolactinoma.

Prolactin and growth hormone responses to dermorphin in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma

We have recently shown that dermorphin (D), a new potent opioid peptide (H-Tyr-D-Ala-Phe-Gly-Tyr-Pro-Ser-NH2) stimulates prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) secretion in humans. In 11 patients with a PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma (eight microprolactinomas and three macroprolactinomas with suprasellar extension), diagnosed by pituitary dynamic function tests, and radiological evidence with confirmation at surgery, the PRL and GH responses to D were studied to evaluate the effect of pathological hyperprolactinemia on the opioid-induced secretion of GH and PRL. No PRL response to D was observed in all 11 patients. Plasma GH increased after D in all patients, except in three patients bearing a macroprolactinoma. This study shows that the effect of D on PRL and GH secretion can be dissociated in patients with PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma, perhaps for a different derangement in the hypothalamic-pituitary mechanism(s) underlying the opioidergic regulation of GH and PRL secretion. In addition our data indicate that D can be employed as a useful opioid probe in humans.

The influence of oestrogens on the sensitivity of PRL, TSH and LH to the inhibitory actions of dopamine in hyperprolactinaemic patients

The effects of oestrogen priming on the response of serum PRL, LH and TSH to dopamine (DA) infusion have been studied in hyperprolactinaemia. Seven hyperprolactinaemic females (aged 22-57 years; basal PRL 911-5130 mU/l, normal less than 420 mU/l), had submaximal DA infusions (0.06 micrograms/kg/min) over 3 h. The DA was repeated at the same dose after pretreatment with ethinyl oestradiol (E2) 100 micrograms daily by mouth for 3 d, and after a further 2 week interval, following pretreatment with tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg twice a day by mouth for 3 d. Ethinyl oestradiol pretreatment stimulated a rise in basal PRL levels in all subjects (mean +/- SE, mU/l; 2903 +/- 761 vs 2293 +/- 684, P less than 0.05) while TAM produced a higher but more variable increase in basal PRL levels (mean +/- SE, mU/l; 3402 +/- 757, P = n.s.). The individual increments in basal PRL levels after both E2 and TAM pretreatment showed a significant positive correlation with the greater decrement in PRL levels during E2 and TAM primed DA infusions (E2, r = 0.93, P less than 0.01, TAM, r = 0.83, P less than 0.05). E2 pretreatment produced a rise in basal LH levels in 5/7 patients, and there was a significant positive correlation between the rise in basal LH levels after E2 and the decremental change in LH levels in E2 primed DA infusions (r = 0.94, P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential effects of acute DA receptor blockade with domperidone on LH and TSH release in patients with hyperprolactinemia

Since dopamine (DA) has been implicated in the inhibitory control of both TSH and LH, we have compared TSH and LH levels following dopamine (DA) receptor blockade with domperidone in patients with hyperprolactinemia due to presumed prolactinomas. Eight euthyroid patients (aged 19-37 yr) with presumed prolactinomas each received domperidone (10 mg iv) at 11:00 and 23:00 h and tests were separated by at least one week. Basal TSH levels were significantly greater at 23:00 than at 11:00 h (2.7 +/- 0.5 vs 1.7 +/- 0.4 mU/l, mean +/- SE, p less than 0.01) whereas basal LH levels did not differ. All subjects showed clear rises in basal TSH levels following drug administration and these were significantly greater at 23:00 than at 11:00 h (p less than 0.02 at each time point). In contrast there was no alteration in LH levels following drug administration at either time of day. These data suggest that the mechanisms underlying the dopaminergic control of TSH and LH are different in these patients. Furthermore the data argue against an anterior pituitary or median eminence site of action of DA in the inhibition of LH release in hyperprolactinemia since domperidone does not penetrate the blood brain barrier to any appreciable extent.

The inability of dynamic tests of prolactin and TSH secretion to differentiate between tumorous and non-tumorous hyperprolactinemia

Certain hyperprolactinemic patients have an obvious pituitary tumor while others with normal pituitary radiology may or may not harbor a pituitary microadenoma. A variety of biochemical tests have been proposed to distinguish between those with and those without pituitary tumors. The aims of this study were: firstly to examine these tests to assess their efficacy in differentiating between patients with radiologically-demonstrated pituitary tumors and normal controls; and secondly to establish if those hyperprolactinemic patients with normal radiology formed two distinct groups biochemically as might be expected if some did and some did not have tumors. The prolactin (PRL) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) response to domperidone and the PRL response to TRH and insulin-induced hypoglycemia have thus been examined in hyperprolactinemic subjects with and without radiological evidence of an adenoma and in normal controls. The basal serum PRL was similar in patients with and without radiological evidence of a pituitary adenoma. The serum PRL response to all stimuli studied, expressed as a percentage of initial values, was blunted in patients with known pituitary tumors with total separation from values in control subjects. Results for patients with normal pituitary radiology were similar to those for patients with tumors with minimal overlap with controls. The peak TSH increment after domperidone was exaggerated in patients with known tumors, but overlap with control values was observed in 25%. In patients with normal radiology the peak TSH increment after domperidone was similarly increased but again overlap with control values occurred in 28%. Cluster analysis showed no evidence of two subgroups of response with in the hyperprolactinemic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypothalamic neurotransmitter function in experimentally induced hyperprolactinemia

It is known that animals or patients bearing a prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumor (PST) do not suppress PRL levels after administration of indirectly acting dopamine agonists, namely nomifensine (Nom), and are not responsive to the PRL releasing effect of antidopaminergic drugs and opioid peptides. Since the action of these drugs is mediated through the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic (TIDA) system, these findings have been taken to indicate that animals and humans bearing prolactinomas have a defective TIDA function. Alternatively, PRL unresponsiveness to these drugs could be due to hyperfunction of TIDA system for the feedback action of high PRL levels. To clarify whether hypo- or hyperfunction of the TIDA system was responsible for such behaviour, we tested the effect of a synthetic opioid peptide (FK 33-824), a DA receptor antagonist, domperidone (Dom), and of Nom on PRL secretion in two experimental models of non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia, i.e. rats bearing ectopic pituitaries since 3 days (TP rats), or treated with ovine PRL (oPRL 250 micrograms, twice daily for 3 days), in which existence of an increased TIDA function has been demonstrated. FK 33-824 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) increased significantly plasma PRL levels in control rats but failed to do so in TP rats and it elicited a significantly lower PRL response than in controls in rats treated with oPRL. In both experimental models, a PRL secretagogue, e.g. 5-hydroxytryptophan (50 mg/kg i.p.), elicited the same response as in controls, indicating that the pituitary PRL pool was preserved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential TSH and PRL responses to dopamine receptor blockade in acromegaly

The serum TSH and prolactin responses to dopamine receptor blockade (domperidone 10 mg i.v.) were measured in eight acromegalic subjects and seven normal controls. The serum TSH response was exaggerated in acromegalics when compared to controls (sum of the increments 12.2 +/- 2.8 mU/l and 4.0 +/- 1.2 mU/l respectively P less than 0.05), whereas the serum prolactin response was blunted (sum of the increments 5029 +/- 1377 mU/l and 14 673 +/- 2889 mU/l respectively P less than 0.01). Dopamine receptor blockade did not significantly alter basal growth hormone levels in either group. To ascertain whether this response was merely a reflection of high circulating growth hormone levels six normal controls were pretreated for 24 h with either intramuscular growth hormone (three injections of 4 IU) or an equivalent volume of saline before the administration of domperidone (10 mg i.v.). The serum TSH and prolactin responses were not affected by prior growth hormone treatment. The opposite TSH and prolactin responses to dopamine blockade do not allow any firm conclusions to be made about the level of hypothalamic dopamine activity in acromegaly.

The interrelationships between prolactin and thyrotrophin secretion following dopaminergic blockage in patients with mild hyperprolactinaemia without any demonstrable pituitary tumour

PRL, TSH and gonadotrophin responses to the dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, were studied in mildly hyperprolactinaemic patients with normal sella radiology and CT scan. Eleven female patients with basal PRL levels ranging from 23 to 124 ng/ml were challenged with intravenous metoclopramide (10 mg) and on subsequent occasions with TRH (200 micrograms) and LHRH (100 micrograms). On the basis of the PRL secretory pattern following metoclopramide and TRH stimulation, the patients were divided into two groups. Group I comprised six subjects who were PRL non-responsive to TRH and metoclopramide. Group II (five subjects) demonstrated PRL responses to TRH and metoclopramide indistinguishable from female controls. Mean +/- SD basal PRL levels were 68.5 +/- 29.9 ng/ml in Group I and not different in Group II (40.6 +/- 12.0 ng/ml). Basal LH levels were increased in Group II, whereas FSH was increased in Group I. Basal TSH levels were lower in Group I than the controls. Following metoclopramide, Group I patients had an increase in TSH from a basal of 2.4 +/- 0.7 microU/ml to a peak of 5.9 +/- 2.7 microU/ml (P less than 0.005) which occurred at 30 min. TSH values were increased above basal at all time intervals following metoclopramide. In contrast, TSH levels did not change in Group II patients or the controls after metoclopramide administration. Both patient groups had TSH responses to TRH similar to the controls. Following LHRH, the LH increase was greater in Group II and the FSH in Group I. In neither group nor the controls did gonadotrophin levels change after metoclopramide. In Group II females, PRL responsiveness to metoclopramide was associated with TSH non-responsiveness. In Group I females, PRL levels failed to rise, whereas TSH increased. The PRL and TSH profile in Group I females is typical of a prolactinoma. It is concluded that PRL as well as TSH determinations following metoclopramide are useful indices in the assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and may be of value in differentiating the functional state from that of a pituitary tumour.

Reduced dopaminergic inhibition of thyrotrophin release in states of physiological hyperprolactinaemia

We have tested the hypothesis that physiological puerperal hyperprolactinaemia may be secondary to reduced hypothalamic dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin (PRL) release. Nine post-partum females with physiological hyperprolactinaemia (aged 19-40 years; mean basal PRL +/- SE, 2099 +/- 257 mU/1, range 1002-3762 mU/1) were studied and results compared with fourteen normoprolactinaemic females (basal PRL less than 400 mU/1; aged 18-36 years). Puerperal hyperprolactinaemic females showed a reduced TSH response to dopamine (DA) receptor blockade with metoclopramide (10 mg i.v.) compared with normal females over a 60-min period following drug administration (total incremental TSH change, mean +/- SE, mU/1; 0.5 +/- 0.3 v. 3.1 +/- 1.0 P less than 0.005). This finding of reduced dopaminergic inhibition of TSH release in females with physiological puerperal hyperprolactinaemia supports the view that an overall reduction in hypothalamic dopaminergic tone may contribute towards hyperprolactinaemia in post-partum women.