Cytoskeletal regulation of the signal transduction of prostaglandin EP4 receptor

Modulation of melatonin receptors and G-protein function by microtubules

Chronic melatonin exposure produces microtubule rearrangements in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the human MT1 melatonin receptor while at the same time desensitizing MT1 receptors. Because microtubule rearrangements parallel MT1 receptor desensitization, we tested whether microtubules modulate receptor responsiveness. We determined whether depolymerization of microtubules by Colcemid, which prevents melatonin-induced outgrowths in MT1-expressing CHO cells, also prevents MT1 receptor desensitization by affecting G(alpha)-GTP exchange on G-proteins. In this study, we found that depolymerization of microtubules in MT1 receptor expressing cells, prevented melatonin-induced receptor desensitization reflected by an increase in the number of high potency sites when compared with melatonin-treated cells. Further examination of the mechanism(s) underlying this desensitization suggested that these effects occurred at the level of G-proteins. Depolymerization of microtubules during melatonin-induced desensitization, attenuated forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, the opposite of which usually occurs following melatonin exposure alone. Concomitant to this attenuation in the forskolin response was a reduction in the amount of G(i alpha) protein coupled to MT1 receptors and an increase in [32P] azidoanilido GTP incorporation into G(i) proteins. These data are consistent with the findings that microtubule depolymerization did not affect MT1/G(q) coupling nor did it affect melatonin-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis following melatonin exposure. However, interestingly, microtubule depolymerization enhanced melatonin-induced protein kinase C activation that was blocked in the presence of pertussis toxin. These data demonstrate that microtubule dynamics can modulate melatonin receptor function through their actions on G(i) proteins and impact on downstream signaling cascades.

Chronic antidepressant treatment prevents accumulation of gsalpha in cholesterol-rich, cytoskeletal-associated, plasma membrane domains (lipid rafts)

Previous studies demonstrated that Gsalpha migrates from a Triton X-100 (TTX-100) insoluble membrane domain to a TTX-100 soluble membrane domain in response to chronic treatment with the antidepressants desipramine and fluoxetine. Antidepressant treatment also causes a Gsalpha redistribution in cells as seen by confocal microscopy. The current studies have focused on examining the possibility that the association between Gsalpha and the plasma membrane and/or cytoskeleton is altered in response to antidepressant treatment, and that this is relevant to both Gsalpha redistribution and the increased coupling between Gsalpha and adenylyl cyclase seen after chronic antidepressant treatment. Chronic treatment of C6 cells with two fuctionally and structurally distinct antidepressants, desipramine and fluoxetine, decreased the Gsalpha content of TTX-100 insoluble membrane domains by as much as 60%, while the inactive fluoxetine analog LY368514 had no effect. Disruption of these membrane domains with the cholesterol chelator methyl-beta-cyclodextrin altered the localization of many proteins involved in the cAMP signaling cascade, but only Gsalpha localization was altered by antidepressant treatment. In addition, microtubule disruption with colchicine elicited the movement of Gsalpha out of detergent-resistant membrane domains in a manner identical to that seen with antidepressant treatment. The data presented here further substantiate the role of Gsalpha as a major player in antidepressant-induced modification of neuronal signaling and also raise the possibility that an interaction between Gsalpha and the cytoskeleton is involved in this process.

Knock-down of RGS4 and beta tubulin in CHO cells expressing the human MT1 melatonin receptor prevents melatonin-induced receptor desensitization

Previously, it has been shown that chronic melatonin exposure in MT1-CHO cells results in receptor desensitization while at the same time producing drastic morphological changes. The addition of a depolymerizing agent during the melatonin pretreatment period prevents MT1 receptor desensitization and the changes in cellular morphology. The lack of morphological change in the presence of a depolymerizing agent is easily explained by the inability of the microtubules to polymerize, however, the prevention of receptor desensitization is a little more complex and may involve G-protein activation. The goal of this study was to determine whether melatonin-induced MT1 receptor desensitization is regulated by proteins known to regulate G-protein activation states, beta-tubulin and RGS4,using anti sense knockdown approaches. The expression of RGS4 mRNA in CHO cells was confirmed using RT PCR and successful knockdown of each was confirmed by western blot analysis or quantitative PCR. Pretreatment of MT1-CHO cells, transfected with the nonsense probes and exposed to melatonin, resulted in a desensitization of the receptor, an increase in forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, an increase in 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin binding and no change in the affinity of melatonin for the MT1 receptor. However, knockdown of either beta-tubulin or RGS4 in MT1-CHO cells followed by pretreatment with melatonin attenuated the desensitization of melatonin receptors, decreased total 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin binding, and did not affect neither the forskolin response nor the affinity of melatonin for the MT1 receptor. Perhaps RGS4 and beta-tubulin modulate Galpha-GDP and Galpha-GTP states thus modulating MT1 melatonin receptor function.

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor enhances whereas prostaglandin E2 inhibits the production of interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa in epidermoid carcinoma A431

Interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa (IP-10) induces antitumor immunity. Cyclooxygenase-2 and its metabolite prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) are overexpressed in tumor cells, which may suppress antitumor immunity. We examined the in vitro effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS398 on IP-10 production in human epidermoid carcinoma A431. NS398 enhanced interferon-gamma-induced IP-10 secretion, mRNA expression, and promoter activation in A431, and exogenous PGE2 antagonized the enhancement. Interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) on IP-10 promoter was responsible for the transcriptional regulation by NS398 and PGE2. NS398 enhanced interferon-gamma-induced transcription through ISRE and binding of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha (STAT1alpha to ISRE in A431, and PGE2 antagonized the enhancement. NS398 enhanced interferon-gamma-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1alpha, Janus tyrosine kinase 1, and Janus tyrosine kinase 2, and PGE2 antagonized the enhancement. PGE2-mediated suppression of IP-10 synthesis was counteracted by adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 and protein kinase A inhibitor H-89, and PGE2 receptor EP4 antagonist AH23848B. AH23848B, SQ22536, and H-89 counteracted the PGE2-mediated suppression of ISRE-dependent transcription, STAT1alpha binding to ISRE, and tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1alpha, Janus tyrosine kinase 1, and Janus tyrosine kinase 2. PGE2 increased intracellular cAMP level and protein kinase A activity in A431 pretreated with NS398, and AH23848B blocked the effects of PGE2. These results suggest that A431-derived PGE2 may generate cAMP signal via EP4 in A431, which may activate protein kinase A, and may resultantly inhibit interferon-gamma-induced STAT1alpha activation and IP-10 synthesis. The results also suggest that NS398 may restore IP-10 synthesis by preventing PGE2 production in A431 and thus may be therapeutically useful for skin cancer.

Microtubules and signal transduction

Although molecular components of signal transduction pathways are rapidly being identified, how elements of these pathways are positioned spatially and how signals traverse the intracellular environment from the cell surface to the nucleus or to other cytoplasmic targets are not well understood. The discovery of signaling molecules that interact with microtubules (MTs), as well as the multiple effects on signaling pathways of drugs that destabilize or hyperstabilize MTs, indicate that MTs are likely to be critical to the spatial organization of signal transduction. MTs themselves are also affected by signaling pathways and this may contribute to the transmission of signals to downstream targets.