Non-selective effects of adenosine A1 receptor ligands on energy metabolism and macromolecular biosynthesis in cultured central neurons

How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration?

The adenosine modulation system mostly operates through inhibitory A₁ (A₁ R) and facilitatory A_2A receptors (A_2A R) in the brain. The activity-dependent release of adenosine acts as a brake of excitatory transmission through A₁ R, which are enriched in glutamatergic terminals. Adenosine sharpens salience of information encoding in neuronal circuits: high-frequency stimulation triggers ATP release in the 'activated' synapse, which is locally converted by ecto-nucleotidases into adenosine to selectively activate A_2A R; A_2A R switch off A₁ R and CB1 receptors, bolster glutamate release and NMDA receptors to assist increasing synaptic plasticity in the 'activated' synapse; the parallel engagement of the astrocytic syncytium releases adenosine further inhibiting neighboring synapses, thus sharpening the encoded plastic change. Brain insults trigger a large outflow of adenosine and ATP, as a danger signal. A₁ R are a hurdle for damage initiation, but they desensitize upon prolonged activation. However, if the insult is near-threshold and/or of short-duration, A₁ R trigger preconditioning, which may limit the spread of damage. Brain insults also up-regulate A_2A R, probably to bolster adaptive changes, but this heightens brain damage since A_2A R blockade affords neuroprotection in models of epilepsy, depression, Alzheimer's, or Parkinson's disease. This initially involves a control of synaptotoxicity by neuronal A_2A R, whereas astrocytic and microglia A_2A R might control the spread of damage. The A_2A R signaling mechanisms are largely unknown since A_2A R are pleiotropic, coupling to different G proteins and non-canonical pathways to control the viability of glutamatergic synapses, neuroinflammation, mitochondria function, and cytoskeleton dynamics. Thus, simultaneously bolstering A₁ R preconditioning and preventing excessive A_2A R function might afford maximal neuroprotection. The main physiological role of the adenosine modulation system is to sharp the salience of information encoding through a combined action of adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2A R) in the synapse undergoing an alteration of synaptic efficiency with an increased inhibitory action of A₁ R in all surrounding synapses. Brain insults trigger an up-regulation of A_2A R in an attempt to bolster adaptive plasticity together with adenosine release and A₁ R desensitization; this favors synaptotocity (increased A_2A R) and decreases the hurdle to undergo degeneration (decreased A₁ R). Maximal neuroprotection is expected to result from a combined A_2A R blockade and increased A₁ R activation. This article is part of a mini review series: "Synaptic Function and Dysfunction in Brain Diseases".

The endogenous somnogen adenosine excites a subset of sleep-promoting neurons via A2A receptors in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus

Recent research has shown that neurons in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus are crucial for sleep by inhibiting wake-promoting systems, but the process that triggers their activation at sleep onset remains to be established. Since evidence indicates that sleep induced by adenosine, an endogenous sleep-promoting substance, requires activation of brain A(2A) receptors, we examined the hypothesis that adenosine could activate ventrolateral preoptic nucleus sleep neurons via A(2A) adenosine receptors in rat brain slices. Following on from our initial in vitro identification of these neurons as uniformly inhibited by noradrenaline and acetylcholine arousal transmitters, we established that the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus comprises two intermingled subtypes of sleep neurons, differing in their firing responses to serotonin, inducing either an inhibition (Type-1 cells) or an excitation (Type-2 cells). Since both cell types contained galanin and expressed glutamic acid decarboxylase-65/67 mRNAs, they potentially correspond to the sleep promoting neurons inhibiting arousal systems. Our pharmacological investigations using A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors agonists and antagonists further revealed that only Type-2 neurons were excited by adenosine via a postsynaptic activation of A(2A) adenosine receptors. Hence, the present study is the first demonstration of a direct activation of the sleep neurons by adenosine. Our results further support the cellular and functional heterogeneity of the sleep neurons, which could enable their differential contribution to the regulation of sleep. Adenosine and serotonin progressively accumulate during arousal. We propose that Type-2 neurons, which respond to these homeostatic signals by increasing their firing are involved in sleep induction. In contrast, Type-1 neurons would likely play a role in the consolidation of sleep.

Effects of insulin-induced acute hypoglycemia and normoglycemic hyperinsulinemia on the retinal uptake and ocular metabolism of glucose in rabbits

Glucose is the principal metabolic substrate for the retina in mammals, being essential for maintaining the functional activity of the retina; it can be supplied to the tissue by both vitreous humor and blood. Yet, the impact of hypoglycemia on retinal glucose metabolism has been poorly investigated. We have therefore studied the effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia on the glucose uptake and metabolism in the retina, by analyzing the hypoglycemia-induced changes in the ocular distribution and metabolic fate of [3H]-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and [14C]-D-glucose, both injected in the vitreous body. Rabbits were rendered hypoglycemic by subcutaneous injection of insulin (0.8 and 1.2 IU/kg). Insulin-induced hypoglycemia increased both retinal [3H]-radioactivity levels and retina to vitreous humor ratio of [3H]-radioactivity levels ([3H]-[R/VH]). Radio-chromatography showed that hypoglycemia did not induce any change in the retinal conversion of 2-DG to 2-DG-6-phosphate, but increased the conversion of [14C]-D-glucose to [14C]-lactate. Normoglycemic hyperinsulinemia caused no change in either retinal [3H]-radioactivity levels or [3H]-[R/VH] while decreasing retinal [14C]-radioactivity levels and retina to vitreous ratios of 14C-radioactivity levels. These results indicate that acute hypoglycemia increases the uptake rate of glucose by the retina and suggest that normoglycemic hyperinsulinemia may decrease retinal lactate, possibly stimulating its removal from the retina.

Cytokine-purine interactions in behavioral depression in rats

This paper reviews recent findings from our laboratories concerning metabolic and immune mediators of behavioral depression in rats. Specifically, a single injection of 6 mg/kg of reserpine substantially increases behavioral depression, as evidenced by an increase in the amount of time spent floating by independent groups of rats tested for swim performance at various times during the next week. The behavioral impairment consists of two components. An early component emerges one hour after reserpine treatment and persists for about 24 hours. The deficit is not reversed by intracranial ventricular infusion of the receptor antagonist for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta). A second, late-component deficit appears approximately 48 hours after reserpine treatment and recovers within a week. Late-component depression is reversed by central infusion of the IL-1beta receptor antagonist, and is mimicked by central infusion of the proinflammatory cytokine. Importantly, both early and late components of reserpine-induced depression and IL-1beta induced depression are reversed by a systemic injection of the highly selective A2A adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(3-Chlorostyryl) caffeine. These data are discussed in terms of the overlap in the conservation-withdrawal reaction during sickness, traumatic stress, and major depression and the regional contribution of purines and cytokines to the organization of this reaction in the brain.

Adenosine in the treatment of stroke: yes, maybe, or absolutely not?

Agonist stimulation of adenosine A(1) receptors has been consistently shown to result in reduction of brain damage following experimentally induced global and focal brain ischaemia in animals. Unsurprisingly, the use of adenosine A(1) receptors as targets for the development of clinical therapeutics suitable for treatment of ischaemic brain disorders has been suggested by many authors. The latest studies of adenosine and its receptors indicate that adenosine-mediated actions might be far more complex than originally anticipated, casting some doubt about the rapid development of stroke treatment based on adenosine. This review discusses the possible role of adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1), A(2) and A(3)) in the context of their potential as therapeutics in stroke.

Adenosine as a neuromodulator and as a homeostatic regulator in the nervous system: different roles, different sources and different receptors

Adenosine exerts two parallel modulatory roles in the CNS, acting as a homeostatic modulator and also as a neuromodulator at the synaptic level. We will present evidence to suggest that these two different modulatory roles are fulfilled by extracellular adenosine originated from different metabolic sources, and involve receptors with different sub-cellular localisation. It is widely accepted that adenosine is an inhibitory modulator in the CNS, a notion that stems from the preponderant role of inhibitory adenosine A(1) receptors in defining the homeostatic modulatory role of adenosine. However, we will review recent data that suggests that the synaptically localised neuromodulatory role of adenosine depend on a balanced activation of inhibitory A(1) receptors and mostly facilitatory A(2A) receptors. This balanced activation of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors depends not only on the transient levels of extracellular adenosine, but also on the direct interaction between A(1) and A(2A) receptors, which control each other's action.

Adenosine and cerebral ischemia: therapeutic future or death of a brave concept?

Numerous studies have consistently shown that agonist stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality associated with global and focal brain ischemia in animals. Based on these observations, several authors have suggested utilization of adenosine A1 receptors as targets for the development of clinically viable drugs against ischemic brain disorders. Recent advent of adenosine A1 receptor agonists characterized by lowered cardiovascular effects added additional strength to this argument. On the other hand, although cardioprotective, adenosine A3 receptor agonists proved severely cerebrodestructive when administered prior to global ischemia in gerbils. Moreover, stimulation of adenosine A3 receptors appears to reduce the efficacy of some of the neuroprotective actions mediated by adenosine A1 receptors. The review discusses the possible role of adenosine receptor subtypes (A1, A2, and A3) in the context of their involvement in the pathology of cerebral ischemia, and analyzes putative strategies for the development of clinically useful strategies based on adenosine and its receptors. It also stresses the need for further experimental studies before definitive conclusions on the usefulness of the adenosine concept in the treatment of brain ischemia can be made.

Adenosine and cerebral ischemia: therapeutic future or death of a brave concept?

Numerous studies have consistently shown that agonist stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality associated with global and focal brain ischemia in animals. Based on these observations, several authors have suggested utilization of adenosine A1 receptors as targets for the development of clinically viable drugs against ischemic brain disorders. Recent advent of adenosine A1 receptor agonists characterized by lowered cardiovascular effects added additional strength to this argument. On the other hand, although cardioprotective, adenosine A3 receptor agonists proved severely cerebrodestructive when administered prior to global ischemia in gerbils. Moreover, stimulation of adenosine A3 receptors appears to reduce the efficacy of some of the neuroprotective actions mediated by adenosine A receptors. The review discusses the possible role of adenosine receptor subtypes (A1, A2, and A3) in the context of their involvement in the pathology of cerebral ischemia, and analyzes putative strategies for the development of clinically useful strategies based on adenosine and its receptors. It also stresses the need for further experimental studies before definitive conclusions on the usefulness of the adenosine concept in the treatment of brain ischemia can be made.