The myosin cross-bridge cycle and its control by twitchin phosphorylation in catch muscle

Mechanism and Function of the Catch State in Molluscan Smooth Muscle: A Historical Perspective

Molluscan smooth muscles exhibit the catch state, in which both tension and resistance to stretch are maintained with very low rates of energy consumption. The catch state is studied mainly on the anterior byssus retractor muscle (ABRM) of a bivalve molluscan animal, Mytilus, which can easily be split into small bundles consisting of parallel fibers. The ABRM contracts actively with an increase in the intracellular free Ca ion concentration, [Ca²⁺]i, as with all other types of muscle. Meanwhile, the catch state is established after the reduction of [Ca²⁺]i to the resting level. Despite extensive studies, the mechanism underlying the catch state is not yet fully understood. This article briefly deals with (1) anatomical and ultrastructural aspects of the ABRM, (2) mechanical studies on the transition from the active to the catch state in the isotonic condition, (3) electron microscopic and histochemical studies on the intracellular translocation of Ca ions during the transition from the active to the catch state, and (4) biochemical studies on the catch state, with special reference to a high molecular mass protein, twitchin, which is known to occur in molluscan catch muscles.

The role of titin in eccentric muscle contraction

Muscle contraction and force regulation in skeletal muscle have been thought to occur exclusively through the relative sliding of and the interaction between the contractile filaments actin and myosin. While this two-filament sarcomere model has worked well in explaining the properties of isometrically and concentrically contracting muscle, it has failed miserably in explaining experimental observations in eccentric contractions. Here, I suggest, and provide evidence, that a third filament, titin, is involved in force regulation of sarcomeres by adjusting its stiffness in an activation-dependent (calcium) and active force-dependent manner. Upon muscle activation, titin binds calcium at specific sites, thereby increasing its stiffness, and cross-bridge attachment to actin is thought to free up binding sites for titin on actin, thereby reducing titin's free-spring length, thus increasing its stiffness and force upon stretch of active muscle. This role of titin as a third force regulating myofilament in sarcomeres, although not fully proven, would account for many of the unexplained properties of eccentric muscle contraction, while simultaneously not affecting the properties predicted by the two-filament cross-bridge model in isometric and concentric muscle function. Here, I identify the problems of the two-filament sarcomere model and demonstrate the advantages of the three-filament model by providing evidence of titin's contribution to active force in eccentric muscle function.

Innervation of bivalve larval catch muscles by serotonergic and FMRFamidergic neurons

Bivalve larvae use catch muscles for rapid shell closure and maintenance of the closed condition. We used specific antibodies against the muscle proteins together with phalloidin and neuronal markers, FMRFamide and serotonin (5-HT), to analyze mutual distribution of muscle and neuronal elements in larvae of the mussel, Mytilus trossulus, and the oyster, Crassostrea gigas. At trochophore and early veliger stages no anatomical connections between muscular and nervous system were detected. By the pediveliger stage the 5-HT innervation of the anterior adductor developed in oyster only, while rich FMRFa innervation of the adductor muscles developed in both species. Possible roles and mechanisms of FMRFamide and serotonin in the regulation of the catch state are discussed.

A force-activated kinase in a catch smooth muscle

Permeabilized anterior byssus retractor muscles (ABRM) from Mytilus edulis were used as a simple system to test whether there is a stretch dependent activation of a kinase as has been postulated for titin and the mini-titin twitchin. The ABRM is a smooth muscle that shows catch, a condition of high force maintenance and resistance to stretch following stimulation when the intracellular Ca(++) concentration has diminished to sub-maximum levels. In the catch state twitchin is unphosphorylated, and the muscle maintains force without myosin crossbridge cycling through what is likely a twitchin mediated tether between thick and thin filaments. In catch, a small change in length results in a large change in force. The phosphorylation state of an added peptide, a good substrate for molluscan twitchin kinase, with the sequence KKRAARATSNVFA was used as a measure of kinase activation. We find that there is about a two-fold increase in phosphorylation of the added peptide with a 10% stretch of the ABRM in catch. The increased phosphorylation is due to activation of a kinase rather than to an inhibition of a phosphatase. The extent of phosphorylation of the peptide is decreased when twitchin is phosphorylated and catch force is not present. However, there is also a large increase in peptide phosphorylation when the muscle is activated in pCa 5, and the catch state does not exist. The force-sensitive kinase activity is decreased by ML-9 and ML-7 which are inhibitors of twitchin kinase, but not by the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632. There is no detectable phosphorylation of myosin light chains, but the phosphorylation of twitchin increases by a small, but significant extent with stretch. It is possible that twitchin senses force output resulting in a force-sensitive twitchin kinase activity that results in autophosphorylation of twitchin on site(s) other than those responsible for relaxation of catch.

Mechanism of catch force: tethering of thick and thin filaments by twitchin

Catch is a mechanical state occurring in some invertebrate smooth muscles characterized by high force maintenance and resistance to stretch during extremely slow relaxation. During catch, intracellular calcium is near basal concentration and myosin crossbridge cyctng rate is extremely slow. Catch force is relaxed by a protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of sites near the N- and C- temini of the minititin twitchin (~526 kDa). Some catch force maintenance car also occur together with cycling myosin crossbridges at submaximal calcium concentrations, but not when the muscle is maximally activated. Additionally, the link responsible for catch can adjust during shortening of submaximally activated muscles and maintain catch force at the new shorter length. Twitchin binds to both thick and thin filaments, and the thin filament binding shown by both the N- and Cterminal portions of twitchin is decreased by phosphorylation of the sites that regulate catch. The data suggest that the twitchin molecule itself is the catch force beanng tether between thick and thin filaments. We present a model for the regulation of catch in which the twitchin tether can be displaced from thin filaments by both (a) the phosphorylation of twitchin and (b) the attachment of high force myosin crossbridges.

The highly efficient holding function of the mollusc 'catch' muscle is not based on decelerated myosin head cross-bridge cycles

Certain smooth muscles are able to reduce energy consumption greatly when holding without shortening. For instance, this is the case with muscles surrounding blood vessels used for regulating blood flow and pressure. The phenomenon is most conspicuous in 'catch' muscles of molluscs, which have been used as models for investigating this important physiological property of smooth muscle. When the shells of mussels are held closed, the responsible muscles enter the highly energy-efficient state of catch. According to the traditional view, the state of catch is caused by the slowing down of the force-generating cycles of the molecular motors, the myosin heads. Here, we show that catch can still be induced and maintained when the myosin heads are prevented from generating force. This new evidence proves that the long-held explanation of the state of catch being due to the slowing down of force producing myosin head cycles is not valid and that the highly economic holding state is caused by the formation of a rigid network of inter-myofilament connections based on passive molecular structures.

A nanobiological approach to nanotoxicology

There is an urgent need to develop efficient and rapid strategies in order to characterize the potential health risks associated with nanomaterials, given the speed with which applications and uses are increasing. Use of standard toxicity methods will not be sufficient to meet this need. This article proposes the adoption of two novel guidances: the system’s biological approach to toxicity testing advocated by the US National Research Council and a nanobiological perspective that identifies key events at the nanoscale that are relevant to signal transduction and structural biology.

Molecular basis of the catch state in molluscan smooth muscles: a catchy challenge

The catch state (or 'catch') of molluscan smooth muscles is a passive holding state that occurs after cessation of stimulation. During catch, force and, in particular, resistance to stretch are maintained for long time periods with low (or no) energy consumption at basal intracellular free [Ca2+]. The catch state is initiated by Ca2+-stimulated dephosphorylation of the titin-like protein twitchin and is inhibited by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of twitchin. In addition, catch is pH sensitive, but the reason for this is unknown. According to a traditional model, catch is due to slower cross-bridge cycles where myosin heads remain longer attached to the actin filaments after force generation, possibly caused by a hindered release of ADP from the myosin heads. However, this model was disproved by recent findings which showed that (i) inhibitors of myosin function, such as vanadate, do not affect catch force; (ii) factors which terminate the catch state do not accelerate myosin head detachment kinetics and (iii) a catch-like high resistance to stretch is still inducible when force development is prevented. Thus, catch probably involves passive linkage structures interconnecting the myofilaments (catch linkages). For example twitchin could (i) tie myosin heads to the thin filaments, (ii) mechanically lock them in a stretch resistant state or (iii) interconnect thick and thin filaments directly. However, it is questionable if these mechanisms are sufficient since twitchin seems to be about 15-times less abundant than myosin. Therefore, in addition, interconnections between thick filaments could exist, which could involve e.g. paramyosin or twitchin. Catch could even involve changes in the compliance of thick filaments. The function of myorod, found specifically in catch muscles in equal abundance with myosin, is not known. The suggestion is made here that catch linkages are present already during active contraction either as ratchet-like elements resisting stretch and not opposing shortening or in some kind of 'standby' mode ready to transform suddenly into the working mode by stretches or after Ca2+ removal following cessation of stimulation.

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

Unphosphorylated twitchin forms a complex with actin and myosin that may contribute to tension maintenance in catch

Molluscan smooth muscle can maintain tension over extended periods with little energy expenditure, a process termed catch. Catch is thought to be regulated by phosphorylation of a thick filament protein, twitchin, and involves two phosphorylation sites, D1 and D2, close to the N and C termini, respectively. This study was initiated to investigate the role of the D2 site and its phosphorylation in the catch mechanism. A peptide was constructed containing the D2 site and flanking immunoglobulin (Ig) motifs. It was shown that the dephosphorylated peptide, but not the phosphorylated form, bound to both actin and myosin. The binding site on actin was within the sequence L10 to P29. This region also binds to loop 2 of the myosin head. The dephosphorylated peptide linked myosin and F-actin and formed a trimeric complex. Electron microscopy revealed that twitchin is distributed on the surface of the thick filament with an axial periodicity of 36.25 nm and it is suggested that the D2 site aligns with the myosin heads. It is proposed that the complex formed with the dephosphorylated D2 site of twitchin, F-actin and myosin represents a component of the mechanical linkage in catch.

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan muscles: evidence that twitchin interacts with myosin, myorod, and paramyosin core and affects properties of actomyosin

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan smooth muscles postulates in vivo existence of twitchin links between thin and thick filaments that arise in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [N.S. Shelud'ko, G.G. Matusovskaya, T.V. Permyakova, O.S. Matusovsky, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 432 (2004) 269-277]. In this paper, we proposed a scheme for a possible catch mechanism involving twitchin links and regulated thin filaments. The experimental evidence in support of the scheme is provided. It was found that twitchin can interact not only with mussel myosin and rabbit F-actin but also with the paramyosin core of thick filaments, myorod, mussel thin filaments, "natural" F-actin from mussel, and skeletal myosin from rabbit. No difference was revealed in binding of twitchin with mussel and rabbit myosin. The capability of twitchin to interact with all thick filament proteins suggests that putative twitchin links can be attached to any site of thick filaments. Addition of twitchin to a mixture of actin and paramyosin filaments, or to a mixture of Ca(2+)-regulated actin and myosin filaments under relaxing conditions caused in both cases similar changes in the optical properties of suspensions, indicating an interaction and aggregation of the filaments. The interaction of actin and myosin filaments in the presence of twitchin under relaxing conditions was not accompanied by an appreciable increase in the MgATPase activity. We suggest that in both cases aggregation of filaments was caused by formation of twitchin links between the filaments. We also demonstrate that native thin filaments from the catch muscle of the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus are Ca(2+)-regulated. Twitchin inhibits the ability of thin filaments to activate myosin MgATPase in the presence of Ca(2+). We suggest that twitchin inhibition of the actin-myosin interaction is due to twitchin-induced switching of the thin filaments to the inactive state.

Myosin cross-bridge kinetics and the mechanism of catch

Catch force in molluscan smooth muscle requires little, if any, energy input and is controlled by the phosphorylation state of the thick filament-associated mini-titin, twitchin. The kinetic parameters of myosin cross-bridge turnover in permeabilized catch muscle, and how they are potentially modified by the catch mechanism, were determined by single turnover measurements on myosin-bound ADP. Under isometric conditions, there are fast and slow components of cross-bridge turnover that probably result from kinetic separation of calcium-bound and calcium-free cross-bridge pools. The structure responsible for catch force maintenance at intermediate [Ca+2] does not alter the processes responsible for the fast and slow components under isometric conditions. Also, there is no measurable turnover of myosin-bound ADP during relaxation of catch force by phosphorylation of twitchin at pCa > 8. The only effects of the catch link on myosin-bound ADP turnover are 1), a small, very slow extra turnover when catch force is maintained at very low [Ca+2] (pCa > 8); and 2), attenuation of the shortening-induced increase in turnover at subsaturating [Ca(+2)]. These limited interactions between the catch link and myosin cross-bridge turnover are consistent with the idea that catch force is maintained by a thick and thin filament linkage other than the myosin cross-bridge.

The catch state of mollusc catch muscle is established during activation: experiments on skinned fibre preparations of the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis L. using the myosin inhibitors orthovanadate and blebbistatin

Catch is a holding state of muscle where tension is maintained passively for long time periods in the absence of stimulation. The catch state becomes obvious after termination of activation; however, it is possible that catch linkages are already established during activation. To investigate this, skinned fibre bundles of the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis were maximally activated with Ca(2+) and subsequently exposed to 10 mmol l(-1) orthovanadate (V(i)) or 5 mumol l(-1) blebbistatin to inhibit the force-generating myosin head cross-bridges. Repetitive stretches of about 0.1% fibre bundle length were applied to measure stiffness. Inhibitor application depressed force substantially but never resulted in a full relaxation. The remaining force was further decreased by moderate alkalization (change of pH from 6.7 to 7.4) or by cAMP. Furthermore, the stiffness/force ratio was higher during exposure to V(i) or blebbistatin than during partial Ca(2+) activation producing the same submaximal force. The increased stiffness/force ratio was abolished by moderate alkalization or cAMP. Finally, the stretch-induced delayed force increase (stretch activation) disappeared, and the force recovery following a quick release of the fibre length, was substantially reduced when the force was depressed by V(i) or blebbistatin. All these findings suggest that catch linkages are already established during maximal Ca(2+) activation. They seem to exhibit ratchet properties because they allow shortening and resist stretches. In isometric experiments a force decrease is needed to stress the catch linkages in the high resistance direction so that they contribute to force.

Effect of pH on the rate of myosin head detachment in molluscan catch muscle: are myosin heads involved in the catch state?

Moderate alkalisation is known to terminate the catch state of bivalve mollusc smooth muscles such as the anterior byssus retractor muscle (ABRM) of Mytilus edulis L. In the present study, we investigated the effect of moderate alkalisation (pH 7.2-7.7 vs control pH 6.7) on the myosin head detachment rate in saponin-skinned fibre bundles of ABRM in order to investigate the possible role of myosin heads in the force maintenance during catch. The detachment rate of myosin heads was deduced from two types of experiments. (1) In stretch experiments on maximally Ca2+-activated fibre bundles (pCa 4.5), the rate of force decay after stepwise stretch was assessed. (2) In ATP step experiments, the rate of force decay from high force rigor (pCa>8) was evaluated. The ATP step was induced by photolysis of caged ATP. We found that moderate alkalisation induces relaxation of skinned fibres in catch, thereby reducing both force and stiffness, whereas it does not accelerate the rate of myosin head detachment. This acceleration, however, would be expected if catch would be simply due to myosin heads remaining sustainably attached to actin filaments. Thus, the myosin heads may be less involved in catch than generally assumed. Catch may possibly depend on a different kind of myofilament interconnections, which are abolished by moderate alkalisation.

Catch force links and the low to high force transition of myosin

Catch is characterized by maintenance of force with very low energy utilization in some invertebrate muscles. Catch is regulated by phosphorylation of the mini-titin, twitchin, and a catch component of force exists at all [Ca2+] except those resulting in maximum force. The mechanism responsible for catch force was characterized by determining how the effects of agents that inhibit the low to high force transition of the myosin cross-bridge (inorganic phosphate, butanedione monoxime, trifluoperazine, and blebbistatin) are modified by twitchin phosphorylation and [Ca2+]. In permeabilized anterior byssus retractor muscles from Mytilus edulis, catch force was identified as being sensitive to twitchin phosphorylation, whereas noncatch force was insensitive. In all cases, inhibition of the low to high force transition caused an increase in catch force. The same relationship exists between catch force and noncatch force whether force is varied by changes in [Ca2+] and/or agents that inhibit cross-bridge force production. This suggests that myosin in the high force state detaches catch force maintaining structures, whereas myosin in the low force state promotes their formation. It is unlikely that the catch structure is the myosin cross-bridge; rather, it appears that myosin interacts with the structure, most likely twitchin, and regulates its attachment and detachment.

Invertebrate Muscles: Muscle Specific Genes and Proteins

This is the first of a projected series of canonic reviews covering all invertebrate muscle literature prior to 2005 and covers muscle genes and proteins except those involved in excitation-contraction coupling (e.g., the ryanodine receptor) and those forming ligand- and voltage-dependent channels. Two themes are of primary importance. The first is the evolutionary antiquity of muscle proteins. Actin, myosin, and tropomyosin (at least, the presence of other muscle proteins in these organisms has not been examined) exist in muscle-like cells in Radiata, and almost all muscle proteins are present across Bilateria, implying that the first Bilaterian had a complete, or near-complete, complement of present-day muscle proteins. The second is the extraordinary diversity of protein isoforms and genetic mechanisms for producing them. This rich diversity suggests that studying invertebrate muscle proteins and genes can be usefully applied to resolve phylogenetic relationships and to understand protein assembly coevolution. Fully achieving these goals, however, will require examination of a much broader range of species than has been heretofore performed.

No effect of twitchin phosphorylation on the rate of myosin head detachment in molluscan catch muscle: are myosin heads involved in the catch state?

Phosphorylation of twitchin is known to abolish the catch state of anterior byssus retractor muscle (ABRM) of the bivalve mollusc Mytilus edulis. To investigate the role of myosin head involvement in force maintenance during catch, the effect of twitchin phosphorylation on myosin head detachment was studied in saponin-skinned fibre bundles of ABRM. The detachment rate of myosin heads was deduced from two types of experiments: (1) force decay after stepwise stretch of maximally Ca2+-activated fibre bundles (pCa 4.5) and (2) force decay from high-force rigor, the former induced by a stepwise increase in ATP concentration elicited by photolysis of caged ATP (pCa<8). The rate of detachment was not affected by thiophosphorylation or phosphorylation of twitchin by 0.12 mM cAMP in the presence of the phosphatase inhibitor cyclosporine A (1 microM). Conversely, measurements of the rate of stretch-induced delayed force increase (stretch activation) and of the force increase following an ATP step in low-force rigor (pCa 4.5) suggest that the rate of myosin head attachment decreases after twitchin phosphorylation. We conclude that catch is not due to myosin heads remaining attached to actin filaments, but depends on myofilament interconnections that break down when twitchin is phosphorylated.

Twitchin, a thick-filament protein from molluscan catch muscle, interacts with F-actin in a phosphorylation-dependent way

Twitchin belongs to the titin-like giant proteins family, it is co-localized with thick filaments in molluscan catch muscles and regulates the catch state depending on its level of phosphorylation. The mechanism by which twitchin controls the catch state remains to be established. We report for the first time the ability of twitchin to interact with F-actin. The interaction is observed at low and physiological ionic strengths, irrespective of the presence or absence of Ca(2+). It was demonstrated by viscosity and turbidity measurements, low- and high-speed co-sedimentation, and with the light-scattering particle size analysis revealing the specific twitchin-actin particles. The twitchin-actin interaction is regulated by twitchin phosphorylation: in vitro phosphorylated twitchin does not interact with F-actin. We speculate that the catch muscle twitchin might provide a mechanical link between thin and thick filaments, which contributes to catch force maintenance.

Effects of vanadate, phosphate and 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) on skinned molluscan catch muscle

The effects of orthovanadate (V(i)), inorganic phosphate (P(i)) and 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) on tension, force transients and the catch state (passive tension maintenance) were investigated in saponin-skinned fibre bundles of the anterior byssus retractor muscle (ABRM) of the bivalve mollusc Mytilus edulis at pH 6.7. During maximal Ca(2+) activation isometric force was depressed by V(i) (0.03-10 mM), P(i) (10 mM) and BDM (50 mM). Force transients following quick stretches (0.1-0.3% of fibre length) were accelerated substantially by 1 mM V(i), 10 mM P(i) or 50 mM BDM. These compounds also accelerated force responses in experiments in which ATP was released rapidly from caged ATP by flash photolysis at both pCa 4.7 (force rise) and at pCa>8 (force decline). The effects on the catch state were investigated in two types of experiments: (1) Ca(2+) removal after maximal Ca(2+) activation and (2) rapid ATP release during high-force rigor at pCa>8. In both cases rapid relaxation was followed by slow relaxation (slower than 2% of initial force per min). This later slow relaxation (catch) was insensitive to V(i) (1-10 mM), P(i) (10 mM) and BDM (50 mM) but was accelerated by 0.12 mM cAMP. Complete relaxation to almost zero force was attained by changing pH from 6.7 to 7.7 (pCa>8). We conclude that catch depends on cAMP- and pH-sensitive structures linking the myofilaments and not on the force-generating actomyosin cross-bridges that are sensitive to V(i), P(i) and BDM.

Marked load-bearing ability of Mytilus smooth muscle in both active and catch states as revealed by quick increases in load

The anterior byssal retractor muscle (ABRM) of the bivalve Mytilus edulis shows a prolonged tonic contraction, called the catch state. To investigate the catch mechanism, details of which still remain obscure, we studied the mechanical responses of ABRM fibres to quick increases in load applied during maximum active isometric force (P(0)) generation and during the catch state. The mechanical response consisted of three components: (1) initial extension of the series elastic component (SEC), (2) early isotonic fibre lengthening with decreasing velocity, and (3) late steady isotonic fibre lengthening. The ABRM fibres could bear extremely large loads up to 10-15P(0) for more than 30-60 s, while being lengthened extremely slowly. If, on the other hand, quick increases in load were applied during the early isometric force development, the ABRM fibres were lengthened rapidly ('give') under loads of 1.5-2P(0). These findings might possibly be explained by two independent systems acting in parallel with each other; one is the actomyosin system producing active shortening and active force generation, while the other is the load-bearing system responsible for the extremely marked load-bearing ability as well as the maintenance of the catch state.

Twitchin from molluscan catch muscle: primary structure and relationship between site-specific phosphorylation and mechanical function

The phosphorylation state of the myosin thick filament-associated mini-titin, twitchin, regulates catch force maintenance in molluscan smooth muscle. The full-length cDNA for twitchin from the anterior byssus retractor muscle of the mussel Mytilus was obtained using PCR and 5'rapid amplification of cDNA ends, and its derived amino acid sequence showed a large molecule ( approximately 530 kDa) with a motif arrangement as follows: (Ig)11(IgFn2)2Ig(Fn)3Ig(Fn)2Ig(Fn)3(Ig)2(Fn)2(Ig)2 FnKinase(Ig)4. Other regions of note include a 79-residue sequence between Ig domains 6 and 7 (from the N terminus) in which more than 60% of the residues are Pro, Glu, Val, or Lys and between the 7th and 8th Ig domains, a DFRXXL motif similar to that thought to be necessary for high affinity binding of myosin light chain kinase to F-actin. Two major phosphorylation sites, i.e. D1 and D2, were located in linker regions between Ig domains 7 and 8 and Ig domains 21 and 22, respectively. Correlation of the phosphorylation state of twitchin, using antibodies specific to D1 and D2, with mechanical properties suggested that phosphorylation of both D1 and D2 is required for relaxation from the catch state.

Characterization of a type I regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase from the bivalve mollusk Mytilus galloprovincialis

Two isoforms of the regulatory subunit (R) of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), named R(myt1) and R(myt2), had been purified in our laboratory from two different tissues of the sea mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. In this paper, we report the sequences of several peptides obtained from tryptic digestion of R(myt1). As a whole, these sequences showed high homology with regions of type I R subunits from invertebrate and also from mammalian sources, but homology with those of fungal and type II R subunits was much lower, which indicates that R(myt1) can be considered as a type I R isoform. This conclusion is also supported by the following biochemical properties: (1) R(myt1) was proved to have interchain disulfide bonds stabilizing its dimeric structure; (2) it failed to be phosphorylated by the catalytic (C) subunit purified from mussel; (3) it has a higher pI value than that of the R(myt2) isoform; and (4) it showed cross-reactivity with mammalian anti-RIbeta antibody.

Electron microscopic evidence for the thick filament interconnections associated with the catch state in the anterior byssal retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis

The anterior byssal retractor muscle (ABRM) of a bivalve mollusc Mytilus edulis is known to exhibit catch state, i.e. a prolonged tonic contraction maintained with very little energy expenditure. Two different hypotheses have been put forward concerning the catch state; one assumes actin-myosin linkages between the thick and thin filaments that dissociate extremely slowly (linkage hypothesis), while the other postulates a load-bearing structure other than actin-myosin linkages (parallel hypothesis). We explored the possible load-bearing structure responsible for the catch state by examining the arrangement of the thick and thin filaments within the ABRM fibers, using techniques of quick freezing and freeze substitution. No thick filament aggregation was observed in the cross-section of the fibers quickly frozen not only in the relaxed and actively contracting states but also in the catch state. The thick filaments were, however, occasionally interconnected with each other either directly or by distinct projections in all the three states studied. The proportion of the interconnected thick filaments relative to the total thick filaments in a given cross-sectional area was much larger in the catch state than in the relaxed and actively contracting states, providing evidence that the thick filament interconnection is responsible for the catch state.

Molecular motors: force and movement generated by single myosin II molecules

Muscle myosin II is an ATP-driven, actin-based molecular motor. Recent developments in optical tweezers technology have made it possible to study movement and force production on the single-molecule level and to find out how different myosin isoforms may have adapted to their specific physiological roles.