Restoration of junctional tetrads in dysgenic myotubes by dihydropyridine receptor cDNA

STAC proteins: The missing link in skeletal muscle EC coupling and new regulators of calcium channel function

Excitation-contraction coupling is the signaling process by which action potentials control calcium release and consequently the force of muscle contraction. Until recently, three triad proteins were known to be essential for skeletal muscle EC coupling: the voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.1 acting as voltage sensor, the SR calcium release channel RyR1 representing the only relevant calcium source, and the auxiliary CaV β1a subunit. Whether CaV1.1 and RyR1 are directly coupled or whether their interaction is mediated by another triad protein is still unknown. The recent identification of the adaptor protein STAC3 as fourth essential component of skeletal muscle EC coupling prompted vigorous research to reveal its role in this signaling process. Accumulating evidence supports its possible involvement in linking CaV1.1 and RyR1 in skeletal muscle EC coupling, but also indicates a second, much broader role of STAC proteins in the regulation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent feedback regulation of L-type calcium channels.

Calcium Channelopathies: Structural Insights into Disorders of the Muscle Excitation–Contraction Complex

Ion channels are membrane proteins responsible for the passage of ions down their electrochemical gradients and across biological membranes. In this, they generate and shape action potentials and provide secondary messengers for various signaling pathways. They are often part of larger complexes containing auxiliary subunits and regulatory proteins. Channelopathies arise from mutations in the genes encoding ion channels or their associated proteins. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have resulted in an explosion of ion channel structures in multiple states, generating a wealth of new information on channelopathies. Disease-associated mutations fall into different categories, interfering with ion permeation, protein folding, voltage sensing, ligand and protein binding, and allosteric modulation of channel gating. Prime examples of these are Ca2+-selective channels expressed in myocytes, for which multiple structures in distinct conformational states have recently been uncovered. We discuss the latest insights into these calcium channelopathies from a structural viewpoint.

Calcium-induced release of calcium in muscle: 50 years of work and the emerging consensus

Ryanodine-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ channels (RyRs) open upon binding Ca2+ at cytosolic-facing sites. This results in concerted, self-reinforcing opening of RyRs clustered in specialized regions on the membranes of Ca2+ storage organelles (endoplasmic reticulum and sarcoplasmic reticulum), a process that produces Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR). The process is optimized to achieve large but brief and localized increases in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, a feature now believed to be critical for encoding the multiplicity of signals conveyed by this ion. In this paper, I trace the path of research that led to a consensus on the physiological significance of CICR in skeletal muscle, beginning with its discovery. I focus on the approaches that were developed to quantify the contribution of CICR to the Ca2+ increase that results in contraction, as opposed to the flux activated directly by membrane depolarization (depolarization-induced Ca2+ release [DICR]). Although the emerging consensus is that CICR plays an important role alongside DICR in most taxa, its contribution in most mammalian muscles appears to be limited to embryogenesis. Finally, I survey the relevance of CICR, confirmed or plausible, to pathogenesis as well as the multiple questions about activation of release channels that remain unanswered after 50 years.

The relationship between form and function throughout the history of excitation-contraction coupling

Franzini-Armstrong reviews the development of the excitation–contraction coupling field over time.

The concept of excitation–contraction coupling is almost as old as Journal of General Physiology. It was understood as early as the 1940s that a series of stereotyped events is responsible for the rapid contraction response of muscle fibers to an initial electrical event at the surface. These early developments, now lost in what seems to be the far past for most young investigators, have provided an endless source of experimental approaches. In this Milestone in Physiology, I describe in detail the experiments and concepts that introduced and established the field of excitation–contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. More recent advances are presented in an abbreviated form, as readers are likely to be familiar with recent work in the field.

Structural insights into binding of STAC proteins to voltage-gated calcium channels

Excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle requires functional and mechanical coupling between L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (Ca_V1.1) and the ryanodine receptor (RyR1). Recently, STAC3 was identified as an essential protein for EC coupling and is part of a group of three proteins that can bind and modulate L-type voltage-gated calcium channels. Here, we report crystal structures of tandem-SH3 domains of different STAC isoforms up to 1.2-Å resolution. These form a rigid interaction through a conserved interdomain interface. We identify the linker connecting transmembrane repeats II and III in two different Ca_V isoforms as a binding site for the SH3 domains and report a crystal structure of the complex with the STAC2 isoform. The interaction site includes the location for a disease variant in STAC3 that has been linked to Native American myopathy (NAM). Introducing the mutation does not cause misfolding of the SH3 domains, but abolishes the interaction. Disruption of the interaction via mutations in the II-III loop perturbs skeletal muscle EC coupling, but preserves the ability of STAC3 to slow down inactivation of Ca_V1.2.

Core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium release complex

The core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) calcium release complex extends through three compartments of the muscle fibre, linking the extracellular environment through the cytoplasmic junctional gap to the lumen of the internal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium store. The protein complex is essential for skeletal excitation-contraction (EC)-coupling and skeletal muscle function. Its importance is highlighted by perinatal death if any one of the EC-coupling components are missing and by myopathies associated with mutation of any of the proteins. The proteins essential for EC-coupling include the DHPR α_1S subunit in the transverse tubule membrane, the DHPR β_1a subunit in the cytosol and the RyR1 ion channel in the SR membrane. The other core proteins are triadin and junctin and calsequestrin, associated mainly with SR. These SR proteins are not essential for survival but exert structural and functional influences that modify the gain of EC-coupling and maintain normal muscle function. This review summarises our current knowledge of the individual protein/protein interactions within the core complex and their overall contribution to EC-coupling. We highlight significant areas that provide a continuing challenge for the field. Additional important components of the Ca²⁺ release complex, such as FKBP12, calmodulin, S100A1 and Stac3 are identified and reviewed elsewhere.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap II: more recent advances in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction (EC) coupling relies on the transmission of an intermolecular signal from the voltage-sensing regions of the L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) in the plasma membrane to the channel pore of the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) nearly 10 nm away in the membrane of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Even though the roles of Ca(V)1.1 and RyR1 as voltage sensor and SR Ca(2+) release channel, respectively, have been established for nearly 25 years, the mechanism underlying communication between these two channels remains undefined. In the course of this article, I will review current viewpoints on this topic with particular emphasis on recent studies.

Structure of the voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(v)1.1 at 3.6 Å resolution

The voltage-gated calcium (Ca_v) channels convert membrane electrical signals to intracellular Ca²⁺-mediated events. Among the ten subtypes of Ca_v channel in mammals, Ca_v1.1 is specified for the excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscles. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the rabbit Ca_v1.1 complex at a nominal resolution of 3.6 Å. The inner gate of the ion-conducting α1-subunit is closed and all four voltage-sensing domains adopt an 'up' conformation, suggesting a potentially inactivated state. The extended extracellular loops of the pore domain, which are stabilized by multiple disulfide bonds, form a windowed dome above the selectivity filter. One side of the dome provides the docking site for the α2δ-1-subunit, while the other side may attract cations through its negative surface potential. The intracellular I-II and III-IV linker helices interact with the β_1a-subunit and the carboxy-terminal domain of α1, respectively. Classification of the particles yielded two additional reconstructions that reveal pronounced displacement of β_1a and adjacent elements in α1. The atomic model of the Ca_v1.1 complex establishes a foundation for mechanistic understanding of excitation-contraction coupling and provides a three-dimensional template for molecular interpretations of the functions and disease mechanisms of Ca_v and Na_v channels.

Structure of the voltage-gated calcium channel Cav1.1 complex

The voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(v)1.1 is engaged in the excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscles. The Ca(v)1.1 complex consists of the pore-forming subunit α1 and auxiliary subunits α2δ, β, and γ. We report the structure of the rabbit Ca(v)1.1 complex determined by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The four homologous repeats of the α1 subunit are arranged clockwise in the extracellular view. The γ subunit, whose structure resembles claudins, interacts with the voltage-sensing domain of repeat IV (VSD(IV)), whereas the cytosolic β subunit is located adjacent to VSD(II) of α1. The α2 subunit interacts with the extracellular loops of repeats I to III through its VWA and Cache1 domains. The structure reveals the architecture of a prototypical eukaryotic Ca(v) channel and provides a framework for understanding the function and disease mechanisms of Ca(v) and Na(v) channels.

The Physiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels and Their Future Therapeutic Potential

Voltage-gated calcium channels are required for many key functions in the body. In this review, the different subtypes of voltage-gated calcium channels are described and their physiologic roles and pharmacology are outlined. We describe the current uses of drugs interacting with the different calcium channel subtypes and subunits, as well as specific areas in which there is strong potential for future drug development. Current therapeutic agents include drugs targeting L-type Ca(V)1.2 calcium channels, particularly 1,4-dihydropyridines, which are widely used in the treatment of hypertension. T-type (Ca(V)3) channels are a target of ethosuximide, widely used in absence epilepsy. The auxiliary subunit α2δ-1 is the therapeutic target of the gabapentinoid drugs, which are of value in certain epilepsies and chronic neuropathic pain. The limited use of intrathecal ziconotide, a peptide blocker of N-type (Ca(V)2.2) calcium channels, as a treatment of intractable pain, gives an indication that these channels represent excellent drug targets for various pain conditions. We describe how selectivity for different subtypes of calcium channels (e.g., Ca(V)1.2 and Ca(V)1.3 L-type channels) may be achieved in the future by exploiting differences between channel isoforms in terms of sequence and biophysical properties, variation in splicing in different target tissues, and differences in the properties of the target tissues themselves in terms of membrane potential or firing frequency. Thus, use-dependent blockers of the different isoforms could selectively block calcium channels in particular pathologies, such as nociceptive neurons in pain states or in epileptic brain circuits. Of important future potential are selective Ca(V)1.3 blockers for neuropsychiatric diseases, neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease, and resistant hypertension. In addition, selective or nonselective T-type channel blockers are considered potential therapeutic targets in epilepsy, pain, obesity, sleep, and anxiety. Use-dependent N-type calcium channel blockers are likely to be of therapeutic use in chronic pain conditions. Thus, more selective calcium channel blockers hold promise for therapeutic intervention.

Amino acid residues 489-503 of dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β1a subunit are critical for structural communication between the skeletal muscle DHPR complex and type 1 ryanodine receptor

The β1a subunit is a cytoplasmic component of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) complex that plays an essential role in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Here we investigate the role of the C-terminal end of this auxiliary subunit in the functional and structural communication between the DHPR and the Ca(2+) release channel (RyR1). Progressive truncation of the β1a C terminus showed that deletion of amino acid residues Gln(489) to Trp(503) resulted in a loss of depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release, a severe reduction of L-type Ca(2+) currents, and a lack of tetrad formation as evaluated by freeze-fracture analysis. However, deletion of this domain did not affect expression/targeting or density (Qmax) of the DHPR-α1S subunit to the plasma membrane. Within this motif, triple alanine substitution of residues Leu(496), Leu(500), and Trp(503), which are thought to mediate direct β1a-RyR1 interactions, weakened EC coupling but did not replicate the truncated phenotype. Therefore, these data demonstrate that an amino acid segment encompassing sequence (489)QVQVLTSLRRNLSFW(503) of β1a contains critical determinant(s) for the physical link of DHPR and RyR1, further confirming a direct correspondence between DHPR positioning and DHPR/RyR functional interactions. In addition, our data strongly suggest that the motif Leu(496)-Leu(500)-Trp(503) within the β1a C-terminal tail plays a nonessential role in the bidirectional DHPR/RyR1 signaling that supports skeletal-type EC coupling.

Electrical coupling between the human serotonin transporter and voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels

Monoamine transporters have been implicated in dopamine or serotonin release in response to abused drugs such as methamphetamine or ecstasy (MDMA). In addition, monoamine transporters show substrate-induced inward currents that may modulate excitability and Ca(2+) mobilization, which could also contribute to neurotransmitter release. How monoamine transporters modulate Ca(2+) permeability is currently unknown. We investigate the functional interaction between the human serotonin transporter (hSERT) and voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (CaV). We introduce an excitable expression system consisting of cultured muscle cells genetically engineered to express hSERT. Both 5HT and S(+)MDMA depolarize these cells and activate the excitation-contraction (EC)-coupling mechanism. However, hSERT substrates fail to activate EC-coupling in CaV1.1-null muscle cells, thus implicating Ca(2+) channels. CaV1.3 and CaV2.2 channels are natively expressed in neurons. When these channels are co-expressed with hSERT in HEK293T cells, only cells expressing the lower-threshold L-type CaV1.3 channel show Ca(2+) transients evoked by 5HT or S(+)MDMA. In addition, the electrical coupling between hSERT and CaV1.3 takes place at physiological 5HT concentrations. The electrical coupling between monoamine neurotransmitter transporters and Ca(2+) channels such as CaV1.3 is a novel mechanism by which endogenous substrates (neurotransmitters) or exogenous substrates (like ecstasy) could modulate Ca(2+)-driven signals in excitable cells.

Shotgun proteomic analysis of sarcoplasmic reticulum preparations from rabbit skeletal muscle

To obtain a comprehensive understanding of proteins involved in excitation-contraction coupling, a catalog of proteins from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane fractions of New Zealand white rabbit skeletal muscle was analyzed by an optimized shotgun proteomic method. Light and heavy SR membrane fractions were obtained by nonlinear sucrose gradient centrifugation and separated by 1DE followed by a highly reproducible, automated LC-MS/MS on the hybrid linear ion trap (LTQ) Orbitrap mass spectrometer. By integrating as low as 1% false discovery rate as one of the features for quality control method, 483 proteins were identified from both of the two independent SR preparations. Proteins involved in calcium release unit complex, including ryanodine receptor 1, dihydropyridine receptor, calmodulin, triadin, junctin, and calsequestrin, were all detected, which offered validation for this protein identification method. Rigorous bioinformatics analysis was performed. Protein pI value, molecular weight range, hydrophobicity index, and transmembrane region were calculated using bioinformatics softwares. Eighty-three proteins were classified as hydrophobic proteins and 175 proteins were recognized as membrane proteins. Based on the proteomic analysis results, we found as the first time that not only transverse tubule but also mitochondrion physically connected to SR. The complete mapping of these proteomes may help in the elucidation of the process of excitation-contraction coupling and excitation-metabolism coupling.

Ca(V)1.1: The atypical prototypical voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel

Ca(V)1.1 is the prototype for the other nine known Ca(V) channel isoforms, yet it has functional properties that make it truly atypical of this group. Specifically, Ca(V)1.1 is expressed solely in skeletal muscle where it serves multiple purposes; it is the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling and it is an L-type Ca²⁺ channel which contributes to a form of activity-dependent Ca²⁺ entry that has been termed Excitation-coupled Ca²⁺ entry. The ability of Ca(V)1.1 to serve as voltage-sensor for excitation-contraction coupling appears to be unique among Ca(V) channels, whereas the physiological role of its more conventional function as a Ca²⁺ channel has been a matter of uncertainty for nearly 50 years. In this chapter, we discuss how Ca(V)1.1 supports excitation-contraction coupling, the possible relevance of Ca²⁺ entry through Ca(V)1.1 and how alterations of Ca(V)1.1 function can have pathophysiological consequences. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium channels.

Orthograde dihydropyridine receptor signal regulates ryanodine receptor passive leak

The skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and ryanodine receptor (RyR1) are known to engage a form of conformation coupling essential for muscle contraction in response to depolarization, referred to as excitation-contraction coupling. Here we use WT and Ca(V)1.1 null (dysgenic) myotubes to provide evidence for an unexplored RyR1-DHPR interaction that regulates the transition of the RyR1 between gating and leak states. Using double-barreled Ca(2+)-selective microelectrodes, we demonstrate that the lack of Ca(V)1.1 expression was associated with an increased myoplasmic resting [Ca(2+)] ([Ca(2+)](rest)), increased resting sarcolemmal Ca(2+) entry, and decreased sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) loading. Pharmacological control of the RyR1 leak state, using bastadin 5, reverted the three parameters to WT levels. The fact that Ca(2+) sparks are not more frequent in dysgenic than in WT myotubes adds support to the hypothesis that the leak state is a conformation distinct from gating RyR1s. We conclude from these data that this orthograde DHPR-to-RyR1 signal inhibits the transition of gated RyR1s into the leak state. Further, it suggests that the DHPR-uncoupled RyR1 population in WT muscle has a higher propensity to be in the leak conformation. RyR1 leak functions are to keep [Ca(2+)](rest) and the SR Ca(2+) content in the physiological range and thus maintain normal intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis.

A malignant hyperthermia-inducing mutation in RYR1 (R163C): consequent alterations in the functional properties of DHPR channels

Bidirectional communication between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RYR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) is responsible for both skeletal-type excitation–contraction coupling (voltage-gated Ca²⁺ release from the SR) and increased amplitude of L-type Ca²⁺ current via the DHPR. Because the DHPR and RYR1 are functionally coupled, mutations in RYR1 that are linked to malignant hyperthermia (MH) may affect DHPR activity. For this reason, we investigated whether cultured myotubes originating from mice carrying an MH-linked mutation in RYR1 (R163C) had altered voltage-gated Ca²⁺ release from the SR, membrane-bound charge movement, and/or L-type Ca²⁺ current. In myotubes homozygous (Hom) for the R163C mutation, voltage-gated Ca²⁺ release from the SR was substantially reduced and shifted (∼10 mV) to more hyperpolarizing potentials compared with wild-type (WT) myotubes. Intramembrane charge movements of both Hom and heterozygous (Het) myotubes displayed hyperpolarizing shifts similar to that observed in voltage-gated SR Ca²⁺ release. The current–voltage relationships for L-type currents in both Hom and Het myotubes were also shifted to more hyperpolarizing potentials (∼7 and 5 mV, respectively). Compared with WT myotubes, Het and Hom myotubes both displayed a greater sensitivity to the L-type channel agonist ±Bay K 8644 (10 µM). In general, L-type currents in WT, Het, and Hom myotubes inactivated modestly after 30-s prepulses to −50, −10, 0, 10, 20, and 30 mV. However, L-type currents in Hom myotubes displayed a hyperpolarizing shift in inactivation relative to L-type currents in either WT or Het myotubes. Our present results indicate that mutations in RYR1 can alter DHPR activity and raise the possibility that this altered DHPR function may contribute to MH episodes.

Ryanodine modification of RyR1 retrogradely affects L-type Ca(2+) channel gating in skeletal muscle

In skeletal muscle, there is bidirectional signalling between the L-type Ca(2+) channel (1,4-dihydropyridine receptor; DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RyR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). In the case of "orthograde signalling" (i.e., excitation-contraction coupling), the conformation of RyR1 is controlled by depolarization-induced conformational changes of the DHPR resulting in Ca(2+) release from the SR. "Retrograde coupling" is manifested as enhanced L-type current. The nature of this retrograde signal, and its dependence on RyR1 conformation, are poorly understood. Here, we have examined L-type currents in normal myotubes after an exposure to ryanodine (200 microM, 1 h at 37 degrees C) sufficient to lock RyR1 in a non-conducting, inactivated, conformational state. This treatment caused an increase in L-type current at less depolarized test potentials in comparison to myotubes similarly exposed to vehicle as a result of a approximately 5 mV hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage-dependence of activation. Charge movements of ryanodine-treated myotubes were also shifted to more hyperpolarizing potentials (approximately 13 mV) relative to vehicle-treated myotubes. Enhancement of the L-type current by ryanodine was absent in dyspedic (RyR1 null) myotubes, indicating that ryanodine does not act directly on the DHPR. Our findings indicate that in retrograde signaling, the functional state of RyR1 influences conformational changes of the DHPR involved in activation of L-type current. This raises the possibility that physiological regulators of the conformational state of RyR1 (e.g., Ca(2+), CaM, CaMK, redox potential) may also affect DHPR gating.

Effects of inserting fluorescent proteins into the alpha1S II-III loop: insights into excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, intermolecular communication between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and RYR1 is bidirectional: orthograde coupling (skeletal excitation-contraction coupling) is observed as depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release via RYR1, and retrograde coupling is manifested by increased L-type Ca(2+) current via DHPR. A critical domain (residues 720-765) of the DHPR alpha(1S) II-III loop plays an important but poorly understood role in bidirectional coupling with RYR1. In this study, we examine the consequences of fluorescent protein insertion into different positions within the alpha(1S) II-III loop. In four constructs, a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tandem was introduced in place of residues 672-685 (the peptide A region). All four constructs supported efficient bidirectional coupling as determined by the measurement of L-type current and myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients. In contrast, insertion of a CFP-YFP tandem within the N-terminal portion of the critical domain (between residues 726 and 727) abolished bidirectional signaling. Bidirectional coupling was partially preserved when only a single YFP was inserted between residues 726 and 727. However, insertion of YFP near the C-terminal boundary of the critical domain (between residues 760 and 761) or in the conserved C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop (between residues 785 and 786) eliminated bidirectional coupling. None of the fluorescent protein insertions, even those that interfered with signaling, significantly altered membrane expression or targeting. Thus, bidirectional signaling is ablated by insertions at two different sites in the C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop. Significantly, our results indicate that the conserved portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop C terminal to the critical domain plays an important role in bidirectional coupling either by conveying conformational changes to the critical domain from other regions of the DHPR or by serving as a site of interaction with other junctional proteins such as RYR1.

Alpha2delta1 dihydropyridine receptor subunit is a critical element for excitation-coupled calcium entry but not for formation of tetrads in skeletal myotubes

It has been shown that small interfering RNA (siRNA) partial knockdown of the alpha(2)delta(1) dihydropyridine receptor subunits cause a significant increase in the rate of activation of the L-type Ca(2+) current in myotubes but have little or no effect on skeletal excitation-contraction coupling. This study used permanent siRNA knockdown of alpha(2)delta(1) to address two important unaddressed questions. First, does the alpha(2)delta(1) subunit contribute to the size and/or spacing of tetradic particles? Second, is the alpha(2)delta(1) subunit important for excitation-coupled calcium entry? We found that the size and spacing of tetradic particles is unaffected by siRNA knockdown of alpha(2)delta(1), indicating that the visible particle represents the alpha(1s) subunit. Strikingly, >97% knockdown of alpha(2)delta(1) leads to a complete loss of excitation-coupled calcium entry during KCl depolarization and a more rapid decay of Ca(2+) transients during bouts of repetitive electrical stimulation like those occurring during normal muscle activation in vivo. Thus, we conclude that the alpha(2)delta(1) dihydropyridine receptor subunit is physiologically necessary for sustaining Ca(2+) transients in response to prolonged depolarization or repeated trains of action potentials.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap: recent developments in skeletal muscle excitation–contraction coupling

Conformational coupling between the L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel (or 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor; DHPR) and the ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (RyR1) is the mechanistic basis for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle. In this article, recent findings regarding the roles of the individual cytoplasmic domains (the amino- and carboxyl-termini, cytoplasmic loops I-II, II-III, and III-IV) of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit in bi-directional communication with RyR1 will be discussed.

The Assembly of Calcium Release Units in Cardiac Muscle

Calcium release units (CRUs) are constituted of specialized junctional domains of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (jSR) that bear calcium release channels, also called ryanodine receptors (RyRs). In cardiac muscle, CRUs come in three subtypes that differ in geometry, but have common molecular components. Peripheral couplings are formed by a junction of the jSR with the plasmalemma; dyads occur where the jSR is associated with transverse (T)-tubules; corbular SR is a jSR domain that is located within the cells and bears RyRs but does not associate with either plasmalemma or T-tubules. Using transmission electron microscopy, this study followed the formation of CRUs and their accrual of four components: the L-type channel dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) of plasmalemma/T-tubules; the RyRs of jSR; triadin (Tr) and junctin (JnC), two homologous components of the jSR membrane; and calsequestrin (CSQ), the internal calcium binding proteins. During differentiation, peripheral couplings are formed first and the others follow. RyRs and DHPRs are targeted to subdomains of the CRUs that face each other and are acquired in a concerted manner. Overexpressions of either junction (JnC or Tr) and of CSQ, singly or in conjunction, shed light on the specific role of JnC in the structural development, organization, and maintenance of jSR cisternae and on the independent synthetic pathways and targeting of JnC and CSQ. In addition, the structural cues provided by the overexpression models allow us to define sequential steps in the synthetic pathway for JnC and CSQ and their targeting to the CRUs of differentiating myocardium.

Evolution of skeletal type e-c coupling: a novel means of controlling calcium delivery

The functional separation between skeletal and cardiac muscles, which occurs at the threshold between vertebrates and invertebrates, involves the evolution of separate contractile and control proteins for the two types of striated muscles, as well as separate mechanisms of contractile activation. The functional link between electrical excitation of the surface membrane and activation of the contractile material (known as excitation–contraction [e–c] coupling) requires the interaction between a voltage sensor in the surface membrane, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR), and a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum, the ryanodine receptor (RyR). Skeletal and cardiac muscles have different isoforms of the two proteins and present two structurally and functionally distinct modes of interaction.

We use structural clues to trace the evolution of the dichotomy from a single, generic type of e–c coupling to a diversified system involving a novel mechanism for skeletal muscle activation. Our results show that a significant structural transition marks the protochordate to the Craniate evolutionary step, with the appearance of skeletal muscle–specific RyR and DHPR isoforms.

Organization of Ca2+ release units in excitable smooth muscle of the guinea-pig urinary bladder

Ca(2+) release from internal stores (sarcoplasmic reticulum or SR) in smooth muscles is initiated either via pharmaco-mechanical coupling due to the action of an agonist and involving IP3 receptors, or via excitation-contraction coupling, mostly involving L-type calcium channels in the plasmalemma (DHPRs), and ryanodine receptors (RyRs), or Ca(2+) release channels of the SR. This work focuses attention on the structural basis for the coupling between DHPRs and RyRs in phasic smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig urinary bladder. Immunolabeling shows that two proteins of the SR: calsequestrin and the RyR, and one protein the plasmalemma, the L-type channel or DHPR, are colocalized with each other within numerous, peripherally located sites located within the caveolar domains. Electron microscopy images from thin sections and freeze-fracture replicas identify feet in small peripherally located SR vesicles containing calsequestrin and distinctive large particles clustered within small membrane areas. Both feet and particle clusters are located within caveolar domains. Correspondence between the location of feet and particle clusters and of RyR- and DHPR-positive foci allows the conclusion that calsequestrin, RyRs, and L-type Ca(2+) channels are associated with peripheral couplings, or Ca(2+) release units, constituting the key machinery involved in excitation-contraction coupling. Structural analogies between smooth and cardiac muscle excitation-contraction coupling complexes suggest a common basic mechanism of action.

Differential contribution of skeletal and cardiac II-III loop sequences to the assembly of dihydropyridine-receptor arrays in skeletal muscle

The plasmalemmal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) is the voltage sensor in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling. It activates calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via protein-protein interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR). To enable this interaction, DHPRs are arranged in arrays of tetrads opposite RyRs. In the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit, the cytoplasmic loop connecting repeats II and III is a major determinant of skeletal-type e-c coupling. Whether the essential II-III loop sequence (L720-L764) also determines the skeletal-specific arrangement of DHPRs was examined in dysgenic (alpha(1S)-null) myotubes reconstituted with distinct alpha(1) subunit isoforms and II-III loop chimeras. Parallel immunofluorescence and freeze-fracture analysis showed that alpha(1S) and chimeras containing L720-L764, all of which restored skeletal-type e-c coupling, displayed the skeletal arrangement of DHPRs in arrays of tetrads. Conversely, alpha(1C) and those chimeras with a cardiac II-III loop and cardiac e-c coupling properties were targeted into junctional membranes but failed to form tetrads. However, an alpha(1S)-based chimera with the heterologous Musca II-III loop produced tetrads but did not reconstitute skeletal muscle e-c coupling. These findings suggest an inhibitory role in tetrad formation of the cardiac II-III loop and that the organization of DHPRs in tetrads vis-a-vis the RyR is necessary but not sufficient for skeletal-type e-c coupling.

The relative position of RyR feet and DHPR tetrads in skeletal muscle

In skeletal muscle, L-type calcium channels (or dihydropyridine receptors, DHPRs) are coupled functionally to the calcium release channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (or ryanodine receptors, RyRs) within specialized structures called calcium release units (CRUs). The functional linkage requires a specific positioning of four DHPRs in correspondence of the four identical subunits of a single RyR type 1. Four DHPRs linked to the four binding sites of the RyR1 cytoplasmic domain (or foot), define the corners of a square, constituting a tetrad. RyRs self-assemble into ordered arrays and by associating with them, DHPRs also assemble into ordered arrays. The approximate location of the four DHPRs relative to the four identical subunits of a RyR-foot can be predicted on the basis of the relative position of tetrads and feet within the arrays. However, until recently one vital piece of information has been lacking: the orientation of the two arrays relative to one another. In this work we have defined the relative orientation of the RyR and DHPR arrays by directly superimposing replicas of rotary shadowed images of rows of feet, obtained from isolated SR vesicles, and replicas of tetrad arrays obtained by freeze-fracture. If the orientation for the two sets of images is carefully maintained, the superimposition provides specific constraints on the DHPR-RyR relative position.

Evidence for conformational coupling between two calcium channels

Ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1, the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release channel) and alpha(1S)dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR, the surface membrane voltage sensor) of skeletal muscle belong to separate membrane systems but are functionally and structurally linked. Four alpha(1S)DHPRs associated with the four identical subunits of a RyR form a tetrad. We treated skeletal muscle cell lines with ryanodine, at concentrations that block RyRs, and determined whether this treatment affects the distance between DHPRs in the tetrad. We find a substantial ( approximately 2-nm) shift in the alpha(1S)DHPR positions, indicating that ryanodine induces large conformational changes in the RyR1 cytoplasmic domain and that the alpha(1S)DHPR-RyR complex acts as a unit.

Plasticity of the transverse tubules following denervation and subsequent reinnervation in rat slow and fast muscle fibres

We have studied the effects of short term denervation followed by reinnervation on the ultrastructure of the membrane systems and on the content of and distribution of key proteins involved in calcium regulation of fast-twitch (FT) extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and slow-twitch (ST) soleus (SOL) muscle fibres. Ischiadic nerve freezing resulted in total lack of neuromuscular transmission for 3 days followed by a slow recovery, but no decline in twitch force elicited by direct stimulation. The latter measurements indicate no significant atrophy within this time frame. The membrane systems of skeletal muscle fibres were visualized using Ca92+)-K3Fe(CN)6-OsO4 techniques and observed using a high voltage electron microscope. [3H]nitrendipine binding was used to detect levels of dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) expression. The Ca2+ pumping free sarcoplasmic reticulum domains were not affected by the denervation, but the Ca2+ release domains were dramatically increased, particularly in the FT-EDL muscle fibres. The increase is evidenced by a doubling up of the areas of contacts between SR and transverse (t-) tubules, so that in place of the normal triadic arrangement, pentadic and heptadic junctions, formed by multiple interacting layers of ST and t-tubules are seen. Frequency of pentads and heptads increases and declines in parallel to the denervation and reinnervation but with a delay. Immunofluorecence and electron microscopy observations show presence of DHPR and ryanodine receptor clusters at pentads and heptads junctions. A significant (P < 0.01) positive correlation between the level of [3H]nitrendipine binding component and the frequency pentads and heptads was observed in both the FT-EDL and ST-SOL muscle fibres indicating that overexpression of DHPRs accompanies the build up extra junctional contacts. The results indicate that denervation reversibly affects the domains of the membrane systems involved in excitation-contraction coupling.

Ca2+-dependent excitation-contraction coupling triggered by the heterologous cardiac/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit in skeletal myotubes

Molecular determinants essential for skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling have been described in the cytosolic loops of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha1S pore subunit and in the carboxyl terminus of the skeletal-specific DHPR beta1a-subunit. It is unknown whether EC coupling domains present in the beta-subunit influence those present in the pore subunit or if they act independent of each other. To address this question, we investigated the EC coupling signal that is generated when the endogenous DHPR pore subunit alpha1S is paired with the heterologous heart/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit. Studies were conducted in primary cultured myotubes from beta1 knockout (KO), ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) KO, ryanodine receptor type 3 (RyR3) KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO mice under voltage clamp with simultaneous monitoring of confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. The beta2a-mediated Ca2+ current recovered in beta1 KO myotubes lacking the endogenous DHPR beta1a-subunit verified formation of the alpha1S/beta1a pair. In myotube genotypes which express no or low-density L-type Ca2+ currents, namely beta1 KO and RyR1 KO, beta2a overexpression recovered a wild-type density of nifedipine-sensitive Ca2+ currents with a slow activation kinetics typical of skeletal myotubes. Concurrent with Ca2+ current recovery, there was a drastic reduction of voltage-dependent, skeletal-type EC coupling and emergence of Ca2+ transients triggered by the Ca2+ current. A comparison of beta2a overexpression in RyR3 KO, RyR1 KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO myotubes concluded that both RyR1 and RyR3 isoforms participated in Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ release triggered by the beta2a-subunit. In beta1 KO and RyR1 KO myotubes, the Ca2+-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a overexpression had the following characteristics: 1), L-type Ca2+ currents had a wild-type density; 2), Ca2+ transients activated much slower than controls overexpressing beta1a, and the rate of fluorescence increase was consistent with the activation kinetics of the Ca2+ current; 3), the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ transient was bell-shaped and the maximum was centered at approximately +30 mV, consistent with the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ current; and 4), Ca2+ currents and Ca2+ transients were fully blocked by nifedipine. The loss in voltage-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a was inferred by the drastic reduction in maximal Ca2+ fluorescence at large positive potentials (DeltaF/Fmax) in double dysgenic/beta1 KO myotubes overexpressing the pore mutant alpha1S (E1014K) and beta2a. The data indicate that beta2a, upon interaction with the skeletal pore subunit alpha1S, overrides critical EC coupling determinants present in alpha1S. We propose that the alpha1S/beta pair, and not the alpha1S-subunit alone, controls the EC coupling signal in skeletal muscle.

Calsequestrin and the calcium release channel of skeletal and cardiac muscle

Calsequestrin is by far the most abundant Ca(2+)-binding protein in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) of skeletal and cardiac muscle. It allows the Ca2+ required for contraction to be stored at total concentrations of up to 20mM, while the free Ca2+ concentration remains at approximately 1mM. This storage capacity confers upon muscle the ability to contract frequently with minimal run-down in tension. Calsequestrin is highly acidic, containing up to 50 Ca(2+)-binding sites, which are formed simply by clustering of two or more acidic residues. The Kd for Ca2+ binding is between 1 and 100 microM, depending on the isoform, species and the presence of other cations. Calsequestrin monomers have a molecular mass of approximately 40 kDa and contain approximately 400 residues. The monomer contains three domains each with a compact alpha-helical/beta-sheet thioredoxin fold which is stable in the presence of Ca2+. The protein polymerises when Ca2+ concentrations approach 1mM. The polymer is anchored at one end to ryanodine receptor (RyR) Ca2+ release channels either via the intrinsic membrane proteins triadin and junctin or by binding directly to the RyR. It is becoming clear that calsequestrin has several functions in the lumen of the SR in addition to its well-recognised role as a Ca2+ buffer. Firstly, it is a luminal regulator of RyR activity. When triadin and junctin are present, calsequestrin maximally inhibits the Ca2+ release channel when the free Ca2+ concentration in the SR lumen is 1mM. The inhibition is relieved when the Ca2+ concentration alters, either because of small changes in the conformation of calsequestrin or its dissociation from the junctional face membrane. These changes in calsequestrin's association with the RyR amplify the direct effects of luminal Ca2+ concentration on RyR activity. In addition, calsequestrin activates purified RyRs lacking triadin and junctin. Further roles for calsequestrin are indicated by the kinase activity of the protein, its thioredoxin-like structure and its influence over store operated Ca2+ entry. Clearly, calsequestrin plays a major role in calcium homeostasis that extends well beyond its ability to buffer Ca2+ ions.

Ca2+ current and charge movements in skeletal myotubes promoted by the beta-subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor in the absence of ryanodine receptor type 1

The beta-subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) enhances the Ca(2+) channel and voltage-sensing functions of the DHPR. In skeletal myotubes, there is additional modulation of DHPR functions imposed by the presence of ryanodine receptor type-1 (RyR1). Here, we examined the participation of the beta-subunit in the expression of L-type Ca(2+) current and charge movements in RyR1 knock-out (KO), beta1 KO, and double beta1/RyR1 KO myotubes generated by mating heterozygous beta1 KO and RyR1 KO mice. Primary myotube cultures of each genotype were transfected with various beta-isoforms and then whole-cell voltage-clamped for measurements of Ca(2+) and gating currents. Overexpression of the endogenous skeletal beta1a isoform resulted in a low-density Ca(2+) current either in RyR1 KO (36 +/- 9 pS/pF) or in beta1/RyR1 KO (34 +/- 7 pS/pF) myotubes. However, the heterologous beta2a variant with a double cysteine motif in the N-terminus (C3, C4), recovered a Ca(2+) current that was entirely wild-type in density in RyR1 KO (195 +/- 16 pS/pF) and was significantly enhanced in double beta1/RyR1 KO (115 +/- 18 pS/pF) myotubes. Other variants tested from the four beta gene families (beta1a, beta1b, beta1c, beta3, and beta4) were unable to enhance Ca(2+) current expression in RyR1 KO myotubes. In contrast, intramembrane charge movements in beta2a-expressing beta1a/RyR1 KO myotubes were significantly lower than in beta1a-expressing beta1a/RyR1 KO myotubes, and the same tendency was observed in the RyR1 KO myotube. Thus, beta2a had a preferential ability to recover Ca(2+) current, whereas beta1a had a preferential ability to rescue charge movements. Elimination of the double cysteine motif (beta2a C3,4S) eliminated the RyR1-independent Ca(2+) current expression. Furthermore, Ca(2+) current enhancement was observed with a beta2a variant lacking the double cysteine motif and fused to the surface membrane glycoprotein CD8. Thus, tethering the beta2a variant to the myotube surface activated the DHPR Ca(2+) current and bypassed the requirement for RyR1. The data suggest that the Ca(2+) current expressed by the native skeletal DHPR complex has an inherently low density due to inhibitory interactions within the DHPR and that the beta1a-subunit is critically involved in process.

Location of ryanodine and dihydropyridine receptors in frog myocardium

Frog myocardium depends almost entirely on calcium entry from extracellular spaces for its beat-to-beat activation. Atrial myocardium additionally shows internal calcium release under certain conditions, but internal release in the ventricle is absent or very low. We have examined the content and distribution of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium release channels (ryanodine receptors, RyRs) and the surface membrane calcium channels (dihydropyridine receptors, DHPRs) in myocardium from the two atria and the ventricle of the frog heart using binding of radioactive ryanodine, immunolabeling of RyR and DHPR, and thin section and freeze-fracture electron microscopy. In cells from both types of chambers, the SR forms peripheral couplings and in both chambers peripheral couplings colocalize with clusters of DHPRs. However, although a low level of high affinity binding of ryanodine is detectable and RyRs are present in peripheral couplings of the atrium, the ventricle shows essentially no ryanodine binding and RyRs are not detectable either by electron microscopy or immunolabeling. The results are consistent with the lack of internal calcium release in the ventricle, and raise questions regarding the significance of DHPR at peripheral couplings in the absence of RyR. Interestingly, the free SR membrane in both heart chambers shows a low but equal density of intramembrane particles representing the Ca(2+) ATPase.

Truncation of the carboxyl terminus of the dihydropyridine receptor beta1a subunit promotes Ca2+ dependent excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal myotubes

We investigated the contribution of the carboxyl terminus region of the beta1a subunit of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) to the mechanism of excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. cDNA-transfected beta1 KO myotubes were voltage clamped, and Ca(2+) transients were analyzed by confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. A chimera with an amino terminus half of beta2a and a carboxyl terminus half of beta1a (beta2a 1-287/beta1a 325-524) recapitulates skeletal-type EC coupling quantitatively and was used to generate truncated variants lacking 7 to 60 residues from the beta1a-specific carboxyl terminus (Delta7, Delta21, Delta29, Delta35, and Delta60). Ca(2+) transients recovered by the control chimera have a sigmoidal Ca(2+) fluorescence (DeltaF/F) versus voltage curve with saturation at potentials more positive than +30 mV, independent of external Ca(2+) and stimulus duration. In contrast, the amplitude of Ca(2+) transients expressed by the truncated variants varied with the duration of the pulse, and for Delta29, Delta35, and Delta60, also varied with external Ca(2+) concentration. For Delta7 and Delta21, a 50-ms depolarization produced a sigmoidal DeltaF/F versus voltage curve with a lower than control maximum fluorescence. Moreover, for Delta29, Delta35, and Delta60, a 200-ms depolarization increased the maximum fluorescence and changed the shape of the DeltaF/F versus voltage curve, from sigmoidal to bell-shaped, with a maximum at approximately +30 mV. The change in voltage dependence, together with the external Ca(2+) dependence and additional controls with ryanodine, indicated a loss of skeletal-type EC coupling and the emergence of an EC coupling component triggered by the Ca(2+) current. Analyses of d(DeltaF/F)/dt showed that the rate of cytosolic Ca(2+) increase during the Ca(2+) transient was fivefold faster for the control chimera than for the severely truncated variants (Delta29, Delta35, and Delta60) and was consistent with the kinetics of the DHPR Ca(2+) current. In summary, absence of the beta1a-specific carboxyl terminus (last 29 to 60 residues of the control chimera) results in a loss of the fast component of the Ca(2+) transient, bending of the DeltaF/F versus voltage curve, and emergence of EC coupling triggered by the Ca(2+) current. The studies underscore the essential role of the carboxyl terminus region of the DHPR beta1a subunit in fast voltage dependent EC coupling in skeletal myotubes.

The structure of Ca(2+) release units in arthropod body muscle indicates an indirect mechanism for excitation-contraction coupling

The relative disposition of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and L-type Ca(2+) channels was examined in body muscles from three arthropods. In all muscles the disposition of ryanodine receptors in the junctional gap between apposed SR and T tubule elements is highly ordered. By contrast, the junctional membrane of the T tubule is occupied by distinctive large particles that are clustered within the small junctional domain, but show no order in their arrangement. We propose that the large particles of the junctional T tubules represent L-type Ca(2+) channels involved in excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling, based on their similarity in size and location with the L-type Ca(2+) channels or dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) of skeletal and cardiac muscle. The random arrangement of DHPRs in arthropod body muscles indicates that there is no close link between them and RyRs. This matches the architecture of vertebrate cardiac muscle and is in keeping with the similarity in e-c coupling mechanisms in cardiac and invertebrate striated muscles.

Electron tomography of frozen-hydrated isolated triad junctions

Cryoelectron microscopy and tomography have been applied for the first time to isolated, frozen-hydrated skeletal muscle triad junctions (triads) and terminal cisternae (TC) vesicles derived from sarcoplasmic reticulum. Isolated triads were selected on the basis of their appearance as two spherical TC vesicles attached to opposite sides of a flattened vesicle derived from a transverse tubule (TT). Foot structures (ryanodine receptors) were resolved within the gap between the TC vesicles and TT vesicles, and some residual ordering of the receptors into arrays was apparent. Organized dense layers, apparently containing the calcium-binding protein calsequestrin, were found in the lumen of TC vesicles underlying the foot structures. The lamellar regions did not directly contact the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane, thereby creating an approximately 5-nm-thick zone that potentially constitutes a subcompartment for achieving locally elevated [Ca(2+) ] in the immediate vicinity of the Ca(2+)-conducting ryanodine receptors. The lumen of the TT vesicles contained globular mass densities of unknown origin, some of which form cross-bridges that may be responsible for the flattened appearance of the transverse tubules when viewed in cross-section. The spatial relationships among the TT membrane, ryanodine receptors, and calsequestrin-containing assemblage are revealed under conditions that do not use dehydration, heavy-metal staining, or chemical fixation, thus exemplifying the potential of cryoelectron microscopy and tomography to reveal structural detail of complex subcellular structures.

Interactions between dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors in striated muscle

Excitation-contraction coupling in both skeletal and cardiac muscle depends on structural and functional interactions between the voltage-sensing dihydropyridine receptor L-type Ca(2+) channels in the surface/transverse tubular membrane and ryanodine receptor Ca(2+) release channels in the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane. The channels are targeted to either side of a narrow junctional gap that separates the external and internal membrane systems and are arranged so that bi-directional structural and functional coupling can occur between the proteins. There is strong evidence for a physical interaction between the two types of channel protein in skeletal muscle. This evidence is derived from studies of excitation-contraction coupling in intact myocytes and from experiments in isolated systems where fragments of the dihydropyridine receptor can bind to the ryanodine receptors in sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles or in lipid bilayers and alter channel activity. Although micro-regions that participate in the functional interactions have been identified in each protein, the role of these regions and the molecular nature of the protein-protein interaction remain unknown. The trigger for Ca(2+) release through ryanodine receptors in cardiac muscle is a Ca(2+) influx through the L-type Ca(2+) channel. The Ca(2+) entering through the surface membrane Ca(2+) channels flows directly onto underlying ryanodine receptors and activates the channels. This was thought to be a relatively simple system compared with that in skeletal muscle. However, complexities are emerging and evidence has now been obtained for a bi-directional physical coupling between the proteins in cardiac as well as skeletal muscle. The molecular nature of this coupling remains to be elucidated.

A component of excitation-contraction coupling triggered in the absence of the T671-L690 and L720-Q765 regions of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha(1s) pore subunit

We conducted a deletion analysis of two regions identified in the II-III loop of alpha(1S), residues 671-690, which were shown to bind to ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) and stimulate RyR1 channels in vitro, and residues 720-765 or the narrower 724-743 region, which confer excitation-contraction (EC) coupling function to chimeric dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs). Deletion mutants were expressed in dysgenic alpha(1S)-null myotubes and analyzed by voltage-clamp and confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. Immunostaining of the mutant subunits using an N-terminus tag revealed abundant protein expression in all cases. Furthermore, the maximum recovered charge movement density was >80% of that recovered by full-length alpha(1S) in all cases. Delta671-690 had no effect on the magnitude of voltage-evoked Ca(2+) transients or the L-type Ca(2+) current density. In contrast, Delta720-765 or Delta724-743 abolished Ca(2+) transients entirely, and L-type Ca(2+) current was reduced or absent. Surprisingly, Ca(2+) transients and Ca(2+) currents of a moderate magnitude were recovered by the double deletion mutant Delta671-690/Delta720-765. A simple explanation for this result is that Delta720-765 induces a conformation change that disrupts EC coupling, and this conformational change is partially reverted by Delta671-690. To test for Ca(2+)-entry independent EC coupling, a pore mutation (E1014K) known to entirely abolish the inward Ca(2+) current was introduced. alpha(1S) Delta671-690/Delta720-765/E1014K expressed Ca(2+) transients with Boltzmann parameters identical to those of the Ca(2+)-conducting double deletion construct. The data strongly suggest that skeletal-type EC coupling is not uniquely controlled by alpha(1S) 720-765. Other regions of alpha(1S) or other DHPR subunits must therefore directly contribute to the activation of RyR1 during EC coupling.

Structure and targeting of RyR1: implications from fusion of green fluorescent protein at the amino-terminal

In skeletal muscle, an anterograde signal from the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) to the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) is required for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling and a retrograde signal from RyR1 to the DHPR regulates the magnitude of the calcium current carried by the DHPR. As a tool for studying biosynthesis and targeting, we constructed a cDNA encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the amino terminal of RyR1 and expressed it in dyspedic myotubes. The GFP-RyR1 was present in a restricted domain near the nucleus injected with cDNA and was fully functional, which places constraints on the location of the amino terminal in the folded structure of RyR1.

Malignant hyperthermia and excitation-contraction coupling

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a state of elevated skeletal muscle metabolism that may occur during general anaesthesia in genetically pre-disposed individuals. Malignant hyperthermia results from altered control of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release. Mutations have been identified in MH-susceptible (MHS) individuals in two key proteins of excitation-contraction (EC) coupling, the Ca2+ release channel of the SR, ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) and the alpha1-subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR, L-type Ca2+ channel). During EC coupling, the DHPR senses the plasma membrane depolarization and transmits the information to the ryanodine receptor (RyR). As a consequence, Ca2+ is released from the terminal cisternae of the SR. One of the human MH-mutations of RyR1 (Arg614Cys) is also found at the homologous location in the RyR of swine (Arg615Cys). This animal model permits the investigation of physiological consequences of the homozygously expressed mutant release channel. Of particular interest is the question of whether voltage-controlled release of Ca2+ is altered by MH-mutations in the absence of MH-triggering substances. This question has recently been addressed in this laboratory by studying Ca2+ release under voltage clamp conditions in both isolated human skeletal muscle fibres and porcine myotubes.

RYR1 and RYR3 have different roles in the assembly of calcium release units of skeletal muscle

Calcium release units (CRUs) are junctions between the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and exterior membranes that mediates excitation contraction (e-c) coupling in muscle cells. In skeletal muscle CRUs contain two isoforms of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)release channel: ryanodine receptors type 1 and type 3 (RyR1 and RyR3). 1B5s are a mouse skeletal muscle cell line that carries a null mutation for RyR1 and does not express either RyR1 or RyR3. These cells develop dyspedic SR/exterior membrane junctions (i.e., dyspedic calcium release units, dCRUs) that contain dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) and triadin, two essential components of CRUs, but no RyRs (or feet). Lack of RyRs in turn affects the disposition of DHPRs, which is normally dictated by a linkage to RyR subunits. In the dCRUs of 1B5 cells, DHPRs are neither grouped into tetrads nor aligned in two orthogonal directions. We have explored the structural role of RyR3 in the assembly of CRUs in 1B5 cells independently expressing either RyR1 or RyR3. Either isoform colocalizes with DHPRs and triadin at the cell periphery. Electron microscopy shows that expression of either isoform results in CRUs containing arrays of feet, indicating the ability of both isoforms to be targeted to dCRUs and to assemble in ordered arrays in the absence of the other. However, a significant difference between RyR1- and RyR3-rescued junctions is revealed by freeze fracture. While cells transfected with RyR1 show restoration of DHPR tetrads and DHPR orthogonal alignment indicative of a link to RyRs, those transfected with RyR3 do not. This indicates that RyR3 fails to link to DHPRs in a specific manner. This morphological evidence supports the hypothesis that activation of RyR3 in skeletal muscle cells must be indirect and provides the basis for failure of e-c coupling in muscle cells containing RyR3 but lacking RyR1 (see the accompanying report, ).

Comparison of Ca(2+) sparks produced independently by two ryanodine receptor isoforms (type 1 or type 3)

The molecular determinants of a Ca(2+) spark, those events that determine the sudden opening and closing of a small number of ryanodine receptor (RyR) channels limiting Ca(2+) release to a few milliseconds, are unknown. As a first step we investigated which of two RyR isoforms present in mammalian embryonic skeletal muscle, RyR type 1(RyR-1) or RyR type 3 (RyR-3) has the ability to generate Ca(2+) sparks. Their separate contributions were investigated in intercostal muscle cells of RyR-1 null and RyR-3 null mouse embryos. A comparison of Ca(2+) spark parameters of RyR-1 null versus RyR-3 null cells measured at rest with fluo-3 showed that neither the peak fluorescence intensity (DeltaF/F(o) = 1.25 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.6), spatial width at half-max intensity (FWHM = 2.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.6 microm), nor the duration at half-max intensity (FTHM = 45 +/- 49 vs. 43 +/- 25 ms) was significantly different. Sensitivity to caffeine (0.1 mM) was remarkably different, with sparks in RyR-1 null myotubes becoming brighter and longer in duration, whereas those in RyR-3 null cells remained unchanged. Controls performed in double RyR-1/RyR-3 null cells obtained by mice breeding showed that sparks were not observed in the absence of both isoforms in >150 cells imaged. In conclusion, 1) RyR-1 and RyR-3 appear to be the only intracellular Ca(2+) channels that participate in Ca(2+) spark activity in embryonic skeletal muscle; 2) except in their responsiveness to caffeine, both isoforms have the ability to produce Ca(2+) sparks with nearly identical properties, so it is rather unlikely that a single RyR isoform, when others are also present, would be responsible for Ca(2+) sparks; and 3) because RyR-1 null cells are excitation-contraction (EC) uncoupled and RyR-3 null cells exhibit a normal phenotype, Ca(2+) sparks result from the inherent activity of small clusters of RyRs regardless of the participation of these RyRs in EC coupling.

The sarcoplasmic reticulum and the control of muscle contraction

Activation of muscle contraction is a rapid event that is initiated by electrical activity in the surface membrane and transverse (T) tubules. This is followed by release of calcium from the inner membrane system, the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Using electron microscopy (EM), K. R. Porter and his laboratory defined the SR, the unique junctions between SR and T tubules, and the continuity between T tubules and surface membrane. Current research in this area centers on the interaction between T tubules and SR. This is mediated by 2 well-identified calcium channels: the dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) that act as voltage sensors in the T tubules, and the ryanodine receptors (RyRs) or calcium release channels of the SR. The relative positions of these 2 molecules differ significantly in skeletal and cardiac muscle, and this correlates well with known functional differences in the control of contraction. Molecular biology experiments combined with EM indicate that DHPRs are linked to RyRs in skeletal but probably not in cardiac muscle.

Involvement of the carboxy-terminus region of the dihydropyridine receptor beta1a subunit in excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscle

Skeletal muscle knockout cells lacking the beta subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) are devoid of slow L-type Ca(2+) current, charge movements, and excitation-contraction coupling, despite having a normal Ca(2+) storage capacity and Ca(2+) spark activity. In this study we identified a specific region of the missing beta1a subunit critical for the recovery of excitation-contraction. Experiments were performed in beta1-null myotubes expressing deletion mutants of the skeletal muscle-specific beta1a, the cardiac/brain-specific beta2a, or beta2a/beta1a chimeras. Immunostaining was used to determine that all beta constructs were expressed in these cells. We examined the Ca(2+) conductance, charge movements, and Ca(2+) transients measured by confocal fluo-3 fluorescence of transfected myotubes under whole-cell voltage-clamp. All constructs recovered an L-type Ca(2+) current with a density, voltage-dependence, and kinetics of activation similar to that recovered by full-length beta1a. In addition, all constructs except beta2a mutants recovered charge movements with a density similar to full-length beta1a. Thus, all beta constructs became integrated into a skeletal-type DHPR and, except for beta2a mutants, all restored functional DHPRs to the cell surface at a high density. The maximum amplitude of the Ca(2+) transient was not affected by separate deletions of the N-terminus of beta1a or the central linker region of beta1a connecting two highly conserved domains. Also, replacement of the N-terminus half of beta1a with that of beta2a had no effect. However, deletion of 35 residues of beta1a at the C-terminus produced a fivefold reduction in the maximum amplitude of the Ca(2+) transients. A similar observation was made by deletion of the C-terminus of a chimera in which the C-terminus half was from beta1a. The identified domain at the C-terminus of beta1a may be responsible for colocalization of DHPRs and ryanodine receptors (RyRs), or may be required for the signal that opens the RyRs during excitation-contraction coupling. This new role of DHPR beta in excitation-contraction coupling represents a cell-specific function that could not be predicted on the basis of functional expression studies in heterologous cells.

Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release and muscle fatigue

Efforts to examine the relevant mechanisms involved in skeletal muscle fatigue are focusing on Ca(2+) handling within the active muscle cell. It has been demonstrated time and again that reductions in sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release resulting from increased or intense muscle contraction will compromise tension development. This review seeks to accomplish two related goals: 1) to provide an up-to-date molecular understanding of the Ca(2+)-release process, with considerable attention devoted to the SR Ca(2+) channel, including its associated proteins and their regulation by endogenous compounds; and 2) to examine several putative mechanisms by which cellular alterations resulting from intense and/or prolonged contractile activity will modify SR Ca(2+) release. The mechanisms that are likely candidates to explain the reductions in SR Ca(2+) channel function following contractile activity include elevated Ca(2+) concentrations, alterations in metabolic homeostasis within the "microcompartmentalized" triadic space, and modification by reactive oxygen species.