Barium inhibition of the collapse of the Shaker K(+) conductance in zero K(+)

Biological physics in México: Review and new challenges

Biological and physical sciences possess a long-standing tradition of cooperativity as separate but related subfields of science. For some time, this cooperativity has been limited by their obvious differences in methods and views. Biological physics has recently experienced a kind of revival (or better a rebirth) due to the growth of molecular research on animate matter. New avenues for research have been opened for both theoretical and experimental physicists. Nevertheless, in order to better travel for such paths, the contemporary biological physicist should be armed with a set of specialized tools and methods but also with a new attitude toward multidisciplinarity. In this review article, we intend to somehow summarize what has been done in the past (in particular, as an example we will take a closer look at the Mexican case), to show some examples of fruitful investigations in the biological physics area and also to set a proposal of new curricula for physics students and professionals interested in applying their science to get a better understanding of the physical basis of biological function.

Time constants of h current in layer ii stellate cells differ along the dorsal to ventral axis of medial entorhinal cortex

Chronic recordings in the medial entorhinal cortex of behaving rats have found grid cells, neurons that fire when the rat is in a hexagonal array of locations. Grid cells recorded at different dorsal-ventral anatomical positions show systematic changes in size and spacing of firing fields. To test possible mechanisms underlying these differences, we analyzed properties of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current I(h) in voltage-clamp recordings from stellate cells in entorhinal slices from different dorsal-ventral locations. The time constant of h current was significantly different between dorsal and ventral neurons. The time constant of h current correlated with membrane potential oscillation frequency and the time constant of the sag potential in the same neurons. Differences in h current could underlie differences in membrane potential oscillation properties and contribute to grid cell periodicity along the dorsal-ventral axis of medial entorhinal cortex.

Stability of the Shab K+ channel conductance in 0 K+ solutions: the role of the membrane potential

Shab channels are fairly stable with K(+) present on only one side of the membrane. However, on exposure to 0 K(+) solutions on both sides of the membrane, the Shab K(+) conductance (G(K)) irreversibly drops while the channels are maintained undisturbed at the holding potential. Herein it is reported that the drop of G(K) follows first-order kinetics, with a voltage-dependent decay rate r. Hyperpolarized potentials drastically inhibit the drop of G(K). The G(K) drop at negative potentials cannot be explained by a shift in the voltage dependence of activation. At depolarized potentials, where the channels undergo a slow inactivation process, G(K) drops in 0 K(+) with rates slower than those predicted based on the behavior of r at negative potentials, endowing the r-V(m) relationship with a maximum. Regardless of voltage, r is very small compared with the rate of ion permeation. Observations support the hypothesized presence of a stabilizing K(+) site (or sites) located either within the pore itself or in its external vestibule, at an inactivation-sensitive location. It is argued that part of the G(K) stabilization achieved at hyperpolarized potentials could be the result of a conformational change in the pore itself.

Inhibition of the collapse of the Shaker K+ conductance by specific scorpion toxins

The Shaker B K(+) conductance (G(K)) collapses when the channels are closed (deactivated) in Na(+) solutions that lack K(+) ions. Also, it is known that external TEA (TEA(o)) impedes the collapse of G(K), and that channel block by TEA(o) and scorpion toxins are two mutually exclusive events. Therefore, we tested the ability of scorpion toxins to inhibit the collapse of G(K) in 0 K(+). We have found that these toxins are not uniform regarding the capacity to protect G(K). Those toxins, whose binding to the channels is destabilized by external K(+), are also effective inhibitors of the collapse of G(K). In addition to K(+), other externally added cations also destabilize toxin block, with an effectiveness that does not match the selectivity sequence of K(+) channels. The inhibition of the drop of G(K) follows a saturation relationship with [toxin], which is fitted well by the Michaelis-Menten equation, with an apparent Kd bigger than that of block of the K(+) current. However, another plausible model is also presented and compared with the Michaelis-Menten model. The observations suggest that those toxins that protect G(K) in 0 K(+) do so by interacting either with the most external K(+) binding site of the selectivity filter (suggesting that the K(+) occupancy of only that site of the pore may be enough to preserve G(K)) or with sites capable of binding K(+) located in the outer vestibule of the pore, above the selectivity filter.

Na(+) interaction with the pore of Shaker B K(+) channels: zero and low K(+) conditions

The Shaker B K(+) conductance (G(K)) collapses (in a reversible manner) if the membrane is depolarized and then repolarized in, 0 K(+), Na(+)-containing solutions (Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1997. J. Physiol. 499:3-15; Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1999. Biophys. J. 77:2988-2998). In this work, the role of Na(+) ions in the collapse of G(K) in 0-K(+) solutions, and in the behavior of the channels in low K(+) was studied. The main findings are as follows. First, in 0-K(+) solutions, the presence of Na(+) ions is an important factor that speeds the collapse of G(K). Second, external Na(+) fosters the drop of G(K) by binding to a site with a K(d) = 3.3 mM. External K(+) competes, in a mutually exclusive manner, with Na(o)(+) for binding to this site, with an estimated K(d) = 80 microM. Third, NMG and choline are relatively inert regarding the stability of G(K); fourth, with [K(o)(+)] = 0, the energy required to relieve Na(i)(+) block of Shaker (French, R.J., and J.B. Wells. 1977. J. Gen. Physiol. 70:707-724; Starkus, J.G., L. Kuschel, M. Rayner, and S. Heinemann. 2000. J. Gen. Physiol. 110:539-550) decreases with the molar fraction of Na(i)(+) (X(Na,i)), in an extent not accounted for by the change in Delta(mu)(Na). Finally, when X(Na,i) = 1, G(K) collapses by the binding of Na(i)(+) to two sites, with apparent K(d)s of 2 and 14.3 mM.