Effects of naltrexone and histamine antagonists on the antinociceptive activity of the cimetidine analog SKF92374 in rats

Role of histaminergic neurons in hypnotic modulation of brain processing of visceral perception

Modulating visceral sensation of the body is important to the understanding of emotion formation. Molecules that act during hypnosis and modify visceral pain perception are not known. We tested our hypothesis that hypnotic suggestion changes electrophysiological processing of visceroafferent signals in the human brain and that these conditions are in part dependent on histaminergic neurons. Twelve healthy male subjects were studied on two separate days: a day of treatment with histamine H1 receptor antagonist (d-chlorpheniramine 100 microg kg(-1), intravenously) and another day of that with placebo (saline, the same amount) in a randomized order. We recorded cortical evoked potentials to 100 rectal electrical stimuli after neutral, hyperalgesic or analgesic hypnotic suggestions as given to modulate the visceral perception. Analgesic suggestion reduced the amplitude of the deepest positive peak of viscerosensory evoked potential. Administration of histamine H1 antagonist diminished the attenuation of viscerosensory evoked potential by analgesic suggestion. Our results suggest that central pain modulatory system in the brain is activated by hypnotic suggestion and that brain histamine is a mediator in the hypnotic modulation of visceral sensory pathway as well as in the control of consciousness level. These findings lead us to possible new treatment for control of visceral perception.

CC12, a high-affinity ligand for [3H]cimetidine binding, is an improgan antagonist

Improgan, a chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective non-opioid analgesic when injected into the CNS. Despite extensive characterization, neither the improgan receptor, nor a pharmacological antagonist of improgan has been previously described. Presently, the specific binding of [(3)H]cimetidine (3HCIM) in brain fractions was used to discover 4(5)-((4-iodobenzyl)thiomethyl)-1H-imidazole, which behaved in vivo as the first improgan antagonist. The synthesis and pharmacological properties of this drug (named CC12) are described herein. In rats, CC12 (50-500nmol, i.c.v.) produced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan (200-400nmol) antinociception on the tail flick and hot plate tests. When given alone to rats, CC12 had no effects on nociceptive latencies, or on other observable behavioral or motor functions. Maximal inhibitory effects of CC12 (500nmol) were fully surmounted with a large i.c.v. dose of improgan (800nmol), demonstrating competitive antagonism. In mice, CC12 (200-400nmol, i.c.v.) behaved as a partial agonist, producing incomplete improgan antagonism, but also limited antinociception when given alone. Radioligand binding, receptor autoradiography, and electrophysiology experiments showed that CC12's antagonist properties are not explained by activity at 25 sites relevant to analgesia, including known receptors for cannabinoids, opioids or histamine. The use of CC12 as an improgan antagonist will facilitate the characterization of improgan analgesia. Furthermore, because CC12 was also found presently to inhibit opioid and cannabinoid antinociception, it is suggested that this drug modifies a biochemical mechanism shared by several classes of analgesics. Elucidation of this mechanism will enhance understanding of the biochemistry of pain relief.

Improgan-induced hypothermia: a role for cannabinoid receptors in improgan-induced changes in nociceptive threshold and body temperature

Improgan, a congener of the H(2) antagonist cimetidine, produces non-opioid antinociception which is blocked by the CB(1) antagonist rimonabant, implying a cannabinoid mechanism of action. Since cannabinoids produce hypothermia as well as antinociception in rodents, the present study investigated the pharmacological activity of improgan on core body temperature and nociceptive (tail flick) responses. Improgan (60, 100 and 140 microg, intraventricular [ivt]) elicited significant decreases in core temperature 3-30 min following injection with a maximal hypothermic effect of -1.3 degrees C. Pretreatment with rimonabant (50 microg, ivt) produced a statistically significant but incomplete (29-42%) antagonism of improgan hypothermia. In control experiments, the CB(1) agonist CP-55,940 (37.9 microg, ivt) induced significant decreases in core temperature (-1.8 degrees C) 3-30 min following injection. However, unlike the case with improgan, pretreatment with rimonabant completely blocked CP-55,940 hypothermia. Furthermore, CP-55,940 and improgan elicited maximal antinociception over the same time course and dose ranges, and both effects were attenuated by rimonabant. These results show that, like cannabinoid agonists in the rat, improgan produces antinociception and hypothermia which is blocked by a CB(1) antagonist. Unlike cannabinoid agonists, however, improgan does not produce locomotor inhibition at antinociceptive doses. Additional experiments were performed to determine the effect of CC12, a recently discovered improgan antagonist which lacks affinity at CB(1) receptors. Pretreatment with CC12 (183 microg, ivt) produced complete inhibition of both the antinociception and the hypothermia produced by improgan, suggesting the possible role of an unknown improgan receptor in both of these effects.

Cannabinoid-improgan cross-tolerance: Improgan is a cannabinomimetic analgesic lacking affinity at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor

Improgan is a non-opioid analgesic which does not act at known histamine or cannabinoid receptors. Because improgan antinociception is blocked by low doses of a cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, the present experiments determined if development of cannabinoid tolerance in mice would alter improgan antinociception. Twice-daily injections of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 10 mg/kg, s.c.) for 3.5 days induced 47-54% and 42-56% reductions in cannabinoid (WIN 55,212-2, 20 microg, i.c.v.) and improgan (30 microg, i.c.v.) antinociception, respectively, as compared with responses from vehicle-treated groups. Because improgan lacks cannabinoid-like side effects in rats, and does not act directly on cannabinoid CB1 receptors, the finding that development of cannabinoid tolerance reduces improgan antinociception suggests that this drug may release endocannabinoids, or activate novel cannabinoid sites. Either possibility offers the potential for developing new types of analgesics.

Antinociceptive activity of chemical congeners of improgan: optimization of side chain length leads to the discovery of a new, potent, non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a chemical congener of the H2 antagonist cimetidine which shows the profile of a highly effective analgesic when administered directly into the CNS. Although the improgan receptor is unknown, improgan activates analgesic pathways which are independent of opioids, but may utilize cannabinoid mechanisms. To discover selective, potent, improgan-like drugs, seven compounds chemically related to improgan were synthesized and tested for antinociceptive activity in rats after intracerebroventricular (icv) administration. Among a series of improgan congeners in which the alkyl chain length of improgan ((-CH2)3-) was varied, five compounds showed full agonist antinociceptive activity with potencies greater than that of improgan. VUF5420 (containing (-CH2)4-, EC50 = 86.1 nmol) produced maximal antinociceptive activity after doses which showed no motor impairment or other obvious toxicity, and was 2.3-fold more potent than improgan (EC50 = 199.5 nmol). As found previously with improgan, VUF5420-induced antinociception was unaffected by administration of the opioid antagonist naltrexone, but was inhibited by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A, suggesting a non-opioid, cannabinoid-related analgesic action. However, VUF5420 showed very low affinity (Kd approximately 10 microM) on CB1-receptor activation of 35S-GTPgammaS binding, indicating that this drug does not directly interact with the CB1 receptor in vivo. The present results show that VUF5420 is a high potency, improgan-like, non-opioid analgesic which may indirectly activate cannabinoid pain-relieving mechanisms.

Antinociceptive, brain-penetrating derivatives related to improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

The antinociceptive profile of selected histamine H(2) and histamine H(3) receptor antagonists led to the discovery of improgan, a non-brain-penetrating analgesic agent which does not act on known histamine receptors. Because no chemical congener of improgan has yet been discovered which has both antinociceptive and brain-penetrating properties, the present study investigated the antinociceptive effects of a series of chemical compounds related to zolantidine, a brain-penetrating histamine H(2) receptor antagonist. The drugs studied presently contain the piperidinomethylphenoxy (PMPO) moiety, hypothesized to introduce brain-penetrating characteristics. Following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) dosing in rats, six of eight drugs produced dose- and time-related antinociception on both the tail flick and hot plate tests over a nearly eight-fold range of potencies. Ataxia and other motor side effects were observed after high doses of these drugs, but two of the compounds (SKF94674 and loxtidine) produced maximal antinociception at doses which were completely devoid of these motor effects. Consistent with the hypothesis that PMPO-containing drugs are brain-penetrating analgesics, SKF94674 and another derivative (JB-9322) showed dose-dependent antinociceptive activity 15 to 30 min after systemic dosing in mice, but these effects were accompanied by seizures and death beginning 45 min after dosing. Other drugs showed a similar pattern of antinociceptive and toxic effects. In addition, loxtidine produced seizures without antinociception, whereas zolantidine produced neither effect after systemic dosing in mice. Although several of the drugs tested have histamine H(2) receptor antagonist activity, neither the antinociception nor the toxicity was correlated with histamine H(2) receptor activity. The present results are the first to demonstrate the existence of brain-penetrating antinociceptive agents chemically related to zolantidine and improgan, but further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of both the pain relief and toxicity produced by these agents.

Role of the histamine system in nefopam-induced antinociception in mice

The present study explored the role of the histaminergic system in nefopam analgesia based on the structural relationship between nefopam and diphenhydramine. In vitro binding assays revealed that nefopam possesses moderate affinity for histamine H1 and H2 receptor subtypes, with IC50 of 0.8 and 6.9 microM, respectively, but no affinity for histamine H(3) receptor subtype until 100 microM. Subcutaneous nefopam administration dose-dependently inhibited pain in acetic acid-induced writhing (1-30 mg/kg) and formalin (1-10 mg/kg) tests in the mouse. Pretreatment with the histamine-depleting agent alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (alpha-FMH, 50 mg/kg), the histamine H1 receptor antagonist pyrilamine (3 or 10 mg/kg), or the histamine H2 receptor antagonists cimetidine (100 mg/kg) and zolantidine (10 or 30 mg/kg) did not significantly modify nefopam antinociception in both tests. The histamine H3 receptor agonist R(-)alpha-methylhistamine (RAMH, 10 mg/kg) did not significantly modify the nefopam analgesic activity in the writhing test. At 25 mg/kg, RAMH inhibited nefopam antinociception at 3 mg/kg, but not at 10 mg/kg in the formalin test. However, pretreatment with the histamine H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide (25 mg/kg) inhibited nefopam antinociception in the writhing test, but not in the formalin test. In conclusion, nefopam analgesic activity is not mediated by histamine H1 or H2 receptors, but can be slightly modulated by histamine H3 receptors in mouse pain tests.

Activation of brain stem nuclei by improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a compound developed from histamine antagonists which shows the pre-clinical profile of a highly effective, non-opioid analgesic when administered into the rodent CNS. Pharmacological studies suggest that improgan activates descending pain-relieving circuits, but the brain and spinal sites of action of this drug have not been previously studied. Presently, the effects of intracerebral and intrathecal microinjections of improgan were evaluated on thermal nociceptive responses in rats. Improgan produced large, dose- and time-related reductions in nociceptive responses following administration into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG), the dorsal PAG, and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). The drug had no measurable effects after injections into the caudate nucleus, basolateral amygdala, hippocampus, ventromedial hypothalamus, superior colliculi, ventrolateral medulla, or the spinal subarachnoid space. Inactivation of the RVM by muscimol microinjections completely attenuated antincociceptive responses produced by intraventricular improgan. These findings, taken with earlier results, show that, like opioids and cannabinoids, improgan acts in the PAG and RVM to activate descending analgesic systems. Unlike these other analgesics, improgan does not act in the spinal cord or in CNS areas outside of the brain stem.

Improgan antinociception does not require neuronal histamine or histamine receptors

Improgan, a chemical congener of the H(2) antagonist cimetidine, induces antinociception following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in rodents, but the mechanism of action of this compound remains unknown. Because the chemical structure of improgan closely resembles those of histamine and certain histamine blockers, and because neuronal histamine is known to participate in pain-relieving responses, the antinociceptive actions of improgan were evaluated in mice containing null mutations in the genes for three histamine receptors (H(1), H(2), and H(3)) and also in the gene for histidine decarboxylase (the histamine biosynthetic enzyme). Similar to earlier findings in Swiss-Webster mice, improgan induced maximal, reversible, dose-related reductions in thermal nociceptive responses in ICR mice, but neither pre-improgan (baseline) nor post-improgan nociceptive latencies were changed in any of the mutant mice as compared with wild-type controls. Improgan also had weak inhibitory activity in vitro (pK(i)=4.7-4.9) on specific binding to three recently-discovered, recombinant isoforms of the rat H(3) receptor (H(3A), H(3B), and H(3C)). The present findings strongly support the hypothesis that neuronal histamine and its receptors fail to play a role in improgan-induced antinociception.

Inhibition of improgan antinociception by the cannabinoid (CB)(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A): lack of obligatory role for endocannabinoids acting at CB(1) receptors

Improgan, a nonopioid antinociceptive agent, activates descending, pain-relieving mechanisms in the brain stem, but the receptor for this compound has not been identified. Because cannabinoids also activate nonopioid analgesia by a brain stem action, experiments were performed to assess the significance of cannabinoid mechanisms in improgan antinociception. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A) induced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan antinociception on the tail-flick test after i.c.v. administration in rats. The same treatments yielded comparable inhibition of cannabinoid [R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-mor pholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate, WIN 55,212-2] analgesia. Inhibition of improgan and WIN 55,212-2 antinociception by SR141716A was also observed in Swiss-Webster mice. Radioligand binding studies showed no appreciable affinity of improgan on rat brain, mouse brain, and human recombinant CB(1) receptors, ruling out a direct action at these sites. To test the hypothesis that CB(1) receptors indirectly participate in improgan signaling, the effects of improgan were assessed in mice with a null mutation of the CB(1) gene with and without SR141716A pretreatment. Surprisingly, improgan induced complete antinociception in both CB(1) (-/-) and wild-type control [CB(1) (+/+)] mice. Furthermore, SR141716A inhibited improgan antinociception in CB(1) (+/+) mice, but not in CB(1) (-/-) mice. Taken together, the results show that SR141716A reduces improgan antinociception, but neither cannabinoids nor CB(1) receptors seem to play an obligatory role in improgan signaling. Present and previous studies suggest that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol may act at both CB(1) and other receptors to relieve pain, but no evidence was found indicating that improgan uses either of these mechanisms. SR141716A will facilitate the study of improgan-like analgesics.

A role for spinal, but not supraspinal, alpha(2) adrenergic receptors in the actions of improgan, a powerful, non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a derivative of cimetidine that induces non-opioid antinociception after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration, but the mechanism of action of this compound remains unknown. Since activation of either supraspinal or spinal alpha(2) adrenergic receptors can induce antinociception, and since improgan showed affinity for these receptors in vitro, the effects of the alpha(2) antagonist yohimbine on improgan antinociception were presently studied in rats on the hot plate and tail flick tests. Systemic yohimbine pretreatment (4 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked improgan antinociception (80 microg, i.c.v.), suggesting a mediator role for alpha(2) receptors. However, i.c.v. pretreatment with yohimbine (30 microg) had no effect on improgan antinociception. Since this treatment completely antagonized clonidine antinociception (40 microg, i.c.v.), supraspinal alpha(2) receptors seem to mediate the antinociceptive effects of clonidine, but not that produced by improgan. In contrast, intrathecal (i.t.) yohimbine pretreatment (30 microg) completely blocked the antinociception elicited by i.c.v. improgan and i.c.v. morphine. These results suggest that spinal (but not supraspinal) alpha(2) adrenergic receptors play a significant role in the pain-relieving actions of improgan. Furthermore, although improgan shows some affinity at alpha(2) receptors, this drug does not act directly at these receptors to induce antinociceptive responses. Like several other classes of analgesics, improgan-like drugs seem to activate non-opioid, descending pain-relieving circuits.

The physiology of brain histamine

Histamine-releasing neurons are located exclusively in the TM of the hypothalamus, from where they project to practically all brain regions, with ventral areas (hypothalamus, basal forebrain, amygdala) receiving a particularly strong innervation. The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of TM neurons (slow spontaneous firing, broad action potentials, deep after hyperpolarisations, etc.) are extremely similar to other aminergic neurons. Their firing rate varies across the sleep-wake cycle, being highest during waking and lowest during rapid-eye movement sleep. In contrast to other aminergic neurons somatodendritic autoreceptors (H3) do not activate an inwardly rectifying potassium channel but instead control firing by inhibiting voltage-dependent calcium channels. Histamine release is enhanced under extreme conditions such as dehydration or hypoglycemia or by a variety of stressors. Histamine activates four types of receptors. H1 receptors are mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to phospholipase C. High densities are found especially in the hypothalamus and other limbic regions. Activation of these receptors causes large depolarisations via blockade of a leak potassium conductance, activation of a non-specific cation channel or activation of a sodium-calcium exchanger. H2 receptors are also mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in hippocampus, amygdala and basal ganglia. Activation of these receptors also leads to mainly excitatory effects through blockade of calcium-dependent potassium channels and modulation of the hyperpolarisation-activated cation channel. H3 receptors are exclusively presynaptically located and are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in the basal ganglia. These receptors mediated presynaptic inhibition of histamine release and the release of other neurotransmitters, most likely via inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels. Finally, histamine modulates the glutamate NMDA receptor via an action at the polyamine binding site. The central histamine system is involved in many central nervous system functions: arousal; anxiety; activation of the sympathetic nervous system; the stress-related release of hormones from the pituitary and of central aminergic neurotransmitters; antinociception; water retention and suppression of eating. A role for the neuronal histamine system as a danger response system is proposed.

Improgan, a cimetidine analog, induces morphine-like antinociception in opioid receptor-knockout mice

Improgan is an analog of the H(2) antagonist cimetidine that does not act on known histamine receptors, but induces highly effective analgesia in rodents following intracerebroventricular (icv) administration. Since the mechanism of action of this compound remains unknown, improgan analgesia was characterized presently with the tail immersion nociceptive test in mutant mice lacking either the mu (exon 1 of MOR-1), delta (exon 2 of DOR-1) or kappa (exon 3 of KOR-1) opioid receptor. Improgan (30 microg, icv) induced reversible, maximal analgesia in both sexes of all three genotypes (+/+, +/- and -/-) of MOR-1 mutant mice 10 and 20 min after administration, whereas morphine analgesia was reduced (+/-) or abolished (-/-) in these subjects. In DOR-1 mutant mice, improgan was equally effective in all three genotypes, despite the reduction (+/-) or complete loss (-/-) of delta opioid receptor (3H-[D-Pen(2), D-Pen(5)]enkephalin, DPDPE) binding. Similarly, improgan analgesia was equivalent in all three genotypes of KOR-1 mutant mice, whereas kappa-mediated analgesia (U50,488) and kappa opioid (3H-U69,593) binding were abolished in the homozygous (-/-) mice. These studies demonstrate that improgan analgesia does not require intact MOR-1, DOR-1, or KOR-1 genes, and support the hypothesis that improgan-like analgesics act in the CNS by non-opioid mechanisms.

A third life for burimamide. Discovery and characterization of a novel class of non-opioid analgesics derived from histamine antagonists

Burimamide, a histamine (HA) derivative with both H2- and H3-blocking properties, induces antinociception when injected into the rodent CNS. Several related compounds share this property, and structure-activity studies have shown that this new class of analgesics is distinct from known HA antagonists. The prototype, named improgan, shows a preclinical profile of a highly effective analgesic, with activity against thermal, mechanical and inflammatory nociception after doses that do not alter motor balance or locomotor activity. Improgen analgesia is not blocked by opioid antagonists and is observed in opioid receptor knock-out mice. Unlike morphine, improgan does not induce tolerance after daily dosing. Extensive in vitro pharmacology studies have excluded known histaminergic, opioid, serotonergic, GABAergic and adrenergic receptor mechanisms, as well as 50 other sites of action. The improgan-like analgesic activity of some HA congeners suggests an analgesic action on a novel HA receptor, but further studies are required to substantiate this. Studies in progress are characterizing the sites and mechanisms of action of improgan, and developing brain-penetrating derivatives that could be useful for clinical pain.

Antinociceptive activity of derivatives of improgran and burimamide

Improgan, a compound related to H2 and H3 antagonists, induces antinociception in rodents after intraventricular administration. Characteristics of improgan and its congeners include: (a) morphine-like antinociception on thermal and mechanical tests in two species; (b) no impairment of motor coordination or locomotor activity; (c) evidence for a novel, nonopioid mechanism that is independent of known histamine receptors; (d) lack of tolerance with daily dosing; and (e) unique structure-activity relationships (SARs). Presently, the antinociceptive activity of several new derivatives of improgan was investigated in rats. Among compounds similar to burimamide, VUF4577 (possessing a two-carbon side chain) and VUF4582 (an N-phenyl derivative of VUF4577) induced complete, dose- and time-dependent antinociception on the hot-plate and tail-flick tests with no behavioral side effects. These compounds (with ED50 values of 71-117 nmol) were approximately twice as potent as burimamide itself (a four-carbon derivative). Two other derivatives in which the thiourea group (C=S, known to cause human toxicity) was replaced by either nitroethene (C=CH-NO2, VUF5405) or urea (C=O, VUF5407) also showed effective, potent antinociception on both assays. The latter compound is the most potent improgan-like drug discovered to date (ED50 = 71 nmol). Furthermore, positional isomers of antinociceptive compounds either lacked activity (VUF5394) or induced toxicity (VUF5393), revealing a high degree of pharmacological specificity. Although the mechanism of improgan antinociception remains unknown, the present results show promise for the further development of safe, effective, and potent pain-relieving compounds.

Antinociceptive activity of impentamine, a histamine congener, after CNS administration

The brain neuromodulator histamine induces antinociception when administered directly into the rodent CNS. However, several compounds derived from H2 and H3 antagonists also produce antinociception after central administration. Pharmacological studies have shown that a prototype of these agents, improgan, induces analgesia that is not mediated by actions on known histamine receptors. Presently, the antinociceptive properties of a compound that chemically resembles both improgan and histamine were investigated in rats. Intraventricular (i.v.t.) administration of impentamine (4-imidazolylpentylamine) induced reversible, near-maximal antinociception on the hot plate and tail flick tests (15 microg, 98 nmol). The dose-response function was extremely steep, however, since other doses showed either no effect or behavioral toxicity. On the tail flick test, impentamine antinociception was resistant to antagonism by blockers of H1, H2, or H3 receptors, similar to characteristics previously found for improgan. In contrast, histamine antinociception was highly attenuated by H1 and H2 antagonists. These findings suggest that: 1) the histamine congener impentamine may induce antinociception by a mechanism similar to that produced by improgan, and 2) additional histamine receptors may be discovered that are linked to pain-attenuating processes.

Absence of antinociceptive tolerance to improgan, a cimetidine analog, in rats

Improgan, an analog of the histamine receptor antagonist cimetidine, produces highly effective analgesia following intraventricular injection. The present study examined changes in the antinociceptive effects of improgan following once daily intraventricular injections. Improgan (100-150 microg) produced near maximal antinociception 10 and 30 min after daily administration on all 4 test days, whereas comparable morphine treatments (50 microg) induced considerable tolerance. Thus, improgan produced highly effective analgesia without the development of tolerance.