NMDA receptor dependence of the input specific NMDA receptor-independent LTP in the hippocampal CA1 region

Prelimbic cortical stimulation disrupts fear memory consolidation through ventral hippocampal dopamine D2 receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anxiety disorders pose one of the biggest threats to mental health worldwide, yet current therapeutics have been mostly ineffective due to issues with relapse, efficacy and toxicity of the medications. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders including anxiety, but very little is known about the effects of deep brain stimulation on fear memories.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In this study, we employed a standard tone-footshock fear conditioning paradigm and modified plus maze discriminative avoidance task to probe the effects of prelimbic cortex deep brain stimulation on various stages of memory.

KEY RESULTS

We identified memory consolidation stage as a critical time point to disrupt fear memory via prelimbic cortex deep brain stimulation. The observed disruption was partially modulated by the inactivation of the ventral hippocampus and the transient changes in ventral hippocampus dopamine (D₂ ) receptors expression upon prelimbic cortex deep brain stimulation. We also observed wide-scale changes of various neurotransmitters and their metabolites in ventral hippocampus, confirming its important role in response to prelimbic cortex deep brain stimulation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings highlight the molecular mechanism in the ventral hippocampus in response to prelimbic cortex stimulation and may have translational value, indicating that targeting the prelimbic cortex in the memory consolidation stage via non-invasive neuromodulation techniques may be a feasible therapeutic strategy against anxiety disorders.

mGlu5: A double-edged sword for aversive learning related therapeutics

Aversive memories underlie many types of anxiety disorders. One area of research to more effectively treat anxiety disorders has therefore been identifying pharmacological targets to affect memory processes. Among these targets, the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor (mGlu5) has received attention due to the availability of drugs to utilize its role in learning and memory. In this review, we highlight preclinical studies examining the role of mGlu5 at various stages of aversive learning and its inhibition via extinction in order to gain a better understanding of its therapeutic potential. We suggest that mGlu5 has distinct roles at different stages of memory that not only makes it a tricky target, but a double-edged sword as a therapeutic. However, the selective involvement of mGlu5 in different memory stages allows for certain precision that could be harnessed clinically. We therefore suggest potential applications, limitations, and pitfalls when considering use of mGlu5 modulators as therapeutics. In addition, we recommend future studies to address important gaps in this literature, such as sex and age factors in light of anxiety disorders being more prevalent in those demographics.

The Paradoxical Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Memory

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment for many memory-related disorders including dementia, anxiety, and addiction. However, the use of DBS can be a paradoxical conundrum-dementia treatments aim to improve memory, whereas anxiety or addiction treatments aim to suppress maladaptive memory. In this review, the key hypotheses on how DBS affects memory are highlighted. We consolidate the findings and conclusions from the current research on the effects of DBS on memory in attempt to make sense of the bidirectional nature of DBS in disrupting and enhancing memory. Based on the current literature, we hypothesize that the timing of DBS plays a key role in its contradictory effects, and therefore, we propose a consolidated model of how DBS can both disrupt and enhance memory.

Two sides to long-term potentiation: a view towards reconciliation

Almost since the discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus, its locus of expression has been debated. Throughout the years, convincing evidence has accumulated to suggest that LTP can be supported either presynaptically, by an increase in transmitter release, or postsynaptically, by an increase in α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor number. However, whereas postsynaptic enhancement appears to be consistently obtained across studies following LTP induction, presynaptic enhancement is not as reliably observed. Such discrepancies, along with the failure to convincingly identify a retrograde messenger required for presynaptic change, have led to the general view that LTP is mainly supported postsynaptically, and certainly, research within the field for the past decade has been heavily focused on the postsynaptic locus. Here, we argue that LTP can be expressed at either synaptic locus, but that pre- and postsynaptic forms of LTP are dissociable phenomena mediated by distinct mechanistic processes, which are sensitive to different patterns of neuronal activity. This view of LTP helps to reconcile discrepancies across the literature and may put to rest a decades-long debate.

Different NMDA receptor subtypes mediate induction of long-term potentiation and two forms of short-term potentiation at CA1 synapses in rat hippocampus in vitro

Potentiation at synapses between CA3 and the CA1 pyramidal neurons comprises both transient and sustained phases, commonly referred to as short-term potentiation (STP or transient LTP) and long-term potentiation (LTP), respectively. Here, we utilized four subtype-selective N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists to investigate whether the induction of STP and LTP is dependent on the activation of different NMDAR subtypes. We find that the induction of LTP involves the activation of NMDARs containing both the GluN2A and the GluN2B subunits. Surprisingly, however, we find that STP can be separated into two components, the major form of which involves activation of NMDARs containing both GluN2B and GluN2D subunits. These data demonstrate that synaptic potentiation at CA1 synapses is more complex than is commonly thought, an observation that has major implications for understanding the role of NMDARs in cognition.

Hippocampal cytochrome oxidase activity of rats in easy and difficult visual discrimination learning

The present study investigated the functional involvement of the rat hippocampal formation in easy and difficult visual discrimination learning by measuring regional brain cytochrome oxidase (C.O.) activity, an index of neuronal metabolic activity. The results showed that learning was related to C.O. activity in the CA field and the dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation of rats in the difficult discrimination, whereas learning was related to C.O. activity only in the dentate gyrus of rats in the easy discrimination. The results suggest that difficult visual discrimination learning required greater involvement of the hippocampal formation than easy visual discrimination learning.

Involvement of presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in cerebellar long-term depression

At the cerebellar synapses between parallel fibers (PFs) and Purkinje cells (PCs), long-term depression (LTD) of the excitatory synaptic current has been assumed to be independent of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation because PCs lack NMDA receptors. However, we now report that LTD is suppressed by NMDA receptor antagonists that act on presynaptic NMDA receptors of the PFs. This effect is still observed when the input is restricted to a single fiber. Therefore, LTD does not require the spatial integration of multiple inputs. In contrast, it involves a temporal integration, since reliable LTD induction requires the PFs to fire two action potentials in close succession. This implies that LTD will selectively depress the response to a burst of presynaptic action potentials.

Blockade of GABAA receptors facilitates induction of NMDA receptor-independent long-term potentiation

An N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-independent form of long-term potentiation (LTP), which depends on postsynaptic, voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs), has been demonstrated in area CA1 of hippocampus. GABA acting at GABAA receptors limits postsynaptic depolarization during LTP induction. Blockade of GABAA receptors should therefore enhance activation of postsynaptic VDCCs and facilitate the induction of this NMDA receptor-independent, VDCC-dependent LTP. In agreement with this hypothesis, pharmacological blockade of GABAA receptors in the in vitro rat hippocampal slice increased the magnitude of LTP resulting from a normally effective, high-frequency (200 Hz) tetanic stimulation protocol. In addition, GABAA receptor blockade allowed a lower frequency (25 Hz) and normally ineffective tetanic stimulation protocol to induce this form of LTP. Intracellular recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells revealed that blocking GABAA receptors during tetanic stimulation allowed greater postsynaptic depolarization, increased the number of postsynaptic action potentials fired during the tetanization, and also increased the duration of synaptically evoked action potentials. To mimic the increased action potential firing observed when GABAA receptors were blocked, we paired 25-Hz antidromic stimulation with 25-Hz orthodromic stimulation. Paired antidromic + orthodromic 25-Hz stimulation induced NMDA receptor-independent LTP, whereas neither antidromic nor orthodromic stimulation alone induced LTP. Increased action potential firing can therefore at least partially account for the facilitation of NMDA receptor-independent LTP caused by blockade of GABAA receptors. This conclusion is consistent with prior studies demonstrating that action potentials are particularly effective stimuli for the gating of VDCCs in CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites.