Antinociceptive activity of combination of morphine and NMDA receptor antagonists depends on the inter-injection interval

Memantine and dizocilpine interactions with antinociceptive or discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats after acute or chronic treatment with morphine

RATIONALE

Memantine is a N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) channel blocker that binds to dizocilpine sites and appears well tolerated during chronic use. Published studies suggest NMDAR antagonists prevent development of tolerance to effects of morphine by blocking NMDAR hyperactivation.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare effects of memantine to those of the more frequently studied dizocilpine and to evaluate memantine as a potential adjunct to modify tolerance to mu-opioid receptor agonists.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate morphine (3.2 mg/kg) and saline under fixed ratio 15 schedules of food delivery. Potency and maximal stimulus or rate-altering effects of cumulative doses of morphine were examined 30 min after pretreatment with dizocilpine (0.032-0.1 mg/kg) or memantine (5-10 mg/kg) and after chronic treatment with combinations of dizocilpine or memantine and morphine, 10 mg/kg twice daily, for 6 to 14 days. Effects of dizocilpine or memantine on morphine antinociception were examined in a 55 °C water tail-withdrawal assay with drug treatments parallel to those in discrimination studies.

RESULTS

Acutely, memantine attenuated while dizocilpine potentiated the stimulus and antinociceptive effects of morphine. Neither chronic dizocilpine nor memantine blocked tolerance to the stimulus effects of morphine. In contrast, combined treatment with dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) blocked tolerance to antinociceptive effects of lower (0.1~3.2 mg/kg) but not higher doses of morphine, whereas memantine did not block tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Memantine and dizocilpine interacted differently with morphine, possibly due to different NMDAR binding profiles. The lack of memantine-induced changes in morphine tolerance suggests that memantine may not be a useful adjunct in chronic pain management.

Pharmacodynamics of memantine: an update

Memantine received marketing authorization from the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) for the treatment of moderately severe to severe Alzheimer s disease (AD) in Europe on 17(th) May 2002 and shortly thereafter was also approved by the FDA for use in the same indication in the USA. Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with strong voltage-dependency and fast kinetics. Due to this mechanism of action (MOA), there is a wealth of other possible therapeutic indications for memantine and numerous preclinical data in animal models support this assumption. This review is intended to provide an update on preclinical studies on the pharmacodynamics of memantine, with an additional focus on animal models of diseases aside from the approved indication. For most studies prior to 1999, the reader is referred to a previous review [196].In general, since 1999, considerable additional preclinical evidence has accumulated supporting the use of memantine in AD (both symptomatic and neuroprotective). In addition, there has been further confirmation of the MOA of memantine as an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist and essentially no data contradicting our understanding of the benign side effect profile of memantine.

The glycine site-specific NMDA antagonist (+)-HA966 enhances the effect of morphine and reverses morphine tolerance via a spinal mechanism

Using the C-fibre reflex as a nociceptive response elicited by a wide range of stimulus intensities in the rat, we recently reported that a single treatment with (+)-HA966, a glycine site-specific NMDA receptor antagonist: (1) potentiates morphine antinociception; and (2) reverses an established morphine tolerance. We presently aimed at determining whether our observation was likely to result from a direct effect on the spinal cord or an indirect effect of supraspinal origin. In a 2x2x2 experimental design, we compared the effects of 5 mg/kg morphine in: (1) sham-operated rats or animals whose brainstems had been transected at the level of the obex; (2) rats that were implanted with pellets, either 150 mg morphine or placebo; and (3) animals injected either with saline or 10 mg/kg (+)-HA966. The control C-fibre reflexes were similar in all groups of animals. As compared to "non-tolerant" rats, the depressive effect of morphine was weaker in "morphine-tolerant" animals where the threshold did not change following morphine but the gain of the stimulus-response curve decreased, albeit to a significantly lesser extent than in the "non-tolerant" group. Whether in "non-tolerant" or "tolerant" groups, the effects of morphine were stronger in "obex-transected" than in "sham-operated" animals. In all groups, the effects of morphine were potentiated by the preliminary administration of (+)-HA966. However, in the "morphine-tolerant" group, the preliminary administration of (+)-HA966 was more potent in the "sham-operated" than in the "obex-transected" groups. Since overall effects were very similar in "sham-operated" and "obex-transected" animals, we concluded for our model that the critical site for the expression of the neuronal plastic changes associated with morphine tolerance lies in the spinal cord.

Primary afferent NMDA receptors increase dorsal horn excitation and mediate opiate tolerance in neonatal rats

Repeated exposure to opiates produces analgesic tolerance, which limits their clinical usefulness. Whole-cell voltage-clamped lamina I cells in spinal slices from opiate-tolerant neonatal rats show an increase in miniature, spontaneous, and primary afferent-evoked EPSCs when compared with lamina I cells from opiate-naive rat spinal slices. This increased excitation can be blocked by the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonist APV, apparently acting at NMDARs on primary afferents. Consistent with these results, electron microscopy demonstrates an increased incidence of NMDARs in substance P-containing spinal dorsal horn primary afferent terminals in opiate-tolerant rats. Moreover, superfusion of spinal slices from opiate-tolerant rats with NMDA produces a reversible increase in miniature EPSC (mEPSC) frequency in contrast to a decrease in mEPSC frequency produced by NMDA in opiate-naive slices. Finally, NMDAR antagonists inhibit the expression of opiate tolerance both in inhibiting EPSCs in spinal slices and in inhibiting behavioral nociceptive responses to heat. NMDAR antagonists have been reported in many studies to inhibit morphine analgesic tolerance. Our studies suggest that an increase in primary afferent NMDAR expression and activity mediates a hypersensitivity to noxious stimuli and causes the inhibition of opiate efficacy, which defines tolerance.

Pain sensitivity is altered in animals after subchronic ketamine treatment

RATIONALE

Clinical observations have shown that pain sensitivity is altered in some schizophrenic patients.

OBJECTIVES

To study alterations in pain sensitivity, the ketamine model in schizophrenia research was employed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were subchronically injected with the dissociative anaesthetic ketamine (Ket, ten injections of 30 mg/kg, one injection per day over a period of 10 days). Two weeks after treatment completion, the animals' pain sensitivity was assayed in the hot plate test and they were subjected to electrical stimulation of the tail root. In addition, the effect of morphine was studied.

RESULTS

In group-housed animals, there was no difference between Ket-injected animals and control rats as measured in both nociceptive tests. In singly housed Ket-injected rats, pain threshold was increased in the electrical stimulation test. This suggests that stress due to single housing might be essential for modifications of pain sensitivity. Moreover, the antinociceptive effect of morphine was modified after single housing. Interestingly, the effect of morphine on locomotor activity was similar in both groups. In group-housed rats, mu receptor binding was unchanged in the frontal cortex, whereas Ket-injected animals had decreased levels in the hippocampus. In singly housed animals, mu receptor binding in Ket-injected rats increased in the frontal cortex and decreased in the hippocampus. (35)S-GTPgamma-S binding increased in the frontal cortex in both singly housed groups, but remained unchanged in the hippocampus.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the ketamine model might be useful for studying altered pain sensitivity in schizophrenia. Moreover, the data suggest that modifications in mu opioid receptor binding contribute to this phenomenon.

NMDA receptor antagonism disrupts the development of morphine analgesic tolerance in male, but not female C57BL/6J mice

Multiple studies demonstrate that coadministration of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists with the opioid agonist morphine attenuates the development of analgesic tolerance. Sex differences in the effects of noncompetitive, but not competitive NMDA receptor antagonists on acute morphine analgesia, have been reported in mice, yet the role of sex in modulation of morphine tolerance by NMDA receptor antagonists has yet to be addressed. Therefore, we tested whether there is a sex difference in the effect of NMDA receptor antagonists on the development of morphine analgesic tolerance in C57BL/6J mice. Acutely, at a dose required to affect morphine tolerance in male mice, the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) prolonged morphine analgesia similarly in both sexes in the hot plate and tail withdrawal assays. In the hot plate assay, coadministration of MK-801 or the competitive antagonist 3-(2-carboxpiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphanoic acid (CPP) with morphine attenuated the development of tolerance in male mice, while having no effect in females. Like normal and sham females, ovariectomized mice were similarly insensitive to the attenuation of morphine tolerance by MK-801 in the hot plate assay. Surprisingly, in the tail withdrawal assay, MK-801 facilitated the development of morphine-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance in males but not females. The results demonstrate that male mice are more sensitive to modulation of nociception and morphine analgesia after repeated coadministration of NMDA receptor antagonists. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms are likely to be different from those mediating the sex difference in the modulation of acute morphine analgesia that has previously been reported.

Investigation of the potentiation of the analgesic effects of fentanyl by ketamine in humans: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study of experimental pain[ISRCTN83088383]

BACKGROUND: Despite preclinical evidence suggesting a synergistic interaction between ketamine and opioids promoting analgesia, several clinical trials have not identified dosing regimens capable of eliciting a benefit in the co-administration of ketamine with opioids. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers participated in a double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover laboratory study in order to determine whether a low dose of ketamine potentiated the antinociceptive effect of fentanyl without causing an increase in sedative effects. A battery of tests was used to assess both nociception and sedation including electrical current, pressure, thermal stimuli, psychometric tests, and both subjective and objective scores of sedation. Target controlled infusions of the study drugs were used. Ketamine and fentanyl were administered alone and in combination in a double-blinded randomised crossover design. Saline was used as the control, and propofol was used to validate the tests of sedation. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: The electrical current pain threshold dose response curve of fentanyl combined with ketamine was markedly steeper than the dose response curve of fentanyl alone. While a ketamine serum concentration of 30 ng/ml did not result in a change in electrical pain threshold when administered alone, when it was added to fentanyl, the combination resulted in greater increase in pain threshold than that of fentanyl administered alone. When nociception was assessed using heat and pressure stimuli, ketamine did not potentiate the anti-nociceptive effect of fentanyl. There was no difference between the sedative effect of fentanyl and fentanyl in combination with ketamine as assessed by both subjective and objective measures of sedation. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were unaffected by the study drugs at the doses given. CONCLUSION: A serum concentration of ketamine that did not alter indices of sedation potentiated the antinociceptive effect of fentanyl. This potentiation of antinociception occurred without an increase in sedation suggesting that low steady doses of ketamine (30-120 ng/ml) might be combined with mu opioid agonists to improve their analgesic effect in a clinical setting. (296 words).

Dementia of Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders--memantine, a new hope

Alzheimer's disease is the fourth largest cause of death for people over 65 years of age. Dementia of Alzheimer's type is the commonest form of dementia, the other two forms being vascular dementia and mixed dementia. At present, the therapy of Alzheimer's disease is aimed at improving both, cognitive and behavioural symptoms and thereby, quality of life for the patients. Since the discovery of Alzheimer's disease by Alois Alzheimer, many pathological mechanisms have been proposed which led to the testing of various new treatments. Until recently the available drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease are cholinesterase inhibitors, which have limited success because these drugs improve cognitive functions only in mild dementia and cannot stop the process of neurodegeneration. Moreover, drugs of this category show gastrointestinal side effects. As the cells of central and peripheral nervous system cannot regenerate, newer strategies are aimed at preserving the surviving neurons by preventing their degeneration. NMDA-receptor-mediated glutamate excitotoxicity plays a major role in Abeta-induced neuronal death. Hence, it was thought that NMDA receptors could be a promising target for preventing the progression of Alzheimer's disease. All the compounds synthesized initially in this category showed toxicity mainly because of their high affinity for NMDA receptors. Memantine (1-amino adamantane derivative), NMDA-receptor antagonist was reported to be effective therapeutically in Alzheimer's disease. It was available in Germany as well as European Union and has been approved for moderate to severe dementia in United States of America recently. It is an uncompetitive, moderate affinity antagonist of NMDA receptors that inhibits the pathological functions of NMDA receptors while physiological processes in learning and memory are unaffected. Memantine is also reported to have beneficial effects in other CNS disorders viz., Parkinson's disease (PD), stroke, epilepsy, CNS trauma, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), drug dependence and chronic pain. Mechanisms of neuroprotection, preclinical and clinical evidence for effectiveness of memantine have been provided. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of memantine and other NMDA-receptor antagonists in comparison with currently approved drugs for dementia treatment have been discussed. The focus is on 'glutamate excitotoxicity' and glutamate receptors as drug target. Various other novel strategies for the treatment of dementia of neurodegenerative disorders have also been discussed.

The N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Antagonist Dizocilpine Inhibits Associative Antinociceptive Tolerance to Morphine in Mice: Relation With Memory

I and coauthor previously reported the memory facilitation effect of morphine. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the involvement of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in associative tolerance to morphine by a contextual procedure. Antinociceptive response latency was measured by the tail-pinch method during repeated morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) injection for four consecutive days with pretreatment by dizocilpine (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) at 30 min prior to morphine injection in the training phase and before and after morphine injection in the test phase. The nociceptive response latency was shortened by the single administration of dizocilpine (0.05 to 0.25 mg/kg, i.p.). Pretreatment by dizocilpine at 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg weakened the antinociception to morphine on Day 1, but decreased the tolerance throughout the training phase. In the test phase, the animals were allocated into the same and different contexts. In the test phase, hyperalgesia before morphine injection in the same context and antinociception after morphine injection in the different context were evident in the saline-pretreated group in the training phase, but they were not observed in those contexts in the dizocilpine-pretreated groups. These results suggest that memory dysfunction with dizocilpine inhibits the recovery of associative tolerance to morphine by contextual change.

Modulation of morphine analgesia by site-specific N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: dependence on sex, site of antagonism, morphine dose, and time

Pharmacological blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors can modulate morphine analgesia in experimental animals and humans. However, this literature is highly inconsistent, with NMDA receptor antagonists variously shown to potentiate, attenuate or produce no effect on morphine analgesic magnitude. A number of factors influencing this modulation have been proposed, but no one has examined such factors simultaneously, and all existing studies in mice were conducted exclusively in male subjects. Thus, the influence of systemic administration of site-specific NMDA receptor antagonists-including dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, MK-801, LY235959, L-701,324, and Ro 25-6981-on morphine analgesia (15-45 mg/kg; 15, 30 and 60 min post-injection) was studied in male and female mice using the 49 degrees C tail-withdrawal test. We found that oral and intraperitoneal dextromethorphan, a low-affinity non-competitive antagonist, dose-dependently potentiated low-dose morphine analgesia but attenuated high-dose morphine analgesia. Dextrorphan and MK-801 were found to potentiate low- but not high-dose morphine analgesia. The competitive glutamate-site antagonist, LY235959, and glycine-site antagonist, L-701,324, potentiated morphine analgesia at all doses. In contrast, the polyamine (NR2B) site antagonist, Ro 25-6981, attenuated morphine analgesia at all doses. Strikingly, the non-competitive antagonists produced no modulation of morphine analgesia whatsoever in female mice, whereas no sex differences were observed using competitive or NR2B antagonists. These findings indicate that NMDA modulation of morphine analgesia is critically influenced by sex, site of antagonism, morphine dose and time after injection. Our data suggest that NMDA antagonism via competitive or glycine site antagonism might result in more reliable clinical effects on morphine analgesia in both sexes.

Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on acute mu-opioid analgesia in the rat

Mixed research findings have led to a debate regarding the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists on opiate analgesia. NMDA antagonists have been found in various studies to enhance, to inhibit, or to have no effect on opiate analgesia. The present research used a single protocol to explore the effects of six NMDA receptor antagonists on acute morphine (3.0 mg/kg s.c.) and fentanyl (0.05 mg/kg s.c.) analgesia in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. NMDA receptor antagonists were selected based on their abilities to block various sites on the NMDA receptor complex, including the noncompetitive antagonists MK-801 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg i.p.), dextromethorphan (10.0 and 30.0 mg/kg i.p.), and memantine (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.), a glycine site antagonist, (+)-HA-966 (10.0 and 30.0 mg/kg i.p.), a competitive antagonist, LY235959 (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.), and a polyamine site antagonist, ifenprodil (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.). Analgesia was assessed using the tail-flick test. A single dose of each opiate was used. The low doses of the antagonists, which are known to produce significant neural and behavioral actions at NMDA receptors, had no effect on morphine or fentanyl analgesia. At the higher doses, morphine analgesia was significantly enhanced by LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), and fentanyl analgesia was significantly enhanced by LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), dextromethorphan (30.0 mg/kg), and (+)-HA-966 (30.0 mg/kg). Enhancement of analgesia occurred without any apparent adverse side effects. None of the NMDA antagonists affected tail-flick responses on their own, except the higher dose of LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), which produced a mild analgesic effect. Because no consistent effects were observed, the data suggest that NMDA receptors are not involved in acute mu-opioid analgesia. The mechanisms underlying the enhancement of opiate analgesia by selected NMDA antagonists, such as LY235959, dextromethorphan, and (+)-HA-966, remain to be determined.

Dextromethorphan and ketamine potentiate the antinociceptive effects of mu- but not delta- or kappa-opioid agonists in a mouse model of acute pain

Animal and clinical studies have reported potentiation of opioid antinociception by NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine and dextromethorphan. The aim of this study was to compare these clinically available NMDA antagonists in combination with classical morphine, mu-selective fentanyl-like opioids, the delta-opioid agonist SNC80 and the kappa-opioid agonist U50,488H. Using a mouse hot-plate test, dose-response relationships were first determined for all compounds individually and then for opioids co-administered with fixed doses of ketamine or dextromethorphan. All compounds were administered intraperitoneally ED(50) values were calculated from the proportion of animals failing to exhibit any response within a fixed cut-off criterion of 30 s. To varying degrees, all compounds produced increases in response latencies over time. Dextromethorphan produced lower ED(50) values for morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil but exerted no effect on the potency of SNC80 or U50,488H. Similarly, ketamine potentiated the antinociceptive potency of morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil but not SNC80 or U50,488H. In summary, these results support the use of mu-opioid agonists in combination with NMDA antagonists, but suggest that there may be no advantage in combining dextromethorphan or ketamine with delta- or kappa-opioids in the management of acute pain.

Ethanol enhances naloxone sensitization and disrupts morphine discrimination--comparison to dizocilpine and pentobarbital: explanation of enhancing acute and attenuating chronic effects

1. Ethanol affects ligand-gated ion channels as a positive modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor function and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist. NMDA antagonists attenuate chronic drug effects. Accordingly, we found that ethanol decreased morphine dependence and locomotor sensitization. We now test whether ethanol alters sensitization to the disrupting effects of naloxone on schedule-controlled responding after morphine administration or affects the acute stimulus effects of morphine. 2. Groups of rats, trained to lever-press for food, were co-administered ethanol (1 g/kg; i.p.), the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (DZ; 0.05 mg/kg; i.p.), the GABA(A) agonist pentobarbital (PB; 3 mg/kg i.p.), or vehicle with morphine (5 mg/kg s.c.). Separate groups received naloxone (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.) 4-hrs later, prior to food sessions (FR15; 30 min) on three consecutive days. Ethanol enhanced the suppressive effects of higher naloxone doses on all three days. DZ and PB altered this behavior differentially by day and naloxone dose. 3. Next, we examined the effects of ethanol, DZ, PB, and naloxone (0.3 mg/kg; s.c.) on morphine discrimination. Rats, trained to discriminate morphine (3.2 mg/kg s.c.) from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced procedure, were tested with morphine (0, 1-5.6 mg/kg) after vehicle and drug administrations. Naloxone blocked dose-related responding to morphine, demonstrating pharmacological specificity, and altered response rates. Both ethanol and DZ, but not PB, disrupted morphine-appropriate responding. 4. The paradox that ethanol and DZ attenuate chronic morphine effects while enhancing acute effects may reflect a temporal pattern of primary mu opiate receptor function followed by secondary NMDA-mediated processes induced by morphine administration.

Opioid-NMDA receptor interactions may clarify conditioned (associative) components of opioid analgesic tolerance

Recent evidence suggests that acute administration of opioid analgesic drugs (such as morphine or heroin) produces delayed hyperalgesia. This hyperalgesic response is likely to result from hyperactivation of NMDA receptors triggered by stimulation of opioid receptors and may mediate acute tolerance. In support of this hypothesis, blockade of NMDA receptors attenuates opioid-induced delayed hyperalgesia and prolongs the duration of antinociceptive activity of morphine. Furthermore, the NMDA receptor-induced hyperalgesia is likely an unconditioned response to opioid receptor stimulation that becomes spatiotemporally associated with environmental cues accompanying repeated opioid exposure. This hypothesis conforms to the traditional Pavlovian requirement for conditioned and unconditioned responses to be qualitatively similar. In support of the role of NMDA receptor hyperactivation in morphine tolerance, NMDA receptor antagonists have been shown to block development of analgesic tolerance induced by repeated exposures to morphine. The view of the conditioned nature of opioid tolerance may be significantly extended by assuming that upon repeated drug administration an early-onset effect of a drug may become a predictive stimulus for a later-onset effect and, consequentially, it may become empowered to elicit the later-onset effect itself. Such 'intra-drug' conditioning hypothesis is well in line with the current experimental evidence but further studies will be needed to verify it directly.