SK&F 83959 and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors in jaw movements via dopamine D1-like/D2-like receptor synergism

Behavioral pharmacology of orofacial movement disorders

Dysfunction in orofacial movement is evident in patients with schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. In animal studies on orofacial dyskinesia, these neurological disorders have been considered as a starting point to examine the pathophysiology and mechanisms underlying the symptoms. There is circumstantial evidence that orofacial dyskinesia in humans might be the consequence of hyperfunctioning mesolimbic-pallidal circuitry, in which the mesolimbic region occupies a central role, in contrast to typical Parkinson-like symptoms which involve hypofunction in the nigrostriato-nigral circuity. Studies in animals suffer from technical difficulties concerning the assessment of orofacial behaviors. There are some experimental designs that provide detailed information on the amplitude and the frequency of the jaw movements. By using such methods, the involvement of neurotransmitter systems and functional neural connections within the basal ganglia has been studied in rat rhythmical jaw movements. Regarding neurotransmitter systems, dopaminergic, cholinergic, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic and glutamaterigic systems have been shown to be involved in rat rhythmical jaw movements. The involved neural connections have also been investigated, focusing on the differential role between the dorsal and ventral part of the striatum, the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens and the output pathways from the striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Taking available clinical and experimental evidence, the orofacial dyskinesias are thought to arise when hierarchically lower order output stations of the mesolimbic region start to dysfunction as a consequence of the arrival of distorted information sent by the mesolimbic region. This review seeks to provide an overview of prior and recent findings across several orofacial movement disorders and interpret new insights in the context of the limitations of behavioral pharmacology and prior knowledge of the regulation of behavior by dopamine receptors and other related neuronal systems.

Pharmacology of signaling induced by dopamine D(1)-like receptor activation

Dopamine D(1)-like receptors consisting of D(1) and D(5) subtypes are intimately implicated in dopaminergic regulation of fundamental neurophysiologic processes such as mood, motivation, cognitive function, and motor activity. Upon stimulation, D(1)-like receptors initiate signal transduction cascades that are mediated through adenylyl cyclase or phosphoinositide metabolism, with subsequent enhancement of multiple downstream kinase cascades. The latter actions propagate and further amplify the receptor signals, thus predisposing D(1)-like receptors to multifaceted interactions with various other mediators and receptor systems. The adenylyl cyclase response to dopamine or selective D(1)-like receptor agonists is reliably associated with the D(1) subtype, while emerging evidence indicates that the phosphoinositide responses in native brain tissues may be preferentially mediated through stimulation of the D(5) receptor. Besides classic coupling of each receptor subtype to specific G proteins, additional biophysical models are advanced in attempts to account for differential subcellular distribution, heteromolecular oligomerization, and activity-dependent selectivity of the receptors. It is expected that significant advances in understanding of dopamine neurobiology will emerge from current and anticipated studies directed at uncovering the molecular mechanisms of D(5) coupling to phosphoinositide signaling, the structural features that might enhance pharmacological selectivity for D(5) versus D(1) subtypes, the mechanism by which dopamine may modulate phosphoinositide synthesis, the contributions of the various responsive signal mediators to D(1) or D(5) interactions with D(2)-like receptors, and the spectrum of dopaminergic functions that may be attributed to each receptor subtype and signaling pathway.

Assessment of jaw movements by magnetic sensor in relation to topographies of orofacial behaviour in freely moving rats: Studies with the dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists SKF 83822 vs SKF 83959

This study applies new magnetic sensor-electromyographic technology for recording jaw movements in freely moving rats to analyse topographies of orofacial movement that occur in association with individual elements of behaviour under challenge with two dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists, SKF 83822 ([R/S]-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and SKF 83959([R/S]-3-methyl-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine). Grooming of the snout/face involved primarily dominant-mouth opening jaw movements with small activation of digastric muscles; subsequent grooming of the flank/trunk was characterised by repetitive, uniform jaw movements with small activation of digastric and masseter muscles. In contrast, grooming of the fingers and tail typically involved high-frequency jaw movements with variable vertical jaw movements and/or strong activation of masseter muscles. Vacuous chewing involved two distinct patterns of jaw movements: a dominant-closing pattern, with strong activation of masseter muscles, and a dominant-opening pattern, with slight activation of masseter muscles. SKF 83822 stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors and activates adenylate cyclase but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis, while SKF 83959 stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors and activates phosphoinositide hydrolysis but not adenylate cyclase. These agonists exerted differential effects on jaw movements, as SKF 83959 induced more jaw movements per episode of syntactic grooming than SKF 83822, while SKF 83822 induced more jaw movements during non-syntactic grooming than SKF 83959. Magnetic sensor technology in freely moving animals resolved distinct topographies of orofacial movement and informs on their relationship to other behaviours in the rodent repertoire and to dopamine D(1)-like receptor function.

Dopamine D(1) receptor activation of adenylyl cyclase, not phospholipase C, in the nucleus accumbens promotes maternal behavior onset in rats

A body of evidence supports the idea that the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system modulates the natural increase in responsiveness female rats show toward offspring (biological or foster) at birth. In the absence of the full hormonal changes associated with pregnancy and birth, female rats do not show immediate responsiveness toward foster offspring. Activation of the mesolimbic DA system can produce an immediate onset of maternal behavior in these females. For example, female rats that are hysterectomized and ovariectomized on day 15 of pregnancy (15HO) and presented with pups 48 hours later normally show maternal behavior after 2-3 days of pup exposure, but will show maternal behavior on day 0 of testing after microinjection of the DA D(1) receptor agonist, SKF 38393, into the nucleus accumbens (NA) at the time of pup presentation. DA D(1) receptor stimulation is known to activate cAMP intracellular signaling cascades via its stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC). However, some DA D(1) receptors are also linked to phospholipase C (PLC) and are capable of activating phosphatidylinositol signaling cascades. SKF 38393 stimulates both types of D(1) receptors. Here we provide evidence that the facilitatory effects of DA D(1) receptor stimulation in the NA on maternal behavior are mediated by AC-linked DA D(1) receptors. By examining the effects of intra-NA application of SKF 83822, a drug which selectively binds DA D(1)-AC receptors, or SKF 83959, a drug which selectively activates D(1)-PLC-linked receptors, we find that only SKF 83822 facilitates maternal behavior onset.

Topographical resolution of jaw movements mediated by cyclase- vs. non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors: Studies with SK&F 83822

This study examined the effects on orofacial movement topography of SK&F 83822 ([R/S]-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors coupled to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) but not phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, in comparison with SK&F 83959 ([R/S]-3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates PI hydrolysis but not AC. SK&F 83822 alone induced chattering, while SK&F 83959 alone exerted little effect. SK&F 83822 and SK&F 83959 each in combination with the dopamine D(2)-like agonist quinpirole resulted in synergistic induction of non-chattering movements with tongue protrusions. These effects were blocked by the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine). However, the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) exerted a biphasic effect on synergism with SK&F 83822: chattering was initially released but antagonised thereafter. Only antagonism was seen for synergism with SK&F 83959. While both AC- and PI-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors participate in synergistic dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, topographically specific synergistic and oppositional dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like interactions evident with SK&F 83822 reflect the involvement primarily of D(1)-like receptors coupled to AC rather than PI.

SK&F 83822 distinguishes adenylyl cyclase from phospholipase C-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors: behavioural topography

Effects of SK&F 83822 [3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-(3-methylphenyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine], an agonist at dopamine D1-like receptors which stimulate adenylyl cyclase but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis, were studied topographically so as to clarify differences between these receptors in the regulation of behaviour. Using cloned receptors, SK&F 83822 showed high, selective affinity for dopamine D1 and D5 over D2, D3, D4 and several non-dopamine receptors. SK&F 83822 induced little intense grooming, but readily induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing; seizures were evident at higher doses, characterised by tonic convulsions, forepaw myoclonus and explosive hyperlocomotion. The dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R(+)-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine] readily antagonised these responses to SK&F 83822, particularly seizure activity. The dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 [cis-N-(1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide] did not alleviate seizures induced by SK&F 83822; YM 09151-02 did, however, attenuate SK&F 83822-induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing, and released vacuous chewing. These findings indicate that dopamine D1-like receptors linked to adenylyl cyclase can be differentiated from those not linked to adenylyl cyclase in terms of their roles in the topographical regulation of behaviour. For example, the seizure and vacuous chewing responses appear to involve dopamine D1-like receptors that stimulate adenylyl cyclase, while intense grooming involves those which do not.

Topographical effects of D1-like dopamine receptor agonists on orofacial movements in mice and their differential regulation via oppositional versus synergistic D1-like: D2-like interactions: cautionary observations on SK&F 82958 as an anomalous agent

Using a novel procedure, the regulation of individual topographies of orofacial movement in the mouse by oppositional versus cooperative/synergistic D1-like: D2-like dopamine receptor interactions was studied. The D1-like agonists SK&F 38393 and SK&F 83959 each induced vertical, but not horizontal, jaw movements, together with tongue protrusions and incisor chattering; however, SK&F 82958 induced a different profile which, consistent with other neurochemical and neurophysiological studies, suggests that this agent shows anomalous properties relative to other D1-like agonists. When given alone, the D2-like agonist quinpirole reduced horizontal jaw movements and incisor chattering. On coadministration, both SK&F 38393- and SK&F 83959-induced vertical jaw movements and tongue protrusions were inhibited by quinpirole, while SK&F 82958 again showed an anomalous profile. These findings indicate that, in the mouse, vertical jaw movements and tongue protrusions are regulated by oppositional D1-like: D2-like interactions, and appear to involve a D1-like receptor that is not coupled to adenylyl cyclase, whereas horizontal jaw movements are inhibited by D2-like receptors. Additionally, results obtained using SK&F 82958 as a probe for D1-like mechanisms should be treated with considerable caution until they are confirmed using other D1-like agonists.

Differential effects of amphetamine transport vs. dopamine reverse transport on particulate PKC activity in striatal synaptoneurosomes

Amphetamine has been shown to increase striatal particulate protein kinase C (PKC) activity [Giambalvo (1992b) Neuropharmacology 31:1211-1222]. The present study examined possible mechanisms involved. Specifically, the effects of calcium, endogenous DA, and DA receptors on the amphetamine-induced increase in PKC activity in striatal synaptoneurosomes were examined. Naïve rats and rats pretreated with N-ethoxy-carbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinolone (EEDQ, i.p.), a nonselective irreversible receptor antagonist, or with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT, i.p.), a DA synthesis inhibitor, were sacrificed and striatal synaptoneurosomes were prepared. The tissue was incubated with amphetamine, with and without calcium, and PKC activity was then determined by the endogenous phosphorylation of endogenous substrate proteins, as described previously [Giambalvo (1988a) Biochem Pharmacol 37:4001-4007]. It was found that calcium enhanced the effect of amphetamine on PKC activity, even in rats pretreated with EEDQ. Intracellular calcium was required since pretreatment with 1,2-bis (2-aminophenoxy) ethane-N, N, N, N-tetracetic acid acetoxymethyl ester (BAPTA-AM) in vitro attenuated the amphetamine-induced increase in PKC activity, resulting in an inhibition of PKC activity instead. Likewise, endogenous DA was essential since pretreatment with AMPT resulted in a similar amphetamine-induced inhibition of PKC activity. Pretreatment with AMPT did not alter the inhibitory effect of the D2 DA agonist, LY 171555, on PKC activity. It did, however, abolish the calcium-dependent stimulatory effect of the D1 agonist SKF 38393 on PKC activity, rendering it inhibitory regardless of calcium. Considering that both BAPTA-AM and AMPT pretreatments, which diminished DA release without affecting uptake via different mechanisms, produced similar inhibitory effects on PKC activity by amphetamine, these results suggest that the inward transport of amphetamine had an inhibitory effect on PKC activity. In contrast, the outward transport of DA seemed to have a stimulatory effect on PKC activity since incubation with low sodium or with ouabain, conditions that promote DA reverse-transport, increased PKC activity. These results showed that PKC activity was altered differently during inward vs. outward transport. The amphetamine-induced increase in PKC activity was attenuated by pretreatment with DA uptake blockers (nomifensine, GBR 12935, and bupropion), even though these drugs by themselves also increased PKC activity. This effect was diminished by calcium and persisted in rats pretreated with EEDQ. Thus, calcium had a differential effect on the PKC activity induced by a transported substrate (amphetamine) vs. nontransported inhibitors (DA uptake blockers).

Prefrontal, accumbal [shell] and ventral striatal mechanisms in jaw movements and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors

The effect on jaw movements of intracerebral injections of the dopamine D1-like receptor agents SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), SK&F 38393 ([R]-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and of injections of the dopamine D2-like receptor agonist quinpirole into the ventrolateral striatum, accumbens shell or prefrontal cortex were studied. SK&F 38393 and SK&F 83959 injected into the ventrolateral striatum synergised with i.v. quinpirole; in the shell of accumbens, SK&F 38393 evidenced weaker synergism with quinpirole, while SK&F 83959 did not synergise with it; neither agent synergised with quinpirole in the prefrontal cortex. Co-injection of SCH 23390 or SK&F 83959 into the prefrontal cortex antagonised jaw movements induced by injection of SK&F 83959 into the ventrolateral striatum in combination with i.v. quinpirole. Injection of SK&F 83959 + quinpirole into the ventrolateral striatum, but not into the accumbens shell, resulted in synergism. These findings indicate a primary, but not exclusive, role for ventral striatal, non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors in the induction of jaw movements. These processes appear to require tonic activity of prefrontal cyclase-linked dopamine D1A [and/or D1B] receptors.

Behavioral response profiles following drug challenge with dopamine receptor subtype agonists and antagonists in developing rat

As part of an investigation into the effects of gestational ethanol (ETOH) exposure on the developing dopamine (DA) system, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to one of three conditions: ETOH, pair-fed (PF) to the ETOH group, or ad libitum lab chow controls (LC). In this paper we report behavioral drug challenge effects for offspring of the two control groups (PF and LC). Male and female pups between postnatal days (PNDs) 21 and 23 in age were exposed to one of three intraperitoneal/subcutaneous doses of one of eight drugs chosen to assess the functional status of the DA D(1), D(2), and D(3) receptor subtype, or a saline control. Agonists were SKF 38393, apomorphine (APO), quinpirole (QUIN), and 7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-amino-tetralin [7-OH-DPAT (DPAT)]; antagonists were spiperone (SPIP), SCH 23390, and two recently developed D(3) antagonists nafadotride (NAF) and PD 152255. Immediately following drug injection, pups were placed in observation cages, where eight behaviors (square entries, grooming, circling, rearing, sniffing, head and oral movements, and yawning) were scored at 3-min intervals for 30 min. Classic behavioral profiles were generally obtained for the high-dose mixed agonists APO, DPAT, and QUIN, which potently increased square entries, rearing, and sniffing, while reducing grooming and head movements. However, low-dose APO had no effect on behavior. The D(1) agonist, SKF 38393, had a strikingly different behavioral profile; it had no effect on square entries at any dose, while increasing grooming and sniffing at the medium dose. The D(1) antagonist, SCH 23390, profoundly decreased all behaviors except oral and head movements, especially at high doses. In contrast, the effects of the D(2) antagonist, SPIP, were limited to increasing sniffing at the medium dose. The two putative D(3) antagonists, NAF and PD 152255, presented strikingly different profiles. NAF induced a pattern of behavioral suppression that resembled the profile of high-dose SCH, while high-dose PD 152255 stimulated behavior. The failure of low-dose APO to have any effect on behavior suggests that the D(2) autoreceptor is not functional in preweanling rats. This hypothesis is further supported by the lack of behavioral suppression seen with low-dose QUIN and DPAT. Failure of NAF to produce behavioral activation at low doses and the stimulatory effects seen with PD 152255 suggests that either the D(3) autoreceptor, the postsynaptic D(3) receptor, or both are not fully functional at this age as well.

SKF83959 selectively regulates phosphatidylinositol-linked D1 dopamine receptors in rat brain

Previously a distinct D1-like dopamine receptor (DAR) that selectively couples to phospholipase C/phosphatidylinositol (PLC/PI) was proposed. However, lack of a selective agonist has limited efforts aimed at characterizing this receptor. We characterized the in vitro and in vivo effects of SKF83959 in regulating PI metabolism. SKF83959 stimulates (EC50, 8 micro m) phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate hydrolysis in membranes of frontal cortex (FC) but not in membranes from PC12 cells expressing classical D1A DARs. Stimulation of FC PI metabolism was attenuated by the D1 antagonist, SCH23390, indicating that SKF83959 activates a D1-like DAR. The PI-linked DAR is located in hippocampus, cerebellum, striatum and FC. Most significantly, administration of SKF83959 induced accumulations of IP3 in striatum and hippocampus. In contrast to other D1 DAR agonists, SKF83959 did not increase cAMP production in brain or in D1A DAR-expressing PC12 cell membranes. However, SKF83959 inhibited cAMP elevation elicited by the D1A DAR agonist, SKF81297, indicating that the compound is an antagonist of the classical D1A DAR. Lastly, we demonstrated that SKF83959 enhances [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) binding to membrane Galphaq and Galphai proteins, suggesting that PI stimulation is mediated by activation of these guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins. Results indicate that SKF83959 is a selective agonist for the PI-linked D1-like DAR, providing a unique tool for investigating the functions of this brain D1 DAR subtype.

Comparative phenotypic resolution of spontaneous, D2-like and D1-like agonist-induced orofacial movement topographies in congenic mutants with dopamine D2 vs. D3 receptor ?knockout?

Using a novel system, the role of D2-like dopamine receptors in distinct topographies of orofacial movement was assessed in mutant mice with congenic D2 vs. D3 receptor knockout, and compared with findings in D1A mutants. Under spontaneous conditions, D2 mutants evidenced increased vertical jaw movements and unaltered horizontal jaw movements, with reductions in tongue protrusions and incisor chattering; in D3 mutants, only incisor chattering was reduced. Given previous evidence that D1A mutants show reduced horizontal but not vertical jaw movements, this indicates that apparent oppositional D1-like:D2-like interactions in the regulation of composited jaw movements may in fact reflect the independent actions of D2 receptors to inhibit vertical jaw movements and of D1A receptors to facilitate horizontal jaw movements. Effects of the D2-like agonist RU 24213 to exert greater reduction in horizontal than in vertical jaw movements were not altered prominently in either D2 or D3 mutants. The D1-like agonists A 68930 and SK&F 83959 induced vertical jaw movements, tongue protrusions, and incisor chattering; induction of tongue protrusions by A 68930 was reduced in D2 mutants. D2 receptors exert topographically specific regulation of orofacial movements in a manner distinct from their D1A counterparts, while D3 receptors exert only minor regulation of such movements.

Phenotypic, ethologically based resolution of spontaneous and D(2)-like vs D(1)-like agonist-induced behavioural topography in mice with congenic D(3) dopamine receptor "knockout"

Uncertainty as to the functional role of the D(3) dopamine receptor, due primarily to a paucity of selective agonists or antagonists, is being addressed in mice with targeted gene deletion ("knockout") thereof. This study describes, for the first time, the phenotype of congenic D(3)-null mice. Initially, 129/Sv x C57BL/6 D(3)-null mice were backcrossed 14 times onto C57BL/6; they were then assessed using an ethologically based approach which resolves all topographies of behaviour within the mouse repertoire. The ethogram of D(3)-null mice, on comparison with wildtypes, was characterised by no alteration in any topography of behaviour over an initial period of exploration; subsequent assessment over several hours revealed only increased rearing among females due to delayed habituation. Low doses of the selective D(2)-like agonist RU 24213 (0.016-0.25 mg/kg) inhibited topographies of exploratory behaviour; this effect was diminished in D(3)-null mice only when investigated following prolonged habituation, and then only for certain topographies of behaviour, primarily sniffing and rearing. High doses of RU 24213 (0.1-12.5 mg/kg) induced stereotyped sniffing and "ponderous" locomotion, while the selective D(1)-like agonist SK&F 83959 (0.016-2.0 mg/kg) promoted characteristic grooming syntax; these effects did not differ materially between the genotypes. When examined topographically on an essentially congenic C57BL/6 background (<0.005% 129/Sv), the resultant phenotype indicated essential conservation of the mouse ethogram, high-dose D(2)-like stimulatory effects, and D(1)-like stimulatory effects in the absence of D(3) receptors. A role for D(3) receptors in inhibitory processes appeared topographically circumscribed and only when baseline levels of behaviour were low.

Phenotypic resolution of spontaneous and D1-like agonist-induced orofacial movement topographies in congenic dopamine D1A receptor 'knockout' mice

A novel system was used to assess the role of D(1)-like dopamine receptors in distinct topographies of orofacial movements in mice with congenic D(1A) receptor knockout. Under spontaneous conditions, vertical jaw movements in wild-types declined with time at a rate that was reduced in D(1A) mutants, while horizontal jaw movements emerged progressively in wild-types but not in D(1A) mutants; tongue protrusions were absent in D(1A) mutants, while incisor chattering was initially reduced in D(1A) mutants but rose subsequently to reach the level of wild-types. D(1A) receptors exert a topographically specific role in regulating individual spontaneous orofacial movements, and these involve interactions with psychomotor processes which 'sculpt' behavioural change over time. The anomalous D(1)-like agonist SK&F 83959, which fails to stimulate, and indeed inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase induced by dopamine, readily stimulated vertical jaw movements, tongue protrusions and incisor chattering, and these response topographies were absent in D(1A) mutants. These results suggest that D(1A) receptors may exert some form of permissive role over orofacial topographies initiated via a novel, putative D(1)-like site not linked to adenylyl cyclase, or that some D(1A) receptors might be coupled to a transduction system other than adenylyl cyclase.

SKF 83959 is an antagonist of dopamine D1-like receptors in the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens: a key to its antiparkinsonian effect in animals?

SKF 83959 that has a unique antiparkinson profile in animal models of Parkinson's disease is an in vitro dopamine D1 antagonist of receptors coupled to adenylyl cyclase. We hypothesized that SKF 83959, among others, interacts with dopamine D1 receptors coupled to adenylyl cyclase in the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex. Effects of intra-accumbal injections of SKF 83959 on locomotor activity were compared to effects of the dopamine D1 agonist SKF 81297 and the dopamine D1 antagonist SCH 39166. Similarly to SCH 39166, SKF 83959 did not affect locomotor activity, but counteracted SKF 81297-induced locomotor activity. Effects of unilateral intra-prefrontal injections of SKF 83959 on rotational behaviour were compared to the effects of the dopamine D1 agonist SKF 81297 and the dopamine D1 antagonists SCH 23390 and SCH 39166 in rats selected on basis of their high locomotor response to novelty and pretreated with a subcutaneous injection of 0.75 mg/kg dexamphetamine. Like SCH 39166 and SCH 23390, SKF 83959 induced a bias for contralateral rotating and blocked the SKF 81297-induced bias for ipsilateral rotating. In conclusion, SKF 83959 is an in vivo antagonist of dopamine D1 receptors that are coupled to adenylyl cyclase in the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex. The role of these receptors in the antiparkinson profile of SKF 83959 is discussed.

Ventral striatal vs. accumbal (shell) mechanisms and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors in jaw movements

This study compared the effects of intracerebral injections of the dopamine D(1)-like receptor agents 3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 83959) and [R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH 23390) into the ventrolateral striatum or the shell of the nucleus accumbens on the synergistic induction of jaw movements by intravenous (i.v.) co-administration of [R]-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 38393) or SK&F 83959 with the dopamine D(2)-like receptor agonist, quinpirole. In the ventrolateral striatum, SCH 23390 and SK&F 83959 each blocked jaw movements induced by i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while only SCH 23390 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. SCH 23390 was less effective in the accumbens shell than in the ventrolateral striatum, and SK&F 83959 was ineffective to block i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while neither SCH 23390 nor SK&F 83959 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. As SK&F 83959 inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via dopamine D(1A) receptors but acts as an agonist at a putative dopamine D(1)-like receptor site not linked to cyclase, an important role is indicated for non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptor sites as well as dopamine D(1A) receptors in the regulation of jaw movements via dopamine D(1)-like/D(2)-like receptor synergism, particularly in the ventrolateral striatum.

The psychopharmacology-molecular biology interface: exploring the behavioural roles of dopamine receptor subtypes using targeted gene deletion ('knockout')

In the absence of selective agonists and antagonists able to discriminate between individual members of the D1-like and D2-like families of dopamine receptor subtypes, functional parcellation has remained problematic. 'Knockout' of these subtypes by targeted gene deletion offers a new approach to evaluating their roles in the regulation of behaviour. Like any new technique, 'knockout' has associated with it a number of methodological limitations that are now being addressed in a systematic manner. Studies on the phenotype of D1(A/1), D(1B/5), D2, D3 and D4 'knockouts' at the level of spontaneous and agonist/antagonist-induced behaviour are reviewed, in terms of methodological issues, neuronal implications and potential clinical relevance. Dopamine receptor subtype 'knockout' is a nascent technology that is now beginning to fulfil its potential. It is being complemented by more systematic phenotypic characterisation at the level of behaviour and additional, molecular biologically-based approaches.

Topographical assessment and pharmacological characterization of orofacial movements in mice: dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptor regulation

A novel procedure for the assessment of orofacial movement topographies in mice was used to study, for the first time, the individual and interactive involvement of dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptors in their regulation. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists A 68930 ([1R,3S]-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenyl-isochroman) and SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) each induced vertical jaw movements with tongue protrusions and incisor chattering. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and BW 737C ([S]-6-chloro-1-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]-7-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline) antagonised these responses, while the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) attenuated those to SK&F 83959 and released horizontal jaw movements. These findings suggest some role for a dopamine D(1)-like receptor that is coupled to a transduction system other than/additional to adenylyl cyclase, and for dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, in the regulation of individual orofacial movement topographies in the mouse. This methodology will allow the use of knockout mice to clarify the roles of individual dopamine receptor subtypes in their regulation.

A dopamine partial agonist and antagonist block amphetamine self-administration in a progressive ratio schedule

A recently characterized class of compounds, dopamine partial agonists, have been suggested as potential therapeutic candidates for pharmacological intervention in psychostimulant addiction. These drugs bind to dopamine receptors with high affinity and low intrinsic activity and are thought to behave as functional antagonists in conditions of high dopaminergic tone, and as agonists in conditions of low receptor occupancy by dopamine. The aim of the present study was to characterize the effects of terguride, a partial dopamine agonist at the D2 receptor subtype, on intravenous self-administration of amphetamine in a progressive ratio schedule and to compare it with the effects produced by the dopamine D2 antagonist eticlopride and the dopamine D2 full agonist quinpirole. Terguride at the doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg i.p. significantly decreased the maximum number of responses delivered for a single injection of amphetamine ("breaking point"), an effect similar to that produced by the antagonist eticlopride (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.). In contrast, administration of quinpirole (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.) did not significantly modify the breaking point for amphetamine responding. Also, terguride dose-dependently increased responding for amphetamine self-administration on a continuous reinforcement schedule. These data further confirm the effects of terguride on psychostimulant self-administration and indicate that under these conditions partial dopamine agonists act as functional dopamine receptor antagonists.

Dopamine D(1A) receptor function in a rodent model of tardive dyskinesia

Tardive dyskinesia develops as a common complication of long-term neuroleptic use. The emergence of such dyskinesias may reflect a shift in the balance of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor-mediated activity, with a relative increase in activity in the D(1) receptor-regulated direct striatonigral pathway. In rats, chronic treatment with the antipsychotic fluphenazine triggers a syndrome of vacuous chewing movements, which are attenuated by dopamine D(1) receptor antagonists. A similar syndrome can be seen in drug-naive animals following acute administration of selective dopamine D(1) receptor agonists. However, not all dopamine D(1) receptor agonists elicit these mouth movements. Thus, some investigators have suggested the existence of novel subtypes of the dopamine D(1) receptor. In these studies, we sought to clarify the role of the dopamine D(1A) receptor in vacuous chewing movements induced both by the selective dopamine D(1) receptor agonist SKF 38393, as well as by chronic neuroleptic administration, using in vivo oligonucleotide antisense to dopamine D(1A) receptor messenger RNA. Intrastriatal antisense treatment significantly and selectively attenuated striatal dopamine D(1) receptor binding, accompanied by reductions in SKF 38393- and chronic fluphenazine-induced vacuous chewing movements. These findings suggest that the dopamine D(1A) receptor plays an important role in the expression of vacuous chewing movements in a rodent model of tardive dyskinesia and may contribute to the pathogenesis of the human disorder. This may have important implications for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia in humans.

Dopaminergic behaviors and signal transduction mediated through adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C pathways

We determined the relative effects of chemical receptor inactivation on dopaminergic signaling through adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C pathways and evaluated the behavioral implications of such receptor manipulations. Groups of rats were given intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ), a reagent that differentially inactivates neurotransmitter receptors. Control and treated animals were used to assess dopaminergic-mediated behaviors or brain tissues were prepared from the animals and used to assay D1-like receptor binding and agonist-stimulated second messenger formation. EEDQ decreased by 75% the number of D1-like binding sites and completely abolished dopamine-stimulated cyclic AMP formation in striatal membranes. Conversely, dopamine-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis was insensitive to inactivation by EEDQ as examined over different durations of EEDQ treatment, in different brain regions, or with different concentrations of the D1-like receptor agonist SKF38393. EEDQ-pretreated animals lost their stereotypic response to apomorphine but showed increased vacuous jaw movements in response to apomorphine or SKF38393. Basal catalepsy was increased and SCH23390 was unable to further enhance catalepsy beyond the basal levels in the lesioned animals. In naive animals, SCH23390 catalepsy was reversed by apomorphine, and apomorphine stereotypy was reversed by SCH23390. Taken together, the present results imply that the dopamine-sensitive phospholipase C system mediates a subset of dopaminergic behaviors, notably vacuous jaw movements, in contrast to stereotypy and catalepsy which appear to be respectively mediated through stimulation and inhibition of the adenylate cyclase-coupled dopaminergic system.