Effects of pravastatin treatment on lipoprotein subclass profiles and particle size in the PLAC-I trial

Relationship between Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Lipoprotein Profile in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

(1) Background: Apolipoprotein E(ApoE) plays a critical role in lipid transport. The specific allele of APOE being expressed is associated with the development of coronary heart disease (CHD), however the specific mechanisms by which ApoE drives disease are unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between APOE allele, lipoprotein metabolome, and CHD severity to provide evidence for the efficacy of clinical cholesterol-lowering therapy; (2) Methods: Blood samples were collected from 360 patients with CHD that were actively being treated with statins. The lipoprotein profile, including particle numbers, particle size, and lipoprotein composition concentrates, was measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The severity of CHD was determined by quantifying coronary angiography results using the Gensini scoring system; (3) Results: We found there was no significant difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels among ε2+ (ε2 allele carriers, consisting of ε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 genotypes), ε3 (consisting of ε3/ε3 and ε2/ε4 genotypes), and ε4+ (ε4 allele carriers, consisting of ε3/ε4 and ε4/ε4 genotypes) participants receiving statin treatment. Compared with the ε3 group, patients with the ε2+ genotype showed lower concentrations of total low-density lipoprotein (LDL), small-LDL, and middle-LDL particles, as well as a larger LDL size, higher very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) composition concentrates, and higher intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) composition concentrates. The ε4+ group showed higher concentrations of total LDL, small LDL particles, and LDL compositions with smaller LDL size. The higher level of small LDL concentration was associated with a high Gensini score (B = 0.058, p = 0.024). Compared with the ε3 group, the risk of increased branch lesions in the ε2+ group was lower (OR = 0.416, p = 0.027); (4) Conclusions: The specific allele of APOE being expressed can affect the severity of CHD by altering components of the lipoprotein profile, such as the concentration of small LDL and LDL size.

Lipid measurements in the management of cardiovascular diseases: Practical recommendations a scientific statement from the national lipid association writing group

Lipoprotein measurements are pivotal in the management of patients at risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) with myocardial infarction and coronary death as the main outcomes, and for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes CHD and stroke. Recent developments and changes in guidelines affect optimization of using lipid measures as cardiovascular biomarkers. This scientific statement reviews the pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical, and clinical aspects of lipoprotein measurements. Highlights include the following: i) It is acceptable to screen with nonfasting lipids. ii) non-high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is measured reliably in either the fasting or the nonfasting state and can effectively guide ASCVD prevention. iii) low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can be estimated from total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) measurements. For patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL and TG ≤150 mg/dL it is reasonable to use the Friedewald formula. However, for those with TG 150-400 mg/dL the Friedewald formula for LDL-C estimation is less accurate. The Martin/Hopkins method is recommended for LDL-C estimation throughout the range of LDL-C levels and up to TG levels of 399 mg/dL. For TG levels ≥400 mg/dL LDL-C estimating equations are currently not recommended and newer methods are being evaluated. iv) When LDL-C or TG screening results are abnormal the clinician should consider obtaining fasting lipids. v) Advanced lipoprotein tests using apolipoprotein B (apoB), LDL Particle Number (LDL-P) or remnant cholesterol may help to guide therapeutic decisions in select patients, but data are limited for patients already on lipid lowering therapy with low LDL-C levels. Better harmonization of advanced lipid measurement methods is needed. Lipid measurements are recommended 4-12 weeks after a change in lipid treatment. Lipid laboratory reports should denote desirable values and specifically identify extremely elevated LDL-C levels (≥190 mg/dL at any age or ≥160 mg/dL in children) as severe hypercholesterolemia. Potentially actionable abnormal lipid test results, including fasting triglycerides (TG) ≥500 mg/dL, should be reported as hypertriglyceridemia. Appropriate use and reporting of lipid tests should improve their utility in the management of persons at high risk for ASCVD events.

Statins for Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Dyslipidemia is a potent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in the general population. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or low high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) are well-established CV risk factors, but more precise determinants of risk include increased apoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], intermediate and very low-density lipoprotein (IDL-C, VLDL-C; “remnant particles”), and small dense LDL particles. Lipoprotein metabolism is altered in association with declining glomerular filtration rate such that patients with non dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) have lower levels of HDL-C, higher triglyceride, ApoB, remnant IDL-C, remnant VLDL-C, and Lp(a), and a greater proportion of oxidized LDL-C. Similar abnormalities are prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients, who often manifest proatherogenic changes in LDL-C in the absence of increased levels. Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) have a similar but more severe dyslipidemia compared to HD patients due to stimulation of hepatic lipoprotein synthesis by glucose absorption from dialysate, increased insulin levels, and selective protein loss in the dialysate analogous to the nephrotic syndrome. In the dialysis-dependent CKD population, total cholesterol is directly associated with increased mortality after controlling for the presence of malnutrition–inflammation.

Treatment with statins reduces CV mortality in the general population by approximately one third, irrespective of baseline LDL-C or prior CV events. Statins have similar, if not greater, efficacy in altering the lipid profile in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (HD and PD) compared to those with normal renal function, and are well tolerated in CKD patients at moderate doses (≤ 20 mg/day atorvastatin or simvastatin). Statins reduce C-reactive protein as well as lipid moieties such as ApoB, remnants IDL and VLDL-C, and oxidized and small dense LDL-C fraction. Large observational studies demonstrate that statin treatment is independently associated with a 30% – 50% mortality reduction in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (similar between HD- and PD-treated patients). One recent randomized controlled trial evaluated the ability of statin treatment to reduce mortality in type II diabetics treated with HD (“4D”); the primary end point of death from cardiac cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke was not significantly reduced. However, results of this trial may not apply to other end-stage renal disease populations. Two ongoing randomized controlled trials (SHARP and AURORA) are underway evaluating the effect of statins on CV events and death in patients with CKD (including patients treated with HD and PD). Recruitment to future trials should be given a high priority by nephrologists and, until more data are available, consideration should be given to following published guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemia in CKD. Additional consideration could be given to treating all dialysis patients felt to be at risk of CV disease (irrespective of cholesterol level), given the safety and potential efficacy of statins. This is especially relevant in patients treated with PD, given their more atherogenic lipid profile and the lack of randomized controlled trials in this population.

CVD Risk Stratification in the PCSK9 Era: Is There a Role for LDL Subfractions?

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Due to high costs and unknown long-term adverse effects, critical evaluation of patients considered for PCSK9 inhibitors is important. It has been proposed that measuring low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions, or LDL particle numbers (LDL-P), could be of value in CVD risk assessment and may identify patients at high risk of CVD. This review evaluates the evidence for the use of LDL subfractions, or LDL-P, when assessing CVD risk in patients for whom PCSK9 inhibitors are considered as a lipid-lowering therapy. Numerous methods for measuring LDL subfractions and LDL-P are available, but several factors limit their availability. A lack of standardization makes comparison between the different methods challenging. Longitudinal population-based studies have found an independent association between different LDL subfractions, LDL-P, and an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but definitive evidence that these measurements add predictive value to the standard risk markers is lacking. No studies have proven that these measurements improve clinical outcomes. PCSK9 inhibitors seem to be effective at lowering all LDL subfractions and LDL-P, but any evidence that measuring LDL subfractions and LDL-P yield clinically useful information is lacking. Such analyses are currently not recommended when considering whether to initiate PCKS9 inhibitors in patients at risk of CVD.

Metabolomic Profiling of Statin Use and Genetic Inhibition of HMG-CoA Reductase

Background

Statins are first-line therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention, but their systemic effects across lipoprotein subclasses, fatty acids, and circulating metabolites remain incompletely characterized.

Objectives

This study sought to determine the molecular effects of statin therapy on multiple metabolic pathways.

Methods

Metabolic profiles based on serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics were quantified at 2 time points in 4 population-based cohorts from the United Kingdom and Finland (N = 5,590; 2.5 to 23.0 years of follow-up). Concentration changes in 80 lipid and metabolite measures during follow-up were compared between 716 individuals who started statin therapy and 4,874 persistent nonusers. To further understand the pharmacological effects of statins, we used Mendelian randomization to assess associations of a genetic variant known to mimic inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase (the intended drug target) with the same lipids and metabolites for 27,914 individuals from 8 population-based cohorts.

Results

Starting statin therapy was associated with numerous lipoprotein and fatty acid changes, including substantial lowering of remnant cholesterol (80% relative to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]), but only modest lowering of triglycerides (25% relative to LDL-C). Among fatty acids, omega-6 levels decreased the most (68% relative to LDL-C); other fatty acids were only modestly affected. No robust changes were observed for circulating amino acids, ketones, or glycolysis-related metabolites. The intricate metabolic changes associated with statin use closely matched the association pattern with rs12916 in the HMGCR gene (R² = 0.94, slope 1.00 ± 0.03).

Conclusions

Statin use leads to extensive lipid changes beyond LDL-C and appears efficacious for lowering remnant cholesterol. Metabolomic profiling, however, suggested minimal effects on amino acids. The results exemplify how detailed metabolic characterization of genetic proxies for drug targets can inform indications, pleiotropic effects, and pharmacological mechanisms.

Effect of PCSK9 Inhibition by Alirocumab on Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

BACKGROUND

In patients with discordance between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and LDL particle (LDL-P) concentrations, cardiovascular risk more closely correlates with LDL-P.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated the effect of alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, on lipoprotein particle concentration and size in hypercholesterolemic patients, using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plasma samples were collected from patients receiving alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (n=26) or placebo (n=31) during a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients (LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL) on a stable atorvastatin dose. In this post hoc analysis, percentage change in concentrations of LDL-P, very-low-density lipoprotein particles, and high-density lipoprotein particles from baseline to week 12 was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Alirocumab significantly reduced mean concentrations of total LDL-P (-63.3% versus -1.0% with placebo) and large (-71.3% versus -21.8%) and small (-54.0% versus +17.8%) LDL-P subfractions and total very-low-density lipoprotein particle concentrations (-36.4% versus +33.4%; all P<0.01). Total high-density lipoprotein particles increased with alirocumab (+11.2% versus +1.4% with placebo; P<0.01). There were greater increases in large (44.6%) versus medium (17.7%) or small high-density lipoprotein particles (2.8%) with alirocumab. LDL-P size remained relatively unchanged in both groups; however, very-low-density and high-density lipoprotein particle sizes increased to a significantly greater extent with alirocumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and LDL-P concentrations in hypercholesterolemic patients receiving stable atorvastatin therapy. These findings may be of particular relevance to patients with discordant LDL-C and LDL-P concentrations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01288443.

Recent Advances in Targeted, Self-Assembling Nanoparticles to Address Vascular Damage Due to Atherosclerosis

Self-assembling nanoparticles functionalized with targeting moieties have significant potential for atherosclerosis nanomedicine. While self-assembly allows the easy construction (and degradation) of nanoparticles with therapeutic or diagnostic functionality, or both, the targeting agent can direct them to a specific molecular marker within a given stage of the disease. Therefore, supramolecular nanoparticles have been investigated in the last decade as molecular imaging agents or explored as nanocarriers that can decrease the systemic toxicity of drugs by producing accumulation predominantly in specific tissues of interest. In this Progress Report, the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and the damage caused to vascular tissue are described, as well as the current diagnostic and treatment options. An overview of targeted strategies using self-assembling nanoparticles is provided, including liposomes, high density lipoproteins, protein cages, micelles, proticles, and perfluorocarbon nanoparticles. Finally, an overview is given of current challenges, limitations, and future applications for personalized medicine in the context of atherosclerosis of self-assembling nanoparticles.

Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions Determined by Ion Mobility and First Cardiovascular Events After Random Allocation to High-Intensity Statin or Placebo: The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can occur in individuals with low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C). We investigated whether detailed measures of LDL subfractions and other lipoproteins can be used to assess CVD risk in a population with both low LDL-C and high C-reactive protein who were randomized to high-intensity statin or placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 11 186 Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) participants, we tested whether lipids, apolipoproteins, and ion mobility-measured particle concentrations at baseline and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo were associated with first CVD events (n=307) or CVD/all-cause death (n=522). In placebo-allocated participants, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per SD, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21). In contrast, associations with CVD events were observed for baseline non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38), apolipoprotein B (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48), and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35) and LDL particles (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). Association with CVD events was also observed for several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions but not for ion mobility-measured HDL subfractions. In statin-allocated participants, CVD events were associated with on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B; these were also associated with CVD/all-cause death, as were several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions, albeit with a pattern of association that differed from the baseline risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In JUPITER, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD events, in contrast with significant associations for non-HDL cholesterol and atherogenic particles: apolipoprotein B and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles, LDL particles, and select subfractions of very-low-density lipoprotein particles and LDL particles. During high-intensity statin therapy, on-treatment levels of LDL-C and atherogenic particles were associated with residual risk of CVD/all-cause death.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.

Comparison of the effects of low-dose rosuvastatin on plasma levels of cholesterol and oxidized low-density lipoprotein in 3 ultracentrifugally separated low-density lipoprotein subfractions

BACKGROUND

Plasma-oxidized (ox) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is an atherogenic lipoprotein. The distribution of ox-LDL in plasma LDL subfractions and the effect of statins on this distribution have not been investigated in detail.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the distribution of cholesterol and ox-LDL in 3 ultracentrifugally separated plasma LDL subfractions and investigated the effects of a statin, rosuvastatin, on the levels of these lipoproteins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one polygenic hypercholesterolemic subjects were included in this study. Levels of cholesterol and ox-LDL in 3 plasma LDL subfractions and plasma levels of remnant-like particle cholesterol, ox-LDL, and adiponectin were measured after 0, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment with rosuvastatin. Sequential ultracentrifugation was performed to subfractionate plasma lipoproteins.

RESULTS

The mean daily dose of rosuvastatin over the 12 months of treatment was 2.9 ± 1.0 mg (mean ± standard deviation). The cholesterol subfraction distribution was 43 ± 10% as low-density LDL, 46 ± 8% as medium-density LDL, and 13 ± 5% as high-density LDL. Similarly, the distribution of ox-LDL was 31 ± 10% as low-density LDL, 48 ± 7% as medium-density LDL, and 22 ± 8% as high-density LDL. After 12 months of treatment with rosuvastatin, the level of cholesterol was significantly reduced in all 3 subfractions (P < .0001), as was the level of ox-LDL (P < .0001). Furthermore, the plasma cholesterol level in high-density lipoprotein2 increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of ox-LDL in plasma LDL subfractions was more skewed toward the denser subfractions, compared with cholesterol. Rosuvastatin treatment significantly reduced plasma levels of cholesterol and ox-LDL in all LDL subfractions.

Systematic review: Evaluating the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on lipoprotein and lipid values

PURPOSE

This systematic review was performed to summarize published experience using low density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P) to monitor the efficacy of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies.

METHODS

Studies were identified from a literature search of MEDLINE (January 1, 2000 - June 30, 2012); and abstract searches of select conferences. All accepted studies reported mean (or median) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based LDL-P values for at least 10 subjects receiving lipid lowering pharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Searches revealed 36 studies (with 61 treatment arms) in which LDL-P measurements were reported pre- and post-treatment. Most studies also reported changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but fewer studies reported changes in apolipoprotein B (apoB)(n = 20) and non-HDL-C (n = 28). Treatments included statins (22 arms/15 studies), fibrates (7 arms/7 studies), niacin (7 arms/6 studies), bile acid sequestrants (5 arms/2 studies), an anti-apoB oligonucleotide (2 arms/2 studies), combination therapies (8 arms/6 studies), anti-diabetics (5 arms/4 studies), and, other treatments (5 arms/2 studies). Lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy resulted in reductions in mean LDL-P in all but two studies. In several statin studies, the percent reductions in LDL-P were smaller than reductions in LDL-C, comparable changes were reported when LDL-P and apoB, were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Study-level data from this systemic review establish that different lipid lowering agents can lead to discordance between LDL-P and LDL-C, therefore, basing LDL-lowering therapy only on the achievement of cholesterol goals may result in a treatment gap. Therefore, the use of LDL-P for monitoring lipid-lowering therapy, particularly for statins, can provide a more accurate assessment of residual cardiovascular risk.

Changes in lipoprotein particle number with ezetimibe/simvastatin coadministered with extended-release niacin in hyperlipidemic patients

Background

Combination therapy with ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) and extended‐release niacin (N) has been reported to be safe and efficacious in concomitantly reducing low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and increasing high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol in hyperlipidemic patients at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. This analysis evaluated the effect of E/S coadministered with N on low‐density lipoprotein particle number (LDL‐P) and high‐density lipoprotein particle number (HDL‐P) as assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in patients with type IIa or IIb hyperlipidemia.

Methods and Results

This was an analysis of a previously reported 24‐week randomized, double‐blind study in type IIa/IIb hyperlipidemic patients randomized to treatment with E/S (10/20 mg/day)+N (titrated to 2 g/day) or N (titrated to 2 g/day) or E/S (10/20 mg/day). Samples from a subset of patients (577 of 1220) were available for post hoc analysis of LDL‐P and HDL‐P by NMR spectroscopy. Increases in HDL‐P (+16.2%) and decreases in LDL‐P (−47.7%) were significantly greater with E/S+N compared with N (+9.8% for HDL‐P and −21.5% for LDL‐P) and E/S (+12.8% for HDL‐P and −36.8% for LDL‐P). In tertile analyses, those with the lowest baseline HDL‐P had the greatest percent increase in HDL‐P (N, 18.4/7.9/2.1; E/S, 19.3/12.2/5.3; and E/S+N, 26.9/13.8/6.9; all P<0.001). Individuals in the highest tertile of LDL‐P had the greatest percent reduction in LDL‐P (N, 18.3/23.1/24.6; E/S, 29.7/38.3/41.8; and E/S+N, 44.3/49.0/50.5; all P<0.001).

Conclusions

These results suggest that E/S+N improves lipoprotein particle number, consistent with its lipid‐modifying benefits in type IIa or IIb hyperlipidemia patients and may exert the greatest effect in those with high LDL‐P and low HDL‐P at baseline.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00271817

Clinical use of a carbohydrate-restricted diet to treat the dyslipidemia of the metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The metabolic syndrome is characterized by an atherogenic dyslipidemia identifiable using lipoprotein subclass analysis. This study assesses the effect of a carbohydrate-restricted diet on the dyslipidemia of the metabolic syndrome in a clinical setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of patients attending a preventive medicine clinic using lipoprotein subclass analysis (by NMR spectroscopy) to identify the atherogenic dyslipidemia. If present, patients were counseled to begin a carbohydrate-restricted diet (< 20 g/day). Patients already on statin therapy were included only if the medication dose was not changed. The outcomes were changes in body weight, fasting serum lipid profiles and serum lipoprotein subclasses.

RESULTS

Of 122 patients identified, 80 patients had complete pre- and post-treatment data. The mean (+/-SD) age was 66 +/- 9 years, baseline weight was 85 +/- 12 kg, BMI was 28.1 +/- 3.6, 73% were male, 99% were Caucasian. Sixty-five percent were taking statin medication. Carbohydrate-restriction led to a 13% reduction in total cholesterol, 16% reduction in LDL cholesterol, 38% reduction in triglycerides, and a 13% increase in HDL cholesterol (all p values < 0.001). Carbohydrate-restriction also led to a reduction in LDL particle concentration of 28%, a reduction in small LDL of 82%, a reduction of large VLDL of 62%, and an increase in large HDL of 30% (all p values < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A carbohydrate-restricted diet recommendation led to improvements in lipid profiles and lipoprotein subclass traits of the metabolic syndrome in a clinical outpatient setting, and should be considered as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome.

Effects of rosuvastatin versus pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein diameter in HIV-1-infected patients receiving ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

HIV infection is associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein profile, and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors exacerbate this phenotype. We evaluated the effect of 45 days of rosuvastatin versus pravastatin on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size and the distribution of LDL subfractions in HIV-1 patients receiving boosted protease inhibitors with elevated LDL levels.

DESIGN

Substudy of the randomized double-blind multicentre ANRS 126 VIHstatine trial.

SETTING

Twenty clinical centres in France.

PATIENTS

HIV-infected patients receiving boosted protease inhibitors with dyslipidaemia (LDL cholesterol > 4.1 mmol/l and triglycerides < 8.8 mmol/l).

INTERVENTION

Rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 39) or pravastatin 40 mg/day (n = 37) for 45 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

LDL size and distribution of LDL subfractions blindly assessed by gradient gel electrophoresis at baseline and at day 45.

RESULTS

Rosuvastatin was more effective than pravastatin in increasing the diameter of the LDL peak. The LDL diameter change was 0.33 ± 0.59 nm in the rosuvastatin group versus -0.01 ± 0.52 nm in the pravastatin group (P = 0.021). Rosuvastatin was also more effective in increasing significantly the percentage of large LDL (LDL1, P = 0.038; LDL2, P = 0.031) and in decreasing the percentage of small LDL (LDL3, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Rosuvastatin was more effective than pravastatin in normalizing LDL size and LDL subfraction distributions, leading to a less atherogenic phenotype.

Apolipoprotein L1 nephropathy risk variants associate with HDL subfraction concentration in African Americans

BACKGROUND

Coding variants in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) are strongly associated with non-diabetic nephropathy in African Americans. ApoL1 proteins associate with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles in the circulation. Plasma HDL particle subclass concentrations were compared in 73 African Americans based on APOL1 genotypes to detect differences potentially contributing to renal disease.

METHODS

HDL subclass concentrations were measured using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in African American first-degree relatives of patients with non-diabetic end-stage renal disease. Participants had estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) > 80 mL/min and lacked albuminuria. Additive effects of the number of APOL1 risk variants on natural logarithm-transformed HDL subclass concentrations were computed.

RESULTS

Participants were 58.9% female with mean ± SD age 47.2 ± 13.3 years and GFR 92.4 ± 18.8 mL/min. The numbers with 2, 1 and 0 APOL1 nephropathy risk variants, respectively, were 36, 17 and 20. Mean ± SD medium-sized HDL concentrations were significantly lower for each additional APOL1 risk variant (2 versus 1 versus 0 risk variants: 9.0 ± 5.6 versus 10.1 ± 5.5 versus 13.1 ± 8.2 μmol/L, respectively; P = 0.0222 unadjusted; P = 0.0162 triglyceride- and ancestry adjusted).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower medium-sized HDL subclass concentrations are present in African Americans based on increasing numbers of APOL1 nephropathy risk variants. Potential mechanistic roles of altered medium HDL concentrations on APOL1-associated renal microvascular diseases should be evaluated.

Dyslipidemia in chronic kidney disease: are statins still indicated in reduction cardiovascular risk in patients on dialysis treatment?

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasingly health disease all around the world with a high burden of mortality and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity rate. Even when renal replacement therapy is reached, more than half patients die, mainly for CV causes due either to uremia-related cardiovascular risk factors (such as anemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, mineral bone disease-CKD with hyperparathyroidism, oxidative stress, hypoalbuminemia, chronic inflammation, prothrombotic factors) or to traditional ones (age, male gender, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, smoking, insulin levels, family history, dyslipidemia). Among the latter causes dyslipidemia represents one of the major, potentially correctable risk factor.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Statins have demonstrated to effectively and safely reduce cholesterol levels in CKD patients. Here we will examine the effects of statins on CV risk factors in CKD patients and particularly in patients on dialysis treatment, in the light of the unfavorable results of the large trials 4D and AURORA, recently published, underlining the role of malnutrition/inflammation as confounding factor. Probably it will be that only with a real prevention, starting statins even in the early stages of CKD, as indicated by post hoc analysis of large trials, that we will reach results in reducing the mortality rate in CKD patients. In the meanwhile, all the other remediable CV risk factors have to be at the same time corrected.

Effects of cardiovascular lifestyle change on lipoprotein subclass profiles defined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Background

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering is a primary goal in clinical management of patients with cardiovascular disease, but traditional cholesterol levels may not accurately reflect the true atherogenicity of plasma lipid profiles. The size and concentration of lipoprotein particles, which transport cholesterol and triglycerides, may provide additional information for accurately assessing cardiovascular risk. This study evaluated changes in plasma lipoprotein profiles determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in patients participating in a prospective, nonrandomized lifestyle modification program designed to reverse or stabilize progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) to improve our understanding of lipoprotein management in cardiac patients.

Results

The lifestyle intervention was effective in producing significant changes in lipoprotein subclasses that contribute to CAD risk. There was a clear beneficial effect on the total number of LDL particles (-8.3%, p < 0.05 compared to matched controls), small dense LDL particles (-9.5%, p < 0.05), and LDL particle size (+0.8%; p < 0.05). Likewise, participants showed significant improvement in traditional CAD risk factors such as body mass index (-9.9%, p < 0.01 compared to controls), total cholesterol (-5.5%, p < 0.05), physical fitness (+37.2%, p < 0.01), and future risk for CAD (-7.9%, p < 0.01). Men and women responded differently to the program for all clinically-relevant variables, with men deriving greater benefit in terms of lipoprotein atherogenicity. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responses to the lifestyle change program were not confounded by lipid-lowering medications.

Conclusion

In at risk patients motivated to participate, an intensive lifestyle change program can effectively alter traditional CAD risk factors and plasma lipoprotein subclasses and may reduce risk for cardiovascular events. Improvements in lipoprotein subclasses are more evident in men compared to women.

Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of statin therapy on lipoprotein particle concentrations in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Changes in lipoprotein particle concentration may predict the risk of coronary heart disease more accurately than lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome (n = 318) were randomly assigned in a double-blind study comparing 10 mg rosuvastatin (RSV), 10 mg atorvastatin, or placebo daily for 6 weeks. From weeks 6 to 12, patients in the RSV and placebo groups received 20 mg RSV, whereas the ATV group increased their dose to 20 mg daily. Lipoprotein particle concentrations were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, LDL cholesterol was measured by beta-quantification, and other lipoproteins were measured by standard methods at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Lipoprotein levels were compared by analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Statins reduced LDL particle concentration less than LDL cholesterol (-30 to -38 vs. -38 to -51%). Reductions were greater with RSV than with ATV (P < 0.05 for LDL particle concentration and P < 0.001 for LDL cholesterol). Most patients attained LDL cholesterol <2.59 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) at 12 weeks (80% with RSV and 59% with ATV; P = 0.003), but only 27% of patients receiving RSV and 19% receiving ATV attained the goal of LDL particle concentration <1,000 nmol/l (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with the metabolic syndrome, statin-induced changes in LDL cholesterol do not accurately reflect changes in LDL particle concentration. Consequently, despite attainment of LDL cholesterol goals, these patients may retain considerable residual coronary heart disease risk.

Atherogenic lipoprotein particle size and concentrations and the effect of pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

To determine lipoprotein particle concentrations and size in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and investigate the effect of pravastatin therapy on these measures.

STUDY DESIGN

Lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes were examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in 144 children with FH and 45 unaffected siblings. The effect of pravastatin therapy (20 to 40 mg) on lipoprotein particle concentration and size were compared with placebo after 1 year of treatment, using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Compared with the unaffected siblings, the children with FH had significantly higher concentrations of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (115.6 nmol/L vs 51.2 nmol/L; P < .001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (1726.8 nmol/L vs 955.3 nmol/L; P < .001), and lower concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (23.2 micromol/L vs 26.9 micromol/L; P < .001). Compared with placebo, pravastatin therapy decreased the concentration of VLDL particles by 35.9 nmol/L (P < .001), of total LDL particles by 342.7 nmol/L (P < .001), of large LDL particles by 189.5 nmol/L (P < .001), and of small LDL particles by 156.2 nmol/L (P = .152), but increased the concentration of total HDL particles by 2.2 micromol/L (P < .001), of large HDL particles by 1.0 micromol/L (P = .006), and of medium HDL particles by 1.1 micromol/L (P = .003). VLDL particle size increased by 1.0 nm (P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with their healthy siblings, children with FH have an atherogenic lipoprotein profile based on their lipoprotein distribution and lipoprotein particle diameter. Pravastatin therapy can improve, but not fully restore, these lipoprotein abnormalities toward normal levels in these children.

LDL Particle Number and Risk of Future Cardiovascular Disease in the Framingham Offspring Study - Implications for LDL Management

BACKGROUND

The cholesterol content of LDL particles is variable, causing frequent discrepancies between concentrations of LDL cholesterol and LDL particle number. In managing patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) to LDL target levels, it is unclear whether LDL cholesterol provides the optimum measure of residual risk and adequacy of LDL lowering treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of alternative measures of LDL to provide CVD risk discrimination at relatively low levels consistent with current therapeutic targets.

METHODS

Concentrations of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were measured chemically and LDL particle number (LDL-P) and VLDL particle number (VLDL-P) were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in 3066 middle-aged white participants (53% women) without CVD in the Framingham Offspring cohort. The main outcome measure was incidence of first CVD event.

RESULTS

At baseline, the cholesterol content per LDL particle was negatively associated with triglycerides and positively associated with LDL-C. On follow-up (median 14.8 yrs), 265 men and 266 women experienced a CVD event. In multivariable models adjusting for non-lipid CVD risk factors, LDL-P was related more strongly to future CVD in both sexes than LDL-C or non-HDL-C. Subjects with a low level of LDL-P (<25(th) percentile) had a lower CVD event rate (59 events per 1000 person-years) than those with an equivalently low level of LDL-C or non-HDL-C (81 and 74 events per 1000 person-years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large community-based sample, LDL-P was a more sensitive indicator of low CVD risk than either LDL-C or non-HDL-C, suggesting a potential clinical role for LDL-P as a goal of LDL management.

Comparison of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate in reaching lipid targets and influencing biomarkers of endothelial damage in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia

Statins and fibrates have different effects on lipid abnormalities of familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL); thus, the selection of the first-line drug is troublesome. We evaluated to what extent monotherapy with a potent statin is more effective than fibrate in reaching the recommended lipid targets in FCHL. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive optimal dosage of atorvastatin (n = 27) or 200 mg/d micronized fenofibrate (n = 29) for 24 weeks. To reach the optimal dosage, atorvastatin was up-titrated at each follow-up visit if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >130 mg/dL (>100 mg/dL in patients with coronary or cerebrovascular disease). The effects of fenofibrate and atorvastatin on lipoprotein fractions as well as on plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and adrenomedullin (AM) were also evaluated. At end of trial, a greater proportion of patients on atorvastatin (average dosage, 20.8 mg/d) reached lipid targets in comparison with those on fenofibrate (64% vs 32.1%, P = .02). Atorvastatin was significantly more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Conversely, triglycerides decreased and HDL increased more during fenofibrate. Nevertheless, atorvastatin produced a marked reduction in very low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein remnants. Atorvastatin lowered all LDL subtypes, although fenofibrate appeared to be more effective on denser LDL. Compared with 43 normolipemic controls, FCHL patients presented increased baseline plasma levels of ET-1 (P = .007) but not of AM. Fenofibrate, but not atorvastatin, significantly lowered ET-1 levels by 16.7% (P < .05). Neither drug significantly affected plasma concentrations of AM. In summary, although fenofibrate showed superiority in raising HDL and reducing ET-1, atorvastatin was more effective in reaching lipid targets in FCHL so that it can be proposed as the first-line option in the management of this atherogenic hyperlipidemia.

Effects of statins, fibrates, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe beyond cholesterol: the modulation of LDL size and subclasses in high-risk patients

Increasing evidence suggests that the quality-rather than just the quantity-of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) exerts a great influence on cardiovascular risk. LDLs comprise multiple subclasses with discrete size and density, and different physicochemical composition, metabolic behaviors, and atherogenicity. Individuals generally cluster into 2 broad subgroups. Most have a predominance of large LDLs, and some have a higher proportion of small particles. Small, dense LDLs are good predictors of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary artery disease. Their predominance has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Several studies have shown that therapeutic modulation of LDL size and subclass is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. This seems particularly true for statins and fibrates when they are administered to higher-risk patients, such as those with type 2 diabetes or vascular disease. Data reporting outcomes with the use of rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced to the market, and ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, are promising.

Clinical importance and therapeutic modulation of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles

The National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III accepted the predominance of small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) as an emerging cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. Most studies suggest that measuring low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, sdLDL cholesterol content and LDL particle number provides additional assessment of CVD risk. Therapeutic modulation of small LDL size, number and distribution may decrease CVD risk; however, no definitive causal relationship is established, probably due to the close association between sdLDL and triglycerides and other risk factors (e.g., high-density lipoprotein, insulin resistance and diabetes). This review addresses the formation and measurement of sdLDL, as well as the relationship between sdLDL particles and CVD. The effect of hypolipidaemic (statins, fibrates and ezetimibe) and hypoglycaemic (glitazones) agents on LDL size and distribution is also discussed.

Functionally defective high-density lipoprotein: a new therapeutic target at the crossroads of dyslipidemia, inflammation, and atherosclerosis

High-density lipoproteins (HDL) possess key atheroprotective biological properties, including cellular cholesterol efflux capacity, and anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory activities. Plasma HDL particles are highly heterogeneous in physicochemical properties, metabolism, and biological activity. Within the circulating HDL particle population, small, dense HDL particles display elevated cellular cholesterol efflux capacity, afford potent protection of atherogenic low-density lipoprotein against oxidative stress and attenuate inflammation. The antiatherogenic properties of HDL can, however be compromised in metabolic diseases associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. Indeed, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes are characterized not only by elevated cardiovascular risk and by low HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels but also by defective HDL function. Functional HDL deficiency is intimately associated with alterations in intravascular HDL metabolism and structure. Indeed, formation of HDL particles with attenuated antiatherogenic activity is mechanistically related to core lipid enrichment in triglycerides and cholesteryl ester depletion, altered apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) conformation, replacement of apoA-I by serum amyloid A, and covalent modification of HDL protein components by oxidation and glycation. Deficient HDL function and subnormal HDL-C levels may act synergistically to accelerate atherosclerosis in metabolic disease. Therapeutic normalization of attenuated antiatherogenic HDL function in terms of both particle number and quality of HDL particles is the target of innovative pharmacological approaches to HDL raising, including inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, enhanced lipidation of apoA-I with nicotinic acid and infusion of reconstituted HDL or apoA-I mimetics. A preferential increase in circulating concentrations of HDL particles possessing normalized antiatherogenic activity is therefore a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of common metabolic diseases featuring dyslipidemia, inflammation, and premature atherosclerosis.

Beneficial effect of simvastatin treatment on LDL oxidation and antioxidant protection is more pronounced in combined hyperlipidemia than in hypercholesterolemia

AIMS

Beneficial effects of statin treatment on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been not entirely explained by the reduction in LDL-cholesterol level. We hypothesised that antioxidant activity of statins may contribute to their salutary cardiovascular effects. The aim of the present study was to examine effect of simvastatin treatment on some parameters of LDL oxidation and antioxidant protection in patients with hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, we were interested, whether the effect of treatment is related to the type of hyperlipidemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourty-two patients (12 males, 30 females, mean age 60+/-10 years) were included in the present study. Fourteen patients had hypercholesterolemia defined as total cholesterol>5.0 mmol/l. Twenty-eight patients had combined hyperlipidemia defined by total cholesterol>5.0 mmol/l and triglycerides>1.7 mmol/l. Simvastatin was administered to patients during 8-week period in a daily dose of 20mg. Oxidation of LDL was measured by assessment of circulating conjugated diene (CD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) level. Antioxidant properties of blood were assessed based on measurement of total antioxidant status (TAS) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity.

RESULTS

Besides expected significant decrease in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and triglyceride levels, simvastatin treatment also reduced significantly circulating CD by 41% (p<0.0001) and MDA level non-significantly by 6% (p=0.078). Simvastatin treatment resulted in an increase of GPx activity by 38% (p<0.0001), but did not have a significant effect on TAS. Patients with combined hyperlipidemia had significantly higher baseline CD (p<0.01) and consequently significantly greater absolute and relative decrease (46% versus 23%) in circulating CD (DeltaCD), when compared with patients with hypercholesterolemia. The increase in GPx activity was significant only in patients with combined hyperlipidemia (p<0.0001). In the multiple stepwise linear regression analysis, both baseline triglyceride (r(2)=0.32; p=0.004) and LDL cholesterol (r(2)=0.08; p=0.05) levels were significant independent predictors of DeltaCD after simvastatin treatment.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced circulating conjugated diene level and led to an increase in glutathione peroxidase activity. These effects were more pronounced in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than in hypercholesterolemia. The results suggest that simvastatin possesses certain antioxidant properties, which may contribute to its beneficial cardiovascular effect.

The Clinical Relevance of Low-Density-Lipoproteins Size Modulation by Statins

The predominance of small, dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; in fact, LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease. Several studies have also shown that the therapeutical modulation of LDL size is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Hypolipidemic treatment is able to alter LDL subclass distribution and statins are currently the most widely used lipid-lowering agents. Statins are potent inhibitors of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis and are the main drugs of choice for the treatment of elevated plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations. Statins potentially lower all LDL subclasses (e.g., large, medium and small particles); thus, their net effect on LDL subclasses or size is often only moderate. However, a strong variation has been noticed among the different agents: analyses of all published studies suggest a very limited role of pravastatin and simvastatin in modifying LDL size and their subclasses, while fluvastatin and atorvastatin seem to be much more effective agents. Finally, rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced in the market, seems to be promising in altering LDL subclasses towards less atherogenic particles.

High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Raising Strategies

There is a distinct inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and cardiovascular disease risk. HDL-C mediates cholesterol efflux from the vasculature and promotes anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-thrombotic effects. There are multiple lifestyle and therapeutic interventions that raise HDL-C, and there is increasing evidence that these interventions improve cardiovascular outcomes. Recent findings regarding the role of HDL-C in cholesterol metabolism offer new strategies designed to target atherosclerosis. This review highlights the utility of existing HDL-C-raising strategies and examines new potential therapies.

Low-density lipoprotein size and cardiovascular risk assessment

A predominance of small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease and evidences suggests that both quality (particularly small, dense LDL) and quantity may increase cardiovascular risk. However, other authors have suggested that LDL size measurement does not add information beyond that obtained by measuring LDL concentration, triglyceride levels and HDL concentrations. Therefore, it remains debatable whether to measure LDL particle size in cardiovascular risk assessment and, if so, in which categories of patient. Therapeutic modulation of LDL particle size or number appears beneficial in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events, but no clear causal relationship has been shown, because of confounding factors, including lipid and non-lipid variables. Studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of LDL size measurements in patients with coronary and non-coronary forms of atherosclerosis; in particular, to test whether LDL size is associated with even higher vascular risk, and whether LDL size modification may contribute to secondary prevention in such patients.

Effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet program compared to a low-fat diet on fasting lipoprotein subclasses

BACKGROUND

Low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diets (LCKD) are effective for weight loss, but concerns remain regarding cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an LCKD program on serum lipoprotein subclasses.

METHODS

This was a randomized, two-arm clinical trial in an outpatient research clinic involving overweight, hyperlipidemic community volunteers motivated to lose weight. Subjects were randomized to either an LCKD (n = 59) and nutritional supplementation (including fish, borage and flaxseed oil), or a low-fat, reduced-calorie diet (LFD, n = 60). The main outcomes were fasting serum lipoprotein subclasses determined by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 44.9 years, the mean BMI was 34.4 kg/m(2), and 76% were women. Comparing baseline to 6 months, the LCKD group had significant changes in large VLDL (-78%), medium VLDL (-60%), small VLDL (-57%), LDL particle size (+2%), large LDL (+54%), medium LDL (-42%), small LDL (-78%), HDL particle size (+5%), large HDL (+21%), and LDL particle concentration (-11%). Compared with the LFD group, the LCKD group had greater reductions in medium VLDL (p = 0.01), small VLDL (p = 0.01) and medium LDL (p = 0.02), and greater increases in VLDL particle size (p = 0.01), large LDL (p = 0.004), and HDL particle size (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The LCKD with nutritional supplementation led to beneficial changes in serum lipid subclasses during weight loss. While the LCKD did not lower total LDL cholesterol, it did result in a shift from small, dense LDL to large, buoyant LDL, which could lower cardiovascular disease risk.

Serum 1H-nuclear magnetic spectroscopy followed by principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis to demonstrate effects of statins on hyperlipidemic patients

Use of statins for prevention of coronary heart disease is based on the decrease of serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. To better investigate the changes in lipid profile after statin treatment, we propose here to use an analysis of serum by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy associated with a multivariate analysis of the main spectral components. Sera were obtained from 60 male patients treated for 6 weeks with simvastatin (30 patients) or atorvastatin (30 patients) for who LDL cholesterol decreased by over 45% in all selected patients. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were obtained and the region of methyl resonance from lipids was separated into six consecutive lines attributed to lipids which were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) based on Euclidian distance coupled with the Ward's minimum variance method. PCA and HCA gave a map discriminating the 120 samples into five clusters, three clusters containing samples obtained at baseline and two others containing samples obtained after treatment. Both statins produced a decrease in lower-density lipoprotein components and an increase in higher density lipoprotein components. Patients with a coronary heart disease history could be discriminated after treatment by the increase in the component containing the highest proportion of HDL. Proton NMR spectroscopy of sera coupled with a PCA and an HCA was able to detect variations in the metabolism of lipids resulting from statin treatments.

Colesevelam HCl reduces LDL particle number and increases LDL size in hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Although LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the target of cholesterol-lowering therapy, high levels of LDL particle numbers better differentiate cardiovascular risk than LDL-C concentrations. Colesevelam HCl, a novel bile acid sequestrant, has also been shown to reduce mean LDL-C by 18% with the maximum dose. The effect of colesevelam HCl on LDL particle number and particle size has not been previously published. LDL particle number and particle size were measured by NMR spectroscopy.

METHODS

In this multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 149 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > 160 mg/dL [4.14 mmol/L]; triglycerides < 300 mg/dL [3.39 mmol/L]) were randomized to colesevelam HCl (1.5-3.75 g/d) or placebo for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Colesevelam HCl reduced LDL particle number by 6.8% at a dosage of 3.0 g/d (P = 0.031), and 13.7% (P = 0.0002) at a dosage of 3.75 g/d. Baseline levels of triglycerides or LDL size did not influence changes in LDL particle number. Further, mean LDL particle size increased with colesevelam HCl 3.75 g/d (1.1% increase versus baseline, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia, treatment with colesevelam HCl at the recommended starting dose of 3.75 g/d lowered LDL particle number, and increased mean LDL particle size.

Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol disorders and cardiovascular risk: contribution of associated low-density lipoprotein subclass abnormalities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Discuss the contribution of low-density lipoprotein subclass abnormalities to cardiovascular risk among individuals with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are commonly encountered among patients with early onset cardiovascular disease. Most often, a low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is not an isolated abnormality, but it is usually associated with a number of other lipoprotein abnormalities. Data from the Framingham Offspring Study demonstrate that among subjects with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein particle numbers were considerably higher than indicated by the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol because these subjects had excess numbers of small cholesterol-depleted low-density lipoprotein particles. Elevated numbers of low-density lipoprotein particles identify individuals at highest risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease and cardiovascular events.

SUMMARY

As high levels of low-density lipoprotein particles are a robust predictor of cardiovascular events, strategies targeted at raising low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol must account for low-density lipoprotein particle interactions.

Effects of Atorvastatin on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Phenotype and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) particle size and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Another objective was to compare the effects of atorvastatin on lipoprotein profiles as determined by direct versus indirect assessment of lipoprotein composition.

DESIGN

Randomized, parallel-group substudy.

SETTING

Two university-affiliated outpatient hemodialysis centers.

PATIENTS

Nineteen patients with LDL levels above 100 mg/dl and with at least two cardiovascular risk factors.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to atorvastatin 10 mg/day or no treatment (control) for 20 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared the differences between LDL particle size and CRP levels at baseline and 20 weeks in the atorvastatin versus control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Atorvastatin therapy was associated with no change in mean LDL particle size (p=0.23) and with a 90% decrease in mean CRP level (p=0.52). When evaluated by standard chemical analysis, atorvastatin therapy reduced total cholesterol levels by 29% (p=0.025) and resulted in nonsignificant reductions in LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Treatment with atorvastatin was not associated with significant changes in lipoprotein profile as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with atorvastatin did not affect LDL particle size but was associated with a sizable, yet nonsignificant, reduction in CRP concentrations. The drug had variable effects on lipoprotein concentrations as determined by chemical and NMR analytical methods. A larger study is necessary to provide definitive information on the effects of atorvastatin on LDL phenotype and CRP in patients with kidney disease.

Predictors of atherosclerosis

It is herein discussed what should be measured as predictors of atherosclerosis, to increase the predictive power of coronary risk evaluation in clinical practice. Plasma apolipoprotein (apo)B and apoAI have been reported to be stronger predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) than plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (C) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C. The estimation of plasma levels of remnants of TG-rich lipoproteins is also important for coronary risk evaluation. An increase in plasma small, dense LDL is a risk factor for CAD. It is not practical to measure plasma small, dense LDL as a routine clinical examination. We should estimate the plasma levels of small, dense LDL by plasma triglyceride (TG), apoB, and HDL-C levels. Oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) plays an important role in atherosclerosis. Further large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to determine whether the measurement of plasma ox-LDL and autoantibodies against ox-LDL is an essential predictor of atherosclerosis. High plasma levels of Lp(a) are a risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular diseases in subjects with high plasma LDL-C levels and multiple coronary risk factors. Metabolic syndrome (MS) has been recognized recently as a predictor of CAD. As a result, it should be elucidated whether MS must be involved in the coronary risk evaluation score because all components of MS are involved in the score. A high plasma level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is an important predictor of atherosclerotic diseases. Whether it is essential to measure the plasma levels of atherosclerosis surrogate markers in clinical practice remains to be elucidated. It is concluded that plasma levels of apoB, apoAI, remnant-like particle (RLP)-C, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and hs-CRP in addition to those of lipids should be measured as predictors of atherosclerosis in clinical practice. We need to establish a new atherosclerosis risk evaluation scoring system involving the above factors, based on large-scale, prospective studies, to prevent atherosclerotic vascular diseases. In Japan, plasma levels of Lp(a), RLP-C, and hs-CRP are routinely measured in clinical practice. As a result, it would be rather easy to establish a new atherosclerosis risk evaluation scoring system in Japan.

Statins in atherosclerosis: lipid-lowering agents with antioxidant capabilities

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is an established risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). In the presence of oxidative stress LDL particles can become oxidized to form a lipoprotein species that is particularly atherogenic. Indeed, oxidized LDL (oxLDL) is pro-inflammatory, it can cause endothelial dysfunction and it readily accumulates within the arterial wall. Several factors may influence the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation, including its size and composition, and the presence of endogenous antioxidant compounds, such as alpha-tocopherol. Individuals with type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome have high levels of oxidative stress and consequently are at an increased risk for cardiovascular events. Reducing oxidative stress has been proposed as a potential approach to prevent CHD and antioxidant vitamins have been employed with encouraging results in experimental models of atherosclerosis. However, clinical trials have not demonstrated consistent beneficial effects of antioxidants on cardiovascular outcomes. Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) are the first-line choice for lowering total and LDL cholesterol levels and they have been proven to reduce the risk of CHD. Recent data suggest that these compounds, in addition to their lipid-lowering ability, can also reduce the production of reactive oxygen species and increase the resistance of LDL to oxidation. It may be that the ability of statins to limit the oxidation of LDL contributes to their effectiveness at preventing atherosclerotic disease.

High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease

There is a large body of evidence demonstrating an inverse correlation between circulating levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk. For every 1-mg/dL increase in HDL, it is estimated that the risk of cardiovascular events decreases by 2% to 3%. HDL is one of many factors that contribute to the regulation of the atherosclerotic process. HDL mediates reverse cholesterol transport and exhibits numerous beneficial properties, including antioxidant, antiinflammatory, and antithrombotic effects on the vasculature. Recent studies have expanded our understanding of the vasoprotective mechanisms of HDL to include enhanced nitric oxide production and improved endothelium-dependent relaxation. Progress has also been made in determining the molecular mechanisms that mediate reverse cholesterol transport. Recently published National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines have broadened the definition of low levels of HDL and encourage more aggressive screening and treatment of lipid abnormalities. Several therapeutic interventions can augment HDL concentrations, and there is increasing evidence that these interventions improve cardiovascular outcomes. Research focusing on defining the molecular roles of HDL will likely identify potential therapeutic targets for decreasing the incidence and progression of coronary heart disease. This review highlights the role of HDL in coronary heart disease, from basic mechanisms of action to recent clinical trial results.

Isolation of plasma small-dense low-density lipoprotein using a simple air-driven ultracentrifuge and quantification using immunassay of apolipoprotein B

Small-dense low-density lipoprotein (SD-LDL) is associated with coronary heart disease risk. Current methods for its quantification are expensive, complex and time-consuming. Plasma was adjusted to a density (D) of 1.044 g/ml in a volume of 0.18 ml and centrifuged in a Beckman Airfuge at 160 000×

Free fatty acids and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Acute elevation of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) is necessary for insulin secretion. Sustained elevation, however, leads to apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and sudden death in patients with insulin resistance or a family history of diabetes mellitus, as well as in individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Data suggest that reduction of FFA plasma levels may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in these at-risk patients. Thiazolidinediones have been shown not only to improve insulin sensitivity but also to reduce FFA plasma levels. Consequently, endothelial function is maintained, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration are minimized, elevated blood pressure and microalbuminuria are reduced, and high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particle sizes are improved.

Phenotype-dependent and -independent actions of rosuvastatin on atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions in hyperlipidaemia

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study evaluated the effects of rosuvastatin (40 mg/day for 8 weeks) on atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoprotein subfractions. Subjects, recruited based on raised plasma triglyceride (TG) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), were divided into normotriglyceridaemic (NTG, n = 13; TG < 2.0 mmol/l) and hypertriglyceridaemic (HTG, n = 16; TG > or = 2.0 mmol/l) groups. Similar reductions on rosuvastatin were observed for both groups in LDL-C (NTG -60%; HTG -56%), apoB (both -49%), intermediate-density lipoprotein (NTG -57%; HTG -54%) and LDL circulating mass (NTG -52%, HTG -58%) (all P < 0.001 versus placebo), i.e., these changes were phenotype independent. Phenotype dependency in response was observed in HTG relative to NTG in concentration of small dense LDL (LDL-III) (NTG -44%, P = NS; HTG -69%, P < 0.001), very-low-density lipoprotein1 (NTG -18%, P = NS; HTG 46%, P < 0.01), and remnant-like particle cholesterol (NTG -31%, P = NS; HTG -48%, P < 0.05). Rosuvastatin reduced cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) by 33% in NTG and 37% in HTG (both P < 0.001); a reduction in cholesteryl ester transfer activity (-59%, P < 0.001) was observed in HTG only. Rosuvastatin therefore, in addition to lowering LDL and apoB-concentrations, largely corrected the TG and LDL abnormalities in subjects who had the propensity to develop the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Increases Both Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Particle Size and Small High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Independent of Diabetic Control

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether troglitazone, independent of control of diabetes, increases low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size.

METHODS

We administered 600 mg of troglitazone (a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist) daily for 8 weeks to 10 patients with type 2 diabetes (8 of whom completed the study). Then troglitazone therapy was discontinued, and alternative medication for diabetic control was used for another 4 weeks. The LDL, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations and subpopulations, as well as blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were determined at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Small, dense LDL cholesterol is commonly seen in patients with diabetes and is thought to be associated with an increased risk for coronary artery disease. After both 4 and 8 weeks of troglitazone therapy, control of diabetes was significantly improved (mean HbA1c values at baseline, week 4, and week 8 were 8.0 +/- 0.7%, 7.4 +/- 0.5%, and 7.0 +/- 0.7%, respectively; P<0.05). HbA1c (6.5 +/- 0.6% at 12 weeks) and blood glucose levels (126 +/- 19 mg/dL at 8 weeks versus 145 +/- 9 mg/dL at 12 weeks) were not significantly different 4 weeks after troglitazone therapy was discontinued. Troglitazone treatment increased the large LDL particle at 4 and 8 weeks, a change that significantly (P<0.05) enlarged the LDL particle size (20.5 +/- 0.3 nm, 21.2 +/- 0.3 nm, and 21.3 +/- 0.2 nm at baseline, week 4, and week 8, respectively). After 8 weeks of troglitazone therapy, VLDL triglycerides were reduced (195 +/- 37 mg/dL versus 136 +/- 28 mg/dL; P<0.05) and HDL was increased (31.6 +/- 2.4 mg/dL versus 35.5 +/- 2.9 mg/dL; P<0.05). This greater HDL value was due to an increase in the small HDL particles. A decrease in the larger VLDL particles (V5 and V6) resulted in a reduction in the mean VLDL particle size (59 +/- 3 nm versus 46 +/- 2 nm; P<0.05). Despite the fact that control of diabetes remained significantly improved after troglitazone therapy was discontinued, the LDL particle size decreased to the baseline value. This change was due to a reduction in the large LDL cholesterol particle (L3).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that troglitazone therapy increases LDL particle size, reduces VLDL particle size, and increases small HDL particles. These changes may lower the risk for coronary artery disease.

Once-Daily Niacin Extended Release/Lovastatin Combination Tablet Has More Favorable Effects on Lipoprotein Particle Size and Subclass Distribution Than Atorvastatin and Simvastatin

Standard lipoprotein measurements may not adequately reflect the increased atherogenic risk found in patients with abnormalities in lipoprotein particle size and subfraction distribution such as disproportionate amounts of small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles, small high-density lipoprotein particles, or large very-low-density lipoprotein particles. Measurement or anticipation of patients most susceptible to lipoprotein subfraction abnormalities may influence therapeutic choices for the optimal management of dyslipidemia. Previously, the ADvicor Vs. Other Cholesterol-modulating Agents Trial Evaluation demonstrated that niacin extended release/lovastatin provided greater global improvement in lipid parameters such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A-I blood levels compared with atorvastatin and simvastatin monotherapies. In this report, niacin extended release/lovastatin was also more effective than atorvastatin and simvastatin monotherapies in reducing small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles and improving low-density lipoprotein phenotype pattern at relative starting doses, and was more effective in increasing the proportion of high-density lipoprotein in the potentially cardioprotective 2b subclass at all doses.

Measurement of plasma small-dense LDL concentration by a simplified ultracentrifugation procedure and immunoassay of apolipoprotein B

BACKGROUND

Existing methods for detecting small-dense low-density lipoprotein (SD-LDL) are either semiquantitative (e.g., gradient gel electrophoresis) or require specialised laboratory methods (e.g., density-gradient ultracentrifugation, DGU).

METHODS

We report a method in which plasma was adjusted to a density (D) of 1.044 and 1.060 g/ml, respectively, in two tubes, both of which underwent ultracentrifugation (UC). A measure of SD-LDL apolipoprotein B (apo B) was obtained by subtraction of the apo B concentration in D>1.060 g/ml lipoproteins from that in D>1.044 g/ml lipoproteins to correct for apo B associated with lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. This procedure was evaluated in paired plasma samples in healthy men (n=62) and in age-matched healthy women (n=74) and in age-matched primary dyslipidaemic men (n=72) and women (n=29) and compared with an established density-gradient ultracentrifugation (DGU) method.

RESULTS

The dyslipidaemic patients had either decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and/or increased triglycerides. In dyslipidaemic men, SD-LDL apo B level (23 [5-77] mg/dl) was significantly higher than in healthy men (P<0.001). In dyslipidaemic women, the SD-LDL apo B levels (11 [4-71] mg/dl) were significantly higher than in healthy women (7 [1-45] mg/dl; P<0.005). The concentration of SD-LDL apo B correlated inversely with HDL-C in both women (r=-0.280: P<0.005) and men (r=-0.464; P<0.0001) and positively with triglyceride concentration in both women (r=0.213; P<0.05) and men (r=0.592: P<0.0001). Correction for apo B in Lp(a) increased the analytical variation, which was 12% for apo B at D=1.044-1.060 g/ml and 9% for apo B measured at D>1.044 g/ml. Although the correlation between the new method and DGU results was high (r=0.830; P<0.0001, n=43), the concentration of apo B at D>1.044 g/ml correlated strongly with both corrected results (r=0.978; P<0.0001; n=237) and also with SD-LDL isolated using the DGU method (r=0.832; P<0.0001). Results at D>1.044 g/ml showed the expected correlations both with HDL-C (r=-0.465: P<0.0001) and triglycerides (r=0.526; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The new method gave results consistent with earlier published findings using other techniques. Further simplification of the method using a single-density spin at D>1.044 g/ml appears feasible and may provide an easier quantitative method for clinical use.

Lipoprotein subclass measurements by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy improve the prediction of coronary artery disease in Type 1 diabetes. A prospective report from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

To examine whether nuclear magnetic resonance lipoprotein spectroscopy improves the prediction of coronary artery disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes, independently of conventional lipid and other risk factors.

METHODS

A prospective nested case-control design of subjects with childhood onset Type 1 diabetes from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study was used. 59 controls were age-, sex- and duration-matched to 59 incident cases of coronary artery disease (fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, coronary stenosis >50%) occurring during 10 years of follow-up. Lipid mass and particle concentrations of VLDL, LDL, and HDL subclasses, grouped into three size categories (large, medium, and small), were assessed prior to event with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed that both lipid mass and particle concentrations of all three VLDL subclasses, small LDL, medium LDL, and medium HDL were increased in CAD cases compared to controls, while large HDL was decreased. Mean LDL and HDL particle sizes were lower in cases. In multivariate models using conventional lipid and non-lipid risk factors, triglycerides and overt nephropathy were the strongest predictors of CAD. Nuclear magnetic resonance measures further improved the prediction, i.e. large HDL particle concentration (OR=0.43, p=0.030), medium HDL mass (OR=3.79, p=0.026) and total VLDL particle concentration (OR=2.33, p=0.033).

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

While these results underscore the importance of triglycerides and overt nephropathy in CAD risk in Type 1 diabetic patients, they also suggest that nuclear magnetic resonance lipoprotein spectroscopy could further refine its prediction and show novel findings concerning HDL subclasses.

Effects of adding fenofibrate (200 mg/day) to simvastatin (10 mg/day) in patients with combined hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome

Combined hyperlipidemia predisposes subjects to coronary heart disease. Two lipid abnormalities--increased cholesterol and atherogenic dyslipidemia--are potential targets of lipid-lowering therapy. Successful management of both may require combined drug therapy. Statins are effective low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering drugs. For atherogenic dyslipidemia (high triglycerides, small LDL, and low high-density lipoprotein [HDL]), fibrates are potentially beneficial. The present study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of a combination of low-dose simvastatin and fenofibrate in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a crossover design. Three randomized phases were employed (double placebo, simvastatin 10 mg/day and placebo, and simvastatin 10 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 mg/day). Each phase lasted 3 months, and in the last week of each phase, measurements were made of plasma lipids, lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma apolipoproteins B, C-II, and C-III and LDL speciation on 3 consecutive days. Simvastatin therapy decreased total cholesterol by 27%, non-HDL cholesterol by 30%, total apolipoprotein B by 31%, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol by 37%, VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 14%, LDL cholesterol by 28%, and LDL apolipoprotein B by 21%. The addition of fenofibrate caused an additional decrease in VLDL + IDL cholesterol and VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 36% and 32%, respectively. Simvastatin alone caused a small increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL, whereas the addition of fenofibrate to simvastatin therapy caused a marked increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL species. Simvastatin alone produced a small (6%) and insignificant increase in HDL cholesterol concentrations. When fenofibrate was added to simvastatin therapy, HDL cholesterol increased significantly by 23%. No significant side effects were observed with either simvastatin alone or with combined drug therapy. Therefore, a combination of simvastatin 10 mg/day and fenofibrate 200 mg/day appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of atherogenic dyslipidemia in combined hyperlipidemia.