Ineffective decrease of serum cholesterol by simvastatin in a subgroup of hypercholesterolemic coronary patients

Evaluation of plasma phytosterols in sitosterolemia, their kindreds and hyperlipidemia subjects

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from sitosterolemia with ABCG5/8 mutation typically present with early-onset or rapidly progressive atherosclerosis. Their kindreds with partial genetic deficiencies of ABCG5/8 are often considered healthy. However, discerning sitosterolemia from its familial kindreds and hyperlipidemia subjects has remained challenging.

METHODS

Here we retrospectively recruited seven families including 8 individuals diagnosed with sitosterolemia subjects, and 14 kindreds carrying single gene mutations. Additionally, 17 individuals with hyperlipidemia and 130 healthy controls served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A total of 6 phytosterols combined with cholesterol absorption indices (including sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and cholestanol) and cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol), was compared across the aforementioned four groups.

RESULTS

As expected, the sitosterolemia subjects with double mutations demonstrated significantly elevated levels of sitosterol and other cholesterol absorption indices. Meanwhile, sitosterolemia kindreds with single gene mutation showed a similar pattern of activated cholesterol-absorption ability to the hyperlipidemia group, but not as high as the double mutation group. Notably, the cholesterol-synthesis enzyme 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase displayed an increase in the hyperlipidemia group but a decrease in the sitosterolemia kindred group, suggesting a potential discriminative role of 7-dehydrocholesterol in distinguishing between these two groups. The combination of phytosterols was more valuable than clinical lipid index for sitosterolemia diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed mild disruptions of cholesterol absorption capacities in sitosterolemia kindreds with single mutations. Furthermore, the combination of 6 phytosterols proved effective in distinguishing between sitosterolemia, its single mutation carriers, and hyperlipidemia patients.

Effect of evolocumab on cholesterol synthesis and absorption

The effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs, including those that reduce cholesterol synthesis (statins) and those that reduce cholesterol absorption (ezetimibe), on cholesterol absorption and synthesis are well understood. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a novel class of cholesterol-lowering drugs that robustly reduce LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), but little is known about their effects on cholesterol absorption and synthesis. We evaluated how treatment with evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal IgG2 antibody to PCSK9, affects markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption by measuring these markers in patients from an evolocumab clinical trial. At 2 weeks, changes in β-sitosterol/total cholesterol (TC) from baseline were 4% for placebo, 10% for evolocumab 140 mg (nonsignificant vs. placebo), and 26% for evolocumab 420 mg (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Changes in campesterol/TC at week 2, relative to baseline between placebo and evolocumab, were all nonsignificant. Evolocumab had a modest effect on markers of cholesterol synthesis. At 2 weeks, changes in desmosterol/TC were 1% for placebo, 7% for evolocumab 140 mg (nonsignificant vs. placebo), and 15% for evolocumab 420 mg (P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Changes from baseline in lathosterol/TC at week 2 between placebo and evolocumab were nonsignificant. These results suggest that evolocumab has a modest effect on cholesterol synthesis and absorption despite significant LDL-C lowering.

Predicting individual responses to pravastatin using a physiologically based kinetic model for plasma cholesterol concentrations

We used a previously developed physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model to analyze the effect of individual variations in metabolism and transport of cholesterol on pravastatin response. The PBK model is based on kinetic expressions for 21 reactions that interconnect eight different body cholesterol pools including plasma HDL and non-HDL cholesterol. A pravastatin pharmacokinetic model was constructed and the simulated hepatic pravastatin concentration was used to modulate the reaction rate constant of hepatic free cholesterol synthesis in the PBK model. The integrated model was then used to predict plasma cholesterol concentrations as a function of pravastatin dose. Predicted versus observed values at 40 mg/d pravastatin were 15 versus 22 % reduction of total plasma cholesterol, and 10 versus 5.6 % increase of HDL cholesterol. A population of 7,609 virtual subjects was generated using a Monte Carlo approach, and the response to a 40 mg/d pravastatin dose was simulated for each subject. Linear regression analysis of the pravastatin response in this virtual population showed that hepatic and peripheral cholesterol synthesis had the largest regression coefficients for the non-HDL-C response. However, the modeling also showed that these processes alone did not suffice to predict non-HDL-C response to pravastatin, contradicting the hypothesis that people with high cholesterol synthesis rates are good statin responders. In conclusion, we have developed a PBK model that is able to accurately describe the effect of pravastatin treatment on plasma cholesterol concentrations and can be used to provide insight in the mechanisms behind individual variation in statin response.

Association between cholesterol synthesis/absorption markers and effects of cholesterol lowering by atorvastatin among patients with high risk of coronary heart disease

No indices are currently available to facilitate clinicians to identify patients who need either statin monotherapy or statin-ezetimibe combined treatment. We aimed to investigate whether cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers can predict the cholesterol-lowering response to statin. Total 306 statin-naïve patients with high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) were treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day for 1 month. Cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were measured before and after treatment. Atorvastatin decreased LDL-C by 36.8% (range: decrease of 74.5% to increase of 31.9%). Baseline cholesterol synthesis marker lathosterol and cholesterol absorption marker campesterol codetermined the effect of atorvastatin treatment. The effect of cholesterol lowering by atorvastatin was significantly associated with baseline lathosterol levels but modified bidirectionally by baseline campesterol levels. In patients with the highest baseline campesterol levels, atorvastatin treatment decreased cholesterol absorption by 46.1%, which enhanced the effect of LDL-C lowering. Atorvastatin treatment increased cholesterol absorption by 52.3% in those with the lowest baseline campesterol levels, which attenuated the effect of LDL-C reduction. Especially those with the highest lathosterol but the lowest campesterol levels at baseline had significantly less LDL-C reduction than those with the same baseline lathosterol levels but the highest campesterol levels (27.3% versus 42.4%, P = 0.002). These results suggest that combined patterns of cholesterol synthesis/absorption markers, rather than each single marker, are potential predictors of the LDL-C-lowering effects of atorvastatin in high-risk CHD patients.

Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis

Hypercholesterolemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. It is caused by a disturbed balance between cholesterol secretion into the blood versus uptake. The pathways involved are regulated via a complex interplay of enzymes, transport proteins, transcription factors and non-coding RNA's. The last two decades insight into underlying mechanisms has increased vastly but there are still a lot of unknowns, particularly regarding intracellular cholesterol transport. After decades of concentration on the liver, in recent years the intestine has come into focus as an important control point in cholesterol homeostasis. This review will discuss current knowledge of cholesterol physiology, with emphasis on cholesterol absorption, cholesterol synthesis and fecal excretion, and new (possible) therapeutic options for hypercholesterolemia.

Effects of a 2-y dietary weight-loss intervention on cholesterol metabolism in moderately obese men

BACKGROUND

Long-term dietary weight loss results in complex metabolic changes. However, its effect on cholesterol metabolism in obese subjects is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the effects of 2 y of weight loss achieved with various diet regimens on phytosterols (markers of intestinal cholesterol absorption), lanosterol (marker of de novo cholesterol synthesis), and changes in apolipoprotein concentrations.

DESIGN

We conducted the 2-y Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT-a study of low-fat, Mediterranean, and low-carbohydrate diets). We assessed circulating phytosterol and lanosterol concentrations and their ratios to cholesterol and apolipoproteins A-I and B-100 in 90 DIRECT participants at 0, 6, and 24 mo.

RESULTS

We observed a significant upregulation of the markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol: +16.8%, P < 0.001) and a downregulation of the markers of cholesterol synthesis (lanosterol: -16.5%, P = 0.008) during the active weight-loss phase (first 6 mo, weight loss of 5%, 6%, and 10% in the 3 diet groups, respectively), followed by a rebound (campesterol: -6.2%, P = 0.045; lanosterol: +43.7%, P < 0.001) during the next 18 mo (weight gain of 1%, 1%, and 2% in the 3 diet groups, respectively). HDL cholesterol continuously increased during the study (17.0%, P < 0.001), whereas LDL cholesterol remained constant. At the end of the 24-mo follow-up period, campesterol (P < 0.001) and lanosterol (P = 0.016) amounts were significantly higher than baseline values. The concentration of apolipoprotein B-100 correlated with cholesterol metabolism (ρ = 0.299 and P = 0.020 for lanosterol; ρ = -0.105 and NS for campesterol), and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance correlated with lanosterol (ρ = 0.09, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term weight loss is related to a characteristic response suggestive of altered cholesterol and apolipoprotein metabolism. Various diets have a similar effect on these effects. DIRECT is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00160108.

The role of serum non-cholesterol sterols as surrogate markers of absolute cholesterol synthesis and absorption

AIMS

To study the whole-body cholesterol metabolism in man, cholesterol synthesis and absorption need to be measured. Because of the complicated methods of the measurements, new approaches were developed including the analysis of serum non-cholesterol sterols. In current lipidologic papers and even in intervention studies, serum non-cholesterol sterols are frequently used as surrogate markers of cholesterol metabolism without any validation to the absolute metabolic variables. The present review compares serum non-cholesterol sterols with absolute measurements of cholesterol synthesis and absorption in published papers to find out whether the serum markers are valid indicators of cholesterol metabolism in various conditions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

During statin treatment, during interventions of dietary fat, and in type 2 diabetes the relative and absolute variables of cholesterol synthesis and absorption were frequently but not constantly correlated with each other. In some occasions, especially in subjects with apolipoprotein E3/4 and E4/4 phenotypes, the relative metabolic markers were even more sensitive than the absolute ones to reflect changes in cholesterol metabolism during dietary interventions. Even in general population at very high absorption the homeostasis of cholesterol metabolism is disturbed damaging the validity of the serum markers.

CONCLUSIONS

It is worth using several instead of only one precursor and absorption sterol marker for making conclusions of altered synthesis or absorption of cholesterol, and even then the presence of at least some absolute measurement is valuable. During consumption of plant sterol-enriched diets and in situations of interfered cholesterol homeostasis the relative markers do not adequately reflect cholesterol metabolism. Accordingly, the validity of the relative markers of cholesterol metabolism should not be considered as self-evident.

Where does the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and/or ezetimibe treatment stand today?

The evidence of the different concepts underlying the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and ezetimibe treatment were reviewed in the light of the eight major trials where cholesterol absorption and synthesis were analyzed on a large scale using the plasma levels of precursors of cholesterol and plant sterols. The only concept supported in all studies is a significant and consistent increase of cholesterol absorption with statin (correlated with the inhibition of synthesis) and of cholesterol synthesis with ezetimibe, whereas in combination, statin and ezetimibe reduce both cholesterol synthesis and absorption. In contrast, most of the other concepts failed to be clearly proven. At baseline, the inverse relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis (only examined in two studies) was found to be weak. On statin treatment, four studies showed that the changes in cholesterol synthesis and absorption, contributed less than 9% to the variability in cholesterol response to statin therapy. It has not been consistently demonstrated that good absorbers/bad synthesizers are bad responders to statin (6 studies) and good responders for ezetimibe (3 studies). There is also no clear inverse correlation between LDL reduction on statin treatment and that on ezetimibe treatment. Finally, the original idea from the first pioneer study of Miettinen et al. that, the higher the baseline intestinal ability to absorb cholesterol, the lower the benefit on the clinical cardiovascular outcomes was not reproduced in the PROSPER study. In conclusion, with the exception of a reverse effect of statin and ezetimibe on absorption and synthesis, most ideas supporting the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis lacked consistency between studies. At present, the use of the plasma levels of plant sterols and cholesterol precursors as markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis is far too limited to definitively solve these questions.

Dietary cholesterol: from physiology to cardiovascular risk

Dietary cholesterol comes exclusively from animal sources, thus it is naturally present in our diet and tissues. It is an important component of cell membranes and a precursor of bile acids, steroid hormones and vitamin D. Contrary to phytosterols (originated from plants), cholesterol is synthesised in the human body in order to maintain a stable pool when dietary intake is low. Given the necessity for cholesterol, very effective intestinal uptake mechanisms and enterohepatic bile acid and cholesterol reabsorption cycles exist; conversely, phytosterols are poorly absorbed and, indeed, rapidly excreted. Dietary cholesterol content does not significantly influence plasma cholesterol values, which are regulated by different genetic and nutritional factors that influence cholesterol absorption or synthesis. Some subjects are hyper-absorbers and others are hyper-responders, which implies new therapeutic issues. Epidemiological data do not support a link between dietary cholesterol and CVD. Recent biological data concerning the effect of dietary cholesterol on LDL receptor-related protein may explain the complexity of the effect of cholesterol on CVD risk.

Insulin resistance is associated with increased cholesterol synthesis, decreased cholesterol absorption and enhanced lipid response to statin therapy

OBJECTIVE

Increasing insulin resistance is associated with a shift in cholesterol metabolism to increased synthesis and decreased absorption. Since statins inhibit cholesterol synthesis, we hypothesized that insulin-resistant patients will have greater LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) response to statins than insulin-sensitive patients.

METHODS

High-risk vascular patients not on lipid-lowering therapy were recruited and treated with Atorvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks. Percent LDL-C response to Atorvastatin was related to insulin sensitivity using the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI). Comparisons: (1) correlation between %LDL-C response and QUICKI. (2) Differences in cholesterol metabolism markers in insulin-resistant (lowest tertile QUICKI) vs insulin-sensitive patients (highest tertile of QUICKI). (3) Correlation of QUICKI with percent LDL-C response after correction for cholesterol metabolism markers.

RESULTS

154 patients were enrolled of which 66 were suitable for this sub-study. Average LDL-C reduction was 57+/-12% (mean+/-SD). QUICKI correlated negatively with percent LDL-C reduction (Pearson's r=-0.258, p=0.037) and on regression analysis explained approximately 7% (R2=0.067) of the variation in percent LDL-C response which approximates that reported by pharmacogenomics. Insulin-resistant patients had higher levels of cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol, lathosterol) and lower levels of absorption markers (cholestanol, sitosterol) and the correlation between QUICKI and percent LDL-C response ceased to be significant when these factors were controlled for.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin-resistant patients have superior LDL-C responses to statin therapy and that this may be related to increased cholesterol synthesis.

BACKGROUND

Patients with features of the metabolic syndrome, e.g. high triglycerides (TG) and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) may have an enhanced benefit from statin therapy. A retrospective analysis from the 4S investigators where the study population was stratified by HDL-C and TG quartiles revealed variations in statin efficacy. Patients who fell into both the lowest quartile of HDL-C (<39 mg/dl) and highest quartile of TG (>159 mg/dl) had a greater frequency of features of the metabolic syndrome (high BMI, hypertension, diabetes) than the patients in the highest quartile of HDL-C (>52 mg/dl) and lowest quartile of TG (<98 mg/dl). The 4S investigators suggested that patients with low HDL-C and high TG achieved an enhanced clinical benefit from statins compared to patients with high HDL-C and low TG with hazard ratios of 0.48 and 0.86 respectively and a treatment-by-subgroup interaction p value of 0.03 [1]. Since the clinical benefit of statin therapy is directly proportional to achieved percent reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2], we hypothesized that insulin-resistant patients would have greater percent decreases in LDL-C with statin therapy.

Indices of cholesterol metabolism and relative responsiveness to ezetimibe and simvastatin

CONTEXT

The level and duration of exposure to circulating low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) are major contributors to coronary atherosclerosis. Therefore, optimal prevention will require long-term LDL-C reduction, making it important to select the most effective agent for each individual.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that individuals with high fractional absorption of cholesterol respond better to the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe than to simvastatin, whereas low absorbers, who have elevated rates of cholesterol synthesis, respond better to simvastatin.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was performed in 215 African- and European-American men.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to placebo, ezetimibe (10 mg/d), simvastatin (10 mg/d), and both drugs for 6 wk each.

MAIN OUTCOME

Plasma levels of LDL-C, surrogate markers for cholesterol absorption (campesterol) and synthesis (lathosterol), and proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9 were measured at baseline and after treatment.

RESULTS

LDL-C levels were reduced by 19% (ezetimibe), 25% (simvastatin), and 41% (ezetimibe+simvastatin) from a baseline of 146 +/- 20 mg/dl; results were similar between ethnic groups. Reduction in LDL-C correlated poorly with baseline levels of noncholesterol sterols and proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9. Although individual responses varied widely, change in LDL-C on ezetimibe correlated with response to simvastatin (r = 0.46, P < 0.001). Combination therapy lowered LDL-C by 15% or greater in more than 95% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline cholesterol absorption and synthesis did not predict responsiveness to LDL-lowering drugs. Responsiveness to simvastatin and ezetimibe were highly correlated, suggesting that factors downstream of the primary sites of action of these drugs are a major determinant of response.

Cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in individuals with and without a CHD event during pravastatin therapy: insights from the PROSPER trial

Cholesterol homeostasis, defined as the balance between absorption and synthesis, influences circulating cholesterol concentrations and subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Statin therapy targets the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis and is efficacious in lowering CHD events and mortality. Nonetheless, CHD events still occur in some treated patients. To address differences in outcome during pravastatin therapy (40 mg/day), plasma markers of cholesterol synthesis (desmosterol, lathosterol) and fractional cholesterol absorption (campesterol, sitosterol) were measured, baseline and on treatment, in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk trial participants with (cases, n = 223) and without (controls, n = 257) a CHD event. Pravastatin therapy decreased plasma LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and increased HDL-cholesterol concentrations to a similar extent in cases and controls. Decreased concentrations of the cholesterol synthesis markers desmosterol (-12% and -11%) and lathosterol (-50% and -56%) and increased concentrations of the cholesterol absorption markers campesterol (48% and 51%) and sitosterol (25% and 26%) were observed on treatment, but the magnitude of change was similar between cases and controls. These data suggest that decreases in cholesterol synthesis in response to pravastatin treatment were accompanied by modest compensatory increases in fractional cholesterol absorption. The magnitude of these alterations were similar between cases and controls and do not explain differences in outcomes with pravastatin treatment.

Baseline cholesterol absorption and the response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the ENHANCE trial

Subjects with increased cholesterol absorption might benefit more from statin therapy combined with a cholesterol absorption inhibitor. We assessed whether baseline cholesterol absorption markers were associated with response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy, in terms of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and cholesterol absorption inhibition, in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). In a posthoc analysis of the two-year ENHANCE trial, we assessed baseline cholesterol-adjusted campesterol (campesterol/TC) and sitosterol/TC ratios in 591 FH patients. Associations with LDL-C changes and changes in cholesterol absorption markers were evaluated by multiple regression analysis. No association was observed between baseline markers of cholesterol absorption and the extent of LDL-C response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy (beta = 0.020, P = 0.587 for campesterol/TC and beta<0.001, P = 0.992 for sitosterol/TC). Ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment reduced campesterol levels by 68% and sitosterol levels by 62%; reductions were most pronounced in subjects with the highest cholesterol absorption markers at baseline, the so-called high absorbers (P < 0.001). Baseline cholesterol absorption status does not determine LDL-C lowering response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy in FH, despite more pronounced cholesterol absorption inhibition in high absorbers. Hence, these data do not support the use of baseline absorption markers as a tool to determine optimal cholesterol lowering strategy in FH patients. However, due to the exploratory nature of any posthoc analysis, these results warrant further prospective evaluation in different populations.

Perspectives on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement

BACKGROUND

Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). European and US guidelines now recommend lower LDL-C levels, particularly in high-risk patients. Although LDL-C treatment goals to reduce the risk of CHD are clear, many patients do not reach their LDL-C goals.

OBJECTIVES

Examine consensus guideline targets for LDL-C lowering in patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk; examine cholesterol goal achievement in clinical practice; evaluate the effectiveness of ezetimibe/statin and other adjunctive lipid-lowering treatments in achieving LDL-C goals; and consider ongoing controversies and the randomized controlled trials that may help to resolve or better illuminate them.

METHODS

An English-language PubMed search was conducted to identify prospective randomized controlled trials, open-label studies, and retrospective and observational studies from 2001 (same year that the executive summary of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III was published) to present for an analysis of the effects of adjunctive therapies on LDL-C lowering and goal attainment in patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Elevated LDL-C is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy; aggressive lowering is of great benefit to those at high risk. Statins are recommended first-line lipid-lowering agents, with a long, well-regarded history of efficacy and safety. Not all patients, however, can achieve recommended LDL-C goals simply using starting doses of statins. For such patients, more intensive therapy utilizing high-dose statins or combination therapy, including statins combined with other lipid-lowering agents, such as ezetimibe, bile acid resins (BARs), or niacin, is warranted. Potential limitations of the present review include possible publication bias and the focus on pharmacotherapy rather than lifestyle modification and the important objective of multiple risk-factor modification to reduce absolute global cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSIONS

With a well-established link between elevated LDL-C and cardiovascular risk, aggressive LDL-C lowering becomes particularly important. Patients needing intensive LDL-C lowering to achieve goals will often require adjunctive treatments, including ezetimibe, BARs, or niacin along with statins. Given both their high mg: mg potency in lowering LDL-C and favorable tolerability and patient acceptance/adherence profile, ezetimibe/statin combination regimens arguably provide the greatest likelihood for patients to reach new, lower LDL-C targets; however, efficacy and safety data of any adjunctive treatment, along with drug costs and patient adherence to treatment (partly related to complexity of the regimen) all need to be considered when determining the optimal regimen to achieve LDL-C goals in individual patients according to their baseline absolute cardiovascular risk, LDL-C level, and consensus LDL-C targets.

Comparison of the effects of maximal dose atorvastatin and rosuvastatin therapy on cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers

We measured plasma markers of cholesterol synthesis (lathosterol) and absorption (campesterol, sitosterol, and cholestanol) in order to compare the effects of maximal doses of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin and investigate the basis for the significant individual variation in lipid lowering response to statin therapy. Measurements were performed in participants (n = 135) at baseline and after 6 weeks on either rosuvastatin (40 mg/day) or atorvastatin (80 mg/day) therapy. Plasma sterols were measured using gas-liquid chromatography. Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin significantly (P < 0.001) altered plasma total cholesterol (C) levels by -40%, and the ratios of lathosterol/C by -64% and -68%, and campesterol/C by +52% and +72%, respectively, with significant differences (P < 0.001) between the treatment groups for the latter parameter. When using absolute values of these markers, subjects with the greatest reductions in both synthesis (lathosterol) and absorption (campesterol) had significantly greater reductions in total C than subjects in whom the converse was true (-46% versus -34%, P = 0.001), with similar effects for LDL-C. Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin decreased markers of cholesterol synthesis and increased markers of fractional cholesterol absorption, with rosuvastatin having significantly less effect on the latter parameter than atorvastatin. In addition, alterations in absolute values of plasma sterols correlated with the cholesterol lowering response.

Ezetimibe: cholesterol lowering and beyond

Ezetimibe is a cholesterol absorption inhibitor that blocks the intestinal absorption of both biliary and dietary cholesterol. It appears to exert its effect by blocking intestinal sterol transporters, specifically Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 proteins, thereby inhibiting the intestinal absorption of cholesterol, phytosterols and certain oxysterols. Ezetimibe monotherapy and in combination with statin therapy is primarily indicated for lowering LDL-cholesterol levels. In addition, it may favorably affect other parameters that could potentially further reduce atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk, such as raising HDL-cholesterol and lowering levels of triglycerides, non-HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and remnant-like particle cholesterol. Further effects of ezetimibe include a reduction in circulating phytosterols and oxysterols and, when used in combination with statins, a reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The clinical significance of the LDL-cholesterol lowering and other effects of ezetimibe is being evaluated in clinical outcome studies.

Effects of ezetimibe, simvastatin, atorvastatin, and ezetimibe-statin therapies on non-cholesterol sterols in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Levels of cholesterol are regulated by its synthesis, absorption, and elimination. Plasma levels of phytosterols (e.g., sitosterol, campesterol) and ratios of these sterols to total cholesterol (TC) are reported to correlate with efficiency of intestinal cholesterol absorption, whereas levels of certain cholesterol precursor sterols (e.g., desmosterol, lathosterol) and their ratios to TC correlate with cholesterol biosynthesis. However, there is a paucity of published data concerning the effects of combined treatment using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and a cholesterol absorption inhibitor (ezetimibe) on these parameters.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the effects of ezetimibe co-administered with statins, compared with each treatment alone, on cholesterol precursor sterols and plasma phytosterol levels.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis was performed to determine the effects of treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg, simvastatin (10-80 mg), and atorvastatin (10-80 mg), alone or in combination, on these non-cholesterol sterols using plasma samples from two randomized controlled trials involving patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipo protein [LDL-C] = 145-250 mg/dL; triglycerides < or = 350 mg/dL; N = 975) but without a recent (< or = 6-month) history of coronary heart disease (CHD) or either uncontrolled or newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Ezetimibe monotherapy significantly reduced plasma sitosterol and campesterol concentrations from baseline compared with placebo (both p < 0.001), whereas statins significantly lowered desmo sterol and lathosterol levels (p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Co-administration of ezetimibe and statins significantly decreased plasma levels of all of these sterols (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed effects of co-administration of ezetimibe and statins on non-cholesterol sterols are consistent with net inhibition of sterol absorption (driven by ezetimibe) in conjunction with net inhibition of cholesterol synthesis (driven by statins). The potential influence of treatment-induced changes in phytosterols on cardiovascular risk warrants further investigation in long-term, prospective, randomized controlled trials. This post-hoc study was by nature exploratory, and, because data from such analyses are not customarily adjusted for multiple comparisons, some associations may have emerged as statistically significant by chance. Future prospective randomized controlled studies may help to confirm our findings and address other research issues, such as the generalizability of our findings to patients with CHD or diabetes mellitus and possible dose:response relationships between escalating statin (or ezetimibe-statin) doses and circulating non-cholesterol levels.

Baseline plasma plant sterol concentrations do not predict changes in serum lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP) and plasma plant sterols following intake of a plant sterol-enriched food

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Plant sterol (PS) consumption lowers serum cholesterol levels, while modestly increasing plasma PS concentrations. Plasma PS concentrations may reflect sterol absorption, thus individuals with high plasma plant sterol (HPS) concentrations may show greater changes in circulating cholesterol and PS than individuals with low plasma plant sterol (LPS) concentrations. The objective of this study was to examine whether HPS and LPS concentrations are related to subsequent changes in plasma PS, serum lipid and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, following dietary PS intake in otherwise healthy hypercholesterolemic men.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

This single-blinded, randomized, diet-controlled study consisted of two 4-week phases, separated by a 4-week washout, where a diet with a placebo or the 2.0 g per day PS-enriched spread was consumed during the phases.

RESULTS

At baseline, men with HPS possessed higher (P<0.01) mean serum cholesterol concentration, while those with LPS had higher (P<0.05) body mass index. Following PS intake, plasma sum of campesterol plus sitosterol concentrations were elevated from 34.6+/-4.2 to 46.2+/-3.3 micromol l(-1) (mean+/-SE) and 16.5+/-0.9 to 20.8+/-1.2 micromol l(-1) after PS intake in men with HPS and LPS, respectively. Changes in plasma PS concentrations, however, were not different between individuals with either HPS or LPS baseline concentrations. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were decreased (P<0.0001) by 6.3 and 7.8%, respectively, with PS consumption for all individuals. Changes in lipid parameters were not different between individuals with HPS or LPS baseline concentrations. No changes in CRP were apparent subsequent to PS intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline plasma PS concentrations are not associated or predictive of changes in serum cholesterol or plasma PS concentrations after PS intervention. Thus, individuals with HPS show similar increases in PS concentrations as individuals with LPS following PS supplementation. Plasma PS remained in the range of previously reported concentrations.

Squalene Synthase Inhibitors

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality with a high level of safety. Nonetheless, there are substantial numbers of people who either do not tolerate statins or whose low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels are not lowered adequately. For these reasons, there is a need to develop other cholesterol-lowering drugs. A target for these new agents is provided by the enzymes distal to HMG-CoA reductase in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. Two classes of drugs have been developed: (i) squalene synthase inhibitors, which act at the first committed step in cholesterol biosynthesis, distal to the mevalonate-farnesyl diphosphate pathway; and (ii) oxidosqualene cyclase inhibitors, which act distal to the squalene intermediate. Of these, squalene synthase inhibitors have received more attention and are the subject of this review. Squalene synthase inhibitors decrease circulating LDL-cholesterol by the induction of hepatic LDL receptors in a similar manner to statins. They have fewer secondary effects mediated by a decrease in non-cholesterol products of mevalonate metabolism distal to HMG-CoA reductase, but have the potential to increase intermediates proximal to squalene. Squalene synthase inhibitors are just now entering clinical trials and data on how effectively they lower LDL-cholesterol and how they compliment the actions of statins and other agents is awaited with considerable interest.

Physiological and therapeutic factors affecting cholesterol metabolism: does a reciprocal relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis really exist?

Cholesterol absorption and synthesis contribute to maintaining cholesterol homeostasis. Several physiological and therapeutic factors affect cholesterol homeostasis, including: genetics, circadian rhythm, body weight, plant sterols, ezetimibe, and statin therapy. The present objective is to determine the main vector, i.e. cholesterol absorption or synthesis, affected by each of these factors, and to examine whether an alteration in one vector is linked to a reciprocal change in the other. Current techniques used to assess cholesterol absorption and synthesis are also reviewed. Review of physiological factors affecting cholesterol metabolism suggest a reciprocal relationship between these two vectors. Carriers of the E2 isoform of apolipoprotein E and ATP binding cassette (ABC) G8 19H (exon 1 mutation) show a decrease in cholesterol absorption accompanied by a corresponding increase in synthesis. Circadian rhythm affects cholesterol synthesis, however, its effect on absorption has yet to be established. Obese subjects show an increase in cholesterol synthesis with a subsequent decrease in cholesterol absorption. Weight loss down regulates cholesterol synthesis, but has little or no effect on absorption. In the case of therapeutic factors, plant sterols and stanols inhibit cholesterol absorption, which results in a compensatory increase in synthesis. Ezetimibe also decreases intestinal absorption, while reciprocally increasing synthesis. Statin therapy down regulates synthesis, which is accompanied by a rise in absorption. These findings suggest that a change in one vector, fairly consistently, results in a compensatory and opposing change in the other. An understanding of this reciprocal relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis may allow for the development of more effective interventions for dyslipidemic disorders.

Plasma Concentrations of Plant Sterols: Physiology and Relationship with Coronary Heart Disease

Recently, it has been questioned whether elevated levels of circulating plant sterols increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). To date, no definitive conclusions regarding such a relationship have been reached, nor have there been any studies summarizing the factors that contribute to the observed elevations in plant sterol concentrations in plasma. Thus, the purpose of this review is to systematically compare the plant sterol levels of subjects from the general population and to describe factors that contribute to the variations observed. The question of whether elevated plasma concentrations of plant sterols are associated with an increased risk of CHD was also assessed. Results indicate that the key factors accounting for variations in circulating plant sterol concentrations include: apolipoprotein E phenotypes, ATP-binding cassette transporter polymorphisms, use of statin drugs, presence of metabolic syndrome, dietary intake of plant sterols, gender, and analytical techniques used in the measurement of plant sterols in the plasma. An analysis of the studies examining the relationship between circulating levels of plant sterols and CHD risk in non-sitosterolemic populations revealed no clear associations. Furthermore, it was shown that the above-mentioned factors play an important role in determining the levels of plant sterols in plasma. Since these factors may act as potential confounders, they must be controlled for before more solid conclusions can be reached.

Ester percentages of plant sterols and cholesterol in chylomicrons and VLDL of humans with low and high sterol absorption

Ester percentages of cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols were measured in chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) in 15 subjects. Our hypothesis was that in humans, in contrast to animal experiments, plant sterols in chylomicrons are esterified similarly to cholesterol. In fact, the mean ester percentage of chylomicron sitosterol (approximately 40%), but not of campesterol ( approximately 51%), was lower than that of cholesterol (approximately 54%) in the whole study population. In high cholesterol absorbers (high serum total campesterol, > or = 2.8 mmol/mol of cholesterol), the ester percentages of sitosterol and other non-cholesterol sterols were similar to that of cholesterol in chylomicrons, and the percentages tended to be higher than those in low absorbers. In contrast to chylomicrons, the ester percentages of sterols in VLDL tended to be lower in the high than low absorbers. In conclusion, percentages of plant sterol esters are not consistently lower than those of cholesterol in chylomicrons.

Serum noncholesterol sterols in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia undergoing pravastatin therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess causes for insufficient cholesterol-lowering response to pravastatin and plant stanol esters in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH).

STUDY DESIGN

Nine of 16 children with HeFH who had not reached normocholesterolemia (< or =194 mg/dL [< or =5 mmol/L]) by 1 year after treatment (40 mg pravastatin and plant stanol ester) were called nonresponders. The 7 remaining children were responders. Serum noncholesterol sterol ratios (10(2) x mmol/mol of cholesterol), surrogate estimates of cholesterol absorption (cholestanol, campesterol, sitosterol) and synthesis (desmosterol and lathosterol), were studied at study baseline (on plant stanol esters) and during combination therapy with pravastatin and plant stanol esters.

RESULTS

Pravastatin decreased the serum levels of cholesterol and cholesterol synthesis markers, and increased the ratios of cholesterol absorption markers. Compared with the responders, the nonresponders had higher study baseline (on plant stanol esters) serum cholesterol concentrations (299 +/- 39 vs 251 +/- 35 mg/dL [7.7 +/- 1.0 vs 6.5 +/- 0.9 mmol/L]; P <.001) and higher respective ratios of campesterol (371 +/- 99 vs 277 +/- 67 10(2) x mmol/mol of cholesterol; P = .049) and sitosterol (176 +/- 37 vs 126 +/- 24 10(2) x mmol/mol of cholesterol; P = .008). The higher the ratio of cholestanol at study baseline, the smaller the 1-year percent reduction in cholesterol (r = .556; P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Pravastatin treatment increases the markers of cholesterol absorption and decreases those of cholesterol synthesis in HeFH during simultaneous inhibition of cholesterol absorption. Combined inhibition of cholesterol absorption and synthesis may not normalize serum lipids in those patients with the highest cholesterol levels, especially if signs of enhanced cholesterol absorption are detectable.

Simvastatin plus ezetimibe: combination therapy for the management of dyslipidaemia

Hyperlipidaemia is a pivotal risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease. A large number of studies have demonstrated that the treatment of abnormalities in lipoprotein levels reduces the risk for myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Despite the development of multiple drug classes to treat dyslipidaemias and the promulgation of clearly defined guidelines for the management of lipid disorders, dyslipidaemia tends to be undertreated in the majority of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. A part of the reluctance to treat different lipoprotein fractions to goal levels is attributable to physician- and patient-related concerns over the increasing toxicity of available therapies, as their dosages are increased. The risks of hepatotoxicity, myalgia, and rhabdomyolysis are fairly well characterised in patients receiving statins, fibrates and niacin. Another issue affecting treatment success rates is the fact that many patients with complex dyslipidaemias are inadequately responsive to single-agent therapy. As the epidemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus continue to worsen, physicians will encounter severe, mixed dyslipidaemias more frequently. Many of these patients will require combinations of drugs to address the various metabolic derangements causing changes in multiple lipoprotein fractions. Although the need for combination therapy is well-established in the management of disorders, such as hypertension and diabetes, it is less often used for the treatment of dyslipidaemias. The development of safe, cost-effective, and efficacious combination dyslipidaemic therapy is an important goal in cardiovascular medicine. Simvastatin plus ezetimibe has recently been combined as a fixed dose therapy, which offers clinicians the opportunity to simultaneously inhibit two key pathways in cholesterol metabolism: hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis and the absorption of cholesterol at the level of the proximal jejunum. This dual mechanism of inhibition substantially increases the capacity to decrease serum levels of atherogenic low-density lipoproteins and increase high-density lipoprotein, compared with that observed when either drug is used alone. This combination increases the likelihood of therapeutic success in patients with dyslipidaemia.

Plant sterols and stanols

The expanding market of 'functional foods' containing plant sterols and stanols has focused interest on their cholesterol-lowering effects as well on possible adverse effects. Trials of cholesterol lowering demonstrate that intake of 2 g/day of plant sterols and stanols reduces serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations by approximately 10%. Safety concerns regarding elevations in serum plant sterol levels, or effects on fat-soluble vitamin absorption or hypothetical effects on serum sex hormone balance have received attention and been addressed in studies. Plant sterol (but not stanol) supplementation increased serum plant sterol concentrations but these levels remained much lower than those observed in homozygous sitosterolemia making an adverse health effect unlikely. Prolonged statin therapy also causes elevations in all cholesterol-adjusted plant sterol levels as well as small but significant elevations in serum unadjusted campesterol levels from baseline. This is probably caused by a statin-induced reduction in biliary cholesterol efflux resulting in a diminished intestinal cholesterol pool. The diminished competition with cholesterol molecules allows more plant sterol molecules to become incorporated in mixed micelles facilitating their uptake in enterocytes. With the exception of beta-carotene, reductions in serum concentrations of fat-soluble (pro)vitamins are usually abolished by adjustment for cholesterol suggesting that they reflect reductions in carrier lipoproteins, mainly LDL. The small reductions in serum beta-carotene are not regarded as a major concern, nor have any adverse effects on sex hormone metabolism been demonstrated apart from parenteral administration of large doses in experimental animals. However, as increasing consumer populations become exposed to a large variety of food products enriched with plant sterols and stanols the likelihood of rare adverse effects increases and surveillance is necessary.

Cholesterol absorption inhibitor Ezetimibe blocks uptake of oxidized LDL in human macrophages

Ezetimibe belongs to a group of selective and very effective 2-azetidione cholesterol absorption inhibitors which act on the level of cholesterol entry into enterocytes. Recent data indicated that the drug prevents the formation of a heterocomplex consisting of annexin-2 and caveolin-l and leads to specific inhibition of an NPCILI-dependent cholesterol uptake pathway required for uptake of micellar cholesterol into enterocytes. Earlier studies have shown that caveolin-l and annexin-2 are also expressed in human macro-phages and we show in this study that human macrophages express NPC1L1. Moreover in human macrophages, Ezetimibe(SCH58235) and its analogue, SCH354909, are bound to specific cell surface receptors followed by endocytosis via the classical endocytic pathway. SCH58235 had no effect on uptake and/or processing of acetylated LDL (Ac-LDL). In contrast, the compound inhibited uptake of oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL) by -50% in a dose-dependent manner. SCH58235 blocked the lipid-induced induction of LXR/RXR target genes ABCAI, ABCGI, and apolipoprotein E distinctively more effectively in macrophages loaded with Ox-LDL than in those loaded with Ac-LDL. Based on these findings, we presume that the caveolin-l-, annexin-2-, and NPClLI-dependent cholesterol uptake system that is operating in enterocytes may also contribute to class B scavenger receptor-dependent uptake of Ox-LDL in human monocyte-derived macrophages.

Cholesterol metabolism and its implications for therapeutic interventions in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

Cardiovascular diseases are the principal causes of mortality in middle-aged people and in older people. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common of the cardiovascular diseases; high serum levels of cholesterol are associated with atherosclerosis and an increased risk of CHD. Cholesterol homeostasis is achieved by means of a fine balance between cholesterol intake, absorption/excretion and synthesis. All of these processes are tightly linked and a change in one of them can significantly influence the others. Results from both experimental studies and clinical trials have shown that inhibition of cholesterol synthesis with a statin increases absorption and that conversely, inhibition of cholesterol absorption increases synthesis. The tight linkage of cholesterol absorption and synthesis in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis suggests that treatment with an agent that influences only one of these two processes is likely to have distinct limits with respect to its effects on cholesterol levels. Better understanding of cholesterol homeostasis, particularly the close interrelationship between cholesterol synthesis and absorption, may result in the design of rational integrated treatment regimens that employ multiple agents with complementary actions that attack multiple mechanisms to lower cholesterol.

Plant stanol and sterol esters in prevention of cardiovascular diseases

Statin trials have indicated that effective reduction of serum cholesterol should last up to one year before reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases can be detected. This observation can be applied most probably also to the use of plant stanol/sterol ester spreads for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. However, despite the fact that the two spreads lower serum cholesterol similarly in short term studies, a comparison of one year results reveals an inconsistent effect of plant sterol spread as compared with that of plant stanol spread on cholesterol concentration in both men and women. This favors the use of plant stanol ester spread for long-term lowering of serum cholesterol. Doses of about 2 g/day of plant stanols as fatty acid ester spread enhances fecal elimination of cholesterol, but not of bile acids, through inhibition of cholesterol absorption by about 40%. This lowers serum total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol despite enhanced compensatory increase in cholesterol synthesis by about 10% and 15% as compared with control spread, respectively, and by up to 20% as compared with the baseline diet. About one-third of mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects reach an accepted cholesterol level. A small dose of statin should be added to treatment in individuals resistant to monotherapy with plant stanol ester spread. A life-long consumption of plant stanol ester spread has been predicted to lower coronary events by about 20%.

Differential mobilization of newly synthesized cholesterol and biosynthetic sterol precursors from cells

Previous work demonstrates that the biosynthetic precursor of cholesterol, desmosterol, is released from cells and that its efflux to high density lipoprotein or phosphatidylcholine vesicles is greater than that of newly synthesized cholesterol (Johnson, W. J., Fischer, R. T., Phillips, M. C., and Rothblat, G. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25037-25046). Here we report that the release of individual precursor sterols varies with the efflux of newly synthesized zymosterol being greater than that of lathosterol and both exceeding that of newly synthesized cholesterol when using either methyl-beta-cyclodextrin or complete serum as acceptors. The transfer of newly synthesized lathosterol to methyl-beta-cyclodextrin was inhibited by actin polymerization but not by Golgi disassembly whereas that of newly synthesized cholesterol was inhibited by both conditions. Newly synthesized lathosterol associated with cellular detergent-resistant membranes more rapidly than newly synthesized cholesterol. Upon efflux to serum, newly synthesized cholesterol precursors associated with both high and low density lipoproteins. Stimulation of the formation of direct endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contacts was accompanied by enhanced efflux of newly synthesized lathosterol but not of newly synthesized cholesterol to serum acceptors. The data indicate that the efflux of cholesterol precursors differs not only from that of cholesterol but also from each other, with the more polar zymosterol being more avidly effluxed. Moreover, the results suggest that the intracellular routing of cholesterol precursors differs from that of newly synthesized cholesterol and implicates a potential role for the actin cytoskeleton and endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contacts in the efflux of lathosterol.