Identification of a [3H]muscimol photoaffinity substrate in the bovine gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor alpha subunit

Modular Structure and Polymerization Status of GABAA Receptors Illustrated with EM Analysis and AlphaFold2 Prediction

Type-A γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors are channel proteins crucial to mediating neuronal balance in the central nervous system (CNS). The structure of GABAA receptors allows for multiple binding sites and is key to drug development. Yet the formation mechanism of the receptor's distinctive pentameric structure is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the role of three predominant subunits of the human GABAA receptor in the formation of protein pentamers. Through purifying and refolding the protein fragments of the GABAA receptor α1, β2, and γ2 subunits, the particle structures were visualised with negative staining electron microscopy (EM). To aid the analysis, AlphaFold2 was used to compare the structures. Results show that α1 and β2 subunit fragments successfully formed homo-oligomers, particularly homopentameric structures, while the predominant heteropentameric GABAA receptor was also replicated through the combination of the three subunits. However, homopentameric structures were not observed with the γ2 subunit proteins. A comparison of the AlphaFold2 predictions and the previously obtained cryo-EM structures presents new insights into the subunits' modular structure and polymerization status. By performing experimental and computational studies, a deeper understanding of the complex structure of GABAA receptors is provided. Hopefully, this study can pave the way to developing novel therapeutics for neuropsychiatric diseases.

Neurosteroids and their potential as a safer class of general anesthetics

Neurosteroids (NS) are a class of steroids that are synthesized within the central nervous system (CNS). Various NS can either enhance or inhibit CNS excitability and they play important biological roles in brain development, brain function and as mediators of mood. One class of NS, 3α-hydroxy-pregnane steroids such as allopregnanolone (AlloP) or pregnanolone (Preg), inhibits neuronal excitability; these endogenous NS and their analogues have been therapeutically applied as anti-depressants, anti-epileptics and general anesthetics. While NS have many favorable properties as anesthetics (e.g. rapid onset, rapid recovery, minimal cardiorespiratory depression, neuroprotection), they are not currently in clinical use, largely due to problems with formulation. Recent advances in understanding NS mechanisms of action and improved formulations have rekindled interest in development of NS as sedatives and anesthetics. In this review, the synthesis of NS, and their mechanism of action will be reviewed with specific emphasis on their binding sites and actions on γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. The potential advantages of NS analogues as sedative and anesthetic agents will be discussed.

Identification of a binding site for bupropion in Gloeobacter violaceus ligand-gated ion channel

Bupropion is an atypical antidepressant and smoking cessation drug which causes adverse effects such as insomnia, irritability, and anxiety. Bupropion inhibits dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake transporters and eukaryotic cation-conducting pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs), such as nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) and serotonin type 3A (5-HT3A) receptors, at clinically relevant concentrations. However, the binding sites and binding mechanisms of bupropion are still elusive. To further understand the inhibition of pLGICs by bupropion, in this work, using a prokaryotic homologue of pLGICs as a model, we examined the inhibitory potency of bupropion in Gloeobacter violaceus ligand-gated ion channel (GLIC), a proton-gated ion channel. Bupropion inhibited proton-induced currents in GLIC with an inhibitory potency of 14.9 ± 2.0 μM, comparable to clinically attainable concentrations previously shown to also modulate eukaryotic pLGICs. Using single amino acid substitutions in GLIC and two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings, we further determined a binding site for bupropion in the lower third of the first transmembrane segment M1 at residue T214. The sidechain of M1 T214 together with additional residues of M1 and also of M3 of the adjacent subunit have previously been shown to contribute to binding of other lipophilic molecules like allopregnanolone and pregnanolone.

Allosteric modulation of α1β3γ2 GABAA receptors by farnesol through the neurosteroid sites

In mammalian cells, all-trans farnesol, a 15-carbon isoprenol, is a product of the mevalonate pathway. It is the natural substrate of alcohol dehydrogenase and a substrate for CYP2E1, two enzymes implicated in ethanol metabolism. Studies have shown that farnesol is present in the human brain and inhibits voltage-gated Ca2+ channels at much lower concentrations than ethanol. Here we show that farnesol modulates the activity of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs), some of which also mediate the sedative activity of ethanol. Electrophysiology experiments performed in HEK cells expressing human α1β3γ2 or α6β3γ2 GABAARs revealed that farnesol increased chloride currents through positive allosteric modulation of these receptors and showed dependence on both the alcoholic functional group of farnesol and the length of the alkyl chain for activity. In silico studies using long-timescale unbiased all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the human α1β3γ2 GABAA receptors revealed that farnesol modulates the channel by directly binding to the transmembrane neurosteroid-binding site, after partitioning into the surrounding membrane and reaching the receptor by lateral diffusion. Channel activation by farnesol was further characterized by several structural and dynamic variables, such as global twisting of the receptor's extracellular domain, tilting of the transmembrane M2 helices, radius, cross-sectional area, hydration status, and electrostatic potential of the channel pore. Our results expand the pharmacological activities of farnesol to yet another class of ion channels implicated in neurotransmission, thus providing a novel path for understanding and treatment of diseases involving GABAA receptor dysfunction.

Harnessing the intrinsic photochemistry of isoxazoles for the development of chemoproteomic crosslinking methods

The intrinsic photochemistry of the isoxazole, a common heterocycle in medicinal chemistry, can be applied to offer an alternative to existing strategies using more perturbing, extrinsic photo-crosslinkers. The utility of isoxazole photo-crosslinking is demonstrated in a wide range of biologically relevant experiments, including common proteomics workflows.

Delta-containing GABAA receptors in pain management: Promising targets for novel analgesics

Communication between nerve cells depends on the balance between excitatory and inhibitory circuits. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, regulates this balance and insufficient GABAergic activity is associated with numerous neuropathological disorders including pain. Of the various GABA_A receptor subtypes, the δ-containing receptors are particularly interesting drug targets in management of chronic pain. These receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels composed of α, β and δ subunits and can be activated by ambient levels of GABA to generate tonic conductance. However, only a few ligands preferentially targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors have so far been identified, limiting both pharmacological understanding and drug-discovery efforts, and more importantly, understanding of how they affect pain pathways. Here, we systemically review and discuss the known drugs and ligands with analgesic potential targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors and further integrate the biochemical nature of the receptors with clinical perspectives in pain that might generate interest among researchers and clinical physicians to encourage analgesic discovery efforts leading to more efficient therapies.

A structural perspective on GABAA receptor pharmacology

GABA_A receptors are pentameric ligand-gated chloride channels of crucial importance for the vertebrate nervous system physiology. They typically modulate the fast inhibitory neurotransmission, and represent the target receptors for major classes of drugs used in the clinic, such as benzodiazepines and general anesthetics. Recent technological progress in structural biology, in particular single-particle cryo-electron microscopy, has led to fundamental advances in understanding the detailed organization and signalling mechanisms of major GABA_A receptor subtypes. This effort culminated with the high-resolution structural analysis of an intact, full-length human heteropentameric receptor, α1β3γ2, in a lipid bilayer and in complex with small molecule ligands including the commonly used benzodiazepines diazepam (Valium) and alprazolam (Xanax). These structures reveal multiple aspects of receptor activation and provide a path for rational design of subunit-specific GABA_A receptor modulators.

GABAA receptor: Positive and negative allosteric modulators

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission and the gene products involved were discovered during the mid-twentieth century. Historically, myriad existing nervous system drugs act as positive and negative allosteric modulators of these proteins, making GABA a major component of modern neuropharmacology, and suggesting that many potential drugs will be found that share these targets. Although some of these drugs act on proteins involved in synthesis, degradation, and membrane transport of GABA, the GABA receptors Type A (GABAAR) and Type B (GABABR) are the targets of the great majority of GABAergic drugs. This discovery is due in no small part to Professor Norman Bowery. Whereas the topic of GABABR is appropriately emphasized in this special issue, Norman Bowery also made many insights into GABAAR pharmacology, the topic of this article. GABAAR are members of the ligand-gated ion channel receptor superfamily, a chloride channel family of a dozen or more heteropentameric subtypes containing 19 possible different subunits. These subtypes show different brain regional and subcellular localization, age-dependent expression, and potential for plastic changes with experience including drug exposure. Not only are GABAAR the targets of agonist depressants and antagonist convulsants, but most GABAAR drugs act at other (allosteric) binding sites on the GABAAR proteins. Some anxiolytic and sedative drugs, like benzodiazepine and related drugs, act on GABAAR subtype-dependent extracellular domain sites. General anesthetics including alcohols and neurosteroids act at GABAAR subunit-interface trans-membrane sites. Ethanol at high anesthetic doses acts on GABAAR subtype-dependent trans-membrane domain sites. Ethanol at low intoxicating doses acts at GABAAR subtype-dependent extracellular domain sites. Thus GABAAR subtypes possess pharmacologically specific receptor binding sites for a large group of different chemical classes of clinically important neuropharmacological agents. This article is part of the "Special Issue Dedicated to Norman G. Bowery".

Structure of a human synaptic GABAA receptor

Fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain is principally mediated by the neurotransmitter GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) and its synaptic target, the type A GABA receptor (GABAA receptor). Dysfunction of this receptor results in neurological disorders and mental illnesses including epilepsy, anxiety and insomnia. The GABAA receptor is also a prolific target for therapeutic, illicit and recreational drugs, including benzodiazepines, barbiturates, anaesthetics and ethanol. Here we present high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures of the human α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor, the predominant isoform in the adult brain, in complex with GABA and the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil, the first-line clinical treatment for benzodiazepine overdose. The receptor architecture reveals unique heteromeric interactions for this important class of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor. This work provides a template for understanding receptor modulation by GABA and benzodiazepines, and will assist rational approaches to therapeutic targeting of this receptor for neurological disorders and mental illness.

GABA A Receptor Coupling Junction and Pore GABRB3 Mutations are Linked to Early-Onset Epileptic Encephalopathy

GABA_A receptors are brain inhibitory chloride ion channels. Here we show functional analyses and structural simulations for three de novo missense mutations in the GABA_A receptor β3 subunit gene (GABRB3) identified in patients with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (EOEE) and profound developmental delay. We sought to obtain insights into the molecular mechanisms that might link defects in GABA_A receptor biophysics and biogenesis to patients with EOEE. The mutant residues are part of conserved structural domains such as the Cys-loop (L170R) and M2-M3 loop (A305V) that form the GABA binding/channel gating coupling junction and the channel pore (T288N), which are functionally coupled during receptor activation. The mutant coupling junction residues caused rearrangements and formation of new hydrogen bonds in the open state, while the mutant pore residue reshaped the pore cavity. Whereas mutant coupling junction residues uncoupled during activation and caused gain of function, the mutant pore residue favoured low conductance receptors and differential sensitivity to diazepam and loss of function. These data reveal novel molecular mechanisms by which EOEE-linked mutations affect GABA_A receptor function.

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants

The role of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) as a signal in animals has been documented for over 60 years. In contrast, evidence that GABA is a signal in plants has only emerged in the last 15 years, and it was not until last year that a mechanism by which this could occur was identified-a plant 'GABA receptor' that inhibits anion passage through the aluminium-activated malate transporter family of proteins (ALMTs). ALMTs are multigenic, expressed in different organs and present on different membranes. We propose GABA regulation of ALMT activity could function as a signal that modulates plant growth, development, and stress response. In this review, we compare and contrast the plant 'GABA receptor' with mammalian GABAA receptors in terms of their molecular identity, predicted topology, mode of action, and signalling roles. We also explore the implications of the discovery that GABA modulates anion flux in plants, its role in signal transduction for the regulation of plant physiology, and predict the possibility that there are other GABA interaction sites in the N termini of ALMT proteins through in silico evolutionary coupling analysis; we also explore the potential interactions between GABA and other signalling molecules.

Structural Studies of GABAA Receptor Binding Sites: Which Experimental Structure Tells us What?

Atomic resolution structures of cys-loop receptors, including one of a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA receptor) subtype, allow amazing insights into the structural features and conformational changes that these pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) display. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of more than 30 cys-loop receptor structures of homologous proteins that revealed several allosteric binding sites not previously described in GABAA receptors. These novel binding sites were examined in GABAA receptor homology models and assessed as putative candidate sites for allosteric ligands. Four so far undescribed putative ligand binding sites were proposed for follow up studies based on their presence in the GABAA receptor homology models. A comprehensive analysis of conserved structural features in GABAA and glycine receptors (GlyRs), the glutamate gated ion channel, the bacterial homologs Erwinia chrysanthemi (ELIC) and Gloeobacter violaceus GLIC, and the serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor was performed. The conserved features were integrated into a master alignment that led to improved homology models. The large fragment of the intracellular domain that is present in the structure of the 5-HT3 receptor was utilized to generate GABAA receptor models with a corresponding intracellular domain fragment. Results of mutational and photoaffinity ligand studies in GABAA receptors were analyzed in the light of the model structures. This led to an assignment of candidate ligands to two proposed novel pockets, candidate binding sites for furosemide and neurosteroids in the trans-membrane domain were identified. The homology models can serve as hypotheses generators, and some previously controversial structural interpretations of biochemical data can be resolved in the light of the presented multi-template approach to comparative modeling. Crystal and cryo-EM microscopic structures of the closest homologs that were solved in different conformational states provided important insights into structural rearrangements of binding sites during conformational transitions. The impact of structural variation and conformational motion on the shape of the investigated binding sites was analyzed. Rules for best template and alignment choice were obtained and can generally be applied to modeling of cys-loop receptors. Overall, we provide an updated structure based view of ligand binding sites present in GABAA receptors.

An Electrostatic Funnel in the GABA-Binding Pathway

The γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA_A-R) is a major inhibitory neuroreceptor that is activated by the binding of GABA. The structure of the GABA_A-R is well characterized, and many of the binding site residues have been identified. However, most of these residues are obscured behind the C-loop that acts as a cover to the binding site. Thus, the mechanism by which the GABA molecule recognizes the binding site, and the pathway it takes to enter the binding site are both unclear. Through the completion and detailed analysis of 100 short, unbiased, independent molecular dynamics simulations, we have investigated this phenomenon of GABA entering the binding site. In each system, GABA was placed quasi-randomly near the binding site of a GABA_A-R homology model, and atomistic simulations were carried out to observe the behavior of the GABA molecules. GABA fully entered the binding site in 19 of the 100 simulations. The pathway taken by these molecules was consistent and non-random; the GABA molecules approach the binding site from below, before passing up behind the C-loop and into the binding site. This binding pathway is driven by long-range electrostatic interactions, whereby the electrostatic field acts as a ‘funnel’ that sweeps the GABA molecules towards the binding site, at which point more specific atomic interactions take over. These findings define a nuanced mechanism whereby the GABA_A-R uses the general zwitterionic features of the GABA molecule to identify a potential ligand some 2 nm away from the binding site.

Neurotransmitters convey signals from one neuron to the next and are indispensable to the functioning of the nervous system. These small molecules bind to receptors to exert their action. One of the most important neurotransmitters is γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which binds to its type A receptor to exert an inhibitory influence on the neuron. Many drugs, both medicinal and nefarious, bind to these neuroreceptors and alter the balance of neuronal signals in the brain. There is a fine balance between these drugs eliciting the desired effect, and causing unwanted and sometimes irreversible alterations in neural behavior. To study this critical binding event, we are using computational simulations to observe precisely how the GABA molecule binds to its type A receptor (GABA_A-receptor). One hundred individual simulations were carried out where GABA was placed near the binding site and then allowed to freely bind to the GABA_A-receptor. Binding occurred in 19 of these simulations. Statistical analysis of these binding simulations reveals the consistent pathway taken by GABA molecules to enter the binding site. This improved understanding of the binding event enables development of safer medicinal neuroactive drugs and countermeasures for effects of neuronal chemical trauma.

Allosteric ligands and their binding sites define γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor subtypes

GABAA receptors (GABA(A)Rs) mediate rapid inhibitory transmission in the brain. GABA(A)Rs are ligand-gated chloride ion channel proteins and exist in about a dozen or more heteropentameric subtypes exhibiting variable age and brain regional localization and thus participation in differing brain functions and diseases. GABA(A)Rs are also subject to modulation by several chemotypes of allosteric ligands that help define structure and function, including subtype definition. The channel blocker picrotoxin identified a noncompetitive channel blocker site in GABA(A)Rs. This ligand site is located in the transmembrane channel pore, whereas the GABA agonist site is in the extracellular domain at subunit interfaces, a site useful for low energy coupled conformational changes of the functional channel domain. Two classes of pharmacologically important allosteric modulatory ligand binding sites reside in the extracellular domain at modified agonist sites at other subunit interfaces: the benzodiazepine site and the high-affinity, relevant to intoxication, ethanol site. The benzodiazepine site is specific for certain GABA(A)R subtypes, mainly synaptic, while the ethanol site is found at a modified benzodiazepine site on different, extrasynaptic, subtypes. In the transmembrane domain are allosteric modulatory ligand sites for diverse chemotypes of general anesthetics: the volatile and intravenous agents, barbiturates, etomidate, propofol, long-chain alcohols, and neurosteroids. The last are endogenous positive allosteric modulators. X-ray crystal structures of prokaryotic and invertebrate pentameric ligand-gated ion channels, and the mammalian GABA(A)R protein, allow homology modeling of GABA(A)R subtypes with the various ligand sites located to suggest the structure and function of these proteins and their pharmacological modulation.

Analysis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor subtypes using isosteric and allosteric ligands

The GABAA receptors (GABAARs) play an important role in inhibitory transmission in the brain. The GABAARs could be identified using a medicinal chemistry approach to characterize with a series of chemical structural analogues, some identified in nature, some synthesized, to control the structural conformational rigidity/flexibility so as to define the 'receptor-specific' GABA agonist ligand structure. In addition to the isosteric site ligands, these ligand-gated chloride ion channel proteins exhibited modulation by several chemotypes of allosteric ligands, that help define structure and function. The channel blocker picrotoxin identified a noncompetitive channel blocker site in GABAARs. This ligand site is located in the transmembrane channel pore, whereas the GABA agonist site is in the extracellular domain at subunit interfaces, a site useful for low energy coupled conformational changes of the functional channel domain. Also in the trans-membrane domain are allosteric modulatory ligand sites, mostly positive, for diverse chemotypes with general anesthetic efficacy, namely, the volatile and intravenous agents: barbiturates, etomidate, propofol, long-chain alcohols, and neurosteroids. The last are apparent endogenous positive allosteric modulators of GABAARs. These binding sites depend on the GABAAR heteropentameric subunit composition, i.e., subtypes. Two classes of pharmacologically very important allosteric modulatory ligand binding site reside in the extracellular domain at modified agonist sites at other subunit interfaces: the benzodiazepine site, and the low-dose ethanol site. The benzodiazepine site is specific for certain subunit combination subtypes, mainly synaptically localized. In contrast, the low-dose (high affinity) ethanol site(s) is found at a modified benzodiazepine site on different, extrasynaptic, subtypes.

What ligand-gated ion channels can tell us about the allosteric regulation of G protein-coupled receptors

The GABA(A) receptor is the target for a number of important allosteric drugs used in medicine, including benzodiazepines and anesthetics. These modulators have variable effects on the potency and maximal response of macroscopic currents elicited by different GABA(A) receptor agonists, yet this modulation is consistent with a two-state model in which the allosteric ligand has invariant affinity constants for the active and inactive states. Analysis of the effects of an allosteric agonist, like etomidate, on the population current provides a means of estimating the gating constant of the unliganded GABA(A) receptor (∼10(-4)). In contrast, allosteric interactions at the M(2) muscarinic receptor are often inconsistent with a two-state model. Analyzing allosterism within the constraints of a two-state model, nonetheless, provides an unbiased measure of probe dependence as well as clues to the mechanism of allosteric modulation. The rather simple allosteric effect of affinity-only modulation is difficult to explain and suggests modulation of a peripheral orthosteric ligand-docking site on the M(2) muscarinic receptor.

Experimental early-life febrile seizures induce changes in GABA(A) R-mediated neurotransmission in the dentate gyrus

PURPOSE

  Febrile seizures (FS), the most frequent seizure type during childhood, have been linked to temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) in adulthood. Yet, underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. Altered γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic neurotransmission in the dentate gyrus (DG) circuit has been hypothesized to be involved. This study aims at analyzing whether experimental FS change inhibitory synaptic input and postsynaptic GABA(A) R function in dentate granule cells.

METHODS

  We applied an immature rat model of hyperthermia (HT)-induced FS. GABA(A) R-mediated neurotransmission was studied using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from dentate granule neurons in hippocampal slices within 6-9 days post-HT.

KEY FINDINGS

  Frequencies of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were reduced in HT rats that had experienced seizures, whereas sIPSC amplitudes were enhanced. Whole-cell GABA responses revealed a doubled GABA(A) R sensitivity in dentate granule cells from HT animals, compared to that of normothermic (NT) controls. Analysis of sIPSCs and whole-cell GABA responses showed similar kinetics in postsynaptic GABA(A) Rs of HT and NT rats. quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiments indicated changes in DG GABA(A) R subunit expression, which was most pronounced for the α3 subunit.

SIGNIFICANCE

  The data support the hypothesis that FS persistently alter neuronal excitability.

A role for loop F in modulating GABA binding affinity in the GABA(A) receptor

The brain's major inhibitory neuroreceptor is the ligand-gated ion channel γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor (GABAR). GABARs exist in a variety of different subunit combinations that act to modulate the physiological behavior of GABAR by altering its pharmacological profile, as well as its affinity for GABA. While the α(1)β(2)γ(2) subtype is one of the most prevalent GABARs, the less populous α(6)β(3)δ subtype has much higher GABA sensitivity. Previous studies identified residues crucial for GABA binding; however, the specific molecular differences responsible for this diverse sensitivity are not known. Furthermore, the role of loop F is a divisive subject, with conflicting evidence for ligand binding function. Using homology modeling, ligand docking, and molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the GABA binding sites of the two receptor subtypes. Simulations identified seven residues that consistently interacted with GABA in both subtypes: αF65, αR132, βL99, βE155, βR/K196, βY205, and βR207. Residue substitution at position β196 (arginine in α(6)β(3)δ, lysine in α(1)β(2)γ(2)) resulted in a shift in GABA binding. However, the major difference between the two binding sites was the magnitude of loop F involvement, with a greater contribution in the α(6)β(3)δ receptor. Free energy calculations confirm that the α(6)β(3)δ binding pocket has an increased affinity for GABA. Thus, the possible role for loop F across the GABAR family is to modulate GABA affinity.

Three arginines in the GABAA receptor binding pocket have distinct roles in the formation and stability of agonist- versus antagonist-bound complexes

Binding of the agonist GABA to the GABA(A) receptor causes channel gating, whereas competitive antagonists that bind at the same site do not. The details of ligand binding are not well understood, including which residues interact directly with ligands, maintain the structure of the binding pocket, or transduce the action of binding into opening of the ion channel gate. Recent work suggests that the amine group of the GABA molecule may form a cation-π bond with residues in a highly conserved "aromatic box" within the binding pocket. Although interactions with the carboxyl group of GABA remain unknown, three positively charged arginines (α(1)Arg67, α(1)Arg132, and β(2)Arg207) just outside of the aromatic box are likely candidates. To explore their roles in ligand binding, we individually mutated these arginines to alanine and measured the effects on microscopic ligand binding/unbinding rates and channel gating. The mutations α(1)R67A or β(2)R207A slowed agonist binding and sped unbinding with little effect on gating, demonstrating that these arginines are critical for both formation and stability of the agonist-bound complex. In addition, α(1)R67A sped binding of the antagonist 2-(3-carboxypropyl)-3-amino-6-(4 methoxyphenyl)pyridazinium bromide (SR-95531), indicating that this arginine poses a barrier to formation of the antagonist-bound complex. In contrast, β(2)R207A and α(1)R132A sped antagonist unbinding, indicating that these arginines stabilize the antagonist-bound state. α(1)R132A also conferred a new long-lived open state, indicating that this arginine influences the channel gate. Thus, each of these arginines plays a unique role in determining interactions with agonists versus antagonists and with the channel gate.

The Haemonchus contortus UNC-49B subunit possesses the residues required for GABA sensitivity in homomeric and heteromeric channels

Hco-UNC-49 is a GABA receptor from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus that has a relatively low overall sequence similarity to vertebrate GABA receptors but is very similar to the UNC-49 receptor found in the free living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. While the nematode receptors do share >80% sequence similarity they exhibit different sensitivities to GABA. In addition, the UNC-49C subunit appears to be a positive modulator of GABA sensitivity in the H. contortus heteromeric channel, but is a negative modulator in the C. elegans heteromeric channel. The cause(s) of these differences is currently unknown since the structural elements essential for GABA sensitivity in nematode receptors have been largely unexplored. Thus, the overall aim of this study was to investigate the residues that are important for UNC-49 receptor sensitivity through the use of homology modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, and two-electrode voltage clamp. This study revealed that Met(170) in Loop B of the GABA binding-site may partially account for the observed differences in GABA receptor sensitivity between the nematode species. Residues in Loops A-D that have been reported to form the GABA binding pocket in mammalian receptors, including those forming the conserved 'aromatic box', also appear to play analogous roles in Hco-UNC-49. In addition, the two mutations that produced the most significant reduction in GABA sensitivity were R66S and Y166S. Homology modeling indicates that these two residues share a hydrogen bond and are positioned close to the carboxyl end of the GABA molecule. However, of residues examined in this study, only those on the Hco-UNC-49B subunit and not its subunit partner, Hco-UNC-49C, appear important for GABA sensitivity. Overall, results from this study suggest that the binding site of the UNC-49 heteromeric GABA receptor exhibits some differences compared to classical vertebrate GABA(A) receptors.

New insights into the GABA(A) receptor structure and orthosteric ligand binding: receptor modeling guided by experimental data

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) are ligand gated chloride ion channels that mediate overall inhibitory signaling in the CNS. A detailed understanding of their structure is important to gain insights in, e.g., ligand binding and functional properties of this pharmaceutically important target. Homology modeling is a necessary tool in this regard because experimentally determined structures are lacking. Here we present an exhaustive approach for creating a high quality model of the α(1)β(2)γ(2) subtype of the GABA(A)R ligand binding domain, and we demonstrate its usefulness in understanding details of orthosteric ligand binding. The model was constructed by using multiple templates and by incorporation of knowledge from biochemical/pharmacological experiments. It was validated on the basis of objective energy functions, its ability to account for available residue specific information, and its stability in molecular dynamics (MD) compared with that of the two homologous crystal structures. We then combined the model with extensive structure-activity relationships available from two homologous series of orthosteric GABA(A)R antagonists to create a detailed hypothesis for their binding modes. Excellent agreement with key experimental data was found, including the ability of the model to accommodate and explain a previously developed pharmacophore model. A coupling to agonist binding was thereby established and discussed in relation to activation mechanisms. Our results highlight the importance of critical evaluation and optimization of each step in the homology modeling process. The approach taken here can greatly aid in increasing the understanding of GABA(A)Rs and related receptors where structural insight is limited and reliable models are difficult to obtain.

Insights into the biophysical properties of GABA(A) ion channels: modulation of ion permeation by drugs and protein interactions

The fundamental properties of ion channels assure their selectivity for a particular ion, its rapid permeation through a central pore and that such electrical activity is modulated by factors that control the opening and closing (gating) of the channel. All cell types possess ion channels and their regulated flux of ions across the membrane play critical roles in all steps of life. An ion channel does not act alone to control cell excitability but rather forms part of larger protein complexes. The identification of protein interaction partners of ion channels and their influence on both the fundamental biophysical properties of the channel and its expression in the membrane are revealing the many ways in which electrical activity may be regulated. Highlighted here is the novel use of the patch clamp method to dissect out the influence of protein interactions on the activity of individual GABA(A) receptors. The studies demonstrate that ion conduction is a dynamic property of a channel and that protein interactions in a cytoplasmic domain underlie the channel's ability to alter ion permeation. A structural model describing a reorganisation of the conserved cytoplasmic gondola domain and the influence of drugs on this process are presented.

GABA acts as a ligand chaperone in the early secretory pathway to promote cell surface expression of GABAA receptors

GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in brain. The fast inhibitory effect of GABA is mediated through the GABA(A) receptor, a postsynaptic ligand-gated chloride channel. We propose that GABA can act as a ligand chaperone in the early secretory pathway to facilitate GABA(A) receptor cell surface expression. Forty-two hours of GABA treatment increased the surface expression of recombinant receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells, an effect accompanied by an increase in GABA-gated chloride currents. In time-course experiments, a 1h GABA exposure, followed by a 5h incubation in GABA-free medium, was sufficient to increase receptor surface expression. A shorter GABA exposure could be used in HEK 293 cells stably transfected with the GABA transporter GAT-1. In rGAT-1HEK 293 cells, the GABA effect was blocked by the GAT-1 inhibitor NO-711, indicating that GABA was acting intracellularly. The effect of GABA was prevented by brefeldin A (BFA), an inhibitor of early secretory pathway trafficking. Coexpression of GABA(A) receptors with the GABA synthetic enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) also resulted in an increase in receptor surface levels. GABA treatment failed to promote the surface expression of GABA binding site mutant receptors, which themselves were poorly expressed at the surface. Consistent with an intracellular action of GABA, we show that GABA does not act by stabilizing surface receptors. Furthermore, GABA treatment rescued the surface expression of a receptor construct that was retained within the secretory pathway. Lastly, the lipophilic competitive antagonist (+)bicuculline promoted receptor surface expression, including the rescue of a secretory pathway-retained receptor. Our results indicate that a neurotransmitter can act as a ligand chaperone in the early secretory pathway to regulate the surface expression of its receptor. This effect appears to rely on binding site occupancy, rather than agonist-induced structural changes, since chaperoning is observed with both an agonist and a competitive antagonist.

Locating GABA in GABA receptor binding sites

The Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels contains both vertebrate and invertebrate members that are activated by GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid). Many of the residues that are critical for ligand binding have been identified in vertebrate GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, and specific interactions between GABA and some of these residues have been determined. In the present paper, I show how a cation-pi interaction for one of the binding site residues has allowed the production of models of GABA docked into the binding site, and these orientations are supported by mutagenesis and functional data. Surprisingly, however, the residue that forms the cation-pi interaction is not conserved, suggesting that GABA occupies subtly different locations even in such closely related receptors.

The evolution of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels

Fast, ionotropic neurotransmission mediated by ligand-gated ion channels is essential for timely behavioral responses in multicellular organisms. Metazoa employ more ionotropic neurotransmitters in more types of synapses, inhibitory or excitatory, than is generally appreciated. It is becoming increasingly clear that the adaptability of a single neurotransmitter receptor superfamily, the pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs), makes the diversity in ionotropic neurotransmission possible. Modification ofa common pLGIC structure generates channels that are gated by ligands as different as protons, histamine or zinc and that pair common neurotransmitters with both cation and anion permeability. A phylogeny of the pLGIC gene family from representative metazoa suggests that pLGIC diversity is ancient and evolution of contemporary phyla was characterized by a surprising loss of pLGIC diversity. The pLGIC superfamily reveals aspects of early metazoan evolution, may help us identify novel neurotransmitters and can inform our exploration of structure/function relationships.

Stress and GABA receptors

GABA(A) receptors are sensitive to subtle changes in the environment in both early-life and adulthood. These neurochemical responses to stress in adulthood are sex-dependent. Acute stress induces rapid changes in GABA(A) receptors in experimental animals, with the direction of the changes varying according to the sex of the animals and the stress-paradigm studied. These rapid alterations are of particular interest as they provide an example of fast neurotransmitter system plasticity that may be mediated by stress-induced increases in neurosteroids, perhaps via effects on phosphorylation and/or receptor trafficking. Interestingly, some studies have also provided evidence for long-lasting changes in GABA(A) receptors as a result of exposure to stressors in early-life. The short- and long-term stress sensitivity of the GABAergic system implicates GABA(A) receptors in the non-genetic etiology of psychiatric illnesses such as depression and schizophrenia in which stress may be an important factor.

Docking of 1,4-benzodiazepines in the alpha1/gamma2 GABA(A) receptor modulator site

Positive allosteric modulation of the GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)R) via the benzodiazepine recognition site is the mechanism whereby diverse chemical classes of therapeutic agents act to reduce anxiety, induce and maintain sleep, reduce seizures, and induce conscious sedation. The binding of such therapeutic agents to this allosteric modulatory site increases the affinity of GABA for the agonist recognition site. A major unanswered question, however, relates to how positive allosteric modulators dock in the 1,4-benzodiazepine (BZD) recognition site. In the present study, the X-ray structure of an acetylcholine binding protein from the snail Lymnea stagnalis and the results from site-directed affinity-labeling studies were used as the basis for modeling of the BZD binding pocket at the alpha(1)/gamma(2) subunit interface. A tethered BZD was introduced into the binding pocket, and molecular simulations were carried out to yield a set of candidate orientations of the BZD ligand in the binding pocket. Candidate orientations were refined based on known structure-activity and stereospecificity characteristics of BZDs and the impact of the alpha(1)H101R mutation. Results favor a model in which the BZD molecule is oriented such that the C5-phenyl substituent extends approximately parallel to the plane of the membrane rather than parallel to the ion channel. Application of this computational modeling strategy, which integrates site-directed affinity labeling with structure-activity knowledge to create a molecular model of the docking of active ligands in the binding pocket, may provide a basis for the design of more selective GABA(A)R modulators with enhanced therapeutic potential.

Role of GABAA receptors in the physiology and pharmacology of sleep

Most sedative-hypnotics used in insomnia treatment target the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors. A vast repertoire of GABA(A) receptor subtypes has been identified and displays specific electrophysiological and functional properties. GABA(A)-mediated inhibition traditionally refers to 'phasic' inhibition, arising from synaptic GABA(A) receptors which transiently inhibit neurons. However, there is growing evidence that peri- or extra-synaptic GABA(A) receptors are continuously activated by low GABA concentrations and mediate a 'tonic' conductance. This slower type of signaling appears to play a key role in controlling cell excitability. This review aims at summarizing recent knowledge on GABA transmission, including the emergence of tonic conductance, and highlighting the importance of GABA(A) receptor heterogeneity. The mechanism of action of sedative-hypnotic drugs and their effects on sleep and the electroencephalogram will be reported. Furthermore, studies using genetically engineered mice will be emphasized, providing insights into the role of GABA(A) receptors in mechanisms underlying physiological and pharmacological sleep. Finally, we will address the potential of GABA(A) receptor pharmacology for the treatment of insomnia.

Agonist- and antagonist-induced conformational changes of loop F and their contributions to the rho1 GABA receptor function

Binding of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to its receptor initiates a conformational change to open the channel, but the mechanism of the channel activation is not well understood. To this end, we scanned loop F (K210-F227) in the N-terminal domain of the rho1 GABA receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes using a site-specific fluorescence technique. We detected GABA-induced fluorescence changes at six positions (K210, K211, L216, K217, T218 and I222). At these positions the fluorescence changes were dose dependent and highly correlated to the current dose-response, but with lower Hill coefficients. The competitive antagonist 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acid (3-APMPA) induced fluorescence changes in the same direction at the four middle or lower positions. The non-competitive antagonist picrotoxin blocked nearly 50% of GABA-induced fluorescence changes at T218 and I222, but only <20% at K210 and K217 and 0% at K211 and L216 positions. Interestingly, the picrotoxin-blocked fraction of the GABA-induced fluorescence changes was highly correlated to the Hill coefficient of the GABA-induced dose-dependent fluorescence change. The PTX-insensitive mutant L216C exhibited the lowest Hill coefficient, similar to that in binding. Thus, the PTX-sensitive fraction reflects the conformational change related to channel gating, whereas the PTX-insensitive fraction represents a binding effect. The binding effect is further supported by the picrotoxin resistance of a competitive antagonist-induced fluorescence change. A cysteine accessibility test further confirmed that L216C and K217C partially line the binding pocket, and I222C became more exposed by GABA. Our results are consistent with a mechanism that an outward movement of the lower part of loop F is coupled to the channel activation.

Synthesis of GABAA receptor agonists and evaluation of their alpha-subunit selectivity and orientation in the GABA binding site

Drugs used to treat various disorders target GABA A receptors. To develop alpha subunit selective compounds, we synthesized 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isoxazolol (4-PIOL) derivatives. The 3-isoxazolol moiety was substituted by 1,3,5-oxadiazol-2-one, 1,3,5-oxadiazol-2-thione, and substituted 1,2,4-triazol-3-ol heterocycles with modifications to the basic piperidine substituent as well as substituents without basic nitrogen. Compounds were screened by [(3)H]muscimol binding and in patch-clamp experiments with heterologously expressed GABA A alpha ibeta 3gamma 2 receptors (i = 1-6). The effects of 5-aminomethyl-3 H-[1,3,4]oxadiazol-2-one 5d were comparable to GABA for all alpha subunit isoforms. 5-piperidin-4-yl-3 H-[1,3,4]oxadiazol-2-one 5a and 5-piperidin-4-yl-3 H-[1,3,4]oxadiazol-2-thione 6a were weak agonists at alpha 2-, alpha 3-, and alpha 5-containing receptors. When coapplied with GABA, they were antagonistic in alpha 2-, alpha 4-, and alpha 6-containing receptors and potentiated alpha 3-containing receptors. 6a protected GABA binding site cysteine-substitution mutants alpha 1F64C and alpha 1S68C from reacting with methanethiosulfonate-ethylsulfonate. 6a specifically covalently modified the alpha 1R66C thiol, in the GABA binding site, through its oxadiazolethione sulfur. These results demonstrate the feasibility of synthesizing alpha subtype selective GABA mimetic drugs.

Investigating the putative binding-mode of GABA and diazepam within GABA A receptor using molecular modeling

The three-dimensional structure of the GABA A receptor that included the ligand/agonist binding site was constructed and validated by using molecular modeling technology. Moreover, the putative binding-mode of GABA and diazepam with GABAA receptor were investigated by means of docking studies. Based on an rmsd-tolerance of 1.0 angstroms, the docking of GABA to alpha1/beta2 interface resulted in three multi-member conformational clusters and model 2 was supported by homologous sequence alignment data and experimental evidence. On the other hand, the docking of diazepam to alpha1/gamma2 interface revealed five multi-member conformational clusters in the binding site and model 1 seemed to represent the correct orientation of diazepam in the binding site.

Structural determinants for antagonist pharmacology that distinguish the rho1 GABAC receptor from GABAA receptors

GABA receptor (GABAR) types C (GABACR) and A (GABAAR) are both GABA-gated chloride channels that are distinguished by their distinct competitive antagonist properties. The structural mechanism underlying these distinct properties is not well understood. In this study, using previously identified binding residues as a guide, we made individual or combined mutations of nine binding residues in the rho1 GABACR subunit to their counterparts in the alpha1beta2gamma2 GABAAR or reverse mutations in alpha1 or beta2 subunits. The mutants were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and tested for sensitivities of GABA-induced currents to the GABAA and GABAC receptor antagonists. The results revealed that bicuculline insensitivity of the rho1 GABACR was mainly determined by Tyr106, Phe138 and Phe240 residues. Gabazine insensitivity of the rho1 GABACR was highly dependent on Tyr102, Tyr106, and Phe138. The sensitivity of the rho1 GABACR to 3-aminopropyl-phosphonic acid and its analog 3-aminopropyl-(methyl)phosphinic acid mainly depended on residues Tyr102, Val140, FYS240-242, and Phe138. Thus, the residues Tyr102, Tyr106, Phe138, and Phe240 in the rho1 GABACR are major determinants for its antagonist properties distinct from those in the GABAAR. In addition, Val140 in the GABACR contributes to 3-APA binding. In conclusion, we have identified the key structural elements underlying distinct antagonist properties for the GABACR. The mechanistic insights were further extended and discussed in the context of antagonists docking to the homology models of GABAA or GABAC receptors.

Autoradiographic analysis of GABAA receptors in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice

Anatomical evidence indicates that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic and opioidergic systems are closely linked and act on the same neurons. However, the regulatory mechanisms between GABAergic and opioidergic system have not been well characterized. In the present study, we investigated whether there are changes in GABA(A) receptors in mice lacking mu-opioid receptor gene. The GABA(A) receptor binding was carried out by autoradiography using [(3)H]-muscimol (GABA(A)), [(3)H]-flunitrazepam (FNZ, native type 1 benzodiazepine) and [(35)S]-t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate (TBPS, binding to GABA(A)-gated chloride channels) in brain slices of wild type and mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. The binding of [(3)H]-FNZ in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice was significantly higher than that of the wild type controls in most of the cortex and hippocampal CA1 and CA2 formations. mu-Opioid receptor knockout mice show significantly lower binding of [(35)S]-TBPS than that of the wild type mice in few of the cortical areas including ectorhinal cortex layers I, III, and V, but not in the hippocampus. There was no significant difference in binding of [(3)H]-muscimol between mu-opioid receptor knockout and wild type mice in the cortex and hippocampus. These data indicate that there are specific regional changes in GABA(A) receptor binding sites in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. These data also suggest that there are compensatory up-regulation of benzodiazepine binding site of GABA(A) receptors in the cortex and hippocampus and down-regulation of GABA-gated chloride channel binding site of GABA(A) receptors in the cortex of the mu-opioid receptor knockout mice.

Exploring ligand recognition and ion flow in comparative models of the human GABA type A receptor

We present two comparative models of the GABA(A) receptor. Model 1 is based on the 4-A resolution structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata and represents the unliganded receptor. Two agonists, GABA and muscimol, two benzodiazepines, flunitrazepam and alprazolam, together with the general anaesthetic halothane, have been docked to this model. The ion flow is also explored in model 1 by evaluating the interaction energy of a chloride ion as it traverses the extracellular, transmembrane and intracellular domains of the protein. Model 2 differs from model 1 only in the extracellular domain and represents the liganded receptor. Comparison between the two models not only allows us to explore commonalities and differences with comparative models of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, but also suggests possible protein sub-domain interactions with the GABA(A) receptor not previously addressed.

Mechanisms of neurosteroid interactions with GABA(A) receptors

Neuroactive steroids have some of their most potent actions by augmenting the function of GABA(A) receptors. Endogenous steroid actions on GABA(A) receptors may underlie important effects on mood and behavior. Exogenous neuroactive steroids have potential as anesthetics, anticonvulsants, and neuroprotectants. We have taken multiple approaches to understand more completely the interaction of neuroactive steroids with GABA(A) receptors. We have developed many novel steroid analogues in this effort. Recent work has resulted in synthesis of new enantiomer analogue pairs, novel ligands that probe various properties of the steroid pharmacophore, fluorescent neuroactive steroid analogues, and photoaffinity labels. Using these tools, combined with receptor binding and electrophysiological assays, we have begun to untangle the complexity of steroid actions at this important class of ligand-gated ion channel.

Agonist-, antagonist-, and benzodiazepine-induced structural changes in the alpha1 Met113-Leu132 region of the GABAA receptor

The structural basis by which agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators exert their distinct actions on ligand-gated ion channels is poorly understood. We used the substituted cysteine accessibility method to probe the structure of the GABAA receptor in the presence of ligands that elicit different pharmacological effects. Residues in the alpha1 Met113-Leu132 region of the GABA binding site were individually mutated to cysteine and expressed with wild-type beta2 and gamma2 subunits in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Using electrophysiology, we determined the rates of reaction of N-biotinaminoethyl methaneth-iosulfonate (MTSEA-biotin) with the introduced cysteines in the resting (unliganded) state and compared them with rates determined in the presence of GABA (agonist), 4-[6-imino-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)pyridazin-1-yl]butanoic acid hydrobromide (SR-95531; antagonist), pentobarbital (allosteric modulator), and flurazepam (allosteric modulator). alpha1N115C, alpha1L117C, alpha1T129C, and alpha1R131C are predicted to line the GABA binding pocket because MTSEA-biotin modification of these residues decreased the amount of current elicited by GABA, and the rates/extents of modification were decreased both by GABA and SR-95531. Reaction rates of some substituted cysteines were different depending on the ligand, indicating that barbiturate- and GABA-induced channel gating, antagonist binding, and benzodiazepine modulation induce specific structural rearrangements. Chemical reactivity of alpha1E122C was decreased by either GABA or pentobarbital but was unaltered by SR-95531 binding, whereas alpha1L127C reactivity was decreased by agonist and antagonist binding but not affected by pentobarbital. Furthermore, alpha1E122C, alpha1L127C, and alpha1R131C changed accessibility in response to flurazepam, providing structural evidence that residues in and near the GABA binding site move in response to benzodiazepine modulation.

Molecular modelling of the GABAA ion channel protein

The GABAA ion channel protein is central to the mechanism of action of general anaesthetics and thus to the phenomenon of human consciousness. A molecular model of the alpha1beta2gamma2 gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) ligand-gated ion channel protein has been constructed. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) from Torpedo marmorata and the X-ray crystal structure of the acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) from Lymnaea stagnalis were used as starting templates for comparative modelling. Features of the modelling approach used in the development of this GABAA model include: (1) multiple sequence alignment of members of the Cys-loop superfamily; (2) the design and implementation of a quasi-ab initio loop modelling algorithm; (3) expansion of the transmembrane domain (TMD) ion pore to model the open-state of the GABAA channel; (4) hydrophobicity analysis of the TMD to refine the structure in regions involved in general anaesthetic binding. The final model of the alpha1beta2gamma2 GABAA protein agrees with available experimental data concerning general anaesthetics.

Neurosteroids: endogenous regulators of the GABAA receptor

GABA(A) (gamma-aminobutyric acid type A) receptors mediate most of the 'fast' synaptic inhibition in the mammalian brain and are targeted by many clinically important drugs. Certain naturally occurring pregnane steroids can potently and specifically enhance GABA(A) receptor function in a nongenomic (direct) manner, and consequently have anxiolytic, analgesic, anticonvulsant, sedative, hypnotic and anaesthetic properties. These steroids not only act as remote endocrine messengers, but also can be synthesized in the brain, where they modify neuronal activity locally by modulating GABA(A) receptor function. Such 'neurosteroids' can influence mood and behaviour in various physiological and pathophysiological situations, and might contribute to the behavioural effects of psychoactive drugs.

Conformational changes at benzodiazepine binding sites of GABA(A) receptors detected with a novel technique

Benzodiazepines are widely used for their anxiolytic, sedative, myorelaxant and anticonvulsant properties. They allosterically modulate GABA(A) receptor function by increasing the apparent affinity of the agonist GABA. We studied conformational changes induced by channel agonists at the benzodiazepine binding site. We used the rate of covalent reaction between a benzodiazepine carrying a cysteine reactive moiety with mutated receptor having a cysteine residue in the benzodiazepine binding pocket, alpha1H101Cbeta2gamma2, as a sensor of its conformation. This reaction rate is sensitive to local conformational changes. Covalent reaction locks the receptor in the conformation stabilized by positive allosteric modulators. By using concatenated subunits we demonstrated that the covalent reaction occurs either exclusively at the alpha/gamma subunit interface, or if it occurs in both alpha1 subunits, exclusively reaction at the alpha/gamma subunit interface can modulate the receptor. We found evidence for an increased rate of reaction of activated receptors, whereas reaction rate with the desensitized state is slowed down. The benzodiazepine antagonist Ro15-1788 efficiently inhibited the covalent reaction in the presence of 100 microm GABA but only partially in its absence or in the presence of 10 microm GABA. It is concluded that Ro15-1788 efficiently protects activated and desensitized states, but not the resting state.

Benzodiazepines affect channel opening of GABA A receptors induced by either agonist binding site

Benzodiazepines are widely used as anxiolytics, sedatives, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants. They allosterically modulate GABA type A (GABA(A)) receptors by increasing the apparent affinity of the agonist GABA to elicit chloride currents. Such an increase in apparent affinity of channel gating could either be caused by an increase in affinity for GABA or by a facilitation of channel opening. In the first case, conformation of the affected sites would have to be altered. In the second case, the affected sites are not necessarily altered, because diazepam could facilitate conformational changes leading to the open channel. It is controversial as to whether benzodiazepines affect only channel opening induced by the occupation of one of the two agonist binding sites or by both. We used receptors formed by concatenated subunits to selectively destroy one of the two agonist sites by point mutation. Both of the receptors harboring only one active agonist site could be stimulated by diazepam. We therefore present evidence that binding of diazepam can affect channel opening induced by either agonist binding site.

Mapping the ρ1 GABAC Receptor Agonist Binding Pocket

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. The GABA receptor type C (GABA(C)) is a ligand-gated ion channel with pharmacological properties distinct from the GABA(A) receptor. To date, only three binding domains in the recombinant rho1 GABA(C) receptor have been recognized among six potential regions. In this report, using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we scanned three potential regions previously unexplored in the rho1 GABA(C) receptor, corresponding to the binding loops A, E, and F in the structural model for ligand-gated ion channels. The cysteine accessibility scanning and agonist/antagonist protection tests have resulted in the identification of residues in loops A and E, but not F, involved in forming the GABA(C) receptor agonist binding pocket. Three of these newly identified residues are in a novel region corresponding to the extended stretch of loop E. In addition, the cysteine accessibility pattern suggests that part of loop A and part of loop E have a beta-strand structure, whereas loop F is a random coil. Finally, when all of the identified ligand binding residues are mapped onto a three-dimensional homology model of the amino-terminal domain of the rho1 GABA(C) receptor, they are facing toward the putative binding pocket. Combined with previous findings, a complete model of the GABA(C) receptor binding pocket was proposed and discussed in comparison with the GABA(A) receptor binding pocket.

Fishing for allosteric sites on GABAA receptors

GABA(A) receptors have structural and functional homology with a super-family of cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel receptors including the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Amino acid residues involved in ligand-binding pockets are homologous among super-family members, leading to the multiple-loop model of binding sites situated at subunit interfaces, validated by structural studies on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and water-soluble snail acetylcholine binding protein. This article will briefly review the literature on the agonist binding sites on the receptor super-family, and then describe the current situation for attempts to identify sites for allosteric modulators on the GABA(A) receptors. A combination of mutagenesis and photoaffinity labeling with anesthetic ligands has given some leads in this endeavor. Current work by others and ourselves focuses on three putative sites for modulators: (1) within the ion channel domain TM2, near the extracellular end; (2) the agonist binding sites and homologous pockets at other subunit interfaces of the pentameric receptor; and (3) on the linker region stretching from the agonist site loop C to the top of the TM1 region. It is likely that concrete structural information will be forthcoming soon.

Four amino acids in the alpha subunits determine the gamma-aminobutyric acid sensitivities of GABAA receptor subtypes

GABA(A) receptors, mediators of fast inhibitory neurotransmission, are heteropentameric assemblies from a large array of subunits. Differences in the sensitivity of receptor subtypes to endogenous GABA may permit subunit-dependent finely tuned responsiveness to the same GABAergic inputs. Using both radioligand binding and electrophysiology combined with mutagenesis, we identified a domain of four amino acids within the alpha subunits that mediates the distinct sensitivities to GABA allowing their selective switch between alphabeta3gamma2 combinations. Replacing this domain in alpha3 by the corresponding segments of alpha1-alpha5 resulted in mutant receptors displaying the GABA EC(50) values of the respective wild-type receptors. Vice versa, the alpha3 motif forced the low sensitivity to GABA of alpha3 upon alpha1beta3gamma2, alpha4beta3gamma2, and alpha5beta3gamma2. Binding of the GABA agonist [(3)H]muscimol was not affected by the exchange of the motif between alpha1 and alpha3 subunits. Thus, the equilibrium binding pocket is maintained upon replacement of the four amino acids. Taken together our data suggest that the identified motifs contribute to a structure involved in the transduction of the binding signal rather than to the binding itself.