The insulin and cAMP response elements of the prolactin gene are overlapping sequences

Insulin-increased prolactin gene expression requires actin treadmilling: potential role for p21 activated kinase

Insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription in GH4 cells was enhanced by binding on fibronectin. This was mediated by receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha, which activated Src, Rho, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. It suggested that insulin signaling to gene transcription was partly dependent on actin rearrangement. This was confirmed through studies using inhibitors of actin treadmilling. Cytochalasin D, jasplakinolide, latrunculin B, and swinholide A altered the actin cytoskeleton of GH4 cells, as assessed by Alexa Fluor phalloidin staining, and inhibited insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription. These reagents did not affect the controls. Nor was it due to a gross defect of insulin signaling because activation/translocation of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and mammalian target of rapamycin were not affected. Expression of wild-type and mutant actin treadmilling agents, Cdc42, TC10, neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, and Nck, indicated that they were essential to insulin-increased prolactin gene expression, and suggested that activation of p21 associated kinase (PAK) might also be essential to this process. PAK expression also increased and PAK mutants decreased prolactin promoter activity in insulin-treated cells. The activation of PAK in the presence of inhibitors was also consistent with a role in activation of insulin-increased prolactin gene expression. Finally, small interfering RNA-mediated reduction of PAK decreased the effect of insulin on prolactin gene expression. Thus, it is likely that insulin activation of actin treadmilling through Cdc42/TC10 and neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein activates PAK and prolactin gene transcription.

Integrin activates receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha, Src, and Rho to increase prolactin gene expression through a final phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/cytoskeletal pathway that is additive with insulin

We previously showed that receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP)-alpha inhibited insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription. Others suggested that RPTPalpha was a key intermediary between integrins and activation of Src. We present evidence that inhibition of insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription was secondary to RPTPalpha activation of Src, reflecting its role as mediator of integrin responses. Src kinase activity was increased in GH4 cells transiently or stably expressing RPTPalpha and cells plated on the integrin-alpha5beta1 ligand fibronectin. C-terminal Src kinase inactivated Src and blocked RPTPalpha inhibition of insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription. Expression of dominant-negative Src also prevented the RPTPalpha-mediated inhibition of insulin-increased prolactin gene expression. Low levels of a constitutively active Src mutant (SrcY/F) stimulated whereas higher expression levels of Src Y/F inhibited prolactin gene expression. Src-increased prolactin gene transcription was inhibited by expression of a blocking Rho-mutant (RhoN19), suggesting that Src acted through or required active Rho. Experiments with an activated Rho-mutant (RhoL63) demonstrated a biphasic activation/repression of prolactin gene transcription that was similar to the effect of Src. The effects of both Src and Rho were phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase dependent. Expression of SrcY/F or RhoL63 altered the actin cytoskeleton and morphology of GH4 cells. Taken together, these data suggest a physiological pathway from the cell matrix to increased prolactin gene transcription mediated by RPTPalpha/Src/Rho/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and cytoskeletal change that is additive with effects of insulin. Over activation of this pathway, however, caused extreme alteration of the cytoskeleton that blocked activation of the prolactin gene.

Oxidative stress activates the plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) promoter through an AP-1 response element and cooperates with insulin for additive effects on PAI-1 transcription

Oxidative stress is one of the characteristics of diabetes and is thought to be responsible for many of the pathophysiological changes caused by the disease. We previously identified an insulin response element in the promoter of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) that was activated by an unidentified member of the forkhead/winged helix (Fox) family of transcription factors. This element mediated a 5-7-fold increase in PAI-1 transcription because of insulin. Here we report that oxidative stress also caused a 3-fold increase in PAI-1 transcription and that the effect was additive with that of insulin. Antioxidants prevent this response. Mutational analysis of the PAI-1 promoter revealed that oxidative stress acted at an AP-1 site at -60/52 of the promoter. Gel mobility shift analysis demonstrated that binding to an AP-1 oligonucleotide was increased 4-fold by oxidative stress. Jun levels were increased by oxidants as assessed by reverse transcriptase-PCR. Western blotting demonstrated that a rapid and prolonged nuclear accumulation of phospho-c-Jun followed oxidant stimulation. The nuclear c-Jun phosphorylation was not observed in cells treated with reduced glutathione. Finally, JNK/SAPK activity was found to increase in response to oxidants, and inhibition of JNK/SAP blocked TBHQ-increased PAI-1-luciferase expression. Thus, oxidative stress stimulated AP-1 and activated the PAI-1 promoter.

A Forkhead/winged helix-related transcription factor mediates insulin-increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene transcription

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is an important regulator of fibrinolysis by its inhibition of both tissue-type and urokinase plasminogen activators. PAI-1 levels are elevated in type II diabetes and this elevation correlates with macro- and microvascular complications of diabetes. Insulin increases PAI-1 production in several experimental systems, but the mechanism of insulin-activated PAI-1 transcription remains to be determined. Deletion analysis of the PAI-1 promoter revealed that the insulin response element is between -117 and -7. Mutation of the AT-rich site at -52/-45 abolished the insulin responsiveness of the PAI-1 promoter. This sequence is similar to the inhibitory sequence found in the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylkinase/insulin-like growth factor-I-binding protein I promoters. Gel-mobility shift assays demonstrated that the forkhead bound to the PAI-1 promoter insulin response element. Expression of the DNA-binding domain of FKHR acted as a dominant negative to block insulin-increased PAI-1-CAT expression. A LexA-FKHR construct was also insulin responsive. These data suggested that a member of the Forkhead/winged helix family of transcription factors mediated the effect of insulin on PAI-1 transcription. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase reduced the effect of insulin on PAI-1 gene expression, a result consistent with activation through FKHR. However, it was likely that a different member of the FKHR family (not FKHR) mediated this effect since FKHR was present in both insulin-responsive and non-responsive cell lines.

Elk-1, C/EBPalpha, and Pit-1 confer an insulin-responsive phenotype on prolactin promoter expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells and define the factors required for insulin-increased transcription

The transcription factor(s) that mediate insulin-increased gene transcription are not well defined. These studies use phenotypic conversion of Rat2 and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with transcription factors to identify components required for regulation of prolactin promoter activity and its control by insulin. The pituitary-derived GH4 cells contain all of the transcription factors required for insulin-increased prolactin-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression while HeLa cells require only Pit-1, a pituitary-specific factor. However, Rat2 and CHO cells require additional factors. We had determined previously that the transcription factor that mediates insulin-increased prolactin gene expression was likely an Ets-related protein. Elk-1 and Sap-1 were the only Ets-related transcription factors tested as chimeras with LexA DNA-binding domain that were able to mediate insulin-increased expression of a LexA-CAT reporter plasmid. Elk-1 and Sap-1 are expressed in GH4 and HeLa cells but Rat2 and CHO cells express Sap-1, but not Elk-1. Expression of Elk-1 made Rat2 cells (but not CHO cells) insulin responsive. C/EBPalpha also binds to the prolactin promoter at a sequence overlapping the binding site for Elk-1. Expression of both C/EBPalpha and Pit-1 in CHO cells is required for high basal transcription of prolactin-CAT. Expression of Elk-1 converts CHO cells into a phenotype in which prolactin gene expression is increased by insulin treatment. Finally, antisense mediated reduction of Elk-1 in GH4 cells decreased insulin-increased prolactin gene expression and confirmed the requirement for Elk-1 for insulin-increased prolactin gene expression. Thus, both C/EBPalpha and Pit-1 were required for high basal transcription while insulin sensitivity required Elk-1.

Physiological concentrations of insulin promote binding of nuclear proteins to the insulin-like growth factor I gene

Limitations in understanding the mechanism of transcriptional regulation by insulin are due in part to lack of models in which there is insulin-responsive binding of nuclear factors to critical promoter regions. The insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) gene responds to diabetes status via a footprinted sequence, region V, which contains an AT-rich element and a GC-rich site. We tested the hypothesis that insulin regulates nuclear factor binding to the AT-rich site. Gel shift analysis with liver nuclear extracts and a region V probe showed binding of Sp1, Sp3, and B(1), which persisted despite the presence of antibodies against Sp1 and Sp3. B(1) was detected by a probe mutated in the GC-rich site (VmSp1), but not by a probe mutated at the AT-rich site (VmAT). We then asked whether B(1) was responsive to insulin. For both region V and VmSp1 probes, nuclear extracts from normal rat hepatocytes, H4IIE cells, and CHO-IR cells exposed to 10(-6) M insulin exhibited an increase in binding, designated insulin-responsive binding protein (IRBP); IRBP comigrated with B(1) from liver extracts. IRBP binding to region V was competed by VmSp1, but not by VmAT, indicating specific interactions with the AT-rich sequence; insulin response elements from other genes also failed to compete. After addition of insulin, IRBP began to increase by 1 h and rose further at 24 h, suggesting involvement of both posttranslational and transcriptional mechanisms. IRBP responded to as little as 10(-10) M insulin, indicating physiological relevance. Induction of IRBP was blunted by the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase inhibitor LY294002, whereas other signal transduction inhibitors had little effect. IRBP interacts with an important sequence in the IGF-I gene and may participate in the metabolic regulation of IGF-I expression. As most insulin-responsive genes do not exhibit insulin-responsive nuclear factor binding, further studies of IRBP may also contribute to understanding of the mechanism of insulin action on gene transcription.

Differentiation of lactotrope precursor GHFT cells in response to fibroblast growth factor-2

The mechanisms that control the emergence of different anterior pituitary cells from a common stem cell population are largely unknown. The immortalized GHFT cells derived from targeted expression of SV40 T antigen to mouse pituitary display characteristics of somatolactotropic progenitors in that they express the transcription factor GHF-1 (Pit-1) but not growth hormone (GH) or prolactin (PRL). We searched for factors capable of inducing lactotropic differentiation of GHFT cells. PRL gene expression was not observed in cells subjected to a variety of stimuli, which induce PRL gene expression in mature lactotropes. Only fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) was able to initiate the transcription, synthesis, and release of PRL in GHFT cells. However, induction of PRL expression was incomplete in FGF-2-treated cells, suggesting that additional factors are necessary to attain high levels of PRL transcription in fully differentiated lactotropes. We also show that the FGF-2 response element is located in the proximal PRL promoter. Stimulation of PRL expression by FGF-2 requires endogenous Ets factors and these factors as well as GHF-1 are expressed at low levels in the committed precursor, suggesting that these low levels are limiting for full PRL expression. Moreover, FGF-2 effect on lactotrope differentiation is mediated, at least partially, by stimulation of the Ras-signaling pathway. Our results suggest that, indeed, GHFT cells represent a valid model for studying lactotropic differentiation and that FGF-2 could play a key role both in initiating lactotrope differentiation and maintaining PRL expression.

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha is a physiological regulator of prolactin gene expression

The sequence -101/-92 of the PRL promoter has been shown to be essential for both basal and hormone-increased PRL gene transcription. It is important to identify transcription factors that bind to this sequence if we are to understand the regulation of the PRL gene. Nuclear proteins, metabolically labeled with 35S were used in gel mobility shift experiments to examine which protein(s) binds to this region of the PRL promoter. An abundant 43-kDa protein binds to the PRL promoter at -106/-87. Two 43-kDa transcription factors were identified in cytosolic extracts of GH4 cells, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBP alpha) and cAMP response element-binding protein. Both of these bind to the PRL promoter, and both were present in GH4 cell nuclear extract, but only C/EBP alpha was definitively identified in complexes with PRL promoter DNA. Expression of C/EBP alpha increased basal PRL gene expression almost 6-fold, whereas expression of Chop10 that can act as an inhibitor of C/EBP alpha reduced the basal activity of the PRL promoter 60-75%. Mutational analysis demonstrated that the ability of C/EBP alpha to increase basal expression of the PRL promoter was dependent on the sequence -101/-92. These data suggest that C/EBP alpha is an important transcription factor that regulates PRL gene expression.

Synergistic activation of the prolactin promoter by vitamin D receptor and GHF-1: role of the coactivators, CREB-binding protein and steroid hormone receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1)

PRL gene expression is dependent on the presence of the pituitary-specific transcription factor GHF-1/Pit-1, which is transcribed in a highly restricted manner in cells of the anterior pituitary. In pituitary GH3 cells, vitamin D increases the levels of PRL transcripts and stimulates the PRL promoter. We have analyzed the role of GHF-1 and of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) to confer vitamin D responsiveness to the PRL promoter. For this purpose we have used nonpituitary HeLa cells, which do not express GHF-1. We found that VDR activates the PRL promoter both in a ligand-dependent and -independent manner through a sequence located between positions -45/-27 in the proximal 5'-flanking region. This sequence also confers VDR and vitamin D responsiveness to a heterologous promoter. In the context of the PRL gene, VDR requires the presence of GHF-1 to activate the promoter. Truncation of the last 12 C-terminal amino acids of VDR, which contain the ligand-dependent activation function (AF2), abolishes regulation by vitamin D, suggesting that binding of coactivators to this region mediates ligand-dependent stimulation of the PRL promoter by the receptor. Indeed, expression of the coactivators, steroid hormone receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and CREB-binding protein (CBP), significantly enhances the stimulatory effect of vitamin D mediated by the wild-type VDR but not by the AF2 mutant receptor. Furthermore, CBP also increases the activation of the PRL promoter by GHF-1 and the ligand-independent activation by both wild-type and mutant VDR.

The EGF response element in the prolactin promoter

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) increases prolactin gene expression in GH4 cells, but the promoter element(s) required for this response has not been clearly defined. We identified a bipartite element - 96/ - 87, - 76/ - 67 in the rat proximal promoter that is essential for EGF signaling using deletion and linker-scanning mutants of the prolactin promoter. This element was active in either normal or inverted orientation when transferred to a heterologous promoter (mammary-tumor virus). We had previously identified this element as the cAMP/insulin response element of the prolactin promoter. However, the effects of EGF are additive with the responses to insulin or cAMP implying that EGF activated prolactin gene transcription by a mechanism different from insulin or cAMP. The EGF response element of the prolactin promoter is a recognition sequence for the Ets-related family of transcription factors and Ets-related factors have been shown to bind this element. Expression of the DNA-binding domain of c-Ets-1, which acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of Ets-related transcription factors, reduces EGF-increased prolactin-CAT expression 65% in GH4 cells. Thus, both EGF and insulin may signal through Ets-related transcription factors to activate prolactin gene transcription at the same response element in the prolactin proximal promoter.

Activation of the prolactin gene by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha appears to be DNA binding-independent

Although the effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been studied primarily in adipocytes and liver, the wide distribution of these receptors suggests that they might also play a role in other cell types. We present evidence that PPAR activators stimulate the expression of the prolactin gene in pituitary GH4C1 cells. Transfection assays in non-pituitary HeLa cells showed that stimulation of the prolactin promoter by PPARalpha requires the presence of the transcription factor GHF-1 (or Pit-1). Proximal promoter sequences confer responsiveness to PPARalpha, and activation by this receptor is lost concomitantly with the response to GHF-1. Surprisingly, expression of the retinoid X receptor (RXR) abolishes stimulation by PPARalpha. Furthermore, the promoter region that confers PPARalpha responsiveness does not contain a PPAR response element. This suggests that the transcriptional effect of PPARalpha might be mediated by protein-protein interactions rather than by binding of PPAR/RXR to the promoter. A direct interaction between PPARalpha and GHF-1 was confirmed by in vitro binding studies. Expression of the coactivators SRC-1 and CREB-binding protein, which bind to PPAR, also enhanced the responsiveness of the prolactin promoter to PPARalpha. Furthermore, CREB-binding protein also significantly increased activation by GHF-1, and both proteins associated in vitro. Thus, PPARalpha, a receptor that normally acts as a ligand-dependent transcription factor by binding to specific DNA sequences in one context, can also stimulate the prolactin promoter by association with GHF-1 and coactivator proteins.

Molecular regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I and its principal binding protein, IGFBP-3

The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have diverse anabolic cellular functions, and structure similar to that of proinsulin. The distribution of IGFs and their receptors in a wide variety of organs and tissues enables the IGFs to exert endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine effects on cell proliferation and differentiation, caloric storage, and skeletal elongation. IGF-I exhibits particular metabolic responsiveness, and circulating IGF-I originates predominantly in the liver. Hepatic IGF-I production is controlled at the level of gene transcription, and transcripts are initiated largely in exon 1. Hepatic IGF-I gene transcription is reduced in conditions of protein malnutrition and diabetes mellitus, and our laboratory has used in vitro transcription to study mechanisms related to diabetes. We find that the presence of sequences downstream from the major transcription initiation sites in exon 1 is necessary for the diabetes-induced decrease in IGF-I transcription. Six nuclear factor binding sites have been identified within the exon 1 downstream region, and footprint sites III and V appear to be necessary for metabolic regulation; region V probes exhibit a decrease in nuclear factor binding with hepatic nuclear extracts from diabetic animals. IGFs in biological fluids are associated with IGF binding proteins, and IGFs circulate as a 150-kDa complex that consists of an IGF, an IGFBP-3, and an acid-labile subunit. Circulating IGFBP-3 originates mainly in hepatic nonparenchymal cells, where IGF-I increases IGFBP-3 mRNA stability, but insulin increases IGFBP-3 gene transcription. Regulation of IGFBP-3 gene transcription by insulin appears to be mediated by an insulin-responsive element, which recognizes insulin-responsive nuclear factors in both gel mobility shift assays and southwestern blots. Studies of mechanisms underlying the modulation of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 gene transcription, and identification of critical nuclear proteins involved, should lead to new understanding of the role and regulation of these important growth factors in diabetes mellitus and other metabolic disorders.

Receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha specifically inhibits insulin-increased prolactin gene expression

A physiologically relevant response to insulin, stimulation of prolactin promoter activity in GH4 pituitary cells, was used as an assay to study the specificity of protein-tyrosine phosphatase function. Receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha (RPTPalpha) blocks the effect of insulin to increase prolactin gene expression but potentiates the effects of epidermal growth factor and cAMP on prolactin promoter activity. RPTPalpha was the only protein-tyrosine phosphatase tested that did this. Thus, the effect of RPTPalpha on prolactin-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) promoter activity is specific by two criteria. A number of potential RPTPalpha targets were ruled out by finding (a) that they are not affected or (b) that they are not on the pathway to insulin-increased prolactin-CAT activity. The negative effect of RPTPalpha on insulin activation of the prolactin promoter is not due to reduced phosphorylation or kinase activity of the insulin receptor or to reduced phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 or Shc. Inhibitor studies suggest that insulin-increased prolactin gene expression is mediated by a Ras-like GTPase but is not mitogen-activated protein kinase dependent. Experiments with inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase suggest that insulin-increased prolactin-CAT expression is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent. These results suggest that RPTPalpha may be a physiological regulator of insulin action.

Differential regulation of pituitary-specific gene expression by insulin-like growth factor 1 in rat pituitary GH4C1 and GH3 cells

We have compared the influence of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) on pituitary gene expression in the rat cell lines GH4C1 and GH3. Incubation with IGF-1 increased PRL messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in GH4C1 cells by 4- to 5-fold but decreased the levels of PRL transcripts in GH3 cells. In addition, the levels of GH-mRNA that were not affected by IGF-1 in GH4C1 cells were significantly inhibited by the growth factor in GH3 cells. IGF-1 also decreased PRL and GH-mRNA response to T3, retinoic acid, and Fk in GH3 cells. Stability of PRL or GH transcripts was not altered by IGF-1 in GH3 cells, suggesting that the inhibitory effect is exerted at a transcriptional level. The pituitary-specific transcription factor GHF-1/Pit-1 activates both the GH and PRL promoters. As analyzed by Western blot, IGF-1 did not alter GHF-1/Pit-1 protein levels in GH4C1 cells but reduced the levels of the transcription factor in GH3 cells. This decrease is secondary to a reduction of GHF-1/Pit-1 transcripts in IGF-1-treated GH3 cells. Thus, a different effect of IGF-1 on the expression of GHF-1/Pit-1 in GH3 and GH4C1 cells is likely involved in the different regulation of GH and PRL gene in both cell types. IGF-1 increases the activity of the PRL promoter in transient transfection assays in GH4C1 cells by a Ras-dependent mechanism. Expression of oncogenic Ras(Val12) mimics the effect of IGF-1, and the dominant negative Ras(Asn17) blocks IGF-1-mediated stimulation of the PRL promoter in GH4C1 cells. Although IGF-1 did not stimulate the PRL promoter in GH3 cells, Ras(Val12) strongly activated the promoter in these cells. Hence, the machinery to activate Ras-dependent signaling is intact in GH3 cells. Moreover, IGF-1 stimulates the mitogen-activated protein kinase in GH3 cells, showing that the components linking the IGF-1 receptor to Ras are also active. These results suggest that, in addition to the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, IGF-1 could activate a different pathway and that the combination of both is required to elicit PRL gene expression by the growth factor. This second pathway may be defective in GH3 cells that respond to Ras but not to IGF-1.

Identification of an insulin-responsive element in the rat insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 gene

The hepatic expression and serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are decreased in insulin-dependent and insulin-resistant diabetes. Insulin increases hepatic IGFBP-3 expression by enhancing gene transcription. This report identifies sequences within the IGFBP-3 promoter that are necessary and sufficient for the response to insulin in hepatic nonparenchymal cells. By transient transfection, we mapped the insulin response element to the -1150 to -1124 base pair (bp) region of the rat IGFBP-3 promoter. Three tandem repeats of the -1150 to -1117 bp region conferred insulin responses in a heterologous promoter. Gel shift analyses revealed a 3-fold increase in DNA-protein complex formation with nuclear extracts obtained from insulin-stimulated nonparenchymal cells compared with cells incubated without insulin and revealed 3-4-fold decrease in complex formation with nuclear extracts obtained from the livers of streptozotocin-diabetic rats compared with control rats. Mutational analysis of this 34-bp region showed a core sequence of 10 bp (-1148 to -1139) that is critical for interaction with insulin-induced trans-acting factors. Southwestern blotting revealed a approximately 90-kDa protein that was increased 2-3-fold by the addition of insulin. Thus, we have identified cis-acting DNA sequences that are responsible for regulation of IGFBP-3 transcription by insulin and essential for binding of insulin-responsive nuclear factors.

GHF-1/Pit-1 functions as a cell-specific integrator of Ras signaling by targeting the Ras pathway to a composite Ets-1/GHF-1 response element

Activation of the rat prolactin (rPRL) promoter by Ras is a prototypical example of tissue-specific transcriptional regulation in a highly differentiated cell type. Using a series of site-specific mutations and deletions of the proximal rPRL promoter we have mapped the major Ras/Raf response element (RRE) to a composite Ets-1/GHF-1 binding site located between positions -217 and -190. Mutation of either the Ets-1 or GHF-1 binding sites inhibits Ras and Raf activation of the rPRL promoter, and insertion of this RRE into the rat growth hormone promoter confers Ras responsiveness. We show that Ets-1 is expressed in GH4 cells and, consistent with their functional synergistic interaction, both Ets-1 and GHF-1 are able to bind specifically to this bipartite RRE. We confirm that Ets-1 or a related Ets factor is the nuclear target of the Ras pathway leading to activation of the rPRL promoter and demonstrate that Elk-1 and Net do not mediate the Ras response. Thus, the pituitary-specific POU homeodomain transcription factor, GHF-1, serves as a cell-specific signal integrator by functionally interacting with an Ets-1-like factor, at uniquely juxtaposed binding sites, thereby targeting an otherwise ubiquitous Ras signaling pathway to a select subset of cell-specific GHF-1-dependent genes.

A TGACG motif mediates growth-hormone factor-1/pituitary-transcriptional-activator-1-dependent cAMP regulation of the rainbow trout growth-hormone promoter

The mechanisms involved in the regulation of the rainbow trout growth hormone (tGH) gene promoter by the pituitary-specific transcription factor GHF1 (growth hormone factor 1), also called Pit1 (pituitary transcriptional activator 1), and cAMP have been investigated in mammalian and fish cells. The -340 to +24 5'-flanking Fegion of the tGH gene focused to the luciferase gene was activated in rat pituitary GC cells and in HeLa cells cotransfected with an effector plasmid encoding rat GHFI. GC cell nuclear extracts produced four GHFI-specific footprints (sites Fl to F4) on the tGH promoter, each containing multiple W4NCAT (W, A or T) or closely related motifs. Mutational analysis performed in GC cells indicated that the proximal Fl site alone can direct transcription, but that the region encompassing the F2 and F3 sites is necessary for optimal activation and contains a TGACG motif (cAMP-response element, CRE) conferring cAMP responsiveness. The role of the TGACG motif in mediating cAMP regulation of the tGH promoter was confirmed in primary cultures of trout pituitary cells. Cotransfection studies in carp EPC cells using an effector plasmid encoding trout GHF1 demonstrated the GHF1 dependence of cAMP stimulation. Gel shift and southwestern experiments revealed nuclear proteins of 43 kDa and 30 kDa in GC and fish cells, respectively, that bind specifically to the tGH CRE, suggesting the involvement of CRE-binding-protein/activating-transcription-factor-l-related peptides in cAMP response. Incidentally, and in contrast with previous reports, we found the rat GH promoter, that lacks TGACG motifs, unresponsive to cAMP. Thus, the CAMP stimulation of the tGH gene is more similar to its human counterpart. that is also GHF1 dependent and mediated by TGACG motifs in the promoter. It is suggested that control of GH gene expression has evolved modularly, through various assortments of the same regulatory units, rather than molecularly, through innovative units.

GABP mediates insulin-increased prolactin gene transcription

The insulin-response element from the prolactin gene is identical to the Ets-binding site, and dominant-negative Ets protein inhibits insulin-increased prolactin gene expression. Immunoblotting identified the Ets-related transcription factor GABP in nuclear extracts from GH cells. Expression of GABP alpha and GABP beta 1 squelches insulin-increased prolactin gene expression. GABP alpha and GABP beta 1 bind the insulin-response element of the prolactin promoter, and anti-GABP alpha and anti-GABP beta 1 antibodies supershift a species seen with nuclear extracts from GH cells. GABP alpha immunoprecipitated from insulin-treated, 32P-labeled GH cells was phosphorylated 3-fold more than GABP alpha from control cells. There was no increase in phosphorylation of GABP beta in response to insulin. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activity is increased 10-fold in insulin-treated GH4 cells. MAP kinase immunoprecipitated from control cells does not phosphorylate GABP alpha while MAP kinase immunoprecipitated from insulin-treated cells shows substantial phosphorylation of GABP alpha. These studies suggest that GABP mediates insulin-increased transcription of the prolactin gene. GABP may be regulated by MAP kinase phosphorylation.

A consensus insulin response element is activated by an Ets-related transcription factor

Insulin increases expression of somatostatin-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) constructs 10-fold and thymidine kinase-CAT constructs 5-fold in GH4 cells. These responses are similar to our previously reported data on insulin-increased prolactin-CAT expression. They are also observed in HeLa cells and are thus not cell type specific. The evidence suggests that the insulin responsiveness of these genes is mediated by an Ets-related transcription factor. First, linker-scanning mutations and/or deletions of the prolactin, somatostatin, and thymidine kinase promoters suggest that their insulin responsiveness is mediated by the sequence CGGA. This sequence is identical with the response element of the Ets-related transcription factors. Second, CGGA-containing sequences placed at -88 in the delta MTV-CAT reporter plasmid conferred insulin responsiveness to the mammary tumor virus promoter. Third, expression of the DNA-binding domain of c-Ets-2, which acts by blocking effects mediated by Ets-related transcription factors, inhibits the response of these promoters to insulin. Finally, the Ets-related proteins Sap and Elk-1 bind to the prolactin, somatostatin, and thymidine kinase insulin-response elements. An Ets-like element was found in all insulin-sensitive promoters examined and may serve a similar function in those promoters.