Clinical impact of posttransplant diabetes mellitus

An observational prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of new onset diabetes after renal transplantation (NODAT) in a tertiary care centre in eastern India

AIM

To analyse post-transplant outcomes of NODAT patients in comparison to the regular cohort (non-NODAT).

OBJECTIVES

To compare graft survival and rejection rate, patient survival rate, incidence of hospitalization (due to any cause) in between NODAT and non-NODAT groups in cases of renal transplantation.

METHODS

A single-centred prospective real-world observational study of 100 subjects who underwent renal transplantation over a period of two years. All NODAT cases evaluated for graft survival/rejection, incidence of hospitalisation/infection, mortality from all causes and compared with that of non-NODAT post-transplant recipients. Nominal categorical data between the groups are compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. p value < 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

Mean number of hospital admissions of subjects was 1.38 ± 1.38 and 0.29 ± 0.56 in NODAT and Non-NODAT respectively, p < 0.0001. Nineteen out of 24 NODAT subjects and 72 out of 76 Non-NODAT subjects had graft survival, p = 0.0342. Twenty out of 24 NODAT and 74 out of 76 Non-NODAT subjects had survived, p = 0.0282.

CONCLUSIONS

NODAT leads to adverse outcomes viz. increased rate of hospitalization, reduced rates of allograft survival and patient survival.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation: assessment of risk factors and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complicatin of kidney transplantation (KT) with adverse impacts on graft and patient survivals. This study aims assess potential risk factors for development of NODAT and compare clinical outcomes of KT recipients with versus without NODAT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 648 patients who underwent KT between 2005 and 2009. From the 83 (12.8%) subjects who developed NODAT, we selected 47 for comparison with controls free of diabetes.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of NODAT was made at 4.3 ± 8.5 months after transplantation in 47 patients, including 76.6% males, with an overall mean age of 54.5 ± 10.8 years. Patients with NODAT presented higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels (P < .001) as well as cyclosporine and tacrolimus trough levels (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose and higher tacrolimus, but not cyclosporine concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. No differences were found for other potential risk factors. Upon follow-up at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), 24 hour proteinuria and proportions of patients with hypertension were similar between groups. Patients with NODAT showed comparable numbers of hospitalizations and infections, as well as acute rejection episodes and acute cardiovascular events as their counterparts. Event-free survival (loss of graft function/death with functioning graft) was similar between the groups (P = .418; K-M).

DISCUSSION

In our population, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels and higher tacrolimus concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. During a mean follow-up of 3 years, NODAT was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Continuous glucose monitoring after kidney transplantation in non-diabetic patients: early hyperglycaemia is frequent and may herald post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and graft failure

OBJECTIVES

New onset of diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a known complication of renal transplantation, but early glycaemic status after transplantation has not been described prospectively. This study aimed to assess blood glucose (BG) levels immediately following kidney transplantation in non-diabetic subjects and to explore their relationship to later graft outcomes and NODAT occurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 9-month period, 43 consecutive non-diabetic patients who received a kidney transplant were prospectively investigated. During the first 4 days after transplantation, fasting BG was measured and the 24-h BG profile assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Capillary BG was measured on hospital admittance and at least four times a day for CGM calibration thereafter. All adverse events were recorded, and fasting BG and HbA1c were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months and at the last visit to our centre.

RESULTS

Immediately following renal transplantation, capillary BG was 12.2 ± 3.8 mmol/L. On day 1 (D1), fasting BG was 9.9 ± 4.3 mmol/L and decreased to 6.0 ± 1.5 mmol/L on D3. The CGM-reported mean 24-h BG (mmol/L) was 10.2±2.4 on D1, 7.7 ± 1.3 on D2 and 7.5 ± 1.1 on D3. From D1 to D4, 43% of patients spent>12h/day with BG levels>7.7 mmol/L. While morbidity during the 3 months following transplantation appeared unrelated to BG, the first post-transplantation capillary BG measurement and fasting BG on D1 tended to be higher in patients who developed diabetes 3 months later. Tacrolimus treatment was associated with a higher incidence of dysglycaemia at 3 and 6 months. After a mean follow-up of 72 months, NODAT was frequently seen (18.6%), and was associated with tacrolimus medication (P<0.01) and a higher rate of renal transplantation failure (RR: 3.6, P<0.02).

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycaemia appears to be a nearly constant characteristic immediately following transplantation in non-diabetic kidney recipients. Higher BG values could identify patients at risk for later post-transplant diabetes and graft failure.

New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, risk factors, impact on outcomes, and novel implications

OBJECTIVE

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a multifactorial, complex metabolic disorder associated with impaired long-term graft function, reduced recipient survival, and increased risks of cardiovascular disease and infectious complications. The impact of NODAT is generally underestimated partly due to the inconsistent criteria that have been previously used for its diagnosis and to the generally short observation periods. The aim of this article was to review the recent literature on NODAT and to highlight the novel implications.

FINDINGS

The 2010 American Diabetes Association guidelines provide useful, simplified criteria to unify the diagnosis including application of hemoglobin A1C levels. We sought to establish the impact of various modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. A vast number of papers have examined the effects of immunosuppressive medications on the development of NODAT: Neither calcineurin inhibitor nor sirolimus (SRL) or steroids seems to be innocent of contributing to it. Immunosuppressants account for 74% of the occurrence of NODAT. Among modifiable risk factors, obesity is independent and significant, with great prevalence in the population. In additional to lifestyle modifications, the role of bariatric surgery (BS) either before or after transplantation is highlighted herein as a strategy to reduce disease in the view of the results among overweight, nontransplanted patients.

SUMMARY

Because of the strong association between high glucose values in the early posttransplant period and the development of NODAT, the condition must be recognized early after (or even before) transplantation by intensive screening. Patients at risk for NODAT must modify appropriate risk factors and particularly undergo pretransplant planning and/or posttransplant adjustment individualizing immunosuppressive therapy to mitigate the risk of this serious complication.

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of mortality following liver transplantation independent of MELD score

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus overall experience worse health outcomes than non-diabetics, but whether this is true among recipients of liver transplantation still remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the mortality of diabetic and non-diabetic patients following liver transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 530 adult patients undergoing liver transplantation at Stanford University Medical Center from February 1995 to July 2006. Information on diabetes mellitus was available for 431 patients; 96 patients who had acute liver failure (n = 17), combined liver and kidney transplantation (n = 28), or died prior to discharge (n = 51) were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, survival was 81% in the diabetic group and 94% among controls (p = <0.0001). After controlling for age (mean +/- SD: 54.4 +/- 7.6 in diabetics, 50.1 +/- 9.6 in controls), body mass index (28.6 +/- 6.6 in diabetics, 27.1 +/- 5.4 in controls), presence of hepatitis C, and MELD score (17 +/- 9.6 in diabetics, 19 +/- 10.2 in controls), diabetes mellitus remained a significant predictor of death (HR 3.11, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for mortality following liver transplantation. Further investigation of this relationship should focus on the impact of more intensive pre- and post-liver transplantation glucose control, cardiovascular risk factor reduction, and the effects of accelerated atherosclerosis in the setting of immune suppression.

Mammalian target of rapamycin and diabetes: what does the current evidence tell us?

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication in organ transplantation; not only does it enhance the risk of graft dysfunction, it also increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is regulated independently by insulin, amino acids, and energy sufficiency. It integrates signal from growth factors, hormones, nutrients, and cellular energy levels to regulate protein translation and cell growth, proliferation, and survival. In addition, mTOR generates an inhibitory feedback loop on insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins. Therefore, it was suggested that mTOR might link nutrient excess with both obesity and insulin resistance. In this review, we summarize the role of mTOR and its inhibitor sirolimus (SRL) on chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in beta cells, adipose tissue, liver, and muscle. We further hypothesize, based on data from the literature and generated in our laboratory, that SRL could counteract the development of NODAT in stable glucose homeostasis due to its positive effects on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, whereas in conditions that require an adaptive beta cell proliferation (such as pregnancy and weight increase), the administration of SRL might have effects that would promote the development of NODAT. Therefore, it seems crucial for patient outcome to consider these potentially contrasting effects of SRL.

Immunosuppressive medications, clinical and metabolic parameters in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a growing concern in transplantation. All modifiable risk factors are not yet identified. We assessed the relationship between baseline clinical and biochemical parameters and NODAT. Eight-hundred and fifty-seven in-Caucasian renal transplant recipients were included. Charts were individually reviewed. The follow-up was 5.3 years (ranges: 0.25-20.8; 5613 patient-years). The incidence of NODAT was 15.0%, 18.4% and 22.0% at 10, 15 and 20 years following transplantation. Age, body mass index (BMI), glucose (all P < 0.0001) and triglycerides [hazard ratio (HR) per 1 mmol/l: 1.44 [1.17-1.77], P = 0.0006] were potent risk factors whereas steroid withdrawal (HR: 0.69 [0.47-1.01], P = 0.0601) reduced the risk. As compared to cyclosporine, sirolimus (HR: 3.26 [1.63-6.49], P = 0.0008) and tacrolimus (HR: 3.04 [2.02-4.59], P < 0.0001) were risk factors for NODAT. The risk of NODAT was comparable for sirolimus (HR: 2.35 [1.06-5.19], P = 0.0350) and tacrolimus (HR: 2.34 [1.46-3.75], P = 0.0004) after adjustments on age, BMI, glucose and steroid withdrawal; however, unlike sirolimus, tacrolimus remained significant after adjustment on triglycerides. The risk of NODAT appeared similar, but its pathophysiology seemed different in sirolimus- and tacrolimus-treated patients; this observation needs confirmation. However, main independent risk factors were age, BMI, initial glucose and triglycerides.

Comprehensive management of post-transplant diabetes mellitus: from intensive care to home care

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication of solid organ and hematopoietic transplantation. This clinically oriented review article briefly summarizes the pathophysiology of PTDM, then presents a comprehensive clinical approach to diagnosis and therapy. Topics include the key clinical aspects of PTDM screening, diagnosis, and management during all phases following transplantation from the intensive care unit, to the inpatient ward, to the outpatient arena.

Risk factors for new-onset diabetes mellitus following liver transplantation and impact of hepatitis C infection : an observational multicenter study

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) remains a common complication of liver transplantation (LT). We studied incidence and risk factors in 211 French patients who had undergone a primary LT between 6 and 24 months previously. This is a cross-sectional and retrospective multicenter study. Data were collected on consecutive patients at a single routine post-LT consultation. Demographic details, immunosuppressive regimens, familial and personal histories, hepatitis status, and cardiovascular risk were analyzed to compare those who developed NODM (American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization criteria) with the others. The overall incidence of NODM was 22.7%: 24% in tacrolimus (Tac)-treated patients (n = 175; 82.9%) and 16.7% in cyclosporine-treated patients (n = 36; 17.1%). A total of 81% of the cases were diagnosed within 3 months of LT (M3). Among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected (HCV(+)) patients, NODM incidence was 41.7% whereas among those patients negative for this virus (HCV(-)), the incidence was only 18.9% (P = 0.008). In Tac-treated patients, the incidence of NODM in the HCV(+) patients was significantly higher than in the HCV(-) patients (46.7% and 19.3%, respectively, P = 0.0014). Only 1 of 6 (16.7%) of the HCV(+) patients developed NODM on cyclosporine. Other independent pretransplantation risk factors for NODM included impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and a maximum lifetime body-mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m2. In conclusion, emergence of NODM after LT is related to risk factors that can be detected prior to the graft, like maximum lifetime BMI, IFG, and HCV status. Tac induced a significantly higher incidence of NODM in the HCV(+) compared to the HCV(-) patients. The treatment should therefore be tailored to the patient's risk especially in case of HCV infection.

Unexpectedly high prevalence of pretransplant abnormal glucose tolerance in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Several studies suggested that the incidence of new-onset diabetes following pediatric kidney transplantation has increased markedly in recent years, with reported incidence of up to 20%. However, limited information is available regarding the incidence and features of pretransplant status of abnormal glucose tolerance in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the risk of 55 non-diabetic pediatric transplant recipients developing PTDM by performing OGTT prior to transplantation. For post-transplant immunosuppression, each patient received either a CsA- or a TAC-based regimen. However, recipients who had abnormal glucose tolerance in the pretransplant OGTT were allocated to the CsA-based regimen. The mean age of the patients was 9.7 +/- 5.4 yr while mean BMI was 16.5 +/- 3.3 kg/m2. FPG level before transplantation was within the normal limit in all patients, while the mean HbA1C value was 4.5. However, 18 of the 55 patients (32.7%) had abnormal glucose tolerance in the pretransplant OGTT, 13 (23.6%) had impaired glucose tolerance, and 5 (9.4%) had DM. PTDM developed in two patients on the TAC-based regimen with these patients having normal glucose tolerance prior to the transplant. In contrast, the 18 patients with abnormal glucose tolerance did not develop PTDM under CsA-based immunosuppression. Our results demonstrated an unexpectedly high prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance in pretransplant OGTT even in a pediatric population. We believe that modification of post-transplant immunosuppression by the identification of high-risk patients using the pretransplant OGTT may minimize the development of new onset of PTDM.

New-onset diabetes mellitus in transplant patients: pathogenesis, complications, and management

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation is characterized by decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance secondary to the effects of immunosuppression. Although impaired beta cell function appears to be the primary mechanism of calcineurin inhibitor-induced new-onset diabetes, impaired peripheral glucose utilization also appears to contribute to insulin resistance and abnormal glucose metabolism. Because transplant recipients who develop new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation are at increased risk for infections, cardiovascular disease, and poor patient and graft survival, all patients should undergo careful assessment of risk for diabetes prior to transplantation and regular screening for the development of hyperglycemia thereafter. For patients in high-risk groups, including certain ethnic backgrounds, older adults, and the very young, and patients with hepatitis C, consideration should be given to initiating immunosuppressive therapy with agents that are less diabetogenic. Recent guidelines include more stringent criteria for diagnosis and stress the importance of strict glycemic control. Diet, exercise, and weight management are core components of treatment with addition of oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin as needed to achieve control. Concomitant measures include aggressive control of lipids and blood pressure to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is a serious issue affecting patient and graft outcomes and warrants the attention of all health care professionals involved in assessing and managing the transplant recipient.

De novo diabetic nephropathy on renal allografts

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a well-recognized clinical problem following renal transplantation. Long-term risks of PTDM are similar to those of diabetes mellitus in general population. The aim of our study was to identify de novo diabetic nephropathy (DN) in our group of patients with PTDM.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with PTDM were reviewed retrospectively. Light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy techniques were performed in 10 of 21 patients with graft biopsy.

RESULTS

Five patients (four women, one man), aged 47.4 years (range, 29 to 58), four of whom received cadaveric grafts, were found to have de novo DN. Their serum creatinine was 211.4 micromol/L (range, 140 to 294). Three patients were slightly proteinuric (0.3 to 0.5 g/L). PTDM was diagnosed 2.4 months after transplantation (range, 1 to 6). Histologic diagnosis of de novo DN was made, on average, 52.6 months after transplantation (range, 8 to 115), and 50.2 months (range, 2 to 114) after PTDM. De novo DN presented as diffuse diabetic glomerulosclerosis in four patients and nodular diabetic sclerosis in one patient, and combined with transplant glomerulopathy in all five patients. The mean graft survival time for this group of patients was equivalent with a control group. Although the difference in slopes of serum creatinine between the studied groups was clinically relevant, it was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In view of our findings, when histologic de novo DN was found in 5 out of 10 patients, one could conclude that de novo DN could be a frequent complication of PTDM.

Cyclosporine: advantages versus disadvantages vis-à-vis tacrolimus

Despite a different molecular structure and biochemical properties, cyclosporine and tacrolimus--by inhibiting calcineurin activity--have been shown in the previous two decades of solid organ transplantation to be well tolerated and effective immunosuppressants. Initial randomized clinical trials showed a lower incidence of acute rejection in tacrolimus than in cyclosporine-treated patients, in combination with steroids and azathioprine. But in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes is less clear. In general, short- and medium-term outcome variables (1-year serum creatinine, graft and patient survival) with cyclosporine and tacrolimus are excellent, and (almost) identical, with both substances having the same intrinsic nephrotoxic potential. On the other hand, cyclosporine and tacrolimus have a different impact on cardiovascular risk factors with tacrolimus having a better profile on arterial tension and lipid metabolism and cyclosporine on glucose metabolism. However, at present no data are available to discern that these differences in risk profile alter patient or graft survival or long-term cardiovascular morbidity/mortality. Therefore, prospective long-term trials are needed to study the quantitative impact of different immunosuppressive agents and concomitant cardiovascular risk factors on long-term patient and graft survival, before evidence-based (patient, graft, or cardiovascular) risk reduction can be firmly claimed by tailoring calcineurin inhibitors.