Interaction between tacrolimus and itraconazole in a heart-lung transplant recipient

Use of a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model to investigate the influence of itraconazole on tacrolimus absorption, distribution and metabolism in mice

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of itraconazole (ITCZ) on tacrolimus absorption, distribution and metabolism by developing a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in mice. 2. Mice were randomly divided into four groups, namely control group (CG, taking 3 mg kg^-1 tacrolimus only), low-dose group (LDG, taking tacrolimus with 12.5 mg kg^-1 ITCZ), medium-dose group (MDG, taking tacrolimus with 25 mg kg^-1 ITCZ) and high-dose group (HDG, taking tacrolimus with 50 mg kg^-1 ITCZ). 3. Liver clearance (CL_li) decreased significantly (**p < 0.01) in LDG (35.3%), MDG (45.2%) and HDG (58.7%) mice compared to CG mice. With respect to gut clearance (CL_gu), significant (**p < 0.01) decrease was also revealed in LDG (35.9%), MDG (50.2%) and HDG (64.6%) mice. A significant (**p < 0.01) higher tacrolimus brain-to-blood partition coefficient (K_t,br) was found in MDG (25.3%) and HDG (55.9%) mice than in CG mice. Moreover, a significant (*p < 0.05) increase (16.3%) was found in the absorption rate constant (K_a) in HDG mice compared to CG mice. There was a significant (**p < 0.01) association between ITCZ dose and the change in CL_gu (ΔCL_gu, r= -0.790), the change in CL_li (ΔCL_li, r= -0.787) and the change in K_t,br (ΔK_t,br, r = 0.727), while the association between ITCZ dose and the change in K_a (ΔK_a) was not significant (p > 0.05). 4. These findings could be useful in predicting the efficacy and toxicity of tacrolimus, and drug-drug interaction of ITCZ and tarcolimus in human.

Analysis of cytochrome P450 gene polymorphism in a lupus nephritis patient in whom tacrolimus blood concentration was markedly elevated after administration of azole antifungal agents

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Both itraconazole (ITCZ) and voriconazole (VCZ) are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and their effects have been reported to be equal. However, ITCZ is metabolized by CYP3A, whereas VCZ is mainly metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 and only partially by CYP3A. We experienced the case of a patient who showed a 5-fold increase in trough levels of tacrolimus (FK) level after switching from ITCZ to VCZ. Our objective is to discuss the mechanism of the increase drug-drug interaction in terms of serum concentration of the azole drugs and patient pharmacogenomics.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old woman was treated with FK (1 mg/day) for lupus nephritis. Because fungal infection was suspected, she received ITCZ (100 mg/day). When ITCZ was replaced with VCZ (400 mg/day), the blood concentration of FK increased markedly from 6·1 to 34·2 ng/mL. During coadministration with FK, the levels of ITCZ and VCZ were 135·5 ng/mL and 5·5 μg/mL, respectively, with the VCZ level around 3-fold higher than the previously reported level (1·4-1·8 μg/mL). Her CYP genotypes were CYP2C19*1/*2, CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*3/*3.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The patient was a CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) and deficient in CYP3A5. The increase in plasma VCZ level appears to have been at least in part, associated with the CYP2C19 IM phenotype. One possible explanation for the marked increase in blood FK concentration was increased inhibition of CYP3A because of the impaired metabolism and subsequent increased plasma concentration of VCZ. This case shows that the severity of drug interactions may be influenced by metabolic gene polymorphism.

Effect of voriconazole and other azole antifungal agents on CYP3A activity and metabolism of tacrolimus in human liver microsomes

Azole antifungal agents are known to inhibit cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. Limited information is available regarding the effect of voriconazole on CYP3A activity. We examined the effect of voriconazole on CYP3A activity in human liver microsomes as measured by the formation of 6β-hydroxytestosterone from testosterone. We also evaluated the interaction between voriconazole and tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive drug, using human liver microsomes. The effect of voriconazole on CYP3A activity and tacrolimus metabolism was compared to that of other azole antifungal agents. CYP3A4 activity and the metabolism of tacrolimus were measured in the absence and in the presence of various concentrations of voriconazole (0-1.43 mM), fluconazole (0-1.63 mM), itraconazole (0-14 µM) and ketoconazole (0-0.19 µM). At a concentration of 21.2 ± 15.4 µM and 29.8 ± 12.3 µM, voriconazole inhibited the formation of 6β-hydroxytestosterone from testosterone and the metabolism of tacrolimus by 50%, respectively. The rank order of inhibition of 6β-hydroxytestosterone formation from testosterone and the metabolism of tacrolimus, is ketoconazole > itraconazole > voriconazole > fluconazole. Our observations suggest that voriconazole at clinically relevant concentrations will inhibit the hepatic metabolism of tacrolimus and increase the concentration of tacrolimus more than two-fold. Close monitoring of the blood concentrations and adjustment in the dose of tacrolimus are warranted when transplant patients receiving tacrolimus are treated with voriconazole.

Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients

Azole antifungal agents are frequently used in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, because of metabolism by or substrate activity for various isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system and/or P-glycoprotein, azole antifungals have the potential to interact with many of the drugs commonly used in these patient populations. Thus, to identify drug interactions that may result between azole antifungals and other drugs, we conducted a literature search of the MEDLINE database (1966-December 2009) for English-language articles on drug interaction studies involving the azole antifungal agents fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Another literature search between each of the azoles and the immunosuppressants cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, as well as the corticosteroids methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, and prednisone, was also conducted. Concomitant administration of azoles and immunosuppressive agents may cause clinically significant drug interactions resulting in extreme immunosuppression or toxicity. The magnitude and duration of an interaction between azoles and immunosuppressants are not class effects of the azoles, but differ between drug combinations and are subject to interpatient variability. Drug interactions in the transplant recipient receiving azole therapy may also occur with antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, and acid-suppressive therapies, among other drugs. Initiation of an azole antifungal in transplant recipients nearly ensures a drug-drug interaction, but often these drugs are required. Management of these interactions first involves knowledge of the potential drug interaction, appropriate dosage adjustments when necessary, and therapeutic or clinical monitoring at an appropriate point in therapy to assess the drug-drug interaction (e.g., immunosuppressive drug concentrations, signs and symptoms of toxicity). These aspects of drug interaction management are essential not only at the initiation of azole antifungal therapy, but also when these agents are removed from the regimen.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Drug Interaction between Intravenous Itraconazole and Intravenous Tacrolimus or Intravenous Cyclosporin A in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

A single-institution, open-label prospective pharmacokinetic evaluation of the interaction between intravenous itraconazole and intravenous cyclosporin A and tacrolimus was conducted in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The study was conducted in 2 phases, with patients acting as their own controls. In phase 1, steady-state concentrations and clearance of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus administered alone were evaluated. Phase 2 evaluated serum concentrations and clearance of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus under the influence of itraconazole therapy. Among 17 patients who completed both phases of the study, the mean increase in the serum tacrolimus concentration was 83% (P<.0001), and the mean increase in the serum cyclosporin A concentration was 80% (P=.0001). There was no correlation between serum itraconazole concentrations and the serum concentrations of tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. The drug interaction between itraconazole and calcineurin inhibitors is predictable and occurs within 48 hours of concomitant drug administration. The data suggest that dose reductions of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A in the range of 50% to 100% are necessary when itraconazole therapy is initiated and that subsequent close monitoring of serum concentrations is necessary to guide further dose modifications.

Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus (FK 506): Efficacy and Drug Interaction

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to lung transplant recipients after transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of interaction between tacrolimus and itraconazole in lung transplant recipients and the efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

The study group included 40 lung transplant recipients followed for at least 12 months. All received prophylactic itraconazole, 200 mg twice a day, for the first 6 months after transplantation. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after itraconazole therapy. Rejection rate, fungal infection rate, and renal function were assessed. The mean cost per daily treatment of the itraconazole/tacrolimus combination and tacrolimus alone was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean tacrolimus dose during itraconazole treatment was 3.26 +/- 2.1 mg/day compared with 5.74 +/- 2.9 mg/day after itraconazole was stopped (p < 0.0001) for a mean total daily dose elevation of tacrolimus of 76%. When the cost of itraconazole was taken into account, the average total daily cost of the combined treatment was US5.86 dollars less than the treatment with tacrolimus alone. No differences in the rejection or fungal infection rate, or in renal toxicity, were observed between the periods with and without itraconazole treatment, although less positive fungal isolates were identified during itraconazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis therapy with itraconazole is highly effective. Itraconazole reduces the dose of tacrolimus and therefore lowers the cost of therapy without causing an increase in rejection rate and with renal function preservation.

Frequency of potential azole drug-drug interactions and consequences of potential fluconazole drug interactions

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency of potential azole-drug interactions and consequences of interactions between fluconazole and other drugs in routine inpatient care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for systemic fungal infections with an oral or intravenous azole medication between July 1997 and June 2001 in a tertiary care hospital. We recorded the concomitant use of medications known to interact with azole antifungals and measured the frequency of potential azole drug interactions, which we considered to be present when both drugs were given together. We then performed a chart review on a random sample of admissions in which patients were exposed to a potential moderate or major drug interaction with fluconazole. The list of azole-interacting medications and the severity of interaction were derived from the DRUGDEX System and Drug Interaction Facts.

RESULTS

Among the 4,185 admissions in which azole agents (fluconazole, itraconazole or ketoconazole) were given, 2,941 (70.3%) admissions experienced potential azole-drug interactions, which included 2,716 (92.3%) admissions experiencing potential fluconazole interactions. The most frequent interactions with potential moderate to major severity were co-administration of fluconazole with prednisone (25.3%), midazolam (17.5%), warfarin (14.7%), methylprednisolone (14.1%), cyclosporine (10.7%) and nifedipine (10.1%). Charts were reviewed for 199 admissions in which patients were exposed to potential fluconazole drug interactions. While four adverse drug events (ADEs) caused by fluconazole were found, none was felt to be caused by a drug-drug interaction (DDI), although in one instance fluconazole may have contributed.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential fluconazole drug interactions were very frequent among hospitalized patients on systemic azole antifungal therapy, but they had few apparent clinical consequences.

Concomitant Clotrimazole Therapy More Than Doubles the Relative Oral Bioavailability of Tacrolimus

The purpose of this pharmacokinetic study was to determine whether the relative oral bioavailability of tacrolimus is increased with concomitant administration of clotrimazole. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in 6 adult kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus therapy. Pharmacokinetic profiling was performed by blood sampling over 12 hours before and after the administration of a 5-day course of clotrimazole. Tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations were determined by microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using WinNonLin, Standard Edition, Version 1.1. Concomitant administration of clotrimazole more than doubled the relative oral bioavailability of tacrolimus. The mean AUC0-12 of tacrolimus was increased 250% with clotrimazole (467.0 +/- 170.0 ng.h/mL versus 188.7 +/- 50.2 ng.h/mL; P = 0.002). Tacrolimus blood trough concentrations also more than doubled with coadministration of clotrimazole (27.7 +/- 10.4 ng/mL versus 11.6 +/- 4.0 ng/mL; P = 0.003). Mean Cmax was significantly increased with clotrimazole (70.7 +/- 34.7 ng/mL versus 27.4 +/- 11.1 ng/mL, P = 0.01). Tmax decreased from 3.2 +/- 1.6 hours to 1.9 +/- 1.0 hours (P = NS). In addition, the apparent oral clearance decreased 60% with coadministration of clotrimazole (median oral clearance 0.16 L/h/kg versus 0.40 L/h/kg; P = 0.03). Thus, clotrimazole causes a significant increase in the relative oral bioavailability, Tmax, and trough concentration of tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels should be monitored following initiation or discontinuation of clotrimazole to minimize toxicity or precipitation of an acute rejection episode due to subtherapeutic levels.

Drug interactions in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient: what every transplanter needs to know

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients can result in either increases in serum concentrations of medications, which may lead to enhanced toxicity; or reduced serum concentrations, which can lead to treatment failure and the emergence of post transplant complications. The use of drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index, such as cyclosporine/tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitors), increases the significance of these interactions when they occur. This report will review the clinical data evaluating the drug interactions of relevance to HSCT clinical practice, focusing on the pharmacokinetic interactions, and provides recommendations for managing these interactions to avoid both toxicity and treatment failure.

Tacrolimus dosage requirements after initiation of azole antifungal therapy in pediatric thoracic organ transplantation

Azole antifungals inhibit the metabolism of tacrolimus mediated by CYP3A4. Upon initiation of azole therapy, the required dose reduction of tacrolimus is unknown. We reviewed our experience with azole antifungals in our pediatric thoracic transplant population receiving tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared before and during azole therapy. Thirty-one patients received both tacrolimus and an azole antifungal (fluconazole = 9, itraconazole = 22). The tacrolimus dose was empirically reduced by approximately one-third when azole therapy was initiated. Mean tacrolimus dose requirements decreased by 68% within the first month of therapy (pre-azole: 0.27 +/- 0.14 mg/kg/day; 30 day post-azole: 0.087 +/- 0.069 mg/kg/day; p < 0.001). Despite a mean decrease in tacrolimus dose from baseline of 33, 42, and 55% on day 1, 2, and 4 of azole therapy, respectively, there was still an unintended 38% increase in tacrolimus levels during the first month of azole therapy. A calculated dose-reduction protocol of 50% on day of azole initiation, 70% on day 3, and 75% on day 14 should result in minimal mean changes in the tacrolimus levels. There was no difference in tacrolimus dose reduction between fluconazole and itraconazole groups. Azole antifungals markedly decrease tacrolimus requirements within the first few days of therapy. An initial reduction in tacrolimus dose by one-third is insufficient, and dose reduction of at least 50% upon azole initiation seems warranted. Once azole antifungal therapy is initiated, frequent therapeutic drug monitoring is required.

In vitro effects of tacrolimus on human cytochrome P450

Tacrolimus, a potent immunosuppressive drug, is known to be metabolized predominantly in the liver by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). In order to determine the potential of tacrolimus to inhibit the metabolism of other drugs, we have investigated its inhibitory effects on specific cytochrome reactions. Specific substrates for the seven cytochromes (CYPs) 1A2, 2A6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1 and 3A4/5 were incubated with human hepatic microsome preparations with or without specific inhibitors or tacrolimus and the metabolites were detected by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) or fluorimetric methods. All the specific inhibitors reduced or abolished the specific CYP activity. Tacrolimus had no effect on any CYP at concentrations below 1 microM, while at higher concentrations it had a mild inhibitory effect on CYP3A4 and 3A5. These observations suggest that tacrolimus is unlikely to potentiate the effect of coadministered drugs through inhibition of their metabolism in the liver.

Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus

The clinical management of tacrolimus, a macrolide used as immunosuppressant after transplantation, is complicated by its narrow therapeutic index in combination with inter- and intraindividually variable pharmacokinetics. As a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes and P-glycoprotein, tacrolimus interacts with several other drugs used in transplantation medicine, which also are known CYP3A and/or P-glycoprotein inhibitors and/or inducers. In clinical studies, CYP3A/P-glycoprotein inhibitors and inducers primarily affect oral bioavailability of tacrolimus rather than its clearance, indicating a key role of intestinal P-glycoprotein and CYP3A. There is an almost complete overlap between the reported clinical drug interactions of tacrolimus and those of cyclosporin. However, in comparison with cyclosporin, only few controlled drug interaction studies have been carried out, but tacrolimus drug interactions have been extensively studied in vitro. These results are inconsistent and are of poor predictive value for clinical drug interactions because of false negative results. P-glycoprotein regulates distribution of tacrolimus through the blood-brain barrier into the brain as well as distribution into lymphocytes. Interaction of other drugs with P-glycoprotein may change tacrolimus tissue distribution and modify its toxicity and immunosuppressive activity. There is evidence that ethnic and gender differences exist for tacrolimus drug interactions. Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosage adjustments of tacrolimus is an efficient tool to manage drug interactions. In the near future, progress can be expected from studies evaluating potential pharmacokinetic interactions caused by herbal preparations and food components, the exact biochemical mechanism underlying tacrolimus toxicity, and the potential of inhibition of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein to improve oral bioavailability and to decrease intraindividual variability of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving anti-infective drugs may be important in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although some interactions involve absorption or distribution, the most clinically relevant interactions during anti-infective treatment involve the elimination phase. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 are the major isoforms responsible for oxidative metabolism of drugs. Macrolides (especially troleandomycin and erythromycin versus CYP3A4), fluoroquinolones (especially enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin versus CYP1A2) and azole antifungals (especially fluconazole versus CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and ketoconazole and itraconazole versus CYP3A4) are all inhibitors of CYP-mediated metabolism and may therefore be responsible for toxicity of other coadministered drugs by decreasing their clearance. On the other hand, rifampicin is a nonspecific inducer of CYP-mediated metabolism (especially of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) and may therefore cause therapeutic failure of other coadministered drugs by increasing their clearance. Drugs frequently used in the ICU that are at risk of clinically relevant pharrmacokinetic interactions with anti-infective agents include some benzodiazepines (especially midazolam and triazolam), immunosuppressive agents (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antiasthmatic agents (theophylline), opioid analgesics (alfentanil), anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, felodipine) and anticoagulants (warfarin). Some lipophilic anti-infective agents inhibit (clarithromycin, itraconazole) or induce (rifampicin) the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein, which promotes excretion from renal tubular and intestinal cells. This results in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the clearance of P-glycoprotein substrates at the renal level and an increase or decrease, respectively, of their oral bioavailability at the intestinal level. Hydrophilic anti-infective agents are often eliminated unchanged by renal glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, and are therefore involved in competition for excretion. Beta-lactams are known to compete with other drugs for renal tubular secretion mediated by the organic anion transport system, but this is frequently not of major concern, given their wide therapeutic index. However, there is a risk of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with some cephalosporins and carbapenems. Therapeutic failure with these hydrophilic compounds may be due to haemodynamically active coadministered drugs, such as dopamine, dobutamine and furosemide, which increase their renal clearance by means of enhanced cardiac output and/or renal blood flow. Therefore, coadministration of some drugs should be avoided, or at least careful therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when available. Monitoring may be especially helpful when there is some coexisting pathophysiological condition affecting drug disposition, for example malabsorption or marked instability of the systemic circulation or of renal or hepatic function.

Aspergillosis in lung transplantation: incidence, risk factors, and prophylactic strategies

Invasive aspergillosis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in transplantation, especially lung and allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. The epidemiology, classic and newly recognized risk factors, and incidence of aspergillosis are reviewed. Risk factors include environmental exposures, airway colonization, profound immunosuppression, neutropenia, prior cytomegalovirus infection, and renal dysfunction. Clinical and radiographic presentations of invasive aspergillosis are discussed, including some unusual manifestations in lung transplant recipients. Early and accurate diagnosis of aspergillosis remains a challenge, and diagnostic strategies are reviewed, with an emphasis on the chest computerized tomography scan and on transbronchial or open lung biopsy. Recent advances include prophylactic and pre-emptive antifungal strategies, newer therapeutic agents, and improved risk stratification.

Cutaneous alternariosis in a cardiac transplant recipient

A 55-year-old male cardiac transplant recipient presented with cutaneous nodules on the limbs caused by Alternaria alternata. Oral fluconazole 200 mg daily for 3 weeks was ineffective. Itraconazole 100 mg oral daily was ceased when hyperglycaemia developed. Individual lesions were successfully treated with either curettage and cautery or double freeze-thaw cryotherapy. Alternaria spp. are ubiquitous fungal saprophytes which may cause cutaneous infections particularly in immunocompromised patients.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

Drug interactions with itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine and their management

A drug interaction develops when the effect of a drug is increased or decreased or when a new effect is produced by the prior, concurrent, or subsequent administration of the other. Before prescribing a drug, it is important to obtain a thorough drug history of the prescription and nonprescription medications taken by the patient. The nonprescription medications may include items such as nutritional supplements and herbal medications. The risk of side effects is an inevitable consequence of drug use. The frequency of adverse reactions is increased in those patients receiving multiple medications. Drug interactions reported in animal or in vitro studies may not necessarily develop in humans. When drug interactions are observed with a particular agent, it cannot be automatically assumed that all closely related drugs will necessarily produce the same interaction. However, caution is advised until sufficient experience accrues. The prescriber should not overestimate or underestimate the potential for a given drug interaction on the basis of personal experience alone. Drug interactions will not necessarily occur in every patient who is given a particular combination of drugs known to produce an interaction. For a clinically significant drug interaction to be manifest, several other factors may be relevant other than just using the two drugs. In many instances drug interactions can be predicted and therefore avoided if the pharmacodynamic effects, the pharmacokinetic properties, and the mechanisms of action of the 2 drugs in question are known. In the case of contraindicated drugs, it may be possible to use an alternative agent.