Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer

Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: indications, extent and tailored approaches

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to review the current literature concerning the indication of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), its extent and complications in prostate cancer (PCa) staging, the available tools, and the future perspectives to assess the risk of lymph node invasion (LNI).

METHODS

A literature review was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy included the terms pelvic lymph nodes, PLND, radical prostatectomy, prostate cancer, lymph node invasion, biochemical recurrence, staging, sentinel lymph node dissection, imaging, and molecular markers.

RESULTS

PLND currently represents the gold standard for nodal staging in PCa patients. Available imaging techniques are characterized by poor accuracy in the prediction of LNI before surgery. On the contrary, an extended PLND (ePLND) would result into proper staging in the majority of the cases. Several models based on preoperative disease characteristics are available to assess the risk of LNI. Although ePLND is not associated with a substantial risk of severe complications, up to 10% of the men undergoing this procedure experience lymphoceles. Concerns over potential morbidity of ePLND led many authors to investigate the role of sentinel lymph node dissection in order to prevent unnecessary ePLND. Finally, the incorporation of novel biomarkers in currently available tools would improve our ability to identify men who should receive an ePLND.

CONCLUSIONS

Nowadays, the most informative tools predicting LNI in PCa patients consist in preoperative clinical nomograms. Sentinel lymph node dissection still remains experimental and novel biomarkers are needed to identify patients at a higher risk of LNI.

Higher scrotal uptake ratio of (99m)Tc-MDP on bone scans in newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a reliable indicator of pelvic node metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the gold standard procedure for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PC) but less commonly used due to its invasiveness. More commonly computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used although these have limited sensitivities and specificities. The aim of this study was to find out the correlation between higher scrotal uptake ratio (SUR) of (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) on bone scan and pelvic node metastasis in patients with PC at high risk for nodal metastasis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study which included 68 biopsy proven newly diagnosed PC patients who had bone scan from January 2008 till January 2012. MRI of the pelvis, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason's score were available in all patients. Whole body bone scan was performed in all patients and SUR was calculated by dividing mean counts over scrotum and soft tissue over lateral aspect of right thigh. PLND was carried out within 2-3 weeks of MRI study in these patients.

RESULTS

Mean age of studied males was 71 ± 07 years with a mean PSA level of 65 ± 162 ng/ml. Prostate biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma in all patients with mean Gleason's score 7 ± 1. Mean SUR was 2.786 ± 0.496. MRI was positive for pelvic lymphadenopathy in 32/68 (47 %). PLND revealed evidence of nodal metastasis in 16/68 (24 %) patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed good diagnostic strength of SUR for nodal metastasis with a cut off value of >2.99 with an area under curve (AUC) 0.708 (95 % CI 0.533-0.847, p value <0.05) and a mean sensitivity of 68.75 % and mean specificity of 80 %. Diagnostic strength of MRI for nodal metastasis was found to be low (AUC 0.566, 95 % CI 0.047-0.657, non-significant p value). No significant correlation was found between SUR and PSA in nodes positive and nodes negative patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in newly diagnosed PC patients, higher SUR on bone scan has a high diagnostic accuracy for pelvic node metastasis. Furthermore, a bone scan with a SUR <2.99 and negative for bone metastasis can stratify newly diagnosed PC patients as low risk.

Prediction of the lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 320 surgical cases

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to identify factors involved in lymph node metastasis (LNM) and evaluate their role in predicting LNM in clinically lymph node negative (clinical stage I-III) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected 320 patients who were diagnosed with ICC with no apparent clinical LNM (T(1-3)N(0)M(0)). Age, gender, tumor boundary, histological differentiation, tumor size, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 value were the studied factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were conducted. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was used to test the predicting value of each factor and a test which combined the associated factors was used to predict LNM.

RESULTS

LNM was observed in 76 cases (76/320, 23.8%). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that histological differentiation as well as tumor boundary and tumor size significantly correlated with LNM. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for LNM for the three factors when combined was 96.1 and 95% respectively. This means that 5% of the patients who did not have the risk factors mentioned above developed LNM.

CONCLUSION

This model used the combination of three factors (low-graded histological differentiation, distinct tumor boundary, small tumor size) and they proved to be useful in predicting LNM in ICC with clinically lymph node negative cases. In patients with these criteria, lymph node dissection or lymph node irradiation may be omitted and such cases may also be good candidates for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

The role of surgery in high-risk localised prostate cancer

• The optimal management of high-risk localised prostate cancer is a major challenge for urologists and oncologists. It is clear that multimodal therapy including radical local treatment is needed in these men to achieve the best outcomes. • External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an essential component of therapy either as a primary or adjuvant treatment. However, the role of radical prostatectomy (RP) is more controversial. Both methods are currently valid therapy options. • There have been many individual studies of EBRT and RP in high-risk disease, but no good quality large prospective randomized trials. • In EBRT, combination with neoadjuvant plus long-term adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been conclusively shown to improve outcomes and is widely considered the standard of care. • However, the role of RP has achieved recent prominence with several important studies. Published data from prospective randomized trials in patients after RP have shown that in men with adverse pathological features at surgery, the addition of adjuvant RT improves biochemical-free and progression-free survival. • More recently, studies from large-volume centres comparing EBRT and RP have provided intriguing suggestions of better outcomes with RP as the primary treatment. • An important question therefore, is which of the two methods provides the best outcome in men with localised high-risk disease. Crucially, does the combination of RP and selective adjuvant EBRT provide clinically significant better outcomes compared with EBRT alone? • In this review we discuss the current evidence for the role of RP for high-risk localised prostate cancer and define the parameters and urgent need for a prospective trial to test the role of surgery for this group of patients.

Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate and reliable staging procedure for detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer. Recently, [(11)C]-choline positron emission tomography imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with lymphotropic superpara-magnetic nanoparticles have shown potential for detecting LNI but are still under investigation. The risk of LNI in low-risk groups could be underestimated by use of the current nomograms, which rely on data collected from patients who underwent only limited PLND. Extended PLND (ePLND) shows higher lymph node yield, which leads to the removal of more positive nodes and fewer missed positive nodes. It may be possible to refrain from performing PLND on low-risk patients with a prostate-specific antigen value <10 ng/ml and a biopsy Gleason score ≤6, but the risk of biopsy-related understaging should be kept in mind. Theoretically, meticulous ePLND may also impact prostate cancer survival by clearing low-volume diseases and occult micrometastasis even in pN0. The therapeutic role of PLND in prostate cancer patients is still an open question, especially in individuals with low-risk disease. Patients with intermediate- to high-risk disease are more likely to benefit from ePLND.

MRI with a lymph-node-specific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph-node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multicohort study

BACKGROUND

In patients with prostate cancer who are deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of having nodal metastases, invasive diagnostic pelvic lymph-node dissection (PLND) is the gold standard for the detection of nodal disease. However, a new lymph-node-specific MR-contrast agent ferumoxtran-10 can detect metastases in normal-sized nodes (ie, <8 mm in size) by use of MR lymphoangiography (MRL). In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRL with up-to-date multidetector CT (MDCT), and test the hypothesis that a negative MRL finding obviates the need for a PLND.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with prostate cancer who had an intermediate or high risk (risk of >5% according to routinely used nomograms) of having lymph-node metastases. All patients were assessed by MDCT and MRL, and underwent PLND or fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Imaging results were correlated with histopathology. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, NPV, and PPV of MRL and MDCT. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00185029.

FINDINGS

The study was done in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands between April 8, 2003, and April 19, 2005. 375 consecutive patients were included. 61 of 375 (16%) patients had lymph-node metastases. Sensitivity was 34% (21 of 61; 95% CI 23-48) for MDCT and 82% (50 of 61; 70-90) for MRL (McNemar's test p<0.05). Specificity was 97% (303 of 314; 94-98) for MDCT and 93% (291 of 314; 89-95) for MRL. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 66% (21 of 32; 47-81) for MDCT and 69% (50 of 73; 56-79) for MRL. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 88% (303 of 343; 84-91) for MDCT and 96% (291 of 302; 93-98) for MRL (McNemar's test p<0.05). Of the 61 patients with lymph-node metastases, 50 were detected by MRL, of which 40 (80%) had metastases in normal-sized lymph nodes. The high sensitivity and NPV of MRL imply that in patients with a negative MRL, the chance of positive lymph nodes is less than 11/302 (4%).

INTERPRETATION

MRL had significantly higher sensitivity and NPV than MDCT for patients with prostate cancer who had intermediate or high risk of having lymph-node metastases. In such patients, after a negative MRL, the post-test probability of having lymph-node metastases is low enough to omit a PLND.

Anatomical Extent of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The rationale for locoregional staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer (pCA) lies in the accurate diagnosis of occult micrometastases to stratify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapeutic measures. In pCA, the issues of the necessity and the therapeutic advantage of pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND]) in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease are still discussed controversially. The aim of this review manuscript is to critically evaluate the current status on PLND in pCA.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed concerning radical prostatectomy and PLND with respect to anatomical extent, oncological outcome, and associated complications.

RESULTS

The anatomical lymphatic drainage of the prostate includes the obturator fossa, and the external and internal iliac arteries; therefore, at least these areas should be included in PLND. According to the current clinical studies, extended PLND (ePLND) significantly increases the yield of both total lymph nodes and lymph node metastases independent of the risk classification of pCA. Lymph node metastases will be detected in about 5-6%, 20-25%, and 30-40% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk pCA, respectively. Exclusively 25% of all positive lymph nodes are located in the area around the internal iliac artery. With regard to progression-free and cancer-specific survival, retrospective analysis of the SEER data and additional case-control studies indicate a direct positive relationship between the number of removed lymph nodes and long-term oncological outcome in patients with limited lymph node involvement or negative lymph nodes. In these patients, cancer-specific survival is improved by about 15-20%. On the basis of results of large case-control studies, complication rates of ePLND are not significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of current data, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) If performed, PLND has to be done in the extended, anatomically adequate variant. (2) The frequency of lymph node metastases in low-risk pCA is low, and the issue of PLND has to be discussed with the patient. (3) If radical prostatectomy is performed in intermediate- and high-risk pCA, an ePLND should be option of choice. For the future, ongoing prospective trials have to demonstrate a benefit in terms of biochemical-free and cancer-specific survival.

Role of lymphadenectomy in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer

There has been considerable debate about the utility of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) when performing a radical prostatectomy. Reported practices vary from those who always perform an extended PLND to those who employ a predictive nomogram in their decision making to those who are increasingly not performing a PLND in low-risk disease. A Medline search was used to identify relevant manuscripts dealing with the role of lymphadenectomy in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. A greater number of lymph nodes (LN) removed and examined at prostatectomy for prostate cancer appears to increase the likelihood of finding LN metastases and increase prostate cancer-specific survival even in patients who have histologically uninvolved LN. This survival benefit may result from more accurate staging and possible removal of occult metastases. The need for and extent of PLND in prostate cancer, especially in low-risk disease, however, is unlikely.

[External beam radiotherapy on locally advanced prostate carcinoma following iliac staging lymphadenectomy]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Locally advanced prostate cancer supposes a high risk condition of post-treatment progression due to the limit situation that represents. Our purpose was to analyze prognoses factors in function of progression probability after using a treatment with external source radiotherapy on patients with this kind of tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a set of 128 patients submitted to pelvic staging limphadenectomy prior to accomplish an external radiotherapeutic treatment. We employed the Kaplan-Meier curves to study the probability of progression, logarithmic ranks test were used for detection of possible statistically significant differences and proportional risks Cox model was employed to study possible risk factors of progression (employing astro criteria).

RESULTS

5 years freedom probability from progression was of 49,93%; in spite of appreciating important differences in the groups stratified by the predictive variables used (total PSA, gleason of pathological biopsy, clinical stage and % of cores affection on biopsy), none of them reached statistical meaning, being the level of total PSA the closest to it.

CONCLUSIONS

The external radiotherapeuthic treatment represents a valid alternative in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer, with a tolerable index of secondaries. It must be used combined with hormonotherapy. It seems that the use of higher radiation doses, in a safer way thanks to 3D conformed radiotherapy, allows to improve the results. The most powerful clinical predictor of evolution must be the total PSA.

Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multivariate nomogram to predict the rate of lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer according to the extent of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND), which is associated with significantly higher rate of LNI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 781 consecutive patients (median age 66.6 years, range 45-85) treated with PLND and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. Their median (range) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 7 (1.03-49.91) ng/mL, and their clinical stages were T1c in 433 (55.4%), T2 in 328 (42%) and T3 in 20 (2.6%). Biopsy Gleason sums were <or= 6 in 514 (65.8%), 7 in 204 (26.1%) and 8-10 in 63 (8.1%). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to test the association between predictors including PSA level, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage, number of nodes removed and the rate of LNI. Finally, regression coefficients were used to develop a nomogram, which was internally validated with 200 bootstrap re-samples.

RESULTS

The median (range) number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (2-40); LNI was detected in 71 patients (9.1%). The univariate predictive accuracy for total PSA level, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum and number of total nodes removed and examined was 64.2%, 59.8%, 74% and 62.9%, respectively. Except for PSA (P = 0.2), all variables were statistically significant multivariate predictors of LNI at RRP (P <or= 0.001). A nomogram based on clinical stage, PSA level, biopsy Gleason sum and the number of total lymph nodes removed was 78.6% accurate, and 1.8% more accurate than a nomogram without the number of removed lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of PLND is directly related to the probability of LNI. The risk of LNI increases linearly, and is proportional to the number of nodes removed and examined. The effect of the increased probability of LNI is weighted more heavily in men with more advanced clinical stage and grade.

Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Invasion among Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and an Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to develop and internally validate a nomogram for prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND).

METHODS

602 consecutive patients (mean age 65.8 years) underwent an ePLND, where 10 or more nodes were removed. PSA was 1.1-49.9 (median 7.2). Clinical stages were: T1c in 55.6%, T2 in 41.4% and T3 in 3%. Biopsy Gleason sums were: 6 or less in 66%, 7 in 25.4%, 8-10 in 8.6%. Multivariate logistic regression models tested the association between all of the above predictors and LNI. Regression-based coefficients were used to develop a nomogram predicting LNI and 200 bootstrap resamples were used for internal validation.

RESULTS

Mean number of lymph nodes removed was 17.1 (range 10-40). LNI was detected in 66 patients (11.0%). Univariate predictive accuracy for total PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum was 63%, 58% and 73%, respectively. A nomogram based on clinical stage, PSA and Biopsy Gleason sum demonstrated bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy of 76%.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram based on pre-treatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum can highly accurately predict LNI at ePLND.

Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients

INTRODUCTION

In recent years there has been a shift in prostate cancer stage with the majority of patients nowadays being operated with cT1c disease, prostate-specific antigen levels of <10 ng/ml, and a decreased rate of seminal vesicle invasion. Recent data suggest the role of preservation of the seminal vesicle in improving continence and/or potency. We describe our preliminary experience with seminal-sparing, unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

21 selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent seminal unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy (seminal-sparing group, SSG). We compared the postoperative continence, erectile function and quality of orgasm results to those obtained in a control group (CG) of 21 patients who underwent unilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Sexual function was evaluated preoperatively and 9 months postoperatively with the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire and with other self-administered questionnaires. The quality of orgasm was evaluated 9 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

1 month postoperatively, 95 and 28% of the patients in the SSG and CG were continent (p<0.001). The median postoperative drop in IIEF-5 score was 5 points in SSG and 14.5 points in CG (p<0.0001). Nine months postoperatively, 90 and 62% of the patients in SSG and CG, respectively (p=0.05), maintained the ability to achieve orgasm.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience seminal-sparing radical prostatectomy showed good feasibility and improved early postoperative urinary continence, erectile function and quality of orgasm, without compromised cancer control.

Cancer of the prostate

Prostate carcinoma, with about 190,000 new cases occurring each year (15% of all cancers in men), is the most frequent cancer among men in northern and western Europe. Causes of the disease are essentially unknown, although hormonal factors are involved, and diet may exert an indirect influence; some genes, potentially involved in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) have been identified. A suspect of prostate cancer may derive from elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) finding. For a definitive diagnosis, however, a positive prostate biopsy is requested. Treatment strategy is defined according to initial PSA stage, and grade of the disease and age and general conditions of the patient. In localized disease, watchful waiting is indicated as primary option in patients with well or moderately differentiated tumours and a life expectancy <10 years, while radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy (with or without hormone-therapy) could be appropriate choices in the remaining cases. Hormone-therapy is the treatment of choice, combined with radiotherapy, for locally advanced or bulky disease and is effective, but not curative, in 80-85% of the cases of advanced disease. Patients who develop a hormone-refractory prostate cancer disease (HRPC) have to be evaluated for chemotherapy because of the recent demonstration of improved overall survival (2-2.5 months) and quality of life with docetaxel in more than 1,600 cases.

Value of prostate-specific antigen in the staging of Taiwanese patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Records of 71 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were reviewed retrospectively regarding clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, CT scan of pelvis, bone scan, and pelvic lymph node dissection. Fourteen patients had pelvic lymphadenopathy based on the CT scan. Of these, no patient had a PSA level <4 ng/mL, 1 patient had a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, and 3 had a PSA level between 10 and 20 ng/mL. Twelve of 13 patients with positive bone scan results had a PSA level >20 ng/mL, and 1 patient had a PSA level between 10 and 20 ng/mL. PSA can be cost-effective in selecting and identifying appropriate staging for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. CT scans are not indicated in men with clinical localized prostate cancer when PSA levels are < or =10 ng/mL. Bone scan is not required for staging asymptomatic men with PSA levels of < or =20 ng/mL. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer may not be necessary if PSA levels is < or =20 ng/mL and Gleason score is < or =5.

Critique of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in genitourinary oncology

Regional lymphadenectomy is prognostic and selectively therapeutic in urologic oncology. The role of lymphadenectomy continues to be defined with the evolving multimodal management of genitourinary malignancies. Laparoscopy is playing a greater role in the management of genitourinary malignancies and thus, it is germane to critique the role of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the management of these tumors. Review of the literature suggests that laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy is feasible with nodal yields commensurate to those in open published series. Although laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor is feasible, the technique and efficacy of this procedure require further investigation.

Diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer

Many controversies surround the management of prostate cancer to include screening practices, diagnosis, and treatment options. The lack of randomized prospective studies comparing the various definitive treatment modalities currently available occasionally can make the decision process challenging for patients and their providers. In this setting of controversy, the cost of treating clinically localized prostate cancer is significant. In the face of these unanswered questions, this article summarizes some important principles regarding the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. This review is limited to the diagnosis and management of clinically localized disease.

No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare differences in the actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival rates at 6 years in a contemporary series of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with and without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Biochemical failure was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen level greater than 0.2 ng/mL confirmed at least 1 week later.

METHODS

The records of 806 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases performed between January 1995 and June 1999 were reviewed. A total of 336 patients with favorable tumor characteristics (prostate-specific antigen 10 ng/mL or less, biopsy Gleason score 6 or less, and clinical Stage T1 or T2) not receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy were divided into two groups according to whether PLND was performed (PLND group, n = 140) or omitted (no-PLND group, n = 196). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the effect of age, race, family history, initial prostate-specific antigen level, tumor stage, biopsy Gleason score, PLND, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion on the likelihood of biochemical failure. Biochemical relapse-free survival for each group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean follow-up time for the entire group was 60.0 months, with a similar follow-up for both cohorts (mean 61.8 and 58.2 months, respectively, P value not statistically significant). Follow-up information was obtained through an institutional review board-approved prospective patient registry.

RESULTS

The 6-year biochemical relapse-free rate for the PLND versus no-PLND group was 86% and 88%, respectively (P = 0.28). On multivariate analysis, PLND was not an independent predictor of outcome (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results demonstrated that the omission of PLND in patients with favorable tumor characteristics does not adversely affect biochemical relapse rates at 6 years after surgery. Such patients can be spared the morbidity and cost of PLND without affecting the chance for cure.

The Predictors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis at Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

We studied preoperative variables in a contemporary series of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) to determine which variables were associated with lymph node metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1995 and November 1999, 1,091 men underwent RRP, 695 of whom underwent bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection without any prior therapy. We evaluated biopsy Gleason score, maximum tumor length and maximum percentage of tumor in the positive core(s), location and number of positive cores, and total prostate specific antigen before surgery in 295 of these patients. We also developed a classification and regression tree analysis algorithm to segregate the risk of positive lymph node metastasis. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent predictors of lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 695 patients 19 (2.7%) had lymph node metastasis. Clinical stage, Gleason score, positive basal core, greatest percentage of tumor on positive cores and maximum tumor length in positive core were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis in the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Classification and regression trees analysis revealed that 4 or more positive cores with any Gleason grade 4 or 5, serum prostate specific antigen 15.0 ng/ml or greater, or the presence of dominant Gleason 4 or 5 were independent predictors of lymph node metastasis. Our algorithm had a significantly higher diagnostic performance than the Hamburg algorithm (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our algorithm may be a valid tool for the prediction of lymph node metastasis and may help to select men who do not need to undergo bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection with RRP.

A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We developed a preoperative nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of 7,014 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at 6 institutions between 1985 and 2000. Exclusion criteria consisted of preoperative androgen ablation therapy, salvage radical prostatectomy and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 50 ng/ml. Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastases consisted of pretreatment PSA, clinical stage (1992 TNM) and biopsy Gleason sum. These predictors were used in logistic regression analysis based nomograms to predict the probability of lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Overall 5,510 patients with complete clinical and pathological information were included in the study. Lymph nodes metastases were present in 206 patients (3.7%). Pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage and institution represented predictors of lymph node status (p <0.001). Bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of the 3-variable nomogram (clinical stage, Gleason sum and PSA) was 0.76. Inclusion of a fourth variable, which accounts for institutional differences in lymph node metastases, yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78. The negative predictive value of our nomograms was 0.99 when they predicted 3% or less chance of positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Using clinical information, we produced 2 calibrated and validated nomograms, which accurately predict pathologically negative lymph nodes in men with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for radical prostatectomy.

The free-to-total serum prostatic specific antigen ratio as a predictor of the pathological features of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Curative therapy and extended period of disease free survival for patients with prostate cancer is possible only if the radical prostatectomy is performed when the disease is organ confined. It has been shown that combined use of local clinical stage, Gleason score of transrectal needle biopsy and serum PSA can accurately predict the final pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Recently the free/total PSA (F/T PSA) has been shown to improve the specificity of serum PSA level in early detection prostate cancer. In this study the utility of F/T PSA ratio in prediction the final pathological features of the prostate cancer was investigated.

METHODS

52 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy were included in this study with mean age of 63 (ranging from 49 to 73). According to the pathologic features of the tumors, patients were classified as organ confined in 37 (%71), specimen-confined in 39 (%75) and as with favorable pathology which was defined as organ confined or specimen confined with Gleason score lower than 7, 39 (%75) patients.

RESULTS

Neither total PSA levels nor F/T PSA values correlate significantly with the pathological characteristics of the tumor. The logistic regression analysis showed that the biopsy Gleason score was the only variable that was able to predict the pathology of the tumor (p < 0,05).

CONCLUSION

As a conclusion Gleason score of the needle biopsy specimen is the most predictive factor of the final pathological outcome. F/T PSA ratio did not provide additional information about predicting pathological stage.

Intraoperative lymph node staging of prostate cancer: the case against

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of obturator nodes is an accepted screening procedure, excluding from prostatectomy that group of node-positive patients who are presumed to almost always have disseminated cancer. The overall efficacy of this procedure depends not only on the near inevitability of cancer progression in these patients, but also the procedure morbidity (previously estimated at 8.4%), the additional costs (currently estimated at A$1200) and the infrequency of positive nodes. We evaluate the efficacy of lymph node staging for prostate cancer.

METHODS

We have evaluated the efficacy of intraoperative screening by node dissection in 123 prostatectomy cases. These cases were prescreened from a series of 261 radical prostatectomies by evaluating preoperative serum PSA and Gleason grade.

RESULTS

Three patients were identified with nodal disease, representing a detection rate of 2.4%. The present study confirms that current trends in prostate cancer identification and selection of individuals for radical surgery very rarely identify node-positive disease even after preselection with accepted 'high-risk' markers.

CONCLUSION

Considering the attendant cost and morbidity, there appears to be no justification for lymph node dissection as a routine preliminary to prostatectomy.

MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes

The occurrence of metastases to pelvic lymph nodes profoundly affects the prognosis of pelvic malignancies, making accurate staging crucial for selecting appropriate treatment. Modalities for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes are lymph node dissection, lymphangiography, and non-invasive techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the role of these techniques will be reviewed. Although this review will focus on prostate cancer, the statements may be generalised for other malignancies, as the metastases in pelvic lymph nodes have a similar pattern for other tumors.

Validation of a biopsy-based pathologic algorithm for predicting lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors validated an algorithm for the preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. The algorithm was applied to sextant biopsy material and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) stage obtained from a cohort of men who were treated at the authors' institution.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-three patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy and RRP with staging lymphadenectomy. The original algorithm was based on systematic sextant biopsy data and classified patients into three risk groups for LN metastases based on the biopsy result. If > or = 4 of 6 biopsies contained any Gleason Pattern 4 disease, then the patient was at high risk for LN metastases (45%). Patients with > or = 1 of 6 biopsies with dominant Gleason Pattern 4 disease (excluding high-risk patients) had an intermediate predicted risk (19%) of LN metastases. All other patients had a low predicted risk of LN metastases (2.2%). The authors assed the percentage of patients who were positive and negative for LN metastases and calculated the specificity and negative predictive value in the series when patients were classified according to the original algorithm.

RESULTS

Twenty of 443 patients had intraoperative LN metastases. When applied to the current data, the Hamburg algorithm classified 404 patients in the low-risk group, 30 patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 9 patients in the high risk group. The incidence of LN metastases was 2.47% in the low-risk group, 20% in the intermediate-risk group, and 44.4% in the high-risk group. The negative predictive value for the low-risk group was 97.52%, and the specificity was 94.14%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hamburg algorithm proved a valid tool for the prediction of lymphatic spread in this validation study on data from the authors' institution. The algorithm may serve as a tool to select patients who do not need to undergo pelvic lymphadenectomy at the time they undergo RRP, hence reducing morbidity and expense. More importantly, with the increasing numbers of men undergoing treatment options in whom LN dissection is not performed, this validated algorithm provides an important selection basis regarding the appropriateness of a therapy that does not routinely include LN staging.

Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy

In recent years prostate cancer has become the predominant malignancy in men. With the introduction of prostate specific antigen (PSA) the disease can be diagnosed at an early stage, at which surgical therapy can be curative. In the past century, the retropubic and the perineal routes were established as alternatives of surgical access to the gland for clinically localized prostate cancer. The selection of the operative route is mostly decided individually on the basis of surgical training and experience. The revived interest in perineal radical prostatectomy is explained by the fact that this technique has been associated with low morbidity. The differences of both surgical approaches of radical prostatectomy are elucidated and compared regarding tumor control and short and long term complication rates. Taking these results into consideration, specific advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy are emphasized.

Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection

INTRODUCTION

The only definite way to determine lymph node metastasis, an unfavorable prognostic factor in prostate cancer is lymphadenectomy. Due to increased morbidity and the increasing trend towards minimally invasive surgery, ways to avoid or at least limit lymphadenectomy are being sought. We routinely performed a meticulous lymphadenectomy in all patients and the goal of this study was to evaluate which of the previously proposed criteria determining who needs a lymphadenectomy can be applied in our patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology, without neoadjuvant hormone therapy, negative pelvic and abdominal CT scans and negative bone scan underwent a radical prostatectomy with simultaneous bilateral extended lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Between 1989 and 1999, 463 patients were included in this study. The median age was 64 (range 44-76) years and the median PSA was 11.0 (range 0.42-172) ng/ml. A median of 21 nodes were removed per patient. One hundred and nine (24%) had lymph node metastasis: 17% of patients with a PSA value < or =20 ng/ml and 12% with a PSA value < or = 10 ng/ml. None of the patients with a preoperative grading of 1 and a PSA value < or =10 ng/ml and 10% of the "low-risk patients" with a PSA value < or = 10 ng/ml and a preoperative grading <3 had lymph node metastases. Seven percent with a PSA value < or = 10 ng/ml and a prostatectomy Gleason score under 7 were found to be node positive.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients would have been understaged and left with diseased nodes when applying preoperative PSA value < or = 10 ng/ml and grading <3/Gleason <7 as criteria for omitting lymphadenectomy. Therefore we consider meticulous lymphadenectomy a must for correct staging in all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with the exception of patients with a grading of 1 and a PSA < or = 10 ng/ml.

Prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer staging in a population-based register

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown a relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and prostate tumour volume. Reports based on selected case series have also indicated that serum PSA may be used for staging, although a varying prevalence of metastasizing tumours complicates the interpretation of these studies. In order to determine the accuracy of the serum level of PSA in predicting the presence of metastases we performed a prospective cohort study of a geographically defined population of men with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Serum level of PSA and the results of investigations for regional lymph node and distant metastases were recorded for all 8328 men with prostate cancer registered in the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register 1996-1997.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lymph node metastases among men who had undergone lymph node exploration was 4%, 16% and 33% for well, moderately and poorly differentiated tumours. The corresponding prevalence of distant metastases was 12%, 30% and 48%. With serum PSA <20 ng/ml as a cut-off point the negative likelihood ratios for well and moderately differentiated tumours were found to be 0.47 and 0.45 for lymph node metastases and 0.24 and 0.18 for distant metastases, resulting in post-test probabilities >92% for the exclusion of metastases. In men with poorly differentiated tumours, the negative likelihood ratio would need to be even lower to safely exclude disseminated disease.

CONCLUSION

For well to moderately differentiated tumours, further investigations to assess the presence of metastases may be omitted with no great risk for understaging if serum PSA <20 ng/ml.

Frozen section diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma in pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with nomogram prediction of metastasis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the sensitivity and negative predictive values of frozen section analysis of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma with the predictive power of published nomograms for metastasis to lymph nodes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma between 1991 and early 1997. The sensitivity and negative predictive values were computed comparing frozen section analysis, and patients were grouped by risk stratification. Comparison was made using the McNemar text.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for detecting lymph node metastasis on frozen section analysis for all risk groups was 33% (9 of 27). The sensitivity for identifying patients at high risk of having nodal metastasis by published nomograms alone was 67% (18 of 27) (P = 0.04). The overall negative predictive value for frozen section analysis was 96.5% (503 of 521). The negative predictive value for uninvolved lymph nodes, using low and intermediate-risk groups stratified by published nomograms, was 97.9% (436 of 445).

CONCLUSIONS

Frozen section analysis of pelvic lymph nodes to detect metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is less sensitive in determining which patients will have lymph nodes involved by metastatic adenocarcinoma than using risk stratification by published nomograms. The negative predictive value of frozen section analysis in all risk groups was very high, up to 97.9%.

[Non-metastatic prostate cancer treated with exclusive radiotherapy: prognosis of patients according to lymph node radiologic or surgical assessment method. Multivariate retrospective analysis]

PURPOSE

To compare retrospectively the outcome of localized prostate cancers treated by curative external radiotherapy in which the negative lymphatic status was either surgically or radiologically assessed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1986 to December 1995, 112 patients with localized prostate cancers were found to have no evidence of lymphatic disease in the pelvis. N0 status was assessed either surgically (61 patients, group pN-) or after a CT scan procedure (51 patients, group cN0). The treatment consisted of conventional external radiotherapy using a four-fields box technique to a total dose of 65 Gy. The pelvis was never irradiated.

RESULTS

The two groups did not statistically differ according to age, PSA level, Gleason score, T stage and hormonal therapy. Actuarial NED survival rates were 80% and 60% at five and ten years respectively. At ten years, the actuarial NED survival rates were 78% and 34% in the pN- and cN0 groups respectively (p = 0.003). The multivariate analysis corroborated the positive impact of lymphatic dissection before radiotherapy on disease free survival of T1-T2 patients, but not for T3 stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests the inability of CT scan to accurately evaluate the lymph node status in carcinoma of the prostate. Systematic ilio-obturator nodal dissection is strongly recommended in early stages before curative radiotherapy. Only pN-patients should be included in high dose conformal irradiation trials.

Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

We prospectively validate an algorithm to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 293 patients with prostatic cancer were identified before pelvic lymph node dissection according to an algorithm developed with the classification and regression tree analysis as high-greater than 3 sextant biopsies containing any Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer, intermediate-at least 1 biopsy dominated by Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer but not high risk and low risk-all other patients. Observed and predicted frequencies of pelvic lymph node metastasis were compared.

RESULTS

The observed frequencies of lymph node metastasis were remarkably similar to the predicted frequencies, including 2.8% versus 2.2% in 85.7% of patients in the low risk group, 16.7% versus 19.4% in 10.2% intermediate and 41.7% versus 45.5% in 4.1% high, respectively. If patients in the low risk group were considered to have node negative disease the specificity and negative predictive value of the algorithm were 88.4% and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our algorithm is valid as a simple and accurate tool for the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic cancer. Those 85.7% of patients classified by the algorithm to have a low risk of lymphatic spread should not undergo pelvic lymph node dissection before definitive local treatment.

Is it necessary to do staging pelvic lymph node dissection for T1c prostate cancer?

The necessity of pelvic lymph node dissection has been questioned in recent years as a result of improved pre-treatment staging based on clinical and pathologic factors. Accurate evaluation of nodal status allows rational selection of therapy and improved outcomes. Nevertheless, lymph node dissection may play a role even in patients with low stage disease (clinical T1c) despite an overall low risk for metastases. Herein we discuss recent advances in the evaluation of lymph nodes in stage T1c prostate cancer with respect to accurate prediction, radiologic imaging, molecular characterization, and operative considerations.

Indications, technique, and results of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy

Despite considerable clinical research, there is still controversy about the optimal management of the pelvic lymph nodes in men with prostate cancer. This article reviews the creation and application of selection criteria for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and describes the various techniques.

No difference in biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients

OBJECTIVES

To detect the short-term differences in biochemical relapse-free rates between patients with and without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Recently, a trend has begun to omit PLND in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy considered at low risk of pelvic lymph node metastases.

METHODS

The records of 1152 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases were reviewed. A total of 575 patients with favorable tumor characteristics (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10 ng/mL or less, Gleason score 6 or less, and clinical Stage T1 or T2) who were not receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy were divided into two groups according to whether PLND was performed (PLND group, n = 372) or omitted (no PLND group, n = 203). Proportional hazards were used to analyze the effect of age, race, family history, stage, biopsy Gleason score, initial PSA, PLND, and pathologic findings on the likelihood of biochemical failure. Biochemical failure-free survival for each group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was 38 months (range 1 to 141).

RESULTS

The actuarial 4-year biochemical relapse-free rate for the PLND versus no PLND groups was 91% and 97%, respectively (P = 0.16). On multivariate analysis, PLND was not an independent predictor of outcome (P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study indicate that the omission of PLND in patients with favorable tumor characteristics does not adversely affect biochemical relapse rates.

The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study assesses artificial intelligence methods to identify prostate carcinoma patients at low risk for lymph node spread. If patients can be assigned accurately to a low risk group, unnecessary lymph node dissections can be avoided, thereby reducing morbidity and costs.

METHODS

A rule-derivation technology for simple decision-tree analysis was trained and validated using patient data from a large database (4,133 patients) to derive low risk cutoff values for Gleason sum and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level. An empiric analysis was used to derive a low risk cutoff value for clinical TNM stage. These cutoff values then were applied to 2 additional, smaller databases (227 and 330 patients, respectively) from separate institutions.

RESULTS

The decision-tree protocol derived cutoff values of < or = 6 for Gleason sum and < or = 10.6 ng/mL for PSA. The empiric analysis yielded a clinical TNM stage low risk cutoff value of < or = T2a. When these cutoff values were applied to the larger database, 44% of patients were classified as being at low risk for lymph node metastases (0.8% false-negative rate). When the same cutoff values were applied to the smaller databases, between 11 and 43% of patients were classified as low risk with a false-negative rate of between 0.0 and 0.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that a population of prostate carcinoma patients at low risk for lymph node metastases can be identified accurately using a simple decision algorithm that considers preoperative PSA, Gleason sum, and clinical TNM stage. The risk of lymph node metastases in these patients is < or = 1%; therefore, pelvic lymph node dissection may be avoided safely. The implications of these findings in surgical and nonsurgical treatment are significant.

A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome, advantages and disadvantages of retropubic and perineal approach to radical prostatectomy, as performed by one surgeon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This unrandomized study included 138 patients who underwent either radical retropubic (RRP) or radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP), based on the specific conditions or the patient's choice; 79 patients (mean age 64.6 years) underwent RPP and 59 (mean age 61.7 years) RRP. Outcome measures included estimated blood loss, the incidence of blood transfusions, positive margins and complications, operative duration, analgesic use, days in hospital and quality of life.

RESULTS

There was no difference in operative duration, and the incidence of positive margins or complications between the groups. The mean estimated blood loss in the RPP and RRP groups was 415 and 1,138 mL, respectively. The RPP group stayed a mean of 2.2 days less in hospital and took 2.8 days less to regain a full diet than the RRP group; the RPP group needed 1.7 days before using oral analgesics and the RRP group 3.8 days. Of patients in both groups, 85% were pad-free at one year and their overall quality of life was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of RRP and RPP are comparable; the advantages of the perineal approach include minimal blood loss, low-intensity postoperative nursing care, low analgesic use and earlier discharge from hospital.

Circulating levels of interleukin-6 in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that plays a central role in host defense due to its wide range of immune and hematopoietic activities. It is found in high levels in human ejaculate, and has recently been found to regulate prostate-specific protein expression in prostate cancer cells through nonsteroidal activation of the androgen receptor. IL-6 may be a candidate mediator of morbidity in patients with metastatic disease. We attempted to evaluate the potential of circulating IL-6 levels as a marker of disease progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Serum IL-6, prostate specific antigen (PSA), percent free PSA (%fPSA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) were measured using commercially available assays in 407 men, including 15 controls. The rest of the study population had clinical or histologic evidence of prostate diseases, including 41 patients with chronic prostatitis, 167 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 8 with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), 88 with localized prostate cancer, 22 with local recurrence after treatment of primary tumor, 4 with advanced untreated disease (nodal or bony metastases), 23 with advanced hormone dependent disease, and 39 with advanced hormone refractory disease (PSA > 1.0 ng/ml while on hormone treatment and/or evidence of disease progression). None had history of concurrent malignancy or acute inflammatory condition. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Spearman's correlation analysis were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Serum levels of IL-6 were significantly elevated in patients with clinically evident hormone refractory disease (5.7 +/- 1.9 pg/ml) and statistical significance was seen when comparing the elevated serum IL-6 levels to those in normal controls, prostatitis, BPH, and localized and recurrent disease, (P values < 0.01). Compared to serum levels of controls and BPH, PSA was significantly elevated in advanced untreated disease and hormone refractory groups (P < 0.05). Percent fPSA was significantly lower in all cancer patients but the hormone refractory. Serum PSMA was elevated in advanced untreated prostate cancer. Serum IL-6 showed positive correlation with PSMA and negative correlation with serum PSA but did not attain statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum IL-6 levels are significantly elevated in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients and may be a surrogate marker of the androgen independent phenotype.

Perineal approach to radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients with localized prostate cancer

Close urologic follow-up of renal transplant candidates and recipients often reveals prostate carcinoma at an early stage. Two patients who underwent renal transplantation for end-stage disease also underwent radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma, 3 years after grafting in 1 patient and 4 years before grafting in the other. The perineal approach to prostatectomy may facilitate later renal transplantation and avoid allograft damage.