A transcatheter intracardiac shunt device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 trial

Left atrial shunting devices: why, what, how, and… when?

Left atrial (LA) hypertension is central in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) in general and of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in particular. Despite approved treatments, a number of HF patients continue experiencing disabling symptoms due to LA hypertension, causing pulmonary congestion, pulmonary hypertension, and right heart dysfunction, at rest and/or during exercise. LA decompression therapies, i.e., left atrial shunting through a specifically designed device (either implant-based or implant-free), are being studied in various forms of HF to alleviate LA hypertension and patients' symptoms. Despite a solid background and favorable signals from initial non-randomized clinical trials, the quest for the optimal HF candidate for interatrial shunt devices is still an area of active research that at the same time is helping to better elucidate the intricate pathophysiology of HF(pEF).

Left atrial pressure normalisation by graded radiofrequency atrial septostomy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a single-arm pilot study

BACKGROUND

In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), elevated mean left atrial pressure (MLAP) is a recognised haemodynamic feature. This pilot study explored the use of a personalised approach-combined radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation (CURB)-to establish interatrial communication in patients with elevated resting MLAP.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and March 2023, a single-arm study was conducted at Fuwai Hospital (Beijing, China) in patients with HFpEF and resting MLAP ≥18 mm Hg. CURB was performed using graded balloon dilation to achieve an MLAP target of <15 mm Hg, followed by rim stabilisation with radiofrequency ablation. Clinical status, interatrial fenestration and haemodynamic parameters were assessed during follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included (mean age 68.4 years; 59% male). The procedural target was achieved in 31 patients (97%). Median MLAP changed from 19.0 mm Hg (IQR 18.0, 21.0) to 13.0 mm Hg (IQR 12.0, 13.3), and mean pulmonary arterial pressure from 26.9 mm Hg (SD 3.9) to 23.5 mm Hg (SD 3.7). Over a median follow-up of 15.5 months (IQR 11.0, 18.0), fenestrations remained patent. The intervention was associated with favourable change in New York Heart Association functional class (median change: -1 class), 6 min walk distance (+48.5 m) and quality of life scores (-21.7 points). Reassessment in a subset (n=8) beyond 1 year showed sustained MLAP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HFpEF and elevated MLAP, the CURB technique was feasible and associated with mid-term changes in haemodynamics and functional measures. Further controlled studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes, safety and broader applicability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04573166.

Therapeutic left-to-right shunting in heart failure

Heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction is associated with elevated left atrial pressure at rest due to fluid overload or during exercise, leading to pulmonary venous congestion. Even with available treatments, heart failure hospitalizations remain high, and improvements in quality-of-life scores and functional capacity are modest. Thus, there is growing interest in non-pharmacological methods to decompress the left atrium and improve heart failure symptoms and outcomes. Left-to-right shunts have emerged as a potential therapeutic option to reduce left atrial hypertension, improve quality of life, and impact long-term outcomes. This nascent field carries both potential therapeutic promise and many unanswered questions. Recent data have questioned whether the effects of this therapy vary based on the left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary vascular resistance, and/or right ventricular structure and function. This review discusses the basis for left-to-right shunt therapies, synthesizes past and ongoing clinical trials, and offers future directions.

Left Atrial Unloading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: In-Vitro Study of Interatrial Shunting and Continuous Flow Pumping

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often presents with elevated left atrial (LA) pressure. Interatrial shunt devices (IASD) were developed and rotary blood pumps implanted off-label to reduce LA pressure in HFpEF patients. This study modeled an HFpEF patient in a mock circulation loop, comparing pulmonary decompression using an IASD (2-12 mm diameter) and a continuous flow (CF) centrifugal rotary blood pump (HeartMate 3; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) in LA to aortic configuration (1-6 L/min support). Left atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and cardiac output (CO) at 12 mm shunt diameter and 6 L/min pump support were primarily used to quantify pulmonary decompression. The IASD reduced LA pressure by 28% and 45%, while the CF reduced LA pressure by 135% and 51% at rest and exercise, respectively. Both devices reduced mean PAP by 13% (IASD) and 57% (CF) at rest and by 21% (IASD) and 32% (HM3) at exercise. The IASD resulted in reduced CO (rest: 14%, exercise 8%), but the CF increased CO (rest: 63%, exercise: 28%) and ventricular loading due to the LA to aortic configuration. Automated changes to rotary blood pump speed or IASD diameter may assist with unloading as physiologic conditions change.

The efficacy, safety and clinical feasibility of a percutaneous atrial septal shunt device for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-center cohort study

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of FreeFlow percutaneous atrial septal shunt device (manufactured by AOLIU Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) in patients with refractory pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) for the first time.

METHODS

The study enrolled adult patients diagnosed with refractory pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at the Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between Oct 2021 and Oct 2023. The patients were treated with the FreeFlow percutaneous atrial septal shunt device and underwent follow-up immediately after operation, as well as before and after discharge (at 1, 3, 6, 12 months post-operation). The primary endpoints of the study included the rate of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and serious device-related adverse events (SADEs) within 12 months of shunt implantation. Data analysis was conducted using SAS 9.3.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients were enrolled in the study and successfully completed the operation. 10 subjects had completed 12 months' follow-up after operation, while two subjects had died. The incidence of MACCE was 0%, and the incidence of SAEs was 33%, which was unrelated to the treatment with this device. No systemic or instrumental embolizations occurred during the follow-up period. All ten subjects exhibited a stable right-to-left shunt after the operation (100% success rate). Seven patients' New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification improved from grade III to grade II. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) score and the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) at 12 months post-operation were significantly improved compared to baseline, with scores of 47.6 ± 19.5 versus 64.7 ± 24.6 (P = 0.029) and distances of 239.5 ± 137.8 m versus 401.7 ± 129.6 m (P = 0.045), respectively. Similarly, the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right heart diameter (RAD) also decreased significantly, from 3236 ± 1590.3 pg/mL to 1787.3 ± 703.7 pg/mL (P = 0.039) and from 59.1 ± 10.6 mm to 46.3 ± 7.5 mm (P = 0.046), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this clinical study demonstrate that the product can attain the anticipated performance under typical conditions of use. The risks associated with the product are deemed acceptable when weighed against its potential benefits. All preclinical and clinical evaluations have furnished definitive and rational scientific evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous atrial septal shunt.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Insights from serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging show early progress in diastolic dysfunction relates to impaired right ventricular deformation

Latent pulmonary vascular disease is a distinct feature already in the early pathophysiology of masked heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and associated with reduced right ventricular (RV) functional reserve. We hypothesized that serial real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at rest and during exercise-stress may detect early progress in pathophysiological alterations in HFpEF. Patients presenting with exertional dyspnoea and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e'>8, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction > 50%) were prospectively enrolled in the HFpEF Stress Trial (NCT03260621). Rest and exercise-stress echocardiography, CMR and right heart catheterisation were performed at baseline. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used for classification of HFpEF (≥ 15/25mmHg at rest/during exercise-stress) and non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD). Repeat rest and exercise-stress CMR was performed in median 2.94 years after recruitment during which timeframe some HFpEF patients had undergone interatrial shunt device (IASD) implantation. Cardiovascular events were assessed after 4 years.Serial CMR scans were available for NCD n = 10, HFpEF n = 10 and HFpEF with IASD implantation following baseline diagnosis n = 6. RV long axis strain at rest and during exercise-stress decreased in HFpEF (p = 0.007 for both) but neither in NCD nor HFpEF with IASD. In contrast, in NCD, an improvement in LA LAS during exercise-stress (p = 0.028) was noted. There were no functional alterations in HFpEF patients who had undergone IASD implantation. RV functional deterioration may be a pathophysiological feature during early-stage disease progress in HFpEF. In this observational study RV functional deterioration was detected in HFpEF patients only but not patients with NCD and patients with HFpEF that were treated with IASD placement. These findings should next be explored in adequately powered future research trials. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621 (First posted date 24/08/2017).

Echocardiography evaluation of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after combined procedure of catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation

Using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to investigate the occurrence and related causes of iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) after catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on the right heart system. We retrospectively analyzed 330 patients that underwent combined procedure of catheter ablation for AF and LAAC at General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2018 to March 2022. These patients were divided into iASD group and non-iASD group according to whether there was persistent iASD shown on TEE at 3 months after procedure. There were 96 (29.1%) patients with iASD and 234 patients without in the TEE follow up at 3 months post-operation. Patients with iASD had larger left atrial volumes (76.5 ± 35.2 ml vs. 61.1 ± 21.9 ml, p = 0.036) as well as higher occurrence of mitral regurgitation (MR) (32.3% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.018) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (27.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.002). Procedural features showed that patients with persistent iASD had longer procedure time (92.1 ± 36.3 vs. 69.1 ± 17.8 min, p = 0.003) and larger sheath sizes (4.1 ± 1.2 mm vs. 3.3 ± 1.2 mm, p = 0.022). The preoperative and postoperative right heart parameters of patients in the persistent iASD group were compared, and there were no significant differences on right atrial/ventricular diameter, right heart systolic/diastolic function and pulmonary artery pressure (P > 0.05). The occurrence of iASD 3 months after combined atrial fibrillation ablation and LAAC was 29.1%. The size of left atrium, the pressure of left atrium, the manipulation time within left atrium, the size of sheath, and the use of ICE during operation was related to the closure of iASD.

Long term safety and outcomes after atrial shunting for heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: 5-year and 3-year follow-up in the REDUCE LAP-HF I and II trials

BACKGROUND

There is a little evidence regarding long-term safety and efficacy for atrial shunt devices in heart failure (HF).

METHODS

The REDUCE LAP-HF I (n = 44) and II (n = 621) trials (RCT-I and -II) were multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trials of patients with HF and ejection fraction >40%. Outcome data were analyzed from RCT-I, a mechanistic trial with 5-year follow-up, and RCT-II, a pivotal trial identifying a responder group (n = 313) defined by exercise PVR <1.74 WU and no cardiac rhythm management device with 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At 5 years in RCT I, there were no differences in cardiovascular (CV) mortality, HF events, embolic stroke, or new-onset atrial fibrillation between groups. After 3 years in RCT II, there was no difference in the primary outcome (hierarchical composite of CV mortality, stroke, HF events, and KCCQ) between shunt and sham in the overall trial. Compared to sham, those with responder characteristics in RCT-II had a better outcome with shunt (win ratio 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.2], P = .006; 44% reduction in HF events [shunt 9 vs. control 16 per 100 patient-years], P = .005; and greater improvement in KCCQ overall summary score [+17.9 ± 20.0 vs. +7.6 ± 20.4], P < .001), while nonresponders had significantly more HF events. Shunt treatment at 3 years was associated with a higher rate of ischemic stroke (3.2% vs. 0%, 95% CI 2%-6.1%, P = .032) and lower incidence of worsening kidney dysfunction (10.7% vs. 19.3%, P = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

With up to 5 years of follow up, adverse events were low in patients receiving atrial shunts. In the responder group, atrial shunt treatment was associated with a significantly lower HF event rate and improved KCCQ compared to sham through 3 years of follow-up.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02600234, NCT03088033.

Iatrogenic atrial septal defects in structural heart interventions: Opening the Pandora's box

In the modern era of structural heart interventions, the total number of transseptal procedures is growing exponentially, thus increasing the rate and need for management of iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASDs). To date, there are no official guidelines on the assessment and management of iASDs, due to inconclusive evidence on whether patients benefit more from the percutaneous closure of iASD than from conservative management and vigorous follow-up. Despite the abundance of observational studies on iASDs, there is still a lack of randomized studies. Evidence so far show that percutaneous closure is no superior over conservative treatment in patients with iASDs, however, it has been demonstrated that patients with spontaneous closure of iASDs experience less heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. On the other hand, researchers have investigated the beneficial nature of interatrial shunt therapy in patients with HFpEF and, more recently, with HFrEF, due to the presumed hemodynamic benefits. Herein, we provide an updated review of relevant literature, focusing on iASD persistence rates, predicting factors for their persistence, and clinical outcomes of iASD persistence, to summarize available evidence and discuss future directions in the field.

Atrial Mechanics, Atrial Cardiomyopathy and Impact of Atrial Interventions

Our comprehension of atrial mechanics, atrial cardiomyopathy and their clinical implications across various cardiovascular conditions has advanced significantly. Atrial interventions can have differing effects on atrial mechanics. With the rapid increase in the use of atrial interventions, it is crucial for investigators and clinicians to acknowledge the potential adverse effects of these interventions on atrial mechanics that might not be clinically significant at the time of interventions. Recognizing the preclinical stage of atrial maladaptation might enable early interventions before the development of irreversible atrial remodeling and clinical manifestation. We review normal atrial function and mechanics, and atrial cardiomyopathy in select cardiovascular conditions. We also summarize and discuss the current evidence of the impact of various atrial interventions on atrial function and mechanics.

Left Atrial Hemodynamics and Clinical Utility in Heart Failure

Comprehensive knowledge of the left atrium (LA) and its pathophysiology has emerged as an important clinical and research focus in the heart failure (HF) arena. Although studies on HF focusing on investigating left ventricular remodeling are numerous, those on atrial structural and functional changes have received comparatively less attention. Studies on LA remodeling have recently received increasing attention, and LA pressure (LAP) has become a novel target for advanced monitoring and is a potential therapeutic approach for treating HF. Various devices specifically designed for the direct measurement of LAP have been developed to optimize HF treatment by reducing LAP. This review focuses on LA hemodynamic monitoring and effective LAP decompression.

2-Year Outcomes of an Atrial Shunt Device in HFpEF/HFmrEF: Results From REDUCE LAP-HF II

BACKGROUND

The REDUCE LAP-HF II (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II) trial found that, compared with a sham procedure, the Corvia Atrial Shunt did not improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. However, after 12-month follow-up, "responders" (peak-exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU and absence of a cardiac rhythm management device) were identified.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine: 1) the overall efficacy and safety of the atrial shunt vs sham control after 2 years of follow-up; and 2) whether the benefits of atrial shunting are sustained in responders during longer-term follow-up or are offset by adverse effects of the shunt.

METHODS

The study analyzed 2-year outcomes in the overall REDUCE LAP-HF II trial, as well as in responder and nonresponder subgroups. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal ischemic/embolic stroke, total heart failure events, and change in health status.

RESULTS

In 621 randomized patients, there was no difference between the shunt (n = 309) and sham (n = 312) groups in the primary endpoint (win ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.82-1.24]) or its individual components at 2 years. Shunt patency at 24 months was 98% in shunt-treated patients. Cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal ischemic stroke were not different between the groups; however, major adverse cardiac events were more common in those patients assigned to the shunt compared with sham (6.9% vs 2.7%; P = 0.018). More patients randomized to the shunt had an increase in right ventricular volume of ≥30% compared with the sham control (39% vs 28%, respectively; P < 0.001), but right ventricular dysfunction was uncommon and not different between the treatment groups. In responders (n = 313), the shunt was superior to sham (win ratio: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.02-1.83]; P = 0.037, with 51% fewer HF events [incidence rate ratio: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25-0.95]; P = 0.034]). In nonresponders (n = 265), atrial shunting was inferior to sham (win ratio: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

At 2 years of follow-up in REDUCE LAP-HF II, there was no difference in efficacy between the atrial shunt and sham groups in the overall trial group. The potential clinical benefit identified in the responder group after 1 and 2 years of follow-up is currently being evaluated in the RESPONDER-HF (Re-Evaluation of the Corvia Atrial Shunt Device in a Precision Medicine Trial to Determine Efficacy in Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial. (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II [REDUCE LAP-HF II]; NCT03088033).

Impact of patent foramen ovale with left-to-right shunt on atrial fibrillation ablation in young patients

OBJECTIVE

The CABANA study shows that atrial fibrillation (AF) paitents younger than 65 years benefit more from the AF radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of inherent patent foramen ovale (PFO) with a Left-to-Right Shunt on the RFCA procedure in young AF patients.

METHODS

Based on the presence or absence of inherent PFO, the AF patients were divided into the PFO groups and the non-PFO group. Clinical follow-up was also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 285 AF patients were enrolled. PFO was detected by TEE in 42 patients. The age of patients at initial AF onset was younger in the PFO group than in the non-PFO group (58.3 ± 8.9 vs. 62.3 ± 9.6 years, P = 0.012). There were more AF patients aged <55 years in the PFO group than in the non-PFO group. For the 9 AF patients with PFO who experienced AF recurrence and the left-to-right shunts decreased in size in 5 of the patients aged <65 years. The LAD decreased in those patients. In the PeAF patients, 53/64 patients aged <65 years and 23/40 patients aged older than 65 years were free of AF (82.8 % vs. 57.5 %, respectively; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Success is not affected when AF is combined PFO compared with AF without PFO. Young patients have better PeAF RFCA outcomes. AF in young patients with left atria enlargement and a serious AF burden, may lead to reduced EF and render PFO easy to detect.

Left Atrial Roof Enlargement Is a Distinct Feature of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown to what extent intrinsic atrial cardiomyopathy or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction drive atrial remodeling and functional failure in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Computational 3-dimensional (3D) models fitted to cardiovascular magnetic resonance allow state-of-the-art anatomic and functional assessment, and we hypothesized to identify a phenotype linked to HFpEF.

METHODS

Patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography (E/e', >8) were prospectively recruited and classified as HFpEF or noncardiac dyspnea based on right heart catheterization. All patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterization and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Computational 3D anatomic left atrial (LA) models were generated based on short-axis cine sequences. A fully automated pipeline was developed to segment cardiovascular magnetic resonance images and build 3D statistical models of LA shape and find the 3D patterns discriminant between HFpEF and noncardiac dyspnea. In addition, atrial morphology and function were quantified by conventional volumetric analyses and deformation imaging. A clinical follow-up was conducted after 24 months for the evaluation of cardiovascular hospitalization.

RESULTS

Beyond atrial size, the 3D LA models revealed roof dilation as the main feature found in masked HFpEF (diagnosed during exercise-stress only) preceding a pattern shift to overall atrial size in overt HFpEF (diagnosed at rest). Characteristics of the 3D model were integrated into the LA HFpEF shape score, a biomarker to characterize the gradual remodeling between noncardiac dyspnea and HFpEF. The LA HFpEF shape score was able to discriminate HFpEF (n=34) to noncardiac dyspnea (n=34; area under the curve, 0.81) and was associated with a risk for atrial fibrillation occurrence (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]; P=0.003), as well as cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]; P=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

LA roof dilation is an early remodeling pattern in masked HFpEF advancing to overall LA enlargement in overt HFpEF. These distinct features predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular hospitalization.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03260621.

Prognostic and diagnostic implications of impaired rest and exercise-stress left atrial compliance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND

With emerging therapies, early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comes to the fore. Whilst the reference standard of exercise-stress right heart catheterisation is well established, the clinical routine struggles between feasibility of exercise-stress and diagnostic accuracy of available tests.

METHODS

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' > 8) who underwent simultaneous rest and exercise-stress echocardiography and right heart catheterisation (RHC). HFpEF was defined according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥15 mmHg stress: ≥25 mmHg). Patients were classified as non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD) in the absence of HFpEF and cardiovascular disease. LA compliance was defined as reservoir strain (Es)/(E/e'). Follow-up was conducted after 4 years to evaluate cardiovascular hospitalisation (CVH).

RESULTS

The final study population included 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and NCD n = 34) of which 23 reached the clinical endpoint, 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Patients with HFpEF according to the HFA-PEFF score (≥5 points) had significantly lower LA compliance at rest (p < 0.001) compared to patients with a score ≤ 4. LA compliance at rest outperformed E/e' (AUC 0.78 vs 0.87, p = 0.024) and showed a statistical trend to outperform Es (AUC 0.79 vs 0.87, p = 0.090) for the diagnosis of HFpEF. LA compliance at rest predicted CVH (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.70-4.74, p < 0.001) irrespective of concomitant atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

LA compliance at rest can be obtained from clinical routine imaging and bears strong diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Addition of LA compliance can improve the role of echocardiography as the primary test and gatekeeper.

MEMS Technology in Cardiology: Advancements and Applications in Heart Failure Management Focusing on the CardioMEMS Device

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. It is characterized by various structural and/or functional abnormalities of the heart, resulting in elevated intracardiac pressure and/or inadequate cardiac output at rest and/or during exercise. These dysfunctions can originate from a variety of conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, cardiomyopathies, heart valve disorders, arrhythmias, and other lifestyle or systemic factors. Identifying the underlying cause is crucial for detecting reversible or treatable forms of HF. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that there has not been an increase in the incidence of the disease. Instead, patients seem to experience a chronic trajectory marked by frequent hospitalizations and stagnant mortality rates. Managing these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that focuses on preventing disease progression, controlling symptoms, and preventing acute decompensations. In the outpatient setting, patient self-care plays a vital role in achieving these goals. This involves implementing necessary lifestyle changes and promptly recognizing symptoms/signs such as dyspnea, lower limb edema, or unexpected weight gain over a few days, to alert the healthcare team for evaluation of medication adjustments. Traditional methods of HF monitoring, such as symptom assessment and periodic clinic visits, may not capture subtle changes in hemodynamics. Sensor-based technologies offer a promising solution for remote monitoring of HF patients, enabling early detection of fluid overload and optimization of medical therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the CardioMEMS device, a novel sensor-based system for pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in HF patients. We discuss the technical aspects, clinical evidence, and future directions of CardioMEMS in HF management.

Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for non-invasive characterisation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: final outcomes of the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Recently, the HFpEF Stress Trial demonstrated feasibility and accuracy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time (RT) exercise-stress atrial function imaging for early identification of HFpEF. However, no outcome data have yet been presented.

METHODS

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively recruited 75 patients with dyspnea on exertion and echocardiographic preserved EF and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' > 8). 68 patients entered the final study cohort and were characterized as HFpEF (n = 34) or non-cardiac dyspnea (n = 34) according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥ 15 mmHg stress: ≥ 25 mmHg). These patients were contacted by telephone and hospital charts were reviewed. The clinical endpoint was cardiovascular events (CVE).

RESULTS

Follow-up was performed after 48 months; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. HFpEF patients were more frequently compared to non-cardiac dyspnea (15 vs. 8, p = 0.059). Hospitalised patients during follow-up had higher H2FPEF scores (5 vs. 3, p < 0.001), and impaired left atrial (LA) function at rest (p ≤ 0.002) and stress (p ≤ 0.006). Impairment of CMR-derived atrial function parameters at rest and during exercise-stress (p ≤ 0.003) was associated with increased likelihood for CVE. CMR-Feature Tracking LA Es/Ee (p = 0.016/0.017) and RT-CMR derived LA long axis strain (p = 0.003) were predictors of CVE independent of the presence of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial function emerged as the strongest predictor for 4-year outcome in the HFpEF Stress Trial. A combination of rest and exercise-stress LA function quantification allows accurate diagnostic and prognostic stratification in HFpEF.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03260621.

[Precision medicine enhances personalized medicine in cardiology]

Personalized medicine and precision medicine, frequently used synonymously, shall be clearly differentiated. Accordingly, personalization in cardiac medicine is based on the clinical presentation of a patient, as well as his/her cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, electrocardiography, imaging, and biomarkers for myocardial load and ischemia. Personalization is based on large clinical trials with detailed subgroup analyses and is practiced on the basis of guidelines. Further in depth personalization is achieved by precision medicine, which is based on innovative imaging for myocardial structure, coronary morphology, and electrophysiology. From the clinical perspective, genome analyses are relevant for comparatively rare monogenetic cardiovascular diseases. While these as well as transcriptome and metabolome analyses play a significant role in cardiovascular research with great translation potential, they have not yet been broadly introduced in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of complex cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, digital technologies have considerable potential in cardiovascular precision medicine. On the one hand, this is based on the frequency of the diseases with the availability of Big Data and, on the other hand, on the availability of bio-signals and sensors of those signals in cardiovascular diseases.

Rest and exercise-stress estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure using real-time free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Identification of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging estimation of PCWP at rest was introduced as a non-invasive alternative. Since many patients are only identified during physiological exercise-stress, we hypothesized that novel exercise-stress CMR-derived PCWP emerges superior compared to its assessment at rest.

METHODS

The HFpEF-Stress Trial prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction who then underwent rest and exercise-stress RHC and CMR. HFpEF was defined according to PCWP (overt HFpEF ≥15 mmHg at rest, masked HFpEF ≥25 mmHg during exercise-stress). CMR-derived PCWP was calculated based on previously published formula using left ventricular mass and either biplane left atrial volume (LAV) or monoplane left atrial area (LAA).

RESULTS

LAV (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and LAA PCWP (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.48, p < 0.001) correlated significantly with RHC-derived PCWP while numerically overestimating PCWP at rest and underestimating PCWP during exercise-stress. LAV and LAA PCWP showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect HFpEF (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) LAV rest 0.73, stress 0.81; LAA rest 0.72, stress 0.77) with incremental diagnostic value for the detection of masked HFpEF using exercise-stress (AUC LAV rest 0.54 vs stress 0.67, p = 0.019, LAA rest 0.52 vs stress 0.66, p = 0.012). LAV but not LAA PCWP during exercise-stress was a predictor for 24 months hospitalization independent of a medical history for atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.55, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive PCWP correlates well with the invasive reference at rest and during exercise stress. There is overall good diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF assessment using CMR-derived estimated PCWP despite deviations in absolute agreement. Non-invasive exercise derived PCWP may particularly facilitate detection of masked HFpEF in the future.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Interatrial Shunt Devices in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent and challenging condition with limited therapeutic options. This meta-analysis aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of interatrial shunt devices (IASD) in the treatment of HFpEF, focusing on key hemodynamic parameters and clinical outcomes. Six clinical trials, encompassing 324 patients, were included in this analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest after IASD implantation, with a mean difference of 1.55 mm Hg. PCWP during exercise also exhibited a decrease, indicating improved exercise tolerance. However, there was an increase in mean right atrial pressure following IASD implantation. These findings suggest that IASD implementation can effectively lower left atrial pressure, a critical target in HFpEF management. This results in substantial clinical improvements, including enhanced New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and 6-minute walk distance. Echocardiographic assessments revealed a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and stable right ventricular changes. The meta-analysis underscores the potential benefits of IASD in ameliorating the symptoms and clinical outcomes of HFpEF patients. The increase in mean right atrial pressure warrants further investigation into its effects on right heart function. Additionally, this analysis emphasizes the need for larger, randomized clinical trials to validate these findings and determine optimal patient selection criteria. IASD implantation holds promise as a therapeutic option for HFpEF, offering the potential to improve the quality of life and functional status of affected patients. However, further research is imperative to confirm its efficacy relative to existing treatments and to address concerns regarding its impact on right heart function. This meta-analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of IASD's role in HFpEF management.

Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a group of clinical syndromes that exhibit a remarkably heterogeneous phenotype, characterized by symptoms and signs of heart failure, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, elevated levels of natriuretic peptides, and an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%. With the aging of the population and the escalating prevalence of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, the incidence of HFpEF is progressively rising. Drug therapy options for HFpEF are currently limited, and the associated high risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure rehospitalization significantly impact patients' quality of life and longevity while imposing a substantial economic burden on society. Recent research indicates that certain device-based therapies may serve as valuable adjuncts to drug therapy in patients with specific phenotypes of HFpEF, effectively improving symptoms and quality of life while reducing the risk of readmission for heart failure. These include inter-atrial shunt and greater splanchnic nerve ablation to reduce left ventricular filling pressure, implantable heart failure monitor to guide diuresis, left atrial pacing to correct interatrial dyssynchrony, cardiac contractility modulation to enhance cardiac calcium handling, as well as renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation to restore the autonomic imbalance. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms and clinical evidence pertaining to these devices, with the aim of enhancing therapeutic strategies for HFpEF.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: The Pathophysiological Mechanisms behind the Clinical Phenotypes and the Therapeutic Approach

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an increasingly frequent form and is estimated to be the dominant form of HF. On the other hand, HFpEF is a syndrome with systemic involvement, and it is characterized by multiple cardiac and extracardiac pathophysiological alterations. The increasing prevalence is currently reaching epidemic levels, thereby making HFpEF one of the greatest challenges facing cardiovascular medicine today. Compared to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the medical attitude in the case of HFpEF was a relaxed one towards the disease, despite the fact that it is much more complex, with many problems related to the identification of physiopathogenetic mechanisms and optimal methods of treatment. The current medical challenge is to develop effective therapeutic strategies, because patients suffering from HFpEF have symptoms and quality of life comparable to those with reduced ejection fraction, but the specific medication for HFrEF is ineffective in this situation; for this, we must first understand the pathological mechanisms in detail and correlate them with the clinical presentation. Another important aspect of HFpEF is the diversity of patients that can be identified under the umbrella of this syndrome. Thus, before being able to test and develop effective therapies, we must succeed in grouping patients into several categories, called phenotypes, depending on the pathological pathways and clinical features. This narrative review critiques issues related to the definition, etiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of HFpEF. We tried to describe in as much detail as possible the clinical and biological phenotypes recognized in the literature in order to better understand the current therapeutic approach and the reason for the limited effectiveness. We have also highlighted possible pathological pathways that can be targeted by the latest research in this field.

Left Atrial Stiffness Increases after Trans-Catheter Atrial Septal Closure

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter atrial septal closures for secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. However, the impact of device implantation on the stiffness of the left atrium remains unclear.

METHOD

Patients with secundum ASD undergoing transcatheter closure and follow-up right heart catheterization at six months were included. We investigated the relationship between post-procedural (E/e' ratio)/(LAs strain) ratio, an index of left atrial stiffness, and baseline characteristics, including echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included (median 69 (56, 75) years, 12 men, and pulmonary systemic flow ratio 2.27 (1.96, 2.86)). Trans-catheter ASD closure was successfully performed without any major complications, accompanying a significant reduction in right ventricular to left ventricular size ratio from 1.04 (0.87, 1.13) to 0.74 (0.66, 0.86) (p < 0.01). The (E/e' ratio)/(LAs strain) ratio was markedly elevated the day after the procedure and was further increased 6 months later (before: 0.25 (0.17, 0.34), 1 day later: 0.34 (0.27, 0.50), 6 months later: 0.43 (0.27, 0.76), p < 0.01). The groups with higher (E/e' ratio)/(LAs strain) ratios at 6 months had significantly more severe heart failure conditions including lower cardiac output and higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptides.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing transcatheter ASD closure experienced improvement in hemodynamics and clinical symptoms but an elevation in left atrial stiffness post-procedure. The clinical ramifications of this finding, particularly during the longer-term observation period subsequent to ASD closure, warrant further investigation.

Emerging devices for heart failure management

There have been significant advances in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in recent years, driven by significant strides in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Despite this, HF is still associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality, and most patients do not receive optimal medical therapy. In conjunction with the improvement of GDMT, novel device therapies have been developed to better treat HF. These devices include technology capable of remotely monitoring HF physiology, devices that modulate the autonomic nervous system, and those that structurally change the heart with the ultimate aim of addressing the root causes of HF physiology As these device therapies gradually integrate into the fabric of HF patient care, it becomes increasingly important for modern cardiologists to become familiar with them. Hence, the objective of this review is to shed light on currently emerging devices for the treatment of HF.

Interatrial Shunt Devices

Elevated left atrial pressure during exercise is a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse left atrial remodeling and poor outcomes. To decompress the pressure-overloaded left atrium in patients with HF, several device-based approaches have been developed to create a permanent, pressure-dependent, left-to-right interatrial shunt. Such approaches are currently in various stages of investigations in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and HF with preserved EF. This review discusses the evolution of the concept of left atrial decompression and summarizes the current landscape of device-based approaches used for left atrial decompression.

Personalized accelerated physiologic pacing

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent with a high socioeconomic burden. Pharmacological heart rate lowering was recommended to improve ventricular filling in HFpEF. This article discusses the misperceptions that have resulted in an overprescription of beta-blockers, which in all likelihood have untoward effects on patients with HFpEF, even if they have atrial fibrillation or coronary artery disease as a comorbidity. Directly contradicting the lower heart rate paradigm, faster heart rates provide haemodynamic and structural benefits, amongst which lower cardiac filling pressures and improved ventricular capacitance may be most important. Safe delivery of this therapeutic approach is feasible with atrial and ventricular conduction system pacing that aims to emulate or enhance cardiac excitation to maximize the haemodynamic benefits of accelerated pacing. This conceptual framework was first tested in the myPACE randomized controlled trial of patients with pre-existing pacemakers and preclinical or overt HFpEF. This article provides the background and path towards this treatment approach.

Medical Management and Device-Based Therapies in Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Major advancements in optimal guideline-directed medical therapy, including novel pharmacological agents, are now available for the treatment of chronic HF including HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Despite these efforts, there are several limitations of medical therapy including but not limited to: delays in implementation and/or initiation; inability to achieve target dosing; tolerability; adherence; and recurrent and chronic costs of care. A significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic with poor HF-related outcomes including rehospitalization, progression of disease, and mortality. Driven by these unmet clinical needs, there has been a significant growth of innovative device-based interventions across all HF phenotypes over the past several decades. This state-of-the-art review will summarize the current landscape of guideline-directed medical therapy for chronic HF, discuss its limitations including barriers to implementation, and review device-based therapies which have established efficacy or demonstrated promise in the management of chronic HF.

Percutaneous Strategies in Structural Heart Diseases: Focus on Chronic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Central Illustration : Percutaneous Strategies in Structural Heart Diseases: Focus on Chronic Heart Failure Transcatheter devices for monitoring and treating advanced chronic heart failure patients. PA: pulmonary artery; LA: left atrium; AFR: atrial flow regulator; TASS: Transcatheter Atrial Shunt System; VNS: vagus nerve stimulation; BAT: baroreceptor activation therapy; RDN: renal sympathetic denervation; F: approval by the American regulatory agency (FDA); E: approval by the European regulatory agency (CE Mark).

BACKGROUND

Innovations in devices during the last decade contributed to enhanced diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiac insufficiency. These tools progressively adapted to minimally invasive strategies with rapid, widespread use. The present article focuses on actual and future directions of device-related diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure.

Atrial Shunt Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update

Transcatheter atrial shunt therapies, designed to dynamically lower left atrial (LA) pressure by shunting blood into the larger reservoir of the right atrium and central veins, have been developed as a novel treatment for heart failure (HF) over the past 10+ years. Several atrial shunt devices and procedures are currently in development with several pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCT) underway; however, only 2 sham-controlled RCT (both with the Atrial Shunt Device [Corvia Medical] in HF with EF ≥ 40%) have been reported thus far; a mechanistic RCT (n = 44) that demonstrated a reduction in exercise LA pressure at 1 month and a pivotal RCT (n = 626) that was neutral with no difference in outcomes or health status between shunt and sham groups. Subsequent analyses of the single completed pivotal RCT found that peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU plus the absence of a cardiac rhythm management device identified a responder group that benefited from LA unloading with atrial shunt implantation, a finding that is currently being confirmed in a follow-up RCT. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the field of atrial shunt therapeutics with a description of the following: (1) current HF treatment; (2) rationale and history of atrial shunt development; (3) design of and accumulated evidence for the various atrial shunt devices and procedures under investigation; (4) unanswered questions in the field; and (5) future considerations. Atrial shunts represent a potential innovative therapeutic for HF but the optimal design/approach and phenotype of HF most likely to benefit are yet to be determined.

No-Implant Interatrial Shunt for HFpEF: 6-Month Outcomes From Multicenter Pilot Feasibility Studies

BACKGROUND

Most approaches to the creation of an interatrial shunt require placement of a permanent implant to maintain patency.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a no-implant interatrial shunt for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, uncontrolled study of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and NYHA functional class ≥II, ejection fraction >40%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during supine exercise ≥25 mm Hg with PCWP-to-right atrial gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Follow-up was through 6 months with imaging to assess shunt durability.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were enrolled: mean age was 68 ± 9 years, and 68% were female. Baseline resting and peak exercise PCWP were 19 ± 7 mm Hg and 40 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively. All procedures displayed technical success with confirmation of left-to-right flow (shunt diameter 7.1 ± 0.9 mm). At 1 month, peak exercise PCWP decreased 5.4 ± 9.6 mm Hg (P = 0.011) with no change in right atrial pressure. There were no serious device or procedure-related adverse events through 6 months. Mean 6-minute walk distance increased 101 ± 71 meters (P < 0.001); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score increased 26 ± 19 points (P < 0.001); N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased 372 ± 857 pg/mL (P = 0.018); and shunt patency was confirmed with unchanged diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

In these feasibility studies of a no-implant interatrial shunt, HFpEF/HFmrEF shunts exhibited stability with favorable safety and early efficacy signals. The results show promise toward this new approach for treating patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and an appropriate hemodynamic profile. (Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-1]; NCT04583527; Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-2]; NCT04838353).

Device Interventions for Heart Failure

Despite remarkable advances in drug therapy for heart failure (HF), the residual HF-related morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations remain substantial across all HF phenotypes, and significant proportions of patients with HF remain symptomatic despite optimal drug therapy. Driven by these unmet clinical needs, the exponential growth of transcatheter interventions, and a recent shift in the regulatory landscape of device-based therapies, novel device-based interventions have emerged as a potential therapy for various phenotypes of HF. Device-based interventions can overcome some of the limitations of drug therapy (eg, intolerance, nonadherence, inconsistent delivery, and recurrent and long-term cost) and can target some HF-related pathophysiologic pathways more effectively than drug therapy. This paper reviews the current evolving landscape of device-based interventions in HF and highlights critical points related to implementation of these therapies in the current workflow of HF management.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Heart Diseases: Pathophysiology, Hemodynamic Assessment and Therapeutic Management

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart diseases (PH-LHD), also termed group 2 PH, represents the most common form of PH. It develops through the passive backward transmission of elevated left heart pressures in the setting of heart failure, either with preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction, which increases the pulsatile afterload of the right ventricle (RV) by reducing pulmonary artery (PA) compliance. In a subset of patients, progressive remodeling of the pulmonary circulation resulted in a pre-capillary phenotype of PH, with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) further increasing the RV afterload, eventually leading to RV-PA uncoupling and RV failure. The primary therapeutic objective in PH-LHD is to reduce left-sided pressures through the appropriate use of diuretics and guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure. When pulmonary vascular remodeling is established, targeted therapies aiming to reduce PVR are theoretically appealing. So far, such targeted therapies have mostly failed to show significant positive effects in patients with PH-LHD, in contrast to their proven efficacy in other forms of pre-capillary PH. Whether such therapies may benefit some specific subgroups of patients (HFrEF, HFpEF) with specific hemodynamic phenotypes (post- or pre-capillary PH) and various degrees of RV dysfunction still needs to be addressed.

Left atrial enlargement is associated with pulmonary vascular disease in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Elevated left atrial (LA) pressure is a pathophysiologic hallmark of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Chronically elevated LA pressure leads to LA enlargement, which may impair LA function and increase pulmonary pressures. We sought to evaluate the relationship between LA volume and pulmonary arterial haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 85 patients (aged 69 ± 8 years) who underwent exercise right heart catheterization and echocardiography were retrospectively analysed. All had symptoms of heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and haemodynamic features of HFpEF. Patients were divided into LA volume index-based tertiles (≤34 ml/m2 , >34 to ≤45 ml/m2 , >45 ml/m2 ). A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with recorded LA global reservoir strain (n = 60), with reduced strain defined as ≤24%. Age, sex, body surface area and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar between volume groups. LA volume was associated with blunted increases in cardiac output with exercise (padjusted  <0.001), higher resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (padjusted  = 0.003), with similar wedge pressure (padjusted  = 1). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) increased with increasing LA volume (padjusted  <0.001). Larger LA volumes featured reduced LA strain (padjusted  <0.001), with reduced strain associated with reduced PVR-compliance time (0.34 [0.28-0.40] vs. 0.38 [0.33-0.43], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Increasing LA volume may be associated with more advanced pulmonary vascular disease in HFpEF, featuring higher PVR and pulmonary pressures. Reduced LA function, worse at increasing LA volumes, is associated with a disrupted PVR-compliance relationship, further augmenting impaired pulmonary haemodynamics.

SERCA2a Agonist Effects on Cardiac Performance During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Impaired ventricular relaxation influences left ventricular pressures during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium-adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA2a) facilitates myocardial relaxation by increasing calcium reuptake and is impaired in HFpEF.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the effects of istaroxime, a SERCA2 agonist, on lusitropic and hemodynamic function during exercise in patients with HFpEF and control subjects.

METHODS

Eleven control subjects (7 male, 4 female) and 15 patients with HFpEF (8 male, 7 female) performed upright cycle exercise with right-sided heart catheterization. Participants received istaroxime (0.5 mg/kg/min) or saline placebo (single-blind, crossover design). Cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and diastolic function were measured at rest and during submaximal exercise. In an exploratory analysis (Hedges' g), 7 patients with HFpEF received higher-dose istaroxime (1.0 mg/kg/min). End-systolic elastance (Ees) was calculated by dividing systolic blood pressure (SBP) × 0.9 by end-systolic volume (ESV; on 3-dimensional echocardiography).

RESULTS

Patients with HFpEF had higher PCWP (25 ± 10 mm Hg vs 12 ± 5 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and lower tissue Doppler velocities during exercise. Istaroxime (0.5 mg/kg/min) had no effect on resting or exercise measures in patients with HFpEF or control subjects. Control subjects had a larger increase in Ees (Δ 1.55 ± 0.99 mm Hg/mL vs D 0.86 ± 1.31 mm Hg/mL; P = 0.03), driven by lower ESV. Comparing placebo and istaroxime 1.0 mg /kg/min during exercise, PCWP during the 1.0 mg /kg/min istaroxime dose was slightly lower (Δ 2.2 mm Hg; Hedges' g = 0.30). There were no effects on diastolic function, but there were increases in SBP and s', suggesting a mild inotropic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose istaroxime had no effect on cardiac filling pressure or parameters of relaxation in patients with HFpEF during exercise. Higher doses of istaroxime may have been more effective in reducing exercise PCWP in patients with HFpEF. (Hemodynamic Response to Exercise in HFpEF Patients After Upregulation of SERCA2a; NCT02772068).

Device therapy with interatrial shunt devices for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is responsible for half of all heart failure and confers substantial morbidity and mortality, and yet to date, there have been no effective pharmacologic interventions. Although the pathophysiology is complex, the primary aetiology of exercise intolerance is due to an elevated left atrial pressure, particularly with exercise. In this context, device-based therapy has become a focus. Several companies have developed techniques to percutaneously create an iatrogenic left to right shunt at the atrial level, thereby reducing left atrial pressure and reducing transmitted pressures to the pulmonary circulation and reducing pulmonary congestion. In this review, we explore the pathophysiology, evidence base, benefits, and considerations of these devices and their place in the therapeutic landscape of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Theoretical considerations for a left atrial pump in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogenous group of disorders, unified by findings of elevated left atrial and left ventricular filling pressures in the setting of normal systolic function. Medical therapies for HFpEF patients are markedly limited, and these patients are often unable to tolerate conventional left ventricular assist device therapies because of small chamber size. The Synergy System (CircuLite, Inc., Saddle Brook, NJ) was a micropump-based form of mechanical circulatory support in which flow derived from the left atrium was delivered to the subclavian artery. In this review, we discuss the potential role of the Synergy left atrial pump to address the hemodynamic derangements of HFpEF.

Device-based percutaneous treatments to decompress the left atrium in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of heart failure hospital admissions in the last years and is burdened by high mortality and poor quality of life. Providing effective management for HFpEF patients is a major unmet clinical need. Increase in left atrial pressure is the key determinant of pulmonary congestion, with consequent dyspnoea and exercise limitation. Evidence on benefits of medical treatment in HFpEF patients is limited. Thus, alternative strategies, including devices able to reduce left atrial pressure, through an interatrial communication determining a left-right shunt, were developed. This review aims to summarize evidence regarding the use of percutaneous interatrial shunting devices. These devices are safe and effective in improving hemodynamic and clinical parameters, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 6-min walking distance, and New York Heart Association functional class. Data on cardiovascular mortality and re-hospitalization for heart failure are still scarce.

Advances in novel devices for the treatment of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of global health impairment. Current drugs are still limited in their effectiveness in the treatment and reversal of HF: for example, drugs for acute HF (AHF) help to reduce congestion and relieve symptoms, but they do little to improve survival; most conventional drugs for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) do not improve the prognosis; and drugs have extremely limited effects on advanced HF. In recent years, progress in device therapies has bridged this gap to a certain extent. For example, the availability of the left ventricular assist device has brought new options to numerous advanced HF patients. In addition to this recognizable device, a range of promising novel devices with preclinical or clinical trial results are emerging that seek to treat or reverse HF by providing circulatory support, repairing structural abnormalities in the heart, or providing electrical stimulation. These devices may be useful for the treatment of HF. In this review, we summarized recent advances in novel devices for AHF, HFpEF, and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with the aim of providing a reference for clinical treatment and inspiration for novel device development.

Utility of E/e' Ratio During Low-Level Exercise to Diagnose Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

E/e' ratio during exercise is the key parameter in identifying elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and thus heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its diagnostic value is limited when mitral inflow or tissue velocities are fused during elevated heart rate.

OBJECTIVES

The authors hypothesized that E/e' ratio during low-level (20 W) exercise (E/e'20W) can help diagnose HFpEF.

METHODS

Ergometric exercise stress echocardiography was performed in 215 dyspneic patients with an EF ≥50%. The authors determined the feasibility of E/e' ratio at each stage (frequency of patients who had measurable E/e' without E-A fusion among 215 participants) and examined whether E/e'20W could predict normal E/e' ratio during peak exercise (E/e'peak ≤15). The authors also evaluated whether E/e'20W could predict normal PCWP during exercise (PCWP <25 mm Hg) in a subset of participants (n = 45) who underwent exercise right heart catheterization.

RESULTS

The feasibility of the E/e' ratio decreased from 100% at rest to 96.3% during 20-W exercise and 74.9% during peak exercise caused by E-A fusion. In patients with E/e'peak >15, there was an increase in E/e' ratio from rest to 20-W exercise (11.2 ± 2.1 to 16.3 ± 3.5; P < 0.0001), but it did not change significantly from 20-W exercise to peak exercise (P = 0.12). E/e'20W predicted E/e'peak ≤15 (AUC: 0.91; P < 0.0001) with the cutoff value of ≤12.4 showing high specificity (94%) and positive predictive value (98%). During 20-W exercise, 93% of the HFpEF patients developed PCWP ≥25 mm Hg. E/e'20W predicted normal PCWP during exercise (AUC: 0.77; P = 0.01) with the cutoff value of ≤12.4 showing high specificity (83%).

CONCLUSIONS

E/e' ratio during low-level exercise is highly feasible and predicts normal E/e' ratio or PCWP during peak exercise with high specificity. These data suggest that E/e'20W could be used as an alternative to the peak exercise value to rule out HFpEF in patients with dyspnea.

Concomitant latent pulmonary vascular disease leads to impaired global cardiac performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

The REDUCE-LAP II trial demonstrated adverse outcomes after interatrial shunt device (IASD) placement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) attributed to latent pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). We hypothesized that exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could provide non-invasive characterization of cardiac and pulmonary physiology for improved patient selection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HFpEF-Stress trial prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and diastolic dysfunction. Patients underwent rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization, echocardiography and CMR imaging. Pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures, cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were calculated. Latent PVD was defined as increased PVR ≥ 1.74 Wood units during exercise stress. CMR assessed long-axis strains (LAS) and filling volumes of all cardiac chambers. Right ventricular (RV) function was further quantified by stroke and peak flow volumes. Patients with latent PVD (n = 24) showed lower RV function (rest tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, p = 0.010; stress RV LAS, p < 0.001) compared to patients without (n = 43). During exercise stress, RV stroke and peak flow volumes (p < 0.001) were reduced and led to impaired left atrial filling (p = 0.040) with a strong statistical trend to impaired ventricular (LV) filling (p = 0.098). This subsequently resulted in reduced LV-CI (p < 0.001) despite preserved LV systolic function (LV LAS p ≥ 0.255). The degree of RV dysfunction during exercise stress best predicted latent PVD (RV peak flow, area under the curve at rest 0.73 vs. stress 0.89, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Latent PVD is a feature of HFpEF and is associated with impaired RV functional reserve, global diastolic filling and LV-CI. This can be quantified by CMR and used to identify patients likely to benefit from IASD implantation.

Fate of iatrogenic atrial septal defects following mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair - a subanalysis of the MITHRAS trial

Persisting iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) after transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) are associated with impaired outcomes. We investigated the natural history of relevant iASDs with left-to-right shunting post-M-TEER, predictors of spontaneous closure of iASD between 1 and 6 months post-M-TEER, and outcomes (heart failure [HF] hospitalization) in patients with spontaneous closure versus those with persistent iASD 6 months post-M-TEER. Patients with a relevant iASD 1-month post-M-TEER, who were treated conservatively in the randomized controlled MITHRAS trial, underwent clinical follow-up including transesophageal echocardiography 6 months post-M-TEER. Overall, 36 patients (median 77 [interquartile range 65-81] years; 36% women) completed the 6-months follow-up. Six (17%) patients had a spontaneous closure of the iASD. The eccentricity index of the iASD 1-month after M-TEER was the strongest predictor for spontaneous closure (Odds ratio 3.78; 95% confidence interval 1.26-11.33, p = 0.01) and an eccentricity index of < 1.9 provided a sensitivity of 77% at a specificity of 83% for iASD persistence (Area under the curve 0.83, p < 0.001) within 6-months post M-TEER.At follow-up, a numerical difference in the endpoint of HF hospitalization between the spontaneous closure and the residual shunt group (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.25) was observed. The eccentricity of the iASD was the strongest predictor for spontaneous closure at 1-months and an eccentricity index of < 1.9 is associated with a high persistence rate for 6 month after M-TEER. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03024268 Identifier: NCT03024268. a (red) is reflecting the mayor lengthwise dimension and b (blue) the mayor oblique dimension. The eccentricity index is calculated by dividing a through b. (Open circle) is depicting an example for a round iASD and (Open rhombus) an example for an eccentric iASD 1 month after M-TEER.

Biventricular longitudinal strain as a predictor of functional improvement after D-shant device implantation in patients with heart failure

Background

The creation of an atrial shunt is a novel approach for the management of heart failure (HF), and there is a need for advanced methods for detection of cardiac function response to an interatrial shunt device. Ventricular longitudinal strain is a more sensitive marker of cardiac function than conventional echocardiographic parameters, but data on the value of longitudinal strain as a predictor of improvement in cardiac function after implantation of an interatrial shunt device are scarce. We aimed to investigate the exploratory efficacy of the D-Shant device for interatrial shunting in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and to explore the predictive value of biventricular longitudinal strain for functional improvement in such patients.

Methods

A total of 34 patients were enrolled (25 with HFrEF and 9 with HFpEF). All patients underwent conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiogram (2D-STE) at baseline and 6 months after implantation of a D-Shant device (WeiKe Medical Inc., WuHan, CN). Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) were evaluated by 2D-STE.

Results

The D-Shant device was successfully implanted in all cases without periprocedural mortality. At 6-month follow-up, an improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was observed in 20 of 28 patients with HF. Compared with baseline, patients with HFrEF showed significant reduced left atrial volume index (LAVI) and increased right atrial (RA) dimensions, as well as improved LVGLS and RVFWLS, at 6-month follow-up. Despite reduction in LAVI and increase in RA dimensions, improvements in biventricular longitudinal strain did not occur in HFpEF patients. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that LVGLS [odds ratio (OR): 5.930; 95% CI: 1.463-24.038; P = 0.013] and RVFWLS (OR: 4.852; 95% CI: 1.372-17.159; P = 0.014) were predictive of improvement in NYHA functional class after D-Shant device implantation.

Conclusion

Improvements in clinical and functional status are observed in patients with HF 6 months after implantation of a D-Shant device. Preoperative biventricular longitudinal strain is predictive of improvement in NYHA functional class and may be helpful to identify patients who will experience better outcomes following implantation of an interatrial shunt device.

New Opportunities in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: From Bench to Bedside… and Back

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health problem in nearly 50% of patients with heart failure. Therefore, research on new strategies for its diagnosis and management has become imperative in recent years. Few drugs have successfully improved clinical outcomes in this population. Therefore, numerous attempts are being made to find new pharmacological interventions that target the main mechanisms responsible for this disease. In recent years, pathological mechanisms such as cardiac fibrosis and inflammation, alterations in calcium handling, NO pathway disturbance, and neurohumoral or mechanic impairment have been evaluated as new pharmacological targets showing promising results in preliminary studies. This review aims to analyze the new strategies and mechanical devices, along with their initial results in pre-clinical and different phases of ongoing clinical trials for HFpEF patients. Understanding new mechanisms to generate interventions will allow us to create methods to prevent the adverse outcomes of this silent pandemic.

Is combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation the future of interatrial communications?

INTRODUCTION

Personalized and stable interatrial communication is an important palliative therapy for patients with heart failure. However, this remains a technically challenging task.

AREAS COVERED

In the past decades, substantial advancements in atrial septostomy for the creation of controllable and durable interatrial communication have been made, and numerous novel devices and techniques are in various stages of development. In this review, we discuss the evolving indications for atrial septostomy, current approaches with or without device implantation, and indicators for optimal interatrial communication. The combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation (CURB) is an individualized management approach based on underlying hemodynamics, which demonstrates unique advantages in creating a sufficient interatrial communication with satisfactory stability. The advantages and disadvantages of this implant-free procedure are analyzed and its clinical prospects are assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

With ready availability, high safety, and efficacy, CURB is a promising procedure for creating personalized and stable interatrial communication without device implantation. Further research is required to simplify the procedure, screen optimal reference parameters for personalized therapy, and evaluate the long-term outcome in a large population of patients.