Fezolinetant for treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause (SKYLIGHT 1): a phase 3 randomised controlled study

A comprehensive review of small molecule drugs approved by the FDA in 2023: Advances and prospects

In 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved 55 novel medications, consisting of 17 biologics license applications and 38 new molecular entities. Although the biologics license applications including antibody and enzyme replacement therapy set a historical record, the new molecular entities comprising small molecule drugs, diagnostic agent, RNA interference therapy and biomacromolecular peptide still account for over 50 % of the newly approved medications. The novel and privileged scaffolds derived from drugs, active molecules and natural products are consistently associated with the discovery of new mechanisms, the expansion of clinical indications and the reduction of side effects. Moreover, the structural modifications based on the promising scaffolds can provide the clinical candidates with the improved biological activities, bypass the patent protection and greatly shorten the period of new drug discovery. Therefore, conducting an appraisal of drug approval experience and related information will expedite the identification of more potent drug molecules. In this review, we comprehensively summarized the pertinent information encompassing the clinical application, mechanism, elegant design and development processes of 28 small molecule drugs, and expected to provide the promising structural basis and design inspiration for pharmaceutical chemists.

Update on Therapies and Treatments in Women's Health

This article contains noninclusive language such as "females" and "women" when those terms were used in the research and historic context we are summarizing. New therapies have become available for vasomotor symptoms, postpartum depression, contraception, osteoporosis, recurrent yeast infections, acute and recurrent urinary tract infections, and female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. These therapies meet unique patient needs and change clinical practice for select groups. As is typical for new treatments, insurance coverage and access issues limit the adoption of some therapies.

Efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as hot flashes and night sweats, are highly prevalent and burdensome for women experiencing menopausal transition. Fezolinetant, a selective neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) antagonist, is a potential therapeutic option for mitigating VMS.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to assess the efficacy and evaluate the safety profile of fezolinetant compared with placebo in post-menopausal women suffering from VMS, by pooling all the relevant data and reflecting the most current evidence.

SEARCH STRATEGY/SELECTION CRITERIA

An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library databases from inception until June 2023 to identify relevant trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of six randomized controlled trials were added. For the frequency of daily VMS, the combined pooled result favored the fezolinetant group over placebo (MD -2.38, 95% CI -2.64 to -2.12; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). For the severity of daily VMS, fezolinetant was again found to be superior to the placebo group (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.29; P < 0.001, I2 = 70%). Fezolinetant (120 mg) consistently demonstrated a significant reduction in the severity of daily moderate/severe VMS compared with other doses at both 4 and 12 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), PROMIS the Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) scores indicated significant improvement with fezolinetant. No significant difference in efficacy of fezolinetant at 4 and 12 weeks were observed in any outcome. As for safety, no significant differences in the treatment emergent adverse events at 12 weeks were found between fezolinetant and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study significantly favors fezolinetant over placebo regarding the primary efficacy outcomes of daily moderate to severe VMS frequency and severity, including PROs, while both the groups are comparable in terms of treatment emergent adverse events. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Drug effects on neuropeptides and their receptors: Big hopes but moderate success in the treatment of chronic pain

Neuropeptides, including tachykinins, CGRP, and somatostatin, are localized in a peptidergic subgroup of nociceptive primary afferent neurons. Tachykinins and CGRP are pronociceptive, somatostatin is an antinociceptive mediator. Intensive drug research has been performed to develop tachykinin and CGRP antagonists, and somatostatin agonists as analgesics. CGRP receptor antagonists are efficacious and well-tolerated drugs in migraine. Monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or its receptor are used for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists failed as analgesics but are used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. New, orally active somatostatin 4 receptor agonists are promising drug candidates for treating various pain conditions.

Phase II study of fezolinetant for treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The phase II STARLIGHT study was conducted to investigate the efficacy/safety of fezolinetant in Japanese women and identify the optimal dose for future evaluation.

METHOD

Participants were perimenopausal/postmenopausal women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years from 36 centers in Japan seeking treatment/relief for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. After screening, participants were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by menopausal status, to receive fezolinetant 15 or 30 mg or placebo orally once daily for 12 weeks. Participants completed a daily VMS diary. The primary endpoint was mean change in frequency of VMS of any severity from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included mean change in VMS frequency from baseline each week up to week 12 and frequency/severity of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 147 participants were randomized (placebo, n = 47; fezolinetant 15 mg, n = 53; fezolinetant 30 mg, n = 47). Fezolinetant 15 and 30 mg demonstrated statistically significant reductions in mean VMS frequency at week 8 versus placebo. Least-squares mean estimates of mean change in frequency of VMS from baseline to week 8 were -7.04 for fezolinetant 15mg, -6.31 for fezolinetant 30mg, and -4.55 for placebo. The difference in least-squares mean estimates was -2.50 (95% CI: -4.03, -0.96), p = 0.002 for fezolinetant 15mg and placebo, and was -1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.35, -0.17), p = 0.030 for fezolinetant 30mg and placebo. Reductions from baseline in mean VMS frequency versus placebo were seen after week 1 of treatment, maintained throughout 12 weeks. Fezolinetant was well tolerated, with no safety signals of concern for either dose to week 12.

CONCLUSION

Oral fezolinetant at once-daily doses of 15 or 30 mg was efficacious and well tolerated for treatment of mild, moderate and severe VMS associated with menopause in this Japanese study.

Effect of fezolinetant on sleep disturbance and impairment during treatment of vasomotor symptoms due to menopause

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the effect of fezolinetant on patient-reported sleep disturbance and impairment in individuals with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) using pooled data from the SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies.

STUDY DESIGN

The SKYLIGHT studies were phase-3, double-blind investigations. Individuals (≥40-≤65 years) who were assigned female at birth and seeking treatment of/relief from moderate-to-severe VMS were enrolled. Participants were randomised to receive placebo, fezolinetant 30 mg, or fezolinetant 45 mg during a 12-week treatment period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sleep assessments: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b), PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment - Short Form 8a (PROMIS SRI SF 8a), and Patient Global Impression of Change/Severity in SD (PGI-C SD and PGI-S SD). Assessments were completed at baseline (except PGI-C SD), weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

Overall, 1022 individuals were randomised and took ≥1 dose of study drug. PROMIS SD SF 8b results showed that improvements in sleep disturbance were observed for fezolinetant 30 and 45 mg versus placebo (week 12, least squares [LS] mean differences: -0.6 [95 % confidence interval [CI]: -1.7, 0.4] for 30 mg and -1.5 [-2.5, -0.5] for 45 mg). Similar improvements in sleep impairment were reported using the PROMIS SRI SF 8a (week 12, LS mean differences: -1.1 [95 % CI: -2.1, -0.1] for 30 mg and -1.3 [-2.3, -0.3] for 45 mg). For PGI-C SD at week 12, 33.6 % (98/292 participants) of the placebo group felt much/moderately better versus 40.1 % (110/274) and 51.0 % (154/302) of the fezolinetant 30 mg and 45 mg groups, respectively. For PGI-S SD at week 12, 44.0 % (129/293) of the placebo group had severe/moderate problems versus 41.1 % (113/275) and 36.6 % (111/303) of the fezolinetant 30 mg and 45 mg groups, respectively. The 12-week timeframe for this analysis was limited by the length of the placebo-controlled period.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant had a beneficial effect on four measures of sleep disturbance and impairment following treatment for VMS.

Fezolinetant impact on health-related quality of life for vasomotor symptoms due to the menopause: Pooled data from SKYLIGHT 1 and SKYLIGHT 2 randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of fezolinetant treatment on health-related quality of life using pooled data from SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies.

DESIGN

Prespecified pooled analysis.

SETTING

USA, Canada, Europe; 2019-2021.

POPULATION

1022 women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS; minimum average seven hot flushes/day), seeking treatment for VMS.

METHODS

Women were randomised to 12-week double-blind treatment with once-daily placebo or fezolinetant 30 or 45 mg. Completers entered a 40-week, active extension (those receiving fezolinetant continued that dose; those receiving placebo re-randomised to fezolinetant received 30 or 45 mg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean changes from baseline to weeks 4 and 12 on Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) total and domain scores, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire specific to VMS (WPAI-VMS) domain scores, Patient Global Impression of Change in VMS (PGI-C VMS); percentages achieving PGI-C VMS of 'much better' (PGI-C VMS responders). Mean reduction was estimated using mixed model repeated measures analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Fezolinetant 45 mg mean reduction over placebo in MENQoL total score was -0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.75 to -0.39) at week 4 and -0.47 (95% CI -0.66 to -0.28) at week 12. Reductions were similar for 30 mg. MENQoL domain scores were also reduced and WPAI-VMS scores improved. Twice as many women receiving fezolinetant reported VMS were 'much better' than placebo based on PGI-C VMS assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant treatment was associated with improvement in overall QoL, measured by MENQoL, and work productivity, measured by WPAI-VMS. A high proportion receiving fezolinetant felt VMS were 'much better' based on PGI-C VMS responder analysis.

Endocrine consequences of breast cancer therapy and survivorship

Breast cancer survivorship is increasing, due to earlier diagnosis of the disease and more effective therapies. Long-term endocrine sequelae, including early menopause, bone health, fertility implications and menopausal symptoms, are important survivorship issues. Ovarian failure is common with chemotherapy and options for preserving fertility in young women include ovarian suppression during chemotherapy and oocyte or embryo cryopreservation before chemotherapy. Tamoxifen as adjunct therapy in premenopausal women leads to ovarian stimulation, sometimes ovulation and occasionally pregnancy with important teratogenic implications. Aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leads to profound bone loss and anti-resorptive therapy is advised to prevent fracture. Tamoxifen acts to preserve bone in postmenopausal women but not premenopausal women. Pregnancy is not discouraged in young women with early breast cancer, even to the point of pausing adjunct therapy in order to conceive. However, menopausal hormone therapy is discouraged even years later. Non-hormonal therapy for menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors is available but, in some cases, estrogen-containing therapy may be worthy of consideration for quality of life in the informed patient.

Retrospective text and qualitative analyses of patient experience and management of vasomotor symptoms due to menopause: voices from the PatientsLikeMe community

OBJECTIVE

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause cause substantial burden and distress. Some women join online communities to share experiences and treatment outcomes through peer-to-peer interactions. This study describes women's experiences with VMS and symptom management on the PatientsLikeMe online support group.

METHODS

Mixed-methods research included women aged 40 to 65 years in the PatientsLikeMe community who were recruited using convenience sampling. Text from online posts by members was analyzed retrospectively using natural language processing. Relevant data, including numbers and percentages of women and frequencies of mentions, were summarized descriptively. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted; data, notes, and recordings were transcribed and deidentified and thematic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Demographic information was available from 1,614 accounts included in retrospective text analyses. Women had a mean age of 56.7 years; most were White (87.8%) and not Hispanic/Latino (90.2%). Hot flashes and night sweats were most commonly mentioned symptoms (n = 146). Of 16 women who were interviewed, 14 met the inclusion criteria, and their responses were included in the analysis. VMS impacted life quality in terms of physical (43%) and mental well-being (36%), social activities (21%), and productivity (14%). Symptom management included temperature regulation (43%), lifestyle changes (36%), over-the-counter Estroven (29%), hormone therapy (21%), and contraceptives (21%). Half of the women were surprised by symptom intensity and duration; many felt unheard by their healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS

VMS have a substantial negative impact on multiple aspects of women's life. Management strategies for these symptoms vary widely, and many women feel unprepared for navigating the complex challenges of menopause.

Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk

The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) notably increases in the fifth decade of a woman's life, coinciding with the onset of menopause and occurring 10 years later than the similar age-related increase in men. Menopause marks a significant transition in a woman's life and is accompanied by cardiometabolic changes, including a shift in body composition, increased blood pressure, disruptions in lipoproteins, and insulin resistance. There is increasing evidence that the menopause transition is a risk factor for CVD, independent of age-related changes, especially considering that the earlier the onset of menopause, the greater is the CVD risk. Further, menopause-related symptoms such as vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbances, and mood changes may all have a direct impact on CVD risk. In this review, we summarize the current literature regarding CVD in midlife women, focusing on the cardiometabolic changes related to ovarian aging versus chronological aging, as well as those related to specific menopause characteristics, including age, type of menopause and the use of menopause hormone therapy.

Validation and Application of Thresholds to Define Meaningful Change in Vasomotor Symptoms Frequency: Analysis of Pooled SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 Data

INTRODUCTION

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), the characteristic symptoms of menopausal transition, are often the primary reason women seek treatment. Current treatment options for VMS include fezolinetant, a nonhormonal, selective neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist. This study aimed to define a clinically meaningful threshold for reduction of moderate-to-severe VMS in postmenopausal women treated with fezolinetant and then apply it in a responder analysis of the pooled trial data.

METHODS

This analysis pooled data from two identical phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that randomized women with moderate-to-severe VMS to once-daily fezolinetant 30 mg, 45 mg, or placebo (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2). The frequency of VMS was collected daily using an electronic diary. Patients completed the Patient Global Impression of Change in VMS (PGI-C VMS) instrument, which assessed changes in hot flushes/night sweats at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline using a seven-point Likert scale. VMS frequency data were anchored to PGI-C VMS data; the anchor level for meaningful within-patient change in PGI-C VMS was "moderately better."

RESULTS

In the pooled population (N = 1022), the mean (standard deviation) estimated thresholds for a meaningful within-patient change in moderate-to-severe VMS frequency were - 5.73 (3.47) at week 4 and - 6.20 (5.18) at week 12. Applying the thresholds for meaningful within-patient change to responder analyses ("missing as non-responder" imputation method) indicated a favorable clinical benefit: greater proportions of responders were observed in the fezolinetant 30-mg and 45-mg groups compared with placebo at week 4 (odds ratio range 2.48-2.91; P < 0.001) and week 12 (odds ratio range 1.908-2.68; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PGI-C VMS is sensitive to change and correlates with VMS frequency: a reduction of approximately six VMS episodes per day from baseline to week 12 was meaningful at the individual patient level. Fezolinetant provides a meaningful clinical benefit for women with moderate-to-severe VMS associated with menopause and represents an important nonhormonal treatment option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04003155 and NCT04003142.

Breast cancer survivorship

Breast cancer survivorship care transitions from active treatment to focus on surveillance and health maintenance. This review article discusses the crucial aspects of breast cancer survivorship, which include cancer surveillance, management of treatment side effects, implementation of a healthy lifestyle, and psychosocial support.

Design of OASIS 1 and 2: phase 3 clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause

OBJECTIVE

Elinzanetant is a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. The pivotal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies Overall Assessment of efficacy and Safety of elinzanetant In patients with vasomotor Symptoms (OASIS) 1 and 2 will assess the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant in women with VMS.

METHODS

The OASIS 1 and 2 pivotal studies are designed in accordance with regulatory guidance. Postmenopausal women with moderate/severe VMS are randomized to receive 120 mg elinzanetant or placebo once daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 14-week active treatment extension. Primary endpoints are the mean change in frequency and severity of moderate/severe VMS from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. Key secondary endpoints will assess the onset of action and effects on sleep disturbance and menopause-related quality of life. Primary and key secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a mixed model with repeated measures. Feedback from postmenopausal women with VMS was used during protocol development.

RESULTS

Women confirmed the relevance of endpoints that assess the impact of VMS, sleep disturbance, and mood changes, and the need for new nonhormone treatments. Educational materials around study design, conduct and expected assessments and procedures were developed based on questions and concerns raised by women.

CONCLUSIONS

The OASIS 1 and 2 pivotal phase 3 studies will enable assessment of the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant as a treatment for VMS, together with its effect on sleep disturbances, depressive symptoms, and menopause-related quality of life. Feedback from postmenopausal women with VMS was used to maximize patient centricity in the trials.

Treating moderate-to-severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fezolinetant: analysis of responders using pooled data from two phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2)

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to further characterize the efficacy of fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause using responder analysis and to investigate whether efficacy, not adjusted for placebo, resulted in clinically meaningful within-patient change.

METHODS

This prespecified analysis used pooled data from two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2). Responders were those experiencing ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% reduction in VMS frequency from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. Responder analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate participants achieving a clinically meaningful within-patient change (not placebo adjusted) at week 4 and 12 versus baseline. Single responders were based on outcomes of VMS frequency, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8b Total Score, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) Total Score, and MENQoL VMS Domain Score. Double and triple responder analyses combined VMS frequency plus one or more of the PRO. Patient Global Impression of Change VMS was deemed a suitable anchor measure for meaningful within-patient change in VMS frequency.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of fezolinetant-treated versus placebo-treated participants had ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% reduction in VMS frequency from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. A greater proportion of responders were observed in the fezolinetant groups versus placebo at week 12 in all four single responder analyses. In the double and triple responder analyses, odds ratios were supportive of a beneficial effect for both doses of fezolinetant versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant was associated with significantly higher within-patient clinically meaningful improvement in important PRO, including VMS frequency, PROMIS SD SF 8b Total Score, MENQoL Total Score, and MENQoL VMS Domain Score.

Update in Outpatient General Internal Medicine: Practice-Changing Evidence Published in 2023

The expansive scope of internal medicine can make it challenging for clinicians to stay informed about new literature that changes practice. Guideline updates and synthesis of relevant evidence can facilitate incorporation of advancements into clinical practice. The titles and abstracts from the seven general medicine journals with highest impact factors and relevance to outpatient internal medicine were reviewed by six internal medicine physicians. Coronavirus disease 19 research was excluded. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The British Medical Journal (BMJ), Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Internal Medicine, and Mayo Clinic Proceedings were reviewed. Additionally, article synopsis collections and databases were evaluated: American College of Physicians Journal Club, NEJM Journal Watch, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, McMaster ACCESSSS/DynaMed Evidence Alerts, and Cochrane Reviews. A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus based on clinical relevance to outpatient internal medicine, potential impact on practice, and strength of evidence. Article qualities and importance were debated until consensus was reached. Clusters of articles pertinent to the same topic were considered together. In total, seven practice-changing articles were included.

Fezolinetant: a novel nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause

INTRODUCTION

During menopause, the majority of women experience vasomotor symptoms which may lead to several untoward effects and negatively impact quality of life. Fezolinetant, a novel agent directly targeting the underlying pathophysiology of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms, offers an alternative to hormonal therapies for which many patients have a contraindication or unwillingness to take due to safety concerns.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes key pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic parameters of fezolinetant along with efficacy and safety data derived from clinical trials. A literature search of peer-reviewed publications evaluating the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases. A review of registered trials in clinicaltrials.gov was evaluated to identify ongoing studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Placebo-controlled studies demonstrated that fezolinetant led to a statistically significant reduction in vasomotor symptom frequency and severity among patients with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. The most common adverse event is headache (5-10%) and no serious safety signals have been noted. Direct head-to-head comparison with hormonal therapies and nonhormonal therapies for vasomotor symptoms, assessment of sleep outcomes, and evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond 1 year are key areas where additional data are still needed.

Effectiveness and safety of fezolinetant in alleviating vasomotor symptoms linked to Menopause.: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most common symptoms during menopause including hot flushes and night sweats. They are highly disruptive to the quality of life. Fezolinetant is an FDA-approved non-hormonal selective neurokinin3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of VMS. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for VMS associated with menopause.

METHODS

Databases were searched until September 2023 for relevant studies comparing fezolinetant against placebo. Data was extracted into an online form and analyzed using RevMan (Version 5.4.1). The GRADE approach was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence regarding efficacy outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fezolinetant to placebo in postmenopausal women experiencing VMS. Exclusion criteria comprised studies involving participants with contraindications to fezolinetant or those evaluating its efficacy for indications other than VMS associated with menopause.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in this study involving 3301 patients. Compared to placebo, fezolinetant reduced the frequency of VMS episodes from baseline (SMD = -0.64, 95 % CI [-0.77, -0.5]) and (SMD = -0.63, 95 % CI [-0.72, -0.53] at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Additionally, fezolinetant reduced VMS severity score (SMD = -0.59, 95 %CI [-0.77, -0.42]) and (SMD = -0.4, 95 % CI [-0.54, -0.27]) at weeks 4 at 12 respectively. These reductions were positively reflected on Menopause specific quality of life score (SMD = -0.46, 95 %CI [-57, -0.34]), (SMD = -0.37, 95 %CI [-0.48, -0.25]) at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Regarding safety analysis, fezolinetant showed increased risk for drug-related TEAEs (RR = 1.47, 95 %CI [1.06,2.04]), serious TEAEs (RR = 1.67, 95 %CI [1.09,2.55]), fatigue (RR = 4.05, 95 %CI [1.27,12.88]), arthralgia (RR = 2.83, 95 %CI [1.02,7.8]) and ALT or AST > 3 times (RR = 2, 95 %CI [1.12,3.57]), with no other statistically significant difference regarding other safety terms.

CONCLUSION

Fezolinetant has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS in postmenopausal women, leading to an improvement in their quality of life. These findings suggest that Fezolinetant may serve as a viable alternative to hormonal therapy for managing VMS.

Fezolinetant for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: a meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to June 2023, comparing fezolinetant to placebo in postmenopausal women suffering from moderate-to-severe VMS. The mean difference and risk ratio were calculated for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. R software was used for the statistical analysis, and RoB-2 (Cochrane) to assess the risk of bias. We performed subgroup analysis based on different dosing regimens. Five RCTs comprising 3302 patients were included. Compared with placebo, at 12-week follow-up, fezolinetant significantly reduced the daily frequency of moderate-to-severe VMS (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.92, -1.81) and daily severity of moderate-to-severe VMS (WMD -0.22; 95% CI -0.31, -0.13). Also, fezolinetant significantly improved the quality of life (WMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.58, -0.26) and sleep disturbance (WMD -1.10; 95% CI -1.96, -0.24). There were no significant differences between groups in adverse events. These findings support the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for the treatment of VMS related to menopause.

Psychometric Evaluation of the MENQOL Instrument in Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause

INTRODUCTION

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire has been developed to assess QOL specific to menopause. The objective of the current study was to assess the psychometric properties, sensitivity to change, and clinically meaningful within-patient change of the MENQOL using data from the fezolinetant SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies in individuals with VMS.

METHODS

Individuals aged ≥ 40 to ≤ 65 years with moderate-to-severe VMS (≥ seven hot flashes/day) were enrolled. In addition to MENQOL, eight patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were used for the psychometric evaluation. All PRO assessments were completed at weeks 4 and 12 during the treatment period, and most were completed at baseline. Psychometric analyses included factor analysis and reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change assessments. The within-patient threshold for a clinically meaningful change in MENQOL was derived.

RESULTS

In total, 1022 individuals were included from SKYLIGHT 1 and 2. Mean MENQOL total score at baseline was 4.30, improving to 3.16 at week 12. The confirmatory factor analysis supported established MENQOL domain structure, including the overall score. The internal consistency of the MENQOL overall and domain scores was supported using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and MENQOL construct validity was supported for overall and domain scores. Item-to-item and item-total correlations were generally sufficient, and moderate test-retest reliability was noted. The scales against which construct validity and responsiveness for MENQOL domains were examined were moderately related to the MENQOL domains in general, providing additional support for acceptable measurement properties of MENQOL in this population. A reduction in MENQOL overall score of ≥ 0.9 points was identified as responding to treatment (a clinically important threshold). Thresholds of 2.0 points for the vasomotor domain and 0.9 for the psychosocial domain were estimated, in addition to distribution-based threshold estimates of 0.8 and 1.2 for the physical and sexual domains, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the MENQOL overall and domain scores support use of this instrument to capture experiences among individuals with moderate-to-severe VMS associated with menopause and assess related endpoints in clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT04003155 and NCT04003142.

Uncovering gaps in management of vasomotor symptoms: findings from a national need assessment

CONTEXT

This national needs assessment study explores the knowledge, attitude, beliefs, and practices (KABP) gaps related to vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause among primary care and OB/GYN clinicians. VMS significantly impacts healthcare costs, workplace productivity, and patient psychosocial health, but a notable disconnect exists between healthcare providers and patients, with provider reticence and knowledge gaps playing a contributing role.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify and propose optimal educational strategies to address these barriers, with attention to health disparities affecting women of color.

METHODS

Methods employed include a multimodal approach of literature review, expert opinion, qualitative interviews, surveys, focus groups, and case studies, ensuring diverse clinician input. Data collection involved in-depth clinician interviews, a nationally disseminated clinician survey, and focus groups.

RESULTS

Results indicate a critical deficiency in healthcare providers' understanding and management of VMS, especially among OB/GYN residents, with 75 % showing limited knowledge. The study also highlights the disproportionate impact of knowledge gaps on women of color, emphasizing the need for a culturally informed approach in medical training and practice. There's a notable discrepancy between clinicians' current and desired abilities in managing VMS, indicating a need for ongoing professional development. Significant variability in approaches to diagnosing and treating VMS, as well as substantial knowledge gaps about treatment options, underscore the need for evidence-based protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Although VMS are a normal aspect of aging, they can significantly disrupt quality of life for many women, necessitating intervention. Beyond the immediate discomfort, VMS can impact quality of life and trigger insomnia and mood disturbances. This study exposes both new and previously recognized gaps in healthcare providers' knowledge and management skills concerning VMS treatment options, particularly regarding hormonal and nonhormonal therapies. Furthermore, our findings highlight the need for a deeper understanding of how VMS uniquely impacts women of diverse backgrounds. Research, including the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), suggests that the experience and severity of VMS may be influenced by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. However, the complex interplay of these factors and their relative contributions remain unclear. Further investigation is crucial to facilitate equitable access to effective treatment for all women. To bridge these gaps, improved education starting as early as residency is essential. This education should address common misconceptions about VMS and its management. Healthcare providers must enhance their competence in discussing the broad spectrum of VMS impacts and employ effective communication strategies to ensure that patients are well-informed about their symptoms and available treatment options.

A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2023

With 54 new drugs and seven cellular and gene therapy products, the approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recovered 2023 from the 2022 dent back to the levels of 2020-2021. As in previous years of this annual review, we assign these new drugs to one of three levels of innovation: first drug against a condition ("first-in-indication"), first drug using a novel molecular mechanism ("first-in-class"), and "next-in-class," i.e., a drug using an already exploited molecular mechanism. We identify four (7%) "first-in-indication," 22 (36%) "first-in-class," and 35 (57%) "next-in-class" drugs. By treatment area, rare diseases (54%) and cancer drugs (23%) were once again the most prevalent (and partly overlapping) therapeutic areas. Other continuing trends were the use of accelerated regulatory approval pathways and the reliance on biopharmaceuticals (biologics). 2023 marks the approval of a first therapy based on CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.

Elinzanetant, a new combined neurokinin-1/-3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms

INTRODUCTION

In many postmenopausal women, quality of life is decreased due to vasomotor symptoms. Efficient and well-tolerated non-hormonal treatment options are needed.

AREAS COVERED

The present review summarizes what is known about the etiology of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms as a rationale for the mechanism of action of Elinzanetant, a new neurokinin (NK)-1/-3 receptor antagonist, as well as its efficacy and side effect profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Elinzanetant likely exerts an antagonistic effect on the NK-3 receptor in the preoptic thermoregulatory zone, but also an additional antagonistic effect on the NK-1 receptor possibly leading to a reduction in vasodilatation and heat-sensing neuro-activity. Elinzanetant's reported peak drug concentrations are reached within one hour and the terminal elimination half-life is approximately 15 hours. Two phase IIb clinical trials evaluated the safety profile and efficacy of several doses. There were no serious adverse events, which also included a lack of evidence of drug-related hepatotoxicity. Overall, Elinzanetant seems to be well-tolerated. In the SWITCH-1 study, the 120 mg/day and 160 mg/day regimen showed good efficacy for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms and led to significant improvements in quality of life. Thus, 120 mg oral Elinzanetant/day was used in phase III trials, whose results have not yet been published.

Efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause among women in East Asia: a phase 3 randomized study (MOONLIGHT I)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause in East Asian women.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind study, postmenopausal women with moderate to severe VMS (minimum average frequency in the 10 days before randomization, ≥7/day or 50/week) received fezolinetant 30 mg/day or placebo (weeks 1-12), followed by an open-label extension phase with fezolinetant 30 mg/day (weeks 13-24). The co-primary endpoints were the mean changes in the daily frequency and severity of VMS at weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

Among 301 participants, the difference in the least squares mean change (95% confidence interval) from baseline in the daily frequency of moderate to severe VMS versus placebo was -0.65 (-1.41 to 0.12) at week 4 and -0.55 (-1.35 to 0.26) at week 12. The differences in the least squares mean change from baseline in the VMS severity score versus placebo were -0.06 (-0.14 to 0.03) and -0.13 (-0.27 to 0.01) at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 0.7% of participants receiving fezolinetant in weeks 1 to 12, compared with 1.3% of those receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant was generally safe but did not reduce the frequency or severity of VMS versus placebo in postmenopausal women in this study.ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04234204.

Long-term safety of fezolinetant in Chinese women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: the phase 3 open-label MOONLIGHT 3 clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess long-term safety and tolerability of fezolinetant, a nonhormonal neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist, among Chinese women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause participating in the MOONLIGHT 3 trial.

METHODS

In this phase 3 open-label study, women in menopause aged 40-65 years received fezolinetant 30 mg once daily for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed at every visit through week 52 and one follow-up visit at week 55.

RESULTS

Overall, 150 women were enrolled (mean age, 54 years) and 105 completed treatment. The frequency of TEAEs was 88.7%. Most TEAEs were mild (63.3%) or moderate (22.7%). The most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (16.0%), followed by dizziness, headache, and protein urine present (10.7% each). There was no clinically relevant change (mean ± standard deviation) in endometrial thickness (baseline, 2.95 ± 1.11 mm; week 52, 2.94 ± 1.18 mm). Alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal were reported in 1.4% of women; no Hy's Law cases occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant 30 mg once daily was generally safe and well tolerated over a 52-week period among women in China with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04451226.

Physical Activity, Self-Care, and Menopausal Symptoms among Women in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: Adherence to Postmenopausal Guidelines (PMGs)

Menopause is a physiological change in which the menstrual period permanently ends. Every woman experiences this transition in different ways between the ages of 40 and 55. Women may have menopausal symptoms as a result of low estrogen levels. Self-care is a practice which women can use to maintain their wellness. This study aimed to assess physical activity, self-care, and menopausal symptoms and their associations with selected variables. The results showed that women should adhere to postmenopausal guidelines (PMGs). A cross-sectional study was conducted among 212 menopausal women randomly selected from health centers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. The international physical activity tool, a self-care questionnaire, and the Kupperman menopausal index scale were used to assess women's physical activity, self-care, and menopausal symptoms, respectively. The chi-square and Pearson correlation tests were used for analysis. The women were 55.01 ± 6.87 years old, and 40.6% reached menopause between the ages of 46 and 50 years; 57.1% of the women had low physical activity, which was associated with menopausal symptoms (p < 0.022). The highest mean score (29.63 ± 5.83) was obtained for physical health, while the lowest (11.92 ± 3.58) was found in self-care screening tests. Regarding menopausal symptoms, 25.9% had mild, 69.8% had moderate, and 4.3% had severe symptoms. A significant association was found between menopausal symptoms and age, menopausal age, education, body mass index, and PMGs awareness at p < 0.001. Self-care positively correlated with menopausal symptoms (p < 0.001). Therefore, attention should be given to women's adherence to PMGs so that they can enjoy healthier lives after menopause.

Fezolinetant treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause: effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in two phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2)

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist, fezolinetant, according to several intrinsic (individual related) and extrinsic (external influence) factors that may influence the frequency and severity of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) using pooled 12-week data from SKYLIGHT 1 and 2.

METHODS

SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 were two phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies conducted from July 2019 to August 2021 (SKYLIGHT 1) or April 2021 (SKYLIGHT 2). Participants were initially randomized to receive daily doses of placebo, fezolinetant 30 mg, or fezolinetant 45 mg. After 12 weeks, placebo participants were rerandomized to receive fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg, whereas those receiving fezolinetant continued on the same dose. Change in VMS frequency from baseline to week 12 was used to assess efficacy according to several intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Overall efficacy and safety were also investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,022 individuals were included. Fezolinetant was efficacious in reducing VMS frequency across all intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Efficacy was most notable for participants who self-identify as Black (least squares mean difference for fezolinetant 45 mg versus placebo, -3.67; 95% CI, -5.32 to -2.01), current smokers (-3.48; -5.19 to -1.77), and current alcohol users (-3.48; -4.42 to -2.54). Overall efficacy was -2.51 (95% CI, -3.20 to -1.82) for fezolinetant 45 mg versus placebo. Similar findings were observed for the fezolinetant 30 mg dose. Comparable incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were observed for placebo (132 of 342 individuals [38.6%]), fezolinetant 30 mg (132 of 340 individuals [38.8%]), and fezolinetant 45 mg (135 of 340 individuals [39.7%]).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the intrinsic and extrinsic factors analyzed substantially reduced the efficacy response to fezolinetant in SKYLIGHT 1 and 2. These data provide additional confidence for using fezolinetant in a diverse population of individuals with VMS.

Systematic review of neurokinin-3 receptor antagonists for the management of vasomotor symptoms of menopause

IMPORTANCE

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) affect many postmenopausal persons and impact sleep and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review examines the literature describing the safety and efficacy of neurokinin-3 receptor antagonists approved and in development for postmenopausal persons with VMS.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts was conducted using the search terms and permutations of neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist, elinzanetant, fezolinetant, and osanetant. Inclusion criteria of reporting on efficacy or safety of fezolinetant, elinzanetant, or osanetant; studies in participants identifying as female; full record in English; and primary literature were applied. Abstract-only records were excluded. Extracted data were synthesized to allow comparison of reported study characteristics, efficacy outcomes, and safety events. Eligible records were evaluated for risk of bias via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized studies and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used. This study was neither funded nor registered.

FINDINGS

The search returned 191 records; 186 were screened after deduplication. Inclusion criteria were met by six randomized controlled trials (RCT), four reported on fezolinetant, and two reported on elinzanetant. One record was a post hoc analysis of a fezolinetant RCT. An additional study was identified outside the database search. Three fezolinetant RCT demonstrated a reduction in VMS frequency/severity, improvement in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life scores, and improvement in sleep quality at weeks 4 and 12 compared with placebo without serious adverse events. The two RCT on elinzanetant also showed improvements in VMS frequency and severity. All eight records evaluated safety through treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common adverse events were COVID-19, headache, somnolence, and gastrointestinal. Each record evaluated had a low risk of bias. There is a strong certainty of evidence as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Because of the high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy of fezolinetant and elinzanetant, these agents may be an effective option with mild adverse events for women seeking nonhormone treatment of VMS.

Managing menopause after cancer

Globally, 9 million women are diagnosed with cancer each year. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, followed by colorectal cancer in high-income countries and cervical cancer in low-income countries. Survival from cancer is improving and more women are experiencing long-term effects of cancer treatment, such as premature ovarian insufficiency or early menopause. Managing menopausal symptoms after cancer can be challenging, and more severe than at natural menopause. Menopausal symptoms can extend beyond hot flushes and night sweats (vasomotor symptoms). Treatment-induced symptoms might include sexual dysfunction and impairment of sleep, mood, and quality of life. In the long term, premature ovarian insufficiency might increase the risk of chronic conditions such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Diagnosing menopause after cancer can be challenging as menopausal symptoms can overlap with other common symptoms in patients with cancer, such as fatigue and sexual dysfunction. Menopausal hormone therapy is an effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms and seems to be safe for many patients with cancer. When hormone therapy is contraindicated or avoided, emerging evidence supports the efficacy of non-pharmacological and non-hormonal treatments, although most evidence is based on women older than 50 years with breast cancer. Vaginal oestrogen seems safe for most patients with genitourinary symptoms, but there are few non-hormonal options. Many patients have inadequate centralised care for managing menopausal symptoms after cancer treatment, and more information is needed about cost-effective and patient-focused models of care for this growing population.

Optimising health after early menopause

The typical age at menopause is 50-51 years in high-income countries. However, early menopause is common, with around 8% of women in high-income countries and 12% of women globally experiencing menopause between the ages of 40 years and 44 years. Menopause before age 40 years (premature ovarian insufficiency) affects an additional 2-4% of women. Both early menopause and premature ovarian insufficiency can herald an increased risk of chronic disease, including osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. People who enter menopause at younger ages might also experience distress and feel less supported than those who reach menopause at the average age. Clinical practice guidelines are available for the diagnosis and management of premature ovarian insufficiency, but there is a gap in clinical guidance for early menopause. We argue that instead of distinct age thresholds being applied, early menopause should be seen on a spectrum between premature ovarian insufficiency and menopause at the average age. This Series paper presents evidence for the short-term and long-term consequences of early menopause. We offer a practical framework for clinicians to guide diagnosis and management of early menopause, which considers the nature and severity of symptoms, age and medical history, and the individual's wishes and priorities to optimise their quality of life and short-term and long-term health. We conclude with recommendations for future research to address key gaps in the current evidence.

An empowerment model for managing menopause

Menopause eventually happens to all people with typically functioning ovaries, and almost one billion women worldwide are postmenopausal. Although the biology of typical menopause is ubiquitous, the experience varies substantially. Factors contributing to the experience include not only individual factors, such as the nature and severity of symptoms, but also psychological, social, and contextual considerations, many of which are modifiable. In this first paper in the Lancet Series on menopause, we argue for a new approach that goes beyond the treatment of specific symptoms, to encompass a broad model to support women transitioning this life stage, using the model of empowerment. WHO defines empowerment as an active process of gaining knowledge, confidence, and self-determination to self-manage health and make informed decisions about care. Rather than focusing on menopause as an endocrine deficiency, we propose an empowerment model that recognises factors modifying the experience, in which the patient is an expert in their own condition and the health-care worker supports the patient to become an equal and active partner in managing their own care.

Efficacy and Safety of Fezolinetant for the Treatment of Menopause-Associated Vasomotor Symptoms: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of fezolinetant for treating vasomotor symptoms (VMS) of menopause.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov , EMBASE, Cochrane Database, Scopus, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched through June 2023 for publications and randomized controlled trials on fezolinetant compared with placebo in menopausal women who experienced moderate-to-severe VMS.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Our literature search identified 330 articles, of which five studies with six reports were included in our meta-analysis per our eligibility criteria.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane's RoB 2 (Risk of Bias version 2) tool, quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, and outcome measures data for effect size were pooled in random-effects model and rated. A total of 2,168 participants from five randomized clinical trials (six reports) were included. Fezolinetant significantly lowered VMS frequency, with pooled mean difference of 2.62 (95% CI, 1.84-3.41). The pooled mean difference for fezolinetant compared with placebo for the MENQOL (Menopause-Specific Quality of Life) measure was -0.60 (95% CI, -0.92 to -0.28), and the mean percentage improvement in VMS frequency was 22.51% (95% CI, 15.35-29.67). Fezolinetant was associated with improvement in sleep quality when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Fezolinetant is effective in lowering moderate-to-severe VMS frequency and sleep disturbances in postmenopausal women.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42023427616.

A Novel Nonhormonal Treatment for Vasomotor Symptoms of Menopause

Vasomotor symptoms of menopause, more commonly called hot flashes and night sweats, affect up to 80% of individuals going through the menopausal transition. Hormone therapy with estrogen and often progesterone is the most effective treatment for these symptoms. Many people, however, cannot take estrogen or do not want to take hormones. Many individuals seek nonhormonal, over-the-counter treatment options that have little safety and efficacy information to support their use. In March 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved fezolinetant (Veozah), a neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause. This article presents an overview of fezolinetant, including appropriate usage, adverse effects, its use in special populations, and implications for nursing practice.

The efficacy of purified pollen extract for reducing vasomotor symptoms in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Menopause impacts the quality of life for women, with symptoms varying from hot flashes to night disturbances. When menopausal hormonal therapy is contraindicated or women refuse menopausal hormonal therapy, many consider alternatives such as pollen extract for treating vasomotor symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis focuses on the impact of using purified pollen extract as a treatment option to reduce vasomotor symptoms in women, specifically focusing on symptoms such as hot flashes, night disturbances, myalgias, and depression.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following Boolean search string "women OR females" AND "purified pollen OR pollen extract OR cytoplasmic pollen OR Bonafide OR Femal OR Estroven OR Serelys" AND "menopausal symptoms OR vasomotor symptoms OR hot flashes OR night sweats OR sleep disturbance." Publications in English from 2003 to the present were included. To assess the risk of bias, authors used the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 for a randomized controlled trial and Risk-of-Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for observational studies. Using ReviewManager, a Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to determine the standardized mean differences (SMDs) in the outcomes for each study.

FINDINGS

Five articles were retained: one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies ( N = 420). An overall decrease in scores from the baseline of studies compared with a 3-month follow-up after purified cytoplasm of pollen (PCP) treatment was recognized when compiling the data. Overall, there was significant improvement across all outcomes at 3 months: hot flashes demonstrated an overall improvement in SMD of -1.66 ( P < 0.00001), night disturbance scores were improved with an SMD of -1.10 ( P < 0.0001), depression scores were improved with an SMD of -1.31 ( P < 0.0001), and myalgia had an improvement in SMD of -0.40 ( P < 0.00001). When controlled studies were pooled for meta-analysis, outcomes, however, were no longer statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of alternative therapies, such as PCP extract, is important to care for women who cannot take traditional vasomotor symptom therapies. Pooled data from controlled studies evaluating PCP extract suggest that vasomotor symptom improvements seen in noncontrolled studies may have been due to the placebo effect; however, its use was not associated with significant adverse effects.

The Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Kisspeptin and Neurokinin B

Kisspeptin (KP) and neurokinin B (NKB) are neuropeptides that govern the reproductive endocrine axis through regulating hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal activity and pulsatile GnRH secretion. Their critical role in reproductive health was first identified after inactivating variants in genes encoding for KP or NKB signaling were shown to result in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and a failure of pubertal development. Over the past 2 decades since their discovery, a wealth of evidence from both basic and translational research has laid the foundation for potential therapeutic applications. Beyond KP's function in the hypothalamus, it is also expressed in the placenta, liver, pancreas, adipose tissue, bone, and limbic regions, giving rise to several avenues of research for use in the diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy, metabolic, liver, bone, and behavioral disorders. The role played by NKB in stimulating the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center to mediate menopausal hot flashes has led to the development of medications that antagonize its action as a novel nonsteroidal therapeutic agent for this indication. Furthermore, the ability of NKB antagonism to partially suppress (but not abolish) the reproductive endocrine axis has supported its potential use for the treatment of various reproductive disorders including polycystic ovary syndrome, uterine fibroids, and endometriosis. This review will provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the preclinical and clinical data that have paved the way for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic applications of KP and NKB.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of fezolinetant with hormone and nonhormone therapies for treatment of vasomotor symptoms due to menopause

IMPORTANCE

The neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist fezolinetant 45 mg/d significantly reduced frequency/severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) of menopause compared with placebo in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Its efficacy relative to available therapies is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare efficacy with fezolinetant 45 mg and hormone therapy (HT) and non-HT for VMS in postmenopausal women.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Using OvidSP, we systematically searched multiple databases for phase 3 or 4 randomized controlled trials in postmenopausal women with ≥7 moderate to severe VMS per day or ≥50 VMS per week published/presented in English through June 25, 2021. Mean change in frequency and severity of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to week 12 and proportion of women with ≥75% reduction in VMS frequency at week 12 were assessed using fixed-effect models.

FINDINGS

The network meta-analysis included data from the pooled phase 3 fezolinetant trials plus 23 comparator publications across the outcomes analyzed (frequency, 19 [34 regimens]; severity, 6 [7 regimens]; ≥75% response, 9 [15 regimens]). Changes in VMS frequency did not differ significantly between fezolinetant 45 mg and any of the 27 HT regimens studied. Fezolinetant 45 mg reduced the frequency of moderate to severe VMS events per day significantly more than all non-HTs evaluated: paroxetine 7.5 mg (mean difference [95% credible interval {CrI}], 1.66 [0.63-2.71]), desvenlafaxine 50 to 200 mg (mean differences [95% CrI], 1.12 [0.10-2.13] to 2.16 [0.90-3.40]), and gabapentin ER 1800 mg (mean difference [95% CrI], 1.63 [0.48-2.81]), and significantly more than placebo (mean difference, 2.78 [95% CrI], 1.93-3.62]). Tibolone 2.5 mg (the only HT regimen evaluable for severity) significantly reduced VMS severity compared with fezolinetant 45 mg. Fezolinetant 45 mg significantly reduced VMS severity compared with desvenlafaxine 50 mg and placebo and did not differ significantly from higher desvenlafaxine doses or gabapentin ER 1800 mg. For ≥75% responder rates, fezolinetant 45 mg was less effective than tibolone 2.5 mg (not available in the United States) and conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/bazedoxifene 20 mg (available only as 0.45 mg/20 mg in the United States), did not differ significantly from other non-HT regimens studied and was superior to desvenlafaxine 50 mg and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The only HT regimens that showed significantly greater efficacy than fezolinetant 45 mg on any of the outcomes analyzed are not available in the United States. Fezolinetant 45 mg once daily was statistically significantly more effective than other non-HTs in reducing the frequency of moderate to severe VMS.

RELEVANCE

These findings may inform decision making with regard to the individualized management of bothersome VMS due to menopause.

New advances in menopause symptom management

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are characteristic of menopause experienced by over 75% of postmenopausal women with significant health and socioeconomic implications. Although the average duration of symptoms is seven years, 10% of women experience symptoms for more than a decade. Although menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) remains an efficacious and cost-effective treatment, its use may not be suitable in all women, such as those at an increased risk of breast cancer or gynaecological malignancy. The neurokinin B (NKB) signaling pathway, together with its intricate connection to the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), has been postulated to provide integrated reproductive and thermoregulatory responses, with a central role in mediating postmenopausal VMS. This review describes the physiological hypothalamo-pituitary-ovary (HPO) axis, and subsequently the neuroendocrine changes that occur with menopause using evidence derived from animal and human studies. Finally, data from the latest clinical trials using novel therapeutic agents that antagonise NKB signaling are reviewed.

Elinzanetant: a phase III therapy for postmenopausal patients with vasomotor symptoms

INTRODUCTION

Menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are experienced by most women and are often debilitating and can last for years. While hormone replacement therapy is effective, it carries risks that have impacted its wider use, and it can be contraindicated. There is a large unmet need for a safe, effective non-hormonal therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The importance of the neurokinin (NK) system in the hypothalamic regulation of the vasomotor center has become clear. NK antagonists, previously developed for other indications, have therefore been investigated for the treatment of VMS. Elinzanetant is a potent antagonist at both NK1 (endogenous ligand Substance P) and NK3 (neurokinin B) receptors, whereas other related drugs in development are selective NK3 antagonists. Elinzanetant has been investigated in 2 Phase II trials for menopausal VMS, demonstrating rapid onset and dose-dependant efficacy for the relief of VMS and improvement in quality of life for up to 12 weeks. Phase III trials are underway in women both with physiological menopause and after treatment for breast cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Elinzanetant is a very promising non-hormonal approach to a highly prevalent symptom constellation, with rapid onset and high efficacy. Wider indications are being explored in current Phase III trials.

Efficacy and safety of fezolinetant, a neurokinin-3 antagonist, in treating vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Menopause causes a variety of symptoms such as hot flashes and night sweats. While menopausal hormonal therapy has been used for managing postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) for quite a while, it has a considerably poor safety profile.

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze existing data to evaluate the efficacy of the neurokinin-3 antagonist, fezolinetant, in treating postmenopausal VMS and to assess its safety profile.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020, to find publications on the efficacy of fezolinetant for postmenopausal VMS. Changes in the frequency and severity scores of moderate/severe VMS and changes in the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) were the efficacy outcomes. Adverse events, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs), drug-related dropouts, hepatotoxicity, endometrial hyperplasia or tumor, and uterine bleeding were all safety outcomes. We used Review Manager 5.4 for pooling risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. A P value of < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in mean daily VMS frequency at weeks 4 and 12 (MD, -2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.85 to -1.87; P < .00001, for week 12) and also a significant decrease in VMS severity scores in the treatment group. Furthermore, improvements in MENQoL, HFRDIS, and GCS scores were observed. There was no significant difference in adverse events while drug-related TEAEs (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.90-1.63; P = .21) showed a slight increase with fezolinetant. Drug-related dropouts were again similar across the 2 groups. Uterine bleeding had a lower incidence while endometrial events and hepatotoxicity showed a statistically insignificant, increasing trend in the fezolinetant group.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Fezolinetant can be a treatment option for postmenopausal VMS but warns of a risk increase in endometrial hyperplasia or tumors. The heterogeneity in the data being analyzed, short follow-up period, and small sample size in most of the included randomized controlled trials were the greatest limitations, which must be considered in further research and safety profile exploration.

Clinical guidelines for managing menopausal symptoms in women with (a history of) breast cancer

Background

One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer. At the time of diagnosis, 75% of patients are postmenopausal. Many will receive anti-hormone therapy, which often induces menopausal symptoms. Premenopausal breast cancer patients frequently become postmenopausal as a result of the treatment and often experience menopausal symptoms. The increased incidence of breast cancer, combined with longer survival, has led to an increase in the number of women experiencing menopausal symptoms. Therefore, the management of menopausal symptoms in women with a history or current breast cancer is a relevant and common clinical problem.

Objectives

To provide a clinically useful overview of the steps in the management of menopausal symptoms in women with (a history of) breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted by authors JS and WT using the PubMed and Medline databases. Abstracts were critically appraised and, where appropriate, the full text was analysed.

Main Outcome Measures

Not applicable.

Results

Depending on the condition, either meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials or retrospective cohorts were identified. No evidence was found for some proposed treatments.

Conclusions

Menopausal symptoms in women with (a history of) breast cancer require a patient-tailored approach. Shared decision making is paramount and adequate up-to-date knowledge can help the breast cancer specialist to advise and guide patients accordingly.

What is new?

A comprehensive, clinically-based overview of evidence-based treatment options for menopausal symptoms in women with (a history of) breast cancer.

Fezolinetant: A New Nonhormonal Treatment for Vasomotor Symptoms

Objective: To review the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of fezolinetant for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted through PubMed using the following search terms: fezolinetant, ES259564, SKYLIGHT, vasomotor symptoms, and menopause. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Selected articles included those which described clinical studies of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, or tolerability of fezolinetant. Data Synthesis: Fezolinetant works by inhibiting neurokinin B from binding to its receptor in the hypothalamus, thereby decreasing the occurrence of vasomotor symptoms. Clinical trials have demonstrated fezolinetant is superior to placebo in decreasing the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms. Common adverse effects associated with the use of fezolinetant include headache and gastrointestinal disturbances, as well as elevations in liver transaminase levels. Conclusions: Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause recommend hormone therapy as the most effective treatment option. Risks associated with hormone use may limit the use of this option in some patients. Neurokinin B inhibitors, like fezolinetant, target the physiologic cause of vasomotor symptoms. With the approval of fezolinetant, as well as elinzanetant which is currently in phase 3 clinical trials, providers and patients have additional nonhormonal treatment options for vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

Global view of vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbance in menopause: a systematic review

Studies have shown racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of vasomotor symptoms (VMS), sleep disturbance and VMS treatment in menopause. To assess the reproducibility of these differences, we systematically reviewed observational studies, published in 2000-2021, reporting the prevalence/incidence of VMS, sleep disturbance or treatment use in menopausal women stratified by race/ethnicity. We screened 3799 records from PubMed and Embase and included 27 papers (19 studies). No incidence data were found. Prevalence data varied widely, but some common patterns emerged. In all five studies comparing VMS between Black women and White, Hispanic and/or East Asian women, the prevalence was highest in Black women and lowest in East Asian women. The prevalence of sleep disturbance overall was compared among Black, White and East Asian women in two study populations, and was highest in White women in both papers. Sleep disturbance was more common than VMS in East Asian women. In all four studies comparing hormone therapy use between White women and Black and/or East Asian women, treatment use was more common in White women. These results highlight the need for individualized counseling and treatment, outreach to under-served minorities, and standardized definitions and outcome measures for VMS and sleep disturbance for future studies.

Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS SD-SF-8b instrument in individuals experiencing vasomotor symptoms due to menopause

BACKGROUND

Women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause frequently experience poor sleep quality. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD-SF-8b) has been developed to assess sleep disturbance. The study objective was to use data from the fezolinetant SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies in individuals with VMS to assess the psychometric properties of the PROMIS SD-SF-8b.

METHODS

Individuals (aged ≥ 40-≤65 years) with moderate-to-severe VMS (≥ 7 hot flashes/day) were enrolled. Besides PROMIS SD-SF-8b, eight other patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were used for the psychometric evaluation. All the PRO assessments were completed at weeks 4 and 12 during the treatment period and most were completed at baseline. Psychometric analyses included factor analysis and reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change assessments. The within-patient threshold for a clinically meaningful change in sleep disturbance was derived.

RESULTS

Overall, 1022 individuals were included from the SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies. Mean PROMIS SD-SF-8b total score at baseline was 26.80, which decreased to 22.68 at week 12, reflecting improved sleep disturbance. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the proposed PROMIS SD-SF-8b domain structure. Internal consistency was excellent, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.915 and 0.935 and a McDonald's omega of 0.917. Item-to-item and item-total correlations were sufficient and moderate test-retest reliability was noted. The construct validity assessments showed that moderate Spearman rank correlations (r: 0.608 to 0.651) were observed between PROMIS SD-SF-8b total scores and measures of sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment, and that significant differences were noted in the total scores across PRO categories. The responsiveness of PROMIS SD-SF-8b total scores was supported by the results from the correlations in change scores and comparisons of mean change scores by PRO categories. Statistically significant differences in mean scores were observed between responder and non-responder PRO groups. A PROMIS SD-SF-8b total score of 8 points was identified as the within-patient threshold to use to confirm a meaningful change in sleep disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the PROMIS SD-SF-8b support its use to measure sleep disturbance in women with VMS due to menopause.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT04003155 and NCT04003142.

Fezolinetant: A Potential Treatment for Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms of Menopause

The most common symptom of menopause is vasomotor symptoms (VMS), which occur in more than 80% of postmenopausal women. Furthermore, VMS are the manifestation of menopause for which women most commonly seek treatment, namely, to address their impacted quality of life, including sleep, and work-and non-work-related productivity. VMS vary in frequency, intensity and duration. Hormone therapy (HT) has been our most effective treatment for VMS and has been approved for this indication by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Despite being a safe and effective treatment option, many patients and providers are hesitant to consider HT. Moreover, HT is contraindicated for some women. While many over-the-counter and non-HT options are available, we lack data on the efficacy and safety of most of these. This has left a void for women. Fezolinetant was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe VMS. So far, clinical trials have shown positive results in terms of safety and efficacy. Fezolinetant is a non-hormonal, neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist that works in the hypothalamus at the thermoregulatory centre. Blocking the non-hormonal neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist modulates hot flashes and night sweats. As early as 4 weeks from initiating fezolinetant, women experienced a statistically significant reduction of both severity and frequency of VMS per day, resulting in an improved quality of life.