First-line atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a phase 3, global, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled study

Global research trends on biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Visualization and bibliometric analysis

The global burden of cancer continues to grow, posing a significant public health challenge. Although cancer immunotherapy has shown significant efficacy, the response rate is not high. Therefore, the objective of our research was to identify the latest research trends and hotspots on biomarkers from 1993 to 2023. Data were collected from the database Web of Science core collection. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were conducted with CiteSpace(6.3.1), VOSviewer (v1.6.20), R-bibliometrix(v4.3.3), and Microsoft Excel(2019). A total of 2686 literatures were retrieved. The sheer annual volume of publications has shown a rapid upward trend since 2015. The United States has generated the most publications and Harvard University ranked as a leading institution. The global biomarker research on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revealed regional differences and in-depth explorations should be promoted in developing countries. Although China has become the second largest country in terms of publication, the average citation per paper and the total link strength were both lower than the other countries. The research on biomarkers mainly concentrated upon the following aspects: PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4, gene expression, adverse events, total mutational burden (TMB), body mass index (BMI), gut microbiota, cd8(+)/cd4(+) t-cells, and blood-related biomarkers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), cytokines. Furthermore, "artificial intelligence" and "machine learning" have become the most important research hotspot over the last 2 y, which will help us to identify useful biomarkers from complex big data and provide a basis for precise medicine for malignant tumors.

Clinical impact of cancer cachexia on the outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of ≥50% receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy

This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to determine whether cancer cachexia serves as a biomarker for determining the most effective treatment for patients having non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or combined with chemotherapy (ICI/chemotherapy). We included 411 patients with advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥50%. The patients were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI/chemotherapy. Cancer cachexia was defined as a weight loss of >5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of <20 kg/m2 coupled with an additional weight loss of >2% within 6 months before starting treatment. Eighty-five (21%) patients met the cancer cachexia criteria. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia in both the pembrolizumab monotherapy group (17.2 vs. 35.8 months, p < 0.001) and the ICI/chemotherapy group (27.0 months vs. not reached, p = 0.044). However, after stratifying by cancer cachexia status, no significant difference in OS was observed between the pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy groups, regardless of cachexia. In conclusion, ICI/chemotherapy offers limited benefits for NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression and concurrent cancer cachexia. Considering the frailty associated with cachexia, ICI monotherapy may be preferred to ICI/chemotherapy for these patients. New interventions that can better address the negative prognostic impact of cachexia in patients treated using ICIs with or without chemotherapy remain warranted.

Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: A molecular perspective

This editorial comments on the review by Da Silva et al, published in the World Journal of Clinical Oncology which focuses on the molecular perspectives of lung cancer. With the rapid development of molecular technology, new diagnostic methods are constantly emerging, including liquid biopsy, the identification of gene mutations, and the monitoring biomarkers, thus providing precise information with which to identify the occurrence and development of lung cancer. Biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, and circulating RNA can provide helpful information for clinical application. Common types of genetic mutations and immune checkpoints include epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, c-ROS proto-oncogene 1, programmed death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein. According to specific biomarkers, targeted therapy and immunotherapy can improve survival outcomes based on the types of gene mutation and immune checkpoints. The application of molecular approaches can facilitate our ability to control the progression of disease and select appropriate therapeutic strategies for patients with lung cancer.

Real-world outcomes of metastatic cancer patients hospitalized at initial diagnosis: ONIRIS, a national study

PURPOSE

Therapeutic management of metastatic cancer patients who are hospitalized at the time of initial diagnosis because of impaired performance status and/or severe symptoms is challenging for clinicians. This study aims to describe their outcome.  METHODS: In this prospective multicentric study, we included all adult, inpatients with newly diagnosed metastatic solid tumors between November 2021 and May 2022. Patients were followed for 3 months.. Our primary objective was to describe overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included assessing SANT effectiveness in specific subgroups, identifying baseline factors associated with SANT initiation, and assessing usual prognostic tools and factors associated with response.

RESULTS

107 patients were included. Seventy-four (69%) initiated a SANT. Among them, 39 patients were alive at 3 months. Median overall survival was 1.7 months for the entire cohort. Thirty-seven patients (55%) died in the unit where they were first admitted. Patients with chemo-sensitive tumors, such as testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (100% OS at 3 months), or those receiving targeted therapies or hormone therapies (80% OS at 3 months), showed numerically better outcomes. Factors associated with the initiation of a SANT were young age (OR = 0,94 [0,90; 0,98]), low Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR = 0,56 [0,42; 0,73]), and patient's or caregiver's request for treatment (respectively, OR = 0,07 [0,02; 0,17] and 0,17 [0,06; 0,42], compared to the respective reference category (no request)).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic cancer patients hospitalized at the time of diagnosis share a similar poor survival. Despite the notable exception of chemo-sensitive tumors and specific molecular alterations, the high mortality observed in both groups suggests that SANT has a limited impact on their outcomes. Best supportive care can be reasonably considered for these patients. The benefit of SANT in this altered population should be assessed in larger prospective studies.

The hidden potential of solasonine: Targeting non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastasis through GATM and Smad2 pathways

PURPOSE

To study the pharmacological effects of solasonine (Sol) in inhibiting non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastasis.

METHODS

The pharmacological effects of solasonine were examined in vitro by continuous induction of NSCLC cells by no treatment, or TGF-β, or creatine. Cell migration and invasion were assessed via wound healing and transwell assays, and the levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers were determined using immunofluorescence and Western Blot. Solasonine's ability to bind to TGF-β and creatine transferases and isoenzymes was assessed by TCGA, KMPLOT database, cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA), and molecular docking assay. In vivo, two types of NSCLC cells were injected into mice using the tail vein. Solasonine's effect on tumor metastasis was determined using in vivo fluorescent probes, hematoxylin-eosin staining assay, and immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Unlike traditional therapies targeting TGF-β receptors, Sol was shown to inhibit NSCLC metastasis through a novel mechanism independent of TGF-β signaling. Creatine was found to promote NSCLC metastasis in vitro by enhancing cell migration, invasion, and EMT-related protein expression, and in vivo by increasing metastasis to the liver. These effects were mediated by the activation of Smad2 phosphorylation and EMT independently of TGF-β. Sol effectively counteracted these effects by targeting guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GATM) with high binding affinity, thereby suppressing the TTK-mediated Smad2 pathway and significantly reducing metastasis to the lungs and liver, as confirmed by HE staining and fluorescence imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies solasonine as a novel inhibitor of NSCLC metastasis, acting through the GATM and Smad2 pathways to counter creatine-induced metastasis. These findings underscore the potential of Sol as a therapeutic candidate for metastatic NSCLC.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years or with an ECOG performance status of 2 (GFPC 08-2015 ENERGY): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown superiority over chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but data for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 or those with an ECOG performance status of 2 are scarce. We aimed to test the superiority of the PD-1 antibody nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab over platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC aged 70 years or older or with an ECOG performance status of 2.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 30 hospitals and cancer centres in France. Eligible patients had stage IV histologically proven NSCLC, with no known oncogenic alterations, and were either aged 70 years or older with ECOG performance status of 0-2 or younger than 70 years with an ECOG performance status of 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally, using a computer-generated algorithm stratified by age (<70 vs ≥70 years), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus pemetrexed [500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks] or carboplatin [on day 1; area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus paclitaxel [90 mg/m2 as intravenous infusion on days 1, 5, and 15, every 4 weeks]). The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. All efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one safety follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03351361.

FINDINGS

The trial was stopped early for futility on the basis of a pre-planned interim analysis after 33% of the expected events had occurred. Between Feb 12, 2018, and Dec 15, 2020, 217 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 216 patients were included in the final analysis, with 109 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 107 in the chemotherapy group; median age was 74 years (IQR 70-78). Median overall survival was 14·7 months (95% CI 8·0-19·7) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 9·9 months (7·7-12·3) in chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·16]). Among patients aged 70 years or older with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (median age 76 years [IQR 73-79]), median overall survival was longer in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group than the chemotherapy group: 22·6 months (95% CI 18·1-36·0) versus 11·8 months (8·9-20·5; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·46-0·96]). Among patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (median age 69 years [IQR 63-75]), median overall survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 1·4-4·8) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus 6·1 months (3·5-10·4) in the chemotherapy group (HR 1·32 [95% CI 0·82-2·11]). No new safety signals were reported. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (28 [27%] of 103 patients) in the chemotherapy group and endocrine disorders (five [5%] of 105 patients), cardiac disorders (ten [10%] patients), and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [11%] patients) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group.

INTERPRETATION

The study showed no benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in the overall study population. As a result of early stopping, the trial was underpowered for primary and secondary endpoints; however, the finding of better survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with platinum doublet in the subgroup of older patients with NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 warrants further study.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with vinorelbine as second‑line treatment for elderly patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma: A retrospective cohort

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with vinorelbine (NVB) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC). The present retrospective analysis included 48 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with advanced SqCLC who received anlotinib in combination with NVB as a second-line therapy between January 2021 and December 2023. The primary endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. The median PFS and OS for the cohort was found to be 5.0 and 9.5 months, respectively. By contrast, the ORR and DCR were found to be 29.17 and 70.83%. Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients who experienced specific adverse events (AEs), such as hypertension, proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome during treatment, generally had superior efficacy compared with those who did not experience these AEs (mPFS, 6.0 vs. 4.0 months; mOS, 11.0 vs. 8.5 months). In addition, apart from promising efficacy, patients who experienced common AEs also experienced decreased appetite (35.42%), fatigue (29.17%), hypertension (25%) and hand-foot syndrome (27.08%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in <30% of patients, the majority of which was alleviated through corresponding support care. These results suggest that the combination of anlotinib and NVB as second-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced SqCLC demonstrated promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile. Such regimen may be a viable treatment option for this patient population. However, further prospective studies are required to validate these findings and optimize the dosing schedule for improved therapeutic outcomes.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

The role of Mediterranean diet in cancer incidence and mortality in the older adults

The magnitude of benefit of Mediterranean diet in cancer prevention and mortality in older adults is still unclear, therefore we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes considered were cancer incidence and cancer mortality. In studies evaluating cancer incidence as a time-to-event endpoint and adherence as quantiles, HR was 0.885 (95% CI 0.773-1.013, I2 = 44%). Including ORs, exploratory pooled effect size was 0.876 (0.794-0.966, I2 = 34%), consistently with results of studies evaluating ORs for adherence as one-point increase (OR 0.744, 0.570-0.972, I2 = 90%). No clear benefit was observed on cancer mortality, with pooled HR of 0.935 (0.800-1.093, I2 = 0%). Significant differences were observed for ORs according to cancer type but not between medium and high adherence for both outcomes. Certainty of evidence was low. Our findings suggest that MD could play a protective role in cancer incidence in advanced age, but no clear effect on cancer mortality was observed.

Single-drug Chemotherapy Plus Immunotherapy as First-line Treatment for Stage Ⅳ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Elderly Patients: A Phase II Clinical Trial UNICORN Study

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer remains the most common malignancy and the leading cancer-related death among the elderly in China, which deserves more research attention. Immunotherapy combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy has been approved as the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are devoid of specific gene mutations or fusions. Given that patients with NSCLC over the age of 65 typically exhibit declining organ function and physical condition, they often showed reduced tolerance for this rigorous treatment regimen. However, the KEYNOTE-042 study illuminated a promising pathway: in patients testing positive for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), immunotherapy alone has demonstrated a superior overall survival (OS) compared to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. This suggests that moderating the intensity of chemotherapy and prioritizing immunotherapy may be a gentler alternative in elderly demographic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter phase II clinical trial named UNICORN aimed to enroll 49 patients aged 65 and older, utilizing paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for those with squamous NSCLC, and pemetrexed for those diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. The treatment protocol entails 4 cycles of serplulimab plus chemotherapy followed by an extended regimen of serplulimab maintenance, spanning a total of 35 cycles. Primary endpoints of this study are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and the secondary endpoints are OS, objective control rate (ORR) and safety metrics.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of serplulimab combined with either paclitaxel or pemetrexed in elderly treatment-naïve patients with stage IV NSCLC whose PD-L1 are positive.

Clinical benefit of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment for patients over the age of 65 or 75 with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy (CT) is considered the standard of care in first line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. However, the clinical benefit of this combination in older patients is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line of treatment for older patients with advanced NSCLC. Subgroups of patients over 65 and over 75 were analyzed. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A fixedeffect model was used. We analyzed ten trials with an anti-PD-1 (camrelizumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab or toripalimab) and six trials with an anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab or sugemalimab), including 3666 patients over the age of 65 (41%) and 282 patients over the age of 75 (<10%). For patients over 65 years of age, anti-PD- 1/PD-L1 + CT was significantly associated (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) with prolonged OS (0.79 [0.72-0.86]; p < 0.00001) and P FS (0.63 [0.58-0.68]; p < 0.00001) compared to CT alone. Survival benefits occurred in both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 trials. For patients over 75 years of age, OS benefit was not statistically significant (0.88 [0.67-1.16]; p = 0.37). For patients over the age of 65 with untreated NSCLC, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination with CT, compared with CT alone, is associated with significantly improved OS and PFS. Due to the low number of patients, it is difficult to conclude for those over 75.

Atezolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a cost-effectiveness analysis in the USA

OBJECTIVE

This study explores the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab monotherapy compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (IIIB/IV-NSCLC) ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy from a US payer perspective.

DESIGN

This is based on the IPSOS clinical trial. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy over a 15-year duration. Employing a robust Markov model incorporating data from 453 patients, we calculated total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per QALY. We performed one-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to validate our model.

SETTING

The US payer perspective.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort with NSCLC ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen from IPSOS clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Atezolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Cost, QALYs, LYs and ICER.

RESULT

Chemotherapy resulted in an average survival of 0.930 QALYs (1.528 LYs) per patient at an average cost of $67 579. Atezolizumab treatment provided an additional 0.309 QALYs but incurred an extra cost of $66 472, leading to an ICER of $215 069 per QALY compared with chemotherapy. The cost of atezolizumab had the most significant impact on the model outcomes. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that atezolizumab had a 30.2% probability of being considered cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $150 000 per QALY in the USA. These results remained consistent across various scenarios and sensitivity analyses employing both deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

CONCLUSION

The current price of atezolizumab renders it an unlikely cost-effective treatment option for patients with IIIB/IV-NSCLC from the payer's perspective in the USA. To achieve cost-effectiveness, substantial discounts are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The IMpower-110, an open-label, randomised, phase 3 clinical trial (NCT02409342). The IPSOS clinical trial (NCT03191786).

Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Subsequent Lines of Therapy for NSCLC Patients: Insights from Real-World Data

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like atezolizumab have improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially in the second-line setting after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, access to ICIs remains limited in many developing nations. This study evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab as a second-line versus later-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in Serbia.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 147 advanced NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab following progression on prior platinum-based chemotherapy at two academic centers in Serbia. Data on demographics and clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics were collected. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified outcome predictors.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 7.13 months, and median OS was 38.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 15%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 57.9%. No significant PFS differences were observed between patients treated with atezolizumab in the second line versus later lines. Patients with good performance status (ECOG 0-1) had significantly better PFS compared to those with poorer status (12.03 vs. 1.63 months, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab is effective in both second-line and later-line settings for advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with good performance status. This highlights the importance of patient selection based on performance status, as well as the need for wider access to ICIs in resource-limited regions.

Biomarker Testing for Guiding Precision Medicine for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The initial management of patients with lung cancer is growing more complex in the context of an expanding number of precision medicine treatments. These challenges are accompanied by opportunities to deliver more efficacious and less toxic treatments to patients. Indications for these treatments are also expanding, and patients with lung cancer across multiple stages now require biomarker testing. Given their role in the initial management of patients being diagnosed with lung cancer, pulmonologists must have fundamental knowledge regarding the importance, indications, and implications of biomarker testing across the spectrum of histology and stage. The purpose of this review is to provide fundamental knowledge regarding biomarker testing, its incorporation into the initial diagnostic and staging evaluation, and guidance for working within a multidisciplinary team to achieve timely and comprehensive biomarker testing to direct the use of precision medicine treatments.

Confronting synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: Navigating the intersection of challenges and opportunities

The increased detection of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (sMPLC) through advanced computed tomography underscores the necessity for innovative therapeutic approaches. sMPLC typically manifests as ground-glass opacities, mixed ground-glass opacities, and/or solid nodules, predominantly in early-stage, non-smoking female patients, with a majority being adenocarcinomas. The high prevalence of EGFR mutations and considerable heterogeneity among lesions pose distinct diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for sMPLC. This study provides a comprehensive review and analysis of recent clinical and radiological studies, genomic profiling, and the efficacy of the "Surgery + X" treatment model for sMPLC. Additionally, the article discusses several intricate and complex sMPLC cases, shedding light on the disease's complexities and identifying existing gaps and potential breakthroughs in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and research. It underscores the critical role of a multidisciplinary approach and advocates for targeted research on sMPLC, highlighting its potential to impact lung cancer research significantly.

Effect of smoking status on immunotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the relationship between smoking history and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced lung cancer. While some studies have suggested that smoking may enhance the response to immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer, other findings indicate the contrary. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to thoroughly examine this association.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for clinical trials comparing immunotherapy with conventional chemotherapy as the primary treatment for advanced lung cancer. A random effects model was used to synthesize hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS). We also conducted predefined subgroup analyses to investigate the efficacy disparities between never-smokers and smokers who were administered immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, as well as the differences between former and current smokers under similar treatment modalities.

Results

Our analysis included data from 17 Phase III clinical trials involving 10,283 patients. The findings indicate that immunotherapy benefits both smokers and never-smokers with lung cancer or non-small cell lung cancer, yielding pooled HRs for OS of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80), respectively. A significant interaction effect was not observed (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77-1.24, pinteraction = 0.14), and the tumor type, immunotherapy combination, and type of immunotherapy did not differ among the groups in the subgroup analyses. Similarly, both former and current smokers experienced a significant survival benefit from immunotherapy, with pooled HRs for OS of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.91) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.87), respectively. However, a significant interaction effect was also not observed (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11, pinteraction = 0.14).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that smoking status does not affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy for lung cancer treatment. However, additional high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/register/, identifier INPLASY2023110058.

Development and validation of a new tool to estimate early mortality in patients with advanced cancer treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for advanced solid cancers. Resistance to ICIs, both primary and secondary, poses challenges, with early mortality (EM) within 30-90 days indicating a lack of benefit. Prognostic factors for EM, including the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), remain underexplored.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients affected by advanced solid tumors, treated with ICI as single agent or combined with other agents. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with EM and 90-day progression risks. A nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality was built and validated within an external cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 637 patients received ICIs (single agent or in combination with other drugs) for advanced solid tumors. Most patients were male (61.9%), with NSCLC as the prevalent tumor (61.8%). Within the cohort, 21.3% died within 90 days, 8.4% died within 30 days, and 34.5% experienced early progression. Factors independently associated with 90-day mortality included ECOG PS 2 and a high/intermediate LIPI score. For 30-day mortality, lung metastasis and a high/intermediate LIPI score were independent risk factors. Regarding early progression, high/intermediate LIPI score was independently associated. A predictive nomogram for 90-day mortality combining LIPI and ECOG PS achieved an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81). The discrimination ability of the nomogram was confirmed in the external validation cohort (n = 255) (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80).

CONCLUSION

LIPI and ECOG PS independently were able to estimate 90-day mortality, with LIPI also demonstrating prognostic validity for 30-day mortality and early progression.

Toxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies in Older Patients: Does Age Make a Difference?

The use of immunotherapy agents especially immune checkpoint inhibitors is growing, and toxicities known as immune-related adverse events affecting any organ system may develop as a consequence of the treatment. With an ageing population, a considerable number of patients who will receive these therapies will be older adults. However, older patients who have highly heterogenous clinical characteristics, age-related changes in the immune system, a higher prevalence of comorbidities and frailty have been poorly represented in clinical trials, leaving gaps in understanding the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor agents in this subgroup. Therefore, the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a primary point of consideration when treating older patients with cancer. The available evidence is conflicting, but it generally suggests that the incidence of immune-related adverse events is not necessarily higher in older patients, but it may have a different profile. It is important to also note that the management of immune-related adverse events can be a challenge in these patients, owing to the risks associated with the use of corticosteroids and a reduced physiological reserve. A comprehensive characterisation of immune ageing, potential biomarkers to predict immune-related adverse events, the use of measures for frailty, enrolling older patients with cancer to clinical trials and analysis of real-world data are necessary to improve the evidence-based decision making for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in a geriatric oncology population.

Non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequent cancer types and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The management of NSCLC has improved considerably, especially in the past 10 years. The systematic screening of populations at risk with low-dose CT, the implementation of novel surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques and a deeper biological understanding of NSCLC that has led to innovative systemic treatment options have improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In non-metastatic NSCLC, the combination of various perioperative strategies and adjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced disease seem to enhance cure rates. In metastatic NSCLC, the implementation of novel drugs might prolong disease control together with preserving quality of life. The further development of predictive clinical and genetic markers will be essential for the next steps in individualized treatment concepts.

Exploring Demographic Representation and Reporting in Lung Cancer Clinical Trials with Canadian Sites from 2013 to 2023

This review evaluates the reporting of demographic characteristics and the diversity of participants of phase III lung cancer clinical trials with Canadian research sites. A literature search was conducted using the ClinicalTrials.gov registry to identify clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2023. The demographic reporting practices and the representation of sex/gender, racial, and ethnic groups were assessed. The location of Canadian research sites was also examined for trends in reporting and representation. Associated publications were reviewed for demographic data collection methods. Of the 25 clinical trials, 24 reported race and 18 also reported ethnicity. All clinical trials reported sex/gender, and the city and province of the participating Canadian sites. Most participants were White (66.1%), identified as not Hispanic or Latino (81.4%), and were male (57.8%). The provinces with the most clinical trial sites were Ontario (43.6%) and Quebec (34.2%). Lung cancer clinical trials lack adequate demographic reporting and representation of females, diverse patient groups, and geographical locations in Canada with high lung cancer incidence rates. Specifically, the Indigenous Peoples of Canada and Nunavut require better representation in lung cancer clinical trials conducted in Canada. These findings highlight the need to improve diversity and demographic representation in clinical research.

Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Under-Represented by Clinical Trials

Since the initial US FDA approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of non-oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nine years ago, this therapeutic strategy has been cemented as a crucial component of treatment for most of these patients. However, there is a clear efficacy-effectiveness gap whereby patients in the 'real world' seem to have more modest clinical outcomes compared to those enrolled in landmark clinical trials. This gap may be driven by the under-representation of important patient populations, including populations defined by clinical or molecular characteristics. In this review, we summarize the data outlining the evidence of ICIs in patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), underlying autoimmune disease (AID), older age, active brain metastases (BMs), and molecular aberrations such as EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, BRAF mutations and ROS1 fusions.

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Older Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Candidates for or Decline Surgery and Chemotherapy: A Practical Proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is either surgery combined with chemotherapy pre- or postoperatively or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, older and frail patients may not be candidates for surgery and chemotherapy due to the high mortality risk and are frequently referred to radiotherapy alone, which is better tolerated but carries a high risk of disease recurrence. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce a high response rate among cancer patients with positive programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Immunotherapy is also well tolerated among older patients. Laboratory and clinical studies have reported synergy between radiotherapy and ICI. The combination of ICI and radiotherapy may improve local control and survival for NSCLC patients who are not candidates for surgery and chemotherapy or decline these two modalities. The International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group proposes a protocol combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy based on the presence or absence of PD-L1 to optimize the survival of those patients.

Brain Metastases as Inaugural Sign of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Case Series and Review of Literature

In the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), managing non-oncogene driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) is challenging, especially when brain involvement is the initial sign. Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastatic NSCLC without epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) nor anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations were retrospectively included. Twenty-five patients were analyzed; 15 (60%) had symptomatic BM as the first sign (group 1), while 10 (40%) had BM discovered during complementary examinations (group 2). Fourteen patients (56%) had concomitant extracerebral metastases, primarily in group 2. Eight (32%) had oligometastatic disease, with seven in group 1. Over half received chemotherapy and pembrolizumab as first-line treatment. BM surgical resection occurred in twelve (80%) patients in group 1 and one in group 2. Median cerebral progression-free survival was 10 months: 12 in group 1 and 5 in group 2. Median overall survival was 25 months: not reached in group 1 and 6 months in group 2. This case series highlights survival outcomes for patients with inaugural BM, a demographic underrepresented in pivotal trials. Oligometastatic disease and symptomatic BM as initial signs seem associated with better prognosis due to increased use of multimodal local approaches. Combining local approaches with first-line ICI+/- chemotherapy appears to improve survival in brain metastatic NSCLC. A literature review was conducted to explore key questions regarding upfront ICI alone or in combination with systemic drugs or local approaches in brain metastatic NSCLC.

Treatment of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer for patients who are under-represented in clinical trials

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by one year of consolidation durvalumab is the current standard-of-care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of good functional status. However, cCRT and consolidation durvalumab may be challenging to administer for selected patient populations underrepresented or even excluded in clinical trials: older and/or frail patients; those with cardiovascular or respiratory comorbidities in which treatment-related adverse events may be higher, and patients with pre-existing autoimmune disorders for whom immunotherapy use is controversial. In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence, challenges, ongoing clinical trials and potential future treatment scenarios in relevant subgroups of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who are underrepresented in clinical trials.

Real-world overview of therapeutic strategies and prognosis of older patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer from the ESME database

INTRODUCTION

In France, 40% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer are ≥70 years old, but these are under-represented in clinical trials. Using data from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform on Lung Cancer (LC), the objective is to provide an overview of the management and the prognosis of older patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (AM-NSCLC) in a real-world context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From the ESME-LC database, we selected patients with AM-NSCLC (stage IIIB, IIIC, and IV), diagnosed between 2015 and 2019, and who received first-line systemic treatment. Demographics, tumour characteristics, and treatment received were described in patients ≥70, and compared to younger ones. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the multivariable Cox model.

RESULTS

Among 10,002 patients with AM-NSCLC, the median age was 64 years, with 2,754 (27.5%) aged ≥70. In comparison with patients <70, older patients were more often male, with worse performance status and more comorbidities, but they were less underweight and more often non-smokers. The proportion of EGFR mutated non-squamous NSCLC was higher in older patients (25.0% vs 12.8%, p < 0.001), particularly among smokers and former smokers (12.7% vs 7.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients ≥70, 76.6% received first-line chemotherapy (including 67.0% treated with a platinum-based doublet), 15.0% received only targeted therapy, and 11.0% received immunotherapy (alone or in combination). Median first-line rwPFS was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4.8;5.4]) for patients ≥70 and 4.6 months (95%CI = [4.4;4.8]) for patients <70, but age was not associated with rwPFS in multivariable analysis. Median OS was 14.8 months (95%CI = [13.9;16.1]) for patients ≥70 and 16.7 months (95%CI = [15.9;17.5]) for patients <70, with a significant effect of age in multivariable analysis for patients treated with chemotherapy and/or with targeted therapy, but not for patients treated with immunotherapy (alone or in combination with chemotherapy).

DISCUSSION

In this real-world cohort of patients with AM-NSCLC, age was not associated with first-line rwPFS regardless of treatment received, nor with OS for patients receiving immunotherapy. However, OS was significantly shorter for patients aged ≥70 treated with chemotherapy or with targeted therapy alone.

New promises and challenges in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have radically improved treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting oncogenic driver mutations continue to evolve over multiple generations to enhance effectiveness and tackle drug resistance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors remain integral for the treatment of NSCLCs that do not have specific actionable genetic mutations. Antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies are being integrated into treatment guidelines, and emerging therapies include T-cell engagers, cellular therapies, cancer vaccines, and external devices. Despite these advances, challenges remain in identifying predictive biomarkers to individually tailor treatments, abrogate resistance, reduce costs, and ensure optimal cancer treatment accessibility.

Induction chemotherapy backbone in frail patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab: a single institution retrospective audit of dose intensities from modified regimens

Guidelines historically recommended mono-chemotherapy for the 1st line treatment of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status (PS). Nowadays, there is no clear indication whether chemo-immunotherapy (chemo-IO) combinations can be effectively delivered in this population. We collected induction chemotherapy data in consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimens plus pembrolizumab, to compute the received dose intensity (RDI) from standard regimens or patient-tailored regimens modified due to age, comorbidities and PS. Comorbidities were stratified according to the comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS). The established cut-off of ≥85% for RDI was used to define adequate delivery. 116 pts were treated from Feb-20 to July-23, of whom 96 and 20 with non-squamous and squamous NSCLC, treated with carboplatin-pemetrexed or carboplatin-paclitaxel doublets plus pembrolizumab, respectively. The majority of patients were aged ≥ 70 years (52.6%), the median CPS was 5, with 58.6% having a CPS ≥5, whilst 47.4%, 44.8% and 7.8% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) - PS of 0, 1 and 2, respectively. PD-L1 TPS were <1% in 31.9% and 1-49% in 65.4%. Overall, 47.4% received a priori modified regimens due to poor PS, age, or comorbidities. Among patients with non-squamous NSCLC, median received doses of carboplatin and pemetrexed were 1.37 AUC/week and 138.8 mg/m2/week, with RDIs of 86% and 75% (p < 0.01) for patients treated with standard or modified regimens, respectively. Of note, the RDI was 57.9% among patients with ECOG-PS 2. However, patients treated with modified regimens experienced similar toxicities as those treated with standard regimens, despite being older (p < 0.01), with higher PS (p < 0.01) and more comorbid (p = 0.03). Patients treated with modified regimens achieved a shorter survival (7.1 vs 13.9 months), which is comparable to IO-free historical controls. Among patients with squamous NSCLC, 90% received modified regimens upfront, with median received doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel of 1.19 AUC/week and 40 mg/m2/week, and an overall RDI of 73.5%. Although regimen modifications ensure a safe administration of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in frail patients, the RDI seems to be subtherapeutic, especially in those with squamous histology. Dedicated trials are needed to implement combination strategies in this population.

The influence of nutritional status, lipid profile, leptin concentration and polymorphism of genes encoding leptin and neuropeptide Y on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients

INTRODUCTION

Neuropeptide Y is a neurotransmitter in the nervous system and belongs to the orexigenic system that increases appetite. Its excessive secretion leads to obesity. Leptin is a pro-inflammatory adipokine (produced in adipose tissue) induced in obesity and may mediate increased antitumor immunity in obesity (including the promotion of M1 macrophages). Leptin and neuropeptide Y gene polymorphisms, causing increased leptin levels and the occurrence of obesity, and lipid profile disorders, may increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 121 patients with advanced NSCLC without mutations in the EGFR gene and rearrangements of the ALK and ROS1 genes, undergoing immunotherapy (1st and 2nd line of treatment) or chemoimmunotherapy (1st line of treatment), we assessed BMI, lipid profile, PD-L1 expression on cancer cells using the immunohistochemical method (clone SP263 antibody), leptin concentration in blood serum by ELISA, polymorphisms in the promoter region of the genes for leptin (LEP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Leptin concentration was significantly higher in obese patients than in patients with normal or low weight (p = 0.00003) and in patients with disease stabilization compared to patients with progression observed during immunotherapy (p = 0.012). Disease control occurred significantly more often in patients with the GA or AA genotype than patients with the GG genotype in the rs779039 polymorphism of the LEP gene. The median PFS in the entire study group was five months (95% CI: 3-5.5), and the median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 8-16). Median PFS was highest in patients with TPS ≥ 50% (6.5 months) and in obese patients (6.6 months). Obese patients also had a slightly longer median OS compared to other patients (23.8 vs. 13 months). The multivariate Cox logistic regression test showed that the only factor reducing the risk of progression was TPS ≥ 50% (HR = 0.6068, 95% CI: 0.4001-0.9204, p = 0, 0187), and the only factor reducing the risk of death was high leptin concentration (HR = 0.6743, 95% CI: 0.4243-1.0715, p = 0.0953).

CONCLUSION

Assessment of nutritional status, serum leptin concentration and polymorphisms in the LEP gene may be of additional importance in predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?

Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.

Immune-related adverse events and their effects on survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine whether the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following the use of ICIs predicts different clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Relevant studies from the time of database creation to July 20, 2023, were systematically searched to explore the differences in clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC with or without irAEs. The outcome indicators included the occurrence of irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 22 reported the effect on OS, and 19 reported the effect on PFS. The results showed that for patients with NSCLC, the occurrence of irAEs after receiving immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over the absence of irAEs for OS (HR=0.55,95% CI=0.46-0.65) and PFS (HR=0.55 95% CI=0.48-0.64), but severe irAEs (grades 3-5) were associated with worse OS (HR=1.05, 95% CI=0.87-1.27). Compared with gastrointestinal, lung, and hepatitis, irAEs of the skin and endocrine system tend to predict better OS and PFS.

Conclusion

The occurrence of irAEs, especially mild and early irAEs, indicates better OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs, irrespective of patient characteristics, type of ICIs, and irAEs. However, Grade 3 or higher toxicities resulted in worse OS.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023409444.

Association of PD-L1 expression with survival benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Whether PD-L1 testing is needed to identify patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is an area of debate.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for phase III randomized clinical trials. We assessed the heterogeneity of overall survival (OS) between patients with high and low PD-L1 expression using an interaction test.

RESULTS

Seventy studies representing 44791 patients were included. Both the CPS and TPS can predict better survival from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with high PD-L1 expression. However, only CPS 1 has the ability to select patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, while an OS advantage can be obtained from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors both in patients with high and low PD-L1 expression defined by CPS 5, CPS 10 and TPS.

CONCLUSION

CPS 1 is recommended to select patients with the likelihood of benefiting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors while excluding patients who may not respond.

NGEF is a potential prognostic biomarker and could serve as an indicator for immunotherapy and chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor (NGEF) plays a key role in several cancers; however, its role in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NGEF as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for LUAD.

METHODS

NGEF expression data for multiple cancers and LUAD were downloaded from multiple databases. The high- and low-NGEF expression groups were constructed based on median NGEF expression in LUAD samples, and then performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the two NGEF expression groups were screened and applied to construct a protein-protein interaction network. The primary pathways were obtained using gene set enrichment analysis. The associations between NGEF expression and clinical characteristics, immune infiltration, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), sensitivity to chemotherapy, and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were investigated using R. Levels of NGEF expression in the lung tissue was validated using single-cell RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), immunohistochemical staining, and western blot analysis.

RESULTS

The expression of NGEF mRNA was upregulated in multiple cancers. mRNA and protein expression levels of NGEF were higher in patients with LUAD than in controls, as validated using qPCR and western blot. High NGEF expression was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD and was associated with advanced tumor stage, large tumor size, more lymph node metastasis, and worse overall survival (OS). A total of 182 overlapping DEGs were screened between The Cancer Genome Atlas and GSE31210, among which the top 20 hub genes were identified. NGEF expression was mainly enriched in the pathways of apoptosis, cell cycle, and DNA replication. Moreover, elevated NGEF expression were associated with a high fraction of activated memory CD4+ T cells and M0 macrophages; elevated expression levels of the ICIs: programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 expression; higher TMB; and better sensitivity to bortezomib, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and parthenolide, but less sensitivity to axitinib and metformin.

CONCLUSION

NGEF expression is upregulated in LUAD and is significantly associated with tumor stages, OS probability, immune infiltration, immunotherapy response, and chemotherapy response. NGEF may be a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in LUAD.

Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a safety analysis of clinical trials and FDA pharmacovigilance system

Objectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the application of ICIs can also cause treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study was to evaluate both the irAEs and trAEs of different ICI strategies for NSCLC based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The study also examined real-world pharmacovigilance data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) regarding claimed ICI-associated AEs in clinical practice.

Methods

Based on Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL, we retrieved RCTs comparing ICIs with chemotherapy drugs or with different ICI regimens for the treatment of NSCLC up to October 20, 2023. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (95%CrI). Separately, a retrospective pharmacovigilance study was performed based on FAERS database, extracting ICI-associated AEs in NSCLC patients between the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 and Q4 of 2023. The proportional reports reporting odds ratio was calculated to analyze the disproportionality.

Results

The NMA included 51 RCTs that involved a total of 26,958 patients with NSCLC. Based on the lowest risk of any trAEs, cemiplimab, tislelizumab, and durvalumab were ranked as the best. Among the agents associated with the lowest risk of grades 3-5 trAEs, tislelizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab were most likely to rank highest. As far as any or grades 3-5 irAEs are concerned, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is considered the most safety option. However, it is associated with a high risk of grades 3-5 trAEs. As a result of FAERS pharmacovigilance data analysis, 9,420 AEs cases have been identified in 7,339 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, and ICIs were related to statistically significant positive signal with 311 preferred terms (PTs), and comprehensively investigated and identified those AEs highly associated with ICIs. In total, 152 significant signals were associated with Nivolumab, with malignant neoplasm progression, death, and hypothyroidism being the most frequent PTs.

Conclusion

These findings revealed that ICIs differed in their safety profile. ICI treatment strategies can be improved and preventive methods can be developed for NSCLC patients based on our results.

Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Atezolizumab versus Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Ineligible for Platinum-Containing Regimens

Purpose

The IPSOS study provided evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of first-line atezolizumab compared to single-agent chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab specifically in this population, considering the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Patients and Methods

In this analysis, a three-state Markov model was utilized. The survival data were derived from the IPSOS clinical trial. Direct medical costs and utility values were collected from national authoritative database and published literature. The primary outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). To ensure the robustness of our model, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results

Atezolizumab monotherapy led to an increase in costs of $4139.23 compared to single-agent chemotherapy. Additionally, it resulted in a gain of 0.14 QALYs, leading to an ICER of $29,365.79 per QALY, which was below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36,066 per QALY used in the model. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed cost of atezolizumab and utility of progressive disease (PD) as major influencing factors for ICER. Furthermore, probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed our base-case results.

Conclusion

From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, atezolizumab emerges as a cost-effective choice for the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Association between sex and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials & methods: We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. Results: 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. Conclusion: Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.

NF-κB in biology and targeted therapy: new insights and translational implications

NF-κB signaling has been discovered for nearly 40 years. Initially, NF-κB signaling was identified as a pivotal pathway in mediating inflammatory responses. However, with extensive and in-depth investigations, researchers have discovered that its role can be expanded to a variety of signaling mechanisms, biological processes, human diseases, and treatment options. In this review, we first scrutinize the research process of NF-κB signaling, and summarize the composition, activation, and regulatory mechanism of NF-κB signaling. We investigate the interaction of NF-κB signaling with other important pathways, including PI3K/AKT, MAPK, JAK-STAT, TGF-β, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, and TLR signaling. The physiological and pathological states of NF-κB signaling, as well as its intricate involvement in inflammation, immune regulation, and tumor microenvironment, are also explicated. Additionally, we illustrate how NF-κB signaling is involved in a variety of human diseases, including cancers, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, and COVID-19. Further, we discuss the therapeutic approaches targeting NF-κB signaling, including IKK inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, nuclear translocation inhibitors, DNA binding inhibitors, TKIs, non-coding RNAs, immunotherapy, and CAR-T. Finally, we provide an outlook for research in the field of NF-κB signaling. We hope to present a stereoscopic, comprehensive NF-κB signaling that will inform future research and clinical practice.

First-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a performance status of 2 (PS2). Primary analysis of the multicenter, single-arm phase II trial SAKK 19/17

INTRODUCTION

The safety and efficacy of first-line durvalumab in PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC is unknown. Here, we present the primary analysis of first-line durvalumab in PS2 patients, unsuitable for combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial patients with PD-L1 positive (tumor proportional score ≥25%), advanced NSCLC with PS2, received four-weekly durvalumab 1500 mg. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 23.3 months (95% CI: 14.3-28.6). OS at 6 months was 60% (95% CI: 45-74%). Median OS was 8.5 months (95%CI: 4.4-16.7). Objective response rate and median progression free survival were 17% (95% CI: 8-30%) and 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-7.1), respectively. Thirty-three deaths were observed at the time point of the analysis. Seven early fatal events considered not treatment-related occurred during the first 5 weeks of treatment. Four out of the first 7 early fatal events (4/7; 57%) were respiratory failure in patients with advanced symptomatic primary lung tumors. Three more early fatal events occurred after exclusion of patients with grade ≥ 3 dyspnea. Treatment-related AEs ≥G3 were reported in 9 patients (19%) and included colonic perforation in one patient (grade 5), colitis in 4 patients (8%), increased lipase in 3 patients (6%), and hepatitis in 2 patients (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line durvalumab in PS2 patients with advanced PD-L1 positive NSCLC results in a high number of early fatal events. When patients with grade ≥ 3 dyspnea are excluded a promising 6-month OS with an acceptable toxicity profile can be observed. Durvalumab could be an option instead of single agent chemotherapy for PS2 patients who are not candidates for platinum doublet chemotherapy provided they are well selected.

IL6-STAT3-C/EBPβ-IL6 positive feedback loop in tumor-associated macrophages promotes the EMT and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most common tumors in the world, and metastasis is one of the major causes of tumor-related death in lung cancer patients. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a major component of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and are frequently associated with tumor metastasis in human cancers. However, the regulatory mechanisms of TAMs in lung cancer metastasis remain unclear.

METHODS

Single-cell sequencing analysis of lung cancer and normal tissues from public databases and from 14 patients who underwent surgery at Zhongshan Hospital was performed. In vitro co-culture experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of TAMs on lung cancer migration and invasion. Changes in the expression of IL-6, STAT3, C/EBPΒ, and EMT pathway were verified using RT-qPCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence. Dual luciferase reporter assays and ChIP were used to reveal potential regulatory sites on the transcription factor sets. In addition, the effects of TAMs on lung cancer progression and metastasis were confirmed by in vivo models.

RESULTS

TAM infiltration is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis. IL-6 secreted by TAMs can activate the JAK2/STAT3 pathway through autocrine secretion, and STAT3 acts as a transcription factor to activate the expression of C/EBPβ, which further promotes the transcription and expression of IL-6, forming positive feedback loops for IL6-STAT3-C/EBPβ-IL6 in TAMs. IL-6 secreted by TAMs promotes lung cancer progression and metastasis in vivo and in vitro by activating the EMT pathway, which can be attenuated by the use of JAK2/STAT3 pathway inhibitors or IL-6 monoclonal antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that TAMs promote IL-6 expression by forming an IL6-STAT3-C/EBPβ-IL6 positive feedback loop. Released IL-6 can induce the EMT pathway in lung cancer to enhance migration, invasion, and metastasis. The use of IL-6-neutralizing antibody can partially counteract the promotion of LUAD by TAMs. A novel mechanism of macrophage-promoted tumor progression was revealed, and the IL6-STAT3-C/EBPβ-IL6 signaling cascade may be a potential therapeutic target against lung cancer.

An approach to the dermatological classification of histopathological skin images using a hybridized CNN-DenseNet model

This research addresses the challenge of automating skin disease diagnosis using dermatoscopic images. The primary issue lies in accurately classifying pigmented skin lesions, which traditionally rely on manual assessment by dermatologists and are prone to subjectivity and time consumption. By integrating a hybrid CNN-DenseNet model, this study aimed to overcome the complexities of differentiating various skin diseases and automating the diagnostic process effectively. Our methodology involved rigorous data preprocessing, exploratory data analysis, normalization, and label encoding. Techniques such as model hybridization, batch normalization and data fitting were employed to optimize the model architecture and data fitting. Initial iterations of our convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved an accuracy of 76.22% on the test data and 75.69% on the validation data. Recognizing the need for improvement, the model was hybridized with DenseNet architecture and ResNet architecture was implemented for feature extraction and then further trained on the HAM10000 and PAD-UFES-20 datasets. Overall, our efforts resulted in a hybrid model that demonstrated an impressive accuracy of 95.7% on the HAM10000 dataset and 91.07% on the PAD-UFES-20 dataset. In comparison to recently published works, our model stands out because of its potential to effectively diagnose skin diseases such as melanocytic nevi, melanoma, benign keratosis-like lesions, basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratoses, vascular lesions, and dermatofibroma, all of which rival the diagnostic accuracy of real-world clinical specialists but also offer customization potential for more nuanced clinical uses.

The Addition of Atezolizumab to Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Trial-Based Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stands as one of the most prevalent types of cancer worldwide, driving extensive research in oncologic therapeutic approaches. Atezolizumab, among the treatments under scrutiny, is undergoing evaluation as a potential first-line therapy for NSCLC. This review aims to assess the efficacy of atezolizumab in treating patients with NSCLC and to shed light on the ongoing quest for the most effective treatment.

Methods

Multiple scientific databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect, were consulted. The literature identification utilized the strategic Boolean term method of keywords relating to "non-small cell lung cancer" and "atezolizumab" to suggest the analyzed population in our review without restricting the potential outcomes. The primary inclusion criterion is clinical studies that attempted to determine the efficacy of atezolizumab in NSCLC patients.

Results

We included four trials to be analyzed in the final analysis, which we stratified into the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressivity status aside from the pooled intention-to-treat (ITT) population. We found the addition of atezolizumab may significantly improve the overall survival (OS) in the respective arm, remarkably among the high PD-L1 expression group (TC3 or IC3). The result of our meta-analysis presented the pooled OS of 0.79 (0.72, 0.87) in 95% confidence interval (CI) with a P value of < 0.05. Sub-analysis of the PD-L1's expression revealed TC3 population benefits the most (hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 95% CI (0.42, 0.73)), compared to low (HR: 0.80, 95% CI (0.68, 0.93)) and negative expression (HR: 0.79, 95% CI (0.68, 0.93)); which is statistically meaningful (P < 0.05). Similar result was also observed in progression-free survival (PFS) analysis with the HR value of 0.63 (0.55, 0.72), with P value of < 0.05, favoring atezolizumab arm.

Conclusions

Upon examination, the study reveals that the addition of atezolizumab demonstrates notable improvements in both OS and PFS among NSCLC patients. These findings present promising attributes for atezolizumab as a viable treatment for NSCLC. However, it is important to acknowledge that the future holds further revelations in this realm, and more insights are yet to be uncovered.

Integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analyses to develop a cancer-associated fibroblast-derived biomarker for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in breast cancer

Background

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to the progression and treatment of breast cancer (BRCA); however, risk signatures and molecular targets based on CAFs are limited. This study aims to identify novel CAF-related biomarkers to develop a risk signature for predicting the prognosis and therapeutic response of patients with BRCA.

Methods

CAF-related genes (CAFRGs) and a risk signature based on these genes were comprehensively analyzed using publicly available bulk and single-cell transcriptomic datasets. Modular genes identified from bulk sequencing data were intersected with CAF marker genes identified from single-cell analysis to obtain reliable CAFRGs. Signature CAFRGs were screened via Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses. Multiple patient cohorts were used to validate the prognosis and therapeutic responsiveness of high-risk patients stratified based on the CAFRG-based signature. In addition, the relationship between the CAFRG-based signature and clinicopathological factors, tumor immune landscape, functional pathways, chemotherapy sensitivity and immunotherapy sensitivity was examined. External datasets were used and sample experiments were performed to examine the expression pattern of MFAP4, a key CAFRG, in BRCA.

Results

Integrated analyses of single-cell and bulk transcriptomic data as well as prognostic screening revealed a total of 43 prognostic CAFRGs; of which, 14 genes (TLN2, SGCE, SDC1, SAV1, RUNX1, PDLIM4, OSMR, NT5E, MFAP4, IGFBP6, CTSO, COL12A1, CCDC8 and C1S) were identified as signature CAFRGs. The CAFRG-based risk signature exhibited favorable efficiency and accuracy in predicting survival outcomes and clinicopathological progression in multiple BRCA cohorts. Functional enrichment analysis suggested the involvement of the immune system, and the immune infiltration landscape significantly differed between the risk groups. Patients with high CAF-related risk scores (CAFRSs) exhibited tumor immunosuppression, enhanced cancer hallmarks and hyposensitivity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Five compounds were identified as promising therapeutic agents for high-CAFRS BRCA. External datasets and sample experiments validated the downregulation of MFAP4 and its strong correlation with CAFs in BRCA.

Conclusions

A novel CAF-derived gene signature with favorable predictive performance was developed in this study. This signature may be used to assess prognosis and guide individualized treatment for patients with BRCA.

Face to face among different chemo-immunotherapy combinations in the first line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of an international expert panel meeting by the italian association of thoracic oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard of care option in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Positive efficacy and safety results have been demonstrated with different chemo-ICI combinations in the corresponding clinical trials, however no randomized prospective comparison is available and there is no evidence on how to choose among the available regimens.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2023 to review data on chemo-ICI regimens available in the first-line setting in patients with NSCLC, and reach common considerations both in clinical practice and in research setting.

RESULTS

Overall, all panelists agreed that safety of the chemo-immunotherapy combination regimens is supported by reviewed data, showing no additional toxicity concerns over those of the individual components of each regimen and highlighting differences in toxicity profile based on ICI component (single anti-PD-1 versus double anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4). Among disease characteristics, PD-L1 value (<1%) but not histology was considered a potential selection factor in favor of the combination with dual ICI. With regards to clinical features, the panelists agreed that chemotherapy, whichever the ICI combination regimen, remains the backbone to counteract disease-related symptoms included those conditioning worse performance status. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to prospectively evaluating the impact of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 on brain metastasis, biomarker subgroups, and the optimal duration and schedule of combination regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, the panelists reached common considerations on strengths and differences between chemotherapy plus single agent ICI and chemotherapy plus double agent ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. In the absence of direct comparison, different toxicity profile and subgroup analysis by PD-L1 are considered as the main potential features to select among the two regimens, however to be confirmed by recommended prospective randomized clinical research.

Is underutilization of adjuvant therapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer associated with socioeconomic disparities?

OBJECTIVES

Although adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) has demonstrated improved survival in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it remains underutilized. Recent trials demonstrating improved outcomes with adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted treatment imply that low uptake of systemic therapy in at-risk populations may widen existing outcome gaps. We, therefore, sought to determine factors associated with the underutilization of AT.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2018) was queried for patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC and stratified based on the receipt of AT. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with AT delivery. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate survival after propensity-matching to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Of 37 571 eligible patients, only 20 616 (54.9%) received AT. While AT rates increased over time, multivariable analysis showed that older age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.47], male sex (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.93) and multiple comorbidities (aOR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.91) were associated with decreased AT. Socioeconomic factors were additionally associated with underutilization, including public insurance (aOR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66-0.74), lower education indicators (aOR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97) and living more than 10 miles from a treatment facility (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93). After propensity matching, receipt of adjuvant therapy was associated with improved overall survival (median 76.35 vs 47.57 months, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AT underutilization in patients with resected stage II-III NSCLC is associated with patient, institutional and socioeconomic factors. It is critical to implement measures to address these inequities, especially in light of newer adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy treatment options which are expected to improve survival.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

Background

Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients.

Methods

In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Findings

Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment.

Interpretation

This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of 2.

Funding

AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.

The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs.

METHODS

Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.

IPSOS trial: A "game changer" redefining first-line immunotherapy in platinum-ineligible NSCLC

First-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves immunotherapy with or without platinum-based chemotherapy; however, not all patients are fit enough. In the IPSOS trial, atezolizumab monotherapy demonstrated a clinical benefit in platinum-ineligible patients with advanced NSCLC, redefining first-line immunotherapy, and breaking barriers for unfit population in NSCLC.