Randomised trial of oral and intravenous methylprednisolone in acute relapses of multiple sclerosis

Disease modifying treatment guidelines for multiple sclerosis in the United Arab Emirates

The newly constituted National Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (NMSS)of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), set up a scientific committee to create a MS disease modifying treatment (DMT) guideline for UAE. The committee considered several unique features of the MS community in UAE including large number of expatriate population, wide variations in health insurance coverage, physician and patient preferences for DMT. The overall goal of the treatment guideline is to facilitate the most appropriate DMT to the widest number of patients. To this end it has adapted recommendations from various health systems and regulatory authorities into a pragmatic amalgamation of best practices from across the world. Importantly where data is unavailable or controversial, a common sense approach is taken rather than leave physicians and patients in limbo. The committee classifies MS into subcategories and suggests appropriate treatment choices. It recommends treatment of RIS and CIS with poor prognostic factors. It largely equates the efficacy and safety of DMT with similar mechanisms of action or drug classes e.g. ocrelizumab is similar to rituximab. It allows early switching of treatment for unambiguous disease activity and those with progression independent of relapses. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be offered to patients who fail one high efficacy DMT. Pragmatic guidance on switching and stopping DMT, DMT choices in pregnancy, lactation and pediatric MS have been included. It is expected that these guidelines will be updated periodically as new data becomes available.

Visual recovery after oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute inflammatory optic neuropathy

PURPOSE

High doses of venous corticosteroids are currently the only validated treatment for the management of optic neuritis (ON). The objective is to assess the changes in visual function parameters after oral high-dose methylprednisolone in patients with ON.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with acute ON was performed. Patients received 1 g per day of oral methylprednisolone for 3 to 5 days. Visual function was measured using the ETDRS test for visual acuity, 30-2 automated visual field test, contrast sensitivity test, and color vision test before treatment, 4 days, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months following treatment. To assess anatomical changes, optical coherence tomography of the ganglion cells was performed at various timepoints.

RESULTS

Between September 2014 and September 2016, a total of 29 patients were included in the study. More than 80% of patients had recovered normal visual acuity after 3 and 6 months. This recovery of all parameters of visual function was observed as early as 4 days but occurred predominantly within 15 days after the initiation of treatment. We observed a thinning of the ganglion cell layer during the follow-up, which mainly occurs within one month. The P100 wave of visually evoked potentials was discernible in all patients at 6 months. During the 6 years of follow-up, 2 patients had experienced a relapse of ON. No serious adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a rapid recovery of all visual function parameters after oral high-dose methylprednisolone ON with no serious adverse effects.

The Efficacy, Adverse Effects and Economic Implications of Oral Versus Intravenous Methylprednisolone for the Treatment of Optic Neuritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Optic neuritis may occur in a variety of conditions, including as a manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Despite significant research into the efficacy of corticosteroids as a first-line treatment, the optimal route of administration has not been well defined. This review aims to explore the efficacy, adverse effects and economic implications of using oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone to treat acute optic neuritis.

METHODS

A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed to July 2022, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results showed that in the treatment of acute optic neuritis, oral methylprednisolone has a non-inferior efficacy and adverse effect profile in comparison to intravenous methylprednisolone. In a cost analysis, oral methylprednisolone to be more cost-effective than intravenous methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral methylprednisolone has comparable efficacy and adverse effect profiles to intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of optic neuritis. The analysis suggests oral administration is more cost-effective than intravenous administration; however, further analyses of the formal cost-benefit ratio are required.

Diagnosis and Management of Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disorders

The spectrum of demyelinating diseases affecting the central nervous system is broad. Although many have a chronic course, neuroinflammatory conditions often present with acute to subacute onset symptoms requiring hospitalization when severe. This article reviews the acute phase assessment and management of these disorders, with a particular focus on multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disorder, and several atypical demyelinating diseases.

Clinical Pathway for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A First Proposal for the Peruvian Population

Background: Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a subtype of degenerative inflammatory demyelinating disease of multifactorial origin that affects the central nervous system and leads to multifocal neurological impairment.

Objectives: To develop a clinical pathway (CP) for the management of Peruvian patients with RRMS.

Methods: First, we performed a literature review using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Science direct. Then, we structured the information as an ordered and logical series of five topics in a defined timeline: (1) How should MS be diagnosed? (2) How should a relapse be treated? (3) How should a DMT be initiated? (4) How should each DMT be used? and (5) How should the patients be followed?

Results: The personnel involved in the care of patients with RRMS can use a series of flowcharts and diagrams that summarize the topics in paper or electronic format.

Conclusions: We propose the first CP for RRMS in Peru that shows the essential steps for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring RRMS patients based on an evidence-based medicine method and local expert opinions. This CP will allow directing relevant clinical actions to strengthen the multidisciplinary management of RRMS in Peru.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in MS refractory relapses: Long-term outcome

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered a treatment option for steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Our objective was to assess long-term clinical response to TPE in MS steroid-refractory exacerbations.

METHODS

Retrospective study of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients presenting intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMPS)-refractory relapses, who underwent TPE. Response to TPE was assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24-months post-treatment, and compared to a second group of RRMS patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics presenting, IVMPS-refractory relapses but not treated with TPE. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess potential predictors of significant clinical response.

RESULTS

Between 2011 to 2020, a total of 23 RRMS patients were treated with TPE. Twenty-one patients not receiving the treatment served as controls. No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics, or predictors of clinical improvement after TPE were detected between groups. Seventy-eight percent of patients treated with TPE presented clinical improvement at 24 months. TPE-treated patients presented lower EDSS scores at 6 and at 24 months. Younger age, presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and TPE treatment were associated with better clinical outcomes. No life-threatening side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is a safe and well tolerated procedure that decreases long-term disability in RRMS patients with IVMPS-refractory relapses.

Oral administration of methylprednisolone powder for intravenous injection dissolved in water to treat MS and NMOSD relapses during COVID-19 pandemic in a real-world setting

Background

Upon the COVID-19 pandemic emergence, safety concerns and logistic drawbacks stimulated the search for alternatives to pulse therapy at infusion centres to treat multiple sclerosis relapses.

Objective

To describe our experience treating multiple sclerosis relapses with a dilute injectable methylprednisolone powder orally administered, in a safe home-based environment and with totally virtual assessment and follow up via telemedicine.

Methods

Descriptive observational, retrospective, single-centre, open label, study in the real-world setting.

Results

Between August 2020 and March 2021, ten multiple sclerosis patients and one neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease patient, regularly assisted at our multiple sclerosis centre in Argentina, experienced twelve disease relapses (nine moderate/severe relapses and three mild relapses) and were treated with the oral dilute of injectable methylprednisolone powder pulses with good efficacy as well as adequate tolerance and safety profile.

Conclusions

The oral pulse therapy based on the methylprednisolone powder dilution we describe is simple and comfortable to administer and can be an option in countries like Argentina, where the oral methylprednisolone formulation is not marketed. In these pandemic times, a home based and virtually monitored pulse therapy could represent a safe and effective alternative to manage relapses while minimizing the patient's risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Anti-inflammatory Roles of Glucocorticoids Are Mediated by Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells via a miR-342-Dependent Mechanism

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the mainstay treatment option for inflammatory conditions. Despite the broad usage of GC, the mechanisms by which GC exerts its effects remain elusive. Here, utilizing murine autoimmune and allergic inflammation models, we report that Foxp3⁺ regulatory T (Treg) cells are irreplaceable GC target cells in vivo. Dexamethasone (Dex) administered in the absence of Treg cells completely lost its ability to control inflammation, and the lack of glucocorticoid receptor in Treg cells alone resulted in the loss of therapeutic ability of Dex. Mechanistically, Dex induced miR-342-3p specifically in Treg cells and miR-342-3p directly targeted the mTORC2 component, Rictor. Altering miRNA-342-3p or Rictor expression in Treg cells dysregulated metabolic programming in Treg cells, controlling their regulatory functions in vivo. Our results uncover a previously unknown contribution of Treg cells during glucocorticoid-mediated treatment of inflammation and the underlying mechanisms operated via the Dex-miR-342-Rictor axis.

Treatment Effectiveness for Resolution of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse in a US Health Plan Population

INTRODUCTION

Timely and effective resolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is critical to minimizing residual deficits, which can result in neurologic disability. Oral corticosteroids (OCS) and intravenous corticosteroids [intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP)] are earlier line treatments; alternatives include repository corticotropin injection (RCI; H.P. Acthar® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Contemporary insight into the use of relapse treatments and their effectiveness is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate relapse rates, frequency of treatments used, and treatment effectiveness (i.e., relapse resolution).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients ages 18-89 years experiencing MS relapse from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2015 was conducted using administrative claims data. MS relapse was defined based on established claims-based methodology. The first claim for relapse treatment (i.e., prescription or administration) was used to designate the treatment group and relapse date, respectively. Relapses occurring ≤ 30 days were considered an episode. The first relapse episode was identified for every patient. Treatment was deemed effective in resolving the relapse if no additional relapses followed within the episode; otherwise, the relapse was considered unresolved. A 5-day OCS taper following IVMP administration, designated IVMP ± OCS, was allowed. Relapse frequency, treatment use, and relapse resolution were quantified. Relapse resolution was likewise evaluated in patients continuously enrolled for 12 months before and after first treatment with RCI or PMP/IVIG, with PMP/IVIG administrations within 7 days of each other being considered a single course of therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 9574 patients experienced ≥ 1 relapse; 26.0% of patients had ≥ 2 relapses/year. The mean number of relapse episodes was 2.6 over a mean follow-up of 2.7 years for an annualized relapse rate of 1.0. Corticosteroids were the first treatment used in 90.4% of relapses (OCS = 51.8%, IVMP = 38.6%), followed by IVIG (6.0%), RCI (2.2%) and PMP (1.5%). The proportion of patients achieving relapse resolution with their first treatment was 90.5% with OCS (n = 5710), 47.8% with IVMP ± OCS (n = 3425), 96.9% with RCI (n = 195), 50.7% with PMP (n = 73), and 43.9% with IVIG (n = 171). Among continuously enrolled patients (n = 373), relapse resolution was 95.7% with RCI (n = 232) and 66.0% with PMP/IVIG (n = 141); significant cohort differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated in other studies, OCS were generally effective. However, real-world effectiveness varied with other treatments. Relapse resolution of the first treatment with OCS was higher than with IVMP ± OCS; similarly, relapse resolution was higher with RCI as the first treatment than with PMP/IVIG. Results demonstrate RCI's effectiveness in appropriate patients. Limitations pertaining to claims-based research apply.

FUNDING

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (Bedminster, NJ).

Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials

Background

Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies.

Methods

English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP.

Conclusions

RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.

Comparison of two high doses of oral methylprednisolone for multiple sclerosis relapses: a pilot, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oral or intravenous methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day for 5 days) is recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Nonetheless, the optimal dose remains uncertain. We compared clinical and radiological effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of oral methylprednisolone [1250 mg/day (standard high dose)] versus 625 mg/day (lesser high dose), both for 3 days] in MS relapses.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with moderate to severe MS relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a pilot, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01986998). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the lesser high dose by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score improvement on day 30 (non-inferiority margin, 1 point). The secondary endpoints were EDSS score change on days 7 and 90, changes in T1 gadolinium-enhanced and new/enlarged T2 lesions on days 7 and 30, and safety and QoL results.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was achieved [mean (95% confidence interval) EDSS score difference, -0.26 (-0.7 to 0.18) at 30 days (P = 0.246)]. The standard high dose yielded a superior EDSS score improvement on day 7 (P = 0.028). No differences were observed in EDSS score on day 90 (P = 0.352) or in the number of T1 gadolinium-enhanced or new/enlarged T2 lesions on day 7 (P = 0.401, 0.347) or day 30 (P = 0.349, 0.529). Safety and QoL were good at both doses.

CONCLUSIONS

A lesser high-dose oral methylprednisolone regimen may not be inferior to the standard high dose in terms of clinical and radiological response.

Multiple Sclerosis Re-Examined: Essential and Emerging Clinical Concepts

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by exacerbations of neurological dysfunction due to inflammatory demyelination. Neurologic symptoms typically present in young adulthood and vary based on the site of inflammation, although weakness, sensory impairment, brainstem dysfunction, and vision loss are common. MS occurs more frequently in women and its development is complex-genetics, hormones, geography, vitamin D, and viral exposure all play roles. Early MS is characterized by relapsing-remitting course and inflammation of the white matter, although as patients age, the disease often transitions to a pathologically distinct secondary progressive phase with gradual disability accrual affecting gait, coordination, and bladder function. A minority of patients (10%) have disease that is progressive at onset. In the past decade, there has been a remarkable expansion in disease-modifying therapy for MS, but treatment of progressive disease remains a challenge. This article reviews foundational concepts in MS and emerging work that has reshaped understanding of the disease, providing new insight for therapeutic advance.

Corticosteroids in the management of acute multiple sclerosis exacerbations

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system characterized in the majority of the patients by a relapsing-remitting disease course. For decades high-dosage corticosteroids (CS) are considered the cornerstone in the management of acute MS relapses. However, many unanswered questions remain when it comes to the exact modalities of CS administration. In this review on behalf of the Belgian Study Group for MS we define the efficacy of CS in reducing MS-related morbidity and examine whether the effect is different according to type of CS, route of administration, cumulative dosage, timing of initiation and disease course. We also review the use of CS in combination with other MS treatments and during pregnancy and lactation. Furthermore, we delineate the relevant adverse events due to a pulse CS regimen and present a decision tree that can be used when treating MS relapses in clinical practice.

Outcome of MS relapses in the era of disease-modifying therapy

Background

In multiple sclerosis (MS), neurological disability results from incomplete remission of relapses and from relapse-independent progression. Intravenous high dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) is the established standard treatment to accelerate clinical relapse remission, although some patients do not respond. Most studies of relapse treatment have been performed when few patients received disease-modifying treatment and may no longer apply today.

Methods

We prospectively assessed, over one year, the course of patients who presented with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or MS relapse, documenting demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data. A standardized follow-up examination was performed 10–14 days after end of relapse treatment.

Results

We documented 119 relapses in 108 patients (31 CIS, 77 MS). 114 relapses were treated with IVMP resulting in full remission (29.2%), partial remission (38.7%), no change (18.2%) or worsening (4.4%). In 27 relapses (22.7%), escalating relapse treatment was indicated, and performed in 24, using double-dose IVMP (n = 18), plasmapheresis (n = 2) or immunoadsorption (n = 4).

Conclusions

Standardised follow-up visits and outcome documentation in treated relapses led to escalating relapse treatment in every fifth relapse. We recommend incorporating scheduled follow-up visits into routine relapse management. Our data facilitate the design of prospective trials addressing methods and timelines of relapse treatment.

Oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous glucocorticoids are recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, they can be inconvenient and expensive. Due to their convenience and low cost, oral glucocorticoids may be an alternative treatment. Recently, several studies have shown that there is no difference in efficacy and safety between oral methylprednisolone (oMP) and intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP).

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral methylprednisolone versus intravenous methylprednisolone for MS relapses in this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral methylprednisolone versus intravenous methylprednisolone for MS relapses were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE and China Biology Medicine until October 25, 2016, without language restrictions. The proportion of patients who had improved by day 28 was chosen as the efficacy outcome. We chose the risk ratio (RR) to analyze each trial with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We also used the fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel approach) to calculate the pooled relative effect estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 5 trials were identified, which included 369 patients. The results of our meta-analysis revealed that no significant difference existed in relapse improvement at day 28 between oMP and ivMP (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.10). No evidence of heterogeneity existed among the trials (P = 0.45, I2 = 0%). Both treatments were equally safe and well tolerated except that insomnia was more likely to occur in the oMP group compared to the ivMP group.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis reveals strong evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP in increasing the proportion of patients experiencing clinical improvement at day 28. In addition, both routes of administration are equally well tolerated and safe. These findings suggest that we may be able to replace ivMP with oMP to treat MS relapses.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of IV immune globulins in combination with IV methylprednisolone in the treatment of relapses in patients with MS

Background: Some patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) do not show a clear improvement of acute relapses after treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We compared the efficacy of the combination of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and IVMP with the standard treatment of IVMP alone in promoting recovery from moderate to severe acute relapses in MS. Methods: Patients with clinically definite MS having a relapse with at least a one point increase in Kurtzke’s expanded disability status scale (EDSS) in comparison to the preattack EDSS were randomized to IVMP-IVIg or IVMP-placebo treatment. The primary outcome criterion was the EDSS grade at four weeks. A preplanned interim analysis was performed after inclusion of 19 consecutive MS patients to evaluate the sample size necessary for a larger trial. Findings: Both groups had improved one point on the EDSS four weeks after start of treatment (P =0.81) and one of the stopping rules of the interim analysis was fulfilled. There were also no differences in secondary outcomes: EDSS at eight and 12 weeks, time to improve]-1 EDSS points, difference in Scripps score and ambulation index. Five patients in the IVMP-IVIg group and two in the IVMP group had a new relapse in the six month follow-up. Interpretation: O ur study could not show superiority of IVMP-IVIg in the treatment of moderate to severe acute relapses in MS.

An Update on Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease that causes a great deal of disability, especially in the young adult population. There have been several immunomodulatory agents that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for MS, including glatiramer acetate, interferon-β 1a and -β 1b, mitoxantrone, and corticosteroids. The effectiveness of these therapies has not been optimal, and drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, that more selectively target the pathogenetic process of MS have been sought. These agents have their own intrinsic limitations such as systemic inflammatory reactions, induction of neutralizing antiantibodies, and even life-threatening infectious processes. The agent that has been in the forefront of the discussion is natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against α 4 integrin, which shows much promise in suppressing MS activity. However, 3 individuals treated with natalizumab developed a life-threatening infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. This article reviews the role of mAbs in the treatment of MS, particularly their advantages over other drugs and their limitations, which have to be overcome for these agents to be at the forefront in the treatment of MS.

Deficiency of IκB Kinase β in Myeloid Cells Reduces Severity of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS), peripherally developed myelin-reactive T lymphocytes stimulate myeloid cells (ie, microglia and infiltrated macrophages) to trigger an inflammatory reaction in the central nervous system, resulting in demyelination and neurodegeneration. IκB kinase β (IKKβ) is a kinase that modulates transcription of inflammatory genes. To investigate the pathogenic role of IKKβ in MS, we developed strains in which IKKβ was conditionally ablated in myeloid cells and established active or passive EAE in these animals. Deficiency of IKKβ in myeloid cells ameliorated EAE symptoms and suppressed neuroinflammation, as shown by decreased infiltration of T lymphocytes and macrophages and reduced inflammatory gene transcription in the spinal cord at the peak or end stage of EAE. Myeloid deficiency of IKKβ also reduced the transcription of Rorc or Il17 genes in T lymphocytes isolated from lymph nodes, spleen, and spinal cord of EAE mice. Moreover, cultured splenocytes isolated from myeloid IKKβ-deficient EAE mice released less IL-17, interferon-γ, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after treatment with myelin peptide than splenocytes from IKKβ wild-type EAE mice. Thus, deficiency of myeloid IKKβ attenuates the severity of EAE by inhibiting both the neuroinflammatory activity and the activation of encephalitogenic T lymphocytes. These results suggest IKKβ may be a potential target for MS patients, especially when neuroinflammation is the primary problem.

Importance of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of the Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Acute Attacks

Background

We planned to investigate contribution of DWMR to the treatment efficacy with ADC values which were measured in acute and chronic plaque before and after MS treatment. ADC changes in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) in patients with MS and healthy volunteers were also evaluated in this study.

Material/Methods

25 patients with MS and 30 healthy subjects with normal brain MR findings were included to our study. Contrast enhancement in plaque was evaluated as an acute, and non-contrast enhancement in plaque was evaluated as a chronic. Also, ADC measurements were performed using the same parameters in NAWM in plaque neighborhood and volunteers. Results were compared with appropriate statistical methods.

Results

ADC values in acute and chronic plaques were decreased after the treatment, and these reductions were statistically significant for acute plaqus in b500 and for chronic plaques in b500 and b1000. The mean ADC values were measured as 1.53±0.49×10⁻³ and 1.43±0.58×10⁻³ in acute plaques and 1.40±0.35×10⁻³ and 1.34±0.36×10⁻³ mm²/sec in chronic plaques before and after the treatment.

Conclusions

We think that DWMR have important role due to quantitative measurement ability in the evaluation of the treatment efficacy of the MS patients with acute attack in addition to contrast-enhanced MR sequence.

Quantitative benefit-risk assessment of methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis relapses

BACKGROUND

High-dose short-term methylprednisolone is the recommended treatment in the management of multiple sclerosis relapses, although it has been suggested that lower doses may be equally effective. Also, glucocorticoids are associated with multiple and often dose-dependent adverse effects. This quantitative benefit-risk assessment compares high- and low-dose methylprednisolone (at least 2000 mg and less than 1000 mg, respectively, during at most 31 days) and a no treatment alternative, with the aim of determining which regimen, if any, is preferable in multiple sclerosis relapses.

METHODS

An overall framework of probabilistic decision analysis was applied, combining data from different sources. Effectiveness as well as risk of non-serious adverse effects were estimated from published clinical trials. However, as these trials recorded very few serious adverse effects, risk intervals for the latter were derived from individual case reports together with a range of plausible distributions. Probabilistic modelling driven by logically implied or clinically well motivated qualitative relations was used to derive utility distributions.

RESULTS

Low-dose methylprednisolone was not a supported option in this assessment; there was, however, only limited data available for this treatment alternative. High-dose methylprednisolone and the no treatment alternative interchanged as most preferred, contingent on the risk distributions applied for serious adverse effects, the assumed level of risk aversiveness in the patient population, and the relapse severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presently available do not support a change of current treatment recommendations. There are strong incentives for further clinical research to reduce the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness and the risks associated with methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis relapses; this would enable better informed and more precise treatment recommendations in the future.

Oral versus intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone for treatment of relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (COPOUSEP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

High doses of intravenous methylprednisolone are recommended to treat relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis, but can be inconvenient and expensive. We aimed to assess whether oral administration of high-dose methylprednisolone was non-inferior to intravenous administration.

METHODS

We did this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial at 13 centres for multiple sclerosis in France. We enrolled patients aged 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who reported a relapse within the previous 15 days that caused an increase of at least one point in one or more scores on the Kurtzke Functional System Scale. With use of a computer-generated randomisation list and in blocks of four, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients to either oral or intravenous methylprednisolone, 1000 mg, once a day for 3 days. Patients, treating physicians and nurses, and data and outcome assessors were all masked to treatment allocation, which was achieved with the use of saline solution and placebo capsules. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had improved by day 28 (decrease of at least one point in most affected score on Kurtzke Functional System Scale), without need for retreatment with corticosteroids, in the per-protocol population. The trial was powered to assess non-inferiority of oral compared with intravenous methylprednisolone with a predetermined non-inferiority margin of 15%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00984984.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 29, 2008, and June 14, 2013, we screened 200 patients and enrolled 199. We randomly assigned 100 patients to oral methylprednisolone and 99 patients to intravenous methylprednisolone with a mean time from relapse onset to treatment of 7·0 days (SD 3·6) and 7·4 days (3·9), respectively. In the per-protocol population, 66 (81%) of 82 patients in the oral group and 72 (80%) of 90 patients in the intravenous group achieved the primary endpoint (absolute treatment difference 0·5%, 90% CI -9·5 to 10·4). Rates of adverse events were similar, but insomnia was more frequently reported in the oral group (77 [77%]) than in the intravenous group (63 [64%]).

INTERPRETATION

Oral administration of high-dose methylprednisolone for 3 days was not inferior to intravenous administration for improvement of disability scores 1 month after treatment and had a similar safety profile. This finding could have implications for access to treatment, patient comfort, and cost, but indication should always be properly considered by clinicians.

FUNDING

French Health Ministry, Ligue Française contre la SEP, Teva.

Patient-reported outcomes as primary end points in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is moving from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and objective measures of disease, such as findings from endoscopy. PROs will become an important aspect of assessing activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and for labeling specific drugs for this disease. PROs always have been considered in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis, and have included measurements of quality of life, disability, or fatigue. Several disease-specific scales have been developed to assess these PROs and commonly are used in clinical trials. Outcomes reported by patients in clinical trials of IBD initially focused on quality of life, measured by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire or disease-specific scales such as the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire or its shorter version. Recently considered factors include fatigue, depression and anxiety, and work productivity, as measured by the Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Hospital Anxiety Depression, and the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire, respectively. However, few data are available on how treatment affects these factors in patients with IBD. Although disability generally is recognized in patients with IBD, it is not measured. The international IBD disability index currently is being validated. None of the PROs currently used in IBD were developed according to FDA guidance for PRO development. PROs will be a major primary end point of future trials. FDA guidance is needed to develop additional PROs for IBD that can be incorporated into trials, to better compare patients' experience with different therapies.

Assessing relapses and response to relapse treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a nursing perspective

There are currently no assessment tools that focus on evaluating patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are experiencing a relapse or that evaluate patients' response to acute relapse treatment. In practice, assessments are often subjective, potentially resulting in overlooked symptoms, unaddressed patient concerns, unnoticed or underrecognized side effects of therapies (both disease modifying and symptomatic), and suboptimal therapeutic response. Systematic evaluation of specific symptoms and potential side effects can minimize the likelihood of overlooking important information. However, given the number of potential symptoms and adverse events that patients may experience, an exhaustive evaluation can be time-consuming. Clinicians are thus challenged to balance thoroughness with brevity. A need exists for a brief but comprehensive objective assessment tool that can be used in practice to 1) help clinicians assess patients when they present with symptoms of a relapse, and 2) evaluate outcomes of acute management. A working group of expert nurses convened to discuss recognition and management of relapses. In this article, we review data related to recognition and management of relapses, discuss practical challenges, and describe the development of an assessment questionnaire that evaluates relapse symptoms, the impact of symptoms on the patient, and the effectiveness and tolerability of acute treatment. The questionnaire is designed to be appropriate for use in MS specialty clinics, general neurology practices, or other practice settings and can be administered by nurses, physicians, other clinicians, or patients (self-evaluation). The relapse assessment questionnaire is currently being piloted in a number of practice settings.

Childhood–juvenile multiple sclerosis: clinical characteristics and treatment

The characteristics of multiple sclerosis with onset during childhood or adolescence are presented in this review. The clinical findings are similar to those of the adult form, but some aspects are peculiar: the high female to male ratio, occurrence of hyperacute forms, occurrence of encephalopatic symptoms and high relapse rate. The evolution is relapsing-progressive in most cases. Mild and severe disability are reached after a longer interval than in the adult form but, in spite of this, at a given age disability is higher. A high relapse rate, short interval between first and second attack and high disability after the first year are negative prognostic factors. Magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid data are discussed, with particular reference to differential diagnosis from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Currently, there are no controlled trials concerning subjects aged under 16 years. Some observations demonstrate that immunomodulatory drugs are well tolerated and have a beneficial effect, reducing the relapse rate and progression of the disease.

Mechanistic insights into corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis: war horse or chameleon?

OBJECTIVES

Relapse management is a crucial component of multiple sclerosis (MS) care. High-dose corticosteroids (CSs) are used to dampen inflammation, which is thought to hasten the recovery of MS relapse. A diversity of mechanisms drive the heterogeneous clinical response to exogenous CSs in patients with MS. Preclinical research is beginning to provide important insights into how CSs work, both in terms of intended and unintended effects. In this article we discuss cellular, systemic, and clinical characteristics that might contribute to intended and unintended CS effects when utilizing supraphysiological doses in clinical practice. The goal of this article is to consider recent insights about CS mechanisms of action in the context of MS.

METHODS

We reviewed relevant preclinical and clinical studies on the desirable and undesirable effects of high-dose corticosteroids used in MS care.

RESULTS

Preclinical studies reviewed suggest that corticosteroids may act in unpredictable ways in the context of autoimmune conditions. The precise timing, dosage, duration, cellular exposure, and background CS milieu likely contribute to their clinical heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to predict when patients will respond favorably to CSs, both in terms of therapeutic response and tolerability profile. There are specific cellular, systemic, and clinical characteristics that might merit further consideration when utilizing CSs in clinical practice, and these should be explored in a translational setting.

Glucocorticoid treatment of multiple sclerosis

Glucorticorticoids have both anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties and both synthetic and natural glucocorticoid medications have been used to treat a number of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, including the management of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) attacks. Many of the studies supporting the use of this approach to MS treatment have important limitations. Nevertheless, on balance, the data seem to support the notion that a brief glucocorticoid treatment regimen (~2 weeks) hastens recovery from an acute MS flare and that this treatment, in general, is well tolerated. However, such treatment does not seem to alter the final degree of recovery from the MS attack. Among the practice community, even within MS centers, there seems to be a general belief that the selection of the optimal agent, route of administration, and the duration of therapy can be made on the basis of personal experience and/or theoretic considerations. As a result, currently, there are a variety of idiosyncratic regimens (often vigorously defended), which are commonly used to treat patients. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that the best route of administration, the optimal dose and duration of treatment, and the preferred agent or agents have yet to be firmly established. Moreover, although it may well turn out that some of these factors are more important than others, the best current evidence for the efficacy of glucocorticoid treatment in MS, by far, comes from the optic neuritis treatment trial, which used high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone for the first 3 days followed by an 11-day course of low-dose oral prednisone.

Neuroendocrine immunoregulation in multiple sclerosis

Currently, it is generally accepted that multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex multifactorial disease involving genetic and environmental factors affecting the autoreactive immune responses that lead to damage of myelin. In this respect, intrinsic or extrinsic factors such as emotional, psychological, traumatic, or inflammatory stress as well as a variety of other lifestyle interventions can influence the neuroendocrine system. On its turn, it has been demonstrated that the neuroendocrine system has immunomodulatory potential. Moreover, the neuroendocrine and immune systems communicate bidirectionally via shared receptors and shared messenger molecules, variously called hormones, neurotransmitters, or cytokines. Discrepancies at any level can therefore lead to changes in susceptibility and to severity of several autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Here we provide an overview of the complex system of crosstalk between the neuroendocrine and immune system as well as reported dysfunctions involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, including MS. Finally, possible strategies to intervene with the neuroendocrine-immune system for MS patient management will be discussed. Ultimately, a better understanding of the interactions between the neuroendocrine system and the immune system can open up new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of MS as well as other autoimmune diseases.

A randomized clinical trial of oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for relapse of MS

Background:

Steroids improve multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses but therapeutic window and dose, frequency and administration route remain uncertain.

Objective:

The objective of this paper is to compare the clinical and radiologic efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP) vs oral methylprednisolone (oMP), at equivalent high doses, for MS relapse.

Methods:

Forty-nine patients with moderate or severe relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter trial to receive ivMP or oMP and their matching placebos. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were determined at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12. Brain MRI were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4. Primary endpoint was a noninferiority assessment of EDSS improvement at four weeks (noninferiority margin of one point), with further key efficacy assessments of number and volume of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), and new or enlarged T2 lesions at four weeks’ post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability.

Results:

The study achieved the main outcome of noninferiority at four weeks for improved EDSS score. No differences were found between ivMP and oMP in the number of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–1) vs 0 (0–0.5), p = 0.630), volume of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–88.0) vs 0 (0–32.9) mm3, p = 0.735), or new or enlarged T2 lesions (0 (0–194) vs 0 (0–123), p = 0.769). MP was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions:

This study provides confirmatory evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP in reducing EDSS, similar in MRI lesions at four weeks for MS relapses and is equally well tolerated and safe.

Trial registration:

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00753792

Updates on clinically isolated syndrome and diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis

Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is a central nervous system demyelinating event isolated in time that is compatible with the possible future development of multiple sclerosis (MS). Early risk stratification for conversion to MS helps with treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most useful tool to evaluate risk. Cerebrospinal fluid studies and evoked potentials may also be used to assess the likelihood of MS. Four clinical trials evaluating the benefits of either interferon β (IFN-β) or glatiramer acetate (GA) within the first 3 months after a high-risk CIS demonstrate decreased rates of conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS) and a lesser degree of MRI progression with early treatment. In the 3-, 5-, and 10-year extension studies of 2 formulations of IFN-β, the decreased conversion rate to CDMS remained meaningful when comparing early treatment of CIS to treatment delayed by a median of 2 to 3 years. Diagnostic criteria have been developed based on the clinical and MRI follow-up of large cohorts with CIS and provide guidance on how to utilize clinical activity in combination with radiographic information to diagnose MS. The most recent 2010 McDonald criteria simplify requirements for dissemination in time and space and allow for diagnosis of MS from a baseline brain MRI if there are both silent gadolinium-enhancing lesions and nonenhancing lesions on the same imaging study. The diagnostic criteria for MS require special consideration in children at risk for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), in older adults who may have small vessel ischemic disease, and in ethnic groups that more commonly develop neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

ACTH protects mature oligodendroglia from excitotoxic and inflammation-related damage in vitro

Corticosteroids (CS) are widely employed to treat relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS). Endogenous ACTH is a 39-amino acid peptide that, among other functions, stimulates CS production. Exogenous ACTH 1-39 is used to treat MS relapses, presumably by stimulating endogenous CS production. However, unlike CS, ACTH binds to melanocortin receptors, found in the central nervous system (CNS) as well as on inflammatory cells. Since glia are implicated in MS and other neurodegenerative diseases, and oligodendroglia (OL) are more sensitive to injury than other glia, we characterized the protective effects of ACTH on OL in vitro without the confounding effects of CS. Rat brain cultures containing OL, astrocytes (AS), and microglia (MG) were incubated for 1 day with potentially cytotoxic agents with or without preincubation with ACTH 1-39. The cytotoxic agents killed 55-70% of mature OL, but caused little or no death of AS or MG at the concentrations used. ACTH protected OL from death induced by staurosporine, AMPA, NMDA, kainate, quinolinic acid, or reactive oxygen species, but did not protect against kynurenic acid or nitric oxide. The protective effects of ACTH were dose dependent, and decreased OL death induced by the different agents by 30-60% at 200 nM ACTH. We show for the first time that melanocortin 4 receptor is expressed on OL in addition to MG and AS. In summary, ACTH 1-39 protects OL in vitro from several excitotoxic and inflammation-related insults. ACTH may be activating melanocortin receptors on OL or alternately on AS or MG to prevent OL death.

Treatment of acute relapses in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. The most common clinical type of MS tends to follow a relapsing course, affecting the vast majority of patients living with this disease. Relapses are a hallmark of MS, and are often associated with significant functional impairment and decreased quality of life. Although usually followed by a period of remission, residual symptoms after MS relapses may persist and lead to sustained disability. Adequate management of MS relapses is important, as it may help to shorten and lessen the disability associated with their course. Historically, treatment of MS relapse was the first approach (and for a period of time, the only approach) to MS treatment in general. Systemic corticosteroids and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) have broad regulatory approval and remain the most established and validated treatment options for MS relapse. Therapeutic mechanisms of ACTH were previously associated (perhaps mistakenly) with only corticotropic actions; however, recently the direct anti-inflammatory effects and immunomodulatory activity of ACTH gel acting through melanocortin pathways have been shown. Second-line treatments of steroid-unresponsive MS relapses and a possible algorithm for MS relapse management are also reviewed in this article.

Oral versus intravenous steroids for treatment of relapses in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

This is an updated Cochrane review of the previous version published (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006921. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006921.pub2).Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), is characterized by recurrent relapses of CNS inflammation ranging from mild to severely disabling.  Relapses have long been treated with steroids to reduce inflammation and hasten recovery.  However, the commonly used intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) requires repeated infusions with the added costs of homecare or hospitalization, and may interfere with daily responsibilities. Oral steroids have been used in place of intravenous steroids, with lower direct and indirect costs.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare efficacy of oral versus intravenous steroids in promoting disability recovery in MS relapses <= six weeks.  Secondary objectives included subsequent relapse rate, disability, ambulation, hospitalization, immunological markers, radiological markers, and quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

A literature search was performed using Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group's Trials Register (January 2012), abstracts from meetings of the American Academy of Neurology (2008-2012), the European Federation of Neurological Sciences (2008-2012), the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and American Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (2008-2012) handsearching. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing oral versus intravenous steroids for acute relapses (<= six weeks) in patients with clinically definite MSover age 16 were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors (JB, PO and MH) participated in the independent assessment of all published articles as potentially relevant to the review. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion among review authors.We contacted study authors for additional information.Methodological quality was assessed by the same three review authors. Relevant data were extracted, and effect size was reported as mean difference (MD), mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR) and absolute risk difference (ARD).

MAIN RESULTS

With this current update, a total of five eligible studies (215 patients) were identified. Only one outcome, the proportion of patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) improvement at four weeks, was common to three trials, while two trials examined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes. The results of this review shows there is no significant difference in relapse recovery at week four (MD -0.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.71 to 0.26, P = 0.20) nor differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gadolinium enhancement activity based on oral versus intravenous steroid treatment. However, only two of the five studies employed more current and rigorous methodological techniques, so these results must be taken with some caution. The Oral Megadose Corticosteroid Therapy of Acute Exacerbations of Multiple Sclerosis (OMEGA) trial and the "Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone Per os Versus IV for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relapses" (COPOUSEP) trial, designed to address such limitations, are currently underway.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the five included trials comparing intravenous versus oral steroid therapy for MS relapses do not demonstrate any significant differences in clinical (benefits and adverse events), radiological or pharmacological outcomes. Based on the evidence, oral steroid therapy may be a practical and effective alternative to intravenous steroid therapy in the treatment of MS relapses.

Temporal evolution of remission following multiple sclerosis relapse and predictors of outcome

Background:

Relapse is a characteristic clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is commonly employed as a measure of efficacy following therapeutic intervention. However, less is known about the temporal evolution of subsequent disability or factors predicting recovery.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to assess the pattern of recovery following relapse and identify factors which predict recovery and residual disability following relapse.

Methods:

A total of 226 relapses were studied prospectively in a cohort of 144 patients with standardised clinical assessments of physical disability including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 10-m timed walk, 9-hole peg test and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) at 0, 2, 6 and 12 months. A total of 82 patients completed 12 months of follow up without further relapse.

Results:

Thirty per cent of relapses were severe (change in EDSS >2.0) of which 11% failed to recover. All measures showed significant improvement at 2 months but additional improvement was also observed in 9-hole peg test and MSIS-29 up to 12 months following initial assessment. Mean time to second relapse was 382 days. The only predictor of relapse severity in the model tested was younger age; however, increasing age and initial relapse severity were also predictors of poor outcome.

Conclusions:

This study shows that the majority of improvement in physical disability following relapse occurs by 2 months but that more subtle recovery can take place over 12 months in a small sub-group of patients. These data will aid in patient counselling and will also inform the timing of therapeutic intervention and physical support.

A tool to measure the attributes of receiving IV therapy in a home versus hospital setting: the Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Management Scale (MSRMS)

Background

Intravenous steroids are routinely used to treat disabling relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS). Theoretically, the infusion could take place at home, rather than in hospital. Findings from other patient populations suggest that patients may find the experiences of home relapse management more desirable. However, formal comparison of these two settings, from the patients' point of view, was prevented by the lack of a clinical scale. We report the development of a rating scale to measure patient's experiences of relapse management that allowed this question to be answered confidently.

Methods

Scale development had three stages. First, in-depth interviews of 21 MS patients generated a conceptual model and pool of potential scale items. Second, these items were administered to 160 people with relapsing-remitting MS. Standard psychometric techniques were used to develop a scale. Third, the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated in a randomised controlled trial of 138 patients whose relapses were managed either at home or hospital.

Results

A preliminary conceptual model with eight dimensions, and a pool of 154 items was generated. From this we developed the MS Relapse Management Scale (MSRMS), a 42-item with four subscales: access to care (6 items), coordination of care (11 items), information (7 items), interpersonal care (18 items). The MSRMS subscales satisfied most psychometric criteria but had notable floor effects.

Conclusions

The MSRMS is a reliable and valid measure of patients' experiences of MS relapse management. The high floor effects suggest most respondents had positive care experiences. Results demonstrate that patients' experiences of relapse management can be measured, and that the MSRMS is a powerful tool for determining which services to develop, support and ultimately commission.

Disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

Since 1993, six disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been proven to be of benefit in rigorous phase III clinical trials. Other agents are also available and are used to treat MS, but definitive data on their efficacy is lacking. Currently, disease-modifying therapy is used for relapsing forms of MS. This includes clinically isolated syndrome/first-attack high-risk patients, relapsing patients, secondary progressive patients who are still experiencing relapses, and progressive relapsing patients. The choice of agent depends upon drug factors (including affordability, availability, convenience, efficacy, and side effects), disease factors (including clinical and neuroimaging prognostic indicators), and patient factors (including comorbidities, lifestyle, and personal preference). This review will discuss the disease-modifying agents used currently in MS, as well as available alternative agents.

Management of acute exacerbations in multiple sclerosis

A key component of multiple sclerosis is the occurrence of episodes of clinical worsening with either new symptoms or an increase in older symptoms over a few days or weeks. These are known as exacerbations of multiple sclerosis. In this review, we summarize the pathophysiology and treatment of exacerbations and describe how they are related to the overall management of this disease.

Dalfampridine: a brief review of its mechanism of action and efficacy as a treatment to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can cause progressive walking impairment that contributes to disability, loss of independence, and reduced quality of life. Dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine), a voltage-dependent potassium channel blocker, has been shown to improve walking in patients with MS, as demonstrated by an increase in walking speed.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize knowledge about the mechanism of action of dalfampridine in the context of clinical evidence of walking improvement in MS patients.

METHODS

Although this was not a systematic review, which is the primary limitation of this study, searches of PubMed were performed using relevant search terms to identify studies that examined the mechanism of action related to MS and its effects in patients with MS in clinical trials.

RESULTS

Voltage-gated potassium channels represent a family of related proteins that span cell membranes, open and close in response to changes in the transmembrane potential, and help regulate ionic potassium currents. Action potential conduction deficits in demyelinated axons result in part from the exposure after demyelination of the paranodal and internodal potassium channels that are distributed in the axonal membrane. This exposure leads to abnormal currents across the axonal membrane that can slow action potential conduction, result in conduction failure, or affect the axon's capacity for repetitive discharge. While dalfampridine is a broad-spectrum blocker of voltage-dependent potassium channels at millimolar concentrations, studies have shown improvement in action potential conduction in demyelinated axons at concentrations as low as 1 μM, and therapeutic plasma concentrations (associated with improved walking) are in the range of 0.25 µM. However, no specific potassium channel subtype has yet been characterized with significant sensitivity to dalfampridine in this range, and the effects of the drug at this low concentration appear to be quite selective. Improved conduction translates into clinical benefit as measured by objectively and subjectively assessed walking relative to placebo. Such improvements were observed in approximately one third of patients treated with an extended-release formulation of dalfampridine in clinical trials. These patients who responded to dalfampridine had an average increase in walking speed of approximately 25%, and greater improvements than nonresponders on a self-reported subjective measure of walking.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended-release formulation of dalfampridine has been shown in clinical trials to improve walking speed in approximately one third of MS patients with ambulatory impairment. The putative mechanism of action of dalfampridine is restoration of action potential conduction via blockade of an as yet uncharacterized subset of potassium channels in demyelinated axons.

Therapeutic strategies in childhood multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) in children and adolescents accounts for 3-10% of the whole MS population, and is characterized by a relapsing course in almost all cases. The frequency of relapses is higher than in adult onset MS, at least in the first years of evolution. The objective of treatment is to speed the recovery after a relapse, to prevent the occurrence of relapses, and to prevent disease progression and neurodegeneration. The use of drugs for MS in children and adolescents has not been studied in clinical trials, so their use is mainly based on results from trials in adults and from observational studies. There is a consensus to treat acute relapses with intravenous high-dose corticosteroids. The possibility of preventing relapses and disease progression is based on the use of immunomodulatory agents. Interferon-beta (IFNB) and glatiramer acetate (GA) have been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated in pediatric MS patients, and also to reduce relapse rate and disease progression. Cyclophosphamide and natalizumab could be offered as second-line treatment in patients with a poor response to IFNB or GA. New oral and injectable drugs will be available in the near future: if safe and well tolerated in the long-term follow up of adults with MS, they could be tested in the pediatric MS population.

Pediatric multiple sclerosis

Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) represents a particular MS subgroup with unique diagnostic challenges and many unanswered questions. Due to the narrow window of environmental exposures and clinical disease expression, children with MS may represent a particularly important group to study to gain a better understanding of MS pathogenesis. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is more common in children than in adults, often making the differential diagnosis of MS, particularly a clinically isolated syndrome, quite difficult. Although both disorders represent acute inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system and have overlapping symptoms, ADEM is typically (not always) self-limiting. The presence of encephalopathy is much more characteristic of ADEM and may help in distinguishing between the two. Young children (under ten years old) with MS differ the most from adults. They have a lower frequency of oligoclonal bands in their cerebrospinal fluid and are less likely to have discrete lesions on MRI. Problems of cognitive dysfunction and psychosocial adjustment have particularly serious implications in both children and teenagers with MS. Increased awareness of these difficulties and interventions are needed. While clinical research on therapies to alter the disease course is limited, the available data fortunately suggests that disease-modifying therapy is well tolerated and likely to be effective. Ultimately, multinational research studies are necessary to advance our knowledge of the causes, symptoms, and treatment of pediatric MS and such collaborations are currently underway.