Fall in mean arterial pressure and fetal growth restriction in pregnancy hypertension: a meta-analysis

Predictive Value of Serum Immune-Inflammatory Markers for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Thrombophilia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Thrombophilia combined with pregnancy poses significant risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Unfortunately, there are no indicators at high risk for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study investigates the predictive efficiency of serum immune-inflammatory markers on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study includes 223 pregnant women diagnosed with thrombophilia who delivered at the Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch from January 2022 to April 2024. Clinical information and pregnancy outcomes were collected. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were calculated using blood samples. The relationship and predictive accuracy between immune-inflammatory markers and adverse pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.

Results

In this study, 50 (22.4%) patients had adverse pregnancy outcomes. Significant differences were observed in neutrophils counts, monocytes counts, LDH, SII, and SIRI levels between the adverse pregnancy outcome groups (APOs) and the control groups (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that SII (AUC=0.762), SIRI (AUC=0.764), and LDH (AUC=0.732) had high predictive values for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Notably, the combined model had the highest AUC of 0.805. Multivariate logistic regression identified SII had the highest odd ratio (OR) (OR=8.512; 95% CI(3.068-23.614)), followed by LDH (OR=4.905; 95% CI (1.167-11.101)), SIRI (OR=3.549; 95% CI(0.847-8.669)), and neutrophils count (OR=1.726; 95% CI (0.563-2.938)) as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.

Conclusion

Elevated levels of immune-inflammatory markers such as SII, SIRI, and LDH level are strong predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes in thrombophilia-complicated pregnancies. These markers are significantly associated with maternal-neonatal outcomes. Our findings underscore the importance of monitoring immune-inflammatory markers in pregnant women with thrombophilia to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Update on Preeclampsia and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

There have been recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy which complicate approximately 16% of pregnancies in the United States. Initiation of low-dose aspirin by 16 weeks' gestation reduces preeclampsia in high-risk women. The Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor ratio for the short-term prediction of preeclampsia. Pregnancy outcomes are improved in women with chronic hypertension when antihypertensives are initiated at a threshold blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg. Women with prior preeclampsia have increased cardiovascular disease risk and should receive risk reduction counseling.

Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: Progress Made and Future Directions for Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of a Patient Safety Bundle

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy account for approximately 5% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States and are one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity. Focus on improving patient outcomes in the setting of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has increased in recent years, and quality improvement initiatives have been implemented across the United States. This paper discusses patient safety and quality initiatives for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, with an emphasis on progress made and a patient safety tool: the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health's Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy patient safety bundle. Future patient safety and quality directions for the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy will be reviewed.

Chronic hypertension diagnosed before or during pregnancy and its effects on pregnancy outcomes

Chronic hypertension (CH) during pregnancy, identified before or within the first 20 weeks, presents varying risks depending on the timing of diagnosis. This real-world study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2023 and included singleton pregnancies with CH to compare pre-pregnancy CH (Group 1) and newly diagnosed CH (Group 2). There were 565 women in the final analysis, with 307 in Group 1 with pre-pregnancy CH and 258 in Group 2 with new-onset CH. Those in Group 1 more frequently had pre-gestational diabetes and a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, whereas Group 2 had a higher incidence of excessive gestational weight gain. Notably, 56.2% of Group 2 patients did not receive antihypertensive treatment before 20 weeks, while the proportion was 36.2% in Group 1, resulting in a significant difference in baseline blood pressure. The study revealed higher incidences of preterm preeclampsia (44.2% vs. 34.9%) and placental abruption (5.4% vs. 2.0%) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. After adjustment, logistic regression indicated that Group 2 had a 1.8-fold higher risk of preterm preeclampsia than Group 1. These findings suggest that pregnant women newly diagnosed with CH in the first 20 weeks face increased adverse outcomes compared to those diagnosed before pregnancy. Intense monitoring and earlier intervention may help manage women with new-onset CH.

Mean Arterial Pressure and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by Mild Chronic Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations.

CONCLUSION

Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and the Cardiovascular System: Causes, Consequences, Therapy, and Prevention

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy continue to be significant contributors to adverse perinatal outcome and maternal mortality, as well as inducing life-long cardiovascular health impacts that are proportional to the severity and frequency of pregnancy complications. The placenta is the interface between the mother and fetus and its failure to undergo vascular maturation in tandem with maternal cardiovascular adaptation by the end of the first trimester predisposes to hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction. While primary failure of trophoblastic invasion with incomplete maternal spiral artery remodeling has been considered central to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, cardiovascular risk factors associated with abnormal first trimester maternal blood pressure and cardiovascular adaptation produce identical placental pathology leading to hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Outside pregnancy blood pressure treatment thresholds are identified with the goal to prevent immediate risks from severe hypertension >160/100 mm Hg and long-term health impacts that arise from elevated blood pressures as low as 120/80 mm Hg. Until recently, the trend for less aggressive blood pressure management during pregnancy was driven by fear of inducing placental malperfusion without a clear clinical benefit. However, placental perfusion is not dependent on maternal perfusion pressure during the first trimester and risk-appropriate blood pressure normalization may provide the opportunity to protect from the placental maldevelopment that predisposes to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Recent randomized trials set the stage for more aggressive risk-appropriate blood pressure management that may offer a greater potential for prevention for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. KEY POINTS: · Optimal management of maternal blood pressure to prevent preeclampsia and its risks is undefined.. · Early gestational rheological damage to the intervillous space predisposes to preeclampsia and FGR.. · First trimester blood pressure management may need to aim for normotension to prevent preeclampsia..

Clinical Trials That Have Changed Obstetric Practice: The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Trial

We describe the evolution of treatment recommendations for chronic hypertension (CHTN) in pregnancy, the CHTN and pregnancy (CHAP) trial, and its impact on obstetric practice. The US multicenter CHAP trial showed that antihypertensive treatment for mild CHTN in pregnancy [blood pressures (BP)<160/105 mm Hg] to goal<140/90 mm Hg, primarily with labetalol or nifedipine compared with no treatment unless BP were severe reduced the composite risk of superimposed severe preeclampsia, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, placental abruption, and fetal/neonatal death. As a result of this trial, professional societies in the United States recommended treatment of patients with CHTN in pregnancy to BP goal<140/90 mm Hg.

Impacts of heat exposure in utero on long-term health and social outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Climate change, particularly global warming, is amongst the greatest threats to human health. While short-term effects of heat exposure in pregnancy, such as preterm birth, are well documented, long-term effects have received less attention. This review aims to systematically assess evidence on the long-term impacts on the foetus of heat exposure in utero.

METHODS

A search was conducted in August 2019 and updated in April 2023 in MEDLINE(PubMed). We included studies on the relationship of environmental heat exposure during pregnancy and any long-term outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using tools developed by the Joanna-Briggs Institute, and the evidence was appraised using the GRADE approach. Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines were used.

RESULTS

Eighteen thousand six hundred twenty one records were screened, with 29 studies included across six outcome groups. Studies were mostly conducted in high-income countries (n = 16/25), in cooler climates. All studies were observational, with 17 cohort, 5 case-control and 8 cross-sectional studies. The timeline of the data is from 1913 to 2019, and individuals ranged in age from neonates to adults, and the elderly. Increasing heat exposure during pregnancy was associated with decreased earnings and lower educational attainment (n = 4/6), as well as worsened cardiovascular (n = 3/6), respiratory (n = 3/3), psychiatric (n = 7/12) and anthropometric (n = 2/2) outcomes, possibly culminating in increased overall mortality (n = 2/3). The effect on female infants was greater than on males in 8 of 9 studies differentiating by sex. The quality of evidence was low in respiratory and longevity outcome groups to very low in all others.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing heat exposure was associated with a multitude of detrimental outcomes across diverse body systems. The biological pathways involved are yet to be elucidated, but could include epigenetic and developmental perturbations, through interactions with the placenta and inflammation. This highlights the need for further research into the long-term effects of heat exposure, biological pathways, and possible adaptation strategies in studies, particularly in neglected regions. Heat exposure in-utero has the potential to compound existing health and social inequalities. Poor study design of the included studies constrains the conclusions of this review, with heterogenous exposure measures and outcomes rendering comparisons across contexts/studies difficult.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD 42019140136.

The association between blood pressure control in women during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: the TMM BirThree Cohort Study

Blood pressure (BP) control in pregnancy is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. However, BP levels for hypertension treatment are inconsistent among various guidelines. This study investigated the association between BP control and adverse perinatal outcomes. A total of 18,155 mother-offspring pairs were classified into four groups according to BP after 20 gestational weeks: normal BP (<140/90 mmHg without antihypertensive drugs), high BP (≥140/90 mmHg without antihypertensive drugs), controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg with antihypertensive drugs), and uncontrolled BP (≥140/90 mmHg with antihypertensive drugs). The prevalence of small for gestational age was 1,087/17,476 offspring in normal BP, 78/604 in high BP, 5/42 in controlled BP, and 7/33 in uncontrolled BP. Compared to normal BP, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) were 1.76 (1.32-2.35) for high BP, 2.08 (0.79-5.50) for controlled BP, and 2.34 (0.94-5.85) for uncontrolled BP (multiple logistic regression analysis). Similarly, the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 1.80 (1.35-2.41), 3.42 (1.35-8.63), and 5.10 (1.93-13.45) for high, controlled, and uncontrolled BPs for low birth weight, respectively; 1.99 (1.48-2.68), 2.70 (1.12-6.50), and 6.53 (3.09-13.82) for high, controlled, and uncontrolled BPs for preterm birth, respectively; 1.64 (1.19-2.24), 2.17 (0.88-5.38), and 2.12 (0.80-5.65) for high, controlled, and uncontrolled BPs for admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit or Growing Care Unit, respectively; and 1.17 (0.70-1.95), 2.23 (0.65-7.68), and 0.91 (0.20-4.16) for high, controlled, and uncontrolled BPs for 1-min Apgar score < 7, respectively. BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg might be taken care for preventing various adverse perinatal outcomes.

Treating Mild Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg compared with 160/105 mm Hg.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare the treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy at mild-range blood pressures (140/90 mm Hg) with the treatment of chronic hypertension before 20 weeks of gestation at severe-range blood pressures (160/105 mm Hg) in a theoretical cohort of 180,000 patients with mild chronic hypertension. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. Primary outcomes included incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), cases of preeclampsia, preeclampsia with severe features, severe maternal morbidity (SMM), preterm birth, maternal death, neonatal death, and neurodevelopmental delay. The cost-effectiveness threshold was $100,000 per QALY.

RESULTS

Treating chronic hypertension in a population of 180,000 pregnant persons at mild-range blood pressures, compared with severe-range blood pressures, resulted in 14,177 fewer cases of preeclampsia (43,953 vs 58,130), 11,835 of which were cases of preeclampsia with severe features (40,530 vs 52,365). This led to 817 fewer cases of SMM (4,375 vs 5,192), and 18 fewer cases of maternal death (102 vs 120). Treating at a lower threshold also resulted in 8,078 fewer cases of preterm birth (22,000 vs 30,078), which led to 26 fewer neonatal deaths (276 vs 302) and 157 fewer cases of neurodevelopmental delay (661 vs 818). Overall, treating chronic hypertension at a lower threshold was a dominant strategy that resulted in decreased costs of $600 million and increased effectiveness of 12,852 QALYs.

CONCLUSION

Treating chronic hypertension at a threshold of mild-range blood pressures is a dominant (lower costs, better outcomes) and cost-effective strategy that results in fewer neonatal and maternal deaths compared with the standard treatment of treating at severe range blood pressures.

Case report of a rare cause of secondary hypertension illustrating the importance of cardio-obstetric preconception counselling

Background

Cardiovascular diseases represent a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. High blood pressure during pregnancy is a major driver of short- and long-term cardiovascular health in both mother and child. Screening and adequate treatment of elevated blood pressure before pregnancy significantly reduce mortality risk to mother and child.

Case summary

A 30-year-old woman with middle aortic coarctation (MAC) previously treated with aortic stenting was referred to our cardio-obstetrics with plans to become pregnant. The clinical examination revealed severe hypertension with a significant blood pressure gradient between the upper and lower limbs. The patient underwent computed tomography angiography showing re-stenosis of the aorta. After the analysis of the benefit risk of all treatment options, percutaneous transluminal aortic in-stent re-stenting was performed. Following the intervention, blood pressure profile significantly improved but remained slightly elevated further necessitating the introduction of an antihypertensive therapy.

Discussion

This clinical case condenses several challenges encountered in the management of hypertension in women who plan to become pregnant. Firstly, it emphasizes the fact that secondary causes of chronic hypertension, including MAC, do not have to be overlooked in childbearing age patient. Secondly, it illustrates the need for a multidisciplinary analysis of all available treatment options in view of a future pregnancy. Finally, it discusses the particular follow-up and potential complications in pregnant women with MAC and aortic stent.

Perinatal Outcomes Associated With Management of Stage 1 Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between maternal blood pressure (BP) below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy), an open label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Participants with mean BP below 140/90 mm Hg were grouped as below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg by averaging postrandomization clinic BP throughout pregnancy. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA).

RESULTS

Of 2,408 patients in CHAP, 2,096 met study criteria; 1,328 had mean BP 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and 768 had mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg were more likely to be older, on antihypertensive medication, in the active treatment arm, and to have lower BP at enrollment. Mean clinic BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with lower frequency of the primary outcome (16.0% vs 35.8%, adjusted relative risk 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.54) as well as lower risk of severe preeclampsia and indicated birth before 35 weeks of gestation. There was no association with SGA.

CONCLUSION

In pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension, mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes without increased risk of SGA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.

The 2023 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Clinical Practice Update on Management of the Patient With a Prolonged QT Interval

A prolonged QT interval on the electrocardiogram is associated with an increased risk of the torsades de pointes form of ventricular arrhythmia resulting in syncope, sudden cardiac arrest or death, or misdiagnosis as a seizure disorder. The cause of QT prolongation can be congenital and inherited as an autosomal dominant variant, or it can be transient and acquired, often because of QT-prolonging drugs or electrolyte abnormalities. Automated measurement of the QT interval can be inaccurate, especially when the baseline electrocardiogram is abnormal, and manual verification is recommended. In this clinical practice update we provide practical tips about measurement of the QT interval, diagnosis, and management of congenital long QT syndrome and acquired prolongation of the QT interval. For congenital long QT syndrome, certain β-adrenergic-blocking drugs are highly effective, and implantable defibrillators are infrequently required. Many commonly prescribed drugs such as antidepressants and antibiotics can prolong the QT interval, and recommendations are provided on their safe use.

α/β- and β-Blocker Exposure in Pregnancy and the Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycemia and Small for Gestational Age

BACKGROUND

α/β- and β-blockers are essential in pregnant women's perinatal congenital heart disease management. Nevertheless, data on the effects of α/β- and β-blockers on pregnant women and fetuses are limited. We examined the risks of neonatal hypoglycemia and small for gestational age (SGA) associated with maternal exposure to α/β- and β-blockers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive pregnant women with heart disease admitted to our hospital between January 2014 and October 2020 were included. Of 306 pregnancies (267 women), 32 were in the α/β-blocker group, 11 were in the β-blocker group, and 263 were in the control group. All 32 pregnancies in the α/β-blocker group were treated with carvedilol. In the β-blocker group, 4 women were treated with bisoprolol, 3 were treated with propranolol, 2 were treated with atenolol, 1 was treated with metoprolol, and 1 was treated nadolol. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was higher in pregnant women taking carvedilol than in the control group (P=0.025). SGA was observed significantly more frequently in pregnant women taking β-blockers than in the carvedilol and control groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol administration during pregnancy was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia; however, it did not occur in a time- or dose-dependent manner. Routine monitoring of blood glucose levels in newborns exposed to α/β- and β-blockers is essential.

Treatment for mild hypertension in pregnancy with different strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antihypertensive treatment for mild pregnancy hypertension.

METHODS

We searched various databases from inception to June 2022, using keywords including hypertension; pregnancy; therapy; treatment; pregnancy outcomes; maternal outcomes; and perinatal outcomes. Only RCTs of antihypertensive treatment for mild hypertension in pregnancy comparing placebo/no therapy were included. We used Review Manager version 5.3 for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

In all, eight studies were eligible, with a total of 4211 participants. Compared with control, the active treatment significantly prevented preeclampsia (OR 0.55; 95%CI, 0.39-0.78), placental abruption (OR 0.39; 95%CI, 0.17-0.91), severe hypertension (OR 0.35; 95%CI, 0.17-0.71), end-organ dysfunction (OR 0.34; 95%CI, 0.19-0.62) and preterm birth (OR 0.69; 95%CI, 0.59-0.82), with no increased risk of small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 1.25; 95%CI, 0.78-2.00), or admission to the NICU (OR 0.83; 95%CI, 0.54-1.28). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the tight control group did not show an advantage over the less-tight control group in improving pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In pregnant women with mild pregnancy-induced hypertension or chronic hypertension, antihypertensive treatment still provided precise benefits of improving pregnancy outcomes without increased risk in fetal outcomes.

Safety of beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocker (BB) and calcium channel blocker (CCB) antihypertensive drugs are commonly used in pregnancy. However, data on their relative impact on maternal and foetal outcomes are limited. We leveraged genetic variants mimicking BB and CCB antihypertensive drugs to investigate their effects on risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and birthweight using the Mendelian randomization paradigm.

METHODS

Genetic association estimates for systolic blood pressure (SBP) were extracted from summary data of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 757,601 participants. Uncorrelated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with SBP (p < 5 × 10-8) in BB and CCB drug target gene regions were selected as proxies for drug target perturbation. Genetic association estimates for the outcomes were extracted from GWASs on 4743 cases and 136,325 controls (women without a hypertensive disorder in pregnancy) for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, 7676 cases and 130,424 controls (women without any pregnancy-related morbidity) for gestational diabetes, and 155,202 women (who have given birth at least once) for birthweight of the first child. All studies were in European ancestry populations. Mendelian randomization estimates were generated using the two-sample inverse-variance weighted model.

RESULTS

Although not reaching the conventional threshold for statistical significance, genetically-proxied BB was associated with reduced risk of pre-eclampsia (OR per 10 mmHg SBP reduction 0.27, 95%CI 0.06-1.19, p = 0.08) and increased risk of gestational diabetes (OR per 10 mmHg SBP reduction 2.01, 95%CI 0.91-4.42, p = 0.08), and significantly associated with lower birthweight of first child (beta per 10 mmHg SBP reduction - 0.27, 95%CI - 0.39 to - 0.15, p = 1.90 × 10-5). Genetically-proxied CCB was associated with reduced risk of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.43-0.89, p = 9.33 × 10-3), and was not associated with gestational diabetes (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.76-1.45, p = 0.76) or changes in birthweight of first child (beta per 10 mmHg SBP reduction 0.02, 95%CI - 0.04-0.07, p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

While BB and CCB antihypertensive drugs may both be efficacious for lowering blood pressure in pregnancy, this genetic evidence suggests that BB use may lower birthweight. Conversely, CCB use may reduce risk of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia without impacting gestational diabetes risk or birthweight. These data support further study on the effects of BBs on birthweight.

Treatment for Mild Chronic Hypertension during Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The benefits and safety of the treatment of mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure, <160/100 mm Hg) during pregnancy are uncertain. Data are needed on whether a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg reduces the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes without compromising fetal growth.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension and singleton fetuses at a gestational age of less than 23 weeks to receive antihypertensive medications recommended for use in pregnancy (active-treatment group) or to receive no such treatment unless severe hypertension (systolic pressure, ≥160 mm Hg; or diastolic pressure, ≥105 mm Hg) developed (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of preeclampsia with severe features, medically indicated preterm birth at less than 35 weeks' gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The safety outcome was small-for-gestational-age birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Secondary outcomes included composites of serious neonatal or maternal complications, preeclampsia, and preterm birth.

RESULTS

A total of 2408 women were enrolled in the trial. The incidence of a primary-outcome event was lower in the active-treatment group than in the control group (30.2% vs. 37.0%), for an adjusted risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.92; P<0.001). The percentage of small-for-gestational-age birth weights below the 10th percentile was 11.2% in the active-treatment group and 10.4% in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.31; P = 0.76). The incidence of serious maternal complications was 2.1% and 2.8%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.26), and the incidence of severe neonatal complications was 2.0% and 2.6% (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.30). The incidence of any preeclampsia in the two groups was 24.4% and 31.1%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.89), and the incidence of preterm birth was 27.5% and 31.4% (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension, a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg was associated with better pregnancy outcomes than a strategy of reserving treatment only for severe hypertension, with no increase in the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth weight. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CHAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02299414.).

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Statement: Antihypertensive therapy for mild chronic hypertension in pregnancy-The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial

The recently published Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy study provides important data to inform the management of mild chronic hypertension in pregnancy. The purpose of this statement is to review the results of this trial and provide guidance for the implementation of the study findings. Based on the available evidence, SMFM recommends treatment with antihypertensive therapy for mild chronic hypertension in pregnancy to a goal blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg. Patients with treated chronic hypertension should continue established antihypertensive therapy during pregnancy or change to a regimen compatible with pregnancy to achieve this treatment goal.

The impact of anti-hypertensive treatment on foetal growth and haemodynamics in pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes - An explorative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the impact of anti-hypertensive treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension on foetal growth and hemodynamics in women with pre-existing diabetes.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 247 consecutive pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes (152 type 1 diabetes; 95 type 2 diabetes), where tight anti-hypertensive treatment was initiated and intensified (mainly with methyldopa) when office blood pressure (BP) ≥135/85 mmHg and home BP ≥130/80 mmHg. Foetal growth was assessed by ultrasound at 27, 33 and 36 weeks and foetal hemodynamics were assessed by ultrasound Doppler before and 1-2 weeks after initiation of anti-hypertensive treatment.

RESULTS

In 215 initially normotensive women, anti-hypertensive treatment for pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders was initiated in 42 (20%), whilst 173 were left untreated. Chronic hypertension was present in 32 (13%). Anti-hypertensive treatment for pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders was not associated with foetal growth deviation (linear mixed model, p = 0.681). At 27 weeks, mainly before initiation of anti-hypertensive treatment, the prevalence of small foetuses with an estimated foetal weight <10th percentile was 12% in women initiating anti-hypertensive treatment compared with 4% in untreated women (p = 0.054). These numbers were close to the prevalence of birth weight ≤10th percentile (small for gestational age (SGA)) (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.003). Pulsatility index in the umbilical and middle cerebral artery remained stable after the onset of anti-hypertensive treatment in a representative subgroup (n = 12, p = 0.941 and p = 0.799, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is no clear indication that antihypertensive treatment causes harm in this particular at-high-risk group of pregnant women with diabetes, such that a larger well-designed study to determine the value of tight antihypertensive control would be worthwhile.

Effects of Antioxidant Intake on Fetal Development and Maternal/Neonatal Health during Pregnancy

During pregnancy, cycles of hypoxia and oxidative stress play a key role in the proper development of the fetus. Hypoxia during the first weeks is crucial for placental development, while the increase in oxygen due to the influx of maternal blood stimulates endothelial growth and angiogenesis. However, an imbalance in the number of oxidative molecules due to endogenous or exogenous factors can overwhelm defense systems and lead to excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Many pregnancy complications, generated by systemic inflammation and placental vasoconstriction, such as preeclampsia (PE), fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preterm birth (PTB), are related to this increase of ROS. Antioxidants may be a promising tool in this population. However, clinical evidence on their use, especially those of natural origin, is scarce and controversial. Following PRISMA methodology, the current review addresses the use of natural antioxidants, such as epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), melatonin and resveratrol (RESV), as well as other classical antioxidants (vitamin C and E) during the prenatal period as treatment of the above-mentioned complications. We review the effect of antioxidant supplementation on breast milk in lactating mothers.

Anti-hypertensive use for non-severe gestational hypertension in Botswana: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The fetal risks and benefits of antihypertensives to treat gestational hypertension in pregnancy are understudied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of obstetrical patients in Botswana from 2014 to 2019. We included women carrying singletons who developed new onset non-severe hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic or 90-109 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Cases were defined as women with either small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants or stillbirth, analyzed separately; controls were otherwise similar women without the adverse outcome in each analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 1932 cases of SGA (7925 controls) and 316 cases of stillbirth (9619 controls). Cases with SGA were more likely to have used an anti-hypertensive than controls (33% vs 29%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.43). Cases with stillbirth were more likely to have used an anti-hypertensive than controls (42% versus 29%, aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14-1.83).

CONCLUSION

Anti-hypertensive use for new-onset gestational hypertension was associated with an increased risk of having an SGA infant or a stillbirth among women who never developed severe hypertension. These data support conduct of a randomized clinical trial to determine the appropriate use of anti-hypertensives in non-severe gestational hypertension.

Maternal Hypertension Increases Risk of Preeclampsia and Low Fetal Birthweight: Genetic Evidence From a Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

Maternal cardiovascular risk factors have been associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Given the difficulty in establishing causal relationships using epidemiological data, we applied Mendelian randomization to explore the role of cardiovascular risk factors on risk of developing preeclampsia or eclampsia, and low fetal birthweight.

METHODS

Uncorrelated single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index, type 2 diabetes, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) with cholesterol, smoking, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at genome-wide significance in studies of 298 957 to 1 201 909 European ancestry participants were selected as instrumental variables. A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study was performed with primary outcome of preeclampsia or eclampsia (PET). Risk factors associated with PET were further investigated for their association with low birthweight.

RESULTS

Higher genetically predicted SBP was associated increased risk of PET (odds ratio [OR] per 1-SD SBP increase 1.90 [95% CI=1.45-2.49]; P=3.23×10-6) and reduced birthweight (OR=0.83 [95% CI=0.79-0.86]; P=3.96×10-18), and this was not mediated by PET. Body mass index and type 2 diabetes were also associated with PET (respectively, OR per 1-SD body mass index increase =1.67 [95% CI=1.44-1.94]; P=7.45×10-12; and OR per logOR increase type 2 diabetes =1.11 [95% CI=1.04-1.19]; P=1.19×10-3), but not with reduced birthweight.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence for causal effects of SBP, body mass index, and type 2 diabetes on PET and identify that SBP is associated with reduced birthweight independently of PET. The results provide insight into the pathophysiological basis of PET and identify hypertension as a potentially modifiable risk factor amenable to therapeutic intervention.

The assessment of blood pressure in pregnant women: pitfalls and novel approaches

Accurate assessment of blood pressure is fundamental to the provision of safe obstetrical care. It is simple, cost effective, and life-saving. Treatments for preeclampsia, including antihypertensive drugs, magnesium sulfate, and delivery, are available in many settings. However, the instigation of appropriate treatment relies on prompt and accurate recognition of hypertension. There are a number of different techniques for blood pressure assessment, including the auscultatory method, automated oscillometric devices, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory monitoring, and invasive monitoring. The auscultatory method with a mercury sphygmomanometer and the use of Korotkoff sounds was previously recommended as the gold standard technique. Mercury sphygmomanometers have been withdrawn owing to safety concerns and replaced with aneroid devices, but these are particularly prone to calibration errors and regular calibration is imperative to ensure accuracy. Automated oscillometric devices are straightforward to use, but the physiological changes in healthy pregnancy and pathologic changes in preeclampsia may affect the accuracy of a device and monitors must be validated. Validation protocols classify pregnant women as a "special population," and protocols must include 15 women in each category of normotensive pregnancy, hypertensive pregnancy, and preeclampsia. In addition to a scarcity of devices validated for pregnancy and preeclampsia, other pitfalls that cause inaccuracy include the lack of training and poor technique. Blood pressure assessment can be affected by maternal position, inappropriate cuff size, conversation, caffeine, smoking, and irregular heart rate. For home blood pressure monitoring, appropriate instruction should be given on how to use the device. The classification of hypertension and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has recently been revised. These are classified as preeclampsia, transient gestational hypertension, gestational hypertension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, chronic hypertension, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia. Blood pressure varies across gestation and by ethnicity, but gestation-specific thresholds have not been adopted. Hypertension is defined as a sustained systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or a sustained diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg. In some guidelines, the threshold of diagnosis depends on the setting in which blood pressure measurement is taken, with a threshold of 140/90 mm Hg in a healthcare setting, 135/85 mm Hg at home, or a 24-hour average blood pressure on ambulatory monitoring of >126/76 mm Hg. Some differences exist among organizations with respect to the criteria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia and the correct threshold for intervention and target blood pressure once treatment has been instigated. Home blood pressure monitoring is currently a focus for research. Novel technologies, including early warning devices (such as the CRADLE Vital Signs Alert device) and telemedicine, may provide strategies that prompt earlier recognition of abnormal blood pressure and therefore improve management. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on methods to assess blood pressure in pregnancy and appropriate technique to optimize accuracy. The importance of accurate blood pressure assessment is emphasized with a discussion of preeclampsia prediction and treatment of severe hypertension. Classification of hypertensive disorders and thresholds for treatment will be discussed, including novel developments in the field.

Toward personalized management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy

Chronic hypertension complicates 1% to 2% of pregnancies, and it is increasingly common. Women with chronic hypertension are an easily recognized group who are in touch with a wide variety of healthcare providers before, during, and after pregnancy, mandating that chronic hypertension in pregnancy be within the scope of many practitioners. We reviewed recent data on management to inform current care and future research. This study is a narrative review of published literature. Compared with normotensive women, women with chronic hypertension are at an increased risk of maternal and perinatal complications. Women with chronic hypertension who wish to be involved in their care can do by measuring blood pressure at home. Accurate devices for home blood pressure monitoring are now readily available. The diagnostic criteria for superimposed preeclampsia remain problematic because most guidelines continue to include deteriorating blood pressure control in the definition. It has not been established how angiogenic markers may aid in confirmation of the diagnosis of superimposed preeclampsia when suspected, over and above information provided by routinely available clinical data and laboratory results. Although chronic hypertension is a strong risk factor for preeclampsia, and aspirin decreases preeclampsia risk, the effectiveness specifically among women with chronic hypertension has been questioned. It is unclear whether calcium has an independent effect in preeclampsia prevention in such women. Treating hypertension with antihypertensive therapy halves the risk of progression to severe hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated liver enzymes, but a reduction in preeclampsia or serious maternal complications has not been observed; however, the lack of evidence for the latter is possibly owing to few events. In addition, treating chronic hypertension neither reduces nor increases fetal or newborn death or morbidity, regardless of the gestational age at which the antihypertensive treatment is started. Antihypertensive agents are not teratogenic, but there may be an increase in malformations associated with chronic hypertension itself. At present, blood pressure treatment targets used in clinics are the same as those used at home, although blood pressure values tend to be inconsistently lower at home among women with hypertension. Although starting all women on the same antihypertensive medication is usually effective in reducing blood pressure, it remains unclear whether there is an optimal agent for such an approach or how best to use combinations of antihypertensive medications. An alternative approach is to individualize care, using maternal characteristics and blood pressure features beyond blood pressure level (eg, variability) that are of prognostic value. Outcomes may be improved by timed birth between 38 0/7 and 39 6/7 weeks' gestation based on observational literature; of note, confirmatory trial evidence is pending. Postnatal care is facilitated by the acceptability of most antihypertensives (including angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors) for use in breastfeeding. The evidence base to guide the care of pregnant women with chronic hypertension is growing and aligning with international guidelines. Addressing outstanding research questions would inform personalized care of chronic hypertension in pregnancy.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Although twin pregnancies had a higher risk of developing HDP, it is not known whether HDP in twins will increase the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. We aimed to assess whether this association differed in singleton and twin pregnancies in women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

We finally included 193,590 live births born via ART from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) for the years 2015-2019. We used Log-binomial regression to evaluate the associations between HDP and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in ART mothers.

RESULTS

Among 193,590 ART-treated mothers, there were 140,870 and 52,720 mothers who had singleton pregnancies and twin pregnancies, respectively. Those ART mothers with twin pregnancies had a higher rate of HDP than singleton pregnancies (20.5% vs. 11.0%). In singleton pregnancies, the risks of preterm birth [adjusted risk ratio (aRR)): 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93], low birth weight (aRR: 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93), small for gestational age (aRR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.49), 5 min Apgar <7 (aRR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.50-1.83) and cesarean section (aRR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.21-1.25) were significantly higher in HDP mothers than in non-HDP mothers respectively. However, in contrast to singleton pregnancies, these associations were weak or reversed in twin pregnancies, after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

In ART-treated women, although twin pregnancies had a higher HDP rate, the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with HDP was lower than that of singletons.

A retrospective review of pregnancy outcomes in women with uncomplicated mild to moderate chronic hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To examine pregnancy complications in women with uncomplicated mild-moderate chronic hypertension (CHTN) treated with antihypertensives prior to 20 weeks compared to those not on antihypertensives.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study examined singleton pregnancies of women with mild-moderate CHTN who delivered from 01/2014-3/2019. Pregnancies complicated by hypertension at ≥ 20 weeks, end organ damage, preexisting diabetes mellitus, early-onset gestational diabetes, multifetal gestation, and fetal anomalies were excluded. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed for each of the outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were reported along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was superimposed preeclampsia with severe features. Additional maternal outcomes were superimposed preeclampsia without severe features, severe hypertension, indicated preterm delivery, placental abruption, and mode of delivery. Neonatal outcomes included composite perinatal outcomes (fetal growth restriction, intrauterine fetal demise, and small for gestational age neonate), low birth weight, very low birth weight, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and Apgar score <7 at 5-minutes.

RESULTS

345 women were identified: 232 (67.2%) were not taking antihypertensives and 113 (32.8%) were taking ≥1 antihypertensive. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome (p = 0.65; aOR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.51-1.52) among the group taking antihypertensive therapy as compared to those not taking antihypertensives. No statistically significant differences were seen for any of the other secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data supports that the use of antihypertensive therapy in women with mild-moderate CHTN does not reduce the risk of developing superimposed preeclampsia.

Arsenic exposure and metabolism in relation to blood pressure changes in pregnant women

Arsenic is concerned with cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, atherosclerosis, and endothelial dysfunction. However, what effects the arsenic exposure and the arsenic metabolism have on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and blood pressure changes during pregnancy remain largely unknown. Our goal was to assess the associations of arsenic exposure and arsenic metabolism with HDP and blood pressure changes in pregnant women through a prospective birth cohort study. A total of 1038 women who were pregnant (52 HDP, 986 non-HDP participants) were included. Arsenic species of spot urine samples collected at three trimesters were measured, which included inorganic arsenic (iAs), monomethylated arsenic (MMA), and dimethylated arsenic (DMA). Arsenic metabolism was evaluated as the percentages of iAs, MMA, and DMA respectively (i.e., iAs%, MMA%, and DMA%). Outcomes were HDP and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure changes during pregnancy. We employed mixed linear models to investigate the relationships between arsenic exposure and arsenic metabolism with changes in blood pressure during pregnancy. Poisson regression with a robust error variance with generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimation was used so that the associations of arsenic exposure and arsenic metabolism with HDP could be estimated. In this study, there was a significant relationship between the concentrations of urinary DMA and the weekly change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (β = -0.10; 95% CI: -0.15, -0.05), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (β = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.02) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (β = -0.08; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.04). Higher DMA% was accompanied with lesser weekly increase in SBP (β = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.10, 0.00), DBP (β = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.10, -0.01) and MAP (β = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.09, -0.01) during pregnancy. There was a positive association with the highest tertile of iAs% and weekly change of SBP (β = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.13), DBP (β = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.11) and MAP (β = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.11). No association was found between each arsenic specie and arsenic metabolism marker in the first trimester and risk of HDP. Arsenic exposure and arsenic metabolism during pregnancy potentially change blood pressure of pregnant women. These findings may be significance as even modest elevation of blood pressure can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.

A Detailed Review of Critical Care Considerations for the Pregnant Cardiac Patient

Maternal cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide and recently, maternal mortality has increased secondary to cardiovascular causes. Maternal admissions to critical care encompass 1%-2% of all critical care admissions, and although not common, the management of the critically ill pregnant patient is complex. Caring for the critically ill pregnant cardiac patient requires integration of pregnancy-associated physiologic changes, understanding pathophysiologic disease states unique to pregnancy, and a multidisciplinary approach to timing around delivery as well as antenatal and postpartum care. Herein we describe cardiorespiratory changes that occur during pregnancy and the differential diagnosis for cardiorespiratory failure in pregnancy. Cardiorespiratory diseases that are either associated or exacerbated by pregnancy are highlighted with emphasis on perturbations secondary to pregnancy and appropriate management strategies. Finally, we describe general management of the pregnant cardiac patient admitted to critical care.

Effect of L-Arginine supplementation in pregnant women with chronic hypertension and previous placenta vascular disorders receiving Aspirin prophylaxis: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of supplementation with Arginine (L-Arg) 3g, (together with Magnesium (Mg) 350 mg and Salicilate (Sal) 100 mg) on maternal blood pressure (BP), uterine artery doppler PI and neonatal outcomes in women with high-risk pregnancy for chronic hypertension (CH) and other previous placenta vascular disorders (PVD) already treated with low dose of aspirin (LDA), as recommended by guidelines.

METHODS

We enrolled women affected by CH and other previous PVD referred to the High-Risk Clinic of the Mother-Infant Department of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia from September 2017 to June 2019. The study design was a controlled, randomized trial of oral supplementation of L-Arg 3g (together with Mg 350 mg and Sal extract 100 mg) + LDA 100 mg/die versus only LDA 100 mg/die. Inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy; diagnosis of chronic hypertension, previous preeclampsia < 34 weeks, previous intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) < 10° centile or previous stillbirth (SB) related to placenta vascular disorders; gestational age < 14 weeks. Each woman was enrolled between 12-14 weeks gestation and underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring with an automatic device (SpaceLab 92710, Critikon, WA), repeated at 18-20th and 24-26th weeks. Moreover Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound evaluation including PI were performed at 18-20 weeks gestation and repeated at 24-26th weeks. Pregnancy outcomes data were collected in a password protected database.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine women agreed to participate in the study. No significant differences between the demographic characteristics in the two groups at enrollment (Group LDA + L-Arg: 30 patients versus Group LDA: 49 patient) were found. In the LDA-L-Arg group there isn't the significant increase in both systolic (127.22 ± 12.02 and 132.75 ± 7.51 mmHg, p=0.002) and diastolic (75.85 ± 8.53 and 83.63 ± 6.05 mmHg, p=0.0000) BP values at 24-26 weeks reveled in the LDA group. The value of the Uterine Artery Doppler median PI > 95° centile at 24-26 weeks show a significant reduction in the LDA+L-Arg group respect the LDA group (7 women, 23.3% vs 21 women, 42.9%; p=0.04). A significantly lower percentage of women received new antihypertensive drugs in the LDA+ L-Arg group than the LDA group (6.7% vs 24.5%) (p= 0.02). There was neither statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes between 2 groups, except for trend of significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we found only trends of improvements of perinatal outcomes in LDA+LArg group, considering the promising results on BP values, uterine artery PI and the low need to start a new antihypertensive treatment, thus the resulting impact in reducing pregnancy medicalization, number of maternal-fetal well-being monitoring visits and the need of induction of labour, we believe that further studies should be performed to enlarge our observation and clarify the role of L-Arg 3g supplementation as a protective integration in high-risk pregnancies already in prophylaxis with LDA.

[Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy]

Hypertensive disorders occur in up to 10 % of pregnancies and increase both maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The most important differential diagnoses comprise pre-existing chronic hypertension, pregnancy-associated hypertension, and preeclampsia with simultaneous proteinuria. Antihypertensive therapy during pregnancy should be initiated when blood pressure is 150-160/100-110 mmHg. With regard to an earlier initiation of therapy, the data situation is not clear. Pre-eclampsia is defined as new or pre-existing elevated blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg in pregnancy with at least one new organ manifestation, usually proteinuria ≥ 300 mg/day or ≥ 30 mg/mmol in the protein-creatinine ratio. Thrombotic microangiopathies TTP and aHUS are altogether rare but potentially life-threatening diseases that should be clarified in case of severe or atypical courses.

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are increasing in incidence and are major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality both in the United States and worldwide. An understanding of these diseases is essential for the practicing nephrologist, as preexisting kidney disease is an important risk factor. In addition, the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has important implications for long-term risk of kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. The definition and diagnostic criteria has changed in recent years as our understanding of the disease entity has progressed. Currently, proteinuria is no longer a necessary diagnostic feature of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension may develop through multiple different mechanisms. Current research suggests contributions of both placental factors and maternal factors contribute to the disease and represent different phenotypic presentations of preeclampsia.

Phthalate exposure linked to high blood pressure in Chinese children

BACKGROUND

Exposure to phthalate esters may be linked to the risk of high blood pressure (HBP), but limited evidence is available in Chinese children.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between nine phthalate metabolites (mPAEs) and systolic/diastolic BP, pulse pressure (PP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and the risk of HBP.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 1044 primary school children (6-8 years old) were enrolled from Shenzhen, China, between 2016 and 2017. Nine mPAEs were analyzed from urine using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. A multivariable linear regression model was used to explore the associations between phthalate exposure and systolic/diastolic BP, PP, and MAP. A binary logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between phthalate exposure and the risk of HBP.

RESULTS

Monomethyl phthalate (MMP) concentrations were significantly higher in HBP children than normal BP children. MMP, monoisobutyl phthalate (MiBP), monobutyl phthalate (MnBP), mono(5-carboxy-2-ethylpentyl) phthalate, mono-[(2-carboxy methyl)hexyl] phthalate (MCMHP), the sum of four short-chain mPAEs (∑LMW), and the sum of all nine mPAEs (∑₉mPAEs) were significantly positively associated with increases in systolic BP z-score, while only MMP was significantly positively associated with diastolic BP z-score. MMP, MiBP, MnBP, MCMHP, ∑LMW, and ∑₉mPAEs were significantly associated with increases in PP, while MMP and MnBP were significantly associated with increases in MAP. MMP was significantly associated with the risk of HBP, with an odds ratio of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.23, 2.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that dimethyl phthalate exposure increases the risk of HBP. And some types of phthalates are associated with elevations in systolic/diastolic BP z scores, PP, and MAP in Chinese children.

Identifying predictive factors for admitting patients with severe pre-eclampsia to intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Traditional obstetric units are inadequate for the level of monitoring required in pre-eclamptic patients. It remains to be determined which facility and tools should be implemented. The aim of this work was to identify predictive factors of admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions for pregnancy-related hypertensive complications.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective multicenter study (Toulouse, Nantes). Both have a level III maternity unit and an ICU. The selected patients had one or more of the following diagnoses on admission in the ICU or during hospitalization: pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy (AFLP), Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). SAPS II, SOFA and APACHE II on admission, and a validated nursing workload assessment score: TISS 28, were collected.

RESULTS

211 parturient women were included. According to the multivariate analysis: APACHE II and SAPS 2 severity scores >15 were significantly higher in the TISS 28 ≥ 20 group. There were also higher rates of uricemia >360 mmol/l.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there are no reliable and validated predictive factors of severity to guide the transfer of pre-eclamptic patients to an ICU. The combination of an increased APACHE II score and uricemia, as well as a high care workload score that could help with the transfer of high-risk pre-eclamptic patients to a specific care facility. This hypothesis should be tested prospectively. This work could incite reflection on the value of creating obstetric intensive care units, according to the size of the maternity unit.

Hypertension During Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect about 5-10% of pregnancies impacting maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. We review the recent studies in this field and discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of hypertension during pregnancy, as well as the short- and long-term consequences on the cardiovascular health of women.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association revised their guidelines for hypertension in the general population in 2017, hypertension during pregnancy continues to be defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on two separate occasions. The addition of stage 1 hypertension will increase the prevalence of hypertension during pregnancy, identifying more women at risk of preeclampsia; however, more research is needed before changing the BP goal because a lower target BP has a risk of poor placental perfusion. Women with chronic hypertension have a higher incidence of superimposed preeclampsia, cesarean section, preterm delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, birth weight less than 2500 g, neonatal unit admission, and perinatal death. They also have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life. The guidelines recommend low-dose aspirin for women with moderate and high risk of preeclampsia. While treating pregnant women with hypertension, the effectiveness of the antihypertensive agent must be balanced with risks to the fetus. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy should be appropriately and promptly recognized and treated during pregnancy. They should further be co-managed by the obstetrician and cardiologist to decrease the long-term negative impact on the cardiovascular health of women.

Chronic hypertension in pregnancy

Chronic hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease are among the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and death in the United States. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy is associated with a host of adverse outcomes that include preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, cerebrovascular accidents, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and maternal and perinatal death. There are several key issues related to the diagnosis and management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy where data are limited and further research is needed. These challenges and recent guidelines for the management of chronic hypertension are reviewed. Well-timed pregnancies are of utmost importance to reduce the risks of chronic hypertension; long-acting reversible contraceptive options are preferred. Research to determine optimal blood pressure thresholds for diagnosis and treatment to optimize short- and long-term maternal and perinatal outcomes should be prioritized along with interventions to reduce extant racial and ethnic disparities.

Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) During Pregnancy: Risks and Challenges

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) affects up to 1 in 1000 people. The disease is characterized by the progressive development of cysts throughout the renal parenchyma due to inherited pathogenic variants in genes including PKD1 or PKD2 and eventually leads to gradual loss of renal function, along with manifestations in other organ systems such as hepatic cysts and intracranial aneurysms. ADPKD management has advanced considerably in recent years due to genetic testing availability, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis technology and new therapeutic agents. Renal disease in pregnancy is recognised as an important risk factor for adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Women with ADPKD and health professionals face multiple challenges in optimising outcomes during the pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and post-partum periods.

The comparison of side effects of methyldopa, amlodipine, and metoprolol in pregnant women with chronic hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the complication of Antihypertensive drug; in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study was performed on 300 pregnant women  with chronic hypertension. Results:  a relative risk of preeclampsia among methyldopa group was 3.45 times higher than the metoprolol, the relative risk of preterm labor was not significantly between methyldopa and metoprolol group, LBW, and IUGR in methyldopa and amlodipine groups .

CONCLUSION

Methyldopa and amlodipine are associated with the least side effects in pregnant women treated for chronic hypertension.the incidence of preeclampsia was greater in methyldopa group.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of 2368 patients

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) comprise a group of hypertension-related diseases and represent the most common medical disorders in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with different types of HDP, including gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, preeclampsia (PE, early or late onset), PE superimposed on chronic hypertension (superimposed PE), eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome. Data from a multicenter retrospective patient cohort in China were analyzed. Seventeen adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes for each HDP subgroups, using the gestational hypertension group as the reference. The final analysis included 2368 patients with HDP. Of these, 39.9% of patients reported at least one adverse pregnancy outcome. Patients with early onset PE had the highest risk for having both adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes (OR = 7.28, 95% CI: 2.68, 19.79). The risk of perinatal death significantly increased in HELLP syndrome, superimposed PE, and early onset PE, (OR = 13.81, 6.32, and 4.84, respectively, p < 0.05) groups. This study highlights that among patients with HDP, those with early onset PE had the highest risk for having both adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, and patients with HELLP syndrome had the highest risk for perinatal death.

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy are associated with reduced severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) between very-low-birth-weight (≤1500 g, VLBW) infants born to mothers with and without hypertensive disorders (HD).

DESIGN/METHODS

Retrospective analysis from the Optum Neonatal Database. The primary outcome of interest was severe IVH (grade 3 or 4). Secondary outcomes included other neonatal morbidities, mortality, and length of hospitalization. Outcomes were compared between VLBW infants born to mothers with and without HD.

RESULTS

A total of 5456 infants met inclusion criteria. After multivariable regression analysis, risks of severe IVH and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were lower ([OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.89, p = 0.01] and [OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p = 0.03], respectively) and median length of hospitalization was decreased in the HD group (49 versus 61 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VLBW infants born to mothers with HD have a decreased risk of severe IVH, BPD, and a shorter duration of hospitalization.

Improving pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes mellitus: modern management

Women with pre-existing (type 1 or type 2) diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of pregnancy complications, such as congenital malformations, preeclampsia and preterm delivery, compared with women who do not have diabetes mellitus. Approximately half of pregnancies in women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus are complicated by fetal overgrowth, which results in infants who are overweight at birth and at risk of birth trauma and, later in life, the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Strict glycaemic control with appropriate diet, use of insulin and, if necessary, antihypertensive treatment is the cornerstone of diabetes mellitus management to prevent pregnancy complications. New technology for managing diabetes mellitus is evolving and is changing the management of these conditions in pregnancy. For instance, in Europe, most women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus are treated with insulin analogues before and during pregnancy. Furthermore, many women are on insulin pumps during pregnancy, and the use of continuous glucose monitoring is becoming more frequent. In addition, smartphone application technology is a promising educational tool for pregnant women with diabetes mellitus and their caregivers. This Review covers how modern diabetes mellitus management with appropriate diet, insulin and antihypertensive treatment in patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus can contribute to reducing the risk of pregnancy complications such as congenital malformations, fetal overgrowth, preeclampsia and preterm delivery.

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are common and contribute inordinately to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Although not completely understood, recent clinical trials have provided important insights into pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia is considered a systemic disease with generalized endothelial dysfunction and risk of future cardiovascular disease. This review revisits the definitions and classifications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; discusses updates on pathophysiology, prevention, and early prediction of preeclampsia; reviews current management guidelines; and discusses potential risks and benefits associated with treatment. Improvement in management and outcomes of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy seems in sight in the near future.