In vivo NMDA/dopamine interaction resulting in Fos production in the limbic system and basal ganglia of the mouse brain

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonism and antagonism within the amygdaloid central nucleus suppresses pain affect: differential contribution of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray

The amygdala contributes to the generation of pain affect, and the amygdaloid central nucleus (CeA) receives nociceptive input that is mediated by glutamatergic neurotransmission. The present study compared the contribution of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonism and antagonism in the CeA to generation of the affective response of rats to an acute noxious stimulus. Vocalizations that occur following a brief tail shock (vocalization afterdischarges) are a validated rodent model of pain affect and were preferentially suppressed, in a dose-dependent manner, by bilateral injection into the CeA of NMDA (.1, .25, .5, or 1 μg/side) or the NMDA receptor antagonist d-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (AP5; 1, 2, or 4 μg/side). Vocalizations that occur during tail shock were suppressed to a lesser degree, whereas spinal motor reflexes (tail flick and hind limb movements) were unaffected by injection of NMDA or AP5 into the CeA. Injection of NMDA, but not AP5, into the CeA increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, and unilateral injection of the μ-opiate receptor antagonist H-d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP; .25 μg) into ventrolateral periaqueductal gray prevented the antinociception generated by injection of NMDA into the CeA. These findings demonstrate that although NMDA receptor agonism and antagonism in the CeA produce similar suppression of pain behaviors, they do so via different neurobiologic mechanisms.

PERSPECTIVE

The amygdala contributes to production of the emotional dimension of pain. NMDA receptor agonism and antagonism within the CeA suppressed rats' emotional response to acute painful stimulation. Understanding the neurobiology underlying emotional responses to pain will provide insights into new treatments for pain and its associated affective disorders.

Ketamine “unlocks” the reduced clock-speed effects of cocaine following extended training: Evidence for dopamine–glutamate interactions in timing and time perception

The present study examined the clock-speed modulating effects of acute cocaine administration in groups of male rats that received different amounts of baseline training on a 36-s peak-interval procedure prior to initial drug injection. After injection of cocaine (10, 15, or 20mg/kg, ip), rats that had received a minimal amount of training (e.g., <or=30 sessions) prior to drug administration displayed a horizontal leftward shift in their timing functions indicating that the speed of the internal clock was increased. In contrast, rats that had received an extended amount of training (e.g., >or=180 sessions) prior to cocaine (15 mg/kg, ip) administration did not produce this "classic" curve-shift effect, but instead displayed a general disruption of temporal control following drug administration. Importantly, when co-administered with a behaviorally ineffective dose of ketamine (10mg/kg, ip) the ability of cocaine to modulate clock speed in rats receiving extended training was restored. A glutamate "lock/unlock" hypothesis is used to explain the observed dopamine-glutamate interactions as a function of timing behaviors becoming learned habits.

Neuroanatomical localization of an internal clock: A functional link between mesolimbic, nigrostriatal, and mesocortical dopaminergic systems

The effects of selective dopamine (DA) depleting lesions with 6-hydroxydopamine microinjection into the SN, CPu, and NAS, as well as radiofrequency lesions of the CPu on the performance characteristics of rats trained on a single-valued 20-s peak-interval (PI) timing procedure or a double-valued 10-s and 60-s PI procedure were evaluated. A double dissociation in the performance of duration discriminations was found. Rats with CPu lesions were unable to exhibit temporal control of their behavior suggesting complete insensitivity to signal duration but were able to show discrimination of the relative reward value of a signal by differentially modifying their response rates appropriately. In contrast, rats with NAS lesions were able to exhibit temporal control of their behavior by differentially modifying their response rates as a function of signal duration(s), suggesting no impairment of sensitivity to signal duration, but were unable to show discrimination of the relative reward value of a signal.

Amygdalic levels of dopamine and serotonin rise upon exposure to conditioned fear stress without elevation of glutamate

Conditioned fear is an artificial stress, induced by a stimulus, such as a tone, that does not elicit fear in nature. This fear response is acquired by experimental animals when tone is combined with an unconditioned stimulus, such as electrical foot shock. The amygdala is considered to be the area involved in acquisition, consolidation and recall of fear. A series of previous pharmacological studies showed antagonists of dopamine D1 and D2, glutamate N-methyl-D-asparatate and (+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptors to prevent the acquisition of conditioned fear. However, little is known about the types of neurotransmitters released when conditioned fear is acquired and recalled. The present study was designed to continuously monitor changes in extracellular levels of glutamate, dopamine and serotonin in the amygdala, at the acquisition of conditioned fear on Day 1 and at fear recall in response to a tone as a conditioned stimulus on Day 2, using the in vivo microdialysis method. Glutamate was elevated only on Day 1, while dopamine and serotonin rose on both days. The periods of elevated dopamine and serotonin were longer on Day 1 than on Day 2. These results suggest that greater amounts of glutamate, dopamine and serotonin are necessary for acquisition than for recall of conditioned fear.

In vivo CREB phosphorylation mediated by dopamine and NMDA receptor activation in mouse hippocampus and caudate nucleus

The pattern of CREB phosphorylation was investigated in the caudate nucleus and hippocampus 10 min or 3 h after i.p. injection of dopamine or NMDA receptor agonists alone, or in combination with antagonists. Ten minutes after C57BL/6 J mice were injected with either the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF-38393 hydrobromide or NMDA, immunoreactivity of phosphorylated CREB (pCREB) was significantly increased in all parts of the caudate nucleus but not in hippocampal regions. However, 3 h after the injection of SKF-38393, pCREB levels in the caudate nucleus did not differ significantly from the pCREB levels in control animals, whereas pCREB levels were still elevated 3 h after NMDA injection. Except for the D1 receptor antagonist SCH-23390, which induced CREB phosphorylation in the caudate nucleus, dopamine and NMDA receptor antagonists had little effect on pCREB levels by themselves. However, the NMDA receptor antagonist CGS-19755 injected i.p. blocked both the NMDA- and SKF-38393-induced rise of pCREB levels in the caudate nucleus. Similarly, the D1 receptor antagonist SCH-23390 inhibited the effects produced by SKF-38393 or NMDA. Interestingly, the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride also blocked the SKF-38393-triggered rise of pCREB. The results demonstrated that NMDA and dopamine receptors modulate pCREB levels in the caudate nucleus and suggest mutual permissive roles for both receptors.

Dopamine D1/D5 receptor activation fails to initiate an activity-independent late-phase LTP in rat hippocampus

The role of dopamine in the hippocampus remains poorly defined. Numerous studies have suggested that it acts as a neuromodulator of late-phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP) in CA1, while other reports controversially indicate that D1/D5 receptor (D1/D5R) activation may directly initiate activity-independent LTP. We have further investigated this putative role of dopamine in area CA1 in rat hippocampal slices using field potential recording techniques. Application of the dopamine D1/D5 receptor agonists SKF 38393 and 6-bromo-APB at 100 microM for 20 min did not induce an activity-independent L-LTP. Varying the incubation conditions still did not permit either SKF 38393 or an alternative D1/D5R agonist, 6-chloro-PB, to induce L-LTP. To further determine if intracellular mechanisms, which may act to limit the expression of LTP, were preventing D1/D5R-induced L-LTP expression, we inhibited protein phosphatase 1 activity by reducing cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5) inhibition of inhibitor 1. Inhibition of cdk5 by roscovitine (10 microM, 40 min) did not facilitate the ability of SKF 38393 to induce L-LTP in CA1. Biochemical experiments confirmed that the concentration of agonist used significantly elevated intracellular cAMP levels, suggesting that effective D1/D5R activation was achieved. Furthermore, coactivation with NMDA receptors (NMDAR) resulted in a synergistic increase in cAMP. These findings demonstrate that D1/D5R activation in CA1 initiates intracellular second messenger accumulation, but that this is insufficient to induce an activity-independent L-LTP.

Resistance to extinction is associated with impaired immediate early gene induction in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala

Extinction of classical fear conditioning is thought to involve activity-dependent potentiation of synaptic transmission in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), resulting in the inhibition of amygdala-dependent fear responses. While many studies have addressed the mechanisms underlying extinction learning, it is unclear what determines whether extinction memory is consolidated or whether spontaneous recovery of the fear response occurs. Here we show, using a combined electrophysiological and immunocytochemical approach, that spontaneous recovery of conditioned fear in mice is associated with a prolonged expression of long-term depression of synaptic transmission in the mPFC and the failure of induction of the immediate-early genesc-Fos and zif268 in the mPFC and the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala. This suggests that coordinated activity-dependent changes in gene expression in the mPFC and the amygdala may underlie the formation of long-term fear extinction memory.

Insights into immediate-early gene function in hippocampal memory consolidation using antisense oligonucleotide and fluorescent imaging approaches

In the 14 years since it was discovered that specific genes could be dynamically regulated in the brain by neural activity, there has been a substantial research focus attempting to understand the role immediate-early genes (IEGs) play in various brain functions. This article examines the involvement of IEGs in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and in memory consolidation processes performed by the hippocampus. Studies employing conventional IEG detection methodologies and a novel gene-imaging approach that provides temporal and cellular resolution (cellular compartment analysis of emporal activity by fluorescence in situ hybridization or catFISH) provide evidence supporting the assertion that IEG expression reflects the integration of information processed by hippocampal neurons. However, IEG expression is not merely correlated with neural activity, but also plays a pivotal role in stabilizing recent changes in synaptic efficacy. As such, localized disruption of IEGs Arc or c-fos by intrahippocampal administration of antisense oligonucleotides or germline disruption of the IEGs c-fos, tissue plasminogen activator, or zif268 impairs consolidation of long-term memory formation, without affecting learning or short-term memory. Further investigation into the expression and function of IEGs using catFISH and antisense approaches will likely increase understanding of the molecular and cellular bases of information processing involving the hippocampus.

The distribution of fos immunoreactivity in rat brain following freezing and escape responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus

Several sources of evidence indicate that the inferior colliculus also integrates acoustic information of an aversive nature besides its well-known role as a relay station for auditory pathways. Gradual increases of the electrical stimulation of this structure cause in a hierarchical manner alertness, freezing and escape behaviors. Independent groups of animals implanted with bipolar electrodes into the inferior colliculus received electrical stimulation at one of these aversive thresholds. Control animals were submitted to the same procedure but no current was applied. Next, analysis of Fos protein expression was used to map brain areas activated by the inferior colliculus stimulation at each aversive threshold and in the controls. Whereas alertness elicited by stimulation of the inferior colliculus did not cause any significant labeling in any structure studied in relation to the respective control, electrical stimulation applied at the freezing threshold increased Fos-like immunoreactivity in the central amygdaloid nucleus and entorhinal cortex. In contrast, escape response enhanced Fos-like immunoreactivity in the nucleus cuneiform and the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter of the mesencephalon. This evidence supports the notion that freezing and escape behaviors induced by electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus activate different neural circuitries in the brain. Both defensive behaviors caused significant expression of c-fos in the frontal cortex, hippocampus and basolateral amygdaloid nucleus. This indistinct pattern of c-fos distribution may indicate a more general role for these structures in the modulation of fear-related behaviors. Therefore, the present data bring support to the notion that amygdala, dorsal hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, frontal cortex, dorsal periaqueductal gray matter and cuneiform nucleus altogether play a role in the integration of aversive states generated at the level of the inferior colliculus.

Phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein in the mouse brain after fear conditioning: relationship to Fos production

Phosphorylation of the cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) triggered by associative learning was monitored immunohistochemically in different areas of the mouse brain during a 6-h interval, starting immediately after training. One trial context-dependent fear conditioning was employed as a learning paradigm. Training consisted of contextual exposure followed by shock. Control groups consisted of naïve mice, mice exposed to the context alone and mice exposed to an immediate shock in the context. For all trained mice, the time course of CREB phosphorylation in hippocampus, parietal cortex and amygdaloid nuclei exhibited a biphasic pattern. The early phase was between 0 and 30 min, and the late phase was between 3 and 6 h after training. The animals exposed to context followed by an electric shock, as well as those exposed to an immediate electric shock, exhibited significantly higher pCREB levels than the mice subjected to context alone. During the late phase, the pCREB levels were highest in the mice exposed to the context followed by shock. It was observed that CREB phosphorylation and Fos production followed different regional and stimulus-dependent patterns. It is suggested that the early phase of pCREB increase may be related to stress-related behaviors, whereas the late phase may rather relate to memory consolidation.

Jun, Fos and Krox in the hippocampus after noxious stimulation: simultaneous-input-dependent expression and nuclear speckling

Stimulation of sensory C-fibres produces extensive expression of the Fos, Jun and Krox families of inducible transcription factors (ITFs) in many nociceptive CNS areas [28]. In the hippocampus, however, c-Fos is only weakly induced by such stimulation, and expression of the other ITFs has not been studied. Here we examine the effects of single, repeated and simultaneous C-fibre inputs on ITF expressions in the rat hippocampus. A brief, strong electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve C-fibres induced little or no expression of c-Fos or Krox-20. In contrast, FosB was induced and continued to rise in all areas, whereas the basal expressions of c-Jun and Krox-24 were initially reduced but then returned during the subsequent 36 h. A weak noxious cutaneous stimulus applied to one hindpaw induced only weak expressions of the ITFs. However, if the sciatic stimulation was applied contralaterally and 6 h beforehand, this weak stimulus strongly induced Krox-24, but not other ITFs, i.e. there was a potentiation of Krox-24 expression. When these two stimuli were applied simultaneously a few c-Fos labelled cells did appear, and there was and an increased Krox-24 expression. There was also a strong potentiation of FosB and a strong reduction in c-Jun expression. This simultaneous stimulation was the only type of stimulation to induce expression of Krox-20. Also after simultaneous stimulation the majority of the nuclear labelling for FosB, but not of the other ITFs, had a speckled appearance. MK-801 blocked these changes in ITF expressions, but it could also cause the C-fibre stimulations to induce c-Fos and c-Jun in specific areas of the hippocampus. Thus C-fibre stimulation does affect transcription factor activity in the hippocampus; and the strong responses of some ITFs to simultaneous inputs points to their having a role as 'genetic coincidence detectors' in the hippocampus.