The role of ipratropium bromide in the emergency management of acute asthma exacerbation: a metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials

The association of prehospital systemic corticosteroids with emergency department and in-hospital outcomes for patients with asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Timely administration of systemic corticosteroids is a cornerstone of asthma exacerbation treatment, yet little is known regarding potential benefits of prehospital administration by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians. We examined factors associated with prehospital corticosteroid administration with hospitalization and hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of EMS encounters for patients 2-50 years of age with suspected asthma exacerbation from a national data set. We evaluated factors associated with systemic corticosteroid administration using generalized estimating equations. We performed propensity matching based on service level, age, encounter duration, vital signs, and treatments to evaluate the association of prehospital corticosteroid administration with hospitalization and LOS using weighted logistic regression. We evaluated the association of prehospital corticosteroid administration with admission using Bayesian models.

RESULTS

Of 15,834 encounters, 4731 (29.9%) received prehospital systemic corticosteroids. Administration of corticosteroids was associated with older age; sex; urbanicity; advanced life support provider; vital sign instability; increasing doses of albuterol; and provision of ipratropium bromide, magnesium, epinephrine, and supplementary oxygen. Within the matched sample, prehospital corticosteroids were not associated with hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.01) or LOS (multiplier 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.05). Administration of corticosteroids was associated with lower odds of admission and shorter LOS in longer EMS encounters (>34 min), lower admission odds in patients with documented wheezing, and shorter LOS among patients treated with albuterol. In a Bayesian model with noninformative priors, the OR for admission among encounters given corticosteroids was 0.86 (95% credible interval 0.77-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital systemic corticosteroid administration was not associated with hospitalization or LOS in the overall cohort of asthma patients treated by EMS, though they had a lower probability of admission within Bayesian models. Improved outcomes were noted among subgroups of longer EMS encounters, documented wheezing, and receipt of albuterol.

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2024 (SINA-2024) is the sixth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children that was developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up-to-date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA Panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged <5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting a better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?

Literature-based meta-analysis is a standard technique applied to pool results of individual studies used in medicine and social sciences. It has been criticized for being too malleable to constrain results, averaging incomparable values, lacking a measure of evidence's strength, and problems with a systematic bias of individual studies. We argue against using literature-based meta-analysis of RCTs to assess treatment efficacy and show that therapeutic decisions based on meta-analytic average are not optimal given the full scope of existing evidence. The argument proceeds with discussing examples and analyzing the properties of some standard meta-analytic techniques. First, we demonstrate that meta-analysis can lead to reporting statistically significant results despite the treatment's limited efficacy. Second, we show that meta-analytic confidence intervals are too narrow compared to the variability of treatment outcomes reported by individual studies. Third, we argue that literature-based meta-analysis is not a reliable measurement instrument. Finally, we show that meta-analysis averages out the differences among studies and leads to a loss of information. Despite these problems, literature-based meta-analysis is useful for the assessment of harms. We support two alternative approaches to evidence amalgamation: meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) and qualitative review employing mechanistic evidence.

Evaluation and management of the critically ill adult asthmatic in the emergency department setting

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common reason for presentation to the Emergency Department and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While patients may have a relatively benign course, there is a subset of patients who present in a critical state and require emergent management.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with severe asthma.

DISCUSSION

It is important to consider a broad differential diagnosis for the cause and potential mimics of asthma exacerbation. Once the diagnosis is determined, the majority of the assessment is based upon the clinical examination. First line therapies for severe exacerbations include inhaled short-acting beta agonists, inhaled anticholinergics, intravenous steroids, and magnesium. Additional therapies for refractory cases include parenteral epinephrine or terbutaline, helium‑oxygen mixture, and consideration of ketamine. Intravenous fluids should be administered, as many of these patients are dehydrated and at risk for hypotension if they receive positive pressure ventilatory support. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation may prevent the need for endotracheal intubation. If mechanical ventilation is required, it is important to avoid breath stacking by setting a low respiratory rate and allowing permissive hypercapnia. Patients with severe asthma exacerbations will require intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of severe asthma with a focus on the emergency clinician.

Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies

BACKGROUND

The French Emergency Medicine Society, the French Intensive Care Society and the Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine French-Speaking Group edited guidelines on severe asthma exacerbation (SAE) in adult and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

The guidelines were related to 5 areas: diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, oxygen therapy and ventilation, patients triage, specific considerations regarding pregnant women. The literature analysis and formulation of the guidelines were conducted according to the Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. An extensive literature research was conducted based on publications indexed in PubMed™ and Cochrane™ databases. Of the 21 formalized guidelines, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 7 a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). The GRADE method was inapplicable to 10 guidelines, which resulted in expert opinions. A strong agreement was reached for all guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The conjunct work of 36 experts from 3 scientific societies resulted in 21 formalized recommendations to help improving the emergency and intensive care management of adult and pediatric patients with SAE.

ERS/EAACI statement on severe exacerbations in asthma in adults: facts, priorities and key research questions

Despite the use of effective medications to control asthma, severe exacerbations in asthma are still a major health risk and require urgent action on the part of the patient and physician to prevent serious outcomes such as hospitalisation or death. Moreover, severe exacerbations are associated with substantial healthcare costs and psychological burden, including anxiety and fear for patients and their families. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) set up a task force to search for a clear definition of severe exacerbations, and to also define research questions and priorities. The statement includes comments from patients who were members of the task force.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2019 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This is the fourth version of the updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is now more aligned for different age groups. The guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting better understanding of disease heterogeneity with integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient–doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Outpatient Management for Acute Exacerbations of Obstructive Lung Diseases

Primary care providers tasked with treating acute exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease must be able to recognize exacerbation of symptoms and triage patients based on exacerbation severity to the appropriate level of care. Early treatment with bronchodilators and corticosteroids should be followed by repeated assessments of treatment efficacy. Primary care providers should also provide symptom-guided action plans to empower patients to manage their disease.

Combined inhaled beta-agonist and anticholinergic agents for emergency management in adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled short-acting anticholinergics (SAAC) and short-acting beta₂-agonists (SABA) are effective therapies for adult patients with acute asthma who present to the emergency department (ED). It is unclear, however, whether the combination of SAAC and SABA treatment is more effective in reducing hospitalisations compared to treatment with SABA alone.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct an up-to-date systematic search and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of combined inhaled therapy (SAAC + SABA agents) vs. SABA alone to reduce hospitalisations in adult patients presenting to the ED with an exacerbation of asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, LILACS, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and evidence-based medicine (EBM) databases using controlled vocabulary, natural language terms, and a variety of specific and general terms for inhaled SAAC and SABA drugs. The search spanned from 1946 to July 2015. The Cochrane Airways Group provided search results from the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials which was most recently conducted in July 2016. An extensive search of the grey literature was completed to identify any other potentially relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Included studies were randomised or controlled clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of combined inhaled therapy (SAAC and SABA) to SABA treatment alone to prevent hospitalisations in adults with acute asthma in the emergency department. Two independent review authors assessed studies for inclusion using pre-determined criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated individual and pooled statistics as risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model and reporting heterogeneity (I²). For continuous outcomes, we reported individual trial results using mean differences (MD) and pooled results as weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies that involved a total of 2724 enrolled participants. Most studies were rated at unclear or high risk of bias.Overall, participants receiving combination inhaled therapy were less likely to be hospitalised (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87; participants = 2120; studies = 16; I² = 12%; moderate quality of evidence). An estimated 65 fewer patients per 1000 would require hospitalisation after receiving combination therapy (95% 30 to 95), compared to 231 per 1000 patients receiving SABA alone. Although combination inhaled therapy was more effective than SABA treatment alone in reducing hospitalisation in participants with severe asthma exacerbations, this was not found for participants with mild or moderate exacerbations (test for difference between subgroups P = 0.02).Participants receiving combination therapy were more likely to experience improved forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) (MD 0.25 L, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.48; participants = 687; studies = 6; I² = 70%; low quality of evidence), peak expiratory flow (PEF) (MD 36.58 L/min, 95% CI 23.07 to 50.09; participants = 1056; studies = 12; I² = 25%; very low quality of evidence), increased percent change in PEF from baseline (MD 24.88, 95% CI 14.83 to 34.93; participants = 551; studies = 7; I² = 23%; moderate quality of evidence), and were less likely to return to the ED for additional care (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98; participants = 1180; studies = 5; I² = 0%; moderate quality of evidence) than participants receiving SABA alone.Participants receiving combination inhaled therapy were more likely to experience adverse events than those treated with SABA agents alone (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.20; participants = 1392; studies = 11; I² = 14%; moderate quality of evidence). Among patients receiving combination therapy, 103 per 1000 were likely to report adverse events (95% 31 to 195 more) compared to 131 per 1000 patients receiving SABA alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, combination inhaled therapy with SAAC and SABA reduced hospitalisation and improved pulmonary function in adults presenting to the ED with acute asthma. In particular, combination inhaled therapy was more effective in preventing hospitalisation in adults with severe asthma exacerbations who are at increased risk of hospitalisation, compared to those with mild-moderate exacerbations, who were at a lower risk to be hospitalised. A single dose of combination therapy and multiple doses both showed reductions in the risk of hospitalisation among adults with acute asthma. However, adults receiving combination therapy were more likely to experience adverse events, such as tremor, agitation, and palpitations, compared to patients receiving SABA alone.

Managing asthma in expectant mothers

Pregnancy does not appear to have a consistent effect on the frequency or severity of asthma. The most common cause of worsening asthma in pregnancy is likely to be noncompliance with medication. Emphasizing to the patient in advance that fetal well-being is dependent on maternal well-being may help prevent this.In general, well controlled asthma is not associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Essential to successful asthma management is patient education that helps to ensure effective medication use, avoidance of triggers, and prompt treatment. This education should include measurement of peak expiratory flow rate and a written asthma action plan. Most of the medications that are used to control asthma in the general population can be safely used in pregnant women. Inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists), cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), and inhaled and systemic corticosteroids all appear to be very well tolerated by the fetus. Budesonide and beclomethasone should be considered as the preferred inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma in pregnancy. Use of the leukotriene receptor antagonists zafirlukast and montelukast in pregnancy is probably safe but should be limited to special circumstances, where they are viewed essential for asthma control. Zileuton should not be used in pregnancy.Acute asthma exacerbations in pregnant women should be treated in a similar manner to that in non-pregnant patients. Maternal blood glucose levels should be monitored periodically in pregnant women receiving systemic corticosteroids because of the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia upon embryos and fetuses. During pregnancy, maternal arterial oxygen saturations should be kept above 95% if possible for fetal well-being. Ambulatory oxygenation should be checked prior to discharge to ensure that women do not desaturate with their daily activities.Acute exacerbations of asthma during labor and delivery are rare. Dinoprost, ergometrine, and other ergot derivatives can cause severe bronchospasm, especially when used in combination with general anesthesia, and should be avoided in asthmatic patients. Pregnant women who have been treated with corticosteroids in the past year may require stress-dose corticosteroids during labor and delivery. Most asthma medications, including oral prednisone, are considered compatible with breast-feeding.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2016 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This is an updated guideline for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand and easy to use by nonasthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. SINA approach is mainly based on symptom control and assessment of risk as it is the ultimate goal of treatment. The new SINA guidelines include updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of asthma control in the management of asthma in adults and children, inclusion of a new medication appendix, and keeping consistency on the management at different age groups. The section on asthma in children is rewritten and expanded where the approach is stratified based on the age. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Guidance on the diagnosis and management of asthma among adults in resource limited settings

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of asthma in resource limited settings is hindered by lack of resources, making it difficult for health providers to adhere to international guidelines. The purpose of this review is to identify steps for asthma diagnosis and management in resource limited settings.

METHODS

Review of international asthma guidelines and other published studies on diagnosis and management of asthma.

RESULTS

We establish that clinical diagnosis of asthma can be made if recurrent respiratory symptoms especially current wheeze or wheeze in the last 12 months are present. Presence of a trigger, other allergic diseases, personal or family history of asthma; clinical improvement and increase in the peak flow and forced expiratory volume in one second of ≥12% after salbutamol administration increases the likelihood of asthma. At diagnosis severity grading, patient education, removal or reduction of trigger should be done. Follow up 2-6 weeks and assessment of control during therapy is essential. Therapy should be adjusted up or down depending on control levels. Patients should be instructed to increase the frequency of their bronchodilators and/or steroids therapy when they start to experience worsening symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Good quality asthma care can be achieved in resource limited settings by use of clinical data and simple tests.

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2012 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This an updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have updated guidelines, which are simple to understand and easy to use by non-asthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. This new version includes updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of Asthma Control Test in the management of asthma, and a new section on "difficult-to-treat asthma." Further, the section on asthma in children was re-written to cover different aspects in this age group. The SINA panel is a group of Saudi experts with well-respected academic backgrounds and experience in the field of asthma. The guidelines are formatted based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There was an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan. The approach adopted by the SINA group is mainly based on disease control as it is the ultimate goal of treatment.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists in addition to usual care for acute asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma presentation in the emergency setting frequently leads to hospital admission. Currently available treatment options include corticosteroid therapy, beta(2)-agonists and oxygen. Antileukotriene agents are beneficial in chronic asthma as additional therapy to inhaled steroids. Their value when used orally or intravenously in the acute setting requires evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the addition of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) produces a beneficial effect in children and adults with acute asthma who are currently receiving inhaled bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group's Specialised Register of trials with predefined terms. Searches are current to February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials comparing antileukotrienes and standard acute asthma care versus placebo and standard care in people with acute asthma of any age. We considered any dose and method of delivery of the leukotriene agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review and extracted data. We then checked data and resolved disagreements by discussion. We contacted study authors where necessary to provide additional information and data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials, generating 10 treatment-control comparisons, that recruited 1470 adults and 470 children met the entry criteria. These studies were of mixed quality, and there was heterogeneity in the severity of asthma exacerbation.For oral treatment, there was no significant difference in hospital admission between LTRAs and control in three trials on 194 children (risk ratio (RR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 3.52). Using a broader composite outcome which measured requirement for additional care there was no significant difference between treatments (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.28). Results demonstrated some indication of improvement in lung function with a significant difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) favouring LTRAs in two trials on 641 adults (mean difference (MD) 0.08; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.14). There were insufficient data to assess this outcome in children. The most common adverse event described was headache; however, there was no significant difference between LTRAs and control (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.22 to 2.99). Due to insufficient numbers, we were unable to conduct a subgroup analysis based on age.The combined results of two trials of intravenous treatment in 772 adults and one trial in 276 children demonstrated a reduction in the risk of hospital admission which was not quite statistically significant (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01). There was a statistically significant small difference in FEV(1) in the adult studies (MD 0.12; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.17), but not in the single trial in children (MD 0.01; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.08).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Presently, the available evidence does not support routine use of oral LTRAs in acute asthma. Further studies are required to assess whether intravenous treatment can reduce the risk of hospital admission, and what the most appropriate dose regimen is. Additional research is also needed into safety and efficacy of additional doses for those on maintenance therapy, and larger paediatric trials are required to allow subgroup analysis. Prolonged studies would be required to establish other health economic outcomes in admitted patients.

Assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department and beyond

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) are common, can result in emergency department presentation and often result in hospitalization. After confirming the diagnosis and treating comorbidities, management of severe AECOPD includes bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, noninvasive ventilation and, occasionally, endotracheal intubation. Once discharged, delayed follow-up and suboptimal management often occurs. Antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids and optimization of nonpharmacological interventions (e.g., smoking cessation, immunization and pulmonary rehabilitation) are important discharge considerations. Improving linkages to primary providers who adhere to management involving a pharmacological and nonpharmacological evidence-based treatment plan is critical to preventing future AECOPDs, reducing healthcare utilization and maintaining the quality of life of patients following an AECOPD.

Management of severe acute asthma in the emergency department

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in most developed countries and control may be elusive. Deterioration in asthma control is common when patients are exposed to airway irritants, viruses, and/or when adherence to chronic anti-inflammatory medications is suboptimal. Acute asthma exacerbations are common, important reasons for presentations to emergency departments, and severe cases may result in hospitalization. Important knowledge gaps exist in what is known and what care is delivered at the bedside.

RECENT FINDINGS

The literature in asthma is rapidly expanding and recent advances in the care are important to summarize. Systematic reviews, especially high-quality syntheses performed using Cochrane methods, provide the best evidence for busy clinicians to remain current. Management of asthma is based on early recognition of severe disease with aggressive therapy using multimodal interventions that focus on both bronchoconstriction and inflammatory mechanisms.

SUMMARY

Treatment of severe acute asthma can effectively and safely reduce hospitalizations, airway interventions, and even death. Using the approach outlined herein will enable clinicians to assist patients to rapidly regain asthma control, return to normal activities, and improve their quality of life in the follow-up period.

Acute lung failure

Lung failure is the most common organ failure seen in the intensive care unit. The pathogenesis of acute respiratory failure (ARF) can be classified as (1) neuromuscular in origin, (2) secondary to acute and chronic obstructive airway diseases, (3) alveolar processes such as cardiogenic and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and pneumonia, and (4) vascular diseases such as acute or chronic pulmonary embolism. This article reviews the more common causes of ARF from each group, including the pathological mechanisms and the principles of critical care management, focusing on the supportive, specific, and adjunctive therapies for each condition.

Muscarinic receptor antagonists, from folklore to pharmacology; finding drugs that actually work in asthma and COPD

In the lungs, parasympathetic nerves provide the dominant control of airway smooth muscle with release of acetylcholine onto M3 muscarinic receptors. Treatment of airway disease with anticholinergic drugs that block muscarinic receptors began over 2000 years ago. Pharmacologic data all indicated that antimuscarinic drugs should be highly effective in asthma but clinical results were mixed. Thus, with the discovery of effective β-adrenergic receptor agonists the use of muscarinic antagonists declined. Lack of effectiveness of muscarinic antagonists is due to a variety of factors including unwanted side effects (ranging from dry mouth to coma) and the discovery of additional muscarinic receptor subtypes in the lungs with sometimes competing effects. Perhaps the most important problem is ineffective dosing due to poorly understood differences between routes of administration and no effective way of testing whether antagonists block receptors stimulated physiologically by acetylcholine. Newer muscarinic receptor antagonists are being developed that address the problems of side effects and receptor selectivity that appear to be quite promising in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Managing outpatient asthma exacerbations

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that renders individuals vulnerable to acute exacerbations. A wide variety of allergic and nonallergic triggers can incite an asthma exacerbation. The goals of managing an asthma exacerbation are prompt recognition, rapid reversal of airflow obstruction, avoidance of relapses, and prevention of future episodes. A written asthma home management plan is essential to minimize the severity of exacerbations. Short-acting beta-agonists, oxygen, and corticosteroids remain fundamental to early intervention in acute asthma exacerbations. Anticholinergics and magnesium sulfate can help nonresponders. Combination inhalers of the long-acting beta-agonist formoterol and inhaled steroid budesonide have been effective in flexible dosing in treating early acute exacerbations and as a daily controller medication outside the United States. Initiation or intensification of long-term controller therapy, treatment of comorbid conditions, trigger avoidance, and prompt follow-up can help prevent relapses. Listening to patient preferences and concerns enhances adherence, and regular follow-up care can help prevent future episodes.

Clinical efficacy and safety of the combination of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol inhaled via the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler for relief of airflow obstruction

Bronchodilators are key drugs in symptomatic as well as maintenance treatment of obstructive lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. The short-acting anticholinergic ipratropium bromide and the short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist fenoterol hydrobromide have been available for combined use both as a pressurized metered-dose inhaler and as a solution for nebulization. Their combination at half the dose in the novel device, the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler (RMT), has been shown to provide therapeutic equivalence to their combination into a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler, both in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, both adults and children. Dose reduction with the RMT has been made possible due to the physical characteristics of the aerosol cloud emitted from the RMT, facilitating correct inhalation and ensuring higher pulmonary deposition of the aerosolized bronchodilators. Post-marketing studies using validated questionnaires confirm a high level of satisfaction with the performance and convenience of the RMT device, a large majority of patients preferring the RMT to other inhaler systems.

Review article: management of acute severe and near-fatal asthma

Despite a decline in the Australian overall asthma mortality, near-fatal/critical asthma continues to be a significant management issue for emergency physicians and intensivists. Near-fatal asthma is a unique subtype of asthma, with a variety of clinical presentations, requiring rapid and aggressive intervention. The pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of near-fatal asthma remains very complex. The present review discusses recent advances and evidence for current available strategies targeting this time critical emergency.

Depressed children with asthma evidence increased airway resistance: "vagal bias" as a mechanism?

BACKGROUND

Depression is prevalent in pediatric asthma, and implicated in asthma morbidity and mortality. Pathways linking stress, depression, and asthma are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To examine, under controlled laboratory conditions, pathways by which depressive states affect airway function via autonomic dysregulation.

METHODS

Participants were 171 children with asthma, age 7 to 17 years, presenting to an emergency department for asthma exacerbation. Forty-five children with asthma and high depressive symptoms (D) were contrasted with 45 with low/no depressive symptoms (ND). Depressive symptoms, asthma disease severity, vagal and sympathetic reactivity to film stressors, airflow (FEV1), and airway resistance were compared between the groups. A subgroup with greater airway reactivity (nonmedicated FEV1<80% predicted) was also studied. Correlations among variables were examined for the entire sample.

RESULTS

Groups did not differ in demographics, disease severity, medications, or adherence. The D group with FEV1<80% predicted showed greater airway resistance throughout all conditions (P = .03), and vagal bias in the film stressors. The D group's vagal response was significant for the sad stimuli: family distress/loss (P = .03), dying (P = .003), and death (P = .03). The ND group showed sympathetic activation to sad stimuli: lonely (P = .04) and dying (P = .04). Depressive symptoms were correlated with respiratory resistance (r = .43; P = .001) and vagal bias in scene 3 (r = .24; P = .03), and vagal bias (scene 3) was correlated with postmovie airway resistance (r = 0.39; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with asthma and depressive symptoms manifest vagal bias when emotionally stressed. Those with depressive symptoms and FEV1<80% manifest greater airway resistance. Depression, vagal bias, and airway resistance were intercorrelated for the full sample.

Increasing the use of anti-inflammatory agents for acute asthma in the emergency department: experience with an asthma care map

PURPOSE

Acute asthma is a common emergency department (ED) presentation and variation in its management is well recognized. The present study examined the use of an asthma care map (ACM) in one Canadian ED to improve adherence to acute asthma guidelines, emphasizing the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).

METHODS

Three time periods were studied: the 15 months before ACM introduction (PRE), the 15 months following a three-month introduction of the ACM (POST(1)) and the 18 months after POST(1) (POST(2)). Randomly selected patient charts from each period were included from patients who were 18 to 60 years of age and presented with a primary diagnosis of acute asthma. A priori criteria were established to determine the degree of completion and success of the ACM. Primary outcomes included documentation, use of SCSs in the ED, and prescription of SCSs and ICSs at ED discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patient charts were included (PRE, n=150; POST(1), n=150; POST(2), n=87). Patient characteristics in the three groups were similar; however, patients in POST(1) and POST(2) showed higher use of newer agents than those in the PRE group. Overall, more women (n=209; 54%) than men were seen; the mean age was 32.4 years. The care map was used in 67% of cases during POST(1) and 70% during POST(2). The use of peak expiratory flow (PEF) was high during the PRE, POST(1) and POST(2) periods (91%, 89% and 91%, respectively); however, documentation of other markers of severity increased in the POST periods. Use of SCSs occurred earlier (P<0.01) and more often (57% PRE, 68% POST(1) and 75% POST(2); P<0.01) in the POST(1,2) periods than the PRE period. There was a significant increase in use of SCSs on discharge (55% PRE, 66% POST(1) and 69% POST(2); P<0.05), and prescription of ICSs significantly increased (24% PRE, 45% POST(1) and 61% POST(2); P<0.001) in the POST(1,2) periods. Discharge without any corticosteroids decreased over the three periods (32% PRE, 21% POST(1) and 17% POST(2); P<0.05). The length of stay in the ED increased over the study periods (181 min PRE, 209 min POST(1) and 265 min POST(2); P<0.01) and admissions were infrequent (9% PRE, 13% POST(1) and 6% POST(2); P=0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides evidence that the standardized ED ACM was widely accepted, improved chart documentation, improved some aspects of ED care and increased prescribing of discharge preventive medications.

Bronchodilator efficacy of the fixed combination of ipratropium and albuterol compared to albuterol alone in moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The potential of anticholinergics to provide bronchodilatory benefits over short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABA) alone in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma has not been well defined.

METHODS

An outpatient, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study in adult asthmatics with moderate-to-severe obstruction despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) was conducted comparing the fixed combination of ipratropium and albuterol (IB+ALB) to albuterol alone (ALB). Serial spirometry was performed over 6h. SABA were withheld for 8h, ICS and LABA for 24h.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were randomized, 106 completed the study (males n=47; mean+/-SD age=51+/-13 years). Mean+/-SD baseline FEV(1)=1.4+/-0.5 L (49+/-12% predicted). IB+ALB resulted in significantly greater improvements over ALB in the average improvement over baseline in FEV(1) as approximated from the area under the curve from 0 to 6h after drug administration (72 ml, p<0.01) and mean peak FEV(1) response (55 ml, p<0.01) as well as higher FEV(1) responses at individual time points from 0.5 to 6h postdose (p<0.01 for all). Time to onset of response was similar between groups but time to peak and duration of response were longer with IB+ALB versus ALB (120 versus 60 min and 245 versus 106 min, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IB+ALB resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV(1) and longer duration of response compared to ALB alone in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (Trial number: 1012.50; ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00096616).

Nebulized racemic epinephrine used in the treatment of severe asthmatic exacerbation: a case report and literature review

Acute asthma is a common emergency department (ED) problem that is typically treated with bronchodilators and anti-inflammatories. Nebulized selective, short-acting beta-agonists, such as salbutamol, are the bronchodilators of choice in most Canadian EDs. Other important treatments in moderate-to-severe cases include systemic corticosteroids and in severe cases may include the addition of ipratropium bromide and magnesium sulfate. Despite aggressive management, some patients do not respond adequately to nebulized salbutamol. Treatment options in these patients are limited to interventions such as parenteral epinephrine, and non-invasive and mechanical ventilation (or both). Both parenteral epinephrine and mechanical ventilation have associated risks, so alternative treatments with a lower risk profile would be useful for the treatment of life-threatening asthma. The following case report describes a patient in whom nebulized racemic epinephrine was used successfully to treat severe acute asthma following failure of standard first-line therapies.

Adding long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids after discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Relapses of asthma following emergency department discharge can be reduced with oral and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), but the benefits of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the addition of a LABA reduces relapses in patients with acute asthma.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of 137 patients, aged 18-55 years, conducted in four Canadian EDs. Patients receiving high-dose ICSs or oral corticosteroids, and those who were medically unstable, were excluded. Patients were randomized to either fluticasone 1,000 microg/day with salmeterol 100 microg/day or fluticasone 1,000 microg/day alone. All patients were discharged on seven days of oral prednisone. The main outcome measure was relapse at 21 days.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. After 21 days, seven of 69 patients (10.1%) treated with fluticasone/salmeterol and ten of 68 patients (14.7%) treated with fluticasone experienced a relapse (p = 0.42). Prior intubation, female gender, and prior use of ICSs were associated with relapse. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in overall quality of life and individual domain scores. Fluticasone/salmeterol improved quality of life (p < 0.05) and relapses (24% to 13%; p = 0.35) in patients receiving ICSs at the time of emergency admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment with a short course of systemic corticosteroids combined with ICSs is adequate for most patients with asthma discharged from the emergency department; those already receiving ICS agents may benefit from ICS/LABA combination therapy to improve quality of life. Larger studies are needed to confirm the role of inhaled LABAs in acute asthma.

Treatment strategies for reducing asthma-related emergency department visits

Acute asthma exacerbations reflect inadequate long-term disease control. Treatment to control acute asthma exacerbations includes: 1) rapid reversal of airflow obstruction with bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids and reversing hypoxemia with oxygen in the emergency department (ED); 2) preventing early relapse by prescribing beta(2) agonists and oral corticosteroids at discharge and ensuring patients have an adequate supply of their other asthma medications; and 3) preventing future asthma exacerbations and ED visits through effective treatment in primary care. This article discusses each treatment and reviews the role of emergency physicians in treating patients to reverse airflow obstruction and prevent early relapse, future exacerbations, and ED visits by communicating the need for additional asthma control to patients' primary care physicians.

Same efficacies of ipratropium and salbutamol in reversing methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Efficacy of salbutamol (S) was compared to that of ipratropium (I) or to their association, after methacholine challenge testing (MCT). MCT was performed in 4 groups of 10 patients suspected to suffer from asthma; mean changes in FEV1, maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMFR), and airway resistance (Raw) were the same in all groups. After MCT, the group 1 patients inhaled S and then I, 10 min later; both drugs were given in the reverse order to the group 2 patients. The group 3 patients inhaled a mixture of both drugs just after MCT; the group 4 patients were not given any bronchodilator till the 20th min after MCT, when they inhaled S. Short-term (10 min) bronchodilator effects of S, I or S + I on spirometric variables were of the same magnitude and Raw returned to its baseline value. Further improvement (10-20 min) in FEV1 was mainly due to spontaneous recovery, whereas further increase in MMFR was due also to bronchodilator actions of drugs. It is concluded that ipratropium could be proposed as an alternative bronchodilator to salbutamol after MCT.

A model protocol for emergency medical services management of asthma exacerbations

Emergency medical services (EMS) is an important part of the continuum of asthma management. The magnitude of the EMS responsibility is very large, with millions of patients with asthma treated each year by EMS personnel. In response to inconsistencies between the 1997 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program asthma guidelines and a variety of existing EMS protocols on the management of asthma exacerbations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a workgroup in 2004 to discuss the various opportunities and challenges ahead. At the meeting, and over the ensuing year, the workgroup created a model protocol that was derived from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines. The model protocol is available in both text and algorithm format and offers guidance for EMS systems to develop and implement treatment protocols in their local areas. The workgroup recommendations emphasize flexibility, simplicity, and low-risk practices. By integrating these recommendations into existing protocols, we believe that EMS systems could improve prehospital care for patients with asthma. Demonstration projects are needed to carefully examine the implementation process and the actual impact of the model protocol on various outcomes. The workgroup also encourages more research on EMS management of asthma exacerbations. In the meantime, improved collaboration between EMS and national asthma organizations is an immediate priority and will continue to advance future discussions on how to improve asthma management in the prehospital setting. The workgroup hopes that state and local EMS systems will see the value of the model protocol and encourage its use.

Pulmonary Emergencies in the Elderly

The aging process results in changes in pulmonary physiology that make the elderly population more susceptible to pulmonary disease. These physiologic changes also alter the clinical presentation of such diseases, making the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary disorders particularly challenging for the clinician. It is important for the clinician to have a high index of suspicion for pulmonary disorders to make the proper diagnosis. It is essential to keep in mind the subtle differences between pulmonary diseases in the elderly compared with younger patients.

Comparison of nebulised magnesium sulphate and salbutamol combined with salbutamol alone in the treatment of acute bronchial asthma: a randomised study

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that combined administration of multiple doses of nebulised salbutamol and magnesium sulphate provides additional benefit compared with salbutamol alone in adult patients with acute asthma.

DESIGN

Randomised, double blind, prospective study.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients presenting to an emergency department with an acute attack of bronchial asthma were randomised to two groups: nebulisation with a combination of salbutamol and magnesium sulphate (group A) and nebulisation with salbutamol only (group B). Both groups received nebulisation thrice at intervals of 20 minutes. Salbutamol and magnesium sulphate were administered in doses of 0.5 mg and 500 mg, respectively, and the solutions were made isotonic to plasma osmolality. Pulse rate, blood pressure, and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured at baseline and at 15, 60, 75, and 120 minutes. Serum magnesium levels and blood gases were measured at 0 and 120 minutes in both groups.

RESULTS

All patients had either acute severe or life threatening asthma. The baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Both groups showed significant rise in PEFR at all time intervals, however, there was no significant difference between the groups in rise in PEFR at any time point. Serum magnesium levels remained within normal limits, and there was no difference in requirement of additional medication during the study or hospital admission rates in both groups. No significant side effects were noted.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that there is no therapeutic benefit of adding magnesium sulphate to salbutamol nebulisation in the treatment of patients with acute severe or life threatening asthma.

Acute asthma during pregnancy

In addition to preventing maternal and fetal hypoxia, the goals of treating acute asthma exacerbation during pregnancy mirror those in the nongravid patient: rapid reversal of airflow obstruction with aerosolized bronchodilators,reduction of likelihood of recurrence by the addition of corticosteroids, and ongoing assessment of mother and fetus. Disposition decisions are multifaceted and must take into account the health and well-being of the pregnant patient and that of her fetus. Discharge planning includes prescription of scheduled 3-2 agonist treatments until symptoms resolve, intensification of daily treatment as needed, prescriptions for systemic and ICSs, as well provision of patient education, a personalized action plan, and close follow-up.

Anticholinergic agents in asthma and COPD

Anticholinergic agents have important uses as bronchodilators for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases, both asthma and, more particularly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Those in approved clinical use are synthetic quaternary ammonium congeners of atropine, and include ipratropium bromide, oxitropium bromide, and tiotropium bromide, each of which is very poorly absorbed when given by inhalation. Ipratropium and oxitropium have relatively short durations of action (4-8 h). They have been widely used for many years, either alone or in combination with short-acting beta-adrenergic agents such as albuterol and fenoterol, for both maintenance treatment of stable disease and for acute exacerbations of airway obstruction. Tiotropium, which was introduced in the early 2000s, has a duration of action of at least 1-2 days making it suitable for once-daily maintenance treatment of COPD. All of the above agents have a wide therapeutic margin and are safe and well tolerated by patients.

The efficacy of nebulized albuterol/ipratropium bromide versus albuterol alone in the prehospital treatment of suspected reactive airways disease

OBJECTIVE

Ipratropium bromide has demonstrated efficacy when added to albuterol for the treatment of reactive airways disease (RAD). Its prehospital use has not been explored.

METHODS

A before-and-after design was used. Prehospital and emergency department (ED) medical records were examined retrospectively six months before and six months after institution of a new protocol, which allowed the addition of ipratropium bromide to all nebulized treatments with albuterol. Primary outcome measures included: changes in vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation), clinical improvement as assessed by paramedics, and admission rates.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients were included (n = 192 albuterol alone, n = 179 ipratropium/albuterol). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with regard to the change in heart rate, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturation. In addition, there was no difference in the proportion of patients with clinical improvement or deterioration as assessed by paramedics. There was no statistically significant difference in the admission rate from the ED except in the subgroup of patients using a metered-dose inhaler at the time of illness. Of note, more than one-third (133/371) of the patients were ultimately determined to have a diagnosis other than RAD, the majority of whom were diagnosed as having cardiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol for the prehospital treatment of RAD does not appear to result in clinical outcome improvements. A substantial number of patients enrolled in the study were diagnosed as having cardiac disease.

Aerosolized magnesium sulfate for acute asthma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of MgSO(4) is one of numerous treatment options available during exacerbations of asthma. While the efficacy of therapy with IV MgSO(4) has been demonstrated, little is known about inhaled MgSO(4).

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of the literature was performed to examine the effect of inhaled MgSO(4) in the treatment of patients with asthma exacerbations in the emergency department.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion and were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez*" register, which consists of a combined search of the EMBASE, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases and the manual searching of 20 key respiratory journals. Reference lists of published studies were searched, and a review of the gray literature was also performed. Studies were included if patients had been treated with nebulized MgSO(4) alone or in combination with beta(2)-agonists and were compared to the use of beta(2)-agonists alone or with an inactive control substance. Trial selection, data extraction, and methodological quality were assessed by two independent reviewers. The results from fixed-effects models are presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) for pulmonary functions and the relative risks (RRs) for hospital admission. Both are displayed with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Six trials involving 296 patients were included. There was a non-significant increase [corrected] in pulmonary function between patients whose treatments included nebulized MgSO(4) and those whose treatments [corrected] did not (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.47 [corrected] five studies); there was also a trend toward reduced [corrected] hospitalizations in patients whose treatments included nebulized MgSO(4) (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; four studies). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that lung function improvement was similar in adult patients and in those patients who received nebulized MgSO(4) in addition to a beta(2)-agonist.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of nebulized MgSO(4), particularly in addition to a beta(2)-agonist, in the treatment of an acute asthma exacerbation appears to produce benefits with respect to improved pulmonary function and may reduce the number of hospital admissions.

Anticholinergics in the treatment of children and adults with acute asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the use of a combination of inhaled beta(2) agonists and anticholinergics, particularly for patients with acute severe or life threatening asthma in the emergency setting. However, this statement is based on a relatively small number of randomised controlled trials and related systematic reviews. A review was undertaken to incorporate the more recent evidence available about the effectiveness of treatment with a combination of beta(2) agonists and anticholinergics compared with beta(2) agonists alone in the treatment of acute asthma.

METHODS

A search was conducted of all randomised controlled trials published before April 2005.

RESULTS

Data from 32 randomised controlled trials (n = 3611 subjects) showed significant reductions in hospital admissions in both children (RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.85, p = 0.0001) and adults (RR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.86, p = 0.002) treated with inhaled anticholinergic agents. Combined treatment also produced a significant increase in spirometric parameters 60-120 minutes after the last treatment in both children (SMD = -0.54; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.81, p = 0.0001) and adults (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.49, p = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This review strongly suggests that the addition of multiple doses of inhaled ipratropium bromide to beta(2) agonists is indicated as the standard treatment in children, adolescents, and adults with moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma in the emergency setting.

Severe exacerbations of asthma

All asthmatics regardless of their perceived severity, are at risk of exacerbation, particularly if they are suboptimally treated in the outpatient arena. Fortunately most patients recover after administration of bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory medications, but preventable deaths continue to occur and refractory cases result in hospitalization and need for mechanical ventilation. We begin this article by reviewing the pathophysiology of acute exacerbations to build a foundation for the assessment of clinical status and to provide the rationale for a carefully contemplated and evidence-based therapeutic approach. We end this article with an in-depth examination of the particular problems that are encountered during mechanical ventilation and offer a strategy that helps minimize complications. In the final analysis, however, the greatest gains in the field of acute asthma will come not from its treatment but from its prevention by enhanced educational and environmental efforts and by the delivery of optimal medications at home.

Corticosteroid therapy for acute asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease, which is characterised by reversible airflow obstruction in response to a variety of stimuli. Exacerbations in response to airway irritants are part of the natural history of asthma, but often they also represent a failure in chronic treatment. Presentations to emergency departments and other acute care settings are common and frequently lead to hospitalisation and other complications. After treatment, however, most patients are discharged to the care of their primary care physician for further management. This review highlights the role of systemic and inhaled corticosteroids as mainstays of treatment in the acute and sub-acute phase of an exacerbation. These agents form the basis of most current clinical practice guidelines, yet their use is not universal. We will review the evidence for the use of these agents that arises from the Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews contained in the Cochrane Library.

Acute asthma in adults: a review

All patients with asthma are at risk of having exacerbations. Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits account for a large proportion of the health-care cost burden of asthma, and avoidance or proper management of acute asthma (AA) episodes represent an area with the potential for large reductions in health-care costs. The severity of exacerbations may range from mild to life threatening, and mortality is most often associated with failure to appreciate the severity of the exacerbation, resulting in inadequate emergency treatment and delay in referring to hospital. This review describes the epidemiology, costs, pathophysiology, mortality, and management of adult AA in the ED and in the ICU.

Severe asthma

Severe asthma is a term that is commonly used to describe patients with refractory, brittle, near fatal, and difficult-to-control asthma. Patients with severe asthma typically experience persistent symptoms despite medical therapy, report decreased quality of life and suffer an accelerated loss of lung function. The role of genetics, environmental exposure, and infection in the development of more severe asthma is the focus of ongoing research. While pathologic changes in these patients are now believed to involve lung parenchyma, in addition to large and small airways, the independent contribution of each of these compartments to the severe asthma phenotype is not well defined. The clinical evaluation of severe asthma patients should include investigating conditions commonly associated with severe asthma, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, vocal cord dysfunction, and rhinosinusitis. In addition, advanced imaging techniques, measurement of exhaled gas or sputum indices, and airway biopsy are tools that may aid in evaluating severe asthma patients in the near future. Management of patients with severe asthma requires a comprehensive approach that includes non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures. Combination antiinflammatory and long-acting bronchodilator therapy remains the mainstay of management.

Severe upper airway obstruction during sleep

Few disorders may manifest with predominantly sleep-related obstructive breathing. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder, varies in severity and is associated with significant cardiovascular and neurocognitive morbidity. It is estimated that between 8 and 18 million people in the United States have at least mild OSA. Although the exact mechanism of OSA is not well-delineated, multiple factors contribute to the development of upper airway obstruction and include anatomic, mechanical, neurologic, and inflammatory changes in the pharynx. OSA may occur concomitantly with asthma. Approximately 74% of asthmatics experience nocturnal symptoms of airflow obstruction secondary to reactive airways disease. Similar cytokine, chemokine, and histologic changes are seen in both disorders. Sleep deprivation, chronic upper airway edema, and inflammation associated with OSA may further exacerbate nocturnal asthma symptoms. Allergic rhinitis may contribute to both OSA and asthma. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for OSA. Treatment with CPAP therapy has also been shown to improve both daytime and nighttime peak expiratory flow rates in patients with concomitant OSA and asthma. It is important for allergists to be aware of how OSA may complicate diagnosis and treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis. A thorough sleep history and high clinical suspicion for OSA is indicated, particularly in asthma patients who are refractory to standard medication treatments.