Imidazoline receptors

Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate CLP-Induced Rat Intestinal Injury via Inhibition of Inflammation

The aim was to verify that dexmedetomidine (DEX) can attenuate CLP-induced intestinal injury via inhibition of inflammation. Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly allocated into Sham group and the other three CLP model groups, in terms of different treatments: placebo, DEX, and yohimbine plus DEX (DEX + YOH) groups. Pathology examination was conducted with HE stain. To identify differences among groups, the levels of DAO, and D-lactate in serum were measured by spectrophotometry, and the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in serum and organ were measured by ELISA. The expressions of occludin and TLR4 in tissue were detected by Western blot. The survival rate of an additional group of animals within 7 d was recorded. In DEX group, mortality was lower, histology change was minor, DAO, and D-lactate levels were reduced, and occludin expression was increased; the expressions of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TLR4 were also decreased in DEX group. These results indicated that acute intestinal injury induced by CLP was mitigated by DEX treatment. However, these effects of DEX were significantly attenuated by yohimbine in DEX + YOH group. Our study indicated the protective effects of DEX on CLP-induced injury, which may be associated with the inhibition of inflammation via modulating TLR4 pathway and can be blocked by yohimbine.

The antinociceptive effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in colorectal distension-induced visceral pain in rats: the role of opioid receptors

BACKGROUND

In comparison with cutaneous pain, the role of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2)-AR) agonists in visceral pain has not been extensively examined. We aimed to characterize the antinociceptive effect of IV dexmedetomidine on visceral pain in rats and to determine whether antinociception thus produced is mediated by opioid receptors.

METHODS

Male Sprague Dawley rats (250-300 g) were instrumented with a venous catheter for drug administration and with enameled nichrome electrodes for electromyography of the external oblique muscles. Colorectal distension (CRD) was used as the noxious visceral stimulus, and the visceromotor response to CRD was quantified electromyographically before and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after dexmedetomidine or clonidine administration. Antagonists were administered 10 min before dexmedetomidine. After confirmation of normal distribution of data, one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for multiple comparison.

RESULTS

IV administration of dexmedetomidine (2.5-20 microg/kg) and clonidine (10-80 microg/kg) produced a dose-dependent reduction in visceromotor response with 50% effective dose values of 10.5 and 37.6 microg/kg, respectively. Administration of the nonspecific alpha(2)-AR antagonist yohimbine (1 mg/kg), but not the peripherally restricted alpha(2)-AR antagonist MK-467 (1 mg/kg), abolished the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine (10 microg/kg). In addition, inhibition of opioid receptors by naloxone (1 mg/kg) attenuated the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that IV dexmedetomidine exerts pronounced antinociception against CRD-induced visceral pain and suggest that the antinociceptive effect of dexmedotimidine is mediated in part by opioid receptors, but peripheral alpha(2)-ARs are not involved.

Platelet imidazoline receptors as state marker of depressive symptomatology

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that imidazoline receptors (IR-1) are increased in platelets and frontal cortex of depressed patients, and this up-regulation is normalized (down-regulated) after antidepressant drug treatments. It has been hypothesized that IR-1 up-regulation during the depressive episode may be a state marker for depressive symptomatology. The goal of the present study was to address the state versus trait question.

METHOD

Twelve healthy subjects (six males and six females) met stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria for physical and mental health. They received desipramine for 6 weeks in order to simulate the length of time and dosing used previously to obtain an IR-1 down-regulation and a therapeutic response in depressed patients. Outcome and safety measures included clinical, psychological, and cardiovascular assessments obtained throughout the study. Plasma concentrations of desipramine were measured throughout the 6 weeks of treatment and again after 2 weeks following tapered discontinuation of desipramine. Platelet receptors were assessed by Western blotting and radioligand binding assays.

RESULTS

Healthy subjects taking desipramine experienced mild dysphoric effects but there were no adverse events. The binding of 8 nM p-[(125)I]clonidine to IR-1 and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in healthy subjects did not change during desipramine treatment. The immunodensity of the 33 kDa band associated with IR-1 gradually increased to a maximum, by week-6, of 26% higher than baseline (p < 0.01 compared to baseline). Two weeks after desipramine discontinuation, there was a decline in alpha(2)-adrenoceptor binding and 33 kDa band's immunodensity (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the hypothesis that platelet IR-1 binding sites are a marker of mood state rather than of antidepressant-induced pharmacological regulation. By comparison, platelet alpha(2)-adrenoceptors appear to be regulated by desipramine as a pharmacological effect independent of mood state.

Possible role of NMDA receptors in antinociception induced by rilmenidine in mice in the formalin test

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the possible role of MK-801, an NMDA antagonist, in analgesia induced by rilmenidine, an imidazoline (I(1)) agonist, in mice in the formalin test.

METHODS

25 microl of formalin 2.5% was injected into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw of the mouse. Pain response was scored after formalin injection for a period of 50 min. A weighted average of nociceptive score, ranging from 0 to 3, was calculated. The mean +/-SEM of scores between 0-5 and 15-40 min after formalin injection was presented.

RESULTS

The study showed that rilmenidine (1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) produced analgesia dose-dependently (p<0.001) in formalin test. In addition, the results demonstrated that efaroxan (0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) could reduce the antinociceptive effect of rilmenidine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) (p<0.01) in animals, however, yohimbine (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) could not block the analgesia induced by rilmenidine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) (p>0.05). On the other hand, MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced the pain related behaviors in mice (p>0.05). Moreover, our findings demonstrated that MK-801 (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.) could potentiate the analgesic effect of rilmenidine (1.25 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that imidazoline (I(1)) receptors play an important role in mediating the antinociception induced by rilmenidine in formalin test. Furthermore, it may be concluded that there is an interaction between NMDA receptors and imidazoline (I(1)) binding sites.

Opposite to α2-adrenergic agonists, an imidazoline I1 selective compound does not influence reflex bradycardia in rabbits

This work aimed to study the respective effects of central alpha2-adrenergic receptors (alpha2-ARS) and I1 imidazoline receptors (I1Rs) in the facilitatory effects of imidazoline-like drugs on the reflex bradycardia (RB). Experiments were performed in anaesthetized rabbits. The reflex bradycardic response was induced by phenylephrine injected i.v. LNP 509, rilmenidine and dexmedetomidine were administered intracisternally (i.c.). LNP509 (1 mg/kg, i.c.), a ligand highly selective for I1Rs, induced hypotension (54+/-3 vs. 93+/-2 mm Hg) and bradycardia (260+/-13 vs. 322+/-13 beats/min) (p<0.05, n=5) but did not affect RB. Rilmenidine (1 microg/kg, i.c.), a hybrid ligand which binds to both I1 and alpha2-ARS, also decreased arterial pressure (61+/-2 vs. 101+/-2 mm Hg) and heart rate (260+/-4 vs. 308+/-8) (p<0.01, n=5); it potentiated the RB (maximum R-R interval: 284+/-17 vs. 196+/-6 ms) (p<0.05, n=5). Dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg, i.c.), a ligand selective for alpha2-ARs, reduced blood pressure (53+/-3 vs. 104+/-2 mm Hg) and heart rate (246+/-4 vs. 312+/-8 beats/min) (p<0.05, n=5) and potentiated the RB (maximum R-R interval: 518+/-38 vs. 194+/-4 ms) (p<0.05, n=5). The potentiation of RB was much greater than that observed with rilmenidine and was significantly prevented by L-NNA injected centrally. This study shows that: (i) an exclusive action on I1Rs which decreases arterial pressure, does not potentiate the RB ii) activation of alpha2-ARs potentiates the RB (iii) the R-R prolongation caused by alpha2-ARs stimulation is prevented by central NOS inhibition.

Identification of the Central Imidazoline Receptor Subtype Involved in Modulation of Halothane-Epinephrine Arrhythmias in Rats

We previously reported that imidazoline receptors in the central nervous system are involved in modulation of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmias. These receptors have been subclassified as I1 and I2 subtypes, but it is not known which receptor subtype is involved in halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. We designed the present study to clarify the involvement of central imidazoline receptor subtype in the modulation of halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. Rats were anesthetized with halothane and monitored continuously for systemic arterial blood pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine was defined as the smallest dose that produces three or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period. Intracisternal moxonidine dose-dependently inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias during halothane anesthesia. Intracisternal efaroxan, a selective I1 antagonist with little affinity for I2 subtype, but not rauwolscine, an alpha2 antagonist without affinity for imidazoline receptors, blocked the antiarrhythmic effect of moxonidine. Intracisternal BU 224 and 2-BFI, selective I2 ligands, also inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias dose-dependently; however, these effects were abolished by efaroxan. We conclude that central I1, but not I2, receptors play an important role in inhibition of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmia.

The involvement of alpha 2A-adrenoceptors in morphine analgesia, tolerance and withdrawal in mice

Alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists potentiate opioid analgesia and alleviate opioid withdrawal. The effects of two alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, clonidine (2 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (20 and 100 microg/kg), and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (0.5 mg/kg) were tested on morphine analgesia, tolerance, and withdrawal in wild-type and alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor knock-out (KO) mice. Analgesia and tolerance were assessed with the tail-flick test. Withdrawal was precipitated with naloxone. Prazosin potentiated morphine analgesia equally in both genotypes. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine had no analgesic effects in alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor KO mice, but morphine analgesia and tolerance were similar in both genotypes. Alpha(2A)-Adrenoceptor KO mice exhibited 70% fewer naloxone-precipitated jumps than wild-type mice; weight loss was similar in both genotypes. The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists reduced opioid withdrawal signs only in wild-type mice. We conclude that alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors are not directly involved in morphine analgesia and tolerance, and not critical for potentiation of morphine analgesia by prazosin, but that alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors modulate the expression of opioid withdrawal signs in mice.

Imidazoline Receptors but Not α2-Adrenoceptors Are Regulated in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Heart by Chronic Moxonidine Treatment

We have recently identified imidazoline I(1)-receptors in the heart. In the present study, we tested regulation of cardiac I(1)-receptors versus alpha(2) -adrenoceptors in response to hypertension and to chronic exposure to agonist. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, 12-14 weeks old) received moxonidine (10, 60, and 120 microg/kg/h s.c.) for 1 and 4 weeks. Autoradiographic binding of (125)I-paraiodoclonidine (0.5 nM, 1 h, 22 degrees C) and inhibition of binding with epinephrine (10(-10)-10(-5) M) demonstrated the presence of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in heart atria and ventricles. Immunoblotting and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified alpha(2A)-alpha(2B)-, and alpha(2C), and -adrenoceptor proteins and mRNA, respectively. However, compared with normotensive controls, cardiac alpha(2) -adrenoceptor kinetic parameters, receptor proteins, and mRNAs were not altered in SHR with or without moxonidine treatment. In contrast, autoradiography showed that up-regulated atrial I(1)-receptors in SHR are dose-dependently normalized by 1 week, with no additional effect after 4 weeks of treatment. Moxonidine (120 microg/kg/h) decreased B(max) in right (40.0 +/- 2.9-7.0 +/- 0.6 fmol/unit area; p < 0.01) and left (27.7 +/- 2.8-7.1 +/- 0.4 fmol/unit area; p < 0.01) atria, and decreased the 85- and 29-kDa imidazoline receptor protein bands, in right atria, to 51.8 +/- 3.0% (p < 0.01) and 82.7 +/- 5.2% (p < 0.03) of vehicle-treated SHR, respectively. Moxonidine-associated percentage of decrease in B(max) only correlated with the 85-kDa protein (R(2) = 0.57; p < 0.006), suggesting that this protein may represent I(2)-receptors. The weak but significant correlation between the two imidazoline receptor proteins (R(2) = 0.28; p < 0.03) implies that they arise from the same gene. In conclusion, the heart possesses I(1)-receptors and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, but only I(1)-receptors are responsive to hypertension and to chronic in vivo treatment with a selective I(1)-receptor agonist.

Nitric oxide and central antihypertensive drugs: one more difference between catecholamines and imidazolines

NO is known to be involved in the peripheral and central regulation of the cardiovascular function. It plays a neuromodulatory role via a direct action on presynaptic nerve terminals, stimulating the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and norepinephrine. Our aim was to study the possible role of NO in the cardiovascular effects of the central antihypertensive drugs clonidine, rilmenidine, and alpha-methyl-norepinephrine (alpha-MNA). Sites and mechanisms of the hypotensive action of these drugs were different; clonidine and rilmenidine acted on imidazoline receptors in the nucleus reticularis lateralis, whereas alpha-MNA acted upon alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in the nucleus tractus solitarius. The influence of N:(G)-nitro-L-arginine, an NO synthase inhibitor, on the central hypotensive effects of these drugs was investigated in pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits. The intracisternal (IC) administration of alpha-MNA (30 microg/kg) induced hypotension (79+/-2 versus 103+/-4 mm Hg) and bradycardia (222+/-8 versus 278+/-4 bpm) (P:<0.05) (n=5). Clonidine (0.07 microg/kg IC) also induced hypotension (69+/-5 versus 99+/-4 mm Hg) and bradycardia (266+/-7 versus 306+/-10 bpm) (P:<0.05) (n=5). In addition to clonidine, rilmenidine (1 microg/kg IC) induced hypotension (64+/-4 versus 97+/-4 mm Hg) and bradycardia (264+/-11 versus 310+/-4 bpm) (P:<0.05) (n=5). Pretreatment with N:(G)-nitro-L-arginine (900 microg/kg IC) completely prevented the hypotensive effect of alpha-MNA but influenced the cardiovascular effects of neither clonidine nor rilmenidine. These results confirm that imidazoline drugs, such as clonidine, rilmenidine, and the catecholamine alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist alpha-MNA, have distinct mechanisms of action.

Structure-activity relationships on adrenoceptors and imidazoline-preferring binding sites (I(1,2)-PBSs). Part 1: Weak intramolecular H-bond and conformational flexibility in a new I1-PBS-selective imidazoline analogue, trans1-(4',5'-dihydro-1'H-imidazol-2'-yl)methyl-2-hydroxyindane (PMS 952)

The highly selective I1-PBS imidazoline analogue PMS 952 has been selected to study the incidence of intramolecular hydrogen bond and molecular flexibility on its biological activity. On one hand, the weak energy difference between three calculated conformers does not support the stabilization of one conformer by an internal hydrogen bond. The 3-D electrostatic map confirms this feature and the solvent effect does not significantly modify the relative energy of these conformers. On the other hand, the conformational spaces of the neutral and ionized forms present a great number of equilibrium structures, in a short energetic range (20 Kcal). The results are representative of an exceptional conformational flexibility due to a cooperative effect between several parts of the molecule.

Imidazoline receptor antisera-selected (IRAS) cDNA: cloning and characterization

The imidazoline-1 receptor (IR1) is considered a novel target for drug discovery. Toward cloning an IR1, a truncated cDNA clone was isolated from a human hippocampal lambda gt11 cDNA expression library by relying on the selectivity of two antisera directed against candidate IR proteins. Amplification reactions were performed to extend the 5' and 3' ends of this cDNA, followed by end-to-end PCR and conventional cloning. The resultant 5131-basepair molecule, designated imidazoline receptor-antisera-selected (IRAS) cDNA, was shown to encode a 1504-amino acid protein (IRAS-1). No relation exists between the amino acid sequence of IRAS-1 and proteins known to bind imidazolines (e.g., it is not an alpha2-adrenoceptor or monoamine oxidase subtype). However, certain sequences within IRAS-1 are consistent with signaling motifs found in cytokine receptors, as previously suggested for an IR1. An acidic region in IRAS-1 having an amino acid sequence nearly identical to that of ryanodine receptors led to the demonstration that ruthenium red, a dye that binds the acidic region in ryanodine receptors, also stained IRAS-1 as a 167-kD band on SDS gels and inhibited radioligand binding of native I1 sites in untransfected PC-12 cells (a source of authentic I1 binding sites). Two epitope-selective antisera were also generated against IRAS-1, and both reacted with the same 167-kD band on Western blots. In a host-cell-specific manner, transfection of IRAS cDNA into Chinese hamster ovary cells led to high-affinity I1 binding sites by criteria of nanomolar affinity for moxonidine and rilmenidine. Thus, IRAS-1 is the first protein discovered with characteristics of an IR1.

Imidazoline receptors: a challenge

The hypotensive effect of imidazoline-like drugs (IMs) directly injected into the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem (NRL/RVLM) was shown to involve non-adrenergic imidazoline specific receptors (IRs). Some IMs caused hypotension when injected there, irrespective of their affinity and selectivity for any alpha-adrenoceptor subtype. Compounds, such as LNP 509, S 23515, S 23757 or benazoline with very high selectivities for IRs over alpha 2-adrenoceptors (A2Rs), became available recently. Some of these compounds (LNP 509, S 23515) caused hypotension when injected alone into the NRL/RVLM region. Nevertheless, high selectivity for IRs will not predict by its own the capability of IMs to elicit hypotension as some of these substances behaved as antagonists towards the hypotensive effects of the latter. As far as hybrid drugs, i.e., with mixed binding profiles (I1/alpha 2), were concerned, a significant correlation has been reported between their central hypotensive effect and their affinity for IRs. Imidazoline antagonists, such as idazoxan, were repeatedly shown to competitively prevent and reverse the centrally induced hypotensive effect of IMs. The sole stimulation of A2Rs within the NRL/RVLM region was not sufficient to decrease blood pressure as much as IMs did, as shown by the lack of significant blood pressure lowering effect of alpha-methylnoradrenaline (alpha-MNA). No correlation was observed between affinity of IMs for A2Rs and their central hypotensive effects. It is also noticeable that yohimbine, an A2Rs antagonist, was repeatedly shown to abolish the hypotensive effect of hybrids but usually in a non-competitive manner. Mutation of A2Rs was shown to prevent the hypotensive effects of centrally acting drugs. It is concluded that (i) drugs highly selective for I1Rs over A2Rs can reduce blood pressure by their own; (ii) the central hypotensive effect of IMs needs implication of IRs and appears to be facilitated by additional activation of A2Rs; and (iii) this effect requires intact A2Rs along the sympathetic pathways.

Imidazoline receptors: from discovery to antihypertensive therapy (facts and doubts)

The hypothesis and indirect evidence of imidazoline receptors has been promoted since some 15 years ago and it gave a substantial impetus for research in this field, resulting in a better understanding of neuronal and cardiovascular regulatory processes. The nomenclature of the imidazoline receptors has been accepted by international forums but no direct proof for the existence of these receptors has been published. Authors summarise the most important available data, including facts and doubts as far as the discovery, characterisation, and function of imidazoline receptors and their subtypes, the differences between imidazoline receptors and alpha-2 adrenoceptors, and also on their participation in regulatory processes.

Participation of imidazoline receptors and alpha(2-)-adrenoceptors in the central hypotensive effects of imidazoline-like drugs

The central hypotensive effect of imidazoline-like drugs (IMs) involves non-adrenergic imidazoline receptors (IRs). IMs cause hypotension irrespective of their affinity and selectivity for one or the other alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes. LNP 509, which binds to I1Rs (Ki = 5.10(-7) M) but roughly not to alpha 2-adrenoceptors (A2Rs) (Ki > 10(-5) M), causes hypotension when injected alone into the brainstem. As far as hybrid drugs, that is, those with mixed binding profiles (I1/alpha 2), are concerned, a significant correlation was reported between their central hypotensive effect and their affinity for IRs. Imidazoline antagonists such as idazoxan competitively antagonized the centrally induced hypotensive effect of IMs. Yohimbine, an A2Rs antagonist, blocks the hypotensive effect of hybrids but usually in a noncompetitive manner. Mutation of A2Rs prevented the hypotensive effects of drugs highly selective for A2Rs, but also that of hybrids such as clonidine. These data indicate that triggering of the hypotensive effects of IMs (1) needs implication of IRs; (2) appears to be facilitated by additional activation of A2Rs; and (3) requires integrity of A2Rs along the sympathetic pathways.

Novel targets and techniques in imidazoline receptor research

Imidazoline binding sites are now generally accepted as being receptors. Despite this acceptance, the molecular structure and signal transduction mechanisms of these receptors are still poorly understood. The I1-imidazoline binding site (I1-receptor) is localized to the plasma membrane, but it is not clear if this represents a conventional receptor. It is also not clear if there are multiple forms of the I1-receptor. The signal transduction mechanisms of I1-receptors are similarly unclear, but much progress has been made. Evidence clearly indicates that ligands with high affinity for I1-receptors stimulate a novel signal transduction pathway, phosphatidylcholine-selective phospholipase C, in the rat adrenal medullary tumor cell line PC-12. However, this may not be the case in all cell types as microphysiometry, a novel technique for determining cellular activation, could not detect receptor activation in cultured bovine adrenal medullary cells exposed to a number of imidazolines considered to be agonists at the I1-receptor. This suggests that there is no I1-receptor-mediated stimulation of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C in these cells. By contrast, nicotine-stimulated increases in ion entry were blocked by clonidine. Ion channels have been suggested as another possible I1-imidazoline "receptor" family and may represent the low affinity I1-receptor. I1-Receptor ligands can be shown to bind to, or block, the following members of the ligand-gated ion channel super family, the 5HT3, K+ATP, NMDA, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The site of action appears to be the phencyclidine binding site in these channels, but other possibilities cannot be excluded. Molecular modeling suggests that I1-receptor-selective ligands share a common three-dimensional structure with phencyclidine, providing a basis for these actions. This suggests that a phencyclidine-binding site motif may represent a novel site of action for I1-receptor ligands and that searches for receptors based on this motif may reveal novel imidazoline "receptors."

Cardiovascular effects of rilmenidine, moxonidine and clonidine in conscious wild-type and D79N alpha2A-adrenoceptor transgenic mice

1. We investigated the cardiovascular effects of rilmenidine, moxonidine and clonidine in conscious wild-type and D79N alpha2A-adrenoceptor mice. The in vitro pharmacology of these agonists was determined at recombinant (human) alpha2-adrenoceptors and at endogenous (dog) alpha2A-adrenoceptors. 2. In wild-type mice, rilmenidine, moxonidine (100, 300 and 1000 microg kg(-1), i.v.) and clonidine (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently decreased blood pressure and heart rate. 3. In D79N alpha2A-adrenoceptor mice, responses to rilmenidine and moxonidine did not differ from vehicle control. Clonidine-induced hypotension was absent, but dose-dependent hypertension and bradycardia were observed. 4. In wild-type mice, responses to moxonidine (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) were antagonized by the non-selective, non-imidazoline alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, RS-79948-197 (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.). 5. Affinity estimates (pKi) at human alpha2A-, alpha2B- and alpha2C-adrenoceptors, respectively, were: rilmenidine (5.80, 5.76 and 5.33), moxonidine (5.37, <5 and <5) and clonidine (7.21, 7.16 and 6.87). In a [35S]-GTPgammaS incorporation assay, moxonidine and clonidine were alpha2A-adrenoceptor agonists (pEC50/intrinsic activity relative to noradrenaline): moxonidine (5.74/0.85) and clonidine (7.57/0.32). 6. In dog saphenous vein, concentration-dependent contractions were observed (pEC50/intrinsic activity relative to noradrenaline): rilmenidine (5.83/0.70), moxonidine (6.48/0.98) and clonidine (7.22/0.83). Agonist-independent affinities were obtained with RS-79948-197. 7. Thus, expression of alpha2A-adrenoceptors is a prerequisite for the cardiovascular effects of moxonidine and rilmenidine in conscious mice. There was no evidence of I1-imidazoline receptor-mediated effects. The ability of these compounds to act as alpha2A-adrenoceptor agonists in vitro supports this conclusion.

Ligand binding to I2 imidazoline receptor: the role of lipophilicity in quantitative structure-activity relationship models

A series of 2-trans-styryl-imidazoline (tracizoline) congeners were designed and tested to develop 2-D and 3-D QSAR models for their binding to imidazoline (I2) receptor. The important role of lipophilicity was assessed by classical 2-D QSAR study (Hansch approach) and by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) with the inclusion of the molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP), as an additional descriptor, besides standard steric and electrostatic fields. Results from these studies were compared to those obtained in a previous modeling study of I2 receptor ligands and integrated into a new, comprehensive model, based on about sixty I2 receptor ligands. This model revealed, at the three-dimensional level, the most significant steric, electrostatic, and lipophilic interactions accounting for high I2 receptor affinity.

Does a second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs really exist?

The site of the hypotensive action of imidazoline compounds, such as clonidine, was first identified within the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem: the nucleus reticularis lateralis. After that, it was shown that imidazolines and related substances reduced blood pressure when applied in this area whereas catecholamines were not capable of producing such an effect. These data led us to suggest the existence of receptors specific for imidazoline-like compounds different from the alpha2-adrenoceptors. Soon after, the existence of imidazoline binding sites was reported in the brain and in a variety of peripheral tissues including the human kidney. As expected, these specific binding sites do not bind the catecholamines. The imidazoline binding sites are already subclassified in two groups: the I1-subtype sensitive to clonidine and idazoxan, and the I2-subtype, sensitive to idazoxan and nearly insensitive to clonidine. Functional studies confirmed that the hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs involved imidazoline receptors while their most frequent side effects only involved alpha2-adrenoceptors. However, recent functional evidence suggests that a cross talk between imidazoline receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors is necessary to trigger a hypotensive effect within the ventral brainstem. Rilmenidine and Moxonidine are the leader compounds of a new class of antihypertensive drugs selective for imidazoline receptors. At hypotensive doses, these drugs are devoid of significant sedative effect. Rilmenidine evoked hypotension when injected within the nucleus reticularis lateralis region; it competed for [3H]-clonidine bound to specific imidazoline binding sites in human medullary membrane preparations but proved more selective for cerebral imidazoline receptors than clonidine. It is suggested that this selectivity might explain the low incidence of their side effects. Additional potentially beneficial actions on cardiac arrhythmias or congestive heart failure enlarge the therapeutic interest of imidazoline-related drugs. Recent binding and functional data throw a new light on the optimal pharmacological profile of this second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs.

1,5-Bis(4-amidinophenoxy)pentane (pentamidine) is a potent inhibitor of [3H]idazoxan binding to imidazoline I2 binding sites

The aromatic diamidine 1,5-bis(4-amidinophenoxy)pentane (pentamidine) is used for treatment and prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Clinical use of pentamidine has been restricted by significant toxicity, that includes hypotension, and hypoglycemia. Although clinical toxicity is well described, the mechanisms are still poorly understood. Competitive binding analyses using [3H]idazoxan as the radioligand, and cirazoline to define non-specific binding, demonstrate that pentamidine binds to an imidazoline I2 binding site on rat liver membranes with a Ki of 1.4+/-0.22 nM. The Ki indicates that pentamidine inhibits radioligand binding at imidazoline I2 sites with an affinity approximating the most potent known ligands and may be related to pentamidine toxicity. Moreover, pentamidine analogs inhibit radioligand binding with a range of affinities that vary according to their structure. Two candidate drugs, Compounds 5 and 6, are more active than pentamidine in the corticosteroid-suppressed rat model of P. carinii pneumonia, yet have different affinities for the imidazoline I2 site (Ki 5 = 50.1+/-1.06 nM and Ki 6 = approximately 3500 nM). Affinity for this site does not correlate with antimicrobial activity (r = 0.60; p = 0.09) or the calculated log of the octanol:water partition coefficient (ClogP) (r = -0.38; p = 0.22).

Autonomic nervous system as a target for cardiovascular drugs

1. Drugs acting within the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are of particular interest when autonomic abnormalities are implicated in the development and maintenance of various cardiovascular pathologies. For example, it has been documented that in the early stages of hypertensive disease (i.e. hyperkinetic borderline hypertension) a sympathetic hyperactivity associated with a decreased parasympathetic activity results in increased cardiac output and heart rate. 2. Several classes of drugs acting within the central, as well as the peripheral ANS, are very efficient in treating hypertensive disease. One of these classes of drugs, the second generation of centrally acting drugs, has proved beneficial in this respect because, in addition to their therapeutic efficacy, these drugs are well tolerated. 3. The central nervous system may also be the target for drugs with the potential to treat other cardiovascular diseases. Some recent experimental and clinical data supporting such new perspectives concerning idiopathic dysrhythmias, angina pectoris and congestive heart failure will be summarized.