Anti-HBs characteristics after hepatitis B immunisation with plasma-derived and recombinant DNA-derived vaccines

Higher disappearance rate of anti-HBs in Taiwanese freshers neonatally vaccinated with recombinant yeast hepatitis B vaccine

BACKGROUND & AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of infant recombinant yeast hepatitis B vaccine (Recombinant group) and infant plasma-derived one (Plasma group) in Taiwanese freshers.

METHODS

Recruited were a total of 38 377 freshmen who underwent university entrance health examinations from 2003 to 2015. Subjects were assigned into two groups-plasma type and recombinant type, according to the national neonatal hepatitis B immunization program. The seroprevalences of hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen, and antibody against hepatitis B core antigen in each group and gender were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of two groups.

RESULTS

The HBsAg-positive rates in the plasma group and recombinant group were 1.5% and 0.3% respectively. The anti-HBs positive rates were 43.6% and 30.9%. The hepatitis B viral natural infection rates were 3.6% and 1.3%. Taking those who were born in July 1986-April 1992 as baseline group after adjustment for gender and age at hepatitis B markers checkup time, the efficacy of recombinant group in decreasing HBsAg positive rate, and decreasing hepatitis B virus natural infection rate was 71.0% (95% C.I.: 59.0-79.0%, P<.001) and 65.0% (95% C.I. 58.0-71.0%, P<.001) respectively. On the contrary, the seroprevalence of anti-HBs positive rate in recombinant group was 39.0% (95% C.I.: 36.0-42.0%, P<.001) lower than that of plasma group. (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Higher disappearance rate of anti-HBs was noted in recombinant group than in plasma group when the subjects reached their youth and young adulthood in Taiwan.

Vaccines for preventing hepatitis B in health-care workers

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes acute and chronic liver diseases. Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for health-care workers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of hepatitis B vaccination in health-care workers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the trial registers of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to February 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing any dose, injection route, injection site, or schedule of hepatitis B plasma-derived vaccines (PDV) or recombinant vaccines (RV) versus placebo, no intervention, or another hepatitis B vaccine in health-care workers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted the data independently. The reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the trials regarding generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The results were presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 21 randomised trials, all with one or more methodological weaknesses. Four trials demonstrated that PDV versus placebo significantly decreased hepatitis B events at maximum follow-up (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.73). RV did not differ significantly from PDV in eliciting a protective hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) level in two trials. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Low-dose vaccine (1 or 2 microg) by the intradermal route resulted in significantly more participants without protective anti-HBs level compared with high-dose (10 or 20 microg) by the intramuscular route (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.76). The intradermal route caused significantly more local adverse events, while the intramuscular route caused significantly more systemic adverse events. The gluteal injection produced significantly more participants without protective anti-HBs level than the deltoid injection. The prevalence of anti-HBs seroconversion by rapid vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) was significantly lower than that by standard vaccination (0, 1, and 6 months). Booster vaccinations with different RV doses (2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 microg) produced similar prevalence of anti-HBs seroconversion in three trials assessing participants who did not respond to previous HBV vaccination.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PDV significantly prevents hepatitis B events. RV seems to be able to elicit similar protective anti-HBs levels. The intramuscular route with 20 microg RV was significantly more effective compared with the intradermal route with 2 microg RV as was the standard schedule compared with a rapid schedule and deltoid intramuscular injection compared with the gluteal intramuscular injection. It is unclear if booster vaccination of non-responders offers higher anti-HBs seroconversion and hepatitis B vaccine prevents the infection of hepatitis B mutants in health-care workers.

Duration of hepatitis B immunity in low risk children receiving hepatitis B vaccinations from birth

BACKGROUND

The duration of protection after hepatitis B vaccination of infants is unknown.

METHODS

We determined antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) at 4-13 years of age in 363 low risk children who had been vaccinated starting at birth with hepatitis B vaccine. Those with nonprotective titers (<10 mIU/mL) received a booster dose. We similarly followed 16 children of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers.

RESULTS

Of low risk infants receiving a plasma-derived vaccine, 41% (42 of 102) of those whose primary response was unknown and 24% (4 of 17) who had initially responded retained protective titers (> or = 10 mIU/mL) of anti-HBs at 9 and 13 years, respectively. Of those who did not have protective antibody titers, 61% (33 of 54) and 67% (8 of 12), respectively, responded to a booster dose. In children of HBsAg-positive mothers, 31% retained protective anti-HBs at 12 years, and 90% (9 of 10) with nonprotective titers responded to a booster. In low risk children initially receiving a recombinant vaccine, 12.5% (26 of 208) and none (0 of 36) retained protective anti-HBs titers at 5 and 7 years of age, respectively. Of those who did not have protective titers, 90% (120 of 134) and 91% (32 of 35), respectively, responded to a booster.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HBs disappeared by 5 years of age in most children who were vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine from birth. Although most children showed immunologic memory, one-third failed to demonstrate an anamnestic response to a booster dose. Additional long term studies of low risk infants are needed to determine duration of protection and the necessity for or timing of booster doses.

LPS-binding protein and CD14-dependent attachment of hepatitis B surface antigen to monocytes is determined by the phospholipid moiety of the particles

It was observed recently that recombinant yeast-derived hepatitis B surface antigen (rHBsAg) particles, which contain the S protein only, bind almost exclusively to monocytes. It is shown here that binding requires the presence of the LPS receptor CD14. Furthermore, evidence is presented that a domain on CD14 that is identical to or largely overlaps with the LPS-binding pocket is instrumental for the attachment of rHBsAg. Additionally, it is shown that the heat-labile LPS-binding protein (LBP) catalyses the binding of rHBsAg to the cells. Remarkably, natural plasma-derived HBsAg (pHBsAg) does not have this property. pHBsAg devoid of its lipids and reconstituted with phosphatidylserine or phosphatidylglycerol acquires the characteristic of yeast-derived HBsAg. Clearly, the interaction of rHBsAg with the cell membrane is determined by the presence of charged phospholipids that are absent in pHBsAg. Although a lipid-receptor interaction is suggested, antibody-inhibition experiments suggest a possible involvement of the C-terminal region of the S protein in the interaction with monocytes. The possible implications of these observations for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and HBV vaccine efficiency are discussed.

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) derived from yeast cells (Hansenula polymorpha) used to establish an influence of antigenic subtype (adw2, adr, ayw3) in measuring the immune response after vaccination

As a product of western world biotechnology the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) hepatitis B vaccine was introduced as antigenic subtype adw2. However, an HBsAg/adw2-vaccine may provide a good but not "optimal" immunologic response for infection with heterologous virus strains. The availability of the yeast Hansenula polymorpha HBsAg in three different antigenic forms (adw2, ayw3 and adr) enabled us to investigate the influence of variant amino acids in the binding of immune anti-HBs after vaccination. Hansenula-derived HBsAg was standardised on the basis of protein content at >95% purity. Standardisation was controlled by monoclonal anti-HBs binding in a well-conserved region. Sera were obtained after immunisation with type adw, ayw and adr vaccines. Direct binding of immune antibodies to homologous antigen (in EIA) was higher than to heterologous antigen except for the adr-related antibodies. Since the binding of the WHO reference anti-HBs was strongly reduced for the ayw and adr compared to the adw antigen, a similar binding profile for the three antigens on protein basis could result in 2-3-fold different anti-HBs level expressed in IU/l. Inhibition of Hansenula-derived HBsAg binding to solid phase monoclonal anti-HBs in enzyme immunoassays after incubation with serum anti-HBs confirmed the differential binding of serum anti-HBs with variant Hansenula-derived HBsAg. This variant (antigenic subtype) dependent reactivity of anti-HBs in immunoassays in combination with a variant specific WHO standard may limit the application of the threshold levels of 10 and 100 IU/l for seroconversion and seroprotection.

Characterization of a human monoclonal antibody obtained after immunization with plasma vaccine and a booster with recombinant-DNA hepatitis B vaccine

A human monoclonal antibody type IgG4, designated 1Ff4, was obtained by Epstein Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from a hepatitis B vaccinee (HB-VAX: plasma-derived vaccine) after one boost of yeast recombinant DNA derived vaccine (Engerix-B). 1Ff4 binds preferentially to HBsAg/adw(2) and HBsAg/ayw(1). In binding experiments, it competes with antibodies induced by vaccination with HB-VAX-DNA (yeast recombinant) and HB-VAX (plasma-derived vaccine). 1Ff4 competes in part with a monoclonal antibody for the w/r region. Partial inhibition of binding of HBsAg/adw(2) to solid phase anti-HBs was detected, resembling inhibition obtained using other human monoclonal specific for the "a"-loop. 1Ff4 does not bind to linear peptides covering the two "a"-loops or to an adw(2)/G145R mutant, its binding to wild type HBsAg strongly depends on the presence of disulphide bonds. In a large series of HBsAg-positive samples from an endemic area, 1Ff4 antibodies were successfully used to discriminate between an adw(2) and an adrq+ strain. The characterisation of 1Ff4 and other human monoclonal anti-HBs antibodies may help to understand the fine specificity of protective antibodies elicited by immunization.

Reduced antigenicity of the hepatitis B virus HBsAg protein arising as a consequence of sequence changes in the overlapping polymerase gene that are selected by lamivudine therapy

The prevalence of hepatitis B virus vaccine escape mutants has increased as a consequence of the introduction of global vaccination programs. Furthermore and as a consequence of the organization of the genome of hepatitis B virus (HBV) into overlapping reading frames, the selection of polymerase mutants during long-term lamivudine therapy can select viruses with changes in the overlapping S gene coding for the hepatitis B small antigen (HBsAg). We have investigated the role of lamivudine in selecting HBV mutants with antigenically altered HBsAg protein using pooled human vaccine sera in enzyme immunosorbent assays and radioimmunoassays. HBsAg proteins containing the vaccine escape mutations G145R and D144E/G145R demonstrated markedly reduced binding to anti-HBs antibody. HBsAg mutants including E164D, W196S, I195M, M198I, and E164D/I195M (corresponding to the polymerase protein changes of V519L, M550I, L526M/M550V V553I, and V519L/L526M/M550V) selected during lamivudine treatment also demonstrated reduced binding to anti-HBs antibody. These findings raise the possibility of lamivudine-resistant mutants arising that possess antigenically distinct HBsAg proteins.

A multi-center controlled study of rapid hepatitis B vaccination using a novel triple antigen recombinant vaccine

Hepatitis B vaccines have been available for 20 years, however, the disease still remains a global problem. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups could be improved if a more potent vaccine with a shorter vaccination regimen were available. Hepacare is new recombinant vaccine, which contains three of the surface antigens of the HB virus and has higher immunogenicity than present single antigen (HBsAg only) vaccines. This study evaluates the potential for developing seroprotection rapidly and the viability of a 1 month/two dose regimen. A total of 400 adult subjects were vaccinated using either the present accelerated 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B or a 1 month/two dose regimen of a novel triple antigen vaccine (Hepacare). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Four weeks after a single dose, the seroprotective rates for Engerix-B and the triple antigen vaccine were 5 and 17%, respectively. By month 2, 4 weeks after two doses of vaccine, it was 38 and 61%. Finally by month 3, 4 weeks after a third dose of Engerix-B or placebo, respectively, the seroprotection rates were 71 and 82%. The geometric mean titres (GMTs), of these responders was then 119 and 120 IU/l, respectively. Both vaccines were well tolerated. At all points up to and including 3 months after beginning vaccination, the novel 1 month/two dose regimen of Hepacare was significantly more effective in producing seroporotective titres than the 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B (P = 0.001).

Comparison of a triple antigen and a single antigen recombinant vaccine for adult hepatitis B vaccination

Hepatitis B and its sequelae are a major public health problem. Vaccines have been available for almost 20 years; however the disease still remains a global problem. Many factors contribute to the failure to control hepatitis B, including the limited nature of the vaccination programs implemented initially. Only relatively recently has mass childhood vaccination begun to be implemented and vaccination of high-risk groups, other than healthcare workers, is still not general policy. Additional factors contributing to continued persistence of hepatitis B in the developed world are that the present vaccines are not fully used by those recommended to be vaccinated and even when vaccination is carried out appropriately, there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups who have inadequate response to current vaccines, and those who are unwilling or unable to comply with protracted multi-dose vaccine regimens, could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Adults who had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B were randomised to receive a vaccination course of either a present single antigen (S) vaccine (Recombivax-HB) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare Medeva Pharma plc). Doses were given at baseline and 1 month and 6 months later. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 7 months after beginning vaccination. The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of protection, measured as the percentage of subjects with anti-HBs titres > or = 10 IU/L, 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 303 adult subjects entered the study and were vaccinated. Of these, 11 failed to complete the study (4 on Hepacare and 7 on Recombivax-HB); however all but 2 (1 to receive the triple antigen vaccine and 1 to receive Recombivax-HB) were included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy evaluation. Treatment randomisation was stratified at entry based on age (above and below 40 years old) and gender. The standard three-dose/6-month vaccination regimen of the single antigen vaccine protected 83% of subjects by 7 months after starting vaccination whereas the triple antigen vaccine as a two-dose/1-month regimen protected 88% within 6 months and as a three-dose/6-month regimen protected 97% by 7 months after starting vaccination. Thus the protection rate provided by the shortened (0, 1) regimen of the novel vaccine was "essentially equivalent" (i.e., not statistically inferior) to that provided by the full (0, 1, and 6) regimen of today's vaccine (88% vs. 81%, P < 0.001), and the protection rate provided by a three-dose/6-month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of the new vaccine was significantly superior to that provided by present vaccines (97% vs. 83% P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects protected increases with time after beginning vaccination and at all time points up to and including 6 months was significantly greater with the two-dose regimen of the triple antigen vaccine than with the single antigen vaccine regimen. In adults at risk for a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccination [i.e., older adults (>/=40), the obese, males, and smokers], the triple antigen vaccine produced a significantly greater percentage of protected subjects (P < 0.001) and higher geometric mean titre (P < 0.001). Indeed as a three-dose/6 month regimen, the triple antigen vaccine raised the level of protection in these vulnerable subgroups to that seen when a single antigen vaccine is used in the optimal younger adult group. Both vaccines were well tolerated and had similar safety profiles. The most frequently (> or = 10%) reported adverse events with the use of either vaccine were pain at the site of injection (38% vs. 41% vs. 20% for the two-dose Hepacare regimen, the three-dose Hepacare regimen, and the three-dose Recombivax-HB regimen, respectively), infections at the site of injection (1% vs. 14% vs. 9%), headache (9% vs. 13% vs. 11%), and nausea (7% vs. 11% vs. 3%). It is concluded that in healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine that contained S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunological response. This was exemplified by the novel vaccine's ability to overcome factors such as advancing age (> or = 40 years), obesity, and smoking, each of which is known to reduce the potential for protection with present recombinant S only vaccines. A two-dose/1-month (0 and 1) regimen of this triple antigen vaccine was as effective as the standard three-dose/6 month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of present single antigen vaccines. (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Anti-HBs after hepatitis B immunization with plasma-derived and recombinant DNA-derived vaccines: binding to mutant HBsAg

The G145R mutant of the small S-protein is a major escape mutant of hepatitis B virus observed in natural infection, after immunization and HBIG therapy. In a previous study we found that plasma-derived and recombinant DNA-derived vaccine HBsAg reacted differently with monoclonal antibodies sensitive for the G145R change. In the present study we investigated the binding of polyclonal anti-HBs obtained after immunization with plasma vaccine and recombinant DNA vaccine to synthetic peptides (adw(2), adr) and rHBsAg (HepG2) (ayw(3); wild type and a 145R mutant). Anti-HBs binding to synthetic peptids (25-mers, 7aa overlap) from the "a"-loop was significantly reduced by the G145R substitution and by changing the amino acid sequence from adw(2) into adr. With mutant G145R rHBsAg the inhibitory activity of vaccine anti-HBs was decreased compared to rHBsAg wild type. In general only minor differences were observed between plasma vaccine and recombinant DNA vaccine related antibody responses. However, the individual heterogeneity in epitope specific reactivity with its possible consequences for protection (against escape mutants) is not reflected in an anti-HBs titer by standard anti-HBs assays. The presented differentiation in anti-HBs response after immunization may deliver new tools for evaluation of future vaccines.