Delayed onset of inhibition of return in schizophrenia

Comparable repetition blindness effect in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Repetition blindness (RB) refers to the difficulty to report repetitions of stimuli visually presented in a rapid list. To date only two studies have examined RB in patients with schizophrenia and the results are not clear-cut. The current study was designed to employ a task with reduced memory load, more trials in each experimental condition, and more participants to obtain a more reliable RB effect.

METHODS

A 2x2x3x2 mixed factor repeated measure design was used, with stimulus repetition, lag, and presentation rate as within-subject factors, and group (patient or control) as a between-subject factor. A rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) procedure was used. Twenty eight inpatients with schizophrenia and 28 healthy controls participated in the experiment.

RESULTS

The patient group showed significantly impaired performance when compared tothe control group in every experimental condition. Nevertheless, the patient group demonstrated similar RB effect as the control group. Furthermore, the overall RB effect observed in patients did not relate to their illness severity or psychotic symptoms. Neither was it related to their age or education.

LIMITATIONS

It was difficult to match the age and education of the control group to that of the inpatient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with schizophrenia performed worse than healthy controls in each experimental condition. Both the control and patient group showed robust RB effect in the short lag with faster rates. In addition, RB effect seemed to be irrelevant to patients' illness severity and clinical symptoms.

Delayed Onset of Inhibition of Return in Visual Snow Syndrome

Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a complex, sensory processing disorder. We have previously shown that visual processing changes manifest in significantly faster eye movements toward a suddenly appearing visual stimulus and difficulty inhibiting an eye movement toward a non-target visual stimulus. We propose that these changes reflect poor attentional control and occur whether attention is directed exogenously by a suddenly appearing event, or endogenously as a function of manipulating expectation surrounding an upcoming event. Irrespective of how attention is captured, competing facilitatory and inhibitory processes prioritise sensory information that is important to us, filtering out that which is irrelevant. A well-known feature of this conflict is the alteration to behaviour that accompanies variation in the temporal relationship between competing sensory events that manipulate facilitatory and inhibitory processes. A classic example of this is the “Inhibition of Return” (IOR) phenomenon that describes the relative slowing of a response to a validly cued location compared to invalidly cued location with longer cue/target intervals. This study explored temporal changes in the allocation of attention using an ocular motor version of Posner's IOR paradigm, manipulating attention exogenously by varying the temporal relationship between a non-predictive visual cue and target stimulus. Forty participants with VSS (20 with migraine) and 20 controls participated. Saccades were generated to both validly cued and invalidly cued targets with 67, 150, 300, and 500 ms cue/target intervals. VSS participants demonstrated delayed onset of IOR. Unlike controls, who exhibited IOR with 300 and 500 ms cue/target intervals, VSS participants only exhibited IOR with 500 ms cue/target intervals. These findings provide further evidence that attention is impacted in VSS, manifesting in a distinct saccadic behavioural profile, and delayed onset of IOR. Whether IOR is perceived as the build-up of an inhibitory bias against returning attention to an already inspected location or a consequence of a stronger attentional orienting response elicited by the cue, our results are consistent with the proposal that in VSS, a shift of attention elicits a stronger increase in saccade-related activity than healthy controls. This work provides a more refined saccadic behavioural profile of VSS that can be interrogated further using sophisticated neuroimaging techniques and may, in combination with other saccadic markers, be used to monitor the efficacy of any future treatments.

Impaired inhibition of return during free-viewing behaviour in patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia affects various aspects of cognitive and behavioural functioning. Eye movement abnormalities are commonly observed in patients with schizophrenia (SZs). Here we examined whether such abnormalities reflect an anomaly in inhibition of return (IOR), the mechanism that inhibits orienting to previously fixated or attended locations. We analyzed spatiotemporal patterns of eye movement during free-viewing of visual images including natural scenes, geometrical patterns, and pseudorandom noise in SZs and healthy control participants (HCs). SZs made saccades to previously fixated locations more frequently than HCs. The time lapse from the preceding saccade was longer for return saccades than for forward saccades in both SZs and HCs, but the difference was smaller in SZs. SZs explored a smaller area than HCs. Generalized linear mixed-effect model analysis indicated that the frequent return saccades served to confine SZs' visual exploration to localized regions. The higher probability of return saccades in SZs was related to cognitive decline after disease onset but not to the dose of prescribed antipsychotics. We conclude that SZs exhibited attenuated IOR under free-viewing conditions, which led to restricted scene scanning. IOR attenuation will be a useful clue for detecting impairment in attention/orienting control and accompanying cognitive decline in schizophrenia.

Inhibition of return (IOR) in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use

Research concerning the spatial orientation in patients with schizophrenia has demonstrated a state independent deficit in inhibition of return (IOR), which has been discussed as a vulnerability marker for schizophrenia. Other recent investigations on brain structure and cognitive processing have revealed less deficits in schizophrenia patients with comorbid cannabis use (SCH + CUD) compared to abstinent schizophrenia patients (SCH). It was hypothesized that these results may reflect a premorbid lower vulnerability in at least a subgroup of comorbid patients. The aim of the present study is to extend previous work by investigating IOR functioning in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use. This in turn should supplement the existing studies on the vulnerability of this patient group. Therefore, we compared IOR functioning in four groups: 62 patients with schizophrenia and 46 healthy controls, both with and without cannabis use. Participants underwent a covert orienting of attention task (COVAT) with peripheral cues and three stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs: 200 ms, 400 ms and 800 ms). Both schizophrenia groups displayed delayed IOR with a more pronounced IOR effect in SCH + CUD compared to SCH. In healthy controls, IOR did not seem to be significantly affected by cannabis use. Significant IOR-differences between groups were only seen between SCH patients without cannabis use and both healthy groups at SOA 400 ms. Patterns of cannabis use as well as clinical parameters of psychoses did not affect IOR. Our results may support the hypothesis of IOR as a vulnerability marker for schizophrenia and of a lower biological vulnerability in at least a subgroup of SCH + CUD.

Influence of empathetic pain processing on cognition in schizophrenia

Deficits in both empathy and cognition have been reported widely in patients with schizophrenia. However, little is known about how these deficits interact among such patients. In the present study, we used pain portraying pictures preceding a color-word Stroop task to investigate the effect of empathetic pain observation on cognition among patients with schizophrenia. Twenty patients with schizophrenia and twenty healthy controls were included. The control group showed increased Stroop facilitation and decreased interference during the empathetic pain condition compared with the non-empathetic condition. Although patients with schizophrenia exhibited deficits in cognition, they demonstrated a similar empathy effect to controls on Stroop facilitation, but a somewhat larger empathy effect on Stroop interference (a more decreased effect). In particular, the groups did not differ in either automatic or controlled processing during the non-empathetic condition, suggesting general rather than specific cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Together, we interpret our findings in terms of two opposing effects of empathy on cognition in schizophrenia, with possible neuromodulatory mechanism. Whereas prior studies showed empathy to be impaired, our outcomes indicate that at least some components of empathetic pain processing are preserved in such patients.

Neural correlates of the preserved inhibition of return in schizophrenia

Inhibition of return (IOR) is an attentional mechanism that previously has been reported to be either intact or blunted in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). In the present study, we explored the neural mechanism of IOR in SCZ by comparing the target-locked N1 and P1 activity evoked by valid-cued trials with that evoked by invalid-cued trials. Twenty-seven schizophrenia patients and nineteen healthy controls participated in a task involving covert orienting of attention with two stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs: 700 ms and 1200 ms) during which 64-channel EEG data were recorded. Behavioral reaction times (RTs) were longer in response to valid-cued trials than to invalid-cued ones, suggesting an intact IOR in SCZ. However, reduced N1 amplitude elicited by valid-cued trials suggested a stronger inhibition of attention from being oriented to a previously cued location, and therefore a relative inhibition of perceptual processing at that location in SCZ. These results indicate that altered N1 activity is associated with the preservation of IOR in SCZ and could be a sensitive marker to track the IOR effect.

Beyond the inhibition of return of attention: reduced habituation to threatening faces in schizophrenia

Attention deficits are prominent among the core symptoms of schizophrenia. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that patients with schizophrenia have a deficit in endogenous disengagement of attention. In this research, we used a standard spatial cueing paradigm to examine whether the attention deficit of such patients is due to impaired attentional disengagement or defective novelty detection/habituation processes. In a spatial cueing procedure with peripheral non-predictive cues and a detection task, we manipulated the valence of either the cue or the target (i.e., a threatening vs. scrambled face) in two separate experiments. The control group exhibited a smaller inhibition of return (IOR) effect only when the target had an emotional load, not when the cue had an emotional load. In the patient group, a larger emotional effect appeared when the threatening face was the target; by contrast, no effect of valence was observed when the threatening face was the cue: IOR was delayed or completely absent independently of valence. The present findings are in conflict with the hypothesis that IOR is due to the disengagement of attention and the subsequent inhibition to return. Instead, they seem to suggest a cost in detecting new information at a previously cued location. From this perspective, it seems that patients with schizophrenia might have a deficit in detecting new information and considering it as new in the current context.

Inhibition of return in the visual field: the eccentricity effect is independent of cortical magnification

Inhibition of return (IOR) as an indicator of attentional control is characterized by an eccentricity effect, that is, the more peripheral visual field shows a stronger IOR magnitude relative to the perifoveal visual field. However, it could be argued that this eccentricity effect may not be an attention effect, but due to cortical magnification. To test this possibility, we examined this eccentricity effect in two conditions: the same-size condition in which identical stimuli were used at different eccentricities, and the size-scaling condition in which stimuli were scaled according to the cortical magnification factor (M-scaling), thus stimuli being larger at the more peripheral locations. The results showed that the magnitude of IOR was significantly stronger in the peripheral relative to the perifoveal visual field, and this eccentricity effect was independent of the manipulation of stimulus size (same-size or size-scaling). These results suggest a robust eccentricity effect of IOR which cannot be eliminated by M-scaling. Underlying neural mechanisms of the eccentricity effect of IOR are discussed with respect to both cortical and subcortical structures mediating attentional control in the perifoveal and peripheral visual field.

Inhibition of return: Twenty years after

When responding to a suddenly appearing stimulus, we are slower and/or less accurate when the stimulus occurs at the same location of a previous event than when it appears in a new location. This phenomenon, often referred to as inhibition of return (IOR), has fostered a huge amount of research in the last 20 years. In this selective review, which introduces a Special Issue of Cognitive Neuropsychology dedicated to IOR, we discuss some of the methods used for eliciting IOR and its boundary conditions. We also address its debated relationships with orienting of attention, succinctly review findings of altered IOR in normal elderly and neuropsychiatric patients, and present results concerning its possible neural bases. We conclude with an outline of the papers collected in this issue, which offer a more in-depth treatment of behavioural, neural, and theoretical issues related to IOR.

Abnormal inhibition of return: A review and new data on patients with parietal lobe damage

The study of the performance of patients with neurological disorders has been fruitful in revealing the nature and neural basis of inhibition of return (IOR). Thus, in recent years, studies have reported abnormal IOR in patients with Alzheimer's disease, patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, and brain-damaged patients. In the present study, we investigated the hypothesis that a spatial "disengagement deficit" (DD; Posner, Walker, Friedrich, & Rafal, 1984) contributed to the pattern of impaired IOR in the ipsilesional field of parietal patients, found in a previous work (Vivas, Humphreys, & Fuentes, 2003). In a first experiment, we replicated the attenuation of IOR for ipsilesional targets on those trials with a lateralized IOR procedure. With stimuli vertically aligned about fixation, we found intact IOR for both up and down targets. Most important, when we ameliorated the potential impact of a spatial DD by presenting both cues and target in the same hemifield, still we found impaired IOR in the ipsilesional field. We interpret these findings in terms of unilateral parietal damage leading to an imbalance of the relative salience of signals represented in a spatial map for directing attention.

Use of cannabis enhances attentional inhibition

OBJECTIVE

Orienting attention to an irrelevant location hampers the response to subsequent targets presented at that location in relation to novel, not previously attended, locations. This inhibitory effect has been named inhibition of return. We conducted an experiment to study the temporal course of inhibition of return in users of cannabis.

METHOD

Twenty-five cannabis users who self-reported a regular frequency of cannabis use in joints per month, and 26 drug-free controls participated in the study. We employed a typical inhibition of return task with a single cue and manipulated the time interval between the onset of the cue and the target (150, 350, 550, 1500, and 2550 ms). Participants were asked to detect the onset of the target regardless of its location.

RESULTS

The group of cannabis users showed a significantly greater overall inhibition relative to the group of nonusers. Furthermore, inhibition of return appeared earlier (at the 350 ms cue-target interval) in the user group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that attentional inhibition is enhanced in cannabis users. More research is needed to determine whether greater inhibition represents an advantage or disadvantage for visual search performance of cannabis users.

Auditory orienting and inhibition of return in schizophrenia: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Patients with schizophrenia (SP) exhibit deficits in both attentional reorienting and inhibition of return (IOR) during visual tasks. However, it is currently unknown whether these deficits are supramodal in nature and how these deficits relate to other domains of cognitive dysfunction. In addition, the neuronal correlates of this pathological orienting response have not been investigated in either the visual or auditory modality. Therefore, 30 SP and 30 healthy controls (HC) were evaluated with an extensive clinical protocol and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an auditory cuing paradigm. SP exhibited both increased costs and delayed IOR during auditory orienting, suggesting a prolonged interval for attentional disengagement from cued locations. Moreover, a delay in the development of IOR was associated with cognitive deficits on formal neuropsychological testing in the domains of attention/inhibition and working memory. Event-related fMRI showed the characteristic activation of a frontoparietal network (invalid trials>valid trials), but there were no differences in functional activation between patients and HC during either attentional reorienting or IOR. Current results suggest that orienting deficits are supramodal in nature in SP, and are related to higher-order cognitive deficits that directly interfere with day-to-day functioning.

Inhibition of return and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon that involves inhibited or delayed orienting to previously cued locations in favor of attending to novel locations. To date, research on IOR in patients with schizophrenia has generated mixed, and seemingly conflicting, results. Some researchers report patients with schizophrenia exhibit blunted or delayed IOR, while other researchers report normal IOR, in terms of time course and magnitude. This meta-analysis summarizes the literature that has employed an IOR task in patients with schizophrenia and with controls while focusing upon a procedural feature, the use of a cue back to fixation, between the cue and target that is known to be important when executive control has been hampered in non-clinical populations. Fifteen experiments were located yielding a total sample of 362 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 285 controls. Using a meta-analytic approach, results of the present analyses show that patients with schizophrenia demonstrate delayed IOR in the single cue procedure. In the cue back to fixation procedure, the time course of IOR among patients is more consistent with that of controls. Differences in measured IOR between patients with schizophrenia and controls are largely related to a deficit in endogenous disengagement of attention.

Deficient inhibition of return in chronic but not first-episode patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of return (IOR) has been tested in patients with schizophrenia with contradictory results. Some studies indicated that patients with schizophrenia have normal levels of IOR; however, other studies reported delayed or blunted IOR. Inconsistency in findings might be due to differences across studies in relevant aspects associated with disease, such as heterogeneity of the disorder, different medications, onset and severity of the illness. The present study was to explore different patterns of IOR in antipsychotic medication free first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia.

METHODS

Forty two patients with first-episode schizophrenia, 44 patients with chronic schizophrenia, and 38 healthy controls were included in the study. All subjects went through a covert orienting of attention task with seven stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) intervals (400 ms, 500 ms, 600 ms, 700 ms, 800 ms, 1200 ms and 1500 ms).

RESULTS

Compared with healthy controls, the magnitude and onset of IOR in first-episode patients with schizophrenia were intact. However, in patients with chronic schizophrenia, there was an attenuated cuing effect especially at SOA 700 ms; in addition, there was a robust IOR until at SOAs 800 ms or above. Moreover, the illness duration and the number of psychotic episodes were significantly correlated with the validity effect at SOAs 400 ms and 600 ms.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that deficient IOR presents in chronic but not in first-episode patients with schizophrenia. IOR deficit in schizophrenia may begin during the course of illness and deteriorate over the course of illness. Our findings are consistent with the neurodegenerative model of schizophrenia.

Confirmation for a delayed inhibition of return by systematic sampling in schizophrenia

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon thought to reflect a mechanism to protect the organism from redirecting attention to previously scanned insignificant locations. A number of studies reported altered IOR in schizophrenia patients with a reduction of its amplitude. However, incomplete sampling of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) makes data on IOR time course incomplete. We examined 14 stabilized young patients with recent onset schizophrenia and 16 healthy controls matched for gender, age, and years of education. Schizophrenia patients (13 males, 1 female) had a mean age of 26.3+/-5.8 years and a mean number of years of study of 9.6+/-3.6. Their illness had a mean duration of 147 weeks. Patients displayed moderate overall slow reaction times (387 ms) in comparison with controls (322 ms). Onset of IOR was found to be delayed in schizophrenia patients appearing between 700 and 800 ms following the cue onset while it appeared at 300 ms in controls. In patients, IOR was constant up to 1100 ms; however, its amplitude was weak with an average of 6 ms. Validity effects (overall and at each SOA value) were uncorrelated to age, years of study, duration of illness, or total or subscale scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.

Eye tracking dysfunction in schizophrenia: characterization and pathophysiology

Eye tracking dysfunction (ETD) is one of the most widely replicated behavioral deficits in schizophrenia and is over-represented in clinically unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients. Here, we provide an overview of research relevant to the characterization and pathophysiology of this impairment. Deficits are most robust in the maintenance phase of pursuit, particularly during the tracking of predictable target movement. Impairments are also found in pursuit initiation and correlate with performance on tests of motion processing, implicating early sensory processing of motion signals. Taken together, the evidence suggests that ETD involves higher-order structures, including the frontal eye fields, which adjust the gain of the pursuit response to visual and anticipated target movement, as well as early parts of the pursuit pathway, including motion areas (the middle temporal area and the adjacent medial superior temporal area). Broader application of localizing behavioral paradigms in patient and family studies would be advantageous for refining the eye tracking phenotype for genetic studies.

Pharmacological modulation of the neural basis underlying inhibition of return (IOR) in the human 5-HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis

RATIONALE

Attentional deficits are common symptoms in schizophrenia. Recent evidence suggests that schizophrenic patients show abnormalities in spatial orienting of attention, particularly a deficit of inhibition of return (IOR). IOR is mostly thought to reflect an automatic, inhibitory mechanism protecting the organism from redirecting attention to previously scanned, insignificant locations. Pharmacologic challenges with hallucinogens have been used as models for psychosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the neural correlates underlying orienting of attention in the human N-methyl-D-aspartic acid antagonist and 5-HT2A agonist models of psychosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study with dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and S-ketamine. We administered a covert orienting of attention task with nonpredictive peripheral cues, and we scanned the subjects on two separate days at least 14 days apart with a placebo and a verum condition on each day.

RESULTS

DMT, but not S-ketamine, slowed down reaction times significantly. IOR was blunted after DMT, but not after S-ketamine. Relative to placebo, S-ketamine increased activation in the IOR condition in the right superior frontal gyrus, left superior temporal gyrus, and right midfrontal frontal gyrus.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancy between the behavioral and functional imaging outcome indicates that pharmacological fMRI might be a sensitive tool to detect drug-modulated blood oxygenation level-dependent signal changes in the absence of behavioral abnormalities. Our findings might help to further clarify the contradictory findings of IOR in schizophrenic patients and might, thus, shed more light on possible differential pathomechanisms of schizophrenic symptoms.

The construct of attention in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is widely thought to involve deficits of attention. However, the term "attention" can be defined so broadly that impaired performance on virtually any task could be construed as evidence for a deficit in attention, and this has slowed cumulative progress in understanding attention deficits in schizophrenia. To address this problem, we divide the general concept of attention into two distinct constructs: input selection, the selection of task-relevant inputs for further processing; and rule selection, the selective activation of task-appropriate rules. These constructs are closely tied to working memory, because input selection mechanisms are used to control the transfer of information into working memory and because working memory stores the rules used by rule selection mechanisms. These constructs are also closely tied to executive function, because executive systems are used to guide input selection and because rule selection is itself a key aspect of executive function. Within the domain of input selection, it is important to distinguish between the control of selection--the processes that guide attention to task-relevant inputs--and the implementation of selection--the processes that enhance the processing of the relevant inputs and suppress the irrelevant inputs. Current evidence suggests that schizophrenia involves a significant impairment in the control of selection but little or no impairment in the implementation of selection. Consequently, the CNTRICS (Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia) participants agreed by consensus that attentional control should be a priority target for measurement and treatment research in schizophrenia.

Orienting of attention in unmedicated patients with schizophrenia, prodromal subjects and healthy relatives

In typical orienting of attention tasks subjects have to respond as fast as possible to targets which appear in the periphery of the visual field and are preceded by spatial cues (e.g. brightening of a peripheral box where the target may subsequently appear). Reaction times (RT) are facilitated when cue and target appear at the same location (valid cueing) and the cue target interval is short (<250 ms). However, RTs slow down again when the target follows a valid cue after an interval of 250 ms and longer. This latter phenomenon is called Inhibition of Return (IOR) and is thought to reflect an automatic, inhibitory mechanism to protect the organism from redundant and distracting stimuli. Deficits of IOR were repeatedly reported in patients with schizophrenia. However, the role of medications and the nature of the deficit (trait or vulnerability indicator?) were unclear. In the present study we examined 15 unmedicated patients with schizophrenia (age: 31.2+/-11.1, m/f: 11/4, global scores SAPS: 48.33+/-33.09, SANS: 19.22+/-26.16), 29 subjects who were putatively in a prodromal state of psychosis, 30 first-degree relatives, another 8 first-degree relatives who had one child and at least one more relative with schizophrenia, and 50 healthy controls. We found an impairment of IOR only in the unmedicated patient group. In conclusion, blunted IOR in schizophrenia is not secondary to medications. According to this and previous studies blunted IOR may be most probably viewed as a trait cognitive feature of the schizophrenic disorder.

[Inhibition of return in schizophrenia: a review]

INTRODUCTION

Most visual environments contain more information than the human brain can process in real time. To overcome this limitation, the attention system acts as a filter by selectively orienting attention to specific regions of the visual field. This ability to orient attention can be reflected in covert shift processes of attention.

LITERATURE FINDINGS

In a typical covert orienting task, subjects have to maintain fixation on a central cross and respond as quickly as possible to a target, which appears in a peripheral box following a cue that summons attention to the direction where the target is going to appear (valid cueing) or to the contralateral direction (invalid cueing). When the cues are nonpredictive, the response characteristics critically depend on stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA). With short SOAs (<300ms), valid cues result in a reaction time advantage over invalid trials, which is due to a reflexive shift of attention towards the source of stimulation. In contrast, with longer SOAs, valid cues result in longer reaction times to the subsequent target.

DISCUSSION

This phenomenon is known as the inhibition of return and is mostly thought to reflect an inhibitory mechanism protecting the organism from redirecting attention to previously scanned insignificant locations. Many studies have reported blunted or delayed inhibition of return in patients with schizophrenia. However, some authors reported normal amounts of inhibition of return. This can be partly explained by the use of manipulations of the covert orienting of the attention paradigm that is known to enhance the course of inhibition of return.

CONCLUSION

The deficit of inhibition of return seems to be time-stable and to be unrelated to psychopathology or length of illness. The contribution of neuroleptic medication to this deficit cannot be determined. Recent data suggest a deficit of inhibition of return in two human models of psychosis (dimethyltryptamine and ketamine). Further studies should clarify whether blunted inhibition of return might represent a trait marker of schizophrenia.

Neuroleptics reverse attentional effects in schizophrenia patients

Patients with schizophrenia show attention deficit characterized by a larger validity effect (fast responses to cued than uncued stimuli) in the right visual field than in the left visual field. In addition, schizophrenia patients do not show inhibition of return (IOR--a mechanism that enables efficient visual search), unless attention is summoned back to the center after the peripheral cue. The present study examined the short-term effect of neuroleptic medications on these two components of visual spatial attention in schizophrenia patients. In order to do this we tested schizophrenia patients that were treated with long-acting neuroleptic medication. These patients were treated once a month, which allowed us to test them with either low or high levels of medication. Here we show that neuroleptic medications reverse the attentional hemispheric asymmetry. In the group with a high level of medication fast RTs to cued trials were found in the right visual field, while in the group with a low level of medication the opposite pattern was found - fast RTs to cued trials were found in the left visual field. In addition, level of medication did not influence IOR - regardless of the level of medication, IOR was observed only when attention was summoned back to the center, unlike control group. These finding suggest an imbalance in dopaminergic activity, possibly in subcortical structures such as the basal ganglia. This study also shows a dissociation between the two components of visual orienting of attention and suggests that facilitation and inhibition are independent processes.

The inter-trial effects of stimulus and saccadic direction on prosaccades and antisaccades, in controls and schizophrenia patients

We investigated the influence of the direction of preceding saccadic trials on the latency of current prosaccades and antisaccades, in healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia. When prosaccades and antisaccades were performed in separate, single-task blocks, we found that only prosaccades were delayed if the saccade in the prior trial was in the same direction, consistent with the expected directional effect from an 'inhibition of return'-like alternation advantage. However, both types of saccades were executed more quickly when the saccade in the penultimate trial was in the same direction, consistent with previous demonstrations of directional plasticity in monkeys. In blocks of randomly mixed prosaccades and antisaccades, the directional effects in healthy subjects were greatest when a prosaccade was preceded by an antisaccade, consistent with a summation of effects of alternation advantage (from the prior stimulus) and directional plasticity (from the prior saccade). Schizophrenic patients showed an additional phenomenon, a directionally specific inhibition of upcoming saccades by preceding antisaccades. These results suggest that saccades in humans are modulated by inter-trial effects attributable to both an 'inhibition of return'-like alternation advantage and directional plasticity.

Disruption of reflexive attention and eye movements in an individual with a collicular lesion

The superior colliculus (SC) plays a central role in the control of saccadic eye movements and has also been implicated in control of covert spatial attention. While there is a growing body of evidence from studies of awake behaving primates that supports these proposals, direct evidence from humans has been sparse. In the present study we tested a patient with thiamine deficiency and a lesion of the SC, who performed both eye movement tasks (prosaccades and antisaccades, with or without a gap) and a covert spatial attention task assessing inhibition of return (IOR). For eye movements, the gap effect was disrupted, and abnormal saccade metrics occurred, with reflexive eye movements being disrupted moreso than voluntary eye movements. Each of these effects resolved coincident with thiamine treatment. The covert attention task revealed a complete absence of IOR. The unequal disruption of voluntary and reflexive eye movements supports the idea that oculomotor responses can be generated in an independent fashion by frontal cortical and lower level neural systems. The role of the SC and other structures in these orienting processes is discussed.

Inhibition of return in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis

Patients with schizophrenia exhibit disturbances of orienting of attention. However, findings have been inconsistent. Pharmacologic challenges with hallucinogens have been used as models for psychosis. The NMDA antagonist state (PCP, ketamine) resembles undifferentiated psychoses with positive and negative symptoms, while the 5-HT(2A) agonist state (LSD, dimethyltryptamine (DMT)) is thought to be an appropriate model for psychoses with prominent positive symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate orienting of attention in the human NMDA antagonist and 5-HT(2A) agonist models of psychosis. A total of 15 healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study with a low and a high dose of DMT and S-ketamine, which elicited subtle 'prepsychotic' or full-blown psychotic symptoms (low and high dose, respectively). Nine subjects completed both experimental days with the two doses of both drugs. Overall, both hallucinogens slowed down reaction times dose dependently (DMT >S-ketamine) and DMT diminished the general response facilitating (alerting) effect of spatially neutral cues. Inhibition of Return (IOR), that is, the normal reaction time disadvantage for validly cued trials with exogenous cues and long cue target intervals, was blunted after both doses of DMT and the low dose of S-ketamine. IOR reflects an automatic, inhibitory mechanism of attention, which is thought to protect the organism from redundant, distracting sensory information. In conclusion, our data suggest a deficit of IOR in both hallucinogen models of psychosis, with the effect being clearer in the serotonin model. Blunted IOR may underlie or predispose to different psychotic manifestations, but particularly to those with prominent positive symptoms.

Deficient inhibition of return in schizophrenia-further evidence from an independent sample

Previous studies on spatial orienting of attention in schizophrenia demonstrated a deficit of Inhibition of Return (IOR). However, other studies reported a delay in the manifestation, but an overall normal amount of IOR in patients with schizophrenia. However, the latter studies used a cue-back manipulation which is known to reinstate or speed up IOR. Hence, it is not clear whether even very long cue target intervals would allow IOR to develop in patients with schizophrenia in the absence of a cue-back manipulation. The aim of the present study was to study IOR in patients with schizophrenia using a single cue paradigm and a very long cue target interval of >1 s in order to differentiate between blunted and delayed IOR. We examined 32 inpatients with schizophrenia and 16 healthy controls with a covert orienting of attention task (COVAT) with non-predictive peripheral cues and three stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA: 100 ms, 800 ms and 1050 ms). We found a lack of Inhibition of Return (IOR) in patients with schizophrenia with both long SOAs of 800 and 1050 ms. As in a previous study of our group, the IOR deficit was unrelated to psychopathology, length of illness, number of previous psychotic episodes and type of neuroleptic medication. In summary, our study confirms and extends previous reports of deficient IOR in patients with schizophrenia. IOR seems to be not just delayed, but rather profoundly disturbed in schizophrenia. Deficient IOR in patients with schizophrenia might be viewed as a trait or alternatively as a vulnerability marker of the disorder.

The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets appearing at previously cued locations are more slowly responded to than targets appearing at previously uncued locations when a relatively long temporal interval occurs between the cue and target. This experiment was conducted to determine whether the magnitude of IOR is influenced by the type of preceding trial (cued or uncued) and/or the location of the cue/target on the previous trial. Although no effect of cue/target location is observed, there was a marked effect of previous trial type, as IOR was greater following an uncued trial relative to a cued trial. This effect was attributable to differences in the response time as a function of previous trial type: specifically, participants were faster to respond to cued and uncued trials when the previous trial type was identical.

Nicotine reduces antisaccade errors in task impaired schizophrenic subjects

Nicotine and/or smoking have been shown to reduce various cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. Here, we examine the effects of nicotine gum on repeated performance on a simple eye movement task. Eight schizophrenic subjects and eight controls participated in three days of testing on saccade (S) and antisaccade (AS) tasks. On each testing day, subjects participated in four testing sessions and received both of two nicotine gum treatments (4 and 6 mg) and both of two control conditions (placebo gum and no gum), each followed by a recovery period. Overall, schizophrenics showed significant impairments on the AS task. However, upon individual examination only four schizophrenics showed significant differences in AS errors or reaction times (RTs) when compared to controls. The other four schizophrenic subjects showed control level performance. All schizophrenic subjects showed normal and better than control level performance on the simple S task. Furthermore, no effects of nicotine were seen on the simple S task. There were significant treatment effects on the AS task. Nicotine treatment significantly decreased errors in the task impaired schizophrenic group and this effect was most pronounced at the 6 mg level. No nicotine effects were demonstrated for non-impaired schizophrenic subjects or controls. This study demonstrates a benefit of short exposure to nicotine in cognitively impaired schizophrenic subjects. These results support previous findings of cognitive benefits of nicotine in schizophrenics.

Blunted inhibition of return in schizophrenia-evidence from a longitudinal study

Previous cross-sectional studies on covert orienting of visual attention in schizophrenia have been inconsistent. In the present longitudinal study, we examined 40 medicated acutely ill inpatients with a covert orienting of attention task (COVAT) shortly after admission, and again 12-16 weeks after the initial examination, while most patients were in (partial) remission. We administered a COVAT with nonpredictive peripheral cues and two stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA; 100 and 800 ms). In addition, we examined 34 healthy control subjects twice (2 weeks apart). The most important finding was a lack of inhibition of return (IOR) in patients with schizophrenia, both at the first examination in an acute psychotic state and at the follow-up examination after considerable clinical improvement. The IOR deficit was unrelated to psychopathology, length of illness, number of previous psychotic episodes, and type of neuroleptic (NL) medication. Deficient IOR in patients with schizophrenia appears to be state-independent and might be viewed as a trait or vulnerability marker of the disorder. Subsequent studies with never-medicated populations and with schizotypal or high-risk subjects are needed in order to further analyze the possible role of NL medications and to clarify whether blunted IOR might represent a vulnerability marker of schizophrenia.

Inhibition of return in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by repetitive obsessions and/or compulsions that interfere with daily functioning. Neuropsychological studies have suggested that such perseverative behaviors may be due to underlying attentional deficits. Inhibition of return (IOR) is an adaptive mechanism that is thought to assist visual search by biasing attention after a critical, short interval to novel, previously unattended areas. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether deficient IOR mechanisms could underlie some of the attentional, and perhaps behavioral, problems, reported in OCD patients. Using a computerized IOR paradigm, participants were required to respond to a target that appeared at either the same or different location to a precue that was presented either 100 ms or 700 ms earlier. Results indicate that patients had a reduced IOR for targets presented in the left visual field, suggesting lateralized anomalies in shifting attention. Results are consistent with lateralization anomalies previously reported in OCD.

The role of response in spatial attention: direct versus indirect stimulus-response mappings

Recent research has suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) develops more quickly when subjects must respond with an eye movement than when they make a manual response to the target (Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1512-1524). Four spatial cueing experiments were conducted where subjects had to indicate the location of visual targets. Within each of the oculomotor and manual modalities, responses could be either directed towards the target (saccade or pointing) or had a more complex stimulus-response (S-R) mapping. For both saccadic and manual responses, IOR onset was delayed as the required S-R mapping became more indirect. This finding further emphasizes the role of response-related processes in spatial attention. Possible explanations for this pattern of results are considered, including the notion that activity in prefrontal cortex, needed for execution of such abstract S-R mappings, may influence the time course of reflexive spatial cueing effects.