A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives

Prioritizing of potential environmental exposure carcinogens beyond IARC group 1-2B based on weight of evidence (WoE) approach

Environmental exposures are the main cause of cancer, and their carcinogenicity has not been fully evaluated, identifying potential carcinogens that have not been evaluated is critical for safety. This study is the first to propose a weight of evidence (WoE) approach based on computational methods to prioritize potential carcinogens. Computational methods such as read across, structural alert, (Quantitative) structure-activity relationship and chemical-disease association were evaluated and integrated. Four different WoE approach was evaluated, compared to the best single method, the WoE-1 approach gained 0.21 and 0.39 improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) value, respectively. The evaluation of 681 environmental exposures beyond IARC list 1-2B prioritized 52 chemicals of high carcinogenic concern, of which 21 compounds were known carcinogens or suspected carcinogens, and eight compounds were identified as potential carcinogens for the first time. This study illustrated that the WoE approach can effectively complement different computational methods, and can be used to prioritize chemicals of carcinogenic concern.

Deriving acceptable limits for non-mutagenic impurities in medicinal products - Durational adjustments

ICH Q3A/B guidelines are not intended for application during the clinical research phase of development and durationally adjusted qualification thresholds are not included. A central tenet of ICH Q3A is that lifetime exposure to 1 mg/day of an unqualified non-mutagenic impurity (NMI) is not a safety concern. An analysis of in vivo toxicology data from 4878 unique chemicals with established NO(A)ELs was conducted to determine whether durationally adjusted qualification limits can be supported. Although not recommended in ICH Q3A/B, a conservative approach was taken by using allometric scaling in the analysis. Following allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from available chronic toxicology studies, it was reconfirmed that there is a safety basis for the 1 mg/day qualification threshold in ICH Q3A. Additionally, allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicology studies could support acceptable limits of 20 and 5 mg/day for an unqualified NMI for dosing durations of less than or greater than one month, respectively. This analysis supports durationally adjusted NMI qualification thresholds for pharmaceuticals that protect patient safety and contribute to 3Rs efforts for qualifying impurities using new approach methods.

Lack of genotoxicity potential and safety assessment of 4-(2-hydroxyethyl) morpholine present as an impurity in pharmaceuticals and nutritional supplements

4-(2-Hydroxyethyl) morpholine (HEM) is widely used as a building block of macromolecules in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements and could remain as an impurity in the finished products. An evaluation of HEM was conducted to identify endpoints that could be used to determine the point-of-departure (POD) for use in assessing the potential risk from exposure to HEM. No oral repeated dose toxicological studies of appropriate duration were found for HEM. Therefore, suitable analogue(s) were identified. Although oral repeated dose studies were available for the analogues, the studies were not of sufficient duration for use in the assignment of a POD for risk evaluation. Accordingly, the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach, which proposes that a de minimis value can be derived to qualitatively assess risk, was considered for HEM. To determine the appropriate TTC approach (genotoxic or non-genotoxic), the genotoxicity of HEM and its analogues were evaluated. The weight of the evidence indicated that HEM, and the appropriate analogues, are not genotoxic. Considering the chemical structure of HEM, the non-genotoxic Cramer class III TTC value of 1.5 μg/kg bw/day was determined to be appropriate for use in safety assessment of HEM as an impurity in products intended for human consumption.

Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in the evaluation of drinking water contact chemicals

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is an approach for assessing the safety of chemicals with low levels of exposure for which limited toxicology data are available. The original TTC criteria were derived for oral exposures from a distributional analysis of a dataset of 613 chemicals that identified 5th percentile no observed effect level (NOEL) values grouped within three tiers of compounds having specific structural functional groups and/or toxic potencies known as Cramer I, II and III classifications. Subsequent assessments of the TTC approach have established current thresholds to be scientifically robust. While the TTC has gained acknowledgment and acceptance by many regulatory agencies and organizations, use of the TTC approach in evaluating drinking water chemicals has been limited. To apply the TTC concept to drinking water chemicals, an exposure-based approach that incorporates the current weight of evidence for the target chemical is presented. Such an approach provides a comparative point of departure to the 5th percentile TTC NOEL using existing data, while conserving the allocation of toxicological resources for quantitative risk assessment to chemicals with greater exposure or toxicity. This approach will be considered for incorporation into NSF/ANSI/CAN 600, a health effects standard used in the safety evaluation of chemicals present in drinking water from drinking water contact additives and materials certified to NSF/ANSI/CAN 60 and 61, respectively.

Evaluating the applicability of the Ames test for cosmetic packaging assessment by comparing carcinogenic risk levels of migrants from plastics with biological detection limits

Risk assessments for cosmetic packaging are required according to the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009, however, the assessment method is well-established for food packaging but limited for cosmetic packaging. In food packaging assessments, Cramer class III TTC (90 μg/day) is applied as the threshold for systemic toxicity when the Ames test including the process of sample concentration steps provides the negative results. However, the human health risks of mutagenic and carcinogenic migrants at exposure levels where the Ames test with the concentrated samples cannot detect are unclear. In the present study, to confirm the applicability of the Ames test for cosmetic packaging assessments, the toxicological data on 37 candidate migrants with Ames test-positive results was collected. For these migrants, the carcinogenic risk levels through cosmetics use were compared to the detection levels of the Ames test for concentrated samples. Regarding at least 32 migrants, the case study showed the negative result from the Ames test incorporating the sample concentration process would indicate negligible mutagenic and carcinogenic risks of packaging extracts. Therefore, application of the Ames test to cosmetic packaging assessments would be helpful to ensure the safety for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity as well as use Cramer-TTC for systemic toxicity.

A simple approach to assess the cancer risk of occupational exposure to genotoxic drugs in healthcare settings

Background

Several drugs for human use possess genotoxic properties as a necessary consequence of their intended therapeutic effect (e.g. antineoplastics). Health workers may be exposed to these chemicals in various occupational settings such as dose preparation and administration. To date, there are no quantitative risk assessment models to estimate the cancer risk of health workers due to the handling of genotoxic drugs. We therefore developed a quantitative risk assessment model to assess the cancer risk of occupational exposure to genotoxic drugs in healthcare settings based on the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept. This model was used to evaluate the cancer risk of health workers due to the handling of genotoxic drugs in modern health care facilities.

Methods

We modified the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept to fit the purpose of occupational cancer risk assessment. The risk model underlying ICH guideline M7 (R1): “assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk” was used as a starting point for our model. We conducted a short review of studies on the occupational exposure of health workers to genotoxic drugs. These occupational exposure data were compared to the acceptable exposure levels resulting from our TTC based risk model.

Results

Based on the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept, we defined an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 4 μg/day as threshold of no concern for the exposure of health workers to genotoxic drugs. Regarding the dermal exposure of health workers to genotoxic drugs, we derived a corresponding acceptable surface contamination level (ASCL) of 20 ng/cm². Both ADI and ASCL are usually not exceeded in modern healthcare settings. Current safety precautions provide sufficient protection to health workers.

Conclusions

The application of our model indicates that workers in modern healthcare facilities are not at risk of developing work related cancer above widely accepted cancer risk levels due to the occupational exposure to genotoxic drugs. Hence, the present study may assist employers and public authorities to make informed decisions concerning the need for (further) protective measures and during risk communication to health workers.

An overview of current practices for regulatory risk assessment with lessons learnt from cosmetics in the European Union

Risk assessments of various types of chemical compounds are carried out in the European Union (EU) foremost to comply with legislation and to support regulatory decision-making with respect to their safety. Historically, risk assessment has relied heavily on animal experiments. However, the EU is committed to reduce animal experimentation and has implemented several legislative changes, which have triggered a paradigm shift towards human-relevant animal-free testing in the field of toxicology, in particular for risk assessment. For some specific endpoints, such as skin corrosion and irritation, validated alternatives are available whilst for other endpoints, including repeated dose systemic toxicity, the use of animal data is still central to meet the information requirements stipulated in the different legislations. The present review aims to provide an overview of established and more recently introduced methods for hazard assessment and risk characterisation for human health, in particular in the context of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC No 1223/2009) as well as the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation (EC 1907/2006).

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a pragmatic tool for the safety assessment: Case studies of cosmetic ingredients with low consumer exposure

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is an internationally accepted pragmatic and conservative tool for the safety assessment of substances, which is used in a wide range of regulatory contexts. The TTC approach produces human exposure threshold values (TTC values) originally derived by Munro from oral toxicity data on cancer and non-cancer toxicity endpoints. This database has been recently substantially enlarged by the COSMOS database, an enhanced oral non-cancer TTC dataset on a larger chemical domain, thereby resulting in a new, transparent and public TTC database also including 552 cosmetics-related chemicals. The 5th percentile point of departure value for each Cramer Class was determined, from which human exposure TTC values have been derived. The combined COSMOS/Munro dataset provided TTC values of 46, 6.2 and 2.3 μg/kg bw/day for Cramer Classes I, II or III, respectively. In order to demonstrate the diverse scope and successful application of the TTC concept to cosmetic ingredients including hair dyes, fragrances and plant-derived ingredients, Cosmetics Europe has prepared several case studies. Overall, the TTC concept is not only useful to replace animal testing but can also successfully be applied to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients in the marketed formulas with low human exposure.

Utilisation of parametric methods to improve percentile-based estimates for the carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines

N-Nitrosamines have recently been the subject of intense regulatory scrutiny, including the setting of low exposure limits (18 ng/day) (European Medicines Agency (EMA), 2020). This paper evaluates different methodologies to determine statistically robust bounds on the carcinogenic potency of chemical classes, using historic TD₅₀ data (Peto et al., 1984; Thresher et al., 2019) and exemplified for N-nitrosamines. Initially, the distribution of TD₅₀ values (TD₅₀s) for N-nitrosamines of known potency was characterised. From this, it is possible to compare parametric and non-parametric methods to obtain percentiles of interest from the distribution of TD₅₀s, which are shown to be robust to uncertainty in the initial TD₅₀ estimates. These methods may then be applied to different chemical subclasses. The values obtained may be of use in refining acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamines and their subclasses.

Evaluating potential refinements to existing Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) values for environmentally-relevant compounds

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) mandates the US EPA perform risk-based prioritisation of chemicals in commerce and then, for high-priority substances, develop risk evaluations that integrate toxicity data with exposure information. One approach being considered for data poor chemicals is the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). Here, TTC values derived using oral (sub)chronic No Observable (Adverse) Effect Level (NO(A)EL) data from the EPA's Toxicity Values database (ToxValDB) were compared with published TTC values from Munro et al. (1996). A total of 4554 chemicals with structures present in ToxValDB were assigned into their respective TTC categories using the Toxtree software tool, of which toxicity data was available for 1304 substances. The TTC values derived from ToxValDB were similar, but not identical to the Munro TTC values: Cramer I ((ToxValDB) 37.3 c. f. (Munro) 30 μg/kg-day), Cramer II (34.6 c. f. 9.1 μg/kg-day) and Cramer III (3.9 c. f. 1.5 μg/kg-day). Cramer III 5th percentile values were found to be statistically different. Chemical features of the two Cramer III datasets were evaluated to account for the differences. TTC values derived from this expanded dataset substantiated the original TTC values, reaffirming the utility of TTC as a promising tool in a risk-based prioritisation approach.

Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern

Toxicological risk assessment of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) in (sources of) drinking water is required to identify potential health risks and prioritize chemicals for abatement or monitoring. In such assessments, concentrations of chemicals in drinking water or sources are compared to either (i) health-based (statutory) drinking water guideline values, (ii) provisional guideline values based on recent toxicity data in absence of drinking water guidelines, or (iii) generic drinking water target values in absence of toxicity data. Here, we performed a toxicological risk assessment for 163 CEC that were selected as relevant for drinking water. This relevance was based on their presence in drinking water and/or groundwater and surface water sources in downstream parts of the Rhine and Meuse, in combination with concentration levels and physicochemical properties. Statutory and provisional drinking water guideline values could be derived from publically available toxicological information for 142 of the CEC. Based on measured concentrations it was concluded that the majority of substances do not occur in concentrations which individually pose an appreciable human health risk. A health concern could however not be excluded for vinylchloride, trichloroethene, bromodichloromethane, aniline, phenol, 2-chlorobenzenamine, mevinphos, 1,4-dioxane, and nitrolotriacetic acid. For part of the selected substances, toxicological risk assessment for drinking water could not be performed since either toxicity data (hazard) or drinking water concentrations (exposure) were lacking. In absence of toxicity data, the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach can be applied for screening level risk assessment. The toxicological information on the selected substances was used to evaluate whether drinking water target values based on existing TTC levels are sufficiently protective for drinking water relevant CEC. Generic drinking water target levels of 37 μg/L for Cramer class I substances and 4 μg/L for Cramer class III substances in drinking water were derived based on these CEC. These levels are in line with previously reported generic drinking water target levels based on original TTC values and are shown to be protective for health effects of the majority of contaminants of emerging concern evaluated in the present study. Since the human health impact of many chemicals appearing in the water cycle has been studied insufficiently, generic drinking water target levels are useful for early warning and prioritization of CEC with unknown toxicity in drinking water and its sources for future monitoring.

The safety evaluation of food flavouring substances: the role of metabolic studies

The safety assessment of a flavour substance examines several factors, including metabolic and physiological disposition data. The present article provides an overview of the metabolism and disposition of flavour substances by identifying general applicable principles of metabolism to illustrate how information on metabolic fate is taken into account in their safety evaluation. The metabolism of the majority of flavour substances involves a series both of enzymatic and non-enzymatic biotransformation that often results in products that are more hydrophilic and more readily excretable than their precursors. Flavours can undergo metabolic reactions, such as oxidation, reduction, or hydrolysis that alter a functional group relative to the parent compound. The altered functional group may serve as a reaction site for a subsequent metabolic transformation. Metabolic intermediates undergo conjugation with an endogenous agent such as glucuronic acid, sulphate, glutathione, amino acids, or acetate. Such conjugates are typically readily excreted through the kidneys and liver. This paper summarizes the types of metabolic reactions that have been documented for flavour substances that are added to the human food chain, the methodologies available for metabolic studies, and the factors that affect the metabolic fate of a flavour substance.

Derivation of Occupational Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Systemically Acting Noncarcinogenic Organic Chemicals

Many substances in workplace do not have occupational exposure limits. The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) principle is part of the hierarchy of approaches useful in occupational health risk assessment. The aim of this study was to derive occupational TTCs (OTTCs) reflecting the airborne concentrations below which no significant risk to workers would be anticipated. A reference dataset consisting of the 8-h threshold limit values-Time-Weighted Average for 280 organic substances was compiled. Each substance was classified into low (class I), intermediate (class II), or high (class III) hazard categories as per Cramer rules. For each chemical, n-octanol:water partition coefficient and vapor pressure along with the molecular weight were used to predict the blood:air partition coefficient. The blood:air partition coefficient along with data on water solubility and ventilation rate allowed the prediction of pulmonary retention factor and absorbed dose in workers. For each Cramer class, the distribution of the predicted doses was analyzed to identify the various percentile values corresponding to the OTTC. Accordingly, for Cramer classes I-III, the OTTCs derived in this study correspond to 0.15, 0.0085, and 0.006 mmol/d, respectively, at the 10th percentile level, while these values were 1.5, 0.09 and 0.03 mmol/d at the 25th percentile level. The proposed OTTCs are not meant to replace the traditional occupational exposure limits, but can be used in data-poor situations along with exposure estimates to support screening level risk assessment and prioritization.

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits

The Threshold Toxicological Concern (TTC) is based on the concept that in absence of experimental data reasonable assurance of safety can be given if exposure is sufficiently low. Using the REACH database the low 5th percentile of the NO(A)EL distribution, for prenatal developmental toxicity (OECD guideline 414) was determined. For rats, (434 NO(A)ELs values) for maternal toxicity, this value was 10 mg/kg-bw/day. For developmental toxicity (469 NO(A)ELs): 13 mg/kg-bw/day. For rabbits, (100 NO(A)ELs), the value for maternal toxicity was 4 mg/kg-bw/day, for developmental toxicity, (112 NO(A)EL values): 10 mg/kg-bw/day. The maternal organism may thus be slightly more sensitive than the fetus. Combining REACH- (industrial chemicals) and published BASF-data (mostly agrochemicals), 537 unique compounds with NO(A)EL values for developmental toxicity in rats and 150 in rabbits were evaluated. The low 5th percentile NO(A)EL for developmental toxicity in rats was 10 mg/kg-bw/day and 9.5 mg/kg-bw/day for rabbits. Using an assessment factor of 100, a TTC value for developmental toxicity of 100 μg/kg-bw/day for rats and 95 μg/kg-bw/day for rabbits is calculated. These values could serve as guidance whether or not to perform an animal experiment, if exposure is sufficiently low. In emergency situations this value may be useful for a first tier risk assessment.

International regulatory requirements for genotoxicity testing for pharmaceuticals used in human medicine, and their impurities and metabolites

The process of developing international (ICH) guidelines is described, and the main guidelines reviewed are the ICH S2(R1) guideline that includes the genotoxicity test battery for human pharmaceuticals, and the ICH M7 guideline for assessing and limiting potentially mutagenic impurities and degradation products in drugs. Key aspects of the guidelines are reviewed in the context of drug development, for example the incorporation of genotoxicity assessment into non-clinical toxicity studies, and ways to develop and assess weight of evidence. In both guidelines, the existence of "thresholds" or non-linear dose responses for genotoxicity plays a part in the strategies. Differences in ICH S2(R1) protocol recommendations from OECD guidelines are highlighted and rationales explained. The use of genotoxicity data during clinical development and in assessment of carcinogenic potential is also described. There are no international guidelines on assessment of potentially genotoxic metabolites, but some approaches to safety assessment are discussed for these. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:296-324, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Japan Flavour and Fragrance Materials Association's (JFFMA) safety assessment of food-flavouring substances uniquely used in Japan that belong to the class of aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, acetals and esters containing additional oxygenated functional groups

We performed a safety evaluation using the procedure devised by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) of the following four flavouring substances that belong to the class of 'aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, acetals, and esters containing additional oxygenated functional groups' and are uniquely used in Japan: butyl butyrylacetate, ethyl 2-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoate, 3-hydroxyhexanoic acid and methyl hydroxyacetate. Although no genotoxicity study data were found in the published literature, none of the four substances had chemical structural alerts predicting genotoxicity. All four substances were categorised as class I by using Cramer's classification. The estimated daily intake of each of the four substances was determined to be 0.007-2.9 μg/person/day by using the maximised survey-derived intake method and based on the annual production data in Japan in 2001, 2005 and 2010, and was determined to be 0.250-600.0 μg/person/day by using the single-portion exposure technique and based on average-use levels in standard portion sizes of flavoured foods. Both of these estimated daily intake ranges were below the threshold of toxicological concern for class I substances, which is 1800 μg/person/day. Although no information from in vitro and in vivo toxicity studies for the four substances was available, these substances were judged to raise no safety concerns at the current levels of intake.

Origin of the TTC values for compounds that are genotoxic and/or carcinogenic and an approach for their re-evaluation

The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) approach is a resource-effective de minimis method for the safety assessment of chemicals, based on distributional analysis of the results of a large number of toxicological studies. It is being increasingly used to screen and prioritize substances with low exposure for which there is little or no toxicological information. The first step in the approach is the identification of substances that may be DNA-reactive mutagens, to which the lowest TTC value is applied. This TTC value was based on the analysis of the cancer potency database and involved a number of assumptions that no longer reflect the state-of-the-science and some of which were not as transparent as they could have been. Hence, review and updating of the database is proposed, using inclusion and exclusion criteria reflecting current knowledge. A strategy for the selection of appropriate substances for TTC determination, based on consideration of weight of evidence for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity is outlined. Identification of substances that are carcinogenic by a DNA-reactive mutagenic mode of action and those that clearly act by a non-genotoxic mode of action will enable the protectiveness to be determined of both the TTC for DNA-reactive mutagenicity and that applied by default to substances that may be carcinogenic but are unlikely to be DNA-reactive mutagens (i.e. for Cramer class I-III compounds). Critical to the application of the TTC approach to substances that are likely to be DNA-reactive mutagens is the reliability of the software tools used to identify such compounds. Current methods for this task are reviewed and recommendations made for their application.

Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution in Science: The Threshold of the Toxicological Concern Approach in Food Toxicology

Environmental risk assessment is often affected by severe uncertainty. The frequently invoked precautionary principle helps to guide risk assessment and decision-making in the face of scientific uncertainty. In many contexts, however, uncertainties play a role not only in the application of scientific models but also in their development. Building on recent literature in the philosophy of science, this paper argues that precaution should be exercised at the stage when tools for risk assessment are developed as well as when they are used to inform decision-making. The relevance and consequences of this claim are discussed in the context of the threshold of the toxicological concern approach in food toxicology. I conclude that the approach does not meet the standards of an epistemic version of the precautionary principle.

Improving risk assessment of color additives in medical device polymers

Many polymeric medical device materials contain color additives which could lead to adverse health effects. The potential health risk of color additives may be assessed by comparing the amount of color additive released over time to levels deemed to be safe based on available toxicity data. We propose a conservative model for exposure that requires only the diffusion coefficient of the additive in the polymer matrix, D, to be specified. The model is applied here using a model polymer (poly(ether-block-amide), PEBAX 2533) and color additive (quinizarin blue) system. Sorption experiments performed in an aqueous dispersion of quinizarin blue (QB) into neat PEBAX yielded a diffusivity D = 4.8 × 10^-10 cm²  s^-1 , and solubility S = 0.32 wt %. On the basis of these measurements, we validated the model by comparing predictions to the leaching profile of QB from a PEBAX matrix into physiologically representative media. Toxicity data are not available to estimate a safe level of exposure to QB, as a result, we used a Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) value for QB of 90 µg/adult/day. Because only 30% of the QB is released in the first day of leaching for our film thickness and calculated D, we demonstrate that a device may contain significantly more color additive than the TTC value without giving rise to a toxicological concern. The findings suggest that an initial screening-level risk assessment of color additives and other potentially toxic compounds found in device polymers can be improved. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 310-319, 2018.

Toxicological and analytical assessment of e-cigarette refill components on airway epithelia

There are over 2.6 million users of e-cigarettes in the United Kingdom alone as they have been promoted as a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. The addition of flavours and aromas has also proven to be popular with younger generations. In this review, we survey the range of studies in the short timeframe since e-cigarettes reached the market to draw attention to the health associated risks and benefits of their introduction. We complement this review with a case study reporting on the composition of selected e-cigarette refills with particular emphasis on the toxicological activity of its components on lung cells.

Use of Genotoxicity Data to Support Clinical Trials or Positive Genetox Findings on a Candidate Pharmaceutical or Impurity …. Now What?

Results from carcinogenicity studies are generally not available for drugs until the time of approval. Many people, including healthy volunteers are often exposed to pharmacologically active doses of the drug before carcinogenicity results are available. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research uses results of genetic toxicology studies as a surrogate for carcinogenicity during the drug development phase (clinical trials). A number of issues are considered in deciding whether drugs that give positive results in genetic toxicology studies can be given to subjects in clinical trials. These relate to the drug indication, the target population, duration of treatment, and importance of the drug. In general, single-dose clinical studies are permitted regardless of the genetox results. In situations where a genetic toxicology assay showed a positive result, some review divisions have asked sponsors to perform a Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay or a p53 carcinogenicity study prior to allowing repeat-dose clinical trials to proceed. This paper discusses alternatives to SHE cell and p53 assays when faced with a positive result in a genetic toxicology assay. In addition, this paper discusses factors to consider when setting limits for genotoxic impurities in drug substances and products.

Pharmaceuticals, Their Metabolites, and Other Polar Pollutants in Field-Grown Vegetables Irrigated with Treated Municipal Wastewater

The reuse of treated municipal wastewater for crop irrigation is a necessity in arid and semiarid regions but a potential entrance for emerging contaminants into the food chain. However, little attention has yet been paid to the detection of micropollutants and possible metabolites in vegetables grown under realistic field conditions. In this study, the uptake of 28 micropollutants and carbamazepine metabolites in 10 different field-grown vegetable species (among them carrot, lettuce, potato, and zucchini) from Jordan was studied. A total of 12 micropollutants and six carbamazepine metabolites, four of which have never been analyzed before in plant-uptake studies, could be detected in all of the samples in concentrations ranging from 1.7 to 216 ng per g of dry weight. In edible tissues, the total concentration of micropollutants decreased in the order of leafy (247-533) > root (73-126) > fruit-bearing (5-76 ng per g of dry weight) vegetables. A preliminary health-risk assessment for nine compounds according to the TTC concept shows no risk for seven of the micropollutats; for ciprofloxacin and 10,11-epoxycarbamazepine, however, more-specific toxicity data would be required for a refined risk assessment.

The Japan Flavour and Fragrance Materials Association's (JFFMA) safety assessment of acetal food flavouring substances uniquely used in Japan

Using the procedure devised by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), we performed safety evaluations on five acetal flavouring substances uniquely used in Japan: acetaldehyde 2,3-butanediol acetal, acetoin dimethyl acetal, hexanal dibutyl acetal, hexanal glyceryl acetal and 4-methyl-2-pentanone propyleneglycol acetal. As no genotoxicity study data were available in the literature, all five substances had no chemical structural alerts predicting genotoxicity. Using Cramer's classification, acetoin dimethyl acetal and hexanal dibutyl acetal were categorised as class I, and acetaldehyde 2,3-butanediol acetal, hexanal glyceryl acetal and 4-methyl-2-pentanone propyleneglycol acetal as class III. The estimated daily intakes for all five substances were within the range of 1.45-6.53 µg/person/day using the method of maximised survey-derived intake based on the annual production data in Japan from 2001, 2005, 2008 and 2010, and 156-720 µg/person/day using the single-portion exposure technique (SPET), based on the average use levels in standard portion sizes of flavoured foods. The daily intakes of the two class I substances were below the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) - 1800 μg/person/day. The daily intakes of the three class III substances exceeded the TTC (90 μg/person/day). Two of these, acetaldehyde 2,3-butanediol acetal and hexanal glyceryl acetal, were expected to be metabolised into endogenous products after ingestion. For 4-methyl-2-pentanone propyleneglycol acetal, one of its metabolites was not expected to be metabolised into endogenous products. However, its daily intake level, based on the estimated intake calculated by the SPET method, was about 1/15 000th of the no observed effect level. It was thus concluded that all five substances raised no safety concerns when used for flavouring foods at the currently estimated intake levels. While no information on in vitro and in vivo toxicity for all five substances was available, their metabolites were judged as raising no safety concerns at the current levels of intake.

Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive

The evaluation of chemicals for their skin sensitising potential is an essential step in ensuring the safety of ingredients in consumer products. Similar to the Threshold of Toxicological Concern, the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) has been demonstrated to provide effective risk assessments for skin sensitisation in cases where human exposure is low. The DST was originally developed based on a Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) dataset and applied to chemicals that were not considered to be directly reactive to skin proteins, and unlikely to initiate the first mechanistic steps leading to the induction of sensitisation. Here we have extended the DST concept to protein reactive chemicals. A probabilistic assessment of the original DST dataset was conducted and a threshold of 64 μg/cm(2) was derived. In our accompanying publication, a set of structural chemistry based rules was developed to proactively identify highly reactive and potentially highly potent materials which should be excluded from the DST approach. The DST and rule set were benchmarked against a test set of chemicals with LLNA/human data. It is concluded that by combining the reactive DST with knowledge of chemistry a threshold can be established below which there is no appreciable risk of sensitisation for protein-reactive chemicals.

Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop

Positive results in the Ames test correlate well with carcinogenic potential in rodents. This correlation is not perfect because mutations are only one of many stages in tumour development. Also, situations can be envisaged where the mutagenic response may be specific to the bacteria or the test protocol, e.g., bacterial-specific metabolism, exceeding a detoxification threshold, or the induction of oxidative damage to which bacteria may be more sensitive than mammalian cells in vitro or tissues in vivo. Since most chemicals are also tested for genotoxicity in mammalian cells, the pattern of mammalian cell results may help identify whether Ames-positive results predict carcinogenic or in vivo mutagenic activity. A workshop was therefore organised and sponsored by the EU Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) to investigate this further. Participants presented results from other genotoxicity tests with Ames-positive compounds. Data came from published, regulatory agency, and industry sources. The question was posed whether negative results in mammalian cell tests were associated with absence of carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity despite a positive Ames test. In the limited time available, the presented data were combined and an initial analysis suggested that the association of negative in vitro mammalian cell test results with lack of in vivo genotoxic or carcinogenic activity could have some significance. Possible reasons why a positive Ames test may not be associated with in vivo activity and what additional investigations/tests might contribute to a more robust evaluation were discussed. Because a considerable overlap was identified among the different databases presented, it was recommended that a consolidated database be built, with overlapping chemicals removed, so that a more robust analysis of the predictive capacity for potential carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic activity could be derived from the patterns of mammalian cell test results obtained for Ames-positive compounds.

Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept when applied to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations intended for short-term clinical trials

In the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, if a multiproduct facility shares equipment amongst drug substances/products it is incumbent upon the manufacturer to demonstrate removal of the pharmaceutical through a robust cleaning validation/verification program. Removal must be to below limits considered acceptable from a quality and toxicological perspective. In order to address the toxicological concerns, an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) was developed which is the "dose that is unlikely to cause an adverse effect if...exposed, by any route...at or below this dose every day for a lifetime" (ISPE, 2010). For compounds in development, defaulted ADEs were proposed by Dolan et al. (2005) and adopted by the International Society of Pharmaceutical Engineers (ISPE) as conservative cutoffs for compounds with limited data. In Phase 1 clinical trials, exposure is typically short-term (single dose or repeated doses for ≤30 days) compared to the chronic doses used to derive ADE and defaulted ADEs. An analysis of publicly available databases for toxicological and pharmacological effects supports the use of 10-fold higher defaulted values when the residual drug substance is in a developmental pharmaceutical intended for Phase 1 clinical trials (exposure ≤30 days).

Role of in silico genotoxicity tools in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities

The toxicological assessment of genotoxic impurities is important in the regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals. In this context, the application of promising computational methods (e.g. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) and/or expert systems) for the evaluation of genotoxicity is needed, especially when very limited information on impurities is available. To gain an overview of how computational methods are used internationally in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities, the current regulatory documents were reviewed. The software recommended in the guidelines (e.g. MCASE, MC4PC, Derek for Windows) or used practically by various regulatory agencies (e.g. US Food and Drug Administration, US and Danish Environmental Protection Agencies), as well as other existing programs were analysed. Both statistically based and knowledge-based (expert system) tools were analysed. The overall conclusions on the available in silico tools for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity prediction are quite optimistic, and the regulatory application of QSAR methods is constantly growing. For regulatory purposes, it is recommended that predictions of genotoxicity/carcinogenicity should be based on a battery of models, combining high-sensitivity models (low rate of false negatives) with high-specificity ones (low rate of false positives) and in vitro assays in an integrated manner.

Overall impact of the regulatory requirements for genotoxic impurities on the drug development process

In the last decade a considerable effort has been made both by the regulators and the pharmaceutical industry to assess genotoxic impurities (GTI) in pharmaceutical products. Though the control of impurities in drug substances and products is a well established and consolidated procedure, its extension to GTI has given rise to a number of problems, both in terms of setting the limits and detecting these impurities in pharmaceutical products. Several papers have dealt with this issue, discussing available regulations, providing strategies to evaluate the genotoxic potential of chemical substances, and trying to address the analytical challenge of detecting GTI at trace levels. In this review we would like to discuss the available regulations, the toxicological background for establishing limits, as well as the analytical approaches used for GTI assessment. The final aim is that of providing a complete overview of the topic with updated available information, to address the overall GTI issue during the development of new drug substances.