The renal effects of minimally nephrotoxic doses of ibandronate and zoledronate following single and intermittent intravenous administration in rats

Effects of bisphosphonates and treadmill exercise on bone and kidney in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease rats

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the aging of society has highlighted the need for development of effective treatments for elderly patients. This study examined whether the combination of treadmill exercise therapy and alendronate (ALN) can improve bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strength without worsening renal function in adenine-induced CKD model rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

8-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 70) were divided into experimental groups based on the treatment protocol, i.e., non-CKD (control), vehicle only (CKD), ALN only, exercise only, and combined ALN plus exercise. A 0.75% adenine diet was used to induce CKD. Groups were killed at either 20 or 30 weeks of age. Comprehensive assessments included serum and urine biochemistry tests, renal histology, bone histomorphometry, BMD measurement, micro-computed tomography examinations, and biomechanical testing.

RESULTS

Blood biochemistry tests, urine analyses and histological evaluations of the kidney demonstrated that ALN treatment did not worsen renal function or kidney fibrosis in moderate-stage CKD model rats. Both ALN and treadmill exercise significantly suppressed bone resorption (p < 0.05-p < 0.01). Moreover, ALN monotherapy and combined ALN and treadmill exercise significantly improved BMD of the lumbar spine and femur, bone microstructure, and trabecular bone strength (p < 0.05-p < 0.01). Treadmill exercise was also shown to decrease cortical porosity at the mid-diaphysis of the femur and improve kidney fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ALN and treadmill exercise is effective in improving BMD, the microstructure of trabecular and cortical bone, and bone strength, without compromising renal function in adenine-induced CKD model rats.

Retrospective assessment of tolerability and efficacy of zoledronate in the palliative treatment of cancer-bearing dogs

Zoledronate is a bisphosphonate frequently used for the treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy and tumour-associated bone pain in dogs, however, there is a paucity of information regarding its use in veterinary medicine. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the tolerability of zoledronate in the palliative treatment of cancer-bearing dogs and secondarily to to assess the efficacy of zoledronate for the treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Thirty-seven dogs (22 with tumour-associated bone pain and 15 with hypercalcaemia of malignancy) that received 114 zoledronate infusions were included. Tolerability was assessed by the absence of post-zoledronate hypocalcaemia or other adverse events as defined by Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. Efficacy was assessed by comparison of available ionized calcium levels before and after zoledronate administration in hypercalcaemic dogs. In 79% of zoledronate infusions, no adverse events were reported. The majority of adverse events which occurred in the other 21% of infusions could be attributed to concurrent chemotherapy or the underlying neoplastic disease. There was a small but significant increase in creatinine following treatment with zoledronate, however, none of the dogs developed clinically significant renal disease. In eight hypercalcaemic dogs with available ionized calcium following zoledronate administration, ionized calcium decreased rapidly within 7 days following treatment with zoledronate. Zoledronate is well-tolerated with few recorded adverse events, however, monitoring of serum creatinine is advised. Zoledronate seems to be effective in the treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Renal Safety of Bisphosphonate Between Low-Dose/High-Frequency and High-Dose/Low-Frequency Regimens in a Late-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Rat Model

The efficacy and renal safety of low-dose/high-frequency (LDHF) dosing and high-dose/low-frequency (HDLF) dosing of bisphosphonates (BPs) are comparable in patients with normal kidney function but might be different in patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and renal safety of two different dosage regimens of a BP, alendronate (ALN), in stage 4 CKD using a rat model. Male, 10-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to either 5/6 nephrectomy or sham surgery. The animals received subcutaneous administration of vehicle (daily) or ALN in LDHF dosage regimen (LDHF-ALN: 0.05 mg/kg/day) or HDLF dosage regimen (HDLF-ALN: 0.70 mg/kg/2 weeks). Medications commenced at 20 weeks of age and continued for 10 weeks. Micro-computed tomography, histological analysis, infrared spectroscopic imaging, and serum and urine assays were performed to examine the efficacy and renal safety of the ALN regimens. Both LDHF-ALN and HDLF-ALN increased bone mass, improved micro-structure, and enhanced mechanical properties, without causing further renal impairment in CKD rats. Histologically, however, HDLF-ALN more efficiently suppressed bone turnover, leading to more mineralized trabecular bone, than LDHF-ALN in CKD rats, whereas such differences between LDHF-ALN and HDLF-ALN were not observed in sham rats. Both LDHF-ALN and HDLF-ALN showed therapeutic effects on high bone turnover osteoporosis in CKD stage 4 rats without causing further renal impairment. However, as HDLF-ALN more efficiently suppressed bone turnover than LDHF-ALN in late-stage CKD, HDLF-ALN might be more appropriate than LDHF-ALN for fracture prevention in high bone turnover osteoporosis patients with late-stage CKD.

Characterization of the small molecule ARC39, a direct and specific inhibitor of acid sphingomyelinase in vitro

Inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), a lysosomal enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphorylcholine, may serve as an investigational tool or a therapeutic intervention to control many diseases. Specific ASM inhibitors are currently not sufficiently characterized. Here, we found that 1-aminodecylidene bis-phosphonic acid (ARC39) specifically and efficiently (>90%) inhibits both lysosomal and secretory ASM in vitro. Results from investigating sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1 (SMPD1/Smpd1) mRNA and ASM protein levels suggested that ARC39 directly inhibits ASM's catalytic activity in cultured cells, a mechanism that differs from that of functional inhibitors of ASM. We further provide evidence that ARC39 dose- and time-dependently inhibits lysosomal ASM in intact cells, and we show that ARC39 also reduces platelet- and ASM-promoted adhesion of tumor cells. The observed toxicity of ARC39 is low at concentrations relevant for ASM inhibition in vitro, and it does not strongly alter the lysosomal compartment or induce phospholipidosis in vitro. When applied intraperitoneally in vivo, even subtoxic high doses administered short-term induced sphingomyelin accumulation only locally in the peritoneal lavage without significant accumulation in plasma, liver, spleen, or brain. These findings require further investigation with other possible chemical modifications. In conclusion, our results indicate that ARC39 potently and selectively inhibits ASM in vitro and highlight the need for developing compounds that can reach tissue concentrations sufficient for ASM inhibition in vivo.

Zoledronic acid induces cytogenetic toxicity in male germline cells of Swiss albino mice

This study mainly focuses on the cytogenetic toxicity induction by zoledronic acid (ZA), a nitrogen containing bisphosphonate (N-BPs) in the male germline cells of Swiss albino mice. A single intraperitoneal exposure with three different doses of ZA (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg body weight), toxicity was assessed by analyzing spermatogonial metaphase chromosome aberrations at 24 h, aberrant primary spermatocytes at week 4, and abnormal spermatozoa at week 8 posttreatment. Cyclophosphamide (40 mg/kg) and 0.9% NaCl were used as positive and vehicle controls respectively in the study. The results showed that there was a significant induction in the number of chromosomal aberrations especially at two doses of ZA (4 and 8 mg/kg) after 24 h in the spermatogonial cells (p < 0.001) compared to vehicle control. The transmission genetic damages were noticed as aberrant spermatocytes with atypical bivalents (X-Y/autosomal asynapsis) at 4 mg/kg of ZA (p < 0.01) and at 8 mg/kg of ZA (p < 0.001) at week 4 posttreatment. A statistically significant higher number of abnormal spermatozoa (sperm) were also noticed at week 8 posttreatment of both at 4 and 8 mg/kg of ZA (p < 0.001). Hence, from these genotoxicity studies, it can be concluded that ZA is genotoxic in male germline cells and has the potential of transmitting the genotoxic effects from spermatogonial cells to sperm in male Swiss mice.

The role of vitamin E in the prevention of zoledronic acid-induced nephrotoxicity in rats: a light and electron microscopy study

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are widely used in metastatic cancer such as prostate and breast cancer, and their nephrotoxic effects have been established previously. In this study we aimed to evaluate both the nephrotoxic effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) and the protective effects of vitamin E (Vit-E) on this process under light and electron microscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups. The first group constituted the control group. The second group was given i.v. ZA of 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks from the tail vein. The third group received the same dosage of ZA with an additional i.m. injection of 15 mg Vit-E every week for 12 weeks. Tissues were taken 4 days after the last dose of ZA for histopathological and ultrastructural evaluation. Paller score, tubular epithelial thickness and basal membrane thickness were calculated for each group.

RESULTS

For group 2, the p-values are all < 0.001 for Paller score, epitelial thickness, and basal membrane thickness. For group 3 (ZA + Vit. E), the p-values are < 0.001 for Paller score, 0.996 for epitelial thickness, and < 0.001 basal membrane thickness. Significant differences were also observed in ultrastructural changes for group 2. However, adding Vit-E to ZA administration reversed all the histopathological changes to some degree, with statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of ZA had nephrotoxic effects on rat kidney observed under both light and electron microscopy. Concomitant administration of Vit-E significantly reduces toxic histopathological effects of ZA.

What Animal Models Have Taught Us About the Safety and Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in Chronic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bisphosphonates (BPs) have long been the gold-standard anti-remodeling treatment for numerous metabolic bone diseases. Since these drugs are excreted unmetabolized through the kidney, they are not recommended for individuals with compromised kidney function due to concerns of kidney and bone toxicity. The goal of this paper is to summarize the preclinical BP work in models of kidney disease with particular focus on the bone, kidney, and vasculature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Summative data exists showing positive effects on bone and vascular calcifications with minimal evidence for bone or kidney toxicity in animal models. Preclinical data suggest it may be worthwhile to take a step back and reconsider the use of bisphosphonates to lessen skeletal/vascular complications associated with compromised kidney function.

Inhibitory actions by ibandronate sodium, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, on calcium-activated potassium channels in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells

The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates used for management of the patients with osteoporosis were reported to influence the function of renal tubular cells. However, how nitrogen-containing bisphosphates exert any effects on ion currents remains controversial. The effects of ibandronate (Iban), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, on ionic channels, including two types of Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ (K_Ca) channels, namely, large-conductance K_Ca (BK_Ca) and intermediate-conductance K_Ca (IK_Ca) channels, were investigated in Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. In whole-cell current recordings, Iban suppressed the amplitude of voltage-gated K⁺ current elicited by long ramp pulse. Addition of Iban caused a reduction of BK_Ca channels accompanied by a right shift in the activation curve of BK_Ca channels, despite no change in single-channel conductance. Ca²⁺ sensitivity of these channels was modified in the presence of this compound; however, the magnitude of Iban-mediated decrease in BK_Ca-channel activity under membrane stretch with different negative pressure remained unchanged. Iban suppressed the probability of BK_Ca-channel openings linked primarily to a shortening in the slow component of mean open time in these channels. The dissociation constant needed for Iban-mediated suppression of mean open time in MDCK cells was 12.2 μM. Additionally, cell exposure to Iban suppressed the activity of IK_Ca channels, and DC-EBIO or 9-phenanthrol effectively reversed its suppression. Under current-clamp configuration, Iban depolarized the cells and DC-EBIO or PF573228 reversed its depolarizing effect. Taken together, the inhibitory action of Iban on K_Ca-channel activity may contribute to the underlying mechanism of pharmacological or toxicological actions of Iban and its structurally similar bisphosphonates on renal tubular cells occurring in vivo.

Compromised vertebral structural and mechanical properties associated with progressive kidney disease and the effects of traditional pharmacological interventions

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) have a significantly higher vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk than the general population. Several preclinical models have documented altered skeletal properties in long bones, but few data exist for vertebral bone. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of progressive CKD on vertebral bone structure and mechanics and to determine the effects of treatment with either bisphosphonates or anti-sclerostin antibody in groups of animals with high or low PTH.

METHODS

Animals with progressive kidney disease were left untreated, treated with calcium to lower PTH, zoledronic acid to lower remodeling without affecting PTH, anti-sclerostin antibody, or anti-sclerostin antibody plus calcium. Non-diseased, untreated littermates served as controls. Vertebral bone morphology (trabecular and cortical) and mechanical properties (structural and material-level) were assessed at 35 weeks of age by microCT and mechanical testing, respectively.

RESULTS

CKD with high PTH resulted in 6-fold higher bone formation rate, significant reductions in the amount of trabecular and cortical bone, and compromised whole bone mechanical properties in the vertebra compared to normal animals. Treatments that reduced bone remodeling were effective in normalizing vertebral structure and mechanical properties only if the treatment reduced serum PTH. Similarly, treatment with anti-sclerostin antibody was effective in enhancing bone mass and mechanical properties but only if combined with PTH-suppressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD significantly altered both cortical and trabecular bone properties in the vertebra resulting in compromised mechanical properties and these changes can be normalized by interventions that involve reductions in PTH levels.

Prolonged recovery time from zoledronic Acid induced acute tubular necrosis: a case report and review of the literature

Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) due to bisphosphonates has been reported with Zoledronic acid but the time to recovery (if any) has been usually less than 4 months. Possible recovery time from ATN of any cause is usually less than 6 months. In this paper, we present the case of a 59-year-old Caucasian female with metastatic breast cancer who had received 16 monthly injections of Zoledronic acid for treatment of tumor induced hypercalcemia and developed several episodes of mild acute kidney injury which resolved by withholding treatment. Unfortunately, after the sixteenth injection, the patient experienced severe acute kidney injury, with a peak serum creatinine of 8.0 mg/dL. Although urinalysis showed muddy brown casts, because of atypical recovery time and presence of eosinophiluria and subnephrotic range proteinuria, a kidney biopsy was performed. Diagnosis of typical acute tubular necrosis was confirmed without any other concomitant findings. The course was remarkable for an unusually slow recovery of renal function over 15 months without need for renal replacement therapy until the patient expired from her metastatic cancer two years later. We reviewed all the published cases of acute kidney injury due to Zoledronic acid and suggest recommendations for clinicians and researchers.

Key roles of the OPG–RANK–RANKL system in bone oncology

Osteoprotegerin (OPG)-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) and RANK ligand (RANKL) have been identified as members of a ligand-receptor system that directly regulates osteoclast differentiation and osteolysis. RANKL may be a powerful inducer of bone resorption through its interaction with RANK, and OPG is a soluble decoy receptor that acts as a strong inhibitor of osteoclastic differentiation. Any dysregulation of their respective expression leads to pathological conditions. Furthermore, recent data demonstrate that the OPG-RANK-RANKL system modulates cancer cell migration, thus controlling the development of bone metastases. This review describes the most recent knowledge on the OPG-RANK-RANKL system, its involvement in bone oncology and the new therapeutic approaches based on this molecular triad.

Renal Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Ibandronate in Multiple Myeloma Patients With or Without Impaired Renal Function

In this open-label study, the authors assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of ibandronate in patients with multiple myeloma and varying renal function. Renal deterioration was graded at baseline depending on creatinine clearance in 4 stages (0: >80; 1: 50-79; 2: 30-49, and 3: <30 mL/min). Patients (n = 40) received intravenous ibandronate 6 mg (30-minute infusion). Ibandronate excretion and serum levels were measured over 24 hours. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and markers of tubular damage were monitored before ibandronate infusion and at 24 and 72 hours following ibandronate infusion. Ibandronate clearance, AUC(0-24), AUC(0-infinity), serum t((1/2)), and C(max) were calculated. There was a significant positive correlation between ibandronate clearance and creatinine clearance (r = 0.858; P < .00001). The AUC for grade 3 renal insufficiency increased by approximately 60% versus grade 0 (P < .01) but was not significantly different between other grades of renal function. The t((1/2)) did not increase significantly, and peak serum levels of ibandronate were similar for the 4 grades of renal function. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and markers of tubular damage did not change significantly within 72 hours of ibandronate infusion. Despite renal function already being compromised in this patient group, there was no evidence of acute nephrotoxicity with ibandronate.

Zoledronate and pamidronate depress neutrophil functions and survival in mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) has been identified as a severe complication of patients previously treated with i.v. bisphosphonates. It has been noted that necrotic bone from BRONJ sites display signs of bacterial infection suggesting that an immune defect may play a role in the pathophysiology of BRONJ. Here, we have examined the effect of two potent bisphosphonates, zoledronate and pamidronate, on neutrophil function, differentiation and survival.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effect of bisphosphonates on chemotaxis, NADPH oxidase activity and neutrophil survival were assessed in vitro using bone marrow-derived primary neutrophils or in vitro differentiated haematopoetic progenitors from mice. The same parameters and the number of circulating neutrophils were quantified in neutrophils isolated from mice treated in vivo with zoledronate. In vivo recruitment of neutrophils was assessed by sodium periodate-induced peritonitis.

KEY RESULTS

Zoledronate and pamidronate inhibited in vitro neutrophil chemotaxis and NADPH oxidase activity in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo recruitment of neutrophils was also suppressed. Zoledronate did not affect in vitro differentiation of neutrophils but shortened their life span in a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-dependent manner. fMLP-induced activation of RhoA activity was decreased by zoledronate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results show that bisphosphonate exposure leads to impaired neutrophil chemotaxis, neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity and reduced circulating neutrophil counts. This work suggests that bisphosphonates have the potential to depress the innate immune system for a prolonged time, possibly contributing to the pathogenesis of BRONJ.

The risk of cumulative renal effects of intravenous bisphosphonates

Some level of renal dysfunction is common in patients with cancer. This could be a result of an age-related kidney function decrease, the underlying disease (eg, multiple myeloma), or the effects of nephrotoxic medications. Some intravenous (I.V.) bisphosphonates have been associated with occasional renal toxicity in the clinical setting. Therefore, the choice of an I.V. bisphosphonate should take into account the risk of renal deterioration. Preclinical studies also suggest that there might be considerable differences between the renal safety profiles of commonly used I.V. bisphosphonates. Variations in the risk of histopathologic damage and the ability to cause cumulative toxicity have been observed in comparative preclinical studies of I.V. bisphosphonates. The reasons for these apparent differences are not fully understood. Research shows that renal safety profiles might be influenced by pharmacokinetic properties, such as renal tissue half-life, protein binding, and intracellular potency. Preclinical analyses are warranted in order to confirm and evaluate these differences between bisphosphonates.

Renal safety of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 min versus 60 min in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomized open-label equivalence trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the renal safety equivalence of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 min versus 60 min, in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were females having breast cancer with at least one bone metastasis. Exclusion criteria were renal failure (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), tooth/jaw disorder or uncontrolled severe disease. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive nine ibandronate 6 mg i.v. infusions over either 15 min or 60 min. The primary outcome was the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in creatinine clearance between groups, 28 days after the last infusion. The equivalence margin was ±8 mL/min.

RESULTS

Overall 334 patients were randomized (165-15 min infusions vs. 169 to 60 min infusions, 325 (159 vs. 166) were analyzed by intent-to-treat, and 312 (151 vs. 161) were analyzed per protocol. Per protocol, the 15 min-60 min difference in creatinine clearance [95% CI] was -3.00 [-8.18, 2.18]. By intent-to-treat, this difference was-2.91 [-7.99, 2.16]. Death and serious adverse event rates did not differ between groups. Three serious adverse events were considered related to ibandronate: an osteonecrosis of the jaw (15-min group), a pain in jaw and an enamel cracking (60-min group). Two renal failures, reported in the 60 min group, were not considered related to ibandronate. None occurred in the 15 min group.

CONCLUSION

Ibandronate may be infused over 15 min without clinically significant consequence on renal safety.

Is there a role for ibandronate in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with bony metastases?

PURPOSE

Zoledronic acid is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for a number of cancers which metastasise to bone and is the only bisphosphonate licensed for the treatment of prostate cancer. However, drug related nephrotoxicity, although rare, does pose a significant complication when using zoledronic acid. Prostate cancer patients are generally older than 65 years of age and already exhibit some form of impaired renal function. Thus, for prostate cancer patients who are unable to tolerate zoledronic acid there is a need for an alternative bisphosphonate. One possibility could be ibandronate which is also a potent third generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate and is an attractive choice for some patients due to the fact it is available in both intravenous and oral preparations.

METHODS

This article reviews the current published literature regarding the use of ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Preliminary data emerging from small Phase II studies suggests ibandronate may provide a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer when zoledronic acid is deemed unsuitable.

CONCLUSION

Further in vivo research with ibandronate in prostate cancer is urgently needed in order to elucidate whether this bisphosphonate may play a role in the treatment and palliative management of metastatic prostate cancer.

The Effect of Alendronate, Risedronate, and Raloxifene on Renal Functions, Based on the Cockcroft and Gault Method, in Postmenopausal Women

BACKGROUND

Oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are effective treatment options in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is little previously reported about the renal safety profiles of these three agents in osteoporosis. We aimed to assess the risk of renal toxicity associated with oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis, prospectively.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia according to lumbar or femoral-neck bone mineral density t score were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to alendronate 70 mg once weekly (n = 47), risedronate 35 mg once weekly (n = 44), or raloxifene 60 mg per day (n = 36) for one year. Preliminary screening included medical history, physical examination, lumbar and femoral bone mineral densitometry measurement, and blood biochemical tests, including renal function tests. The biochemical markers were then assessed at the end of 12 months.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between basal and final renal function parameters of each group. Also these parameters did not differ between the three groups after 12 months of treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are all safe drugs for renal functions in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Risk of renal impairment after treatment with ibandronate versus zoledronic acid: a retrospective medical records review

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compared renal impairment rates in breast cancer, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with ibandronate or zoledronic acid.

STUDY DESIGN

Medical records in two German oncology clinics from May 2001 to March 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Creatinine measurements were analyzed from baseline (before bisphosphonate treatment) to last available measurement for each patient. The Cox proportional hazards model and the Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox model for multiple events analysis were used for multivariate analysis, which controlled for age, clinic site, primary cancer type, baseline SCr or GFR value, prior bisphosphonate use, concomitant use of drugs associated with acute renal failure, and renal-related comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 333 patients, 109 received ibandronate and 256 received zoledronic acid (32 patients had both drugs). Compared with ibandronate, the zoledronic acid group had a significantly better baseline renal function and fewer patients had a history of renal disease. Zoledronic acid treatment increased the relative risk (RR) and the incidence rate (IR) of renal impairment by approximately 1.5-fold in all assessed patients (all tumors) compared with ibandronate. Multivariate analysis found significantly higher hazards ratios for zoledronic acid over ibandronate (two to sixfold), after adjusting for differences in characteristics between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective review, patients were significantly more likely to experience renal impairment with zoledronic acid than with ibandronate.

Bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease; balancing potential benefits and adverse effects on bone and soft tissue

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is often associated with increased vascular stiffness and calcification. Recent studies have suggested a complex interaction between vascular calcification and abnormalities of bone and mineral metabolism, with an inverse relationship between arterial calcification and bone mineral density (BMD). Although osteoporosis is recognized and treated in CKD 1 to 3, the interpretation of BMD levels in the osteoporotic range is controversial in CKD 4, 5, and 5D when renal osteodystrophy is generally present. In addition, there is a paucity of data for patients with CKD mineral and bone disorder (MBD), because studies using bisphosphonates in postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis have generally excluded patients with significant CKD. For these patients, treatment of low BMD using standard therapies for osteoporosis is not without potential for harm due to the possibility of worsening low bone turnover, osteomalacia, mixed uraemic osteodystrophy, and of exacerbated hyperparathyroidism; and bisphosphonates should only be used selectively and with caution. Some experimental and clinical studies have also suggested that bisphosphonates may reduce progression of extra-osseous calcification and inhibit the development of atherosclerosis. The authors review the potential benefits and risks associated with bisphosphonate use for bone protection in CKD, and assess their effect on vascular calcification and atherosclerosis.

Bisphosphonate nephrotoxicity

Bisphosphonates are valuable agents for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis (PMO), hypercalcemia of malignancy, and osteolytic bone metastases. Oral bisphosphonates are used mainly to treat PMO and are not associated with significant nephrotoxicity. In contrast, nephrotoxicity is a significant potential limiting factor to the use of intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates, and the nephrotoxicity is both dose-dependent and infusion time-dependent. The two main IV bisphosphonates available to treat hypercalcemia of malignancy and osteolytic bone disease in the United States are zoledronate and pamidronate. Patterns of nephrotoxicity described with these agents include toxic acute tubular necrosis and collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, respectively. With both of these agents, severe nephrotoxicity can be largely avoided by stringent adherence to guidelines for monitoring serum creatinine prior to each treatment, temporarily withholding therapy in the setting of renal insufficiency, and adjusting doses in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. In patients with PMO, zoledronate and pamidronate are associated with significantly less nephrotoxicity, which undoubtedly relates to the lower doses and longer dosing intervals employed for this indication. Ibandronate is approved in the US for treatment of PMO and in Europe for treatment of PMO and malignancy-associated bone disease. Available data suggest that ibandronate has a safe renal profile without evidence of nephrotoxicity, even in patients with abnormal baseline kidney function.

[Changes in renal function during bisphosphonate treatment of breast cancer patients]

Renal function aberrations during bisphosphonate treatment is a well-known phenomenon. In our retrospective study we examined renal functions of 97 breast cancer patients with bone metastasis during their first year of bisphosphonate treatment i.e. (1) frequency of initial renal function alterations; (2) frequency of decreasing renal function during bisphosphonate treatment; (3) the connection between the laboratory findings and the renal function parameters measured at the beginning of bisphosphonate treatment. At the beginning of bisphosphonate treatment we found a surprisingly high rate (26.80%) of decreased creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Decreased creatinine clearance at least once during bisphosphonate treatment has been found in 32.99% of the patients, and in 13.4% of the patients with decreased renal function parameters before bisphosphonates it remained decreased during the one-year period. Expected normal renal function is prognosticated by the renal function parameters and serum calcium level measured before starting bisphosphonate treatment. However, we could not demonstrate any connection between decreasing renal function and either the route of administration or the generation or type of bisphosphonates or the previous use of platinum compounds. Our analysis confirms the necessity of monitoring renal function before and during bisphosphonate treatment, and it is advisable to calculate the creatinine clearance in the upper quarter of the normal range of creatinine levels. In case of decreased renal function, change to a less nephrotoxic bisphosphonate or discontinuing the treatment is suggested. While our results are at variance with the published literature, the above-mentioned questions should be examined in a prospective trial.

Renal safety profiles of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 and 60 min: a randomized, open-label study

BACKGROUND

Clinical data show that a single, 15-min i.v. infusion of ibandronate 6 mg does not significantly alter renal function. We evaluated the effect on renal function of repeated 15-min infusions of ibandronate 6 mg in women with breast cancer and bone metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to i.v. ibandronate 6 mg every 3-4 weeks for < or =6 months, infusion over 15 min (n = 102) or 60 min (n = 28). The primary end point was the percentage of patients with increased serum creatinine of > or =44.2 micromol/l. Blood chemistry was assessed at each visit.

RESULTS

Two per cent [2/101; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-7.0] of patients in the 15-min infusion arm and no patients (0/26; 95% CI 0.0-13.2) in the 60-min infusion arm had increased serum creatinine that met the primary end point. There were no clinically relevant changes in serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, or N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase, alpha(1)-microglobulin, or microalbuminuria. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No clinically relevant changes were observed in vital signs, hematology, blood chemistry, or urine analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibandronate 6 mg by 15-min infusion every 3-4 weeks appear to be consistent with those renal safety profiles of 60-min infusion.

Quarterly intravenous injection of ibandronate to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition that generally requires long-term therapy for fracture risk reduction to become apparent. Although the bisphosphonates have made a major contribution to how clinicians manage osteoporosis, compliance with therapy has generally been less in the real-world setting than seen in clinical trials. Less-frequently administered dosage regimens or nonoral routes may enhance compliance and so maximize the therapeutic benefit of bisphosphonates. Ibandronate is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, whose high potency allows it to be administered orally or intravenously with extended dosing intervals. This paper will review the role of intravenous ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Renal safety of intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis

Oral bisphosphonates are the mainstay of treatment for osteoporosis but cannot be used in some patients due to gastrointestinal contraindications, gastrointestinal intolerance, malabsorption or the inability to comply with dosing requirements. In such patients, intravenous bisphosphonates are a useful alternative. This review summarises the renal safety issues associated with the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Intravenous bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, which may be a reflection of their selective activity in bone and metabolic stability. Adverse effects on renal function are primarily related to infusion rate and dose. Due to lack of data, no conclusions can be made regarding bisphosphonate safety in patients with intrinsic renal disease or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 30 ml/min.

Application of Metabonomics in a Comparative Profiling Study Reveals N-Acetylfelinine Excretion as a Biomarker for Inhibition of the Farnesyl Pathway by Bisphosphonates

In this work, the results of metabolic profiling of urine from a preclinical comparative profiling study with the two biphosphonates ibandronate and zoledronate are reported. Toxicological assessment showed very different effects for the two compounds. Ibandronate did not cause major signs of toxicity, whereas zoledronate elicited hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Increased levels of urinary glucose and decreased levels of urinary creatinine detected by NMR also indicated drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Similarly, increased urinary levels of creatine and taurine indicated hepatotoxicity. Both organ toxicities were later confirmed by histopathology. In addition, the benefit of metabonomics as an open approach as compared to targeted methods was demonstrated by the identification of an unknown molecule in the urine of rats dosed with zoledronate. The structure elucidation revealed this molecule as N-acetylfelinine. Analysis of the pathways proposed for the biochemical synthesis of this molecule showed that the synthesis and excretion of N-acetylfelinine could easily be explained by drug-induced inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase. This is the reported mode of action of bisphosphonates. Until now, N-acetylfelinine was exclusively observed in the urine of felidae species, where it is believed to be a precursor to a pheromone.

Effects of the bisphosphonate ibandronate on hyperalgesia, substance P, and cytokine levels in a rat model of persistent inflammatory pain

The anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of different bisphosphonates have been demonstrated in both animal and human studies. Ibandronate is a third-generation bisphosphonate effective in managing different types of bone pain. In this study we investigated its effects in a standard pre-clinical model of inflammatory pain. We evaluated the effects of a single injection of different doses (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg i.p.) of ibandronate on inflammatory oedema and cutaneous hyperalgesia produced by the intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in the rat hind-paw. In addition, we measured the effects of this drug (1.0 mg/kg i.p.) on hind-paw levels of different pro-inflammatory mediators (PGE-2, SP, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta). We also measured the levels of SP protein and of its mRNA in the ipsilateral dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Ibandronate proved able to reduce the inflammatory oedema, the hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation, and the levels of SP in the inflamed tissue as measured 3 and 7 days following CFA-injection. This drug significantly reduced the levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta only on day 7. On the other hand, the levels of PGE-2 in the inflamed hind-paw were unaffected by the administration of this bisphosphonate. Finally, ibandronate blocked the overexpression of SP mRNA in DRG induced by CFA-injection in the hind-paw. These data help to complete the pharmacodynamic profile of ibandronate, while also suggesting an involvement of several inflammatory mediators, with special reference to substance P, in the analgesic action of this bisphosphonate.

Managing metastatic bone pain: the role of bisphosphonates

Approximately two-thirds of patients with bone metastases have severe and debilitating pain. Despite a range of treatments, about 25% of patients with painful bone metastases suffer from uncontrolled pain. Bisphosphonates are the standard care for the reduction of skeletal events associated with bone metastases. We review the efficacy of currently available bisphosphonates in cancer-related bone pain. Oral clodronate, intravenous (i.v.) pamidronate, and i.v. zoledronic acid have shown an analgesic effect in some studies. Both i.v. and oral ibandronate reduced bone pain in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and maintained bone pain scores below baseline levels for up to two years in clinical trials. Pilot studies of intensive i.v. ibandronate dosing show rapid and effective relief from moderate-to-severe bone pain in patients with breast cancer and other tumors. Phase III trials are warranted to compare the efficacy of bisphosphonates in treating bone pain and to confirm the effects of intensive dosing regimens.

Differences in Nephrotoxicity of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Malignancy- Related Bone Disease

Renal dysfunction is a particularly problematic adverse event that requires additional management and can prohibit the use of certain medications. Due to their renal uptake and elimination, some bisphosphonates can cause nephrotoxicity when used for the treatment of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases. However, clinical studies and post-marketing experience indicate that renal effects do not appear to be the same for all bisphosphonates. Zoledronic acid and pamidronate appear to be associated with a greater risk of renal toxicity, especially when given in high doses or over short infusion times. In contrast, high loading doses of intravenous ibandronate (3 x 6 mg given on days 1-3) have shown no additional renal safety concerns, and intravenous ibandronate 6 mg appears to have a renal safety profile comparable to placebo. This paper reviews the renal safety of intravenously administered bisphosphonates and makes some suggestions, based on preclinical and clinical data, as to why renal safety profiles may differ.

Ibandronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia or nephrocalcinosis in patients with multiple myeloma and acute renal failure: Case reports

Multiple myeloma disrupts calcium homeostasis by a variety of mechanisms, including bone destruction and resorption. This causes hypercalcemia. When left untreated, hypercalcemia leads to nephrocalcinosis, impairment of kidney function, and eventually renal failure. Some degree of renal dysfunction is common in myeloma patients. Here, we report case studies showing the efficacy and renal safety of the single-nitrogen bisphosphonate, ibandronate, for the treatment of hypercalcemia and/or nephrocalcinosis in multiple myeloma patients hospitalized with acute renal failure. Patients (n = 7) received either one or two intravenous infusions of ibandronate (2-6 mg). Ibandronate was well tolerated in all patients and returned elevated blood calcium levels to normal. Renal function improved for all patients and normalized in 3/7 patients. We conclude that ibandronate is involved in rapidly improving or restoring acute renal function and calcium levels to within the normal range in this patient population. To clarify the exact value of ibandronate, further investigation is warranted in randomized prospective trials.

Evaluation of biodistribution by local versus systemic administration of 99mTc-labeled pamidronate

BACKGROUND

There is an emerging interest in utilizing local and systemic administration of bisphosphonates in orthopedics. The primary objective of this study was to use (99m)Tc-pamidronate ((99m)Tc-PAM) as a tool and compare bone and tissue uptake by local versus systemic administration.

METHODS

(99m)Tc-PAM was administered intravenously (i.v.), subcutaneously (s.c.) and by direct application (d.a.) on a surgically exposed and fractured femur (d.a.#f). The animals were imaged at 2 h and 24 h after administration and then killed. Organs were harvested, and their radioactivity was estimated. Specific uptake in the right femur was compared between groups, as was systemic exposure to (99m)Tc PAM.

RESULTS

Bone uptake of (99m)Tc-PAM in the i.v. and s.c. groups was 2.2 +/- 0.15 and 0.65 +/- 0.07% ID/g, respectively, at the 2 h time point. Uptake by surgically exposed right femur (d.a) was 5.15 +/- 0.26% ID/g, 134% higher than the femoral uptake by the i.v. method (P < 0.05). In the presence of exposed bone when the femur was fractured (d.a.#f), the uptake was 7.89 +/- 0.46% ID/g, a further 50% increase (P < 0.05). The uptake of (99m)Tc-PAM increased after 24 h of application to 2.4 +/- 0.15, 1.53 +/- 0.09, 7.94 +/- 0.99, and 13.2 +/- 0.80% ID/g) for i.v., s.c., d.a., and d.a.#f methods, respectively. The increases in uptake for the d.a. methods were significantly higher than for the local methods at the 24-h time point (P < 0.05). Although renal uptake was comparable with the i.v. and s.c. methods (0.22 +/- 0.03 and 0.22 +/- 0.04% ID/g), it was significantly lower with the d.a. methods (0.05 +/- 0.07 and 0.16 +/- 0.07% ID/g) (P < 0.05). The corresponding urinary excretion was 55%, 45%, 36%, and 35% of the injected dose at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the bone uptake of (99m)Tc-PAM was significantly higher (P = 0.001) and the kidney uptake significantly lower (P = 0.004) with the d.a. methods than with the i.v. or s.c. method. The findings indicate the need for further study into the potential of local administration of bisphosphonates in the presence of orthopedic indications.

OPG/membranous--RANKL complex is internalized via the clathrin pathway before a lysosomal and a proteasomal degradation

The members of the OPG/RANK/RANKL (osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB/RANK ligand) triad are involved in various osteolytic pathologies such as bone tumors. Although many studies described the use of OPG during the treatment of bone diseases, its bioavailability and the mechanism by which the cells control the extracellular OPG remains blurred. The present work uses a strongly RANKL expressing cellular model to assess the becoming and the bioavailability of exogenous OPG in the context of its interactions with RANKL. The human kidney cell line 293, which initially expresses neither OPG nor RANKL, was stably transfected by the full length of mouse transmembranous form of RANKL (293RL). When OPG is incubated with 293RL cells, the extracellular concentration of OPG was strongly decreased in a time-dependent manner. The OPG disappearance was not inhibited by the addition of several proteases inhibitors, thus excluding any extracellular protease degradation. Contrary to previous results obtained on myeloma cells, which strongly express syndecan-1, the OPG disappearance was unaffected by the use of an antibody against syndecan-1. However, this event was abolished by an antibody against RANKL. These results, not necessarily conflicting, could be in relation with the expression level of the receptors in the two cellular models. In this context, an internalization process was put forward. Confocal microscopy demonstrated via the clathrin pathway an internalization of OPG mediated by RANKL. After being internalized, OPG was then degraded by the proteasome and the lysosome. A similar internalization phenomenon was also observed in osteoblast cells expressing physiologically RANKL, thus validating our data observed on 293RL cells. Western blotting analysis revealed that the half-life of RANKL was greatly reduced in the presence of OPG, pointing out that OPG binding to RANKL induces an enhancement of the ligand internalization. By the light of these results, the inhibitory effect of OPG on bone resorption can be explained not only by a decoy receptor function, competitor inhibitor of the RANK/RANKL binding, but also by the modulation of the RANKL half-life induced by OPG. Reciprocally, this modulation contributes to reduce the bioavailability of OPG.

Intravenous ibandronate does not affect time to renal function deterioration in patients with skeletal metastases from breast cancer: phase III trial results

As patients with metastatic bone disease typically receive long-term treatment with bisphosphonates, and often antineoplastic compounds, drug-related safety is of considerable importance. Clinical trial data for intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate suggest that its nephrotoxic potential is comparable with placebo. We conducted a post hoc Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to serum creatinine increase with i.v. ibandronate throughout 2 years of treatment. After 96 weeks, 12% of patients in the placebo group and 6% in the ibandronate 6 mg group (ns, P = 0.22) had defined serum creatinine increases. After 12 treatment months (48 weeks), 4% of patients receiving placebo and 2% of patients receiving ibandronate 6 mg showed increased serum creatinine. These results suggest that there is no clinically relevant change in serum creatinine levels with i.v. ibandronate 6 mg infused every 3-4 weeks for 2 years. Comparative trials to examine the renal safety of ibandronate and other i.v. bisphosphonates are warranted.

Management of the adverse effects associated with intravenous bisphosphonates

Intravenous bisphosphonates are widely used to treat hypercalcemia and to reduce skeletal-related morbidity among cancer patients. However, serious complications, generally occurring in less than 2% of patients participated in phase III clinical trials, including acute systemic inflammatory reaction, ocular inflammation, renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, electrolyte imbalance, and osteonecrosis of the maxilla and mandible have all been increasingly reported. Yet, strategies to deal with these complications are becoming clear. Acute systemic inflammatory reaction is often self-limited and becomes less intense during subsequent treatments. For patients who develop ocular symptoms, prompt ophthalmologic evaluation is crucial to determine the safety of a subsequent bisphosphonate therapy. Patients who receive long-term pamidronate should be evaluated at intervals for early sign of nephritic syndrome as timely cessation of the agent may result in a full recovery. To reduce the risk of severe electrolyte abnormalities, particularly hypocalcemia, correcting any pre-treatment electrolyte abnormality and supplementing vitamin D and calcium may be helpful. Finally, to reduce the risk of osteonecrosis of the maxilla and mandible, obtaining a full dental evaluation before treatment and avoidance of invasive dental procedures is suggested. The three commonly used intravenous bisphosphonates (pamidronate, zoledronic acid, and ibandronate), are generally safe; ibandronate has to date been the least reported to be associated with renal side effects. As clinical indications of intravenous bisphosphonates continue to expand, prescribing clinicians should be familiar with these possible adverse effects and discuss them with patients before commencing or continuing on therapy.

Ibandronate: the evolution of a once-a-month oral therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates have been shown to be highly effective in preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and the associated risk of fracture. However, poor adherence with bisphosphonate therapies for PMO results in a high incidence of otherwise preventable fractures. The chronicity of this condition requires long-term treatment, but fewer than one in two women remains on daily bisphosphonate therapy for 1 yr. A good way to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures is through development of equally efficacious formulations with more convenient dosing regimens. Weekly formulations of bisphosphonates have been introduced that demonstrate comparable efficacy to daily formulations with slightly improved adherence. Recently, a new formulation utilizing a third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate--ibandronate--has been approved with a monthly dosing regimen. The pharmacokinetics and high potency of ibandronate, similar with other bisphosphonates, facilitate lower mg doses and longer-interval dosing frequencies with similar efficacy and enhanced tolerability. Preclinical studies and clinical trials have consistently demonstrated that it is the total cumulative dose of ibandronate that determines efficacy. The convenience of once-monthly dosing may ultimately improve adherence and clinical outcomes among the growing population of postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporosis.

Ibandronic Acid

Ibandronic acid (Bondronat) is a potent, new-generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, available in both intravenous and oral formulations, which effectively inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In clinical trials, the two formulations were equally effective in preventing skeletal-related events and improving quality of life in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer. Both intravenous and oral ibandronic acid reduced metastatic bone pain scores below baseline levels for up to 2 years. Oral ibandronic acid is administered as a single 50 mg tablet taken once daily. It suppressed bone resorption in breast cancer patients with bone metastases to an extent similar to that observed with intravenous zoledronic acid. Both intravenous and oral ibandronic acid were well tolerated with no evidence of renal toxicity. Ibandronic acid is therefore a valuable addition to the bisphosphonates used in the treatment of bone metastases of breast cancer, offering high potency and the convenience of oral administration, combined with the absence of renal toxicity.

Acute Renal Effects of Intravenous Bisphosphonates in the Rat

Bisphosphonates are potent osteoclast inhibitors that have been associated with renal toxicity following rapid intravenous administration of high doses, which was hypothesised to be due to precipitation of bisphosphonate aggregates or complexes in the kidney. Five studies were conducted in rats investigating the characteristics of bisphosphonate-related acute renal effects. These studies included single intravenous injections of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (1) ibandronate (1-20 mg/kg), or (2) zoledronate (1-10 mg/kg); (3) a single nephrotoxic dose of the non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, clodronate (2 x 200 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection); (4) a single low dose of ibandronate (1 mg/kg); (5) a single high dose of zoledronate (10 mg/kg). Clinical biochemistry and kidney histopathology were performed 1 and/or 4 days after bisphosphonate dosing. The proximal convoluted tubules were the primary target for renal injury. Tubular degeneration and single cell necrosis of the these tubules were observed with all three bisphosphonates on the fourth, but not the first day after dosing. Differences between the bisphosphonates in the type and/or localisation of the lesions were apparent. Granular deposits in the lumen of distal tubules were apparent with the highest dose of zoledronate (10 mg/kg). However, intraluminal debris was proteinaceous with no evidence of any precipitation of bisphosphonate, or formation of aggregates or complexes in the kidney. Generally, biochemical parameters of renal safety and urinary enzymes did not differ significantly from controls. In summary, bisphosphonate-related renal changes did not appear to be due to the precipitation, aggregation or complexation of bisphosphonate, and biochemical parameters of renal safety did not reliably detect this renal injury.

Preclinical Perspectives on Bisphosphonate Renal Safety

Renal insufficiency is not rare in cancer patients who may receive nephrotoxic medications as antineo-plastic agents or for comorbid conditions. Thus, the choice of a particular bisphosphonate for patients with metastatic bone disease should be based not only on efficacy but also on the risk for renal deterioration. Some i.v. bisphosphonates have been associated with occasional renal toxicity in the clinical setting. Preclinical studies have also shown that there may be considerable differences among bisphosphonate renal safety profiles. Comparative studies show variations in the risk for histopathologic damage and the ability to cause cumulative toxicity during intermittent dosing. Reasons for the differences among bisphosphonates are not fully understood; however, research shows that they may be influenced by pharmacokinetic properties such as renal tissue half-life or protein binding and intracellular potency. Further preclinical analyses are needed to confirm and evaluate differences among bisphosphonates.

Biological properties and mechanism of action of ibandronate: application to the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates, with their proven efficacy and safety, are the most commonly prescribed treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, optimal efficacy is often not achieved due to poor patient adherence to medication. Poor adherence leads to an increased risk of fracture, which itself results in morbidity, elevated healthcare costs and potentially, mortality. Although weekly rather than daily dosing of bisphosphonates has improved adherence, there remains a significant problem, and dosing less frequently than weekly has been suggested as a possible means for further improving adherence. Ibandronate is a new bisphosphonate that has a specific structure and set of characteristics that enable less frequent dosing than currently available bisphosphonates. This review provides details of the general structural features of all bisphosphonates and how these are understood to contribute to their functions in osteoporosis treatment. From this, the unique structure of ibandronate is described, along with how this translates into the high antiresorptive potency, favorable bone-binding, persistence in bone, and good tolerability that permits less frequent dosing. Finally, the clinical evidence for ibandronate is briefly presented, demonstrating the viability of less frequent dosing, with its potential benefits for patient convenience and adherence to therapy.

Renal Safety of Ibandronate

Despite their efficacy in treating complications associated with metastatic bone disease, there are concerns about the potential nephrotoxicity of certain i.v. bisphosphonates for the long-term management of cancer patients. Clinical data suggest, however, that i.v. ibandronate (Bondronat); F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com), unlike other bisphosphonates, has a renal safety profile comparable with that of placebo. In a 2-year, phase III study of patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone, the incidence of adverse renal events in patients treated with 6 mg i.v. ibandronate was low and comparable with that of placebo (4% versus 4.5% with placebo). Two-year assessments of time to serum creatinine increase also demonstrated renal safety comparable with that of placebo (patients with creatinine increase: 6% versus 12% with placebo). Long-term (4-year) renal safety of ibandronate was demonstrated in a 2-year extension of the trial. Phase II, open-label studies show that intensive ibandronate dosing does not compromise renal safety in patients with metastatic bone pain from a variety of tumor types. In addition, i.v. ibandronate is well tolerated, with no evidence of renal toxicity in multiple myeloma and urologic cancer patients with existing renal impairment. The potential nephrotoxicity of some bisphosphonates has prompted additional renal safety precautions in product labeling for these agents. The precautions are not, however, contained in the label for ibandronate, which may thus simplify patient management.

Ibandronate in metastatic bone disease: a review of preclinical data

Bisphosphonates are widely used to prevent and treat skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease. There is increasing evidence that, besides inhibiting osteoclast activity and reducing bone resorption, bisphosphonates also have an anti-tumor effect. This paper reviews the preclinical data for ibandronate. Ibandronate increased the proportion of apoptotic tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, possibly following activation of caspase-like proteases. In vitro, ibandronate also prevented adhesion and spreading of tumor cells to bone, and tumor cell invasion. These inhibitory effects were additive when ibandronate was given with paclitaxel or docetaxel. In animal models of tumor-induced osteolysis, ibandronate significantly reduced the development of osteolytic lesions. Efficacy for the prevention and reduction of bone metastases was related to the timing of treatment; ibandronate treatment initiated prior to or shortly after tumor cell inoculation inhibited the growth of bone metastases and preserved skeletal integrity most effectively. As with other bisphosphonates, the influence of ibandronate on soft tissue metastases has been inconsistent. Overall, preclinical evidence supports the rationale for adjuvant treatment with ibandronate for patients at risk of metastatic bone disease. The renal safety profile of ibandronate supports its suitability for long-term adjuvant use, even with intermittent high dosing. Adjuvant clinical trials have been initiated. The ability of bisphosphonates to preserve skeletal integrity is also of benefit in other clinical settings. Recent studies in rat models demonstrate improved osseointegration of joint implants following ibandronate therapy, with potential application in patients with conditions such as degenerative arthritis or osteoporosis.