1
|
Hrbacek J, Kacperek A, Beenakker JWM, Mortimer L, Denker A, Mazal A, Shih HA, Dendale R, Slopsema R, Heufelder J, Mishra KK. PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00748-X. [PMID: 38971383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | | | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Linda Mortimer
- Medical Physics Department, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Proton Therapy (BE-APT), Berlin, Germany
| | - Alejandro Mazal
- Medical Physics Service, Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helen A Shih
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Orsay, France
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BerlinProtonen am HZB, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kavita K Mishra
- Proton Ocular Radiation Therapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Osher Foundation Endowed Chair in Clinical Programs in Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yilmaz MT, Sari SY, Zorlu F, Yazici G. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:932-951. [PMID: 38869695 PMCID: PMC11236855 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults. With the evidence demonstrating that episcleral plaque brachytherapy (EPB) has similar survival rates as enucleation in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS), eye-sparing treatments have come to the fore today. External radiotherapy techniques (proton beam radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) are an important treatment option for globe-sparing treatments. There are no prospective randomized trials comparing these techniques; however, retrospective series, meta-analyses, and reviews indicate that these EPB and external radiotherapy techniques are equal. With this review, we aimed to examine the external radiotherapy techniques used in the treatment of uveal melanoma in detail with reference to the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fleury E, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Milder M, van Rij C, Naus N, Yavuzyigitoglu S, den Toom W, Zolnay A, Spruijt K, van Vulpen M, Trnková P, Hoogeman M. Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100605. [PMID: 39050744 PMCID: PMC11268348 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients. Materials and methods For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences. Results In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy. Conclusions This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Milder
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tseng YH, Hsu CA, Chou YB. Comparing efficacy of charged-particle therapy with brachytherapy in treatment of uveal melanoma. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:1882-1890. [PMID: 38565600 PMCID: PMC11226678 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03035-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular tumour in adults. The most used eye-preserving treatments are charged-particle therapy (CPT) and brachytherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacies and complications of these two radiotherapies. METHODS We searched EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to December 2022. Two independent reviewers identified controlled studies comparing outcomes of CPT versus brachytherapy. Case series that utilize either treatment modality were also reviewed. RESULTS One hundred fifty studies met the eligibility criteria, including 2 randomized control trials, 5 controlled cohort studies, and 143 case series studies. We found significant reduction in local recurrence rate among patients treated with CPT compared to brachytherapy (Odds ratio[OR] 0.38, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.60, p < 0.01). Analysis also showed a trend of increased risks of secondary glaucoma after CPT. No statistically significant differences were found in analyzing risks of mortality, enucleation, and cataract. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested no difference in mortality, enucleation rate and cataract formation rate comparing the two treatments. Lower local recurrence rate and possibly higher secondary glaucoma incidence was noted among patients treated with CPT. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is limited, and further high-quality studies are necessary to provide a more definitive conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsuan Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Chia-An Hsu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Bai Chou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Semeniuk O, Yu E, Rivard MJ. Current and Emerging Radiotherapy Options for Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1074. [PMID: 38473430 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
What treatment options are there for patients having uveal melanoma? A randomized, prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial (COMS) showed no difference in survival between brachytherapy and enucleation for medium-sized lesions. With the obvious benefit of retaining the eye, brachytherapy has flourished and many different approaches have been developed such as low-dose-rate sources using alternate low-energy photon-emitting radionuclides, different plaque designs and seed-loading techniques, high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources and applicators, and low- and high-dose-rate beta-emitting sources and applicators. There also have been developments of other radiation modalities like external-beam radiotherapy using linear accelerators with high-energy photons, particle accelerators for protons, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery. This article examines the dosimetric properties, targeting capabilities, and outcomes of these approaches. The several modalities examined herein have differing attributes and it may be that no single approach would be considered optimal for all patients and all lesion characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksii Semeniuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Esther Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khan SA, Almalki WH, Arora S, Kesharwani P. Recent approaches for the treatment of uveal melanoma: Opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 193:104218. [PMID: 38040071 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular cancer in adult population. Primary methods for treatment of UM involves surgery Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), Plaque Brachytherapy, phototherapy, and Charged Particle Radiation Therapy (CPT). It has been found that approximately 50 % of patients diagnosed with UM ultimately experience development of metastatic disease. Furthermore, it has been identified that majority of the patient experience metastasis in liver with a prevalence of 95 %. Management of metastatic UM (MUM) involves various therapeutic modalities, including systemic chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy and liver directed interventions. We outline gene mutation in UM and addresses various treatment modalities, including molecular targeted therapy, miRNA-based therapy, and immunotherapy. Additionally, inclusion of ongoing clinical trials aimed at developing novel therapeutic options for management of UM are also mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sauban Ahmed Khan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India
| | - Waleed H Almalki
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Swaranjeet Arora
- Department of Finance and Management, Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, 11/07 Dwarka Sector 11, Near Metro Station, New Delhi, Delhi 110075, India
| | - Prashant Kesharwani
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pica A, Weber DC, Schweizer C, Chaouch A, Zografos L, Schalenbourg A. Clinical Outcomes in AYAs (Adolescents and Young Adults) Treated with Proton Therapy for Uveal Melanoma: A Comparative Matching Study with Elder Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4652. [PMID: 37760619 PMCID: PMC10526519 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with those of elder adult patients treated with proton therapy (PT) for uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective, comparative study was conducted in UM patients who underwent PT at the Ocular Oncology Unit of the Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital (University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland) and the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI); (Villigen, Switzerland) between January 1997 and December 2007. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to select for each AYA (between 15-39 years old) an elder adult patient (≥40 years) with similar characteristics. We assessed ocular follow-up, local tumor control, metastasis incidence, and overall and relative survival (OS and RS). Non-terminal outcomes were then compared between the two groups using competing risk survival analysis. RESULTS Out of a total of 2261 consecutive UM patients, after excluding 4 children (<15 years) and 6 patients who were metastatic at presentation, we identified 272 AYA patients and matched 270 of them with 270 elder adult patients. Before PSM, the AYA patients had a higher incidence of primary iris melanoma (4.0% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.005), while the elder patients were more likely to have other neoplastic diseases at presentation (9% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.004). Ocular outcomes and local tumor control were similar in both groups. Cumulative metastasis incidence for the AYA and elder adult groups was 13% and 7.9% at 5 years and 19.7% and 12.7% at 10 years, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.214). The OS was similar in the two groups (p = 0.602), with estimates in the AYA and elder adult groups of 95.5% and 96.6% at 5 years and 94.6% and 91.4% at 10 years, respectively. However, the relative survival (RS) estimation was worse in the AYA group than the elder group (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION While AYAs treated with PT for UM have similar ocular outcomes and present the same metastasis incidence and OS as elder adults, their RS is worse than that in elder adults, when compared with the population in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen West, Switzerland;
| | - Damien C. Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen West, Switzerland;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claude Schweizer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA (Fondation Asile des Aveugles), 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (C.S.); (L.Z.); (A.S.)
| | - Aziz Chaouch
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Leonidas Zografos
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA (Fondation Asile des Aveugles), 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (C.S.); (L.Z.); (A.S.)
| | - Ann Schalenbourg
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA (Fondation Asile des Aveugles), 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (C.S.); (L.Z.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Banou L, Tsani Z, Arvanitogiannis K, Pavlaki M, Dastiridou A, Androudi S. Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6374-6396. [PMID: 37504330 PMCID: PMC10378371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprini Banou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zoi Tsani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Maria Pavlaki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Anna Dastiridou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Sofia Androudi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hickling SV, Corner S, Kruse JJ, Deisher AJ. Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 37084072 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton therapy is a key modality used in the treatment of ocular melanoma. Traditionally ocular sites are treated using a dedicated eyeline with a passively scattered proton beam and a brass aperture. This work aims to design and characterize a beam-collimating aperture to treat ocular targets with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam. METHODS A plastic aperture system that slides into the gantry nozzle of a spot scanning proton beam was designed and constructed. It consists of an intermediate scraper layer to attenuate stray protons and a 3D-printed patient-specific aperture positioned 5.7 cm from the surface of the eye. The aperture system was modeled in TOPAS and Monte Carlo simulations were validated with film measurements. Two different spot configurations were investigated for treatment planning and characterized based on lateral penumbra, central axis (CAX) dose and relative efficiency. Alignment and leakage were investigated through experimental film measurements. Range was verified using a multi-layer ionization chamber. Reference dose measurements were made with a PinPoint 3D ion chamber. Neutron dose was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS Aperture alignment with radiation isocenter was determined to be within 0.31 mm at a gantry angle of 0°. A single-spot configuration with a 10 mm diameter aperture yielded film-measured lateral penumbras of 1 mm to 1.25 mm, depending on depth in the spread-out Bragg peak. TOPAS simulations found that a single spot configuration results in a flat dose distribution for a 10 mm diameter aperture and provides a CAX dose of less than 106% for apertures less than 14 mm in diameter. For larger targets, adding four corner spots to fill in the dose distribution is beneficial. Trade-offs between lateral penumbra, CAX dose and relative efficiency were characterized for different spot configurations and can be used for future clinical decision-making. The aperture was experimentally determined to not affect proton beam range, and no concerning leakage radiation or neutron dose was identified. Reference dose measurements with a PinPoint ion chamber were within 2.1% of Monte Carlo calculated doses. CONCLUSION The aperture system developed in this work provides a method of treating ocular sites on a gantry-based spot scanning proton system. Additional work to develop compatible gaze tracking and gating infrastructure is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah V Hickling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Stephen Corner
- Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J Kruse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amanda J Deisher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hussain RN, Chiu A, Pittam B, Taktak A, Damato BE, Kacperek A, Errington D, Cauchi P, Chadha V, Connolly J, Salvi S, Rundle P, Cohen V, Arora A, Sagoo M, Bekir O, Kopsidas K, Heimann H. Proton beam radiotherapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma in the UK-national audit of referral patterns of 1084 cases. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37:1033-1036. [PMID: 35840716 PMCID: PMC10050435 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02178-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton beam therapy has been utilised for the treatment of uveal melanoma in the UK for over 30 years, undertaken under a single centre. In the UK, all ocular tumours are treated at one of four centres. We aimed to understand the variation in referral patterns to the UK proton service, capturing all uveal melanoma patients treated with this modality. METHODS Retrospective analysis of data regarding all patients treated at the Clatterbridge Proton service between January 2004 and December 2014. RESULTS A total of 1084 patients with uveal melanoma were treated. The mean age was 57 years (range 9-90 years), basal diameter of 11.5 mm (range 2.0-23.4 mm) and tumour thickness of 3.9 mm (range 0.1-15.4 mm). The majority were TNM stage I (39%) or II (36%). The distance to the optic nerve varied from 0 to 24.5 mm with 148 (14%) of patients having ciliary body involvement. There were variations in the phenotypic characteristic of the tumours treated with protons from different centres, with London referring predominantly small tumours at the posterior pole, Glasgow referring large tumours often at the ciliary body and Liverpool sending a mix of these groups. DISCUSSION In the UK, common indications for the use of proton treatment in uveal melanoma include small tumours in the posterior pole poorly accessible for plaque treatment (adjacent to the disc), tumours at the posterior pole affecting the fovea and large anterior tumours traditionally too large for brachytherapy. This is the first UK-wide audit enabling the capture of all patients treated at the single proton centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R N Hussain
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
| | - A Chiu
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - B Pittam
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - A Taktak
- Department of Eye and Vision Science and Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - B E Damato
- Ocular Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
| | - A Kacperek
- University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - D Errington
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, Wirral, CH63 4JY, UK
| | - P Cauchi
- Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - V Chadha
- Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - J Connolly
- Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - S Salvi
- The National Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, S10 2JF, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Rundle
- The National Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, S10 2JF, Sheffield, UK
| | - V Cohen
- Ocular Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
| | - A Arora
- Ocular Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
| | - M Sagoo
- Ocular Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, EC1V 2PD, UK
| | - O Bekir
- Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - K Kopsidas
- The National Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, S10 2JF, Sheffield, UK
| | - H Heimann
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jaarsma-Coes MG, Klaassen L, Verbist BM, Vu TK, Klaver YL, Rodrigues MF, Nabarro C, Luyten GP, Rasch CR, van Herk M, Beenakker JWM. Inter-Observer Variability in MR-Based Target Volume Delineation of Uveal Melanoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101149. [PMID: 36691449 PMCID: PMC9860418 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Several efforts are being undertaken toward MRI-based treatment planning for ocular proton therapy for uveal melanoma (UM). The interobserver variability of the gross target volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the important parameters to design safety margins for a reliable treatment. Therefore, this study assessed the interobserver variation in GTV delineation of UM on MRI. Methods and Materials Six observers delineated the GTV in 10 different patients using the Big Brother contouring software. Patients were scanned at 3T MRI with a surface coil, and tumors were delineated separately on contrast enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) and 3DT2-weighted scans with an isotropic acquisition resolution of 0.8 mm. Volume difference and overall local variation (median standard deviation of the distance between the delineated contours and the median contour) were analyzed for each GTV. Additionally, the local variation was analyzed for 4 interfaces: sclera, vitreous, retinal detachment, and tumor-choroid interface. Results The average GTV was significantly larger on T1gd (0.57cm3) compared with T2 (0.51cm3, P = .01). A not significant higher interobserver variation was found on T1gd (0.41 mm) compared with T2 (0.35 mm). The largest variations were found at the tumor-choroid interface due to peritumoral enhancement (T1gd, 0.62 mm; T2, 0.52 mm). As a result, a larger part of this tumor-choroid interface appeared to be included on T1gd-based GTVs compared with T2, explaining the smaller volumes on T2. Conclusions The interobserver variation of 0.4 mm on MRI are low with respect to the voxel size of 0.8 mm, enabling small treatment margins. We recommend delineation based on the T1gd-weighted scans, as choroidal tumor extensions might be missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam G. Jaarsma-Coes
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lisa Klaassen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Berit M. Verbist
- Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - T.H. Khanh Vu
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Yvonne L.B. Klaver
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Myra F. Rodrigues
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Claire Nabarro
- Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Coen R.N. Rasch
- HollandPTC, Radiation oncology, Delft, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands,Leiden University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands,Corresponding author: Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yazici G, Kiratli H, Ozyigit G, Sari SY, Elmali A, Yilmaz MT, Koc I, Deliktas O, Gumeler E, Cengiz M, Zorlu F. Every other day stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma decreases toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:39-45. [PMID: 36184996 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report the long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS/FSRT) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the results of patients treated between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), enucleation-free survival (EFS) and treatment toxicity. RESULTS 443 patients with 445 UMs were treated via CyberKnife®. According to the COMS classification, 70% of the tumors were small/medium and 30% were large. Median total RT dose was 54 Gy, median BED10 was 151 Gy. After a median 74-months follow-up, SRS/FSRT yielded an 83% overall LC rate. The 5- and 10-year LRFS rate was 74% and 56%, respectively. Patient age and the COMS size were prognostic for all survival endpoints. An increased SRS/FSRT dose was associated with higher LRFS and EFS rates. SRS/FSRT-related toxicity was observed in 49% of the eyes. Median visual acuity (VA) significantly deteriorated after SRS/FSRT in 76% of the treated eyes. The overall eye preservation rate was 62%, and the 5- and 10-year EFS rate was 64% and 36%, respectively. The delivery of FSRT every other day resulted in a significantly lower rate of toxicity and enucleation compared to FSRT on consecutive days. CONCLUSION A total dose of ≥45 Gy and BED10Gy ≥ 112.5 SRS/FSRT is associated with a higher LC rate in patients with UM. Despite the favorable outcomes, treatment toxicity is the major limitation of this treatment. Toxicity and enucleation can be minimized by treating the eye every other day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hayyam Kiratli
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aysenur Elmali
- Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Koc
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozge Deliktas
- Tunceli State Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Tunceli, Turkey
| | - Ekim Gumeler
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guberina M, Sokolenko E, Guberina N, Dalbah S, Pöttgen C, Lübcke W, Indenkämpen F, Lachmuth M, Flühs D, Chen Y, Hoffmann C, Deuschl C, Jabbarli L, Fiorentzis M, Foerster A, Rating P, Ebenau M, Grunewald T, Bechrakis N, Stuschke M. Feasibility, Method and Early Outcome of Image-Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery Followed by Resection for AJCC Stage IIA–IIIB High-Risk Large Intraocular Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194729. [PMID: 36230660 PMCID: PMC9562629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The aim of this trial was to define one optimal contemporary treatment procedure for large intraocular melanoma. Radiosurgery is a highly effective treatment in cancer. In this trial, all consecutive patients with large intraocular melanoma treated with multimodality treatment, comprising 4D image-guided volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery procedure followed by resection, were evaluated. In the short-term follow-up there was no clinical toxicity due to external beam radiation therapy, and no local tumor recurrence. In 98% of the cases, the eye bulb could be maintained with partial residual visual acuity in the mean follow-up of 18 months. The outcome estimates one optimal treatment procedure for high-risk, large intraocular melanoma, with excellent results in the first follow-up. Abstract The main objective of this prospective observational study was the characterization of the feasibility and early outcome of image-guided (IG) volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) radiosurgery (SRS) followed by resection for patients with large intraocular melanoma. Our study included consecutive patients with unfavorable-risk melanoma, enrolled in an ophthalmic oncology center. IG-VMAT-SRS was applied by high-resolution 4D image guidance and monitoring. Current stereotactic technique parameters were evaluated for comparison. Side effects and eye function, based on a 5-point CTC assessment score, were quantified. In patients with tumors located more than 0.7–1 mm apart from the optic nerve, partial to complete volume-sparing of the optic nerve head could be achieved. In 95.5% of this subgroup, the vitality of the optic nerve and vision could be preserved by the multimodality-treatment approach (mean follow-up: 18 months (7.5–36 months)). The advanced technology of stereotactic radiotherapy demonstrated the achievability of steep dose gradients around the high-dose volume, with 4D-IG-VMAT dose application. These results enforce IG-VMAT-SRS followed by resection as one of the major therapeutic options for patients with large intraocular melanoma. The combination of 4D-IG high-precision SRS and resection provides an effective treatment for large intraocular melanoma, with few side effects, and enables an eye bulb and even vision preserving modus operandi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-2321
| | - Ekaterina Sokolenko
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Sami Dalbah
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Lübcke
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Frank Indenkämpen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Manfred Lachmuth
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Flühs
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Hoffmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Cornelius Deuschl
- Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Leyla Jabbarli
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Miltiadis Fiorentzis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Foerster
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Rating
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Melanie Ebenau
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Grunewald
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Bechrakis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufeland Str. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Via R, Pica A, Antonioli L, Paganelli C, Fattori G, Spaccapaniccia C, Lomax A, Weber DC, Schalenbourg A, Baroni G, Hrbacek J. MRI and FUNDUS image fusion for improved ocular biometry in Ocular Proton Therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 174:16-22. [PMID: 35788353 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ocular biometry in Ocular Proton Therapy (OPT) currently relies on a generic geometrical eye model built by referencing surgically implanted markers. An alternative approach based on image fusion of volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and panoramic fundus photography was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen non-consecutive uveal melanoma (UM) patients, who consented for an MRI and had their tumour base visible on panoramic fundus photography, were included in this comparative analysis. Through generating digitally-reconstructed projections from MRI images using the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection, 2D-3D image fusion between fundus photography and an eye model delineated on MRI scans was achieved and allowed for a novel definition of the target base (MRI + FCTV). MRI + FCTV was compared with MRI-only delineation (MRIGTV) and the conventional (EyePlan) target definition (EPCTV). RESULTS The combined use of fundus photography and MRI to define tumour volumes reduced the average discrepancies by almost 65% with respect to the MRI only tumour definitions when comparing with the conventionally planned EPCTV. With the proposed method, shallow sub-retinal tumour infiltration, otherwise invisible on MRI, can be included in the target volume definition. Moreover, a novel definition of the fovea location improves the accuracy and personalisation of the 3D eye model. CONCLUSION MRI and fundus image fusion overcomes some of the limitations of ophthalmological MRI for tumour volume definition in OPT. This novel eye tumour modelling method might improve treatment planning personalisation, allowing to better anticipate which patients could benefit from prophylactic treatment protocols for radiation induced maculopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Via
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
| | - Alessia Pica
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Luca Antonioli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fattori
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Spaccapaniccia
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Antony Lomax
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ann Schalenbourg
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilli C, Thariat J, Chacun S, Nguyen AM, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Mathis T. [Radiation-induced retinopathy: actual knowledge and new concepts]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:1090-1099. [PMID: 35879145 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiation retinopathy is an occlusive vascular pathology following radiotherapy, generally targeted on the eye or peri-ocular structures. Despite increasingly precise techniques (stereotactic radiosurgery, proton therapy, etc.), the inclusion of the retina in the radiation field is sometimes unavoidable. This can lead to a severe pathology, which can ultimately cause blindness or even the anatomical loss of the eye when neovascular glaucoma occurs, due to the abnormal proliferation of neovessels. Radiation retinopathy have been described for more than a century, but it has recently seen great advances in both diagnosis and treatment. The advances of efficient and less invasive examinations in our clinical practice, such as OCT-angiography, allows for easier screening and diagnosis at earlier stages. Thus a new approach to the pathology is necessary, first of all through new definitions and classifications including previously undetected minimal forms. Furthermore, the recent appearance of intravitreal therapies by injection of anti-VEGF or dexamethasone implants has drastically changed the visual prognosis of these patients, who were previously treated only by retinal photocoagulation of the ischaemic areas. Recent studies have even shown the effectiveness of these new molecules in preventing the development of radiation retinopathy. This review of the literature provides an update on this disease and details how these recent diagnostic and therapeutic developments may play a role in the management of this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gilli
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France
| | - J Thariat
- Laboratoire de physique Corpusculaire / IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534 - ARCHADE, Unicaen - université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
| | - S Chacun
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France
| | - A M Nguyen
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France
| | - O Loria
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; UMR5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, université Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - L Kodjikian
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; UMR5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, université Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - T Mathis
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; UMR5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, université Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, van Rij C, Rodrigues M, Klaver Y, Spruijt K, Naus N, Zolnay A, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Hoogeman MS. Improving Organs-at-Risk Sparing for Choroidal Melanoma Patients: A CT-based Two-Beam Strategy in Ocular Proton Therapy with a Dedicated Eyeline. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:173-181. [PMID: 35487435 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a two-beam arrangement technique using three-dimensional (3D) imaging of uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with proton therapy and a dedicated eyeline. MATERIAL/METHODS Retrospective CT-based treatment plans of 39 UM patients performed using a single beam (SB) were compared to plans with two beams (TB) optimized for better trade-offs in organs-at-risk sparing. The RBE-weighted prescribed dose was 60 Gy (DRBE, GTV = 60 Gy) in four fractions, assuming an RBE of 1.1. Dosimetric findings were analyzed for three patient groups based on tumor-optic nerve distance and UM staging (group GrA: ≤ 3 mm, T1 T2 UM; GrB: ≤ 3 mm, T3 UM; GrC: > 3 mm, T1 T2 T3 UM). Finally, two schedules were compared on biologically effective dose (BED): both beams being delivered either the same day (TB) or on alternate days (TBalter). RESULTS All strategies resulted in dosimetrically acceptable plans. A dose reduction to the anterior structures was achieved in 23/39 cases with the two-beam plans. D25% was significantly lowered compared to SB plans by 12.4 and 15.4 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. D2% was reduced by 18.6 and 6.0 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. A cost to the optic nerve was observed with a median difference up to 3.8 Gy RBE-weighted dose in GrB. BED differences were statistically significant for all considered parameters in favor of two beams delivered the same day. CONCLUSION A two-beam strategy appears beneficial for posterior tumors abutting the optic nerve. This strategy might have a positive impact on the risk of ocular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yvonne Klaver
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Spruijt
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center, Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thariat J, Martel A, Matet A, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Nahon-Estève S, Mathis T. Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051194. [PMID: 35267502 PMCID: PMC8909862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective. Abstract The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534—ARCHADE, Unicaen—Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Service d’Oncologie Oculaire, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Loria
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Rétine Galien, Centre d’Exploration et de Traitement de la Rétine et de la Macula, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- INSERM, Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cennamo G, Montorio D, D' Andrea L, Farella A, Matano E, Giuliano M, Liuzzi R, Breve MA, De Placido S, Cennamo G. Long-Term Outcomes in Uveal Melanoma After Ruthenium-106 Brachytherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 11:754108. [PMID: 35047387 PMCID: PMC8763327 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.754108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the results after ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma in terms of tumor control, visual acuity, radiation-related complications, tumor recurrence, metastases, and patients’ survival rate during 4 years’ follow-up. A total of 355 eyes from 355 patients have been treated with Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma between February 2011 and March 2020. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and then 350 eyes of 350 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including echography and spectral domain–optical coherence tomography. The mean follow-up was 4 years (3 months to 9 years). After treatment, the mean tumor thickness was reduced to 1.75 ± 0.21 mm. Radiation complications were found in 63% of patients: 38% showed radiation maculopathy, 11% had optic neuropathy, and 14% developed cataracts. Cancer-free survival was 99%, 97%, and 85%, respectively, at 5, 7, and 9 years. Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy represents a reliable treatment of uveal melanoma. This technique is valid and safe with a low rate of ocular complications during a long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilda Cennamo
- Eye Clinic, Public Health Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Montorio
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Luca D' Andrea
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Farella
- Radiotherapy Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Elide Matano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Rare Cancer Coordinating Center - Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Rare Cancer Coordinating Center - Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Liuzzi
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Angelica Breve
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Rare Cancer Coordinating Center - Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cennamo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
On measuring the 3D dose distribution for notched and circular Ru-106 plaque shapes through Gafchromic film dosimetry approach. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
20
|
Marinkovic M, Pors LJ, van den Berg V, Peters FP, Schalenbourg A, Zografos L, Pica A, Hrbacek J, Van Duinen SG, Vu THK, Bleeker JC, Rasch CRN, Jager MJ, Luyten GPM, Horeweg N. Clinical Outcomes after International Referral of Uveal Melanoma Patients for Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246241. [PMID: 34944862 PMCID: PMC8699723 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This study aims to assess cancer control and preservation of the eye and visual acuity after proton therapy abroad for eye melanoma. For this, medical files were reviewed of Dutch uveal melanoma patients who were treated in Switzerland with proton therapy from 1987 to 2019. The tumours of these patients were too large and/or localised too close to the optic nerve to be treated with local plaque irradiation. There were 103 patients, of whom one had a uveal melanoma in both eyes. The tumours were relatively large and often localised around the central part of the retina. At five years after treatment, proton therapy had controlled the uveal melanomas of 94% of the patients and 81% had preserved their eye. Spread of the cancer beyond the eye was observed in 30% of the patients. Most patients (79%) became blind or had severe visual impairment after proton therapy; a small group of patients had mild or no visual impairment (17%). The size of the tumour, its localisation and the dose of proton therapy were important for the risk of decline in visual acuity. This study shows that proton therapy abroad for uveal melanoma is feasible and yields good results. Abstract Objective: To assess oncological and ophthalmological outcomes after international referral of uveal melanoma patients for proton therapy. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study among Dutch uveal melanoma patients who were treated in Switzerland with 60.0 CGE proton therapy (in 4 fractions) from 1987 to 2019. All patients were ineligible for brachytherapy due to tumour size and/or proximity to the optic nerve. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier’s methodology and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 103 patients (104 eyes) with a median largest tumour diameter of 19 mm (range 6–26 mm). Tumours were localised centrally (11%), mid-peripherally (65%) or peripherally (34%). Median follow-up was 7 years. Five-year local control, distant metastasis-free survival and eye preservation rates were 94%, 70% and 81% respectively. At five years, severe, moderate and mild visual impairment was observed in respectively 79%, 4% and 6% of the patients. Larger tumour volumes and more central tumour localisation were associated with severe visual impairment. After correction for these factors, dose to the macula, optic disc and retina, but not optic nerve was significantly associated with severe visual impairment. Conclusion: International referral for proton therapy yielded good tumour control and eye preservation rates, but risk of distant metastasis and severe visual impairment were substantial, possibly due to the selection of advanced tumour stages and/or central localisation. Dose to the macula may be more relevant than dose to the optic nerve for preservation of visual acuity, which is relevant for the treatment planning of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Lennart J. Pors
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (L.J.P.); (F.P.P.); (C.R.N.R.)
| | - Vincent van den Berg
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Femke P. Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (L.J.P.); (F.P.P.); (C.R.N.R.)
| | - Ann Schalenbourg
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.S.); (L.Z.)
| | - Leonidas Zografos
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, FAA, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.S.); (L.Z.)
| | - Alessia Pica
- Proton therapy Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (A.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Proton therapy Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (A.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Sjoerd G. Van Duinen
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - T. H. Khanh Vu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Jaco C. Bleeker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Coen R. N. Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (L.J.P.); (F.P.P.); (C.R.N.R.)
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Gregorius P. M. Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.M.); (V.v.d.B.); (T.H.K.V.); (J.C.B.); (M.J.J.); (G.P.M.L.)
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (L.J.P.); (F.P.P.); (C.R.N.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-715265539
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang X, Hobbs B, Gandhi SJ, Muijs CT, Langendijk JA, Lin SH. Current status and application of proton therapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:27-36. [PMID: 34534613 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer remains one of the leading causes of death from cancer across the world despite advances in multimodality therapy. Although early-stage disease can often be treated surgically, the current state of the art for locally advanced disease is concurrent chemoradiation, followed by surgery whenever possible. The uniform midline tumor location puts a strong importance on the need for precise delivery of radiation that would minimize dose to the heart and lungs, and the biophysical properties of proton beam makes this modality potential ideal for esophageal cancer treatment. This review covers the current state of knowledge of proton therapy for esophageal cancer, focusing on published retrospective single- and multi-institutional clinical studies, and emerging data from prospective clinical trials, that support the benefit of protons vs photon-based radiation in reducing postoperative complications, cardiac toxicity, and severe radiation induced immune suppression, which may improve survival outcomes for patients. In addition, we discuss the incorporation of immunotherapy to the curative management of esophageal cancers in the not-too-distant future. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence to support proton therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer, and proton therapy has its limitations in clinical application. It is expected to see the results of future large-scale randomized clinical trials and the continuous improvement of proton radiotherapy technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, China
| | - Brian Hobbs
- Department of Population Health, University of Texas, Austin, USA
| | - Saumil J Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christina T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, Spruijt K, Herault J, Lebbink F, Heufelder J, Hrbacek J, Horwacik T, Kajdrowicz T, Denker A, Gerard A, Hofverberg P, Mamalui M, Slopsema R, Pignol J, Hoogeman M. Characterization of the HollandPTC proton therapy beamline dedicated to uveal melanoma treatment and an interinstitutional comparison. Med Phys 2021; 48:4506-4522. [PMID: 34091930 PMCID: PMC8457201 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Eye-dedicated proton therapy (PT) facilities are used to treat malignant intraocular lesions, especially uveal melanoma (UM). The first commercial ocular PT beamline from Varian was installed in the Netherlands. In this work, the conceptual design of the new eyeline is presented. In addition, a comprehensive comparison against five PT centers with dedicated ocular beamlines is performed, and the clinical impact of the identified differences is analyzed. MATERIAL/METHODS The HollandPTC eyeline was characterized. Four centers in Europe and one in the United States joined the study. All centers use a cyclotron for proton beam generation and an eye-dedicated nozzle. Differences among the chosen ocular beamlines were in the design of the nozzle, nominal energy, and energy spectrum. The following parameters were collected for all centers: technical characteristics and a set of distal, proximal, and lateral region measurements. The measurements were performed with detectors available in-house at each institution. The institutions followed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)-398 Code of Practice for absolute dose measurement, and the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice, its modified version or International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 78 for spread-out Bragg peak normalization. Energy spreads of the pristine Bragg peaks were obtained with Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4. Seven tumor-specific case scenarios were simulated to evaluate the clinical impact among centers: small, medium, and large UM, located either anteriorly, at the equator, or posteriorly within the eye. Differences in the depth dose distributions were calculated. RESULTS A pristine Bragg peak of HollandPTC eyeline corresponded to the constant energy of 75 MeV (maximal range 3.97 g/cm2 in water) with an energy spread of 1.10 MeV. The pristine Bragg peaks for the five participating centers varied from 62.50 to 104.50 MeV with an energy spread variation between 0.10 and 0.70 MeV. Differences in the average distal fall-offs and lateral penumbrae (LPs) (over the complete set of clinically available beam modulations) among all centers were up to 0.25 g/cm2 , and 0.80 mm, respectively. Average distal fall-offs of the HollandPTC eyeline were 0.20 g/cm2 , and LPs were between 1.50 and 2.15 mm from proximal to distal regions, respectively. Treatment time, around 60 s, was comparable among all centers. The virtual source-to-axis distance of 120 cm at HollandPTC was shorter than for the five participating centers (range: 165-350 cm). Simulated depth dose distributions demonstrated the impact of the different beamline characteristics among institutions. The largest difference was observed for a small UM located at the posterior pole, where a proximal dose between two extreme centers was up to 20%. CONCLUSIONS HollandPTC eyeline specifications are in accordance with five other ocular PT beamlines. Similar clinical concepts can be applied to expect the same high local tumor control. Dosimetrical properties among the six institutions induce most likely differences in ocular radiation-related toxicities. This interinstitutional comparison could support further research on ocular post-PT complications. Finally, the findings reported in this study could be used to define dosimetrical guidelines for ocular PT to unify the concepts among institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Petra Trnková
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Departement of Radiation OncologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Kees Spruijt
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Joël Herault
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | | | - Jens Heufelder
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
- Department of OphthalmologyCharité ‐ Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Paul Scherrer Institute Center for Proton TherapyVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Tomasz Horwacik
- Institute of Nuclear PhysicsPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | | | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieBerlinGermany
| | - Anaïs Gerard
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Petter Hofverberg
- Departement of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - Maria Mamalui
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation OncologyEmory Proton Therapy CenterAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of RadiotherapyErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy CenterDelftThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Spaccapaniccia C, Via R, Thominet V, Liffey A, Baroni G, Pica A, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Hrbacek J. Non-invasive recognition of eye torsion through optical imaging of the iris pattern in ocular proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34126607 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0afb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of non-invasive imaging techniques such as MRI imaging for treatment planning and optical eye tracking for in-room eye localization would obviate the requirement of clips implantation for many patients undergoing ocular proton therapy. This study specifically addresses the issue of torsional eye movement detection during patient positioning. Non-invasive detection of eye torsion is performed by measuring the iris pattern rotations using a beams eye view optical camera. When handling images of patients to be treated using proton therapy, a number of additional challenges are encountered, such as changing eye position, pupil dilatation and illumination. A method is proposed to address these extra challenges while also compensating for the effect of cornea distortion in eye torsion computation. The accuracy of the proposed algorithm was evaluated against corresponding measurement of eye torsion using the clips configuration measured on x-ray images. This study involves twenty patients who received ocular proton therapy at Paul Scherrer Institute and it is covered by ethical approval (EKNZ 2019-01987).
Collapse
|
24
|
Iatrogenic Ocular Surface Diseases Occurring during and/or after Different Treatments for Ocular Tumours. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081933. [PMID: 33923737 PMCID: PMC8073875 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The ocular surface represents a finely regulated system that allows the protection of the eye. It can be affected by therapies used for the treatment of various intraocular tumours, particularly conjunctival cancers and uveal melanoma. In these conditions, treatments are chosen according to the characteristics of the lesion, and include a combination of selective surgery, anticancer eye drops, and/or radiotherapy delivered through different mechanisms. Possible side effects affecting the ocular surface range from transient dry eye or keratitis up to more severe complications such as corneal melting and perforation. These complications deserve careful evaluation for the risk of permanent sight-threatening sequelae. Physicians involved in the management of patients affected by ocular tumours should be aware of this risk in order to reach an early diagnosis and promptly set up an adequate treatment. The present review summarizes acute and chronic complications affecting the ocular surface following different therapies for the treatment of conjunctival cancers and uveal melanoma, and also reports clinical cases of representative patients who experienced these complications. Abstract The ocular surface represents a finely regulated system that allows the protection of the eye. It is particularly susceptible to different treatments for intraocular tumours, such as uveal melanoma and conjunctival cancers. Traditionally, the management of ocular tumours depends on the characteristics of the lesion, and is based on a combination of selective surgery, topical chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy delivered through different mechanisms (e.g., charged-particle radiotherapy or brachytherapy). Possible complications involving the ocular surface range from transient dry eye disease or keratitis up to corneal melting and perforation, which in any case deserve careful evaluation for the risk of permanent sigh-threatening complications. Clinicians involved in the management of these patients must be aware of this risk, in order to reach an early diagnosis and promptly set up an adequate treatment. The present review of the literature will summarize acute and chronic complications affecting the ocular surface following different therapies for the treatment of ocular tumours.
Collapse
|
25
|
Damico NJ, Wu AK, Kharouta MZ, Eitan T, Pidikiti R, Jesseph FB, Smith M, Langmack C, Mattson DL, Dobbins D, Mansur DB, Machtay MX, Dorth JA, Choi S, Yao M, Bhatt AD. Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies. Int J Part Ther 2021; 7:42-51. [PMID: 33829072 PMCID: PMC8019573 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00025.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Periorbital tumor location presents a significant challenge with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy due to high tumor dose needed in the setting of close proximity to orbital structures with lower tolerance. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is felt to be an effective modality in such cases due to its sharp dose gradient. Materials and Methods We reviewed our institutional PBT registry and identified 17 patients with tumor epicenters within 2 cm of the eye and optic apparatus treated with passive scatter PBT with comparison volumetric arc therapy plans available. Maximum and mean doses to organs at risk of interest, including optic nerves, optic chiasm, lens, eye ball, pituitary, cochlea, lacrimal gland, and surrounding brain, were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test. Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Median age was 67. Median follow-up was 19.7 months. Fourteen patients underwent upfront resection and received postoperative radiation and 3 received definitive radiation. One patient received elective neck radiation, 2 underwent reirradiation, and 3 had concurrent chemotherapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, brain, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea as well as in the maximum dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea with PBT. The 18-month cumulative incidence of local failure was 19.1% and 1-year overall survival was 80.9%. Conclusion Proton beam therapy resulted in significant dose reductions to several periorbital and optic structures compared with volumetric arc therapy. Proton beam therapy appears to be the optimal radiation modality in such cases to minimize risk of toxicity to periorbital organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Damico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anna K Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Z Kharouta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tal Eitan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rajesh Pidikiti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Frederick B Jesseph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mark Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Christian Langmack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Diana L Mattson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Donald Dobbins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David B Mansur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell X Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer A Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Serah Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aashish D Bhatt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Elisei G, Pella A, Ricotti R, Via R, Fiore MR, Calvi G, Mastella E, Paganelli C, Tagaste B, Bello F, Fontana G, Meschini G, Buizza G, Valvo F, Orlandi E, Ciocca M, Baroni G. Development and validation of a new set-up simulator dedicated to ocular proton therapy at CNAO. Phys Med 2021; 82:228-239. [PMID: 33657472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.01.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
An Eye Tracking System (ETS) is used at CNAO for providing a stable and reproducible ocular proton therapy (OPT) set-up, featuring a fixation light (FL) and monitoring stereo-cameras embedded in a rigid case. The aim of this work is to propose an ETS set-up simulation algorithm, that automatically provides the FL positioning in space, according to patient-specific gaze direction and avoiding interferences with patient, beam and collimator. Two configurations are provided: one in the CT room for acquiring images required for treatment planning with the patient lying on a couch, and one related to the treatment room with the patient sitting in front of the beam. Algorithm validation was performed reproducing ETS simulation (CT) and treatment (room) set-up for 30 patients previously treated at CNAO. The positioning accuracy of the device was quantified through a set of 14 control points applied to the ETS case and localizable both in the CT volume and in room X-ray images. Differences between the position of ETS reference points estimated by the algorithm and those measured by imaging systems are reported. The corresponding gaze direction deviation is on average 0.2° polar and 0.3° azimuth for positioning in CT room and 0.1° polar and 0.4° azimuth in the treatment room. The simulation algorithm was embedded in a clinically usable software application, which we assessed as capable of ensuring ETS positioning with an average accuracy of 2 mm in CT room and 1.5 mm in treatment room, corresponding to gaze direction deviations consistently lower than 1°.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Elisei
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Pella
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy.
| | - R Ricotti
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - R Via
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - M R Fiore
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Calvi
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Particle Accelerator Department, Pavia, Italy
| | - E Mastella
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department - Medical Physics Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Paganelli
- Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy
| | - B Tagaste
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Bello
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Fontana
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Meschini
- Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy
| | - G Buizza
- Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy
| | - F Valvo
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
| | - E Orlandi
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Ciocca
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department - Medical Physics Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Baroni
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica CNAO, Clinical Department-Bioengineering Unit, Pavia, Italy; Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fleury E, Trnková P, Erdal E, Hassan M, Stoel B, Jaarma‐Coes M, Luyten G, Herault J, Webb A, Beenakker J, Pignol J, Hoogeman M. Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:1315-1326. [PMID: 33336379 PMCID: PMC7986198 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning approach for uveal melanomas (UM) in proton therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS For eight patients with UM, a segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed on T1- and T2-weighted 7 Tesla MRI image data to reconstruct the patient MR-eye. An extended contour was defined with a 2.5-mm isotropic margin derived from the GTV. A broad beam algorithm, which we have called πDose, was implemented to calculate relative proton absorbed doses to the ipsilateral OARs. Clinically favorable gazing angles of the treated eye were assessed by calculating a global weighted-sum objective function, which set penalties for OARs and extreme gazing angles. An optimizer, which we have named OPT'im-Eye-Tool, was developed to tune the parameters of the functions for sparing critical-OARs. RESULTS In total, 441 gazing angles were simulated for every patient. Target coverage including margins was achieved in all the cases (V95% > 95%). Over the whole gazing angles solutions space, maximum dose (Dmax ) to the optic nerve and the macula, and mean doses (Dmean ) to the lens, the ciliary body and the sclera were calculated. A forward optimization was applied by OPT'im-Eye-Tool in three different prioritizations: iso-weighted, optic nerve prioritized, and macula prioritized. In each, the function values were depicted in a selection tool to select the optimal gazing angle(s). For example, patient 4 had a T2 equatorial tumor. The optimization applied for the straight gazing angle resulted in objective function values of 0.46 (iso-weighted situation), 0.90 (optic nerve prioritization) and 0.08 (macula prioritization) demonstrating the impact of that angle in different clinical approaches. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility and suitability of a 3D MRI-based treatment planning approach have been successfully tested on a cohort of eight patients diagnosed with UM. Moreover, a gaze-angle trade-off dose optimization with respect to OARs sparing has been developed. Further validation of the whole treatment process is the next step in the goal to achieve both a non-invasive and a personalized proton therapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Fleury
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - P. Trnková
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - E. Erdal
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| | - M. Hassan
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - B. Stoel
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - M. Jaarma‐Coes
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - G. Luyten
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Herault
- Department of Radiation OncologyCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance
| | - A. Webb
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J.‐W. Beenakker
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of OphthalmologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J.‐P. Pignol
- Department of Radiation OncologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - M. Hoogeman
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyHollandPTCDelftThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van Beek JGM, Ramdas WD, Angi M, van Rij CM, Naus NC, Kacperek A, Errington RD, Damato B, Heimann H, Kiliç E. Local tumour control and radiation side effects for fractionated stereotactic photon beam radiotherapy compared to proton beam radiotherapy in uveal melanoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:219-224. [PMID: 33549643 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the adverse side effects of fractionated stereotactic photon beam radiotherapy (fSRT) with proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS A retrospective study investigating 306 UM patients treated with fSRT (N=153) by the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study group (ROMS), The Netherlands, between 1999-2014 or with PBR (N=153) at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital and the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom, between 1993-2014. The tumours treated with fSRT were matched with tumours treated with PBR based on sex, left or right eye, TNM classification, posterior margin ≤ or > 3mm of the fovea and of the optic disc. RESULTS The five-year actuarial rates of tumour recurrence were 4.5% for fSRT and 6.1% for PBR. For fSRT and PBR, the five-year actuarial rates of maculopathy were 14.9% and 12.4%, and for vitreous haemorrhage were 29.4% and 4.7%, respectively. Only vitreous haemorrhage (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.56) was more common after fSRT compared to PBR. Overall, larger tumours were risk factors for maculopathy and secondary enucleation. CONCLUSIONS Both treatments have excellent local tumour control. In matched groups, vitreous haemorrhage was the only adverse side effect showing a significant difference between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackelien G M van Beek
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Wishal D Ramdas
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martina Angi
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline M van Rij
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole C Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bertil Damato
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Heinrich Heimann
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eibenberger K, Dunavoelgyi R, Gleiss A, Sedova A, Georg D, Poetter R, Dieckmann K, Zehetmayer M. Hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma: 20-year experience. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:207-214. [PMID: 32969745 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1820572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the long-term results after hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with choroidal melanoma treated between 1997 and 2016. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 335 patients (183 male and 152 female) with choroidal melanoma unsuitable for ruthenium-106 brachytherapy or local resection were treated with linear accelerator-based SRT at the Medical University of Vienna. All patients received five fractions with either 10, 12 or 14 Gy per fraction. A complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity and measurement of the tumor base and height using standardized A- and B-scan ultrasonography was performed every 3 months in the first 2 years, every 6 months until 5 years and yearly thereafter. Early and late adverse side effects were assessed at every follow-up visit. RESULTS The median overall follow-up was 78.6 months (39.1 to 113.7 months). Local tumor control was 95.4% after 10 and 12 years, respectively. Fifty-four patients developed metastatic disease, and 31 died during the follow-up. Mean visual acuity decreased from 0.55 Snellen at baseline to 0.05 Snellen at the last individual follow-up. Ischemic retinopathy (192/335cases) and optic neuropathy (174/335cases) were the most common radiogenic side effects, followed by radiogenic cataract (n = 127), neovascular glaucoma (n = 71) and corneal epithelium defects (n = 49). Enucleation was performed in 54 patients mostly due to neovascular glaucoma (n = 41) or tumor recurrence (n = 10) during the study period. The eye retention rate was 79.7% after 10 and 12 years. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy showed a high rate of local tumor control for choroidal melanoma and an acceptable rate of radiogenic side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roman Dunavoelgyi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Gleiss
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksandra Sedova
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Poetter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Zehetmayer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang G, Wang J, Wang Y, Peng H. Proton FLASH: passive scattering or pencil beam scanning? Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:03NT01. [PMID: 33296881 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd22d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
This study focused on a direct comparison of dose delivery efficiency between two proton FLASH delivery modes: passive scattering and pencil beam scanning (PBS). Monte-Carlo simulation of the beamline was performed using the Geant4 package. Two proton energies (63 and 230 MeV) were selected, targeting for shallow and deep-seated tumors, respectively. Two irradiation field sizes were selected: 13 × 13 mm2 and 50 × 50 mm2. For each delivery mode, two cases were investigated: shoot-through and Bragg peak, yielding a total of 4 delivery scenarios. For the passive scattering mode, the impact on dose rate by multiple components along the beamline were investigated, including ridge-filter, scatterer, range shifter and collimator. A quantitative comparison among four scenarios was made in terms of field size, dose, dose rate and treatment plan quality (dose volume histogram). For the 230 MeV case, the dose rate (for 1 nA current) is 0.05 Gy s-1 (passive with Bragg peak, field size: 50 × 50 mm2) and 2.6 Gy s-1 (PBS with shoot-through). Dose rate comparison is made between passive scattering and PBS as the delivery changes from spot-layer to shoot-through. In conclusion, the study successfully established a benchmark reference for dose rate performance for different scenarios, taking into account components along the beamline, field size and beam current. The results allow us to predict and compare the required beam current to yield a dose rate sufficiently high, above the threshold of the FLASH effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoliang Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Wuhan University, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Junliang Wang
- Cancer Radiation Therapy Center, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100039, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuenan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120, Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Medical Physics, Wuhan University, 430072, People's Republic of China.,NewRT Medical Systems Inc., Wuxi, 214144, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Via R, Hennings F, Pica A, Fattori G, Beer J, Peroni M, Baroni G, Lomax A, Weber DC, Hrbacek J. Potential and pitfalls of 1.5T MRI imaging for target volume definition in ocular proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:53-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
32
|
Parker T, Rigney G, Kallos J, Stefko ST, Kano H, Niranjan A, Green AL, Aziz T, Rath P, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1526-1536. [PMID: 33152286 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30459-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma knife radiosurgery is regarded as the gold-standard stereotactic radiosurgery modality for the treatment of intracranial tumours, and its use has been expanded for the treatment of intraocular malignancies. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the clinical outcomes of patients with uveal melanomas or intraocular metastases treated primarily with gamma knife radiosurgery. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published between Sept 1, 1960, and Feb 1, 2020, reporting the use of gamma knife radiosurgery as primary treatment for uveal melanoma or uveal metastases. The search was restricted to clinical studies and relevant grey literature published in English. Studies reporting treatment of benign tumours, extraocular tumours, or other forms of stereotactic radiosurgery were excluded to reduce heterogeneity. No restrictions were placed on participant criteria. Local tumour control and tumour regression were extracted as the primary outcomes and analysed via a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions using the DerSimonian and Laird method with a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019148165. FINDINGS Our search returned 454 studies, of which 109 were assessed for full-text eligibility. 52 studies, reporting on 1010 patients with uveal melanoma and 34 intraocular metastases, were eligible for systematic review. 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 840 of 898 patients (0·96, 95% CI 0·94-0·97; I2=16%) from 19 studies had local control, and 378 of 478 patients (0·81, 0·70-0·90; I2=83%) from 16 studies experienced tumour regression. INTERPRETATION Gamma knife radiosurgery is an efficacious primary method of treating uveal melanomas and intraocular metastases, with reliable tumour control rates. Randomised controlled trials should further evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery in this setting. FUNDING The Rhodes Trust and the Howard Brain Sciences Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq Parker
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Grant Rigney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Justiss Kallos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - S Tonya Stefko
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pamela Rath
- Everett and Hurite Ophthalmic Association, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jaarsma-Coes MG, Marinkovic M, Astreinidou E, Schuurmans MS, Peters FP, Luyten GP, Rasch CR, Beenakker JWM. Measuring eye deformation between planning and proton beam therapy position using magnetic resonance imaging. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 16:33-36. [PMID: 33458341 PMCID: PMC7807689 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Eye and tumour deformation due to gravity is less than 0.4 mm. Conformity index between flexed and supine position for eyes is >0.95. Conformity index between flexed and supine position for tumours is >0.85. Supinely acquired MR images can be used for PBT planning.
Proton beam therapy (PBT) for uveal melanoma (UM) is performed in sitting position, while the acquisition of the Magnetic resonance (MR)-images for treatment planning is performed in supine position. We assessed the effect of this difference in position on the eye- and tumour- shape. Seven subjects and six UM-patients were scanned in supine and a seating mimicking position. The distances between the tumour/sclera in both positions were calculated. The median distance between both positions was 0.1 mm. Change in gravity direction produced no substantial changes in sclera and tumour shape, indicating that supinely acquired MR-images can be used to plan ocular-PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam G. Jaarsma-Coes
- Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Radiology, C.J. Gorter Centre for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Corresponding author at: Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Megan S. Schuurmans
- Radiology, C.J. Gorter Centre for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Femke P. Peters
- Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Coen R.N. Rasch
- Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Radiology, C.J. Gorter Centre for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pica A, Weber DC, Vallat L, Bergin C, Hrbacek J, Schweizer C, Zografos L, Schalenbourg A. Good long-term visual outcomes of parapapillary choroidal melanoma patients treated with proton therapy: a comparative study. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 41:441-452. [PMID: 32975693 PMCID: PMC7882567 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01594-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate why small- and certain medium-sized parapapillary choroidal melanoma (pcM) patients treated with hypo-fractionated proton therapy (PT) retain excellent long-term visual acuity (VA) and assess the negative predictive factors for retaining good vision (≤ 0.2 logMAR (≥ 0.6 decimal) after 5 years. METHODS This single-center, retrospective, comparative study recruited consecutive pcM patients that were treated with PT. Between 1984 and 2005, 609 patients received a total of 60 CGE, of whom 310 met the following inclusion criteria: posterior tumor border ≤ 2.5 mm from the optic disc, largest tumor diameter ≤ 17.9 mm, tumor thickness ≤ 5.2 mm and available follow-up data for at least 5 years. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 120.8 ± 48.8 months (54.0-295.0). Out of 310 patients, 64 (21%) maintained a VA ≤ 0.2 logMAR (≥ 0.6 decimal) for at least 5 years following PT and were allocated to the "good visual outcome" (GVO) group, while the remaining 246 (79%) constituted the "poor visual outcome" (PVO) group, subdivided into 70 (22%) with a VA of 0.3-1.0 logMAR (0.1-0.5 decimal) and 157 (57%) patients with a VA > 1.0 logMAR (< 0.1 decimal). On multivariate analysis, older age (P = 0.04), tumor localization ≤ 0.5 mm to the fovea (P < 0.03), volume of the optic disc and macula receiving 50% of dose (30 CGE) (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively) were independent negative predictors of GVO. CONCLUSIONS Of 310 small- to medium-sized pcM patients successfully treated with PT, 21% retained a VA ≤ 0.2 logMAR (≥ 0.6 decimal) for at least 5 years. Strongest negative predictive factor for retaining good long-term vision was the volume of the macula irradiated with at least 30 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Laureen Vallat
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ciara Bergin
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Claude Schweizer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Leonidas Zografos
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ann Schalenbourg
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sayan M, Mamidanna S, Oncel D, Jan I, Vergalasova I, Weiner J, Ohri N, Acikalin B, Chundury A. Clinical management of uveal melanoma: a comprehensive review with a treatment algorithm. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:162-169. [PMID: 33012143 PMCID: PMC7533402 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM), the most frequently occurring non-cutaneous melanoma and most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, arises from the melanocytes of the choroid in approximately 95% of cases. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is vital as primary tumor size is one of the key factors associated with survival. Despite recent advances in management, more than half of the patients develop metastatic disease which portends poor survival. Currently, treatment options for UM include local resection, enucleation, plaque brachytherapy, and/or particle beam radiotherapy (RT). Enucleation was initially the standard of care in the management of UM, but a shift towards eye-preserving therapeutic choices such as RT and local resection has been noted in recent decades. Plaque brachytherapy, a form of localized RT, is the most popular option and is now the preferred treatment modality for a majority of UM cases. In this review we discuss the etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and diagnosis of UM and place a special emphasis on its therapeutic options. Furthermore, we review the current literature on UM management and propose a functional treatment algorithm for non-metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutlay Sayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Swati Mamidanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Damla Oncel
- Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Imraan Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Irina Vergalasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Banu Acikalin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Anupama Chundury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Özcan G, Gündüz AK, Mirzayev İ, Oysul K, Uysal H. Early Results of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Uveal Melanoma and Risk Factors for Radiation Retinopathy. Turk J Ophthalmol 2020; 50:156-162. [PMID: 32631003 PMCID: PMC7338750 DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.78370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To report treatment results and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery in uveal malignant melanoma and to identify risk factors for development of radiation retinopathy. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 36 patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma between 2014 and 2019. Best corrected visual acuity, funduscopic findings, basal tumor diameter and tumor thickness were recorded at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3-month intervals. The response of tumors to stereotactic radiosurgery and complications were determined. Results: The mean basal diameter of tumor was 10.2 (range: 4.0-19.4, standard deviation [SD]: ±3.3) mm x 9.7 (range: 4.5-18.0, SD: ±3.3), tumor thickness was 5.1 (range: 2.0-11.0, ±2.4) mm at baseline. The mean follow-up period was 17.2 (range: 6-48, SD: ±10.43) months. The mean visual acuity was 0.5 (SD: ±0.3) logMAR before treatment and 0.6 (SD: ±0.3) logMAR after the mean follow-up period. The most common complications after stereotactic radiosurgery were cataract (38.9%) and radiation retinopathy (27.7%). There was a statistically significant relation between radiation retinopathy development and tumor distance from the optic disc (p=0.04). The rate of eye salvage was 83.3% in this study. Conclusion: Our short-term results show stereotactic radiosurgery was an effective and sustained treatment modality among the other eye conservation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gökçen Özcan
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Kaan Gündüz
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İbadulla Mirzayev
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kaan Oysul
- Medicana International Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hasan Uysal
- Medicana International Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Eitan T, Damico NJ, Pidikiti R, Kharouta MZ, Dobbins D, Jesseph FB, Smith M, Mangla A, Teknos TN, Mansur DB, Machtay M, Yao M, Bhatt AD. Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT. Int J Part Ther 2020; 6:13-18. [PMID: 32582810 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reirradiation in the scalp area can be challenging given the proximity to organs at risk (OARs), such as the eye and brain. Our aim is to evaluate the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and electron beam therapy (EBT) compared with 3-dimensional proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods We evaluated a patient with recurrent angiosarcoma of the left temporal scalp after prior surgical resections and radiation therapy to 60 Gy in 30 fractions who needed reirradiation. We generated VMAT, EBT, and PBT plans using the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System (TPS). Both VMAT and EBT plans used a skin bolus, whereas no bolus was used for the proton plan. Doses to the OARs, including cochlea, eyes, lens, lacrimal glands, optic nerves, optic chiasm, pituitary gland, and underlying brain, were compared. Results The reirradiation treatment dose was 60 Gy(RBE). Target volume coverage was comparable in all plans. Compared with VMAT and EBT, the PBT plan showed reductions in mean and maximum doses to all OARs. Without the use of protons, several OARs would have exceeded dose tolerance utilizing VMAT or electrons. Dose reduction of up to 100% was achieved for central and contralateral OARs. Conclusion Compared with VMAT and EBT, PBT resulted in dose reductions to all OARs, while maintaining excellent target coverage. PBT showed a significant advantage in treating superficially located skin cancers, such as angiosarcoma, without the need for a bolus. PBT can be considered in the upfront treatment and certainly in the reirradiation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Eitan
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nicholas J Damico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rajesh Pidikiti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Z Kharouta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Donald Dobbins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Frederick B Jesseph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mark Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ankit Mangla
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Theodoros N Teknos
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH, USA
| | - David B Mansur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aashish D Bhatt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Grech Fonk L, Ferreira TA, Webb AG, Luyten GPM, Beenakker JWM. The Economic Value of MR-Imaging for Uveal Melanoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:1135-1143. [PMID: 32425499 PMCID: PMC7196205 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s238405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intra-ocular tumour. Treatment is determined by tumour size and location. Generally, smaller tumours are eligible for brachytherapy unless they are located close to posterior pole. Larger tumours are enucleated or undergo proton beam therapy (PBT), which is more expensive than brachytherapy and less available. Accuracy of tumour size determination is critical for accurate planning and delivery of treatment, particularly to ensure tumour coverage, critical structure sparing, and for the choice of treatment modality. This is particularly the case for tumour dimensions that are close to the cut-off point for a specific type of treatment: in the case of the brachytherapy protocol at our institution, 6-8 mm. Ultrasound is conventionally used, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently become an additional available tool. Although more expensive, it enables more accurate measurements and is particularly useful in combination with clinical fundus examination, fundus photography and ultrasound. Our aim in this paper was to determine the economic value of MRI for UM treatment. Methods We retrospectively analysed 60 patients' MRI scans acquired as part of a study or for clinical care. For each patient, we assessed whether the extra cost of an MRI generated economic benefit or change in optimal treatment. Results MRI indicated a smaller tumour prominence than US in 10% of patients with intermediate tumour size, resulting in a change from PBT to brachytherapy. The costs of MRI, €200-€1000, are significantly lower than the higher costs of PBT compared to brachytherapy, €24,000 difference. In addition, the annual total economic burden of severe vision impairment associated with eye removal is €10,000. Furthermore, for patients where ultrasound was impossible due to previous surgery, MRI enabled eye-preserving treatment. Conclusion An additional MRI for specific patients with UM improves economic value as it enables less expensive treatment in a sufficient percentage of patients to compensate for the MRI costs. Value is increased in terms of quality of care as it enables for some a treatment option which spares more vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Grech Fonk
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Teresa A Ferreira
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew G Webb
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,C.J. Gorter Centre for High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P M Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rayess N, Mruthyunjaya P. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Radiation Retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2020; 51:S44-S49. [PMID: 32348534 DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20200401-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to review the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in treating patients with radiation retinopathy (RR). PATIENTS AND METHODS RR can be associated with a significant decrease in visual acuity (VA) related to the development of cystoid macular edema, macular ischemia, and proliferative retinopathy leading to neovascular glaucoma. RESULTS Anti-VEGF therapy is effective at stabilizing VA in around 80% of patients and achieving reductions in central macular thickness when it is administered using a constant algorithm. Furthermore, consistent prophylactic anti-VEGF therapy reduces the risk of development of RR, neovascularization of the iris, and neovascularization glaucoma. CONCLUSION Future studies are needed to determine the optimal regimen for anti-VEGF therapy according to patient risk factors and likelihood of developing RR. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S44-S49.].
Collapse
|
40
|
Via R, Hennings F, Fattori G, Pica A, Lomax A, Weber DC, Baroni G, Hrbacek J. Technical Note: Benchmarking automated eye tracking and human detection for motion monitoring in ocular proton therapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:2237-2241. [PMID: 32037578 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ocular proton therapy is an effective therapeutic option for patients affected with uveal melanomas. An optical eye-tracking system (ETS) aiming at noninvasive motion monitoring was developed and tested in a clinical scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ETS estimates eye position and orientation at 25 frames per second using the three-dimensional position of pupil and cornea curvature centers identified, in the treatment room, through stereoscopic optical imaging and infrared eye illumination. Its capabilities for automatic detection of eye motion were retrospectively evaluated on 60 treatment fractions. Then, the ETS performance was benchmarked against the clinical standard based on visual control and manual beam interruption. RESULTS Eye-tracking system detected eye position successfully in 97% of all available frames. Eye-tracking system-based eye monitoring during therapy guarantees quicker response to involuntary eye motions than manual beam interruptions and avoids unnecessary beam interruptions. CONCLUSIONS Eye-tracking system shows promise for on-line monitoring of eye motion. Its introduction in the clinical workflow will guarantee a swifter treatment course for the patient and the clinical personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Via
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Hennings
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Fattori
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Antony Lomax
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 20133, Italy
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Center for Proton Therapy, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
LaRiviere MJ, Santos PMG, Hill-Kayser CE, Metz JM. Proton Therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 33:989-1009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
42
|
Müller C, De Prado Leal M, Dominietto MD, Umbricht CA, Safai S, Perrin RL, Egloff M, Bernhardt P, van der Meulen NP, Weber DC, Schibli R, Lomax AJ. Combination of Proton Therapy and Radionuclide Therapy in Mice: Preclinical Pilot Study at the Paul Scherrer Institute. Pharmaceutics 2019; 11:pharmaceutics11090450. [PMID: 31480730 PMCID: PMC6781294 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11090450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy (PT) is a treatment with high dose conformality that delivers a highly-focused radiation dose to solid tumors. Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), on the other hand, is a systemic radiation therapy, which makes use of intravenously-applied radioconjugates. In this project, it was aimed to perform an initial dose-searching study for the combination of these treatment modalities in a preclinical setting. Therapy studies were performed with xenograft mouse models of folate receptor (FR)-positive KB and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive PC-3 PIP tumors, respectively. PT and TRT using 177Lu-folate and 177Lu-PSMA-617, respectively, were applied either as single treatments or in combination. Monitoring of the mice over nine weeks revealed a similar tumor growth delay after PT and TRT, respectively, when equal tumor doses were delivered either by protons or by β¯-particles, respectively. Combining the methodologies to provide half-dose by either therapy approach resulted in equal (PC-3 PIP tumor model) or even slightly better therapy outcomes (KB tumor model). In separate experiments, preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) was performed to investigate tissue activation after proton irradiation of the tumor. The high-precision radiation delivery of PT was confirmed by the resulting PET images that accurately visualized the irradiated tumor tissue. In this study, the combination of PT and TRT resulted in an additive effect or a trend of synergistic effects, depending on the type of tumor xenograft. This study laid the foundation for future research regarding therapy options in the situation of metastasized solid tumors, where surgery or PT alone are not a solution but may profit from combination with systemic radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Müller
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Maria De Prado Leal
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Marco D Dominietto
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Christoph A Umbricht
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Rosalind L Perrin
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Martina Egloff
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Peter Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Medical Bioengeneering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nicholas P van der Meulen
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roger Schibli
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Psomiadi A, Haas G, Edlinger M, Bechrakis NE, Blatsios G. Ultra-wide-field imaging of choroidal melanoma before and after proton beam radiation therapy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019; 30:1397-1402. [PMID: 31466473 PMCID: PMC7745607 DOI: 10.1177/1120672119873210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the imaging characteristics of choroidal melanoma before and after proton beam radiotherapy via Optos® ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Methods: Retrospective, descriptive study of choroidal melanoma patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy. All patients underwent full clinical evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity, ultrasound examination and ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging in the pseudo-colour (red and green channel) as well as auto-fluorescence mode. Tumours were classified and evaluated according to their location, size, presence of subretinal fluid, drusen, orange pigment and reflectance intensity in ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Tumour sonographic (basal diameter, height) and ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging dimensions (maximal diameter) were documented. Results: A total of 39 eyes (38 patients) were followed for 24 months (range 6–48 months). Mean best-corrected visual acuity dropped from 20/40 to 20/63 after proton beam radiotherapy. There was no change in the imaging tumour characteristics during follow-up. Subretinal fluid changes were better detected in the autofluorescence compared to pseudo-colour mode. Mean tumour diameter did not significantly change in the ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy although it did so in the ultrasound. No patient showed local tumour recurrence. Conclusion: The ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging characteristics of choroidal melanoma in the Optos® system do not significantly change after proton beam radiotherapy after a mean follow-up of 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Psomiadi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gertrud Haas
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Edlinger
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Georgios Blatsios
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
LARGE UVEAL MELANOMA (≥10 MM THICKNESS): Clinical Features and Millimeter-by-Millimeter Risk of Metastasis in 1311 Cases. The 2018 Albert E. Finley Lecture. Retina 2019. [PMID: 29528980 DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000002144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the clinical features and rate of metastatic disease in eyes with large (≥10 mm thickness) uveal melanoma. DESIGN Retrospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS There were 1,311 consecutive patients. METHODS Retrospective medical chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical features and rate of metastatic melanoma. RESULTS Of 1,311 patients with large melanoma, the mean age was 59 years (median 60, range 6-98 years) and 95% were white. Mean tumor basal dimension was 17 mm (median 17, range 7-25 mm), and mean tumor thickness was 12 mm (median 12, range 10-24 mm). Mean distance to the foveola was 6 mm (median 6, range 0-19 mm) and to optic nerve was 6 mm (median 5, range 0-19 mm). Of all eyes, using Kaplan-Meier analysis, metastasis occurred in 11, 30, 45, and 52% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively. According to tumor thickness (10.0-11.0, 11.1-12.0, 12.1-13.0, 13.1-14.0, 14.1-15.0, 15.1-16.0, and >16.0 mm), metastasis at 1 year was found in 7, 12, 13, 15, 18, 22, and 20%; metastasis at 3 years was 24, 27, 37, 35, 51, 69, and 57%; metastasis at 5 years was 38%, 42%, 56%, 48%, 61%, not available, and 66%; and metastasis at 7 years was 47%, 47%, 61%, 57%, 61%, not available, and 66%. Clinical features associated with fewer metastatic events included Bruch membrane rupture (7-year metastasis at 48%, P = 0.018) and macular location (7-year metastasis at 32%, P = 0.014), whereas those with worse outcome included extraocular extension (7-year metastasis at 79%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in rate of melanoma-related metastasis for patients treated with plaque radiotherapy versus enucleation. CONCLUSION Large uveal melanoma demonstrates 7-year rate of metastasis at 52%, with generalized increasing risk per 1-mm or 2-mm thickness increments. Extraocular extension was associated with greater metastatic rate, whereas Bruch membrane rupture and macular location demonstrated lower rate.
Collapse
|
45
|
Jasińska-Konior K, Wiecheć O, Sarna M, Panek A, Swakoń J, Michalik M, Urbańska K, Elas M. Increased elasticity of melanoma cells after low-LET proton beam due to actin cytoskeleton rearrangements. Sci Rep 2019; 9:7008. [PMID: 31065009 PMCID: PMC6504917 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43453-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cellular response to non-lethal radiation stress include perturbations in DNA repair, angiogenesis, migration, and adhesion, among others. Low-LET proton beam radiation has been shown to induce somewhat different biological response than photon radiation. For example, we have shown that non-lethal doses of proton beam radiation inhibited migration of cells and that this effect persisted long-term. Here, we have examined cellular elasticity and actin cytoskeleton organization in BLM cutaneous melanoma and Mel270 uveal melanoma cells. Proton beam radiation increased cellular elasticity to a greater extent than X-rays and both types of radiation induced changes in actin cytoskeleton organization. Vimentin level increased in BLM cells after both types of radiation. Our data show that cell elasticity increased substantially after low-LET proton beam and persisted long after radiation. This may have significant consequences for the migratory properties of melanoma cells, as well as for the cell susceptibility to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Jasińska-Konior
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | - Olga Wiecheć
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | - Michał Sarna
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Panek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, Kraków, Poland
| | - Jan Swakoń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, Kraków, Poland
| | - Marta Michalik
- Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | - Krystyna Urbańska
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | - Martyna Elas
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fatehi N, McCannel TA, Giaconi J, Caprioli J, Law SK, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery in Eyes with Treated Uveal Melanoma. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2019; 5:20-27. [PMID: 30675473 DOI: 10.1159/000488056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim We report patient safety and intraocular pressure (IOP) control after placement of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD) in eyes with a history of treated malignant uveal melanoma. Methods A retrospective review of the records of patients with uveal melanoma was performed. Outcomes were local tumor recurrence, rate of metastases, and to-nometric success, based on survival curves, defined as IOP < 21 mm Hg. Results Eleven eyes with choroidal melanoma, 4 with iris melanoma, and 1 with ciliary body melanoma were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 2.1 (1.1-3.2) years. Two subjects developed liver metastases; one had monosomy 3 and tumor gene expression profile class 2. The other case with ciliary body melanoma was negative for monosomy 3. There were no cases of local treatment failure. Mean preoperative IOP decreased from 30.5 ± 7.7 to 15.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg at 1 year after surgery (1-year success rate 80%). Conclusions Our case series with a median follow-up of 2 years shows that placing a GDD in patients with treated uveal melanoma does not expose patients to greater risk of local or extraocular recurrence. A larger series and longer follow-up time are required to fully evaluate the safety of GDDs in this clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Fatehi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tara A McCannel
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - JoAnn Giaconi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph Caprioli
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Simon K Law
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mitsch C, Zehetmayer M, Gleiss A, Georg D, Dieckmann K, Pötter R, Sayegh R, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Dunavoelgyi R. Early ultrasonographic tumor regression after linear accelerator stereotactic fractionated photon radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma as a predictor for metastatic spread. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:385-391. [PMID: 29747872 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE During extended follow-up (of up to 15 years), approximately fifty percent of patients with choroidal melanoma will develop metastatic disease and eventually die. Thus, continuing research on prognostic factors, early detection and treatment is necessary. Height regression rates both after plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation have been shown to have prognostic value. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of early tumor regression rate after treatment of choroidal melanoma with LINAC stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) as an independent risk factor for metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS 256 patients with choroidal melanoma treated with LINAC SFRT were included. Follow-up included standardized echography yielding apical height, smallest and largest basal linear diameter, tumor volume and mean reflectivity. The influence of baseline measurements and of a longitudinal, normalized area under the curve coefficient (NAC) of the latter marker on metastasis risk was assessed. RESULTS NAC for tumor thickness at months 3, 6, and 12 had a statistically significant (p < 0.001) non-linear effect on risk of metastasis. Additionally, ultrasonographic baseline tumor dimensions, but not internal reflectivity were found to be statistically significant risk factors for metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate a non-linear influence of regression rate of choroidal melanoma as independent risk factor of metastatic disease after LINAC SFRT. These prove the clinical experience that, in comparison to rather slow regressions, very quick and very slow early tumor responses to LINAC SFRT are associated with a significantly higher metastasis risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Mitsch
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Zehetmayer
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Andreas Gleiss
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ramzi Sayegh
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Roman Dunavoelgyi
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Spatola C, Privitera G, Raffaele L, Salamone V, Cuttone G, Cirrone P, Sabini MG, Lo Nigro S. Clinical Application of Proton Beams in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma: The First Therapies Carried Out in Italy and Preliminary Results (Catana Project). TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 89:502-9. [PMID: 14870772 DOI: 10.1177/030089160308900508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background The first Italian proton therapy facility was realized in Catania, at the INFN-LNS. With its energy (62 MeV proton beam), it is ideal for the treatment of shallow tumors like those of the ocular region: uveal melanoma, first of all (the most common primary intraocular malignancy of adults) and other less frequent lesions like choroidal hemangioma, conjunctiva melanoma, and eyelid tumors. Material and methods The first patient was enrolled in February 2002, and to date 30 patients have been treated. All patients had a localized uveal melanoma, with no systemic metastases, and had specific indications for proton beam radiation therapy: lesions between 5–25 mm basal diameter, not exceeding 15 mm thickness, absence of total retinal detachment or glaucoma. According to the tumor dimensions, 2 patients had a small lesion or T1 (6%), 3 had a medium-sized lesion or T2 (10%), 14 had a large lesion or T3 (47%), and 11 had an extra-large lesion or T3 (37%); no patient had extrascleral invasion or T4 of the TNM-AJCC Staging System. In most cases, the tumor infiltrated only the choroid (14 patients, 47%) or the choroid plus the ciliary body (14 patients, 47%). We also treated a primitive iris melanoma, without diffusion to the ciliary body. The target volume was defined as the tumor plus a safety margin of 2.5 mm, laterally and antero-posteriorly; this margin was increased to 3 mm if ciliary body involvement was present. The treatment was carried out in 4 fractions on 4 consecutive days to a total dose of 54.5 Gy (single fraction 13.6 Gy), which corresponds to 60 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent; single fraction 15 CGE), because the relative biological effectiveness is 1.1. Results The first follow-up is planned at 6–8 months after the end of the treatment, and our clinical end points are local control (defined as cessation of growth or tumor shrinkage), eye retention, and maintenance of a good visual function. At the time of this writing, we had preliminary results from 13 patients. Nine patients showed tumor shrinkage (69%), 3 a substantially stable dimension (23%), but almost all patients presented an increased ultrasound reflectivity (a surrogate for tumor control). Discussion and conclusions The literature data show that charged particle therapy has allowed an optimal local control in the treatment of uveal melanomas (about 96% in the different series, superior to that obtained with plaquetherapy [between 83% and 92%]), a metastatic rate slightly better than enucleation reports, and a survival rate of almost 90% at 5 years. Our preliminary results show a tumor response in almost all cases, with no major acute or subacute side effects. We thus plan to continue with our treatment procedures and our dose prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrado Spatola
- Servizio di Radioterapia, Policlinico Universitario Catania, Catania, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Śniegocka M, Podgórska E, Płonka PM, Elas M, Romanowska-Dixon B, Szczygieł M, Żmijewski MA, Cichorek M, Markiewicz A, Brożyna AA, Słominski AT, Urbańska K. Transplantable Melanomas in Hamsters and Gerbils as Models for Human Melanoma. Sensitization in Melanoma Radiotherapy-From Animal Models to Clinical Trials. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E1048. [PMID: 29614755 PMCID: PMC5979283 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19041048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The focus of the present review is to investigate the role of melanin in the radioprotection of melanoma and attempts to sensitize tumors to radiation by inhibiting melanogenesis. Early studies showed radical scavenging, oxygen consumption and adsorption as mechanisms of melanin radioprotection. Experimental models of melanoma in hamsters and in gerbils are described as well as their use in biochemical and radiobiological studies, including a spontaneously metastasizing ocular model. Some results from in vitro studies on the inhibition of melanogenesis are presented as well as radio-chelation therapy in experimental and clinical settings. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma is very successfully treated with radiation, both using photon and proton beams. We point out that the presence or lack of melanin pigmentation should be considered, when choosing therapeutic options, and that both the experimental and clinical data suggest that melanin could be a target for radiosensitizing melanoma cells to increase efficacy of radiotherapy against melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyna Śniegocka
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Ewa Podgórska
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Przemysław M Płonka
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Martyna Elas
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Bożena Romanowska-Dixon
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Medical College of Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Małgorzata Szczygieł
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Michał A Żmijewski
- Department of Histology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Mirosława Cichorek
- Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Anna Markiewicz
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Medical College of Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| | - Anna A Brożyna
- Department of Tumor Pathology and Pathomorphology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Oncology Centre-Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- Department of Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Cancer Chemoprevention Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| | - Andrzej T Słominski
- Department of Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Cancer Chemoprevention Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
- VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| | - Krystyna Urbańska
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Via R, Hennings F, Fattori G, Fassi A, Pica A, Lomax A, Weber DC, Baroni G, Hrbacek J. Noninvasive eye localization in ocular proton therapy through optical eye tracking: A proof of concept. Med Phys 2018; 45:2186-2194. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Via
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
| | - Fabian Hennings
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
| | - Aurora Fassi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
| | - Antony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
- Department of Physics; ETH-Hönggerberg; Zurich 8093 Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
- Radiation Oncology Department; Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern; Bern 3010 Switzerland
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica; Pavia 27100 Italy
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy; Paul Scherrer Institut; Villigen PSI 5232 Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|