The effect of atrial pacing therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency: results of a randomized trial in patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias

Characteristics of successful termination of atrial fibrillation by atrial antitachycardia pacing in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often found in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Second-generation atrial antitachycardia pacing (A-ATP) is effective in managing AF in patients implanted with CIEDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-ATP in patients implanted with CIEDs. This was a single-center retrospective study involving 91 patients (male 46 patients, mean age 74 ± 9 years) implanted with Reactive A-ATP equipped devices (84 patients with pacemakers, 6 with ICDs, and 1 with a CRT-D). The AF burden, rate of AF termination, and details of the activation of the A-ATP were analyzed in each patient. During a mean follow-up period of 21 ± 13 months, A-ATP was activated in 45 of 91 patients (49.5%). No patients had adverse events. Although the efficacy of the A-ATP varied among the patients, the median rate of AF termination was 44%. In comparison to the A-ATP start time, "0 min" had a higher AF termination rate by the A-ATP (39.4% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.011). The rate of termination by the A-ATP was high for AF with a long cycle length and a relatively regular rhythm. A-ATP successfully terminated AF episodes in some patients implanted with CIEDs. The optimal settings of the A-ATP will be determined in future studies.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Transition mechanisms from atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation during anti-tachycardia pacing therapy

BACKGROUND

Atrial anti-tachycardia pacing (aATP) has been shown to be effective for the termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias, but its success rate is still not high enough.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of atrial flutter (AFL) termination by aATP and the transition from AFL to atrial fibrillation (AF) during aATP.

METHODS

We developed a multi-scale model of the human atrium based on magnetic resonance images and examined the atrial electrophysiology of AFL during aATP with a ramp protocol.

RESULTS

In successful cases of aATP, paced excitation entered the excitable gap and collided with the leading edge of the reentrant wave front. Furthermore, the excitation propagating in the opposite direction collided with the trailing edge of the reentrant wave to terminate AFL. The second collision was made possible by the distribution of the wave propagation velocity in the atria. The detailed analysis revealed that the slowing of propagation velocity occurred at the exit of the sub-Eustachian isthmus, probably due to source-sink mismatch. During the transition from AFL to AF, the excitation collided with the refractory zone of the preceding wave and broke into multiple wave fronts to induce AF. A similar observation was made for the transition from AF to sinus rhythm. In both cases, the complex anatomy of the atria played an essential role.

CONCLUSION

The complex anatomy of atria plays an essential role in the maintenance of stable AFL and its termination by aATP, which were revealed by the realistic three-dimensional simulation model.

Usefulness of Prolonged PR Interval to Predict Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Development Following Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs), which may occur after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) surgery, can cause sudden cardiac death. However, ATAs may also develop in response to electrical substrates. This study aims to examine the predictive factors for ATAs by identifying electrical substrates in the atrium obtained from 12-lead electrocardiogram in patients who underwent TOF repair. A total of 144 patients aged >15 years (median, 31.6 years) who underwent TOF repair at Hokkaido University were enrolled. We investigated the correlation between the development of ATAs with age, time interval after initial corrective surgery, brain natriuretic peptide levels, cardiac magnetic resonance parameters (right ventricular end-diastolic volume index, right ventricular end-systolic volume index, right ventricular ejection fraction, right atrial volume index, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction), and 12-lead electrocardiogram parameters (P wave maximum voltage, PR interval, QRS width, number of fragmented QRS). Of the 144 patients, 44 patients (30.6%) developed ATAs. Multivariate analysis revealed time interval after initial corrective surgery (odds ratio 6.7, 95% confidence interval 1.78 to 12.6) and PR interval (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 4.20) as independent risk factors for the development of ATAs. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a PR interval cut-off value of >200 milliseconds as predictive of the development of ATAs in patients more than 15 years after initial corrective surgery (area under the curve, 0.658; sensitivity, 71.4%; specificity, 66.4%). The present study demonstrated that a prolonged PR interval is a simple and convenient predictor for the development of ATAs in patients who underwent TOF repair.

Assessing Atrial Fibrillation Substrates by P Wave Analysis: A Comprehensive Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic rhythm control strategies impact on AF-related symptoms, while leaving largely unaffected the risk of stroke. Moreover, up to 20% of AF patients are asymptomatic during paroxysmal relapses of arrhythmia, thus underlying the need for early markers to identify at-risk patients and prevent cerebrovascular accidents. Indeed, non-invasive assessment of pre-clinical substrate changes that predispose to AF could provide early identification of at-risk patients and allow for tailored care paths. ECG-derived P wave analysis is a simple-to-use and inexpensive tool that has been successfully employed to detect AF-associated structural and functional atrial changes. Beyond standard electrocardiographic techniques, high resolution signal averaged electrocardiography (SAECG), by recording microvolt amplitude atrial signals, allows more accurate analysis of the P wave and possibly AF risk stratification. This review focuses on the evidence that support P wave analysis to assess AF substrates, predict arrhythmia relapses and guide rhythm-control interventions.

Resting Heart Rate and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation

In a previous meta-analysis, it was demonstrated that the resting heart rate (RHR) is a potential risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the results of that meta-analysis were conflicting, and the relationship between the RHR and AF is still not well established. In the current meta-analysis, our aim is to update evidence with a better statistical model. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for relevant studies and used a "one-stage approach" with a restricted cubic spline model to summarize the dose-specific relationships between the RHR and AF. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure the effects. In total, 10 studies were included, with a total of 18,630 cases of AF among 431,432 participants. In the dose-response analysis, there was evidence of a nonlinear association between the RHR and the risk of AF (nonlinearity, P < 0.0001), which exhibited a significant J-shaped association between the two factors. An RHR between 68 and 80 bpm had the lowest risk of AF. Among people who had RHR < 70 bpm, the summary RR was 1.09 per 10-RHR decrease (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.12; P < 0.001). The results were similar for participants with RHR > 70 bpm (per 10 bpm increase) (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.08; P < 0.001). Our dose-response meta-analysis revealed a significant J-shaped association between the RHR and AF. Both low RHR and high RHR were associated with an increased risk of AF compared with a modest RHR of 68-80 bpm.

Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing therapy reduces atrial tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing (rATP) aims to terminate atrial tachyarrhythmia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) episodes when they spontaneously organize to atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia; however, its effectiveness in the real-world has not been studied. We used a large device database (Medtronic CareLink, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to evaluate the effects of rATP at reducing AT/AF.

METHODS

Pacemaker, defibrillator, and resynchronization device transmission data were analyzed. Eligible patients had device detected AT/AF during a baseline period but were not in persistent AT/AF immediately preceding first transmission. Note that 1:1 individual matching between groups was conducted using age, sex, device type, pacing mode, AT/AF, and percent ventricular pacing at baseline. Risks of AT/AF events were compared between patients with rATP-enabled versus control patients with rATP-disabled or not available in the device. For matched patients, AT/AF event rates at 2 years were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of 43,440 qualifying patients, 4,203 had rATP on. Matching resulted in 4,016 pairs, totaling 8,032 patients for analysis. The rATP group experienced significantly lower risks of AT/AF events lasting ≥1 day (HR 0.81), ≥7 days (HR 0.64), and ≥30 days (HR 0.56) compared to control (P < 0.0001 for all). In subgroup analysis, rATP was associated with reduced risks of AT/AF events across age, sex, device type, baseline AT/AF, and preventive atrial pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Among real-world patients from a large device database, rATP therapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of AT/AF. This association was independent of whether the patient had a pacemaker, defibrillator, or resynchronization device.

EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management—status 2019

Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.

Implication of ventricular pacing burden and atrial pacing therapies on the progression of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after pacemaker implantation. However, the impact of pacemaker algorithms in AF prevention is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of pacing algorithms in preventing AF progression.

METHODS

A systematic search of articles using the PubMed and Embase databases resulted in a total of 754 references. After exclusions, 21 randomized controlled trials (8336 patients) were analyzed, comprising studies reporting ventricular pacing percentage (VP%) (AAI vs DDD, n = 1; reducing ventricular pacing [RedVP] algorithms, n = 2); and atrial pacing therapies (atrial preference pacing [APP], n = 14; atrial antitachycardia pacing [aATP]+APP, n = 3; RedVP+APP+aATP, n = 1).

RESULTS

Low VP% (<10%) lead to a nonsignificant reduction in the progression of AF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.13; P = .21; I² = 67%) compared to high VP% (>10%). APP algorithm reduced premature atrial complexes (PAC) burden (mean difference [MD] -1117.74; 95% CI -1852.36 to -383.11; P = .003; I² = 67%) but did not decrease AF burden (MD 8.20; 95% CI -5.39 to 21.80; P = .24; I² = 17%) or AF episodes (MD 0.00; 95% CI -0.24 to 0.25; P = .98; I² = 0%). Similarly, aATP+APP programming showed no significant difference in AF progression (odds ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.36-1.14; P = .13; I² = 61%). No serious adverse events related to algorithm were reported.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrated that algorithms to reduce VP% can be considered safe. Low burden VP% did not significantly suppress AF progression. The atrial pacing therapy algorithms could suppress PAC burden but did not prevent AF progression.

Important Parameters for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Selection

The efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in reducing the risk of sudden cardiac death has been well established by several clinical trials. Several factors relating to device characteristics, patient attributes, and comorbidities should be considered when selecting the appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillators for each patient. This review examines some of these issues.

Atrial fibrillation and conduction system disease: the roles of catheter ablation and permanent pacing

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and diseases of the cardiac conduction system frequently co-exist, and interactions between these rhythm disturbances can adversely impact patient outcomes. Concurrent AF and sinus node disease often manifests as the tachy-brady syndrome wherein the underlying sinus node dysfunction can pose a challenge to AF management. Similarly, the combination of AF and left bundle branch block increases mortality in individuals with co-existent heart failure and hampers effective delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy. A thorough understanding of the therapeutic interventions available for these conditions, including the role of catheter ablation and permanent pacemaker programming, is crucial for optimal management in affected patients.

Pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pacemakers are frequently implanted in patients with atrial fibrillation. Many patients with pacemakers also develop atrial fibrillation. Over a period of time, through many studies on different pacing modes, sites, and algorithms, significant insights have been gained in the field of treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this review is to discuss some aspects of the scientific basis, current standards and possible future research related to cardiac pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trials involving pacing at the alternative pacing site per se or in combination with specific algorithms for prevention of atrial fibrillation have not shown consistent results. Recently, a new generation of antitachycardia pacing therapies has brought on a new optimism with promising outcome data of reduction in permanent atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular hospitalizations, and mortality.

SUMMARY

Multiple trials and clinical observational studies of different pacing methods and algorithms, with the exception of newer therapies in conjunction with atrial pacing algorithms, have not been shown to prevent atrial fibrillation. Hence, while permanent pacing is indicated for sinus node dysfunction and conduction abnormalities in patients with or without atrial fibrillation, the prevailing data in the literature does not support implantation of a permanent pacemaker for prevention of atrial fibrillation per se.

Intermittent vs. Continuous Anticoagulation theRapy in patiEnts with Atrial Fibrillation (iCARE-AF): a randomized pilot study

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that intermittent anticoagulation based on daily rhythm monitoring using the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is feasible and safe among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Patients with paroxysmal AF and ≥1 risk factors for stroke were randomized to either intermittent or continuous anticoagulation. Those in the intermittent group were instructed to transmit a daily ECG using an iPhone-based rhythm monitoring device. If AF was detected, patients received one of the NOACs for 48 h-1 week. Patients who failed to transmit an ECG for three consecutive days or more than 7 days total were crossed over to continuous anticoagulation. Patients in the continuous group received one of the NOACs.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were randomized to either intermittent (n = 29) or continuous anticoagulation (n = 29). Over a median follow-up of 20 months, 20 patients in the intermittent group failed to submit a daily ECG at least once (median three failed submissions). Four patients (14 %) crossed over to continuous anticoagulation due to failure to submit an ECG for three consecutive days. One stroke (continuous group) occurred during the study. Major bleeding occurred in two patients in the continuous and one patient in the intermittent group, after crossing over to continuous anticoagulation. In a prespecified per-protocol analysis, gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent in the continuous group (16 vs. 0 %; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent anticoagulation based on daily rhythm monitoring is feasible and may decrease bleeding in low-risk patients with paroxysmal AF. A larger trial, adequately powered to detect clinical outcomes, is warranted.

Innovative pacing: Recent advances, emerging technologies, and future directions in cardiac pacing

The field of cardiovascular medicine is rapidly evolving as advancements in technology and engineering provide clinicians new and exciting ways to care for an aging population. Cardiac pacing, in particular, has seen a series of game-changing technologies emerge in the past several years spurred by low-power electronics, high density batteries, improved catheter delivery systems and innovative software design. We look at several of these emerging pacemaker technologies, discussing the rationale, current state and future directions of these pioneering developments in electrophysiology.

Slow Heart Rate Predicts New Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the relation between baseline heart rate and new occurrence of AF in patients with mild symptoms.

METHODS

Patients without pre-existing AF or structural heart disease who underwent 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring for palpitations, dizziness or syncope were followed up for new-onset AF.

RESULTS

428 patients (mean age 66.6±10.2 years, 43.7% male) were classified according to the average heart rate into four quartiles (1(st) quartile: <63 beat per minute (bpm); 2(nd) quartile: 63-70 bpm; 3(rd) quartile 70-77 bpm; and 4(th) quartile: >77 bpm). There were no significant differences in gender, prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, left ventricular ejection fraction, or medications but a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease was noted among patients in the lower quartiles of average heart rate. After a mean follow-up of 5.8±1.8 years, 60 patients (14.0%) developed new-onset AF. The annual incidence of new-onset AF was highest amongst those at the lowest quartile of average heart rate (9.39%/year) as compared to those amongst other quartiles. Cox regression analysis revealed that increasing age, decreasing quartile of average heart rate, and the use of calcium channel blocker were associated with increased risk of new-onset AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Average heart rate predicts new AF.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study to assess the effects of dronedarone 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks on atrial fibrillation burden in subjects with permanent pacemakers

Purpose

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative with a pharmacological profile similar to amiodarone but has a more rapid onset of action and a much shorter half-life (13–19 h). Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of dronedarone in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients using dual-chamber pacemakers capable of quantifying atrial fibrillation burden.

Methods

Pacemakers were adjusted to optimize AF detection. Patients with AF burden >1 % were randomized to dronedarone 400 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. Pacemakers were interrogated after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in AF burden from baseline over the 12-week treatment period. Patients with permanent AF, severe/recently decompensated heart failure, and current use of antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded. AF burden was assessed by a core laboratory blinded to treatment assignment.

Results

From 285 patients screened, 112 were randomized (mean age 76 years, 60 % male, 84 % hypertensive, 65 % with sick sinus syndrome, 26 % with diabetes mellitus type II, 15 % with heart failure). Baseline mean (SEM) AF burden was 8.77 % (0.16) for placebo and 10.14 % (0.17) for dronedarone. Over the 12-week study period, AF burden compared to baseline decreased by 54.4 % (0.22) (P = 0.0009) with dronedarone and trended higher by 12.8 % (0.16) (P = 0.450) with placebo. The absolute change in burden was decreased by 5.5 % in the dronedarone group and increased by 1.1 % in the placebo group. Heart rate during AF was reduced to approximately 4 beats/min with dronedarone (P = 0.285). Adverse events were higher with dronedarone compared to placebo (65 vs 56 %).

Conclusions

Dronedarone reduced pacemaker-assessed the relative AF burden compared to baseline and placebo by over 50 % during the 12-week observation period.

Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial

Aims

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in bradycardia patients. Advanced pacemakers feature atrial preventive pacing and atrial antitachycardia pacing (DDDRP) and managed ventricular pacing (MVP), which minimizes unnecessary right ventricular pacing. We evaluated whether DDDRP and MVP might reduce mortality, morbidity, or progression to permanent AF when compared with standard dual-chamber pacing (Control DDDR).

Methods and results

In a randomized, parallel, single-blind, multi-centre trial we enrolled 1300 patients with bradycardia and previous atrial tachyarrhythmias, in whom a DDDRP pacemaker had recently been implanted. History of permanent AF and third-degree atrioventricular block were exclusion criteria. After a 1-month run-in period, 1166 eligible patients, aged 74 ± 9 years, 50% females, were randomized to Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP, or MVP. Analysis was intention-to-treat.

The primary outcome, i.e. the 2-year incidence of a combined endpoint composed of death, cardiovascular hospitalizations, or permanent AF, occurred in 102/385 (26.5%) Control DDDR patients, in 76/383 (19.8%) DDDRP + MVP patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.99, P = 0.04 vs. Control DDDR] and in 85/398 (21.4%) MVP patients (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.77–1.03, P = 0.125 vs. Control DDDR). When compared with Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP reduced the risk for AF longer than 1 day (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.85, P < 0.001), AF longer than 7 days (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.73, P < 0.001), and permanent AF (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.75, P = 0.004).

Conclusion

In patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias, DDDRP + MVP is superior to standard dual-chamber pacing. The primary endpoint was significantly lowered through the reduction of the progression of atrial tachyarrhythmias to permanent AF.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT00262119.

Comparison of rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and a pacemaker

The effect of rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation who have undergone previous pacemaker (PM) implantation is unknown. We evaluated the mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and a PM randomized to rate or rhythm control treatment strategies. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management data set was stratified by the presence (n = 250) or absence (n = 3,810) of a PM at randomization into the rate or rhythm control arm. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for univariate analysis, and proportional hazards were used for multivariate analysis. The subjects with a PM (n = 250) were older (73 vs 69 years, p <0.01) and had a greater prevalence of coronary artery disease (53% vs 37%, p <0.01) and congestive heart failure (33% vs 23%, p <0.01). All-cause mortality was significantly greater in the PM patients who were randomized to the rhythm control arm (n = 128) than in the patients enrolled in the rate control arm with or without a PM (n = 2,027, p <0.01) and those in the rhythm control arm without a PM (n = 1,905, p <0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that predictors of all-cause mortality included PM patients randomized to the rhythm control arm (hazard ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 4.58, p <0.01) and the presence of congestive heart failure (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 4.16, p <0.01). In conclusion, all-cause mortality was greater among patients with atrial fibrillation with a PM, who were randomized to the rhythm control arm of the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management study compared with all other patients enrolled in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management study. The rhythm control strategy in patients with a PM was an independent predictor of mortality.

Pacing in sinus node disease to prevent atrial fibrillation

Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for patients with symptomatic sinus node disease (SND). The majority of patients with SND have several risk factors associated with development of atrial fibrillation (AF) at the time of pacemaker implantation and are therefore considered a high-risk population. Patients with SND can be treated with any kind of commercially available pacemaker pacing in the atrium, the ventricle or both. Pacing in SND can therefore alter atrial and ventricular conduction and atrioventricular coupling. These mechanisms can prevent or contribute to initiation and maintenance of AF during pacing. Different pacemaker modalities and algorithms have been tested to reduce AF in patients with SND in recent decades. To prevent AF in this population, it seems to be important to mimic the optimal electromechanical function of the heart, especially to preserve an optimal atrioventricular coupling.

Risk factors for bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Symptomatic bradycardia may complicate atrial fibrillation (AF) and necessitate a permanent pacemaker. Identifying patients at increased risk for symptomatic bradycardia may reduce associated morbidities and health care costs. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors for developing bradycardia requiring a permanent pacemaker in patients with AF. The records of all patients treated for AF or atrial flutter in an academic hospital's emergency department from August 1, 2005, to July 31, 2008, were reviewed. Survival and the presence of a pacemaker as of November 1, 2011, were determined. Cases were defined as patients with pacemakers placed for bradycardia after their AF diagnoses. Patients without pacemakers who were followed constituted the control group. Variables for the logistic regression analysis were identified a priori. A post hoc model was fit adjusting for AF type and atrioventricular nodal blocker use. Of the 362 patients in the cohort, 119 cases had permanent pacemakers implanted for bradycardia after AF diagnosis, and 243 controls were alive without pacemakers. The median follow-up time was 4.5 years (interquartile range 3.8 to 5.4). Odds ratios were determined for age at the time of AF diagnosis (1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1 to 1.04), female gender (1.58, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.63), previous heart failure (2.72, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.01), and African American race (0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.94). The post hoc model identified permanent AF (odds ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.61 to 5.57) and atrioventricular nodal blocker use (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.4). In conclusion, in patients with AF, heart failure and permanent AF each nearly triple the odds of developing bradycardia requiring a permanent pacemaker; although not statistically significant, our results suggest that women are more likely and African Americans less likely to develop bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation.

Relevance of Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice

The monitoring of atrial fibrillation (AF) is performed using a variety of tools, ranging from the conventional Holter electrocardiogram to modern implantable loop recording with remote data exchange. The main clinical areas in AF where monitoring is crucial for decision-making are catheter and surgical ablation, as well as anticoagulation to prevent strokes. Identifying the patient cohort at risk - e.g., those with subclinical silent AF - is a challenge. In addition, the interaction of AF with implanted devices - e.g. AF-triggered inadequate shock therapy - should be the object of continuous monitoring. The prevention of inadequate shock delivery in particular is of major clinical importance.

Usefulness of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation

The problem of early recognition of atrial fibrillation (AF) is greatly aggravated by the often silent nature of the rhythm disturbance. In about 1/3 of patients with this arrhythmia, patients are not aware of the so-called asymptomatic AF. In the past 15 years, the diagnostic data provided by implanted pacemakers and defibrillators have dramatically increased knowledge about silent AF. The unreliability of symptoms to estimate AF burden and to identify patients with and without AF has been pointed out not only by pacemaker trials but also in patients without implanted devices. The technology for continuous monitoring of AF has been largely validated. It is a powerful tool to detect silent paroxysmal AF in patients without previously documented arrhythmic episodes, such as those with cryptogenic stroke or other risk factors. Early diagnosis triggers earlier treatment for primary or secondary stroke prevention. Today, new devices are also available for pure electrocardiographic monitoring, implanted subcutaneously using a minimally invasive technique. In conclusion, this recent and promising technology adds relevant clinical and scientific information to improve risk stratification for stroke and may play an important role in testing and tailoring the therapies for rhythm and rate control.

Atrial burst pacing with biphasic and monophasic waveforms for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Biphasic pacing is a novel mode of pacing that was suggested to increase cardiac conduction velocity as compared with cathodal monophasic pacing. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapid atrial pacing to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm.

METHODS

Multiple biphasic (anodal/cathodal), reverse biphasic (cathodal/anodal), and monophasic (cathodal) atrial pacing therapies were performed among 12 patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation for AF. The efficacy end point was successful conversion of AF to sinus rhythm, and safety end point no induction of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were paced at three cycle lengths (100, 200, and 333 msec) for 60 seconds at three locations (right and left atrial appendages and coronary sinus).

RESULTS

Among the 66 biphasic (anodal/cathodal) pacing procedures one procedure in a patient with chronic AF, which involved pacing at the left atrial appendage with a cycle length of 200 msec, led to conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. None of the 66 monophasic pacing procedures or the 66 reverse biphasic (cathodal/anodal) pacing procedures was associated with AF termination. None of the biphasic pacing procedures was associated with induction of ventricular arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid atrial pacing using a variety of waveforms at the cycle length and output used in the current study was found to be safe. There was a single success in converting a chronic AF to sinus rhythm.

Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke

BACKGROUND

One quarter of strokes are of unknown cause, and subclinical atrial fibrillation may be a common etiologic factor. Pacemakers can detect subclinical episodes of rapid atrial rate, which correlate with electrocardiographically documented atrial fibrillation. We evaluated whether subclinical episodes of rapid atrial rate detected by implanted devices were associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients who did not have other evidence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We enrolled 2580 patients, 65 years of age or older, with hypertension and no history of atrial fibrillation, in whom a pacemaker or defibrillator had recently been implanted. We monitored the patients for 3 months to detect subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias (episodes of atrial rate >190 beats per minute for more than 6 minutes) and followed them for a mean of 2.5 years for the primary outcome of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. Patients with pacemakers were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive continuous atrial overdrive pacing.

RESULTS

By 3 months, subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by implanted devices had occurred in 261 patients (10.1%). Subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias were associated with an increased risk of clinical atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio, 5.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.78 to 8.17; P<0.001) and of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.28 to 4.85; P=0.007). Of 51 patients who had a primary outcome event, 11 had had subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by 3 months, and none had had clinical atrial fibrillation by 3 months. The population attributable risk of stroke or systemic embolism associated with subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias was 13%. Subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias remained predictive of the primary outcome after adjustment for predictors of stroke (hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.28 to 4.89; P=0.008). Continuous atrial overdrive pacing did not prevent atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias, without clinical atrial fibrillation, occurred frequently in patients with pacemakers and were associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; ASSERT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256152.).