Effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on exercise performance in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

A Comparison of Rate Control Agents for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Follow-Up Investigation of the AFFIRM Study

There are limited data from randomized controlled trials comparing rate control agents in atrial fibrillation. Patient-level data from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial was used to compare outcomes in patients randomized to the rate control arm who were treated with a single rate control agent at baseline. The rate control agents used were beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and digoxin. The independent variable for this analysis was the initial study drug used and the dependent variables were time to first hospitalization and time to death from any cause. We analyzed 1,144 out of 2,027 participants assigned to the rate control group who were on a single rate control agent at the start of the trial. There were 485 (42.5%) participants in the beta-blocker group, 344 (30%) in the calcium channel blocker group, and 315 (27.5%) in the digoxin group. All hospitalization and all-cause mortality occurred in 55.9% and 12.5% of those in the beta-blocker group, 58.4% and 16.7% in the calcium channel blocker group, and 55.2% and 21.1% in the digoxin group, respectively. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, there were no significant differences in time to hospitalization or death for any group. In the AFFIRM trial, the initial rate control drug used was not associated with statistically significant differences in time to hospitalization or death after controlling for differences in baseline characteristics. There is limited data at present to guide the selection of rate control agents in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Effect of induced chronic atrial fibrillation on exercise performance in Standardbred trotters

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting performance in horses. However, no previous studies have quantified the performance reduction in horses suffering from AF.

Objectives

To quantify the effect of AF on maximum velocity (V_max), maximum heart rate (HR_max), heart rate recovery (T₁₀₀), hematologic parameters and development of abnormal QRS complexes.

Animals

Nine Standardbred trotters.

Methods

Two‐arm controlled trial. Six horses had AF induced by means of a pacemaker and 3 served as sham‐operated controls. All horses were subjected to an exercise test to fatigue before (SET1) and after (SET2) 2 months of AF or sham. The V_max and HR_max were assessed using a linear mixed normal model. Abnormal QRS complexes were counted manually on surface ECGs.

Results

Atrial fibrillation resulted in a 1.56 m/sec decrease in V_max (P < .0001). In the AF group, HR_max ± SD increased from 226 ± 11 bpm at SET1 to 311 ± 27 bpm at SET 2. The AF group had higher HR_max at SET2 compared with controls (P < .0001), whereas no difference between the control and AF groups was observed at SET1 (P = .96). Several episodes of wide complex tachycardia were observed during exercise in 3 of the AF horses during SET2.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Atrial fibrillation resulted in a significant reduction in performance, an increase in HR and development of abnormal QRS complexes during exercise, which may be a risk factor for collapse or sudden cardiac death.

Frailty and maximal exercise capacity in adult lung transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Frail lung transplant candidates are more likely to be delisted or die without receiving a transplant. Further knowledge of what frailty represents in this population will assist in developing interventions to prevent frailty from developing. We set out to determine whether frail lung transplant candidates have reduced exercise capacity independent of disease severity and diagnosis.

METHODS

Sixty-eight adult lung transplant candidates underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a frailty assessment (Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP)). Primary outcomes were peak workload and peak aerobic capacity (V˙O₂). We used linear regression to adjust for age, gender, diagnosis, and lung allocation score (LAS).

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age was 57 ± 11 years, 51% were women, 57% had interstitial lung disease, 32% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 11% had cystic fibrosis, and the mean LAS was 40.2 (range 19.2-94.5). In adjusted models, peak workload decreased by 10 W (95% CI 4.7 to 14.6) and peak V˙O₂ decreased by 1.8 mL/kg/min (95% CI 0.6 to 2.9) per 1 unit increment in FFP score. After adjustment, exercise tolerance was 38 W lower (95% CI 18.4 to 58.1) and peak V˙O₂ was 8.5 mL/kg/min lower (95% CI 3.3 to 13.7) among frail participants compared to non-frail participants. Frailty accounted for 16% of the variance (R²) of watts and 19% of the variance of V˙O₂ in adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

Frailty contributes to reduced exercise capacity among lung transplant candidates independent of disease severity.

Correlation between heart rate control during exercise and exercise capacity in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Rate control is an acceptable alternative to rhythm control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF).

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study of AF patients was to understand the correlation between their exercise capacity and both heart rate (HR) and HR variation index during exercise.

METHODS

The exercise capacity of 85 male patients with chronic AF was measured using a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX). Within this population, we compared the exercise tolerance of patients with a normal chronotropic response (maximal HR 85%-115% that of the maximal age-predicted HR during CPX) to those whose HR response exceeded this range. Two similar comparisons were made by dividing the subject population according to (1) whether or not their HR variation index (HRVI) during CPX exceeded 10 bpm/min, and (2) whether their HR during the 6-minute walk test exceeded 110 bpm.

RESULTS

Patients with an HRVI not over 10 bpm/min showed higher maximal oxygen uptake compared to patients with a higher HRVI (26.7 ± 6.1 vs 22.8 ± 4.8 mL O(2) /kg/min, P = 0.002) and a longer distance walked during CPX (705.6 ± 200.3 vs 520.9 ± 155.5 m, P<0.001). No other significant influence on exercise capacity was seen. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that both the body mass index and the HRVI during CPX were independent predictors of the maximal oxygen uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

Better HRVI control on CPX was correlated with better exercise capacity in patients with chronic AF.

Heart rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for exercise testing

Clinical practice guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recommended a heart rate (HR) of 60 to 80 beats/min at rest and 90 to 115 at moderate exercise. The degree to which HR control at rest and with exercise in patients with AF complies with these recommendations is unknown. HR at rest and at peak exercise was retrospectively examined in 1,097 consecutive patients with AF referred for exercise myocardial perfusion imaging. In a subgroup of 195 patients, HR was also measured at an intermediate "moderate" level. Median HR at rest was 80 beats/min, at the upper end of the recommended range of 60 to 80. Only patients administered a beta blocker (BB; 31%) had lower (p <0.001) median HRs at rest. Median HR at moderate exercise was 128 beats/min, higher than the range of 90 to 115 recommended by the guidelines. Only patients administered a BB had significantly reduced HRs (p <0.003) at moderate exercise. Median peak exercise HR was 147 beats/min. Forty-five percent of patients exceeded their age-predicted maximal HR. Patients administered BBs were significantly less likely (p <0.01) to exceed their age-predicted maximal HR. In conclusion, in patients with AF, HR control at rest and during exercise often did not comply with guideline recommendations. Regimens including a BB were more effective in achieving HR control.

Rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation

Guidelines on the use of digoxin are inconsistent with evidence from randomised trials

Exercise capacity in atrial fibrillation: a substudy of the Sotalol-Amiodarone Atrial Fibrillation Efficacy Trial (SAFE-T)

BACKGROUND

Therapy for chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) focuses on rate versus rhythm control, but little is known about the effects of common therapeutic interventions on exercise tolerance in AF.

METHODS

Six hundred fifty-five patients with chronic AF underwent maximal exercise testing at baseline and 8 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after randomization to sotalol, amiodarone, or placebo therapy and attempted direct current cardioversion. Analyses of baseline determinants of exercise capacity, predictors of change in exercise capacity at 6 months and 1 year, and the short- and long-term effects of cardioversion on exercise capacity were made.

RESULTS

Age, obesity, and presence of symptoms accompanying AF were inversely associated with baseline exercise capacity, but these factors accounted for only 10% of the variance in exercise capacity. Patients most likely to benefit from cardioversion were those most limited initially, younger, not obese or hypertensive, and with an uncontrolled ventricular rate at baseline. Conversion to sinus rhythm (SR) resulted in significant reductions in resting (approximately 25 beat/min) and peak exercise (approximately 40 beat/min) heart rates at 6 months and 1 year (P < .001). Successful cardioversion improved exercise capacity by 15% at 8 weeks, and these improvements were maintained throughout the year. This improvement was observed both among those who maintained SR and those with intermittent AF.

CONCLUSION

Cardioversion resulted in a sustained improvement in exercise capacity over the course of 1 year, and this improvement was similar between those in SR and those with SR and recurrent AF. Patients most likely to improve with treatment tended to be younger and nonobese and have the greatest limitations initially.

The safety of digoxin as a pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation

Digoxin has traditionally been the drug of choice for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), with or without heart failure (HF) with systolic dysfunction. In patients with permanent AF, digoxin monotherapy is ineffective to control ventricular rate during exercise, but the combination of digoxin with a beta-blocker or a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist can control heart rate both at rest and during exercise. Only a few randomised, controlled studies have evaluated the adverse effects of digoxin in patients with AF in a systematic way and side effects requiring drug withdrawal have rarely been reported. When reported, the most frequent adverse effects were cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular arrhythmias, AV block of varying degrees and sinus pauses). This evidence suggested that, in contrast to other antiarrhythmic drugs, digoxin is a safe drug in patients with AF. However, this safety profile can be erroneous due to the short follow-up of the studies and patient selection. Because patients with HF have been excluded in most studies, the safety profile of digoxin in this population has not been directly addressed. Early recognition that an arrhythmia is related to digoxin intoxication as well as recognition of concomitant medications or medical conditions that may directly alter the pharmacokinetic profile of digoxin, or indirectly alter its cardiac effects by pharmacodynamic interactions remain essential for safe and effective use of digoxin in patients with AF.

Rate Control and Quality of Life in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation The Quality Of Life and Atrial Fibrillation (QOLAF) Study

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to determine whether quality of life (QOL) in permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients would be improved by monotherapy with beta-blocker (BB) or calcium antagonist (CAA) as compared with digitalis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with permanent AF under digitalis were randomized into BB (bisoprolol, atenolol or metoprolol) or CAA (verapamil) monotherapy treatment group. Twenty-five were men and the mean age was 67+/-8 years. After the assigned monotherapy, 12 patients received the other monotherapy in a cross-over fashion. Under each treatment, efficacy of rate control was determined by Holter electrocardiogram (ECG), treadmill testing and QOL questionnaire (Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Quality of Life of Atrial Fibrillation (AFQLQ)), and compared with the baseline digitalis treatment. CAA significantly increased mean and minimum heart rate (HR) in Holter ECG as compared with digitalis, whereas BB increased only minimum HR. Exercise duration in treadmill testing was significantly prolonged by CAA treatment, although it only tended to be prolonged by BB treatment. CAA but not BB improved role function-physical score of SF-36, and frequency and severity of symptoms of AFQLQ.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that CAA is preferable to digitalis when monotherapy is selected for short-term improvement of QOL and exercise tolerance in patients with permanent AF.

Rate versus rhythm control in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation

The management of patients with atrial fibrillation involves three main areas: anticoagulation, rate control and rhythm control. Importantly, these are not mutually exclusive of each other. Anticoagulation is necessary for patients who are at a high risk of stroke; for example, those who are older than 75 years, or those who have hypertension, severe left ventricular dysfunction, previous cerebrovascular events, or diabetes. It is now clear that patients who are at a high risk of stroke require long-term anticoagulation with warfarin regardless of whether a rate-control or rhythm-control strategy is chosen. One possible exception might be patients who are apparently cured with catheter ablation. Several published trials comparing rate-control and rhythm-control strategies for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation have shown no difference in mortality between these approaches. The patients enrolled in these studies were typically over 65 years of age. Data comparing rate and rhythm strategies in patients who are younger than 60 years of age are limited. For more elderly patients, it seems reasonable to consider rate control as a primary treatment option and to reserve rhythm control for those who do not respond to rate control. For younger patients, we prefer to start with a rhythm-control approach and to reserve rate-control approaches for patients in whom antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation, or both, do not ameliorate the symptoms.

Relation between achieved heart rate and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management [AFFIRM] Study)

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are treated with rate control and anticoagulation. However, the relation between the degree of heart rate (HR) control and clinical outcome is uncertain. We assessed whether lower achieved HR at rest and/or lower achieved exercise HR was associated with improved prognosis, quality of life (QoL), and functional status among patients in the AFFIRM study. Patients in the rate control arm and who were in AF at baseline and 2 months were included. Patients were grouped by quartile of achieved HR at rest (44 to 69, 70 to 78, 79 to 87, 88 to 148 beats/min) and achieved exercise HR following a 6-minute walk (53 to 82, 83 to 92, 93 to 106, 107 to 220 beats/min). QoL measurements and functional status were also analyzed. Complete data were available for 680 patients for achieved HR at rest, 349 patients for achieved exercise HR, and 118 patients for QoL. Survival free from cardiac hospitalization and overall survival were not significantly different among quartiles of achieved HR at rest (p = 0.19 and p = 0.8, respectively) or achieved exercise HR (p = 0.77 and p = 0.14, respectively). After controlling for covariates, there remained no significant relation between either achieved HR at rest or achieved exercise HR and event-free survival (hazard ratio 0.95, p = 0.35 and hazard ratio 0.98, p = 0.81) or overall survival (hazard ratio 1.03, p = 0.70 and hazard ratio 1.22, p = 0.13). Furthermore, there was no significant association between achieved HR and QoL measurements, New York Heart Association functional class, or 6-minute walking distance. After 2 months of drug titration, neither achieved HR at rest nor achieved exercise HR predicted survival free from cardiovascular hospitalization, overall survival, QoL, or functional status among patients with AF.

Use of beta-blockers in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in the general population and is frequently associated with organic heart disease. beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (b-blockers) are very effective in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. It has been shown recently that the beta-blocker metoprolol controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) is also effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. There is concern that class I antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine, disopyramide, and flecainide in particular, may increase mortality. The risk of proarrhythmia associated with beta-blocker treatment is very low. Therefore b-blockers, such as metoprolol CR/XL, may be the first line of treatment to maintain sinus rhythm, especially after myocardial infarction and in patients with chronic heart failure and in those with arterial hypertension. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, AV-nodal conduction-slowing drugs, such as calcium channel antagonists and beta-blockers are used to control the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Several studies clearly show that beta-blockers alone, or in combination with digoxin are very effective in controlling the ventricular rate at rest and during exercise. beta-blockers are effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and controlling the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Given these effects and their favorable effects on mortality, beta-blockers should be considered as first-line agents in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation.

The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate approaches used to control rate, the effectiveness of rate control, and switches from one drug class to another in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study.

BACKGROUND

The AFFIRM study showed that atrial fibrillation (AF) can be treated effectively with rate control and anticoagulation, but drug efficacy to control rate remains uncertain.

METHODS

Patients (n = 2,027) randomized to rate control in the AFFIRM study were given rate-controlling drugs by their treating physicians. Standardized rate-control efficacy criteria developed a priori included resting heart rate and 6-min walk tests and/or ambulatory electrocardiographic results.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 3.5 +/- 1.3 years. Initial treatment included a beta-adrenergic blocker (beta-blocker) alone in 24%, a calcium channel blocker alone in 17%, digoxin alone in 16%, a beta-blocker and digoxin in 14%, or a calcium channel blocker and digoxin in 14% of patients. Overall rate control was achieved in 70% of patients given beta-blockers as the first drug (with or without digoxin), 54% with calcium channel blockers (with or without digoxin), and 58% with digoxin alone. Adequate overall rate control was achieved in 58% of patients with the first drug or combination. Multivariate analysis revealed an association between first drug class and several clinical variables. There were more changes to beta-blockers than to the other two-drug classes (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rate control in AF is possible in the majority of patients with AF. Beta-blockers were the most effective drugs. To achieve the goal of adequate rate control in all patients, frequent medication changes and drug combinations were needed.

Pharmacological rate control of atrial fibrillation

To control ventricular rate in patients with AF, physicians should seek to control heart rate at rest and with exertion. The goal has to be achieved while minimizing costs and adverse effects. For emergency use, i.v. diltiazem or esmolol are drugs useful because of their rapid onset of action. They have to be used with caution in patients with concomitant left ventricular failure symptoms, however. For most patients with AF, chronic control of the ventricular rate can be achieved with one drug. For the chronic control of ventricular rate in patients with AF and normal ventricular function, diltiazem, atenolol, are metoprolol are probably the drugs of choice. For patients with AF and structurally abnormal hearts, atenolol, metoprolol, or carvedilol are appropriate choices. Adequate ventricular rate control by pharmacological agents should be evaluated by either 24-hour Holter monitoring or a submaximal stress test to determine the resting and exercise ventricular rate. If the mean ventricular rate is not close to 80 beats per minute, or the heart rate on moderate exertion is not between 90 to 115 beats per minute, a second agent to control the rate should be added. Excessive reductions in ventricular rates that could limit exercise tolerance should be avoided.

Beta-blocker therapy in atrial fibrillation

Beta-blocking agents are a generally established therapy to achieve rate control in patients with AF. With the widely spread belief that rhythm control is the therapy of choice, their use is currently limited to patients that were considered not suitable for specific antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In contrast to that belief, recent studies show that beta-blockers do have some benefit in maintaining sinus rhythm or reducing the frequency of paroxysmal AF and that this benefit might be comparable to conventionally used antiarrhythmic drugs, with the exception of amiodarone. In addition, four prospectively randomized studies recently presented concluded that rate control may be an appropriate aim as a first line approach in patients with AF. Hence, an increased use of beta-blockers in the treatment of patients with AF is to be expected, given the proven prognostic benefit of these drugs in many cardiovascular disorders that are associated with AF. However, no prospective study has yet proven that beta-blockers do exert the same benefit in patients in AF, and one retrospective analysis suggests that there may be differences with regard to the potential benefits of beta-blocker therapy when patients are in AF compared to sinus rhythm. The article summarizes available clinical studies and reviews some experimental data examining the treatment effects of antiadrenergic therapy in AF.

Special problems with antiarrhythmic drugs in the elderly: safety, tolerability, and efficacy

With advancing age, atrial fibrillation is increasingly likely to indicate underlying cardiovascular disease and risk. An understanding of this is particularly important in the elderly patient, where likely triggers to atrial fibrillation and the influence of other pathologies on the safety and efficacy of proposed treatments will all contribute to optimal care of these patients. It is not yet clear whether rate control or cardioversion to sinus rhythm is the best strategy for the generality of patients with atrial fibrillation, and still less so for individuals. Age and comorbidity add complexities to this decision, which should inform the choice of drugs to be used. Further uncertainties arise from a literature that has often excluded elderly patients and derived its conclusions about mode of drug action from studies undertaken during sinus rhythm rather than atrial fibrillation. Despite these difficulties the careful evaluation of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and their involvement in relevant choices should ensure optimum treatment for the individual.

Serial change in the atrial transport function after the radial incision approach

BACKGROUND

The left atrial transport function recovers slowly over several months after the maze procedure (Maze), but remains at a low level even during the long-term postoperative period. Because the Maze leaves an insufficient left atrial transport function, patients may still be prone to thromboembolism after the Maze. The radial incision approach (Radial) has been shown to preserve greater atrial transport function than does the Maze in the early postoperative period.

METHODS

To examine the serial change in the atrial transport function after the Radial, out of 32 patients who underwent the Radial, 15 patients were assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The atrial filling fraction and peak A/E velocity ratio were determined from the flow-velocity spectra across the mitral and tricuspid valves. The incidence of thromboembolic events was examined in 21 patients who were followed for more than 3 months after the Radial. The data were compared with data obtained from 13 patients after (41 +/- 6 months) the Maze III procedure.

RESULTS

The left atrial transport function after the Radial increased within 3 months to a significantly greater level than did that after the Maze in the longterm. The atrial filling fraction was 28.2% +/- 7.9% at 3 months after the Radial and 15.1% +/- 4.0% at 41 months after the Maze (p < 0.01). The peak A/E ratio was 0.52 +/- 0.18 at 3 months after the Radial and 0.25 +/- 0.07 at 41 months after the Maze (p < 0.01). This increased atrial transport function was maintained for an extended period after the Radial. There were no thromboembolic events in any of the patients after the Radial or Maze, irrespective of postoperative anticoagulant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Radial approach prevents thromboembolism by restoring sufficient atrial transport function more effectively and faster than does the Maze.

Importance of rate control or rate regulation for improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and normal left ventricular function: a randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the importance of rhythm regulation or rate control in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and normal left ventricular function.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty six patients with a mixed fast and slow ventricular response rate to their AF were randomised to either His bundle ablation (HBA) and VVIR pacemaker (HBA group) or VVI pacemaker and atrioventricular modifying drugs (Med group). Outcomes assessed at one, three, six, and 12 months included exercise duration and quality of life.

RESULTS

Exercise duration significantly improved from baseline in both groups. There was no difference in outcome between the groups (Med +40% v HBA +20%, p = NS). The heart rate profile on exercise was similarly slowed in both groups compared to baseline. Quality of life significantly improved in both treatment arms for the modified Karolinska questionnaire (KQ) (Med +50% v HBA +50%, p = NS) and the Nottingham health profile (NHP) (Med +40% v HBA +20%, p = NS). However, for the individual symptom scores of each questionnaire more were improved in the Med group (KQ-Med 6 improved v HBA 4, NHP-Med 3 v HBA 1). Left ventricular function was equally preserved by both treatments during follow up.

CONCLUSION

In these patients control of ventricular response rate with either HBA + VVIR pacemaker or atrioventricular modifying drugs + VVI pacemaker will lead to a significant improvement in exercise duration and quality of life. Rhythm regulation by HBA did not confer additional benefit, suggesting rate control alone is necessary for the successful symptomatic treatment of these patients in permanent AF.

Exercise tolerance and quality of life in elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia affecting the elderly. Although the risk of cardioembolic stroke is well defined, the effects of chronic atrial fibrillation on exercise tolerance and quality of life have been less well quantified.

METHODS

We compared a group of 52 elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation to a group of 48 control patients in sinus rhythm. Each patient underwent an interview that incorporated the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to quantify individual perceptions on quality of life. In addition each person underwent physiologic testing that included a Modified Bruce Protocol exercise tolerance test, 24-hour ambulatory monitor test, and an echocardiogram.

RESULTS

Both groups were elderly, 77 vs 76 years of age (P=0.35). The two groups had similar ejection fractions, 55.4% vs 58.4% (P=0.10). The atrial fibrillation patients demonstrated a higher level of comorbidity based on the Charlson Comorbidity Index, 2.46 vs 1.57 (P=0.03). On formal exercise testing there was no statistical difference in exercise duration between the two groups 9.0 vs 10.1 minutes (P=0.24). Similarly the Physical Summary Score (PCS) and the Mental Summary Score (MCS) of the SF-36 quality of life survey did not demonstrate a statistical difference between the two groups. PCS: 43.0 vs 45.9 (P=0.24);

MCS

52.5 vs 55.7 (P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher level of comorbidity, elderly, ambulatory patients with chronic atrial fibrillation demonstrate similar exercise tolerance and report similar quality of life to a group of age-matched control patients in sinus rhythm. There is a cohort of patients in chronic atrial fibrillation in whom a strategy of rate control and anticoagulation may be appropriate.

Pilsicainide for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Pilsicainide is a newly synthesized antiarrhythmic agent with class Ic properties. Various antiarrhythmic agents have been used to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm or decrease the rate of relapse of AF.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 62 patients with chronic AF to oral treatment of either a placebo (10 patients) or 150 mg/day of pilsicainide (52 patients) for 4 weeks before electrical cardioversion. Before oral administration of pilsicainide, 41 patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography to investigate whether there was thrombus formation in the heart chambers. Patients without pharmacologic defibrillation underwent direct current cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm. After successful cardioversion, all patients continued to receive pilsicainide and were monitored for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Before cardioversion, 11 patients in the pilsicainide group (21%) reverted to sinus rhythm. No patients in the placebo group reverted to sinus rhythm. Direct current cardioversion was performed in 51 patients; however, 8 patients were not converted to sinus rhythm (5 patients receiving pilsicainide, 3 patients receiving placebo), and 3 patients needed intracardiac cardioversion to convert to sinus rhythm. Asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias were observed in 5 patients in the pilsicainide group. During the follow-up period, 33 patients (71%) in the pilsicainide group remained in sinus rhythm at 1 month; this number decreased to 23 patients (49%) at 3 months, 20 (43%) at 6 months, 16 (34%) at 12 months, 16 (34%) at 18 months, and 16 (34%) at 24 months. All patients receiving placebo continued to receive placebo after the cardioversion, and AF recurred a few days after cardioversion in all cases. No independent discriminant variables were identified in the groups between maintenance and nonmaintenance of sinus rhythm. Although no serious side effects regarding pilsicainide have been documented, one patient died of acute myocardial infarction, most likely not related to pilsicainide administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pilsicainide is effective in restoring or maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic AF lasting longer than an average duration of 22 months. No major adverse effects were observed.

Appropriate outcome measures in trials evaluating treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a widespread disease that has only recently received the focused attention of arrhythmia specialists despite being the most frequently occurring significant cardiac arrhythmia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The wide variety of trial designs used to evaluate AF treatment is a reflection of the diverse outcomes associated with this condition. The best trials assess the impact of treatment on a clearly measured outcome that is of clinical relevance to patients. This review discusses the different designs of AF treatment trials and analyzes the utility of the various outcomes that can be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

A sensible goal of AF treatment is to reduce the frequency of recurrences and to prolong the time between them. The most appropriate trials focus on AF recurrences that are symptomatic and therefore relevant to the patient. We still do not know if there is value in AF prevention, beyond preventing symptoms. However, ongoing and future studies will show whether AF suppression reduces the longer-term risks of stroke or death and improves patient quality of life. Cost of care will increasingly be studied in future trials of AF management.

Effect of betaxolol on the hemodynamic, gas exchange, and cardiac output response to exercise in chronic atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

beta-blockade controls the ventricular response to exercise in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), but the effects of beta-blockers on exercise capacity in AF have been debated.

METHODS

Twelve men with AF (65+/-8 years) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of betaxolol (20 mg daily). Patients underwent maximal exercise testing with ventilatory gas exchange analysis, and a separate, submaximal test (50% of maximum) during which cardiac output was measured by a CO2 rebreathing technique.

RESULTS

After betaxolol therapy, heart rate was reduced both at rest (92+/-27 vs 62+/-12 beats/min; p < 0.001) and at peak exercise (173+/-22 vs 116+/-24 beats/min; p < 0.001). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2) was reduced by 19% after betaxolol (21.8+/-5.3 with placebo vs 17.6+/-5.1 mL/kg/min with betaxolol; p < 0.05), with similar reductions observed for maximal exercise time, minute ventilation, and CO2 production. VO2 was reduced by a similar extent (19%) at the ventilatory threshold. Submaximal cardiac output was reduced by 15% during betaxolol therapy (12.9+/-2.3 vs 10.9+/-1.3 L/min; p < 0.05), and stroke volume was higher (88.0+/-21 vs 105.6+/-19 mL/beat; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Betaxolol therapy in patients with AF effectively controlled the ventricular rate at rest and during exercise, but also caused considerable reductions in maximal VO2 and cardiac output during exercise. The observed increase in stroke volume could not adequately compensate for reduced heart rate to maintain VO2 during exercise.

Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on variability of ventricular rate and exercise performance in chronic atrial fibrillation complicated with ventricular arrhythmias

For conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and management of ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs were frequently used. However, the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on exercise performance and on the variability of ventricular rate were not available. This study included 37 patients who had chronic atrial fibrillation complicated with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. The patients were divided into three groups and received sotalol, propafenone, and procainamide, respectively. Before and after taking the drugs for 14 days, these patients received treadmill exercise test, 24 h Holter electrocardiogram, and tilt table test for evaluation of the exercise performance and the variability of ventricular rate (including the mean RR intervals, mRR, the standard deviation of RR intervals, SDRR, and the root mean square of the difference in successive RR intervals, rMSSD). All these antiarrhythmic drugs could suppress ventricular arrhythmia but only sotalol could significantly increase the exercise duration (374+/-50 to 476+/-55 s, P=0.02), and reduce the maximal heart rate (186+/-23 to 136+/-16 beats/min, P=0.01) during exercise test. Furthermore, only sotalol increased the mRR (777+/-60 to 885+/-66 ms, P=0.02), SDRR (190+/-40 to 216+/-48 ms, P=0.04) and rMSSD (223+/-48 to 253+/-40 ms, P=0.03) during 24 h Holter electrocardiogram. With head-up tilt, the mRR, SDRR and rMSSD all decreased significantly before drug therapy, and these changes were still present only after propafenone therapy. Therefore, comparisons among sotalol, propafenone and procainamide showed that sotalol increased the exercise performance and the variability of ventricular rate in patients who had chronic atrial fibrillation complicated with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.

Efficacy of ventricular rate stabilization by right ventricular pacing during atrial fibrillation

To assess the effect of right ventricular pacing on rate regularity during exercise and daily life activities, 16 patients with sinoatrial disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied. Incremental ventricular pacing was commenced at 40 beats/min until > 95% of ventricular pacing were achieved during supine, sitting, and standing. Thirteen patients also underwent randomized paired submaximal exercise tests in either a fixed rate mode. (VVI) or a ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) mode in which the pacing rate was set manually at 10 beats/min above the average AF rate during the last minute of each exercise stage. The pacing interval for rate regularization was shortest during standing (692 +/- 26 ms) compared with either supine or sitting (757 +/- 30 and 705 +/- 26 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). During exercise VRS pacing significantly increased the maximum rate (119 +/- 5.2 vs 106 +/- 4.2 ms, P < 0.05), percent of ventricular pacing (85% +/- 5% vs 23% +/- 7%, P < 0.05), rate regularity index (5.8% +/- 1.6% vs 13.4% +/- 1.9%, P < 0.05), and maximum level of oxygen consumption (12.4 +/- 0.5 vs 11.3 +/- 0.5 mL/kg, P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing. There was no change in oxygen pulse or difference in symptom scores in this acute study between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that right ventricular pacing may significantly improve rate regularity and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with chronic AF. This may be incorporated in a pacing device for rate regularization of AF using an algorithm that is rate adaptive to postural and exercise stresses.

Rhythm management in atrial fibrillation--with a primary emphasis on pharmacological therapy: Part 1

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common, sustained, symptomatic tachyarrhythmia that clinicians are called upon to manage. Management strategies include ventricular rate control coupled with anticoagulation, versus restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Rate control may be achieved pharmacologically, with agents that impair AV nodal conduction directly and/or by increasing parasympathetic/sympathetic balance, or by modifying or ablating the AV nodal region anatomically. Rhythm control may be achieved by electrical or pharmacological conversion followed by maintenance of sinus rhythm by pharmacological (or occasionally ablative) therapies. This article will present current approaches to rate and rhythm control issues in AF. Part 1, the current manuscript, details approaches to rate control and includes a drug selection algorithmic conclusion. It also introduces the subject of the pursuit of sinus rhythm. Parts 2 and 3, to be published in subsequent editions of PACE, will deal with therapeutic measures to restore and maintain sinus rhythm.

The medical management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is an extremely common arrhythmia that is associated with significant sequelae. Certain aspects of therapy, such as anticoagulation, are studied in well-constructed randomized trials. Other therapy, such as the maintenance of sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic agents, is supported by limited evidence. This article reviews the epidemiology and medical treatment of this arrhythmia, addressing anticoagulation, ventricular rate control, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Randomized trials in progress that attempt to answer important questions in the management of atrial fibrillation are also discussed.

Pharmacologic management of atrial fibrillation

In an era when many electrophysiologic problems are routinely treated with invasive procedures or implantable devices, drugs remain the cornerstones of treatment for atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation may present as an episodic rhythm in patients who are primarily in sinus rhythm or it may be manifested as rhythm disorder that is permanent. Patients who appear to have an episodic rhythm disorder may be found to be in atrial fibrillation permanently when followed for long periods of time, and prognosis in the two forms is similar. It is, therefore, useful to consider them different manifestations in the same spectrum of disease. This review will address pharmacologic approaches designed to: (1) slow ventricular response; (2) restore sinus rhythm; (3) reduce occurrences of atrial fibrillation; and (4) prevent thromboembolic complications. Nonpharmacologic approaches to treating atrial fibrillation will be briefly reviewed.

Oxygen uptake kinetics and cardiopulmonary performance in lone atrial fibrillation and the effects of sotalol

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with impaired exercise capacity. Oxygen uptake (VO2) kinetics determines cardiopulmonary performance during submaximal exercise, which may be impaired in patients with AF.

AIM

To study oxygen kinetics and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with AF without structural heart disease and the effects of oral sotalol on these parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients (mean age, 56+/-8 years) with chronic AF were recruited. The protocol design was a randomized, single-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either sotalol or placebo for an 8-week study period, and the alternative treatment in the subsequent period. Cardiopulmonary function tests using constant workload and incremental workload protocols were performed at the end of each phase. Sixteen age-matched normal subjects were included as control subjects.

RESULTS

During constant submaximal exercise, patients with AF had a larger oxygen deficit (425+/-140 mL vs 289+/-80 mL in normal subjects; p<0.05) and the time for achieving 63% of VO2 (mean response time) was also delayed (46+/-15 s vs 33+/-10 s; p<0.05). Compared with normal subjects, patients with chronic AF had a higher maximal exercise heart rate (180+/-34 beats/min vs 153+/-22 beats/min; p<0.05), but a lower maximal VO2 (20+/-4 mL/kg/min vs 26+/-6 mL/kg/min; p<0.05). Oral sotalol lowered the resting (72+/-15 beats/min vs 93+/-22 beats/min; p<0.05) and exercise heart rate compared with placebo (125+/-27 beats/min vs 180+/-34 beats/min; p<0.05, respectively), and normalized oxygen pulse and the heart rate to minute ventilation ratio during maximal exercise. There was no significant difference between those receiving sotalol and those receiving placebo in oxygen deficit (502+/-150 mL vs 425+/-140 mL; p=0.38), maximal VO2 (17.2+/-4.9 mL/kg/min vs 20.4+/-4.7 mL/kg/min; p=0.17), and other gas exchange variables. In patients with AF, oxygen deficit has a fair correlation with VO2 at the anaerobic threshold (r2=0.43; p<0.05) and at maximal exercise (r2=0.45; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In addition to maximal exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary performance, patients with chronic AF without significant structural heart disease had impaired submaximal exercise performance as assessed by VO2 kinetics. These parameters were not significantly affected by sotalol used for rate control.

Long-term management of atrial fibrillation

In the past decade, catheter ablation techniques and implantable devices have revolutionized the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, junctional arrhythmias, and atrial flutter. For most patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF), the treatment available today is similar to that used a century ago, although nonpharmacologic strategies of therapy have begun to emerge for selected cases. There have been important recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of AF and its complications, and it may be possible to improve patient management by refinement of the way in which current drugs are used.

Pharmacologic control of heart rate in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is associated with a resting heart rate in excess of age-matched subjects in sinus rhythm, and there is an additional steep rise in rate during exertion. This article reviews the factors responsible for this tachycardia, the pharmacologic agents commonly used for heart rate control, and the effects of atrial antiarrhythmic agents on the heart rate during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Comparative study of efficacy and safety of low-dose diltiazem or betaxolol in combination with digoxin to control ventricular rate in chronic atrial fibrillation: randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

The combination therapy of low-dose diltiazem or bexatolol with digoxin can be a useful adjunct for achieving heart rate control with minimal side effects. But there has not been a study including patients with impaired left ventricular function and evaluating whether the beneficial effects of medication will be maintained during a follow-up period.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was three-fold: (1) to compare the efficacy of digoxin with low-dose diltiazem and digoxin with low-dose betaxolol on randomized crossover study; (2) to evaluate whether the beneficial effects of medication will be maintained after 7 months; (3) to evaluate the safety of the combination therapy in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

METHODS

We did a prospective randomized crossover study in 35 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) including 15 patients with left ventricular dysfunction. After enrollment, each patient was evaluated for heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure products, maximal exercise tolerance at rest and during symptom-limited treadmill test before medication, at 4 weeks after medication of digoxin (0.125-0.5 mg daily) with diltiazem (90 mg twice daily), and at 4 weeks after digoxin with betaxolol (20 mg once daily). We performed 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) in 15 patients at the end of each phase of treatment. We repeated symptom-limited treadmill test like above method in 15 patients at 7 months of medication.

RESULTS

(1) Ventricular rates were significantly reduced in digoxin with low-dose betaxolol therapy at rest and during exercise (67 +/- 3, 135 +/- 5 (mean +/- S.E.M.) beats/min, respectively) in comparison to digoxin with low-dose diltiazem therapy (80 +/- 7, 154 +/- 5) (P < 0.05). (2) Rate-pressure products were significantly less in digoxin with low-dose betaxolol at rest and during exercise (85 +/- 4, 213 +/- 12 x 10(2) mmHg/min) than in digoxin with low-dose diltiazem therapy (105 +/- 6, 269 +/- 12) (P < 0.05). (3) Exercise capacity was significantly improved in digoxin with low-dose betaxolol (9.3 +/- 0.5 METS) or digoxin with low-dose diltiazem (9.7 +/- 0.5) in comparison to control state (8.3 +/- 0.5) (P < 0.05). (4) At 7 months evaluation, there was no significant difference between at 4 weeks and at 7 months. (5) Results on 24-h ambulatory ECG showed the same findings as on treadmill test. (6) Although side effects occurred more frequently in digoxin with low-dose betaxolol therapy, they were minimal and no patient had to withdraw medication. Worsening of left ventricular dysfunction was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that (1) combination therapy of low-dose betaxolol with digoxin was more superior to low-dose diltiazem with digoxin in controlling ventricular rate and reducing rate-pressure products; (2) the effects controlling ventricular rate, reducing rate-pressure products and improving exercise capacity have been well maintained even after 7 months of medication with each combination therapy.

Implantable atrial defibrillators

Due to the limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation, several nonpharmacologic therapeutic options have evolved. One of these is an implantable atrial defibrillator. Recent studies have shown that internal atrial defibrillation is feasible with relatively low energies. To date, the optimal electrode configuration involves large surface area catheters in the right atrium and coronary sinus. In humans, atrial defibrillation can generally be achieved with < 2 J using this electrode configuration and a biphasic shock waveform. For shocks < 5 J, there is no significant pathological damage to the atria or coronary sinus. Further investigation is needed to guarantee that atrial defibrillation shocks do not provoke ventricular arrhythmias. Preliminary data suggest that atrial defibrillation shocks synchronized to R waves that are not closely coupled are safe. In addition, the shocks are well tolerated if the shock energy is < 1.5 J. With additional studies to confirm the safety of implantable atrial defibrillators, further reduce shock energy, and improve patient tolerance, an implantable atrial defibrillator can become an acceptable therapy for patients with symptomatic, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Indications and limitations of class II and III antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation

In summary, the Class III antiarrhythmic agents amiodarone and sotalol are effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation with a higher effectiveness of amiodarone. Both agents successfully prevent recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion and both can control heart rate in persistent atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone appears to be particularly suitable in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant congestive heart failure because it lacks clinically relevant negative inotropic activity. Both substances are also effective in controlling ventricular arrhythmias that are frequently present in patients with atrial fibrillation. Finally, both drugs possess antiadrenergic activity, which makes the substances particularly attractive in patients with coronary heart disease as the underlying cause of atrial fibrillation.

Beta-adrenoceptor blockers in atrial fibrillation: the importance of partial agonist activity

1. The ideal drug treatment for atrial fibrillation will control resting heart rate, blunt exercise induced tachycardia whilst not exacerbating nocturnal bradycardia. Monotherapy with digoxin may not be ideal. We have compared the effect of combining digoxin (0.25 mg daily) with atenolol 50 mg and 100 mg or pindolol 5 mg twice daily and 15 mg twice daily in a cross-over randomised single-blind trial in eight symptomatic patients (six male; mean age 62 years) with poorly controlled atrial fibrillation. 2. Heart rate control was measured by 24 h ECG at baseline on digoxin therapy and after 2 weeks with each treatment. Symptom scores for breathlessness and palpitation were measured using visual analogue scales. 3. The addition of both beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly reduced mean diurnal maximum heart rate from baseline (all P < 0.001 ANOVA). Atenolol at both doses caused a greater reduction than either dose of pindolol (P < 0.001 ANOVA). Nocturnal maximum heart rate was not significantly reduced from baseline by either beta-adrenoceptor blocker, but both doses of pindolol caused increases in nocturnal maximum heart rate compared with atenolol (P < 0.001 ANOVA). 4. Atenolol caused a reduction in diurnal minimum heart rate compared with baseline and caused a reduction in nocturnal minimum heart rate whereas pindolol caused an increase (P < 0.001 ANOVA). 5. Atenolol 100 mg caused longer nocturnal pauses compared with baseline but pindolol 15 mg twice daily reduced the number of nocturnal pauses > 1.5 s (P = 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chronotropic response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation: relation to functional state

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relation between functional capacity and heart rate response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation.

SUBJECTS

73 consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relation between functional capacity, measured as peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2; ml/min/kg), and heart rate at all stages of exercise in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Peak VO2 showed no correlation with resting heart rate, but it showed a negative correlation with heart rate during the first stage of exercise (r = -0.94, p < 0.01). Indeed, heart rate during the early stages of exercise (stages 1-5) was higher in patients with a peak VO2 less than or equal to 20 ml/mm/kg than in those with a peak VO2 greater than 20 ml/min/kg (heart rate 140 v 125 beats/min, p < 0.05). At maximal exercise, however, peak VO2 was positively correlated with heart rate (r = 2.15, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with atrial fibrillation and impaired functional capacity heart rate at low levels of exercise is augmented but maximal heart rate attenuated compared with patients with preserved functional capacity. Excessive heart rate responses to minor exercise may have deleterious effects on left ventricular function and thereby further limit functional capacity.

Hemodynamic determinants of exercise capacity in chronic atrial fibrillation

To evaluate the response of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) to exercise, 79 male patients (mean age 64 +/- 1 years) with AF underwent resting two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography and symptom-limited treadmill testing with ventilatory gas exchange analysis. Patients were classified by underlying disease into five subgroups: no underlying disease (LONE: n = 17), hypertension (HT: n = 11), ischemic heart disease (n = 13), cardiomyopathy or history of congestive heart failure (CHF: n = 26), and valvular disease (n = 12). A higher maximal heart rate than expected for age was observed (175 vs 157 beats/min), which was most notable in the LONE and HT subgroups. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) was lower than expected for age in all groups. Patients with CHF had a lower resting ejection fraction than all other patients (p < 0.001), a lower VO2 max, and a lower maximal heart rate than LONE and HT patients (p < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that echocardiographic measurements at rest were poor predictors of VO2 max and VO2 at the ventilatory threshold. Among clinical, morphologic, and exercise variables, maximal systolic blood pressure accounted for the greatest variance in exercise capacity, but it explained only 35%. In patients with AF the higher than predicted maximal heart rates may be a compensatory mechanism for maintaining exercise capacity after the loss of normal atrial function. However, even in the absence of underlying disease, it does not appear to compensate fully for a compromised exercise capacity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of timolol on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in men after myocardial infarction

The effect of the nonselective beta blocker timolol on maximal cardiopulmonary exercise performance was evaluated in 28 men with previous myocardial infarction without effort angina (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Patients were randomized to placebo or timolol (10 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the alternative therapy in a double-blind manner. At the completion of each treatment period, patients underwent symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary exercise on a cycle ergometer. Exercise time, heart rate, oxygen consumption (VO2), oxygen (O2) pulse and respiratory exchange ratio were measured at peak exercise and at a submaximal exercise level defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00. Timolol treatment reduced peak heart rate from 153 +/- 11 to 102 +/- 14 beats/min (-33%, p less than 0.001). Exercise time decreased from 680 +/- 91 to 633 +/- 78 seconds (-7%, p less than 0.001). Peak VO2 decreased from 25.3 +/- 4.7 to 21.4 +/- 3.5 ml/min/kg (-15%, p less than 0.001). O2 pulse increased from 12.9 +/- 1.9 to 16.7 +/- 2.3 ml/beat (+29%, p less than 0.001). Peak respiratory exchange ratio did not change significantly, indicating comparable effort. At submaximal exercise, defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00, there was no difference in exercise time between placebo and timolol. Heart rate decreased with timolol compared with placebo, from 126 +/- 16 beats/min by 31% (p less than 0.001), VO2 decreased from 18.5 +/- 4.3 ml/min/kg by 10% (p less than 0.001), O2 pulse increased from 11.5 +/- 2.0 ml/beat by 30% (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The drug treatment of atrial fibrillation

1. Atrial fibrillation is an inefficient cardiac rhythm associated with impaired exercise tolerance, exertional dyspnoea, palpitation and a substantial risk of thromboembolism. 2. The first decision in management is to consider cardioversion which can be achieved in suitable cases electrically, or pharmacologically with a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug like flecainide or propafenone. 3. Prophylaxis in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is best achieved with a class Ic drug or a class III drug such as sotalol or amiodarone. 4. Control of ventricular rate in chronic atrial fibrillation can be achieved by pharmacological manipulation of the atrioventricular node by digoxin alone, or in combination with the calcium channel blockers verapamil or diltiazem, or beta-adrenoceptor blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity like pindolol or xamoterol. 5. In view of the considerable risk of thromboembolism in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation anticoagulation or at least treatment with aspirin should be considered.