Characterization of endocrine events during the periestrous period in sheep after estrous synchronization with controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device

The Effectiveness of Pharmacological Synchronization of the Estrous Cycle in Hinds (Cervus elaphus L.): A Pilot Field Trial

The aim was to estimate the effective pharmacological method of the estrous cycle synchronization by checking the effects of synchronization by measurement of progesterone (P4) and 17-beta estradiol (E2) concentration by RIA and artificial insemination. The experiment was performed at the red deer farm in Rudzie (North-East Poland; 3 year's old). The herd (N = 14) was kept away from bulls and was divided in two groups of seven animals. In the Group I, CIDR insert (0.3 g of P4) was applicated intravaginally for 12 days; a second insert replaced the first one for the next 12 days, and next 200 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was injected intramuscularly (Folligon). Estrus was expected 48 h after eCG injection. In the Group II, Chronogest sponge (20 mg of flugestone acetate) was applicated intravaginally and after 7 days replaced with second chronogest sponge for 7 days. After removing the sponge, on the same day eCG was injected and estrus was expected after 48 h. Artificial insemination was provided with frozen-thawed semen twice: 12 and 24 h after expected estrus. The peripheral blood from the jugular vein was collected each time when the inserts or sponge were applicated and 40 days after insemination. The concentration of P4 and E2 in plasma was measured by RIA. The effectiveness of insemination was monitored by pregnancy-associated glycoproteins determination and observed by the number of calves born. Two pregnancies were confirmed in Group I and five in Group II based on PAG concentration. One newborn was observed in Group I and five in Group II. Both methods of synchronization are effective in hinds based on the received profile of steroids. Although the sponge shape in case of chronogest is better comparing with CIDR, which was not completely deposited in the vagina of hind, potentially leads to bacteria inflammation, and it disturbs the rightful endocrine regulation. Moreover, pregnancy rate and hormone responsiveness were better in Group II.

Evidence for Changes in Numbers of Synaptic Inputs onto KNDy and GnRH Neurones during the Preovulatory LH Surge in the Ewe

Kisspeptin neurones located in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) and preoptic area (POA) are critical mediators of gonadal steroid feedback onto gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurones. ARC kisspeptin cells that co-localise neurokinin B (NKB) and dynorphin (Dyn), are collectively referred to as KNDy (Kisspeptin/NKB/Dyn) neurones, and have been shown in mice to also co-express the vesicular glutamate transporter, vGlut2, an established glutamatergic marker. The ARC in rodents has long been known as a site of hormone-induced neuroplasticity, and changes in synaptic inputs to ARC neurones in rodents occur over the oestrous cycle. Based on this evidence, the the present study aimed to examine possible changes across the ovine oestrous cycle in synaptic inputs onto kisspeptin cells in the ARC (KNDy) and POA, and inputs onto GnRH neurones. Gonadal-intact breeding season ewes were perfused using 4% paraformaldehyde during either the luteal or follicular phase of the oestrous cycle, with the latter group killed at the time of the luteinising hormone (LH) surge. Hypothalamic sections were processed for triple-label immunodetection of kisspeptin/vGlut2/synaptophysin or kisspeptin/vGlut2/GnRH. The total numbers of synaptophysin- and vGlut2-positive inputs to ARC KNDy neurones were significantly increased at the time of the LH surge compared to the luteal phase; because these did not contain kisspeptin, they do not arise from KNDy neurones. By contrast to the ARC, the total number of synaptophysin-positive inputs onto POA kisspeptin neurones did not differ between luteal phase and surge animals. The total number of kisspeptin and vGlut2 inputs onto GnRH neurones in the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) was also increased during the LH surge, and could be attributed to an increase in the number of KNDy (double-labelled kisspeptin + vGlut2) inputs. Taken together, these results provide novel evidence of synaptic plasticity at the level of inputs onto KNDy and GnRH neurones during the ovine oestrous cycle. Such changes may contribute to the generation of the preovulatory GnRH/LH surge.

Effect of a new device for sustained progesterone release on the progesterone concentration, ovarian follicular diameter, time of ovulation and pregnancy rate of ewes

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new progesterone intravaginal device (DPR) in ewes through four experiments: Experiment 1 compared the circulating progesterone concentration of ovariectomized ewes that received either a new or a re-used DPR. Experiment 2 compared the progesterone concentration between DPR-estrous-synchronized ewes and naturally estrous-cycling ewes. Experiment 3 evaluated the effect of new and re-used DPRs on ovarian follicular dynamics and time of ovulation of estrous cycling ewes. Experiment 4 compared the pregnancy rate after the use of a DPR and Controlled Internal Drug Releasing Device (CIDR). The mean concentration of progesterone released by the DPR device during its first use (New Group: 5.1 ± 0.5 ng/ml) was greater than that during the second use (Re-used Group: 2.4 ± 0.3 ng/ml). There was no difference between the animals that received DPR devices for first and second use in terms of ovulatory follicle diameter, follicular wave emergence day for ovulatory follicle and period of ovulatory wave of ovarian follicular development. However, there was a significant difference between groups regarding the time between DPR device removal and first ovulation (New Group: 71.7 ± 2.5h and Re-Used Group: 63.9 ± 2.7h). Pregnancy rates were similar between ewes with DPR and CIDR devices. It was concluded that DPR is effective in increasing and maintaining progesterone concentrations, controlling follicular dynamics, promoting synchronized times of ovulation from healthy follicles, promoting development of a competent corpus luteum and when used results in pregnancy rates similar to that with use of the CIDR.

Progesterone improves the maturation of male-induced preovulatory follicles in anoestrous ewes

The first ovulation induced by male effect in sheep during seasonal anoestrus usually results in the development of a short cycle that can be avoided by progesterone priming before ram introduction. In elucidating the involvement of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis in the occurrence of short cycles, the effects of progesterone and the time of anoestrus on the development of male-induced preovulatory follicles were investigated in anoestrous ewes using morphological, endocrine and molecular approaches. Ewes were primed with progesterone for 2 (CIDR2) or 12 days (CIDR12) and untreated ewes used as controls during early (April) and late (June) anoestrus. The duration of follicular growth and the lifespan of the male-induced preovulatory follicles were prolonged by ∼1.6 days in CIDR12 ewes compared with the controls. These changes were accompanied by a delay in the preovulatory LH and FSH surges and ovulation. Intra-follicular oestradiol concentration and mRNA levels ofLHCGRandSTARin the granulosa and theca cells of the preovulatory follicles were higher in CIDR12 ewes than the control ewes. The expression of mRNA levels ofCYP11A1andCYP17A1also increased in theca cells of CIDR12 ewes. CIDR2 ewes gave intermediate results. Moreover, ewes ovulated earlier in June than in April, without changes in the duration of follicular growth, but these effects were unrelated to the lifespan of corpus luteum. Our results give the first evidence supporting the positive effect of progesterone priming on the completion of growth and maturation of preovulatory follicles induced by male effect in seasonal anoestrous ewes, thereby preventing short cycles.

Developmental programming: impact of prenatal exposure to bisphenol-A and methoxychlor on steroid feedbacks in sheep

Bisphenol-A (BPA), a polymer used in plastics manufacturing, and methoxychlor (MXC), a pesticide, are endocrine disrupting compounds with estrogenic and anti-androgenic properties. Prenatal BPA or MXC treatment induces reproductive defects in sheep with BPA causing prepubertal luteinizing hormone (LH) hypersecretion and dampening of periovulatory LH surges and MXC lengthening follicular phase and delaying the LH surge. In this study, we addressed the underlying neuroendocrine defects by testing the following hypotheses: 1) prenatal BPA, but not MXC reduces sensitivity to estradiol and progesterone negative feedback, 2) prenatal BPA, but not MXC increases pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), and 3) prenatal BPA dampens LH surge response to estradiol positive feedback challenge while prenatal MXC delays the timing of the LH surge. Pregnant sheep were treated with either 1) 5mg/kg/day BPA (produces approximately twice the level found in human circulation, n=8), 2) 5mg/kg/day MXC (the lowest observed effect level stated in the EPA National Toxicology Program's Report; n=6), or 3) vehicle (cotton seed oil: C: n=6) from days 30 to 90 of gestation. Female offspring of these ewes were ovariectomized at 21months of age and tested for progesterone negative, estradiol negative, estradiol positive feedback sensitivities and pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. Results revealed that sensitivity to all 3 feedbacks as well as pituitary responsiveness to GnRH were not altered by either of the prenatal treatments. These findings suggest that the postpubertal reproductive defects seen in these animals may have stemmed from ovarian defects and the steroidal signals emanating from them.

KNDy (kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin) neurons are activated during both pulsatile and surge secretion of LH in the ewe

KNDy (kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin) neurons of the arcuate nucleus (ARC) appear to mediate the negative feedback actions of estradiol and are thought to be key regulators of pulsatile LH secretion. In the ewe, KNDy neurons may also be involved with the positive feedback actions of estradiol (E(2)) to induce the LH surge, but the role of kisspeptin neurons in the preoptic area (POA) remains unclear. The goal of this study was to identify which population(s) of kisspeptin neurons is (are) activated during the LH surge and in response to the removal of E(2)-negative feedback, using Fos as an index of neuronal activation. Dual-label immunocytochemistry for kisspeptin and Fos was performed on sections containing the ARC and POA from ewes during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle, or before or after the onset of the LH surge (experiment 1), and from ovary-intact, short-term (24 h) and long-term (>30 d) ovariectomized (OVX) ewes in anestrus (experiment 2). The percentage of kisspeptin neurons expressing Fos in both the ARC and POA was significantly higher during the LH surge. In contrast, the percentage of kisspeptin/Fos colocalization was significantly increased in the ARC, but not POA, after both short- and long-term E(2) withdrawal. Thus, POA kisspeptin neurons in the sheep are activated during, and appear to contribute to, E(2)-positive feedback, whereas ARC kisspeptin (KNDy) neurons are activated during both surge and pulsatile modes of secretion and likely play a role in mediating both positive and negative feedback actions of E(2) on GnRH secretion in the ewe.

Prenatal programming by testosterone of hypothalamic metabolic control neurones in the ewe

Ewes treated prenatally with testosterone develop metabolic deficits, including insulin resistance, in addition to reproductive dysfunctions that collectively mimic polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), a common endocrine disease in women. We hypothesised that metabolic deficits associated with prenatal testosterone excess involve alterations in arcuate nucleus (ARC) neurones that contain either agouti-related peptide (AgRP) or pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC). Characterisation of these neurones in the ewe showed that immunoreactive AgRP and POMC neurones were present in separate populations in the ARC, that AgRP and POMC neurones co-expressed either neuropeptide Y or cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, respectively, and that each population had a high degree of co-localisation with androgen receptors. Examination of the effect of prenatal testosterone exposure on the number of AgRP and POMC neurones in adult ewes showed that prenatal testosterone excess significantly increased the number of AgRP but not POMC neurones compared to controls; this increase was restricted to the middle division of the ARC, was mimicked by prenatal treatment with dihydrotestosterone, a non-aromatisable androgen, and was blocked by co-treatment of prenatal testosterone with the anti-androgen, flutamide. The density of AgRP fibre immunoreactivity in the preoptic area, paraventricular nucleus, lateral hypothalamus and dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus was also increased by prenatal testosterone exposure. Thus, ewes that were exposed to androgens during foetal life showed alterations in the number of AgRP-immunoreactive neurones and the density of fibre immunoreactivity in their projection areas, suggestive of permanent prenatal programming of metabolic circuitry that may, in turn, contribute to insulin resistance and an increased risk of obesity in this model of PCOS.

Progesterone milk residues in goats treated with CIDR-G(®) inserts

Progesterone (P4)-impregnated intravaginal controlled internal drug-releasing devices (CIDRs) have been used worldwide for estrus synchronization in ruminants. CIDRs serve to place all treated animals in the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. The objectives of this study were to compare P4 concentrations in milk from normal reproductively cycling, CIDR-treated, and pregnant goats. CIDRs were placed in treatment goats on day 0 and removed on day 19. Milk was collected daily from day 0 to day 21 from control and CIDR-treated goats and for 5 consecutive days between 40 and 60 days of gestation from pregnant does. Milk P4 was plotted against time (in days) for each individual, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as an estimate of total milk P4. The AUC(day 0-21) for control and CIDR-treated goats were 29.5 ± 11.9 and 33.7 ± 6.6 d·ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.77). The highest single-day and highest 5-day average P4 values for each animal were also compared among groups. Single-day peak P4 levels were 4.8 ± 1.5, 4.0 ± 1.0, and 6.0 ± 0.4 ng/mL for control, CIDR-treated, and pregnant goats (P = 0.42). The highest 5-day average P4 concentrations were 3.6 ± 1.3, 2.9 ± 1.8, and 4.2 ± 0.3 for control, CIDR-treated, and pregnant goats (P = 0.56). The results of this study show that intravaginal P4 CIDR devices inserted for 19 days in healthy goats resulted in milk P4 levels similar to or less than those endogenously produced during diestrus or pregnancy.

The estrous cycle of the ewe is resistant to disruption by repeated, acute psychosocial stress

Five experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that psychosocial stress interferes with the estrous cycle of sheep. In experiment 1, ewes were repeatedly isolated during the follicular phase. Timing, amplitude, and duration of the preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge were not affected. In experiment 2, follicular-phase ewes were subjected twice to a "layered stress" paradigm consisting of sequential, hourly application of isolation, restraint, blindfold, and predator cues. This reduced the LH pulse amplitude but did not affect the LH surge. In experiment 3, different acute stressors were given sequentially within the follicular phase: food denial plus unfamiliar noises and forced exercise, layered stress, exercise around midnight, and transportation. This, too, did not affect the LH surge. In experiment 4, variable acute psychosocial stress was given every 1-2 days for two entire estrous cycles; this did not disrupt any parameter of the cycle monitored. Lastly, experiment 5 examined whether the psychosocial stress paradigms of experiment 4 would disrupt the cycle and estrous behavior if sheep were metabolically stressed by chronic food restriction. Thirty percent of the food-restricted ewes exhibited deterioration of estrous cycle parameters followed by cessation of cycles and failure to express estrous behavior. However, disruption was not more evident in ewes that also encountered psychosocial stress. Collectively, these findings indicate the estrous cycle of sheep is remarkably resistant to disruption by acute bouts of psychosocial stress applied intermittently during either a single follicular phase or repeatedly over two estrous cycles.

Role of estradiol in cortisol-induced reduction of luteinizing hormone pulse frequency

Precise control of pulsatile GnRH and LH release is imperative to ovarian cyclicity but is vulnerable to environmental perturbations, like stress. In sheep, a sustained (29 h) increase in plasma cortisol to a level observed during stress profoundly reduces GnRH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with ovarian steroids, whereas shorter infusion (6 h) is ineffective in the absence of ovarian hormones. This study first determined whether the ovarian steroid milieu or duration of exposure is the relevant factor in determining whether cortisol reduces LH pulse frequency. Prolonged (29 h) cortisol infusion did not lower LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes deprived of ovarian hormones, but it did so in ovariectomized ewes treated with estradiol and progesterone to create an artificial estrous cycle, implicating ovarian steroids as the critical factor. Importantly, this effect of cortisol was more pronounced after the simulated preovulatory estradiol rise of the artificial follicular phase. The second experiment examined which component of the ovarian steroid milieu enables cortisol to reduce LH pulse frequency in the artificial follicular phase: prior exposure to progesterone in the luteal phase, low early follicular phase estradiol levels, or the preovulatory estradiol rise. Basal estradiol enabled cortisol to decrease LH pulse frequency, but the response was potentiated by the estradiol rise. These findings lead to the conclusion that ovarian steroids, particularly estradiol, enable cortisol to inhibit LH pulse frequency. Moreover, the results provide new insight into the means by which gonadal steroids, and possibly reproductive status, modulate neuroendocrine responses to stress.

Cortisol reduces gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in follicular phase ewes: influence of ovarian steroids

Stress-like elevations in plasma glucocorticoids suppress gonadotropin secretion and can disrupt ovarian cyclicity. In sheep, cortisol acts at the pituitary to reduce responsiveness to GnRH but does not affect GnRH pulse frequency in the absence of ovarian hormones. However, in ewes during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle, cortisol reduces LH pulse frequency. To test the hypothesis that cortisol reduces GnRH pulse frequency in the presence of ovarian steroids, the effect of cortisol on GnRH secretion was monitored directly in pituitary portal blood of follicular phase sheep in the presence and absence of a cortisol treatment that elevated plasma cortisol to a level observed during stress. An acute (6 h) cortisol increase in the midfollicular phase did not lower GnRH pulse frequency. However, a more prolonged (27 h) increase in cortisol beginning just before the decrease in progesterone reduced GnRH pulse frequency by 45% and delayed the preovulatory LH surge by 10 h. To determine whether the gonadal steroid milieu of the follicular phase enables cortisol to reduce GnRH pulse frequency, GnRH was monitored in ovariectomized ewes treated with estradiol and progesterone to create an artificial follicular phase. A sustained increment in plasma cortisol reduced GnRH pulse frequency by 70% in this artificial follicular phase, in contrast to the lack of an effect in untreated ovariectomized ewes as seen previously. Thus, a sustained stress-like level of cortisol suppresses GnRH pulse frequency in follicular phase ewes, and this appears to be dependent upon the presence of ovarian steroids.

Ultrasonographic and endocrine evaluation of three regimes for oestrus and ovulation synchronization for sheep in the subtropics

This study aimed to evaluate three regimes for oestrus and ovulation synchronization in Farafra ewes in the subtropics. During autumn, 43 ewes were assigned to (i) controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR)-eCG group, treated with CIDR for 12 days and eCG at insert withdrawal, n=13; (ii) PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha group, treated with two PGF2alpha injections at 11 days interval, n=14; and (iii) GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH group, treated with GnRH, followed 5 days later with PGF2alpha and 24 h later with a second GnRH, n=16. Oestrus-mating detection was carried out at 4 h intervals starting on day 0 [the day of CIDR withdrawal (CIDR-eCG group), the day of second PGF2alpha treatment (PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha group) and the day of PGF2alpha treatment (GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH group)]. Ovarian dynamics was monitored by ultrasound every 12 h beginning on day 0 and continued for 4 days. Blood samples were obtained daily for progesterone (P4) and oestradiol 17beta (E2) estimation starting on day 0 and continued for 4 days. The obtained results showed that, oestrus expression, ovulation and conception were greater (p<0.05) in CIDR-eCG and PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha groups than in GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH group. All ewes of PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha group presented, on day of second PGF2alpha injection with mature CL (P4>2.0 ng/ml), compared to 42.9% in GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH group (p=0.01). The peak of oestrus occurred 32-52, 48-60 and 28-96 h after the end of treatment in CIDR-eCG, PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha and GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH groups, respectively. Ovulation started 48 h after treatment in all groups and extended for 24, 36 and 48 h for CIDR-eCG, PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha and GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH groups, respectively. Results demonstrated that oestrus and ovulation synchronization could be efficiently achieved in Farafra ewes using either CIDR-eCG or PGF2alpha-PGF2alpha regimes; however, the GnRH-PGF2alpha-GnRH treatment induced a more spread oestrus and ovulation that may make the protocol inadequate for timed artificial insemination.

Effects of breed and progestin source on estrus synchronization and rates of fertility and fecundity in Iranian Sanjabi and Lori ewes

A trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of FGA (Fluorogestone acetate) and CIDR (Controlled internal drug release) on the induction of estrus and pregnancy and fecundity rates of the Sanjabi and Lori sheep. A total of 360 Sanjabi and Lori sheep were randomly grouped into two treatments with intravaginal devices inserted for 13 days: Group FGA (40 mg FGA, n = 180) and Group CIDR (n = 180). All ewes received an i.m. injection of 400 IU eCG (equine chorionic gonadotrophin) at devices removal. Estrous was assessed by exposing all ewes to vasectomized rams at 12 h intervals. Cervical artificial insemination was performed 12 h after estrus onset. The overall estrus response was 72.5%. The source of progestin did not influence the efficiency of estrus response but a significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the breed groups (Lori: 88.6%, Sanjabi: 58.3%). Among the sheep that received either CIDR or FGA, estrus response was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Lori (CIDR: 82.2%, FGA: 91.1%) than in the Sanjabi (CIDR: 64.4%, FGA: 52.2%) breed. The lambing and fecundity rates for all groups were 60.2% and 1.2 +/- 0.03, respectively. No significant differences in term of the lambing and fecundity rates were recorded between CIDR and FGA groups and among Lori and Sanjabi breed. The results of this study indicate the source of progestin or sheep breed did not influence the pregnancy and fecundity rates. The sheep breed influences the estrous response rate while the source of progestin did not affect the estrous response.

Long-Term Exposure of Female Sheep to Physiologic Concentrations of Estradiol: Effects on the Onset and Maintenance of Reproductive Function, Pregnancy, and Social Development in Female Offspring1

As steroids and steroid-like compounds accumulate in the environment, it has become important to understand how low-dose exposure affects reproductive function. Ovary-intact sheep were used in a multigenerational study, to determine whether chronic exposure to low levels of estrogen disrupts reproductive function and behavior. We assessed parameters of reproductive performance in control and postnatally estradiol-treated females (Generation 1, G1), and their offspring (Generation 2, G2). In the G1 animals, 17beta-estradiol (E) was administered continuously from 4 wk of age at two doses via subcutaneous implants (ultralow E [<1 pg/ml in circulation, n = 8] or low E [1-3 pg/ml, n = 8]). Both doses delayed puberty; low E also produced pronounced prepubertal and seasonal anestrus hypogonadotropism, and delayed the onset of the second breeding season. All G1 animals conceived and produced offspring (G2), the treatment of which resulted from continuous maternal exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Behavioral observations of G2 females revealed that low prenatal E modestly masculinized play behavior and increased the frequency of attempts to displace competitors relative to ultralow E and control animals. The timing and magnitude of the LH surge also differed in prepubertal low prenatal E females relative to the controls, although these differences were not evident when retested at one year of age. These findings support the hypothesis that chronic exposure to physiologic amounts of exogenous estrogens has multigenerational effects on behavior and neuroendocrine function. Despite these disruptive steroid actions, ovarian cyclicity and fertility are not invariably compromised, pointing to an impressive resiliency of the reproductive axis to insult by exogenous estrogenic compounds.

Reproductive Performance of Ewes after 5-Day Treatment with Intravaginal Inserts Containing Progesterone in Combination with Injection of Prostaglandin F2alpha

Three experiments were conducted with a total of 1579 ewes to examine reproductive performance in response to synchronization of oestrus during the breeding season, using controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR-G) inserts in regimens designed to provide high concentrations of circulating progesterone. In experiment 1, treatment with two CIDR-G inserts for 12 days produced conception rate (79%) and prolificacy (1.9) to first service equivalent to breeding at natural oestrus (56% and 2.0, respectively). Pregnancy rates to two service periods were 90 and 79%, respectively. In experiments 2 and 3, progesterone was delivered by a single CIDR-G insert for 5 days in combination with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha; 5 mg i.m., twice, 3 h apart) the day before (experiment 2), or at insert removal (experiment 3). The combined treatments improved rates of synchronization of oestrus (p<0.01) by 23 and 20% points, respectively, and pregnancy rates to the first service period by 19 (p<0.05) and 13 (p<0.01) percentage points, respectively, compared to treatment with PGF2alpha alone. It is concluded that the combination of treatment for 5 days with a CIDR-G insert and two injections of 5 mg PGF2alpha, the day before, or the day of insert removal, were effective treatments to obtain high fertility at synchronized oestrus in ewes during the breeding season.

Cloning of exotic/endangered species: desert bighorn sheep

Cloning using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) may be a useful tool for conserving genetic diversity and for propagating exotic and/or endangered animal species. Somatic cells can be obtained easily, expanded in culture, cryopreserved, and thawed at a later date for use in NT. Significant challenges relevant to using SCNT for cloning wild and endangered animal species include the need for using interspecies NT and interspecies embryo transfer. Animal care and welfare issues raised that are unique to exotic and endangered species also are raised. In this chapter, the methods used in attempts to clone the wild animal species of Desert Bighorn Sheep are described.

Role of sex and sex steroids in mediating pituitary-adrenal responses to acute buspirone treatment in sheep

Systematic characterisation of sex differences in the serotonergic modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis may assist with our understanding of why stress-related disorders are disproportionately represented in women. In this study, we examined the acute effects of buspirone, a serotonergic 1A receptor subtype agonist, on the endocrine endpoints of adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) and cortisol secretion in gonadectomised male and female sheep. Each sheep was treated with an acute i.v. injection containing vehicle or buspirone (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) in the presence and absence of sex steroid replacement (SSR). In males, SSR treatment consisted of testosterone (2 x 200 mg s.c. pellets) and, in females, the mid-luteal phase of the oestrus cycle was simulated by treatment with oestradiol (1 cm s.c. implant) and an intravaginal controlled internal drug release device containing 0.3 g progesterone. ACTH, cortisol, testosterone and progesterone were measured in jugular blood. Basal ACTH levels were higher in males, whereas basal cortisol levels were higher in females, regardless of sex steroid status. The magnitude of the increase in ACTH and cortisol secretion following buspirone treatment was dose-dependent. There were no differences in the ACTH responses of males and females to buspirone treatment, either in the presence or absence of sex steroid replacement. However, although the cortisol response to buspirone was greater in females, there was no discernable effect of sex steroid status in addition to this sex difference on either basal or buspirone-stimulated cortisol release. We conclude that the larger basal and buspirone-stimulated cortisol response measured in females may reflect a sex difference, either in the sensitivity of the adrenal gland to ACTH or in the catecholaminergic innervation of the adrenal gland. The lack of effect of sex and sex steroids in the ACTH secretory response to buspirone may indicate that the sex differences in serotonergic modulation of the HPA axis, as reported previously by our group, were mediated via serotonergic receptor subtypes other than the 1A receptor.

Fetal Programming: Testosterone Exposure of the Female Sheep During Midgestation Disrupts the Dynamics of Its Adult Gonadotropin Secretion During the Periovulatory Period1

Prenatal exposure of the female sheep to excess testosterone (T) leads to hypergonadotropism, multifollicular ovaries, and progressive loss of reproductive cycles. We have determined that prenatal T treatment delays the latency of the estradiol (E2)-induced LH surge. To extend this finding into a natural physiological context, the present study was conducted to determine if the malprogrammed surge mechanism alters the reproductive cycle. Specifically, we wished to determine if prenatal T treatment 1) delays the onset of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge during the natural follicular phase rise in E2, 2) alters pulsatile LH secretion and the dynamics of the secondary FSH surge, and 3) compromises the ensuing luteal function. Females prenatally T-treated from Day 60 to Day 90 of gestation (147 days is term) and control females were studied when they were approximately 2.5 yr of age. Reproductive cycles of control and prenatally T-treated females were synchronized with PGF2alpha, and peripheral blood samples were collected every 2 h for 120 h to characterize cyclic changes in E2, LH, and FSH and then daily for 14 days to monitor changes in luteal progesterone. To assess LH pulse patterns, blood samples were also collected frequently (each 5 min for 6 h) during the follicular and luteal phases of the cycle. The results revealed that, in prenatally T-treated females, 1) the preovulatory increase in E2 was normal; 2) the latencies between the preovulatory increase in E2 and the peaks of the primary LH and FSH surges were longer, but the magnitudes similar; 3) follicular-phase LH pulse frequency was increased; 4) the interval between the primary and secondary FSH surges was reduced but there was a tendency for an increase in duration of the secondary FSH surge; but 5) luteal progesterone patterns were in general unaltered. Thus, exposure of the female to excess T before birth produces perturbances and maltiming in periovulatory gonadotropin secretory dynamics, but these do not produce apparent defects in cycle regularity or luteal function. To reveal the pathologies that lead to the eventual subfertility arising from excess T exposure during midgestation, studies at older ages must be conducted to assess if there is progressive disruption of neuroendocrine and ovarian function.

The influence of the corpus luteum on ovarian follicular dynamics during estrous synchronization in goats

Ovarian follicular dynamics and fertility are unaffected by the presence or absence of a corpus luteum during synchronization of estrus with progestins in goats. On day 5 of the estrous cycle (estrus= day 0), a gestagen-containing sponge was inserted in the vagina for 11 days. To remove corpora lutea, one group of goats (CL-, n=41) received 7.5 mg of luprostiol on days 7 and 8 of the estrous cycle. The second group of goats retained the CL (CL+, n=38). Growth and development of follicles > or =4 mm in diameter were measured daily from onset of estrus to 2 days after subsequent ovulation in seven goats from each group, using rectal ultrasonography. Estrus was detected by the use of a reproductively sterilized buck and estrous does were subsequently mated. The number of waves of follicular development (CL- =3.57+/-0.2 versus CL+ =3.14+/-0.14; P>0.05) did not differ between groups. The second wave of follicular development was present at the time of progesterone decline in the CL- group and neither its duration (CL- =4.8+/-0.4 versus CL+=5.6+/-0.7 days; P>0.05) nor the day of commencement of the third wave of follicular development (CL -=11.6+/-0.7 versus CL+=11.8+/-0.6; P>0.05) were altered by the concentration of endogenous progesterone. The pregnancy rate was similar between the two groups. (CL-=68.29% versus CL+=65.79%; P>0.05). Thus, in goats, ovarian follicular dynamics and fertility were not altered by the presence or absence of a corpus luteum during estrous synchronization.

Development and use of an ovarian synchronization model to study the effects of endogenous estrogen and nitric oxide on uterine blood flow during ovarian cycles in sheep

The objective of the current study was to develop an ovine animal model for consistent study of uterine blood flow (UBF) changes during synchronized ovarian cycles regardless of season. Sheep were surgically bilaterally instrumented with uterine artery blood flow transducers and 5-7 days later implanted with a vaginal progesterone (P(4))-controlled internal drug-releasing device (CIDR; 0.3 g) for 7 days. On Day 6 of P(4), sheep were given two prostaglandin F(2 alpha) injections (7.5 mg i.m. 4 h apart). At CIDR removal, Experimental Day 0, zero (n = 9), 500 IU (n = 8), or 1000 IU (n = 7) eCG was injected i.m.; UBF was monitored continuously for 55-75 h. Jugular blood was sampled every 8 h to evaluate levels of P(4), estradiol-17 beta (E(2)beta) and luteinizing hormone (LH). The inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was infused in a stepwise fashion unilaterally into one uterine artery at 48-50 h after 500 IU eCG and the effects on UBF were examined (n = 7). The zero-eCG group gradually increased UBF from a baseline of 17.4 +/- 3.9 to 80.5 +/- 1.1 ml/min. The 500-IU-eCG group increased UBF between 10 and 15 h from a baseline of 11 +/- 3.3 to 83.3 +/- 1.0 ml/min, whereas UBF for the 1000-IU-eCG group was higher (100.1 +/- 1.7 ml/min) than that seen in either of the other groups. Plasma P(4) fell to baseline within 8 h of CIDR removal, while E(2)beta rose gradually in association with elevations in UBF. LH surges occurred between 32 and 56 h after CIDR removal and the LH surge occurred earlier in the 1000-IU-eCG group than the other two groups (P < 0.01). L-NAME infusion dose dependently reduced maximum levels of UBF ipsilaterally by 54.6% +/- 6.2%, but contralaterally only by 27.4% +/- 8.5%. Regardless of season, either dose of eCG will result in analogous UBF responses. During the follicular phase, elevations in UBF are in part locally controlled by the de novo production of nitric oxide.

Endotoxin inhibits the surge secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone via a prostaglandin-independent pathway

Immune/inflammatory challenges, such as bacterial endotoxin, disrupt gonadotropin secretion and ovarian cyclicity. We previously determined that endotoxin can block the estradiol-induced LH surge in the ewe. Here, we investigated mechanisms underlying this suppression. First, we tested the hypothesis that endotoxin blocks the estradiol-induced LH surge centrally, by preventing the GnRH surge. Artificial follicular phases were created in ovariectomized ewes, and either endotoxin or vehicle was administered together with a surge-inducing estradiol stimulus. In each ewe in which endotoxin blocked the LH surge, the GnRH surge was also blocked. Given this evidence that endotoxin blocks the estradiol-induced LH surge at the hypothalamic level, we began to assess underlying central mechanisms. Specifically, in view of the prior demonstration that prostaglandins mediate endotoxin-induced suppression of pulsatile GnRH secretion in ewes, we tested the hypothesis that prostaglandins also mediate endotoxin-induced blockade of the surge. The prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor flurbiprofen was delivered together with endotoxin and the estradiol stimulus. Although flurbiprofen abolished endotoxin-induced fever, which is a centrally generated, prostaglandin-mediated response, it failed to reverse blockade of the LH surge. Collectively, these results indicate endotoxin blocks the LH surge centrally, suppressing GnRH secretion via a mechanism not requiring prostaglandins. This contrasts with the suppressive effect of endotoxin on GnRH pulses, which requires prostaglandins as intermediates.

Endocrine events during the periestrous period and the subsequent estrous cycle in ewes after estrus synchronization

The aim of the present study was to investigate the endocrinology of the periestrus period and that of the subsequent estrous cycle in ewes synchronized during the breeding season. Animals were treated for 14 days with either MAP intravaginal sponges or subcutaneous progesterone implants, followed by administration of 500 IU PMSG at the time of withdrawal. The time to estrus occurrence following progestagen withdrawal differed significantly between groups (45.3+/-2.7h for the MAP and 21.5+/-1.2h for the implant group, P<0.001). Estradiol levels around estrus did not differ between groups, but a significant difference was detected for the interval from peak estradiol to estrus, with a shorter interval for the implant group (26.7+/-0.7 and 2.7+/-0.9h, P<0.001). Progesterone implants shortened the interval from removal to LH surge, compared to the MAP group (31.2+/-4.4 and 56.5+/-3.6h, respectively, P<0.05). An earlier response was also observed for the interval from estradiol peak to LH peak in the implant group (12.1+/-3.3 and 37+/-2h, respectively, P<0.005), but no difference was observed for the interval from estrus to LH surge. Progesterone levels, particularly during the Days 6 to 10 of the subsequent estrous cycle were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the implant group. It is concluded that the kind of progesterone treatment may affect the time of estrus and the LH peak as well as the progesterone levels of the subsequent cycle.

Progesterone blocks the estradiol-stimulated luteinizing hormone surge by disrupting activation in response to a stimulatory estradiol signal in the ewe

The preovulatory surges of GnRH and LH are activated by increased concentrations of circulating estradiol, but ovulation is blocked when progesterone concentrations are elevated. Although it is has been shown that this action of progesterone is due to a central inhibition of the GnRH surge, the mechanisms that underlie the blockade of the GnRH surge are poorly understood. In this study we investigated whether progesterone can block the estradiol-dependent activation stage of the GnRH surge induction process, and thus prevent expression of the LH surge. The results demonstrated that exposure to progesterone for half or the full duration of the activation stage can prevent the stimulation of LH surges by estradiol (experiment 1), whereas exposure to progesterone midway though a period of estradiol exposure, which in itself is sufficient to activate the surge, did not block the LH surge (experiment 2). These results suggest that progesterone 1) disrupts activation of the surge induction system in response to a stimulatory estradiol signal and 2) does not compromise the ability of animals to respond to a stimulatory estradiol signal applied immediately after progesterone exposure. Because the disruptive effects of activated progesterone in response to estradiol are rapid but transient, it may be that progesterone directly interferes with the activation of estradiol-responsive neural systems to block the GnRH/LH surge.

Fetal programming: prenatal androgen disrupts positive feedback actions of estradiol but does not affect timing of puberty in female sheep

We studied the impact of prenatal androgen exposure on the timing of onset of puberty, maintenance of cyclicity in the first breeding season, and the LH surge mechanism in female sheep. Pregnant sheep were injected with testosterone propionate (100 mg i.m.) twice each week from Day 30 to Day 90 (D30-90) or from Day 60 to Day 90 (D60-90) of gestation (term = 147 days). Concentrations of plasma progesterone and gonadotropins were measured in blood samples collected twice each week from control (n = 10), D60-90 (n = 13), and D30-90 (n = 3) animals. Rate of weight gain and initiation of estrous behavior were also monitored. After the first breeding season, when the animals entered anestrus, competency of the gonadotropin surge system to respond to estradiol positive feedback was tested in the absence or presence of progesterone priming for 12 days. Prenatally androgenized females had similar body weight gain and achieved puberty (start of first progestogenic cycle) at the same time as controls. Duration of the breeding season and the number of cycles that occurred during the first breeding season were similar between control and prenatally androgenized sheep. In contrast, prenatal exposure to androgens compromised the positive feedback effects of estradiol. Onset of LH/FSH surges following the estradiol stimulus was delayed in both groups of androgenized ewes compared with the controls in both the absence and presence of progesterone priming. In addition, the magnitude of LH and FSH surges in the two animals that surged in the D30-90 group were only one third and one half, respectively, of the magnitudes observed in the control and D60-90 groups. The present findings indicate that disruption of the surge system can account for the fertility problems that occur during adulthood in prenatally androgenized sheep.

Role of endogenous opioid peptides in mediating progesterone-induced disruption of the activation and transmission stages of the GnRH surge induction process

How progesterone blocks the E2-induced GnRH surge in females is not known. In this study we assessed whether the endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) that mediate progesterone negative feedback on pulsatile GnRH secretion also mediate the blockade of the GnRH surge. We treated ovariectomized ewes with physiological levels of E2 and progesterone to stimulate and block the GnRH surge, respectively, using LH secretion as an index of GnRH release. A pilot study confirmed that blocking opioidergic neurotransmission with the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (NAL; 1 mg/kg.h, i.v.), could prevent the suppression of pulsatile LH secretion by progesterone in our model. By contrast, antagonizing EOP receptors with NAL did not restore LH surges in ewes in which the E2-induced GnRH surge was blocked by progesterone treatment during the E2-dependent activation stage (Exp 1) of the GnRH surge induction process. However, in ewes treated with progesterone during the E2-independent transmission stage (Exp 2), NAL partially restored blocked LH surges, as indicated by increased fluctuations in LH that, in some cases, resembled LH surges. We conclude, therefore, that the EOPs that mediate progesterone negative feedback on pulsatile GnRH secretion are not involved in blockade of activation of the E2-induced GnRH surge by progesterone, but do appear to be part of the mechanism by which progesterone disrupts the transmission stage.

Ovarian estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) regulation: I. Changes in ERbeta messenger RNA expression prior to ovulation in the ewe

Ovarian growth and development are critically dependent upon the influence of endogenous estrogens, and both are highly regulated during the reproductive cycle. The observation that estrogen-receptor-alpha-deficient mice still exhibit follicular growth and development, together with other evidence, suggests that responsiveness of the ovary to estradiol occurs predominantly through the second estrogen receptor, ERbeta. We characterized the physiological regulation of ERbeta expression in ovarian follicles during the follicular phase of sheep that were synchronized for estrus during the breeding season with intravaginal progesterone implants (controlled internal drug release [CIDR] device; InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand). Ovaries were removed at times corresponding to the early (EF) and late follicular phases (LF) of the ovine estrous cycle (12 h [n = 5] and 32 h [n = 5] after CIDR device removal, respectively). Sections of ovary were then hybridized with a cRNA probe corresponding to the 5' region of ovine ERbeta. ERbeta mRNA expression within the granulosa layer of different size follicles (size classes: < or =3 mm, 3.1-4.0 mm, 4.1-5.0 mm, >5 mm) was quantified. ERbeta mRNA expression varied both with follicle size (P < 0.01) and with cycle stage (P < 0.01). In EF ewes, the highest levels of ERbeta mRNA expression were found in follicles < or = 3 mm in size. ERbeta mRNA expression declined progressively thereafter among the different size classes with lowest levels expressed in >5-mm follicles. By contrast, expression of ERbeta mRNA in the 3.1- to 4.0-mm follicles of LF group was significantly higher than in the < or =3-mm size follicles and declined thereafter progressively to the >5-mm size levels as in the EF group. Furthermore, expression of ERbeta mRNA in < or =3-mm size follicles of LF group was significantly lower than the corresponding size class in the EF group. Lower expression of ERbeta mRNA in >5-mm follicle is suggestive of a down-regulation by the local estrogen milieu.

Breeding ewes out-of-season using melengestrol acetate, one injection of progesterone, or a controlled internal drug releasing device

A series of studies was designed to identify methods of improving out-of-season breeding success in ewes. In Experiment 1, 190 mature ewes were assigned to receive in April, either: (A) a control ration of 0.3 kg corn twice daily for 8 d before ram introduction (control ewes n=49), (B) the control ration containing 0.125 mg of melengestrol acetate (MGA) in 0.3 kg corn (MGA8a ewes n=46), (C) the control ration or 7.5 d followed by 1 feeding of 0.5 mg MGA in 0.3 kg corn (MGA1 ewes n=48), or (D) the control ration plus a 20 mg i.m. injection of progesterone on D 8 (P ewes n=47). Ewes were exposed to rams for 21 d. A greater percentage of MGA8a and P ewes lambed than did control ewes (P < 0.04). The lambing rate was greatest among MGA8a (P < 0.02 vs. control), intermediate among P ewes (P < 0.19 vs. control) and least among MGA1 and control ewes (P > 0.79). In Experiment 2, 70 mature ewes were assigned to receive in June, either: (A) a control ration of 0.3 kg of corn twice daily for 8 d before to ram introduction (control ewes n=25), (B) the control ration containing 0.125 mg of MGA per 0.3 kg corn (MGA8b ewes n=21), or (C) the control ration and simultaneous treatment of ewes with a progesterone-containing controlled internal-drug releasing device (CIDR ewes n=24). Ewes were exposed to rams for 21 d. Both CIDR and MGA8b ewes exhibited estrus earlier than did control ewes (P < 0.01). The CIDR ewes exhibited estrus earlier than did the MGA8b ewes (P < 0.05). A greater percentage of ewes treated with CIDR or MGA8b lambed than did control ewes (P < 0.01), with more CIDR ewes lambing than MGA8b ewes (P < 0.01). The lambing rate was greater in CIDR ewes than in control ewes (P < 0.04). These data provide evidence that several options exist to improve pregnancy success in ewes bred out of season and that success varies with method of treatment.

Short-term treatment with a controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) device and FSH to induce fertile estrus and increase prolificacy in anestrous ewes

The objectives were to evaluate, in anestrous ewes, the effectiveness of a CIDR-G device (0.3 g progesterone) administered for 5 d to induce estrus; and FSH (Folltropin; 55 mg NIH-FSH-P1 equivalent) in saline:propylene glycol (1:4) 24 h before insert removal (Day 0), to increase ovulation rate and prolificacy. Ewes of mixed breeding were assigned at random to 3 treatments: control (C; n = 125), 5 d progesterone (P5; n = 257) and 5 d progesterone plus FSH (P5F; n = 271). Intact rams were joined at insert removal and ewes were observed every 24 h for 3 d. On Day 14, the ovulation rates of all ewes detected in estrus in the treated groups were determined using transrectal ultrasonography. Rams were removed on Day 26 to 31. Ewes were examined for pregnancy then, and again 20 to 25 d later to detect ewes that conceived to the second service period. Percentage of ewes marked by rams was higher in progesterone-treated (77%) than in C (20%; P < 0.01), but did not differ between P5 and P5F. The ovulation rate (1.95+/-0.04) did not differ due to FSH. Conception (68%) and pregnancy (52%) rates were higher in progesterone-treated (P < 0.01) than in C (0%) ewes. Estrous response varied quadratically with time after ram introduction, and the conception rate varied quadratically with the time of observation of onset of estrus. Over two service periods more progesterone-treated than C ewes lambed (65 vs 45%; P < 0.01). Lambs born per ewe exposed (0.7+/-0.1, 1.0+/-0.1, and 1.1+/-0.1 for C, P5 and P5F, respectively) was increased by progesterone (P < 0.05). Litter size to the first service period (1.59+/-0.04) and overall (1.54+/-0.03) did not differ among treatment groups. FSH-treated ewes tended to have more lambs (1.67+/-0.1) than did ewes receiving progesterone alone (1.5+/-0.1; P = 0.06) and than did ewes lambing to the second service period (1.5+/-0.1; P = 0.06). In summary, a 5-d progesterone pre-treatment of anestrous ewes induced estrous cycles and increased the pregnancy rates. A single injection of FSH only tended to increase litter size.

Duration and amplitude of the luteal phase progesterone increment times the estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone surge in ewes

Progesterone (P) powerfully inhibits the neuroendocrine reproductive axis, but the mechanisms and site or sites of action of this steroid remain poorly understood. Progesterone exposure during the luteal phase also alters the responsiveness of the hypothalamus to increased concentrations of estrogen (E) during the follicular phase. Using an ovariectomized ovine follicular phase model, we investigated whether the amplitude and duration of the luteal phase increase in circulating P affects the E-induced surge in LH. Treatment of ewes for 10 days with two, one, or half an intravaginal P-releasing implant or with an empty implant demonstrated that P concentrations significantly (P: < 0.0001) delayed the time to surge onset upon exposure to an equal concentration of E. This delay was not due to a time-related difference in responsiveness to E after P clearance because the time of surge onset was not different when E treatment began 6, 12, or 24 h after the withdrawal of two P implants that had been present for 10 days. The final study demonstrated that the duration of P before treatment (5, 10, or 30 days) significantly (P: < 0.0001) delayed the responsiveness of the estradiol-dependent surge-generating system. There was no effect on surge amplitude or duration in any experiment. Thus, the amplitude and duration of exposure to luteal phase P significantly affect the neural elements targeted by E to induce the preovulatory LH surge.

Endocrine alterations that underlie endotoxin-induced disruption of the follicular phase in ewes

Two experiments were conducted to investigate endocrine mechanisms by which the immune/inflammatory stimulus endotoxin disrupts the follicular phase of the estrous cycle of the ewe. In both studies, endotoxin was infused i.v. (300 ng/kg per hour) for 26 h beginning 12 h after withdrawal of progesterone to initiate the follicular phase. Experiment 1 sought to pinpoint which endocrine step or steps in the preovulatory sequence are compromised by endotoxin. In sham-infused controls, estradiol rose progressively from the time of progesterone withdrawal until the LH/FSH surges and estrous behavior, which began approximately 48 h after progesterone withdrawal. Endotoxin interrupted the preovulatory estradiol rise and delayed or blocked the LH/FSH surges and estrus. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that endotoxin suppresses the high-frequency LH pulses necessary to stimulate the preovulatory estradiol rise. All 6 controls exhibited high-frequency LH pulses typically associated with the preovulatory estradiol rise. As in the first experiment, endotoxin interrupted the estradiol rise and delayed or blocked the LH/FSH surges and estrus. LH pulse patterns, however, differed among the six endotoxin-treated ewes. Three showed markedly disrupted LH pulses compared to those of controls. The three remaining experimental ewes expressed LH pulses similar to those of controls; yet the estradiol rise and preovulatory LH surge were still disrupted. Our results demonstrate that endotoxin invariably interrupts the preovulatory estradiol rise and delays or blocks the subsequent LH and FSH surges in the ewe. Mechanistically, endotoxin can interfere with the preovulatory sequence of endocrine events via suppression of LH pulsatility, although other processes such as ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation appear to be disrupted as well.

Endotoxin disrupts the estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone surge: interference with estradiol signal reading, not surge release

Three experiments were conducted to investigate whether the immune/inflammatory stimulus endotoxin disrupts the estradiol-induced LH surge of the ewe. Ovariectomized sheep were set up in an artificial follicular phase model in which luteolysis is simulated by progesterone withdrawal and the follicular phase estradiol rise is reproduced experimentally. In the first experiment, we tested the hypothesis that endotoxin interferes with the estradiol-induced LH surge. Ewes were either infused with endotoxin (300 ng/kg/h, i.v.) for 30 h beginning at onset of a 48-h estradiol stimulus or sham infused as a control. Endotoxin significantly delayed the time to the LH surge (P < 0.01), but did not alter surge amplitude, duration, or incidence. The second experiment tested the hypothesis that the delaying effects of endotoxin on the LH surge depend on when endotoxin is introduced relative to the onset of the estradiol signal. Previous work in the ewe has shown that a 14-h estradiol signal is adequate to generate GnRH and LH surges, which begin 6-8 h later. Thus, we again infused endotoxin for 30 h, but began it 14 h after the onset of the estradiol signal. In contrast to the first experiment, endotoxin given later had no effect on any parameter of the LH surge. In the third experiment, we tested the hypothesis that endotoxin acts during the first 14 h to disrupt the initial activating effects of estradiol. Estradiol was delivered for just 14 h, and endotoxin was infused only during this time. Under these conditions, endotoxin blocked the LH surge in five of eight ewes. In a similar follow-up study, endotoxin again blocked the LH surge in six of seven ewes. We conclude that endotoxin can disrupt the estradiol-induced LH surge by interfering with the early activating effects of the estradiol signal during the first 14 h (reading of the signal). In contrast, endotoxin does not disrupt later stages of signal processing (i.e. events during the interval between estradiol signal delivery and surge onset), nor does it prevent actual hormonal surge output. Thus, endotoxin appears to disrupt estrogen action per se rather than the release of GnRH or LH at the time of the surge.

Estrus synchronization and artificial insemination of hair sheep ewes in the tropics

Hair sheep ewes (St. Croix White and Barbados Blackbelly) were used to evaluate 3 methods of estrus synchronization for use with transcervical artificial insemination (TAI). To synchronize estrus, ewes (n = 18) were treated with PGF2alpha (15 mg, im) 10 d apart, with controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices containing 300 mg progesterone for 12 d (n = 18), or with intravaginal sponges containing 500 mg progesterone for 12 d (n = 18). On the day of the second PGF2alpha injection or at CIDR or sponge removal, sterile rams were placed with the ewes. Jugular blood samples were collected from the ewes at 6-h intervals until the time of ovulation, and daily for 16 d after estrus (Day 0). Plasma was harvested and stored at -20 degrees C until LH, and progesterone concentrations were determined by RIA. There was no difference (P>0.10) in time to estrus among the CIDR-, PGF2alpha- or sponge-treated ewes. All of the ewes in the CIDR group and 94.4% of the sponge treated ewes exhibited estrus by 36 h after ram introduction, while only 72.2% of PGF2alpha-treated ewes showed signs of estrus by this time (P<0.06). The time from ram introduction to ovulation was not different (P>0.10) among the CIDR-, PGF2alpha- or sponge-treated ewes. The time to the preovulatory LH surge was similar (P>0.10) among CIDR, PGF2alpha and sponge treated ewes. Progesterone levels through Day 16 after the synchronized estrus were not different (P>0.10) among treatment groups. Hair sheep ewes (n = 23) were synchronized using PGF2alpha and bred by TAI using frozen-thawed semen 48 h after the second injection. The conception rate to TAI was 2/23 (8.7%) and produced 3 ram lambs. In a subsequent trial, 17 ewes were synchronized with CIDR devices and bred by TAI using frozen-thawed semen 48 h after CIDR removal, resulting in a conception rate of 52.9% (9/17). It is possible to synchronize estrus in hair sheep using either CIDRs, sponges or PGF2alpha. Even though there were no significant differences in the timing of ovulation or the LH surge among the treatment groups, a higher conception rate was achieved in ewes synchronized with CIDR devices during the second trial. This may reflect an increase in the skill level of the TAI technician.

Progesterone priming is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge in the ewe

The luteal phase elevation in circulating progesterone (P) powerfully inhibits GnRH and, consequently, LH release, thereby preventing premature preovulatory LH surges in the ewe. Whether luteal phase P modulates the response of the GnRH system to the positive feedback effect of estradiol is unknown. To investigate this possibility, two experiments were conducted during the anestrous season using an artificial model of the follicular phase in ovariectomized ewes bearing 10-mm s.c. 17beta-estradiol SILASTIC brand implants (Dow Coming Corp.). In Exp 1, ewes (n = 10) were run through four successive artificial cycles during which a luteal phase level of P was either replaced (cycles 1 and 3) or not replaced (cycles 2 and 4). GnRH and LH secretions were monitored by sampling cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and jugular blood from 10-35 h after four 30-mm 17beta-estradiol SILASTIC implants were inserted sc. CSF could be collected from only four ewes over the four cycles. There was no P-dependent difference in the onset of the GnRH and LH surges, which may have been due to a progressive delay in the surge onsets over the four cycles (by ANOVA, P < 0.05). Due to this delay, it was not possible to obtain an accurate estimate of the duration of the GnRH and LH surges in all ewes, but the size of the GnRH surge was always greater when animals had been treated with P, resulting in a significant increase in the maximum (P < 0.01) and mean (P < 0.05) levels during the surge. In contrast, there was no effect on any parameter of LH secretion. In Exp 2, ewes (n = 10) were run through two artificial estrous cycles during which luteal phase P was either replaced or not replaced, using a cross-over experimental design. CSF was collected from seven ewes over the two cycles. GnRH and LH secretions were monitored from 10-53 h after estradiol administration. As in Exp 1, a clear significant increase in the maximal and mean GnRH levels (P < 0.05 for both) was observed during the surge when ewes had been pretreated with P. Again, no changes were observed in LH release during the surge. P priming did, however, delay the onsets of the GnRH (P < 0.01) and LH surges (P < 0.01). Our data show that the increase in P during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory GnRH surge in the ewe.