Evaluation of disinfection and sterilization of reusable angioscopes with the duck hepatitis B model

Guidelines for standardizing cleansing and disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes

As part of the activities toward standardizing endoscopy procedures, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has prepared guidelines for cleansing and disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes. The environment of gastrointestinal endoscopy differs between Japan and advanced Western countries. In advanced Western countries, gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed almost exclusively at specialized facilities, where strict provisions are observed for cleansing and disinfecting endoscopes. In Japan, however, gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed even in small clinics, and the annual number of gastrointestinal endoscopy cases is enormous. In addition, the method for cleansing and disinfecting endoscopes differs among hospitals. Although there is a distinct lack of evidence for how gastrointestinal endoscopes are cleaned and disinfected, it is necessary to standardize the method for doing so to advance the field of endoscopic medicine.

Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

The bioburden (blood, protein, pathogens and biofilm) on flexible endoscopes after use is often high and its removal is essential to allow effective disinfection, especially in the case of peracetic acid-based disinfectants, which are easily inactivated by organic material. Cleaning processes using conventional cleaners remove a variable but often sufficient amount of the bioburden. Some formulations based on peracetic acid are recommended by manufacturers for the cleaning step. We performed a systematic literature search and reviewed the available evidence to clarify the suitability of peracetic acid-based formulations for cleaning flexible endoscopes. A total of 243 studies were evaluated. No studies have yet demonstrated that peracetic acid-based cleaners are as effective as conventional cleaners. Some peracetic acid-based formulations have demonstrated some biofilm-cleaning effects and no biofilm-fixation potential, while others have a limited cleaning effect and a clear biofilm-fixation potential. All published data demonstrated a limited blood cleaning effect and a substantial blood and nerve tissue fixation potential of peracetic acid. No evidence-based guidelines on reprocessing flexible endoscopes currently recommend using cleaners containing peracetic acid, but some guidelines clearly recommend not using them because of their fixation potential. Evidence from some outbreaks, especially those involving highly multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens, indicated that disinfection using peracetic acid may be insufficient if the preceding cleaning step is not performed adequately. Based on this review we conclude that peracetic acid-based formulations should not be used for cleaning flexible endoscopes.

High-level endoscope disinfection processes in emerging economies: financial impact of manual process versus automated endoscope reprocessing

BACKGROUND

The use of flexible endoscopes is growing rapidly around the world. Dominant approaches to high-level disinfection among resource-constrained countries include fully manual cleaning and disinfection and the use of automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs). Suboptimal reprocessing at any step can potentially lead to contamination, with consequences to patients and healthcare systems.

AIM

To compare the potential results of guideline-recommended AERs to manual disinfection along three dimensions - productivity, need for endoscope repair, and infection transmission risk in India, China, and Russia.

METHODS

Financial modelling using data from peer-reviewed published literature and country-specific market research.

FINDINGS

In countries where revenue can be gained through productivity improvements, conversion to automated reprocessing has a positive direct impact on financial performance, paying back the capital investment within 14 months in China and seven months in Russia. In India, AER-generated savings and revenue offset nearly all of the additional operating costs needed to support automated reprocessing.

CONCLUSION

Among endoscopy facilities in India and China, current survey-reported practices in endoscope reprocessing using manual soaking may place patients at risk of exposure to pathogens leading to infections. Conversion from manual soak to use of AERs, as recommended by the World Gastroenterology Organization, may generate cost and revenue offsets that could produce direct financial gains for some endoscopy units in Russia and China.

Is hepatitis B-virucidal validation of biocides possible with the use of surrogates?

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is considered to be a major public health problem worldwide, and a significant number of reports on nosocomial outbreaks of HBV infections have been reported. Prevention of indirect HBV transmission by contaminated objects is only possible through the use of infection-control principles, including the use of chemical biocides, which are proven to render the virus non-infectious. The virucidal activity of biocides against HBV cannot be predicted; therefore, validation of the virucidal action of disinfectants against HBV is essential. However, feasible HBV infectivity assays have not yet been established. Thus, surrogate models have been proposed for testing the efficacy of biocides against HBV. Most of these assays do not correlate with HBV infectivity. Currently, the most promising and feasible assay is the use of the taxonomically related duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV), which belongs to the same Hepadnaviridae virus family. This paper reviews the application of DHBV, which can be propagated in vitro in primary duck embryonic hepatocytes, for the testing of biocides and describes why this model can be used as reliable method to evaluate disinfectants for efficacy against HBV. The susceptibility levels of important biocides, which are often used as ingredients for commercially available disinfectants, are also described.

Nanoscale topographic changes on sterilized glass surfaces affect cell adhesion and spreading

Producing sterile glass surfaces is of great importance for a wide range of laboratory and medical applications, including in vitro cell culture and tissue engineering. However, sterilization may change the surface properties of glass and thereby affect its use for medical applications, for instance as a substrate for culturing cells. To investigate potential effects of sterilization on glass surface topography, borosilicate glass coverslips were left untreated or subjected to several common sterilization procedures, including low-temperature plasma gas, gamma irradiation and steam. Imaging by atomic force microscopy demonstrated that the surface of untreated borosilicate coverslips features a complex landscape of microislands ranging from 1000 to 3000 nm in diameter and 1 to 3 nm in height. Steam treatment completely removes these microislands, producing a nanosmooth glass surface. In contrast, plasma treatment partially degrades the microisland structure, while gamma irradiation has no effect on microisland topography. To test for possible effects of the nanotopographic structures on cell adhesion, human gingival fibroblasts were seeded on untreated or sterilized glass surfaces. Analyzing fibroblast adhesion 3, 6, and 24 h after cell seeding revealed significant differences in cell attachment and spreading depending on the sterilization method applied. Furthermore, single-cell force spectroscopy revealed a connection between the nanotopographic landscape of glass and the formation of cellular adhesion forces, indicating that fibroblasts generally adhere weakly to nanosmooth but strongly to nanorough glass surfaces. Nanotopographic changes induced by different sterilization methods may therefore need to be considered when preparing sterile glass surfaces for cell culture or biomedical applications.

Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy

Flexible endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Contaminated endoscopes are the medical devices frequently associated with outbreaks of health care-associated infections. Accurate reprocessing of flexible endoscopes involves cleaning and high-level disinfection followed by rinsing and drying before storage. Most contemporary flexible endoscopes cannot be heat sterilized and are designed with multiple channels, which are difficult to clean and disinfect. The ability of bacteria to form biofilms on the inner channel surfaces can contribute to failure of the decontamination process. Implementation of microbiological surveillance of endoscope reprocessing is appropriate to detect early colonization and biofilm formation in the endoscope and to prevent contamination and infection in patients after endoscopic procedures. This review presents an overview of the infections and cross-contaminations related to flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy and illustrates the impact of biofilm on endoscope reprocessing and postendoscopic infection.

New developments in reprocessing semicritical items

Semicritical medical devices are defined as items that come into contact with mucous membranes or nonintact skin (eg, gastrointestinal endoscopes). Such medical devices require minimally high-level disinfection. Because many of these items are temperature sensitive, low-temperature chemical methods must be used rather than steam sterilization. Strict adherence to current guidelines is required because more outbreaks have been linked to inadequately cleaned or disinfected endoscopes undergoing high-level disinfection than any other medical device.

Does limited virucidal activity of biocides include duck hepatitis B virucidal action?

BACKGROUND

There is agreement that the infectivity assay with the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) is a suitable surrogate test to validate disinfectants for hepatitis B virucidal activity. However, since this test is not widely used, information is necessary whether disinfectants with limited virucidal activity also inactivate DHBV. In general, disinfectants with limited virucidal activity are used for skin and sensitive surfaces while agents with full activity are more aggressive. The present study compares the activity of five different biocides against DHBV and the classical test virus for limited virucidal activity, the vaccinia virus strain Lister Elstree (VACV) or the modified vaccinia Ankara strain (MVA).

METHODS

Virucidal assay was performed as suspension test according to the German DVV/RKI guideline. Duck hepatitis B virus obtained from congenitally infected Peking ducks was propagated in primary duck embryonic hepatocytes and was detected by indirect immunofluorescent antigen staining.

RESULTS

The DHBV was inactivated by the use of 40% ethanol within 1-min and 30% isopropanol within 2-min exposure. In comparison, 40% ethanol within 2-min and 40% isopropanol within 1-min exposure were effective against VACV/MVA. These alcohols only have limited virucidal activity, while the following agents have full activity. 0.01% peracetic acid inactivated DHBV within 2 min and a concentration of 0.005% had virucidal efficacy against VACV/MVA within 1 min. After 2-min exposure, 0.05% glutardialdehyde showed a comparable activity against DHBV and VACV/MVA. This is also the case for 0.7% formaldehyde after a contact time of 30 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Duck hepatitis B virus is at least as sensitive to limited virucidal activity as VACV/MVA. Peracetic acid is less effective against DHBV, while the alcohols are less effective against VACV/MVA. It can be expected that in absence of more direct tests the results may be extrapolated to HBV.

Reducing infection risk in colonoscopy

Colonoscopy is a well recognized diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Endoscope reprocessing must be done correctly every time; a breach of protocol leading to transmission of infection has the potential to bring endoscopy to a halt. Standards exist that guide the practitioner in all health care settings to minimize the chance of transmission of infection. Safe injection practices and reprocessing of endoscopes using high-level disinfection and sterilization methods may help avert the risk of contracting possible infections during colonoscopy procedures.

The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing

BACKGROUND

Patient soil and bacterial biofilm in patient-ready endoscope channels can adversely impact the efficacy of detergent and disinfectant, thereby increasing the risk of nosocomial infection. Biofilm bacteria are firmly attached to one another and to the substrate by exopolysaccharide, making them difficult to remove. We analyzed the effect of 20 wash/contamination cycles on biofilm formation.

MATERIALS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm-covered endoscope tubing was soaked in water (control), an enzymatic cleaner, or a nonenzymatic cleaner (Matrix) for 10 minutes and decontaminated in a washer-disinfector machine. Media containing P aeruginosa was then recycled to simulate contamination in clinical practice.

RESULTS

SEM analysis showed that loosely attached biofilm was removed under the high flow rates in the washer-disinfector. The control tubing remained 100% covered with biofilm, which became thicker with increased recontamination cycles. Washing in the enzymatic detergent retarded the redevelopment of biofilm. The nonenzymatic cleaner (Matrix) continued to remove more biofilm with an increasing number of wash/contamination cycles. At the 20th cycle, 90% of the tubing was biofilm-free.

CONCLUSION

Washing endoscopes under high flow rates with some detergents removes established biofilm and retards biofilm generation, emphasizing the importance of cleaning before disinfection. Continued research into the physicochemical mechanisms of biofilm adherence and removal is needed to optimize detergents.

Review of surface steam sterilization for validation purposes

Sterilization is an essential step in the process of producing sterile medical devices. To guarantee sterility, the process of sterilization must be validated. Because there is no direct way to measure sterility, the techniques applied to validate the sterilization process are based on statistical principles. Steam sterilization is the most frequently applied sterilization method worldwide and can be validated either by indicators (chemical or biological) or physical measurements. The steam sterilization conditions are described in the literature. Starting from these conditions, criteria for the validation of steam sterilization are derived and can be described in terms of physical parameters. Physical validation of steam sterilization appears to be an adequate and efficient validation method that could be considered as an alternative for indicator validation. Moreover, physical validation can be used for effective troubleshooting in steam sterilizing processes.

Validation of biocides against duck hepatitis B virus as a surrogate virus for human hepatitis B virus

The use of a surrogate virus, namely duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV), has been recommended for testing the virucidal activity of chemical biocides against hepatitis B virus. To date, however, this model has not been recognized as a standard test in European countries, as its laboratory use is associated with considerable difficulties. As previous studies have demonstrated, several alternative procedures may improve the validation of DHBV infection in a cell culture system. Using indirect immunofluorescent antigen staining and the light cycler real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, the virucidal activity of peracetic acid (PAA), povidone-iodine (PVP-I) and formaldehyde was tested against DHBV obtained from congenitally infected ducks or prepared from the transfected hepatoma D2 cell line. The results demonstrated that inactivation of DHBV from the D2 cell line was achieved with lower concentrations of the biocides and within shorter exposure time intervals. These lower concentration-exposure time values for DHBV from D2 cells in comparison with DHBV from infected ducks indicated a higher sensitivity of the virus derived from D2 cells. In addition, concentrations of PAA and PVP-I that significantly inactivated DHBV in suspension tests were not able to destroy the viral genome. In conclusion, DHBV from congenitally infected ducks should be used for virucidal testing of chemical biocides against DHBV; DHBV prepared from D2 cells is unsuitable due to its higher sensitivity to biocides. Indirect immunofluorescent staining allows reliable detection of DHBV infectivity, whereas the hepadnavirucidal effect can be evaluated by quantitative PCR.

Alternative methods for validation of cell culture infection with duck hepatitis B virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an important virus used in disinfection procedures for blood spillage. However, validation of HBV inactivation is difficult, since there are no feasible infectivity assays. In some countries, the duck HBV (DHBV) is recognized as a suitable model for testing antiviral activity of chemical biocides against HBV. Currently, DHBV-infected ducks are required for preparation of the test virus as well as eggs from DHBV-free flocks for testing DHBV infectivity. To improve the practicality of the system, we suggested to use commercially available embryonated duck eggs for preparation of DHBV-susceptible hepatocyte cultures and to exclude infected hepatocytes by pre-screening with qualitative detection of DHBV DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A standardized DHBV test virus was prepared from the DHBV DNA-transfected hepatoma cell line D2, which contained 10(11)DHBV DNA molecules per mL detected by light cycler real-time PCR. Infection of cell cultures was most efficient 4 days after plating. The best identification of infected cultures was possible 6 days after infection with immunofluorescence using an antiserum against DHBV surface antigen.

Suitability of the German test method for cleaning efficacy in washer–disinfectors for flexible endoscopes according to prEN ISO 15883

In Europe, the evaluation of processing flexible endoscopes in washer-disinfectors (WDs) is performed in compliance with prEN ISO 15883-1 which includes determination of the efficacy of the cleaning process. Recent data suggest that cleaning processes show large differences when the prEN ISO 15883-1 German test model is applied. Hence, we analysed a total of 72 experiments in order to evaluate the test method. Transparent test tubes as test pieces (length 2 m, lumen 2 mm) were contaminated with a mixture of blood and Enterococcus faecium. Three set-ups were used: WD 425 with soft water, WD 425 with hard water and WD 440 with demineralized water. WDs were set to perform the cleaning stage of the programme alone. Seven cleaning agents were used according to the manufacturers' instructions (21 cleaning processes); in addition, three cleaning processes were carried out without a cleaning agent (i.e. with water alone). Each cleaning process was assessed by means of three experiments. Suspensions of test organism had 9.2x10(10) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL E. faecium (mean of 24 processes). Controls (recovery) contained 1.0x10(6) cfu/mL E. faecium (mean of 71 experiments). Mean log(10) reduction factors (RFs) for each process, i.e. the difference in microbial loads on the control and the processed tubes, were calculated. Cleaning processes led to RFs of 0-4.1, but no process led to residual bacterial loads below the limit of detection (1.8l gcfu/mL). Standard deviations for a cleaning process were small (< or =0.6 in 79% of the processes) indicating adequate reproducibility. The test model led to reproducible results and revealed large differences between the individual processes. If a cleaning process is intended to result in a bioburden reduction (i.e. RF> or =4), the control must carry a minimum bioburden of 6.5x10(5) cfu/mL. This was achieved in 58% of the processes. However, controls with a bioburden <6.5x10(5) cfu/mL never yielded a residual bacterial load below the limit of detection. We found that the prEN ISO 15883-1 German test method is suitable to determine the cleaning efficacy in WDs and leads to reproducible and valid results.

Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to the failure of cleaning and decontamination?

We predicted that biofilm would form on surfaces of endoscope tubing in contact with fluids, and may be difficult to remove by current washing procedures. Its presence may protect micro-organisms from disinfectant action and contribute to failure of decontamination prior to re-use. Tubing samples removed from 13 endoscopes that had been sent to an endoscope-servicing centre were examined for the presence of biofilm and bacteria by scanning electron microscopy. Biological deposits were present on all samples tested. Biofilm (bacteria plus exopolysaccharides matrix) was present on the suction/biopsy channels of five of 13 instruments, and was very extensive on one of these. Bacteria and microcolonies were often but not necessarily associated with surface defects on the tubing. All 12 air/water channels examined showed biofilm, and this was extensive on nine samples. Routine cleaning procedures do not remove biofilm reliably from endoscope channels, and this may explain the unexpected failure of decontamination encountered in practice despite good adherence to infection control guidelines.

The importance of cleaning for the overall results of processing endoscopes

Reprocessing comprises three steps: cleaning, disinfection and-if required-sterilisation. While the extents of disinfection and of sterilisation are quantitatively defined, there are only imprecise (qualitative) definitions of cleaning. There are two main reasons for accurate cleaning. First organic and inorganic materials that remain on inner and outer surfaces will interfere with the efficacy of the disinfectants. In case of endoscopes this will lead to channel blockages; they remain undisinfected. Second the bioburden found on endoscopes after use can be very high. Data available demonstrate that a bacterial burden of up to 10(9)cfu/endoscope channel can be expected. Therefore it is necessary to perform a thorough cleaning. Studies using endoscopes showed a reduction in microbial counts by a factor of approximately 10(4) by cleaning (manual and mechanical). Therefore in 2001 the German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH) specified its requirements and recommendations for determining cleaning efficacy separately from those for disinfection. Cleaning and disinfecting can be done manually or mechanically, but it seems impossible to validate manual processes. However our studies in two different washer-disinfectors (WD) showed differences in cleaning efficacy. The tested cleaning processes showed different efficacies. Not all cleaning processes showed better results than water alone with regard to visible cleanliness and to a microbiological reduction E. faecium. Our results show that the evaluation of cleanliness exclusively by visible inspection is not sufficient, particular for the lumens of endoscopes. The results also show that a cleaning process may be very effective also in reducing micro-organisms present.

Surface fixation of dried blood by glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid

The difficulties of successful prion inactivation by chemical agents has led to changes in recommendations regarding the reprocessing of instruments including flexible endoscopes. One of the changes is the preference for peracetic acid instead of glutaraldehyde in order to avoid fixation of organic material, but the surface fixation by various active agents has not been fully investigated. We used a standardized amount of dried blood soil on metal carriers (on average 22 mg). One part of the carriers was exposed to different disinfectants (four based on peracetic acid, three based on glutaraldehyde, two based on quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC), one based on QAC and amines, one based on phenols and one cleaning agent) and air dried. The difference compared with the non-exposed soiled carrier was taken as the measure of blood removal by exposure to the disinfectants. In addition the other part of the carriers was exposed to a cleaning agent and air dried. The cleaning agent itself was capable of removing more than 99% of the dried blood and served as a control for non-fixation. The rate of fixation of dried blood was calculated as the ratio of the weight of residual soil on 'soiled, disinfected and cleaned' carriers and on 'soiled and disinfected' carriers. All experiments were repeated eight times. Blood removal varied between 90.3% +/- 1.5% (phenol-based disinfectant) and < 10% (glutaraldehyde-based preparations). Fixation of the remainder was between 76.9 +/- 8.4% and 102.5 +/- 1.1% with glutaraldehyde and between 19.2% +/- 3.3% and 78.1% +/- 2.4% with peracetic acid. No other preparations showed a potential for blood fixation (< 1.3%). Our findings underline the potential for blood fixation, not only by glutaraldehyde, but also by peracetic acid, and support the evidence that effective cleaning should precede the chemical disinfection.

Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective

Endoscopes are used frequently for the diagnosis and therapy of medical disorders. For example, greater than 10000000 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are performed each year in the United States. Failure to employ appropriate cleaning and disinfection/sterilization of endoscopes has been responsible for multiple nosocomial outbreaks and serious, sometimes life-threatening, infections. Flexible endoscopes, by virtue of the site of use, have a high bioburden of microorganisms after use. The bioburden found on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes following use has ranged from 10(5) to 10(10)CFU/ml, with the highest levels being found in the suction channels. Cleaning dramatically reduces the bioburden on endoscopes. Several investigators have shown a mean log(10) reduction factor of 4 (99.99%) in the microbial contaminants with cleaning alone. Cleaning should be done promptly following each use of an endoscope to prevent drying of secretions, allow removal of organic material, and decrease the number of microbial pathogens. Because the endoscope comes into intimate contact with mucous membranes, high-level disinfection is the reprocessing standard after each patient use. High-level disinfection refers to the use of a disinfectant (e.g., FDA-cleared chemical sterilant or high-level disinfectant) that inactivates all microorganisms (i.e., bacteria, viruses, fungi, mycobacteria) but not high levels of bacterial spores. The disinfection process requires immersion of the endoscope in the high-level disinfectant and ensuring all channels are perfused for the approved contact time (e.g., for ortho-phthaladehyde this is 12 min in the US). Following disinfection, the endoscope and channels are rinsed with sterile water, filtered water, or tapwater. The channels are then flushed with alcohol and dried using forced air. The endoscope should be stored in a manner that prevents recontamination. A protocol that describes the meticulous manual cleaning process, the appropriate training and evaluation of the reprocessing personnel, and a quality assurance program for endoscopes should be adopted and enforced by each unit performing endoscopic reprocessing.

Efficacy of 10 different cleaning processes in a washer–disinfector for flexible endoscopes

Successful cleaning of medical devices, such as flexible endocopes, has been recognized to be of major importance for effective processing. Washer-disinfectors (WD) are considered to be an important step in this direction. The cleaning process in WD, however, has only been partially assessed regarding its effectiveness, and therefore to study this in more detail, tests were carried out, according prEN ISO 15883, using transparent teflon tubes as test pieces (length 2 m). For each experiment three test pieces were contaminated with the 'German test soil' containing Enterococcus faecium in blood, two for the test and one as a control (no automatic cleaning). Automatic cleaning was performed with a Wassenburg WD 440. Ten cleaning agents were used. In addition the process was carried out with water alone. After automated cleaning, test pieces were assessed visually (four categories, range: very poor to excellent visible cleanliness) and microbiologically [log(10) reduction factor (RF)]. Each experiment was repeated three times. Using the WD water gave excellent visible cleanliness with a mean RF of 1.1+/-0.6. The same excellent visible cleanliness was obtained with seven cleaning processes: deconex 23 Neutrazym, Helimatic Cleaner enzymatic, Korsolex-Endo-Cleaner, Labomat E, neodisher mediclean, Thermosept ER, and Thermoton NR. Worse visible cleanliness was found with three cleaning processes: Olympus ETD Cleaner and neodisher FE led to adequate visible cleanliness, and the cleaning process with neodisher medizym led to poor visible cleanliness. Six cleaning processes reduced the test organism by RF>or=3, i.e. the reduction was significantly higher than after cleaning with water alone. No significant difference between use of water alone and the cleaning process was found with three cleaning processes: Olympus ETD Cleaner, neodisher mediclean, and Thermosept ER (range RF: 0.8-1.8; P > 0.05). The cleaning process with neodisher medizym yielded a significantly lower mean RF (P = 0.039) in comparison with water treatment alone. Both visible cleanliness and mean RF, varied indicating that the choice of cleaning process had a major impact on the overall result.

Test models to determine cleaning efficacy with different types of bioburden and its clinical correlation

The importance of cleaning as a first crucial step in reprocessing instruments and endoscopes is recognized worldwide. However, no standards to determine the efficacy of cleaning have been established. We have therefore investigated Bodedex forte, a new cleaner, in various test models derived from critical types of bioburden on flexible endoscopes. Removal of dried blood from metal carriers was determined in comparison with standard instrument disinfectants. Removal of biofilm endotoxin from silicone test pieces and removal of dried X-ray contrast medium from polyethylene pieces was measured in comparison with one other standard cleaner. Residual bacteria in a biopsy channel from duodenoscopes following use of Bodedex forte, compared with two other cleaners, were measured in an endoscopy unit. After 15 min exposure to Bodedex forte, 95% of the dried blood were removed. Removal was between 0 and 86% with the disinfectants. Bodedex forte reduced endotoxin by 1.91+0.19 log(10)-steps compared with 0.43+0.19 log(10)-steps Cidezyme (P < 0.001) two-sided t-test). Removal of dried X-ray contrast medium was 99% with Bodedex forte and 94% with a conventional cleaner. No bacterial contamination after reprocessing was found in 98% of duodenoscopes with Bodedex forte (78 duodenoscopes), in 72% with a conventional cleaner (129 duodenoscopes) and in 69% with an enzymatic cleaner (100 duodenoscopes). The difference between the three cleaners was significant (P < 0.001) chi-squared test). The superiority of the cleaning capacity of the new cleaner was demonstrated in various test models, which were designed according to the clinical relevance of different bioburdens. Implementation of accepted and reproducible standards for testing the cleaning efficacy will remain a goal for the next years.

Surrogate viruses for testing virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants

Since important agents of viral nosocomial infections like hepatitis B and C viruses and norovirus do not replicate sufficiently in cell culture systems, disinfectants with suspected efficacy against these viruses must be evaluated by different methods. Besides molecular approaches and indirect tests, the use of surrogate viruses with similar biophysical properties and genomic structure allows the assessment of virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants in quantitative suspension tests. Furthermore, insights into the survival of these viruses in the environment are possible. In recent years, duck hepatitis B virus and bovine viral diarrhoea virus have been tested as surrogates for hepatitis B and C viruses. Feline calicivirus serves as a surrogate for the group of norovirus. By including these viruses in inactivation experiments, valuable data from suspension tests can be derived on the virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants. Even in vivo tests using fingerpads of adult volunteers can be performed with these animal viruses without risk of infection. In contrast to in vitro examinations, the results of these tests allow use recommendations of chemical disinfectants for outbreak situations and daily routine disinfection.

Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments (DLI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A total of 125 consecutive patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with single-use DLI (group 1, n = 62) or DLI that were reused (group 2, n = 63) after high-level disinfection by alkalinized 2% glutaraldehyde. Operative and postoperative outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in mean operating time, linear analogue pain scale score, duration and amount of analgesic administration, or hospital stay. Total incidence of complications (3.2% vs 4.8%, p = 0.50) and infection rates (1.6% vs 3.2%, p = 0.57) were also similar when group 1 was compared to group 2.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that reusing DLI did not change the operative and postoperative outcomes or the infection rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy when strict rules for disinfection were followed.

Cleaning efficacy of nine different cleaners in a washer-disinfector designed for flexible endoscopes

Studies on processing endoscopes usually involve the combined cleaning and disinfecting activity. We compared nine cleaning agents designed for automatic processing for cleaning efficacy alone using soft and hard water as controls in 12 different processes in a washer-disinfector. Experiments were performed according to the German Endoscopy Working Group recommendations using transparent Teflon tubes (internal diameter 2mm, length 2m) as test pieces. For each test three pieces contaminated with a blood/test soil containing Enterococcus faecium were used; two for the test and one as a control; each test was repeated three times. Tests were run according to the manufacturer's instructions. Test pieces were assessed visually and microbiologically [log(10) reduction factors (RF) vs. untreated controls]. Soft water alone gave poor visible cleanliness and an RF of 0.3 (SD 0.2), while hard water produced adequate visible cleanliness and an RF of 1.2 (SD 1.0). Five processes gave better visible cleanliness than soft water, but only three were better than hard water. Six processes were worse than soft water and five worse than hard water. Nine processes gave a better microbiological reduction factor than soft water, but the difference was only statistically significant in three. Only one process yielded a significantly higher RF than hard water; three were significantly worse. None of the cleaning processes reached the RF of 4 specified in the US regulations. This study confirms the variability of cleaning processes to dissolve blood residues and reduce the bioburden. We do not recommend abandoning cleaning agents, but suggest that further research is needed to clarify the relationships between washer-disinfectors, cleaning agents, and cleaning performance.

Development of viral disinfectant assays for duck hepatitis B virus using cell culture/PCR

Human hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a worldwide public health problem with chronic carriers at risk for developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Accidental nosocomial infections from inadequately disinfected equipment or exposure to blood and body fluids from patients are major routes. To solve such problems, disinfectants to inactivate HBV must be validated. Duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) is accepted as a surrogate for HBV, due to their similar sensitivities to disinfectants and its safety. Ducklings are used for disinfectant efficacy assays; however, the same virus titer is obtained using duck embryonic hepatocytes. Viral titration in disinfectant efficacy assay is conducted using Southern hybridization of infected duck serum. However, this test requires radioisotopes. Therefore, disinfectant assessment protocols were developed using duck embryonic hepatocytes with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or nested PCR. The ease of handling, lowered cost and enhanced sensitivity make PCR desirable. Chicken embryonic hepatocytes were applied to DHBV disinfectant efficacy assay. Results were consistent and could be used under certain conditions. The virucidal activities of two quaternary ammonium chloride disinfectants, n-alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride and alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (10C-12C) were compared and effective concentrations were 1200 and 1800 ppm, respectively. Efficacies of these disinfectants were validated using real-time quantitative PCR. Results confirmed that the efficacy of n-alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride was higher than alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (10C-12C). This assay was useful for rapid discrimination of killing potentials of disinfectants. In conclusion, these assays can be applied to other viruses that are unable to cause CPE in cell cultures and broadened the utility of DHBV as animal model for HBV.

Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether reprocessed single-use devices would meet regulatory standards for sterility and meet the same materials standards as a new device.

DESIGN

The study included single-use and reusable biopsy forceps and papillotomes and a reusable stone retrieval basket. The suitability of these devices for cleaning and disinfection or sterilization was examined.

METHODS

Testing of cleanability was conducted on devices contaminated with technetium 99-radiolabeled human blood. Instruments were cleaned using hospital recommended practices for manual cleaning. Gamma counts per second were determined before and after cleaning to localize contaminants, which were additionally visualized using light and scanning electron microscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to quantify contamination elements on the materials tested. Residual bioburden testing on instruments contaminated with microorganisms suspended in coagulable sheep blood was carried out to establish the efficacy of disinfection and sterilization.

RESULTS

All devices remained contaminated after cleaning, but single-use devices and the stone basket tended to be more heavily contaminated than reusable forceps and papillotomes. Cleaning procedures facilitated distribution of contaminants further into the lumens of the disposable forceps. Decreased concentrations of silicon and increased concentrations of carbon and nitrogen suggested that layers of silicon lubricant had been removed and contaminants were organic material. Reusable devices were effectively disinfected, but single-use devices were not. Sterilization could not eliminate the challenge microorganisms completely.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the reprocessed single-use instruments were effectively cleaned, disinfected, or sterilized. This condition may provide an opportunity for the viability of nonresistant or nosocomial organisms and viruses. Additionally, reprocessing procedures may result in material destruction of fragile devices. Cost-saving initiatives that have inspired reprocessing of single-use devices, despite the absence of data establishing the efficacy of decontamination and the durability of materials throughout reprocessing, should be pushed into the background.

Duck hepatitis B photoinactivation bydimethylmethylene blue in RBC suspensions

BACKGROUND

Dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) has been used to photoinactivate a number of model viruses, including VSV, in RBC suspensions under conditions that preserve in vitro RBC properties during storage. The relative sensitivity of duck HBV (DHBV) and VSV to photoinactivation by DMMB was investigated by performing an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using primary duck hepatocyte (PDH) cultures or a standard plaque assay for the respective viruses.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

DMMB was added to 45-percent Hct, WBC-reduced, oxygenated AS-3 RBCs at 10-, 1-, and 0.1-microM concentrations. Samples (1-mm thick) were illuminated with 5.4-mW per cm(2) of red light for 2 or 9 seconds. Unilluminated samples without DMMB or with 10 microM DMMB served as control.

RESULTS

DHBV and VSV were rapidly photoinactivated by DMMB in a concentration and light-dose-dependent fashion. Neither virus was substantially inactivated by incubation with DMMB in the dark. For a given light exposure, DHBV required a concentration of DMMB one-one hundredth that of VSV to achieve approximately the same level of inactivation.

CONCLUSION

DHBV appears to be considerably more sensitive than VSV to DMMB photoinactivation. Photoinactivation in 45-percent Hct RBCs can be achieved in seconds by using micromolar quantities of dye.

Manual cleaning and disinfection of flexible endoscopes--an approach to evaluating a combined procedure

Compliance in endoscope reprocessing is unsatisfactory worldwide. The success of the reprocessing procedure relies upon both disinfection and cleaning. Products for instrument disinfection have to be tested accordingly. However, there is still no accepted standard against which to test the result of the cleaning procedure. Different strategies for endoscope reprocessing are possible: one- or two-step procedures. The decision for the method chosen strongly depends on the possibilities in individual hospitals. Products based on glutaraldehyde should not be used if it is not absolutely certain that instruments are already clean. There has to be an awareness that instruments are not designed for easy cleaning. A one-step procedure with products based on aliphatic amines could be an alternative. Methods of assessing such a procedure are suggested.

Reprocessing of thermosensitive materials--efficacy against bacterial spores and viruses

To estimate process parameters for non-thermal methods of antimicrobial inactivation, the half-cycle method is very often used. However, the essential premise of this method of estimation, the independence of microbial inactivation kinetics from the microbial load, seems not to be true. Consequently, the attainment of the sterility assurance level as recommended by the pharmacopoeias by a process which has been validated using the half cycle method is not guaranteed. For the evaluation of such chemo-thermo disinfection processes, the quantification of remaining hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) traces on the surface of instruments is a useful tool. An infection can be excluded if a decrease of the HBN3-DNA residues on the instruments below the minimum infective dose can be demonstrated. Using the signal amplification technique to detect HBV-DNA on instruments, the safety of an reprocessing procedures can be improved.

Residuals on medical devices following reprocessing

Micro-organisms may be transmitted by medical devices. A large variety of infectious agents may be involved in infections transmitted by endoscopic procedures. We review a series of examples that demonstrate to what extent micro-organisms can be detected on medical devices and how transmission on to subsequently examined persons due to inadequate reprocessing can occur. Hardly any data are available regarding residuals of process chemicals, although numerous published cases of glutaraldehyde-related colitis demonstrate that this issue requires urgent clarification. A risk of endoscope contamination exists, interalia, if washer-disinfectors are technically defective or are incorrectly operated. In particular, a final rinse water of poor microbiological quality can lead to recontamination of endoscopes.

Preventing the spread of hepatitis B and C viruses: where are germicides relevant?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most prevalent bloodborne pathogens. Infections caused by these organisms can become chronic and may lead to liver cirrhosis and carcinoma. Limited chemotherapy is now available, but only HBV can be prevented through vaccination. Both viruses are enveloped and relatively sensitive to many physical and chemical agents; their ability to survive in the environment may not be as high as often believed. As a result, their spread occurs mainly through direct parenteral or percutaneous exposure to tainted body fluids and tissues. Careful screening of and avoiding contact with such materials remain the most effective means of protection. Nevertheless, the indirect spread of these viruses, although much less common, can occur when objects that are freshly contaminated with tainted blood enter the body or contact damaged skin. Germicidal chemicals are important in the prevention of HBV and HCV spread through shared injection devices, sharps used in personal services (such as tattooing and body piercing), and heat-sensitive medical/dental devices (such as flexible endoscopes) and in the cleanup of blood spills. Microbicides in vaginal gels may also interrupt their transmission. General-purpose environmental disinfection is unlikely to play a significant role in the prevention of the transmission of these viruses. Testing of low-level disinfectants and label claims for such products against HBV and HCV should be discouraged. Both viruses remain difficult to work with in the laboratory, but closely related animal viruses (such as the duck HBV) and the bovine viral diarrhea virus show considerable promise as surrogates for HBV and HCV, respectively. Although progress in the culturing of HBV and HCV is still underway, critical issues on virus survival and inactivation should be addressed with the use of these surrogates.

Inactivation of hepatitis B virus in plasma by hospital in-use chemical disinfectants assessed by a modified HepG2 cell culture

Because of the difficulties of the chimpanzee model and the genetic differences using the duck model, we developed a cell culture method to measure human hepatitis B virus (HBV) inactivation in vitro. Pooled HBV-infected human plasma that had been exposed to a disinfectant was left in contact for three days with a cell culture of the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2, with 4% polyethyleneglycol and 3 mM sodium butyrate. The mean log10 of the viral titre of unexposed plasma was 4.87 infectious units per mL. Our results showed that 1% glutaraldehyde, sodium hypochlorite at 4700 ppm free chlorine and an iodophor-detergent disinfectant containing 3.6% povidone-iodine reduced viral titres by factors exceeding 10(3)-10(4). However, sodium hypochlorite at 1000 ppm free chlorine had minimal activity and povidone-iodine at 9, 5 and 3.6% had no measurable activity (less than 10-fold reduction). This is the first study using a cell culture model to assess disinfectant activity against HBV. It demonstrates more rapidly than the chimpanzee model that glutaraldehyde and sodium hypochlorite, using standard concentrations and exposure times compatible with clinical practice, were highly active against HBV. However, unexpectedly for an enveloped virus, we found no antiviral activity for iodine in the absence of detergent.