Treatment--metformin

Repurposing Metformin for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Current Insights

Metformin is an orally effective anti-hyperglycemic drug that despite being introduced over 60 years ago is still utilized by an estimated 120 to 150 million people worldwide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Metformin is used off-label for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and for pre-diabetes and weight loss. Metformin is a safe, inexpensive drug with side effects mostly limited to gastrointestinal issues. Prospective clinical data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), completed in 1998, demonstrated that metformin not only has excellent therapeutic efficacy as an anti-diabetes drug but also that good glycemic control reduced the risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, especially in obese patients and thereby reduced the risk of diabetes-associated cardiovascular disease (CVD). Based on a long history of clinical use and an excellent safety record metformin has been investigated to be repurposed for numerous other diseases including as an anti-aging agent, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, cancer, COVID-19 and also atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is the most frequently diagnosed cardiac arrythmia and its prevalence is increasing globally as the population ages. The argument for repurposing metformin for AF is based on a combination of retrospective clinical data and in vivo and in vitro pre-clinical laboratory studies. In this review, we critically evaluate the evidence that metformin has cardioprotective actions and assess whether the clinical and pre-clinical evidence support the use of metformin to reduce the risk and treat AF.

Pharmacological Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine

BACKGROUND

Drug therapy for diabetes mellitus (DM) has had a significant impact on quality of life and work potential of affected persons and has contributed to a remarkable decrease in the frequency and severity of complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. The current approach is the result of incremental progress in using technological advances to increase the safety and effectiveness of insulin therapy and the introduction of new molecules as oral and injectable antidiabetic drugs.

STUDY QUESTION

What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of DM in the past century?

STUDY DESIGN

To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of DM, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States.

DATA SOURCES

The chapters on describing the management of DM in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 to 2020.

RESULTS

In 1927, DM was treated with insulin extracted from the pancreas of large animals (cattle, hogs, and sheep) and purified with alcohol to prevent the tissues' proteolytic action on the hormone. The therapeutic milestones in DM marked 2 avenues for innovation. The first created advances in insulin therapy, starting with processes that led to the production of crystalline insulin and protamine zinc insulin (1937), synthetic human insulin (1996), and prandial (2000) and basal (2004) insulin analogues. The second was an effort to develop and introduce in clinical practice in the United States oral antidiabetic drugs, starting with tolbutamide, a sulfonylurea (1955), followed by metformin, a biguanide (1996), thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and benzoic acid derivatives (2000), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (2008), and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (2020). A latent period of 40 years between significant advances was likely because of searches for new technologies (eg, recombinant DNA for the production of synthetic insulin and analogues) and, at least in part, to the impact of the controversial University Group Diabetes Project on the development and acceptance of oral antidiabetic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacological management of DM has progressed unevenly, with a long latency period in the second half of the last century followed by highly encouraging advances in the first 2 decades of the 21st century. In chronological order, the major advances were synthetic insulins obtained through DNA recombinant technology, adoption of metformin as first line therapy, and introduction of antidiabetic medication classes that also promote weight reduction and cardiovascular health.

The Long-term Effects of Metformin on Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

Metformin is the first pharmacological option for treating type 2 diabetes. However, the use of this drug is not recommended in individuals with impaired kidney function because of the perceived risk of lactic acidosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 10,426 patients with type 2 DKD from two tertiary hospitals. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression. The secondary outcome was metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Taking into account the possibility that patients with less severe disease were prescribed metformin, propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted.

RESULTS

All-cause mortality and incident ESRD were lower in the metformin group according to the multivariate Cox analysis. Because the two groups had significantly different baseline characteristics, PSM was performed. After matching, metformin usage was still associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.73; P < 0.001) and ESRD progression (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.58-0.77; P < 0.001). Only one event of metformin-associated lactic acidosis was recorded. In both the original and PSM groups, metformin usage did not increase the risk of lactic acidosis events from all causes (aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.668-1.276; P = 0.629).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present retrospective study, metformin usage in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, especially those with CKD 3B, decreased the risk of all-cause mortality and incident ESRD. Additionally, metformin did not increase the risk of lactic acidosis. However, considering the remaining biases even after PSM, further randomized controlled trials are needed to change real-world practice.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): Moving towards a new paradigm

Although metformin has been used for over 60 years, the balance between the drug's beneficial and adverse effects is still subject to debate. Following an analysis of how cases of so-called "metformin-associated lactic acidosis" (MALA) are reported in the literature, the present article reviews the pitfalls to be avoided when assessing the purported association between metformin and lactic acidosis. By starting from pathophysiological considerations, we propose a new paradigm for lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Metformin therapy does not necessarily induce metformin accumulation, just as metformin accumulation does not necessarily induce hyperlactatemia, and hyperlactatemia does not necessarily induce lactic acidosis. In contrast to the conventional view, MALA probably accounts for a smaller proportion of cases than either metformin-unrelated lactic acidosis or metformin-induced lactic acidosis. Lastly, this review highlights the need for substantial improvements in the reporting of cases of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Accordingly, we propose a check-list as a guide to clinical practice.

Metformin: historical overview

Metformin (dimethylbiguanide) has become the preferred first-line oral blood glucose-lowering agent to manage type 2 diabetes. Its history is linked to Galega officinalis (also known as goat's rue), a traditional herbal medicine in Europe, found to be rich in guanidine, which, in 1918, was shown to lower blood glucose. Guanidine derivatives, including metformin, were synthesised and some (not metformin) were used to treat diabetes in the 1920s and 1930s but were discontinued due to toxicity and the increased availability of insulin. Metformin was rediscovered in the search for antimalarial agents in the 1940s and, during clinical tests, proved useful to treat influenza when it sometimes lowered blood glucose. This property was pursued by the French physician Jean Sterne, who first reported the use of metformin to treat diabetes in 1957. However, metformin received limited attention as it was less potent than other glucose-lowering biguanides (phenformin and buformin), which were generally discontinued in the late 1970s due to high risk of lactic acidosis. Metformin's future was precarious, its reputation tarnished by association with other biguanides despite evident differences. The ability of metformin to counter insulin resistance and address adult-onset hyperglycaemia without weight gain or increased risk of hypoglycaemia gradually gathered credence in Europe, and after intensive scrutiny metformin was introduced into the USA in 1995. Long-term cardiovascular benefits of metformin were identified by the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) in 1998, providing a new rationale to adopt metformin as initial therapy to manage hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Sixty years after its introduction in diabetes treatment, metformin has become the most prescribed glucose-lowering medicine worldwide with the potential for further therapeutic applications.

Metformin use in kidney transplant recipients in the United States: an observational study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although metformin is contraindicated in patients with increased serum creatinine levels (≥1.5 mg/dl in men, ≥1.4 mg/dl in women) in the United States, its use has not been systematically examined in kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to determine the frequency of metformin use and its associations among kidney transplant recipients, and to assess allograft and patient survival associated with metformin use.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for all incident kidney transplants 2001-2012 and national pharmacy claims (n = 46,914). We compared recipients having one or more pharmacy claims for a metformin-containing product (n = 4,609) and recipients having one or more claims for a non-metformin glucose-lowering agent (n = 42,305).

RESULTS

On average, metformin claims were filled later after transplant and were associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rates before the first claim. Median serum creatinine (mg/dl) levels before the first claim were lower in recipients with metformin claims than in those with non-metformin claims (1.3 [interquartile range 1.0-1.7] vs. 1.6 [1.2-2.5], respectively; p < 0.0001). Metformin was associated with lower adjusted hazards for living donor (0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.80; p = 0.002) and deceased donor (0.55, 0.44-0.70; p < 0.0001) allograft survival at 3 years posttransplant, and with lower mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite metformin being contraindicated in renal dysfunction, many kidney transplant recipients receive it, and it is not associated with worse patient or allograft survival.

Efficacy and safety of metformin during pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus or polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an effective oral anti-hyperglycemic agent that is widely used to manage diabetes mellitus type 2 in the general population and more recently, in pregnancy. However, as metformin crosses the placenta, its use during pregnancy raises concerns regarding potential adverse effects on the mother and fetus.

OBJECTIVE

(i) To provide background for the use of metformin during pregnancy through a narrative review and (ii) to critically appraise the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of using metformin during pregnancy through a systematic review.

RESULTS

Metformin appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), particularly for overweight or obese women. However, patients with multiple risk factors for insulin resistance may not meet their treatment goals with metformin alone and may require supplementary insulin. Evidence suggests that there are potential advantages for the use of metformin over insulin in GDM with respect to maternal weight gain and neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, patients are more accepting of metformin than insulin. The use of metformin throughout pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome reduces the rates of early pregnancy loss and preterm labor and protects against fetal growth restriction. There have been no demonstrable teratogenic effects, intra-uterine deaths or developmental delays with the use of metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

The publications reviewed in this paper support the efficacy and safety of metformin during pregnancy with respect to immediate pregnancy outcomes. Because there are no guidelines for the continuous use of metformin in pregnancy, the duration of treatment is based on clinical judgment and experience on a case-by-case basis.

Emerging diabetes therapies and technologies

The prevalence of diabetes is increasing globally and is expected to increase to 439 million people by the year 2030. Several studies have shown that improved glycemic control measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes results in a reduction of both the micro- and macrovascular complications associated with the disease. The recent introduction of new oral medications, insulin analogs (long and rapid acting), insulin pens and pumps, better SMBG meters and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have all resulted in improvement of glycemic control. Closed-loop devices currently in development aim to integrate the CGM and pump system in order to more closely mimic the human pancreas. The other upcoming new basal insulin (Degludec), prandial insulin, other new technologies and improved oral therapies will significantly improve patient acceptance of intensive therapy, glycemic control and quality of life in patients with diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes: assessing the relative risks and benefits of glucose-lowering medications

The selection of appropriate pharmacologic therapy for any disease requires a careful assessment of benefit and risk. In the case of type 2 diabetes, this decision typically balances the benefits accrued from improved glycemic control with the risks inherent in glucose-lowering medications. This review is intended to assist therapeutic decision-making by carefully assessing the potential benefit from improved metabolic control relative to the potential risks of a wide array of currently prescribed glucose-lowering agents. Wherever possible, risks and benefits have been expressed in terms of absolute rates (events per 1000 patient-years) to facilitate cross-study comparisons. The review incorporates data from new studies (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial), as well as safety issues associated with newer glucose-lowering medications.

Design and synthesis of novel imidazoline derivatives with potent antihyperglycemic activity in a rat model of type 2 diabetes

Imidazoline derivatives have been reported to show antihyperglycemic activity in vivo. In the present study, we first showed that there was no correlation between the in vivo antidiabetic activity and the in vitro affinities for the I1/I2 binding sites for several substituted aryl imidazolines. Among these compounds, 2-(alpha-cyclohexyl-benzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole 2 exhibited potent antihyperglycemic properties. It was then chosen as lead compound. Thirty-six new derivatives were synthesized by replacing the cyclohexyl/benzyl group by various cyclic systems or the imidazoline ring by isosteric heterocycles. These compounds were evaluated in vivo for their antihyperglycemic activity using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in a rat model of type-2 diabetes obtained by giving a single intravenous (iv) injection of a low dose of streptozotocin to rats (STZ rats) and in normal rats. Nine compounds with an imidazoline moiety, possibly substituted by a methyl group, had a potent effect on the glucose tolerance in normal or STZ-diabetic rats, after an oral (po) administration of the test compound at a dose of 30 or 10 mg kg(-1), without any hypoglycemia. Replacement of the imidazoline ring by isosteric heterocycles resulted in a total loss of activity.

Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis Precipitated by Acute Renal Failure

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a rare but serious clinical entity. It is almost always seen in patients with a serious underlying medical disorder, most often a degree of renal impairment or other factors that are known to predispose to the lactic acidosis. We report a case of MALA in which acute renal failure resulting from hypovolemia secondary to acute gastroenteritis likely precipitated the condition. Early recognition of this condition and initiation of treatment are important. Bicarbonate hemodialysis is the treatment of choice.

Metformin: mechanisms of antihyperglycemic action, other pharmacodynamic properties, and safety perspectives

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the mechanisms of action of metformin and describe its effects and safety profile.

METHODS

Results of more than 30 years of clinical use in countries other than the United States are summarized. In addition, the pharmacologic properties of metformin are compared with those of other antihyperglycemic agents.

RESULTS

Approximately 90% of all cases of diabetes are non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)--a heterogeneous disease that involves several pathogenic factors and is associated with other coexisting conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and obesity. Thus, an agent that controls blood glucose levels and has favorable effects on the concomitant conditions should be considered when pharmacologic intervention is needed for the treatment of NIDDM. Metformin possesses the pharmacodynamic properties to do both. Its mechanisms of action include the reduction of hepatic glucose production and enhancement of peripheral glucose disposal, making metformin an effective antihyperglycemic agent. It also has other pharmacologic properties, independent of its glycemic effects, that offer additional clinical benefits in comparison with other pharmacologic NIDDM treatments. These benefits include stabilization or even loss of weight in patients for whom weight gain is a concern and reduction of plasma lipid levels in patients with hyperlipidemia.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of 3 decades of clinical experience, metformin has been shown to be not only a well tolerated but also a highly effective antihyperglycemic agent.

Clinical evaluation and management of metabolic and morphologic abnormalities associated with human immunodeficiency virus

In recent years, a spectrum of metabolic and morphologic alterations has emerged among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving antiretroviral treatment. Changes observed include insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, abdominal and dorsocervical fat accumulation, and fat depletion in the extremities and in the face. The health consequences of these changes are not well understood but may include increased risk for diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Therefore, clinicians that treat patients with HIV need current, practical information on management strategies and interventions for patients with manifestations of HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Literature is reviewed on the health consequences of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and alterations in body fat distribution in non-HIV populations to gain perspective on how such abnormalities might affect HIV-infected patients. We also suggest treatments and strategies to manage metabolic and morphologic changes in patients with HIV.

Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a world-wide growing health problem affecting more than 150 million people at the beginning of the new millennium. It is believed that this number will double in the next 25 yr. The pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes mellitus consist of insulin resistance, pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction, and increased endogenous glucose production. To reduce the marked increase of cardiovascular mortality of type 2 diabetic subjects, optimal treatment aims at normalization of body weight, glycemia, blood pressure, and lipidemia. This review focuses on the pathophysiology and molecular pathogenesis of insulin resistance and on the capability of antihyperglycemic pharmacological agents to treat insulin resistance, i.e., a-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin. Finally, a rational treatment approach is proposed based on the dynamic pathophysiological abnormalities of this highly heterogeneous and progressive disease.

Clinical efficacy of metformin against insulin resistance parameters: sinking the iceberg

It has been increasingly recognised in recent years that type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes is part of a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors known as the metabolic syndrome, but also endorsed with such names as the deadly quartet, syndrome X and the insulin resistance syndrome. Atherosclerosis is the most common complication of type 2 diabetes among Europeans, and coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease are 2 to 5 times more common in people with this condition than in those without diabetes. These observations indicate that the treatment of type 2 diabetes requires agents that do more than simply lower blood glucose levels, and a therapy with both antihyperglycaemic effects and beneficial effects on dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity, hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance is likely to be most useful. In this respect, metformin has an important and established role: this drug has been shown to lower blood glucose and triglyceride levels, and to assist with weight reduction and to reduce hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance. Studies in the Israeli sand rat, Psammomys obesus, have indicated hyperinsulinaemia/insulin resistance to be the initial and underlying metabolic disorder in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Thus, the well established effect of metformin in reducing insulin resistance makes this drug an excellent candidate for the prevention of progression of impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes, and for the reduction of mortality associated with cardiovascular disease.

Metformin as secondary therapy in a defined population with type 2 diabetes

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of metformin as a second-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in a defined population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We measured the extent and circumstances of metformin use in the 15,000-person diabetes registry of a large, group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Among subsets of patients in whom adequate glycemic control could not be maintained with sulfonylurea (SU) therapy, we compared glycemic control before and after metformin use to glycemic control during a similar interval before metformin was introduced. Metformin users were significantly more likely than nonusers to have had poor glycemic control at baseline. Nearly two thirds (63.8%) of patients with a glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) level >10% switched to metformin, as did 46.3% of those with an Hb A1c level of 8% to 10%. In all patients (metformin users and nonusers) in whom SU therapy failed to maintain glycemic control, Hb A1c levels decreased 0.9% after metformin was introduced, compared with a decrease of 0.4% during the control period. In a group-model HMO that promoted the use of metformin as second-line therapy in patients unable to maintain glycemic control with SU therapy, metformin reduced hyperglycemic levels.

A risk-benefit assessment of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Metformin has been used for over 40 years as an effective glucose-lowering agent in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Typically it reduces basal and postprandial hyperglycaemia by about 25% in more than 90% of patients when either given alone or coadministered with other therapies including insulin during a programme of managed care. Metformin counters insulin resistance and offers benefits against many features of the insulin resistance syndrome (Syndrome X) by preventing bodyweight gain, reducing hyperinsulinaemia and improving the lipid profile. In contrast to sulphonylureas, metformin does not increase insulin secretion or cause serious hypoglycaemia. Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with metformin from diagnosis also offers greater protection against the chronic vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most serious complication associated with metformin is lactic acidosis which has an incidence of about 0.03 cases per 1000 patients years of treatment and a mortality risk of about 0.015 per 1000 patient-years. Most cases occur in patients who are wrongly prescribed the drug, particularly patients with impaired renal function (e.g. serum creatinine level > 130 micromol/L or > 1.5 g/L). Other major contraindications include congestive heart failure, hypoxic states and advanced liver disease. Serious adverse events with metformin are predictable rather than spontaneous and are potentially preventable if the prescribing guidelines are respected. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, notably diarrhoea, occur in less than 20% of patients and remit when the dosage is reduced. The life-threatening risks associated with metformin are rare and could mostly be avoided by strict adherence to the prescribing guidelines. Given the 4 decades of clinical experience with metformin, its antihyperglycaemic efficacy and benefits against Syndrome X, metformin offers a very favourable risk-benefit assessment when compared with the chronic morbidity and premature mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Effects of current therapeutic interventions on insulin resistance

Although diet and exercise remain the cornerstones of type 2 diabetes therapy, attempts at lifestyle changes seldom result in the achievement of glycaemic control. As a result, the addition of pharmacological agents is usually necessary. Currently available treatment options improve glycaemic control in the short term; however, maintaining long-term glycaemic control, halting disease progression, and preventing the complications of type 2 diabetes have all proven to be elusive therapeutic goals. For more than 30 years, sulphonylureas (SUs) have been first-line therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes. These compounds control hyperglycaemia by stimulating insulin release from pancreatic beta cells, and thus their benefits are limited to patients with preserved beta-cell function. Despite historic reliance on these agents to treat type 2 diabetes, long-term use of SUs may desensitize beta cells. The meglitinides (e.g. repaglinide) are a new class of non-sulphonylurea secretagogues that bind to a different receptor on the beta cell. Repaglinide has a short duration of action and may be useful for the treatment of postprandial hyperglycaemia. The biguanides (e.g. metformin) represent another class of antidiabetic agents and improve glycaemic control primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Metformin and SUs provide similar glucose-lowering effects, and, in combination, may provide additional benefits in some patients. Reducing the rate of glucose absorption with alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (e.g. acarbose) has been explored as an alternative approach to the management of postprandial hyperglycaemia, but these agents do not address the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Eventually, prolonged overproduction of insulin to compensate for hyperglycaemia leads to dramatically reduced beta-cell function, and exogenous insulin therapy is required.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: a rare or very rare clinical entity?

AIMS

Lactic acidosis is a well recognized complication of biguanide therapy which is potentially serious. Although the prevalence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is much lower than that associated with phenformin, it is still being reported sporadically which raises concerns for the practising clinicians. We review the currently available world-wide data of the prevalence of MALA, the risk factors for its development and the current practical guidelines on the use of metformin to minimize the risk of this potential hazard.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was conducted from both Medline and Ovid (1965-98) using the following keywords: 'Type 2 diabetes mellitus', 'oral hypoglycaemic drugs', 'biguanides', 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' and 'renal impairment'.

RESULTS

MALA was found to be a very rare clinical entity, being 20 times less common than phenformin-associated lactic acidosis. Amongst all the risk factors, renal impairment appears to be the major precipitating factor for the development of MALA in metformin-treated patients. We also found cases of MALA where no precipitating factors were identified and the underlying mechanism in these cases remains unclear. Practical recommendations of metformin use to minimize the risk of MALA have been listed based on previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence of MALA is comparable to the prevalence of sulphonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia. Metformin has many beneficial metabolic effects in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Provided that the recommended guidelines for metformin use are strictly adhered to, its widespread use would be safe and the incidence of MALA will be further reduced.

An overview of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus results from impaired insulin secretion and reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity. Treatment options include diet, oral antihyperglycemic agents, and insulin. Metformin, an oral biguanide, ameliorates hyperglycemia by improving peripheral sensitivity to insulin, and reducing gastrointestinal glucose absorption and hepatic glucose production. Unlike sulfonylureas, it does not stimulate insulin secretion, aggravate hyperinsulinemia, or cause hypoglycemia or weight gain (weight stabilizes or decreases). It also has beneficial effects on serum lipid profiles. In lean or overweight type 2 diabetic patients uncontrolled by diet, metformin monotherapy significantly improves glycemic control, compared with placebo, and to similar extents as sulfonylurea monotherapy. In secondary sulfonylurea failure, combination metformin-sulfonylurea treatment significantly improves glycemic control beyond that achieved with either agent along. Metformin-sulfonylurea also appears to be as effective as insulin or insulin plus sulfonylurea, suggesting that such combination therapy may obviate or substantially delay insulin therapy. Limited data suggest that metformin-insulin therapy may improve glycemic control, possibly reducing insulin requirements, in type 2 diabetic patients uncontrolled by insulin alone following secondary sulfonylurea failure. Gastrointestinal side effects are common, but usually tolerated. Lactic acidosis risk is minimal, provided that contraindications, particularly renal impairment, and prescribing guidelines are respected. Aside from elevated plasma metformin levels with cimetidine and synergistic hypoglycemia with sulfonylureas, few interactions occur. Thus, metformin is safe and effective both as monotherapy or in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetic patients requiring additional glycemic control and may be advantageous when weight control is desirable and/or hyperlipidemia exists.

Metformin-associated nonketotic metabolic acidosis

OBJECTIVE

To document a case of anion gap, nonketotic metabolic acidosis occurring in a patient with acute renal failure who was receiving metformin.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old white man presented with a 9-day history of weakness, nausea, dizziness, and difficulty moving; he had also not eaten during the previous 2 days. The patient had numerous abnormalities on his serum chemistry panel and arterial blood gases, including a pH of 7.1 and an anion gap of 21 mEq/L No ketones were detected in the urine. The patient was treated with intravenous fluids, sodium bicarbonate, insulin, and hemodialysis. All medications were discontinued. The acidosis resolved shortly after hemodialysis. The hospital course was complicated by the onset of atrial fibrillation occurring on day 2 that did not respond to chemical cardioversion. On day 6 the patient was discharged home with resolving acute renal failure and normal serum pH.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of biguanide-induced lactic acidosis is approximately 50%; thus, early recognition and treatment are essential. Suspicion of lactic acidosis should be high when diabetic patients who are taking a biguanide present with acidosis. The majority of cases of metformin-induced lactic acidosis have occurred in patients with contraindications to the drug (i.e., renal dysfunction). Thus, it is important to maintain strict adherence to these contraindications and monitor patients for deteriorating renal function.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin in healthy subjects and patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

This study was conducted to assess the effect of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and gender on the pharmacokinetics of metformin and to investigate whether or not metformin exhibits dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. The pharmacodynamic effects (on plasma glucose and insulin) of metformin in patients with NIDDM and in healthy subjects also were assessed. Nine patients with NIDDM and 9 healthy subjects received 4 single-blind single-dose treatments of metformin HCL (850 mg, 1,700 mg, 2,550 mg, and placebo) and a multiple-dose treatment of 850 mg metformin HCL (3 times daily for 19 doses). After each single-dose treatment and the final dose of the multiple-dose phase, multiple plasma and urine samples were collected for 48 hours and assayed for metformin levels. Plasma samples were also assayed for glucose and insulin levels. There were no significant differences in metformin kinetics in patients with NIDDM compared with healthy subjects, in men compared with women, or during multiple-dose treatment versus single-dose treatment. Plasma concentrations of metformin increase less than proportionally to dose, most likely due to a decrease in percent absorbed. In patients with NIDDM, single doses of 1,700-mg or higher of metformin significantly decrease postprandial, but not preprandial, glucose concentrations and do not influence insulin concentrations. With multiple doses, both preprandial and postprandial glucose concentrations and preprandial insulin concentrations were significantly lower than with placebo. The effect of metformin on glucose level is correlated with the average fasting plasma glucose level without drug. In healthy subjects, single and multiple doses of metformin showed no effect on plasma glucose, but significantly attenuated the rise in immediate postprandial insulin levels.

Food intake and dosage level, but not tablet vs solution dosage form, affect the absorption of metformin HCl in man

The pharmacokinetics of four single-dose treatments of the metformin administered orally (as the HCl salt) were compared in 24 healthy subjects: 500 mg and 850 mg tablets and 850 mg solution fasting and 850 mg tablet with food. Solution and tablet formulations are bioequivalent. Bioavailability of a 500 mg tablet is 14% greater than that of an 850 mg tablet. Compared with the fasting state, bioavailability is 24% lower, and the peak concentration delayed about 37 min when an 850 mg tablet is administered with food.

Pharmacokinetics of oral antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with renal insufficiency

This paper reviews the effects of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of oral antidiabetic drugs. Of the 3 groups of drugs currently available for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), the sulphonylureas and metformin are, in general, well-tolerated and generally safe. In patients with chronic renal insufficiency, however, care must be exercised in the use of many of these drugs, as accumulation, either of the active drug or of active metabolites, can lead to serious adverse effects such as hypoglycaemia or, with metformin, lactic acidosis. The sulphonylurea drugs, to a greater or lesser degree, are metabolised in the liver to a variety of active or inactive compounds which, in general, are excreted by the kidneys. In addition, varying amounts of parent compound may depend on renal elimination. As a result, sulphonylurea drugs such as tolazamide, acetohexamide, chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide) are more likely to cause significant hypoglycaemia, as the metabolism of these drugs, compared with other commonly prescribed sulphonylureas, can lead to the accumulation of either the parent drug or the active metabolite in the presence of renal insufficiency. Tolbutamide, glipizide, gliclazide and gliquidone are much less likely to cause hypoglycaemia as their metabolites are either inactive or have minimal hypoglycaemic potency. Metformin is dependent on renal excretion and is not significantly metabolised. As a result, caution is required when treating patients with renal insufficiency where metformin accumulation can occur, with the danger of lactic acidosis. Although the correlation between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and total oral clearance of drug is weaker than the correlation between CLCR and renal clearance (CLR) of metformin, it is clear that renal insufficiency is associated with most cases of metformin-induced lactic acidosis. For this reason, clinicians in general would regard a raised plasma creatinine as a contraindication to metformin treatment. Acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, and a relatively new agent for treating NIDDM, is likely to be safe in patients with impaired renal function, as the drug is not significantly absorbed from the gut, but data on this subject are lacking.

Drug therapy of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the elderly

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) is a common problem in the elderly. The discovery of several classes of oral antidiabetic agents has increased the prospects of achieving better control of hyperglycaemia with reduced risk of severe adverse events. Some of these agents, such as acarbose or miglitol, do not cause hypoglycaemia and act locally in the gut. As such they are safer agents. On the other hand, the low cost of some sulphonylurea agents and a once or twice daily administration schedule make them an attractive option. Metformin appears to be especially useful in obese insulin-resistant patients with NIDDM. However, obesity is not as much of a problem in the elderly as it is in middle-aged patients, and contraindications to the use of metformin are common in the elderly. The use of a combination of 2 or 3 oral antidiabetic agents to delay the need for insulin therapy is now possible. The long term effects of this approach are not known and the cost of polypharmacy is of concern.

Metformin: an antihyperglycemic agent for treatment of type II diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative efficacy of metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin in the treatment of patients with type II diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified by a MEDLINE search of articles from 1966 to 1994, using the terms metformin, sulfonylurea, chlorpropamide, glipizide, glyburide, tolazamide, tolbutamide, and insulin, published in English, French, or German. Articles also were identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles.

STUDY SELECTION

With the exception of articles dealing with the pharmacology of metformin, only randomized, active, controlled studies were selected for review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Effects of metformin therapy on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors were abstracted: weight, blood pressure, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting and postprandial glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent with a mean bioavailability of 50-60%. It is eliminated primarily by renal filtration and secretion and has a half-life of approximately 6 hours in patients with type II diabetes. Although the half-life of metformin is prolonged in patients with renal impairment, no specific dosage adjustments have been recommended. This agent has no effect in the absence of insulin. Metformin is as effective as the sulfonylureas in treating patients with type II diabetes and has a more prominent postprandial effect than the sulfonylureas or insulin. When combined with a sulfonylurea, metformin has been shown to exert antihyperglycemic effects in addition to the sulfonylurea with which it is combined. Metformin decreases absorption of vitamin B12 and folic acid, although reported cases of megaloblastic anemia are rare. Cimetidine decreases the elimination of metformin; therefore, the manufacturer reccommends a reduced metformin dosage when these agents are combined. The most frequently reported adverse effects of metformin are gastrointestinal in nature (diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and metallic taste, in decreasing order). Metformin has been used in Canada, Great Britain, and the rest of Europe for more than 30 years and was approved for use in the US in December 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Three trials comprise the Food and Drug Administration approval database (one foreign). Metformin will be most useful in managing patients with poorly controlled postprandial hyperglycemia, as its postprandial effect is much greater than that of the sulfonylureas. In contrast, sulfonylureas or insulin are more effective for managing patients with poorly controlled fasting hyperglycemia. Metformin should be considered a first-line agent, particularly in obese or hyperlipidemic patients.

Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The biguanide metformin (dimethylbiguanide) is an oral antihyperglycaemic agent used in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It reduces blood glucose levels, predominantly by improving hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin without affecting the secretion of this hormone. Metformin also appears to have potentially beneficial effects on serum lipid levels and fibrinolytic activity, although the long term clinical implications of these effects are unclear. Metformin possesses similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to sulphonylureas in obese and nonobese patients with NIDDM. Additionally, interim data from the large multicentre United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) indicated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy for metformin and insulin in newly diagnosed patients with NIDDM. Unlike the sulphonylureas and insulin, however, metformin treatment is not associated with increased bodyweight. Addition of metformin to existing antidiabetic therapy confers enhanced antihyperglycaemic efficacy. This may be of particular use in improving glycaemic control in patients with NIDDM not adequately controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy, and may serve to reduce or eliminate the need for daily insulin injections in patients with NIDDM who require this therapy. The acute, reversible gastrointestinal adverse effects seen with metformin may be minimised by administration with or after food, and by using lower dosages, increased slowly where necessary. Lactic acidosis due to metformin is rare, and the risk of this complication may be minimised by observance of prescribing precautions and contraindications intended to avoid accumulation of the drug or lactate in the body. Unlike the sulphonylureas, metformin does not cause hypoglycaemia. Thus, metformin is an effective antihyperglycaemic agent which appears to improve aberrant plasma lipid and fibrinolytic profiles associated with NIDDM. Possible long term clinical benefits of this drug with regard to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are not yet established but are being assessed in a major ongoing study. Since metformin does not promote weight gain or hypoglycaemia it should be considered first-line pharmacotherapy in obese patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by nonpharmacological measures. Metformin appears similarly effective for the pharmacological management of NIDDM in nonobese patients.

Comparative tolerability profiles of oral antidiabetic agents

The sulphonylureas and the biguanides are widely used as adjuncts to dietary measures in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Adverse effect profiles differ markedly between the sulphonylureas and biguanides, reflecting differences in chemical structure and mode of action. Sulphonylureas are generally well tolerated, although pharmacokinetic differences between these agents have important clinical implications. The main adverse effect associated with sulphonylureas is hypoglycaemia. This effect is a predictable consequence of the principal pharmacological effect of these drugs, i.e. sensitisation of the islet beta-cell to glucose, resulting in enhanced endogenous insulin secretion. Sulphonylurea-induced suppression of hepatic glucose production may cause profound and protracted hypoglycaemia, especially in elderly patients, in individuals with intercurrent illnesses and reduced caloric intake, or when taken in combination with other compounds with hypoglycaemic potential, e.g. alcohol (ethanol). Sulphonylureas with a longer duration of action, notably chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), are more liable to induce serious hypoglycaemia, particularly when drug elimination is reduced by renal impairment. Other drugs such as salicylates may potentiate the actions of sulphonylureas, thereby increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Biguanide therapy is associated with alterations in lactate homeostasis which under certain clinical circumstances may result in fatal lactic acidosis. Phenformin is associated with a markedly greater risk of lactic acidosis than metformin. Phenformin has been withdrawn in many countries for this reason. All biguanides must be avoided in patients with renal impairment, hepatic dysfunction and cardiac failure--conditions where drug accumulation or disordered lactate metabolism may predispose to lactic acidosis. Phenformin should not be given to individuals who exhibit a severe, genetically conferred hepatic defect of hydroxylation which impedes metabolism of this drug. Less seriously, the biguanides are associated with a relatively high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects which limit compliance. Acarbose, a competitive inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases, has recently been introduced. In contrast to the sulphonylureas and biguanides, acarbose has not been associated with life-threatening adverse effects. This reflects the low systemic absorption of the drug and, predictably, its principal unwanted effects are gastrointestinal disturbances resulting from iatrogenic carbohydrate malabsorption.

Effects of metformin on glucose and glucagon regulated gluconeogenesis in cultured normal and diabetic hepatocytes

The effects of glucose and glucagon on the anti-gluconeogenic action of metformin were investigated in normal and diabetic hepatocytes. Glucose production from lactate was elevated by 88% in hepatocytes from fasted normal rats compared with hepatocytes from fed animals. Diabetes caused 3.5- and 2.1-fold increases in hepatic gluconeogenesis under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. Metformin (250 microM) suppressed glucose production by 37% in normal and by 30% in diabetic hepatocytes from fed rats. This drug was more effective (up to 67%) with increasing concentrations of glucose in the medium. Potentiation by metformin of insulin action on gluconeogenesis was elevated significantly (P < 0.01 to 0.001) by glucose in vitro. Metformin (75-250 microM) also counteracted the effects of glucagon at optimal concentrations in normal (32-68%) as well as diabetic (8-46%) hepatocytes. The findings of this study indicate that (i) the anti-gluconeogenic effect of metformin is enhanced by glucose in vivo and in vitro; and (ii) the suppression of glucagon-induced gluconeogenesis by metformin could play a role in its glucose-lowering effects in diabetic conditions.

Insulin requirement for the antihyperglycaemic effect of metformin

1. Insulin-dependent diabetic BB/S rats with little or no endogenous insulin were used to determine whether insulin is required for the acute antihyperglycaemic effect of metformin (dimethylbiguanide). 2. Metformin (250 mg kg-1, intrajejunally) did not lower the hyperglycaemia in BB/S rats in the absence of exogenous insulin, but metformin increased by 69% (P < 0.05) the blood glucose-lowering effect of exogenous insulin. 3. Metformin (250 mg kg-1, intrajejunally) improved glucose disposal in rats with a normal insulin response to an intravenous glucose challenge. Plasma glucose disappearance was increased from 0.7 +/- 0.1 to 2.5 +/- 0.1% min-1 (P < 0.05). 3. When the insulin response to glucose was suppressed with somatostatin and diazoxide, metformin improved glucose disposal to a similar extent to that in rats with a normal insulin response. Plasma glucose disappearance was increased from 0.24 +/- 0.02 to 1.0 +/- 0.1% min-1 (P < 0.01). 5. The results indicate that insulin is required for the acute antihyperglycaemic effect of metformin, but the extent of this effect is not proportional to the prevailing insulin concentration.

Metformin and brown adipose tissue thermogenetic activity in genetically obese Zucker rats

The effect of chronic metformin treatment on brown adipose tissue thermogenetic activity was investigated in young genetically obese Zucker rats. The binding of [3H]GDP to brown adipose tissue mitochondria, expression of uncoupling protein mRNA in brown adipose tissue, weight gains and cumulative food intakes were measured in metformin (320 mg/kg orally for 12 days)-treated obese Zucker rats as well as in pair-fed--and in ad libitum--fed control obese rats. The weight gains were identically reduced in the metformin- and pair-fed control group compared to the ad libitum--fed rats. Metformin also significantly reduced cumulative food intake. The binding of [3H]GDP to brown adipose tissue mitochondria and the expression of uncoupling protein mRNA in brown adipose tissue were not modified by metformin. It is concluded that the weight gain reducing effect of metformin in obese Zucker rats is mainly due to reduced food intake and does not involve an effect of metformin on brown adipose tissue thermogenetic activity.

Effect of subchronic metformin treatment on macronutrient selection in genetically obese Zucker rats

Metformin has been particularly recommended to be used in obese type 2 diabetic patients because of its weight decreasing and serum lipid profile normalizing effects. In the present study the effects of subchronic metformin treatment on macronutrient selection, weight gain and plasma insulin and glucose were investigated in 20 genetically obese male Zucker rats which were maintained on a free-feeding self-selection paradigm with three pure macronutrient diets of carbohydrate, fat and protein. Half of the rats were given metformin hydrochloride 320 mg/kg/day up to 18 days in drinking water. The other half of the animals received normal drinking water as a control. Metformin treatment significantly reduced 24 hr carbohydrate (P < 0.01), fat (P < 0.001) and protein (P < 0.01) intake. The proportion of fat of the total consumed energy was significantly increased by metformin (P < 0.01) while the proportion of protein was decreased (P < 0.05). In hunger stimulated feeding experiment metformin decreased selectively protein intake (P < 0.01). Changes in macronutrient selection were associated with reduced body weight gain in metformin treated rats (P < 0.001). Metformin markedly reduced the hyperinsulinaemia (P < 0.01) and plasma glucose levels (P < 0.05), which suggests improved glucose tolerance after metformin treatment. It is concluded that subchronic metformin treatment can modify the composition of energy intake in a macronutrient selective manner.

Effect of metformin on glucose metabolism in the splanchnic bed

1. Use of the antihyperglycaemic agent, metformin, is often associated with a small rise in circulating lactate. This study investigates the source of the lactate and examines the effect of metformin on glucose metabolism by the intestine and liver of rats. 2. Changes in plasma glucose and lactate were measured in the inferior vena cava (IVC), hepatic portal vein (HPV), hepatic vein (HV) and aorta (A) after intrajejunal administration of metformin (50 and 250 mg kg-1) without and with glucose (2 g kg-1). 3. Metformin 250 mg kg-1 reduced the hyperglycaemic response to a glucose challenge, associated with a greater reduction of glucose concentrations in the HPV (average decrease of 33% at 60 and 120 min) than at other sites. 4. Both doses of metformin increased lactate concentrations in the glucose-loaded state: the highest concentration (2.5 fold increase) was recorded in the HPV 60 min after administration of 250 mg kg-1 metformin, with a high lactate concentration persisting in the HV at 120 min. Metformin 250 mg kg-1 also increased lactate concentrations in the basal state, with highest concentrations (2 fold increase) in the HPV. 5. Two hours after intrajejunal administration of metformin, 50 mg kg-1, rings of tissue from the small intestine showed an average 22% decrease in glucose oxidation ([14C]-glucose conversion to 14CO2) and a 10% increase in lactate production. Since glucose metabolism in the gut is predominantly anaerobic, metformin caused an overall 9.5% increase of intestinal glucose utilization.6. Metformin, 10-6 and I0- mol 1', did not significantly alter glucose oxidation or lactate production by isolated hepatocytes, but a very high concentration of metformin (102 mol 1') increased lactate production by 60%.7. The results support the view that metformin increased intestinal glucose utilization and lactate production by the intestine. Under basal conditions there was net extraction of lactate by the liver but not after an enteral glucose load.

The effects of glucose, insulin and metformin on the order parameters of isolated red cell membranes. An electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic study

Human red blood cell (RBC) membranes (RBC ghosts) were treated with glucose, insulin and metformin. The order parameters of RBC membranes were determined by 5- and 16-doxyl-stearic acid spin labels. Metabolic effects were excluded using an isolated system of RBC membranes. The membranes were incubated with glucose in physiological (5 mM), renal threshold (10 mM) and manifested diabetic (20 mM) concentrations for limited times. High concentrations of glucose (10, 20, 100 mM) increase the order parameters of RBC membranes significantly. Insulin by itself has a similar effect which is, however, not strictly concentration-dependent. By contrast, metformin at therapeutic concentrations (0.5 and 5.0 microM) decreases the order parameters. At 50 microM concentration the metformin effect is expressed less and recurs at 100 microM concentration. The effects are significant with 5-doxyl-stearic acid, but are not significant with the 16-doxyl derivative. When RBC membranes are co-incubated with 20 mM glucose and metformin at 0.5 and 5.0 microM concentrations the order parameters as determined by 5-doxyl-stearic acid remain normal (= control values). Higher concentrations of metformin (50 and 100 microM) cause an overshoot to very low order parameters. Insulin at 10, 100 and 200 mU/L does not influence significantly the effects of metformin. Addition of physiological amounts of bovine serum albumin does not abolish the effects of metformin. Metformin, at therapeutic concentrations (0.5 and 5.0 microM), maintains the normal fluidity at the polar interface of isolated RBC membranes by counterbalancing non-enzymatic glycosylation with 20 mM glucose in vitro.

Subchronic treatment with metformin produces anorectic effect and reduces hyperinsulinemia in genetically obese zucker rats

The effect of subchronic metformin treatment on food intake, weight gain and plasma and tissue hormone levels was investigated in genetically obese male Zucker rats and in their lean controls. Metformin hydrochloride (320 mg/kg/day for 14 days in the drinking water) significantly reduced 24 hour food intake both after one and two weeks treatment in obese rats. In contrast, metformin had only a transient effect on food intake in lean animals. The reduced food intake was associated with body weight decrease, particularly in obese rats. Metformin markedly reduced also the hyperinsulinemia of the obese animals without altering their plasma glucose or pancreatic insulin content which may reflect an improved insulin sensitivity after metformin treatment. Metformin did not change plasma corticosterone levels or insulin and somatostatin concentrations in the pancreas. Metformin reduced pyloric region somatostatin content in lean rats. It is concluded that metformin has an anorectic effect and reduces body weight and hyperinsulinemia in genetically obese Zucker rat.

The management of diabetes mellitus in older individuals

Nearly 50% of individuals with type II diabetes mellitus are over the age of 65 years. There are numerous reasons to maintain blood glucose levels below 11.1 nmol/L (200 mg/dl) in older persons, and there are a number of changes often seen with advancing age that persons, and there are a number of changes often seen with advancing age that may interfere with the management of diabetes mellitus, e.g. hypodipsia, anorexia, visual disturbance, altered renal and hepatic function, depression, impaired basoreceptor response and multiple medications. Hyperglycaemia appears to produce cognitive impairment which may lead to poor compliance. It is often difficult to manipulate diet in older people, and in fact dietary changes can lead to severe protein energy malnutrition. High maximum voluntary oxygen intake has been correlated with increased glucose disposal, but there is little evidence that physical exercise can improve diabetic control in the elderly. Oral sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents are extremely useful in the treatment of diabetes in these patients, but it should be remembered that they are more liable to develop hypoglycaemia than are younger diabetics. The role of metformin in the management of older diabetic patients is poorly studied. Many older persons can cope well with insulin therapy, but those with visual disturbances often make errors when drawing up insulin and require special attention. Combination therapy of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents is not recommended in this group of patients, and serum fructosamine is preferred to glycated haemoglobin to monitor control. Successful management of elderly diabetic patients thus requires an interdisciplinary team approach.