1
|
Demeke T, Hailemariam D, Santos P, Seife E, Addissie A, Sven Kroeber E, Mikolajczyk R, Silbersack B, Kantelhardt EJ, Unverzagt S. Willingness and ability to pay for breast cancer treatment among patients from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300631. [PMID: 38547108 PMCID: PMC10977721 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant neoplasm among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The willingness and ability to pay (WATP) for treatment is a contributing factor in the utilization of health care services. The World Health Organization Breast Cancer Initiative calls for 80% of patients to complete multimodality treatment and indicates payment as central factor to improve BC outcome. The objectives of this study are to identify how much female BC patients paid in Addis Ababa for BC treatment, their WATP for BC treatment, and the factors that affect WATP. METHODS The researchers collected data from 204 randomly selected BC patients who were treated in one of four different health facilities (one public and three private) between September 2018 and May 2019. A structured questionnaire was used to assess their WATP for BC treatment and multivariable regression to investigate factors associated with patients' WATP. RESULTS Of interviewed patients, 146 (72%) were at reproductive age. Patients' median expenditure for all BC treatment services was 336 US dollars (USD) in a public cancer center and 926 USD in privately owned health facilities. These amounts are in contrast with a reported WATP of 50 USD and 149 USD. WATP increased with increasing expenditure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.89 per 100 US), educational level (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85) and service quality (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.72). In contrast, a monthly income increase by 100 USD corresponds to a 17% decrease of WATP (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that BC treatment was very expensive for patients, and the cost was much higher than their WATP. Thus, we suggest that BC should be included in both social and community-based health insurance plans and treatment fees should consider patients' WATP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamiru Demeke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Global and Planetary Health Working Group, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Damen Hailemariam
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Pablo Santos
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Global and Planetary Health Working Group, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Edom Seife
- Radiotherapy Centre, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Adamu Addissie
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Eric Sven Kroeber
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Global and Planetary Health Working Group, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rafael Mikolajczyk
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Birgit Silbersack
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Global and Planetary Health Working Group, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Susanne Unverzagt
- Global and Planetary Health Working Group, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nduka E. How do American and British Nonsmokers Value Secondhand Smoke Health Risks? JOURNAL OF PREVENTION (2022) 2024; 45:47-85. [PMID: 37999883 PMCID: PMC11343785 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-023-00752-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite concerted efforts to enforce smoke-free laws in various countries, nonsmokers, particularly women and children, continue to be exposed to daily secondhand smoke (SHS), resulting in significant health risks. While existing studies have assessed the health effects of numerous diseases, the quantification of SHS spillovers remains understudied. This research employs choice experiments and contingent valuation techniques to rigorously quantify the attributes of SHS health risks, with a specific emphasis on facilitating cross-country comparisons. Our investigation reveals that nonsmoking individuals in the United Kingdom exhibit an attitude of indifference towards a proposed policy offering increased disposable income as compensation for SHS exposure. Conversely, nonsmoking Americans express a contrary perspective. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that nonsmoking Americans attribute a higher value to SHS health risks compared to their British counterparts. Consequently, this research uncovers a hitherto unexplored dimension of health risk-related behaviors. These findings hold the potential to significantly contribute to the development of future smoke-free policies, offering valuable insights that can inform policy decisions and address the persistent challenges associated with SHS exposure, particularly among vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanya Nduka
- Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farabi H, Moradi N, Ahmadzadeh A, Agamir SMK, Mohammadi A, Rezapour A. Factor associated with willingness to pay for prevention of cancer: a study of prostate cancer screening. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2023; 21:89. [PMID: 37990328 PMCID: PMC10664311 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00494-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigates Iranian men's willingness to pay (WTP) for prostate cancer (PCa) screening and influencing factor, along with the impact of information. METHOD We assessed preferences for prostate cancer screening in 771 Iranian men aged 40 and above using an internet-based questionnaire survey. Participants received basic and complementary information, and their willingness to pay was determined through a payment card approach. A Wilcoxon test assessed the impact of information. We also analyzed prostate cancer screening demand and employed Heckman's two-step model to evaluate factors influencing the willingness to pay. Additionally, reasons for unwillingness to pay were explored. RESULTS Willingness to pay significantly decreased with complementary information relative to basic information (16.3$ vs 17.8$). Heckman model, using WTP based on basic information shows age, education, and monthly household expenditure positively influenced the decision to pay. In contrast, health status, expectations of remaining life and prostate problems history positively affect amount of WTP for PCa screening, and insurance coverage has a negative impact on it. Majority of respondents (91%) supported PCa screening, with 82% expressing a willingness to pay. Common reasons for not paying include seeing screening as a public good (43%), financial constraints (35%), and having insurance (20%). The screening demand is price-sensitive. CONCLUSION The basic mindset of Iranian men exaggerates the risk of prostate cancer. Reduced willingness to pay after receiving information reassures the reliability of their financial expectation. Taking into account the factors that influence PCa screening is essential for accurate planning and the successful implementation of this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiro Farabi
- Barts and the London Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Najmeh Moradi
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Abdolreza Mohammadi
- Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aziz Rezapour
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roy Chowdhury S, Bohara AK. Preferences of cancer patients as a guide to cancer prevention: a retrospective willingness to pay study in Nepal. Public Health 2023; 214:42-49. [PMID: 36495725 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In developing countries, like Nepal, with no population-based cancer registry and low level of awareness, it is difficult to communicate the significance of cancer preventative measures to the general population. Only patients, who have faced or facing the economic and mental burden of cancer, can better understand the importance of early diagnosis. This led us to study the retrospective preference of cancer patients in valuing an annual comprehensive cancer screening program in Nepal. STUDY DESIGN This is a primary survey-based study of 600 diagnosed cancer patients (aged 18+ years) randomly sampled from five hospitals of Nepal during December 2015-February 2016. METHODS Using the contingent valuation estimation methods, we modelled patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for early cancer screening through the Structural Equation Modelling framework. RESULTS About 59% of our sampled patients did not receive education and 65% earned below $100/month. Among other findings, we saw that the Risk of re-occurrence impacted WTP through two opposing channels. The direct effect of Risk of re-occurrence on WTP was positive (β = 0.20; p < 0.05), but higher the risk of cancer relapses, the higher was the Pessimism among patients, which indirectly impacted WTP negatively (β = -0.16; p < 0.1). In addition, we found the effect of Income on WTP to be positive (β = 0.15; p < 0.05), whereas, one belonging to the backward Dalit section of the society had lower WTP for screening. CONCLUSION Cancer patients value the importance of early diagnosis with multiple psychosocial factors impacting this preference. This direct account of patients could be used as evidence in policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A K Bohara
- Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steigenberger C, Flatscher-Thoeni M, Siebert U, Leiter AM. Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:1455-1482. [PMID: 35166973 PMCID: PMC8853086 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection. METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains. RESULTS We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information. CONCLUSION Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Steigenberger
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Division of Health Technology Assessment, ONCOTYROL, Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Health Decision Science, Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea M Leiter
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang Q, Ren D, Chang X, Sun C, Liu R, Wang J, Zhang N. Willingness to pay for packaging cancer screening of Chinese rural residents. Cancer Med 2022; 12:3532-3542. [PMID: 36000818 PMCID: PMC9939105 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined the acceptance and willingness to pay (WTP) of rural residents toward packaging cancer screening (PCS) to provide a reference basis for promoting the screening sustainable development. METHODS A face-to-face questionnaire survey was conducted among rural residents aged 40-69. The combination of double-bounded dichotomous choices and open-ended questions in the Contingent Valuation Method was used to guide participants' WTP. Logistic regression was used to explore the influencing factors of participants' screening acceptance, and Tobit model was used to analyze the associated factors of WTP. RESULTS Of the 959 respondents, 89.36% were willing to accept PCS, but 10.64% stated unwillingness for the dominant reason that they did not attend clinics until symptom onset. Willingness to accept screening was significantly associated with region (Dongchangfu, OR = 0.251, 95%CI: 0.113~0.557; Linqu, OR = 0.150, 95%CI: 0.069~0.325), age with 60-69 (OR = 0.321, 95%CI: 0.126~0.816), annual income with 10,000-30,000 (OR = 1.632, 95%CI: 1.003~2.656) and having cancer-screening experience (OR = 0.581, 95%CI: 0.371~0.909). And 57.66% of participants were willing to pay part of the screening cost among those willing to accept PCS. The residents' average WTP was ¥622, accounting for 20.73% of the total cost (¥3000). Willingness to pay for PCS was positively correlated with male gender, self-employed occupation, residence in Feicheng (than Linqu), higher income, and having cancer-screening experience. CONCLUSIONS Most rural residents were willing to accept free PCS, more than half of them were willing to pay part of the ¥3000 total cost, but their WTP-values were low. It is necessary to carry out PCS publicity activities to improve public awareness and participation in precancerous screening. Additionally, for expanding the coverage and sustainability of screening, the appropriate proportion of rural residents to pay for screening costs should be controlled at about 20%, and governments, insurance and other sources are encouraged to actively participate to cover the remaining costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianqian Zhang
- School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina
| | - Deyu Ren
- School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina,Center for Cancer Control and Policy Research (CCPR)Shandong UniversityJinanChina,NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University)JinanChina
| | - Xuan Chang
- Department of PublicityShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical UniversityJinanChina
| | - Chen Sun
- School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina,NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University)JinanChina
| | - Ruyue Liu
- School of Public HealthWeifang Medical UniversityWeifangChina
| | - Jialin Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteShandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinanChina
| | - Nan Zhang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteShandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinanChina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han KT, Kim W, Kim S. Disparities in healthcare expenditures according to economic status in cancer patients undergoing end-of-life care. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:303. [PMID: 35317774 PMCID: PMC8939210 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09373-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds A desire for better outcome influences cancer patients’ willingness to pay. Whilst cancer-related costs are known to have a u-shaped distribution, the actual level of healthcare utilized by patients may vary depending on income and ability to pay. This study examined patterns of healthcare expenditures in the last year of life in patients with gastric, colorectal, lung, and liver cancer and analyzed whether differences exist in the level of end-of-life costs for cancer care according to economic status. Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study which used data from the Korean National Elderly Sampled Cohort, 2002 to 2015. End-of-life was defined as 1 year before death. Economic status was classified into three categorical variables according to the level of insurance premium (quantiles). The relationship between the dependent and independent variables were analyzed using multiple gamma regression based on the generalized estimated equation (GEE) model. Results This study included 3083 cancer patients, in which total healthcare expenditure was highest in the high-income group. End-of-life costs increased the most in the last 3 months of life. Compared to individuals in the ‘middle’ economic status group, those in the ‘high’ economic status group (RR 1.095, 95% CI 1.044–1.149) were likely to spend higher amounts. The percentage of individuals visiting a general hospital was highest in the ‘high’ economic status group, followed by the ‘middle’ and ‘low’ economic status groups. Conclusion Healthcare costs for cancer care increased at end-of-life in Korea. Patients of higher economic status tended to spender higher amounts of end-of-life costs for cancer care. Further in-depth studies are needed considering that end-of-life medical costs constitute a large proportion of overall expenditures. This study offers insight by showing that expenditures for cancer care tend to increase noticeably in the last 3 months of life and that differences exist in the amount spent according economic status. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09373-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Tae Han
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Woorim Kim
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungju Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohammadi B, Goudarzi R, Amiresmaili M, Barouni M. Willingness to pay for complementary health insurance in Iran: Contingent valuation approach. Int J Health Plann Manage 2022; 37:1816-1826. [PMID: 35194840 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Iranian health system is based on social health insurance, which is responsible for providing access to basic health care. In addition to basic treatment insurance, complementary health insurance (CHI) offers introductory packages that include surplus services. We recently observed an increase in Iran's health insurance loss coefficient, from 16.5% to 90.4% in 2017. AIM To determine the willingness to pay (WTP) for (CHI). METHODS We attempted to determine the WTP for CHI in this study to understand better the potential market and the factors that influence CHI demand. The study surveyed 1023 households in the Kerman Province. A questionnaire developed by the researcher was used in this study, based on the principles of contingent valuation and the bidding game method principles. In each scenario, the factors affecting people's WTP, the demand function, and the effective factors on demand were determined using linear multivariate regression using the ordinary least squares method. FINDINGS The average WTP was $ 7.01, $ 12.57, $ 16.19, and $ 18.73 for the first to fourth scenarios, respectively. The demand elasticity for health insurance increased from the first to the fourth scenario, indicating that demand is expandable. On the other hand, it was observed that risk aversion dictates the demand for CHI. CONCLUSION Contrary to the insurance claims theory, demand for CHI did not reverse. To this end, insurance fund policymakers can avoid risks and high financial costs by identifying risk-averse individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behzad Mohammadi
- Non Communicable Diseases Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran
| | - Reza Goudarzi
- Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Amiresmaili
- Research Center for Health Services Administration, Institute of Future Studies in Health, Health Services Administration, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohsen Barouni
- Research Center for Health Services Administration, Institute of Future Studies in Health, Health Services Administration, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evaluating the Social Cost of Conflict between New Media and Society: The Case of Gaming Disorder in South Korea. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13148106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Historically, the introduction of a new media in mass market caused a strong conflict starting from the nineteenth century popular literature, comics, rock music and film. Interestingly, these conflicts have shown similar and repeated patterns, which is now called media panic and moral regulation, and games are following this pattern. In 2019, Gaming disorder (GD) was decided to be included in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), and similar conflicts on games arenow expected. However, the social cost and damage have not been fully addressed until now. Thus, this study focuses on the estimation of the social cost induced by GD for policy design and decisions in the public healthcare of South Korea. Using the contingent valuation method, a popular valuation method in econometrics for non-market goods, this study has tried to estimate the social cost induced by the introduction of GD into the public healthcare practice. Focusing on a false positive problem in the diagnosis, this study estimates that the willingness to pay for GD diagnosis for children is about KRW 152 K (USD 135). Considering the difference between the prevalence of GD (1.9%) and GD suspicion rate of children in the respondents (12.54%), the excessive medical diagnosis cost due to the false positive problem is estimated to KRW 101 billion (USD 89.6 M), which is about four times more than the annual medical cost for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) treatment in South Korea. Thus, strong scientific proof and a cautious policy approach on GD are needed before the inclusion of GD in the public health practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Regulation and Consumer Interest in an Antioxidant-Enriched Ham Associated with Reduced Colorectal Cancer Risks. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13051542. [PMID: 34063614 PMCID: PMC8147652 DOI: 10.3390/nu13051542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
An economic experiment was conducted in France in 2020 to evaluate consumer attitudes toward two ham products associated with different colorectal cancer risks. We focused specifically on comparing a conventional ham and a new hypothetical antioxidant-enriched ham with a reduced risk of provoking colorectal cancer. Study participants were given descriptions of the two hams before carrying out successive rounds of willingness-to-pay (WTP) assessments. The results show that WTP was higher for the antioxidant-enriched ham than for the conventional ham. WTP estimates were also impacted by providing additional information about the reduction in colorectal cancer risk associated with the antioxidant-enriched ham. Based on the participants' WTP, we came up with ex ante estimates for the social impacts of introducing the antioxidant-enriched ham onto the market, and we suggest that it would be socially optimal to promote the product. Competition arising from pre-existing product labelling and marketing assertions could greatly limit the market potential of antioxidant-enriched ham, which suggests that alternative approaches may be necessary, such as regulations mandating antioxidant enrichment. These results also concern all countries with high levels of meat consumption.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ashburn A, Pickering R, McIntosh E, Hulbert S, Rochester L, Roberts HC, Nieuwboer A, Kunkel D, Goodwin VA, Lamb SE, Ballinger C, Seymour KC. Exercise- and strategy-based physiotherapy-delivered intervention for preventing repeat falls in people with Parkinson's: the PDSAFE RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-150. [PMID: 31339100 DOI: 10.3310/hta23360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with Parkinson's disease are twice as likely to experience a fall as a healthy older person, often leading to debilitating effects on confidence, activity levels and quality of life. OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of a physiotherapy programme for fall prevention among people with Parkinson's disease. DESIGN A multicentre, pragmatic, investigator-masked, individually randomised controlled trial (RCT) with prespecified subgroup analyses. SETTING Recruitment from NHS hospitals and clinics and community and social services in eight English regions with home-based interventions. PARTICIPANTS A total of 474 people with Parkinson's disease (i.e. Hoehn and Yahr scale stages 1-4) were recruited: 238 were assigned to a physiotherapy programme and 236 were assigned to usual care. Random allocation was 50 : 50. INTERVENTIONS All participants received routine care; the usual-care group received an information digital versatile disc (DVD) and a single advice session at trial completion. The intervention group had an individually tailored, progressive, home-based fall avoidance strategy training programme with balance and strengthening exercises: PDSAFE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the risk of repeat falling, collected by self-report monthly diaries between 0 and 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included near-falls, falls efficacy, freezing of gait (FoG), health-related quality of life, and measurements taken using the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), the Chair Stand Test (CST), the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire. RESULTS PDSAFE is the largest RCT of falls management among people with Parkinson's disease: 541 patients were screened for eligibility. The average age was 72 years, and 266 out of 474 (56%) participants were men. Of the 474 randomised participants, 238 were randomised to the intervention group and 236 were randomised to the control group. No difference in repeat falling within 6 months of randomisation was found [PDSAFE group to control group odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.98; p = 0.447]. An analysis of secondary outcomes demonstrated better balance (Mini-BESTest: mean difference 0.95, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.67; p = 0.009), functional strength (CST: p = 0.041) and falls efficacy (Falls Efficacy Scale - International: mean difference 1.6, 95% CI -3.0 to -0.19; p = 0.026) with near-falling significantly reduced with PDSAFE (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.86; p = 0.001) at 6 months. Prespecified subgroup analysis (i.e. disease severity and FoG) revealed a PDSAFE differing effect; the intervention may be of benefit for people with moderate disease but may increase falling for those in the more severe category, especially those with FoG. LIMITATIONS All participants were assessed at primary outcome; only 73% were assessed at 12 months owing to restricted funding. CONCLUSIONS PDSAFE was not effective in reducing repeat falling across the range of people with Parkinson's disease in the trial. Secondary analysis demonstrated that other functional tasks and self-efficacy improved and demonstrated differential patterns of intervention impact in accordance with disease severity and FoG, which supports previous secondary research findings and merits further primary evaluation. FUTURE WORK Further trials of falls prevention on targeted groups of people with Parkinson's disease are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN48152791. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 36. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Sarah E Lamb is funded by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and CLAHRC Oxford. Victoria A Goodwin is supported by the NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care in the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC). Lynn Rochester is supported by the NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre based at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University. The research was also supported by the NIHR Newcastle Clinical Research Facility Infrastructure funding. Helen C Roberts is supported by CLAHRC Wessex and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Ashburn
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruth Pickering
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Emma McIntosh
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sophia Hulbert
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lynn Rochester
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen C Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alice Nieuwboer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dorit Kunkel
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Sarah E Lamb
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Ballinger
- Wessex Public Involvement Network (PIN), University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou Q, Li Y, Liu HZ, Liang YR, Lin GZ. Willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening in Guangzhou. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:4708-4715. [PMID: 30416318 PMCID: PMC6224470 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 09/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To measure the willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening in Guangzhou, and to identify those factors associated with it. METHODS A face-to-face questionnaire survey for pre-screening population from free and non-free colonoscopy districts was used to collect information on demographic characteristics, health behaviours, the intention of the cancer screenings and willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening. A total of 1243 participants who took part in the pre-screening for colorectal cancer in Guangzhou were collected in the study. Categorical data were compared using the χ2 test to analyse significant differences. Non-conditional logistic regression and multi-class logistic regression were also performed for multivariate analysis and to estimate the odds ratios. RESULTS The percentage of participants willing to pay for colorectal cancer screening was 91.7%. "Unnecessary" was the dominant reason that participants gave for their unwillingness, accounting for 63.1%. Of those who were willing to pay, 29.2%, 20.7%, 14.8%, 13.0% and 22.4% of participants were willing to pay less than \100, \100-\199, \200-299, \300-\399 and more than \400, respectively. Non-logistic regression analysis showed that respondents who were male, had a high level of education, were from the family with more children/older to raise, and accepted colorectal cancer screening were willing to pay for this screening. Multi-class logistic regression analysis showed that respondents with higher annual household income per capita, from government and private enterprises, government agency/institution and peasants, and less family medical expenditure were willing to pay more. CONCLUSION Willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening in Guangzhou is high, but the amount of willing to pay is not much.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Zhou
- Department of Non-communicable Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Non-communicable Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hua-Zhang Liu
- Department of Non-communicable Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying-Ru Liang
- Department of Non-communicable Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Guo-Zhen Lin
- Department of Non-communicable Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee SJ, O'Leary MC, Umble KE, Wheeler SB. Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:2267-2282. [PMID: 30464417 PMCID: PMC6216965 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s156552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient preferences are important to consider in the decision-making process for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Vulnerable populations, such as racial/ethnic minorities and low-income, veteran, and rural populations, exhibit lower screening uptake. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on vulnerable patient populations' preferences regarding CRC screening. METHODS We searched the CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2017. We screened studies for eligibility and systematically abstracted and compared study designs and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 43 articles met the inclusion criteria, out of 2,106 articles found in our search. These 43 articles were organized by the primary sub-population(s) whose preferences were reported: 27 report on preferences among racial/ethnic minorities, eight among low-income groups, six among veterans, and two among rural populations. The majority of studies (n=34) focused on preferences related to test modality. No single test modality was overwhelmingly supported by all sub-populations, although veterans seemed to prefer colonoscopy. Test attributes such as accuracy, sensitivity, cost, and convenience were also noted as important features. Furthermore, a preference for shared decision-making between vulnerable patients and providers was found. CONCLUSION The heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcomes of the selected studies revealed a wide spectrum of CRC screening preferences within vulnerable populations. More decision aids and discrete choice experiments that focus on vulnerable populations are needed to gain a more nuanced understanding of how vulnerable populations weigh particular features of screening methods. Improved CRC screening rates may be achieved through the alignment of vulnerable populations' preferences with screening program design and provider practices. Collaborative decision-making between providers and vulnerable patients in preventive care decisions may also be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Lee
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
| | - Meghan C O'Leary
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
| | - Karl E Umble
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clarke EV, Schneider JL, Lynch F, Kauffman TL, Leo MC, Rosales AG, Dickerson JF, Shuster E, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200139. [PMID: 30020962 PMCID: PMC6051630 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Expanded carrier screening can provide risk information for numerous conditions. Understanding how individuals undergoing preconception expanded carrier screening value this information is important. The NextGen study evaluated the use of genome sequencing for expanded carrier screening and reporting secondary findings, and we measured participants’ willingness to pay for this approach to understand how it is valued by women and couples planning a pregnancy. Methods We assessed 277 participants’ willingness to pay for genome sequencing reporting carrier results for 728 gene/condition pairs and results for 121 secondary findings. We explored the association between attitudes and demographic factors and willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening using genome sequencing and conducted interviews with 58 of these participants to probe the reasoning behind their preferences. Results Most participants were willing to pay for expanded carrier screening using genome sequencing. Willingness to pay was associated with income level and religiosity, but not risk status for a condition in the carrier panel. Participants willing to pay nothing or a small amount cited issues around financial resources, whereas those willing to pay higher amounts were motivated by “peace of mind” from carrier results. Conclusion Women and couples planning a pregnancy value genome sequencing. The potentially high out-of-pocket cost of this service could result in healthcare disparities, since maximum amounts that participants were willing to pay were higher than a typical copay and related to income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth V. Clarke
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jennifer L. Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Frances Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Michael C. Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Ana G. Rosales
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - John F. Dickerson
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Trueman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saengow U, Birch S, Geater A, Chongsuwiwatvong V. Willingness to Pay for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Effect of Copayment in Southern Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:1727-1734. [PMID: 29938473 PMCID: PMC6103562 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.6.1727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in Thailand is increasing. Hence, the nationwide screening programme with copayment is being considered. There are two proposed screening alternatives: annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and once-in-10-year colonoscopy. A copayment for FIT is 60 Thai baht (THB) per test (≈ 1.7 USD); a copayment for colonoscopy is 2,300 THB per test (≈ 65.5 USD). Methods: The willingness to pay (WTP) technique, which is theoretically founded on a cost-benefit analysis, was used to assess an effect of copayment on the uptake. Subjects were patients aged 50-69 years without cancer or screening experience. WTP for the proposed tests was elicited. Results: Nearly two thirds of subjects were willing to pay for FIT. Less than half of subjects were willing to pay for colonoscopy. Among them, median WTP for both tests was greater than the proposed copayments. In a probit model, knowing CRC patient and presence of companion were associated with non-zero WTP for FIT. Presence of companion, female, and family history of cancer were associated with non-zero WTP for colonoscopy. After adjustment for starting price in the linear model, marital status, drinking behavior, and risk attitude were associated with WTP. None of factors was significant for colonoscopy. Uptake decreased as levels of copayment increased. At proposed copayments, the uptake rates of 59.8% and 21.6% were estimated for colonoscopy and FIT respectively. The demand for FIT was price inelastic; the demand for colonoscopy was price elastic. Estimates of optimal copayment were 62.1 THB for FIT and 460.2 THB for colonoscopy. At the optimal copayment, uptake rates would be 59.8% for FIT and 42.3% for colonoscopy. Conclusion(s): More subjects were willing to pay for FIT than for colonoscopy (59.0% versus 46.5%). The estimated uptake rates were 59.8% and 21.6% for colonoscopy and FIT at the proposed copayments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udomsak Saengow
- Center of Excellence in Health System and Medical Research (CE-HSMR), Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.,School of Medicine, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Valuing a Lifestyle Intervention for Middle Eastern Immigrants at Risk of Diabetes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15030413. [PMID: 29495529 PMCID: PMC5876958 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15030413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Willingness-to-pay (WTP) techniques are increasingly being used in the healthcare sector for assessing the value of interventions. The objective of this study was to estimate WTP and its predictors in a randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle intervention exclusively targeting Middle Eastern immigrants living in Malmö, Sweden, who are at high risk of type 2 diabetes. We used the contingent valuation method to evaluate WTP. The questionnaire was designed following the payment-scale approach, and administered at the end of the trial, giving an ex-post perspective. We performed logistic regression and linear regression techniques to identify the factors associated with zero WTP value and positive WTP values. The intervention group had significantly higher average WTP than the control group (216 SEK vs. 127 SEK; p = 0.035; 1 U.S.$ = 8.52 SEK, 2015 price year) per month. The regression models demonstrated that being in the intervention group, acculturation, and self-employment were significant factors associated with positive WTP values. Male participants and lower-educated participants had a significantly higher likelihood of zero WTP. In this era of increased migration, our findings can help policy makers to take informed decisions to implement lifestyle interventions for immigrant populations.
Collapse
|
17
|
Soeteman L, van Exel J, Bobinac A. The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2017; 18:743-760. [PMID: 27623946 PMCID: PMC5486460 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0825-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The questionnaire format applied in a CV study represents the way in which the WTP estimates are obtained. Payment scales are often used in CV studies as the questionnaire format of choice. The study summarized here analyzes the impact of the design of two payment scales (PS) on the monetary value of QALY gains. The scales differed in terms of their end-points, mid points, and coarseness. We judged the performance of the two PS against several indicators: the average WTP per QALY estimates, post-estimation uncertainty levels, the existence of mid-point concentration, and the dependency on end-points. Our results show that PS design influences respondents' WTP values. The results also suggest that a more detailed scale with a more realistic range may help respondents to elicit values closer to their "true" WTP values, hence produce higher-quality outcomes. Further research and pretesting strategies are suggested to explore and minimize the effects of PS design on WTP estimates, which may ultimately increase the quality of WTP estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Soeteman
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, iBMG, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, iBMG, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ana Bobinac
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, iBMG, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparing the validity of the payment card and structured haggling willingness to pay methods: The case of a diabetes prevention program in rural Kenya. Soc Sci Med 2016; 169:86-96. [PMID: 27701019 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to compare the theoretical validity of two willingness-to-pay (WTP) methods, the commonly used payment card (PC) and the recently developed structured haggling (SH), for estimating the potential benefits of a diabetes prevention program in rural Kenya. METHODS A convenience sample of adult residents from a rural county in Kenya (Kiambu), with no history of diabetes, was randomly assigned to one of two WTP methods, PC or SH, using structured face-to-face interviews from December 2011 to February 2012. RESULTS A total of 376 respondents completed the interviews using PC (n = 185) or SH (n = 191). More than 95% of respondents were willing to pay something for program access. The study showed that both methods were feasible in rural Kenya. SH resulted in a higher annual mean WTP than PC, Ksh504.05 (US$7.25) versus Ksh619.95 (US$5.90), respectively (p < 0.01). Based on theory, it was hypothesized that certain predisposing factors would result in greater WTP. Greater socio-economic status (measured using income proxies) resulted in greater unconditional WTP for both the PC and SH groups (t-tests and bivariate correlations) and conditional WTP (GLM models). GLM for PC showed being male, employed and having distant relatives with diabetes were significant predictors for WTP, while for SH being educated, employed and owning a vehicle were significant predictors. CONCLUSION Both PC and SH showed theoretical validity in rural Kenya. However, the use of SH over PC in rural Kenya may be the better choice given that SH more closely mirrors marketplace transactions in this setting and the use of SH resulted in more significant variables in the GLM models.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hollinghurst S, Banks J, Bigwood L, Walter FM, Hamilton W, Peters TJ. Using willingness-to-pay to establish patient preferences for cancer testing in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16:105. [PMID: 27503337 PMCID: PMC4977833 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making is a stated aim of several healthcare systems. In the area of cancer, patients’ views have informed policy on screening and treatment but there is little information about their views on diagnostic testing in relation to symptom severity. Methods We used the technique of willingness-to-pay to determine public preferences around diagnostic testing for colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer in primary care in the UK. Participants were approached in general practice waiting rooms and asked to complete a two-stage electronic survey that described symptoms of cancer, the likelihood that the symptoms indicate cancer, and information about the appropriate diagnostic test. Part 1 asked for a binary response (yes/no) as to whether they would choose to have a test if it were offered. Part 2 elicited willingness-to-pay values of the tests using a payment scale followed by a bidding exercise, with the aim that these values would provide a strength of preference not detectable using the binary approach. Results A large majority of participants chose to be tested for all cancers, with only colonoscopy (colorectal cancer) demonstrating a risk gradient. In the willingness-to-pay exercise participants placed a lower value on an X-ray (lung cancer) than the tests for colorectal or pancreatic cancer and X-ray was the only test where risk was clearly related to the willingness-to-pay value. Conclusion Willingness-to-pay values did not enhance the binary responses in the way intended; participants appeared to be motivated differently when responding to the two parts of the questionnaire. More work is needed to understand how participants perceive risk in this context and how they respond to questions about willingness-to-pay. Qualitative methods could provide useful insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Hollinghurst
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Jonathan Banks
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lin Bigwood
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tim J Peters
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gupta JK, Daniels JP, Middleton LJ, Pattison HM, Prileszky G, Roberts TE, Sanghera S, Barton P, Gray R, Kai J. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia: the ECLIPSE trial. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:i-xxv, 1-118. [PMID: 26507206 DOI: 10.3310/hta19880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem, yet evidence to inform decisions about initial medical treatment is limited. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) (Mirena®, Bayer) compared with usual medical treatment, with exploration of women's perspectives on treatment. DESIGN A pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial with an economic evaluation and a longitudinal qualitative study. SETTING Women who presented in primary care. PARTICIPANTS A total of 571 women with HMB. A purposeful sample of 27 women who were randomised or ineligible owing to treatment preference participated in semistructured face-to-face interviews around 2 and 12 months after commencing treatment. INTERVENTIONS LNG-IUS or usual medical treatment (tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined oestrogen-progestogen or progesterone alone). Women could subsequently swap or cease their allocated treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the patient-reported score on the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale (MMAS) assessed over a 2-year period and then again at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included general quality of life (QoL), sexual activity, surgical intervention and safety. Data were analysed using iterative constant comparison. A state transition model-based cost-utility analysis was undertaken alongside the randomised trial. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were derived from the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Short Form questionnaire-6 Dimensions (SF-6D). The intention-to-treat analyses were reported as cost per QALY gained. Uncertainty was explored by conducting both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The MMAS total scores improved significantly in both groups at all time points, but were significantly greater for the LNG-IUS than for usual treatment [mean difference over 2 years was 13.4 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9 to 16.9 points; p < 0.001]. However, this difference between groups was reduced and no longer significant by 5 years (mean difference in scores 3.9 points, 95% CI -0.6 to 8.3 points; p = 0.09). By 5 years, only 47% of women had a LNG-IUS in place and 15% were still taking usual medical treatment. Five-year surgery rates were low, at 20%, and were similar, irrespective of initial treatments. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between groups. Using the EQ-5D, at 2 years, the relative cost-effectiveness of the LNG-IUS compared with usual medical treatment was £1600 per QALY, which by 5 years was reduced to £114 per QALY. Using the SF-6D, usual medical treatment dominates the LNG-IUS. The qualitative findings show that women's experiences and expectations of medical treatments for HMB vary considerably and change over time. Women had high expectations of a prompt effect from medical treatments. CONCLUSIONS The LNG-IUS, compared with usual medical therapies, resulted in greater improvement over 2 years in women's assessments of the effect of HMB on their daily routine, including work, social and family life, and psychological and physical well-being. At 5 years, the differences were no longer significant. A similar low proportion of women required surgical intervention in both groups. The LNG-IUS is cost-effective in both the short and medium term, using the method generally recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Using the alternative measures to value QoL will have a considerable impact on cost-effectiveness decisions. It will be important to explore the clinical and health-care trajectories of the ECLIPSE (clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia) trial participants to 10 years, by which time half of the cohort will have reached menopause. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86566246. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 88. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janesh K Gupta
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane P Daniels
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lee J Middleton
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen M Pattison
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gail Prileszky
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sabina Sanghera
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pelham Barton
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard Gray
- Clinical Trials Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joe Kai
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Greenspoon JN, Whitton A, Whelan T, Sharieff W, Wright J, Sussman J, Gafni A. Robotic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of 1–3 Brain Metastases: A Pragmatic Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Willingness-To-Pay. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2016; 12:517-23. [DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
With the emergence of radiosurgery as a new radiotherapeutic technique, health care decision makers are required to incorporate community need, cost and patient preferences when allocating radiosurgery resources. Conventional patient utility measures would not reflect short term preferences and would therefore not inform decision makers when allocating radiosurgery treatment units. The goal of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility of cost-benefit analysis to elicit the yearly net monetary benefit of robotic radiosurgery. To calculate the yearly incremental cost of robotic radiosurgery as compared to fixed gantry radiosurgery we used direct local cost data. We assumed a standard 10 year replacement and 5% amortization rate. Decision boards summarizing the clinical scenario of brain metastases and the difference between robotic and fixed gantry radiosurgery in terms of immobilization, comfort and treatment time were then presented to a sample of 18 participants. Participants who preferred robotic radiosurgery were randomly assigned to either a low ($1) or high ($5) starting point taxation based willingness-to-pay algorithm. The yearly incremental cost of providing robotic radiosurgery was $99,177 CAD. The mean community yearly willingness-to-pay for robotic radiosurgery was $2,300,000 CAD, ρ = 0.03. The calculated yearly net societal benefit for robotic radiosurgery was $2,200,823 CAD. Among participants who preferred robotic radiosurgery there was no evidence of starting point bias, ρ = 0.8. We have shown through this pilot study that it is feasible to perform cost-benefit analysis to evaluate new technologies in Radiation Oncology. Cost-benefit analysis offers an analytic method to evaluate local preferences and provide accountability when allocating limited healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Noah Greenspoon
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony Whitton
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Whelan
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Waseem Sharieff
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Wright
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Sussman
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amiram Gafni
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xu WY, Dowd B, Abraham J. Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2016; 17:203-215. [PMID: 25773049 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0672-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
We use the 1997-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and variation in the timing of state mandates for coverage of colorectal, cervical, and prostate cancer screenings to investigate the behavioral and financial effects of mandates on privately insured adults. We find that state mandates did not result in increased rates of cancer screening. However, coverage of preventive care, whether mandated or not, moves the cost of care from the consumer's out-of-pocket expense to the premium, resulting in a cross-subsidy of users of the service by non-users. While some cross-subsidies are intentional, others may be unintentional. We find that users of cancer screening have higher levels of income and education, while non-users tend to be racial minorities, lack a usual source of care, and live in communities with fewer physicians per capita. These results suggest that coverage of preventive care may transfer resources from more advantaged individuals to less advantaged individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Yi Xu
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Bryan Dowd
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jean Abraham
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Xu WY, Dowd B. Lessons from Medicare coverage of colonoscopy and prostate-specific antigen test. Med Care Res Rev 2015; 72:3-24. [PMID: 25552266 DOI: 10.1177/1077558714563176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Under the 1997 Balanced Budget Act, Medicare expanded coverage of colonoscopy and prostate-specific antigen tests from diagnostic and surveillance tests to preventive screenings. The preventive tests now are covered with no deductibles or copayments. Reducing out-of-pocket costs increases premiums, resulting in a subsidy to beneficiaries who use the service by nonusers, and by taxpayers who shoulder the bulk of Medicare's costs. Using Medicare fee-for-service claims and the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we estimate the behavioral and financial consequences of these Balanced Budget Act coverage expansions. We find that fee-for-service Medicare-covered colonoscopies increased by 3.5 percentage points after the coverage expansion, and prostate-specific antigen tests increased by 6.8 percentage points. Beneficiaries with lower incomes, less education, and those lacking a usual source of care or supplemental insurance were less likely to use these tests. Therefore, they generally received much smaller net benefits from the coverage of colonoscopies than more advantaged beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bryan Dowd
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kistler CE, Hess TM, Howard K, Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Hawley ST, Brenner AT, Ward KT, Lewis CL. Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9. [PMID: 26203233 PMCID: PMC4508065 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s82203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding which attributes of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests drive older adults' test preferences and choices may help improve decision making surrounding CRC screening in older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS To explore older adults' preferences for CRC-screening test attributes and screening tests, we conducted a survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a directly selected preferred attribute question, and an unlabeled screening test-choice question in 116 cognitively intact adults aged 70-90 years, without a history of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease. Each participant answered ten discrete choice questions presenting two hypothetical tests comprised of four attributes: testing procedure, mortality reduction, test frequency, and complications. DCE responses were used to estimate each participant's most important attribute and to simulate their preferred test among three existing CRC-screening tests. For each individual, we compared the DCE-derived attributes to directly selected attributes, and the DCE-derived preferred test to a directly selected unlabeled test. RESULTS Older adults do not overwhelmingly value any one CRC-screening test attribute or prefer one type of CRC-screening test over other tests. However, small absolute DCE-derived preferences for the testing procedure attribute and for sigmoidoscopy-equivalent screening tests were revealed. Neither general health, functional, nor cognitive health status were associated with either an individual's most important attribute or most preferred test choice. The DCE-derived most important attribute was associated with each participant's directly selected unlabeled test choice. CONCLUSION Older adults' preferences for CRC-screening tests are not easily predicted. Medical providers should actively explore older adults' preferences for CRC screening, so that they can order a screening test that is concordant with their patients' values. Effective interventions are needed to support complex decision making surrounding CRC screening in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Kistler
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Correspondence: Christine E Kistler, Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive – CB 7595, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA, Tel +1 919 395 8621, Fax +1 919 966 6126, Email
| | - Thomas M Hess
- Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael P Pignone
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trisha M Crutchfield
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly T Ward
- Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Carmen L Lewis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2014; 7:271-82. [PMID: 24652475 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0054-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well established that screening is effective in reducing the incidence and mortality associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). National screening programs have been implemented in many countries; however, uptake remains an issue. Understanding patient preferences may assist in shaping screening programs and tailoring information about screening tests. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to undertake a systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) of CRC screening. METHODS A systematic review of DCEs of CRC screening was undertaken in an average-risk general population. The methodological qualities of the studies were assessed using a standard checklist outlining best practice for conjoint studies. RESULTS Nine studies met the selection criteria. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the data and methods. However, in eight studies, attributes describing accuracy and/or clinical effectiveness were reported to be statistically significant. We also found that individuals were willing to trade-off other attributes such as an increased risk of complications to gain greater clinical benefits. Screening was also preferred to non-screening by the majority of respondents, regardless of the test used. CONCLUSIONS Understanding and incorporating individuals' preferences in decision making is increasingly considered essential in the health field. Data from DCEs can provide valuable insights into the trade-offs individuals are willing to undertake in respect to CRC screening. Such insights can be used by decision makers to identify screening tests that could maximize informed uptake. It is likely that, with better reporting and evolving methodology, the contribution that DCEs can make to such debates will increase.
Collapse
|
26
|
Turgeon DK, Ruffin MT. Screening strategies for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic adults. Prim Care 2014; 41:331-53. [PMID: 24830611 DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2014.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an update for the primary care community on the evidence and recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in the adult population without symptoms at average and increased risk, excluding patients with high-risk genetic syndromes. The current and possible new screening strategies are reviewed, along with clinical wisdom related to the implementation of each method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kim Turgeon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Mack T Ruffin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jimbo M, Kelly-Blake K, Sen A, Hawley ST, Ruffin MT. Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:381. [PMID: 24216139 PMCID: PMC3842677 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians face challenges in promoting colorectal cancer screening due to multiple competing demands. A decision aid that clarifies patient preferences and improves decision quality can aid shared decision making and be effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. However, exactly how such an intervention improves shared decision making is unclear. This study, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to provide detailed understanding of how an interactive decision aid that elicits patient's risks and preferences impacts patient-clinician communication and shared decision making, and ultimately colorectal cancer screening adherence. METHODS/DESIGN This is a two-armed single-blinded randomized controlled trial with the target of 300 patients per arm. The setting is eleven community and three academic primary care practices in Metro Detroit. Patients are men and women aged between 50 and 75 years who are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening. ColoDATES Web (intervention arm), a decision aid that incorporates interactive personal risk assessment and preference clarification tools, is compared to a non-interactive website that matches ColoDATES Web in content but does not contain interactive tools (control arm). Primary outcomes are patient uptake of colorectal cancer screening; patient decision quality (knowledge, preference clarification, intent); clinician's degree of shared decision making; and patient-clinician concordance in the screening test chosen. Secondary outcome incorporates a Structural Equation Modeling approach to understand the mechanism of the causal pathway and test the validity of the proposed conceptual model based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Clinicians and those performing the analysis are blinded to arms. DISCUSSION The central hypothesis is that ColoDATES Web will improve colorectal cancer screening adherence through improvement in patient behavioral factors, shared decision making between the patient and the clinician, and concordance between the patient's and clinician's preferred colorectal cancer screening test. The results of this study will be among the first to examine the effect of a real-time preference assessment exercise on colorectal cancer screening and mediators, and, in doing so, will shed light on the patient-clinician communication and shared decision making 'black box' that currently exists between the delivery of decision aids to patients and subsequent patient behavior. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01514786.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahito Jimbo
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Karen Kelly-Blake
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Ananda Sen
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mack T Ruffin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sanghera S, Frew E, Kai J, Gupta J, Elizabeth Roberts T. An assessment of economic measures used in menorrhagia: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2013; 98:149-53. [PMID: 24331893 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2012] [Revised: 08/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
'Menorrhagia', or heavy menstrual bleeding, is a common problem affecting women. The principal driver for treatment is women's experience of its interference in their lives, so a measure of quality of life (QoL) is increasingly used as the primary outcome to assess treatment success. QoL measures need to accurately reflect women's concerns as these measures are often used to inform resource allocation decisions within the healthcare service. Healthcare decision-makers often advocate the use of generic measures so as to achieve consistency when making decisions. Generic measures, by definition, have a broad focus on QoL in contrast to disease-specific measures that focus on dimensions of health relevant to the condition. We report a systematic review of studies that have either used or assessed economic outcome measures in menorrhagia, and present criteria for assessing which measure is the most appropriate. Studies including women presenting with menorrhagia, and using or assessing economic measures were sought by searching nine electronic databases. Fifty-six eligible studies were identified. A narrative synthesis was most suitable to the review question. Eleven studies assessed the psychometric properties of the outcome measures, twelve studies applied the measures in an economic evaluation, and thirty-three used them in effectiveness studies. Mixed results on the psychometric properties of the instruments were observed. Studies were often found to include both a disease-specific and a generic measure. We found no consensus on the most appropriate economic outcome measure to use when assessing the cost-effectiveness of treatment for menorrhagia. This is an important finding as QoL is the primary focus for treatment decisions. The cyclical nature of the condition has a large impact on the reliability and validity of outcome measurement. Alternative measures, such as willingness-to-pay, which embrace more than health and avoid standard recall periods should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Sanghera
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health & Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health & Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Joe Kai
- University of Nottingham, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Janesh Gupta
- Birmingham Women's Foundation NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Tracy Elizabeth Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health & Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lin PJ, Cangelosi MJ, Lee DW, Neumann PJ. Willingness to pay for diagnostic technologies: a review of the contingent valuation literature. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2013; 16:797-805. [PMID: 23947973 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand how people value information from diagnostic technologies, we reviewed and analyzed published willingness-to-pay (WTP) studies on the topic. METHODS We searched PubMed for English-language articles related to WTP for diagnostic laboratory tests published from 1985 through 2011. We characterized methodological differences across studies, examined individual- and technology-level factors associated with WTP, and summarized median WTP values across different diagnostic tests. RESULTS We identified 66 relevant WTP studies. Half focused on oncology, while others analyzed infectious diseases (n = 11, 16.1%) and obstetric or gynecological conditions (n = 8, 11.7%), among others. Most laboratory tests included in studies were biological samples/genetic testing (n = 44, 61.1%) or imaging tests (n = 23, 31.9%). Approximately one third of the analyses (n = 20, 30.3%) used discrete-choice questions to elicit WTP values. Higher income, education, disease severity, perceived disease risk, family history, and more accurate tests were in general associated with higher WTP values for diagnostic information. Of the 44 studies with median WTP values available, most reported a median WTP value below $100. The median WTP value for colon or colorectal cancer screening ranged from below $100 to over $1000. CONCLUSIONS The contingent valuation literature in diagnostics has grown rapidly, and suggests that many respondents place considerable value on diagnostic information. There exists, however, great variation in studies with respect to the type of technologies and diseases assessed, respondent characteristics, and study methodology. The perceived value of diagnostic technologies is also influenced by the study design and elicitation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heredia-Pi IB, Servan-Mori E, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Bautista-Arredondo S. The maximum willingness to pay for smoking cessation method among adult smokers in Mexico. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2012; 15:750-758. [PMID: 22867786 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.1384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2011] [Revised: 02/24/2012] [Accepted: 03/17/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for an effective smoking cessation treatment among smokers in Mexico and to identify the environmental, demographic, and socioeconomic factors associated with the WTP. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample contained 777 smokers (willingness to quit using a WTP of >0) who had responded to the 2009 Global Adult Tobacco Survey conducted in Mexico. Statistical associations and descriptive analyses were conducted to describe smokers and their WTP by using tobacco-related environmental, socioeconomic, and demographic variables. RESULTS Overall, 74.4% of the smokers were men and 51.4% were daily smokers. On average, the smokers had been consuming tobacco for more than 15 years, 58.6% had made cessation attempts in the past, and around 10.0% knew about the existence of centers to aid in smoking cessation. The average WTP for an effective cessation method was US $191. Among men, the WTP was US $152 lower than among women. In all the estimated models, the higher an individual's education and socioeconomic level, the higher his or her WTP. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that Mexican smokers interested in quitting smoking attribute a high monetary value to an effective cessation method. Male smokers demonstrated less altruistic behavior than did female smokers. Mexico requires the implementation of more policies designed to support smoking cessation and to limit tobacco addiction. Expanding the availability of cessation programs and access to pharmacological treatments may contribute to reaching universal coverage by integrating new pharmacological alternatives into the health sector's medicine formulary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ileana B Heredia-Pi
- Centre for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Li C, Zeliadt SB, Hall IJ, Smith JL, Ekwueme DU, Moinpour CM, Penson DF, Thompson IM, Keane TE, Ramsey SD. Willingness to pay for prostate cancer treatment among patients and their family members at 1 year after diagnosis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2012; 15:716-23. [PMID: 22867781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2011] [Revised: 02/06/2012] [Accepted: 03/01/2012] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore an alternative approach to quantifying the burden of side effects at 1 year after treatment for prostate cancer among both patients and their partners. METHODS We analyzed data from 75 couples in the Family and Cancer Therapy Selection study. Paired patients and family members were independently asked about their willingness to pay (WTP) for a hypothetical new treatment that cures prostate cancer without side effects if they could reconsider their treatment decision by indicating the maximum amount they would be willing to pay given 11 separate "bids" ranging from $0 to $1500 per month. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted for patients and family members controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status; Spearman correlations were also examined. RESULTS Among 75 couples analyzed, the income-adjusted mean WTP estimates per month were $400.8 (standard error [SE] $54.3) for patients and $650.2 (SE 72.2) for family members. The WTP between patients and family members was correlated (Pearson ρ 0.30; P = 0.01). After adjusting for covariates, the adjusted mean WTP per month was $588.1 (SE 65.77) for patients and $819.4 (SE 74.33) for family members. Wanting to avoid side effects at baseline predicted higher WTP for patients (P = 0.010). Experiencing sexual side effects was predictive of higher WTP for family members (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS Fairly high WTP amounts for a hypothetical treatment without side effects suggests that patients and their partners are experiencing important burdens 1 year after treatment. The higher amounts partners are willing to pay and the correlation with sexual side effects suggest that they are perceptive of significant treatment burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyu Li
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singer S, Meyer A, Fuchs M, Schock J, Pabst F, Vogel HJ, Oeken J, Sandner A, Koscielny S, Hormes K, Breitenstein K, Dietz A. Motivation as a predictor of speech intelligibility after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 2012; 35:836-46. [PMID: 22733689 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has often been argued that if patients' success with speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy is limited, it is the result of lacking motivation on their part. This project investigated the role of motivation in speech rehabilitation. METHODS In a multicenter prospective cohort study, 141 laryngectomees were interviewed at the beginning of rehabilitation and 1 year after laryngectomy. Speech intelligibility was measured with a standardized test, and patients self-assessed their own motivation shortly after the surgery. Logistic regression, adjusted for several theory-based confounding factors, was used to assess the impact of motivation on speech intelligibility. RESULTS Speech intelligibility 1 year after laryngectomy was not significantly associated with the level of motivation at the beginning of rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.3; p = .43) after adjusting for the effect of potential confounders (implantation of a voice prosthesis, patient's cognitive abilities, frustration tolerance, physical functioning, and type of rehabilitation). CONCLUSIONS Motivation is not a strong predictor of speech intelligibility 1 year after laryngectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Singer
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Hammitt JK, Concannon TW, Auerbach HR, Fang C, Kent DM. Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2012; 21:238-51. [PMID: 22271512 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2010] [Revised: 10/27/2010] [Accepted: 11/23/2010] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
We assessed how much, if anything, people would pay for a laboratory test that predicted their future disease status. A questionnaire was administered via an internet-based survey to a random sample of adult US respondents. Each respondent answered questions about two different scenarios, each of which specified: one of four randomly selected diseases (Alzheimer's, arthritis, breast cancer, or prostate cancer); an ex ante risk of developing the disease (randomly designated 10 or 25%); and test accuracy (randomly designated perfect or 'not perfectly accurate'). Willingness-to-pay (WTP) was elicited with a double-bounded, dichotomous-choice approach. Of 1463 respondents who completed the survey, most (70-88%, depending on the scenario) were inclined to take the test. Inclination to take the test was lower for Alzheimer's and higher for prostate cancer compared with arthritis, and rose somewhat with disease prevalence and for the perfect versus imperfect test [Correction made here after initial online publication.]. Median WTP varied from $109 for the imperfect arthritis test to $263 for the perfect prostate cancer test. Respondents' preferences for predictive testing, even in the absence of direct treatment consequences, reflected health and non-health related factors, and suggests that conventional cost-effectiveness analyses may underestimate the value of testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Holubar SD, Chatterjee A, Finlayson SR. Cost-Based Comparative-Effectiveness Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2011. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2011.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
35
|
Terashita T, Muto H, Nakamura T, Ogasawara K, Maezawa M. Willingness to pay for municipality hospital services in rural Japan: a contingent valuation study. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4:177. [PMID: 21645419 PMCID: PMC3130668 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2010] [Accepted: 06/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Japanese healthcare system has undergone reforms to address the struggles that municipality hospitals face. Reform guidelines clearly define criteria for administrative improvement. However, criteria to evaluate the demand for healthcare provisions in rural Japan, including the needs of rural residents for municipality hospitals in particular have not been specified. The purpose of this paper is to measure residents' willingness to pay (WTP) for municipality hospital services using the contingent valuation method, and to evaluate municipality hospital valuation on the basis of WTP. K town, located in the Hokkaido prefecture of Japan, was selected as the location for this study. Participants were recruited by a town hall healthcare administrator, hospital and clinic staff, and a local dentist. Participants were asked what amount they would be willing to pay as taxes to continue accessing the services of the municipality hospital for one year by using open-ended questions in face-to-face interviews. Findings Forty-eight residents were initially recruited, and 40 participants were selected for the study (response rate 83%). As compared to K town's population, this data slanted toward the elderly, although there was no significant difference in frequency among the characteristics. The median WTP was estimated at 39,484 yen ($438.71), with a 95% confidence interval 27,806-55,437 yen ($308.95-615.96). Logistic regression revealed no significant factors affecting WTP. Conclusions If the total amount of residents' WTP for the municipality hospital were to be estimated by this result, it would calculate with 129,586,000 yen ($1,439,844). This is approximately equal to the amount of money to be transferred from the general account of the government of K town, more than one-half of the town tax of K town, and about two-fold in comparison to Japan as a whole. This showed that K town's residents placed a high valuation on the municipality hospital, which nearly equalled the amount that the K town government provided to the municipality hospital to cover its annual deficit. K town residents had come to expect not only general clinical practice, but also emergency medical services and night practice provided by their own town's municipality hospital. WTP can be used as a measure of hospital evaluation because it reflects the importance of the hospital to the residents in its region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayoshi Terashita
- Department of Healthcare Systems Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jonas DE, Russell LB, Chou J, Pignone M. Willingness-to-pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2010; 19:1193-1211. [PMID: 19725018 PMCID: PMC4174545 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients. OBJECTIVE We sought to use willingness-to-pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods. METHODS Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method. RESULTS 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Jonas
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yaesoubi R, Roberts SD. A game-theoretic framework for estimating a health purchaser’s willingness-to-pay for health and for expansion. Health Care Manag Sci 2010; 13:358-77. [DOI: 10.1007/s10729-010-9135-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2010] [Accepted: 07/27/2010] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
38
|
Milligan MA, Bohara AK, Pagán JA. Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 10:301-14. [PMID: 20635138 DOI: 10.1007/s10754-010-9082-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2009] [Accepted: 05/31/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. and its economic cost is very high. The objective of this study is to analyze the socioeconomic and demographic factors that are related to the willingness to pay (WTP) for cancer prevention. Data from an experimental module in the 2002 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were used to identify WTP differences across different population subgroups. Respondents were asked whether they were willing and able to pay different dollar amounts per month for a new cancer prevention drug. Years of age were negatively related to WTP whereas income and the probability of developing cancer were positively related to WTP. Risk-relevant numeracy skills were positively related to self-assessed cancer risk, which may suggest that adults with poor numeracy skills underestimate their cancer risk. This has consequences not only on the relative perceived value of different cancer treatments across different population subgroups but also on perceived value as captured by WTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Milligan
- Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, 1915 Roma NE, MSC05 3060, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marshall D, McGregor SE, Currie G. Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2010; 3:79-89. [DOI: 10.2165/11532250-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
40
|
Jonas DE, Bryant Shilliday B, Laundon WR, Pignone M. Patient time requirements for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. Med Decis Making 2009; 30:206-16. [PMID: 19773584 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x09343960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients receiving warfarin are managed in outpatient office settings or anticoagulation clinics that require frequent visits for monitoring. OBJECTIVE To measure the amount and value of time required of patients for chronic anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. DESIGN /Participants. Prospective observation of a cohort of adult patients treated at a university-based anticoagulation program. Measurements. Participants completed a questionnaire and a prospective diary of the time required for 1 visit to the anticoagulation clinic, including travel, waiting, and the clinic visit. The authors reviewed subjects' medical records to obtain additional information, including the frequency of visits to the anticoagulation clinic. They used the human capital method to estimate the value of time. RESULTS Eighty-five subjects completed the study. The mean (median) total time per visit was 147 minutes (123). Subjects averaged 15 visits per year (14) and spent 39.0 hours (29.3) per year on their visits. Other anticoagulation-related activities, such as communication with providers, pharmacy trips, and extra time preparing food, added an average of 52.7 hours (19.0) per year. The mean annual value of patient time spent traveling, waiting, and attending anticoagulation visits was $707 (median $591). The mean annual value when also including other anticoagulation-related activities was $1799 (median $1132). CONCLUSIONS The time required of patients for anticoagulation visits was considerable, averaging approximately 2.5 hours per visit and almost 40 hours per year. METHODS for reducing patient time requirements, such as home-based testing, could reduce costs for patients, employers, and companions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Jonas
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Helvoort-Postulart D, Dirksen CD, Kessels AGH, van Engelshoven JMA, Myriam Hunink MG. A comparison between willingness to pay and willingness to give up time. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2009; 10:81-91. [PMID: 18437436 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-008-0105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2007] [Accepted: 04/02/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
We compared the willingness-to-pay and willingness to give up time methods to assess preferences for digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Respondents were hypertensive patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis. Data were gathered using telephone interviews. Both the willingness-to-pay and willingness to give up time methods revealed that patients preferred CTA to MRA in order to avoid DSA. The agreement between willingness-to-pay and willingness to give up time responses was high (kappa 0.65-0.85). The willingness-to-pay method yielded relatively more protest answers (12%) as compared to willingness to give up time (2%). So, our results provided evidence for the comparability of willingness to pay and willingness to give up time. The high percentage of protest answers on the willingness-to-pay questions raises questions with respect to the application of the willingness-to-pay method in a broad decision-making context. On the other hand, the strength of willingness-to-pay is that the method directly arrives at a monetary measure well founded in economic theory, whereas the willingness to give up time method requires conversion to monetary units.
Collapse
|
42
|
Pinto SL, Holiday-Goodman M, Black CD, Lesch D. Identifying factors that affect patients' willingness to pay for inhaled insulin. Res Social Adm Pharm 2009; 5:253-61. [PMID: 19733826 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2008] [Revised: 10/14/2008] [Accepted: 10/16/2008] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Predictors of patients' willingness to pay for inhaled insulin are unknown. This study found patients with higher annual household income and those who were dissatisfied with their current insulin therapy were willing to pay for inhaled products. BACKGROUND Not all diabetes patients are receptive to taking injectable insulin and may therefore be noncompliant. Inhaled insulin has been shown to be as efficacious as subcutaneous insulin, but determinants of patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for inhaled insulin are unknown. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between various patient characteristics and patient satisfaction variables with WTP for inhaled insulin. METHODS Exploratory cross-sectional study using a random sample of patients with diabetes from a national database. Data were collected using a mailed survey focusing on patient satisfaction with current insulin therapy, WTP, and general patient information. Any WTP (categorical) and the amount (continuous) patients were willing to pay were the 2 dependent variables in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.15.0. Descriptive statistics as well as linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS One hundred twenty-eight patients responded. The logistic regression analysis indicated that annual household income (P=.038) and patient satisfaction (P=.002) predict WTP. Additionally, the current cost of insulin therapy (P=.009) and annual household income (P=.049) were found to predict the amount patients were willing to pay. On average, patients were willing to pay $55.49 out of pocket for inhaled insulin per month. CONCLUSIONS The out-of-pocket cost that patients were willing to pay was the same as the amount patients pay presently for their insulin and syringes. Although Exubera is no longer on the market, the study findings can have an impact on pharmaceutical companies working on new inhaled insulin products in their efforts to care for patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharrel L Pinto
- Pharmaceutical Care and Outcomes Research Laboratory, Division of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, College of Pharmacy, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tuominen R. Evaluation of three methods assessing the relative value of a dental program. Acta Odontol Scand 2008; 66:82-7. [PMID: 18446548 DOI: 10.1080/00016350801958274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate three commonly used methods for preference measurement in medical and dental programs. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a questionnaire filled in by 156 first-year medical (n=120) and dental (n=36) students, they were asked to evaluate five programs, each costing approximately 2 million euros annually. The programs were helicopter ambulance service, MPR vaccination (measles, parotitis and rubella), breast cancer screening, 250 hip replacement operations, and a dental check-up program for 7-year-olds. RESULTS The respondents were willing to make the highest donations for running the helicopter ambulance service (39 euros) and least for the dental check-up programme (14 euros) (p<0.01). When using the visual analog scale (VAS) method to evaluate the importance of the five programs, MPR vaccination was considered the most important (score 88), and hip replacement operations and dental check-up the least important (scores 68) (p<0.01). With the rank order (RO) method, MPR vaccinations were ranked the highest (score 1.8) and hip replacement operations (score 4.2) and dental check-up (score 4.0) the lowest (p<0.01). The respondents considered VAS and RO methods significantly easier than the willingness to pay method (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that depending on the nature of the information required, each of the three methods can be used for assessing preferences. The willingness to pay method seemed to be the most difficult to comprehend, but it provides more detailed and ready-to-use information for economic evaluations than the other two methods.
Collapse
|
44
|
Ruffin MT, Fetters MD, Jimbo M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2007; 45:267-73. [PMID: 17689600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2006] [Revised: 07/02/2007] [Accepted: 07/06/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening. METHOD From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR=3.23 (2.73-3.50 95% Confidence Interval). CONCLUSION Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mack T Ruffin
- University of Michigan Health System, Department of Family Medicine, 1018 Fuller Street SPC 5708, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5708, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Van Bebber SL, Liang SY, Phillips KA, Marshall D, Walsh J, Kulin N. Valuing personalized medicine: willingness to pay for genetic testing for colorectal cancer risk. Per Med 2007; 4:341-350. [DOI: 10.2217/17410541.4.3.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Personalized medicine using genetic information is increasing in cancer screening and treatment; however, little is known about perceived value of genetic testing for cancer risk in a general population. The objectives of this report are: to identify a general population’s willingness to pay for genetic testing that provids colorectal cancer risk information; examine whether screening intentions (likelihood of testing and test choice) change based on risk; and identify providers’ beliefs about patients’ perceived value. Methods: A survey of US general (n = 1087) and physician (n = 100) populations using the willingness-to-pay method was carried out. Physicians responded from the perspective of a typical patient. χ2 tests, t-tests and ordered logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with willingness to pay and intentions to be screened. Results: General population respondents’ average willingness to pay for a genetic test for colorectal cancer risk was US$150. Higher willingness to pay was significantly associated with being male, having higher income and education, having private health insurance and reporting a greater likelihood of getting colorectal cancer screening when due. Physicians’ beliefs about patients were different than general population responses: physicians believed patients would be willing to pay more (US$212; p < 0.001), fewer believed patients would not pay (1 vs 17%; p<0.001), and if a genetic test indicated higher than average risk, physicians believed patients would be more likely to get screened (65 vs 46%; p < 0.001) and would choose alternative screening tests (62 vs 22%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Respondents valued genetic tests to inform screening decisions and indicated that tests may influence screening choices. Additional studies are needed to examine the implications of physicians’ beliefs about patients’ choices for screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Van Bebber
- University of California, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, 3333 California St Suite 420, Box 0613, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–0613, USA
| | - Su-Ying Liang
- University of California, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, 3333 California St Suite 420, Box 0613, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–0613, USA
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- University of California, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, 3333 California St Suite 420, Box 0613, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–0613, USA
| | - Deborah Marshall
- McMaster University, Deptartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, ON L8N1G6, Canada
| | - Judith Walsh
- UCSF Women’s Health Clinical Research Center, Campus Box 1793, 1635 Divisadero, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Nathalie Kulin
- McMaster University, Deptartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, ON L8N1G6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kristiansen IS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Nexøe J, Bo Nielsen J. Willingness-to-pay for a population program aimed at reducing dietary salt in Denmark. Prev Med 2006; 43:31-5. [PMID: 16678893 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2005] [Revised: 03/21/2006] [Accepted: 03/21/2006] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High intake of salt increases blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Population programs aimed at reducing dietary salt may be cost-effective, but little is known about people's valuation of such programs. METHODS A random sample (n = 924) of Danish people aged 20-74 was interviewed in-person in year 2000. They were asked how much they would be willing to contribute in additional tax for a population program that would half the intake of salt. The respondents were randomized to presentation of effectiveness format (number-needed-to-treat (NNT), relative risk reduction (RRR), avoided cases of heart attack or increase in longevity). RESULTS In total, 57% were unwilling to contribute to the program (63%, 51%, 51% and 63% in the NNT-, RRR-, case- and longevity-groups, respectively). The mean willingness-to-pay among the remaining 43% was $30 per person per month. While in Denmark, the annual net program cost would be $148 millions in the most unfavorable scenario, the aggregate willingness-to-pay was $468 millions. CONCLUSIONS A public health program may be worthwhile even though only a minority of the population is willing to contribute towards it. People's valuation is moderately sensitive to format of the program information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
- Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 9 J.B. Winslow Road, DK-5000 C Odense, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Heresbach D, Manfrédi S, Branger B, Bretagne JF. [Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 30:44-58. [PMID: 16514382 DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73077-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in France is based on a faecal occult blood test every two years in average risk subjects 50-74 years of age while other endoscopic or non-endoscopic screening methods are used in Europe and in the USA. Beside the reduced incidence of and mortality from CRC found in available studies, cost-effectiveness data need to be taken into account. Because of the delay between randomized controlled trials and clinical results, transitional probabilistic models of screening programs are useful for public health policy makers. The aim of the present review was to promote the implementation of cost-effectiveness studies, to provide a guide to analyze cost-effectiveness studies on CRC screening and, to propose a French cost effectiveness study comparing CRC screening strategies. Most of these trials were performed by US or UK authors and demonstrate that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio varies between 5 000 and 15 000 US dollars/one year life gained, with wide variations: these results were highly dependent on the unit costs of the different devices as well as the predictive values of the screening tests. Although CRC screening programs have been implemented in several administrative districts of France since 2002, and the results of these randomized controlled trials using fecal occult blood have been updated, cost-effectiveness criteria need to be integrated; especially since the results of screening campaigns based on other tools such as flexible sigmoidoscopy should be available in 2007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Heresbach
- Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Philips Z, Whynes DK, Avis M. Testing the construct validity of willingness to pay valuations using objective information about risk and health benefit. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2006; 15:195-204. [PMID: 16229053 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
This paper describes an experiment to test the construct validity of contingent valuation, by eliciting women's valuations for the NHS cervical cancer screening programme. It is known that, owing to low levels of knowledge of cancer and screening in the general population, women both over-estimate the risk of disease and the efficacy of screening. The study is constructed as a randomised experiment, in which one group is provided with accurate information about cervical cancer screening, whilst the other is not. The first hypothesis supporting construct validity, that controls who perceive greater benefits from screening will offer higher valuations, is substantiated. Both groups are then provided with objective information on an improvement to the screening programme, and are asked to value the improvement as an increment to their original valuations. The second hypothesis supporting construct validity, that controls who perceive the benefits of the programme to be high already will offer lower incremental valuations, is also substantiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Philips
- School of Economics, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Whynes DK, Frew EJ, Wolstenholme JL. Willingness-to-Pay and Demand Curves: A Comparison of Results Obtained Using Different Elicitation Formats. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 5:369-86. [PMID: 16378240 DOI: 10.1007/s10754-005-4014-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Health economists use "willingness-to-pay" to assess the prospective value of novel interventions. The technique remains controversial, not least with respect to the formats under which values are elicited. The paper analyses the results of a series of studies of the same intervention valued by the same population, in which different elicitation formats were employed. The findings support the hypothesis that data collected using different formats give rise to different demand curves, from which different inferences about demand elasticity, profitability and consumer surplus will be derived. Judgements as to the relative merits of rival interventions depend crucially upon whichever format has been used to evaluate each intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K Whynes
- Health Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
An examination of the willingness to pay values elicited from more than 3000 persons involved in three independent studies revealed that the majority had offered one of a limited number of values from the ranges available to them. These values were 'prominent numbers', the use of which has been observed previously in circumstances where subjects feel that precise estimates of value are either difficult to make, or are not worth making. The existence of widespread prominence in response is suggestive of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation.
Collapse
|