The influence of reproductive and hormonal factors on the risk of colon and rectal cancer in women

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk - A meta-analysis and systematic review

There is limited understanding of the potential relationship between the risk of colorectal cancer and oral contraceptive use among women of different ages. Further investigation on the issue helps develop an informed choice of contraception. Data for this meta-analysis were derived from case-control and cohort studies of colorectal cancer and oral contraceptive use conducted between June 2000 and May 2022. The studies had a very high heterogeneity, as shown by an I² of 99%, and a confidence interval of 95% was considered significant. Other results from the meta-analysis were as follows; Heterogeneity: Chi² = 585.13, df = 6 (P < 0.00001). A test of the overall effect of ever use versus never use of oral contraceptives was Z = 21.85 (P < 0.00001). All the studies had a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 0.53. The use of oral contraceptives is associated with reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer. There is a need for further research into the biological mechanisms underlying these relationships, which may lead to insights into potential preventive interventions for colorectal carcinogenesis in women. The keywords used to locate studies included in this meta-analysis include Keywords targeting oral contraceptives included oral contraceptive pills, and birth control pills. Search keywords targeting colorectal carcinogenesis included neoplasms, tumors, or colon and rectal cancer.

•

Oral contraceptive use in woman does affect the risk of developing colorectal cancer.

•

Colorectal cancer has many identifiable and nonidentifiable risk factors.

•

OCP usage in women of various age groups shown a lower risk of colorectal cancer development than those who never used OCPs.

•

Regarding the population at risk for colorectal cancer due to a variety of reasons, many studies have deemed OCP usage safe.

Synergistic Effects of Genetic Variants of Glucose Homeostasis and Lifelong Exposures to Cigarette Smoking, Female Hormones, and Dietary Fat Intake on Primary Colorectal Cancer Development in African and Hispanic/Latino American Women

BACKGROUND

Disparities in cancer genomic science exist among racial/ethnic minorities. Particularly, African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino American (HA) women, the 2 largest minorities, are underrepresented in genetic/genome-wide studies for cancers and their risk factors. We conducted on AA and HA postmenopausal women a genomic study for insulin resistance (IR), the main biologic mechanism underlying colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis owing to obesity.

METHODS

With 780 genome-wide IR-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 4,692 AA and 1,986 HA women, we constructed a CRC-risk prediction model. Along with these SNPs, we incorporated CRC-associated lifestyles in the model of each group and detected the topmost influential genetic and lifestyle factors. Further, we estimated the attributable risk of the topmost risk factors shared by the groups to explore potential factors that differentiate CRC risk between these groups.

RESULTS

In both groups, we detected IR-SNPs in PCSK1 (in AA) and IFT172, GCKR, and NRBP1 (in HA) and risk lifestyles, including long lifetime exposures to cigarette smoking and endogenous female hormones and daily intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PFA), as the topmost predictive variables for CRC risk. Combinations of those top genetic- and lifestyle-markers synergistically increased CRC risk. Of those risk factors, dietary PFA intake and long lifetime exposure to female hormones may play a key role in mediating racial disparity of CRC incidence between AA and HA women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may improve CRC risk prediction performance in those medically/scientifically underrepresented groups and lead to the development of genetically informed interventions for cancer prevention and therapeutic effort, thus contributing to reduced cancer disparities in those minority subpopulations.

Genetic Signatures of Glucose Homeostasis: Synergistic Interplay With Long-Term Exposure to Cigarette Smoking in Development of Primary Colorectal Cancer Among African American Women

INTRODUCTION

Insulin resistance (IR)/glucose intolerance is a critical biologic mechanism for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) in postmenopausal women. Whereas IR and excessive adiposity are more prevalent in African American (AA) women than in White women, AA women are underrepresented in genome-wide studies for systemic regulation of IR and the association with CRC risk.

METHODS

With 780 genome-wide IR single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 4,692 AA women, we tested for a causal inference between genetically elevated IR and CRC risk. Furthermore, by incorporating CRC-associated lifestyle factors, we established a prediction model on the basis of gene-environment interactions to generate risk profiles for CRC with the most influential genetic and lifestyle factors.

RESUTLS

In the pooled Mendelian randomization analysis, the genetically elevated IR was associated with 9 times increased risk of CRC, but with lack of analytic power. By addressing the variation of individual SNPs in CRC in the prediction model, we detected 4 fasting glucose-specific SNPs in GCK, PCSK1, and MTNR1B and 4 lifestyles, including smoking, aging, prolonged lifetime exposure to endogenous estrogen, and high fat intake, as the most predictive markers of CRC risk. Our joint test for those risk genotypes and lifestyles with smoking revealed the synergistically increased CRC risk, more substantially in women with longer-term exposure to cigarette smoking.

DISCUSSION

Our findings may improve CRC prediction ability among medically underrepresented AA women and highlight genetically informed preventive interventions (e.g., smoking cessation; CRC screening to longer-term smokers) for those women at high risk with risk genotypes and behavioral patterns.

Impact of menopausal hormone therapy on colorectal cancer risk-A systematic review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in females worldwide. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been proposed as a potential protective factor for the development of CRC. Yet, the available evidence is controversial. Thus, we aimed at summarizing the current evidence on the effect of MHT on CRC through a systematic review. A systematic literature search identified 1001 potentially relevant articles, out of which 57 original studies and nine meta-analyses were deemed eligible for the final synthesis. The evidence synthesis showed the following: (1) MHT showed a heterogeneity in findings for CRC risk with a slight tendency to a neutral or protective effect; (2) MHT effect was either neutral or protective on colorectal adenoma; (3) MHT had no impact on tumour grade, subsite and histologic types; (4) MHT was not associated with CRC mortality; and (5) MHT showed heterogeneous effects on CRC stage and invasiveness, respectively. In summary, despite some evidence pointing towards a protective effect of MHT on CRC, MHT is currently not recommended for primary CRC prevention by international guidelines due to several important, potentially harmful effects.

Hormonal and reproductive factors and reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer

Females differ from males in incidence and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer. Understanding the differences can lead to development of preventive approaches. To identify reproductive factors currently associated with the risk of colorectal cancer. Consecutively diagnosed female colorectal cancer cases and randomly chosen colorectal cancer-free controls matched on age/ethnicity/primary care clinic within the molecular epidemiology of colorectal cancer study, a population-based case-control study in Northern Israel, were included. A total of 2867 female cases and 2333 controls participated in this analysis. Participants were interviewed on reproductive history: ages at menarche, menopause, first birth, terminations of pregnancies, miscarriages, births, use of oral contraceptives. Among 5200 women, spontaneous miscarriages (odds ratio = 0.71, 0.61-0.83 for ever/never in Jews; odds ratio = 0.76, 0.53-1.08 in Arabs) and number of miscarriages, but not termination of pregnancies, as well as use, and duration of use, of oral contraceptives (Jews: odds ratio = 0.49, 0.39-0.62 for ever/never; Arabs: odds ratio = 0.14, 0.04-0.47) were strongly inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk. Up to 5 pregnancies were associated with increased risk while ages at menarche, at menopause and at first birth were not associated with colorectal cancer risk. Miscarriages but not terminations of pregnancy or full-term pregnancies, and use of oral contraceptives, were strongly associated with reduced odds of developing colorectal cancer suggesting unique hormonal influences on colorectal cancer.

Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Apart from lifestyle factors, sex hormones also seem to have a role in the etiology of colorectal cancer. This raises interest in the possible effects of fertility drugs, especially because the use of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has strongly increased over the past decades.

METHODS

In 1996, a nationwide cohort study was set up to examine cancer risk in a population that included 19,158 women who received ovarian stimulation for IVF (IVF group) and 5950 women who underwent subfertility treatments other than IVF (non-IVF group). Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Colorectal cancer risk in the IVF group was compared with those in the general population and in the non-IVF group.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 21 years, 109 colorectal cancers were observed. Compared with the general population, risk of colorectal cancer was not increased in the IVF group (standardized incidence ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.23), and was significantly decreased in the non-IVF group (standardized incidence ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88). Women in the IVF group had a significant increase in risk compared with women in the non-IVF group (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.10-2.94). No trend emerged with more IVF cycles or more ampules of gonadotropins administered. Colorectal cancer risk did not increase with longer follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Although women who receive ovarian stimulation for IVF do not have an increased risk for colorectal cancer compared with the general population, findings from our nationwide cohort study indicate that their risk is increased compared with women who received subfertility treatments other than IVF. Further research is warranted to examine whether ovarian stimulation for IVF contributes to development of colorectal cancer.

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and colorectal adenomas

PURPOSE

The influence of reproductive factors on colorectal cancer, including oral contraceptive (OC) use, has been examined, but less research is available on OC use and adenomas.

METHODS

Participants of the Nurses' Health Study who had a lower bowel endoscopy between 1986 (when endoscopies were first assessed) and 2008 were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression models for clustered data were used to estimate odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals [OR (95 % CIs)].

RESULTS

Among 73,058 participants, 51 % (n = 37,382) reported ever using OCs. Ever OC use was associated with a slight increase in non-advanced adenomas [OR 1.11, 95 % CI (1.02, 1.21)] but not with any other endpoints. Duration of OC use was not associated with adenomas, but longer times since last OC use were associated with increased odds of adenomas [e.g., compared to never use, 15+ years since last use: OR 1.17 (1.07, 1.27)]. Shorter times since last OC use were inversely associated [e.g., ≤4 years since last use: OR 0.74 (0.65, 0.84)].

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a modest borderline increase in risk of colorectal adenomas with any prior OC use. Additionally, more recent OC use may decrease risk, while exposure in the distant past may modestly increase risk of adenomas.

Oral contraceptive use and colorectal cancer in the Nurses' Health Study I and II

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear if oral contraceptive (OC) use is associated with the incidence of colorectal cancer. Few studies have examined this association by duration of OC use, time since last OC use, and different cancer subsites.

METHODS

Among 88,691 participants of the Nurses' Health Study I (NHSI) and 93,080 participants of the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII), we assessed OC use every 2 years between 1976 and 2010 and categorized it as ever use, duration of use, and time since last use. We included incident colorectal cancer cases through 2010 (NHSI: age at diagnosis = 36-88, N = 1,764; NHSII: age at diagnosis = 33-64, N = 206). Multivariable hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Ever OC use was not associated with colorectal cancer in NHSI [1.01 (0.91, 1.12)] nor NHSII [1.03 (0.69, 1.53)]. In NHSII, when compared with never-users, longer durations (5+ years) of OC use were inversely associated with the risk of colon cancers (Ptrend = 0.02) but the number of endpoints was limited. No other colorectal cancer subsites were associated with OC durations or times since last OC use in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In two large prospective cohorts, we found little evidence that OC use may be protective for colorectal cancer, except potentially with longer durations of use among younger women.

IMPACT

Our results do not support the previous initial studies that reported an inverse association of recent OC use with colorectal cancer but instead support newer, larger studies demonstrating no such association.

Reproductive history and risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sex hormones may be associated with colorectal adenocarcinoma, although the association of pregnancy history and risk of colorectal cancer is not consistent.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based nested case-control study of persons born between 1932 and 2008 who are in the Swedish Multi-Generation Register. In total, 12,915 women and 15,519 men with colorectal adenocarcinoma were identified during follow-up in the Swedish Cancer Register; 10 age- and sex-matched controls were selected for each case. Number of children and age at first and last birth were analyzed in relation to the risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma, using conditional logistic regression, to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Compared with women without children, women with 1 or 2 children had an OR of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.93-1.13) of developing adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon; those with 3 or 4 children, 1.18 (1.06-1.32); and those with ≥5 children, 1.30 (1.05-1.61) (test for trend P < 0.01). The corresponding associations in men were 0.92 (0.84-1.00), 1.02 (0.92-1.13), and 0.97 (0.78-1.20), respectively (test for trend P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher parity in women was associated with the risk of adenocarcinoma of the proximal colon, although not the distal colon or rectum. A similar risk with family size was not seen for fathers. Still, the influence of lifestyle factors cannot be ruled out.

Age at menarche and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies.

Methods

After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85–1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I² = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75–1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90–1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses.

Conclusions

Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future.

The relationship between gravidity and parity and colorectal cancer risk

OBJECTIVES

The influence of hormonal changes caused by pregnancy has been well studied in relation to colorectal cancer risk, but the association remains undefined. The purpose of this investigation was to examine in a case-control study the relationship between differences in gravidity and parity and colorectal cancer risk and if the association varied by microsatellite instability (MSI), a feature more common in women.

METHODS

The study population included incident colorectal cancer patients (n = 1014), aged 50-74 years, diagnosed in 1998-2002 in Washington state and controls (n = 1064) randomly selected from population lists. All study subjects completed telephone interviews to ascertain prior pregnancies, live births, and other covariates. Case tissue samples were obtained for MSI analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age, family history of colorectal cancer, body mass index (BMI), education, endoscopy screening, oral contraceptive use, hormone therapy use, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

There was an approximate 30%-50% reduction in risk of colon cancer associated with gravidity, which was attenuated in the analysis with parity. Increasing gravidity and parity were associated with a suggestion of a decreasing trend in risk for rectal cancer (p for trend = 0.07). Compared with women who had equal numbers of pregnancies and live births, women who were nulligravid and nulliparous had a 40%-60% increased risk of colon cancer. There was a suggestion of a reduced risk of both colon and rectal cancer associated with one more pregnancy than live birth. There was a suggestion of an increased risk of MSI-high tumors with nulligravidity and nulliparity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the importance of pregnancy events in the etiology of colon and rectal cancer.

The Effects of Twins, Parity and Age at First Birth on Cancer Risk in Swedish Women

The effect of reproductive history on the risk of cervical, colorectal and thyroid cancers and melanoma has been explored but the results to date are inconsistent. We aimed to examine in a record- linkage cohort study the risk of developing these cancers, as well as breast, ovarian and endometrial cancers, among mothers who had given birth to twins compared with those who had only singleton pregnancies. Women who delivered a baby in Sweden between 1961 and 1996 and who were 15 years or younger in 1961 were selected from the Swedish civil birth register and linked with the Swedish cancer registry. We used Poisson regression to assess associations between reproductive factors and cancer. Twinning was associated with reduced risks of breast, colorectal, ovarian and uterine cancers, although no relative risks were statistically significant. The delivery of twins did not increase the risk of any cancers studied. Increasing numbers of maternities were associated with significantly reduced risks of all tumors except thyroid cancer. We found positive associations between a later age at first birth and breast cancer and melanoma, while there were inverse associations with cervix, ovarian, uterine and colorectal cancers. These findings lend weight to the hypothesis that hormonal factors influence the etiology of colorectal cancer in women, but argue against any strong effect of hormones on the development of melanoma or tumors of the thyroid.

Oral contraceptives, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

Oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors may initiate long-term changes to the hormonal milieu and thereby, possibly influence colorectal cancer risk.

METHODS

We examined the association of hormonal and reproductive factors with risk of colorectal cancer among 337,802 women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, of whom 1878 developed colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

After stratification for center and age, and adjustment for body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, physical activity and alcohol consumption, ever use of oral contraceptives was marginally inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR), 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-1.02), although this association was stronger among post-menopausal women (HR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74-0.95). Duration of oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors, including age at menarche, age at menopause, type of menopause, ever having an abortion, parity, age at first full-term pregnancy and breastfeeding, were not associated with colorectal cancer risk.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide limited support for a potential inverse association between oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk.

Hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use, and distal large bowel cancer: a population-based case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Lower incidence rates of distal large bowel cancer in women when compared with men support the protective role of female hormones. We aimed to determine the associations between hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use, and distal large bowel cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based case-control study of incident distal large bowel cancer in North Carolina between 2001 and 2006. Data on hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use, demographics, and risk factors were obtained through in-person interviews. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, and distal large bowel cancer were estimated through unconditional logistic regression models overall, by duration of use, and within strata of race.

RESULTS

There were a total of 443 women with distal large bowel cancer and 405 controls. Ever use of hormone replacement therapy was strongly associated with a reduced risk of distal large bowel cancer (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.72). Further reduction of distal large bowel cancer risk occurred with increased duration of use (<4 years (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.44-1.35), 4-8 years (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.10), 9-14 years (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81), and >or=15 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.58)). Ever use of oral contraceptives was not associated with reduced incidence of distal large bowel cancer (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.67-1.34) nor was duration of use. There were no differences by race.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone replacement therapy is associated with a lower risk of distal large bowel cancer. This risk is further reduced with increased duration of use. Hormone replacement therapy may be partially responsible for the reduced incidence of distal large bowel cancer in women compared with men.

Use of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to 2006

The association of contraceptive methods, including oral contraceptives (OC), intrauterine devices (IUD) and tubal sterilization (TS), with overall and site-specific cancer were prospectively investigated in a cohort of 66,661 Chinese women in Shanghai, 76.7% of whom used contraception. During a median follow-up time of 7.5 years, 2,250 women were diagnosed with cancer. Ever-use of any contraceptive method was not associated with overall cancer risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR(adj)) = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.92-1.12]. Use of any contraceptive method was associated with increased risk of rectal cancer (HR(adj) = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.08-2.62) and reduced risk of thyroid cancer (HR(adj) = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.38-1.04). Risk of gallbladder cancer increased with ever use of OC (HR(adj) = 2.38, 95% CI, 1.26-4.49). IUD use was associated with a possible reduced risk of thyroid cancer (HR(adj) = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.38-1.07). Longer duration of IUD use decreased risk for breast, thyroid and lung cancers. Ever having a TS was associated with increased uterine body cancer (HR(adj) = 2.50, 95% CI, 1.47-4.25) and decreased risk of stomach cancer (HR(adj) = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.39-0.91). We did not find any contraceptive method to be related to the risk of ovarian cancer but the analyses were based on few events. Although chance findings are a likely explanation for some of the associations found in our study, these findings suggest that various contraceptive methods or reproductive patterns may play a role in the etiology of cancer.

Perceived stress and risk of colorectal cancer in men and women: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the relationship between stress and risk of primary colorectal cancer in men and women.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Denmark.

SUBJECTS

A total of 6488 women and 5426 men were included in the study. The participants were asked about intensity and frequency of stress at baseline in 1981-1983 and were followed until the end of 2000 in the Danish Cancer Registry. Less than 0.1% was lost to follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

First time incidence of primary colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

During follow-up 162 women and 166 men were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Women with moderate and high stress intensity had a hazard ratio of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.37-0.98) and 0.52 (0.23-1.14) for colorectal cancer, respectively, compared to women with no stress. For colon cancer, a one-unit increase on a seven-point stress-score was associated with an 11% lower incidence of the disease (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99) amongst women. There was no consistent evidence of an association between stress and colorectal cancer in men.

CONCLUSION

Perceived stress was associated with lower risk of particularly colon cancer in women, whilst there was no clear relationship between stress and colorectal cancer in men.

Exogenous hormones and colorectal cancer risk in Canada: associations stratified by clinically defined familial risk of cancer

OBJECTIVE

This work assessed associations between colorectal cancer risk and postmenopausal/contraceptive hormones; subgroup analyses included women with a clinically defined family history of cancer.

METHODS

A population based case-control study of incident colorectal cancer was conducted among women aged 20-74 years in Ontario and Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada. Incident cases (n = 1,404) were selected from provincial cancer registries and controls (n = 1,203) were identified through property records, and other means, between January 1997 and April 2006. Family history of cancer, exogenous hormone-use, and other risk factors were collected via self-administered questionnaires. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Decreased risks of colorectal cancer were observed with ever-users of: hormonal contraceptives (OR: 0.77; CI: 0.65-0.91), estrogen-only postmenopausal hormones (OR: 0.60; CI: 0.47-0.75), and estrogen-progestin postmenopausal hormones (OR: 0.70; CI: 0.52-0.95). Risk estimates were similar between women with and without a strong familial history of cancer. Age at initiation of hormonal contraceptives was associated with colorectal cancer risk; women who initiated use at younger ages (age <22 years: OR: 0.60; CI: 0.47-0.77) experienced a greater reduced risk of disease than women who initiated use at later ages (age 30+: OR: 0.92; CI: 0.68-1.24; p (trend): 0.0026).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that exogenous hormone-use is linked with reduced risk of colorectal cancer among women with a strong familial risk of cancer, consistent with observations on population samples of sporadic colorectal cancer cases. A potential age-effect for use of hormonal contraceptives warrants further attention.

Induced abortions and the risk of all cancers combined and site-specific cancers in Shanghai

Although some previous case-control studies found an increased risk of breast cancer in women who had an induced abortion, the evidence from prospective studies suggests that induced abortions do not cause breast cancer. We have assessed risks of 12 types of cancer in women who have had induced abortions in a prospective study in China. Female textile workers (n = 267,400) completed a baseline questionnaire (1989-1991) that ascertained information on the major risk factors for breast cancer, contraceptive use, and induced abortions and were actively followed until July 2000. Cox Proportional Hazards analysis was used to calculate incidence rate ratios for specific types of cancer in women who ever had an induced abortion and by number of induced abortions. Women who had had an abortion were not at increased risk of cancer. There was a significant reduction in risk of uterine corpus cancer in women who had ever had an induced abortion, and a significant decreasing trend in risk with increasing number of induced abortions. No convincing associations with other cancers were observed. Women who have induced abortions after a live birth are not at increased risk of cancer and induced abortions may reduce risk of cancer of the corpus uteri.

Colorectal cancer in middle-aged women in relation to hormonal status: a report from the Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) study

OBJECTIVE

To delineate a perceived association of estradiol versus estradiol plus norethisterone hormone therapy on the prevalence of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

The Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) project covers 10,766 women aged 50-60 years, living in the Lund area, Sweden. Out of this population, 6908 (64%) women completed questionnaires, underwent physical and laboratory assessments and had self-reported information regarding colorectal cancer. Four hundred and twenty-two (6%) were premenopausal (PM), 3600 (52%) were postmenopausal without hormone therapy (PM0), 2452 (36%) were postmenopausal with combined hormone therapy (PMT-HT) and 364 (5%) were postmenopausal with estrogen monotherapy (PMT-E).

RESULTS

There were 21 cases of colorectal cancer (0.3%), one in the PM group, 16 in the PM0 group, two in the PMT-HT group and another two in the PMT-E group. Colorectal cancer prevalence was lower in the PMT-HT than in the PM0 group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04-0.80). However, for the PMT-E group, the OR (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.86-1.20). There was a positive association between low physical activity (p = 0.04), low parity (p = 0.02) and risk of colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Combined hormone therapy seemed to be associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women in contrast to estrogen monotherapy. Hence the progestin might have a protective role.

Cause-specific mortality of grand multiparous women in Finland

Knowledge is limited on mortality of grand multiparous women (> or =5 deliveries), whose hormonal, metabolic, and social conditions differ from the average. The authors studied overall and cause-specific mortality in 1974-2001 among 87,922 grand multiparous women including 3,678 grand grand multiparous women (> or =10 deliveries) in Finland. Standardized mortality ratios were defined as ratios of observed to expected numbers of deaths, both derived from national cause-of-death files. During follow-up, 18,870 grand multiparous women and 625 grand grand multiparous women died (standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) = 0.95 and 1.01, respectively). Decreased mortality among grand multiparous women was found for cancers of the breast (SMR = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59, 0.69), corpus uteri (SMR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.80), ovary (SMR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.75), bladder (SMR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.82), and respiratory tract (SMR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.88). The only malignant tumor associated with elevated mortality was kidney cancer (SMR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.56). The standardized mortality ratio was also low for dementia (SMR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.84), respiratory diseases (SMR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.85), and accidents and violent causes (SMR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.84). Mortality from diabetes mellitus (SMR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.55) and ischemic heart disease (SMR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.13) was increased. According to this study, overall mortality among grand multiparous women is not elevated. Low mortality from cancers is offset by higher mortality from cardiovascular conditions and diabetes mellitus.

Causes of Infertility as Predictors of Subsequent Cancer Risk

BACKGROUND

Although studies have found elevated risks of certain cancers linked to infertility, the underlying reasons remain unclear.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of 12,193 U.S. women evaluated for infertility between 1965 and 1988, 581 cases of cancer were identified through 1999. We used standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to compare cancer risk with the general population. Analyses within the cohort estimated rate ratios (RRs) associated with infertility after adjusting for other risk predictors.

RESULTS

Infertility patients demonstrated a higher cancer risk than the general population (SIR = 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-1.3), with nulligravid (primary infertility) patients at even higher risk (1.43; 1.3-1.6). Particularly elevated risks among primary infertility patients were observed for cancers of the uterus (1.93) and ovaries (2.73). Analyses within the cohort revealed increased RRs of colon, ovarian, and thyroid cancers, and of melanomas associated with endometriosis. Melanomas were linked with anovulatory problems, whereas uterine cancers predominated among patients with tubal disorders. When primary infertility patients with specific causes of infertility were compared with unaffected patients who had secondary infertility, endometriosis was linked with distinctive excesses of cancers of the colon (RR = 2.40; 95% CI = 0.7-8.4), ovaries (2.88; 1.2-7.1), and thyroid (4.65; 0.8-25.6) cancers, as well as melanomas (2.32; 0.8-6.7). Primary infertility due to anovulation particularly predisposed to uterine cancer (2.42; 1.0-5.8), and tubal disorders to ovarian cancer (1.61; 0.7-3.8). Primary infertility associated with male-factor problems was associated with unexpected increases in colon (2.85; 0.9-9.5) and uterine (3.15; 1.0-9.5) cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of infertility may extend beyond gynecologic cancers. Thyroid cancers and melanomas deserve specific attention, particularly with respect to endometriosis.

Oral Contraceptive Use, Reproductive Factors, and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Findings from Wisconsin

We investigated the association of oral contraceptive (OC) use and reproductive factors with colorectal cancer risk in a large population-based case-control study. Cases were women ages 20 to 74 years, living in Wisconsin, with a new diagnosis of colon (n = 1,122) or rectal (n = 366) cancer. Control participants were randomly selected from population lists of similarly aged female Wisconsin residents (n = 4,297). Risk factor information was collected through structured telephone interviews. Compared with never users, OC users had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.89 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.75-1.06] for colorectal cancer. OC use associations did not differ significantly between colon and rectal cancer sites; however, when compared with never users, recent OC users (<14 years) seemed at reduced risk of rectal cancer (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.00). Women with age at first birth older than the median (23 years) had 0.83 times the risk of colon cancer compared with women with age at first birth below the median (95% CI, 0.70-0.98). We observed an inverse trend between increasing parity and rectal cancer risk (P = 0.05). Compared with nulliparous women, women with five or more births had 0.66 times the risk of rectal cancer (95% CI, 0.43-1.02). Compared with postmenopausal women, premenopausal women were at reduced risk (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97) of colorectal cancer. No significant associations were observed between colorectal cancer risk and age at menarche or age at menopause. These findings suggest differential roles of reproductive factors in colon and rectal cancer etiology.

Cancer risk associated with early and late maternal age at first birth

OBJECTIVE

This paper provides a review of the literature associating maternal age at first birth and cancer. Potential mechanisms explaining associations between maternal age at first birth and cancer are also discussed.

METHOD

Systematic review of English language literature using searches on established databases (e.g., Medline, Popline) and the references of materials identified in these databases.

RESULTS

Older age (typically defined as 35 years or older) at first birth is associated with increased risk of breast and brain cancers. Conversely, younger age (typically defined as 19 years or younger) at first birth is associated with an increased risk of cervical and endometrial cancers. There is an unclear correlation between maternal age at first birth and site-specific malignancies such as ovarian, colorectal, thyroid, pancreatic, and kidney cancers. Causal mechanisms linking age at first birth and cancer were identified and reported for breast, brain, cervical, and endometrial cancers.

CONCLUSION

Older age at first birth increases the risk for breast and brain cancers but decreases the risk of cervical and endometrial cancers.

Having children with different men and subsequent cancer risk. A nationwide study in Denmark

The more men by whom a woman has children, the more diverse will be the foetal antigens of paternal origin introduced into her bloodstream, and we investigated whether this has an impact on subsequent cancer risks. By using population registries we identified 64 704 women who had children with at least two different partners from 1973 to 1996 in Denmark. We compared their cancer incidence with that of women who during the same time period had at least two births with no indication of partner change, adjusting for age, parity, socioeconomic factors and residence. The overall cancer incidence was more than 50% higher in women with two or more partners. Women having children with multiple partners had a higher incidence of cancer of the cervix and corpus uteri, a lower incidence of melanoma but a similar incidence of breast and ovarian cancer. Uncontrolled differences in lifestyle factors may explain the higher cancer risk associated with having multiple partners. The strong protective effect for melanoma was unexpected and deserves further study.

Association of Fluids From Beverages With Risk of Rectal Cancer

Little information is available about how fluid intake from beverages and sources of fluid intake influence risk of rectal cancer. We examined these associations with risk of incident rectal cancer in a population-based case-control study of 952 cases and 1,205 controls living in northern California and Utah. We also determined if intake of fiber (soluble and insoluble), physical activity, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) or aspirin modified the associations between fluid intake and rectal cancer. We identified a modest inverse association of water intake (odds ratio, OR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.48, 1.02) and total fluid intake (high vs. low OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.46, 1.06) with risk of rectal cancer in men and a positive association with juice among women (high vs. low OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.00, 2.41). Risk of rectal cancer increased nonsignificantly among men with beer consumption, among women with high white wine use, and among men and women with high long-term alcohol use. NSAIDs modified the association of alcohol consumption with rectal cancer: 1) risk associated with beer increased among men who did not take NSAIDs and had a high beer intake (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.08, 2.39) and 2) risk associated with long-term alcohol intake increased in a linear fashion in women who did not use NSAIDs (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.15, 3.40). Risk of rectal cancer increased among estrogen-negative women if they consumed any beer or white wine but decreased among estrogen-positive women with beer. In men, low intake of water and low insoluble fiber intake were associated with increased risk of rectal cancer beyond that of either factor alone (OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.11, 3.00). The interactions of fiber with water intake suggest that bowel motility may be the mechanism responsible for modification of rectal cancer risk for water. Associations of alcohol to risk for rectal cancer may be related to cellular hyperproliferation and may be modified by NSAID use.

Contraceptive methods and induced abortions and their association with the risk of colon cancer in Shanghai, China

267400 female textile workers in Shanghai, who were administered a questionnaire at enrollment into a randomised trial of breast self-examination between October 1989 and October 1991, were followed up until the middle of 2000. Based on the 655 women who developed colon cancer, rate ratios (RRs) were estimated and trends in risk assessed using Cox Proportional Hazards Models. Risk was increased in women who used oral contraceptives for over 3 years (RR=1.56, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-2.40). A possible increase in risk was also observed in women who received progestational injections during pregnancy (RR=1.24, 95% CI 0.95-1.62), but not in relation to the use of injectable contraceptives. A possible reduction in risk was associated with tubal ligation (RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.03) and ever having had an induced abortion (RR=0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.00). No trends in risk were observed in relation to the duration of hormonal contraceptive use or the number of induced abortions. Additional studies of the possible roles contraceptives may play in the aetiology of colon cancer in women at low risk of this disease are warranted.

Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancer

Sex-steroid-related tumours in women are represented by breast cancer and endometrial cancer, but a possible relationship may exist between sex steroids and both ovarian and colon cancer. Unopposed oestrogen therapy is known to increase the risk of endometrial cancer and is appropriate only for hysterectomized women. In women with an intact uterus, an appropriate combination of oestrogen and progestin does not appear to increase-and may even decrease-the risk of endometrial cancer. Current users of HRT seem to benefit from a reduced risk for colon cancer. As for epithelial ovarian cancer, the present data are very conflicting. The association between replacement hormones and this malignancy seems to be stronger for unopposed oestrogen than for oestrogen-progestin treatment. Data available at the moment do not allow discriminating for dose, routes of administration, bioavailability and tissue effects of different compounds so that it is inappropriate to consider all forms of HRT jointly. The future of HRT in post-menopausal women lies in the individualization of the therapy based upon personal risk factors and characteristics.

Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?

Colorectal carcinomas (CRC) that arise proximal (right) or distal (left) to the splenic flexure exhibit differences in incidence according to geographic region, age and gender. Together with observations that tumours in the hereditary cancer syndromes HNPCC and FAP occur predominantly in the right and left colon, respectively, the existence of 2 categories of CRC based on site of origin in the large bowel was proposed more than a decade ago. Differences between normal right and left colonic segments that could favour progression through different tumourigenic pathways are summarized in this review. Accumulating evidence suggests that the risk of CRC conferred by various environmental and genetic factors is different for proximal and distal tumours. Right- and left-sided tumours also exhibit different sensitivities to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Such differences are probably related to the molecular characteristics of the tumours, with the microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotypes being associated with right-sided tumours and chromosomal instability with left-sided tumours. Future molecular-based classification systems for CRC that rely upon distinctive gene expression patterns may allow a clearer discrimination of subgroups than that provided by tumour site alone. Until then however, the existence of 2 broadly different groups of cancer defined by site of origin in the colon should be considered in the design of future epidemiologic studies as well as in the design of new clinical trials aimed at testing novel adjuvant therapies.

Trends in colorectal cancer incidence in Norway by gender and anatomic site: an age-period-cohort analysis

The purpose of this study was to examine the secular trend of colorectal cancer in Norway by gender and subsite. All new cases of cancer in proximal colon, distal colon and rectum diagnosed between 1958 and 1997 in Norway were included in the study, altogether 34 202 and 34 097 cases for men and women, respectively. The incidence data were fitted separately for each gender and subsite to an age-period-cohort model. An increase in incidence of colorectal cancer was seen from 1958 to 1997 for both men and women, although a moderate attenuation of the increase has taken place in the last 15-20 years. This observation is most pronounced for cancer of the distal colon, but is also evident for proximal colonic and rectal cancers. For the distal colon and rectum, the period effect is more important than the cohort effect for both genders, whilst opposite for the proximal colon. The main estimated trend for cohort effects is a steady increase for both men and women, apart from an unexpected drop in incidence among the cohorts born during or shortly after World War II. These findings indicate that different aetiological risk factors may act on cancers of the proximal and distal part of the large bowel and further suggest that exogenous risk factors acting very early in life may play a more important role for colorectal cancer than previously recognized.

Estrogen metabolism in human colorectal cancer cells

Epidemiological and "in vitro" studies support a direct role of estrogens in the pathogenesis and/or progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent observations suggest a local synthesis of 17beta-estradiol (E(2)). In the present study, the CRC estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) positive HCT8, HCT116, DLD-1 and LoVo cell lines were evaluated for expression of functional 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17betaHSD) types 1, 2, 3, and 4. RT-PCR analysis revealed that while 17betaHSD1 and 17betaHSD4 were expressed in all the four cell lines, 17betaHSD2 and 17betaHSD3 were expressed in a cell-specific manner. The interconversion of tritiated estrone (E(1)) or E(2) evaluated by thin layer chromatography of conditioned media revealed that in HCT8, HCT116, and DLD-1 cells both reductive and oxidative activities were present, the latter showing K(m) values (approximately 10 microM) 40-fold higher than the former (approximately 250 nM). On the contrary, in LoVo cells, estrogens were almost (approximately 90%) completely metabolized to hydrophile compounds. Charcoal-dextrane (DC) stripped fetal calf serum (FCS) (10%), E(2) (10nM), Vitamin D(3) (100nM) and the combined E(2) and Vitamin D(3) treatment were evaluated for modulation of 17betaHSD isoenzymes gene expression and activity. Gene expression and activity of 17betaHSD reductive and oxidative isoenzymes were respectively inhibited and enhanced by Vitamin D(3) in HCT8 and LoVo cells. Surprisingly, DC-FCS induced a marked increase of estrogen metabolism toward hydrophile metabolites in all four cell lines. In conclusion, our results clearly show that metabolism of estrogens by 17betaHSD isoenzymes is functional and modulated by external stimuli in continuous neoplastic colonic epithelial cell lines.

Oral contraceptives and cancer: an update

Most up-to-date information on oral contraceptives (OCs) and breast cancer risk comes from a collaborative re-analysis of individual data on 53297 cases and 100239 controls. It is now established that there is a moderately increased breast cancer risk among current OC users, which tends to level off in the few years after stopping use. With regard to cervical cancer, OC use has been found to be associated with increased risk in human papilloma virus-positive women. With reference to the well known protective effects of OCs against endometrial carcinogenesis, additional information has suggested a consistent protection across types of OCs used. Further data on ovarian cancer confirm that the protection of OCs is long lasting, and may well be observed 15 to 20 years after stopping use. Several studies have suggested an inverse relationship between use of OCs and risk of colorectal cancer, and in a meta-analysis of published data the pooled relative risk of colorectal cancer for DC ever-use was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.97). There was no association with duration of use. The increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of hepatitis B viruses is the only established evidence of a direct association between OC use and cancer risk, which led an International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group to classify OCs as carcinogenic to humans in 1998.

Menopause, hormone replacement therapy and cancer

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively review available evidence on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and cancer.

METHODS

Qualitative literature review.

RESULTS

Most potential favorable and adverse effects on cancer risk of HRT are restricted to current users. On the basis of observational epidemiological data, the RR of breast cancer is moderately elevated in current and recent HRT users, and increases by about 2.3% per year with longer duration of use, but the effect drops after cessation and largely, if not totally, disappears after about 5 years. Unopposed estrogen use is strongly related to endometrial cancer risk, but cyclic combined oestrogen-progestin treatment appears to largely or totally reduce this side effect, if progestin are used for at least 14 days per cycle. However, combined HRT may be associated with higher risk of breast cancer as compared to unopposed estrogens. HRT has been inversely related to colorectal cancer, although the issue of causal relation remains open to discussion. No consistent association was reported for ovarian, liver, other digestive or lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for prolonged HRT use must be considered on an individual basis, taking into account the presence of other risk factors mainly for breast cancer, such as family history of breast cancer or a personal history of benign breast disease, as well as individual risk for other chronic diseases.

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Several studies have suggested an inverse association between use of combined oral contraceptives (OC) and the risk of colorectal cancer and here we present a meta-analysis of published studies. Articles considered were epidemiological studies published as full papers in English up to June 2000 that included quantitative information on OC use. The pooled relative risks (RR) of colorectal cancer for ever OC use from the 8 case-control studies was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.94), and the pooled estimate from the 4 cohort studies was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). The pooled estimate from all studies combined was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92), without apparent heterogeneity. Duration of use was not associated with a decrease in risk, but there was some indication that the apparent protection was stronger for women who had used OCs more recently (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.71). A better understanding of this potential relation may help informed choice of contraception.

Migration, socio-economic status and the risk of colorectal cancer in Italy

To assess how the risk of cancer of the colon and rectum relates to place of birth and socio-economic status, we analysed data from an Italian case-control study. Data included 1225 cases with a recent diagnosis of cancer of the colon (ages 19-74 years), 728 cases of cancer of the rectum (ages 23-74 years) and 4154 controls (ages 19-74 years), frequency-matched with cases by age and catchment area and admitted to hospitals for a wide spectrum of acute non-neoplastic conditions. Compared with residents born in the north of Italy, migrants from the centre and south had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0.9) for colon cancer and OR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2) for cancer of the rectum. The inverse association of migration with colon cancer was stronger among women (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.8) than among men (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-1.1), and was independent of education and occupation. Among migrants, the direct association between education and colon cancer risk was less clear than among non-migrants. In conclusion, place of origin played an independent role in colon cancer aetiology. Results on rectal cancer were less clear, although in the same direction. Among migrants, those less susceptible to behavioural changes (e.g. women) retained most of the benefit associated with their place of origin.

Menopause and colorectal cancer

Post-menopausal women who have never used hormone replacement therapy have a higher risk of colon, but not rectal, cancer than do premenopausal women of the same age, socio-cultural class and dietary habits. Such risk increase seems to last about 10 years and to be restricted to lean women, a group who have lower levels of oestradiol after ovarian function ceases after menopause.

Estrogen replacement therapy and colon cancer: a clinical review

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in women. Studies on the potential protective effect of postmenopausal hormone replacement on the incidence of colon cancer have been contradictory. To attempt to clarify the potential protective effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), an English-language key word (KW) search of MEDLINE, up to August 1999, was performed for KW colon cancer or colorectal adenoma or colon adenoma or adenomatous polyp and KW estrogen replacement or hormone replacement. Additional references were obtained from reading of the reference lists. Thirty-five studies, including 3 meta-analyses, were found. Of these, 23 suggested any degree of protective effect of HRT, 11 reported neutral results, and 1 reported negative impact of hormone replacement. The single prospective randomized controlled trial included small numbers of inpatients taking high-dose estrogen. However, studies did not uniformly specify hormone type, dose, duration, and potential differential effects on right and left colon. Estrogen and progesterone effects were not often considered separately. Many studies had inadequate control of confounders, for example, family history of colon cancer or indication for endoscopy. Therefore, although the majority of studies, especially more rigorously designed recent studies, support the conclusion that postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has a protective effect against colon adenomas and colon cancer, methodological limitations preclude practical application of study results at present. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the existence and degree of protective effect, as well as to specify the mechanism of protection.

Oral contraceptives and colorectal tumors. A review of epidemiologic studies

Over the last two decades, the mortality rates of colorectal cancer in many developed countries have declined in women but not in men. One of the explanations of this difference between the genders may be the favorable influence of the spread of exogenous female hormone use (i.e., oral contraceptives [OC] and hormone replacement therapy) Reduced risk in ever-users of OC was found in three of four cohort studies available on this topic, and was significant in the one based on colorectal cancer mortality. The fourth one showed no difference. Of 11 case-control studies (or groups of studies), none showed significantly elevated risk. Five reported lowered colorectal cancer risk among ever-users, with a significant inverse association in the largest investigation available. Recent OC use, more than long duration use, seemed to be related to some risk reduction. One cohort study and three case-control investigations suggested that OC use was not related to the risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Thus, at present, it seems that OC use does not increase and may even have a favorable effect on either incidence or mortality of colorectal cancer.