Progestins and breast cancer

Sulfatase inhibitors for recidivist breast cancer treatment: A chemical review

Steroid sulfatase (STS) plays a momentous role in the conversion of sulfated steroids, which are biologically inactive, into biologically active un-sulfated steroid hormones, which support the development and growth of a number of hormone-dependent cancers, including breast cancer. Therefore, inhibitors of STS are supposed to be potential drugs for the treatment of breast and other steroid-dependent cancers. The present review concentrates on broad chemical classification of steroid sulfatase inhibitors. The inhibitors reviewed are classified into four main categories: Steroid sulfamate based inhibitors; Steroid non-sulfamate based inhibitors; Non-steroidal sulfamate based inhibitors; Non-steroidal non-sulfamate based inhibitors. A succinct overview of current treatment of cancer, estradiol precursors, STS enzyme and its role in breast cancer is herein described.

Steroid derivatives as inhibitors of steroid sulfatase

Sulfated steroids function as a storage reservoir of biologically active steroid hormones. The sulfated steroids themselves are biologically inactive and only become active in vivo when they are converted into their desulfated (unconjugated) form by the enzyme steroid sulfatase (STS). Inhibitors of STS are considered to be potential therapeutics for the treatment of steroid-dependent cancers such as breast, prostate and endometrial cancer. The present review summarizes steroid derivatives as inhibitors of STS covering the literature from the early years of STS inhibitor development to October of 2012. A brief discussion of the function, structure and mechanism of STS and its role in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) hormone-dependent breast cancer is also presented. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Synthesis and biological testing of steroid derivatives as inhibitors".

Progesterone and breast cancer

Progesterone is an ovarian steroid hormone that is essential for normal breast development during puberty and in preparation for lactation and breastfeeding. The actions of progesterone are primarily mediated by its high-affinity receptors, which include the classical progesterone receptor (PR)-A and -B isoforms, located in diverse tissues, including the brain, where progesterone controls reproductive behavior, and the breast and reproductive organs. Progestins are frequently prescribed for contraception or during postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, in which progestins are combined with estrogen as a means to block estrogen-induced endometrial growth. The role of estrogen as a potent breast mitogen is undisputed, and inhibitors of the estrogen receptor and estrogen-producing enzymes (aromatases) are effective first-line cancer therapies. However, PR action in breast cancer is grossly understudied and remains controversial. Herein, we review existing evidence and discuss the challenges to defining a role for progesterone in breast cancer.

Use of different postmenopausal hormone therapies and risk of histology- and hormone receptor-defined invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

We previously found that the risk of invasive breast cancer varied according to the progestagen component of combined postmenopausal hormone therapy (CHT): progesterone, dydrogesterone, or other progestagens. We conducted the present study to assess how these CHTs were associated with histology- and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used data from the French E3N cohort study, with 80,391 postmenopausal women followed for a mean duration of 8.1 years; 2,265 histologically confirmed invasive breast cancers were identified through biennial self-administered questionnaires completed from 1990 to 2002. The relative risks (RRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Compared with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) never-use, ever-use of estrogen+progesterone was not significantly associated with the risk of any breast cancer subtype, but increasing duration of estrogen+progesterone was associated with increasing risks of lobular (P = .06) and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR-; P = .02). Estrogen+dydrogesterone was associated with a significant increase in risk of lobular carcinoma (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6). Estrogen+other progestagens was associated with significant increases in risk of ductal and lobular carcinomas (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8; and 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7, respectively), of ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR- carcinomas (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1; and 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.5, respectively), but not of ER-/PR+ or ER-/PR- carcinomas (RR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.1; and 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.0, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The increase in risk of breast cancer observed with the use of CHTs other than estrogen+progesterone and estrogen+dydrogesterone seems to apply preferentially to ER+ carcinomas, especially those ER+/PR-, and to affect both ductal and lobular carcinomas.

Progestins and breast cancer

Progestins exert their progestational activity by binding to the progesterone receptor (form A, the most active and form B, the less active) and may also interact with other steroid receptors (androgen, glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, estrogen). They can have important effects in other tissues besides the endometrium, including the breast, liver, bone and brain. The biological responses of progestins cover a very large domain: lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, water and electrolyte regulation, hemostasis, fibrinolysis, and cardiovascular and immunological systems. At present, more than 200 progestin compounds have been synthesized, but the biological response could be different from one to another depending on their structure, metabolism, receptor affinity, experimental conditions, target tissue or cell line, as well as the biological response considered. There is substantial evidence that mammary cancer tissue contains all the enzymes responsible for the local biosynthesis of estradiol (E(2)) from circulating precursors. Two principal pathways are implicated in the final steps of E(2) formation in breast cancer tissue: the 'aromatase pathway', which transforms androgens into estrogens, and the 'sulfatase pathway', which converts estrone sulfate (E(1)S) into estrone (E(1)) via estrone sulfatase. The final step is the conversion of weak E(1) to the potent biologically active E(2) via reductive 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity. It is also well established that steroid sulfotransferases, which convert estrogens into their sulfates, are present in breast cancer tissues. It has been demonstrated that various progestins (e.g. nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone) as well as tibolone and their metabolites can block the enzymes involved in E(2) bioformation (sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) in breast cancer cells. These substances can also stimulate the sulfotransferase activity which converts estrogens into the biologically inactive sulfates. The action of progestins in breast cancer is very controversial; some studies indicate an increase in breast cancer incidence, others show no difference and still others a significant decrease. Progestin action can also be a function of combination with other molecules (e.g. estrogens). In order to clarify and better understand the response of progestins in breast cancer (incidence, mortality), as well as in hormone replacement therapy or endocrine dysfunction, new clinical trials are needed studying other progestins as a function of the dose and period of treatment.

Unequal risks for breast cancer associated with different hormone replacement therapies: results from the E3N cohort study

Large numbers of hormone replacement therapies (HRTs) are available for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. It is still unclear whether some are more deleterious than others regarding breast cancer risk. The goal of this study was to assess and compare the association between different HRTs and breast cancer risk, using data from the French E3N cohort study. Invasive breast cancer cases were identified through biennial self-administered questionnaires completed from 1990 to 2002. During follow-up (mean duration 8.1 postmenopausal years), 2,354 cases of invasive breast cancer occurred among 80,377 postmenopausal women. Compared with HRT never-use, use of estrogen alone was associated with a significant 1.29-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.65). The association of estrogen-progestagen combinations with breast cancer risk varied significantly according to the type of progestagen: the relative risk was 1.00 (0.83-1.22) for estrogen-progesterone, 1.16 (0.94-1.43) for estrogen-dydrogesterone, and 1.69 (1.50-1.91) for estrogen combined with other progestagens. This latter category involves progestins with different physiologic activities (androgenic, nonandrogenic, antiandrogenic), but their associations with breast cancer risk did not differ significantly from one another. This study found no evidence of an association with risk according to the route of estrogen administration (oral or transdermal/percutaneous). These findings suggest that the choice of the progestagen component in combined HRT is of importance regarding breast cancer risk; it could be preferable to use progesterone or dydrogesterone.

Oral progestagens before menopause and breast cancer risk

We examined the relationship between use of progestagen-only before menopause (except for mini-pills) after the age of 40 and invasive breast cancer risk in 73 664 women from the French E3N cohort study (mean age at start of follow-up, 51.8 years; mean duration of follow-up, 9.1 years). A total of 2390 cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed during follow-up. Risk estimates were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Overall, ever use of progestagen before menopause was not significantly associated with risk (relative risk (RR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.11). However, we observed a significant increase in risk associated with the duration of use (P-value for trend: 0.012), current use of progestagens for longer than 4.5 years being significantly associated with risk (RR: 1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.00). Prolonged use of progestagens after the age of 40 may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and the subject needs to be investigated further.

Current breast cancer risks of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

The controversies surrounding hormone replacement therapy have left many women confused and afraid. Providers have been faced with long-standing assumptions challenged by an abundance of new data in the past few years, with little guidance on how to interpret these findings. The objective of this paper is to provide a framework for understanding breast cancer risk associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, with a particular focus on how observational studies and randomised trials provide complementary information. This framework considers the data on risks of various hormonal preparations, the profiles of women at risk, and ends with an expert opinion in this context.

Hormone replacement therapy after cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of female hormones in estrogen-dependent cancers has been debated for years. This is particularly true of breast cancer. Retrospective, case, and cohort control studies usually have suggested no influence. The Women's Health Initiative study in 2002, a prospective double-blind study, noted an increased risk of breast cancer if estrogen plus progesterone was given. In the estrogen-only arm of that study, a decreased (not significant) risk of breast cancer was noted. With this controversy, can estrogen be given safely to a woman who has been treated for breast cancer? The relation between endometrial cancer and unopposed estrogen is well established. With clear-cut evidence of this relation, is there evidence to suggest a role for replacement therapy in women who have been treated for endometrial cancer?

RECENT FINDINGS

Several case-control and cohort studies have noted either no increased risk or actually less risk of recurrence in women taking estrogen after therapy after breast cancer. Although the general consensus is that such a recommendation is contraindicated, the data do not support this admonition. The current data suggest that replacement therapy can be given to the woman who has been treated for endometrial cancer.

SUMMARY

There seems to be little if any risk in giving hormone replacement therapy to women who have had breast or endometrial cancer. There are no data to suggest that hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated in women who have been treated for cervical or ovarian cancer.

The effect of low dose hormone therapy on mammographic breast density

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of two standard and one low dose continuous hormone therapy regimens on mammography.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-two non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were randomly allocated either to conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg (CEE/MPA, n=38), 17beta-estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA, n=44) or 17beta-estradiol 1 mg plus norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg (low E2/NETA, n=50). Treatment was continuous and the study period lasted 12 months. Main outcome measures were the changes according to Wolfe classification between baseline and 12-month mammograms.

RESULTS

Five (13.2%) women in the CEE/MPA group showed an increase in breast density. Fourteen (31.8%) women on E2/NETA and 6 (12.2%) on low E2/NETA treatment revealed an increase in breast density. No woman exhibited an involution of fibroglandular tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Different hormone therapy regimens have a variable impact on breast density probably depending on the steroid used. Low dose hormone therapy associates with significantly lesser increase in breast density.

Progestins and progesterone in hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer

Controlled studies and most observational studies published over the last 5 years suggest that the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), particularly in continuous-combined regimen, increases the breast cancer (BC) risk compared to estrogen alone. By contrast, a recent study suggests that the addition of natural progesterone in cyclic regimens does not affect BC risk. This finding is consistent with in vivo data suggesting that progesterone does not have a detrimental effect on breast tissue. The increased BC risk found with the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen could be due to the regimen and/or the kind of progestin used. Continuous-combined regimen inhibits the sloughing of mammary epithelium that occurs after progesterone withdrawal in a cyclic regimen. More importantly, the progestins used (medroxyprogesterone acetate and 19-Nortestosterone-derivatives) are endowed with some non-progesterone-like effects, which can potentiate the proliferative action of estrogens. Particularly relevant seem to be the metabolic and hepatocellular effects (decreased insulin sensitivity, increased levels and activity of insulin-like growth factor-I, and decreased levels of SHBG), which contrast the opposite effects induced by oral estrogen.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: What is the problem?

Observational studies provide evidence that breast cancer risk is increased with long-term oral use of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ET). Various large cohort studies have shown that the addition of a progestogen in combined hormone replacement therapy (EPT) increases this risk further. Prospective, randomized controlled trials have confirmed this for the continuous combined regimen. So, why not tell our patients, "Stop using ET and EPT, it is dangerous to your health!"? The answer is: there are too many problems to allow such an oversimplified, definite statement. What is the problem? There is more than one! The problems are as follows: In conclusion, we have a problem as we cannot formulate any general advice that holds for the majority of European postmenopausal women due to lack of consistency, lack of biological plausibility, and lack of relevance of randomized clinical trial data to our daily practical work. So, we have a problem and not a firm basis for undisputable statements.

[Actions of a 19-norprogesterone derivative on mammary gland: nomegestrol acetate]

As the biological effects of progestins vary according to their molecular structure, it becomes essential to differentiate the various types of progestins, particularly with regard to the breast.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to gather published data on the effects of a 19-norprogesterone derivative, nomegestrol acetate, on the breast. Materials and methods. All experimental and clinical published studies reporting data in the literature on nomegestrol acetate and breast were reviewed.

RESULTS

In experiments on steroid receptors, it was shown that nomegestrol acetate presents a high binding specificity and affinity for progesterone receptors, notably in normal and cancerous human breast tissues. It sharply inhibits synthesis of progesterone receptors in hormone-dependent T-47D human breast cancer cells grown in an estrogenic culture medium, thereby demonstrating its strong progestational activity. On the other hand, it does not bind to estrogen receptors and lacks any estrogenic potential, confirmed by the lack of induction of alkaline phosphatase activity of endometrial Ishikawa cells. Estrogen-induced synthesis of estrogen receptors is also inhibited by nomegestrol acetate, a major determinant of its strong intrinsic anti-estrogenic activity. Unlike androgenic progestins (e.g. 19-nortestosterone derivatives and medroxyprogesterone acetate) which may act indirectly on the breast by inducing modifications of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), nomegestrol acetate is devoid of any androgenic activity. In studies carried out on the effects of progestins on enzyme activities involved in estradiol (E2) formation in breast tissue, nomegestrol acetate can control E2 levels in breast cancer tissue in vitro: it inhibits estrone sulfatase activity that converts estrone sulfate (E1S) to estrone (E1) and inhibits 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity that converts E1 to E2, resulting in blockade of E2 bioformation in MCF-7 and T-47D human breast cancer cells. It also stimulates sulfotransferase activity and subsequently the transformation of non conjugated estrogens E1 and E2 into biologically inactive estrogen sulfates. In vitro studies on cell proliferation have demonstrated that nomegestrol acetate, on the one hand, is unable to stimulate proliferation of MCF-7 cells cultured in a medium devoid of estrogens and, on the other hand, can exert antiproliferative effects on T-47D cells grown in an estrogenic environment. Furthermore, studies on mammary apoptosis have shown that the withdrawal of nomegestrol acetate induces apoptosis peak of normal human breast epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. In clinical trials carried out with premenopausal women, nomegestrol acetate administered in antigonadotropic sequence has demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of cyclical mastodynia and early onset benign breast diseases. With postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) combining estrogen and nomegestrol acetate, clinical trial results showed low incidence of mastodynia while under treatment as well as moderate increase in mammographic density, particularly with continuous combined regimens, however rapidly reversed by a short-term suspension of HRT. Noclinical data with this progestagen is available on breast cancer risk.

CONCLUSION

In addition to efficacy on mastodynia, in vitro and in vivo study results support the good tolerance of nomegestrol acetate on breast, in the short and medium term.

Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects

An experts' meeting on the 'Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects' was held in Berlin from January 19 to 22, 2001. The meeting was chaired by Dr R. Sitruk-Ware (New York, USA) and participants included Ms F. Fruzzetti (Pisa, Italy), J. Hanker (Trier, Germany), J. Huber (Vienna, Austria), F. Husmann (Bad Sassendorf, Germany), S. O. Skouby (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. H. H. Thijssen (Utrecht, The Netherlands), and R. Druckmann (Nice, France). The present paper reports the conclusions of the meeting. However, the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study, which appeared after the meeting, led to additional comments and revisions.

Selective loss of AKR1C1 and AKR1C2 in breast cancer and their potential effect on progesterone signaling

Progesterone plays an essential role in breast development and cancer formation. The local metabolism of progesterone may limit its interactions with the progesterone receptor (PR) and thereby act as a prereceptor regulator. Selective loss of AKR1C1, which encodes a 20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [20alpha-HSD (EC 1.1.1.149)], and AKR1C2, which encodes a 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [3alpha-HSD (EC 1.1.1.52)], was found in 24 paired breast cancer samples as compared with paired normal tissues from the same individuals. In contrast, AKR1C3, which shares 84% sequence identity, and 5alpha-reductase type I (SRD5A1) were minimally affected. Breast cancer cell lines T-47D and MCF-7 also expressed reduced AKR1C1, whereas the breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A expressed AKR1C1 at levels comparable with those of normal breast tissues. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed loss of AKR1C1 expression in breast tumors. AKR1C3 and AKR1C1 were localized on the same myoepithelial and luminal epithelial cell layers. Suppression of ARK1C1 and AKR1C2 by selective small interfering RNAs inhibited production of 20alpha-dihydroprogesterone and was associated with increased progesterone in MCF-10A cells. Suppression of AKR1C1 alone or with AKR1C2 in T-47D cells led to decreased growth in the presence of progesterone. Overexpression of AKR1C1 and, to a lesser extent, AKR1C2 (but not AKR1C3) decreased progesterone-dependent PR activation of a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in both prostate (PC-3) and breast (T-47D) cancer cell lines. We speculate that loss of AKR1C1 and AKR1C2 in breast cancer results in decreased progesterone catabolism, which, in combination with increased PR expression, may augment progesterone signaling by its nuclear receptors.

Mammary steroid metabolizing enzymes in relation to hyperplasia and tumorigenesis in the dog

Progesterone and estradiol play a crucial role in the control of mammary gland proliferation and tumour formation in the dog. However, little is known whether steroid metabolizing enzymes are present within the canine mammary gland that may play a modulating role in the bioavailability of progesterone and estrogen. In this study we investigated the expression of the steroid metabolizing enzymes 5alpha-reductase (type I and type II) and aromatase in relation to hyperplasia or tumorigenesis in the canine mammary tissue. The relative mRNA concentrations were examined by a semi-quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR analysis (RT-PCR). In addition the affinity of dihydroprogesterone (5alpha-reduced metabolite of progesterone) for canine progesterone receptors was investigated. Quantification of the RT-PCR products revealed that in mammary tumours a significantly higher expression of aromatase is present in comparison to normal mammary tissue. Furthermore, significant decrease in expression of both aromatase and 5alpha-reductase type II enzymes was found in hyperplasic mammary tissue compared to tumours. The changes in expression of type II 5alpha-reductase and aromatase were highly correlated. 5alpha-Reduction of progesterone to dihydroprogesterone resulted in a six-fold less affinity for the canine progesterone receptor. It is concluded that hyperplasia is associated with a decreased expression of type II 5alpha-reductase and aromatase enzymes, whereas in tumours the opposite situation is found.

Exogenous progestagens and the human breast

The role of progestins (or progestagens) on the breast tissue remains controversial. However, according to the molecule and the duration of application, cell differentiation and apoptosis may predominate over proliferation. Progestins are also used as second-line agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In young women with benign breast disease, long-term treatment with 19-nortestosterone progestins had a trend to decrease breast cancer risk contrarily to what was observed in postmenopausal women receiving estrogens. Several compounds with progestational activity have been used for HRT. Small differences in the structure of the molecules may lead to pronounced differences in activities, some progestins exerting androgenic effects and some exerting estrogenic or glucocorticoid like activities. While most progestins do not bind to the estrogen receptors, it has been shown that some androgenic progestins stimulate MCF7 cells proliferation while progestins derived from progesterone did not induce cell multiplication in the same cell lines. Therefore, different progestins may induce different effects on the breast cells. Whether the progestins available to date are able to bind specifically to the progesterone receptors PR-A or PR-B and whether this is of clinical relevance to breast cell proliferation is still unclear. Although the relationship between progestin use and breast cancer risk is still the subject of debate and controversy, the data reported to date suggest that 5 years of treatment carry a low risk but further duration of use increases the risk. Further studies are still needed, randomised long-term prospective studies as well as from the laboratory, especially to determine whether a sequential or continuous regimen would be preferable as far as breast-cell response and apoptosis are concerned, and what are the effects of the various molecules used for HRT.

Classification and pharmacology of progestins

Besides the natural progestin, progesterone, there are different classes of progestins, such as retroprogesterone (i.e. dydrogesterone), progesterone derivatives (i.e. medrogestone) 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone derivatives (i.e. chlormadinone acetate, cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, megestrol acetate), 19-norprogesterone derivatives (i.e. nomegestrol, promegestone, trimegestone, nesterone), 19-nortestosterone derivatives norethisterone (NET), lynestrenol, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate, dienogest) and spironolactone derivatives (i.e. drospirenone). Some of the synthetic progestins are prodrugs, which need to be metabolized to become active compounds. Besides the progestogenic effect, which is in common for all progestins, there is a wide range of biological effects, which are different for the various progestins and have to be taken into account, when medical treatment is considered.

Use of high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry for structural identification of monohydroxylated progesterones

For the structural identification of monohydroxylated progesterones synthesized by microorganisms, a method was developed using a combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-CIDMS). The retention times and MS/MS spectra of 11 different standards at 30 eV were collected and compared. The identification of D-ring-hydroxylated progesterones (15beta-, 16alpha-, 17alpha- and 21-OH-P) using ESI-CIDMS was not possible. However, they were separated chromatographically using a 65:35 mixture of water and acetonitrile containing 0.5% acetic acid. The other hydroxylated progesterones (2alpha-, 6beta-, 7beta-, 9alpha-, 11alpha-, 11beta-, and 19-OH-P) could be identified by comparison of eight fragments. The complete separation of 11 standards was achieved chromatographically. The developed assay was evaluated by the identification of monohydroxylated progesterones produced by CYP106A2 from Bacillus megaterium ATCC 13368.

Effects of a progestogen on normal human breast epithelial cell apoptosis in vitro and in vivo

Many investigators have reported cyclic proliferation of normal human breast epithelial cells. A delicate balance between proliferation and apoptosis (programmed cell death) ensures breast homeostasis. Both the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle are characterized by proliferation, whereas apoptosis occurs only at the end of the latter phase. In this study, we observed that the withdrawal of a synthetic progestin (nomegestrol acetate or NOMAC), but not continuous treatment with it, induced apoptosis of normal human breast epithelial cells in vitro and in women who applied NOMAC gel to their breasts. Furthermore, this apoptotic response was specific to normal breast cells, since withdrawal of NOMAC did not induce apoptosis of tumoral T47D cells in vitro or of fibroadenoma cells in women. These observations open up new perspectives in the prevention of hyperplasia and breast cancer.

Breast cancer and post-menopausal hormone therapy

From the introduction of post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) there has been great concern that HRT could possibly increase the risk of breast cancer. Prolonged exposure to endogenous oestrogens undeniably increases the risk of breast cancer. Questions that are important and until now only partly answered, are the following. Are oestrogens tumour promoters, as they induce mitosis, lead to proliferation and, therefore, accelerated growth of clinically occult pre-existing tumours? In addition to this, are they genotoxic mutagenic carcinogens, or could they initiate tumours by way of accumulation of incessant DNA-replication damage mechanism? Opinions vary as to the effect of the addition of a progestogen. There is a multitude of different progestogens which could bind with differing affinity to progesterone receptor PR-A or PR-B, and which have different physiological functions via differential gene regulation. The action of a progestogen on the oestrogen-induced cellular mitotic activity could be synergistic or antagonistic (by different pathways: oestrogen receptor downregulation, activating of metabolic pathways within the breast or stimulation of apoptosis)? Over 60 observational studies and two randomized trials provide evidence that the small but significant increase in risk appears with long-term current post-menopausal hormone use. The addition of a progestogen does not decrease the risk as seen with oestrogens alone and might increase the risk further. It is not clear whether there is a difference in risk with sequentially combined versus continuously combined HRT. Many questions nevertheless still remain. Is the risk increase limited to lean women only? What about risk-modifying factors such as alcohol use and a positive family history for breast cancer? Are tumours detected under HRT less aggressive, is there a better prognosis and is the mortality not increased while morbidity is? And is HRT contraindicated for women with a positive family history for breast cancer or in those women who have been treated for breast cancer? And finally, are there alternative options for these women?

Progestin and G protein-coupled receptor 30 inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

We have previously shown that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)30 is critical for progestin-induced growth inhibition. In this study, we addressed signal transduction pathways involved in progestin-mediated signaling. Progestin could not provide any additional growth inhibitory effect to MCF-7 cells treated with specific MAPK kinase inhibitors, PD98059 and U0126. Medroxyprogesteroneacetate (MPA) induced a late (22-23 h) decrease in ERK-1 and -2 activities verified by immunoblotting and kinase assay. The inactivation was abrogated by antiprogestin. Transient expression of GPR30 decreased ERK-1 and -2 activity; and in the cells in which GPR30 expression was decreased by the antisense, ERK activities were increased. The antisense-expressing cells were able to significantly resist the growth-inhibitory effect of the MAPK kinase inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 but not that of other factors tested. Interestingly, the decrease of ERK activity induced by MPA was abrogated by GPR30 antisense. Collectively, these results show that MAPK activity is inhibited by progestin and GPR30 and suggest that progestin-induced ERK inactivation is mediated through GPR30. Coupled with our previous findings, the data imply that up-regulation of GPR30 by progestin leads to ERK-1 and -2 inactivation associated with MPA-induced growth inhibition.

The intrinsic transcriptional estrogenic activity of a non-phenolic derivative of levonorgestrel is mediated via the estrogen receptor-alpha

Levonorgestrel (LNG), a 19-nor-testosterone derivative, is widely used in contraceptive formulations. This compound does not bind to the estrogen receptor (ER), but it shows estrogen-like effects under in vivo and in vitro conditions. The estrogenicity of LNG may be attributed to its bio-transformation into non-phenolic metabolites. In this study, the ability of A-ring reduced LNG metabolites to activate transcription via an estrogenic mechanism of action, including differences between ER alpha and ER beta subtypes, were investigated. Transactivation assays were performed in HeLa cells transfected with expression vectors for ER alpha and ER beta and an estrogen-responsive reporter gene. Cells were also transfected with expression vectors for both progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms (A or B). As expected, the tetrahydro derivatives of LNG (3 alpha,5 alpha- and 3 beta,5 alpha-LNG) showed significantly lower PR-mediated transcriptional activities through both isoforms when compared with progesterone (P(4)) and LNG. In contrast, the 3 beta,5 alpha-tetrahydro derivative resulted in a significant activation of estrogen-dependent gene transcription. This effect was selectively confined to the ER alpha, since little if any activity could be observed with the ER beta and no antagonistic activities were demonstrated. This study provides structural and molecular clues for the well documented in vitro and in vivo intrinsic estrogenicity of 19-nor-testosterone-derived progestins and ligand requirements for ER alpha recognition.

Evidence for sulfatase and 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activities in equine epididymis and uterus

Our previous work showed that stallion testis produces high amounts of estrogens which are subsequently found in the ejaculate. These estrogens are mainly synthesized by testicular aromatase, and the major estrogen produced is estrone sulfate (E1S). The objective of this study was to investigate the potential role of E1S as a source of estrogens in the male and female horse reproductive tracts by determining whether both estrone sulfatase (Sulf) and 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I (17beta-HSD1) activities were present in equine testes, epididymis and uterus. We assessed E1S bioconversion into estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) in these tissues. Both Sulf and 17beta-HSD1 activities were well detected in the cauda epididymis and uterus. Additionally, Sulf activity was present in the distal corpus of the epididymis, and 17beta-HSDI in the proximal corpus. In contrast, aromatase gene expression, measured as an internal control of endogenous estrogen production, had high activity only in the testis. We found that seminal E1S of testicular origin can be metabolized to E2, especially in the cauda epididymis and uterus. Because E2 appears to play a major role in male and female reproduction, we propose that the bioconversion of seminal E1S could affect male and female fertility.

Effect of tibolone (Org OD14) and its metabolites on aromatase and estrone sulfatase activity in human breast adipose stromal cells and in MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells

Tibolone (Org OD14) is a synthetic steroid used for post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Since HRT might increase breast cancer risk, it is important to determine the possible effects of tibolone on breast tissues. Tibolone and its metabolites Org 4094, Org 30126 and Org OM38 have been reported to inhibit estrone sulfatase activity in MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cell lines, which suggest beneficial effects on hormone dependent breast cancer by reducing local production of free estrogens. Breast adipose stromal cells (ASCs) contain aromatase activity-an obligatory step in the biosynthesis of estrogens-and possibly contain sulfatase activity. We investigated the effects of tibolone, its metabolites and the pure progestin Org 2058 on PGE(2)-stimulated aromatase activity and on sulfatase activity in human ASC primary cultures and on sulfatase activity in MCF-7 and T47D cell lines. In MCF-7, tibolone and metabolites, but not Org 2058, were found to inhibit sulfatase activity. In T47D, tibolone inhibited sulfatase only at 10(-6)M, although weakly. ASC had high sulfatase activity, which was inhibited by 10(-6)M of tibolone, Org 4094 and Org 30126, but not by Org OM38 or Org 2058. Surprisingly, aromatase activity in ASC was increased by both tibolone and Org 2058 at 10(-6)M. As ligand binding assay results and immunohistochemistry indicated the absence of progesterone and estrogen receptors in ASC, these effects on aromatase and sulfatase activity in ASC likely take place by other routes. Because tibolone and its metabolites inhibit sulfatase activity, and because tibolone only increases aromatase activity at a high concentration, we conclude that effects of tibolone on the breast are probably safe.

Tibolone and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone alone or in combination with an antiandrogen in a rat breast tumour model

Tibolone was combined with the antiandrogen flutamide to determine whether the inhibition of tumour growth in the prophylactic 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) rat model could be attributed to androgenic properties of one of its metabolites. The mean tumour load after tibolone (0.25 or 1.0 mg/kg twice daily orally for 10 weeks) was 125 and 255 versus 718 mm2 for placebo. The mean number of tumours were 1.2 and 2.0 versus 5.8, respectively. Combined with flutamide (10 mg/kg twice daily orally) both doses of tibolone did not result in an increase compared to placebo, but in significantly lower tumour loads (160 and 64 versus 718 mm2, respectively) and smaller numbers of tumours (0.8 and 1.0 versus 5.8, respectively). The differences between tibolone monotherapy and the combination groups with flutamide were not statistically significant indicating that flutamide did not reverse tibolone's inhibition of tumour growth. The positive control, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), entirely suppressed tumour development and flutamide abolished the inhibitory effect of DHT. Thus, unlike DHT, tibolone does not exert its beneficial effect in DMBA-induced tumours via the androgen receptor, but acts via different mechanisms.

Roles of androgens in the development, growth, and carcinogenesis of the mammary gland

Androgens influence the development and growth of the mammary gland in women. Treatment of animals and cultured cells with androgens has either inhibitory or stimulatory effects on the proliferation of mammary epithelia and cancer cells; the mechanisms for these dual functions are still not very clear and are discussed in this review. Epidemiological data suggest that, similar to increased estrogens, elevated androgens in serum may be associated with the development of breast cancer. Experiments in rodents have also shown that simultaneous treatment of androgen and estrogen synergizes for mammary gland carcinogenesis. Similar synergistic effects of both hormones have been observed for carcinogenesis of the uterine myometrium of female animals and for carcinogenesis of the prostate and deferens of males. There are also clinical and experimental indications for a possible association of elevated levels of both androgens and estrogens with the development of ovarian and endometrial cancers. A hypothesis is thus proposed that concomitant elevation in both androgens and estrogens may confer a greater risk for tumorigenesis of the mammary gland, and probably other female reproductive tissues than an elevation of each hormone alone.

Reversal effects of nomegestrol acetate on multidrug resistance in adriamycin-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is important in the systematic treatment of breast cancer. To enhance the response of tumours to chemotherapy, attention has been focused on agents to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) and on the sensitivity of tumour cells to chemical drugs. Hundreds of reversal drugs have been found in vitro, but their clinical application has been limited because of their toxicity. The reversal activity of progestogen compounds has been demonstrated. However, classical agents such as progesterone and megestrol (MG) also have high toxicity. Nomegestrol (NOM) belongs to a new derivation of progestogens and shows very low toxicity. We studied the reversal activity of NOM and compared it with that of verapamil (VRP), droloxifene (DRO), tamoxifen (TAM) and MG, and investigated the reversal mechanism, i.e. effects on the expression of the MDR1, glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTpi), MDR-related protein (MRP) and topoisomerase IIalpha (TopoIIalpha) genes, as well as the intracellular drug concentration and the cell cycle. The aim of the study was to examine the reversal effects of NOM on MDR in MCF7/ADR, an MCF7 breast cancer cell line resistant to adriamycin (ADR), and its mechanism of action.

METHODS

MCF7/ADR cells and MCF7/WT, an MCF7 breast cancer cell line sensitive to ADR, were treated with NOM as the acetate ester. With an assay based on a tetrazolium dye [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide; MTT], the effects of various concentrations of NOM on MDR in MCF7/ADR cells were studied. Before and after the treatment with 5 microM NOM, the expression of the MDR-related genes MDR1, GSTpi, TopoIIalpha and MRP were assayed with a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) immunocytochemistry assay. By using flow cytometry (FCM), we observed the intracellular ADR concentration and the effects of combined treatment with NOM and ADR on the cell cycle. Results collected were analysed with Student's t test.

RESULTS

NOM significantly reversed MDR in MCF7/ADR cells. After treatment NOM at 20, 10 and 5 microM, chemosensitivity to ADR increased 21-fold, 12-fold and 8-fold, respectively. The reversal activity of NOM was stronger than that of the precursor compound MG, and comparable to that of VRP. After treatment with 5 microM NOM, the expression of both the MDR1 and the GSTpi mRNA genes began to decline on the second day (P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively), and reached the lowest level on the third day (both P <0.01); however, on the fifth day the expression levels began to increase again (both P <0.05). The expression of MRP and TopoIIalpha had no significant changes. Changes in the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and GSTpi were similar to those of their mRNA expressions, showing early declines and late increases. Two hours after treatment with 20, 10 and 5 microM NOM, the intracellular ADR concentration increased 2.7-fold, 2.3-fold and 1.5-fold respectively. However, NOM did not increase ADR accumulation in MCF7/WT cells. FCM data showed that after 48 h of combined administration of NOM (20 microM) and ADR (from low to high concentration), MCF7/ADR cells showed a gradual arrest at the G2M phase with increasing ADR dose. The arrest effect with combined drug treatment was stronger than that with the single ADR treatment.

CONCLUSION

MDR is the major mechanism of drug resistance in malignant tumour cells. To overcome MDR and to increase chemosensitivity, many reversal agents have been found. Most progestogen compounds have been demonstrated to have reversal effects, but we found no data on NOM, a new progestogen compound. Our results show that NOM has strong reversal activity. The reversal effects were stronger than those of the precursor compound, MG, and were comparable to that of VRP. Because NOM has low toxicity, it might have good prospects in clinical application. Using RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry assays, we studied the effects of NOM on MDR-related genes. The results were that NOM could markedly downregulate the mRNA and protein expression levels of MDR1 and GSTpi. TopoIIalpha and MRP gene expression showed no significant changes. It is known that P-gp induces MDR in tumour cells mainly by decreasing the intracellular drug concentration. After treatment with NOM, the intracellular drug concentration in MCF7/ADR cells increased significantly. Combined treatment with NOM and ADR induced arrest at the G2M phase. It is worth noting that NOM caused an early decrease and a late increase in the expression of some MDR-related genes in a time-dependent manner. The phenomena raise a question for the continued administration of reversal agents in clinics that merits further study. We demonstrate that NOM has strong reversal effects on MDR in MCF7/ADR cells. The reversal is via different routes, namely downregulating the mRNA and protein expression levels of MDR1 and GSTpi, increasing intracellular drug concentration and arresting cells at the G2M phase (NOM in combination with ADR). The reversal mechanism needs further study.

Modulation of anthracycline activity in canine mammary tumour cells in vitro by medroxyprogesterone acetate

Failure of chemotherapy with anthracyclines as a result of drug resistance and toxicity is a major problem in the clinical management of neoplasia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) as a chemosensitiser on anthracycline cytotoxicity. The study investigated whether such an effect could be related to an increase in lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide production, membrane fluidity and intracellular anthracycline concentration. The results showed that anthracyclines decreased nitric oxide production but increased membrane viscosity (polarisation constant) and lipid hydroperoxide formation in canine mammary tumour cells. Moreover, it was found that both drug-induced cytotoxicity and membrane viscosity increased in the presence of MPA. Conversely, lipid hydroperoxides decreased in MPA-supplemented cells. Medroxyprogesterone acetate did not show any effect on nitric oxide production. The two anthracyclines used (doxorubicin and idarubicin) showed differential intranuclear accumulation in canine mammary tumour cells, and MPA significantly modified intracellular concentration of anthracyclines.

Effects of estrogens and hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk and on efficacy of breast cancer therapies

This review summarises preclinical and clinical data on effects of endogenous and exogenous estrogens on probability of breast cancer diagnosis, and on the course and efficacy of breast cancer therapies. The data indicate that higher endogenous estrogen exposure (e.g. pregnancy, early menarche and late menopause, estrogen levels in future breast cancer patients, obesity) or exogenous estrogens (oral contraceptives; hormone replacement therapies) may be associated with an increased probability of breast cancer diagnosis. However, there is little evidence that estrogens have deleterious effects on the course of breast cancer. Moreover, increased incidence of breast cancer diagnosis after prolonged hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use seems to be associated with clinically less advanced disease. In studies assessing both diagnosis and mortality, HRT is frequently associated with reduced mortality compared to never users. The interaction of progestagens and estrogens on the probability of breast cancer diagnosis is complex and dependent on type of progestagens and regimens employed. Efficacy of current treatment modalities for breast cancer (surgery, irradiation, adjuvant therapy or chemotherapy) is not negatively influenced by estrogens at concentrations considerably higher than those attained with current HRT preparations. Although it cannot be excluded that estrogens increase the probability of breast cancer diagnosis, available data fail to demonstrate that, once breast cancer has been diagnosed, estrogens worsen prognosis, accelerate the course of the disease, reduce survival or interfere with the management of breast cancer. It may therefore be concluded that the prevalent opinion that estrogens and estrogen treatment are deleterious for breast cancer, needs to be revisited. However, results of ongoing prospective, randomised clinical trials with different HRT regimens in healthy women or breast cancer survivors are needed to provide more definite conclusions about risks and benefits of HRT.

Progesterone effect on cell growth, ultrastructural aspect and estradiol receptors of normal human breast epithelial (HBE) cells in culture

The stimulating effect of estradiol (E2) on breast cell growth is well documented. However, the actions of progesterone (P) and its derivatives remain controversial. Additional information is therefore necessary. On a culture system of normal human breast epithelial (HBE) cells, we observed an inhibitory effect on cell growth of a long-term P treatment (7 days) in the presence or absence of E2, using two methods: a daily cell count providing a histometric growth index, and [3H]-thymidine incorporation during the exponential phase of cell growth. A scanning electron microscopy study confirmed these results. Cells exhibited a proliferative appearance after E2 treatment, and returned to a quiescent appearance when P was added to E2. In both studies, P proved to be as efficient as the synthetic progestin R5020. Moreover, the immunocytochemical study of E2 receptors indicated that E2 increases its own receptor level whereas P and R5020 have the opposite effect, thus limiting the stimulatory effect of E2 on cell growth. In the HBE cell culture system and in long-term treatment, P and R5020 appear predominantly to inhibit cell growth, both in the presence and absence of E2.

Progestin regulation of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in T-47D human breast cancer cells

This study examined the enzymatic characteristics and steroid regulation of the glucocorticoid-metabolizing enzyme 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11beta-HSD) in the human breast cancer cell line T-47D. In cell homogenates, exogenous NAD significantly increased the conversion of corticosterone to 11-dehydrocorticosterone, while NADP was ineffective. There was no conversion of 11-dehydrocorticosterone to corticosterone either with NADH or NADPH demonstrating the lack of reductase activity. In keeping with these results, RT-PCR analysis indicated a mRNA for 11beta-HSD2 in T-47D cells, while 11beta-HSD1 mRNA levels were undetectable. In T-47D cells treated for 24 h with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 11beta-HSD catalytic activity was elevated 11-fold, while estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)) and the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) were ineffective. The antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486) acted as a pure antagonist of the progestin-enhanced 11beta-HSD activity, but did not exert any agonistic effects of its own. In addition, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that MPA was a potent inducer of 11beta-HSD2 gene expression, increasing the steady-state levels of 11beta-HSD2 mRNA. Taken together, these results demonstrate that 11beta-HSD2 is the 11beta-HSD isoform expressed by T-47D cells under steady-state conditions and suggest the existence of a previously undocumented mechanism of action of progestins in breast cancer cells.

Recommendations for estrogen and progestin replacement in the climacteric and postmenopause. European Progestin Club

The diversity of function that sex steroids have proven to have in the female body, gives them a position of central importance in gynaecology. Scientific research demonstrates not only the well known genital functions of sexual steroids, furthermore, various extragenital organs are influenced and modulated by ovarian hormones. Therefore, the general benefit of HRT for the female organism becomes clearer and the clinical management of menopause is developing to a broad new discipline, the gender specific medicine. In clinical practise, phytosteroids are claimed by the patient and therefore, also of high interest for the scientific research. Also, tissue specificity of the endocrine treatment and the biological relevance of different steroid receptors of HRT are discussed, leading to the development of new HrT preparations. Individualisation, the tailoring of HRT, according to the patients needs, and low dose steroids management, will also become an important aspect in the recommendations for estrogen and progestin replacement therapy.

Progestins and cancer

The role of progestins in breast tissue is less well defined than in the endometrium. Although in vitro studies have shown that progestins induce a similar decrease in both estrogen and progesterone receptors and an increase in 17beta-estradiol dehydrogenase in the breast as in the endometrium, epidemiologic studies have suggested that progestins prevent endometrial cancer, but do not reverse the estrogen-related increase in breast cancer risk in long-term hormone-replacement therapy (HRT). Other studies have also suggested a protective effect for progestins on breast tissue. The dual effect of progesterone and progestins on the cell cycle has been demonstrated, suggesting that according to the duration of administration, the same steroid can induce cells to enter the multiplication phase or to enter a resting state. Progestins exert different effects according to the steroid from which they are derived, e.g. pregnanes derived from progesterone, estranes or gonanes derived from testosterone. Some estrane derivatives are able to stimulate breast cell multiplication in vitro through an estrogen receptor-mediated pathway. Most pregnanes do not exert such an effect. Also, some pregnane derivatives stimulate apoptosis, leading to cell death. However, it is well established that high doses of progestins have been successfully used in the treatment of advanced breast cancer as second-line endocrine therapy. Finally, striking differences have been observed in progestin use in Europe and in the USA. In France, where the rate of progestin use per head is higher than in the USA, the rate of breast cancer has not increased as sharply as observed in North America. Although cancer genesis is multifactorial, it may be concluded that progestins do protect endometrial tissue against the proliferative action of estrogen and if they do not protect breast tissue, at least they do not stimulate its proliferation. Also, they are useful agents as a second-line therapy for breast cancer, when used at high doses.